[Congressional Record Volume 140, Number 45 (Thursday, April 21, 1994)]
[House]
[Page H]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[Congressional Record: April 21, 1994]
From the Congressional Record Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
REHABILITATION WORKS
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentleman from Alabama [Mr. Bachus] is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. BACHUS of Alabama. Madam Speaker, on February 8, I introduced
House Joint Resolution 319, which now has over 16 cosponsors and which
requires the Secretary of Health and Human Services to report to
Congress on the impending insolvency of the Social Security Disability
Insurance Trust Fund.
The Social Security Disability Insurance Trust Fund was created to
provide financial support for those who are physically unable to work,
but over the years, the purpose of the disability fund has been
distorted and its good intentions have been abused. This abuse has not
only caused the money in the disability fund to run out, but it now
threatens the solvency of this Nation's Social Security Old Age and
Survivors Trust Fund which provides financial security to all senior
citizens.
The Clinton administration has proposed shifting billions of dollars
out of Social Security's old age fund and into the disability fund. I
say that's no solution. We need a complete re-evaluation of the
criteria used to determine whether a person is truly disabled, and we
need a clearly defined method of re-examination that will allow us to
remove people who are no longer disabled from the Social Security rolls
and get them back to work.
We also ought to be able to take advantage of medical advances and
rehabilitation in order to increase the opportunities for disabled
citizens to re-enter the work force and at the same time reduce the
number of disability insurance payments.
Recently, I toured a facility in Birmingham, AL which proves that
rehabilitation works.
Sixteen year old Jay Marcum was terribly burned and brain injured in
a car wreck. Four months later, his physical therapist, Ms. Beth
Dozier, made these observations: ``He was crumbled up, burned, and
nonresponsive. He couldn't talk. He would just yell out.''
Some physical therapists might have given up, but Beth didn't. And
other therapists working with her didn't either.
Thanks to the good work of therapists at ReLife Rehabilitation
Hospital in Birmingham AL, Jay is now driving, speaking, and working
again.
Jay's rehab bill was nearly $200,000, but considering the
alternative, millions of dollars in nursing home care and disability
payments, this was quite reasonable. Furthermore, if you multiply that
$200,000 by the 90,000 traumatic brain injury survivors who suffer
extreme debilitation each year, the cost and expense of nursing home
care and disability payments would far exceed the cost and expense of
rehabilitation. With rehab, at least 50 percent can be functional
again.
As Jay's mom says, ``Without hospitalized rehab, I believe Jay would
be curled up in a ball in a nursing home bed somewhere.''
In conclusion, Madam Speaker, as we debate health care reform
proposals and consider ways to reform the disability insurance system,
we need to look at rehabilitation as a cost-effective and sound way to
invest our money--and, as demonstrated in Jay Marcum's case, a far more
humane and compassionate approach.
____________________