[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 39 (Thursday, March 2, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H2575]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
FOOD FOR AMERICA'S CHILDREN MUST HAVE PRIORITY OVER SUPPORT FOR FOREIGN
GOVERNMENTS
The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. McHugh). Under a previous order of the
House, the gentleman from Alabama [Mr. Hilliard] is recognized for 5
minutes.
Mr. HILLIARD. Mr. Speaker, the children of Alabama, like those of the
rest of the Nation, depend on the food programs of the Federal
Government. Some come from very needy families who cannot afford to
feed their children.
In my district, one of the poorest in the Nation, these food programs
for kids make the difference between health and sickness, or between
the ability to concentrate or become distracted from their class
studies. These programs make the difference between a successful
student and one who fails.
In the 7th district of Alabama, nearly two-thirds of students served
cannot afford to pay. Even field kids who cannot afford to pay for
their breakfast meal under Federal guidelines receive food. Mr.
Speaker, this is a catastrophe. We must take care of our kids. We must
protect our kids. Cutting food programs will literally take food out of
the mouths of young kids. This we cannot afford to do.
Mr. Speaker, we must prepare for the future. Those of us who wish to
balance the budget do not wish to balance the budget on the backs of
kids. There are so many other ways and methods we could make cuts in
order to balance the budget.
Mr. Speaker, last year we spent $4 billion defending Japan. Japan
paid the United States $2 billion of that $4 billion we spent. We will
spend $2.4 billion over the next five years that will be taken from the
food program for the support of Japan.
Mr. Speaker, last year we spent $18 billion defending Europe. We will
take $2.4 billion from the food program over the next five years.
Mr. Speaker, one year of defending Germany or defending China or
defending the world will support the food program in this country for 5
years. I submit that we should take priorities, and that the number one
priority should be our children.
Mr. Speaker, most of us would love to balance the budget. Each one of
us, regardless of our party, believe in balancing the budget, but we
cannot balance it at the expense of our children. I am opposed to
including children's nutrition programs in block grant form. I am
opposed, because I realize that, like my State, which is a deficit
State, that money will be used for other purposes, directly or
indirectly.
Let me say, Mr. Speaker, exactly how that would happen. If the money
is sent directly to the State, and it is not earmarked just solely for
food programs, but for other indirect costs associated with
administering that program, then that money will be spent for highways,
it will be spent for roads and bridges, it will be spent for other
programs, and it will happen in this manner.
The money will go to the States, earmarked for the administration of
the food program. Instead of buying food supplies, that money will be
used to pay salaries of workers. At the present time, Mr. Speaker, the
Federal program pays for the food supplies, and the State program
matches it by paying salaries of the workers.
I am certain that the State will not pay the salaries of the workers.
Therefore, the money that ordinarily will go for food supplies will go
towards partially paying the salaries of the workers, and the workers'
salaries that have been paid by the State, what will happen to that
money? Mr. Speaker, you know and I know that it will be used to build
highways, to
build bridges, to repair roads, or for any other emergency that may
occur.
I have been in the State government for 18 years. We have many trust
funds in the State of Alabama. I have seen us raid those trust funds
for other purposes than those intended by the fund itself, so I know
what will happen. I suggest it will happen every day, all across
America. There will not be just 50 programs, but every State will have
a program. That program, Mr. Speaker, would not be sufficient to feed
the children, to feed the kids, to feed the students in our country.
Mr. Speaker, the children, the kids, the students in this country
deserve our very best. They deserve to be treated better than we treat
them, and they deserve to be treated in terms of priority above the
defense of Japan and above the defense of Europe.
____________________