[Congressional Record Volume 142, Number 9 (Wednesday, January 24, 1996)]
[Senate]
[Page S346]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
STATEMENTS ON INTRODUCED BILLS AND JOINT RESOLUTIONS
By Mr. LAUTENBERG (for himself and Mr. Harkin):
S. 1524. A bill to amend title 49, United States Code, to prohibit
smoking on any scheduled airline flight segment intrastate, interstate,
or foreign air transportation.
the airliner cabin air quality act of 1996
Mr. LAUTENBERG. Mr. President, I am introducing the Airliner Cabin
Air Quality Act of 1996, which would prohibit smoking on international
flights to and from the United States by domestic and foreign carriers.
Mr. President, more than 50,000 studies have established the
scientific evidence incriminating cigarette smoking as a direct cause
of death and disability. Volumes of evidence also document similar
health effects as a result of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke.
For example, in 1991, the National Institute for Occupational Safety
and Health placed environmental tobacco smoke in its most significant
category of human carcinogens.
The Environmental Protection Agency estimates that environmental
tobacco smoke causes some 3,000 lung cancer deaths and 12,000 other
cancer deaths each year. In addition, the EPA believes that 70 percent
of the lung cancer deaths attributable to environmental tobacco smoke
are due to exposures outside of the home.
Environmental tobacco smoke exposure leads to coughing, chest
discomfort, and reduced lung function in nonsmoking adults. While these
symptoms may seem minor in nature, their effects on individuals can
have permanent health and financial consequences. It is estimated that
flight attendants lose about $10,000 per year in salary if they are
unable to work on international flights on which smoking is still
allowed.
Mr. President, in September 1992, the International Civil Aviation
Organization [ICAO] passed a nonbinding resolution urging governments
to take the necessary steps to ban smoking on all international flights
as a safety and health measure. The resolution calls for the ban to be
in place no later than July 1, 1996. I am hopeful, but not confident,
that the ICAO resolution will be successful.
This past summer, ICAO released a working paper on the progress being
made toward the implementation of its international smoking ban
resolution. While developing the working paper, ICAO asked its more
than 300 members to indicate their intentions with respect to
implementation of the smoking ban. Of the 67 replies, 34 countries gave
either no indication of their intentions or indicated they were going
to delay implementation. Another 10 countries indicated implementation
plans were under study. Only 24 countries stated that they would
implement the smoking ban. Based upon replies to this questionnaire,
some have estimated that just 13 percent of all ICAO members will take
the steps necessary to ban smoking on international flights.
Mr. President, from the perspective of the United States, the
potentially low rate of participation of other countries in an
international smoking ban should be unacceptable. The United States and
its carriers have repeatedly demonstrated their support for an
international smoking ban. As the result of an agreement between the
United States, Canada, and Australia, passengers traveling between
these countries need not suffer through a smoke-filled flight.
About a year ago, the Department of Transportation provided eight
U.S. carriers with an antitrust waiver so they could discuss
implementing a voluntary transatlantic smoking ban. Despite their
unanimous resolve to move toward a smoke-free environment, the
participating carriers were unable to reach an agreement. Many were
unwilling to ban smoking because of perceptions about competitive
pressures from foreign carriers who are unwilling to voluntarily ban
smoking.
Mr. President, I have been active for many years in efforts to ensure
clean cabin air for airline passengers. In 1988, I sponsored
legislation that banned smoking on domestic flights of 2 hours or less.
This law protected approximately 80 percent of all domestic passengers
from the documented effects of environmental tobacco smoke. In 1989,
based upon the success and popularity of the 2-hour smoking ban,
Congress expanded the ban to include nearly all domestic flights.
Mr. President, this legislation would extend the protection now
enjoyed by domestic passengers and flight attendants to those who fly
into and out of this country. I wish other countries would enter into
multilateral smoking-ban agreements on their own so this bill would be
unnecessary. However, that does not seem likely. Therefore, this bill
is needed to demonstrate the U.S. Congress' resolve and continued
leadership on this issue. The bill would create a level competitive
playing field for carriers utilizing our market. And, most importantly,
it would protect the health and safety of all those who fly
internationally.
I urge my colleagues to support this legislation.
____________________