[Congressional Record Volume 140, Number 7 (Wednesday, February 2, 1994)]
[Senate]
[Page S]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[Congressional Record: February 2, 1994]
From the Congressional Record Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION SEAFOOD SAFETY REGULATIONS
Mr. STEVENS. Mr. President, on January 21, 1993, Health and Human
Services Secretary Donna Shalala and Food and Drug Administrator David
Kessler announced the completion of a comprehensive new seafood safety
program based on the hazard analysis critical control point [HACCP]
model.
We have been working to develop a comprehensive national seafood
safety program for quite a number of years now, and I feel certain that
the fishing industry will generally be pleased by this important
announcement.
I compliment the Food and Drug Administration [FDA], the National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [NOAA], and the many industry
and consumer groups who helped in developing these regulations.
The FDA's proposed HACCP plan has not yet been published in the
Federal Register, but in my opinion it will receive a good reception
when published. The seafood industry and consumer groups have been
anticipating the regulations, and the FDA intends to provide adequate
time for all who are interested to comment on the proposed rule.
HACCP is a preventative concept that was originally developed by the
Pillsbury Company in the 1960's as part of its work on food for the
U.S. space program. The basic idea of HACCP is that a processor
identifies all of the steps in the process where hazards could occur,
then defines preventative measures and operating parameters to control
hazards at each of the critical points.
In my State, a HACCP-type program was developed and implemented for
seafood over 10 years ago. In fact, my colleagues helped me in 1984 to
provide some of the funding used by the State of Alaska to develop this
pioneer application of HACCP to seafood.
The FDA has acknowledged the Alaska program in its proposed rule, and
that agency has made a point of asking for comments on how the new
Federal program should mesh with existing State programs in order to
avoid imposing inconsistent Federal and State requirements.
Both the FDA and the National Marine Fisheries Service [NMFS]
currently have contracts with the State of Alaska and use State
employees to conduct FDA and NMFS inspections. It is my understanding
that the FDA used the State of Alaska's plan as a model and consulted
with State employees in the development of the new FDA HACCP plan.
In Alaska, our main concern will be to ensure that the new Federal
program does not reduce in any way the safety standards we already have
in place.
To illustrate how well our State program has worked, I am pleased to
inform the Senate that since 1982 there have been no reported incidents
of contaminated Alaska seafood reaching consumers, and no cases of
botulism caused by Alaska seafood.
This is a significant statistic when you consider that over half of
the fish caught in the United States is caught in the waters off
Alaska.
One of the great benefits to come from a national HACCP program will
be a clarification for U.S. consumers of what we already know because
of our Alaska program: that Alaska seafood is completely safe and of
the highest possible quality.
The development of a national HACCP plan really began in 1986 when
the Appropriations Committee included, at my request, $350,000 in the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration budget directing NOAA
to work in cooperation with the FDA to design a HACCP inspection
program.
I compliment the National Fisheries Institute [NFI] for working with
us on the HACCP concept. NFI really got behind the idea of HACCP as the
appropriate alternative to the inspection programs used in the meat and
poultry industry.
The development of a national seafood inspection program has been
largely due to the efforts and leadership of our colleague, Senator
Hollings. Senator Hollings' involvement stems all the way back to the
late 1960's with halibut and swordfish, and as recently as 1990 and
again in 1992, when he introduced legislation that called on the
expertise of the FDA and NOAA for a comprehensive National Seafood
Inspection Program. The FDA's proposed new program marks the
culmination of these efforts.
It is my understanding that the proposed regulations for the FDA plan
will be published in the Federal Register next week and be followed by
a 90-day public comment period. The FDA anticipates the completion of a
final rule by late 1994 or early 1995, with full implementation planned
for 1996.
I am looking forward to hearing from processors throughout the United
States about this plan, particularly those in Alaska already operating
under our similar inspection program, and I encourage the FDA to
continue working and cooperating with industry, consumer groups, and
States--particularly my State of Alaska that has experience under this
system--as it develops the final rule for the new Federal HACCP
Program.
____________________