[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 214 (Tuesday, January 2, 1996)]
[Senate]
[Pages S19339-S19343]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




            TEMPORARY EXTENSION OF THE CONTINUING RESOLUTION

  Mr. DOLE. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the Finance 
Committee be discharged from further consideration of H.R. 1643, MFN 
status for Bulgaria; that the Senate proceed to its immediate 
consideration; that there be one amendment in order, the text of which 
is a clean continuing resolution for all agencies of Government without 
funding at this time which shall expire January 12, 1996; that the 
amendment be deemed agreed to, the bill be read a third time and 
passed, and the motion to reconsider be laid upon the table, all 
without any intervening action or debate.
  I send up the amendment.
  Mr. DORGAN. Reserving the right to object, and I shall not object, 
Mr. President, it seems to me this is a significant advancement in this 
process. I know that the majority leader has not been an advocate for a 
shutdown. He has indicated that a number of times on the floor of the 
Senate. We have all wanted to get to this point where the Senate could 
pass a clean CR. We have offered on 10 occasions a clean CR. This is a 
clean continuing resolution that provides additional funding through a 
date certain. We would prefer that it be beyond January 12 but we 
certainly are in agreement that doing it this way would bring Federal 
workers back to work with pay, restore the Federal Government to the 
functions that it was able to perform previous to this shutdown. This 
is a major step forward.
  I hope very much that the House of Representatives will see fit as 
early as possible to also accept this clean continuing resolution. 
Doing so would then end this partial shutdown that now exists. I do not 
object to this and fully support the continuing resolution.
  As I have indicated, we were prepared today to offer on the 11th 
occasion a clean CR that is identical to the unanimous-consent request 
that has been made.
  Mr. DOMENICI. Reserving the right to object, and I will not object, 
Mr. President, let me congratulate the distinguished majority leader on 
his last proposal. While I supported two previous ones, I think the 
important one to many, many Americans is the last one which would say 
through the 12th day of January the U.S. Government goes back to work. 
The people that work for the Government would go back to work and would 
be paid. I think it is time we do this.
  Obviously, I understand the House has some different problems than we 
have. I think it is right for the U.S. Senate under your leadership to 
proceed this evening to send this measure to the U.S. House for their 
consideration.
  I want to suggest to the Senate that in my home State where, 
obviously, we have a considerable number of Federal employees, even 
those who are not Federal employees are very perplexed and concerned 
about something they do not understand. I think they make a great 
point. That is, Federal employees are furloughed but there is a 
commitment that when they come back to work we will pay them for the 
time they did not spend working. More constituents are calling me 
asking, what kind of business is that? We have people who are being 
paid for not working, and then you have Federal employees who have been 
deemed necessary, they are on the job and they are being paid but they 
must work. Frankly, most Federal employees are saying they would like 
to work for their pay.
  As I understand the distinguished majority leader's proposal, not 
only would it open Government through the 12th day of this month, but 
pay the back pay for all the workers who have been furloughed. We would 
be back to a position where they would all receive their money and 
their back pay and the other things that are bothering us around the 
country. I compliment him for that.
  I hope the House gives serious consideration to this and soon we will 
get to part of our efforts to get a balanced budget, which is separate 
and distinct, but nonetheless we must have the White House negotiating. 
They must concede some issues. They cannot win everything. Hopefully, 
that will continue while we move ahead with the continuing resolution 
at this time. I yield the floor.

  Mr. DOLE. It would also provide that there would be no double-
dipping. You could not get unemployment compensation then be paid back 
pay. You would subtract any unemployment compensation pay for the pay 
that you should have been entitled to, which I think is fair.
  Let me just say I read a wire story there is a split between the 
House and the Senate on what ought to happen. I do not get that feeling 
at all in talking with the Speaker. In fact, we just had a 30-minute 
meeting. The Senator from Virginia was there, I was there, the Senator 
from New Mexico was there, the Speaker, the majority leader of the 
House, Mr. Armey was there, and we had a good discussion. I think there 
is some difference on just how we should proceed, but in my view what 
we really want, of course, is to get people back to work.
  I felt that way for some time. I have a hard time rationalizing 
paying people for not working when I know they want to work. If they 
did not want to work, I say they should not be paid. These people want 
to work. They are caught. They are in the middle. They are pawns. I do 
not believe at this point--I think if there was a point to make, that 
point has been made. I know the Speaker indicated you just have to do 
what you have to do.
  We are going to send this to the House. The House will be back 
tomorrow. Hopefully tonight at 6 o'clock we will have serious 
discussions. I think we have had enough preliminary discussions at the 
White House. It is time that I think we will get serious about whether 
or not we will reach a balanced budget over the next 7 years.
  I wanted to correct an impression that there might be some rift 
between the House and the Senate. I think there are some House Members 
who have a different view. They feel this is helpful in bringing about 
a balanced budget. That is not my view. I think it may have been 
helpful the first time around, but if you add up the time people have 
had off with the two shutdowns, it would be almost a month--about 30 
days they have been out of work which they will be paid for. It is no 
fault of theirs. I am not critical. That is a huge cost when the work 
was not performed by willing workers.
  It seems to me that if we extend this continuing resolution until the 
12th of January we will know by then if we are serious about a balanced 
budget over the next 7 years. If we do not know by then, we ought--I do 
not know what we do. I think we would not have to be a rocket scientist 
to know by then. That way we will all be covered.
  Mr. WARNER. Mr. President, I wish to commend our distinguished 
majority leader. I had the opportunity to be in that meeting. I suggest 
he look at his words again. He said half an hour; it was 2\1/2\ hours 
that we were there.
  Indeed, I certainly perceive no split between the distinguished 
majority leader and the Speaker of the House. There are a wide range of 
issues which were discussed in a very objective manner. I think there 
was a clear perception that the American public now understand the 
complexity of this situation and there is a feeling of a sense of 
fairness emerging. That sense of fairness says to the Congress, we have 
to work with our President to come to some conclusion. It is not fair 
to the Government employees. They are being held hostage. More than 
that, there is a ripple effect. It is not just the Federal Government 
employees. It is many others who are dependent upon a functioning of 
the U.S. Government for their daily livelihood. Particularly that class 
of individual cannot look to compensation subsequently, like the 
Government employees, and I again thank the distinguished majority 
leader and indeed the speaker and others for confirming they will be 
paid. But 

[[Page S19340]]
this other group, this ripple effect, they are not likely to get any 
compensation. An empty hotel room tonight is an empty hotel room 
forever. A lost wage to a taxi driver, all of the people, for instance, 
in the greater metropolitan area who are here every day to make it 
possible that tourism--one of the largest industries in this area--can 
function are suffering irreparably. People are losing wages, and that 
is taking place all across the country, not only in the greater 
Washington metropolitan area.
  I wish to be a cosponsor, Mr. Leader.
  Mr. DOLE. The Senator is a cosponsor and the Senator from New Mexico 
will be a cosponsor.
  Mr. WARNER. I commend you again.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Domenici). Is there objection to the 
unanimous-consent request of the majority leader with reference to the 
continuing resolution?
  Mr. SARBANES. Would it be possible to speak for a couple of minutes 
after its adoption? I am quite content to have it go ahead.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  So the amendment (No. 3115) was deemed agreed to, as follows:
       Strike all after the enacting clause and insert the 
     following:

     SEC.   . TEMPORARY EXTENSION OF THE CONTINUING RESOLUTION.

       (a) In General.--Section 106(c) of Public Law 104-56 is 
     amended by striking ``December 15, 1995'' and inserting 
     ``January 12, 1996''.
       (b) Effective Period.--The amendment made by subsection (a) 
     shall be considered to have taken effect on December 16, 
     1995.

     SEC.   . ELIGIBILITY FOR UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION.

       Begining on January 2, 1996, any federal employee who is 
     excepted from furlough and is not being paid due to a lapse 
     in appropriations shall be eligible for unemployment 
     compensation benefits with no waiting period for such 
     eligibility to accrue. With respect to any person who is 
     eligible for such benefits by reason of the preceding 
     sentence, any such benefits received shall be subject to 
     repayment in the same manner and to the same extent when 
     eligibility by reason of the preceding sentence ceases as if 
     such cessation were an end to the period of unemployment.

  So the bill (H.R. 1643), as amended, was read the third time and 
passed.
  Mr. SARBANES. Mr. President, I want to commend the distinguished 
majority leader and all who have worked with him in bringing forth this 
clean extension of the CR with which my distinguished colleague from 
Virginia said it is not just the Federal employees affected, although 
they are clearly very much affected, but there is a large part of the 
private sector also impacted and impacted in a very negative way by 
what has occurred.
  This, of course, will carry through until the 12th of January and 
give us an opportunity to correct the difficulties that have existed 
thus far and hopefully avoid any difficulties from arising in the 
future. I think it will bring, at least for now, significant relief in 
terms of anxiety and apprehension and tension and turmoil to a lot of 
families which have been very negatively impacted. I very much hope it 
will be adopted on the House side when they consider the matter.
  Mr. WARNER. Mr. President, both Senator Dole and myself have been in 
contact almost on a daily basis with Congressman Wolf, Congressman 
Davis, and Congresswoman Morella. They are very much included. We are 
going to start meeting daily on this problem to give to the leadership 
of both Houses our best judgment as to the severity of the problem in 
the greater metropolitan area of Washington. I welcome the 
participation by my distinguished colleague from Maryland.
  Mr. DOLE. Mr. President, I hope the House would take a look at this 
tomorrow. They are all back tomorrow. It was an opportunity for them to 
have been in their districts.
  I know some have said this is an indication that the Government is 
too big, that they are not essential or they have not been missed, what 
is the big deal?
  If we want to make the Government smaller, then we ought to make the 
Government smaller. If we want to eliminate departments--some of us 
do--then we ought to do it. Bring it out here, have the debate, and 
say, OK, we will eliminate Energy and HUD and Commerce and Education, 
for example. But this is not the way to do it. If we do it through 
legislation, that is one thing, but if we just say we are not going to 
pay people, I, at least, think that is not, in my judgment, how it 
ought to be done.
  People who work for the Federal Government are good people, and they 
understand that from time to time, as part of the Federal 
establishment, they have to make certain sacrifices when it comes to 
cost-of-living adjustments or even temporary Government shutdowns. So 
this is the second shutdown. This has been a lengthy shutdown. And, as 
I said earlier, if there is any point to be made I think that point 
should have been made by now.
  Some of these Federal employees--in fact, I am certain the Senator 
from Maryland knows, what percentage make less than $25,000? Probably 
20, as a percent of the total?
  Mr. SARBANES. Probably even more than that, I would say.
  Mr. DOLE. And they live from paycheck to paycheck.
  Mr. SARBANES. Exactly.
  Mr. DOLE. When they do not get the check, we say, ``Oh, well, they 
can borrow the money.'' If they borrow the money, they have to pay for 
it--if they can borrow the money.
  So I hope, based on fairness and getting people back to work and 
eliminating some of the stress that I am certain some have undergone, 
that the House will look upon this favorably. If not, I think the 
second option--I know it is not the preferred option by a lot of 
people--would be the first bill we passed, which deems all workers 
essential and promises they will be paid. That is not the same as being 
paid. Plus, we added a number of categories--the Senator from Maryland 
was not here at the time--to take care of Meals on Wheels, protective 
services for children, unemployment insurance--there are about 11 
States, plus D.C., which will have exhausted Federal funds for 
administering the Federal Unemployment Insurance Program, including, I 
might add, the State of Kansas, where somebody said today they shot out 
the windows at the unemployment office. I have not verified that story. 
In other words, if the office is closed, people with unemployment 
benefit claims cannot have their claims addressed.
  The District of Columbia would be included, and also assistance 
payments to 53,000 Indian families and foster family care for about 
3,000 Indian children. Then we have the same problem with about 170,000 
veterans. And we believe that, of course, if you have a CR, you do not 
have to worry about that. If you do not have a CR, then the backup 
would be adopting the deeming provision.
  Let me just say, in fairness--I will not make all these requests, 
because I hope that we have a bipartisan, or nonpartisan solution here 
that can be dealt with in the same way on the House side--but I would 
say, everybody wants to assign blame. I am not here to assign blame. I 
am just here to suggest that we have three appropriations bills that 
were vetoed. Had they not been vetoed, a lot of people would be 
working, they would not be worrying about the 7- or 9-day CR. But the 
President vetoed those bills. I understand some of them just have two 
or three areas where we have disagreements. I urge my colleagues--on 
the Interior bill, for example, I understand there are only three areas 
of disagreement. If we can work out the areas of disagreement, we ought 
to pass the bill, meet the President's request, and send it back and 
that will take care of any future problems in case the Government was 
shut down a third time. I hope that would not happen.

  The same is true with VA-HUD. I understand that is another bill that 
could be, with a little effort, worked out, just a give and take on 
both sides.
  State, Justice, Commerce, I think there are probably a number of 
differences there. I am not certain that can be accommodated.
  On the D.C. appropriations bill, there is one issue, vouchers. Only 
one issue keeps that bill from going to the President and being signed 
by the President.
  Foreign operations, one issue, one issue on the Mexico City policy. 
That is the only issue that keeps that bill from going to the 
President. I do not think he has a problem with that bill.
  Finally, Labor-HHS, and we have had two party-line votes on bringing 
it to the membership on the floor. It takes 60 votes. It has been a 
party-line vote so we have not been able to bring 

[[Page S19341]]
Labor-HHS to the floor. Maybe there is some way to work out our 
differences there.
  But one way to avoid the CR's and the potential problems of a 
shutdown would be to get together on the appropriations bills. We are 
urging our colleagues on this side to do that starting immediately. We 
would be happy to accommodate anybody on the other side. I know there 
is a lot of interest in Interior and State, Justice, Commerce; foreign 
operations; HUD; District of Columbia. If those bills could be passed--
and three of them have been vetoed--but passed again, to accommodate 
some of the concerns raised by the administration, then we would not be 
here worrying about 5 days, 9 days, and 10 days.
  Mr. DORGAN addressed the Chair.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The acting minority leader.
  Mr. DORGAN. Mr. President, let me just observe that we have seen 
previous vetoes of appropriations bills in the history of the U.S. 
Congress, but that did not result in a shutdown of the Federal 
Government. I would not want people listening to this to believe that 
because appropriations vetoes occurred this year, that resulted in a 
shutdown of the Government. That is not why we have a shutdown. The 
shutdown, it seems to me, was a matter of strategy by some.
  I might say, not the majority leader. He has made it, I think, clear 
a number of times on the floor of the Senate that he is not an advocate 
of shutdowns. Nonetheless, I think it has been a matter of strategy to 
use the shutdown as leverage with respect to the balanced budget talks.
  Another Senator mentioned that his constituents could not understand 
this shutdown. I would say, my constituents have told me the same 
thing--they could not understand it. I have said that is pretty 
reasonable, because it is not an understandable policy. It defies all 
common sense. It does not make any sense to decide to shut the 
Government down, pay $40 million a day for labor that you prevent being 
performed by Federal workers, but that you say you will reimburse 
later. I think, when all of the noise and all of the dust and all of 
the wind is over, at least today we will have been seen as taking a 
first sensible step. That is a CR that funds the Government, brings 
Federal employees back to work, and pays them.

  I might say that the proposal that we have offered on previous 
occasions, a continuing resolution to fund these functions of 
Government and bring people back to work, would take us through the end 
of January. The CR that we are enacting today in the Senate takes us 
only through January 12. While we would prefer that this go to the end 
of January, and that during this period, between now and the end of 
January, we would have a set of budget negotiations that would result 
in an agreement and we would not again be faced with the circumstances 
of a threatened shutdown, we accept January 12 because it is a step 
forward. If the House will address this, it will resolve this impasse.
  Again, my fervent hope is that early tomorrow the House of 
Representatives will take this up. I hope they would agree with it by a 
voice vote as the Senate has and restore people back to work, pay them 
for coming back to work. And, I say again as I said before, I commend 
the Senator from Kansas for this initiative.
  We have offered this initiative previously. I know the Senator from 
Kansas has not been an advocate of a shutdown. But nonetheless we were 
faced with this set of circumstances. If the House acts on this in the 
morning, it seems to me we finally have this back on track and perhaps 
we will not again see a shutdown that penalizes the American taxpayer, 
penalizes Federal workers, and does nothing good for anyone that I can 
see. It is fundamentally a nonunderstandable policy.
  Again, I thank the Senator from Kansas, the majority leader. We were 
happy to accommodate the unanimous-consent request.
  Mr. WARNER addressed the Chair.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Chafee). The Senator from Virginia.
  Mr. WARNER. Mr. President, throughout the day the distinguished 
acting minority leader has been on the floor, active in the debate. But 
I think it was very important that the majority leader bring up the 
fact that the veto of the appropriations bills is a very strong factor 
in the problem that we are addressing here with the CR.
  The distinguished minority leader has stated his case. But I also 
feel very strongly that the majority leader, in good conscience, had to 
bring that matter up.
  Mr. DORGAN. Mr. President, if the Senator will yield on that point?
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The acting minority leader.
  Mr. DORGAN. I accept his point. My only observation was we could 
debate all this. On Labor-HHS, Republicans deserted on the vote there 
as well. Some of the vetoes were fully expected, in terms of what was 
in the legislation when it went to the President.
  My hope is that now, beginning at 6 o'clock, the negotiations on the 
balanced budget plan will bear fruit and we will have no further 
shutdowns. We will have appropriations bills resolved the way they 
should be resolved, not by the leverage of a Government shutdown but by 
the give and take as between the Congress and the President.
  Mr. WARNER addressed the Chair.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Virginia.
  Mr. WARNER. Mr. President, I said earlier today it is senseless that 
we pass the football to your side, you pass it back to us. The blame 
game exchange will not get us anywhere. Let us put the football on the 
50-yard line and blow time out on the blame game and let us get behind 
the President and the distinguished leaders of this body, who will go 
down in just a matter of minutes and try and reconcile this problem.
  We all wish them luck.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Maryland.
  Mr. SARBANES. Mr. President, I just make the observation that I think 
all of the appropriations bills that were mentioned had legislation on 
an appropriations bill. Of course, if we did not do that to begin with, 
why, it would be an easier task dealing with the appropriations bills. 
The President took issue with some of that and vetoed the bills.
  I listened carefully to the majority leader who suggested maybe if 
some of those objections could be accommodated, it might be possible to 
work out the differences between the President and the Congress on that 
legislation. Therefore, there is a chance some of them might be 
enacted. And it seems to me that is a worthwhile path to explore.
  The other thing though is I do feel very strongly, as I indicated 
earlier today, that this closing down of the Government was without 
reason and without common sense. And I wish to underscore one point 
because I think it tends to get overlooked. There is a tendency to 
think of this in terms of the Federal employees who are not working. 
That is a very important aspect of it. But by not working, they are not 
providing services that are needed by the private sector. So it is 
having an impact, a far-reaching impact through our economy and through 
our country.
  In other words, people who want passports are not able to get those 
passports. You have people who planned trips for years. You have had 
business reasons to take such trips. Grants by the NIH have been put on 
the shelf, and so forth and so on. So there is a strong impact. People 
who contract with the Federal Government have found themselves unable 
to carry through and, of course, that is going to start affecting 
unemployment offices; they are closing down. That is not unemployment 
offices for the Federal workers. That is unemployment offices for 
everyone. So someone who gets laid off from some private job in some 
States now is not going to be able to find an open unemployment office 
with which to file a claim in order to obtain unemployment benefits in 
order to carry his family through a very difficult period.
  Now, obviously, the way to address it is the way it is being 
addressed here, and that is with a clean CR which brings the workers 
back in, pays them, they do the job, they perform the services, they 
meet the need, the private sector can then interact with the Government 
as it does, and we can move forward from there.
  So I again wish to thank the majority leader for moving forward with 
this 

[[Page S19342]]
CR, and I am hopeful that the House will accept it when it takes it up 
on tomorrow.
  Mr. ROBB addressed the Chair.
  The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The Senator from Virginia is 
recognized.
  Mr. ROBB. I would like to add my own word of thanks and appreciation 
to the distinguished majority leader and those who have worked with him 
to propose the continuing resolution at this point. I think it is very 
important. Understandably, because of the serious differences in some 
of the philosophical questions that have been presented in this debate, 
it is not easy for leaders on either side of the debate to make a move 
toward getting us beyond a step which many of us feel is simply 
unconscionable and indefensible to continue.
  I hope that the leadership that the distinguished majority leader has 
provided in moving us to this point will indeed provide an impetus for 
our colleagues in the other body to act in accord so that we may move 
beyond this particular impasse.

  The big issues can still be debated, but the question of whether or 
not it makes any sense to continue the furlough of Federal employees 
who will eventually get paid so this Government is saving no money but 
which represents an enormous waste of taxpayer resources and an 
inconvenience for many and serious economic concerns for others who 
interact with the Federal Government, for many small businesses that 
are dependent upon the successful actions of the Federal Government, 
all of this can be resolved at least in the near term with this 
particular action, and all of the essential arguments that have been 
made by both sides are preserved for full debate at the appropriate 
time.
  I again thank the majority leader for exercising this leadership. I 
thank my distinguished colleague and senior Senator from Virginia, the 
distinguished senior Senator from Maryland, and others in the region 
who are most impacted by this particular situation but all who have 
shown the good will in an attempt to get beyond the difficulties that 
have held us up.
  So to all, including my good friend from Rhode Island, who may be 
about to speak on this topic, I say thank you for bringing us to this 
point and hope that they will succeed in urging our colleagues in the 
other body to follow the leadership of our distinguished majority 
leader.
  With that, Mr. President, I yield the floor.
  The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The Senator from Rhode Island.
  Mr. DOLE. I thank my friend from Virginia. I will be happy to yield 
the floor.
  Mr. CHAFEE. Mr. President, I just want to join in congratulating the 
majority leader for what he has done today. This is really terribly 
important. And while many citizens in the country are not suffering at 
all--they are getting their Social Security check, the VA checks, the 
AFDC checks--there are literally hundreds, and, indeed, thousands who 
truly are suffering out of this, whether it be a passport they cannot 
obtain, having made payments on flights that are not redeemable, 
whether it is the AmeriCorps individuals who are working in the inner 
cities and live paycheck to paycheck and are not receiving their check, 
whether it is those who are under some Government contract and not 
being paid. There is a lot of suffering taking place across the 
country.
  And so I just give high praise to our distinguished majority leader, 
the senior Senator from Kansas, for what he has done, and I just hope 
the House accepts it. It is, as I understand, until January 12. And in 
the meantime the negotiators on the biggest subject, namely the budget, 
can keep working. This is not something that is fostering--in other 
words, the shutdown is not fostering the talks. Nothing is being gained 
from that. The administration is not being bullied, and the Republicans 
are not being bullied. It is a nonwinner. It is one of those rare 
things where everybody loses.
  So I congratulate the majority leader, and I just hope the House 
accepts this and we can get on with the Government reopening. If things 
are not worked out by January 12, well, then have another. But 
meanwhile I just know everybody who is involved is trying to reach a 
settlement on this budget.
  I thank the Chair.
  The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The majority leader is recognized.
  Mr. DOLE. Mr. President, I thank my colleagues. I certainly share 
their view. I do not see any sense in what we have been doing, frankly. 
Maybe I missed the point. I have been here a while. Maybe something 
went by me. But I think we have had shutdowns before lasting a day or 2 
days, and you can handle that. But when it is--what is today, day 18? 
And we have already had a 7-day. As I said earlier, you are going to 
have 30 days here very quickly. I do not believe any side gains.
  I do not believe we are sitting down because the Government is 
partially shut down. I do not believe the President is sitting down 
because the Government is partially shut down. We better be sitting 
down because we agreed we ought to balance the budget in 7 years. And 
the Federal employees are going to be part of that. I think they are 
going to be asked to make sacrifices like everybody else if that is 
done. But to say that they cannot work and they cannot be paid until we 
put together an agreement--I know there are some of my colleagues in 
the House who feel just as strongly the other way, but I do not quite 
understand the logic of it all. As I said earlier, I think the Speaker 
is inclined to be receptive. All the House Members are back, I 
understand, tomorrow, and they will have an opportunity to discuss 
this. I hope that we could have quick action. People have been gone 
from their jobs long enough. Enough is enough.

  I ask unanimous consent that Senator Stevens be added as a cosponsor 
to amendment 3115, the CR until January 12, 1996.
  Mr. DORGAN. And anybody else who wants to----
  Mr. CHAFEE. I want to join.
  Mr. DOLE. Senator Robb, and Senator Dorgan already have.
  Mr. DORGAN. Senator Daschle.
  Mr. DOLE. Senator Daschle, and Senator Sarbanes, and anybody else.
  The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. Without objection, it is so 
ordered.
  Mr. DORGAN. I wonder if I might ask unanimous consent to have printed 
in the Record a description of the effects of the shutdown offered by 
OMB. I believe it was the description that Senator Dole referred to, 
and I think it would be useful to have that in the Congressional 
Record.
  Mr. DOLE. Let me indicate we did not cover all those in the other one 
because we thought some were not as urgent as others, but I think we 
ought to enable people to be able to get a passport, to open the parks, 
and other things that I think are important to all people.
  There being no objection, the material was ordered to be printed in 
the Record, as follows:

      Effects of the Continuing Shutdown, Tuesday, January 2, 1996

       Administration on Aging: 600,000 elderly Americans face the 
     potential of losing their services of ``Meals on Wheels,'' 
     transportation and personal care provided by HHS if a CR is 
     not passed this week.
       Protection and services for children: As of today, states 
     will lose $74 million in quarterly grants for discretionary 
     child protection programs, which help states respond to more 
     than 2.5 million reported cases of child maltreatment each 
     year. In addition, the Federal Parent Locator Service, to 
     which 20,000 child support cases per day on average are 
     referred, is closed.
       Unemployment insurance: By the end of this week, 11 states 
     (plus DC and the VI) will have exhausted Federal funds for 
     administering the unemployment insurance program (NJ, AL, RI, 
     TN, KS, AK, MA, NH, VT, UT, NM). In order to keep 
     unemployment offices open, states will have to fill the gap 
     with their own funds. Otherwise, unemployment offices would 
     have to close and benefit payments would cease. Kansas has 
     already closed its unemployment office.
       Securities markets: The SEC's funds are expected to be 
     exhausted by the end of next week, causing review of an 
     estimated three-fourths of pending and new SEC filings for 
     the months of January to be delayed. A delay in review of 
     filings for initial public offerings, mergers and 
     acquisitions, and filings for new debt or stock offerings 
     would eventually impact the flow of corporate financing and 
     capital formation.
       Home-buyers: Each day of the shutdown, the Federal Housing 
     Administration cannot process 2,500 home purchase loans and 
     refinancings ($200 million of mortgage loans) for moderate- 
     and low-income working families. 
     
[[Page S19343]]

       Protection of workers: Since the start of the shutdown, 
     over 1000 workplace safety complaints have gone unanswered 
     and 3,500 investigations involving pension, health and other 
     employee benefit plans have been suspended.
       Environmental protection: All EPA non-Superfund civil 
     environmental enforcement actions have stopped, costing $3 
     million a day in fines or injunctive relief against 
     polluters; and as of today, up to 32 Superfund cleanups will 
     be shut down.
       District of Columbia: The December 22 CR expires tomorrow 
     which will continue the uncertainty over how DC an continue 
     to operate its services.
       Passports: Each day, the State Department can't process 
     23,000 applications for passports that it would receive.
       Programs for native Americans: The Bureau of Indian Affairs 
     cannot make general assistance payments due to about 53,000 
     Indian families and individuals, or to guardians and foster 
     families that care for about 3,000 Indian children.
       Veterans: While the December 22 CR provided funding for 
     certain benefits and payments, it expires tomorrow; 
     consequently, contractors providing services and supplies to 
     hospitals will not be paid and benefits for January will not 
     be paid (on February 1). In addition, approximately 170,000 
     veterans did not receive their December Montgomery GI Bill 
     education benefits and will not receive benefits in January. 
     Funding has also lapsed for processing veterans' claims for 
     educational & rehabilitation counseling, and enabling 
     veterans to obtain VA guaranteed home loans.
       Small businesses: Each day of the shutdown, over 260 small 
     businesses are not receiving SBA-guaranteed financing; and 
     1,200 small business owners are not receiving SBA-Sponsored 
     training and counseling normally available to them.
       National parks/forests and related businesses: Each day, an 
     average of 383,000 people cannot visit National Parks. 
     Potential per day losses for businesses in communities 
     adjacent to National Parks could reach $14 million, due to 
     reduced recreational tourism.
       Foreign visitors: Each day, the State Department cannot 
     issue 20,000 visas to visitors, who normally spend an average 
     of $3,000 on their trips.
       Export promotion: On an average day--export licenses with a 
     value of $30.5 million that would otherwise have been 
     approved by the Bureau of Export Administration will not be 
     acted upon; more than $92 million in sales of U.S. products 
     are blocked due to inability to process license applications; 
     and more than 2500 telephone calls and faxes from U.S. 
     businesses seeking export information are not being answered.


                       Effects on Federal Workers

       Due to Congress' failure to approve short-term funds, 
     beginning last Friday, December 29, about three-quarters-of-
     a-million Federal employees received only half their usual 
     pay. They received pay for December 10 to 15, but not 
     December 16 to 23. Unless the Congress approves funding by 
     late this week, emergency and furloughed employees will not 
     receive pay for the current pay period on time (i.e. next 
     week).
       480,000 emergency workers are working, and the government 
     is obligated to pay them, but they can't be paid until 
     Congress approves funds to end the shutdown (includes federal 
     law enforcement officials, prison guards, and nurses at 
     Veterans Hospitals).
       280,000 non-emergency workers are currently furloughed and 
     not being paid (and have no guarantee they will receive back 
     pay unless Congress acts to approve back pay).

                          ____________________