[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 137 (Wednesday, September 6, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H8583]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
{time} 1845
FOUR SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN MEDICINE
The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Chambliss). Under a previous order of
the House, the gentleman from Georgia [Mr. Kingston] is recognized for
5 minutes.
Mr. KINGSTON. Mr. Speaker, there are four significant changes that
are happening in our society that have to do with the field of medicine
and the reason that medicine right now is going to be a hotly debated
subject in the coming months, in the coming years, in our society.
I would say that those changes are philosophical changes, No. 1, in
Washington, which I hate to use it but will, is a new paradigm, a new
way of looking at things; No. 2, technological changes; No. 3, the
possible bankruptcy of Medicare; No. 4, changes in the Medicaid
delivery system.
Let me start with No. 1, though, philosophical changes in Washington.
We have some 80 new freshmen this year, all of whom I would describe as
very regular folks who want to cut the budget and go home. They are not
trying to be the next President. They are not trying to run for other
offices. They just want to do the right thing. They are very attuned to
the problems of middle-class America and businesses and employers, and
they are just not as political as I would say classes have been in the
past.
I would say also that the reforms, the changes, are not attributable
to the Republican Party alone. President Clinton, his election in 1992
did a lot to trigger the moves of reform and the debate for change in
health care.
A couple of things that we have seen as evidence of a new philosophy
in this House, tangible evidence, the tort reform bill that we for many
years debated that never got out of committee, it actually passed the
House this year; OSHA reforms, where we are trying to get OSHA to be
more technological and employer-friendly and more concentrated on
safety rather than concentrating strictly on fines. We are trying to
get the FDA to put more money and manpower in faster approval of pills,
of medical devices, rather than also being punitive and restrictive in
their ways of doing business.
Then of course the biggest thing is, we are taking a serious stab at
budget reduction. Interest is the third largest expenditure on our
national budget right
now. In 2 years it is projected to exceed the defense budget, so we
have got to do things about it.
I would say, No. 1, that philosophical changes, we are looking at
doing things differently; No. 2, technological changes. We passed this
huge telecommunications bill recently. In that will be new avenues for
such things as telemedicine. There is going to be the Internet. I
believe the Internet will make medicine a lot more consumer-friendly,
because a person back home right now does not know how much a broken
arm or broken leg is going to cost.
On an Internet system, they can figure it out, figure out what
orthopedists are charging, which ones are the best at this, which
hospitals will get them in and out the fastest, and so forth. That
would be the case with every operation. You could go in there, plug in
whatever your ailment is, and see how much it costs for certain
treatments, and so forth, and see who is best at it. I think that is
going to make medicine a lot more competitive.
Those are some of the technological things, but I would say that the
Federal Government's way of looking at medicine is with a slide rule,
but we are in the world of pocket calculators now and we have to move.
We have to make that change.
Then, No. 3, Medicare. The April trustees' report said clearly that
Medicare will go bankrupt in 6 years if we do not do anything about it.
We have to fix it. We have to do it in a nonpartisan way. We need to
simplify it, to protect and preserve it. We need to slow down the rate
of growth.
There are all kinds of options out there that people are looking at
and this Congress is going to be addressing, things that will make
Medicare more consumer-friendly and again, above all, simplify and
protect it.
Then, finally, changes in the Medicaid system, most significantly,
welfare reform and block granting this authority back to States so that
States have the flexibility. For example, I represent Georgia. Our
Medicaid problems, our welfare delivery problems may be different than
those in New York City or San Francisco, downtown Cincinnati, and we
are going to make those changes but it is going to give the States the
flexibility that they need.
Mr. Speaker, this is a lengthy subject. I look forward to the months
of debate ahead, but I would say that the four significant changes
again in medicine are philosophical changes, new ways of looking at
things; changes in Medicare; changes in Medicaid; and, above all, the
new technologies.
I thank the Speaker for this time. I will not say it is good to be
back completely, but I notice that I am back and it is good to be here
and see you, Mr. Speaker.
____________________