[Congressional Record Volume 142, Number 53 (Tuesday, April 23, 1996)]
[House]
[Pages H3666-H3667]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
LET US PASS AN INCREASE IN THE MINIMUM WAGE NOW
(Mr. RICHARDSON asked and was given permission to address the House
for 1 minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
Mr. RICHARDSON. Mr. Speaker, what issue is supported by 85 percent of
the American people? What issue is supported by 61 percent of
Republican voters? Increasing the minimum wage.
So why do we not do it cleanly, without amendments that will clutter
the issue?
Mr. Speaker, the last vote to increase the minimum wage occurred in
1989, and due to inflation much of this increase has been eroded. Who
does an increase in the minimum wage help? Twelve million Americans.
Sixty percent of these are adults over 25 years old; mainly women.
Mr. Speaker, this is not a teenager-plus issue. It is an issue that
affects all Americans.
Twelve million Americans would benefit from an increase to $5.15 an
hour, including 100,000 New Mexico workers.
Raising the minimum wage is a critical step in moving people from
welfare to work. Someone can make more on welfare than they can by
working right now. Is $8,400 a year sufficient to help a family? The
answer is ``no,'' Mr. Speaker.
Let us end the politics, let us pass a minimum wage bill. Let us move
on to health care. Let us leave a lot of these issues that need to be
done uncluttered with many amendments. Let us pass an increase in the
minimum wage now.
[[Page H3667]]
CRIME: A SERIOUS ISSUE IN OUR COUNTRY TODAY
(Mrs. CUBIN asked and was given permission to address the House for 1
minute).
Mrs. CUBIN. Mr. Speaker, I want to talk about a very serious issue in
our country today--crime. With all of the freedoms we enjoy in our
country today, if we as citizens do not have confidence in our judicial
system to keep the criminals off the streets, we do not have total
freedom, because we will always be looking over our shoulders or will
be too scared to participate in social activities outside of our homes.
Many, many people feel this way today. And who can blame them--when
they read stories about Clinton-appointed judges who side with the
criminals and blame society. Like the Clinton judge who insisted that
the killer had ``socially redeeming values,'' even though he stabbed
his victim repeatedly, shot him twice, and laughed at the victim while
he pled for his life.
This is wrong. Our justice system should protect the rights of crime
victims--not invent newer and more expansive rights for criminal
defendants. Our justice system should distribute justice, not liberal
social experiments that coddle criminals.
We need to appoint judges who represent and understand America's
values.
____________________