[Congressional Record Volume 140, Number 52 (Wednesday, May 4, 1994)]
[Senate]
[Page S]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[Congressional Record: May 4, 1994]
From the Congressional Record Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
AUTHORIZING THE PRINTING OF SENATOR ROBERT C. BYRD'S ADDRESSES TO THE
SENATE ON THE HISTORY OF ROMAN CONSTITUTIONALISM
Mr. LEVIN. Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that the Senate
proceed to the immediate consideration of Senate Concurrent Resolution
68, a concurrent resolution submitted earlier today by Senator Reid,
authorizing the printing of Senator Robert Byrd's addresses to the
Senate on the history of Roman constitutionalism; that the concurrent
resolution be agreed to; that the motion to reconsider be laid on the
table; and that any statements thereon appear in the Record at the
appropriate place as though read.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
So the concurrent resolution (S. Con. Res. 68) was agreed to, as
follows:
S. Con Res. 68
Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives
concurring), That there shall be printed as a Senate document
``U.S. Senator Robert C. Byrd's Addresses to the United
States Senate on the History of Roman Constitutionalism'',
delivered between May 5, 1993 and October 18, 1993.
Sec. 2. The document referred to in the first session shall
be--
(1) published under the supervision of the Secretary of the
Senate; and
(2) in such style, form, manner, and binding as directed by
the Joint Committee on Printing, after consultation with the
Secretary of the Senate.
The document shall include illustrations.
Sec. 3. In addition to the usual number of copies of the
document, there shall be printed the lesser of--
(1) 5,000 copies for the use of the Secretary of Senate; or
(2) such number of copies as does not exceed a total
production and printing cost of $47,864.
Mr. REID. Madam President, 1 year ago, on May 5, 1993, our esteemed
colleague Robert C. Byrd initiated a series of 14 addresses on the
subject of the line-item-veto. During the following 5\1/2\ months, he
delivered each of these speeches--packed with names, dates, and complex
narratives--entirely from memory and without recourse to notes or
consultation with staff aides.
In effect, Senator Byrd had created a 14-week university seminar on
the constitutional history of separated and shared powers as shaped in
the republic and empire of ancient Rome. To prepare himself for this
task, he read extensively in the history of England and ancient Rome.
He began with the writings of Montesquieu, the 18th-century French
philosopher who had also studied and thought deeply about the history
of Rome and the operation of contemporary English governmental
institutions. Montesquieu's political philosophy had profoundly
influenced the thinking of those who framed the U.S. Constitution. To
better understand what the framers had in mind when they created a
governmental system of divided and shared powers, Senator Byrd
carefully examined Montesquieu's 1734 essay, ``Considerations on the
Causes of the Greatness of the Romans and their Decline.''
Senator Byrd reasoned that if,
The history of the Roman people helped to influence
Montesquieu's political theory concerning checks and balances
and the separation of powers, and if Montesquieu's political
theory influenced our American forbears in their writing of
the United States Constitution, then why can it not be said
that the history of Rome and the Romans, as well as the
history of England and Englishmen, influenced [the
Constitution's framers].
To test this premise, he examined the works of more than 20
celebrated historians of ancient Rome who wrote from the time of
Polybius, in the second century before Christ, down through Julius
Caesar, Plutarch, Tacitus, Suetonius, and concluding with Edward
Gibbon, in the 18th century.
In these addresses, Robert C. Byrd describes the development of
ancient Rome from its founding in 753 B.C. through its evolution to a
republic with a strong and independent senate and then into its decline
as the Roman Senate willingly yielded hard-won powers to a succession
of emperors.
Senator Byrd sees ample parallels between the willingness of Roman
Senators to hand over powers of the purse to usurping executives and
the compliant attitude of United States Senators in responding to
presidential urging for a similar grant of powers in a line-item veto
constitutional amendment.
Taken together, this remarkable 14-part series displays vast
learning, prodigious memory, and single-minded determination to
preserve constitutional prerogatives forged over more than two
millennia of human experience. In my judgment, this work merits the
widest possible distribution among the students, scholars, and general
citizenry of this Nation. Accordingly I have submitted a concurrent
resolution authorizing printing, as a Senate Document, of Senator
Robert C. Byrd's ``Addresses to the United States Senate on the History
of Roman Constitutionalism.''
____________________