[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 23 (Monday, February 6, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H1216]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
SUPERFUND LIABILITY MORATORIUM
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under the Speaker's announced policy of
January 4, 1995, the gentleman from Florida [Mr. Canady] is recognized
during morning business for 5 minutes.
Mr. CANADY of Florida. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to offer an avenue
of relief to small businesses and individuals throughout the country
who have done nothing wrong, but are nonetheless being held liable for
the expensive task of Superfund site clean up.
As you know, Mr. Speaker, Congress passed the Superfund law in 1980
to clean up the country's most polluted waste sites. The merits of the
Superfund effort are without question. Superfund sites are
environmental disaster areas which have a clear potential for impact on
public health and safety. Superfund sites must be cleaned up.
But while the Superfund law may have a noble purpose, the details are
a nightmare. The framers of Superfund, adhering to the concept of
``polluter pays,'' created a scheme of joint and several and
retroactive liability. This wrongheaded provision has forced many
individuals and small businesses to pay a portion of the clean up costs
although they are not in fact responsible for the pollution.
Mr. Speaker, this structure has resulted in a notorious tangle of
litigation and enforcement, and it has wreaked havoc on the lives of
innocent citizens while accomplishing very little in the way of actual
clean up.
These innocent individuals had no knowledge of the release of
hazardous substances into the environment. They were simply trying to
do the right thing by contracting with a third party for proper
disposal. Now they are liable, under Superfund, for the cleanup of
environmental disasters they did not create.
Such liability without culpability is patently unfair. It runs
contrary to common sense and the fundamental requirements of justice.
Further, it can be financially devastating to innocent individuals who
are caught in the Superfund trap.
There is general agreement, in this body and elsewhere, that the
Superfund liability structure must be changed. I am aware that the
appropriate committees and subcommittees in both Houses of Congress are
working on a comprehensive reform effort. I support this effort.
However, as Congress debates the shape and scope of reform,
individuals in my district and elsewhere continue to be pursued and
persecuted for something they did not do. This is not right, Mr.
Speaker. We must stop this injustice and prevent this law from further
disrupting the lives of innocent individuals.
It is for this reason that I introduced H.R. 795 last week to provide
relief for innocent parties while we proceed with comprehensive reform
of the law. My bill instructs the Administrator of the Environmental
Protection Agency [EPA] to cease all agency actions against the
nonpolluters. It also places a moratorium on the authority for
contribution actions under the statute.
It is important, Mr. Speaker, to explain what my bill does not do. It
does not abolish the Superfund Program, it does not repeal Superfund
funding authority and it does not stop the clean up of Superfund sites.
It allows the EPA to continue its enforcement actions against the true
polluters--the culpable owners and operators of the contaminated sites
and all others who had prior knowledge of illegal or environmentally
harmful disposal activities.
H.R. 795 simply suspends the practice of financing Superfund clean
ups on the backs of innocent people who had no knowledge of wrongdoing
and no intent to harm the environment.
This legislation is needed to provide relief to the innocent
individuals caught in the Superfund liability trap. The Superfund
nightmare has gone on far too long. We should stop the injustice
without further delay. I encourage my colleagues to join me in this
effort.
____________________