[Congressional Record Volume 142, Number 16 (Tuesday, February 6, 1996)]
[Senate]
[Pages S888-S889]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
A COMPROMISE FARM PROGRAM
Mr. COCHRAN. Mr. President, in connection with the issue that is
before
[[Page S889]]
the Senate today, I hope Senators will be able to support the petition
to invoke cloture so we can have a vote on the merits of amendments to
and the farm bill itself, that will put in place a farm program for
this and later years. This farm bill that is being presented to the
Senate, and which we will reach if we are able to invoke cloture today,
is a compromise that has been developed to resolve the current impasse
between the Congress and the administration about the content of farm
legislation.
As Senators remember, we included in the Balanced Budget Act the
provisions of farm legislation that would be in effect over the 7-year
period that was covered by the Balanced Budget Act of 1995. The
Congress passed that and sent it to the President and he vetoed it.
Because of that veto, we are now forced to go back and reexamine
those provisions relating to agriculture and to pull them out and put
them together in a freestanding bill so we can pass that legislation.
If we do not, laws that have been on the books since 1938--and 1949, in
some cases--will govern the agriculture programs that would be in place
for this crop year. These provisions are so out of date it is
ludicrous. The price support for wheat farmers would go up to about $7-
something a bushel. In order to qualify, you would have had to have had
allotments that were based on your planting experience prior to 1950.
It is unthinkable that this Congress is dragging its feet and making
it difficult to enact farm legislation that would give producers of
American agriculture products the certainty of the laws that govern the
planting and the production of those crops. But that is what is
happening. It is a disgrace. We need to put a stop to it, and to put a
stop to it we are going to have to vote for cloture to limit debate of
this issue so we can get to votes on the merits of amendments and the
bill itself, and to pass the legislation, send it to the House, meet in
conference, and get a bill to the President. This has to be done as
soon as possible.
Farmers are confronted right now with the inevitability of a planting
season that is here, whether we legislate it or not. We cannot slow
down the planting season by simply not enacting farm legislation.
Lenders are going to have to extend credit based on some idea of what
the returns will be in this production year for wheat and corn farmers
and others who are covered by these laws.
I am hopeful that the Senate will recognize our solemn responsibility
to be fair with farmers and to undertake our obligation to legislate in
a serious manner and stop the partisan squabbling back and forth on who
has the better program, the Democrats or the Republicans. Forget it.
This bill before the Senate is a bipartisan substitute for the previous
provisions that were before the Senate last week when the Senate failed
to invoke cloture, when only 53 Senators voted for cloture.
Now we have another chance. We need 60 Senators to vote to permit us
to reach the amendments and then the merits of this bill. I urge
Senators to look at the fact that we have made some fundamental changes
to attract a large majority of support here in the Senate. There is a
reauthorization of food and nutrition programs in this bill. There is a
reauthorization of the Conservation Reserve Program in this bill. There
are revisions and a reauthorization of a wetlands reserve program that
has support from many sectors of this country. And there are other
provisions--an authorization for a compact of New England States to
join together to provide for themselves a new dairy program. There are
other items in this bill that reflect an effort to reach out and
broaden the base of support for this legislation. I hope Senators will
vote for cloture so we can get on with the discussion of amendments and
the vote on final passage.
If Senators do not like some of these provisions, they can offer
amendments to them to strike them, and we can have up-or-down votes on
them. But let us get past this point in the debate and vote for cloture
on this bill.
Mr. GREGG addressed the Chair.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from New Hampshire is recognized.
Mr. GREGG. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent to speak for 5
minutes as if in morning business.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
____________________