[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 154 (Friday, September 29, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H9720]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
{time} 1615
REPORT CARD ON CONGRESS
The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Everett). Under a previous order of the
House, the gentleman from Texas [Mr. Doggett] is recognized for 5
minutes.
Mr. DOGGETT. Mr. Speaker, what we have seen here in the House of
Representatives today is truly remarkable. With the Federal fiscal year
drawing to a close, the Republican leadership had a responsibility to
put on President Clinton's desk 13 appropriations bills. How did they
do?
Well, they got 2 of 13. Where I come from, 2 out of 13 is not a very
good grade. In fact, I do not even know that it is high enough to earn
an F. Down in Texas we would probably give it an F-minus for 2 of 13
bills, and the quality of Republican leadership that it represents. And
when you look at those two bills, you find the quality is as sorry as
the quantity.
The first bill they sent over there was the legislative
appropriation, protect the Congress first, worry about the rest of the
country last. And the second one was a military construction bill so
loaded with pork barrel you could hear the pigs squeal all the way to
Arlington, TX.
Today, this Republican leadership has had a truly unparalleled
accomplishment, perhaps in the entire history of this country. They
have come forward with conference reports on two appropriations bills
for consideration in this House this afternoon, and they have had two
appropriations conference reports defeated. Two up two down. Two very
down. In fact, the last one of those appropriations bills, they could
not even command a majority of the Republican Members, much less the
Democrats.
So, here we are this afternoon, exactly 1 week after Speaker Gingrich
went up to New York and declared ``I do not care what the price is. I
do not care if we have no executive offices and no bonds for 60 days.
Not this time.''
We have had plenty of alarming rhetoric, but not very much
responsible leadership. On appropriations, that leadership is 2 bills
out of 13, as this fiscal year draws to a close this weekend.
Much of this is because at every stage in the budget process, the
Federal Budget Act, the statute on the books, has been looked at as
something to flaunt, something to ignore, something to violate from top
to bottom. The keystone of this Republican plan to balance the budget
is to take $270 billion out of the Medicare system.
Can you believe that at this late date the Republicans at the end of
the fiscal year have yet to even introduce the bill, to take that $270
billion out of the pockets of America's seniors and America's disabled?
They have not even filed the bill that is the centerpiece of their
budget.
From at least the first morning that the Committee on the Budget
considered their budget, it was presented on a take-it-or-leave-it
basis. Bipartisanship was out the window, because they had their plan
and they were going to accomplish it no matter how many seniors or
disabled people or people they viewed as powerless got in the way and
got run over.
What about that great successful campaign ploy, the Contract on
America? Well, they have not had quite as much success once they rolled
it out here in the Congress. We have had 2 bills passed out of 11 in
the planning. The first one was to repackage a Democratic idea that
would have been law at the beginning of this Congress if the
Republicans had not killed it last time. It is called the Congressional
Accountability Act. It is a good bill. It passed on day 1 of this
Congress and became law.
The second, an unfunded mandates bill, which passed with significant
Democratic support. We have a third bill, a line-item veto bill, but
Speaker Gingrich is afraid that President Clinton will use it to slash
and slice out some of that pork barrel that has been put into the bill.
So he held up and delayed appointing conferees for that bill.
So we have two bills passed, two bills dead and gone, and seven
lingering somewhere in the legislative process.
But nowhere has the lack of leadership been more obvious than when it
comes to lobby control, when it comes to gift ban, with the
relationships between legislators and lobbyists, when it comes to
ethics. There we find, as we have just heard this afternoon, that the
lobbyists they want to control are the Girl Scouts, the National
Council of Senior Citizens, Catholic Charities, and the YMCA.
What about the polluters, what about the lobbyists who keep writing
special loopholes in the Tax Code? What about those that loaded up
these bills with pork barrel? That lobby control is nowhere. It has not
been brought to the floor of this House. And we have the chairman of
the Committee on Ethics telling us in her own words this week the
letter of the law is not compelling to me; my goal is to have a process
that the committee members feel good about.
Well, America does not feel good about what this Congress is not
doing or what it is doing, and the way it has ignored ethics and
proceeded to pursue a right wing extremist agenda.
____________________