[Congressional Record Volume 142, Number 16 (Tuesday, February 6, 1996)]
[Senate]
[Pages S912-S913]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
A BALANCED BUDGET
Mr. GORTON. Madam President, it seems to me in the last 24 to 48
hours, we have taken one or two steps forward in our quest for a truly
balanced budget, a balanced budget that will pay great dividends to
future generations of America in lower interest rates, better jobs, and
higher incomes. And at the same time, at least one major step backward.
That major step backwards, of course, is what the President of the
United States has submitted as a budget for fiscal year 1997. This
yellow booklet really should not carry that title because it obviously
does not meet the requirements of a budget submission under the law. To
the extent that it does give an outline of the President's priorities,
however, it is clearly a status quo document. All of the difficult
decisions, the heavy lifting, is left until after the completion of
[[Page S913]]
the term of the President who will be elected this fall.
So, while it does not represent a step forward on the part of the
President, it also, one must confess, does not represent a step
backward either. It consolidates the modest gains that were attained
through five separate budget submissions on the part of the President
for the current year. The overwhelmingly significant step forward,
however, was the work by the National Governors Conference, which now
unanimously has reached a detailed statement of principle on both
Medicaid and welfare reform, one that has been agreed to by both
Republican and Democrat Governors across the country, one that raises
the very real possibility of breaking the budget deadlock in which we
find ourselves at the present time. I cannot possibly be too laudatory
of the tremendously difficult task that the Governors have undertaken
and the great degree of success they have reached.
Madam President, we need a balanced budget for our children and for
our grandchildren. We need reforms in Medicare and Medicaid for our
seniors and for others who are less fortunate and cannot afford to pay
for health care services themselves. We need welfare reform for all
Americans for a more just and equitable system. And we need tax cuts
for hard-working American families. All of these remain our goal. But
two of the most difficult now are the beneficiaries of intervention on
the part of the National Conference of Governors in such a way that the
entire logjam may now possibly be broken and that, before the end of
the current continuing resolution on March 15, there is the very real
possibility of a wonderfully genuine move toward a budget that will
lead to a very real balance by the year 2002 without gimmicks and
without postponing all of the hard questions for 4 more years.
The final element in this equation was the report yesterday that the
Medicare part A trust fund is going bankrupt much more rapidly than we
had thought during our debate during the course of the last year.
Instead of being in the black last year, it was in the red, 1 year
earlier than was predicted just last April. That fact makes more urgent
the reform of Medicare and the Medicare trust fund so that this trust
fund will be there after the turn of the century for all of those over
the age of 65 who depend on it. It causes to be even more modest in the
long term the reforms in Medicare that were included in the Balanced
Budget Act of 1995, regrettably vetoed by the President, and makes more
urgent a set of reforms that will protect Medicare for our seniors in
the future and will more equitably distribute the burden for paying for
Medicare among all of our citizens--both those working and those
retiring.
So, all in all, in spite of the President's refusal to recognize
these new facts in this so-called budget document, I believe that this
week represents real progress toward an honest balanced budget, a
budget that will be good for all Americans, that will lessen the burden
of debt on future generations and increase their opportunities, their
jobs, and their income.
Madam President, I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
The assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. GRASSLEY. Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that the order
for the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
Mr. GRASSLEY. Madam President, I ask unanimous consent to speak for 7
minutes as if in morning business.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
(The remarks of Mr. Grassley pertaining to the introduction of S.
1560 are located in today's Record under ``Statements on Introduced
Bills and Joint Resolutions.'')
Mr. GRASSLEY. I yield the floor. Madam President, I suggest the
absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
The assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. HELMS. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for
the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Gorton). Without objection, it is so
ordered.
The Senator from North Carolina is recognized.
MR. HELMS. I thank the Chair.
(The remarks of Mr. Helms pertaining to the introduction of S. 1562
are located in today's Record under ``Statements on Introduced Bills
and Joint Resolutions.'')
Mr. HELMS. Mr. President, I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. DOLE. Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for
the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mrs. Hutchison. Without objection, it is so
ordered.
____________________