[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 64 (Thursday, April 6, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Pages S5287-S5288]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
STRIKER REPLACEMENT
Mr. FAIRCLOTH. Mr. President, on March 23, I introduced S. 603--a
bill to nullify Executive Order 12954 which prohibits Federal contracts
with any company that hires permanent replacements for striking
workers. This is the companion bill to H.R. 1176 introduced by Chairman
Goodling of the Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunities.
Yesterday, Mr. Goodling's committee held a hearing on H.R. 1176, at
which testimony was given concerning the fundamental flaws of this
Executive order. Many of the same issues were addressed in this Chamber
when the distinguished Senator from Kansas, Chairman Kassebaum, ably
led an effort to limit funding for the implementation of the Executive
order.
We lost that fight, but the opponents of this Presidential power grab
will not rest until the Executive order is overturned and balance is
restored to this Nation's labor policies.
Today, I would like to speak briefly about just a few of the more
recent and compelling criticisms of the Executive order.
I share the opinion of those who conclude that the order is invalid
because it exceeds the President's constitutional and statutory
authority. The Justice Department's legal memorandum in justification
of the order cites a statute which was enacted in 1949 to implement the
recommendations of the Hoover Commission.
The Justice Department takes the position that this statute
authorizes the President to adopt any regulation which promotes economy
and efficiency in Government procurement. However, there is no Supreme
Court decision that supports the Justice Department's interpretation of
this statute as conferring such sweeping Presidential authority.
Moreover, the Congressional Research Service recently concluded that
Executive Order 12954 ``may not survive even the most restrained
judicial scrutiny.''
We must be clear about the legal foundation which restricts the
President's authority to issue an Executive order regarding a central
tenet of national labor policy.
The National Labor Relations Act itself authorizes the hiring of
replacement workers--and by so doing, limits Presidential authority to
regulate the relationship between management and striking employees.
The President has
[[Page S5288]] not been granted authority under any statute to alter
this carefully balanced congressional design.
If this order is not overturned, just imagine the possible
consequences of allowing the President to bypass Congress and issue
directives on any and all matters relating to Federal contractors.
For example, President Clinton would be permitted to unilaterally
impose on Federal contractors a mandate to implement the type of health
care plan which he advocated last year and which was so thoroughly and
soundly rejected by Congress and the American people.
In issuing Executive Order 12954, President Clinton has made a
sweeping assertion of Presidential power which is completely at odds
with our constitutional system of separated and enumerated powers. It
should not be allowed to stand, and during the 104th Congress we should
commit ourselves to reversing this ill-conceived precedent.
Mr. President, I yield the floor and suggest the absence of a quorum.
Ms. MOSELEY-BRAUN addressed the Chair.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Will the Senator from North Carolina withhold
his request? The Senator from Illinois is seeking the floor.
Mr. FAIRCLOTH. Mr. President, I am sorry. I did not see the Senator
from Illinois.
I withdraw the request for a quorum call.
Ms. MOSELEY-BRAUN. I thank the Senator from North Carolina.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Illinois is recognized. The
Chair apologizes. I was raptured by the Senator from North Carolina,
and my head was turned the wrong way. I wish her a good day.
____________________