[Congressional Record Volume 142, Number 2 (Thursday, January 4, 1996)]
[House]
[Pages H135-H136]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
BLAME GAME DOES NOT BALANCE THE BUDGET
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentleman from Virginia [Mr. Davis] is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. DAVIS. Mr. Speaker, let me just share a little bit different
perspective.
First of all, I think to hear Members from this side of the aisle get
up and blame the President for the shutdown and Members on the other
side get up and blame the Republican Congress, we get an understanding
of why things are not working around here. It seems like nobody says
they want a train wreck, but the President would love to have it down
here at the Capitol steps. Some of our Members would like to have it
down at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. In the meanwhile, nothing gets done.
[[Page H136]]
Let us talk frankly about what it would take to open up this
Government. Four things could happen. First of all, the President could
sign the appropriations bills that we sent him. He has signed a number
of those bills. He has vetoed three and sent them back. The Interior
appropriations bill we tried to override today, our second option if he
does not sign those bills that would put people to work and put the
Government to work, which is his prerogative under the Constitution, is
that we can see if we have enough votes to muster a veto override. That
takes two-thirds votes.
We voted on the Interior appropriations today. I think it was a
reasonable bill. I did not like all parts of it. We had rejected that
bill twice on environmental grounds, tried to make it a little better
each time. The President vetoed it knowing, in the meantime, that this
bill would have put 133,000 people to work; it would have opened up the
national parks, the Smithsonian; it would have put the U.S. Geological
Survey back to work. I have 1,000 workers in Reston that are furloughed
at this time, so that they could do their work.
Mr. HEFNER. Mr. Speaker, will the gentleman yield?
Mr. DAVIS. I am happy to yield to the gentleman from North Carolina.
Mr. HEFNER. Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman for yielding.
I just want to make a point, a point that has been missed here. I
have been around here for a long time, and this body has been here for
a long time. It is the President's prerogative to veto bills. This
should have been worked out for your sake, and I know how special this
is to you because of all of your people that are here. A clean CR is
not going to stop the negotiations on the budget.
{time} 1545
I just do not understand why we make the balanced budget hold these
people hostage of something that is going to happen 7 years down the
road.
Mr. DAVIS. Reclaiming my time, let me just say to my friend, we have
had 57 continuing resolutions since 1980 between the House and Senate.
Most of those were with a Democratic Congress and a Republican
President.
How many of those CR's were clean CR's? Many of them were not. The
Boland amendment which forbade aid to the Contras was put on a
continuing resolution. We even put roads and the New Jersey Turnpike
into the Federal Highway System on a continuing resolution. There is a
loss of surplusage and riders in these. I am not defending, and I would
like to see a clean CR. I was one of two Members on this side of the
aisle who voted with you yesterday to bring up a clean CR. I am going
to get to that in a minute.
But no one can sit here and say, ``Gee, let's do a clean CR'' when
you all were on the other side and we had a Republican President you
very often did not send a clean CR at the same time.
Mr. HEFNER. Will the gentleman yield?
Mr. DAVIS. Just for a second, because I want to make a few points.
Mr. HEFNER. We are talking about past history, and you folks were
elected saying, ``We're going to change things around here.'' But this
is not changing things for the better. This is human misery. VA
hospitals in North Carolina. These people are in dire circumstances.
Mr. DAVIS. Reclaiming my time, I do not disagree with the gentleman.
I think what has happened here is a national disgrace. But to put it on
one side or one party is, I think, a big mistake. I think that is part
of our problem, is we end up too much time pointing fingers at each
other and too little time working together and working these issues
out.
Let me just get back to the Interior appropriations bill again. This
bill I think had a number of good items. I think the President, part of
him wanted to sign this. I know the Vice President urged him not to. We
could still fix this bill. I think we have time to come back and fix
this bill in a reasonable period of time and get these people back to
work.
Some of the other appropriation bills that have been brought forward,
I think, need a little more fixing and we need some time.
The President could have signed these bills, would have put people to
work in fairness, Congress could have overridden the vetoes, the votes
are not here to do that, so next comes to the continuing resolution.
Ms. ESHOO. Mr. Speaker, will the gentleman yield?
Mr. DAVIS. I would be happy to yield, but I want to make a few
points, I only have 5 minutes, I say to my friend from California.
Ms. ESHOO. I thank the gentleman for yielding. The point that I want
to raise, the gentleman understands the dilemma that we are in.
You just said that this is a national disgrace. Putting any fault or
blame aside, can you work to find 20 votes in your caucus to open up
the Government, Republican votes?
We have 198 on our side and I think that you, being as reasonable and
moderate as you are, that there would be 19 others?
Mr. DAVIS. Let me say to my friend that may be able to happen in
time. We will have a discharge petition. But 30 days have to run. The
problem with this recess is that you do not get the legislative days
run during that time. Eventually this will happen, I think, if we could
get it to the floor, it or something close to it would pass.
Ms. ESHOO. But 20 votes would stop that recess, and we could open up
the Government, and we could move on.
Mr. DAVIS. Well, that would do it, but it does not solve some of the
other problems. A continuing resolution is not a resolution. There are
still a lot of issues at play in the continuing resolution that frankly
ought to be worked out.
Ms. ESHOO. Of course there are. They have to be negotiated.
Mr. DAVIS. Let me just make a couple of final points.
It also does not get us to a balanced budget which is something else
that I think needs to be done that we feel very strongly.
The fourth thing that could happen is the President could put a
balanced budget on the table and we would get a continuing resolution
like that. I think that onus is on the President. Both sides are at
play here. I think we could all do a better job.
____________________