[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 44 (Thursday, March 9, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H2976]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
PUNITIVE DAMAGES
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentleman from Tennessee [Mr. Bryant] is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. BRYANT of Tennessee. Mr. Speaker, punitive damages have clearly
gotten out of hand. Tonight, I want to share with you a case involving
punitive damages in my home State of Tennessee.
Sadly, it involved the death of an individual from Alabama by carbon
monoxide poisoning.
The plaintiff claimed that the carbon monoxide poisoning was caused
by a natural gas water heater made in Tennessee. It was a used heater
obtained by a homeowner and installed by someone with no plumbing
background. It was installed behind a wall without combustion air, with
no vent, and was connected to an LP gas line. The local gas company
wasn't notified, and that was a violation of local law.
In short, the heater was altered from its original manufactured
condition and was installed improperly and illegally. Nevertheless, a
jury verdict was rendered against State industries. The jury awarded
$5.5 million in compensatory damages and $6.5 in punitive damages. In
fact, one of the jurors wanted to give $25 million.
On appeal, the Alabama Supreme Court reduced the compensatory damages
to $850,000, but the punitive damages stood.
Now I am not criticizing in any way, shape, or form the person who
installed the heater. In his mind's eye, he was lending a helping hand.
And I am truly sorry for the death of anyone. But what I am criticizing
is the award the jury made.
Punitive damages are intended to punish--not to redistribute wealth.
Compensatory damages are designed to compensate for medical costs, lost
wages, pain and suffering, and emotional distress. Punitive damages are
intended to punish--to send a message that whatever was done wrong,
don't do it again.
Had the legislation before us tonight been in place, the plaintiff
still could have received almost $3.5 million. That's a substantial
amount of money which would have served to both compensate the
plaintiff for their suffering and punish the defendant for whatever
wrong they may have done.
This legislation will not impede upon anyone's right to sue, despite
the many fallacious and misleading charges by its opponents.
I would support no legislation that would close the courthouse doors
to anyone. Access to the courts is a fundamental right that must be
acknowledged. But as a lawyer, I can tell you we must have tort reform,
and we must have it now.
It's time we establish common sense and reason in our judicial
system, and this legislation does just that. Many States have already
placed caps on punitive damage awards.
It's time the Federal Government followed their lead, and passed tort
reform legislation.
____________________