[Congressional Record Volume 140, Number 51 (Tuesday, May 3, 1994)]
[House]
[Page H]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[Congressional Record: May 3, 1994]
From the Congressional Record Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
CONGRESSIONAL REFORM
Mr. SMITH of Michigan. Mr. Speaker, I suspect a lot of Members of
Congress wish that political campaigns were not quite so expensive and
that the demands to accept special interest's political action
committee money were not so great.
Mr. Speaker, I think it is time for Members of this House to declare
where they stand on Congressional reform. Do they stand with the
American people, who are demanding reform, or with the special
interests that are investing millions of dollars in reelection
campaigns to make sure that their special Congressman gets hired?
We live in a time when most Americans believe that many Members of
Congress are bought and paid for by the special interests. The best way
to restore confidence is to remove the perception of privilege, perks,
and PAC influence from the political process.
Mr. Speaker, it is no secret that lobbyists come to Congress to
influence our votes.
{time} 1040
If they convince us to vote their way, advantages and possibly
millions and millions of taxpayer dollars flow into the pockets of
those special interests. They want to make sure that their favorite
congressman or congresswoman gets elected, and they do that by putting
money into their political campaigns.
In 1992, this last election, political action committees contributed
more than $109 million to congressional candidates. As a body, we will
hopefully soon again debate a congressional reform package. However, if
it is like the previous House bill that we debated, it will not serve
the American people well. In fact, it will be a hoodwinking of the
American people, because it really won't be reform.
Mr. Speaker, I have some questions. First, will continuing to allow
special interests lobbyists to decide what goes into appropriation
bills and other legislation be good for our children and grandchildren?
Second, will continuing to ignore the clamor to ban PAC campaign
contributions restore America's faith that the political process
belongs to them and not the special interests? Third, will continuing
to exempt Congress from the laws which we impose on the taxpayers
restore credibility to this House? Will continuing to accept
congressional cost-of-living pay increases automatically restore trust
as we vote to eliminate or scale back those adjustments on the elderly
and many other Americans?
Will continuing to raise most campaign contributions from outside our
congressional districts convince our constituents that we are truly
responsible and responsive to their concerns?
Mr. Speaker, as one of what I think is 22 now Members of Congress who
does not accept PAC contributions, I enjoy the independence. I enjoy
not having to look back over my shoulder to see who I owe a favor to. I
believe the answers to those questions are obvious, at least obvious to
the American people who sent us here.
True campaign finance reform must contain a ban on all PAC
contributions, an end to the use of soft money in Federal elections, a
ban on the bundling of contributions, a requirement that candidates
raise at least half their contributions from the district
representatives where they serve, and a requirement that corporations,
unions, and nonprofit organizations disclose their lobbying activities
and applying these reforms to the 1994 election.
Mr. Speaker, it is time for the U.S. Congress to tell special
interests lobbyists to put their wallets away so that Members of
Congress can regain credibility and respond to the American people that
elected them.
Our status as Member of Congress, I believe, right now might rank us
among the least respected professions in this country. If Congress is
going to lead, we need the respect of the people of this country. To
get that respect, we need dramatic reforms in the U.S. Congress.
____________________