[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 9 (Tuesday, January 17, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Pages S998-S1000]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
CLOTURE MOTION
Mr. DOLE. Mr. President, having said that, I send a cloture motion to
the desk.
Let me say before I send it to the desk, it is obvious to me what is
happening here is nothing is happening. We had amendment after
amendment on congressional coverage, on which we wasted all of last
week, and part of last week on unfunded mandates.
We are told there are 40, 50, 60 amendments. I am not certain how
many are germane. This is an issue supported by the Governors,
supported
[[Page S999]] by the mayors, supported by the county commissioners,
supported by people all across America--Republicans and Democrats--and
supported by the President of the United States.
It is pretty obvious we are not going to be able to move it quickly
in the Senate because people are using the rules to frustrate efforts.
That is the way it works. I do not fault that. I think we may have done
that in the past a time or two.
This is something where there is broad bipartisan support. We would
like to complete it this week. If we can get cloture, we may be able to
complete it this week.
So I send a cloture motion to the desk.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The cloture motion having been presented under
rule XXII, the Chair directs the clerk to read the motion.
The legislative clerk read as follows:
Cloture Motion
We the undersigned Senators in accordance with the
provisions of rule XXII of the Standing Rules of the Senate
do hereby move to bring to a close debate on S. 1, the
unfunded mandates bill:
Bob Dole, Dirk Kempthorne, Don Nickles, Connie Mack,
Trent Lott, Thad Cochran, Alfonse D'Amato, Al Simpson,
Strom Thurmond, Pete Domenici, Ted Stevens, Bill Cohen,
Christopher S. Bond, Frank Murkowski, Jesse Helms,
Spencer Abraham, Bob Smith, Larry E. Craig, Mike
DeWine, and Bill Frist.
Mr. BYRD. Mr. President, will the leader yield?
Mr. DOLE. I will be happy to yield.
Mr. BYRD. May I say to my friend, I was not aware until just now, in
listening to the distinguished leader's comments, that there was any
necessity for a cloture motion to be entered. I did not realize that
there was a filibuster occurring.
Mr. DOLE. I began to realize it, if I may say to my friend. I can
just see maybe the beginning of one.
Mr. BYRD. I thought progress was being made on the bill. It seems to
me that the Senate was working its will.
Mr. DOLE. If the Senator will yield, I might say to my good friend
from West Virginia, I have indicated to the Democratic leader that if
we can reach some agreement--I do not disagree with the Senator from
West Virginia totally. I will withdraw the motion if we can agree on
limited amendments so we at least have some finite number of
amendments, hopefully germane amendments. But not having that, and
looking at the fact that my colleagues on the other side would like to
have a retreat on Friday of this week, I would like to be
accommodating, but I do not know how we can accommodate that request
unless we make some progress on what is a bill that enjoys strong
bipartisan support.
Mr. BYRD. Is there a list of amendments? I have not seen any list. I
heard there might be a list of amendments, so I suggested that I have
three. I may not call up any of them. So I thought we were making
progress.
Mr. DOLE. It may be progress, depending on how it is defined. I have
not checked Webster's lately. But it would be slow progress if it is
progress. But it is my hope we can put a list together, with staff
working on each side, and submit a copy of that to the Democratic
leader and also the Senator from West Virginia, and others who have an
interest, and see if we can reach some agreement on a list of
amendments. If it is going to be 40, 50, or 60, probably half are
nongermane. I hope in the interest of expediency, we will have support
for the vote of cloture, which would eliminate all the nongermane
amendments.
Mr. BYRD. Mr. President, this kind of underlines everything I was
saying earlier today and last Friday and Thursday. What is all this big
hurry? Here we are, this is the 17th of January, and why can we not be
legislators and take time to understand what is in a bill? I was
seeking to have the committees provide committee reports, and it was
mainly for that reason that I took the floor and complained that the
minority in both committees had been denied that opportunity to have
reports in which they could file views, individual views and minority
views. Now that has been accomplished.
I say, therefore, that the distinguished leader has done, what he has
every right to do--he is the leader and he has introduced a cloture
motion. But it seems to me that the Senate is now beginning to work its
will, now that it has had access to the committee reports, and I do not
know what all the rush is. What is there that is coming behind this
measure?
Mr. DOLE. I think the Senator from West Virginia may have some
inkling. There may be--I would not suggest that, but I know, knowing
the Senator from West Virginia is a master of the game, and I say that
in a complimentary way--he knows that a balanced budget amendment may
be somewhere on the horizon. And I assume that the further away the
better for the Senator from West Virginia. And one way to keep it at a
distance is not to rush through anything else that may be on the Senate
floor.
I am not suggesting that might motivate the Senator from West
Virginia, but it is something that has occurred to me a few times, and
I had the same problem on this side of the aisle.
Mr. BYRD. But it is my understanding that the balanced budget
amendment has not yet been reported out of the Judiciary Committee.
Mr. DOLE. But we hope it may be by the time we complete action on
this bill. We will be coming in later tomorrow morning to accommodate
the Judiciary Committee. And we may adjourn in the afternoon to
accommodate the Judiciary Committee.
Mr. BYRD. Well, as I said earlier, I may vote for this unfunded
mandates bill. I probably will. I do not know yet. I still want to
study it some, and may offer an amendment or so. But I am a little bit
surprised that the leader is implying that a filibuster has been going
on.
Mr. DOLE. I say to my friend, I do not think there is a filibuster in
the real sense. We have not had a real filibuster, as the Senator said
the other day, around here for years. I think I would know a real one
if one occurred.
It seemed to me, with the broad support we have for this unfunded
mandates bill, it is not only filed because of what the leader may
consider delay, but also to avoid a lot of nongermane amendments. We
went through that turkey shoot last week and the week before.
So it seems to me that one way to talk about unfunded mandates and
germane amendments to unfunded mandates is to get cloture and 30 or 40
of those amendments will disappear. We can have the debate the Senator
from West Virginia wants. If necessary, I would be willing to see--we
can extend the 30 hours by consent. I am not trying to shut anything
off, but I would like to eliminate some of these nongermane amendments.
Mr. BYRD. Mr. President, if the majority leader will yield, of course
the majority leader knows as well as I do that there is no rule on
germaneness in the Senate except with respect, in a small way, to
appropriations bills. But this cloture motion just underlines what I
said earlier, that there is an effort to ram this bill through, an
effort to steamroll it through.
It seems to me that a good legislator would seek to know what is in a
bill. I am just trying to play the part of what I think a good
legislator ought to do. A good legislator ought to try to understand
what is in a bill. And we have been deprived, to a degree, of knowing
earlier what was in this bill; having the benefit of a committee report
as an explanation of what is in the bill. We were deprived of that, not
through my fault, not through anybody's fault on this side of the
aisle, but actually against the wishes of certain Senators on this side
of the aisle who are on those committees.
A good legislator, it seems to me, would want to know what is in a
bill. He would want access to a committee report. I have been in
legislative bodies now going on my 49th year and I have found it
beneficial to have committee reports. I think the American people want
their legislators to know what is in a bill. We owe that to the
American people.
So the distinguished majority leader has the right to offer a cloture
motion. He is the leader. If he thinks that there is a slowdown here
and if he thinks that necessity requires that we have a cloture vote on
this bill and then limit it to nongermane amendments, that is his
right. Senators from time to time offer cloture motions when there is
no filibuster. Their sole objective is to create a situation in which
there will not be nongermane amendments.
[[Page S1000]] Our friend Russell Long used to do that from time to
time when he was managing a Finance Committee bill on the floor. He
would offer a cloture motion, not for the purpose of shutting off
debate so much but more so for the purpose of ruling out nongermane
amendments. So the distinguished Republican leader has a point there
and that may be his goal.
But let me just say, lest the Record be left to appear that there is
a filibuster going on here, we have been making progress. We will
continue to make progress. But it just underscores my concerns that the
idea here is to ram things through. Do not take the time to study the
bill. Do not take the time to understand what is in the bill. Just get
the bill passed.
How poor are they that have not patience!
What wound did ever heal but by degrees?
Mr. President, I will yield the floor. I hope we will have an
opportunity before the cloture vote to offer other amendments and I
hope the leader will not put us on any other measure until we finish
this one, so we will really have 2 days in which to discuss the bill
and offer amendments.
I thank the leader for yielding. I yield the floor.
Mr. DOLE addressed the Chair.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The majority leader.
____________________