[Congressional Record Volume 140, Number 30 (Thursday, March 17, 1994)]
[Senate]
[Page S]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[Congressional Record: March 17, 1994]
From the Congressional Record Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
NUCLEAR NONPROLIFERATION IN SOUTH ASIA
Mr. PRESSLER. Mr. President, I have long been a strong advocate of
nonproliferation policy.
In 1985, Congress enacted the Pressler amendment that prohibits aid
to Pakistan unless the President can make a yearly certification that
the country does not possess a nuclear explosive device. As many of my
colleagues know, the sanctions in that law took effect when the
President was unable to make the certification in 1990.
Recently, the Pressler amendment has been challenged both by the
administration and some in Congress. This is both unfortunate and
difficult to understand. The Pressler amendment is the only effective
nonproliferation law we currently have on the books. Proliferation of
nuclear weapons is the single greatest security threat facing the
United States today. As part of the ongoing debate, I ask unanimous
consent to submit, for the Record, a piece I wrote recently for the New
York Times.
There being no objection, the article was ordered to be printed in
the Record, as follows:
[From the New York Times, Mar. 5, 1994]
We Need Aid Leverage to Slow Nuclear Race
To the Editor: I cannot agree with Representative Lee
Hamilton's conclusions in ``Bomb Scares'' (Op-Ed, Feb. 22),
concerning the Pressler Amendment.
Since 1985, Pakistan has been ineligible to purchase United
States arms or receive most aid unless the President annually
certifies that Pakistan does not possess a nuclear explosive
device. In 1991, President Bush could not do so. As a result,
for three years, some $600 million in annual American aid to
Pakistan has been cut off.
Representative Hamilton and some in the Administration
propose that Congress repeal the Pressler Amendment or
authorize the president to waive it. The Administration has
offered assurances that it would not allow arms sales to
Pakistan while it possesses a nuclear device, but the
presumption is that a waiver, once granted, would be
exercised.
After extensive talks with leaders of Korea, India,
Pakistan and the International Atomic Energy Agency, I am
convinced we should keep the Pressler Amendment unchanged.
President Clinton has stated that proliferation of weapons of
mass destruction is the most critical national security issue
facing the United States today. To repeal the Pressler
Amendment would contradict the President's assessment.
Providing delivery resources to a country in South Asia we
know possesses nuclear weapons would be disastrous. It would
lead to an escalation of the nuclear arms race.
North Korea, other rogue states and countries on the
threshold of acquiring nuclear weapons are looking closely to
see whether or not we mean what we say. Backing away from the
Pressler Amendment would suggest there is no penalty in the
decision to go nuclear. In May 1979, President Carter imposed
aid sanctions on Pakistan because of its nuclear program.
Seven months later he removed those sanctions.
Pakistan assumed from our inconsistent policy that the
United States was not serious on nuclear nonproliferation. It
moved ahead with its program. Repeal the Pressler Amendment
and other nations will follow.
Some specialists say that, but for the threat of United
States aid termination, Egypt and other countries might now
possess nuclear weapons.
Other members of Congress and I are prepared to fight
efforts to overturn the Pressler Amendment. Congress should
not weaken the toughest nuclear sanctions legislation ever
enacted.
Larry Pressler,
U.S. Senator from South Dakota.
____________________