[Congressional Record Volume 140, Number 43 (Tuesday, April 19, 1994)]
[House]
[Page H]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[Congressional Record: April 19, 1994]
From the Congressional Record Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
LIVING WITHIN OUR MEANS
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under the Speaker's announced policy of
February 11, 1994, the gentleman from New Hampshire [Mr. Zeliff] is
recognized during morning business for 3 minutes.
Mr. ZELIFF. Madam Speaker, about 9 months ago we started a project
here in the House to address the greatest challenge we all have, and
that is to live within our means to turn over a stewardship to the
future of our country, to our grandchildren and our children, and in
early August we had 234 cosponsors of a letter to the Speaker asking
for a time certain to address the challenge of living within our means,
to cut spending.
{time} 1040
After those 234 cosigners, during that following week we signed on
and basically passed the deficit reduction bill that added a trillion
dollars to our debt, the bill called the Clinton Economic Plan. We then
dropped the bill, and we now have 227 cosponsors.
We have 172 Republicans and we have 55 Democrats, for a total of 227
cosponsors.
It is a bipartisan spending mission. It is a mission because it is a
major grassroots effort to address the No. 1 challenge in this House.
It is kind of like a small town meeting in New Hampshire or a small
business meeting where people sit around the table, look at their
expenses and their problems, and cut back their expenses so they can
live within their means. It is a very simple process.
We think that we can cut $100 billion from this deficit. The key is
that we are going to be doing it line by line, and we basically have a
proposal on a particular program. There would be an open rule, a full
debate, and an up-or-down vote. We think we can cut even more than $100
billion.
It is going to be the reversal of what Congress normally does. What
they normally do well is spend a lot of money. What they do not do well
is spend within their means, cut their spending, and get rid of
inefficiency in Government. It is going to be kind of like turning the
tables on the U.S. Congress from a grassroots effort. It is as simple
as A to Z. It is going to break down the walls of this House.
Low taxes come from low spending. That is the way we do it in New
Hampshire.
There are just a few other things to be aware of. On April 7, the
Wall Street Journal came out in a lead editorial on the A-to-Z concept.
George Will last Thursday came out with his editorial in the Washington
Post, and since then we have had syndicated columns of George Will
across the country.
Many, many organizations have signed on. The National Chamber of
Commerce signed on yesterday. United We Stand signed on yesterday, I
believe. Other organizations supporting the plan are the American
Conservative Union, the American Legislative Exchange Council,
Americans for a Balanced Budget, the American Small Business
Association, Americans for Tax Reform, Christian Coalition, Citizens
Against Government Waste, Citizens for a Sound Economy, Free the Eagle,
National American Wholesale Grocers Association, National Federal of
Independent Business, National Taxpayers Union, Pennsylvania Leadership
Council, Small Business Survival Committee, and the United Seniors
Association.
Again we are talking about this nationwide, and on Thursday, April
28, we will initiate a discharge petition where we will hopefully get
277 Members or more to sign on a discharge so we can get it out on the
floor for a full debate.
Madam Speaker, it is time to take the pork to the slaughterhouse, I
say to my friends.
____________________