[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 10 (Wednesday, January 18, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H303]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
THOUGHTS ON A NEGATIVE APPROACH
(Mr. LINDER asked and was given permission to address the House for 1
minute.)
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman may proceed.
Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts. Mr. Speaker, a parliamentary inquiry.
Mr. LINDER. Regular order, Mr. Speaker. I have been recognized in the
well of the House. Do I have the floor?
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from Georgia [Mr. Linder] is
recognized for 1 minute.
Mr. LINDER. Mr. Speaker, sometime just before the campaigns got in
earnest, a former majority whip of this House, Tony Coelho, was brought
in to help the Democrats win. He said this:
Ideas are not the issue. Candidates can't get reelected if
they run on who they are and what they stand for. They have
to go in and put negative ads out. The only way you can win
races today is with negative advertising.
It seems to me that the minority has decided to continue the campaign
and absent an ability to compete with the Speaker's ideas, they have
chosen to tear down the Speaker personally. There are far more things
to be done in this House than to make personal attacks. I do not
recall----
Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts. A point of order, Mr. Speaker.
Mr. LINDER. Do I have the floor, Mr. Speaker?
Mr. Speaker, I do not recall these questions being raised about a
former Member of the Senate----
point of order
Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts. A point of order, Mr. Speaker.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Will the gentleman suspend, and will the
gentleman from Massachusetts state his point of order?
Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts. Tentatively as to the Chair's ruling, the
gentleman is impugning the motives of Members of this House. The
gentleman at the microphone has just said he has imputed inappropriate
motives to things that have been said, but the tenor of the Chair's
ruling is that no personal references to other Members ought to be
allowed.
The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Stearns). The Chair will state that the
gentleman from Georgia has not made a personal reference to any one
Member. The gentleman from Georgia may continue.
Mr. LINDER. Mr. Speaker, I would like to further ask if any of these
ethical questions were raised about the book, ``Earth in the Balance,''
which yielded a $100,000 advance to its author, a former Member of the
other body, and $670,000 in royalties. Where were the questions of
impropriety there?
Mr. Speaker, it seems to me these questions are very selective.
____________________