[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 42 (Tuesday, March 7, 1995)]
[House]
[Pages H2780-H2781]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
WE NEED A NEW ECONOMIC NATIONALISM
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentleman from Missouri [Mr. Gephardt] is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. GEPHARDT. Madam Speaker, I rise today to call my colleagues'
attention to an important finding in last week's issue of Business
Week.
I am speaking of an economic reality which may be new to the business
press in the United States--but has been plaguing millions of hard-
working middle-class families for more than 16 years.
The simple fact is corporate profits are surging, but the working
people who stand behind those profits are seeing their incomes fall.
That is why Business Week concluded in an editorial, and I quote,
The middle class has shouldered much of the pain * * * that
has made Corporate America so productive and competitive in
global markets. Now is the time for the middle class to share
in the fruits of higher productivity.
When you look at the facts, it is clear that we are in the midst of a
powerful business boom. Business Week reports that, despite the Federal
Reserve's efforts to halt our economy, corporate profits among 900
leading companies grew by an astonishing 71 percent in the fourth
quarter of 1994.
Profits grew by a whopping 41 percent for all of 1994, the biggest
increase since Business Week began keeping these statistics back in
1973.
But while business has never been better, for middle-income families,
the economic crunch continues.
Business Week reports that American household wealth has actually
fallen by about half of 1 percent--only the eighth time it has dropped
in 30 years.
This is something to which attention must be paid, especially by
those who talk about family values.
Look at what is happening to the families that have given up every
minute of family time while parents work two, three, even four jobs.
How can you build a strong family when you are working day and night
just to pay the bills?
When I was growing up in the 1950's, America brought a higher
standard of living to a growing number of our people.
As profits flourished, the people behind those profits saw their real
wages rise.
But today, working people cannot even expect to share in the fruits
of their own labor.
The statistics are as plain as day. From 1947 to 1973, American
workers gave their companies an almost 90 percent increase in
productivity, and in return, their real wages increased by nearly 99
percent. They got as much as they gave.
But from 1973 to 1982, workers got only half as much of an increase
in real wages as they gave in new productivity. And from 1982 through
last year, they got only a third as much as they gave in real
productivity.
For Democrats, the single, simple, fundamental task of our party--in
this Congress, in this decade, in this generation--is to fight for the
standard of living of working families and the middle class. We must
heed the words of Business Week, and help the middle class to share in
the profits and fruits of higher productivity.
That means that we must question a boom in which Wall Street is
strong, but Main Street is still weak.
It means we must challenge an economy in which the Dow Jones keeps
rising through the roof, but family fortunes keep falling through the
floor.
And it means that the American people have to decide which political
party is willing to stand up and fight for them--and which political
party is standing in their way.
Democrats believe in a substantial minimum wage increase--because you
cannot support a strong economy, let alone your own family, on $8,500 a
year. People ought to be paid more if they are working than if they are
on welfare, and too often, we know that is not the case today.
Republicans not only oppose a minimum wage increase, House Republican
Leader Dick Armey wants to abolish the minimum wage altogether. I ask
Mr. Armey or those who agree with him, could you raise a family on
$8,500 a year?
Democrats believe that a capital gains tax cut is not the first
priority, that we need a middle-class tax cut, to build up the
community of consumers who buy America's products.
Republicans not only oppose a middle-class tax cut, they want to give
that tax break to the wealthiest investors, forcing deep cuts in the
programs working Americans need most; school lunches for children, food
stamps, Social Security, Medicare.
Democrats believes that globalization of our economy
should not mean the pauperization of our middle class. It should not
mean throwing our workers into roller-coaster competition with third-
world workers who earn as little as a dollar a day.
And it does not have to mean that, if we change the way we do
business, both home and abroad.
We need a new economic internationalism, to bring the third world
into the global economy, without submerging developed nations into the
third world, to lift them up, without dragging ourselves down.
We need a new economic nationalism. Not an effort to isolate
ourselves, but a commitment by business, labor, and government to hard-
working, middle class families here at home.
We need a commitment to the notion of ``Pay for Performance''--
ensuring that productivity, quality, and creativity profit the people
who are actually providing it. A powerful study by Laura Tyson and
David Levine shows that if you reward workers' good results, you get
even more progress. In the coming months, I will offer legislation to
encourage companies to embrace such financial fairness.
Republicans, on the other hand, actually like the rampant
globalization of
[[Page H2781]] our economy. They do not see lower wages, lower
environmental standards, and lower labor standards as a problem; they
see them as the solution. We have seen the results in these past 16
years: people suffer, even as profits soar.
Business Week's findings are powerful proof of the challenge we face:
raising the standard of living for working families and the middle
class.
And I think it is clear that this goal could not be farther from the
Republican agenda. Just read the Contract. There is not so much as a
nod or wink about real jobs or opportunities.
So it is up to the Members of my party--the Democratic Party--to
devise real solutions to this very real national crisis.
____________________