[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 78 (Thursday, May 11, 1995)]
[House]
[Pages H4869-H4870]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
HAITI
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentleman from Washington [Mr. Metcalf] is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. METCALF. Mr. Speaker, I rise with great concern over the
administration's action in Haiti. On March 31, 1995, President Clinton
turned over control of the Multi National Force [MNF] in Haiti, to the
United Nations, under the auspice of the U.N. Mission in Haiti [UNMIH].
UNMIH, although still under American command, differs from the previous
U.S. operation in two respects. The net effect of these changes is a
U.S. commander and U.S. forces under the control of the U.N. Special
Representative, Mr. Lakhdar Brahimi and a U.N. mandate for rules of
engagement [ROE] which dictate the use of force by U.S. troops.
[[Page H4870]] Mr. Speaker, in his report to the U.N. Security
Council on January 17, 1995, Secretary General Boutros Boutros-Ghali
stated; ``UNMIH will consist of civilian, military and civilian police
components under the control of my special representative, Mr. Lakhdar
Brahimi.'' This statement by the Secretary makes it clear he expects
that General Kinser will work under the direction of the United
Nations. In his report to Congress on February 1, 1995, President
Clinton indirectly acknowledged this by stating ``the UNMIH commander
will work for the U.N. Special Representative of the Secretary
General.''
The administration, Mr. Speaker, will respond to my concern by
stating that General Kinzer will have operational control of all forces
in Haiti. This is a considerable improvement over the situation in
Somali, but it is still not good enough. We all remember Somalia, where
United States soldiers were shot down and dragged through the streets
while under a foreign command, in an event forever etched in American
minds.
Mr. Speaker, my concern is best illustrated by the current situation
in Bosnia. Lt. Gen. Rupert Smith has the same operational control in
Bosnia that Gen. Kinzer has in Haiti. Serbian gunners attacked Butmir
last weekend killing 10 and wounding 50. Mr. Speaker this area was well
within the exclusion zone. Lt. Gen. Smith requested NATO support
enforcing the U.N. resolution protecting Sarajevo by ordering air
strikes. With the planes in the air U.N. Special Representative Akashi
rejected the request. Mr. Speaker, I ask you how can Lt. Gen. Smith
protect his troops and their commitments when his military judgment is
overruled by a U.N. representative.
Mr. Speaker, operational control is simply not good enough. We must
take additional steps to assure General Kinzer and our troops will not
be overruled by the U.N. civilian command when ordering military
action.
The second concern I have deals with the revised rules of engagement
under UNMIH. The rules of engagement approved by the Security Council
are significantly more restrictive than the rules under U.S. command of
the Multi National Force. The rules of engagement of UNMIH were
mandated by the United Nations; not by the United States. Any changes
to the current rules of engagement must go through the Secretary
General and the Security Council, not through Gen. Kinzer or any other
American. Mr. Speaker, how can the administration assert U.S. command
of our forces when policy is evolving not out of the Pentagon, but the
United Nations.
The record of U.N. ``peacekeeping operations'', Mr. Speaker is poor
at best. The situation in Bosnia illustrates multiple scenarios were
operational control was called into question by the U.N. Special
Representative. Moreover, we should never be forced to accept U.N.
mandates for rules of engagement that place unreasonable restrictions
on our forces. This is not what the House intended under the National
Security Revitalization Act. We must take action to restore the
integrity and safety of our forces. We must work quickly to protect our
forces from the action taken by the administration, before we are
forced to accept another tragedy at the hands of the United Nations.
____________________