[Congressional Record Volume 142, Number 46 (Friday, March 29, 1996)]
[Senate]
[Pages S3187-S3188]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
PACIFIC NORTHWEST SALMON RESTORATION
Mr. GORTON. Mr. President, the Columbia River is the crown jewel of
our Pacific Northwest. Its waters passing through our dams light our
cities and towns. Its waters held back at times by those dams have
saved thousands of lives from destructive floods. Its waters spread on
our dry land have made the desert bloom and provide food for millions
of people around the world. At the same time, that magnificent Columbia
River has been the home to the most munificent runs of salmon anywhere
in the lower 48 States of the United States of America.
Now that very civilization that has built those dams and used these
waters so constructively threatens the future of these wonderful salmon
runs. What should we do? How should we see to it that we both have the
benefits of power and of irrigation and flood control and at the same
time preserve and strengthen and restore these wonderful runs of
salmon?
I think it is becoming more and more evident what we should not do.
In the last 5 years, Federal bureaucrats here in Washington, DC, have
billed us in the Pacific Northwest $1.5 billion for salmon restoration,
half a billion dollars last year alone, and we have not seen any
positive results at all. In spite of this investment, an investment the
people of the Pacific Northwest have not begrudged, the results are
nothing. The results are a continued decline in our salmon runs. These
costs are welcomed by the people of the Pacific Northwest, but the
results are not.
I am convinced that this failure of Washington, DC, bureaucrats means
that we cannot succeed if we continue to do business in the same way
that we are doing it at the present time. I believe, and I believe
firmly, that we can do a far better job in the Pacific Northwest if we
are allowed to make the decisions that affect our lives and affect our
resources.
Personally, I am totally committed to restoring an abundant salmon
fishery in the Columbia and the Snake Rivers. Healthy and strong salmon
[[Page S3188]]
runs are vitally important to our economy, to thousands of people whose
livelihoods rest on them. But there is something more important even
than those who are professionals in these fields. Salmon are a distinct
part of our society and of our culture. Everyone who grows up in
the Pacific Northwest has his favorite stories--his or her own big
catch, the thrill of the child catching that first salmon, or just of a
summer cookout with the family with salmon on the grill. I would find
it unacceptable that my grandchildren would not have in their lifetime
the same opportunities that I have had.
I have also to confess that my thinking, along with that of many in
the Pacific Northwest, has grown and expanded over the years to
emphasize the vital importance of native salmon runs. We have spent
much of our time building hatcheries and creating artificial runs where
native runs once existed. Those hatcheries are important. They are an
important supplement. But we now recognize that it is vital that we
strengthen the native runs and help restore them at the same time.
I am convinced that the people of the Pacific Northwest are willing
to pay money, money literally in the hundreds of millions and billions
of dollars that has already been wasted, in order to restore these
salmon runs, but at the same time the people of the Pacific Northwest
want that money to be spent effectively. They also want the amount of
money they are going to spend to be predictable, and they want it to be
spent in a scientifically credible fashion.
Last November, the National Academy of Sciences, the most prestigious
institute of science in the free world, came up with a set of reports
indicating what we know and what we do not know and suggesting some
courses of action. That report has been almost totally ignored by the
Federal bureaucrats who are in charge of spending our money and telling
us what to do.
So I believe we need a change. I think we need to change a system
that has failed and come up with a system that will work. I believe
that that system is most likely to be developed by the people who are
going to pay the bills and benefit from any success and pay the penalty
for any failure.
Mr. President, do you not agree that the people of our region are
better capable of answering these questions than the bureaucrats here
in Washington, DC? Should not authority over how we deal with these
runs be turned over to us, collectively--our sportsmen, our commercial
fishermen, our citizens in cities and towns, our irrigators and
farmers, our Indian tribes? Are they not going to be able to come up
with a better answer to this question than we have gotten so far from
Washington, DC?
Mr. President, I am convinced that is the case. I am convinced that
this Congress should require a significant amount of money to be spent
on the restoration of our salmon runs, should allow our people to spend
more, if they wish to do so, should allow us to come up with a
predictable number of dollars for this effort, and then, most vitally,
should allow us, using the best science we can possibly find through
these wonderful national and international scientists, to decide how
best to spend that money so that we, you and I and all of us from the
Pacific Northwest, may be able to pass on to our children and
grandchildren the wonderful heritage of an abundant fishery at the same
time that we preserve power for our cities and towns, water for our
farms, rivers for our recreation, and safety for our citizens.
Several Senators addressed the Chair.
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Grams). The Senator from Texas.
Mr. GRAMM. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent to proceed as in
morning business for up to 20 minutes.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
____________________