[Congressional Record Volume 142, Number 26 (Thursday, February 29, 1996)]
[Senate]
[Pages S1441-S1442]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
EXTENDING WHITEWATER INVESTIGATION
Ms. MIKULSKI. Mr. President, yesterday we returned for the last
session of the 104th Congress to complete the Nation's business. We
returned so that we could attempt to reach a bipartisan agreement on
welfare reform. We returned to continue debating the future of
Medicare. We returned so we could end the budget impasse. We returned
so that we could face the legislative challenges before us and not let
the American people down.
I'm sad to say, we are not doing these important things. We are not
serving the American people by working on the things that affect their
day to day lives. Instead, we are debating whether
[[Page S1442]]
to extend the Senate Committee's investigation into Whitewater
indefinitely and if an additional $600,000 for the investigation should
be provided.
I oppose this attempt to extend the hearings indefinitely. The Senate
has already spent $950,000 on 277 days of Whitewater investigation,
heard from more than 100 witnesses, and collected more than 45,000
pages of documents. Enough is enough.
Let me tell you what I support. I support Senator Daschle's proposal
to complete the task at hand by extending the hearing until April 3,
1996, with a final report due on May 10, 1996. I also support letting
the Independent Counsel do his work. Three federal judges have given
him the job of investigating Whitewater and all related matters. He has
more than 130 staff members helping him. There is no time limit or
spending cap on his investigation, so he will be able to gather facts
in a systematic and unencumbered way and to investigate Whitewater
thoroughly. The results of his investigation will be made public. If
the Independent Counsel finds wrongdoing, he has the authority to bring
any lawbreakers to justice. By permitting him to do what none of us can
do and what none of us should be doing, we will get a complete
rendering of the facts. That's the right thing to do. That's what I
support.
What I don't support is using Senate committees to play Presidential
politics. The goal of this proposed extension is very clear. It's about
Presidential politics. And, it's about vilifying Mrs. Clinton in the
name of Presidential politics. This attack on her is unprecedented. She
has voluntarily answered questions on four occasions from the Grand
jury and on three occasions in interviews for the Grand jury, numerous
written questions, and she has been cooperative with the committee. I
know her personally. Like many others across the Nation, I have deep
admiration and respect for her.
Like so many other American women she has struggled to meet the
demands of both a career and a family. She is dedicated to her family
and she is a dedicated advocate for children. For more than 25 years
she worked on behalf of children and families which she discusses in
her book ``It Takes a Village''. In ``Village'', Mrs. Clinton shares
with the public her passion, conviction, and insight, gleaned from her
experience as a mother, daughter, advocate, attorney, and First Lady.
Mrs. Clinton has truly inspired a generation of men, women and
children. She has worked to raise her own family and she has worked to
protect a generation of children. So I don't support extending the
Senate committee's investigation into Whitewater.
We should not ask taxpayers to continue subsidizing this round of
Presidential politics and this attack on Mrs. Clinton. Instead, I say,
let's get on with the business of this country and its citizens. The
Senate committee should finish its investigation immediately, write its
report, and let the American people hear what the committee has to say.
I believe the Senate should get back to the job we were elected to do.
Get back to meeting the day to day needs of the American people. The
American public deserves our full attention.
____________________