[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 59 (Thursday, March 30, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Pages S4934-S4937]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]


                          AMENDMENTS SUBMITTED

                                 ______


           EMERGENCY SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS ACT OF 1995

                                 ______


                BINGAMAN (AND OTHERS) AMENDMENT NO. 426

  Mr. BINGAMAN (for himself, Mr. Daschle, and Mr. Simon) proposed an 
amendment to amendment No. 420 proposed by Mr. Hatfield to the bill 
(H.R. 1158) making emergency supplemental appropriations for additional 
disaster assistance and making rescissions for the fiscal year ending 
September 30, 1995, and for other purposes; as follows:

       On page 14, line 19, strike ``$100,000,000'' and insert 
     ``$113,000,000''.
       On page 31, line 9, strike ``$26,988,000'' and insert 
     ``$13,988,000''.
                                 ______


                D'AMATO (AND OTHERS) AMENDMENTS NO. 427

  Mr. D'AMATO (for himself, Mr. Domenici, Mr. Stevens, Mr. Helms, Mr. 
Brown, Mr. Shelby, Mr. Faircloth, Mr. Murkowski, Mr. Grams, Mr. 
Pressler, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Craig, Mr. Burns, and Mr. Nickles) proposed 
an amendment to amendment No. 420 proposed by Mr. Hatfield to the bill 
H.R. 1158, supra; as follows:

       At the appropriate place, insert the following new section:

     SEC.   . CONGRESSIONAL APPROVAL OF CERTAIN FOREIGN 
                   ASSISTANCE.

       (a) In General.--Section 5302(b) of title 31, United States 
     Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: ``Except 
     as authorized by an Act of Congress, the Secretary may not 
     take any action under this subsection with respect to a 
     single foreign government (including agencies or other 
     entities of that government) or with respect to the currency 
     of a single foreign country that would result in expenditures 
     and obligations, including contingent obligations, 
     aggregating more than $5,000,000,000 with respect to that 
     foreign country during any 12-month period, beginning on the 
     date on which the first such action is or had been taken.''.
       (b) Effective Date.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
     this Act, the amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply to 
     any action taken under section 5302(b) of title 31, United 
     States Code, on or after January 1, 1995.
                                 ______


                        BURNS AMENDMENT NO. 428

  Mr. BURNS proposed an amendment to amendment No. 420 proposed by Mr. 
Hatfield to the bill H.R. 1158, supra; as follows:

       On page 69, strike lines 7 through 10 and insert the 
     following:
       ``(A) expeditiously prepare, offer, and award salvage 
     timber sale contracts on Federal lands, except in--
       ``(i) any area on Federal lands included in the National 
     Wilderness Preservation System;
       ``(ii) any roadless area on Federal lands designated by 
     Congress for wilderness study in Colorado or Montana;
       ``(iii) any roadless area on Federal lands recommended by 
     the Forest Service or Bureau of Land Management for 
     wilderness designation in its most recent land management 
     plan in effect as of the date of enactment of this Act; or
       ``(iv) any area on Federal lands on which timber harvesting 
     for any purpose is prohibited by statute; and''.
                                 ______


                  MURRAY (AND LEAHY) AMENDMENT NO. 429

  Mrs. MURRAY (for herself and Mr. Leahy) proposed an amendment to 
amendment No. 420 proposed by Mr. Hatfield to the bill H.R. 1158, 
supra; as follows:

       On page 68, strike line 9 and all that follows through page 
     79, line 5, and insert the following:
       (a) Definition.--In this section:
       (1) Consulting agency.--The term ``consulting agency'' 
     means the agency with which a managing agency is required to 
     consult with respect to a proposed salvage timber sale if 
     consultation is required under the Endangered Species Act of 
     1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
       (2) Managing agency.--The term ``managing agency'' means a 
     Federal agency that offers a salvage timber sale.
       (3) Salvage timber sale.--The term ``salvage timber sale'' 
     means a timber sale--
       (A) in which each unit is composed of forest stands in 
     which more than 50 percent of the trees have suffered severe 
     insect infestation or have been significantly burned by 
     forest fire; and
       (B) for which agency biologists and other agency forest 
     scientists conclude that forest health may be improved by 
     salvage operations.
       (b) Salvage Timber Sales.--
       (1)  Direction to complete salvage timber sales.--The 
     Secretary of Agriculture, acting through the Chief of the 
     Forest Service, and the Secretary of the Interior, acting 
     through the Director of the Bureau of Land Management, 
     shall--
       (A) expeditiously prepare, offer, and award salvage timber 
     sale contracts on Forest Service lands and Bureau of Land 
     Management lands that are located outside--
       (i) any unit of the National Wilderness Preservation 
     System; or
       (ii) any roadless area that--

       (I) is under consideration for inclusion in the National 
     Wilderness Preservation System; or
       (II) is administratively designated as a roadless area in 
     the managing agency's most recent land management plan in 
     effect as of the date of enactment of this Act (not including 
     land designated as a Federal wilderness area); or

       (iii) any area in which such a sale would be inconsistent 
     with agency standards and guidelines applicable to areas 
     administratively withdrawn for late successional and riparian 
     reserves; or
       (iv) any area withdrawn by Act of Congress for any 
     conservation purpose; and
       (B) perform the appropriate revegetation and tree planting 
     operations in the area in which the salvage occurred.
       (2) Sale documentation.--
       (A) Preparation of documents.--In preparing a salvage 
     timber sale under paragraph (1), Federal agencies that have a 
     role in the planning, analysis, or evaluation of the sale 
     shall fulfill their respective duties expeditiously and, to 
     the extent practicable, simultaneously.
       (B) Procedures to expedite salvage timber sales.--
       (i) In general.--When it appears to a managing agency that 
     consultation may be required under section 7(a)(2) of the 
     Endangered Species Act (16 U.S.C. 1536(a)(2))--

       (I) the managing agency shall solicit comments from the 
     consulting agency within 7 days of the date of the decision 
     of the managing agency to proceed with the required 
     environmental documents necessary to offer to sell the 
     salvage timber sale; and
       (II) within 30 days after receipt of the solicitation, the 
     consulting agency shall respond to the managing agency's 
     solicitation concerning whether consultation will be required 
     and notify the managing agency of the determination .

       (ii) Consultation Document.--In no event shall a consulting 
     agency issue a final written consultation document with 
     respect to a salvage sale later than 30 days after the 
     managing agency issues the final environmental document 
     required under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1973 
     (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
       (iii) Delay.--A consulting agency may not delay a salvage 
     timber sale solely because the consulting agency believes it 
     has inadequate information, unless--

       (aa) the consulting agency has been actively involved in 
     preparation of the required environmental documents and has 
     requested in writing reasonably available additional 
     information from the managing agency that the consulting 
     agency considers necessary under part 402 of title 50, Code 
     of Federal Regulations, to complete a biological assessment; 
     and
       (bb) the managing agency has not complied with the request.

       (3) Streamlining of administrative appeals.--Administrative 
     review of a decision of a managing agency under this 
     subsection shall be conducted in accordance with section 322 
     of the Department of the Interior and Related Agencies 
     Appropriations Act, 1993 (106 Stat. 1419), except that--
       (A) an appeal shall be filed within 30 days after the date 
     of issuance of a decision by the managing agency; and
       (B) the managing agency shall issue a final decision within 
     30 days and may not extend the closing date for a final 
     decision by any length of time.
       (4) Streamlining of judicial review.--
       (A) Time for challenge.--Any challenge to a timber sale 
     under subsection (a) or (b) shall be brought as a civil 
     action in United States district court within 30 days after 
     the later of--
       (i) the decision to proceed with a salvage timber sale is 
     announced; or
       (ii) the date on which any administrative appeal of a 
     salvage timber sale is decided.
     [[Page S4935]]   (B) Expedition.--The court shall, to the 
     extent practicable, expedite proceedings in a civil action 
     under subparagraph (A), and for the purpose of doing so may 
     shorten the times allowed for the filing of papers and taking 
     of other actions that would otherwise apply.
       (C) Assignment to special master.--The court may assign to 
     a special master all or part of the proceedings in a civil 
     action under subparagraph (A).
       (c) Option 9.--
       (1) Direction to complete timber sales.--The Secretary of 
     the Interior, acting through the Director of the Bureau of 
     Land Management, and the Secretary of Agriculture, acting 
     through the Chief of the Forest Service, shall expeditiously 
     prepare, offer, and award timber sale contracts on Federal 
     lands in the forests specified in Option 9, as selected by 
     the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of 
     Agriculture on April 13, 1994.
       (2) Establishment of rebuttable presumption.--A rebuttable 
     presumption exists that any timber sale on Federal lands 
     encompassed by Option 9 that is consistent with Option 9 and 
     applicable administrative planning guidelines meets the 
     requirements of applicable environmental laws. This paragraph 
     does not affect the applicable legal duties that Federal 
     agencies are required to satisfy in connection the planning 
     and offering of a salvage timber sale under this subsection.
       (3) Availability of funds.--
       (A) In general.--The Secretary of Agriculture and the 
     Secretary of the Interior shall make available 100 percent of 
     the amount of funds that will be required to hire or contract 
     with such number of biologists, hydrologists, geologists, and 
     other scientists to permit completion of all watershed 
     assessments and other analyses required for the preparation, 
     advertisement, and award of timber sale contracts prior to 
     the end of fiscal year 1995 in accordance with and in the 
     amounts authorized by the Record of Decision in support of 
     Option 9.
       (B) Source.--If there are no other unobligated funds 
     appropriated to the Secretary of Agriculture or the Secretary 
     of the Interior, respectively, for fiscal year 1995 that can 
     be available as required by subparagraph (A), the Secretary 
     concerned shall make funds available from amounts that are 
     available for the purpose of constructing forest roads only 
     from the regions to which Option 9 applies.
       (d) Section 318.--
       (1) In general.--With respect to each timber sale awarded 
     pursuant to section 318 of Public Law 101-121 (103 Stat. 745) 
     the performance of which is, on or after July 30, 1995, 
     precluded under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 
     1531 et seq.) due to requirements for the protection of the 
     marbled murrelet, the Secretary of Agriculture shall provide 
     the purchaser replacement timber, at a site or sites selected 
     at the discretion of the Secretary, that is equal in volume, 
     kind, and value to that provided by the timber sale contract.
       (2) Terms and conditions.--Harvest of replacement timber 
     under paragraph (1) shall be subject to the terms and 
     conditions of the original contract and shall not count 
     against current allowable sale quantities.
       (e) Expiration.--Subsections (b) and (c) shall expire on 
     September 30, 1996, but the terms and conditions of those 
     subsections shall continue in effect with respect to timber 
     sale contracts offered under this Act until the contracts 
     have been completely performed.

                                 ______


                GRASSLEY (AND DORGAN) AMENDMENT NO. 430

  Mr. GRASSLEY (for himself and Mr. Dorgan) proposed an amendment to 
amendment No. 420 proposed by Mr. Hatfield to the bill, H.R. 1158, 
supra; as follows:

       At the appropriate place, insert the following:

     SEC.  . PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS TO DELINEATE NEW 
                   AGRICULTURAL WETLANDS.

       (A) In General.--Except as provided in subsection (b), 
     during the period beginning on the date of enactment of this 
     Act and ending on December 31, 1995, none of the funds made 
     available by this or any other Act may be used by the 
     Secretary of Agriculture to delineate wetlands for the 
     purpose of certification under section 1222(a) of the Food 
     Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3822(a)).
       (b) Exception.--Subsection (a) shall not apply to land if 
     the owner or operator of the land requests a determination as 
     to whether the land is considered a wetland under subtitle C 
     of title XII of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3821 
     et seq.) or any other provision of law.
                                 ______


                       JEFFORDS AMENDMENT NO. 431

  (Ordered to lie on the table.)
  Mr. JEFFORDS submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to 
amendment No. 420 proposed by Mr. Hatfield to the bill, H.R. 1158, 
supra; as follows:

       On page 14, line 12, strike the period and insert ``, of 
     which not more than $20,500,000 shall constitute a reduction 
     in the amount available for solar and renewable energy 
     activities and at least $14,500,000 shall constitute a 
     reduction in the amount available for nuclear energy 
     activities.''.
                                 ______


                     HELMS AMENDMENTS NOS. 432-433

  (Ordered to lie on the table.)
  Mr. HELMS submitted two amendments intended to be proposed by him to 
amendment No. 420 proposed by Mr. Hatfield to the bill, H.R. 1158, 
supra; as follows:
                           Amendment No. 432

       At the end of the Committee amendment insert the following:
       Sec.  . Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no 
     funds appropriated under this Act or any other Act may be 
     obligated for the International Fund for Ireland until the 
     President certifies and reports to Congress that the Irish 
     Republican Army has begun a process of disarming.
                                                                    ____


                           Amendment No. 433

       At the appropriate place in the substitute, add:

     SEC.  . BILATERAL ECONOMIC ASSISTANCE.


                  Funds Appropriated to the President

                  Agency for International Development

  Assistance for the New Independent States of the Former Soviet Union

                              (Recission)

       Of the funds made available under this heading in Public 
     Law 103-87 for support of an officer settlement program in 
     Russia as described in section 560(a)(5), $30,000,000 are 
     rescinded.
                                 ______


                         KYL AMENDMENT NO. 434

  (Ordered to lie on the table.)
  Mr. KYL submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to 
amendment No. 420 proposed by Mr. Hatfield to the bill H.R. 1158, 
supra; as follows:

       On page 31, between lines 5 and 6, insert the following:


                   LOW INCOME HOME ENERGY ASSISTANCE

                              (RESCISSION)

       Of the funds made available in the third paragraph under 
     this heading in Public Law 103-333, $1,319,204,000 are 
     rescinded.
                                 ______


                 KERREY (AND OTHERS) AMENDMENT NO. 435

  Mr. KERREY (for himself, Mr. Cohen, Mr. Baucus, and Mr. Kerry) 
proposed an amendment to amendment No. 420 proposed by Mr. Hatfield to 
the bill H.R. 1158, supra; as follows:

       Beginning on page 51 of the bill, line 12, strike 
     everything through page 54, line 6, and insert in lieu 
     thereof, the following:


                    General Services Administration

                         Federal Buildings Fund

               Limitations on the Availability of Revenue

                              (rescission)

       Of the funds made available under this heading in Public 
     Laws 101-136, 101-509, 102-27, 102-141, 103-123, 102-393, 
     103-329, $565,580,000 are rescinded from the following 
     projects in the following amounts:
       Arizona:
       Lukeville, Border Station, commercial lot expansion, 
     $1,219,000
       Phoenix, Federal building and U.S. Courthouse, $121,890,000
       San Luis, Border Station, primary lane expansion and 
     administrative office space, $3,496,000
       Sierra Vista, Arizona, U.S. Magistrates office, $1,000,000
       Tucson, Federal building-U.S. Courthouse, $70,000,000
       California:
       Menlo Park, United States Geological Survey, office 
     laboratory buildings, $980,000
       San Francisco, California, U.S. Court of Appeals annex, 
     $9,003,000
       District of Columbia:
       Army Corps of Engineers, headquarters, $25,000,000
       Central and West heating plants, $5,000,000
       General Service Administration, Southeast Federal Center, 
     headquarters, $25,000,000
       Southeast Federal Center, infrastructure, $58,000,000
       U.S. Secret Service, headquarters, $18,910,000
       Georgia:
       Atlanta, Centers for Disease Control, site acquisition and 
     improvement, $25,890,000
       Atlanta, Centers for Disease Control, $14,110,000
       Florida: Tampa, U.S. Courthouse, $5,994,000
       Illinois: Chicago, Federal Center, $7,000,000
       Indiana: Hammond, U.S. Courthouse, $52,272,000
       Maryland: Avondale, DeLaSalle building, $16,671,000
       Massachusetts: Boston, U.S. Courthouse, $4,076,000
       Nebraska: Omaha, U.S. Courthouse, $5,000,000
       Nevada: Reno, Federal building--U.S. Courthouse, $1,465,000
       New Hampshire: Concord, Federal building--U.S. Courthouse, 
     $3,519,000
       New Mexico: Santa Teresa, Border station, $4,004,000
       New York: Holtsville, New York, IRS Center, $19,183,000
       North Dakota: Fargo, U.S. Courthouse, $1,371,000
       [[Page S4936]] Ohio:
       Youngstown, Federal building and U.S. Courthouse, site 
     acquisition and design, $4,574,000
       Steubenville, U.S. Courthouse, $2,280,000
       Oregon: Portland, U.S. Courthouse, $5,000,000
       Pennsylavnia: Philadelphia, Veterans Administration, 
     $1,276,000
       Rhode Island: Providence, Kennedy Plaza Federal Courthouse, 
     $7,740,000
       Tennessee: Greenville, U.S. Courthouse, $2,936,000
       Texas:
       Corpus Christi, U.S. Courthouse, $6,446,000
       Ysleta, site acquisition and construction, $1,727,000
       U.S. Virgin Islands: St. Thomas, Charlotte Amalie, U.S. 
     Courthouse Annex, $2,184,000
       Washington:
       Seattle, U.S. Courthouse, $3,764,000
       Nationwide chlorofluorocarbons program, $12,300,000
       Nationwide energy program, $15,300,000''
                                 ______

                  BOXER (AND OTHERS) AMENDMENT NO. 436

  Mrs. BOXER (for herself, Mr. Bingaman, Mr. Kerrey, Mr. Wellstone, Mr. 
Dodd, and Mr. Bumpers) proposed an amendment to amendment No. 420 
proposed by Mr. Hatfield to the bill H.R. 1158, supra; as follows:

       On page 35, beginning on line 21, strike out 
     ``$15,200,000'' and all that follows through ``title III-B, 
     $5,000,000, and'', and inserting in lieu thereof ``$5,200,000 
     are rescinded as follows: from the Elementary and Secondary 
     Education Act of 1965,''.
       On page 68, between lines 6 and 7, insert the following:


                              chapter xii

              department of defense--military, procurement

                       aircraft procurement, army

                              (rescission)

       Of the funds available under this heading in title III of 
     Public Law 103-335, $11,000,000 are rescinded.
                                 ______


                        SHELBY AMENDMENT NO. 437

  Mr. SHELBY proposed an amendment to amendment No. 435 proposed by Mr. 
Kerrey to amendment No. 420 proposed by Mr. Hatfield to the bill H.R. 
1158, supra; as follows:

       In lieu of the language proposed to be inserted, insert the 
     following:
       Of the funds made available under this heading in Public 
     Laws 101-136, 101-509, 102-27, 102-141, 103-123, 102-393, 
     103-329, $1,842,885,000 are rescinded from the following 
     projects in the following amounts:
       Alabama:
       Montgomery, U.S. Courthouse annex, $46,320,000
       Arkansas:
       Little Rock, Courthouse, $13,816,000
       Arizona:
       Bullhead City, FAA grant, $$2,200,000
       Lukeville, commercial lot expansion, $1,219,000
       Nogales, Border Patrol, headquarters, $2,998,000
       Phoenix, U.S. Federal Building, Courthouse, $121,890,000
       San Luis, primary lane expansion and administrative office 
     space, $3,496,000
       Sierra Vista, U.S. Magistrates office, $1,000,000
       Tucson, Federal Building, U.S. Courthouse, $121,890,000
       California:
       Menlo Park, United State Geological Survey office 
     laboratory building, $6,868,000
       Sacramento, Federal Building-U.S. Courthouse, $142,902,000
       San Diego, Federal building-Courthouse, $3,379,000
       San Francisco, Lease purchase, $9,702,000
       San Francisco, U.S. Courthouse, $4,378,000
       San Francisco, U.S. Court of Appeals annex, $9,003,000
       San Pedro, Customhouse, $4,887,000
       Colorado:
       Denver, Federal building-Courthouse, $8,006,000
       District of Columbia:
       Central and West heating plants, $5,000,000
       Corps of Engineers, headquarters, $37,618,000
       General Services Administration, Southeast Federal Center, 
     headquarters, $25,000,000
       U.S. Secret Service, headquarters, $113,084,000
       Florida:
       Ft. Myers, U.S. Courthouse, $24,851,000
       Jacksonville, U.S. Courthouse, $10,633,000
       Tampa, U.S. Courthouse, $14,998,000
       Georgia:
       Albany, U.S. Courthouse, $12,101,000
       Atlanta, Centers for Disease Control, site acquisition and 
     improvement, $25,890,000
       Atlanta, Centers for Disease Control, $14,110,000
       Atlanta, Centers for Disease Control, Roybal Laboratory, 
     $47,000,000
       Savannah, U.S. Courthouse annex, $3,000,000
       Hawaii:
       Hilo, federal facilities consolidation, $12,000,000
       Illinois:
       Chicago, SSA DO, $2,167,000
       Chicago, Federal Center, $47,682,000
       Chicago, Dirksen building, $1,200,000
       Chicago, J.C. Klucynski building, $13,414,000
       Indiana:
       Hammond, Federal Building, U.S. Courthouse, $52,272,000
       Jeffersonville, Federal Center, $13,522,000
       Kentucky:
       Covington, U.S. Courthouse, $2,914,000
       London, U.S. Courthouse, $1,523,000
       Louisiana:
       Lafayette, U.S. Courthouse, $3,295,000
       Maryland:
       Avondale, DeLaSalle building, $16,671,000
       Bowie, bureau of Census, $27,877,000
       Prince Georges/Montgomery Counties, FDA consolidation, 
     $284,650,000
       Woodlawn, SSA building, $17,292,000
       Massachusetts:
       Boston, U.S. Courthouse, $4,076,000
       Missouri:
       Cape Girardeau, U.S. courthouse, $3,688,000
       Kansas City, U.S. Courthouse, $100,721,000
       Nebraska:
       Omaha, Federal Building,U.S. Courthouse, $9,291,000
       Nevada:
       Las Vegas, U.S.courthouse, $4,230,000
       Reno, Federal building--U.S.Courthouse, $1,465,000
       New Hampshire:
       Concord, Federal building--U.S. Courthouse, $3,519,000
       New Jersey:
       Newark, parking facility, $9,000,000
       Trenton, Clarkson Courthouse, $14,107,000
       New Mexico:
       Albuquerque, U.S. courthouse, $47,459,000
       Santa Teresa, Border Station, $4,004,000
       New York:
       Brooklyn, U.S. Courthouse, $43,717,000
       Holtsville, IRS Center, $19,183,000
       Long Island, U.S. Courthouse, $27,198,000
       North Dakota:
       Fargo, Federal building-U.S. courthouse, $20,105,000
       Pembina, Border Station, $93,000
       Ohio:
       Cleveland, Celebreeze Federal building, $10,972,000
       Cleveland, U.S. Courthouse, $28,248,000
       Steubenville, U.S. Courthouse, $2,820,000
       Youngstown, Federal Building-U.S. Courthouse, $4,574,000
       Oklahoma:
       Oklahoma City, Murrah Federal building, $5,290,000
       Oregon:
       Portland, U.S. Courthouse, $5,000,000
       Pennsylvania:
       Philadelphia, Byrne-Green Federal building-Courthouse, 
     $30,628,000
       Philadelphia, Nix Federal building-Courthouse, $13,814,000
       Philadelphia, Veterans Administration, $1,276,000
       Scranton, Federal Building-U.S. Courthouse, $9,969,000
       Rhode Island:
       Providence, Kennedy Plaza Federal Courthouse, $7,740,000
       South Carolina:
       Columbia, U.S. Courthouse annex, $592,000
       Tennessee:
       Greeneville, U.S. Courthouse, $2,936,000
       Texas:
       Austin, Veterans Administration annex, $1,028,000
       Brownsville, U.S. Courthouse, $4,339,000
       Corpus Christi, U.S. Courthouse, $6,446,000
       Laredo, Federal building-U.S. Courthouse, $5,986,000
       Lubbock, Federal building-Courthouse, $12,167,000
       Ysleta, site acquisition and construction, $1,727,000
       U.S. Virgin Islands:
       Charlotte Amalie, St. Thomas, U.S. Courthouse, $2,184,000
       Virginia:
       Richmond, Courthouse annex, $12,509,000
       Washington:
       Blaine, Border Station, $4,472,000
       Point Roberts, Border Station, $698,000
       Seattle, U.S. Courthouse, $10,949,000
       Walla Walla, Corps of Engineers building, $2,800,000
       West Virginia:
       Beckley, Federal building-U.S. Courthouse, $33,097,000
       Martinsburg, IRS center, $4,494,000
       Wheeling, Federal building-U.S. Courthouse, $35,829,000
       Nationwide chlorofluorocarbons program, $12,300,000
       Nationwide energy program, $15,300,000
                                 ______


                   REID (AND BRYAN) AMENDMENT NO. 438

  Mr. REID (for himself and Mr. Bryan) proposed an amendment to 
amendment No. 420 proposed by Mr. Hatfield to the bill, H.R. 1158, 
supra; as follows:

       On page 14, between lines 12 and 13, insert the following:


                      nuclear waste disposal fund

                              (rescission)

       Of the funds made available under this heading in Public 
     Law 103-316, $14,700,000 are rescinded.
       On page 28, strike lines 18 through 23.
                                 ______


                         REID AMENDMENT NO. 439

  Mr. REID proposed an amendment to amendment No. 420 proposed by Mr. 
Hatfield to the bill, H.R. 1158, supra; as follows:

       On page 14, between lines 12 and 13, insert the following:
               [[Page S4937]] nuclear waste disposal fund

                              (rescission)

       Of the funds made available under this heading in Public 
     Law 103-316, $5,625,000 are rescinded.
       On page 28, line 7, strike ``, $42,071,000 are rescinded'' 
     and insert ``for programs other than the rural health 
     research program and the rural health outreach grant program, 
     $36,446,000 are rescinded''.
                                 ______


                 HOLLINGS (AND BIDEN) AMENDMENT NO. 440

  Mr. HATFIELD (for Mr. Hollings, for himself and Mr. Biden) proposed 
an amendment to amendment No. 420 proposed by Mr. Hatfield, to the 
bill, H.R. 1158, supra; as follows:

       On page 8 of the substitute amendment strike line 1 through 
     line 6 and insert in lieu thereof the following:

                         GENERAL ADMINISTRATION

                          WORKING CAPITAL FUND


                              (rescission)

       Of the unobligated balances available under this heading in 
     Public Law 103-317, $5,000,000 are rescinded.

                            LEGAL ACTIVITIES

                         ASSET FORFEITURE FUND


                              (rescission)

       Of the funds made available under this heading in Public 
     Law 103-317, $5,000,000 are rescinded.

                       OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS

                              DRUG COURTS


                              (rescission)

       Of the funds made available under this heading in title 
     VIII of Public Law 103-317, $17,100,000 are rescinded.
                                 ______


               MURKOWSKI (AND D'AMATO) AMENDMENT NO. 441

  Mr. MURKOWSKI (for himself and Mr. D'Amato) proposed an amendment to 
amendment No. 427 proposed by Mr. D'Amato to amendment No. 420 proposed 
by Mr. Hatfield, to the bill, H.R. 1158, supra; as follows:

       At the end of line 10 of page 2, prior to the period insert 
     the following:
       ``, Provided, That as the bearer bonds issued by the 
     Government of Mexico are redeemed with monies provided by the 
     Government of the United States, the Government of the United 
     States first be provided with the names and addresses of 
     those redeeming such bonds.''
     

                          ____________________