[Congressional Record Volume 142, Number 59 (Thursday, May 2, 1996)]
[Senate]
[Page S4650]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATIONS
Mr. PRYOR. Once again I should have been here a few moments ago
because it was my understanding that one of my colleagues, and perhaps
even the majority leader himself, made some reference to the
appointment of judges by President Clinton.
Mr. DOLE. Not today.
Mr. PRYOR. I did not hear the majority leader.
Mr. DOLE. I did not make any reference today to the appointment of
judges, but I did make a reference to the fact that judges in the
second and ninth circuits have been reaching for some way to find a
constitutional right to die, and I thought that should be decided by
the legislative branch.
Mr. PRYOR. I see. Notwithstanding the majority leader's assurances
that he has not talked about President Clinton's appointments to the
bench, Mr. President, I think the record should fairly reflect what the
facts are about this. I really appreciate the majority leader yielding
to me for a moment.
The appointments of President Clinton's judges--in fact, almost two-
thirds of President Clinton's judicial appointments--have received the
American Bar Association's highest rating: ``Well qualified,'' the
highest percentage of any of his three predecessors.
Second, U.S. News and World Report is saying with regard to President
Clinton's appointments to the bench, and I quote, ``Centrism is
carrying the day.''
Third, even Senator Hatch, our colleague and friend from Utah, our
distinguished chairman of the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, has as
recently as August 3, 1995, Mr. President, stated at a confirmation
hearing, and I quote:
I wish to compliment the administration for the type of
people they are sending to us. It is making our job much
easier.
That is a direct quote from the distinguished chairman of the
Judiciary Committee, Senator Orrin Hatch of Utah. Only two more
comments, because I know the distinguished majority leader may be
needing to get on.
Only 3--only 3--of the 185 judges in the lower Federal court
appointed by President Clinton have been even the subject of contested
votes. They did not even have a vote--only three have been subjected to
a contested vote in the Judiciary Committee or in this Chamber. I think
this is a remarkable record.
Finally, Mr. President, let me say that the Senate has approved
unanimously with the consent of all Republicans 182 of 185 lower court
Federal judges President Clinton has nominated and were ultimately
approved for the bench.
So I think from time to time it is necessary for us to put the facts
out in the Record, and I am very, very grateful for the understanding
and the opportunity the majority leader has given me to make this
record.
Mr. President, I yield the floor.
Mr. DOLE. Mr. President, I appreciate that. I would only say the fact
that they got the highest rating by the American Bar Association
worries me even more. It is nothing but a liberal advocacy group, and
that should indicate what kind of judges are being given these very
high ratings. The more liberal you are, the higher rating you get from
the American Bar Association.
It is customary, it has been in Democratic and Republican
administrations, to honor a President's nominees unless there was some
reason--sometimes you do not know until after they have, in this case,
been on the bench and made a few rulings to see precisely which
direction they can go, but we will be happy to accommodate the Senator
from Arkansas if he would like to have all these contested in the
future. I do not know how many judicial nominees are on the calendar
now.
So I would just say, obviously, the President has a right to appoint
the judges that he believes more or less follow his philosophy and
others would have the right to appoint those who follow their
philosophy. That debate will probably continue.
____________________