[Congressional Record Volume 140, Number 43 (Tuesday, April 19, 1994)]
[House]
[Page H]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[Congressional Record: April 19, 1994]
From the Congressional Record Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
CRIME BILL ALREADY POLITICIZED
(Mr. SCHIFF asked and was given permission to address the House for 1
minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
Mr. SCHIFF. Mr. Speaker, in the last several minutes we have heard
several lectures from members of the majority party to us on the
minority side, particularly demanding that we on our side not
politicize the coming crime bill. I find that remarkable, because the
majority party has already highly politicized the crime bill through
its control of the Committee on Rules.
Under action by the Committee on Rules, a number of amendments which
Republicans would have liked to have offered to the crime bill and
which, in my opinion, would have vastly improved it will not even be
considered because they are not allowed to be considered.
Let me just give three examples: If allowed, there would have been an
amendment offered that would have said that for two convictions for
violent crimes, particularly two convictions for being a serial violent
crime committer, violent crime criminal, then life in prison would
apply. That amendment will not be heard on the House floor today.
The bill, as written, says that it lowers, actually lowers, the
penalty for certain drug traffickers. A Republican offered an amendment
to take that provision out of the bill, but that amendment will not be
considered here today.
In the prevention section, quite a number of pork-barrel projects
have been put in there, bills Members have been trying to pass for
years without success. They have added the words to their bill for the
purpose of preventing crime, and we are not allowed to amend to take
those out.
I suggest that the call for an end to politicization of this bill is
a little late.
____________________