[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 43 (Wednesday, March 8, 1995)]
[House]
[Pages H2889-H2890]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
DISCUSSION ON NEWSPAPER STORIES
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentleman from Arizona [Mr. Hayworth] is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. HAYWORTH. Mr. Speaker, earlier today it was my privilege to
appear on C-SPAN with one of our colleagues on the other side of the
aisle from Illinois to discuss the morning newspapers, and a rather
lively discussion ensued, and it was very interesting to go over many
different articles in the Nation's press.
One article, however, we failed to get to, and I would bring to your
attention, Mr. Speaker, and indeed the attention of the American
people, on the editorial page of the Wall Street Journal, an article
entitled ``Protest, Washington Style.'' Quoting from the article now:
Newt Gingrich and other speakers were prevented from
addressing the National Association of Counties in Washington
on Monday after 500 shouting protesters invaded the hotel
ballroom and used megaphones to call for higher school lunch
funding. Many of the protesters had been bused in from out of
town, prompting Mr. Gingrich to ask some pointed questions.
Why weren't they at work? Who are they? Who paid them? Well,
it turns out the protest was organized by the left wing
activist group, ACORN, a frequent recipient of Federal and
state grants.
The Washington Times reports that 42 participants in
President Clinton's new national service program are working
for ACRON at a cost to taxpayers of more than $1.1 million.
Several operate out of ACORN's Washington, D.C. offices. We
may never know if federally funded `volunteers' helped ruin
meetings for 2,000 county officials, but we hope Congress
plans some oversight hearings on the groups involved in Mr.
Clinton's service program.
{time} 2300
It was interesting today, Mr. Speaker, to see yet more protesters
arrive here on Capitol Hill. And I find it especially interesting that
it appears that some of these protesters are subsidized with tax money
from you and me and from the American people, so now we have really
reached a new low in the concept of protest.
And please don't misunderstand. I uphold the first amendment and
applaud the first amendment, and certainly people have a right to
peaceably assemble and petition the Government for redress of
grievances. But the problem comes as certainly there is a cloud of
suspicion that what we have now are protesters subsidized with tax
money here to champion
the tired old policies of the past.
And what is even more true, and I will come back to this fact until
the American people have it clear in their minds, all this talk about
cutting the school lunch programs, about cutting the Federal nutrition
programs, can only be characterized as false.
Again, the numbers speak for themselves. This new Republican majority
is willing to fund these programs $200 million in excess of what
President Clinton has called for this year. And moreover, we called for
increases of 4.5 percent.
Now the guardians of the old order bankrupt of any new ideas come
here and march to the will of this House and say, No, no, those are
cuts. Again, only in Washington can it be considered a cut when you
reduce a future planned increase.
My friends on the other side are upset because the increase will not
be 5.1 percent. Instead, the increase is
[[Page H2890]] only 4.5 percent. But I would ask, amidst all of these
allegations, amidst the misreading of numbers, amidst this phantom
number of $7 billion with imaginary money that is not even there, who
has been harmed?
We know who has been scared. Name for me the school children, show me
the schools that are being deprived of lunches. They are not there.
Again, it is the policy of this new majority to empower people, to
enfranchise people and not to hold down people in the form of a
permanent underclass but to truly feed the needy and to give the
opportunities to feed the needy in the classrooms, the people who
really need it, to have that opportunity at the local level. But the
money is not being taken away.
And with reference to people coming to lobby us, to come to see us, I
thought it was very interesting that in previous weeks folks would come
bringing cut-out dolls of this nature and they would list names of
very, very small children. Now, look, it is obvious a 3-year-old,
precocious though she might be, did not assemble this doll. This was
something done by adults, from government bureaucrats who have paid
money into political action committees that have funded the tired old
order 10 to 1 over Republicans. That is part of the problem. That is
the real story. That is what we will move to correct.
____________________