[Congressional Record Volume 142, Number 49 (Wednesday, April 17, 1996)]
[Senate]
[Page S3445]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
IRANIAN ARMS FOR BOSNIA
Mr. DOLE. Mr. President, since the report surfaced in the Los Angeles
Times that President Clinton decided to allow Iran to provide arms to
the Bosnians, there has been little, if any, response from the other
side of the aisle.
Had there been a Republican in the White House, no doubt, the
Democrats would have been all over the President. But, that is not the
real issue. I am not here to be all over the President. This is not
about the conduct of partisan politics, but the conduct of our foreign
policy. This is about American leadership, American credibility, and
Congressional oversight. That is why I met today with the chairmen of
the Foreign Relations, Intelligence, Armed Services, and Judiciary
Committees to discuss this serious foreign policy matter. For nearly 3
years, this administration opposed congressional efforts to lift the
unjust and illegal arms embargo on Bosnia and Herzegovina. We were
told, and the American people were told, that the United States was
bound by the U.N. embargo on the former Yugoslavia. We were told that
if America violated this embargo, we would lose support from our allies
for other embargoes, such as the one against Iraq. Finally, we were
told that lifting the embargo and allowing the Bosnians to have arms
while U.N. forces were deployed in Bosnia, would endanger the troops of
our allies.
Some people are saying, well, you knew that Iran was providing arms
to the Bosnians. I would like to respond to that. While we read and
heard reports that Iran was smuggling arms to the Bosnians, we did not
know the President and his advisers made a conscious decision to give a
green light for Iran to provide arms. Indeed, those of us who advocated
lifting the arms embargo--Republicans and Democrats--argued that if
America did not provide Bosnia with assistance, Iran would be Bosnia's
only option. In my view, the role of the President and administration
officials in this matter need to be examined--even if we do not receive
cooperation from the White House and the Intelligence Oversight Board--
which has been the case to date.
In the meeting I held with the four committee chairmen today, we
decided on the approach we would take. The Intelligence Committee will
investigate the matter of whether any administration officials were
engaged in covert action. The Foreign Relations Committee will review
administration policy as stated and as executed, as well as the
ramifications of these revelations. Let me tell you why I believe this
examination is important.
In short, this duplicitous policy has seriously damaged our
credibility with our allies. It has also produced one of the most
serious threats to our military forces in Bosnia and, according to the
administration, the main obstacle to the arm and train program for the
Bosnians--I am talking about the presence of Iranian military forces
and intelligence officials in Bosnia.
As I have said many, many times on this floor, along with many of my
colleagues on the other side, had we lifted the arms embargo and had we
provided the weapons, the Bosnians could have defended themselves and
chances are there would not have been any American troops there now,
and we would have had a peace agreement sooner and on better terms for
the Bosnians. And most likely, as I said, we would not have 20,000
Americans in Bosnia at this moment. And finally, had we lifted the arms
embargo on Bosnia, the United States would have done the right thing
for the right reason. We would have done it openly, and we would have
done it honestly.
That is what this examination and these hearings will be about,
because I think we owe it to the American people and we owe it to
Members of Congress. As far as I know, no one knew about what was
happening. We were told we just could not lift the arms embargo because
of all the problems that would create with our allies and our
credibility at the same time. Apparently some knew it was happening
through the back door.
I yield back the remainder of my leader time.
Mr. HOLLINGS addressed the Chair.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Who yields time?
Mr. HATCH. Did the Senator want to comment on the Moynihan amendment?
Mr. HOLLINGS. I ask unanimous consent that I be given 10 minutes as
if in morning business to respond to the majority leader on the issue
of broadcast spectrum auctions.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there objection? Without objection, it is
so ordered. The Senator from South Carolina is recognized.
Mr. HOLLINGS. I thank the distinguished leaders of this measure.
____________________