[Congressional Record Volume 142, Number 50 (Thursday, April 18, 1996)]
[Senate]
[Pages S3613-S3614]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
CONGRESS MUST STOP JUNK GUN VIOLENCE
Mrs. BOXER. Mr. President, in 1968, Senator Robert Kennedy was
assassinated in California by an assailant carrying a junk gun. That
terrible event convinced Congress that something had to be done about
the dramatic increase in gun violence. Specifically, Congress concluded
that it had to act to stem the proliferation of these junk guns, or as
they are also known, Saturday night specials.
Later that year, Congress passed the Gun Control Act of 1968, which
barred the importation of junk guns. The guns affected by the import
ban had several things in common: They were cheap. They were poorly
constructed, and they lacked important safety devices.
Shortly after the passage of the Gun Control Act, unintended
consequences began to emerge. Many new companies were formed to
manufacture junk guns domestically. Protected from foreign competition
and given a virtual monopoly over the U.S. market, the domestic
production of junk guns skyrocketed. In fact, all of the companies that
produce today's criminals' favorite junk guns were founded after 1968.
In 1972, Congress tried to end the double standard that allows the
domestic manufacture of junk guns. Sixty eight Senators--including Bob
Dole and Strom Thurmond--voted to close the loophole permanently.
Unfortunately, despite its more than two to one support in the Senate,
that bill was killed in a House committee.
Along with my cosponsors, John Chafee and Bill Bradley, I have
introduced legislation, S. 1654, that is closely modeled after that
1972 bill.
The principle of that bill that passed the Senate so overwhelmingly
nearly 25 years ago and the bill I have introduced is simple: if a gun
is such a great threat to public safety that its importation is banned,
then its domestic manufacture should also be prohibited. Its point of
origin is irrelevant.
By every measure, the problem of gun violence has grown worse since
passage of the Gun Control Act. This indisputable fact was most
recently demonstrated in the release last week of a study by the
Children's Defense
[[Page S3614]]
Fund. Among CDF's findings was the chilling statistic that a child dies
from gunfire every 92 minutes in the United States. And over the last
10 years, the rates of child gun deaths have nearly doubled.
A Center for Disease Control survey found that on an average day, 1
in 20 high school students carries a gun to school. But it is not just
a high school problem. A few years ago in San Francisco, a 7 year old
second grader was suspended for bringing his mother's junk gun to
school, where he threatened to shoot a classmate.
What can we do to fight this problem? One Step is to end this junk
gun double standard.
In my State of California, a bill to prohibit the manufacture and
sale of junk guns passed the State senate last year, but was blocked in
an assembly committee in January.
However, this is a problem that the U.S. Congress created, and it is
one that the Congress should fix. Clearly, a nationwide ban would be
the most effective way to keep these firearms out of the hands of
criminals.
My bill applies prospectively only. It does not affect any guns
currently in circulation.
I am proud that my legislation has been endorsed by the California
Police Chiefs Association and the chiefs of some of California's
largest cities including Willie Williams of Los Angeles, Fred Lau of
San Francisco, Art Venegas of Sacramento, and Louis Cobarruviaz of San
Jose. In all, 27 California police chiefs and sheriffs have endorsed my
legislation. It has also been endorsed by the Coalition to Stop Gun
Violence, a leading national antiviolence organization.
I am introducing this measure at the same time that Congress is
moving backward on gun issues by reopening the assault weapons ban. I
am confident that with the leadership of President Clinton, Senators
Dianne Feinstein, Paul Simon and others, we will defeat efforts to roll
back our progress on assault weapons, but I believe that just holding
our ground is not enough. We must continue to move forward.
What is a junk gun? There are many differences between models, but
they have certain traits in common. They are small and light, which
make them highly concealable. They are made of inferior materials like
zinc, instead of higher quality metal alloys. And they lack important
safety features that can help prevent accidental shootings. Junk guns
are cheap--some can be bought for as little as $69. The most striking
feature in common is that junk guns are used disproportionately in
crimes.
One recent study conducted by the U.C. Davis Violence Prevention
Center found that junk guns are 3.4 times as likely to be used in
crimes as are other firearms. This view was confirmed by Chief Ronald
Lowenberg, president of the California Police Chiefs' Association who
wrote to me, ``There is no doubt that `Saturday Night Specials' are
disproportionately represented in homicides and other crimes.''
According to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms, of the 10
guns most frequently traced at crime scenes, 8 are junk guns.
Junk guns' price and concealability--the factors that make them so
attractive to criminals--are also the factors that make them unsuitable
for general use.
What about junk guns for hunting and target shooting? According to
firearms experts, they are totally unsuitable because of low accuracy
and high failure rates. And what about home and self protection? Again,
junk guns are ill suited for the job. These guns are inaccurate, poorly
constructed, and lacking important safety features. Keeping a junk gun
in the house is an invitation to disaster.
I know of one case in which a man was killed when his gun fell from
its holster as he bent over to get a drink of water from a fountain. In
another case, a man was critically injured when a junk gun he kept in
his car fired when the car hit a bump in the road. These tragedies
could have been prevented if these junk guns had better safety
features.
I plan to fight hard for this bill, and I am confident that with the
strong support of law enforcement and citizens' groups around the
country, we will prevail.
____________________