[Congressional Record Volume 142, Number 53 (Tuesday, April 23, 1996)]
[House]
[Pages H3662-H3663]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
MEDICARE
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under the Speaker's announced policy of May
12, 1995, the gentleman from Florida [Mr. Miller] is recognized during
morning business for 5 minutes.
Mr. MILLER of Florida. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to talk about
Medicare, but my colleagues on the other side of the aisle keep
bringing up the issue of the environment. I am glad the previous
speaker talked about all the environmental Republicans from the fact
that President Nixon was one that brought forth the Environmental
Protection Agency. The real core difference we have, we are all for the
environment. The difference is whether Washington has all the answers
or we know better in Florida what to do with the Florida environment
and New York knows better what to do with their environment. I do not
believe that Washington is the expert on every single subject. We need
to let the States have the power to make some of those decisions.
What I rise today to talk about is Medicare. There are two articles
in today's papers about Medicare; one in the New York Times, the front
page, and one in the Wall Street Journal.
The New York Times article talks about how Medicare is in a bigger
financial problem than we realize. And the Wall Street Journal article
talks about how the Democrats are making it a campaign issue, which is
too bad because Medicare is far too important to play politics with and
to scare seniors.
The New York Times article says that the Medicare Program is in worse
than projected financial problems. They talk about the fact that last
year, for example, in the Medicare Program, the part A Program, was
projected to have a $4.7 billion surplus. Instead it ran a $35.7
million deficit. So we started the problem a year ago. In this current
fiscal year, the first 6 months, during this whole year the projection
has been that Medicare would have a $4.2 billion surplus. We are losing
money already this year. We are projected to have a surplus of $45
million this year. Instead we are going to have a $4.2 billion deficit
for the first 6 months alone. Medicare is going bankrupt faster than we
ever thought it was.
We said it was going to go bankrupt in 7 years. It is probably going
to go bankrupt now in another 5 years or so, and we are anxious to get
the trustees' report to see how serious the problem really is.
The one thing good about the New York Times article is Chris
Jennings, who is a special assistant to President Clinton, says,
Republicans and Democrats should work together to address the problem.
That is exactly what we need to do. This is a bipartisan problem. It is
too important to demagog and scare seniors. I have an 87-year-old
mother who is dependent on Medicare. In 11 years I will be on Medicare.
We all have family and relatives and friends on Medicare. We cannot
allow the program to go bankrupt and we are not going to. We are going
to save the system. We all agree to save the system.
President Clinton, my friends on the other side of the aisle,
everybody wants to keep the system alive, keep it going. We have to do
that. It is too important. But we should not scare seniors. Being from
Florida, we know what happens when you scare seniors, Gov. Lawton
Chiles used that in his campaign back in 1994, and there were hearings
in the State legislature how they had a mediscare campaign in Florida.
That is wrong and we should stop doing it here.
It was brought out in the Wall Street Journal article today. Let me
read a couple comments from that.
Democrats and their allies are mounting an aggressive drive
to paint Republicans as Medicare's undertakers, ignoring the
Democrats own overhaul proposals and charging instead in a
national advertising campaign that the GOP wants to savage
the program.
Come on. Let us get serious about this. Medicare is too important. We
agree; they agree. We have to save the program. Stop using rhetoric
like that. These are ads run by, whether it is the Democratic Party or
the AFL-CIO spending their $35 million to beat up on Medicare, they say
it is wrong to start cutting Medicare.
Minority Leader Gephardt has a quote in here, the extremist
Republican Medicare cuts would destroy and devastate the program.
Again, let us get serious. That is not right. That is scaring
seniors. I have more seniors in my district than anyone else. We have
to take care of Medicare and we will.
Robert Reischauer is quoted in here, former head of the Congressional
Budget Office, appointed by Democrats, saying, if you keep it in proper
perspective, we are within striking distance of each other. We are
going to spend $1.6 trillion over the next 7 years on Medicare. The
difference between the Republican proposal and the Democratic proposal
is $44 billion. We are not talking about big differences.
We have learned a great deal over the past year about what is wrong
with it. It is full of waste and fraud and abuse. If we cannot find $44
billion over 7 years, more waste, fraud, and abuse, then we are not
doing a very good job.
That is what we have to focus on, the waste, fraud, and abuse. The
Republicans are allowing Medicare to be the fastest growing part of our
budget. If you look at it on a per person basis, we are going from
$4,800 per person on Medicare to $7,100 per person on Medicare over the
7 years, more money every year to spend on Medicare. So we
[[Page H3663]]
are going to take care of Medicare but we have to slow the rate of
growth. To say we are destroying and devastating the program, that is
wrong, and all you are doing is getting senior citizens scared. I have
got too many senior citizens to have scared like that. I think it is
wrong and we need to stand back and say this is a bipartisan issue. Let
us work together to save the Medicare Program.
____________________