[Congressional Record Volume 140, Number 11 (Tuesday, February 8, 1994)]
[Senate]
[Page S]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[Congressional Record: February 8, 1994]
From the Congressional Record Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
BOSNIA
Mr. EXON. Madam President, I will now turn to another subject, an
overriding international subject that is on the minds of many Americans
and many of us in the House and Senate this day. That has to do with
Bosnia.
Madam President, I have discussed this matter before. I say again, I
hope that we will listen to the advice of our military leadership and
never, ever commit American ground troops to be involved unilaterally
or as a part of a United Nations effort to restore order there until
and unless there is a cease-fire that looks like it has a chance to
hold. That is not in the offing as of now.
I will simply say to the President and our other decisionmakers that
I hope we will be very careful and very cautious as to what we do and
not do. Naturally, with the recent atrocities that happened there--the
killing of civilians--there is a tendency to move and move now.
I will simply sum up my position by saying that we should not get
further involved there unless and until we think through what the
ultimate situation might be. I think it might best be summed up, in my
mind at least: Do not go without a workable goal.
Let me repeat that: Do not go without a workable goal.
The superpower of the United States of America cannot and should not
be involved as the ultimate policeman of the world. On many occasions,
I have said that I am fearful that we are becoming the police force of
the United Nations. The United Nations has done a lot of good over
there, I think, in many things, and certainly the efforts of the United
Nations today have alleviated some of the problems there.
But if we are going to enter into some arrangement with the United
Nations and limit that only to selected bombing of gun emplacements of
the Serbs around Sarajevo, then I think the word of our military
leadership that has been stated over and over again will likely come to
pass: It will not be effective.
I simply say in using the phrase ``do not go without a workable
goal'' that we should tell the United Nations, we should tell our
allies in NATO that if we are going to be involved in such a situation
with them, we have to look beyond as to what will happen if the
selected bombing raids do not work, which I suspect they will not for a
variety of reasons.
I simply say, Madam President, that unless the United Nations and
unless our NATO allies are willing and agreeable to what would happen
as the next step if the selected bombing in the combat area does not
work, what do we do then, it seems to me that we ought to cross that
bridge that has been talked about very little. If the bombing starts
there and it does not work, then I think we have a responsibility, in
conjunction with the United Nations and our NATO allies, to agree we
would talk about bombers and other warmaking potential of the Serbs
throughout the former state of Yugoslavia, even to Belgrade itself.
I am talking about warmaking essentials--communications, railroad
yards, factories and everything else that has gone into the success of
the Serbian aggression and ethnic cleansing, if you will, in that
troubled part of the world. I think we should go slow, we should go
carefully. Last week, the week before last, I chaired a meeting in the
Armed Services Committee with our counterparts in the armed services
committees of our NATO allies.
I will sum up by saying I think there was much diversion, discussion,
and division among our NATO allies, as there probably is in the United
States. Unless we have a clear policy thought through that can have a
chance of winning, I say, do not go.
In closing, Madam President, let me say once again I simply warn,
while some action might be in order, I suggest that the United States
of America not go without a winnable goal. I thank my colleagues for
yielding me the time, and I yield the floor.
The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. Who yields time? The Senator from
Massachusetts.
____________________