[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 25 (Wednesday, February 8, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H1437]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
THE TRUTH ABOUT FEDERAL PAYMENTS TO ALABAMA
(Mr. BROWDER asked and was given permission to address the House for
1 minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
Mr. BROWDER. Mr. Speaker, I know it is difficult to correct a piece
of misinformation once it is published, but I am going to try. Much
attention has been directed in recent weeks to the impact of the
balanced budget amendment on the finances of the various States. In
that vein, several national publications have reported that my home
State of Alabama led the nation, with 58 percent of its 1993 budget
coming from the Federal Government.
That figure is amazing, but it is not true. The confusion results
from a difference in Alabama's accounting system that was not
adequately explained when the State's budget figures were reported in
the national survey.
Mr. Speaker, I will include for the Record a letter from the
Department of Finance of the State of Alabama showing that Federal
funds accounted for 32 percent, not 58 percent, of Alabama's budget for
fiscal year 1993.
State of Alabama,
Department of Finance,
Montgomery, AL, January 27, 1995.
Hon. Glen Browder,
U.S. House of Representatives,
Washington, DC.
Dear Congressman Browder: Recent news articles published by
Newsweek and by Time on January 23, 1995, analyzed the
Federal Balanced Budget Amendment and its effects on state
finances. Both articles reflected that 58% of Alabama's
Budget for fiscal year ending 1993 was received from the
Federal Government. This information is not correct. Actual
Federal revenues received by Alabama for the fiscal year
ending in 1993 were $2.74 billion and compared to total
revenues received (from all sources) of $8.52 billion is
approximately 32 percent.
This confusion has been brought on by the data supplied to
Newsweek and Time by the National Association of State Budget
Officers in their ``NASBO 1994 State Expenditure Survey--
Fiscal Years 1992-94.'' Alabama provided data for the
referenced NASBO survey, but our data was not adequately
explained. Alabama included in the section for Federal Funds,
expenditures from Federal funds, local funds, state earmarked
funds, tuition, fees, grants and, contracts with a footnote
to that effect. This footnote was included because
expenditures are made from fund accounts made up of these
various revenue sources thus precluding actual identification
of each expenditure by source of funding. A reasonable
estimation of the Federal percentage can be made from the
revenue perspective of Alabama's accounting system and for FY
1993 is approximately 32 percent.
I wanted to clarify this data for you, so you would not
base your vote on this issue on incorrect data.
Sincerely,
Bill Newton,
Assistant Finance Director.
____________________