[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 22 (Friday, February 3, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H1197]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




ORDER OF OFFERING AMENDMENTS DURING FURTHER CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 2 ON 
                        MONDAY, FEBRUARY 6, 1995

  Mr. ARMEY. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that when the 
Committee of the Whole House meets under the 5-minute rule next Monday 
to consider amendments to H.R. 2 that four amendments, if offered, will 
be considered, time to be divided equally between proponents and 
opponents of the amendment, with debate not to exceed the time 
allotted, in this case the gentleman from Utah [Mr. Orton] for 1 hour, 
the gentlewoman from California [Ms. Waters] for 30 minutes, the 
gentleman from Louisiana [Mr. Tauzin] for 30 minutes, and the gentleman 
from Ohio [Mr. Traficant] for 30 minutes; furthermore, that no 
amendments to the amendments may be offered, that two substitutes, if 
offered, will also be considered, time to be equally divided between 
the proponents and opponents, and debate not to exceed 1 hour each.
  Those substitutes would be by the gentlewoman from New York [Ms. 
Slaughter] and by the gentleman from Texas [Mr. Stenholm], with the 
proviso that the gentleman from Texas [Mr. Stenholm] will not begin to 
offer his substitute until 5 o'clock p.m.; and, finally, that no 
amendments to the substitutes may be offered.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. For clarification, the Chair will ask one 
question.
  Is it the majority leader's request that the six named amendments, 
and none other, be in order for the balance of the consideration?
  Mr. ARMEY. The Chair is correct in that.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the 
gentleman from Texas?
  There was no objection.

                          ____________________