[Congressional Record Volume 142, Number 2 (Thursday, January 4, 1996)]
[House]
[Page H159]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
BUDGET DISPUTE IS INSANITY
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentleman from North Carolina [Mr. Watt] is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. WATT of North Carolina. Mr. Speaker, I had made some effort to
stay out of this dispute to the extent that I could in terms of the
debate, but several of my constituents have called and expressed severe
concern about the direction that we are headed and concern that I had
not been as vocal on this issue as they expected me to be as their
Representative.
The people who called me are real citizens of this country. They are
constituents of mine in my congressional district. They are a Federal
prison guard who is continuing to work because he has a critical
position in the prison system, and despite the fact that he continues
to work, he is not now being paid on a timely basis. Although he
acknowledges that he may be paid in the future, he asked me, ``What
should I tell my creditors in the meantime?'' And I had no answer for
him.
They are VA hospital employees who care for our veterans, and live in
my congressional district and work at a VA hospital located in my
congressional district, who continue to provide services to their
patients at veterans hospitals but are not currently being paid.
They are people who had a real estate closing scheduled to close so
that they could avoid a foreclosure on their house, and when they got
ready to close, they were advised that the FHA had closed its doors and
they could not close their loan.
They are people who had sought to go to England for a special
training program, who were advised that they could not be issued a
passport for this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity that they had been
provided.
I had no answers for them, because I have thought that all along this
dispute is absolutely insane. There is little if any connection between
the continuing operation of the Federal Government and the resolution
of the larger budget issue that we face.
Notwithstanding that, my Republican colleagues have succeeded in, as
they always do, reducing this major dispute to a one-sentence simple-
minded kind of expression--``Let's have a 7-year balanced budget.''
Well, they told us that they were going to operate our Government, or
try to make it operate, like the private industry operates.
Well, I do not know of any private industry that can tell me how much
income they are going to have 7 years from now. I do not know of any
private industry that itemizes the expenditures that they will make 7
years from now. I do not know of any individual, either in this House
or outside this House, who can tell me how much income they will have,
CBO numbers or otherwise, 7 years from now.
{time} 1915
I do not know of any individual either in this House or outside this
House that can itemize for me what expenditures they will make 7 years
from now. So we have got this kind of simple-minded ``there is
something magic about 7 years'' that my colleagues cannot live up to,
and they have boxed themselves in and they are holding the American
public hostage to their simple-mindedness.
So I want to call on my colleagues, in conclusion, Mr. Speaker, to,
please, come to your senses. This makes no sense. Let us open the
Government. Let us keep negotiating about these budget issues and get
them resolved and do what the American people sent us here to do.
____________________