[Senate Hearing 119-437]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]



                                                        S. Hrg. 119-437

                      NOMINATIONS TO THE MARITIME
                  ADMINISTRATION, THE FEDERAL MARITIME
                  COMMISSION AND THE NATIONAL OCEANIC
                     AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION

=======================================================================




                                HEARING

                               before the

                         COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE,
                      SCIENCE, AND TRANSPORTATION
                          UNITED STATES SENATE

                    ONE HUNDRED NINETEENTH CONGRESS

                             FIRST SESSION

                               __________

                            OCTOBER 22, 2025

                               __________

    Printed for the use of the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation





                   [GRAPHIC NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]





                Available online: http://www.govinfo.gov
                
                              ______
                                 

                 U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE

63-981 PDF                WASHINGTON : 2026
                
                






       SENATE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND TRANSPORTATION

                    ONE HUNDRED NINETEENTH CONGRESS

                             FIRST SESSION

                       TED CRUZ, Texas, Chairman
                       
JOHN THUNE, South Dakota             MARIA CANTWELL, Washington, 
ROGER WICKER, Mississippi                Ranking
DEB FISCHER, Nebraska                AMY KLOBUCHAR, Minnesota
JERRY MORAN, Kansas                  BRIAN SCHATZ, Hawaii
DAN SULLIVAN, Alaska                 EDWARD MARKEY, Massachusetts
MARSHA BLACKBURN, Tennessee          GARY PETERS, Michigan
TODD YOUNG, Indiana                  TAMMY BALDWIN, Wisconsin
TED BUDD, North Carolina             TAMMY DUCKWORTH, Illinois
ERIC SCHMITT, Missouri               JACKY ROSEN, Nevada
JOHN CURTIS, Utah                    BEN RAY LUJAN, New Mexico
BERNIE MORENO, Ohio                  JOHN HICKENLOOPER, Colorado
TIM SHEEHY, Montana                  JOHN FETTERMAN, Pennsylvania
SHELLEY MOORE CAPITO, West Virginia  ANDY KIM, New Jersey
CYNTHIA LUMMIS, Wyoming              LISA BLUNT ROCHESTER, Delaware

                 Brad Grantz, Republican Staff Director
           Nicole Christus, Republican Deputy Staff Director
                   Lila Harper Helms, Staff Director
                 Melissa Porter, Deputy Staff Director
                 
                 
                 
                 
                 
                 
                 
                 
                            C O N T E N T S

                              ----------                              
                                                                   Page
Hearing held on October 22, 2025.................................     1
Statement of Senator Cruz........................................     1
Statement of Senator Cantwell....................................     2
Statement of Senator Fischer.....................................    82
Statement of Senator Moreno......................................    83
Statement of Senator Rosen.......................................    85
Statement of Senator Young.......................................    87
Statement of Senator Klobuchar...................................    89
Statement of Senator Sullivan....................................    91
Statement of Senator Peters......................................    93
Statement of Senator Markey......................................    95
    Letter dated October 20, 2025 to Hon. Ted Cruz and Hon. Maria 
      Cantwell from Greg Morrison, Executive Vice President, 
      National Water Resources Association.......................    99
    Letter dated October 6, 2025 to Hon. Ted Cruz and Hon. Maria 
      Cantwell from Jimi Netniss, General Manager, Modesto 
      Irrigation District and Brad Koehn, General Manager, 
      Turlock Irrigation District................................    99
    Letter dated dated October 9, 2025 to Hon. Ted Cruz and Hon. 
      Maria Cantwell from Zippy Duvall, President, American Farm 
      Bureau Federation..........................................   100
    Letter dated October 20, 2025 to Hon. Ted Cruz and Hon. Maria 
      Cantwell from Federico Barajas, Executive Director, San 
      Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority.......................   101
    Letter dated October 21, 2025 to Hon. Ted Cruz and Hon. Maria 
      Cantwell from Mark Yacucci, President, National States 
      Geographic Information Council (NSGIC).....................   102
    Letter dated October 20, 2025 to Hon. Ted Cruz and Hon. Maria 
      Cantwell from Ian Lyle, Director of Federal Relations, 
      Association of California Water Agencies...................   103
    Letter dated October 20, 2025 to Hon. Ted Cruz and Hon. Maria 
      Cantwell from John Copple, Owner and Chief Executive 
      Officer, The Sanborn Map Company, Inc......................   104
    Letter dated September 22, 2025 to Hon. Ted Cruz and Hon. 
      Maria Cantwell from Paul Arrington, Executive Director and 
      General Counsel, Idaho Water Users Association (IWUA)......   105
    Letter to Senators from Cary S. Davis, President and CEO, 
      American Association of Port Authorities...................   106
    Letter dated September 17, 2025 to Hon. Ted Cruz and Hon. 
      Maria Cantwell from Adam Vokac, President, Marine 
      Engineers' Beneficial Association..........................   106
    Letter dated September 9, 2025 to Hon. Ted Cruz from Captain 
      Sam Stephenson, J.D., President Emeritus, Florida Harbor 
      Pilots Association.........................................   107
    Letter dated August 17, 2025 to Hon. Ted Cruz and Hon. Maria 
      Cantwell from Marco Poisler, UTC Overseas COO--Global 
      Energy & Capital Projects, UTC Overseas, Inc...............   108
    Letter dated September 9, 2025 to Hon. Ted Cruz and Hon. 
      Maria Cantwell from William P. Doyle, Chief Executive 
      Officer, Dredging Contractors of America...................   109
    Letter dated September 19, 2025 to Hon. Ted Cruz and Hon. 
      Maria Cantwell from Joseph Edward Farrell III, Chief 
      Executive Officer, Resolve Marine..........................   109
    Letter dated August 14, 2025 to Hon. Ted Cruz and Hon. Maria 
      Cantwell from Jesus Mejias, President, ECMC................   110
    Letter dated October 7, 2025 to Hon. Ted Cruz and Hon. Maria 
      Cantwell from Representative Mary Dye, Washington State 
      House of Representatives, 9th Legislative District.........   111

                               Witnesses

Hon. Mark Kelly, U.S. Senator from Arizona.......................     4
Hon. James Risch, U.S. Senator from Idaho........................     5
Stephen M. Carmel, Nominee to be Administrator, Maritime 
  Administration.................................................     7
    Prepared statement...........................................     8
    Biographical information.....................................     9
Laura DiBella, Nominee to be a Commissioner, Federal Maritime 
  Commission.....................................................    30
    Prepared statement...........................................    31
    Biographical information.....................................    33
Robert Harvey, Nominee to be a Commissioner, Federal Maritime 
  Commission.....................................................    46
    Prepared statement...........................................    48
    Biographical information.....................................    49
Timothy Petty, Nominee to be Assistant Secretary of Commerce for 
  Oceans and Atmosphere, National Oceanic and Atmospheric 
  Administration.................................................    62
    Prepared statement...........................................    63
    Biographical information.....................................    64

                                Appendix

Response to written questions submitted to Stephen M. Carmel by:
    Hon. Ted Cruz................................................   113
    Hon. Roger Wicker............................................   114
    Hon. Dan Sullivan............................................   115
    Hon. Maria Cantwell..........................................   116
    Hon. Edward Markey...........................................   120
    Hon. Tammy Baldwin...........................................   120
    Hon. Tammy Duckworth.........................................   121
Response to written question submitted to Laura DiBella by:
    Hon. Dan Sullivan............................................   123
    Hon. Marsha Blackburn........................................   125
    Hon. Ted Budd................................................   125
    Hon. Maria Cantwell..........................................   125
    Hon. Tammy Duckworth.........................................   127
Response to written questions submitted to Robert Harvey by:
    Hon. Marsha Blackburn........................................   127
    Hon. Ted Budd................................................   127
    Hon. Maria Cantwell..........................................   127
    Hon. Tammy Duckworth.........................................   129
Response to written questions submitted to Timothy Petty by:
    Hon. Roger Wicker............................................   129
    Hon. Dan Sullivan............................................   130
    Hon. Marsha Blackburn........................................   133
    Hon. Maria Cantwell..........................................   134
    Hon. Edward Markey...........................................   137
    Hon. Tammy Duckworth.........................................   138
    Hon. John Hickenlooper.......................................   138








 
                      NOMINATIONS TO THE MARITIME
                  ADMINISTRATION, THE FEDERAL MARITIME
                  COMMISSION AND THE NATIONAL OCEANIC
                     AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION

                              ----------                              


                      WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 22, 2025

                                       U.S. Senate,
        Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
                                                    Washington, DC.
    The Committee met, pursuant to notice, at 10:30 a.m., in 
room SR-253, Russell Senate Office Building, Hon. Ted Cruz, 
Chairman of the Committee, presiding.
    Present: Senators Cruz, Wicker, Fischer, Sullivan, Young, 
Moreno, Sheehy, Cantwell, Klobuchar, Markey, Peters, Rosen, and 
Fetterman.

              OPENING STATEMENT OF HON. TED CRUZ, 
                    U.S. SENATOR FROM TEXAS

    Chairman Cruz. Good morning. The Senate Committee on 
Commerce, Science, and Transportation will come to order. I 
want to welcome two of our colleagues, Senator Risch, Senator 
Kelly. We are glad to have you both joining us in this 
Committee, at least for a few moments at the opening.
    Today, we will be hearing from four nominees: Stephen 
Carmel, nominee for Administrator of the U.S. Maritime 
Administration; Laura DiBella and Robert Harvey, nominees for 
Commissioners of the Federal Maritime Commission; and Timothy 
Petty, nominee for Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Oceans 
and Atmosphere and Deputy Administrator of the National Oceanic 
and Atmospheric Administration. Congratulations to each of you.
    Let's begin with Mr. Petty, who would serve as Deputy 
Administrator of NOAA. A geoscientist and an engineer, Mr. 
Petty has spent more than two decades on Capitol Hill, where he 
is currently a Senior Professional Staff Member for the House 
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. During the 
first Trump administration, Mr. Petty served as Assistant 
Secretary for Water and Science in the Department of the 
Interior. As second-in-command at NOAA, he will draw on his 
policy expertise to manage U.S. fisheries programs and to 
protect coastal and ocean resources.
    Next are the two Republican nominees for the Federal 
Maritime Commission, Laura DiBella and Robert Harvey. Ms. 
DiBella previously served as Port Director of the Port of 
Fernandina, Executive Director of the Florida Harbor Pilots 
Association, and head of Florida's state-level economic 
development organization. Mr. Harvey is an attorney with 30-
plus years navigating complex regulatory schemes and promoting 
economic development. A former U.S. Navy JAG officer, he 
currently leads two public economic development corporations in 
Florida.
    Finally, Stephen Carmel, who will draw on decades of 
experience to advise the Secretary of Transportation on Federal 
maritime policy as Administrator of the Maritime 
Administration. A graduate of the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy, 
Mr. Carmel served on U.S. vessels as a deck officer and 
shipmaster before joining Maersk Line, Limited, the largest 
operator of U.S. flagged ships. He is well versed in maritime 
operations and security, having sat on the Board of Advisors 
for the Merchant Marine Academy and the Chief of Naval 
Operations Executive Panel. Mr. Carmel will support Secretary 
Duffy's efforts to fortify U.S. maritime security, 
shipbuilding, and infrastructure.
    Like our nominee, I am concerned that China's maritime 
industrial base dwarfs our own. That is why I look forward to 
the Administration's forthcoming Maritime Action Plan, which 
will address this geopolitical challenge. At the same time, I 
continue to believe we need a maritime strategy focused on 
attracting capital and removing regulatory barriers, not simply 
picking winners and losers. American shipyards can compete 
globally without heavy-handed protectionism, but only if they 
lean into nascent industries like seabed mining and nuclear-
powered shipping, not those where we are at a distinct 
comparative disadvantage.
    Thank you to our nominees for joining us today. I am eager 
to hear how each of you will approach Federal maritime policy.
    And with that I recognize Ranking Member Cantwell for her 
opening remarks.

               STATEMENT OF HON. MARIA CANTWELL, 
                  U.S. SENATOR FROM WASHINGTON

    Senator Cantwell. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Carmel, Ms. 
DiBella, Mr. Harvey, Mr. Petty, congratulations on your 
nominations, and it is good to see our two colleagues here, 
Senator Risch and Senator Kelly. I certainly have enjoyed 
working with Dr. Petty and Senator Risch on the Columbia River 
Treaty for many years. I know firsthand of his legislative 
skill set, so congratulations on this nomination.
    Today, we want to discuss the concrete steps our Nation is 
taking to invest in our shipyards, our ports, our workforce in 
the efforts to build larger ships in the United States. These 
investments are not just important international trade issues 
for the United States. These are the kinds of investments that 
are needed to build our future maritime workforce, our economy, 
and support our national defense.
    The good news is there is strong bipartisan support on this 
Committee for American shipbuilding, but we need to ensure that 
these investments we authorize will be implemented by this 
Administration. I look forward to discussing with the nominees 
here how we can accomplish that.
    Mr. Carmel, I certainly enjoyed our conversation yesterday. 
I truly believe that you have a vision for what needs to 
happen, and I appreciate that. You are nominated to be the 
Administrator of the U.S. Maritime Administration, the agency 
responsible for fostering, promoting, and developing the U.S. 
maritime industry. And you clearly have relevant experience, 
just starting at the Merchant Marine Academy and continuing as 
a Deck Officer Master on U.S.-flagged vessels, and your senior 
positions at Maersk. So, I certainly believe you have a keen 
view of what needs to be done.
    I believe this experience will serve you well, and I know 
that you have expressed concerns about the deterioration of the 
U.S. maritime, as you call it, ``ecosystem.'' I share that 
word. It is an ecosystem. And just like other ecosystems we 
have had to invest in, I look forward to asking you questions 
about how critical that is for supply chain issues for the 
United States of America, when supply chain issues have become 
a dominant issue. COVID proved that to us, and now we have to 
think about it and how it relates to very strategic assets and 
resources. Senator Risch and I have been partners on a fusion 
strategy, and certainly fusion is one of those issues where the 
supply chain will be critical.
    Next, Ms. DiBella and Mr. Harvey, it is good to have you 
here at the Committee and I see that we have two other Federal 
Maritime Commissioners here, so thank you guys--oh, three. 
Sorry. Sorry. Thank you for that. Thank you. This speaks to the 
Commission's important jurisdiction over ports and 
international ocean shipping, and charged with the protection 
and interests of U.S. shipping and regulating licenses.
    The FMC, while not a household word, it is certainly 
playing a pivotal role for us, as again we saw during COVID. 
Importantly, Congress created the Federal Maritime Commission, 
and I expect Commissioners to maintain this independence. That 
is to say despite various administrations' efforts to undermine 
the agency, we want it to continue to remain strong.
    Ms. DiBella, your service as the first female Secretary of 
Commerce for the State of Florida, and your tenure as Executive 
Director of the Florida Harbor Pilots Association certainly 
come with some very relevant experience, and I appreciate that.
    Mr. Harvey, I have not had a chance to visit with you, so I 
look forward to hearing more about your Navy JAG experience, 
and I hope you will address your view about the Federal FMC 
this morning and what you think needs to happen.
    What I would say to you is that we need to continue to be 
proactive, that as a more global economy and economic 
opportunities are outside the United States, and so much of the 
concentration is with foreign carriers--now we are going to 
lean on Mr. Carmel, to help change that--but in the meantime, 
how do we make sure that there are fair policies and that the 
Commission is doing its job in protecting consumers? We do not 
want U.S. shippers' product left on docks, we do not want 
unfair practices, and we certainly do not want unfair rates.
    Finally, Mr. Petty, as I already mentioned, I am happy to 
have worked with you in the past on this important issue of the 
Columbia River Treaty. Congratulations on the nomination to the 
NOAA Assistant Secretary for Commerce. If confirmed, you will 
be responsible for fisheries, habitat, climate resilience, and 
many other issues, and I believe that your experience up here 
on the Hill will serve you well.
    I hope to hear from you how you will succeed in this 
environment, especially when it comes to the essential work 
that NOAA does supporting healthy fisheries, the 2.3 million 
jobs that depend on a seafood industry, and the important 
issues of stock assessment? I think this Committee has been 
very, very loud and clear about the importance of stock 
assessments. You cannot catch fish if you have not done the 
stock assessment, and we need the fisheries to continue to 
work.
    This requires providing NOAA with expertise and resources, 
and NOAA has lifted the hiring freeze for some weather 
personnel, but what about fisheries personnel? We need to get 
the stock assessments done; we need the personnel to do them. 
So I know my colleague, Senator Sullivan, when he is here, will 
agree with this.
    When it comes to protecting our coastal economies, 
scientists are not optional. Let's not forget, the President 
proposed a 27 percent cut to NOAA's budget, and the agency has 
lost at least 576 fisheries staffers, nearly one in five under 
this Administration. So I am very, very concerned about that.
    They are seeing real impacts from this. For instance, a 
number of our stock assessments in New England have been 
canceled this year. A 60-day regulatory freeze led to the 
overfishing of the Atlantic bluefin tuna off North Carolina, 
and in my state, salmon are incredibly important economically 
and culturally, and so we depend on NOAA for this long-term 
sustainability. I look forward to asking you questions about 
that and what you can do to help correct these issues at the 
department.
    Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I again look forward to the 
testimony of all the witnesses, and of course, our colleagues 
who are here to sing praises on them. Thank you.
    Chairman Cruz. Thank you, Senator Cantwell. I will now turn 
to our colleague from the great state of Arizona, Senator 
Kelly, to introduce Mr. Carmel. Senator Kelly, welcome back to 
the Commerce Committee.

                 STATEMENT OF HON. MARK KELLY, 
                   U.S. SENATOR FROM ARIZONA

    Senator Kelly. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Chairman Cruz, 
Ranking Member Cantwell, and members of the Committee, thank 
you for the opportunity to speak today on the nomination of 
Steve Carmel to serve as the Administrator of the Maritime 
Administration.
    As I know this Committee is painfully aware, the U.S. 
maritime industry needs a lot of help. Right now, the U.S. 
Federal Government, mostly through the Navy and Coast Guard, is 
the primary customer of large--and in the case of the Coast 
Guard, not so large--ocean-going vessels built in U.S. 
shipyards. And there are only about 80 ships, out of more than 
50,000 globally, that fly the U.S. flag in international 
commerce. By contrast, China has 5,500 ocean-going merchant 
vessels that operate under the Chinese flag. Three in every 
four commercial ships built in the next decade will be built in 
a Chinese shipyard if we do not do something about it. For 
decades, both political parties have made the failed assumption 
that we could build our way out of this deficit by just giving 
the Navy and Coast Guard additional funding year to year, and 
not by actually rethinking how we make the commercial maritime 
industry commercially viable in the United States.
    We need to do both. We need policy solutions that include 
the private sector, and that is why I am here to support Steve 
Carmel's nomination for Maritime Administrator.
    Unlike his immediate predecessors in this job, Steve will 
bring four decades of experience working in the commercial 
maritime industry. Steve and I both attended the U.S. Merchant 
Marine Academy, not at the same time, but we were also both in 
6th Company. After graduating, Steve served aboard U.S.-flagged 
merchant vessels as a deck officer and a master for the 
Maritime Overseas Corporation and Military Sealift Command. He 
became a master, which is the captain of the ship, at just 26 
years old. For those who don't know the industry well, that is 
incredibly fast. He is a talented guy.
    After a decade at sea he transitioned to work ashore for 
Maersk Line, Limited and U.S. Marine Management. At a time when 
we are facing a shortage of qualified mariners, Steve brings 
firsthand knowledge of what it is like to work at sea. He would 
be the first Administrator in 20 years to hold an Unlimited 
Master's License.
    At a time when we need to incentivize ship owners from 
around the world to invest in the U.S.-flagged fleet and U.S. 
shipyards, Steve will bring a private sector perspective to our 
efforts to rebuild the U.S. maritime industry. Steve 
understands we need to reform how dated regulations and find 
innovative strategies to put more cargo on U.S. flagged 
vessels.
    At a time when there is bipartisan momentum to rebuild 
America'a maritime industry, as indicated by both the SHIPS for 
America Act and President Trump's Executive Order on Maritime 
Dominance, we need leaders at MARAD who can hit the ground 
running on day one. And I believe Steve Carmel is the right 
leader for this moment, and can do that. I know that he will 
demonstrate his thoughtfulness and depth of knowledge of the 
industry at today's hearing, and I hope his nomination will be 
quickly advanced. We need him in this job.
    The motto at King's Point, our alma mater, is ``Acta Non 
Verba--Deeds, Not Words.'' Steve is a leader of action, and it 
is my pleasure to introduce him to the Committee today. Thank 
you.
    Chairman Cruz. Thank you, Senator Kelly, and I appreciate 
you bringing a little bit of Latin into this hearing. That is 
the level of erudition we try to avoid in the Senate Commerce 
Committee.
    I now welcome our colleague from the great state of Idaho, 
Senator Risch, to introduce Dr. Petty. Senator Risch, welcome 
to the Commerce Committee.

                STATEMENT OF HON. JAMES RISCH, 
                    U.S. SENATOR FROM IDAHO

    Senator Risch. Well, thank you, Chairman Cruz and Ranking 
Member Cantwell. Thank you so much for allowing me to speak 
here today. It is a real honor and privilege, personally, to 
introduce Dr. Tim Petty, who has been nominated to be Assistant 
Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere.
    Tim was an integral part and member of my staff for many 
years and continues to be a trusted friend, and in addition to 
that, he comes in from time to time and keeps me up-to-date on 
things that are happening that are in his lane, and I truly 
appreciate that.
    Tim brings a deep and informed understanding of the complex 
intersection between water policy and scientific research 
through a rare combination of technical expertise and 
legislative experience in both houses. Tim's experiences as a 
senior legislative staff in both chambers give him holistic 
understanding of various water and natural resource challenges 
and a long history of working with his colleagues on a 
bipartisan basis to solve problems.
    He has also served under both President Bush and President 
Trump at the Department of the Interior, including serving as 
President Trump's first term as the Assistant Secretary for 
Water and Science, a post he was confirmed by the Senate 
unanimously to. In his role, he oversaw the USGS and the Bureau 
of Reclamation, solving Western water issues and collaborating 
on an interagency basis with the U.S. Army Corps and NOAA.
    Particularly close to home for Ranking Member Cantwell and 
I both, Tim has specific experience working in the Columbia 
River basin. We have an issue there right now that is 
incredibly important to both Senator Cantwell and I and our 
constituents in the region. And as I said, it is bipartisan, 
and it is incredibly important. In his last stint at the 
agency, he represented Interior as part of the United States 
negotiating entity for the Columbia River Treaty, and worked 
with Senator Cantwell and I both as we represented the 
Northwest in the Senate through treaty negotiations.
    These have been long--dare I say, Senator Cantwell?--and 
difficult and complex. I think we are actually seeing some 
light at the end of the tunnel. There is starting to be some 
movement. And Senator Cantwell and I have worked on this for 
years and years. We have been ably guided by Tim, who has 
helped us through this very complex web of negotiations.
    In addition to his extraordinary qualifications, what 
cannot be overstated is his character. Tim is a true public 
servant, and has answered the call time and again to give his 
time and talent to the American people. Having worked closely 
with Tim since I came to the Senate I can confidently say he 
brings thoughtful, measured judgment to every issue he 
encounters, treats others with respect, and approaches 
leadership roles with humility.
    Tim has built a distinguished career in public service, and 
is exceptionally well-prepared to serve as the Assistant 
Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere. His expertise 
and experience will be an incredible asset to the Department of 
Commerce and to our country.
    Again, Chairman Cruz, Ranking Member Cantwell, thank you 
for the Committee's consideration and considering Tim Petty's 
nomination. Thank you so much.
    Chairman Cruz. Thank you, Senator Risch, and I certainly 
appreciated the movie reference to ``A Few Good Men,'' as you 
looked up like Jack Nicholson and said, ``What kind of shoddy 
operation are you running here,'' with microphones that don't 
operate.
    Senator Risch. I was more diplomatic than that.
    Chairman Cruz. You know, we can't handle the truth. I will 
say four staffers have lost their job already in the time since 
you said that.
    I now recognize Mr. Carmel for his opening statement.

   STATEMENT OF STEPHEN CARMEL, NOMINEE TO BE ADMINISTRATOR, 
                    MARITIME ADMINISTRATION

    Mr. Carmel. Thank you, and thank you to Senator Kelly for 
the kind introduction. Good morning, Chairman Cruz, Ranking 
Member Cantwell, and members of the Committee. Thank you for 
allowing me to be here today. I am honored to appear before you 
as the nominee for the position of Maritime Administrator. 
Please permit me to introduce my wife, Alison, a Navy veteran 
from a long line of Coast Guard officers, and our sons, John 
and Greg, who are here with me today.
    I graduated from the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy, Class of 
1979, and went to sea immediately thereafter. I sailed 
steadily, earned my Master's license, and commanded ships that 
sailed every corner of the world. My time at sea was marked by 
many more highlights than I could recount here, but perhaps the 
most meaningful was my service in the Arctic, an experience 
that sparked a lifelong fascination with that region and 
inspired much of my later academic work.
    After coming ashore, I held a variety of executive 
positions with Maersk Line, Limited, the U.S.-flag subsidiary 
of one of the world's largest shipping companies, and later 
became President of U.S. Marine Management, my current 
position, following our acquisition by Maritime Partners, the 
leading Jones Act provider of vessel leasing and construction 
financing. I also returned to graduate school and collected a 
few extra initials along the way.
    Throughout my shoreside career, I and my colleagues have 
faced many challenges, ranging from two Middle East wars to the 
complex logistics of supporting operations in Afghanistan; 
revolts in Angola and inland grain movements in Russia; piracy 
off Somalia's coast; and even an earthquake and nuclear 
disaster in Japan. Those experiences taught me many things, but 
two lessons stand out. First, maritime strength depends on 
people, and it must be built long before a crisis occurs. And 
leadership is about execution, accountability, and partnership.
    I have been fortunate to work, both at sea and ashore, 
alongside some of the finest men and women this country has to 
offer, and I am very proud of all that we accomplished 
together. But now, if given the honor of a confirmation, it is 
time to take up a new challenge.
    We are a formidable naval power, but we are not a true 
maritime power. For more than 150 years, we have searched for a 
maritime policy that works, even as our industrial capacity has 
declined to a point of near irrelevance, both in our ability to 
carry our own commerce and the ability to build the ships that 
do it. We have outsourced those capabilities and we have 
sacrificed much of our independence in the process.
    A strong maritime sector is not nostalgia. It is strategy. 
It means resilient supply chains we control, credible logistics 
for our joint forces, good jobs across our coasts, rivers, and 
Great Lakes, and the freedom to move what America needs, when 
and where America needs it, under our own flag.
    We have done hard things before. With this Committee's 
guidance, and in partnership with labor and industry, we can do 
them again. We will not be the generation that stood on the 
sidelines and passively watched our noble industry die. We will 
be the generation that rebuilds it--stronger, smarter, and 
ready to answer the call.
    If confirmed, I will work in a spirit of partnership to 
meet our challenges, and overcome them, uphold the traditions 
of my alma mater, and live by its motto, at the risk of Senator 
Kelly's repeating them: Acta Non verba--deeds, not words.
    Thank you, and I stand by for your questions.
    [The prepared statement and biographical information of Mr. 
Carmel follow:]

 Prepared Statement of Stephen M. Carmel, Nominee to be Administrator, 
                        Maritime Administration
    Good morning, Chairman Cruz, Ranking Member Cantwell, and Members 
of the Committee. Thank you for allowing me to be here today. I am 
honored to appear before you as the nominee for the position of 
Maritime Administrator. Please permit me to introduce my wife, Alison--
a Navy Veteran from a long line of Coast Guard officers--and our sons, 
John and Greg, who are here with me today.
    I graduated from the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy, Class of 1979, 
and went to sea immediately thereafter. I sailed steadily, earned my 
Master's license, and commanded ships that traveled to every corner of 
the world. My time at sea was marked by more highlights than I could 
recount here, but perhaps the most meaningful was my service in the 
Arctic--an experience that sparked a lifelong fascination with that 
region and inspired much of my later academic work.
    After coming ashore, I held a variety of executive positions with 
Maersk Line, Limited--the U.S.-flag subsidiary of one of the world's 
largest shipping companies--and later became President of U.S. Marine 
Management, my current position, following our acquisition by Maritime 
Partners, the leading Jones Act provider of vessel leasing and 
construction financing.
    I also returned to graduate school and collected a few extra 
initials behind my name. Throughout my shoreside career, my colleagues 
and I faced challenges ranging from two Middle East wars to the complex 
logistics of supporting operations in Afghanistan; revolts in Angola 
and inland grain movements in Russia; piracy off Somalia's coast; and 
even an earthquake and nuclear disaster in Japan.
    Those experiences taught me many things, but two lessons stand out. 
First, maritime strength depends on people--and it must be built long 
before a crisis occurs. Second, leadership is about execution, 
accountability, and partnership.
    I have been fortunate to work, both at sea and ashore, alongside 
some of the finest men and women this country has to offer, and I am 
proud of all that we accomplished together.
    Now, if given the honor of confirmation, it is time to take up a 
new challenge.
    We are a formidable naval power, but we are not yet a true maritime 
power. For more than 150 years, we have searched for a maritime policy 
that works, even as our industrial capacity has steadily declined--both 
in our ability to carry our own commerce and to build the ships that do 
it. We have outsourced those capabilities and, with that, much of our 
independence.
    A strong maritime sector is not nostalgia--it's strategy. It means 
resilient supply chains we control; credible logistics for our joint 
forces; good jobs across our coasts, rivers, and Great Lakes; and the 
freedom to move what America needs, when and where America needs it--
under our own flag.
    We have done hard things before. With this Committee's guidance, 
and in partnership with labor and industry, we can do them again. We 
will not be the generation that stood on the sidelines and passively 
watched our noble industry die. We will be the generation that rebuilt 
it--stronger, smarter, faster, and ready.
    If confirmed, I will work in a spirit of partnership to meet our 
challenges, uphold the traditions of my alma mater, and live by its 
motto: Acta non verba--deeds, not words.
    Thank you, and I stand ready for your questions.
                                 ______
                                 
                      a. biographical information
    1. Name (Include any former names or nicknames used): Stephen 
Michael Carmel.
    2. Position to which nominated: Administrator, U.S. Maritime 
Administration.
    3. Date of Nomination: May 6, 2025.
    4. Address (List current place of residence and office addresses):

        Residence: Information not released to the public.
        Office: Information not provided.

    5. Date and Place of Birth: Washington, DC.
    6. Provide the name, position, and place of employment for your 
spouse (if married) or domestic partner, and the names and ages of your 
children (including stepchildren and children by a previous marriage).

        Wife: Alison Parker. Program Manager. On administrative/
        terminal leave from Military Sealift Command, U.S. Navy pending 
        retirement 31 Dec, 2025 (took the Federal buy-out program)

        Children: John A. Carmel (24 years old); Stepchildren from 
        Alison Parker: Gregory E Cyrus (42 years old), Ashley M Cyrus 
        (46 years old); Stepchild from Maria E. Carmel (died from 
        cancer in 1997); Stephanie Hemingson-Carmel (approximate age 49 
        years old) (Lost touch with her when her mother died).

    7. List all college and graduate schools attended, whether or not 
you were granted a degree by the institution. Provide the name of the 
institution, the dates attended, the degree received, and the date of 
the degree.

        B.S., Marine Transportation, U.S. Merchant Marine Academy 
        (1975-1979)

        M.B.A., Old Dominion University (1991-1993)

        M.A., Economics, Old Dominion University (1994-1996)

        Ph.D., International Studies, Old Dominion University (2010-
        2018)

                All But Dissertation (ABD): Completed course work/
                comprehensives but not dissertation.

        Advanced Management Program Certificate Program, Ross School of 
        Business, University of Michigan (2011)

    8. List all post-undergraduate employment, including the job title, 
name of employer, and inclusive dates of employment, and highlight all 
management-level jobs held and any non-managerial jobs that relate to 
the position for which you are nominated.

        President, U.S. Marine Management (spin off From Maersk) (1993-
        Present).
        Various positions, Maersk Line Limited:
                Member, Board of Directors (1997-2005)
                Senior Vice President (1997-2023)

        Various positions, U.S. Marine Management (subsidiary of 
        Maersk):
                Vice President of Finance (1995-1997)
                Program Manager (1989-1995)
                Ships officer/Master: Maritime Overseas Corp, Military 
                Sealift Command (1979-1989)

    Note: every position listed is managerial.
    9. Attach a copy of your resume. Attached.
    10. List any advisory, consultative, honorary, or other part-time 
service or positions with Federal, State, or local governments, other 
than those listed above after 18 years of age.

        Board of Visitors, U.S. Merchant Marine Academy--Served as an 
        appointee of President Trump during his first term (2018-2021)

        Naval Studies Board, National Academies of Science (Term ended 
        in 2021)

        Chief of Naval Operations Executive Panel (2006-2016)

        Marine Board, National Academies of Science (Term ended in 
        2014)

        Hydrographic Services Review Board, NOAA (Term ended in 2014)

        Senior Fellow, George Washington University Homeland Security 
        Policy Institute (2009)

        Adjunct Professor of Economics, Old Dominion University (early 
        2000s time frame).

    11. List all positions held as an officer, director, trustee, 
partner, proprietor, agent, representative, or consultant of any 
corporation, company, firm, partnership, or other business, enterprise, 
educational, or other institution.

        Board of Directors, Hampton Roads World Affairs Council (2020-
        2025)

        Board of Directors, Maersk Line Limited (1997-2005)

        Trustee, Old Dominion University Research Foundation 
        (Approximate dates: 2010-2013)

    12. List all memberships you have had after 18 years of age or 
currently hold with any civic, social, charitable, educational, 
political, professional, fraternal, benevolent or religiously 
affiliated organization, private club, or other membership organization 
(You do not have to list your religious affiliation or membership in a 
religious house of worship or institution). Include dates of membership 
and any positions you have held with any organization. Please note 
whether any such club or organization restricts membership on the basis 
of sex, race, color, religion, national origin, age, or disability.
    I have never belonged to any organization, including the below 
listed, that restricts membership on the basis of sex, race, color, 
religion, national origin, age, or disability.

    Current:

        American Bureau of Shipping

        World Affairs Council Hampton Roads Chapter (2020 to present)

        Royal United Services Institute (2022 to present)

        Chatham House (2022-present)

        International Institute for Strategic Studies (2022 to 
        ppresent)

        U.S. Merchant Marine Academy Alumni (1979 to present)

    Past:

        International Studies Association (2010-2018) (approx.)

        American Economic Association (1994-2000) (approx.)

        Institute of Management Accountants (1992-1996) (approx.)

    13. Have you ever been a candidate for and/or held a public office 
(elected, non-elected, or appointed)? If so, indicate whether any 
campaign has any outstanding debt, the amount, and whether you are 
personally liable for that debt. No.
    14. List all memberships and offices held with and services 
rendered to, whether compensated or not, any political party or 
election committee within the past ten years. If you have held a paid 
position or served in a formal or official advisory position (whether 
compensated or not) in a political campaign within the past ten years, 
identify the particulars of the campaign, including the candidate, year 
of the campaign, and your title and responsibilities. None.
    15. Itemize all political contributions to any individual, campaign 
organization, political party, political action committee, or similar 
entity of $200 or more for the past ten years.

    Maersk Inc. Political Action Committee, 04/30/2015, $200

    During my tenure as an executive with Maersk Line Limited I 
contributed to the Maersk Political Action Committee fund as all senior 
executives did. I did not control or even input into how the PAC 
distributed the money
    16. List all scholarships, fellowships, honorary degrees, honorary 
society memberships, military medals, and any other special recognition 
for outstanding service or achievements.

        Meritorious Public Service Medal, Awarded by CNO Richardson, 18 
        Jan, 2017
        2009 George Washington University Homeland Security Policy 
        Institute Senior Fellow

    17. List all books, articles, columns, letters to the editor, 
Internet blog postings, or other publications you have authored, 
individually or with others. Include a link to each publication when 
possible. If a link is not available, provide a digital copy of the 
publication when available.
    See Addendum.
    18. List all speeches, panel discussions, and presentations (e.g., 
PowerPoint) that you have given on topics relevant to the position for 
which you have been nominated. Include a link to each publication when 
possible. If a link is not available, provide a digital copy of the 
speech or presentation when available.
    See Addendum provided via separate correspondence.
    19. List all public statements you have made during the past ten 
years, including statements in news articles and radio and podcasts and 
television appearances, which are on topics relevant to the position 
for which you have been nominated, including dates. Include a link to 
each statement when possible. If a link is not available, provide a 
digital copy of the statement when available.

        Endorsement supporting Ships for America Act, April 2025
        Quoted in Wall street Journal Article https://www.wsj.com/
        politics/ national-security/why-the-u-s-military-has-to-hitch-
        a-ride-on-commercial-ships-
        58d0ece9?st=1enwuZ&reflink=article_e-mail_share

    I know I was quoted in news articles about Maersk Line Limited 
business but do not have specific examples as it was just a routine 
part of business
    20. List all digital platforms (including social media and other 
digital content sites) on which you currently or have formerly operated 
an account, regardless of whether or not the account was held in your 
name or an alias. Include the full name of an ``alias'' or ``handle'', 
including the complete URL and username with hyperlinks, you have used 
on each of the named platforms. Indicate whether the account is active, 
deleted, or dormant. Include a link to each account if possible.

        Linked In--Stephen Carmel (Active)
        X (Twitter)--@StephenCar73193 (Active)

    21. Please identify each instance in which you have testified 
orally or in writing before Congress in a governmental or non-
governmental capacity and specify the date, committee, and subject 
matter of each testimony.
    Testimony to Standing Senate Committee on Security and Defense, 
Canadian Parliament, 2007. The Testimony was as a subject matter expert 
on Arctic Shipping. Report below. Prepared comments included in the 
Speeches addendum. https://sencanada.ca/content/ sen/committee/403/
defe/rep/rep07mar11-e.pdf
    22. Given the current mission, major programs, and major 
operational objectives of the department/agency/commission/corporation 
to which you have been nominated, what in your background or employment 
experience do you believe affirmatively qualifies you for appointment 
to the position for which you have been nominated, and why do you wish 
to serve in that position?
    I graduated from the Merchant Marine Academy in 1979 and have lived 
my entire professional life fulfilling the mission of the Academy. I 
have served as a deck officer and master primarily on tankers in 
international trade. I have served in a variety of positions in 
executive management for a major international shipping company. In 
those capacities, I have done everything contemplated in President 
Trump's Executive Order on Maritime Strategy and the related Ships for 
America Act. Therefore, I have deep knowledge of the U.S. maritime 
industry and the people that work in it. Concurrent with that, I have 
served in a variety of positions on Navy committees and organizations, 
hence developing a deep understanding of the relationship between the 
maritime industry and national and economic security. In those roles I 
have often conducted studies, participated in war games, and other 
exercises at both the classified and unclassified level, probing issues 
such as contested logistics. I have also developed expertise in Arctic 
security issues, particularly arctic shipping and its relation to 
national security. I have also developed an expertise in the 
international security aspects of globalization and globalized supply 
chains, topics on which I speak often and taught a seminar for the 
Advanced Maritime Operations Course for Naval Intelligence. My 
background positions me well to make an immediate impact on the mission 
of MARAD I believe firmly in our industry and this industry has 
provided me with great opportunity. I believe it is my obligation to 
serve if called to pay back for that opportunity. The industry is in 
desperate need of revitalization, now is the greatest potential for 
that to happen in generations and the opportunity may never come again. 
Those factors combined motivate me to want to serve in the capacity of 
Maritime Administrator, if confirmed, and make a positive contribution 
to our industry.
    23. What do you believe are your responsibilities, if confirmed, to 
ensure that the department/agency/commission/corporation has proper 
management and accounting controls, and what experience do you have in 
managing a large organization?
    I have extensive experience leading large organizations, sometimes 
through difficult transitions such as that facing the Maritime 
Administration now. During such times especially proper controls, 
transparency, and clear communication are essential to a successful 
outcome. The fundamentals of organizational change are-or should be-
consistent whether in government or private industry, therefore my past 
experience in the industry will be directly applicable in successfully 
leading MARAD should I be confirmed. From my experience as a corporate 
executive, responsibility for proper management and accounting in the 
organizations for which I was responsible can be grouped into several 
overarching areas:

   Remember who I work for and my responsibilities to the 
        owners and other stakeholders. Ensure the assets of the owners 
        (including their reputation and the reputation of the firm) are 
        preserved. Ensure responsibilities to employees and larger 
        society are met.

   Establish the proper environment--Demonstrate ethical 
        behavior, commitment to proper governance, and act with 
        integrity. Ensure roles and responsibilities are clearly 
        defined and accountability for decisions enforced. Establish an 
        environment that promotes transparency and accountability.

   Design and implement proper internal controls including 
        policies and procedures that are efficient, effective, and 
        routinely tested or audited. Ensure auditors are properly 
        supported in their role and ensure audit or other governance 
        reports are received directly and unfiltered. Establish 
        effective relationships with finance and internal control 
        teams, including regular review of financial statements and 
        ensure understanding of deviations from plan.

   Establish a strong internal and external communication 
        routine with all stakeholders.

    Per my resume, I have had several executive leadership positions 
ashore with Maersk Line Limited (MLL)--the largest U.S. flag shipping 
company in the country (at the time about 60 ships), including approx. 
40 percent of the tonnage in the Maritime Security Program, including 
time on the Board of Directors, and a $1.5B company responsibly for 
several thousand staff including sea staff. I am presently President of 
a tanker company after spin off from MLL responsible for 6 ships and 
full P and L responsibility to the board and roughly 400 staff at sea 
and afloat.
    24. What do you believe to be the top three challenges facing the 
department/agency/commission/corporation, and why?

  1.  The deterioration of the U.S. maritime industry in terms of U.S. 
        flag shipping and commercial shipbuilding to the point they are 
        now irrelevant as a factor in U.S. economic security and hence 
        incapable of fulfilling any national security mission, 
        including executing the complex logistics mission any conflict 
        with China would require. In addition, the U.S. port system 
        ranks poorly in international standings for port productivity. 
        Lastly the U.S. internal waterway system is in desperate need 
        to upgrade and repair, receiving a C-from the ASCE, and having 
        a $7.5B backlog in needed repairs in 2025. The internal 
        waterway system is essential to agricultural and manufacturing 
        sectors in the Midwest and a significant failure could have 
        grievous consequences for the national economy.

  2.  A serious shortage of maritime labor, both seagoing and for 
        shipbuilding and repair. A revitalization of the U.S. maritime 
        industry cannot happen without significant investment in 
        skilled workforce development starting at the high school 
        level. This also include ``fixing'' the U.S. Merchant Marine 
        Academy, which is in dire need of investment and attention.

  3.  Lack of a coherent strategy that ties all elements of the 
        maritime industry (the Blue Economy) together as a system, 
        unambiguously and clearly ties the industry and solutions to 
        its challenges to broader national and economic security plans, 
        policies and objectives, and provides for specific actionable 
        programs to remedy the problems stated above with adequate and 
        sustainable sources of funding.
                   b. potential conflicts of interest
    1. Describe all financial arrangements, deferred compensation 
agreements, and other continuing dealings with business associates, 
clients, or customers. Please include information related to retirement 
accounts, such as a 401(k) or pension plan.
    My arrangements are fully described in Part 3 of my Public 
Financial Disclosure Report. A list of these arrangements and 
agreements is below.

   I have vested restricted stock units in an independent stock 
        plan as part of a long-term incentive program from my former 
        employer, Maersk Line Limited. Maersk will accelerate the 
        unlocking of my vested restricted stock units. I will forfeit 
        restricted stock units valued over and above $10,000 and will 
        be awarded only up to $10,000 in Maersk stock prior to assuming 
        my position as Administrator, if confirmed. I will divest my 
        interests in Maersk as soon as practicable but not later than 
        90 days after my confirmation.

   I have a defined contribution plan (401K plan) with U.S. 
        Marine Management. I will continue to participate in this 
        defined contribution plan. The plan's sponsor will not make 
        further contributions after my separation.

   I will receive a severance payment upon my separation from 
        U.S. Marine Management for $50,000. The amount of the payment 
        is determined at the discretion of the owners and has already 
        been fixed by the company. This payment will be paid to me 
        prior to assuming the duties of the position of Administrator 
        (if confirmed) or I will forfeit it.

    2. Do you have any commitments or agreements, formal or informal, 
to maintain employment, affiliation, or practice with any business, 
association, or other organization during your appointment? If so, 
please explain. No.
    3. Indicate any investments, obligations, liabilities, or other 
relationships which could involve potential conflicts of interest in 
the position to which you have been nominated. Explain how you will 
resolve each potential conflict of interest.
    In connection with the nomination process, I have consulted with 
the Office of Government Ethics and the Department of Transportation 
(``DOT'') Designated Agency Ethics Official to identify potential 
conflicts of interest. Any potential conflicts of interest will be 
resolved consistent with the terms of an ethics agreement I have 
entered into with the DOT Designated Agency Ethics Official, which has 
been provided to this Committee. I am not aware of any other conflicts 
of interest.
    4. Describe any business relationship, dealing, or financial 
transaction which you have had during the last ten years, whether for 
yourself, on behalf of a client, or acting as an agent, that could in 
any way constitute or result in a possible conflict of interest in the 
position to which you have been nominated. Explain how you will resolve 
each potential conflict of interest.
    In connection with the nomination process, I have consulted with 
the Office of Government Ethics and the Department of Transportation 
(``DOT'') Designated Agency Ethics Official to identify potential 
conflicts of interest. Any potential conflicts of interest will be 
resolved consistent with the terms of an ethics agreement I have 
entered into with the DOT Designated Agency Ethics Official, which has 
been provided to this Committee. I am not aware of any other conflicts 
of interest.
    5. Identify any other potential conflicts of interest and explain 
how you will resolve each potential conflict of interest.
    In connection with the nomination process, I have consulted with 
the Office of Government Ethics and the Department of Transportation 
(``DOT'') Designated Agency Ethics Official to identify potential 
conflicts of interest. Any potential conflicts of interest will be 
resolved consistent with the terms of an ethics agreement I have 
entered into with the DOT Designated Agency Ethics Official, which has 
been provided to this Committee. I am not aware of any other conflicts 
of interest.
    6. Describe any activity during the past ten years, including the 
names of clients represented, in which you have been engaged for the 
purpose of directly or indirectly influencing the passage, defeat, or 
modification of any legislation or affecting the administration and 
execution of law or public policy. None.
                            c. legal matters
    1. Have you ever been disciplined or cited for a breach of ethics, 
professional misconduct, or retaliation by, or been the subject of a 
complaint to, any court, administrative agency, the Office of Special 
Counsel, an Inspector General, professional association, disciplinary 
committee, or other professional group? If yes:
    No.

  a.  Provide the name of the court, agency, association, committee, or 
        group;

  b.  Provide the date the citation, disciplinary action, complaint, or 
        personnel action was issued or initiated;

  c.  Describe the citation, disciplinary action, complaint, or 
        personnel action;

  d.  Provide the results of the citation, disciplinary action, 
        complaint, or personnel action.

    2. Have you ever been investigated, arrested, charged, or held by 
any Federal, State, or other law enforcement authority of any Federal, 
State, county, municipal, or foreign government entity, other than for 
a minor traffic offense? If so, please explain. No.
    3. Have you or any business or nonprofit of which you are or were 
an officer ever been involved as a party in an administrative agency 
proceeding, criminal proceeding, or civil litigation? If so, please 
explain.
    As a U.S. flag ship operator, our mariners are not eligible for 
workman's compensation for work related injuries. They are required to 
seek compensation via the courts which is normal for our industry. 
Therefore, the case list is extensive. See Attachment A for a complete 
list.
    4. Have you ever been convicted (including pleas of guilty or nolo 
contendere) of any criminal violation other than a minor traffic 
offense? If so, please explain. No.
    5. Have you ever been accused, formally or informally, of sexual 
assault, sexual harassment, or discrimination on the basis of sex, 
race, religion, or any other basis? If so, please explain. No.
    6. Please advise the Committee of any additional information, 
favorable or unfavorable, which you feel should be disclosed in 
connection with your nomination. None.
                     d. relationship with committee
    1. Will you ensure that your department/agency/commission/
corporation complies with deadlines for information set by 
congressional committees, and that your department/agency/commission/
corporation endeavors to timely comply with requests for information 
from individual Members of Congress, including requests from members in 
the minority?
    Yes, I will ensure that my office responds, timely, to such 
requests for information as appropriate.
    2. Will you ensure that your department/agency/commission/
corporation does whatever it can to protect congressional witnesses and 
whistleblowers from reprisal for their testimony and disclosures?
    Yes, I will ensure that my office responds as appropriate.
    3. Will you cooperate in providing the Committee with requested 
witnesses, including technical experts and career employees, with 
firsthand knowledge of matters of interest to the Committee?
    Yes, I will ensure that my office keeps the Committee appraised as 
appropriate.
    4. Are you willing to appear and testify before any duly 
constituted committee of the Congress on such occasions as you may be 
reasonably requested to do so? Yes, I will ensure that my office 
responds as appropriate.
                                 ______
                                 
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]
                                 

                                                  FEDERAL CASES
 
                                                                                                         Date
     Party Name         Case Number           Case Title                 Court          Date  Filed     Closed
 
Maersk Line,         1:1990cv00628      Lapetri v. Maersk Line  New York Eastern          2/22/1990   10/25/1990
 Limited                                                         District Court
Maersk Line,         1:1990cv00628      Lapetri v. Maersk Line  New York Eastern          2/22/1990   10/25/1990
 Limited                                                         District Court
Maersk Line,         1:1990cv00628      Lapetri v. Maersk Line  New York Eastern          2/22/1990   10/25/1990
 Limited                                                         District Court
Maersk Line,         1:1991cv01747      Harris v. Maersk Line,  New York Southern         3/13/1991    4/30/1991
 Limited                                 Limited                 District Court
Maersk Line,         1:1992cv00453      Maersk Line, Ltd v.     Alabama Southern           6/2/1992    2/17/1993
 Limited                                 Smith                   District Court
Maersk Line,         1:1992cv00453      Maersk Line, Ltd v.     Alabama Southern           6/2/1992    2/17/1993
 Limited                                 Smith                   District Court
Maersk Line,         1:1992cv04209      Maersk Line, Limited    New York Southern          6/8/1992   10/30/1992
 Limited                                 v. South East           District Court
                                         Atlantic
Maersk Line,         2:1992cv00791      Allred v. Maersk line   Virginia Eastern          10/6/1992    2/24/1995
 Limited                                                         District Court
Maersk Line,         3:1993cv00283      Falk v. Maersk Line,    California Northern       1/25/1993    11/8/1993
 Limited                                 Limited                 District Court
Maersk Line,         2:1993cv00742      Najah v. Maersk Line,   New Jersey District       2/22/1993    6/22/1994
 Limited                                 Limited, et al          Court
Maersk Line,         0:1993cv.pr02029   Allred v. Maersk Line,  U.S. Court of Appeals,    8/17/1993    9/13/1994
 Limited                                 Limited                 Fourth Circuit
Maersk Line,         2:1996cv03273      Small v. Maersk Line,   New Jersey District        7/5/1996    2/13/1998
 Limited                                 Limited, et al          Court
Maersk Line,         2:1997cv00299      Sargent v. Maersk       Pennsylvania Eastern      1/14/1997    11/5/1997
 Limited                                 Line, Limited           District Court
Maersk Line,         2:1997cv04175      Zolinas v. Maersk       Pennsylvania Eastern      6/20/1997     8/7/1997
 Limited                                 Line, Limited           District Court
Maersk Line,         1:1998ap05601      Devan and Maersk Line,  Maryland Bankruptcy       2/23/1998    6/11/1999
 Limited                                 Limited                 Court
Maersk Line,         1:1999cv01122      Sang v. American Of,    New York Eastern          2/26/1999    9/28/2001
 Limited                                 et al                   District Court
Maersk Line,         1:1999cv01122      Sang v. American Of,    New York Eastern          2/26/1999    9/28/2001
 Limited                                 et al                   District Court
Maersk Line,         3:1999cv00194      Hall v. Maersk Inc.,    Texas Southern            3/29/1999     8/4/1999
 Limited                                 et al                   District Court
Maersk Line,         3:1999cv00331      Laffitte v. Maersk      Texas Southern             6/2/1999     6/7/2000
 Limited                                 Line, Limited           District Court
Maersk Line,         1:1999cv00560      Maersk Line, Limited    Alabama Southern          6/16/1999    9/29/2000
 Limited                                 v. Laffitte             District Court
Maersk Line,         1:1999cv00689      Maersk Line, Limited    Alabama Southern          7/26/1999    3/31/2000
 Limited                                 v. Juzang               District Court
Maersk Line,         33:1999cv00808     Hall v. USA, et al      Florida Middle            8/10/1999    1/18/2001
 Limited                                                         District Court
Maersk Line,         1:1999cv00766      Maersk Line, Ltd v.     Alabama Southern          8/20/1999    2/22/2000
 Limited                                 Dansley, et al          District Court
Maersk Line,         3:1999cv00761      Martin v. Maersk Line,  Texas Southern           12/10/1999    3/17/2000
 Limited                                 Limited                 District Court
Maersk Line,         0:2000pcf40710     Laffitte v. Maersk      U.S. Court of Appeals,    6/27/2000    6/12/2001
 Limited                                 Line, Limited           Fifth Circuit
Maersk Line,         0:2000pcf40740     Laffitte v. Maersk      U.S. Court of Appeals,    6/30/2000    6/12/2001
 Limited                                 Line, Limited           Fifth Circuit
Maersk Line,         2:2001cv03119      Young v. United         Pennsylvania Eastern      6/22/2001    8/26/2002
 Limited                                 States, et al           District Court
Maersk Line,         2:2001cv04616      Thompson v. Maersk      New Jersey District       10/1/2001    5/27/2005
 Limited                                 Line, Limited           Court
Maersk Line,         1:2001cv09689      U.S. Ship Management    New York Southern         11/2/2001    2/27/2002
 Limited                                 v. Maersk Line,         District Court
                                         Limited
Maersk Line,         1:2002cv00603      Koen v. Maersk Line,    Alabama Southern           8/8/2002    9/11/2002
 Limited                                 Ltd, et al              District Court
Maersk Line,         1:2002cv08923      MacCollister v.         New York Southern         11/8/2002    1/26/2005
 Limited                                 Expediter Transport,    District Court
                                         et al
Maersk Line,         2:2002cv00906      Kennedy v. Maersk       Virginia Eastern         11/19/2002     3/9/2004
 Limited                                 Line, Limited, et al    District Court
Maersk Line,         0:2003pcf30021     Scardina v. Maersk      U.S. Court of Appeals,     1/8/2003     2/5/2003
 Limited                                 Line Ltd                Fifth Circuit
Maersk Line,         0:2003cv60033      Adams v. Maersk Line,   Florida Southern          1/10/2003    9/24/2004
 Limited                                 Limited                 District Court
Maersk Line,         0:2003pcf40418     Fanos v. Maersk Line,   U.S. Court of Appeals,    3/27/2003    3/10/2004
 Limited                                 Ltd. et al              Fifth Circuit
Maersk Line,         1:2003cv00951      U.S. Ship Management,   District of Columbia      4/29/2003     3/4/2005
 Limited                                 Inc. v. U.S. Maritime   District Court
                                         Administration
Maersk Line,         1:2003bk80215      Baltimore Marine        Maryland Bankruptcy       6/11/2003     2/3/2011
 Limited                                 Industries, Inc.        Court
Maersk Line,         1:2003ap05300      Maersk Line, Limited    Maryland Bankruptcy        7/3/2003    5/19/2004
 Limited                                 and Baltimore Marine    Court
                                         Industries, Inc.
Maersk Line,         1:2003ap08040      Baltimore Marine        Maryland Bankruptcy        7/8/2003    5/19/2004
 Limited                                 Industries, Inc. and    Court
                                         Maersk Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         1:2003ap08154      Maersk Line, Limited    Maryland Bankruptcy       7/31/2003    5/19/2010
 Limited                                 and Ocean Technical     Court
                                         Services Corp.
Maersk Line,         1:2003ap08154      Maersk Line, Limited    Maryland Bankruptcy       7/31/2003    5/19/2010
 Limited                                 and Ocean Technical     Court
                                         Services Corp.
Maersk Line,         1:2003ap08154      Maersk Line, Limited    Maryland Bankruptcy       7/31/2003    5/19/2010
 Limited                                 and Ocean Technical     Court
                                         Services Corp.
Maersk Line,         1:2003cv07459      MC Logistics Limited v  New York Southern         9/23/2003    9/14/2005
 Limited                                 M/V ``Dirch Maersk``,   District Court
                                         et al
Maersk Line,         3:2003cv00890      Smalls v. USA, et al    Florida Middle           10/20/2003     7/8/2004
 Limited                                                         District Court
Maersk Line,         1:2003cv09669      Adolph Jahn & Co. Gmbh  New York Southern         12/5/2003     4/2/2004
 Limited                                 v. M/V Sealand          District Court
                                         Performance et al
Maersk Line,         2:2004cv70216      Westfall v. United      Michigan Eastern          1/22/2004    5/28/2004
 Limited                                 States of America       District Court
Maersk Line,         1:2004cv00825      Lyons v. Maersk Line    Illinois Northern          2/2/2004     2/5/2004
 Limited                                 Ltd                     District Court
Maersk Line,         2:2004cv00114      Dempster v. Maersk      Virginia Eastern          2/27/2004    11/9/2004
 Limited                                 Line, Limited et al     District Court
Maersk Line,         1:2004cv02504      U.S. Ship Management,   New York Southern         3/31/2004     1/6/2005
 Limited                                 Inc. v. Maersk Line,    District Court
                                         Limited
Maersk Line,         1:2004cv20913      Wright v. Maersk Line,  Florida Southern          4/16/2004    6/22/2004
 Limited                                 Limited                 District Court
Maersk Line,         1:2004cv05666      Maersk Line, Limited    New York Southern         7/19/2004    10/5/2004
 Limited                                 v. U.S. Ship            District Court
                                         Management, Inc.
Maersk Line,         0:2004cvus05299    US Ship Mgmt v. U.S.    U.S. Court of Appeals,    8/27/2004     3/3/2005
 Limited                                 Maritime Admin          D.C. Circuit
Maersk Line,         1:2004cv07661      U.S. Ship Management,   New York Southern         9/28/2004     3/9/2005
 Limited                                 Inc. v. Maersk Line,    District Court
                                         Limited
Maersk Line,         2:2004cv04994      Benson v. Maersk Line,  New Jersey District      10/13/2004   10/11/2005
 Limited                                 Limited et al           Court
Maersk Line,         0:2004cv.pr02387   US Ship Mgmt, et al v.  U.S. Court of Appeals,    11/4/2004   11/18/2004
 Limited                                 Maersk Line             Fourth Circuit
Maersk Line,         0:2004cv.pr02387   US Ship Mgmt, et al v.  U.S. Court of Appeals,    11/4/2004   11/18/2004
 Limited                                 Maersk Line             Fourth Circuit
Maersk Line,         1:2005mc00001      U.S. Ship Management    Virginia Eastern           1/6/2005    2/14/2005
 Limited                                 v. Maersk Line,         District Court
                                         Limited
Maersk Line,         1:2005mc00101      U.S. Ship Management    District of Columbia      2/24/2005   11/21/2006
 Limited                                 Inc v. Maersk Line,     District Court
                                         Limited
Maersk Line,         2:2005cv01447      Liberty Global          New York Eastern          3/18/2005    10/7/2005
 Limited                                 Logistic LLC v.         District Court
                                         United States
                                         Maritime
                                         Administration et al
Maersk Line,         2:2005cv00260      Brooks v. Maersk Line,  Virginia Eastern           5/4/2005   10/24/2005
 Limited                                 Limited                 District Court
Maersk Line,         1:2005cv01441      Grochal v. Maersk       Maryland District         5/27/2005     1/9/2006
 Limited                                 Line, Limited et al     Court
Maersk Line,         1:2005cv06245      Hanback v. Maersk       New York Southern          7/7/2005    5/30/2008
 Limited                                 Line, Limited et al     District Court
Maersk Line,         1:2005cv06246      Wilson v. Maersk Line,  New York Southern          7/7/2005     4/3/2008
 Limited                                 Limited et al           District Court
Maersk Line,         4:2005cv40187      Valentine v. Maersk     Massachuetts District    10/21/2005    9/20/2007
 Limited                                 Line, Limited           Court
Maersk Line,         2:2005cv00747      Maersk Line, Limited    Virginia Eastern         12/21/2005   10/30/2006
 Limited                                 v. The United States    District Court
                                         of America
Maersk Line,         4:2005cv04382      Royal Cargo Line, Inc.  Texas Southern           12/29/2005     5/8/2006
 Limited                                 v. M/V Sea-land Comet   District Court
                                         et al
Maersk Line,         3:2006cv00087      Dickey v. Maersk Line,  Texas Southern            2/14/2006    11/1/2006
 Limited                                 Limited                 District Court
Maersk Line,         0:2006bk.dc01206   Grochal, et al v.       U.S. Court of Appeals,    2/17/2006     2/9/2007
 Limited                                 Ocean Technical Svcs,   Fourth Circuit
                                         et al
Maersk Line,         3:2006cv00199      Teferi v. Maersk Line,  Texas Southern            3/30/2006    1/12/2007
 Limited                                 Limited                 District Court
Maersk Line,         4:2006cv01362      Capt Craig Towing, LLC  Texas Southern            4/19/2006    6/25/2008
 Limited                                                         District Court
Maersk Line,         4:2006cv01362      Capt Craig Towing, LLC  Texas Southern            4/19/2006    6/25/2008
 Limited                                                         District Court
Maersk Line,         4:2006cv01362      Capt Craig Towing, LLC  Texas Southern            4/19/2006    6/25/2008
 Limited                                                         District Court
Maersk Line,         2:2006mc50625      Equal Employment        Michigan Eastern          6/28/2006
 Limited                                 Opportunity             District Court
                                         Commission v. Maersk
                                         Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         2:2006cv00371      Clements v. Norfolk     Virginia Eastern          6/30/2006   10/17/2006
 Limited                                 Southern Railway        District Court
                                         Company et al
Maersk Line,         2:2006mc50671      Equal Employment        Michigan Eastern          7/13/2006
 Limited                                 Opportunity             District Court
                                         Commission v. Maersk
                                         Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         3:2006ap00391      William Kaye, as        Tennessee Middle          9/28/2006    2/26/2007
 Limited                                 Trustee of the Murray   Bankruptcy Court
                                         Liquidating and
                                         Maersk, Inc.
Maersk Line,         6:2006cv00110      Smith v. Texas          Texas Southern           10/31/2006     9/8/2008
 Limited                                 Shredder, Inc. st al    District Court
Maersk Line,         0:2007cv.us01013   Maersk Line, Limited    U.S. Court of Appeals,     1/9/2007    1/28/2008
 Limited                                 et al v. United         Fourth Circuit
                                         States
Maersk Line,         3:2007cv00076      Eleazar Lozano, Jr. v.  Texas Southern             2/6/2007   11/28/2007
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    District Court
Maersk Line,         2:2007cv01293      Tombari v. Maersk       New Jersey District       3/19/2007   11/30/2007
 Limited                                 Line, Limited           Court
Maersk Line,         3:2007cv03318      Garrett v. U.S. Ship    California Northern       6/25/2007    2/19/2009
 Limited                                 Management, Inc. et     District Court
                                         al
Maersk Line,         3:2007cv01568      Nazario v. Maersk       Puerto Rico District      6/25/2007    5/27/2010
 Limited                                 Line, Limited et al     Court
Maersk Line,         1:2007cv02633      Sieger v. Maersk Line,  New York Eastern          6/28/2007   12/16/2008
 Limited                                 Limited et al           District Court
Maersk Line,         3:2007cv00431      Alvarez v. Maersk       Texas Southern            8/23/2007    7/28/2008
 Limited                                 Line, Limited           District Court
Maersk Line,         3:2008cv00043      Hackler v. P&O Ports    Louisiana Middle          1/22/2008    3/29/2013
 Limited                                 Louisiana, Inc. et al   District Court
Maersk Line,         3:2008cv00074      Michael T. Hackler v.   Louisiana Middle           2/4/2008    9/19/2008
 Limited                                 P&O Ports Louisiana,    District Court
                                         Inc. et al
Maersk Line,         3:2008cv00082      Hackler v Greater       Louisiana Middle           2/7/2008    8/25/2008
 Limited                                 Baton Rouge Port        District Court
                                         Commision
Maersk Line,         5:2008cv10782      Zain v. Maersk Line,    Michigan Eastern          2/25/2008    7/31/2008
 Limited                                 Limited et al           District Court
Maersk Line,         0:2008cv.pr01263   In Re: Application of   U.S. Court of Appeals,     3/4/2008     3/4/2008
 Limited                                 Sipromad v. Maersk      Fourth Circuit
                                         Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         1:2008cv03518      Hall v. Maersk Line,    New York Southern         4/11/2008     4/4/2011
 Limited                                 Limited et al           District Court
Maersk Line,         1:2008cv00442      Maddux v. United        Ohio Southern District    6/27/2008    5/16/2011
 Limited                                 States of America et    Court
                                         al
Maersk Line,         1:2008cv11204      Barclay v. Maersk       Massachuetts District     7/15/2008    2/25/2011
 Limited                                 Line, Limited           Court
Maersk Line,         2:2008cv87777      Hackler v. P&O Ports    Pennsylvania Eastern      8/22/2008     2/7/2012
 Limited                                 Louisiana, Inc. et al   District Court
Maersk Line,         2:2008cv87779      Hackler v Greater       Pennsylvania Eastern      8/22/2008    6/28/2012
 Limited                                 Baton Rouge Port        District Court
                                         Commision et al
Maersk Line,         2:2008cv88873      Hackler et al v. P&O    Pennsylvania Eastern      9/12/2008     6/4/2010
 Limited                                 Ports Louisiana, Inc.   District Court
                                         et al
Maersk Line,         1:2008cv04813      Skye v. Maersk Line,    New Jersey District       9/25/2008    9/22/2009
 Limited                                 Limited et al           Court
Maersk Line,         1:2009cv03624      Ahmed v. Maersk Line,   New York Southern          4/8/2009     5/4/2011
 Limited                                 Limited                 District Court
Maersk Line,         1:2009cv04575      Phillips Foods, Inc.    New York Southern         5/14/2009     9/3/2009
 Limited                                 v. Maersk Line,         District Court
                                         Limited et al
Maersk Line,         4:2009cv01601      Hicks v. Waterman       Texas Southern            5/27/2009    9/16/2009
 Limited                                 Steamship               District Court
Maersk Line,         4:2009cv01692      Cupan v. Maersk Line,   Texas Southern             6/3/2009     9/8/2009
 Limited                                 Limited                 District Court
Maersk Line,         2:2009cv02736      Jaradat v. Maersk       Pennsylvania Eastern      6/17/2009    9/22/2010
 Limited                                 Line, Limited et al     District Court
Maersk Line,         1:2009cv00747      Maersk Line, Limited    Virginia Eastern           7/6/2009    7/13/2009
 Limited                                 v. Vilsak et al         District Court
Maersk Line,         1:2009cv03161      Liberty Shipping Group  New York Eastern          7/22/2009    9/24/2009
 Limited                                 LLC v. United States    District Court
                                         of America et al
Maersk Line,         1:2009cv03193      Lopez-Ranilla v.        New York Eastern          7/24/2009    9/15/2010
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    District Court
Maersk Line,         1:2009cv03404      Spencer v. Maersk       New York Eastern           8/6/2009    3/26/2010
 Limited                                 Line, Limited et al     District Court
Maersk Line,         1:2009cv03408      Salah v. Maersk Line,   New York Eastern           8/6/2009    4/11/2011
 Limited                                 Limited                 District Court
Maersk Line,         1:2009cv03454      Austin v. Maersk Line,  New York Eastern          8/10/2009    5/28/2010
 Limited                                 Limited                 District Court
Maersk Line,         1:2009cv00513      Johnson v. Maersk       Alabama Southern          8/10/2009    6/10/2010
 Limited                                 Line, Limited et al     District Court
Maersk Line,         1:2009cv03455      Martinez v. Maersk      New York Eastern          8/10/2009   12/13/2010
 Limited                                 Line, Limited           District Court
Maersk Line,         2:2009cv05170      Anacta v. Maersk Line,  New Jersey District       10/8/2009    2/18/2011
 Limited                                 Limited                 Court
Maersk Line,         3:2010cv02078      Gonzalez v. Maersk      Puerto Rico District      11/3/2010   10/12/2012
 Limited                                 Line, Limited et al     Court
Maersk Line,         1:21010ap02627     The Official Committee  Illinois Northern        12/23/2010   11/19/2012
 Limited                                 of Unsecured            Bankruptcy Court
                                         Creditors of X and
                                         Esquel Enterprises
                                         Ltd
Maersk Line,         1:2010ap02647      The Official Committee  Illinois Northern        12/23/2010    5/16/2012
 Limited                                 of Unsecured            Bankruptcy Court
                                         Creditors of X and
                                         Esquel Enterprises
                                         Ltd
Maersk Line,         0:2011cv03022      James Maddux v. USA et  U.S. Court of Appeals,     1/7/2011    1/19/2011
 Limited                                 al                      Sixth Circuit
Maersk Line,         1:2011cv02888      A&D Exclusive Corp. v.  New York Southern         4/28/2011    6/27/2012
 Limited                                 Maersk Inc. et al       District Court
Maersk Line,         1:2011cv02888      A&D Exclusive Corp. v.  New York Southern         4/28/2011    6/27/2012
 Limited                                 Maersk Inc. et al       District Court
Maersk Line,         2:2011cv05026      O'Connor v. Maersk      Pennsylvania Eastern       8/4/2011    2/21/2012
 Limited                                 Line, Limited           District Court
Maersk Line,         4:2011cv03251      Lewis v. Maersk Line,   Texas Southern             9/1/2011    3/23/2012
 Limited                                 Limited                 District Court
Maersk Line,         0:2012cv00834      Padilla v. Maersk       U.S. Court of Appeals,     3/1/2012    6/25/2013
 Limited                                 Line, Limited           Second Circuit
Maersk Line,         2:2012cv02483      Maersk Line, Limited    New Jersey District       4/26/2012     7/9/2012
 Limited                                 et al                   Court
Maersk Line,         4:2012cv00127      Horton et al v. Maersk  Georgia Southern           5/9/2012    9/22/2014
 Limited                                 Line, Limited           District Court
Maersk Line,         2:2012cv05280      Andrucovici et al       New Jersey District       8/22/2012    9/11/2012
 Limited                                                         Court
Maersk Line,         4:2013cv02171      Fetter v. Maersk Line,  Texas Southern            7/25/2013     4/2/2014
 Limited                                 Limited. Case           District Court
                                         electronically
                                         transferred to
                                         District of New
                                         Jersey
Maersk Line,         1:2013cv07136      RLI Insurance Copany    New York Southern         10/8/2013    4/29/2014
 Limited                                 et al v. Orca et al     District Court
Maersk Line,         2:2013cv06899      Reinauer                New Jersey District       11/8/2013     4/1/2014
 Limited                                 Transportation          Court
                                         Companies, LLC v.
                                         Maersk Line, Limited
                                         et al
Maersk Line,         2:2013cv06899      Reinauer                New Jersey District       11/8/2013     4/1/2014
 Limited                                 Transportation          Court
                                         Companies, LLC v.
                                         Maersk Line, Limited
                                         et al
Maersk Line,         1:2013cv08477      National Union Fire     New York Southern        11/26/2013    6/25/2014
 Limited                                 Insurance Company of    District Court
                                         Pittsburgh, P.A. et
                                         al v. Maersk et al
Maersk Line,         3:2014cv00220      KVA Electric, Inc. et   California Northern       1/14/2014    3/24/2014
 Limited                                 al v. A.P. Moelller-    District Court
                                         Maersk A/S trading as
                                         Maersk Line et al
Maersk Line,         2:2014mc00090      In re: Khaled           California Central        2/25/2014    5/15/2014
 Limited                                 Munassar, United        District Court
                                         States Merchant
                                         Marine (MMD No.
                                         2246187) Missing at
                                         Sea, February 10,
                                         2014
Maersk Line,         2:2014cv03737      Ghaleb m. Ghaleb vs.    California Central        5/15/2014    6/19/2014
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    District Court
Maersk Line,         1:2014cv05757      Saleh v. Maersk Line,   New York Southern         7/28/2014     4/7/2016
 Limited                                 Limited                 District Court
Maersk Line,         1:2014cv06260      Maersk Line, Limited    New York Southern          8/7/2014    3/31/2015
 Limited                                 v. Saleh                District Court
Maersk Line,         1:2014cv07006      George et al v. Maersk  New York Southern         8/28/2014     6/9/2016
 Limited                                 Line, Limited et al     District Court
Maersk Line,         1:2014cv07294      National Union Fire     New York Southern         9/19/2014   10/23/2014
 Limited                                 Insurance Company of    District Court
                                         Pittsburgh, P.A. et
                                         al v. M/V Maersk Utah
                                         et al
Maersk Line,         0:2014prici14450   John Horton, et al v.   U.S. Court of Appeals,    10/2/2014    2/27/2015
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited,   Eleventh Circuit
                                         et al
Maersk Line,         1:2014cv05951      Soliman v. Maersk       New York Eastern         10/10/2014    1/26/2017
 Limited                                 Line, Limited           District Court
Maersk Line,         1:2014bk12414      National Air Cargo,     New York Western         10/17/2014     2/5/2019
 Limited                                 Inc.                    Bankruptcy Court
Maersk Line,         1:2014cv01028      Crowley Technical       U.S. Court of Federal    10/22/2014    9/25/2015
 Limited                                 Management, Inc v.      Claims
                                         USA
Maersk Line,         1:2014cv00024      Marquez v. Maersk       Northern Mariana         12/11/2014    5/24/2016
 Limited                                 Line, Limited           Islands District
                                                                 Court
Maersk Line,         1:2015cv01785      National Union Fire     New York Southern         3/10/2015    4/24/2015
 Limited                                 Insurance Company of    District Court
                                         Pittsburgh, P.A. et
                                         al v. M/V Leda Maersk
                                         et al
Maersk Line,         2:2016cv00230      Reyes v. Maersk Line,   Virginia Eastern          5/10/2016    12/7/2016
 Limited                                 Limited                 District Court
Maersk Line,         8:2016cv01600      Mohsen Hubair v.        California Central        8/30/2016    1/13/2017
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    District Court
                                         et al
Maersk Line,         1:2016ap01068      The Official Committee  New York Western         10/11/2016     1/8/2018
 Limited                                 of Unsecured            Bankruptcy Court
                                         Creditors and Maersk
                                         Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         0:2016cv04757      Don Shine, et al v.     U.S. Court of Appeals,   12/29/2016    11/8/2019
 Limited                                 Alcoa Steamship Co.,    Sixth Circuit
                                         Inc., et al
Maersk Line,         3:2017cv00019      EPL Oil & Gas, Inc. et  Texas Southern            1/20/2017    3/22/2017
 Limited                                 al v. Maersk Line,      District Court
                                         Limited. Case has
                                         been transferred to
                                         Houston Division
Maersk Line,         4:2017cv00898      EPL Oil & Gas, Inc. et  Texas Southern            1/20/2017     4/6/2017
 Limited                                 al v. Maersk Line,      District Court
                                         Limited. Case is
                                         consolicated under
                                         4:17-cv-188
Maersk Line,         1:2017cv00281      Anham FZCO, LLC v.      Virginia Eastern           3/9/2017     4/5/2017
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    District Court
Maersk Line,         1:2017cv10534      Foster v. Maersk Line,  Massachuetts District     3/28/2017   10/31/2018
 Limited                                 Limited                 Court
Maersk Line,         3:2017cv00178      Pierce v. Maersk Inc.   Texas Southern             6/7/2017     6/1/2018
 Limited                                 et al                   District Court
Maersk Line,         1:2017cv05959      AGCS Marine Insurance   New York Southern          8/7/2017    9/27/2017
 Limited                                 Company v. M/V Maersk   District Court
                                         Kinloss et al
Maersk Line,         1:2017cv07473      Federal Insurance       New York Southern         9/29/2017   10/30/2017
 Limited                                 Company v. Maersk       District Court
                                         Line A/S et al
Maersk Line,         1:2017cv00262      Maersk Line, Limited    U.S. Court of            10/31/2017    9/17/2019
 Limited                                 v. United States        International Trade
Maersk Line,         1:2017cv08659      National Air Cargo      New York Southern         11/8/2017    9/27/2019
 Limited                                 Group, Inc. v. Maersk   District Court
                                         Line, Limited et al
Maersk Line,         1:2018cv00188      Maersk Line, Limited    U.S. Court of             8/23/2018    9/12/2019
 Limited                                 v. United States        International Trade
Maersk Line,         4:2019cv00012      Richard Grimble v.      Texas Southern             1/2/2019     3/3/2022
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    District Court
                                         et al
Maersk Line,         2:2019cv04244      Certain Underwriters    California Central        5/16/2019     7/2/2019
 Limited                                 at Lloyds v. Maersk     District Court
                                         Line AS et al
Maersk Line,         3:2019cv00238      Reed et al v. Maersk    Texas Southern            7/22/2019    4/12/2023
 Limited                                 Line, Limited et al     District Court
Maersk Line,         3:2019cv00242      Marsh v. BP Products    Texas Southern            7/24/2019    5/18/2021
 Limited                                 North America, Inc.     District Court
                                         et al
Maersk Line,         0:2019cv03254      National Air Cargo      U.S. Court of Appeals,    10/8/2019   11/18/2019
 Limited                                 Group, Inc. v. Maersk   Second Circuit
                                         Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         3:2019cv06743      Bickham v. Maersk       California Northern      10/18/2019    3/29/2022
 Limited                                 Line, Limited et al     District Court
Maersk Line,         1:2019cv11373      Liberty Specialty       New York Southern        12/12/2019     2/9/2021
 Limited                                 Markets Limited et al   District Court
                                         v. Maersk, Inc. et al
Maersk Line,         1:2019cv11364      Sai Marine Export Pvt   New York Southern        12/12/2019     2/9/2021
 Limited                                 Limited v. Maersk       District Court
                                         Line A/S
Maersk Line,         1:2020cv03322      Valentine v. Maersk     New York Eastern          7/23/2020    9/16/2020
 Limited                                 Line, Limited           District Court
Maersk Line,         3:2020cv00829      USA et al v. Maersk     Illinois Southern         8/27/2020    3/16/2021
 Limited                                 Line, Limited et al     District Court
Maersk Line,         2:2020cv18841      Muthala v. Maersk       New Jersey District      12/14/2020    3/14/2025
 Limited                                 Line, Limited et al     Court
Maersk Line,         1:2021cv00125      Maersk Line, Limited    District of Columbia      1/14/2021    8/11/2023
 Limited                                 v. U.S. Department of   District Court
                                         State
Maersk Line,         1:2021cv01722      Air Express             New York Southern         2/26/2021     9/9/2022
 Limited                                 Internatiional USA,     District Court
                                         Inc. v. Maersk, Inc.
                                         et al
Maersk Line,         1:2021cv01722      Air Express             New York Southern         2/26/2021     9/9/2022
 Limited                                 Internatiional USA,     District Court
                                         Inc. v. Maersk, Inc.
                                         et al
Maersk Line,         2:2021cv11222      Solis v. Maersk Line,   New Jersey District       5/14/2021     8/2/2022
 Limited                                 Limited                 Court
Maersk Line,         2:2021cv00317      Allen v. Maersk Line,   Virginia Eastern           6/4/2021    1/10/2022
 Limited                                 Limited, et al          District Court
Maersk Line,         1:2021cv01277      Cockett Marine Oil      Delaware District          9/8/2021    4/26/2023
 Limited                                 DMCC v. CI              Court
                                         International Fuels,
                                         LLC et al
Maersk Line,         2:2021cv00501      Maersk Line, Limited    Virginia Eastern           9/9/2021    12/9/2021
 Limited                                 v. United States        District Court
                                         Coast Guard
Maersk Line,         0:2021pcf30636     Seville v. Maersk Line  U.S. Court of Appeals,   10/13/2021   11/18/2022
 Limited                                                         Fifth Circuit
Maersk Line,         1:2022cv00100      White Coral Marine      Delaware District         1/25/2022     9/2/2022
 Limited                                 Limited et al v.        Court
                                         Chimbusco Pan Nation
                                         Petro-Chemical
                                         Co.Ltd. Et al
Maersk Line,         2:2022cv05038      Acosta v. Port Newark   New Jersey District       8/12/2022    7/28/2023
 Limited                                 Container Terminal,     Court
                                         LLC et al
Maersk Line,         2:2022cv00370      Maersk Line, Limited    Virginia Eastern           9/2/2022   12/19/2023
 Limited                                 v. United States        District Court
Maersk Line,         4:2022cv03764      Okpere v. Maersk Line,  Texas Southern           10/28/2022    9/12/2024
 Limited                                 Limited                 District Court
Maersk Line,         4:2022cv00261      Amick v. Maersk Line,   Georgia Southern          11/2/2022    7/21/2023
 Limited                                 Limited                 District Court
Maersk Line,         1:2023cv00017      Ogbo et al v. CSX       Georgia Southern          2/21/2023   11/27/2023
 Limited                                 Transportaion, Inc.     District Court
                                         et al
Maersk Line,         1:2023cv02501      Gaylan v. Maersk Line,  New York Southern         3/24/2023   10/24/2023
 Limited                                 Limited                 District Court
Maersk Line,         1:2023cv09599      Maersk Line, Limited    New York Southern         11/1/2023     3/8/2024
 Limited                                 v. Theodor Wille        District Court
                                         Intertrade, GmbH
Maersk Line,         4:2024cv00274      Carter v. Maersk Line,  Georgia Southern          12/6/2024
 Limited                                 Limited-USA et al       District Court
 


                                                CALIFORNIA CASES
 
                                                                                                         Date
     Party Name         Case Number           Case Title                 Court          Date  Filed     Closed
 
Maersk Line,         22STCV22245        Dalia Franklin v.       Los Angeles County       07/10/2022
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    Superior Court
                                         (Asbestos)
Maersk Line,         2:22cv3543         Travelers Property      USDC Central District    05/24/2022
 Limited                                 Casualty Company of     of California
                                         America v. Maersk
                                         Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         22STCV15952        Ricky Lynn Feigner v.   Los Angeles County       05/12/2022
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    Superior Court
                                         (Asbestos)
Maersk Line,         21STCV29691        Eduardo Hernandez v.    Los Angeles County       08/11/2021
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    Superior Court
Maersk Line,         RG21088294         Edward Richards v.      Alameda County           01/29/2021
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    Superior Court
                                         (Asbestos)
Maersk Line,         20STCV47908        Dejan Ulic v. Maersk    Los Angeles County       12/15/2020
 Limited                                 Line, Limited           Superior Court
Maersk Line,         20STCV45382        Gerald Feigner v.       Los Angeles County       11/24/2020
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    Superior Court
                                         (Asbestos)
Maersk Line,         3:19cv6743         Omoro Bickham v.        USDC Northern District   10/18/2019
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    of California
Maersk Line,         8:19cv1847         Oar Auto Inc, v.        USDC Central District    09/27/2019
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    of California
Maersk Line,         RG19035560         Omoro Bickham v.        Alameda County           09/18/2019
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    Superior Court
Maersk Line,         3:19cv3707         Allan D. Bombita v.     USDC Northern District   06/26/2019
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    of California
Maersk Line,         2:19cv4244         Certain Underwriters    USDC Central District    05/16/2019
 Limited                                 at Lloyds v. Maersk     of California
                                         Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         37-2018-38528-CU-  Denver Urlaub v.        San Diego County         08/01/2018
 Limited              BC-CTL             Maersk Line, Limited    Superior Court
Maersk Line,         2:17cv8457         Maersk Line, Limited    USDC Central District    11/20/2017
 Limited                                 v. Apex Maritime Co.    of California
Maersk Line,         BC640986           Mario Baja v. Maersk    Los Angeles County       11/16/2016
 Limited                                 Line, Limited           Superior Court
Maersk Line,         8:16cv1600         Mohsen Hubair v.        USDC Central District    08/30/2016
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    of California
Maersk Line,         2:16cv4173         NGL Transportation v.   USDC Central District    06/10/2016
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    of California
Maersk Line,         2:16cv272          Elkay Plastics Company  USDC Central District    01/13/2016
 Limited                                 Inc. v. Maersk Line,    of California
                                         Limited
Maersk Line,         BC600032           Elkay Plastics Company  Los Angeles County       11/04/2015
 Limited                                 Inc. v. Maersk Line,    Superior Court
                                         Limited
Maersk Line,         RG14-734205        David Kabasinskas v.    Alameda County           07/24/2014
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    Superior Court
Maersk Line,         2:14cv3737         Maersk Line, Limited    USDC Central District    05/15/2014
 Limited                                 v. Ghaleb M. Ghaleb     of California
Maersk Line,         2:14cv3567         Agro Trading            USDC Central District    05/08/2014
 Limited                                 International LLC v.    of California
                                         Maersk Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         2:14mc90           Re Khaled Munassar,     USDC Central District    02/25/2014
 Limited                                 Missing at Sea, v.      of California
                                         Maersk Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         2:14cv427          XL Specialty Insurance  USDC Central District    01/17/2014
 Limited                                 Company v. Maersk       of California
                                         Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         3:14cv220          KVA Electric Inc. v.    USDC Northern District   01/14/2014
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    of California
Maersk Line,         2:13cv9440         Agro Trading            USDC Central District    12/23/2013
 Limited                                 International LLC v.    of California
                                         Maersk Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         4:13cv5812         Darin Allen v. Maersk   USDC Northern District   12/16/2013
 Limited                                 Line, Limited           of California
Maersk Line,         BC530643           Bridgette Moore et al   Los Angeles County       12/16/2013
 Limited                                 v. Maersk Line,         Superior Court
                                         Limited (Asbestos)
Maersk Line,         NC059203           Agro Trading            Los Angeles County       11/25/2013
 Limited                                 International LLC v.    Superior Court
                                         Maersk Line, Limited    Branches
Maersk Line,         2:13cv6503         Elouise T. James v.     USDC Central District    09/05/2013
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    of California
Maersk Line,         BC515773           Brittany D. Lewis v.    Los Angeles County       07/22/2013
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    Superior Court
Maersk Line,         2:13cv5147         Pandol Associates       USDC Central District    07/17/2013
 Limited                                 Marketing Inc. v.       of California
                                         Maersk Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         RG13-688180        Robert Bell v. Maersk   Alameda County           07/17/2013
 Limited                                 Line, Limited           Superior Court
Maersk Line,         BC515247           Norberto Castillo v.    Los Angeles County       07/16/2013
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    Superior Court
Maersk Line,         2:13cv3453         Terry Allen v. Maersk   USDC Central District    05/14/2013
 Limited                                 Line, Limited           of California
Maersk Line,         2:12cv1857         Tokio Marine and        USDC Central District    03/05/2012
 Limited                                 Nichido Fire Co. Ltd.   of California
                                         V. Maersk Line,
                                         Limited
Maersk Line,         RG11-578268        Kenneth Vollman v.      Alameda County           05/27/2011
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    Superior Court
Maersk Line,         4:11cv725          Stephen Lambert v.      USDC Northern District   02/16/2011
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    of California
Maersk Line,         NC054758           Ahmed Hissein           Los Angeles County       06/28/2010
 Limited                                 Alaidaroos v. Maersk    Superior Court Branch
                                         Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         NC053633           John Gomard v. Maersk   Los Angeles County       10/09/2009
 Limited                                 Line, Limited           Superior Court Branch
Maersk Line,         2:09-cv-07147      Ronald Glusac v.        USDC Central District    10/01/2009
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    of California
Maersk Line,         NC042852           Paquiz Mario v. Maersk  Los Angeles County       12/18/2008
 Limited                                 Line, Limited           Superior Court Branch
Maersk Line,         3:08-cv-04728      Abdulaziz Zain v.       USDC Northern District   10/14/2008
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    of California
Maersk Line,         5:08-cv-01247      James Edward Harper v.  USDC Central District    09/11/2008
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    of California
Maersk Line,         CGC-08-472574      Fadel Mohamed v.        San Francisco County     02/26/2008
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    Superior Court
Maersk Line,         CGC-07-468402      Fadel Mohamed v.        San Francisco County     10/22/2007
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    Superior Court
Maersk Line,         3:06-cv-07728      Charles Andrews v.      USDC Northern District   12/18/2006
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    of California
Maersk Line,         CGC-03-430986      William Dean v. Maersk  San Francisco County     04/29/2004
 Limited                                 Line, Limited           Superior Court
 


                                                  FLORIDA CASES
 
                                                                                                         Date
     Party Name         Case Number           Case Title                 Court          Date  Filed     Closed
 
Maersk Line,         3:03cv77           Bruce Childers v.       US District Court for      2/3/2003       Closed
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    the Middle District
                                                                 of Florida
Maersk Line,         1:09cv21679        Daniell P. Gibbons v.   US District Court,        6/17/2009       Closed
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    Florida Southern
Maersk Line,         0:03cv60033        George Adams v. Maersk  US Distrcit Court for     1/10/2003       Closed
 Limited                                 Line, Limited           the Southern District
                                                                 of Florida
Maersk Line,         CACE01010980       Tanya Kennedy v.        Florida Circuit &         6/25/2001       Closed
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    County Court, Broward
                                                                 County
Maersk Line,         3:11cv206          John C. Orr v. Maersk   US District Court for      5/2/2011       Closed
 Limited                                 Line, Limited           the Northern District
                                                                 of Florida
Maersk Line,         1:04cv20913        Wright v. Maersk Line,  US District Court for     4/16/2004       Closed
 Limited                                 Limited                 the Southern District
                                                                 of Florida
Maersk Line,         3:03cv890          William Smalls, Jr. v.  US District Court for    10/20/2003       Closed
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    the Middle District
                                                                 of Florida
Maersk Line,         14-14450           John Horton v. Maersk   US Court of Appeals       10/2/2014       Closed
 Limited                                 line, Limited           for the Eleventh
                                                                 Circuit
Maersk Line,         8:09cv2176         Steven Lonas v. Maersk  US District Court,       10/26/2009       Closed
 Limited                                 Line, Limited           Florida Middle
Maersk Line,         161998CA006515     George Davis v. Maersk  Florida Circuit &         12/7/1998       Closed
 Limited             XXX XMA             Line, Limited           County Court, Duval
                                                                 County
Maersk Line,         162010CA015209     Maersk Line, Limited    Florida Circuit &        12/29/2010       Closed
 Limited             XXX XMA             v. United Motors Inc.   County, Duval County
Maersk Line,         162006CA006890     Horace Robinson IV v.   Florida Circuit &         9/25/2006       Closed
 Limited             XXX                 Maersk Line, Limited    County, Duval County
                     XMA
Maersk Line,         2003-015372-CA-01  Dionisio Batiz v.       Florida Circuit &          7/1/2003       Closed
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    County Court, Miami-
                                                                 Dade County
Maersk Line,         2004-007111-CA-01  Nadia Wright v. Maersk  Florida Circuit &         3/26/2004       Closed
 Limited                                 Line, Limited           County Court, Miami-
                                                                 Dade County
Maersk Line,         2002-030993-CA-01  George Adams v. Maersk  Florida Circuit &        12/11/2002       Closed
 Limited                                 Line, Limited           County Court, Miami-
                                                                 Dade County
Maersk Line,         2005-018715-CA-01  David Mike Bunch v.     Florida Circuit &         9/15/2005       Closed
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    County Court, Miami-
                                                                 Dade County
Maersk Line,         1:21cv23908        Maersk Line, Limited    US District Court,        11/5/2021       Closed
 Limited                                 v. Accelerated          Florida Southern
                                         International
                                         Forwarders et al
Maersk Line,         2:14cv546          Bolin v. Maersk Line,   US District Court,        9/17/2014       Closed
 Limited                                 Limited                 Florida Middle
Maersk Line,         03-CA-010618       John M. Frew v. Maersk  Florida Circuit &        11/12/2003       Closed
 Limited                                 Line, Limited           County Court,
                                                                 Hillsborough County
Maersk Line,         00-12275           Maersk Line, Limited    US Court of Appeals        5/3/2000       Closed
 Limited                                 v. Rickie L. Juzang     for the Eleventh
                                                                 Circuit
Maersk Line,         00-13566           Maersk Line, Limited    US Court of Appeals       7/10/2000       Closed
 Limited                                 v. Othello Dansley      for the Eleventh
                                                                 Circuit
Maersk Line,         3:99cv808          Hall v. Maersk Line,    US District Court for     8/10/1999       Closed
 Limited                                 Limited                 the Middle District
                                                                 of Florida
Maersk Line,         12-16433           William Skye v. Maersk  US Court of Appeals      12/19/2012       Closed
 Limited                                 Line, Limited           for the Eleventh
                                                                 Circuit
Maersk Line,         1:13cv21312        Saiti Express v.        US District Court,        4/15/2013       Closed
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    Florida Southern
Maersk Line,         0:03cv60033        Adams v. Maersk Line,   US District Court for     1/10/2003       Closed
 Limited                                 Limited                 the Southern District
                                                                 of Florida
Maersk Line,         2012-029705-CA-01  One West Bank v.        Florida Circuit &         7/25/2012       Closed
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    County Court, Miami-
                                                                 Dade County
 


                                                  GEORGIA CASES
 
                                                                                                         Date
     Party Name         Case Number           Case Title                 Court          Date  Filed     Closed
 
Maersk Line,         STCV24-02350       Alexander Heyward v.    Chatham County           10/14/2024       Active
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         STCV24-02323       Marquis Carter v.       Chatham County           10/10/2024       Active
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         24-GM-12940        Portfolio Recovery      Gwinnett County           5/17/2024       Active
 Limited                                 Associates, LLC v.
                                         Flowers
Maersk Line,         22A00849           NGOZI OGBO v. Maersk    Dekalb Sate Court          3/4/2022   12/20/2022
 Limited                                 Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         14A52261E7         Kevin Dean v. Bridge    Dekalb Sate Court         7/16/2014     7/2/2015
 Limited                                 Terminal Transport,
                                         Inc.
Maersk Line,         STCV1200562        John Horton & Carolyn   Chatham County             4/3/2012     5/9/2012
 Limited                                 Horton v. Maersk
                                         Line, Limited
 


                                               MASSACHUETTS CASES
 
                                                                                                         Date
     Party Name         Case Number           Case Title                 Court          Date  Filed     Closed
 
Maersk Line,         4:05-cv-40187-FDS  Valentine v. Maersk     District of              10/21/2005    9/20/2007
 Limited                                 Line, Limited           Massachuetts
Maersk Line,         1:07-cv-12144-JLT  Spence v. Maersk Line,  District of              11/15/2007    7/14/2009
 Limited                                 Limited                 Massachuetts
Maersk Line,         1:08-cv-11204-DPW  Barclay v. Maersk       District of               7/15/2008    2/25/2011
 Limited                                 Line, Limited           Massachuetts
Maersk Line,         1:17-cv-10534-LTS  Foster v. Maersk Line,  District of               3/28/2017   10/31/2018
 Limited                                 Limited                 Massachuetts
Maersk Line,         1:19-cv-11842-RGS  Parisi v. Maersk Line,  District of               8/29/2019    3/25/2020
 Limited              case transferred   Limited                 Massachuetts
                      to E.D. Va. 2:20-
                      cv-00155
 


                                                   TEXAS CASES
 
                                                                                                         Date
     Party Name         Case Number           Case Title                 Court          Date  Filed     Closed
 
Maersk Line,         DC-17-08473        Alton Hickman v.        Dallas County District    7/14/2017    9/24/2018
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    Court
Maersk Line,         DC-23-05862        Lazaro Gonzalez v.      Dallas County District     5/3/2023    7/20/2023
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    Court
Maersk Line,         201081908          Maersk Line, Limited
 Limited                                 v. Rogelios
                                         Castellanos
Maersk Line,         202443140          Maersk Line, Limited    Harris County-165th       8/15/2024    8/19/2024
 Limited                                 v. Harris Central       Civil District Court
                                         Appraisal District
Maersk Line,         201858665          Troy Ancar v. Maersk    Harris County-270th       8/29/2018     2/3/2022
 Limited                                 Line, Limited           Civil District Court
Maersk Line,         200710116          Calhoun, Bridget Anf
 Limited                                 of her son Cac v.
                                         Maersk Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         201738922          Certain Underwriters
 Limited                                 at Lloyds London v.
                                         Maersk Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         202246803          Jose Mario Chavez v.    Harris County-281st
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    Civil District Court
Maersk Line,         201025981          Charles Curtis Leon v.
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         2023-01487         David Kendrick v.       Harris County-127th        1/9/2023     1/9/2024
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    Civil District Court
Maersk Line,         201764133          Eberto Castro v.        Harris County-152nd       9/27/2017   11/15/2018
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    Civil District Court
Maersk Line,         200935336          Antonio Garcia v.
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         200957502          Sheldon Greenberg v.
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         200826963          Albert Henry v. Maersk
 Limited                                 Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         200926129          Richard E. Hicks v.
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         201409676          Julius Obilana v.       Harris County-295th       2/25/2014     7/7/2015
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    Civil District Court
Maersk Line,         202181859          Kenneth E. Benton v.    Harris County-281st
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    Civil District Court
Maersk Line,         200773458          Eleazar Lozano, Jr. v.
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         200336307          Port Terminal Railroad
 Limited                                 Authority v. Maersk
                                         Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         200980308          Reginald Watkins v.
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         200964336          Miguel Ruiz v. Maersk
 Limited                                 Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         201374042          Sandra Magee v. Maersk
 Limited                                 Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         202018231/         Sulesooay Streete, Jr.  Victoria Couty-267th       6/5/2020   10/25/2021
 Limited             20-06-85855-X       v. Maersk Line,         District Court
                                         Limited
Maersk Line,         202275527          Tesfaye Gebregziabher   Harris County-215th       11/6/2022     8/1/2024
 Limited                                 v. Maersk Line,         Civil District Court
                                         Limited
Maersk Line,         201772879          Timothy Brock v.        Harris County-125th      10/27/2017    12/4/2018
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    Civil District Court
Maersk Line,         2017DCV-5064-B     Darryl Alexander v.
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         2020-139           Tanos Energy et al v.
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         202257584          Ehimarey Okpere v.      Harris County-133rd        9/9/2022   11/14/2024
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    Civil District Court
 


                                                 NEW YORK CASES
 
                                                                                                         Date
     Party Name         Case Number           Case Title                 Court          Date  Filed     Closed
 
Maersk Line,         101020/2008        Michael Gaciala v.      New York County            4/2/2009   12/18/2009
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    Supreme Court
Maersk Line,         153124/2012        Gabriel Albino v.       New York County           5/25/2012      Pre-RJI
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    Supreme Court                            Status
Maersk Line,         153125/2012        William Richards v.     New York County           5/25/2012      Pre-RJI
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    Supreme Court                            Status
Maersk Line,         153126/2012        Mohamed Soliman v.      New York County           5/25/2012      Pre-RJI
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    Supreme Court                            Status
Maersk Line,         190284/2022        Keith Collins & Liz     New York County          12/13/2022      Pre-RJI
 Limited                                 Collins v. Maersk       Supreme Court                            Status
                                         Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         190298/2014        Willard E. Bartel v.    New York County           8/29/2014       Active
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    Supreme Court
Maersk Line,         190303/2014        Willard E. Bartel v.    New York County           8/29/2014       Active
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    Supreme Court
Maersk Line,         190307/2014        Willard E. Bartel v.    New York County           8/29/2014       Active
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    Supreme Court
Maersk Line,         190350/2013        Rita Mae Perkins v.     New York County           9/27/2013      Pre-RJI
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    Supreme Court                            Status
Maersk Line,         190506/2012        Armando Giachin et al   New York County          10/22/2012    10/8/2014
 Limited                                 v. Maersk Line,         Supreme Court
                                         Limited
Maersk Line,         24180/2013E        Miguel Guity v. Maersk  Bronx County Supreme      11/6/2013    5/22/2018
 Limited             (0024180/2013)      Line, Limited           Court
Maersk Line,         452742/2014        Raphael James v.        New York County          11/14/2014     6/7/2017
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    Supreme Court
Maersk Line,         607663/2022        Hope Hicks v. Maersk    Nassau County Supreme     6/14/2022   11/14/2022
 Limited                                 Line, Limited           Court
Maersk Line,         607767/2022        Midshipman-Y v. Maersk  Nassau County Supreme     6/15/2022   11/23/2022
 Limited                                 Line, Limited           Court
Maersk Line,         0004569/2003       Abdullah Saeed v.       Kings Supreme Court       5/22/2003    7/28/2004
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         0029826/2007       Kathleen Dunn & Howard  Kings Supreme Court       1/23/2008    2/23/2010
 Limited                                 Dunn v. Maersk Line,
                                         Limited
Maersk Line,         0301110/2007       Joseph Archer v.        Bronx Supreme Court       3/13/2008    5/16/2012
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         0302580/2009       Francisco Diego v.      Bronx Supreme Court        8/3/2009     8/4/2011
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         0003775/2010       Christopher T. Hale v.  Nassau County Supreme     2/25/2010     1/3/2011
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    Court
Maersk Line,         102991/2011        Michael McCright v.     New York County            6/8/2012    7/25/2013
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    Supreme Court
Maersk Line,         10318/2012         Shastri Mullahoo v.     Queens Supreme Court      7/16/2012     4/7/2014
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         190336/2016        Willard E. Bartel v.    New York County           11/3/2016       Active
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    Supreme Court
 


                                              SOUTH CAROLINA CASES
 
                                                                                                         Date
     Party Name         Case Number           Case Title                 Court          Date  Filed     Closed
 
Maersk Line,         2005CP1003594      Altec Industries Inc    Charleston Circuit         9/2/2005    1/10/2006
 Limited                                 Etc et al v. Maersk     Court
                                         Line, Limited
 


                                                 VIRGINIA CASES
 
                                                                                                         Date
     Party Name         Case Number           Case Title                 Court          Date  Filed     Closed
 
Maersk Line,         CL16002434-00      Karen Annette Reyes v.  Norfolk Circuit Court      3/3/2016    5/10/2013
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         CL03001141-00      William Wright v.       Norfolk Circuit Court     5/12/2003     6/4/2003
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         CL05000899-00      Roslyn N. Brooks v.     Norfolk Circuit Court     4/22/2005    7/22/2005
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         CL05000899-01      Roslyn N. Brooks v.     Norfolk Circuit Court    10/27/2005     8/8/2007
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         CL06002919-00      Alphonso A. Clements    Norfolk Circuit Court     5/26/2006    6/30/2006
 Limited                                 v. Maersk Line,
                                         Limited
Maersk Line,         CL06002919-01      Alphonso A. Clements    Norfolk Circuit Court    10/23/2006    4/16/2007
 Limited                                 v. Maersk Line,
                                         Limited
Maersk Line,         CL06004876-00      Maersk Line, Limited    Norfolk Circuit Court     9/14/2006     1/4/2007
 Limited                                 v. York-Mahar Inc
Maersk Line,         CL07004158-00      Mark Hoffler v. Maersk  Norfolk Circuit Court     7/10/2007    9/15/2008
 Limited                                 Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         CL08001371-00      Maersk Line, Limited    Norfolk Circuit Court     2/29/2008    3/24/2010
 Limited                                 v. York-Mahar Inc
Maersk Line,         CL12002799-00      Hector Sanchez v.       Norfolk Circuit Court      4/9/2012   11/15/2012
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         CL12002800-00      Mario Clotter v.        Norfolk Circuit Court      4/9/2012   11/15/2012
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         CL12002801-00      Miguel Ruiz v. Maersk   Norfolk Circuit Court      4/9/2012   11/15/2012
 Limited                                 Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         CL12002802-00      Clifford Lacon v.       Norfolk Circuit Court      4/9/2012   11/15/2012
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         CL12002803-00      Richard Hicks v.        Norfolk Circuit Court      4/9/2012   11/20/2012
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         CL12002804-00      Andrew Brzezinski v.    Norfolk Circuit Court      4/9/2012   11/15/2012
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         CL12002805-00      Mohamed Abdelwaham v.   Norfolk Circuit Court      4/9/2012    11/8/2012
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         CL12002808-00      Husain Salah v. Maersk  Norfolk Circuit Court      4/9/2012   11/15/2012
 Limited                                 Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         CL12002809-00      Jimmy Sabga v. Maersk   Norfolk Circuit Court      4/9/2012   11/15/2012
 Limited                                 Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         CL17006906-00      Ramon Sanchez Castillo  Norfolk Circuit Court     6/16/2017    11/3/2021
 Limited                                 v. Maersk Line,
                                         Limited
Maersk Line,         CL21014539-00      Terry L. Franklin v.    Norfolk Circuit Court    11/30/2021     2/8/2023
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         CL22005545-00      Herbert Hyde v. Maersk  Norfolk Circuit Court     4/29/2022    3/27/2023
 Limited                                 Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         CL22006722-00      D'Andre Turner v.       Norfolk Circuit Court     5/26/2022     9/7/2022
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         CL08003825-00      Denise Russell v.       Norfolk Circuit Court     6/16/2008    5/26/2009
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         CL07002958-00      Denise Russell v.       Norfolk Circuit Court     5/15/2007    5/15/2008
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         CL98001501-00      Richard C. Sequist v.   Norfolk Circuit Court     6/11/1998     8/9/1999
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         CL12001616-00      ATM Reza v. Maersk      Norfolk Circuit Court     2/28/2012   11/15/2012
 Limited                                 Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         CL12001617-00      John Cronan v. Maersk   Norfolk Circuit Court     2/28/2012   11/15/2012
 Limited                                 Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         CL17011063-00      Randy L. Bowman v.      Norfolk Circuit Court     9/29/2017     4/9/2019
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         CL19004751-00      Kenneth C. Sumner v.    Norfolk Circuit Court     5/20/2019   10/14/2021
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         CL19006610-00      Samuel Garrett v.       Norfolk Circuit Court     6/27/2019   12/22/2021
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         CL20001300-00      Allan D. Bombita v.     Norfolk Circuit Court     1/30/2020    6/24/2021
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         CL20010003-00      David James v. Maersk   Norfolk Circuit Court    11/16/2020    4/12/2023
 Limited                                 Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         CL21002890-00      Selina s. Vaughan v.    Norfolk Circuit Court     3/11/2021     2/4/2022
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         CL21009330-00      Allan D. Bombita v.     Norfolk Circuit Court     8/27/2021    2/16/2022
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         CL21012747-00      Philip Parisi v.        Norfolk Circuit Court    10/20/2021   11/10/2022
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         CL22014560-00      Shawn Hughley v.        Norfolk Circuit Court    10/26/2022    12/1/2023
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         CL23006096-00      Elias Bonefont v.       Norfolk Circuit Court     4/21/2023   10/16/2023
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         CL24006953-00      Merley Ford v. Maersk   Norfolk Circuit Court     6/24/2024       Active
 Limited                                 Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         CL97002718-00      John H. Batson v.       Norfolk Circuit Court     8/11/1997    8/18/1999
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited
Maersk Line,         CL11002579-00      Marvin Porter v.        Portsmouth Circuit        8/22/2011     1/3/2013
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    Court
Maersk Line,         CL05000112-00      Jeffrey L. Mayberry v.  Portsmouth Circuit        1/25/2005    1/20/2006
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    Court
Maersk Line,         CL09000576-00      Christopher T. Hale v.  Portsmouth Circuit         3/5/2009     5/2/2011
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    Court
Maersk Line,         CL09000576-01      Christopher T. Hale v.  Portsmouth Circuit        2/24/2014    2/18/2016
 Limited                                 Maersk Line, Limited    Court
Maersk Line,         CL96002273-00      Donald Sneed v. Maersk  Portsmouth Circuit       11/26/1996    2/20/1998
 Limited                                 Line, Limited           Court
Maersk Line,         CL97001011-00      John Batson v. Maersk   Portsmouth Circuit         6/9/1997    7/25/1997
 Limited                                 Line, Limited           Court
 

                                 ______
                                 
  Addendum to the questionnaire submitted to the Senate Committee on 
   Commerce, Science, and Transportation, 119th Congress by Stephen 
                                Carmel.
    Upon further review, I have identified additional information that 
is responsive to multiple questions on the Committee's questionnaire. 
The information is disclosed below and separated by question.
    For Part A, Question 8, please find the following employment date 
adjustments:

   President, U.S. Marine Management*** (2023-Present)

   Various positions, Maersk Line Limited (1990-2023)

     Senior Vice President, U.S. Marine Management (1997-
            2023)

     Member, Board of Directors (1997-2005)

     Vice President of Finance, U.S. Marine Management 
            (1995-1997)

     Program Manager, U.S. Marine Management (1990-1995)

   Master, Marine Overseas Corp. (1985-1990)

   Ship Officer, Military Sealift Command U.S. Navy (1979-1985)

    ***In 2023, U.S. Marine Management was a division of Maersk Line 
Limited, but was spun off in 2023.
    Note: All positions listed were/are managerial.
    For Part A, Question 11, please find the following additional 
memberships:

   Member, Yorktown Institute Advisory Board (2020-Present)

   American Bureau of Shipping (2005-Present)

   Naval Studies Board, National Academies of Science (2016 -
        2021)

   Marine Board, National Academies of Sciences (2009-2014)

   Hydrographic Services Review Panel, NOAA (2009-2014)

   Chief of Naval Operations Executive Panel (N00K) (2004-2016)

    For Part A, Question 17 please find the following additional 
authored content:

   A Commercial Approach to Sea Basing-Afloat Forward Staging 
        Bases, US Naval Institute (2004)

   Transformation Implications of Sea Basing for Commercial 
        Shipping, Defense Transportation Journal (2004) (no hyperlink 
        or digital copy found)

   Study of Parametric Rolling Event on a Panamax Container 
        Vessel, Transportation Research Record Journal of the 
        Transportation Research Board (2006)

   Fighting Piracy and Protecting National Interests, George 
        Washington University Homeland Security Policy Institute (2009)

   The Big Myth of Somali Pirates, U.S. Naval Institute (2010)

   The Cold, Hard Realities of Arctic Shipping, U.S. Naval 
        Institute (2013)

   Globalization, Security, and Economic Well-Being, Naval War 
        College Review (2013)

   Arctic Force Structure: What an Arctic Fleet Might Look 
        Like, Hoover Institute (2014)

   The U.S. Navy Needs Tankers: A Crisis in Capability, 
        GCaptain (2023)

   Contagion in the Transpacific Shipping Network: 
        International Networks and Vulnerability Interdependence, 
        International Interactions (2023)

   It's Not Just DeepSeek China is After, RealClear Defense 
        (2025)

    For Part A, Question 18, please find additional presentations and 
panel discussions

   Presentation: Global Interdependence, Vulnerability, and 
        Terrorism: Simulating the Containership Shipping Network, 
        Annual Convention of the International Studies Association 
        (2008) (no digital copy or hyperlink available)

   Presentation: Maritime Security Challenges, 4th Maritime 
        Security Challenges Conference (2010)

   Panel: Transportation Research Board, Safe Navigation in the 
        U.S. Arctic, Breakout Group on Shipping Operations/Traffic 
        Regulation Schemes (2012) (no digital copy or hyperlink found)

   Presentation: Maritime Security, Globalization and Navy 
        Strategy, NWDC Speaker Series (2012)

   Presentation: The Uncertainty of the ``Made In'' Label in 
        Today's Global Economy, Volpe National Transportation Systems 
        Center (2012) (no digital copy or hyperlink found)

   Panel: The Arctic on the Agenda Forum 2013 Conference, 
        Arctic Forum Foundation (2013)

   Panel: America's Arctic Economic Ambitions: Opportunities 
        and Limitations, Center for Strategic & International Studies 
        (2017)

   Panel: The Supply Chain Crisis 2.0, Baltimore Council on 
        Foreign Affairs (2022)

    For Part A, Question 19, please find the following additional 
public statements:

   Maersk Backs Away from U.S. Military Contracts, GCaptian 
        (2023)

   Why the U.S. Military Has to Hitch a Ride on Commercial 
        Ships, Wall Street Journal (2024)

    For Part C, Question 3, please find the following additional cases 
for disclosure:

   U.S. Coast Guard Fine Maersk Line Limited $10k for Violating 
        46 USC Sec. 10104 (2010)

   Maersk Line to Pay $31.9 Million to Resolve False Claims 
        Allegations for Inflated Shipping Costs to Military in 
        Afghanistan and Iraq, U.S. Department of Justice (2012)

   Maersk Line Limited Settles Alleged Contract Fraud for $8.7 
        Million, Southern District of Illinois (2014)

   U.S. Department of Labor Finds Maersk Line Limited 
        Retaliated Against Seaman who Reported Safety Concerns to U.S. 
        Coast Guard, U.S. Department of Labor (2023)

    Chairman Cruz. Thank you. I now recognize Ms. DiBella for 
her opening.

STATEMENT OF LAURA DiBELLA, NOMINEE TO BE A COMMISSIONER, U.S. 
                  FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

    Ms. DiBella. Chair Cruz, Ranking Member Cantwell, and 
members of the Committee, good morning and thank you for the 
opportunity to appear here before you today as a nominee to be 
Commissioner of the Federal Maritime Commission. A sincere 
thank you, as well, for the courtesies that your staff extended 
to me throughout the nomination process.
    I would like to recognize FMC Commissioners Dye, Maffei, 
and Vekich, and thank them for being here in supportive 
attendance. And most importantly, I would like to thank 
President Trump for nominating me for this most important role.
    It is with great pleasure, humility, and honor to be 
nominated for this position as well as a homecoming of sorts to 
the maritime industry for me. In 2017, while spearheading local 
economic development in Nassau County, Florida, I was 
approached to wear a second hat and stand in temporarily as 
Port Director at the Port of Fernandina, a small and often 
overlooked seaport surrounded by renown juggernauts named 
JAXPORT and the Port of Savannah. The port was going through a 
rough transition and had little resources to spare for a 
qualified Port Director. I knew very little about ports back 
then, except for the fact that they were vital economic engines 
to a region and state, and because of that, and without 
hesitation and compensation, I willingly took on the role.
    Little did I know at the time that the decision to support 
the port was one that would change the trajectory of my life 
and career forever. What began as a temporary assignment 
resulted in a two and a half year journey that put me at ground 
zero of seaport operations, port authority governance, and the 
integration of a port within the economic development space and 
overall supply chain network. The knowledge I gained while 
serving dual roles greatly enhanced my economic development 
capabilities and afforded me the opportunity to form lasting 
relationships with past and present, and hopefully future, 
members of the Maritime Administration team and that of the 
maritime community at large.
    In the fall of 2019, I was approached about the Executive 
Director role for the Florida Harbor Pilots Association, a 
full-time position that never existed in the organization's 
150-plus year history, that put the livelihoods of Florida's 
nearly 100 harbor pilots in my hands. I dove headfirst into the 
job and learned at the most intimate level about an aspect of 
the maritime industry that very few outsiders have the 
privilege of seeing.
    Before long, we were met with the COVID-19 pandemic 
shutdown, which dealt a massive blow to Florida as the self-
proclaimed ``Cruise Capital of the World,'' with the cessation 
of cruise activity for nearly a year and a half and resulting 
supply chain crisis which upended their world and exposed every 
element of the fragile transportation network that we rely upon 
day in and day out.
    If that wasn't enough, we were also heavily engaged in 
blocking a potentially precedent-setting citizens' initiative 
at the Port of Key West that could have had broad implications 
around the restriction of cargo across other seaports around 
the country and world. The measure served as a stark reminder 
that ports, although local in nature, are truly global in 
principle and must be viewed and protected as such.
    In the summer of 2022, I was appointed Secretary of 
Commerce of Florida along with President and CEO of Enterprise 
Florida and entrusted with maintaining and growing what was 
then the state's $1.5 trillion economy, and once again had the 
pleasure of working with all 16 of Florida's seaports in a 
larger economic development capacity. As the third-largest 
state in the Nation and 16th-largest economy in the world, it 
was then that I also engaged heavily in international trade 
discussions with key trading partners around the globe as well 
as economic development efforts involving the newest mode of 
transportation to intersect with maritime, which is the 
incredibly exciting space industry.
    I say all of this in the hopes to demonstrate not only my 
hands-on experience, knowledge, and unique perspective of the 
maritime space, but also my sincere passion and commitment to 
the industry. If my past superiors had enough faith in me not 
only to do the job at hand but do it well, I hope so can you. 
More than anything, however, I hope my past shows just how 
dedicated I am to the economic and security interests of this 
great country.
    If I am confirmed as a Commissioner of the FMC, I will 
uphold the statutory directives of the Ocean Shipping Reform 
Act of 2022 and ensure that the economic and homeland security 
needs of our country are always at the forefront of every 
discussion. I promise to be fair-minded and objective when 
collaborating with my fellow Commissioners and FMC staff to 
positively contribute to the FMC's vital and growing mission. I 
will work to eliminate unfair shipping practices by foreign 
governments and do everything in my power to guarantee that 
shippers, common carriers, ocean transport intermediaries, and 
ports regulated by the FMC are provided with a fair market 
environment in which to operate.
    Thank you again for the honor and privilege to sit before 
you today and for your hopeful support. I look forward to 
working with all of you.
    [The prepared statement and biographical information of Ms. 
DiBella follow:]

  Prepared Statement of Laura DiBella, Nominee to be a Commissioner, 
                    U.S. Federal Maritime Commission
    Chair Cruz, Ranking Member Cantwell, and members of the Committee, 
good morning and thank you for the opportunity to appear here before 
you today as a nominee to be Commissioner of the Federal Maritime 
Commission (FMC).
    A sincere thank you as well as for the courtesies that your staff 
extended to me throughout the nomination process. I would like to 
recognize FMC Commissioners, Dye, Maffei, and Vekich and thank them for 
being here in supportive attendance. And most importantly, I would like 
to thank President Trump for nominating me for this most important 
role.
    It is with great pleasure, humility, and honor to be nominated for 
this position as well as a homecoming of sorts to the maritime industry 
for me. In 2017, while spearheading local economic development in 
Nassau County, Florida, I was approached to wear a second hat and stand 
in temporarily as Port Director at the Port of Fernandina, Ocean 
Highway and Port Authority of Nassau County, a small and often 
overlooked seaport surrounded by renown juggernauts named JAXPORT, Port 
of Brunswick, and Port of Savannah. The port was going through a rough 
transition with its sole terminal operator and had little resources to 
spare for a qualified Port Director. I knew very little about ports 
back then, except for the fact that they were vital economic engines to 
a region and state, and because of that, and without hesitation and 
compensation, I willingly took on the role.
    Little did I know at the time that the decision to support the port 
was one that would change the trajectory of my life and career forever. 
What began as a temporary assignment resulted in a two-and-a-half-year 
journey that put me at ground zero of seaport operations, port 
authority governance, and the integration of a port within the economic 
development space and overall supply chain network. The knowledge I 
gained while serving dual roles greatly enhanced my economic 
development capabilities and afforded me the opportunity to form 
lasting relationships with past and present members of the maritime 
administration team and that of the maritime community at large.
    In the fall of 2019, I was approached about the Executive Director 
role for the Florida Harbor Pilots Association, a full-time position 
that never existed in the organization's 150+ year history, that that 
put the livelihoods of Florida's nearly 100 harbor pilots in my hands. 
I dove headfirst into the job and learned at the most intimate level 
about an aspect of the maritime industry that very few outsiders have 
the privilege of seeing. Before long, we were met with the COVID-19 
pandemic shutdown, which dealt a massive blow to Florida as the self-
proclaimed ``Cruise Capital of the World'' with the cessation of cruise 
activity for nearly a year and a half and resulting supply chain crisis 
which upended their world and exposed every element of the fragile 
transportation framework that we rely upon day in and day out.
    If that wasn't enough, we were also heavily engaged in blocking a 
potentially precedent setting citizens' initiative at the Port of Key 
West that could have had broad implications around the restriction of 
cargo across other seaports around the country and world. The measure 
served as a stark reminder that ports, although local in nature, are 
truly global in principle and must be viewed and protected as such.
    In the summer of 2022, I was appointed Secretary of Commerce of 
Florida along with President and CEO of Enterprise Florida and 
entrusted with maintaining and growing what was then the state's $1.5 
trillion economy, and once again had the pleasure of working with all 
16 of Florida's seaports in a larger economic development capacity. As 
the third largest state in the nation and 16th largest economy in the 
world, it was then that I also engaged heavily in international trade 
discussions with key trading partners around the globe as well as 
economic development efforts involving the newest mode of 
transportation to intersect with maritime, which is the incredibly 
exciting space industry.
    I say all of this in the hopes to demonstrate not only my hands on 
experience, knowledge, and unique perspective of the maritime space, 
but also my sincere passion and commitment to the industry. If all my 
past superiors had enough faith in me not only to do the job at hand, 
but do it well, I hope so can you. More than anything, however, I hope 
my past shows just how dedicated I am to the economic and security 
interests of this great country.
    If I am confirmed as a Commissioner of the FMC, I will uphold the 
statutory directives of the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 2022 and 
ensure that the economic and homeland security needs of our country are 
always at the forefront of every discussion. I promise to be fair-
minded and objective when collaborating with my fellow Commissioners 
and FMC staff to positively contribute to the FMC's vital and growing 
mission. I will work to eliminate unfair shipping practices by foreign 
governments and do everything in my power to guarantee that shippers, 
common carriers, ocean transportation intermediaries, and ports 
regulated by the FMC are provided with a fair market environment in 
which to operate.
    Thank you again for the honor and privilege to sit before you today 
and for your hopeful support. I look forward to working with all of 
you.
                                 ______
                                 
                      a. biographical information
    1. Name (Include any former names or nicknames used): Laura Maria 
DiBella.
    2. Position to which nominated: Commissioner, Federal Maritime 
Commission.
    3. Date of Nomination: September 3, 2025.
    4. Address (List current place of residence and office addresses):

        Residence: Information not released to the public.
        Office: Information not provided.

    5. Date and Place of Birth: Fort Lauderdale, Florida.
    6. Provide the name, position, and place of employment for your 
spouse (if married) or domestic partner, and the names and ages of your 
children (including stepchildren and children by a previous marriage).

        I am divorced. I have two stepdaughters: Jacqueline Healy, age 
        28, and Lillian Healy, age 24.

    7. List all college and graduate schools attended, whether or not 
you were granted a degree by the institution. Provide the name of the 
institution, the dates attended, the degree received, and the date of 
the degree.

        University of Florida, 1997-2001, B.S., Human Resource 
        Management (with an outside concentration in Business 
        Administration), awarded May 2001

    8. List all post-undergraduate employment, including the job title, 
name of employer, and inclusive dates of employment, and highlight all 
management-level jobs held and any non-managerial jobs that relate to 
the position for which you are nominated.

    * denotes management-level jobs and non-managerial jobs that relate 
to the position for which I have been nominated.

        02/2024 to present: Government Affairs Advisor, Adams & Reese 
        LLP*

        08/2020 to present: President/CEO/Broker, CONN LLC, CONN 
        Florida LLC dba Laura DiBella Real Estate

        07/2004 to present: President/CEO, LDB Marketing, Inc.

        11/2023-2/2024: President of Business Development, 
        FloridaCommerce/Select Florida*

        07/2022-11/2023: Secretary of Commerce/President/CEO, 
        Enterprise Florida, Florida Opportunity Fund*

        11/2019-7/2022: Executive Director, Florida Harbor Pilots 
        Association*

        05/2017-11/2019: Port Director, Port of Fernandina--Ocean 
        Highway and Port Authority of Nassau County*

        10/2014-11/2019: Executive Director, Nassau County Economic 
        Development Board*

        09/2009-09/2014: Director of Sales and Leasing, Florida Medical 
        Space

        05/2001-09/2014: Sales and Marketing Representative, Enviro 
        Technologies, Inc.*

        09/2006-09/2009: Sales Associate, Holly Real Estate

        08/2002-08/2006: Co-Founder, Image Marketing & Special Events, 
        Inc.

        01/2002-08/2006: Sales Associate, Coldwell Banker Real Estate

    9. Attach a copy of your resume.
    See Attachment A.
    10. List any advisory, consultative, honorary, or other part-time 
service or positions with Federal, State, or local governments, other 
than those listed above after 18 years of age.

   Present: National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration 
        (NOAA) Industry Advisory Committee Member, ``The Continuum'' 
        Enterprise Accelerator

   Present: Co-Chair of FDOT Florida Freight Advisory Committee

   Present: University of Florida, Florida Semiconductor 
        Institute (FSI) Stakeholder Advisory Board

   Present: University of Florida I-STREET Advisory Board 
        Member

   Former: Vice Chair of Florida State College at Jacksonville 
        District Board of Trustees

   Former: Volunteer as a certified guardian in Florida's 2nd 
        Judicial Circuit Guardian ad Litem Program

    11. List all positions held as an officer, director, trustee, 
partner, proprietor, agent, representative, or consultant of any 
corporation, company, firm, partnership, or other business, enterprise, 
educational, or other institution.

        08/2020 to present: President/CEO/Broker, CONN LLC, CONN 
        Florida LLC dba Laura DiBella Real Estate

        07/2004 to present: President/CEO, LDB Marketing, Inc.

        07/2022-11/2023: Secretary of Commerce/President/CEO, 
        Enterprise Florida, Florida Opportunity Fund

        03/2018-01/2023: Vice Chair of Florida State College at 
        Jacksonville District Board of Trustees

        11/2019-07/2022: Executive Director, Florida Harbor Pilots 
        Association

        05/2017-11/2019: Port Director, Port of Fernandina--Ocean 
        Highway and Port Authority of Nassau County

        10/2014-11/2019: Executive Director, Nassau County Economic 
        Development Board

        08/2002-08/2006: Co-Founder, Image Marketing & Special Events, 
        Inc.

        01/2002-08/2006: Sales Associate, Coldwell Banker Real Estate

    12. List all memberships you have had after 18 years of age or 
currently hold with any civic, social, charitable, educational, 
political, professional, fraternal, benevolent or religiously 
affiliated organization, private club, or other membership organization 
(You do not have to list your religious affiliation or membership in a 
religious house of worship or institution). Include dates of membership 
and any positions you have held with any organization. Please note 
whether any such club or organization restricts membership on the basis 
of sex, race, color, religion, national origin, age, or disability.

        07/2022 to present: Member, Economic Club of Florida

        01/2020 to present: Member, Governors Club of Tallahassee

        11/2011-12/2013: Member, Gate Governors Club

        11/2011-12/2013: Member, TPC Sawgrass

        11/2011-12/2013: Member, Sawgrass Country Club

        11/2011-12/2013: Member, Marsh Landing Country Club

        11/2011-12/2013: Member, Jacksonville Chamber of Commerce

    13. Have you ever been a candidate for and/or held a public office 
(elected, non-elected, or appointed)? If so, indicate whether any 
campaign has any outstanding debt, the amount, and whether you are 
personally liable for that debt.

        03/2021 to present: Appointee, Co-Chair of FDOT Florida Freight 
        Advisory Committee (no outstanding debt)

        07/2022-11/2023: Appointee, Secretary of Commerce/President/
        CEO, Enterprise Florida, Florida Opportunity Fund (not liable 
        for debt post separation)

        03/2018-01/2023: Appointee, Former Vice Chair of Florida State 
        College at Jacksonville District Board of Trustees (not liable 
        for debt post separation)

        05/2017-11/2019: Appointee, Former Port Director, Port of 
        Fernandina--Ocean Highway and Port Authority of Nassau County 
        (not liable for debt post separation)

    14. List all memberships and offices held with and services 
rendered to, whether compensated or not, any political party or 
election committee within the past ten years. If you have held a paid 
position or served in a formal or official advisory position (whether 
compensated or not) in a political campaign within the past ten years, 
identify the particulars of the campaign, including the candidate, year 
of the campaign, and your title and responsibilities. Not Applicable.
    15. Itemize all political contributions to any individual, campaign 
organization, political party, political action committee, or similar 
entity of $200 or more for the past ten years. Not Applicable.
    16. List all scholarships, fellowships, honorary degrees, honorary 
society memberships, military medals, and any other special recognition 
for outstanding service or achievements. Not Applicable.
    17. List all books, articles, columns, letters to the editor, 
Internet blog postings, or other publications you have authored, 
individually or with others. Include a link to each publication when 
possible. If a link is not available, provide a digital copy of the 
publication when available.
    Below is an article I was asked to write for the Harvard Kennedy 
School Taubman Center for State and Local Government after speaking 
with the students about pursuing a career in economic development.

        Part-Time Economic Developer and Conductor--How Growing an 
        Economy Can Resemble Leading an Orchestra | Harvard Kennedy 
        School
    18. List all speeches, panel discussions, and presentations (e.g., 
PowerPoint) that you have given on topics relevant to the position for 
which you have been nominated. Include a link to each publication when 
possible. If a link is not available, provide a digital copy of the 
speech or presentation when available.

   CoMotion MIAMI '23--Keynote by Laura DiBella, President & 
        CEO, Enterprise Florida

   Taking Action For A Resilient Global Supply Chain--YouTube

    19. List all public statements you have made during the past ten 
years, including statements in news articles and radio and podcasts and 
television appearances, which are on topics relevant to the position 
for which you have been nominated, including dates. Include a link to 
each statement when possible. If a link is not available, provide a 
digital copy of the statement when available.
   I am a regular guest on the Ed Dean Morning Show, a 
        conservative talk radio show that is the number one syndicated 
        show in Florida. I am the resident expert on Florida's economy 
        and economic development matters that impact the state. I have 
        appeared as a guest on the show on: November 14, 2024; January 
        21, 2025; February 13, 2025; February 27, 2025; March 4, 2025; 
        March 13, 2025; March 24, 2025; April 3, 2025; April 9, 2025; 
        April 29, 2025; May 8, 2025; May 15, 2025; June 2, 2025; June 
        30, 2025; July 21, 2025; July 30, 2025; and August 12, 2025.

   Revitalizing Shipbuilding and the Blue Economy with Laura 
        DiBella | Yachting USA

   Business of Maritime: Laura DiBella on Port Operations, 
        Industry Challenges & Growth | YACHTING USA

   Port Perspectives--Laura DiBella, Adams & Reese

   Ep.141 Boosting Business: Unveiling Florida's Blueprint for 
        Technology & Leadership Innovation

   Engaging with Maritime & Economics Expert, Laura DiBella

   Logistics of seaports and spaceports with NASA and FHPA

   Revitalizing Shipbuilding and the Blue Economy with Laura 
        DiBella | Yachting USA

   Business of Maritime: Laura DiBella on Port Operations, 
        Industry Challenges & Growth | YACHTING USA

   Port Perspectives--Laura DiBella, Adams & Reese

   Engaging with Maritime & Economics Expert, Laura DiBella

   Logistics of seaports and spaceports with NASA and FHPA

    20. List all digital platforms (including social media and other 
digital content sites) on which you currently or have formerly operated 
an account, regardless of whether or not the account was held in your 
name or an alias. Include the full name of an ``alias'' or ``handle'', 
including the complete URL and username with hyperlinks, you have used 
on each of the named platforms. Indicate whether the account is active, 
deleted, or dormant. Include a link to each account if possible.

        LinkedIn (active): www.linkedin.com/in/lauradibella

        Facebook (active): https://www.facebook.com/laura.dibella

        Twitter (active): Laura DiBella (@FollowMeToFL)/X

        Twitter (dormant): Laura DiBella (@thelauradibella)/X

        Instagram (active): Laura DiBella (@followmetofl)  
        Instagram photos and videos

        Instagram (dormant): LDB (@thelauradibella)  Instagram 
        photos and videos

        Truth Social (dormant): lauradibella (@lauradibella) | Truth 
        Social

    21. Identify each instance in which you have testified orally or in 
writing before Congress in a governmental or non-governmental capacity 
and specify the date, committee, and subject matter of each testimony. 
Not Applicable.
    22. Given the current mission, major programs, and major 
operational objectives of the Federal Maritime Commission, what in your 
background or employment experience do you believe affirmatively 
qualifies you for appointment to the position for which you have been 
nominated, and why do you wish to serve in that position?
    I believe that my background and employment experience 
affirmatively qualifies me for appointment to the Commission because I 
have first-hand experience with the major drivers of the economy, which 
include land, air, and maritime transportation, and the way these modes 
intersect. I have been both an on-the-ground practitioner and a leader 
in the economic development and maritime spaces at both the local and 
state level. I understand how crucial it is to make every cog in the 
supply chain wheel not only work but work in a very efficient manner.
    I wish to serve in this position because I love the maritime 
industry and believe that it is very misunderstood and, therefore, in a 
way inadvertently unappreciated. I have always said that economic 
development would not exist in the absence of seaport activity because 
there are not enough planes, trains, or automobiles to move the vast 
quantity of cargo that is transported over water. With this 
appointment, I hope to play a part in helping reframe the U.S. economic 
revival around the central need for maritime dominance.
    23. What do you believe are your responsibilities, if confirmed, to 
ensure that the Federal Maritime Commission has proper management and 
accounting controls, and what experience do you have in managing a 
large organization?
    I believe my responsibilities, if confirmed, to ensure that the 
Federal Maritime Commission has proper management and accounting 
controls is paramount to carry out our mission and, most importantly, 
that of the President. I have held several leadership roles of 
differing capacities and my time as Secretary of Commerce/President and 
CEO of Enterprise Florida was the largest organization I have managed 
to date, with 78 FTE employees and $21.8 million budget. Florida is the 
third largest state in the Nation and roughly the 15th largest economy 
in the world at $1.76 trillion GDP at present. Putting the above in 
perspective against our competitive states with much larger budgets 
(California with the first largest budget, and Texas with the second 
largest budget), running a very successful statewide economic 
development organization with a total budget (including salaries) of 
$21.8 million meant that we had to be lean and mean and a very 
efficient, well-oiled machine. I consider myself a servant leader and 
lead by example while fostering an honest, healthy, open, 
collaborative, driven, and winning environment where accountability, 
passion, integrity, and purpose at all levels reigns supreme.
    24. What do you believe to be the top three challenges facing the 
Federal Maritime Commission, and why?
    The top three challenges facing the Federal Maritime Commission 
today are, first, maritime choke points around the world, of which 
there are many. The areas of highest concern in today's global climate 
would include the Strait of Hormuz, Bab-el-Mandeb Strait, Strait of 
Malacca, Suez Canal, Panama Canal, Strait of Gibraltar, the English 
Channel, and I would also include the Bering Strait. With 90 percent of 
global trade transiting by sea, the use of efficient and well-
positioned maritime shipping lanes is essential to reduce transport 
costs and also, very importantly, allow for the safe passage of 
warships. In line with the choke points, are growing concerns about 
restrictions on, and attacks against, certain U.S. and international 
vessel traffic at global seaports for ideological reasons. It is of 
great importance to note that actions restricting the free flow of 
American goods for ideological reasons can disrupt our global supply 
chains and lead to significantly negative economic consequences. The 
targeted attacks on commercial vessels by non-state actors like the 
Houthis in the Red Sea are a prime example of this. These attacks have 
significantly disrupted global trade by forcing shipping companies to 
reroute vessels. There have also been significant threats to critical 
infrastructure, like undersea pipelines and data cables, creating 
additional political pressure and disrupting services by attacking 
critical infrastructure at sea.
    Second, flags of convenience (FOC) pose a challenge to general 
maritime safety protocols from both the commercial and mariner 
perspectives, and unfortunately best practices can be very difficult to 
enforce. FOC's refers to open registries allowing a shipowner to 
register a vessel in a country other than the one in which the owner is 
based. This is done to take advantage of lower costs and lax 
regulations, which creates numerous issues related to safety, labor, 
and environmental protection. The use of FOC's allows shipowners to 
operate with minimal oversight and accountability. This practice is 
linked to illicit activities and creates or worsens negative 
consequences for global supply chains and critical infrastructure. Key 
issues associated with flags of convenience include the exploitation of 
labor with numerous safety risks to seafarers, which only further 
damages the reputation of the maritime industry from a recruitment 
standpoint. FOC registries are often criticized for minimal oversight 
and for allowing substandard vessel maintenance and safety practices, 
which put crews and the environment at risk. They also can allow 
shipowners to remain legally anonymous through the use of shell 
companies, complicating accountability for crimes or environmental 
violations like illegal trafficking of drugs and arms, human 
trafficking, and sanctions evasion. The use of FOCs contributes to the 
formation of ``shadow fleets,'' whose owners hide their identities and 
use deceptive practices to circumvent international sanctions.
    Lastly, the climate change framework brought forth by the 
International Maritime Organization (IMO) and other measures aimed at 
reducing greenhouse gas emissions from the global shipping industry has 
been a tightening noose around the neck of the maritime industry for 
quite some time. Measures like these would not only increase costs for 
Americans; they also threaten to reduce the efficient movement of 
vessels, further complicating the operations of the global supply 
chain.
                   b. potential conflicts of interest
    1. Describe all financial arrangements, deferred compensation 
agreements, and other continuing dealings with business associates, 
clients, or customers. Please include information related to retirement 
accounts, such as a 401(k) or pension plan. Not Applicable.
    2. Do you have any commitments or agreements, formal or informal, 
to maintain employment, affiliation, or practice with any business, 
association, or other organization during your appointment? If so, 
please explain. Not Applicable.
    3. Indicate any investments, obligations, liabilities, or other 
relationships which could involve potential conflicts of interest in 
the position to which you have been nominated. Explain how you will 
resolve each potential conflict of interest. Not Applicable.
    4. Describe any business relationship, dealing, or financial 
transaction which you have had during the last ten years, whether for 
yourself, on behalf of a client, or acting as an agent, that could in 
any way constitute or result in a possible conflict of interest in the 
position to which you have been nominated. Explain how you will resolve 
each potential conflict of interest. Not Applicable.
    5. Identify any other potential conflicts of interest and explain 
how you will resolve each potential conflict of interest. Not 
Applicable.
    6. Describe any activity during the past ten years, including the 
names of clients represented, in which you have been engaged for the 
purpose of directly or indirectly influencing the passage, defeat, or 
modification of any legislation or affecting the administration and 
execution of law or public policy.

  a.  During Florida's 2021 Legislative Session, while employed with 
        the Florida Harbor Pilots Association, I collaborated and 
        supported the drafting, execution, and successful passing of 
        Florida Senate Bill 1194 to protect Florida's ability to 
        conduct international trade and welcome tourists. The Florida 
        Senate Bill 1194 was signed into law on June 30, 2021.

  b.  In May 2020, while employed by the Florida Harbor Pilots 
        Association, I assisted in the drafting of the U.S. Coast Guard 
        Sector Mobile First-Class Licensing Policy for the Port of 
        Pensacola and Pensacola Bay Pilots on Pilotage Special 
        Requirements.
                            c. legal matters
    1. Have you ever been disciplined or cited for a breach of ethics, 
professional misconduct, or retaliation by, or been the subject of a 
complaint to, any court, administrative agency, the Office of Special 
Counsel, an Inspector General, professional association, disciplinary 
committee, or other professional group? If yes:

  a.  Provide the name of the court, agency, association, committee, or 
        group;

  b.  Provide the date the citation, disciplinary action, complaint, or 
        personnel action was issued or initiated;

  c.  Describe the citation, disciplinary action, complaint, or 
        personnel action;

  d.  Provide the results of the citation, disciplinary action, 
        complaint, or personnel action.

    No.
    2. Have you ever been investigated, arrested, charged, or held by 
any Federal, State, or other law enforcement authority of any Federal, 
State, county, municipal, or foreign government entity, other than for 
a minor traffic offense? If so, please explain. No.
    3. Have you or any business or nonprofit of which you are or were 
an officer ever been involved as a party in an administrative agency 
proceeding, criminal proceeding, or civil litigation? If so, please 
explain. No.
    4. Have you ever been convicted (including pleas of guilty or nolo 
contendere) of any criminal violation other than a minor traffic 
offense? If so, please explain. No.
    5. Have you ever been accused, formally or informally, of sexual 
assault, sexual harassment, or discrimination on the basis of sex, 
race, religion, whistleblower activity, or any other basis? If so, 
please explain. No.
    6. Please advise the Committee of any additional information, 
favorable or unfavorable, which you feel should be disclosed in 
connection with your nomination. No.
                     d. relationship with committee
    1. Will you ensure that your department/agency/commission/
corporation complies with deadlines for information set by 
congressional committees, and that your department/agency/commission/
corporation endeavors to timely comply with requests for information 
from individual Members of Congress, including requests from members in 
the minority?
    If confirmed, I will work with my fellow Commissioners to ensure 
that the Federal Maritime Commission complies with deadlines for 
information set by congressional committees, and that the FMC endeavors 
to timely comply with requests for information from individual Members 
of Congress, including requests from members in the minority.
    2. Will you ensure that your department/agency/commission/
corporation does whatever it can to protect congressional witnesses and 
whistleblowers from reprisal for their testimony and disclosures? Yes.
    3. Will you cooperate in providing the Committee with requested 
witnesses, including technical experts and career employees, with 
firsthand knowledge of matters of interest to the Committee? Yes.
    4. Are you willing to appear and testify before any duly 
constituted committee of the Congress on such occasions as you may be 
reasonably requested to do so? Yes.
    5. Do you agree, if confirmed, to keep this Committee, its 
subcommittees, other appropriate Committees of Congress, and their 
respective staffs apprised of new information that materially impacts 
the accuracy of testimony, briefings, reports, records--including 
documents and electronic communications, and other information you or 
your organization previously provided?
    I agree, if confirmed, to keep this Committee, its subcommittees, 
other appropriate Committees of Congress, and their respective staffs 
apprised of new information that materially impacts the accuracy of 
testimony, briefings, reports, records--including documents and 
electronic communications, and other information me or my organization 
previously provided.
    6. Do you agree, if confirmed, and on request, to provide this 
Committee and its subcommittees with records and other information 
within their oversight jurisdiction, even absent a formal Committee 
request?
    I agree, if confirmed, and on request, to provide this Committee 
and its subcommittees with records and other information within their 
oversight jurisdiction, even absent a formal Committee request.
    7. Do you agree, if confirmed, to ensure that you and other members 
of your organization protect from retaliation any military member, 
Federal employee, or contractor employee who testifies before, or 
communicates with this Committee, its subcommittees, and any other 
appropriate committee of Congress?
    I agree, if confirmed, to ensure that me and other members of my 
organization protect from retaliation any military member, Federal 
employee, or contractor employee who testifies before, or communicates 
with this Committee, its subcommittees, and any other appropriate 
committee of Congress.
                                 ______
                                 
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]
                                 
                                 ______
                                 
  Addendum to the questionnaire submitted to the Senate Committee on 
         Commerce, Science, and Transportation, 119th Congress
    Upon further review, I have identified additional information that 
is responsive to questions C.3, E.4 and E.1 on the Committee's 
questionnaire. Please see attached Addendum.
    The undersigned certifies that the information contained in the 
public addendum is true and correct.

Laura DiBella Addendum
September 24, 2025

    C.3, E.4: I was a defendant in a civil lawsuit captioned American 
Express Centurion Bank v. Di Bella, Laura, Case No. 50-2009-CA-013503, 
filed on 04/10/2009 in Palm Beach County, Florida regarding an 
outstanding credit card debt. This case was resolved and has been 
closed as of 12/17/2012.
                                 ______
                                 
  Addendum to the questionnaire submitted to the Senate Committee on 
Commerce, Science, and Transportation, 119th Congress by Laura DiBella.
    Upon further review, I have identified the following additional 
information that are responsive to questions A.8, A.15, A.18, A.19, and 
Part A, Q10 on the Committee's questionnaire. They are:

   A.8 - I am the President of an entity called Sweat Sisters 
        LLC, which was created on 4/12/2013 for when I was a running 
        coach. I do not coach any longer and have not for many years as 
        I simply do not have the time to dedicate to the effort, so the 
        entity is in effect, inactive.

   A.15--I have identified political contributions that were 
        inadvertently not disclosed and are listed below. Please note 
        that with the exception of the Republican Party of Florida 
        contribution, the Hillary for America contribution and Nancy 
        Soderberg contribution were associated with events that I had 
        attended with my now ex-husband (Edmund Andrus Healy) who was a 
        registered Democrat.

     12/9/2019--Republican Party of Florida, $1,050

     3/7/16--Hillary for America, $500

     9/28/12--Nancy Soderberg (FL), $500

   A.18 - My current and previous positions were very outward 
        facing and therefore required me to participate in frequent 
        speaking engagements. I have identified panels and other 
        speaking engagements that were previously not disclosed. They 
        are listed here:

     4/6/2016--Panel--Women Making the Deals CREW 
            Jacksonville (no hyperlink available)

     1/18/2018--Speech--Men's Newcomers Club, Fernandina 
            Beach Golf Club (no hyperlink available)

     9/16/2020--Speech--Propeller Club Port of Washington, 
            DC (no hyperlink available)

     10/6/2020--Speech--Propeller Club Port of Jacksonville 
            (no hyperlink available)

     11/16/2020--Speech--Propeller Club Port of 
            Jacksonville (no hyperlink available)

     11/17/2020--Panel--Florida Seaports: Focused on the 
            Future

     2/22/2022--Speech--Florida Harbor Pilots Association 
            Annual Maritime Industry Awards Night (no hyperlink 
            available)

     10/25/2022--Panel--Chamber Forum: Manufacturing, 
            logistics are key to continued economic success

     3/21/2023--Speech--Beth Cicchetti of the Floria 
            Economic Development Council and Laura DiBella of 
            Enterprise Florida, NEBA

     4/18/2023--Speech--P3 Airport Summit Keynote (no 
            hyperlink available)

     4/21/2023--Panel--eMerge

     5/19/2023--Speech--2023 Florida Supply Chain Summit

     6/13/2023--Panel--CCIM Conference (no hyperlink 
            available)

     9/21/2023--Speech--LEAD Annual Dinner

     9/25/2023--Speech--Clay FL Economic Development 
            Corporation Q3 2023 Presentation

     10/12/2023--Panel--Gainesville Innovation Summit 2023

     10/19/2023--Speech--LBC with Laura DiBella intro, 
            Leadership Business Council

     10/25/2023--Speech--LeverX Third Annual Innovation 
            Forum, Business Wire (no hyperlink available)

     11/8/2023--Panel--Taking Action For a Resilient Global 
            Supply Chain, Port Miami Global Gateway World Strategic 
            Forum

     1/15/2024--Speech--Taiwanese Chambers of Commerce of 
            North America (no hyperlink available)

     2/16/2024--Speech--Volusia County Economic Development 
            ``Q'' Breakfast

     3/22/2024--Speech--Jacksonville Venture

     4/11/2024, Speech--Port Perspectives--Laura DiBella, 
            Adams & Reese, International Association of Maritime & Port 
            Executives

     4/18/2024, Speech--Taubman Center, Harvard Kennedy 
            School (no hyperlink available)

     9/5/2024--Panel--Israel and Miami: The U.S. 
            Destination for Startup Nation, eMerge Americas

     9/11/2024--Panel--Florida Supply Chain Summit (no 
            hyperlink available)

     9/18/2024--Panel--South Florida Innovation Day, Alan 
            B. Levan, NSU Broward Center of innovation (no hyperlink 
            available)

     10/10/2024--Panel--America Decides 2024: Elections 
            Have Consequences: Harris/Walz vs. Trump/Vance, 
            Transportation Club of Jacksonville (no hyperlink 
            available, event was cancelled due to Hurricane Milton)

     1/31/2025--Speech--2025 Economic Forecast, Nassau 
            County Economic Development Board (no hyperlink available)

   A.19--In tandem with A.18, I have made public statements 
        that were previously not disclosed. They are as follows:

     4/9/2015--Article--Workspace: Laura DiBella enjoys 
            bringing Nassau County to the closing table | Jax Daily 
            Record

     9/2016--Article--Around the State Northeast, Looking 
            up: A major development project is shifting attention north 
            of Jacksonville, FloridaTrend

     1/26/2018--Article--The seeds for growth, Jacksonville 
            Business Journal

     6/30/2019--Podcast--The Exciting Future of Nassau 
            County: An Interview with Laura DiBella, The Miller Report

     8/12/2019--Article--https://www.postandcourier.com/
            business/charleston
            -green-gas-company-investing-in-renewable-energy/
            article_27059232-b7b7-
            11e9-9a13-e3c674363822.html

     10/31/2019--Article--https://www.bizjournals.com/
            jacksonville/news/2019/
            10/31/laura-dibella-talks-nassau-countys-struggle-to.html

     9/23/2021--Podcast--MotivationU the Podcast

     2/25/2022--Podcast--Logistics of Seaports and 
            spaceports with NASA and FHPA, What the Truck?!?, 
            FreightWaves

     7/24/2022--Podcast--Engaging with Maritime & Economics 
            Expert, Laura DiBella, Round Table Group

     11/8/2022--Article--https://www.flgov.com/eog/news/
            press/2022/florida
            -ranks-1-nation-attracting-and-developing-skilled-
            workforce#::text=Governor
            %20Ron%20DeSantis%20announced%20this%20ranking%20as,best%20s
            tate
            %20to%20learn%2C%20work%20and%20live

     2/6/2023--Article--Enterprise Florida Board of 
            Directors Confirms Laura DiBella as President and CEO, 
            Florida Trend

     3/17/2023--Article--Laura DiBella: Northeast Florida 
            is the right spot

     3/18/2023--Podcast--TechTables Podcast

     5/9/2023--Podcast--Synapse Summit, Synapse Podcast

     5/15/2023--Article--OPEN FOR BUSINESS: Flagler County 
            welcomes new manufacturing plant for India's Vidya Herbs 
            The Daytona Beach

     5/23/2023--Article--The National Security Importance 
            of the Jones Act Recognized on National Maritime Day MENAFN

     5/24/2023--Article--https://www.cosentino.com/usa/
            blog/cosentino-group
            -announces-investment-in-florida-plan-to-expand-
            manufacturing-to-north-america/

     5/30/2023--Article--As agency changes, outgoing 
            Florida commerce secretary talks incentives, space and more 
            Jacksonville Business Journal

     6/1/2023--Article--Laura DiBella: Florida's Tech 
            Bloom, Florida Funders Skin in the Game VC Podcast

     7/17/2023--Podcast--John D. Villarreal Show #5

     9/13/2023--Podcast--Sunshine Startups Live Episode 4: 
            Laura DiBella--President and CEO of Enterprise Florida, 
            Levan Center Live

   9/28/2023--Article--Enterprise Florida Exiting, Florida 
        Trend

   10/2/2023--Article--Doors closing on Enterprise Florida 
        Backroom Briefing, Orlando Sentinel

   2/19/2024--Article--https://floridapolitics.com/archives/
        60005-sunburn-the-morning-read-of-whats-hot-in-florida-
        politics-2-19-24/

   1/26/2024--Article--Nassau economic development forum: 
        `Money follows the innovation' News Leader

     Part A, Q10--Below is the list of advisory, 
            consultative, honorary, or other part-time service or 
            positions with Federal, State, or local governments to 
            which I have served after 18 years of age (dates added):

   3/2018-1/2023: Vice Chair of Florida State College at 
        Jacksonville District Board of Trustees

   2/2021 to present: Volunteer as a certified guardian in 
        Florida's 2nd Judicial Circuit Guardian ad Litem Program

   3/2021 to present: Co-Chair of FDOT Florida Freight Advisory 
        Committee

   10/2023 to present: University of Florida I-STREET Advisory 
        Board Member

   3/2025 to present: National Oceanic & Atmospheric 
        Administration (NOAA) Industry Advisory Committee Member, ``The 
        Continuum'' Enterprise Accelerator

   5/2025 to present: University of Florida, Florida 
        Semiconductor Institute (FSI) Stakeholder Advisory Board

    Chairman Cruz. Thank you. I now recognize Mr. Harvey for 
his opening statement.

   STATEMENT OF ROBERT HARVEY, NOMINEE TO BE A COMMISSIONER, 
                  FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

    Mr. Harvey. Thank you. Chairman Cruz, Ranking Member 
Cantwell, and members of the Committee, it is an honor to 
appear before you today as a nominee to be Commissioner of the 
Federal Maritime Commission. I also want to thank your 
respective staff for all their efforts and the professionalism 
shown to me during the nomination process.
    I would like to thank Commissioners Dye, Vekich, and Maffei 
for meeting with me during the confirmation process and for 
today's hearing. I would like to recognize my wife, Debra 
Jenks, who has been my law partner, is my life partner, and has 
fully supported me in my desire to return to public service. 
Finally, I would like to thank President Trump for the honor of 
nominating me today.
    If confirmed, I look forward to continuing the important 
work of the FMC at this critical time for the United States 
ocean transportation system and supply chain. I will work to 
ensure that the FMC maintains a competitive and reliable 
international ocean transportation system and protects U.S. 
consumers, exporters, and importers from unlawful, unfair, and 
deceptive ocean transportation practices.
    For the past 3 years, I have been engaged in multiple 
economic development roles in Florida. With 1,300 miles of 
coastline, 16 public seaports, and 7 cruise ports, I have 
gained an even greater appreciation for the maritime industry.
    While I am a proud Floridian, I was born, raised, and 
educated in Illinois. The first waterborne commerce I ever saw 
was barge traffic, containing agriculture, coal, and bulk 
goods, floating on the Des Plaines River, through the middle of 
my hometown of Joliet.
    The first large bulk carrier I ever saw was a laker. The 
Great Lakes shipping industry supports tens of thousands of 
jobs directly, and is a vital economic engine for the cities, 
towns, and people, of the region. If confirmed, I look forward 
to ensuring fair conditions for all U.S. shipping.
    I began my career with the U.S. Navy, where I served on 
active duty as a Navy Judge Advocate and Special Assistant U.S. 
Attorney. After leaving active duty I served in the Reserves 
with Amphibious Group 2, in Little Creek, Virginia, and with 
the U.S. Naval Forces Europe, in London. One of the lesson 
learned from my time in the Navy is that economic security and 
national security are inseparable.
    After leaving active duty I began my civilian law career in 
private practice. After two years I had the opportunity to join 
a startup. Not knowing what a startup was, I leapt at the 
opportunity, moved to New York City, and ultimately became the 
Senior Vice President and General Counsel. After being with 
that company for 7 years and a successful exit, I have served 
in various roles in law, business, finance, and public service.
    Most recently I have been a partner of Jenks & Harvey, a 
law firm in West Palm Beach, where my practice was concentrated 
in securities litigation, arbitration, and regulation. I 
returned to the public sector in November 2022, as the General 
Counsel of Enterprise Florida, Florida's principal economic 
development organization.
    Today, I serve as President and Executive Director of the 
Florida Opportunity Fund, Florida's venture capital fund. The 
fund is a $180 million fund investing in Florida-based, new 
technology companies. In terms of the maritime industry, we 
have invested in cybersecurity companies that protect critical 
assets including vessels, ports, and maritime infrastructure. 
We have invested in companies that fuse real-time data with AI 
to track maritime missions, improve operational efficiency at 
sea and at shore. We have invested in logistics companies, 
which provide multimodal, last-mile delivery solutions, which 
reduces shipping time and costs. Currently we are reviewing 
quantum solutions in the marine industry, enabling potential 
breakthroughs in route and fleet optimization, sensing and 
navigation, secure communication, and predictive maintenance.
    Finally, I also serve as the Executive Director of the 
Florida Development Finance Corporation. That is the state-
authorized issuer of industrial revenue bonds. In the last two 
years, FDFC has issued over $8 billion of tax-exempt, taxable, 
and private activity bonds. We are currently reviewing several 
projects where private activity bonds may be used for marine 
infrastructure, including ports, docks, wharves, and 
manufacturing.
    If confirmed, I believe that my over 35 years of diverse 
experience in the military, legal and regulatory affairs, 
business, investment and finance, technology, and economic 
development will allow me to positively contribute to FMC's 
vital mission.
    In closing, Chairman Cruz, Ranking Member Cantwell, and 
members of the Committee, thank you very much for holding this 
hearing today.
    [The prepared statement and biographical information of Mr. 
Harvey follow:]

  Prepared Statement of Robert Harvey, Nominee to be a Commissioner, 
                    U.S. Federal Maritime Commission
    Chairman Cruz, Ranking Member Cantwell and members of the 
Committee, good morning and thank you for the opportunity to appear 
here before you today as a nominee to be Commissioner of the Federal 
Maritime Commission (FMC). I also want to thank your respective staff 
for all their efforts and the professionalism shown to me during the 
nomination process.
    I would like to thank Commissioners Dye, Maffei, and Vekich for 
meeting with me during the confirmation process and for attending 
today's hearing. Most importantly, I would like to recognize my wife, 
Debra, who has been my law partner, is my life partner, and has fully 
supported me in my desire to return to public service. Finally, I would 
like to thank President Trump for the honor of nominating me to be a 
Commissioner of the FMC.
    If confirmed, I will continue the important work of the FMC at this 
critical time for the United States ocean transportation system and 
supply chain.
    I look forward to ensuring that FMC maintains a competitive and 
reliable international ocean transportation system and protects U.S. 
consumers, exporters and importers from unlawful, unfair, and deceptive 
ocean transportation practices.
    For the past three years, I have been engaged in multiple economic 
development roles in Florida.
    With 1300 miles of coastline, sixteen public seaports and seven 
cruise ports, I have gained an even greater appreciation for the 
maritime industry, supply chains, and port access, not only for Florida 
but the entire country.
    While I am a proud Floridian, I was born, raised, and educated in 
Illinois.
    The first water-borne commerce I ever saw was barge traffic, 
containing agriculture, coal and bulk goods, floating on the Des 
Plaines River, through the middle of my hometown of Joliet.
    The first large bulk carrier I ever saw was a laker.
    The Great Lakes shipping industry supports tens of thousands of 
jobs directly, and is a vital economic engine for the cities, towns, 
and people, of the region.
    I will work to ensure fair conditions for the entire U.S. shipping 
industry.
    I began my career with the United States Navy, where I served on 
active duty at Naval Station Great Lakes, Illinois, as a Navy Judge 
Advocate and Special Assistant U.S. Attorney. I also served on active 
duty as Senior Defense Counsel and Senior Trial Counsel at Naval Legal 
Service Office, Great Lakes.
    After leaving active duty I served as a reservist with Amphibious 
Group 2, Little Creek, Virginia and U.S. Naval Forces Europe, London, 
United Kingdom.
    The lesson learned from my time in the Navy is that economic 
security and national security are inseparable. U.S. national security 
protects our economic assets, including critical infrastructure, supply 
chains, port access, and international trade routes, from both 
traditional and emerging threats.
    After leaving active duty I began my civilian law career in private 
practice in Illinois. After two years I had the opportunity to join 
startup Meridian VAT Reclaim North America in New York, New York, where 
I became Meridian's Senior Vice President of Operations & General 
Counsel. After Meridian was acquired in 1999, I served in various roles 
as in law, business, investment management, finance, and public 
service.
    From 2015 to 2022, I was a Founding Partner of Jenks & Harvey LLP 
in West Palm Beach, Florida, where my practice was concentrated in 
securities litigation, arbitration, and regulation.
    I returned to the public sector in November 2022 as the General 
Counsel of Enterprise Florida, Inc., Florida's principal economic 
development organization.
    Today, I serve as President and Executive Director of the Florida 
Opportunity Fund, Inc. (FOF). FOF is a $180 million venture capital 
fund which invests in Florida-based, new technology companies. These 
investments have been crucial in supporting new businesses, creating 
jobs in Florida, and further diversifying the state's economy. FOF 
focuses on technology sectors that are strategic to Florida including 
artificial intelligence, life sciences, information technology, 
advanced manufacturing processes, aviation and aerospace, homeland 
security and defense, and cybersecurity, among other strategic areas.
    Related to FMC's mission, FOF has invested in (1) cybersecurity/
information technology companies that protect critical infrastructure; 
including vessels, ports and marine infrastructure; (2) companies that 
fuse real-time data with artificial intelligence to monitor maritime 
emissions and improve operational efficiency, at sea and ashore, and; 
(3) logistics companies providing multimodal last-mile delivery 
solutions, which improve visibility and reduce shipping time and cost.
    FOF has begun to review investments in quantum solutions for the 
marine industry, enabling potential breakthroughs in route and fleet 
optimization, quantum sensing and navigation, secure quantum 
communication, and predictive maintenance and environmental modeling.
    Finally, I also serve as the Executive Director of Florida 
Development Finance Corporation (FDFC). FDFC is the state authorized 
issuer of industrial revenue bonds. FDFC supports economic development 
by assisting for-profit and not-for-profit businesses with access to 
capital for project financing. The primary mechanism for accessing 
capital markets is tax-exempt and taxable bonds.
    In the last two fiscal years, FDFC successfully facilitated the 
authorization and issuance of over $8.0 billion of tax-exempt, taxable, 
and private activity bonds, across a wide range of sectors, including 
transportation, solid waste, and healthcare.
    FDFC is currently reviewing multiple projects where private 
activity bonds may be used for investment for infrastructure projects 
like ports, including docks, wharves, and related facilities, including 
commercial manufacturing.
    If confirmed as a Commissioner of the FMC, I believe my over 35 
years of diverse experience in the military, legal and regulatory 
affairs, business, investment and finance, technology, and economic 
development will allow me to positively contribute to FMC's vital 
mission.
    In conclusion, Chairman Cruz, Ranking Member Cantwell, and members 
of the Committee, if given the opportunity and privilege of serving as 
a Federal Maritime Commissioner, I promise you that I will follow the 
statutory requirements of the law in a fair and unbiased manner. I also 
promise to respond to requests of this Committee as you fulfill your 
oversight responsibilities of the FMC.
    Thank you.
                                 ______
                                 
                      a. biographical information
    1. Name (Include any former names or nicknames used): Robert John 
Harvey.
    2. Position to which nominated: Commissioner, Federal Maritime 
Commission.
    3. Date of Nomination: September 3, 2025.
    4. Address (List current place of residence and office addresses):

        Residence: Information not released to the public.
        Office: Information not provided.

    5. Date and Place of Birth: Joliet, IL.
    6. Provide the name, position, and place of employment for your 
spouse (if married) or domestic partner, and the names and ages of your 
children (including stepchildren and children by a previous marriage).

        Spouse: Debra A. Jenks; Owner of Debra A. Jenks, PA. We have no 
        children.

    7. List all college and graduate schools attended, whether or not 
you were granted a degree by the institution. Provide the name of the 
institution, the dates attended, the degree received, and the date of 
the degree.

        Southern Illinois University School of Law, 1983-1986, J.D. 
        awarded 1986

        Eastern Illinois University, 1981-1983, B.S. Business, awarded 
        1983

        Joliet Junior College, 1979-1981, Associate in Arts

    8. List all post-undergraduate employment, including the job title, 
name of employer, and inclusive dates of employment, and highlight all 
management-level jobs held and any non-managerial jobs that relate to 
the position for which you are nominated.

    * denotes management-level jobs and non-managerial jobs that relate 
to the position for which I have been nominated.

    All post-graduate employment includes:

        President & Executive Director, Florida Opportunity Fund, Inc. 
        (FOF)*
        01/2023 to present

        Executive Director, Florida Development Finance Corporation 
        (FDFC)*
        07/2023 to present

        General Counsel, Enterprise Florida, Inc. (EFI)*
        11/2022-12/2023

        Owner, Jenks & Harvey LLP*
        04/2015-11/2022

        Partner, Klayman & Toskes
        11/2014-04/2015

        Partner, Ciklin Lubitz Martens & O'Connell
        03/2013-11/2014

        Partner, Schwed Kahle & Jenks
        11/2010-02/2013

        Attorney, Frank White-Boyd
        11/2009-11/2010

        Owner, Law Firm of Robert J. Harvey, P.A.
        07/2009-04/2023

        Managing Member, KCF Management LLC, Kensington Capital Fund LP
        06/2003-01/2014

        Managing Member, Bateleur LLC
        06/2001-07/2008

        Chief Operating Officer, Imperial Software*
        05/2000-06/2001

        Director of Operations, MBIA Muniservices*
        05/1999-05/2000

        Senior Vice President of Operations & General Counsel*
        Meridian VAT Reclaim, North America
        09/1992-05/1999

        Attorney, James Hoffman & Associates
        04/1990-08/1992

        Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, United 
        States Navy*
        08/1986-12/1986 (Officer Indoctrination School--Temporary 
        Active Duty)
        01/1987-03/1990 (Active Duty)
        04/1990-08/2001 (Reserves)

    9. Attach a copy of your resume.
    See attached resume.
    10. List any advisory, consultative, honorary, or other part-time 
service or positions with Federal, State, or local governments, other 
than those listed above after 18 years of age.
    Listed below in reverse chronological order are the advisory, 
consultative, honorary, or other part-time service or positions with 
Federal, State, or local governments, other than those listed above to 
which I have served after 18 years of age:

        State of Florida, 15th Circuit Judicial Nominating, Commission
        2015 to present, Chair (2019-2023), Vice-Chair (2015-2019)

        Impact Fee Review Committee, Vice Chair, Palm Beach County
        (2021 to present) West Palm Beach Federal Courthouse Committee 
        (2018 to present)

        Land Development Regulation Advisory Board, Palm Beach County 
        (2017-2023)

        Equestrian Preserve Committee, Wellington, Florida (2007-2008)

        Planning Board, Town of East Hampton, New York (2003-2005)

    11. List all positions held as an officer, director, trustee, 
partner, proprietor, agent, representative, or consultant of any 
corporation, company, firm, partnership, or other business, enterprise, 
educational, or other institution. None.
    12. List all memberships you have had after 18 years of age or 
currently hold with any civic, social, charitable, educational, 
political, professional, fraternal, benevolent or religiously 
affiliated organization, private club, or other membership organization 
(You do not have to list your religious affiliation or membership in a 
religious house of worship or institution). Include dates of membership 
and any positions you have held with any organization. Please note 
whether any such club or organization restricts membership on the basis 
of sex, race, color, religion, national origin, age, or disability.
    Listed below are all the memberships I have had after 18 years of 
age or currently hold with any civic, social, charitable, educational, 
political, professional, fraternal, benevolent or religiously 
affiliated organization, private club, or other membership 
organization:

        Florida Bar (2009 to present)

        Palm Beach County Bar (2009 to present)

        Ocean Reef Club (2012 to present)

        Palm Beach Yacht Club (2011 to present)

        Palm Beach County Bar Securities Law Committee, Chair (2015-
        2016)

        Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, 
        Compliance & Legal Society (2010-2018)

        Florida Securities Dealers Association (2014-2018)

        Arbitrator, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (2015 to 
        present)

        Republican National Lawyers Association (2022 to present)

        Federalist Society (2013 to present)

    None of the above restricts membership on the basis of sex, race, 
color, religion, national origin, age, or disability.
    13. Have you ever been a candidate for and/or held a public office 
(elected, non-elected, or appointed)? If so, indicate whether any 
campaign has any outstanding debt, the amount, and whether you are 
personally liable for that debt. No.
    14. List all memberships and offices held with and services 
rendered to, whether compensated or not, any political party or 
election committee within the past ten years. If you have held a paid 
position or served in a formal or official advisory position (whether 
compensated or not) in a political campaign within the past ten years, 
identify the particulars of the campaign, including the candidate, year 
of the campaign, and your title and responsibilities. None.
    15. Itemize all political contributions to any individual, campaign 
organization, political party, political action committee, or similar 
entity of $200 or more for the past ten years.
    Listed below are all political contributions to any individual, 
campaign organization, political party, political action committee, or 
similar entity of $200 or more for the past ten years:

Bobby Powell                                                       $200
Andrew Watt                                                        $200
Al Jacquet                                                         $200
Hal Valeche                                                        $500
Dave Kerner                                                        $200
Mac Bernard                                                        $200
Melissa McKinley                                                   $500
Adam Putnam                                                        $500
Rick Roth                                                          $200
Ron DeSantis                                                     $1,000
Brian Mast                                                         $250
Michael Caruso                                                   $1,000
Rick Scott                                                       $1,000
 

    16. List all scholarships, fellowships, honorary degrees, honorary 
society memberships, military medals, and any other special recognition 
for outstanding service or achievements.
    The following list includes all scholarships, fellowships, honorary 
degrees, honorary society memberships, military medals, and any other 
special recognition for outstanding service or achievements:

        Navy Achievement Medal
        Leadership New York IX

    17. List all books, articles, columns, letters to the editor, 
Internet blog postings, or other publications you have authored, 
individually or with others. Include a link to each publication when 
possible. If a link is not available, provide a digital copy of the 
publication when available. None.
    18. List all speeches, panel discussions, and presentations (e.g., 
PowerPoint) that you have given on topics relevant to the position for 
which you have been nominated. Include a link to each publication when 
possible. If a link is not available, provide a digital copy of the 
speech or presentation when available.

        Superyacht Builders Association, Palm Beach, Florida (March 
        2025)
        https://www.linkedin.com/posts/robert-harvey-44190610_kicking-
        off-the-2025-
        palm-beach-international-activity-73079716901001093l2-n6OG/
        ?originalSub
        domain=pe

    19. List all public statements you have made during the past ten 
years, including statements in news articles and radio and podcasts and 
television appearances, which are on topics relevant to the position 
for which you have been nominated, including dates. Include a link to 
each statement when possible. If a link is not available, provide a 
digital copy of the statement when available. None.
    20. List all digital platforms (including social media and other 
digital content sites) on which you currently or have formerly operated 
an account, regardless of whether or not the account was held in your 
name or an alias. Include the full name of an ``alias'' or ``handle'', 
including the complete URL and username with hyperlinks, you have used 
on each of the named platforms. Indicate whether the account is active, 
deleted, or dormant. Include a link to each account if possible.
    Listed below are all digital platforms (including social media and 
other digital content sites) on which I currently or have formerly 
operated an account, regardless of whether the account was held in my 
name or an alias:

        LinkedIn (active): https://www.linkedin.com/in/robert-harvey-
        44190610/

        Facebook (active): https://www.facebook.com/robert.harvey.37853

        X (formerly Twitter) (active): https://x.com/FLBIZNOW

        Instagram (active): https://www.instagram.com/robertharvey00/
        ?hl=en

    21. Identify each instance in which you have testified orally or in 
writing before Congress in a governmental or non-governmental capacity 
and specify the date, committee, and subject matter of each testimony. 
None.
    22. Given the current mission, major programs, and major 
operational objectives of the Federal Maritime Commission (FMC), what 
in your background or employment experience do you believe 
affirmatively qualifies you for appointment to the position for which 
you have been nominated, and why do you wish to serve in that position?
    Given the current mission, major programs, and major operational 
objectives of the Federal Maritime Commission, I believe that having 
over 35 years of government, legal, and business operations experience 
affinnatively qualifies me for appointment to the Commission.
    My professional career began with my service in the United States 
Navy where I served on active duty from 1987-1990 (1990-2001 reserve 
duty) as a Navy Judge Advocate and Special Assistant U.S. Attorney. As 
a result, I have always had a deep appreciation for the relationship 
between the U.S. military and commercial maritime sectors. National 
security and economic security are essential to maintaining a vibrant 
maritime industry. For example, naval freedom of navigation operations 
is critical to maintaining supply chains and port access globally. I 
look forward to cooperating and coordinating with departments and 
agencies to support a secure and prosperous maritime economy.
    For nearly the past three years, I have been engaged in multiple 
economic development roles in Florida. With 1300 miles of coastline, 
sixteen public seaports and seven cruise ports, I have gained an even 
greater appreciation for the criticality of the maritime industry, 
supply chains, and port access for Florida and the country.
    As the maritime industry moves forward it is a given that 
technology will play a major role. In my current role as President of 
the Florida Opportunity Fund I have overseen the growth of a technology 
portfolio of 54 emerging technology companies, including companies 
tracking maritime emissions and multimodal logistics. Artificial 
intelligence, smart contracts and blockchain technologies are just some 
of the technologies that will continue to shape the maritime industry 
going forward.
    Finally, my law practice was concentrated on secunt1es litigation, 
arbitration, and regulation, in state and Federal courts and securities 
regulators. I appreciate and understand the effectiveness of robust 
enforcement, investigation, and compliance and look forward to 
supporting those programs at FMC.
    Why do I wish to serve?
    I have always made public service and integral part of my 
professional career. Service as an FMC Commissioner would be the honor 
of a lifetime and the highlight of my public service. As shown in my 
application, since leaving active duty I have always made time for 
public service on the state and local level. I presently hold the 
following positions: State of Florida, 15th Circuit Judicial Nominating 
Commission. 2015 to present, Chair (2019-2023), Vice-Chair (2015-2019) 
and the Impact Fee Review Committee, Vice Chair, Palm Beach County 
(2021 to present).
    23. What do you believe are your responsibilities, if confirmed, to 
ensure that the FMC has proper management and accounting controls, and 
what experience do you have in managing a large organization?
    If confirmed, I will accept any responsibilities as assigned to 
ensure that the FMC has proper management and accounting controls in 
place. In my current roles at FOF and FDFC, I have ultimate 
responsibility for annual audits, in addition to ensuring that proper 
management and accounting controls are followed and in place.
    24. What do you believe to be the top three challenges facing the 
FMC, and why?
    The top three challenges facing the FMC are as follows:

        1. Global Chokepoints-Freedom of Navigation

        FMC has rightly initiated an investigation of conditions at 
        seven key global chokepoints--the English Channel, the Malacca 
        Strait, the Northern Sea Passage, the Singapore Strait, the 
        Panama Canal, the Strait of Gibraltar, and the Suez Canal. With 
        90 percent of global trade moving by sea, unobstructed shipping 
        lanes are essential to U.S. economic prosperity.

        Additional areas of concern are the unlawful and sweeping 
        maritime claims in the South China Sea which pose a serious 
        threat to the freedom of the seas, including the freedoms of 
        navigation and overflight, free trade and unimpeded commerce, 
        and freedom of economic opportunity for South China Sea 
        littoral nations.

        The United States must continue to challenge excessive maritime 
        claims around the world regardless of the identity of the 
        claimant. The international community has an enduring role in 
        preserving the freedom of the seas, which is critical to global 
        security, stability, and prosperity.

        2. Competition

        The number of major carriers in the U.S. transpacific and 
        transatlantic trades has decreased from 20 in 2015 to 11 by 
        2022. due to ocean carrier mergers and the bankruptcy of one 
        major carrier.

        The FMC must continue to monitor the competitive market effects 
        of collaborative agreements among competitors, such as vessel 
        sharing agreements (alliances are vessel sharing agreements 
        that operate globally) or joint ventures to ensure that 
        operators which compete against each other in the market, do 
        not result in a reduction in competition that produces 
        unreasonable increases in transportation costs or unreasonable 
        decreases in transportation services.

        3. Flags of Convenience

        Not all foreign ship registries share a commitment with the 
        United States to ocean shipping integrity and accountability. 
        The lack of ship registry accountability not only disadvantages 
        U.S.-flag shipping, but also presents a problem in addressing 
        smuggling operations, sanctions evasion, disguised ownership, 
        and other irregularities.

        The vessel registration practices of certain foreign countries, 
        so-called flags of convenience, are creating unfavorable 
        shipping conditions in the foreign trade of the United States. 
        These flags enable unsafe vessels to operate and further enable 
        shadow fleet activity and the evasion of sanctions.
                   b. potential conflicts of interest
    1. Describe all financial arrangements, deferred compensation 
agreements, and other continuing dealings with business associates, 
clients, or customers. Please include information related to retirement 
accounts, such as a 401(k) or pension plan. None.
    2. Do you have any commitments or agreements, formal or informal, 
to maintain employment, affiliation, or practice with any business, 
association, or other organization during your appointment? If so, 
please explain. No.
    3. Indicate any investments, obligations, liabilities, or other 
relationships which could involve potential conflicts of interest in 
the position to which you have been nominated. Explain how you will 
resolve each potential conflict of interest. None.
    4. Describe any business relationship, dealing, or financial 
transaction which you have bad during the last ten years, whether for 
yourself, on behalf of a client, or acting as an agent, that could in 
any way constitute or result in a possible conflict of interest in the 
position to which you have been nominated. Explain how you will resolve 
each potential conflict of interest. None.
    5. Identify any other potential conflicts of interest and explain 
how you will resolve each potential conflict of interest. None.
    6. Describe any activity during the past ten years, including the 
names of clients represented, in which you have been engaged for the 
purpose of directly or indirectly influencing the passage, defeat, or 
modification of any legislation or affecting the administration and 
execution of law or public policy. None.
                            c. legal matters
    1. Have you ever been disciplined or cited for a breach of ethics, 
professional misconduct, or retaliation by, or been the subject of a 
complaint to, any court, administrative agency, the Office of Special 
Counsel, an Inspector General, professional association, disciplinary 
committee, or other professional group? If yes:

  a.  Provide the name of the court, agency, association, committee, or 
        group;

  b.  Provide the date the citation, disciplinary action, complaint, or 
        personnel action was issued or initiated;

  c.  Describe the citation, disciplinary action, complaint, or 
        personnel action;

  d.  Provide the results of the citation, disciplinary action, 
        complaint, or personnel action.

    No
    2. Have you ever been investigated, arrested, charged, or held by 
any Federal, State, or other law enforcement authority of any Federal, 
State, county, municipal, or foreign government entity, other than for 
a minor traffic offense? If so, please explain. No.
    3. Have you or any business or nonprofit of which you are or were 
an officer ever been involved as a party in an administrative agency 
proceeding, criminal proceeding, or civil litigation? If so, please 
explain.
    Both FOF and FDFC have been parties to litigation. No litigation 
has ever been determined to have a material, adverse effect on either 
FOF or FDFC's financial position. Both corporations are independently 
audited on an annual basis.
    I have been a party in two divorce cases in Illinois (1995) and 
Florida (2009).
    I was named as a party in a foreclosure action in Florida in 2011 
that involved a former marital residence lived in by my ex-wife. I was 
not on the note, just a nominal Defendant due to ownership interest. 
Judgment was entered solely against my ex-wife.
    4. Have you ever been convicted (including pleas of guilty or nolo 
contendere) of any criminal violation other than a minor traffic 
offense? If so, please explain. No.
    5. Have you ever been accused, formally or informally, of sexual 
assault, sexual harassment, or discrimination on the basis of sex, 
race, religion, whistleblower activity, or any other basis? If so, 
please explain. No.
    6. Please advise the Committee of any additional information, 
favorable or unfavorable, which you feel should be disclosed in 
connection with your nomination. No.
                     d. relationship with committee
    1. Will you ensure that your department/agency/commission/
corporation complies with deadlines for information set by 
congressional committees, and that your department/agency/commission/
corporation endeavors to timely comply with requests for information 
from individual Members of Congress, including requests from members in 
the minority?
    If confirmed, yes, I will ensure that the FMC complies with 
deadlines for information set by congressional committees, and that the 
FMC endeavors to timely comply with requests for information from 
individual Members of Congress, including requests from members in the 
minority.
    2. Will you ensure that your department/agency/commission/
corporation does whatever it can to protect congressional witnesses and 
whistleblowers from reprisal for their testimony and disclosures?
    Yes, I will ensure that the FMC does whatever it can to protect 
congressional witnesses and whistleblowers from reprisal for their 
testimony and disclosures.
    3. Will you cooperate in providing the Committee with requested 
witnesses, including technical experts and career employees, with 
firsthand knowledge of matters of interest to the Committee?
    Yes. I will cooperate in providing the Committee with requested 
witnesses, including technical experts and career employees, with 
firsthand knowledge of matters of interest to the Committee.
    4. Are you willing to appear and testify before any duly 
constituted committee of the Congress on such occasions as you may be 
reasonably requested to do so?
    Yes, I am willing to appear and testify before any duly constituted 
committee of the Congress on such occasions as I may be reasonably 
requested to do so.
    5. Do you agree, if confirmed, to keep this Committee, its 
subcommittees, other appropriate Committees of Congress, and their 
respective staffs apprised of new information that materially impacts 
the accuracy of testimony, briefings, reports, records-including 
documents and electronic communications, and other information you or 
your organization previously provided?
    Yes, I agree, if confirmed, to keep this Committee, its 
subcommittees, other appropriate Committees of Congress, and their 
respective staffs apprised of new information that materially impacts 
the accuracy of testimony, briefings, reports, records-including 
documents and electronic communications, and other information.
    6. Do you agree, if confirmed, and on request, to provide this 
Committee and its subcommittees with records and other information 
within their oversight jurisdiction, even absent a formal Committee 
request?
    Yes, I agree, if confirmed, and on request, to provide this 
Committee and its subcommittees with records and other information 
within their oversight jurisdiction, even absent a formal Committee 
request.
    7. Do you agree, if confirmed, to ensure that you and other members 
of your organization protect from retaliation any military member, 
Federal employee, or contractor employee who testifies before, or 
communicates with this Committee, its subcommittees, and any other 
appropriate committee of Congress?
    Yes, I agree, if confirmed, to ensure that I and other members of 
the FMC protect from retaliation any military member, Federal employee, 
or contractor employee who testifies before, or communicates with this 
Committee, its subcommittees, and any other appropriate committee of 
Congress.

[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]

                                 ______
                                 
                          Speaking Engagements
    Venture Capital in Florida, Florida Business Seminar, Paris, France 
(June 2025)

    Venture Capital and Corporate Investment in the Energy Sector, 
Middle East Energy 2025--Global Innovation Forum, Dubai, United Arab 
Emirates (April 2025)

    Opportunities in SpaceTech, Israel Tech Week, Miami, Florida (March 
2025)

    Superyacht Builders Association, Palm Beach, Florida (March 2025)

    Investment Insights, Plug and Play Selection Day Batch 2-Aerospace, 
Dual-Use, and Semiconductor Technologies, NeoCity, Kissimmee, Florida 
(March 2025)

    Investment Insights, Funding Solutions for Life Sciences 
Innovation, BioFlorida Innovation Conference, Lake Buena Vista, Florida 
(November 2024)

    Panel Discussion, Plug and Play NeoCity Semiconductors Expo, 
Kissimmee, Florida (October 2024)

    Israel Venture Tech Showcase, Las Olas Chabad Jewish Center, Fort 
Lauderdale, Florida (September 2024)

    The State of Innovation, South Florida Innovation Day, Alan B. 
Levan-NSU Broward Center of Innovation, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 
(September 2024)

    Demystifying Access to Capital, Business Development Board, Martin 
County Florida (September 2024)

    Corporate Counsel Roundtable, Florida Bar-Business Law Section 
Annual Retreat, Naples, Florida (August 2024)

    What is Venture Capital, and is it for me?--Understanding the 
Florida Opportunity Fund, 2024 Small Business Success Summit, Ponte 
Vedra, Florida (August 2024)

    Entrepreneurial Coaching, 35 Mules, Florida Power & Light, Juno 
Beach, Florida (August 2024)

    The Association for Manufacturing Technology, Interview, Haddy, 
Inc., St. Petersburg, Florida (July 2024)

    Venture Capital in Florida, PLUG and PLAY Silicon Valley Summit, 
Sunnyvale, California (May 2024)

    Venture Capital in Florida, Venture in the South, Podcast, (May 
2024) Venture Capital in Florida, Business Brokers of Florida Annual 
Meeting, Deerfield Beach, Florida (April 2024)

    State of Venture Capital in Florida, 2024 Florida Venture Forum 
Capital Conference, Miami, Florida (February 2024)

    Strategies for Attracting Global Technology Companies to Florida, 
2023 BioFlorida Conference, Ponte Vedra, Florida (October 2023)

    The Future of Economic Development: Optimizing for Impact, Edison 
Awards--Meet the Innovators Forum, Fort Myers, Florida (April 2023)

    Executive Branch Experiences-Lessons from the Front Lines, 
Federalist Society of South Florida, West Palm Beach, Florida (April 
2023)

    Journey to the Gavel, Palm Beach County Justice Association, West 
Palm Beach, Florida (April 2023)

    CIED Venture Symposium, Santa Fe College, Gainesville, Florida 
(April 2023)

    Florida Opportunity Fund-Year to Date, Enterprise Florida, Inc., 
Quarterly Board of Directors Meeting, Tallahassee, Florida (March 2023)

    Florida Venture Forum-Capital Crawl, Miami, Florida (February 2023)

    The Question of States' Rights: The Constitution and American 
Federalism, South Fork High School, Stuart, Florida (September 2022)

    Florida's Judicial Nominating Commissions, The Hispanic Vote Palm 
Beach County-Community Leaders Meeting, Greenacres, Florida (July 2022)

    Palm Beach County Elections: Why They Matter? Boca Raton/Boynton 
Beach Florida Chamber of Commerce, Boca Raton, Florida (July 2022)

    How to Prepare for a Pathway to the Bench, Palm Beach County 
Hispanic Bar Association webinar (June 2022)

    Elements of An Effective and Successful JNC Application, Palm Beach 
County Bar Association, Committee for Diversity and Inclusion, 2022 
Road to the Bench Academy webinar (March 2022)

    Pathway to the Bench: Panel Discussion on the Judicial Appointment 
Process and the Role of Judge as a Career, Palm Beach County Bar 
Association CLE webinar (October 2021)

    So, You've Applied, What's Next? Palm Beach County Bar Association 
Committee for Diversity and Inclusion 2021 Road to the Bench Academy 
webinar (March 2021)

    FINRA Arbitration Hot Topics for 2020: Updates You Should Know, The 
Knowledge Group, LLC's nationwide webcast (December 2019)

    FINRA Arbitration 2019--Regulatory Trends and Arbitration 
Procedures, ProLawCLE's nationwide webinar (June 2019)

    How to Handle a FINRA Rule 8210 Request: A Comprehensive Guide, The 
Knowledge Group, LLC's nationwide webcast (March 2019)

    FINRA Arbitration Issues & Strategies--Claims in the FINRA Forum, 
ProLawCLE's nationwide webinar (August 2018)

    Alternative Dispute Resolution, Florida Atlantic University-Law in 
the Real-World Series, Palm Beach Gardens, FL (2015 to 2019)

    FINRA Dispute Resolution and How it Works, Florida Institute of 
CPAs-Sailfish Chapter, Stuart, Port St. Lucie, and Okeechobee Florida 
(2016-2017)

    Investment Opportunities in Latin America, 22nd Annual Alpha Hedge 
East Conference, Palm Beach Gardens, FL (2016)

    Crowdfunding Roundtable: Regulators and Practitioners, Public 
Investors Arbitration Bar Association Annual Meeting, La Quinta, CA 
(2014)
                                 ______
                                 
  Addendum to the questionnaire submitted to the Senate Committee on 
Commerce, Science, and Transportation, 119th Congress by Robert Harvey.
    Please find below my responses to questions received on October 8, 
2025:

    A.8--Mr. Harvey's OGE 278e list his positions with Florida 
Resiliency and Energy District and Florida Venture Forum, as does his 
Ethics Agreement, but those positions are not listed on his 
questionnaire. Please clarify and provide a supplement as appropriate.
    Response: A.8 requested all post-graduate employment.
    I am an uncompensated board member of the Florida Venture Forum and 
serve as the uncompensated Executive Director of the Florida Resiliency 
and Energy District (FRED). Therefore, neither were included as 
employment under A.8, but were listed on OGE 278e and my Ethics 
Agreement as positions that I will be required to resign upon 
confirmation.
    My position as a board member for the Florida Venture Forum is 
relevant to question A.11, I served in this position from January 2023-
Present.
    My position as an Executive Director of the Florida Resiliency and 
Energy District (FRED) is an uncompensated advisory position for an 
entity established by state law, relevant to question A.10. I served in 
this position from July 2023-Present.
    Additionally, during my time as a Navy JAG, while on active duty 
from 1987-1990 I also served as a Special Assistant U.S. Attorney.

    A.15--We have identified political contributions that Mr. Harvey 
may have not disclosed. Please complete a thorough search, and provide 
a supplement as appropriate. These omitted contributions include:

  1.  An additional $1,000 contribution to Rick Scott (Jun. 2024)

  2.  An additional $1,000 contribution to Ron DeSantis (Oct. 2023)

    Response: The above contributions are each listed twice on the 
Federal Election Commission website because they are joint fundraising 
committee dispersals. The contributions appear to have been received, 
then transferred by the candidates to other campaign entities, 
resulting in the double entries. My initial disclosure is accurate to 
my actual contributions.

    A.18--We have identified panels Mr. Harvey participated on that 
were not disclosed. Please conduct a comprehensive search for other 
responsive speeches, panel discussions and presentations, and provide a 
supplement as appropriate. The panels identified are listed here:

    1. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/robert-harvey-
44190610_southfloridainnovati
onday-levancenter-techinnovation-activity-7242368212787437568-Re6-
?utm_source=
share&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAADleFtAB5wziBPzKt0CKTpcRo
GKVRKxh-d0
    Response: This speaking engagement was disclosed on my resume as 
The State of Innovation, South Florida Innovation Day, Alan B. Levan-
NSU Broward Center oflnnovation, Fort Lauderdale, Florida (September 
2024)

    2. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/robert-harvey-44190610_israel-
innovation-tech
nology-activity-7166641603015618560-
fG42?utm_source=share&utm_medium=mem
ber_desktop&rcm=ACoAADleFtAB5wziBPzKt0CKTpcRoGKVRKxh-d0
    Response: This was not disclosed since it was not a speech or panel 
discussion. I appeared on stage with Mr. Driquez, former Deputy Consul 
General of Israel, at a pitch event for Israeli companies in 
Tallahassee, Florida.

    C.2--Please clarify whether Mr. Harvey was investigated, arrested, 
charged, or held on the following dates. If so, please describe the 
circumstances around these arrests and provide a supplement as 
appropriate.

  1.  May 1, 1992--felony, misdemeanor

  2.  February 23, 1988--misdemeanor

  3.  October 21, 1985--misdemeanor

  4.  May 28, 1987--misdemeanor

  5.  January 26, 1994--misdemeanor

  6.  June 26, 1991--felony

  7.  July 28, 1986--misdemeanor

    Response: I was not investigated, arrested, charged, or held on the 
above dates. There are no circumstances to describe since I have never 
been arrested.

    Chairman Cruz. Thank you. I now recognize Mr. Petty.

           STATEMENT OF TIMOTHY PETTY, NOMINEE TO BE

              ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR

    OCEANS AND ATMOSPHERE, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC 
                         ADMINISTRATION

    Mr. Petty. Chairman Cruz, Ranking Member Cantwell, and 
distinguished guests and Committee members, thank you for the 
opportunity to be here today. I am deeply honored to be 
nominated by President Trump to serve as Assistant Secretary of 
Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere. I want to thank Secretary 
Lutnick, as well, for his confidence in me, and again for 
Senator Risch for his kind introduction and for his steadfast 
leadership on behalf of the people of Idaho but also this 
Nation. It is a privilege to be here today, and I respectfully 
ask for your consideration and consent for my nomination.
    Before I begin today, I would like to take a moment and 
recognize friends and family, but foremost my wife, Elaine, who 
is sitting behind me here. She has always been a big support 
and a foundation throughout my journey here in Washington, D.C. 
My parents and my four siblings are watching remotely from the 
family farms back in Indiana. My mother, Esther, is 93 years 
old, and my stepfather, Vern, is 97. Their resilience, faith, 
and work ethic have been a guiding light for me in my life.
    I was born and raised on a family farm in Grant County, 
Indiana. Our farm was more than a livelihood. It was a 
classroom and a place where I learned the values that have 
shaped my life of hard work, faith, and service. From milking 
cows before the sun would rise, baling hay in the summer heat, 
and watching the skies for signs of rain that could make or 
break a season on the farm, I came to understand the deep 
connection between people and the land. Our farm bordered 
rivers and a gravel pit, which sparked my interest and 
fascination with both water, geology, and the natural systems 
that support them.
    That curiosity led me to pursue a science degree at Purdue 
University. I began my career in the private sector, working as 
a geologist and a hydrogeologist in Indiana, California, and 
even abroad, and I learned the intricacies of groundwater 
systems, seismic activity, the environment, and fishing. But I 
also realized that science alone was not enough. I needed sound 
policy to guide how to manage our natural resources. That 
realization brought me to Washington, D.C., where I joined the 
Senate staff of Senator Connie Mack, of Senator Rick Santorum, 
and, of course, of Senator Risch.
    During the time in the Senate, I have had the privilege of 
working with many of you members here and your staff, whether 
it was advancing hydropower legislation, supporting tribal 
water rights settlements, strengthening our water 
infrastructure, and of course the environment. I have seen 
firsthand the power of collaboration and the importance of 
science-based policymaking.
    I later earned my Ph.D. in Water Resources at the 
University of Alaska Fairbanks, where I was focused on 
hydrology and digital transformation.
    At the Department of the Interior, I was honored to serve 
twice, first under the George W. Bush administration, and later 
again as Assistant Secretary for Water and Science under the 
Trump administration. In those roles, I provided oversight for 
the U.S. Geological Survey and the Bureau of Reclamation, 
managing programs critical to our Nation's water security, 
science, and advancement.
    These experiences deepened my understanding of the complex 
interplay between science, policy, and public service. They 
also reinforced my belief that effective stewardship of our 
oceans and atmosphere requires not only technical expertise, 
but collaboration and a commitment to transparency.
    Most recently, I have served in the House of 
Representatives under Chairman Graves on the Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure. This included work with the 
Army Corps of Engineers, the EPA, NOAA, and other key agencies.
    If confirmed, I will bring my full energy, experience, and 
dedication to advancing NOAA's mission. I will champion 
innovation, transparency, and collaboration. I will listen to 
the voices of the scientists, stakeholders, and all the 
communities involved. And I will work to ensure that our 
policies are grounded in sound science and guided by the public 
good.
    I look forward to supporting NOAA's dedicated workforce and 
advancing its critical work in oceanic research, weather 
forecasting, fishery monitoring, and environmental resilience. 
Together, we can ensure that our oceans and atmosphere are 
managed wisely, for today but also for future generations.
    Thank you again for your consideration. I look forward to 
your questions.
    [The prepared statement and biographical information of Mr. 
Petty follow:]

 Prepared Statement of Timothy R. Petty, Ph.D., Nominee for Assistant 
  Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere, U.S. Department of 
                                Commerce
    Chairman Cruz, Ranking Member Cantwell, and distinguished Members 
of the Committee--thank you for the opportunity to appear before you 
today.
    I am deeply honored to be nominated by President Trump to serve as 
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere at the 
Department of Commerce. I also want to thank Secretary Lutnick for his 
confidence in me, and Senator Risch for his kind introduction and for 
his steadfast leadership on behalf of the people of Idaho and the 
Nation.
    It is a privilege to be here, and I respectfully ask for your 
consideration and consent to this nomination.
    Before I begin, I'd like to take a moment to recognize my family. 
My wife, Elaine, is here with me today--her support has been my 
foundation throughout this journey. My parents and four siblings are 
watching remotely from the family farms back in Indiana. My mother, 
Esther, is 93, and my stepfather, Vernon, is 97. Their resilience, 
faith, and work ethic have been a guiding light in my life.
    I was born and raised on a family farm in Grant County, Indiana. 
Our farm was more than a livelihood--it was a classroom, and a place 
where I learned the values that have shaped my life: hard work, faith, 
and service. From milking cows before sunrise, to bailing hay in the 
summer heat, to watching the skies for signs of rain that could make or 
break a season, I came to understand the deep connection between people 
and the land. Our farm bordered a river and a gravel pit, which sparked 
my early fascination with water, geology, and the natural systems that 
sustain us.
    That curiosity led me to pursue a Bachelor of Science in 
Geosciences at Purdue University. I began my career in the private 
sector, working as a geologist and hydrogeologist in Indiana, 
California, and abroad. I learned the intricacies of groundwater 
systems, seismic activity, and the environment. But I also realized 
that science alone wasn't enough--we needed sound policy to guide how 
we manage our natural resources. That realization brought me to 
Washington, where I joined the Senate under Senator(s) Connie Mack, 
Rick Santorum, and Senator Risch.
    During my time in the Senate, I've had the privilege of working 
with many of you and your staff. Whether it was advancing hydropower 
legislation, supporting tribal water rights settlements, or 
strengthening our water infrastructure and environment, I've seen 
firsthand the power of collaboration and the importance of science-
based policymaking.
    I later earned a Ph.D. in Water Resource Science from the 
University of Alaska Fairbanks. My doctoral research focused on surface 
hydrology and digital transformation--an area I pursued after 
witnessing the need for more timely and accurate flood forecasting 
during my time at the Interior.
    At the Department of the Interior, I was honored to serve twice--
first under the George W. Bush Administration, and later as Assistant 
Secretary for Water and Science under the Trump Administration. In 
these roles, I provided oversight for the U.S. Geological Survey and 
the Bureau of Reclamation, managing programs critical to our Nation's 
water security and scientific advancement.
    These experiences deepened my understanding of the complex 
interplay between science, policy, and public service. They also 
reinforced my belief that effective stewardship of our oceans and 
atmosphere requires not only technical expertise, but collaboration, 
and a commitment to transparency.
    Most recently, I've served in the House of Representatives under 
Chairman Sam Graves on the Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure, focusing on water resources and environment. This 
included work with the Army Corps of Engineers, the EPA, NOAA, and 
other key agencies whose missions are rooted in the protection and 
sustainable use of our water and coastal resources.
    If confirmed, I will bring my full energy, experience, and 
dedication to advancing NOAA's mission. I will champion innovation, 
transparency, and collaboration. I will listen to the voices of 
scientists, stakeholders, and communities. And I will work to ensure 
that our policies are grounded in sound science and guided by the 
public good.
    I look forward to supporting NOAA's dedicated workforce and 
advancing its critical work in oceanic research, weather forecasting, 
fishery monitoring, and environmental resilience. Together, we can 
ensure that our oceans and atmosphere are managed wisely--for today's 
needs and for future generations.
    Thank you again for considering my nomination. I look forward to 
your questions and to the opportunity to serve.
                                 ______
                                 
                      a. biographical information
    1. Name (Include any former names or nicknames used): A. Timothy 
Ray Petty or Tim Petty.
    2. Position to which nominated: Assistant Secretary of Commerce for 
Oceans and Atmosphere.
    3. Date of Nomination: August 1, 2025.
    4. Address (List of current place of residence and office 
addresses):

        Residence: Information not released to the public.
        Office: Information not provided.

    5. Date and Place of Birth: Marion, Indiana.
    6. Provide the name, position, and place of employment for your 
spouse (if married) or domestic partner, and the names and ages of your 
children (including stepchildren and children by a previous marriage).

        Elaine G. Petty (wife), Professional Staff, Endowment for 
        Community Leadership.
        No children. No stepchildren.

    7. List all college and graduate schools attended, whether or not 
you were granted a degree by the institution. Provide the name of the 
institution, the dates attended, the degree received, and the date of 
the degree.

        Univ. of Alaska Fairbanks
                School of Engineering & Mining
                PhD: Doctor in Philosophy--May 2017
                attended: 2012-2017

        University of Maryland Global Campus
                Business Management School
                Master's degree--April 1999
                attended: 1998-1999

        Universiteit of Antwerpen, Belgium
                Business School
                (MS) Certificate w/Univ. of Maryland
                attended: spring 1999

        King's University, Texas
                Master's degree--May 1995
                attended: 1987-1995

        Purdue University, Indiana
                Bachelor of Science--May 1987
                attended: 1984-1987

        Taylor University, Indiana
                attended: 1982-1984 (transfer to Purdue U.)

    8. List all post-undergraduate employment, including the job title, 
name of employer, and inclusive dates of employment, and highlight all 
management-level jobs held and any non-managerial jobs that relate to 
the position for which you are nominated.

        U.S. House of Representatives
                House Committee on Transportation & Infrastructure
                Subcommittee: Water & Environment
                Senior Professional Staff
                2022 to present
                Chairman Sam Graves of Missouri
                Oversight & Authorization: for (USACE) U.S. Army Corps 
                Engineers, (EPA) Environmental Protection Agency, 
                partial (NOAA) National Oceanic & Atmospheric 
                Administration, (USDA--NRCS) U.S. Department of 
                Agriculture--National Resources Conservation Service, 
                Great Lakes and Saint Lawrence Seaway (DOT)

        U.S. Senate
                Senator James Risch (ID)
                Senior Advisor
                2021-2022
                Natural Resources & Water

        U.S. Dept of the Interior
                Secretary David Bernhardt
                Assistant Secretary of Water & Science
                2018-2021
                Bureau of Reclamation & U.S. Geological Survey

        U.S. Senate
                Senator James Risch (ID)
                Deputy Legislative Director
                2009-2017
                Natural Resources & Water

        U.S. Dept of the Interior
                Secretary Dirk Kempthorne
                Deputy Assistant Secretary of Water & Science
                2006-2009
                Bureau of Reclamation & U.S. Geological Survey

        U.S. Senate
                Senator Connie Mack (FL)
                Senator Rick Santorum (PA)
                Professional Staff
                1999-2006

        U.S. Dept of Energy
                Office of Nuclear Energy (NN-30)
                Professional Staff
                1996-1998

        Professional Engineering Services (1988-1995)
                Alton Geoscience
                        Hydrogeologist
                Environmental Geoscience Engineering
                        Staff Geologist
                ICG Geotechnical Services
                        Staff Geologist

    9. Attach a copy of your resume.
    Professional resume attached to document
    10. List any advisory, consultative, honorary, or other part-time 
service or positions with Federal, State, or local governments, other 
than those listed above after 18 years of age.

        Advisory: Duties, oversight, and responsibilities as Deputy 
        Assistant Secretary and Assistant Secretary, Dept of Interior 
        Water & Science

        Consultative: Duties as a professional geotechnical engineer 
        via my duties with engineering companies listed above.

        Honorary: None

        Part-time services: None

    11. List all positions held as an officer, director, trustee, 
partner, proprietor, agent, representative, or consultant of any 
corporation, company, firm, partnership, or other business, enterprise, 
educational, or other institution.

        Officer: None

        Director: None

        Trustee: None

        Partner: None

        Proprietor: None

        Agent: None

        Representative: None

        Consultant Corporation: None

        Consultant Company: Duties for engineering companies listed 
        above

        Consultant Firm: None

        Consultant Partnership: None

        Consultant Business: None

        Consultant Enterprise: None

        Consultant Education: None

        Consultant Institution: None

    12. List all memberships you have had after 18 years of age or 
currently hold with any civic, social, charitable, educational, 
political, professional, fraternal, benevolent or religiously 
affiliated organization, private club, or other membership organization 
(You do not have to list your religious affiliation or membership in a 
religious house of worship or institution). Include dates of membership 
and any positions you have held with any organization. Please note 
whether any such club or organization restricts membership on the basis 
of sex, race, color, religion, national origin, age, or disability.

        Phi Kappa Phi Honor Society Member (since 2017)

        Golden Key International Honor Society Member (since 1995)

        American Geophysical Union Member (since 2014)

    13. Have you ever been a candidate for and/or held a public office 
(elected, non-elected, or appointed)? If so, indicate whether any 
campaign has any outstanding debt, the amount, and whether you are 
personally liable for that debt. No.
    14. List all memberships and offices held with and services 
rendered to, whether compensated or not, any political party or 
election committee within the past ten years. If you have held a paid 
position or served in a formal or official advisory position (whether 
compensated or not) in a political campaign within the past ten years, 
identify the particulars of the campaign, including the candidate, year 
of the campaign, and your title and responsibilities. None.
    15. Itemize all political contributions to any individual, campaign 
organization, political party, political action committee, or similar 
entity of $200 or more for the past ten years.

        National Republican Committee
                2025: 29 August: $250;
                2024: 18 October: $10; 6 August: $50: 10 June: $10
                2023: $0;
                2022: $100;
                2021: $0; 2020: $0; 2019: $0; 2018: $0; 2017: $0; 2016: 
                $0;
                2015: $0

    16. List all scholarships, fellowships, honorary degrees, honorary 
society memberships, military medals, and any other special recognition 
for outstanding service or achievements.

        Scholarships: None

        Fellowship:
                National Academies Sciences (class of 2023-24)
                Sea Grant Fellow (summer 2015)

        Honorary Degrees: None

        Honorary Society Memberships:
                Phi Kappa Phi
                Golden Key

        Military: None

        Outstanding Service: 2 Federal Star Awards (2007 & 2008)

    17. List all books, articles, columns, letters to the editor, 
Internet blog postings, or other publications you have authored, 
individually or with others. Include a link to each publication when 
possible. If a link is not available, provide a digital copy of the 
publication when available.

        Books: None

        Articles: None

        Columns: None

        Letters to Editor: None

        Internet Blogs: None

        Publications:

                UAF Dissertation: ``Flood Hazard Hydrology''
                        https://scholarworks.alaska.edu/handle/11122/
                        7633

                Springer: ``Bridging policy and science action 
                boundaries''
                        https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/
                        s11077-018-9311-y

                JAWRA: ``Streamflow Hydrology Estimates using Machine 
                Learning''
                        https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12555

                Journal of Geographic Information System: ``Flood 
                Forecasting GIS Water-Flow Visualization Enhancement 
                (WaVE)''
                        https://www.scirp.org/journal/
                        paperinformation?paperid=72935

    18. List all speeches, panel discussions, and presentations (e.g., 
PowerPoint) that you have given on topics relevant to the position for 
which you have been nominated. Include a link to each publication when 
possible. If a link is not available, provide a digital copy of the 
speech or presentation when available.

        Senate ENR Nomination Hearing for Tim Petty (2017)
                https://www.doi.gov/ocl/nomination-timothy-petty

        Senate Budget presentation to House Appropriations Committee
                ASWS Testimony on FY 2020 Budget Before the Senate Sub-
                Committee on Energy and Water Development

        Senate Indian Affairs Committee
                https://www.indian.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/
                6.24.20_ASPetty_Testi
                mony_on_S_3019.pdf

        Senate subcommittee on Energy & Water Appropriations
                https://www.appropriations.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/
                03.11.20--Petty%
                20Testimony.pdf

    19. List all public statements you have made during the past ten 
years, including statements in news articles and radio and podcasts and 
television appearances, which are on topics relevant to the position 
for which you have been nominated, including dates. Include a link to 
each statement when possible. If a link is not available, provide a 
digital copy of the statement when available.

    Statements & Interviews in news Articles:

        Hydro Leader Magazine
                Dr. Tim Petty on the New Water Management Executive 
                Order--Hydro Leader

        Senate ENR on CSKT Water Right testimony
                https://flatheadbeacon.com/2020/06/27/bill-settle-cskt-
                water-rights-gains-senate-committee-support/

        Municipal Water Leader article
                Dr. Tim Petty: How the Water Subcabinet Promotes 
                Progress--Municipal Water Leader Magazine

        Justia Patents article notice
                Timothy R. Petty Inventions, Patents and Patent 
                Applications--Justia Patents Search

        Idaho Stateman
                Idaho Sen. Risch aide named to Interior water, science 
                job | Idaho Statesman

        U.S. Dept. of Interior announcement Co-Chair Drought 
        Partnership
                https://edit.doi.gov/pressreleases/interior-assistant-
                secretary-water-and-science-tim-petty-named-co-chair-
                national

        California Water News Daily
                https://californiawaternewsdaily.com/industry/
                president-trump-appoints-tim-petty-for-interior-
                department-secretary-zinke-cheers-the-nomination/

        Radio: None

        Podcasts: None

        Television: None

    20. List all digital platforms (including social media and other 
digital content sites) on which you currently or have formerly operated 
an account, regardless of whether or not the account was held in your 
name or an alias. Include the full name of an ``alias'' or ``handle'', 
including the complete URL and username with hyperlinks, you have used 
on each of the named platforms. Indicate whether the account is active, 
deleted, or dormant. Include a link to each account if possible.

        LinkedIn: Tim Petty PhD | LinkedIn (https://www.linkedin.com/
        in/tim-petty
        -phd-5b46aaba/)

        WhatsApp: Phone calls only: name under ``Tim Petty''

        Facebook: None

        Tik Tok: None

        Telegram: None

        Instagram: None

        Snapchat: None

        Twitter: None

    21. Please identify each instance in which you have testified 
orally or in writing before Congress in a governmental or non-
governmental capacity and specify the date, committee, and subject 
matter of each testimony.

        Senate Energy & Natural Resources nomination written testimony
                https://www.energy.senate.gov/services/files/1AC9D7DB-
                808A-4ACA-88D0-26479B7C8117

        Senate Energy & Natural Resources testimony on H.R. 1967
                https://www.energy.senate.gov/services/files/92F18793-
                6965-435D-B35A-E1194724729C

        Senate Energy & Natural Resources Hearing (Dec. 5, 2017)
                Full Committee Hearing to Consider DOE, DOI Nominees--
                U.S. Senate Committee on Tim Petty.
                Senate Hearing. 115-338--Timothy Petty NOMINATIONS | 
                Congress.gov | Library of Congress

        House Committee on Natural Resources Bio
                https://naturalresources.house.gov/uploadedfiles/
                3.21_resume_petty.pdf

        Budget presentation to House Appropriations Committee
                ASWS Testimony on FY 2020 Budget Before the Senate Sub-
                Committee on Energy and Water Development

        Senate subcommittee Energy & Natural Resources (S. 3001)
                https://www.energy.senate.gov/services/files/916FC45F-
                5A34-4515-B6F4-45741D357740
                https://www.usbr.gov/newsroomold/testimony/
                detail.cfm?RecordID=3344

        Senate ENR Committee on WIFIA (June 13, 2018)
                https://www.energy.senate.gov/services/files/17C5D812-
                8409-43CE-841D-5C0DE04F6853

    22. Given the current mission, major programs, and major 
operational objectives of the department/agency/commission/corporation 
to which you have been nominated, what in your background or employment 
experience do you believe affirmatively qualifies you for appointment 
to the position for which you have been nominated, and why do you wish 
to serve in that position?
    Response: My qualifications for the role of Assistant Secretary for 
NOAA are deeply rooted in my extensive background in water science and 
geoscience. My career spans both the private sector and significant 
roles within government, including work in Congressional offices for 
the Senate, a Committee for the House of Representatives, and service 
in two previous administrations at the Department of the Interior. This 
diverse experience directly aligns with NOAA's mission, major programs, 
and operational objectives.
    NOAA's mission centers on understanding and predicting changes in 
oceans, coasts and weather, and safeguarding and managing coastal and 
marine ecosystems. My career reflects a strong alignment with these 
goals including:
    Expertise in Water and Science Leadership and Continued Federal 
Leadership: As the Assistant Secretary for Water and Science at the 
U.S. Department of the Interior during the first Trump administration, 
I oversaw policy development for the Bureau of Reclamation and the U.S. 
Geological Survey. These agencies maintain close collaboration with 
NOAA, particularly in areas such as hydrology, coastal modeling, 
satellite imagery, remote sensing technology, biological surveys, 
research methodology, and ecosystem management. My executive experience 
also includes prior service as Deputy Assistant Secretary and Acting 
Assistant Secretary for Water and Science under President George W. 
Bush, demonstrating ongoing experience in these fields. These positions 
represent a background in Federal leadership.
    Policy and Legislative Experience: My policy background complements 
NOAA's operational objectives and includes Congressional Service as 
Senior Professional Staff for House Transportation and Infrastructure 
on the subcommittee for Water Resources and the Environment. 
Additionally, I have served as Deputy Legislative Director and 
Legislative Assistant for Senator James Risch, Senator Rick Santorum, 
and Senator Connie Mack, focusing on issues related to water, natural 
resources, environment, science, and technology.
    Field Experience in Geoscience and Hydrology: My field experience 
includes work as a geologist and hydrogeologist. These roles gave me 
hands-on expertise in water quality research, surface and subsurface 
hydrology, atmospheric weather, coastal research, and digital mapping--
areas critical to NOAA's environmental monitoring and coastal 
resilience efforts.
    Academic and Technical Foundation: I hold a PhD in Water Science 
from the University of Alaska Fairbanks, an MS in Business Management 
from the University of Maryland, and a BS in Geosciences from Purdue 
University. This academic background provides a strong scientific and 
technical foundation that supports NOAA's mandates.
    Personal Motivation and Commitment: Finally, my personal motivation 
and commitment during my 26 years of Federal service to the United 
States reveals a deep-rooted passion for water resources, atmospheric 
research, and environmental stewardship. Early experiences on a family 
farm in Indiana stimulated a fascination with water, biology, geology, 
and animal life. My aspiration for this role is grounded in a 
dedication to public service, scientific integrity, and advancing 
environmental sustainability.
    23. What do you believe are your responsibilities, if confirmed, to 
ensure that the department/agency/commission/corporation has proper 
management and accounting controls, and what experience do you have in 
managing a large organization?
    Response: If confirmed as the Assistant Secretary of Commerce for 
Oceans and Atmosphere, I believe my principal responsibility is to 
ensure that NOAA operates with integrity, transparency, and 
accountability. This involves establishing and maintaining robust 
management and accounting controls to safeguard public resources, 
promote efficiency, and uphold the trust placed in me by Congress and 
the American people.
    I will prioritize strategic oversight of each of NOAA's line 
offices, making certain that the agency's mission--across ocean 
science, fisheries management, biological survey and science, 
atmospheric advancement, and all areas of remote sensing technology and 
operations--is supported by sound governance structures as outlined by 
Congress. These structures will include clear performance metrics to 
measure progress and impact.
    Collaboration with leadership and Chief Financial Officer will be 
central to my approach. Together, we will work to strengthen financial 
stewardship by implementing internal controls, enforcing compliance 
with Federal financial regulations, and ensuring that reporting is both 
timely and accurate. I will review and implement management processes 
as necessary to identify and mitigate risks associated with critical 
operational platforms, financial impacts, and areas of concern within 
NOAA's priority mission areas. This will be especially important in 
high-impact sectors such as operational research, grant distribution, 
procurement, and the maintenance of science and data integrity--all 
with complete transparency for the American people.
    With a workforce of over 12,000 NOAA employees, I will foster a 
culture of leadership, accountability, and innovation throughout all 
line offices. This includes investing in leadership development, 
streamlining decision-making processes, and ensuring every employee 
understands how their work contributes to NOAA's overall mission, 
purpose and need.
    My previous experience includes leading large multidisciplinary 
teams in both the public and private sectors. In my prior role at the 
Department of Interior, I oversaw more than 14,000 employees across a 
comparable scale and complexity. My responsibilities there involved 
managing a multimillion-dollar budget, navigating Federal compliance 
frameworks, and driving performance improvements across geographically 
dispersed units.
    Additionally, I have worked in science-driven environments where 
collaboration among researchers, technologists, and policy experts was 
essential--experience that closely aligns with NOAA's structure and 
culture.
    Ultimately, I view this role not only as a managerial challenge, 
but as a stewardship opportunity. NOAA's work affects every American, 
from ocean health to weather forecasts, and I am committed to ensuring 
that our operations reflect the highest standards of public service.
    24. What do you believe to be the top three challenges facing the 
department/agency/commission/corporation, and why?
    Response: The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 
(NOAA) encounters complex questions from various private, public, and 
congressional stakeholders regarding ocean and atmospheric issues.
    Adequate staffing and constrained financial resources continue to 
affect its operations. I believe the following are three significant 
challenges currently facing the agency:

  1)  Workforce: NOAA manages a staff with extensive expertise. 
        Adjusting operational capacity and skills alongside emerging 
        technologies remains ongoing. The key challenge is aligning 
        workforce capabilities with mission priorities as determined by 
        Congress. Maintaining institutional knowledge and continuity in 
        scientific research is necessary, as is balancing credible 
        science with established priorities.

  2)  Budget Resources: Congressional requirements and statutory 
        mandates consistently put pressure on NOAA's budget. Upcoming 
        Fiscal Years will require prioritization of funding for ocean 
        research, fishery sustainability, coastal resource management, 
        and atmospheric forecasting, all of which pose substantial 
        demands on available funds.

  3)  Organizational Disruption: Changes in leadership can directly 
        impact organizational structure. Addressing workforce and 
        budget considerations may lead to modifications within NOAA and 
        its relationships with private and commercial institutions. The 
        agency will need to build upon established stewardship roles to 
        forecast oceanic and atmospheric risks and incorporate new 
        technology and datasets. Enhanced coordination will be 
        necessary for NOAA to address both national and global 
        environmental concerns.

    These challenges are central to NOAA's responsibilities, affecting 
areas such as agriculture, fisheries, aviation, transportation, weather 
forecasting, coastal communities, and inland impacts.
                   b. potential conflicts of interest
    1. Describe all financial arrangements, deferred compensation 
agreements, and other continuing dealings with business associates, 
clients, or customers. Please include information related to retirement 
accounts, such as a 401(k) or pension plan. (Please Note* Form 278e 
provided)

        Financial arrangements: None

        Deferred Compensation Agreements: None

        Business associates: None

        Clients: None

        Customers: None

        Retirement Accounts: TSP

        Pension Plan: FERS Retirement

    2. Do you have any commitments or agreements, formal or informal, 
to maintain employment, affiliation, or practice with any business, 
association, or other organization during your appointment? If so, 
please explain.

        Agreements: None

        Affiliations: None

        Businesses: None

        Associations: None

        Organizations: None

    3. Indicate any investments, obligations, liabilities, or other 
relationships which could involve potential conflicts of interest in 
the position to which you have been nominated. Explain how you will 
resolve each potential conflict of interest.

        Investments: None with potential conflicts of interest

        Obligations: None with potential conflicts of interest

        Liabilities: None with potential conflicts of interest

        Relationships: None with potential conflicts of interest

    4. Describe any business relationship, dealing, or financial 
transaction which you have had during the last ten years, whether for 
yourself, on behalf of a client, or acting as an agent, that could in 
any way constitute or result in a possible conflict of interest in the 
position to which you have been nominated. Explain how you will resolve 
each potential conflict of interest.

        Business Relationships: None

        Business Dealings: None

        Financial Transactions: None

        Behalf of a client: None

        Acting as an Agent: None

    5. Identify any other potential conflicts of interest and explain 
how you will resolve each potential conflict of interest.

        Other potential conflicts: None

    6. Describe any activity during the past ten years, including the 
names of clients represented, in which you have been engaged for the 
purpose of directly or indirectly influencing the passage, defeat, or 
modification of any legislation or affecting the administration and 
execution of law or public policy.

        Activities, names of clients, legislation: None

        Activities, direct influence, legislation: None

        Activities, indirect influence, legislation: None

        Activities, affecting the administration & execution of law: 
        None

        Activities, affecting the administration & execution of public 
        policy: None
                            c. legal matters
    1. Have you ever been disciplined or cited for a breach of ethics, 
professional misconduct, or retaliation by, or been the subject of a 
complaint to, any court, administrative agency, the Office of Special 
Counsel, an Inspector General, professional association, disciplinary 
committee, or other professional group?

    Legal discipline: No

    Breach of ethics: No

    Professional misconduct: No

    Retaliation: No

    Subject of a complaint: No

    If yes: (N/A--Nonapplicable for a-d)

  a.  Provide the name of the court, agency, association, committee, or 
        group.

  b.  Provide the date the citation, disciplinary action, complaint, or 
        personnel action was issued or initiated.

  c.  Describe the citation, disciplinary action, complaint, or 
        personnel action;

  d.  Provide the results of the citation, disciplinary action, 
        complaint, or personnel action.

    2. Have you ever been investigated, arrested, charged, or held by 
any Federal, State, or other law enforcement authority of any Federal, 
State, county, municipal, or foreign government entity, other than for 
a minor traffic offense?

    Yes, State of Virginia. Speeding ticket.
    If so, please explain: July 2008, Fairfax County, VA, speeding 
ticket on motorcycle. 55 mph in 25 mph zone. Misdemeanor reckless for 
speeding. Speeding ticket disposed of October 2008.
    3. Have you or any business or nonprofit of which you are or were 
an officer ever been involved as a party in an administrative agency 
proceeding, criminal proceeding, or civil litigation?
    No.
    If so, please explain. Not Applicable.
    4. Have you ever been convicted (including pleas of guilty or nolo 
contendere) of any criminal violation other than a minor traffic 
offense?
    Yes.
    If so, please explain. July 2008, speeding ticket, plea of quilty 
for speeding in Fairfax Country, VA ticket for misdemeanor speeding.
    5. Have you ever been accused, formally or informally, of sexual 
assault, sexual harassment, or discrimination on the basis of sex, 
race, religion, or any other basis?
    No.
    If so, please explain. Not Applicable.
    6. Please advise the Committee of any additional information, 
favorable or unfavorable, which you feel should be disclosed in 
connection with your nomination. None.
                     d. relationship with committee
    1. Will you ensure that your department/agency/commission/
corporation complies with deadlines for information set by 
congressional committees, and that your department/agency/commission/
corporation endeavors to timely comply with requests for information 
from individual Members of Congress, including requests from members in 
the minority? Yes.
    2. Will you ensure that your department/agency/commission/
corporation does whatever it can to protect congressional witnesses and 
whistleblowers from reprisal for their testimony and disclosures? Yes.
    3. Will you cooperate in providing the Committee with requested 
witnesses, including technical experts and career employees, with 
firsthand knowledge of matters of interest to the Committee? Yes.
    4. Are you willing to appear and testify before any duly 
constituted committee of the Congress on such occasions as you may be 
reasonably requested to do so? Yes.
                                 ______
                                 
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]
                                 
                                 ______
                                 
  Addendum to the questionnaire submitted to the Senate Committee on 
  Commerce, Science, and Transportation, 119th Congress by Timothy R. 
                                 Petty
    Part A, Q18--Please add the following presentations and panelist 
discussions:

    i. ``Using GIS in the Senate''--November 14, 2017--Library of 
Congress

    ii. ``Senior Federal Agency Water Officials Panel--Improving Inter-
agency Coordination for Water Supply Reliability''--December 13, 2019--
Colorado River Water Users Association

    iii. ``Plenary Session 4: Integrated Geospatial Platform and 
Services: Towards a Digital Economy''--January 13, 2020--GeoBuiz Summit

    iv. The Trump Water Subcabinet: ``Decisions Made at the Speed of 
Trust''--February 21, 2020--Family Farm Alliance Conference

    v. Rep. Dan Newhouse (R-WA) virtual roundtable on the Grand Coulee 
Dam--August 12, 2020

    Part A, Q21--Please add the following statements before Congress:

    i. March 14, 2018--House Appropriations Committee, Energy and Water 
Development, and Related Agencies Subcommittee Hearing on The F.Y. 2019 
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Bureau of Reclamation Budget

    ii. March 22, 2018--Senate Energy & Natural Resources Committee 
Hearing to Examine the 2018 Western Water Supply Outlook and Bills 
Related to Water Infrastructure and Drought Resiliency

    iii. April 12, 2018--House Committee on Natural Resources, 
Subcommittee on Water, Power, and Oceans Hearing on Examining the 
Proposed Fiscal Year 2019 Spending, Priorities and Missions of the 
Bureau of Reclamation and the Four Power Marketing Administrations

    iv. April 18, 2018--Senate Appropriations Committee, Subcommittee 
on Energy and Water Development Hearing on the FY2019 Budget Request 
for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers & Bureau of Reclamation

    v. March 27, 2019--(Incorrectly linked to Senate testimony in 
questionnaire) House Appropriations Committee, Subcommittee on Energy 
and Water Development Hearing on Army Corps of Engineers and Bureau of 
Reclamation Fiscal 2020 Budget Request

    vi. April 10, 2019--Senate Appropriations Committee, Subcommittee 
on Energy and Water Development Hearing on FY2020 Budget Requests for 
Army Corps of Engineers & Bureau of Reclamation

    vii. March 10, 2020 -House Appropriations Committee, Subcommittee 
on Energy and Water Development Hearing on U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 
and Bureau of Reclamation Budget Requests for FY2021

    viii. June 24, 2020--Senate Committee on Indian Affairs, 
Legislative Hearing to receive testimony on S. 2165, S. 2716, S. 2912, 
S. 3019, S. 3044, S. 3099 & S. 3100

    In Part A, Q20--Please add the following dormant LinkedIn account:

    1. https://www.linkedin.com/in/tim-petty-37770b4

    In Part A, Q10--Please add that I served as co-chair of the 
National Drought Resilience Partnership.

    Chairman Cruz. Thank you. President Trump has been vocal 
about restoring American maritime dominance. I think most 
Americans would be disturbed to learn that our ports are light 
years behind Europe and Asia in using automated technology. You 
only have to look at the supply chain snarls outside of 
California's ports from a few years ago to see how poorly our 
country did at moving cargo quickly from ship to shore.
    Mr. Carmel, why are American ports so archaic compared to 
their foreign counterparts?
    Mr. Carmel. Thank you, Senator. We are, no question about 
it, in terms of our ability to productivity, behind. There is a 
variety of reasons, some of which I was just not around for. 
The real issue, though, at the end of the day is using 
technology in a way that leverages labor, makes labor more 
productive, and allows us to compete at the level of foreign 
ports. We should use technology in a way that does not displace 
jobs. We should use technology in a way that enhances them and 
magnifies them so that workers can be productive. But at the 
end of the day it is productivity that we have to deal with.
    Chairman Cruz. Is the problem a lack of Federal spending or 
too much red tape and other factors?
    Mr. Carmel. I think it is a combination of both. 
Regulations certainly can get in the way, and I think that some 
of it is just inertia, I think, to be honest with you. So we 
have to ignite an innovation drive. I know that the SHIPS Act 
has innovation in it. I know that MARAD has the Maritime 
Innovation Center. Waterfront Workers has an innovation 
section. So there are three actual competing programs for 
innovation. We need to leverage them, make sure that they are 
used in a way that is synergistic and provide value rather than 
compete, and find ways to make our workforce productive, make 
sure that the workforce understands that the waterfront is a 
good place to have a long, productive career, a good place to 
raise families, and deal with it that way.
    Chairman Cruz. OK. Mr. Petty, NOAA reviews offshore oil and 
gas activities for compliance with NEPA, the Endangered Species 
Act, and the Marine Mammal Protection Act. Key regulations for 
the incidental take of marine mammals are set to expire in 
April 2026. The expiration of these regulations would curtail 
geophysical activities related to oil and gas exploration and 
production in the Gulf of America.
    If confirmed, will you ensure that these incidental take 
regulations are renewed by April 2026, to prevent any 
permitting delays?
    Mr. Petty. Chairman, thank you for that question. It is an 
important one, and we need to make sure that we have the focus 
on these areas of regulation. I look forward to getting into 
the department and looking specifically at all the priorities 
that are set, at what are coming due, that we can address them 
immediately. The President and the Administration, as well as 
the Secretary, has said that we need to focus on regulatory, 
making it focused and short, so that we can move things but do 
it right, and that is the commitment that I make, is making 
sure that the laws are met, that the regulations are quick and 
decisive and clear, moving forward.
    Chairman Cruz. Well, and I can certainly echo that it is 
the President's commitment and Secretary Lutnick's commitment 
to move swiftly and not to have permitting delays. So I trust 
that you, when confirmed, will implement a streamlining to 
ensure that permitting can move forward efficiently.
    How do you hope to streamline the environmental permitting 
process, beyond ensuring timely renewal of the incidental take 
regulations?
    Mr. Petty. Again, I look forward to getting in, if 
confirmed. But streamlining, I think, needs to be a partnership 
with not only the different agencies that have oversight, not 
only Commerce but Interior and other agencies, but they need to 
be looking at that not in a kind of a rail where it is what 
goes from one car to the next car to the next, but all tracks 
are parallel, working together. And I think we can do that with 
the technology of interacting with the resources of the 
regulatory so we can all be looking at them at the same time 
and moving things much more quickly versus the old method, 
which is when one packet is done it gets moved to another 
committee.
    Chairman Cruz. OK. And this last question is for our two 
Federal Maritime Commission nominees. The Federal Maritime 
Commission has a narrow mission--ensuring a competitive ocean 
transportation system. Mr. Harvey, Ms. DiBella, what are the 
statutory functions of the FMC, and will you commit, if 
confirmed, to staying within the bounds of your authority? Mr. 
Harvey, we will start with you.
    Mr. Harvey. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. The statutory 
commitments are to create, have a reliable ocean transportation 
system, I think that we would stay in our lane in terms of our 
jurisdiction, that we are there to review the agreements that 
are filed with our agency to assure that those are fair and 
reasonable and not anti-competitive. We also have an 
enforcement division, and I believe in regulation, to ensure 
that competitiveness and enforcement, when necessary, of those. 
And we have an adjudication process to make sure that all the 
players in the system can get their disputes resolved quickly. 
But I would look to stay in our lane, and I would hope to have 
marketplace solutions to these problems.
    Chairman Cruz. Ms. DiBella.
    Ms. DiBella. I echo Mr. Harvey's statement, all of it. And 
taking it a step further, we will work very collaboratively 
with other agency, like MARAD and Service Transportation Board, 
whomever would be involved with the matter at hand, in assuring 
that the whole system is being addressed. And I think that is 
the overarching, you know, outside the statutory 
responsibilities that we have. We are responsible for the 
entire system to be efficiently and competitive and also 
reliable.
    So that is really the crux of the conversation, you know, 
how do we do that, is addressing the business needs, either 
businesses that are operating here in the United States or 
those that are looking to operate here. And we are functioning 
as that authority that is responding to their inquiries, to 
their needs, and then taking action as appropriate.
    Chairman Cruz. Thank you. Ranking Member Cantwell.
    Senator Cantwell. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Lots of 
questions. I will try to get through as many of them as I can. 
Mr. Carmel, do you support the Jones Act?
    Mr. Carmel. Yes, Senator, I do.
    Senator Cantwell. Thank you, and thank you for your vision 
for a maritime nation. You and I had a chance to talk about 
many issues related to that shipbuilding financing. We did not 
spend as much time talking in my office, though, about 
workforce issues, so I want to bring up, what do you think we 
need to do to deal with the serious shortage? And clearly the 
Senate has been very concerned about sexual assault and sexual 
crime at sea, passing legislation reform, and looking for new 
leadership to make sure that the Academy is acquiring a 
workforce that is well aware of what the conduct should be.
    So if you have thoughts about what we should do there?
    Mr. Carmel. Thank you, Senator. Yes, one of the biggest 
things we have to do for the workforce of the future is ensure 
that the workforce understands the future will be there. It is 
very difficult to attract people into the industry if they are 
afraid that a year or two, the ship that they signed on is 
going to be gone, they are not going to have a job.
    So building a stable, credible maritime industry that can 
produce a ladder for a career path that is going to be around 
for a while, I think is one of the biggest things we have to 
do. We have to do a better job at educating the American 
student body about what is out there, that the maritime 
industry is just a good place for good jobs.
    And training programs. We tend to often focus straight on 
officers, like Kings Point, but ships do not run without 
unlicensed, as well. So we need to make sure that that pipeline 
is also operating the way it should. Full marks to the unions, 
the SIU, in particular, are very good at that sort of stuff, 
but we need to support them. I know that the SHIPS Act and, I 
think, the Waterfront Workers Act both have training money in 
there for that.
    In terms of King's Point, we have a long way to go to get 
King's Point fixed. No question about it.
    Senator Cantwell. You are referring to now on the sexual 
assault issues?
    Mr. Carmel. Yes, ma'am. And overall. Overall. You know, at 
the end of the day King's Point is an academic institution. We 
need to make sure that when both students and instructors walk 
through the gate to that place they are proud to be there. I 
think that has a lot to do with the attitude of people. I think 
that the discipline instilled in the regimental system could 
probably stand a little bit of tightening up, and I think that 
will help.
    But at the end of the day it is common sense. It is making 
sure that people treat each other with respect. That is not 
that hard of a concept. And I know it sounds stupid because we 
have had failures in the past, but we have to really hammer 
that home--at sea, at shore, period.
    Senator Cantwell. We will look for your leadership on that. 
Dr. Petty, if you could comment on support for PCSRF, stock 
assessments, and a NOAA Organic Act?
    Mr. Petty. Yes, Senator. Thank you for the question. First 
of all, stock assessment. That is a high priority for the 
Administration, along with the executive order that prioritizes 
the stock assessment. I look forward to working with now-
confirmed Under Secretary Neil Jacobs on specifically 
implementing and making sure we have the resources and 
personnel to get those stock assessments done.
    Senator Cantwell. OK. PCSRF you support?
    Mr. Petty. Yes.
    Senator Cantwell. NOAA Organic Act?
    Mr. Petty. Yes, absolutely, Senator. Looking forward to 
working with you on----
    Senator Cantwell. OK.
    Mr. Petty. Yep.
    Senator Cantwell. A little reverse approach than what 
Senator Cruz asked, you know, is we need the Federal Maritime 
Commission obviously working with the MARAD nominee here, to 
assure that both American consumers and American exporters are 
not taken advantage of. So Mr. Harvey, it was good to hear your 
detail of experience on the technology side. Mr. Carmel and I 
had a great conversation about blockchains and immutable 
manifests and great things that might help us accelerate our 
leadership position on supply chain issues.
    But you also mentioned unfair and deceptive practices, and 
that clearly was what was happening to us, and I do not think 
most Americans understand. We do not control shipping today. I 
mean, we control calling on our ports, but these are basically 
big international carriers that tried to dictate to us what 
business was going to be like. So thank God we passed a new law 
and gave more authority to the Commission.
    So what do you have in mind when you are looking at unfair 
and deceptive practices, again when we are going to try to 
build the maritime nation again under the leadership here that 
we are talking about? But we also have to show to the 
international community that is calling on our ports that we 
are going to be serious about unsubstantiated increases in 
rates, or practices where they are leaving us high and dry on 
the docks with our U.S. products.
    Mr. Harvey. Thank you. That is where the reviewing of the 
agreements, watching the alliances that operate to make sure 
that there are not anti-competitive practices, because it is a 
unique--I will use this word again--ecosystem in the maritime 
industry where there is very limited amount of providers and 
agreements that, on one hand, could be helpful to making the 
system more efficient and making capacity more available. But 
they are also very capable of becoming anti-competitive.
    Senator Cantwell. I just want to clarify. So you are not 
afraid to use that authority in ways when you see problems that 
exist?
    Mr. Harvey. No, ma'am.
    Senator Cantwell. OK.
    Mr. Harvey. And when I saw it in the securities industry, 
now regulation is an important part of what we do in 
rulemaking, but I would say that nothing gets an industry 
member's attention like an enforcement action, when that is 
necessary. I was on the other end of those, so I know when 
those get filed, it is attention getting, for sure.
    Senator Cantwell. Great. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. 
Chairman. I will have whatever comments you have on that, Ms. 
DiBella for the record. You have had more involvement in this, 
so I think we have some understanding of your record. Thank 
you.
    Ms. DiBella. Oh, sure. I appreciate that. Thank you very 
much. I would say, you know, that the carriers make the market, 
so it is a bit of a balance that we have to have with them. I 
appreciate their role in all of this. However, we do need to, 
and do, provide some good oversight. And I hope for additional 
transparency that relationship will, shall we say, improve and 
we will be able to have a more efficient system.
    Senator Cantwell. Thank you.
    Chairman Cruz. Thank you. Senator Fischer.

                STATEMENT OF HON. DEB FISCHER, 
                   U.S. SENATOR FROM NEBRASKA

    Senator Fischer. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Carmel, as 
you know there are three programs that ensure U.S. flagged 
vessels are available for the sealift: the Jones Act, Cargo 
Preference, and the Maritime Security Program. What importance 
do you put on those programs?
    Mr. Carmel. All three programs are critical to sustaining 
the fleet we have now. They are not, on their own, going to 
help us grow it, but they are critical to making sure we do not 
go backward.
    Senator Fischer. Do you have any ideas on ways that MARAD 
could possibly improve on those programs?
    Mr. Carmel. Those programs themselves do what they are 
intended to do. The Maritime Security Program, one of the 
problems with the Maritime Security Program that we 
experience--and it is actually, at the end of the day, it is 
also the Tanker Security Program, which is another one--rely on 
government preference cargo. At the end of the day it is not 
about ships. It is about cargo. Our whole industry is built on 
cargo. If we do not have enough cargo, how many ships we have 
is irrelevant. And so we need to do a better job of generating 
cargo.
    Now, for the Maritime Security Program and the Tanker 
Security Program we are talking about preference cargos. There 
is not enough of that around really to scale either program. So 
we also need to find ways to generate cargo that does not come 
from the American taxpayer. If we want the size of fleet that 
we are talking about, we are going to have to get our fleet 
back to carrying a nation's commerce, not just focused on the 
military.
    Senator Fischer. In any potential conflict, though, our 
sealift assets will be indispensable, so that we can take care 
of our forces, so that material can transit to the theater of 
operations. The Ready Reserve Force fleet is a key component of 
our sealift capability, but because of systemic underinvestment 
its readiness has suffered. Would you agree with that?
    Mr. Carmel. No question. Yes, ma'am.
    Senator Fischer. Great. Given your operational and your 
corporate experience, how can MARAD work better with industry 
to revive that Ready Reserve Force?
    Mr. Carmel. Well, there are two programs in place right 
now. One is, which is still being, I guess, working through the 
legislative process, which is building ships for the Ready 
Reserve Force. The other one is the buy used new ships. That 
puts a band-aid on a problem. That gets ships into the fleet 
relatively quickly. Like there are still ships that sit at the 
dock and do not really do anything.
    Senator Fischer. Do you think you would need any additional 
authorities to better execute that recapitalization of that 
force?
    Mr. Carmel. I would have to get in the building and 
understand what MARAD is doing on that now. But what we are 
doing right now is heading down the same path we have always 
headed down and got us to where we are today.
    Senator Fischer. Thank you, sir. The FMC has undertaken 
significant efforts to enhance port efficiency, and has taken a 
closer look at detention practices. The FMC can play a crucial 
role in improving port operations. Ms. DiBella and Mr. Harvey, 
if confirmed, what specific criteria will you prioritize to 
ensure agreements align with FMC standards and facilitate 
efficient freight movement overall?
    Ms. DiBella. Thank you for the question. In regards to 
detention and truly any matter, I think taking, once confirmed, 
and once I am able to be briefed fully on many of these issues, 
I believe, again going back to more transparency, understanding 
the realities of why certain cargo, certain containers are left 
and are resulting in such detention and demurrage charges, I 
think uncovering really where the inefficiencies are. You know, 
truly, and going back to what I had said before, looking at 
things systematically. Going back to the supply chain crisis, 
the issues at the waterfront were largely contributed to the 
interior.
    So it is truly taking a very comprehensive look at every 
aspect of the supply chain and understanding exactly where the 
issue is created, and taking action in that regard. It could be 
elsewhere. It could be maybe not in the interior. It could be 
far off in another, you know, 3,000 miles away in the ocean. 
But it is just really taking a very comprehensive look.
    Senator Fischer. Thank you. Mr. Harvey, anything to add?
    Mr. Harvey. Thank you, Senator. Just to add to that, I am 
an investor in technology for the state of Florida, and I want 
to ensure that regulations that are coming from the FMC 
encourage innovation. Some of these problems, especially in 
detention, can be solved, by, for instance, we invested in a 
last mile delivery entity, and that is multimodal. So it is the 
ship, the rail, the truck.
    So I think that if we can create fair and competitive 
markets, private capital is going to flow and help to solve 
some of these problems, whether it is fixing these types of 
problems or even the larger problems with port renovation and 
upgrading, which is a huge capital lift there that probably is 
not just for government alone.
    Senator Fischer. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
    Chairman Cruz. Thank you. Senator Moreno.

               STATEMENT OF HON. BERNIE MORENO, 
                     U.S. SENATOR FROM OHIO

    Senator Moreno. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and 
congratulations to all four of you for being nominated. I look 
forward to getting you confirmed quickly and expeditiously.
    Mr. Carmel, I will start with you. What is the state of our 
maritime industry in America? How would you assess that 
competitively? Are we in the top 10? Bottom 10? Middle of the 
pack?
    Mr. Carmel. Thank you, Senator. I appreciate that question 
a lot. It is something I lose sleep over all the time. I am not 
even sure we are on the scale.
    Senator Moreno. So the next question is, what happened, 
because that was not always the case? You go back to the 1940s, 
and we won World War II because we could produce a lot of 
ships. So what happened from then until now?
    Mr. Carmel. Yes, Senator, that is correct. Actually, 
though, as I mentioned in the opening, we have been fighting 
this for 150 years. The first stab at trying to repair a badly 
damaged Merchant Marine happened with the House Select 
Committee on the Merchant Marine in 1870, and we have been 
repeating cycles of this ever since. So we have had a long 
history of not getting it right.
    Now, to answer your question directly, that is true. We did 
a great job of cycling up for World War II because we had the 
industrial capacity to do it. Our Merchant Marine was in tough 
shape prior to that. Prior to World War I we had to cycle up, 
but we did it late. Most of the ships we built for the World 
War I surge were too late to be delivered to matter for the war 
effort.
    World War II we had to cycle up again. Interestingly 
enough, Mr. Kaiser was a dam builder, and is the one that built 
the ships. So we did a great job. But we knew how to build 
things then. That is the difference. We knew how to build 
things. Our industrial capacity had not rotted yet.
    After World War II--and by the way, there is a problem. 
Every time we do this, every time we cycle up, build a lot of 
stuff for a war, and then the war is over, then we are faced 
with what do we do with all these ships, and that creates a 
boom-and-bust cycle that is not healthy.
    But we let our industrial capacity rot again, except this 
time we let it rot too far, and I personally do not believe we 
could do that again. I do not believe we have the industrial 
capacity we need right now to be able to do that. And I think 
that it manifests itself all throughout the maritime industry, 
and in many ways it ripples out into our U.S. economy. It is 
imperative that in order to get the maritime industry right we 
need to fix the underlying maritime infrastructure and 
industrial capacity.
    At the end of the day, wealth of a country is not about how 
many dollars are in the bank. The wealth of a country is our 
capability to build our own future for tomorrow. And we have 
sacrificed that, and we need to get it back. Thank you.
    Senator Moreno. Perfect. I appreciate that, and obviously 
all of us can sense that is really a matter of national 
security.
    Mr. Harvey, there are obviously ports in Florida and Texas 
and the East Coast, the West Coast, although I do not hold my 
breath for new ports going into the West Coast with the current 
political environment. They may find a frog that may have 
passed by that land and prohibit any construction there. But 
there is a place called the Great Lakes. President Trump did 
not name them, so I do not want to get my Democratic colleagues 
upset, but they are a huge natural resource for this country. 
In Lake Erie we have the Port of Cleveland.
    Can you talk about what you are going to do to make certain 
that we revitalize the Great Lakes shipping industry?
    Mr. Harvey. Thank you, Senator. As I said in my opening, 
the Great Lakes region is a special place to me because that is 
where I grew up and actually watched sort of the 
deindustrialization of that part of the country. And I think 
there is no way to restore America's maritime dominance without 
restoring our industrial dominance.
    So I think we just have to be aware that everything that we 
do at the FMC in terms of rules, regulations, not only helps 
the international carriers, but really focuses also on what is 
happening on the Great Lakes.
    Senator Moreno. Because we compare the Port of Miami, for 
example----
    Mr. Harvey. Yes, sir.
    Senator Moreno.--where you have these monstrosity, giant 
cruise ships, you are not going to get a lot of industrial 
capacity there, nor would it be logistically feasible. But when 
you bring things into places like Cleveland, it is dramatically 
easier to feed our industrial base. And I just want to make 
sure we do not have a Florida-centric or Southern-centric view 
of this, that we understand how critical the Great Lakes are.
    So I want it to have a special place in your heart, but 
also in your mind and in your pocketbook, so that we are 
looking at the Great Lakes and refurbishing that. Do I have 
your commitment, both of you, Ms. DiBella, as well?
    Mr. Harvey. Yes.
    Ms. DiBella. My response to that? I would take the same 
approach that we did at the state level, when thinking about 
where the export needs are and perhaps ways that we could 
potentially help. You know, where are the bottlenecks in the 
system? Where is overregulation? Are there issues with Canada? 
Or trying to enhance the capabilities in and around that region 
that would utilize the resources that are there and the 
infrastructure that is there in order to export and also 
import. So I would say I believe there is a lot of agriculture 
that comes in and out of there that would support Middle 
America.
    So it is really examining the supply chain. You know, once 
again, what is dominating, from an import and export activity, 
and how can we help.
    Senator Moreno. Great. Maybe we will get you all to 
Cleveland after we confirm you.
    Ms. DiBella. That would be great.
    Senator Moreno. Just remember, Cleveland, on the Great 
Lakes, is much earlier than Minnesota.
    Chairman Cruz. Senator Rosen.

                STATEMENT OF HON. JACKY ROSEN, 
                    U.S. SENATOR FROM NEVADA

    Senator Rosen. Well, and I appreciate the great 10,000 
lakes in Minnesota and all the other Great Lakes. I do not have 
shipping lakes but I do have really great lakes in Lake Tahoe 
and Lake Mead, so I am just going to give them a shoutout, 
anyway, even though they may not be a subject of this. We have 
got good lakes all around our country.
    Thank you all to the witnesses for being here. Thank you, 
Mr. Chairman, for this hearing. I am going to talk about 
something that we all care about, every single day, when we 
wake up. The first thing you think about--well, after the 
coffee, of course--is what is the weather going to be today? 
How am I going to get to work? How am I going to drive? How am 
I going to get there? What am I going to wear?
    Over the last several years we have seen academic 
institutions, private companies incorporate machine learning, 
artificial intelligence into their weather and ocean 
forecasting products. For example, the Desert Research 
Institute in Nevada is improving wildfire smoke prediction 
emissions using machine learning algorithms.
    So Dr. Petty, what roles do you see machine learning or 
artificial intelligence playing in natural disaster, climate 
forecasting models, both as it relates to water management--we 
are on the water theme with all the lakes--but climate 
forecasting and modeling, water management, and NOAA's 
overarching mission, please?
    Mr. Petty. Yes, Senator. Right off the bat I think they are 
critical. I think that is where we need to be moving more 
toward expansion in that capability of technology, and being 
able to not only look at past history and the science to feed 
into these models and the technology for machine learning and 
artificial intelligence.
    Senator Rosen. That is great. And so we do know that these 
advancements are going to continue to be critical. So it is why 
I introduced the Smart Weather Forecasting for Water 
Management, Farming, and Ranching Act. It is going to carry out 
pilot projects for better sub-seasonal to seasonal forecasting, 
particularly for water management. It is a huge issue in our 
country--too much, too little.
    So, Dr. Petty, if confirmed, would you advocate for NOAA to 
invest and expand research on sub-seasonal to season 
forecasting?
    Mr. Petty. Senator, I look forward to getting into the 
building to really look at the priorities. But I probably will 
be able to confidently say that will be a high priority, from 
just listening to the hearing that Dr. Jacobs had with you 
about a month and a half ago.
    Senator Rosen. Please, I welcome you to our office to 
continue the conversation.
    Mr. Petty. I would enjoy that very much.
    Senator Rosen. Thank you. I am going to keep on weather a 
little bit, because NOAA Regional Climate Centers are key in 
collecting and distributing raw climate data to support 
decisionmakers as they grapple with extreme weather events that 
threaten health, safety, agriculture, infrastructure, travel. 
In Nevada, again, we are very thankful for our very own Desert 
Research Institute, which serves as one of only six Regional 
Climate Centers nationally.
    Dr. Petty, if confirmed, will you commit to supporting our 
Regional Climate Centers?
    Mr. Petty. Senator, I am actually very familiar with the 
Center in your great state. And so I look forward to, first of 
all, getting into the office, getting a complete review by the 
National Weather Service and their team, so that we can really 
look at the priorities, implementing new technologies, and the 
big part, which is the collaboration and making sure that 
transparency is getting to all the different communities that 
have to deal directly with weather.
    Senator Rosen. Thank you, and I am going to kind of stay on 
this because even though we do have our lakes and rivers, but 
we are a landlocked state, of course. But we often experience 
severe weather events that originate in the coastal areas of 
the Pacific--California, Oregon, Washington, right? So what do 
you see as some of the challenges that coastal and marine 
ecosystems are facing during these extreme weather events, and 
how do you think the Regional Climate Centers, do you have an 
opinion about how they might manage going forward, how we might 
help predict and really mitigate some of the impact?
    Mr. Petty. Yes, Senator. I think right off the bat the 
understanding of both the estuaries, the ecosystems that are 
not only coastal but inland, all of those play off of each 
other, and the importance of making sure that there is 
transparency and collaboration not only with the Federal 
Government but with the state governments, but then even more 
so, with my experience, is that all of the agencies are working 
together--Interior, Army Corps of Engineers, Department of 
Energy, as well as Commerce are all on the same page, working 
together.
    Senator Rosen. I am very interested, very pleased to hear 
that you are interested in collaborating with everyone. I do 
know that over 15 percent of NOAA's workforce has been slashed. 
That is really distressing to us, given the importance of these 
positions as far as researching, forecasting, communicating 
dangerous weather conditions.
    And so I guess I have a few seconds. You can just ask how 
will you ensure that you have enough staff to accurately 
predict, communicate weather information, do the important 
research that we rely on for so many sectors--like I said, 
agriculture, transportation, farming, you name it?
    Mr. Petty. Yes, Senator. Fully recognizing all of the other 
agencies that utilize NOAA's weather service is the important 
part. But for my part on prioritizing and maintaining, to 
ensuring that that research is focused, responsive, and looking 
for public needs of what they are specifically needing to 
address. So that will be my commitment to you on what we will 
work on with the staff within NOAA.
    Senator Rosen. Thank you. I appreciate it.
    Mr. Petty. Thank you, Senator.

                 STATEMENT OF HON. TODD YOUNG, 
                   U.S. SENATOR FROM INDIANA

    Senator Young [presiding]. Well, congratulations to all of 
you on your nomination. Mr. Carmel, I believe your nomination 
represents an important milestone for MARAD. Our country is 
just now waking up to an important situation that we put 
ourselves in regarding our capacity to build and operate ships 
here in America. As a Merchant Marine Academy graduate, one of 
the youngest captains of a commercial ship in recent history, 
and a senior executive in one of the world's largest shipping 
lines, you have unique experience and a perspective that you 
can bring to bear on the challenges we face, and a familiarity 
with the commercial industry that we desperately need at this 
time.
    The President has made building ships in America a 
priority, and I am glad that he has. I have bipartisan 
legislation with Senator Mark Kelly of Arizona, the SHIPS for 
America Act, that would set the conditions for restoring 
American dominance.
    Would you please give me your assessment, Mr. Carmel, of 
the state of commercial shipping, briefly, and shipbuilding in 
America, and how the SHIPS Act and the President's plan will 
get us back on the right track?
    Mr. Carmel. Thank you very much, Senator. That is a great 
question. The state of our shipping and shipbuilding industry 
is, starting with shipping, is basically on a lifeline. We do 
not carry our own commerce, flat out. A Merchant Marine is 
supposed to be for carrying the Nation's commerce, and we need 
to find a way to get back there. That, to me, is extremely 
important.
    In terms of shipbuilding, our shipbuilding industry is very 
narrowly focused on a very niche market. We are not even 
comparable to international scale shipbuilding. I know that the 
SHIPS Act says we cannot build ships at scale. I would go a 
step further and say that for ships that matter in 
international trade we cannot build them at all. We are just, 
simply, that capacity just does not exist here. It needs to be. 
We need to bring it back. I think the SHIPS Act is a great 
thing, because it addresses the pillars that we need to do, 
that the Executive Order gave us the vision of what needs to be 
done. The SHIPS Act gives us the levers and the resources to do 
it, and that is what is important. One of the reasons we failed 
over the years is instability. The SHIPS Act gives us that too.
    Senator Young. Well, thank you for that. Yes, the numbers 
are pretty disturbing. China has, the numbers vary, but roughly 
5,500 ships that can operate in ocean-level shipping. We have 
much less than that, 80, roughly. And we have the capacity--it 
is not to suggest we do--we have the capacity to build only 5 a 
year. So we need to up our game. The SHIPS Act would help us 
build 250 over the next 10.
    If you are confirmed, and I think you will be, you will 
play a key role in implementing the President's agenda, which 
you referenced. For MARAD, what are the key parts of that 
agenda, if you could quickly itemize them, that are necessary 
to restore our shipbuilding capacity, and if you could speak to 
how the SHIPS Act might fit into that picture, that would also 
be helpful?
    Mr. Carmel. Thank you, Senator. One is the financial 
framework and structure. The Maritime Trust Fund is a great 
start at that. So we need a financial structure. We need demand 
generation. We need to come up with a better way of finding 
something for our ships to do. We need workforce development. 
The SHIPS Act addresses all those things. We need innovation. 
Again, the SHIPS Act actually has areas that overlap, Workers 
on the Waterfront, or Waterfront Workers. There are areas that 
those areas can work together. Innovation is key to getting us 
out of where we are. So those things are just a few of the 
things that MARAD has the handle on, that can implement the 
SHIPS Act.
    Senator Young. Thank you, sir. With our roughly one minute 
left maybe you could paint a picture of what will happen if we 
do not pass the SHIPS Act? Will you still be able, in this new 
position, for which I expect you will be confirmed, will you 
still be able to implement the President's vision effectively?
    Mr. Carmel. The SHIPS Act is critical to being able to do 
it effectively and quickly. If the SHIPS Act is not passed, we 
will still work on that agenda. We will do what we can, 
assuming I get confirmed, to implement the vision. But it will 
go a lot slower, it will not be as robust, and most 
importantly, it will be fragile. We run the risk of doing what 
we have done in the past, start down a path and the whole thing 
falls apart. We need a way to make this permanent, so that it 
is codified and we do not go through a cycle of start and stop, 
and the SHIPS Act does that.
    Senator Young. Thank you, Mr. Carmel. Thank you, all of 
you. Senator Klobuchar, you are recognized for questions.

               STATEMENT OF HON. AMY KLOBUCHAR, 
                  U.S. SENATOR FROM MINNESOTA

    Senator Klobuchar. Thank you so much, Mr. Chair, and 
congratulations to all of you. You are tasked with 
strengthening our maritime industry, ensuring the U.S. 
maintains a resilient supply chain, protecting our water 
resources, and that, of course, includes the Great Lakes, so 
that is a lot on your shoulders.
    In 2022, Senator Thune and I passed the Ocean Shipping 
Reform Act, which strengthened oversight of ocean shipping, 
improved supply chain efficiency, and it has brought some 
meaningful results in terms of getting some lower rates, 
because we leveraged the power of that agency. The law 
basically tells the foreign-owned shipping alliances to do 
three things: charge fair rates, stop profiting off our backs, 
and fill your empty crates with American-made products. After 
we passed it, and I do not think it was because the rules had 
not even taken effect, but it was hanging out there, the 
shipping rates fell 85 percent in that year. There were a 
number of factors, but we were clearly serious when we passed a 
bill like that, that we were going to go farther if it did not 
get done.
    So I guess I would start with you, Ms. DiBella and Mr. 
Harvey. I told you about the bill, and if confirmed, will you 
commit to vigorously enforcing the Ocean Shipping Reform Act?
    Ms. DiBella. Yes, I will.
    Senator Klobuchar. Mr. Harvey.
    Mr. Harvey. Yes, ma'am. I think important compliance 
functions, investigations, and enforcement are critical, and 
that is probably why they got the message, but the message has 
to continue to be sent. So definitely.
    Senator Klobuchar. OK. The Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway 
System moves over 200 million tons of cargo each year. As Mr. 
Harvey, you mentioned in your testimony, the Great Lakes 
shipping industry supports tens of thousands of jobs directly, 
and is a vital economic engine for cities, towns, and people of 
the region. How will you make sure the FMC supports the needs 
of our inland seas, not just those on the coast?
    Mr. Harvey. Thank you for that question. I think that we 
will continue to do investigations like we have done with the 
Canada in the Ballast Water Regulations, and to make sure that 
American shippers and the lakers are not harmed. I think the 
FMC has been able to carve out some exemptions for some of 
that, but I think the battle goes on.
    Senator Klobuchar. OK.
    Mr. Harvey. Thank you.
    Senator Klobuchar. I guess I will turn to you, Mr. Carmel, 
and I would note the Duluth Port is an incredible place. What 
were you going to say?
    Mr. Carmel. It is. I have actually been to Duluth.
    Senator Klobuchar. Yes. Was it warm?
    Mr. Carmel. No, but----
    [Laughter.]
    Mr. Carmel. I was representing a paper company so I had to 
be there. Any time, you know.
    Senator Klobuchar. Well, of course, that is some of the 
shipping that goes on there, iron ore. I mean, it is kind of an 
incredible place, Duluth is----
    Mr. Carmel. It is.
    Senator Klobuchar.--that port, and we are working very hard 
on things, that I see Senator Sullivan, like icebreakers and 
other things that are necessary to keep that Great Lakes 
shipping lane strong and open. So along those lines, Mr. 
Carmel, when shippers are delayed by port congestion, inland 
freight bottlenecks, outdated infrastructure, products do not 
arrive on time, businesses suffer, costs go up. How will you 
work to strengthen maritime and multimodal supply chains, 
resilience, and efficiency?
    Mr. Carmel. Thank you, Senator. One of the problems that we 
had during the supply chain crisis was surge and stop, surge 
and stop. We need to have a stable demand, predictable demand. 
We need to be able to manage flows through our ports so that we 
do not have too much stuff trying to go at one time and then 
not enough stuff going at others. So that is across a number of 
activities. Certainly, I think we can use information better 
than we use now. That, to me, would be a big one.
    Senator Klobuchar. Very good. Thank you. And then, Mr. 
Petty, we care a lot about NOAA and weather in Minnesota. How 
do you plan to recruit qualified employees? We are obviously 
concerned. I will ask you two separate questions, because my 
time is running out here. And then also, could you look into 
the Minnesota Sea Grant? It is a research and education program 
that supports fisheries, tourism. I mentioned the Great Lakes 
but we also, as Senator Rosen mentioned, we have 15,000 lakes, 
and that is just 10,000 like on our license plates. And could 
you talk about both of those things?
    Mr. Petty. Yes, Senator. Thank you. Lots of good questions, 
and in your Sea Grant question, as well. I do look forward to 
getting into the department and taking a look at that. I know 
specifically there are the priority areas. But that partnership 
and that collaboration that can take place with institutions, 
researchers, play a vital part within NOAA, and I look forward 
to working with you so that we can continue that collaboration.
    With regards to the other areas of the National Weather 
Service, the importance of staff, it really gets back to making 
sure that the priorities with what the mission calls for, 
within health and safety and resources within NOAA, and we are 
delivering the technical and the advanced science so that 
decisions can be made by multiple agencies and states and 
resources.
    Senator Klobuchar. And then you can just look into this 
later, but the Great Lakes Restorative Initiative. This is in 
Representative Stauber's district, Lake Superior, the 
surrounding things. Always been bipartisan. You just heard from 
some of the Great Lakes Senators on the Republican side, so 
please keep that going strong.
    Mr. Petty. Thank you, Senator. I sure will. Thank you.
    Senator Klobuchar. Thank you.

                STATEMENT OF HON. DAN SULLIVAN, 
                    U.S. SENATOR FROM ALASKA

    Senator Sullivan. Thank you, Senator Klobuchar, and I am 
always reminded, you know, we have a little competition, 
friendly competition with my friend from Minnesota and other 
states. When she talks about Minnesota's 10,000 lakes or 15,000 
lakes, I like to remind people that we have over 3 million 
lakes in Alaska.
    [Laughter.]
    Senator Sullivan. It is by a magnitude of----
    Senator Klobuchar. With most of them constantly frozen.
    Senator Sullivan. That is true, but 3 million lakes. So I 
just want you to remember that. Maybe we will put that on our 
license plate too someday.
    But I want to thank everybody. These are really important 
positions, and I want to begin by covering an executive order 
that President Trump issued on day one of his Administration. 
It is called ``Unleashing Alaska's Extraordinary Resource 
Potential.'' Very long. There is the President's signature. We 
are the only state in the union that has got our own executive 
order from this Administration. And it says that ``It is the 
policy of the United States to fully avail itself of Alaska's 
vast lands and resources for the benefit of the Nation and the 
American citizens who call Alaska home.''
    So I want to begin by getting from all the witnesses, a 
commitment, if confirmed, and I think you are going to get 
confirmed, to come up to Alaska soon, after your confirmation, 
to see this extraordinary resource potential. You can come in 
the winter when it is cold, or the summer, to do some fishing. 
But can I get your commitment? We will start with you, Dr. 
Carmel.
    Mr. Carmel. Thank you, Senator. Actually, I look forward to 
going back to Alaska. I have been there many times, and I would 
love to come back. Thank you, sir.
    Senator Sullivan. Great.
    Ms. DiBella. I echo that. I have been there once on a 
layover, a very brief layover, and I would like to be back for 
a lot longer.
    Senator Sullivan. Great.
    Mr. Harvey. Sir, I agree to support that. I have been to 
Alaska with my wife, fishing the Kenai and other great areas in 
the state, and we love it.
    Senator Sullivan. Great. Dr. Petty?
    Mr. Petty. Absolutely.
    Senator Sullivan. You are a UAF grad----
    Mr. Petty. That is correct.
    Senator Sullivan.--so we are very proud of you. I think you 
might be the first UAF grad to hold this position. We have got 
to double-check that. So we are excited for you to get back to 
Alaska.
    Mr. Petty. Excellent.
    Senator Sullivan. Great. One of the elements of this 
executive order, and you are already hearing it a lot, is the 
EO directs Federal agencies to streamline permitting and 
accelerate approvals of critical infrastructure projects in 
Alaska. And yet, we continue to see lengthy and unnecessary 
delays.
    Let me give you one. It is kind of MARAD and NPIAS. It is a 
MARAD grant for the Port of Adak, which we are going to be 
doing a lot with. We have, in the defense bill, starting to 
work to reopen the military base in Adak, out on the Aleutian 
Island chain. Very strategic, but also important for fisheries. 
This grant, the MARAD grant, has been stalled for months while 
NPIAS completes its biological opinion.
    Formal consultations began in June, but NPIAS did not 
consider the application until late July. It has since 
reassigned staff to start all over again, has told the people 
of Adak that maybe they will get it out by December, maybe it 
will slip to next year because of Federal Register timing.
    Dr. Petty, this is, my view, classic deep state. No 
offense. You know, I like all my constituents, but there are a 
lot of Federal employees who would love to slow-roll everything 
in Alaska. The President of the United States said, ``Enough. 
We are done doing that, in Alaska, especially.''
    So I need your commitment, if confirmed, and you are going 
to get confirmed--I am a strong supporter of yours--to kind of 
give NPIAS a little bit of a kick in the behind, saying we are 
not doing this anymore. The Biden years of delaying, crushing 
projects in Alaska, because far-left environmental groups 
wanted that, they are over. Can you commit to me to get a 
culture of accountability and urgency with permitting offices 
throughout NOAA, if confirmed?
    Mr. Petty. Senator, simply, yes, I look forward to it.
    Senator Sullivan. And that one, in particular, but all the 
other ones, as well?
    Mr. Petty. Yes, sir.
    Senator Sullivan. No more delays. We are not doing 7-year 
permits anymore, 8-year permits.
    Mr. Petty. Or longer.
    Senator Sullivan. It is ridiculous. Killing the country. 
And it particularly kills my state, which is why the President, 
on day one, said, ``We are done with trying to crush Alaska, 
Federal agencies. You are going to move forward.'' So we need 
that leadership. I appreciate that.
    Let me turn to another executive order, again from the 
Trump administration. This is ``Restoring American Seafood 
Competitiveness.'' I think Secretary Lutnick is off to a great 
start. We had the Seafood Roundtable that we talked about 
recently, with all the congressional delegation, Alaska 
stakeholders. We have Administrator Jacobs. You know, my state, 
again, is the superpower of seafood. Over two-thirds of all 
seafood harvested in America--subsistence, sport, commercial--
comes from Alaska. Almost $2 billion of that is exported. 
Almost $16 billion is contributed to the U.S. economy from 
Alaska's seafood industry, 1.6 million jobs nationwide.
    But you have heard it from Senator Cantwell. Unlike a lot 
of industries in America, the CHIPS Act, look, all these 
computer chip companies get a quarter of a trillion dollars in 
subsidies. Our seafood industry needs two things from the 
Federal Government--surveys and timely promulgation of 
regulations to open fisheries. That is it, and that is under 
you. And the surveys have not been going well.
    Can I get your commitment to get us back to the gold 
standard of serious surveys, but doing it in a way in which it 
is prioritized, and again, in a way in which it is promoted in 
the President's executive order on seafood competitiveness, in 
addition to his executive order on Alaska?
    Mr. Petty. Well, Senator, I know you have that executive 
order memorized, and so----
    Senator Sullivan. And I want you to have it memorized.
    Mr. Petty. That is right. I am sure you do.
    Senator Sullivan. Both of them, actually.
    Mr. Petty. I look forward to working specifically with you 
and your outstanding staff, who have incredible knowledge. So 
yes, looking forward to each one of those items.
    Senator Sullivan. Let me just get to one final one, and I 
am going to turn it over to Senator Peters. Dr. Carmel, I think 
you and I are meeting later today in my office, so I am looking 
forward to that. I have a whole bunch of questions for you and 
others for the record.
    But it goes to NOAA's budget that we need to get out here 
soon, their spend plan that includes, my understanding is to 
approve NOAA and OMB fishery disaster declarations and funds 
for the 2022 Yukon salmon, 2021 Upper Cook Inlet, and 2022 
Kuskokwim salmon. Can you assure me that your first order of 
business will be the approval of these disaster funds and the 
recovery resources necessary?
    Mr. Carmel. Senator, I look forward to getting into the 
building and doing just that. I think even already confirming 
Dr. Jacobs and him watching today and hearing it loud and 
clear. So I look forward to working with you to move those 
areas that you have highlighted forward, whether it is the 
research gaps that are missing, and even those surveys, as 
well.
    Senator Sullivan. And we are going to do a lot together, as 
you and I talked about in my office yesterday, on the salmon 
challenges that we have.
    Mr. Carmel. Yes, sir.
    Senator Sullivan. Some of our salmon runs in Alaska are 
doing great, sockeye salmon run in Bristol Bay. Some are doing 
horrible, the King Run on the Yukon and the Kuskokwim. Very 
important to my constituents. Our legislation addresses that, 
but we have huge research gaps that we need to figure out and 
address. So I appreciate your commitment on that.
    I will have some more questions for the record for the 
other witnesses. Thank you.
    And I am now going to turn the entire hearing over to my 
Democratic colleagues. I hope they do not undertake some kind 
of coup on the Commerce Committee. So with that, Senator 
Markey, I think, or maybe Senator Peters. I am sorry. Senator 
Peters.

                STATEMENT OF HON. GARY PETERS, 
                   U.S. SENATOR FROM MICHIGAN

    Senator Peters [presiding]. Yes, thank you, Senator 
Sullivan. Where is that gavel? You want to bring it right down 
here.
    Senator Sullivan. Now don't hold it for long.
    Senator Peters. Oh, you have got it right there. Senator 
Markey has it already. We are ready to roll. We are ready to 
roll.
    Senator Markey. You can go whenever you want.
    Senator Peters. Trust us. Don't worry. Well, welcome to 
each of you. Welcome and congratulations on your nominations.
    Mr. Carmel, I would like to start with a topic that I 
raised with Secretary Duffy at his nomination hearing, ensuring 
both robust investment in our port infrastructure and the fair 
distribution across all regions in the country. As I am sure 
you know, MARAD Port Infrastructure Development Program 
supports much needed investments in safety, efficiency, as well 
as reliability of our Nation's ports. This sort of an 
investment is absolutely essential to ensuring that our 
manufacturers stay competitive and that the goods are reliably 
delivered to consumers across the Midwest but also all across 
the entire nation.
    Program funding that has gone to our Great Lakes ports has 
provided a major boost, but that funding has been hard to come 
by, with the Great Lakes ports receiving as little as two 
percent of the funds in the past years. As a matter of fact, 
the Gulf ports have not gotten a fair shake either--it is not 
just Great Lakes--which is why my legislation to fix this 
funding disparity is cosponsored by Senators Wicker and Cornyn, 
along with my fellow Great Lakes colleagues, Senators Baldwin, 
Young, Duckworth, and Moreno. All bipartisan support for these.
    This funding disparity is simply unacceptable, and when I 
raised this issue with Secretary Duffy, to his credit he fully 
agreed that it is unacceptable. And he committed to work with 
me to ensure robust and fair funding for Great Lakes ports 
going forward.
    So Mr. Carmel, do you commit to the same? Specifically, if 
confirmed, one, will you support robust funding for our ports 
through the Port Infrastructure Development Program?
    Mr. Carmel. Thank you, Senator. If I am given the honor of 
being confirmed, I look forward to working with you to advance 
that agenda. Yes, sir.
    Senator Peters. Would you work to ensure the funding is 
distributed fairly, so that our Great Lakes, as well as Gulf 
ports, are not left at a competitive disadvantage, and will you 
commit to awarding those grants so that critical ongoing 
investments can proceed?
    Mr. Carmel. I would need to get in the building. I am not 
that familiar with the PDIP program at all. I have never worked 
in it. But I would commit to working with you to make sure it 
is administered fairly and effectively.
    Senator Peters. So you would fully support fair funding, 
making sure Gulf and Great Lakes ports, and you understand the 
importance of those to our Nation's economy?
    Mr. Carmel. Oh, absolutely. I have been in and out of Great 
Lakes ports most of my sailing career, and I understand deeply 
the importance of the Great Lakes ports to the heartland 
manufacturing. So, yes.
    Senator Peters. Great, especially overtaxed ports on the 
coast, the East Coast, coming up the St. Lawrence Seaway and 
into the Great Lakes can create a lot of opportunities for 
further efficient movement of goods.
    Mr. Carmel. Yes.
    Senator Peters. Good. Mr. Petty, my next question is for 
you. Harmful algal blooms pose a serious risk to water quality, 
tourism, as well as public health in the Great Lakes. To give 
you a sense of just how devastating these outbreaks can be, a 
toxic algal bloom in Lake Erie left residents in Toledo without 
safe drinking water for three full days recently. NOAA's 
research and forecasting capabilities are absolutely essential 
for early detection or mitigation strategies and long-term 
solutions that will protect our communities as well as our 
ecosystems from future outbreaks.
    However, despite unwavering--once again, unwavering--
bipartisan support for these activities here in Congress, this 
Administration has sought drastic cuts to NOAA that would 
jeopardize this critical mission.
    So Mr. Petty, if confirmed, how will you ensure that NOAA 
can support and meet the growing needs for harmful algal bloom 
detection and forecasting to ensure safe, clean water for Great 
Lakes communities, agriculture, and industry? As you well know, 
millions and millions of people rely every day on water from 
the Great Lakes to drink, and for these other three key 
functions. And as part of your answer, could you speak to the 
importance of having sufficient staff and funding at NOAA to be 
able to carry out these important activities?
    Mr. Petty. Yes, Senator. Thank you for that question. HABs 
is an issue that needs to be fully addressed in many ways. The 
commitment that I will make, for sure, is that we are getting 
the best available science for those areas to address these 
HABs issues. It is not only Great Lakes but it is multiple 
areas up and down our coastal states, as well as the 
relationship that we have with other agencies that also get 
resources and funding specifically. That is the area that is 
the priority, of making sure that all the different agencies--
Army Corps, Interior--have the resources that they need to 
directly address these HABs issues, including the Department of 
Agriculture.
    Senator Peters. So in terms of staff at NOAA, if there are 
shortfalls you will be an aggressive advocate to make sure you 
have the resources and the people----
    Mr. Petty. Correct.
    Senator Peters.--to actually do that work?
    Mr. Petty. Yes. Looking forward to being able to get into 
the building and making sure that the priorities and that we 
have all the critical staff to meet the mission that you have 
set forth.
    Senator Peters. Very good. Well, thank you.
    I now turn the floor over to Senator Markey, who will also 
have the exclusive control of the gavel at this point.

               STATEMENT OF HON. EDWARD MARKEY, 
                U.S. SENATOR FROM MASSACHUSETTS

    Senator Markey [presiding]. So I hope you packed a lunch.
    [Laughter.]
    Senator Markey. Thank you, Senator Peters. Seaport projects 
create good-paying union jobs for Americans and develop 
infrastructure that lasts for decades. These projects take 
years of expensive planning, but they bring huge economic 
benefits to both blue and red states.
    If confirmed, Mr. Carmel, you would be in charge of the 
Port Infrastructure Development Program, and this is an 
incredibly important program. It delivers major support for the 
ports that keep our Nation running.
    But in August of this year, the Trump administration 
arbitrarily canceled millions of dollars of grants under this 
program, pulling the rug out from port projects that were 
construction ready. Ports across America now cannot trust the 
Federal Government to support port projects based on the merits 
because they are getting canceled based on politics, Mr. 
Carmel.
    Mr. Carmel, do you believe that arbitrary and sudden 
cancellations of Port Infrastructure Development grants 
decrease trust between ports and Maritime Administration?
    Mr. Carmel. Thank you, Senator. I am not familiar with the 
situation that you are talking about. Again, I am not familiar 
at all with the PDIP program, other than I know it exists. I 
have never worked in it. I would need to get into the building 
to understand what happened and why, and I can commit to you to 
working with you to sort things out. I can tell you that as a 
general rule, stability is important to our industry.
    Senator Markey. Well, we agree with that, and our MARAD 
Administration will have to grapple with the fact that right 
now our ports can no longer trust this Administration to keep 
its word and protect their workers or their investments to have 
stability. It just does not exist. It is a highly unstable 
environment.
    So Mr. Carmel, do you believe it is appropriate for the 
Administration to kill American maritime and construction jobs 
by canceling grant awards for political reasons?
    Mr. Carmel. Senator, I was not here then. I do not 
understand what happened. I would actually need to get into the 
building and sit with the Maritime Administration staff to 
understand what happened, to be able to give you an answer to 
the question.
    Senator Markey. Well, I do not think it is appropriate. I 
do not think the 800 union workers in Massachusetts who are not 
getting a paycheck, thanks to the Trump administration, think 
it is appropriate either. It is just arbitrary, it is 
capricious, it is political. That is what is happening to 800 
people now without a job.
    Mr. Carmel, if confirmed, would you work to restore Port 
Infrastructure Development Program grants that were canceled 
despite the fact that the projects met all the terms of their 
grant agreements?
    Mr. Carmel. Thank you, sir. And again, if I am given the 
honor of confirmation I can commit to trying to understand the 
situation. I was not there. I do not understand what happened. 
And without having the facts I really am not in a position to 
give an answer, other than to say I would commit to learning 
about it.
    Senator Markey. Well, if we play politics with nonpartisan 
port infrastructure grants it sets a terrible, but a powerful 
precedent for administrations to come, that they can just move 
in politically and kill projects because they come under the 
control of Democratic states, or in the future, Republican 
states, and that is just a terrible precedent to be set in the 
first 10 months of the Trump administration. Because it makes 
it very difficult to work on a bipartisan basis in Congress to 
support these agencies, because you are not sure that what you 
reach as an agreement is going to, in fact, be upheld, and be 
agreed to.
    The great humorist, Oscar Levant, used to have a joke that 
covered this subject. It covers the era in which we are now 
working, which was he would say, ``We will double-cross that 
bridge when we get to it.'' So you reach an agreement, think 
everything is great, and then down the line, on a partisan 
basis, the Democratic projects get cut and the Republicans do 
not. So it just makes it harder, a lot harder for all of us to 
be able to operate in a world in which your word is your bond, 
that you get the benefit of the bargain that you gave, and in 
return you got for your home state.
    But that whole era is now increasingly being viewed in a 
rear-view mirror, because these are not hypothetical questions. 
These attacks already happened, taking paychecks out of 
workers' pockets and taking investment out of portside 
communities, and it is just unacceptable that the Trump 
administration is punishing communities just because they did 
not vote for him in 2024. It is just absolutely a destruction 
of the bipartisan construct of the U.S. Congress.
    Mr. Carmel, the Trump administration has told the country 
we are experiencing, quote, ``an energy emergency,'' yet this 
Administration is trying to kill offshore wind projects, 
destroy union jobs, and keep megawatts of clean power off the 
grid. Mr. Carmel, yes or no. Do you believe that the offshore 
wind industry can contribute to the development of American 
ports and American shipping, create more American jobs, and 
also provide more megawatts for the grid?
    Mr. Carmel. Again, I was not involved in any of those 
discussions. I was not there. Energy policy is outside of my 
area of expertise. So I would need to get in the building to 
understand the issues and where MARAD intersects with them, to 
be able to give you an answer.
    Senator Markey. Well, you do not have to go in that 
building to know that electricity prices have gone up 10 
percent since Donald Trump was sworn in this year, 10 percent. 
That is on the front page of newspapers across the country. 
That is dramatic what is happening.
    Mr. Carmel, do you agree that it is not in the national 
interest to raise energy prices for households in the United 
States?
    Mr. Carmel. Again, Senator, energy policy, in general, is 
just not my swim lane. And so I am not qualified to answer the 
question.
    Senator Markey. Well, ultimately all of these coastal 
decisions are going to have an incredible impact on the 
electricity rates for families in our country. It is now 
increasing at triple the rate of inflation, and a lot of it is 
due to the energy policy of the Trump administration, the 
cancellation of offshore wind projects, and then the ripple 
effect that it has upon the electricity rates for everyone else 
within those communities that have been now denied those extra 
megawatts, that have been turned into nega-watts that just do 
not exist.
    Well, in addition to Trump administration's attacks on 
American-made wind industry, another driver of rising costs is 
the surge in fossil fuel exports. As Administrator of MARAD, 
you would be directly responsible for making sure that deep-
water export terminals do not receive permits if they are not 
in the national interest or consistent with national policy 
goals and objectives, including national security, energy 
sufficiency domestically, and environmental quality 
domestically.
    As you review these export terminal permits, I urge you to 
prioritize lower domestic costs, environmental protection over 
the higher profits for oil and gas companies. And I urge you to 
do that, sir. It is an important part of your responsibility.
    And I would say, as now we are exporting upwards of 15 
percent of all of our natural gas overseas, the companies get a 
bigger price for it, once it hits the open market, and get it 
in the ship and get it off our shore. But it has a dramatic 
impact on the price of natural gas here, where the remaining 
natural gas becomes much more expensive, because you have 
reduced it by 15 percent to sell it overseas. That then impacts 
small businesses. It impacts consumers all across our Nation.
    Dr. Petty, two questions to you. Because of DOGE and Trump 
we are losing invaluable research in fisheries expertise 
throughout the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 
Dr. Petty, do you agree to support the Northeast Fisheries 
Science Center and the important work that it does, if you are 
confirmed?
    Mr. Petty. Senator, thank you. It is an important question. 
For sure, with NOAA fisheries, the whole northeastern part of 
the Atlantic and the fisheries aspect, we have great staff up 
there that are doing amazing work in jobs up there. My priority 
is to making sure that they continue to do their work and that 
they are doing it with all the resources that they have 
available to them.
    Senator Markey. Do you agree that it is critical to protect 
the NOAA scientists so that they can continue their work on 
fisheries issues?
    Mr. Petty. Senator, I take seriously the scientific 
integrity of making sure that we are providing the best 
available science and that the scientists have the resources 
that they have to make sure that they get their work done, that 
Congress has given them direct mission to do.
    Senator Markey. Well, I would invite you to come to visit 
important NOAA facilities in Massachusetts----
    Mr. Petty. I look forward to that.
    Senator Markey.--if you are confirmed.
    Mr. Petty. Yes. Thank you, Senator. I appreciate that.
    Senator Markey. We would look forward to that.
    So Mr. Carmel, Ms. DiBella, Mr. Harvey, Dr. Petty, my final 
question is required of all nominees. If confirmed, do you 
pledge to work collaboratively with this Committee to provide 
thorough and timely responses to the Committee's requests and 
to appear before the Committee when requested?
    Mr. Carmel. Yes, Senator, I do.
    Ms. DiBella. Yes, Senator. You have my word.
    Mr. Harvey. Yes, sir.
    Mr. Petty. Yes, Senator.
    Senator Markey. Thank you. So I have 16 letters of support 
from various organizations for Mr. Carmel's, Ms. DiBella's, and 
Dr. Petty's nominations, and I ask unanimous consent to have 
those letters inserted in the hearing record. Without 
objection, so ordered.
    [The information referred to follows:]

                       National Water Resources Association
                                                   October 20, 2025

Hon. Ted Cruz,
Chairman,
Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee,
Washington, DC.
Hon. Maria Cantwell,
Ranking Member
Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee,
Washington, DC.

Dear Chairman Cruz and Ranking Member Cantwell:

    On behalf of the National Water Resources Association (NWRA), I 
want to express our strong support for the nomination of Dr. Tim Petty 
to serve as the Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and 
Atmosphere (NOAA).
    NWRA is a nonprofit federation of state water resources 
associations, regional associations, agriculture and municipal water 
agencies, and industrial water groups. Our members provide water and 
hydropower to approximately 50 million individuals, families, 
agricultural producers and other industries that support our 
communities large and small, our economy and environment.
    Dr. Petty is a devoted public servant who will bring extensive 
experience and proven leadership in natural resource management to this 
position. Having previously served as Assistant Secretary for Water and 
Science at the Department of Interior, NWRA witnessed firsthand his 
effective leadership in managing water development, regulatory 
responsibilities, and policy initiatives essential to the sustainable 
management of the Nation's water resources. NWRA has also worked 
closely with Dr. Petty in his most recent role as a Professional Staff 
Member on the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee's Water 
Resources and Environment Subcommittee, where he applied his expertise 
to legislative and oversight matters concerning water infrastructure 
and hazardous waste management.
    Dr. Petty's years of experience have allowed him to build a strong 
network across the natural resources community, where collaboration is 
essential to shaping coastal and ocean management, resilience, and 
fisheries policy. His ability to connect policy with practical 
solutions, combined with his commitment to public service, positions 
him well to lead efforts that strengthen our natural resources and the 
communities that rely on them.
    The NWRA confidently endorses the appointment of Dr. Tim Petty for 
Assistant Secretary of NOAA. His experience and leadership will 
strengthen the agency's work and help advance its mission.
    Thank you for considering our views on this important nomination. 
Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or 
require additional information.
            Sincerely,
                                             Greg Morrison,
                                          Executive Vice President,
                                  National Water Resources Association.
                                 ______
                                 
                                Modesto Irrigation District
                                Turlock Irrigation District
                                                    October 6, 2025

Honorable Ted Cruz,
Chairman
Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
Hon. Maria Cantwell,
Ranking Member,
Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.

Dear Chairman Cruz, Ranking Member Cantwell, and Members of the 
            Committee:

    On behalf of the Modesto Irrigation District (MID) and Turlock 
Irrigation District (TID), we are pleased to express support for Dr. 
Timothy Petty as the nominee for Assistant Secretary for Oceans and 
Atmosphere at the U.S. Department of Commerce.
    The Assistant Secretary for Oceans and Atmosphere plays an 
important role providing accountable oversight to NOAA Fisheries 
including implementation of the Endangered Species Act (ESA). These 
responsibilities directly affect the availability and affordability of 
water and power for our customers, and we are confident Dr. Petty has 
the experience and skill to find balanced solutions that protect 
species and our local communities at the same time.
    We have worked with Dr. Petty on numerous Western water issues and 
have found him to be a principled leader with a deep understanding of 
the challenges faced by agricultural communities and water users. His 
prior service as Assistant Secretary for Water and Science at the 
Department of the Interior and as Congressional staff in the House and 
Senate demonstrates his capability and commitment to pursuing durable, 
science-based solutions to challenging water resources issues.
    In his previous role, he has also led interagency efforts such as 
the Water Subcabinet and the National Drought Resilience Partnership, 
promoting coordination and innovation in water resource management.
    We are confident that Dr. Petty will bring practical experience, 
collaborative spirit, and scientific integrity to this role. His 
appointment would benefit both Federal fisheries management and the 
agricultural communities that depend on sound policy. We strongly 
support this nomination and strongly urge the Committee and the full 
Senate to quickly approve Dr. Tim Petty's nomination.
            Sincerely,
                                              Jimi Netniss,
                                                   General Manager,
                                           Modesto Irrigation District.
                                                Brad Koehn,
                                                   General Manager,
                                           Turlock Irrigation District.
                                 ______
                                 
                            American Farm Bureau Federation
                                                    October 9, 2025

Hon. Ted Cruz,
Chairman,
U.S. Senate,
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
Hon. Maria Cantwell,
Ranking Member,
U.S. Senate,
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.

Dear Chairman Cruz and Ranking Member Cantwell:

    The American Farm Bureau Federation writes in support of the 
nomination of Dr. Timothy Petty to serve as Assistant Secretary of 
Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere and urges the Senate Committee on 
Commerce, Science, and Transportation to swiftly approve his 
nomination. AFBF is our Nation's largest general farm organization, 
working together to build a sustainable future of safe and abundant 
food, fiber, timber and renewable fuel for our Nation and the world.
    Dr. Petty is a dedicated public servant with decades of experience 
serving our Nation as senior staff on Capitol Hill and at the 
Department of the Interior. He also has a significant scientific 
background as a geologist and hydrogeologist who earned a Ph.D. 
studying surface hydrology. Dr. Petty is from Indiana and grew up on a 
family farm and, therefore, understands the opportunities and 
challenges facing our Nation's farmers. He has a unique and varied 
background and set of experiences that has prepared him for this next 
challenge.
    We look forward to Dr. Petty's work at the department and his focus 
on responding to the needs of the American people, especially farmers, 
ranchers and landowners. Thank you for your attention to this important 
matter and for your commitment to serving our Nation's farmers and 
rural communities.
            Sincerely,
                                              Zippy Duvall,
                                                         President.
                                 ______
                                 
                   San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority
                                   Sacramento, CA, October 20, 2025

Hon. Ted Cruz,
Chairman,
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
United States Senate,
Washington, DC.
Hon. Maria Cantwell,
Ranking Member,
Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation,
United States Senate,
Washington, DC.

Submitted via e-mail

Re: Support for the Nomination of Dr. Tim Petty as Assistant Secretary 
            for Oceans and Atmosphere

Dear Chairman Cruz, Ranking Member Cantwell, and Committee Members,

    The San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority (``Water Authority'') 
is pleased to strongly endorse Dr. Timothy Petty as the next Assistant 
Secretary for Oceans and Atmosphere at the U.S. Department of Commerce.
    The Water Authority is a public agency in California, comprised of 
twenty-seven member agencies, and was formed in 1992 as a joint powers 
authority. Twenty-five of these agencies contract with the United 
States for the delivery of water from the Federal Central Valley 
Project (``CVP''). The CVP is operated and managed by the United States 
Bureau of Reclamation. The Water Authority acts as the operation and 
maintenance entity for the CVP's Delta Division and south-of-Delta 
facilities that the Water Authority's member agencies depend on for the 
delivery of their water supply.
    Most of the Water Authority's member agencies depend upon the CVP 
as the principal source of water they provide to users within their 
service areas. That water supply serves approximately 1.2 million acres 
of California agricultural lands within areas of San Joaquin, 
Stanislaus, Merced, Fresno, Kings, San Benito, and Santa Clara 
Counties; a portion of the water supply for over 2 million people, 
including in urban areas such as Silicon Valley in the San Francisco 
Bay Area; and approximately 200,000 acres of managed wetlands and 
wildlife refuges within the largest continuous wetland in the western 
United States. Importantly, the San Joaquin Valley in California, 
served in significant part by the CVP, produces nearly two-thirds of 
the Nation's fruits and vegetables during certain periods of the year, 
highlighting the region's importance to America's national security.
    The Assistant Secretary for Oceans and Atmosphere serves as the 
Deputy Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric 
Administration (``NOAA'') and assists the Under Secretary of Commerce 
for Oceans and Atmosphere in overseeing oceanic and atmospheric 
research, policy, and operations. NOAA Fisheries is responsible for the 
stewardship of the Nation's ocean resources and habitat. Guided by the 
Magnuson-Stevens Act, NOAA Fisheries works in partnership with Regional 
Fishery Management Councils to assess and predict the status of fish 
stocks, set catch limits, ensure compliance with fisheries regulations, 
and reduce bycatch. NOAA Fisheries also implements the Marine Mammal 
Protection Act and the Endangered Species Act (``ESA'') for anadromous 
and catadromous species, working to recover protected marine species 
while supporting regional economies, including communities reliant on 
imported water from the CVP and industries affected by management of 
anadromous species in California's rivers. Our members--whose water 
supply is reliant on watersheds that provide habitat for anadromous 
fish, like salmon and steelhead trout--are significantly impacted by 
ESA-related decisions made by NOAA Fisheries. As a result, this 
appointed position holds particular importance for our member and our 
region.
    The Water Authority knows that Dr. Petty is a strong leader; he is 
a respected professional, collaborative, guided by common sense and 
high ethical standards. We have worked with Dr. Petty on numerous water 
issues and have seen firsthand his grasp of the unique challenges in 
states where Federal land and water management decisions directly 
affect local communities.
    Dr. Petty has extensive Federal policy-level experience gained from 
his many years of public service on Capitol Hill and at the Department 
of the Interior, including as the Senate-confirmed Assistant Secretary 
for Water and Science at the Department of the Interior (``DOI''), 
overseeing both the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Bureau of 
Reclamation. His career spans private-sector work as a geologist and 
hydrogeologist in Indiana and California, a legislative and policy 
expert advising three United States Senators, and executive leadership 
in DOI under the George W. Bush administration as both Deputy and 
Acting Assistant Secretary for Water and Science.
    Dr. Petty also co-chaired the Water Subcabinet, an interagency 
coordination body established under Executive Order 13956 to streamline 
Federal water resource management, infrastructure modernization, 
drought resilience, and workforce development across agencies like the 
Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Department of Agriculture, NOAA, 
U.S. Department of Energy, and the U.S. Army Corps.
    We know that if confirmed, Dr. Petty will bring a level of 
practical experience, scientific integrity, and a collaborative, 
solutions-oriented approach that strengthens fisheries while balancing 
the needs of farmers, communities, and wildlife enthusiasts throughout 
California and the Pacific Northwest.
    For these reasons, the Water Authority respectfully requests your 
support for Dr. Tim Petty's nomination as Assistant Secretary for 
Oceans and Atmosphere of the U.S. Department of Commerce. He will serve 
the Department, the Administration, and the public exceedingly well in 
this position.
    Thank you for consideration. If you have any further questions, 
please reach out to Scott Petersen, Water Policy Director, at 
[email protected].
            Respectfully,
                                          Federico Barajas,
                                                Executive Director,
                              San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority.
                                 ______
                                 
             National States Geographic Information Council
                                                   October 21, 2025

Hon. Ted Cruz,
Chairman
Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
United States Senate,
Washington, DC.
Hon. Maria Cantwell,
Ranking Member,
Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
United States Senate,
Washington, DC.

Dear Chairman Cruz and Ranking Member Cantwell:

    On behalf of the National States Geographic Information Council 
(NSGIC), the national non-profit 501(c)(3) organization representing 
state geographic information system (GIS) leaders and professionals 
dedicated to advancing geospatial technology and policy at the state 
and local levels, I write to express support for the nomination of Dr. 
Timothy Petty for the position of Assistant Secretary of Commerce for 
Oceans and Atmosphere at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric 
Administration (NOAA).
    The role of the Assistant Secretary for Oceans and Atmosphere is, 
as you know, a position of extreme importance and the confirmation of 
this nomination is vital to the fulfillment of the agency's mission to 
serve the Nation by providing reliable scientific information to 
describe and understand changes in climate, weather, oceans, and 
coasts. As the Department of Commerce's premier agency for atmospheric 
and oceanic science, the expeditious confirmation of a qualified 
nominee for this appointment is paramount to maintain the great work of 
this agency.
    NSGIC believes that Dr. Petty is uniquely qualified to fulfill the 
responsibilities of this role. With nearly two decades of experience in 
Federal water and science policy, including his tenure as Assistant 
Secretary for Water and Science at the Department of the Interior where 
he oversaw the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and the Bureau of 
Reclamation, Dr. Petty will no doubt hit the ground running. In that 
capacity, he served as Co-Chair of the National Drought Resilience 
Partnership, coordinating interagency efforts on drought forecasting, 
research, and technology. He previously served as Acting Assistant 
Secretary and Deputy Assistant Secretary for Water and Science during 
the George W. Bush Administration, and holds a Ph.D. from the 
University of Alaska Fairbanks.
    NSGIC and its member states work very closely with NOAA to advance 
its mission by providing geospatial data integration, GIS support, and 
policy coordination--to name a few. Our contributions include 
supporting initiatives like the Digital Coast Partnership, which 
leverages lidar, elevation data, and coastal mapping to enhance 
resilience and decision-making at state and local levels. Our 
membership sees firsthand the many benefits NOAA provides our Nation, 
states, counties, tribal governments,
    first-responders, institutions of higher learning, and many others. 
We look forward to continuing to support that important work under the 
leadership of Dr. Petty, should he be confirmed.
    I urge you and your colleagues to give full and fair consideration 
to this nomination, and to expeditiously confirm Dr. Petty for the 
position of Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere. 
Thank you for your consideration.
            Sincerely,
                                              Mark Yacucci,
                                                         President,
                National States Geographic Information Council (NSGIC).

Cc: John S. Jordan,
CAE Executive Director
National States Geographic Information Council (NSGIC)
                                 ______
                                 
                   Association of California Water Agencies
                                                   October 20, 2025

Hon. Ted Cruz,
Chairman,
Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
Hon. Maria Cantwell,
Ranking Member,
Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.

RE: Support for Nomination of Timothy Petty to be Assistant Secretary 
            for Oceans and Atmosphere of the U.S. Department of 
            Commerce

Dear Chairman Cruz and Ranking Member Cantwell:

    The Association of California Water Agencies (ACWA) writes to 
support the nomination of Dr. Timothy Petty to serve as Assistant 
Secretary for Oceans and Atmosphere for the U.S. Department of 
Commerce.
    ACWA is the largest statewide coalition of public water agencies in 
the United States. ACWA represents approximately 470 member agencies 
that are responsible for delivering about 90 percent of the water to 
communities, farms, and businesses in California. ACWA and its members 
are dedicated to providing a high-quality, reliable water supply in an 
environmentally sustainable and fiscally responsible manner.
    Several of ACWA's key priorities align with the National Oceanic 
and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). For example, ACWA members seek 
to obtain Federal permits from the National Marine Fisheries Service 
(NMFS) and improve forecasting and modeling to predict water supply 
availability. Dr. Petty's expertise as a scientist, engineer, and 
dedicated public servant will only strengthen the Agency's capabilities 
in these critical areas.
    Dr. Petty is highly qualified to serve as Assistant Secretary for 
Oceans and Atmosphere at the Department of Commerce and as Deputy 
Administrator of NOAA. Dr. Petty brings a strong combination of Federal 
government experience and scientific expertise that will enhance the 
Agency's critical work implementing the Endangered Species Act (ESA) 
through NOAA Fisheries and advancing watershed forecasting efforts such 
as Forecast-Informed Reservoir Operations (FIRO).
    Dr. Petty's extensive public service includes well over a decade 
working in Congress, serving as Assistant Secretary for Water and 
Science at the Department of the Interior (DOI) during the first Trump 
Administration, and previously holding senior leadership roles at DOI 
including Acting Assistant Secretary and Deputy Assistant Secretary for 
Water and Science, under President George W. Bush. Holding a Bachelor's 
degree in Geosciences from Purdue University, a Master's in Business 
Management from the University of Maryland University College, and a 
Doctorate in Water Science and Policy from the University of Alaska 
Fairbanks, Dr. Petty's educational background supplements his 
dedication to applying evidence-based, science-driven solutions to 
Federal policymaking and program implementation.
    The West faces a great challenge contending with the worsening, 
historic drought. NOAA has continued to play a major role in helping 
our Nation work through this drought while balancing support for 
communities, businesses, agriculture, and ecosystem restoration. Dr. 
Petty is well qualified to navigate the unique challenges that Western 
states face through this trying time. ACWA welcomes the opportunity to 
work with Dr. Petty in a collaborative and constructive manner. We 
strongly support his nomination and urge his swift confirmation.
    Please do not hesitate to reach out if we can be of assistance in 
advancing Dr. Petty's nomination by contacting Ian Lyle, ACWA's 
Director of Federal Relations at [email protected].
            Sincerely,
                                                  Ian Lyle,
                                      Director of Federal Relations
                               Association of California Water Agencies

CC:
The Honorable Alex Padilla, U.S. Senate
The Honorable Adam Schiff, U.S. Senate
                                 ______
                                 
                              The Sanborn Map Company, Inc.
                             Colorado Springs, CO, October 20, 2025

Hon. Ted Cruz,
Chairman,
Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
United States Senate,
Washington, DC.
Hon. Maria Cantwell,
Ranking Member,
Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
United States Senate,
Washington, DC.

Dear Chairman Cruz and Ranking Member Cantwell:

    I am writing on behalf of The Sanborn Map Company, Inc., where I 
serve as Owner and Chief Executive Officer, to express my 
enthusiastic support for the nomination of Dr. Timothy Petty to serve 
as Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere at the 
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). As a leader in 
the geospatial industry with over 150 years of experience delivering 
innovative remote sensing and mapping solutions to the U.S. government, 
Sanborn has a vested interest in the effective stewardship of our 
Nation's oceans, atmosphere, and environmental data resources--all of 
which geospatial data and GIS services support. Dr. Petty's 
distinguished career and proven leadership in water science, 
environmental management, and interagency collaboration make him 
exceptionally qualified for this critical role.
    Dr. Petty brings a wealth of expertise to NOAA, honed through his 
tenure as Assistant Secretary for Water and Science at the Department 
of the Interior, where he oversaw the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and 
the Bureau of Reclamation. In that capacity, he played a pivotal role 
in advancing drought resilience strategies, including his leadership as 
Co-Chair of the National Drought Resilience Partnership (NDRP). This 
interagency effort coordinates Federal policies, research, 
forecasting, and technology to enhance community preparedness for 
natural disasters--a mission that directly aligns with NOAA's core 
functions in weather prediction, climate monitoring, and oceanic 
resource management. His prior service as Deputy Assistant Secretary 
for Water and Science further underscores his deep understanding of the 
scientific and policy challenges at the intersection of water 
resources, environmental protection, and economic resilience.
    In addition to his work with multiple presidential administrations, 
Dr. Petty served as a senior advisor to three United States Senators, 
including Senator Connie Mack, Senator Rick Santorum, and Senator James 
Risch, as well as a Senior Professional Staff Member on the House 
Transportation and Infrastructure Committee.
    At Sanborn, we have long partnered with Federal agencies like USGS 
and NOAA to deliver high-resolution geospatial data that informs 
decision-making on pressing issues such as flood risk assessment, 
infrastructure planning, and landslide mitigation, to name a few. Dr. 
Petty's track record of fostering collaboration between agencies, 
including his support for NOAA's National Water Model, positions him to 
strengthen these vital partnerships. Under his guidance, NOAA can 
accelerate the integration of geospatial innovations with atmospheric 
and oceanic data, enabling more precise forecasts, enhanced 
environmental modeling, and robust support for industries from 
agriculture to disaster response.
    As Legislative Affairs Chairman of MAPPS, the national 
association representing over 100 private-sector geospatial firms 
and 10,000 professionals, I have witnessed firsthand the 
importance of leaders who champion science-based policies and public-
private collaboration. Dr. Petty embodies this ethos. His nomination 
represents an opportunity to elevate NOAA's mission in an era of 
increasing environmental challenges, ensuring that geospatial and 
atmospheric sciences continue to safeguard American lives, livelihoods, 
and landscapes.
    I urge the Committee to confirm Dr. Petty without delay. His 
confirmation will not only advance NOAA's strategic priorities but 
also reinforce the geospatial sector's role in supporting congressional 
intent for resilient infrastructure and environmental stewardship. 
Thank you for your leadership on these matters and for considering this 
letter in your deliberations.
            Sincerely,
                                               John Copple,
                                 Owner and Chief Executive Officer,
                                          The Sanborn Map Company, Inc.
                                 ______
                                 
                              Idaho Water Users Association
                                      Boise, ID, September 22, 2025

Hon. Ted Cruz, Chairman,
Hon. Maria Cantwell, Ranking Member,
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
United States Senate,
Washington, DC.

RE: Support for Dr. Tim Petty's Nomination

Dear Chairman Cruz, Ranking Member Cantwell and Members of the 
            Committee:

    On behalf of the Idaho Water Users Association (IWUA), I write to 
express support for Dr. Timothy Petty as the next Assistant Secretary 
for Oceans and Atmosphere of the U.S. Department of Commerce.
    IWUA is a non-profit organization representing approximately 300 
canal companies, irrigation districts, ground water districts, 
municipal and public water suppliers, hydroelectric companies, 
aquaculture interests, agri-businesses, professional firms and 
individuals throughout Idaho. Our purpose is to promote, aid and assist 
in the development, control, conservation, preservation and utilization 
of Idaho's water resources.
    As the Assistant Secretary for Oceans and Atmosphere, Dr. Petty 
would serve as the Deputy Administrator of the National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and assist the Under Secretary of 
Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere in overseeing oceanic and 
atmospheric research, policy, and operations. NOAA Fisheries is 
responsible for the stewardship of the Nation's ocean resources and 
habitat. Using the Magnuson-Stevens Act as the guide, NOAA Fisheries 
works in partnership with Regional Fishery Management Councils to 
assess and predict the status of fish stocks, set catch limits, ensure 
compliance with fisheries regulations, and reduce bycatch. Under the 
Marine Mammal Protection Act and the Endangered Species Act (ESA), NOAA 
Fisheries works to recover protected marine species while allowing 
economic and recreational opportunities.
    IWUA members are impacted by BSA-related decisions made by NOAA 
Fisheries. We rely on NOAA fisheries to make reasons, science-based 
decisions that balance the needs of communities, economies and 
fisheries. Thus, this appointed position is critically important to our 
organization.
    Dr. Petty is a strong leader, a well-respected professional and a 
person with vision, common sense and high ethical standards. We have 
worked with Dr. Petty in the past on many water issues. He understands 
the unique challenges faced by water users--particularly in basins 
where the Federal government plays a significant role in the management 
of land and water.
    Dr. Petty has extensive Federal policy-level experience gained from 
his time on Capitol Hill and at the Department of the Interior, 
including as the Senate-confirmed Assistant Secretary for Water and 
Science at the Department of the Interior (DOI). He co-chaired the 
Water Subcabinet during the first Trump administration, an interagency 
coordination body established to streamline Federal water resource 
management, infrastructure modernization, drought resilience, and 
workforce development across agencies like. EPA, USDA, NOAA, DOE, and 
the Army Corps.
    We are confident that Dr. Petty will bring a level of practical 
experience, collaboration, intelligence and strong scientific integrity 
to this position that will serve not only the interests of the Federal 
government but also strengthen important fisheries while respecting 
communities and economies up and down the West Coast.
    IWUA respectfully requests your support for Dr. Tim Petty's 
nomination as the next Assistant Secretary for Oceans and Atmosphere of 
the U.S. Department of Commerce. We know he will serve the Department, 
the Administration, and our Nation very well in this important 
position.
            Sincerely,
                                            Paul Arrington,
                            Executive Director and General Counsel,
                                         Idaho Water Users Association.
                                 ______
                                 
Dear Senator,

    On behalf of the American Association of Port Authorities (AAPA), 
representing the seaports that connect U.S. commerce to the global 
economy, we write in strong support of the nomination of Laura DiBella 
to serve as a Commissioner on the Federal Maritime Commission (FMC).
    The FMC plays a critical role in ensuring fair competition and 
reliability in our Nation's maritime supply chains, particularly at a 
time when global instability, shifting trade patterns, and supply chain 
disruptions threaten American businesses and workers. Filling the 
Commission's current vacancies with qualified leaders is essential to 
providing continuity, expertise, and effective oversight of the 
industry.
    Laura DiBella is exceptionally qualified for this role. She brings 
decades of experience across both public and private sectors in 
maritime, trade, and economic development. Her leadership as President 
and CEO of Enterprise Florida and as Executive Director of the Florida 
Harbor Pilots Association reflects her deep understanding of both 
business and regulatory environments. Her direct operational 
perspective as Port Director of the Port of Fernandina Ocean Highway 
and Port Authority further demonstrates her familiarity with the daily 
challenges and opportunities facing U.S. ports. Beyond ports, her 
service as Executive Director of the Nassau County Economic Development 
Board underscores her commitment to advancing regional economic growth 
tied to maritime commerce.
    For these reasons, AAPA strongly urges the Senate Commerce, 
Science, and Transportation Committee to expeditiously advance Laura 
DiBella's nomination and for the full Senate to confirm her as a 
Commissioner on the FMC. Her proven leadership, breadth of maritime and 
economic development experience, and commitment to strengthening U.S. 
supply chains make her an invaluable addition to the Commission.
    We deeply appreciate your consideration of this important 
nomination.
            Very Respectfully,
                                             Cary S. Davis,
                                                 President and CEO,
                              American Association of Port Authorities.
                                 ______
                                 
         Marine Engineers' Beneficial Association (AFL-CIO)
                                 Washington, DC, September 17, 2025

Hon. Ted Cruz,
Chairman,
U.S. Senate,
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
Hon, Maria Cantwell,
Ranking Member
U.S. Senate,
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.

Re: Nomination of Laura DiBella to the Federal Maritime Commission

Dear Chairman Cruz and Ranking Member Cantwell:

    On behalf of the Marine Engineers' Beneficial Association 
(M.E.B.A.), the Nation's oldest maritime labor union representing 
licensed U.S. merchant marine officers, I write to express our strong 
support for the nomination of Laura DiBella to serve as a Commissioner 
of the Federal Maritime Commission (FMC).
    Ms. DiBella has demonstrated throughout her career a deep 
understanding of the maritime industry and an abiding commitment to its 
successful growth. Her leadership as Executive Director of the Florida 
Harbor Pilots Association, Port Director of the Port of Fernandina, and 
Secretary of Commerce for the State of Florida reflects both her 
expertise and her proven ability to navigate the complex challenges 
facing U.S. ports, maritime commerce, and supply chains.
    Notably, Ms. DiBella has shown that she values and respects the 
invaluable role of maritime workers in supporting our Nation's growing 
economy. She has worked collaboratively with maritime labor, 
recognizing that a strong U.S.-flag fleet and skilled mariners are 
indispensable to our national defense and economic security. At a time 
when foreign carriers and alliances threaten to dominate international 
shipping, Ms. DiBella's leadership will help ensure that the FMC 
remains vigilant in protecting U.S. jobs, businesses, and fair 
competition in the global shipping industry.
    Her crisis management during the COVID-19 pandemic, where she 
safeguarded critical maritime operations while ensuring the workforce 
remained supported, exemplifies the steady and capable leadership she 
will bring to the Commission. As the Administration works to revitalize 
the U.S. maritime industry, Ms. DiBella's vision and experience will be 
invaluable in promoting policies that strengthen the U.S.-flag fleet 
and ensure our merchant mariners can continue their essential service 
to the Nation.
    For these reasons, M.E.B.A. is proud to support the nomination of 
Laura DiBella to the Federal Maritime Commission and urges the 
Committee to move swiftly on her confirmation.
            Sincerely,
                                                Adam Vokac,
                                                         President,
                              Marine Engineers' Beneficial Association.
                                 ______
                                 
                          Florida Harbor Pilots Association
                             Fort Lauderdale, FL, September 9, 2025

Hon. Ted Cruz,
United States Senator for Texas,
Washington, DC.

RE: Letter of Recommendation for Laura DiBella for the Federal Maritime 
            Commission

Dear Senator Cruz:

    It is my honor to recommend Laura DiBella for confirmation to the 
Federal Maritime Commission. With her extensive background in maritime 
policy, industry and marine operations, Laura has very unique 
qualifications and insight which will be invaluable to the Federal 
Maritime Commission's mission.
    When I served as President of the Florida Harbor Pilots 
Association, I hired Laura as the Executive Director in 2019. Hiring 
Laura was the best decision I made as President, she did an excellent 
job as Executive Director. She learned the harbor pilot's issues and 
became very well respected in a short period of time with the Florida 
Legislatures.
    In addition, Laura was Florida's first female Secretary of 
Commerce. Furthermore, she served as President of Business Development 
at Florida Commerce, President/CEO at Enterprise Florida, Port Director 
for Fernandina Port Authority, and President of the Florida Opportunity 
Fund.
    Laura's leadership qualities to inspire, lead, and make a positive 
impact stand out in each position she has held. She is known for her 
integrity, loyalty, and dedication. In my opinion, she will bring the 
same level of professionalism and passion to the Federal Maritime 
Commission, and make a great Commissioner.
    In conclusion, without reservation, I wholeheartedly endorse Laura 
DiBella for a seat on the Federal Maritime Commission. I am confident 
that her appointment will enhance the Commission's efforts to foster a 
competitive and efficient maritime industry for the United States. 
Respectfully, I thank you for considering her nomination. If you have 
any questions, please do not hesitate to call me.
            Sincerely,
                              Captain Sam Stephenson, J.D.,
                                                President Emeritus,
                                     Florida Harbor Pilots Association.
                                 ______
                                 
                                               UTC Overseas
                                       Houston, TX, August 17, 2025

Hon. Ted Cruz,
Chairman, U.S. Senate,
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Washington, DC.
Hon. Maria Cantwell,
Ranking Member, U.S. Senate,
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.

Subject: Strong Support for Senate Confirmation of Captain Stephen 
            Carmel, nominee to be U.S. Administrator, Maritime 
            Administration (MARAD), U.S. Department of Transportation

Dear Chairman Cruz and Ranking Member Cantwell:

    On behalf of UTC Overseas, headquartered in your home state of 
Texas, I am writing to express our strong support for the Senate's 
confirmation of Captain Stephen Carmel to be Administrator of MARAD.
    As background, UTC Overseas was founded in New York in 1926 and 
transferred its worldwide headquarters to Houston. With 50 offices 
around the globe, we have been a leading provider of international 
project logistics and transportation services for nearly a century. 
From our Houston headquarters at 2 North Point Drive, we serve as a 
critical link in America's export supply chain, facilitating the 
movement of U.S. manufactured goods and equipment to infrastructure 
projects worldwide.
    As a U.S.-headquartered company with deep roots in Texas, UTC 
Overseas is a strong advocate for Cargo Preference requirements and the 
U.S. flag merchant fleet. These policies are essential to maintaining 
America's maritime industrial base and ensuring that American workers 
and American vessels benefit from U.S. government-impelled cargo. Our 
company has assisted many clients of major U.S. OEMs and other U.S. 
manufacturers with U.S. Export-Import Bank transactions, supporting 
billions of dollars in American exports that create and sustain high-
paying jobs across the maritime, manufacturing, and logistics sectors.
    Captain Carmel's extensive commercial maritime expertise makes him 
uniquely qualified to lead MARAD during this critical period for 
America's maritime industry. His four decades of experience--from 
achieving his first command of a 40,000-ton tanker at age 26 to serving 
in senior executive roles at Maersk Line Limited--provides the rare 
combination of operational knowledge and business acumen needed to 
execute the Administration's Maritime Action Plan.
    If confirmed, Captain Carmel would become the first MARAD 
Administrator since 2005 to hold a Master's Unlimited license, bringing 
invaluable hands-on maritime experience to the role. His deep 
understanding of commercial shipping operations, combined with his 
corporate experience managing complex vessel operations, positions him 
perfectly to advance policies that strengthen both our national 
security sealift capability and our commercial maritime 
competitiveness.
    Texas is home to some of America's most important maritime 
infrastructure, including the ports of Houston, Beaumont, Galveston, 
and Corpus Christi. These facilities, along with the skilled maritime 
workers they employ, are essential to America's role as a global 
trading nation. Strong leadership at MARAD is crucial to ensuring that 
Texas ports and the broader U.S. maritime transportation system remain 
competitive with international rivals, particularly China, which now 
builds 74 percent of the world's ships compared to America's 0.2 
percent.
    Captain Carmel's selection reflects the Administration's wise 
recognition that rebuilding America's maritime industrial base requires 
deep industry experience rather than purely military credentials. His 
experience with the Maritime Security Program and understanding of 
public-private partnerships will be invaluable as MARAD implements new 
initiatives including the Maritime Security Trust Fund and Maritime 
Prosperity Zones.
    From our perspective as a Houston-based company that depends on 
efficient maritime transportation systems and strong U.S. flag 
policies, we believe Captain Carmel's nomination represents exactly the 
kind of commercial-first leadership approach needed to revitalize 
American maritime competitiveness.
    We respectfully urge the Committee to move expeditiously on Captain 
Carmel's confirmation so that MARAD can have the experienced leadership 
it needs to execute the Administration's ambitious maritime agenda.
    Thank you for your consideration of our views and your continued 
leadership on issues vital to Texas and American maritime interests.
            Sincerely,
                                             Marco Poisler,
                UTC Overseas COO--Global Energy & Capital Projects,
                                                     UTC Overseas, Inc.

cc: Majority Staff: Alexis Rudd
Minority Staff: Nikky Teutschel
                                 ______
                                 
                            Dredging Contractors of America
                                  Washington, DC, 09 September 2025

Hon. Ted Cruz,
Chairman,
U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
Hon. Maria Cantwell,
Ranking Member,
U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.

Re: Nomination of Laura DiBella to be a Federal Maritime Commissioner

Dear Chairman Cruz and Ranking Member Cantwell:

    On behalf of the Dredging Contractors of America, I write in strong 
support of President Donald Trump's nomination of Laura DiBella to 
serve as a Federal Maritime Commissioner. We respectfully urge her 
swift confirmation to this critical role.
    The Dredging Contractors of America represents private-sector 
companies engaged in marine dredging, coastal restoration, harbor 
maintenance, and marine construction for America's navigation channels, 
port authorities, energy terminals, harbors, and U.S. military 
installations nationwide.
    We know Laura DiBella well. She has been a strong and effective 
voice in the maritime, ports, and commerce sectors. Her distinguished 
service includes leadership as Executive Director of the Florida Harbor 
Pilots Association, Port Director of the Port of Fernandina Ocean 
Highway and Port Authority, and Secretary of Commerce for the State of 
Florida--experiences that uniquely prepare her to serve with 
distinction on the Commission.
    Ms. DiBella brings proven leadership and crisis management skills, 
coupled with a clear vision for port expansion, infrastructure growth, 
and the dredging and marine construction projects essential to U.S. 
competitiveness. As Executive Director of the Florida Harbor Pilots 
during the COVID-19 pandemic, it's a matter of record that she guided 
the organization through unprecedented challenges, ensuring pilots 
remained employed even as Florida's cruise industry--vital to the 
state's economy--came to a standstill.
    In closing, Laura DiBella is exceptionally qualified to serve as 
Federal Maritime Commissioner.
    Her leadership, experience, and commitment to strengthening 
America's maritime sector will be an asset to the Commission and the 
Nation. We urge her prompt confirmation and stand ready to provide any 
additional information the Committee may require.
            Respectfully,
                                          William P. Doyle,
                                           Chief Executive Officer,
                                   Dredging Contractors of America.
                                 ______
                                 
                                             Resolve Marine
                                                 September 19, 2025

Hon. Ted Cruz,
Chairman,
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
Hon. Maria Cantwell,
Ranking Member,
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.

Dear Chairman Cruz and Ranking member Cantwell:

    It is with great pride and unwavering confidence that I write to 
recommend Laura DiBella for confirmation as a Commissioner of the 
Federal Maritime Commission. As Chief Executive Officer of Resolve 
Marine, a global leader in maritime emergency response and salvage 
operations, I have had the privilege of observing Ms. DiBella's career 
and contributions to the maritime sector with deep respect and 
admiration.
    Ms. DiBella brings to this nomination a rare blend of strategic 
vision, operational acumen, and public service dedication. Her tenure 
as Florida's first female Secretary of Commerce and her leadership of 
Enterprise Florida demonstrated her ability to navigate complex 
regulatory environments, foster international trade relationships, and 
champion maritime economic development. Her efforts have directly 
supported the growth of port infrastructure,logistics innovation, and 
the advancement of U.S. maritime competitiveness.
    Throughout her career, Ms. DiBella has exemplified the values of 
integrity, transparency, and collaboration.She has consistently engaged 
stakeholders across government, industry, and community sectors to 
build consensus and deliver results. Her understanding of the maritime 
domain, from port operations to international shipping dynamics, 
positions her uniquely to contribute to the Commission's mission of 
ensuring a fair, efficient, and secure maritime transportation system.
    In an era where global supply chains face unprecedented challenges, 
the Federal Maritime Commission requires leaders who not only 
understand the intricacies of maritime commerce but who also possess 
the courage and clarity to act decisively. Ms. DiBella is such a 
leader. Her appointment would bring a seasoned, principled, and 
forward-thinking voice to the Commission.
    I respectfully urge the Committee to confirm Laura DiBella to this 
vital role. Her service will undoubtedly strengthen the Commission's 
work and benefit the maritime industry and the Nation at large.
            Sincerely,
                                 Joseph Edward Farrell III,
                                           Chief Executive Officer,
                                                        Resolve Marine.
                                 ______
                                 
                U.S. Exporters Competitive Maritime Council
                                                  August 14th, 2025

Hon. Ted Cruz,
Chairman,
U.S. Senate Committee Commerce, Science, and Transportation
Washington, DC.
Hon. Maria Cantwell,
Ranking Member,
U.S. Senate Committee Commerce, Science, and Transportation
Washington, DC

Subject: Recommendation for Senate Confirmation of Captain Stephen 
            Carmel, nominee to be U.S. Administrator, Maritime 
            Administration (MARAD), U.S. Department of Transportation.

Dear Chairman Cruz, and Ranking Member Cantwell:

    On behalf of the members of the U.S. EXPORTERS COMPETITIVE MARITIME 
COUNCIL (ECMC), it is our pleasure to support the Senate's confirmation 
of nominee Captain Stephen Carmel to be Administrator of MARAD.
    As background, the ECMC (ecmc-us.org) was formed in 1997 to 
represent the interests of U.S. exporters who are involved in export/
import trade, transportation and supply chain management of cargoes 
that are required to support large-scale infrastructure projects 
(Capital Projects). Our member companies (see below) make up a large 
majority of leading U.S. companies responsible for these shipments. 
Please note that Capital Projects have historically supported thousands 
of high paying U.S. manufacturing, engineering, and service jobs. The 
successful execution of these projects, and the ability of our U.S. 
Companies to compete internationally, is highly dependent on an 
efficient U.S. Maritime Transportation System that is well aligned with 
our National Transportation System.
    Captain Carmel's extensive commercial maritime expertise makes him 
uniquely qualified to provide the leadership to execute the 
Administration and Congressional bi-partisan efforts to rebuild 
America's critical maritime industrial base. If confirmed, Captain 
Carmel would bring a rare combination of operational and executive 
experience at MARAD. As a graduate of the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy, 
Captain Carmel would become the first MARAD Administrator since 2005 to 
hold a Master's Unlimited license. He has also held several senior 
level corporate positions within our maritime industry. Captain 
Carmel's extensive commercial background would provides the necessary 
insights to execute the Maritime Action Plan envisioned by the 
Administration's Executive Order and the bi-partisan maritime 
legislation currently under consideration in Congress.
    Simply put, our country is a Maritime Nation with 43 States out of 
50 having at least one seaport capable of facilitating U.S. Exports. 
Sadly, our transportation port and intermodal infrastructure that 
supports our maritime transportation system has fallen behind our 
international competition such as China. Rebuilding our maritime 
industrial base requires strong leadership at MARAD and the ability to 
work with the Secretary and other Senate confirmed Modal Administrators 
at the U.S. Department of Transportation. In view of the above, we urge 
an expedited Senate confirmation of Captain Stephen Carmel to be 
Administrator of MARAD.
            Sincerely,
                                              Jesus Mejias,
                                                         President,
                                                                  ECMC.

cc: ECMC Membership
Majority Staff: Alexis Rudd
Minority Staff: Nikky Teutschel

MEMBER COMPANIES--alphabetical order

Air Products                                       International Trade & Transportion, Inc.
Amos Logistics                                     KBR
Babcock Power                                      Kiewit
Bechtel Corporation                                Kuehne + Nagel
Bertling Logistics                                 Linde Engineering America
Black & Veatch                                     McDermott International
Crane Worldwide                                    Plug Power
dbSchenker                                         Powell Electric
deugro USA                                         Siemens Gamesa
DHL Global Forwarding                              Technip Energies
Drexel Logistics                                   TechnipFMC
DSV                                                UTC Overseas
Fluor                                              Vogt Power
Fracht                                             Worley
Freeport McMorAn
 

                                 ______
                                 
                  Washington State House of Representatives
                                                  October 7th, 2025

ATTN: The Honorable Ted Cruz and Maria Cantwell,
U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.

Dear Chairman Cruz, Ranking Member Cantwell, and Members of the 
            Committee:

    I am honored to strongly recommend Dr. Tim Petty for confirmation 
as Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere within the 
U.S. Department of Commerce. Dr. Petty is an accomplished leader whose 
extensive expertise, integrity, and record of service uniquely qualify 
him to guide the Nation's work in advancing our oceans, atmosphere, and 
critical natural resource programs.
    I had the opportunity to work with Dr. Petty during his tenure as 
Assistant Secretary for Water and Science at the U.S. Department of the 
Interior, and subsequently, as Senior Professional Staff Member for the 
House Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment. In both roles, 
he demonstrated exceptional skill in navigating complex water and 
infrastructure challenges, fostering bipartisan solutions, and 
advancing policies that directly benefit communities in Washington 
State and across the country. His ability to bridge science, policy, 
and practical implementation is rare, and has earned him the respect of 
colleagues in both the Executive and Legislative branches.
    A prime example of his leadership was his instrumental role in 
restarting construction on the Columbia Basin Project--the largest 
unfinished reclamation project in the Nation. Recognizing both the 
political sensitivities and the pressing needs of communities deprived 
of reliable water resources, Dr. Petty elevated the issue, provided 
technical guidance, and successfully championed the project within the 
Bureau of Reclamation and later in the House Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure. His persistence and vision helped 
move this decades-delayed initiative forward, ensuring progress for 
future generations.
    Beyond his policy and technical expertise, Dr. Petty is deeply 
respected for his character. He is approachable, thoughtful, and 
committed to listening to stakeholders--from local community leaders to 
Members of Congress. His broad professional network, coupled with his 
specialized knowledge of Federal water, infrastructure, and 
environmental policy, will make him an invaluable leader at the 
Department of Commerce.
    I strongly recommend Dr. Tim Petty's nomination. I am confident 
that his experience, professionalism, and unwavering dedication to 
public service will bring great value to the Agency and to the American 
people.
    Thank you for your consideration of this outstanding nominee.
            Respectfully,
                                    Representative Mary Dye
                              Washington State House of Representatives
                                               9th Legislative District

    Senator Markey. Senators will have until the close of 
business on October 24 to submit questions for the record. The 
nominees will have until the close of business on October 27 to 
respond to the questions which are going to be given to you.
    That concludes today's hearing, and with that the Committee 
stands adjourned.
    [Whereupon, at 12:32 p.m., the hearing was adjourned.]

                            A P P E N D I X

      Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Ted Cruz to 
                           Stephen M. Carmel
    Question 1. A recent American Affairs article\1\ warns that efforts 
to rebuild America's maritime must ``navigate between the Scylla of 
government coddling and the Charybdis of nonmarket opponents.'' If 
confirmed, how would you revitalize the U.S. merchant marine and 
shipbuilding base through targeted, market-driven measures--while 
avoiding excessive subsidies or preferential treatment for legacy 
contractors?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    \1\ William Cahill & Jacqueline Deal, A Shining City on the Sea: 
Rebuilding America's Maritime Industry, 9 AM. AFF. 2 (May 2025), 
https://americanaffairsjournal.org/2025/05/a-shining-city-on-the-sea-
rebuilding-americas-maritime-industry/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Answer. Thank you for the question, I agree that the U.S. maritime 
industry needs to reduce its reliance on direct government support. 
What is needed in its place is indirect support by adjusting national 
policy to include maritime in trade deals to ensure the merchant marine 
carries our Nation's commerce. This requires initial government direct 
support for the transition. However, this support must be time-bound 
and tied to the implementation of the indirect support structure.
    Global shipping and shipbuilding are industries of scale--scale in 
operations, supply chains, and global reach for comprehensive support.
    To compete internationally, U.S. companies must achieve this scale. 
MARAD's job is to create the conditions that enable this growth. 
Therefore, we must walk a careful line: encouraging new market entrants 
without discouraging the vital growth necessary to achieve that 
essential scale.

    Question 2. Taxpayer support for the maritime industry has at times 
propped up underperforming firms without strengthening U.S. capacity. 
Will you commit, if confirmed, to limiting MARAD assistance to 
performance-based programs that reduce the risk of long-term industry 
dependence? How will you work to accomplish this goal?
    Answer. I agree that taxpayer support should drive performance, not 
dependency. If confirmed, I'll ensure MARAD funding is tied to 
measurable outcomes--specifically, more ships built here, more mariners 
trained, and stronger commercial competitiveness, focusing on our 
Nation's commerce. This means moving away from open-ended subsidies and 
toward performance-based tools that reward innovation, efficiency, and 
private investment. Every Federal dollar should strengthen national 
capacity, not sustain firms that can't compete.

    Question 3. Rigid contracting practices can hinder innovation. How 
will this fact inform your approach to MARAD's role in overseeing ship 
financing, training vessel acquisition, and reserve fleet management?
    Answer. I share your concern about propping up inefficiency; as a 
member of the maritime industry dealing with these issues, I've often 
been personally frustrated by them. However, the problem isn't just 
poor performance--it's that many of our maritime programs are built on 
1950s models that no longer fit the world we operate in. Simply 
tightening contracts on legacy programs like the Ready Reserve Fleet 
won't solve that fundamental issue.
    If confirmed, I'd push for a system-level rethink across the 
enterprise (MARAD, MSC, TRANSCOM). This involves clarifying what 
capabilities we actually need and then designing modern, performance-
based tools to deliver them. We must update both what we're doing and 
how we do it.

    Question 4. As Maritime Administrator, how will you ensure U.S. 
shipbuilders and carriers remain innovative and globally competitive, 
despite reduced pressure from foreign markets?
    Answer. That question strikes at the heart of my focus on 
rebuilding U.S. shipbuilding. The only way to make U.S. shipbuilders 
truly innovative and competitive is to rebuild the industry so it's 
once again exposed to international competition. Right now, isolation 
has bred inefficiency. If we can move U.S. shipbuilding down the cost 
curve through modernized yards, scalable production, and smarter demand 
signals, our builders can compete globally. That revitalizes our 
industrial base, attracts private capital, and naturally fixes industry 
problems.
    Moving U.S. shipbuilding down the cost curve is about restoring 
both industrial competitiveness and national security. Today, our 
shipyards are trapped in low-volume, high-cost cycles that make them 
dependent on government contracts and completely divorced from 
international commercial ship production best practices. The solution 
isn't more protection--it's scale and modernization.
    We need greenfield yards built around advanced modular 
construction, digital engineering, and automation. These must be 
supported by steady commercial demand so firms can plan long-term 
investments. When that happens, per-unit costs drop dramatically, 
private capital returns to the sector, and U.S. builders can compete 
internationally. That revitalizes the broader industrial base--steel, 
components, logistics--while giving us a more resilient sealift and 
naval support foundation. In the process, a healthy, competitive 
shipbuilding ecosystem naturally narrows the Jones Act freight-rate 
wedge by bringing down transport costs. The economic and security 
benefits move in the same direction.
                                 ______
                                 
    Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Roger Wicker to 
                           Stephen M. Carmel
U.S. Merchant Marine Academy
    Background: The U.S. Merchant Marine Academy's (USMMA) facilities 
lag behind the other service academies. Many of the buildings date back 
to the 1940s and are unable to meet the needs of current and future 
midshipmen. Given these conditions and the lack of significant 
investment in campus infrastructure for decades, it is critical that 
the Maritime Administration and Academy leadership implement their 
Campus Modernization Plan expediently to rehabilitate and modernize the 
campus.

    Question 1. The conditions of the Merchant Marine Academy's 
facilities fall below the other service academies. Many of the 
buildings exhibit crumbling concrete, leaking pipes, mold, and 
inadequate heating and air conditioning for the Midshipmen.

    Question 2. Wouldn't you agree that the state of the campus makes 
it hard to recruit top talent for this prestigious service academy?
    Answer. Yes, I completely agree, and I thank Secretary Duffy for 
his continued commitment and leadership to supporting the Merchant 
Marine Academy. Secretary Duffy has made it a top priority to 
expediently implement a modernization plan to rehabilitate the campus's 
infrastructure. Modernizing the facilities is essential for recruiting, 
as a state-of-the-art campus signals an investment in the midshipmen's 
future and provides the technological environment needed for a 21st-
century maritime education. By offering competitive, high-quality 
living and training spaces, the Academy can attract and retain the 
Nation's brightest future leaders.

    Question 3. If confirmed, will you commit to working with the 
Department of Transportation to implement the Campus Modernization 
Plan?
    Answer. Yes, I look forward, if confirmed, to working with this 
committee and all stakeholders to implement the plan and fix Kings 
Point.
Maritime Security Program/Tanker Security Program
    Background: The Maritime Security Program is a vital component of 
our military strategic sealift and global response capability. It is 
designed to ensure that the United States has a U.S. flag commercial 
sealift capability and trained U.S. citizen merchant mariners available 
in times of war or national emergencies. The Tanker Security Program 
(TSP) ensures that a core fleet of U.S.-based product tankers can 
operate competitively in international trade and enhance U.S. supply 
chain resiliency for liquid fuel products. The TSP will provide the 
Department of Defense with assured access to 10 U.S.-registered product 
tank vessels that may be used to supply the armed forces with fuel 
during times of armed conflict or national emergency.

    Question 1. The Tanker Security Program and Maritime Security 
Program play a key role in maintaining our sealift capability and 
supporting the U.S.-flag fleet. From your perspective, does the 
Department of Defense provide enough cargo to keep the Tanker Security 
Program commercially viable? How would you manage or expand preference 
cargoes to strengthen participation?
    Answer. If I am confirmed, I look forward to working with DOW on 
this important issue and getting read up on the specifics. Interagency 
collaboration is imperative and I look forward to working with your 
office on this issue.
                                 ______
                                 
    Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Dan Sullivan to 
                           Stephen M. Carmel
Port Infrastructure Development Program and Visit Alaska
    Alaska's unique geography and lack of transportation infrastructure 
means that my constituents rely on maritime transportation as a 
lifeline.
    Alaska has 33,904 miles of shoreline, dwarfing the entire Lower 48. 
A majority of Alaskan communities are dependent on barge deliveries for 
food, building materials, and everyday household goods necessary to 
support life in the 21st Century. In many parts of the state, these 
deliveries occur only two or three times per year. However, even today, 
many of our communities lack reliable marine access.
    One of the biggest infrastructure gaps in the State of Alaska, in 
terms of lack of support for Federal support mechanisms, is the lack of 
a waterfront program to support our rural communities.
    Through previous efforts with the Commerce Committee and the 
Infrastructure bill, we have made significant progress in supporting 
these communities and projects through the MARAD Port Infrastructure 
Development program.

    Question 1. Will you commit to strong support for the Port 
Infrastructure Development program?
    Answer. If confirmed, I can commit to working with your office to 
continue to follow the law, as passed by Congress.

    Question 2. Will you commit to ensure that Alaska's port and harbor 
projects are evaluated based on their strategic and community 
importance?
    Answer. If confirmed, I commit to evaluating projects based on 
their merit and look forward to working directly with your office to 
understand Alaska's port and harbor priorities.

    Question 3. Will you support efforts to ensure that MARAD adopts 
permit streamlining practices to avoid duplicative environmental 
reviews that delay critical maritime infrastructure projects?
    Answer. If confirmed, I commit to working to ensure timely reviews 
of maritime infrastructure projects wherever possible.
Port of Alaska Modernization Program (PAMP)--Project Background and 
        Status Background
    The Port of Alaska handles nearly half of all cargo entering the 
state and is a designated Defense Strategic Port, making it essential 
for both civilian supply chains and national security. Aging 
infrastructure--over 50 years old--is at risk of catastrophic failure, 
especially in the event of a major earthquake. The docks are heavily 
corroded and beyond their design life.
    The Port of Alaska Modernization Program (PAMP) is a five-phase 
reconstruction effort focused on replacing, not expanding, 
infrastructure to ensure long-term resilience and efficiency. 
Modernization will strengthen seismic resilience, accommodate larger, 
deeper-draft vessels, and bring facilities up to current codes and 
standards--all while supporting Alaska's economy and military 
readiness.
    Timely Federal action is critical. MARAD's support in streamlining 
reviews, accelerating permitting, and facilitating funding will be key 
to keeping this lifeline operational for decades to come. Delays risk 
severe consequences for Alaska's supply chain and national defense 
capacity. This is not just a state issue--it's a strategic national 
priority.

    Question 1. Given MARAD's central role in reviewing and funding 
port infrastructure projects, would you ensure the Port of Alaska 
Modernization Program stays on schedule and receives the Federal 
priority it deserves, considering the risks to both Alaska's supply 
chain and national defense readiness if this project is delayed?
    Answer. I commit to working with you and your office to ensure that 
programs such as the Port of Alaska modernization program are executed 
in a timely and efficient manner.
University of Alaska--Centers of Excellence for Domestic Maritime 
        Workforce Training and Education
    As part of the FY2023 MARAD Authorization (that became law via FY23 
NDAA) I worked to authorize the Maritime Administration to designate 
eligible organizations as centers of excellence for domestic maritime 
workforce training and education, and authorized funding to support 
maritime workforce development activities at designated centers of 
excellence.
    While I'm pleased that the Maritime Administration has taken the 
steps to designate centers, including the Alaska Maritime Education 
Consortium, there has been no funding to ultimately address maritime 
workforce challenges.

    Question 1. Will you commit to working to see that appropriate 
funding is requested in the President's Budget so the United States can 
increase its efforts to train the next generation of maritime 
professionals?
    Answer. I can commit to working with your office to continue to 
follow the law, as passed by Congress.
Missile Defense Agency Vessel Recapitalization
    Given the immediate national security and operational risks posed 
by the impending decommissioning of the Missile Defense Agency's 
telemetry ships, I urge MARAD to act swiftly under its existing 
contractual authorities and issue the necessary Task Orders/Delivery 
Orders under the current Vessel Construction Manager contract. While I 
understand the process is underway, the timeline remains extremely 
tight.
    Question 1. Will you commit upon confirmation to issue the TO/DOs 
to initiate vessel design? If any administrative or procedural barriers 
remain, please identify those issues along with a corrective action 
plan and timeline that aligns with Congress's intent for immediate 
recapitalization.
    Answer. I can commit to working with your office to continue to 
follow the law, as passed by Congress.
Wrangell RAISE Grant Coordination
    The City and Borough of Wrangell have been working closely with the 
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and MARAD on a project of high 
importance to my state--specifically, the replacement of deteriorating 
float infrastructure in Wrangell Harbor, which is linked to long-
standing dredging needs in the federally authorized navigation basin.
    It has been reported to my office that while NEPA concerns for the 
float replacement portion have been addressed through coordination with 
the USACE Regulatory Division and the Borough, NEPA requirements 
associated with the USACE-led dredging effort remain unresolved. I 
understand that MARAD is serving as the lead Federal agency for NEPA on 
this project and is conducting an Environmental Assessment (EA) rather 
than an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), which should allow for a 
more streamlined process.
    The current holdup, as conveyed to me, is that USACE has yet to 
submit a required sampling work plan for review under MARAD's pre-NEPA 
process. Until this work plan is approved, in-water sediment sampling 
cannot occur--delaying essential technical and environmental analyses. 
MARAD reportedly provided guidance for this work plan as early as May 
2025, but USACE has cited staffing shortages and operational delays as 
the reason for their lack of progress.
    Because the dredging and float replacement are interdependent 
efforts, and because the Borough cannot finalize its RAISE grant 
agreement with MARAD until NEPA is completed for both, this delay 
threatens to stall a key infrastructure project in my state. I 
understand that once the USACE work plan is received, MARAD's internal 
review could move quickly. I appreciate MARAD's responsiveness on that 
front.
    In light of these circumstances, I respectfully urge MARAD to 
prioritize this project and take all possible steps to expedite its 
part in the NEPA process once the necessary materials are provided by 
USACE. This project is important to the local economy, to maritime 
safety, and to honoring the commitments made under the RAISE program.

    Question 1. Once confirmed, will you commit to this project and 
your coordination with the Borough and USACE?
    Answer. If I receive the honor of confirmation, I can commit to 
working to understanding the specifics of MARADs role in this project 
and to expeditiously review the issue.
                                 ______
                                 
   Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Maria Cantwell to 
                           Stephen M. Carmel
    Shipbuilding. There is bipartisan agreement that it is critical we 
increase American-built and American-crewed ships to support our 
economy, increase international trade, and strengthen our national 
security. This includes investments in shipyard and port 
infrastructure, expanding financial tools needed to incentivize 
shipbuilding and shipyard modernization, and investing in our maritime 
workforce.

    Question 1. Please describe your plan to invest in port 
infrastructure and increase U.S. shipbuilding capacity.
    Answer. I fully agree that rebuilding our shipbuilding ecosystem is 
critical--not only for national security, but also for addressing 
broader economic issues such as freight rate wedges and supply chain 
resilience.
    I plan to attract private capital and gradually reduce the need for 
government involvement with the ultimate objective of reestablishing 
shipbuilding as a self-sustaining, commercially competitive industry. 
By restoring competitiveness and scale in the private sector, we can 
both strengthen our industrial base and ensure that the maritime and 
logistics sectors contribute fully to U.S. economic and national 
security objectives.

    Question 2. How do you plan to use programs like the Title XI loan 
guarantee program or new financing mechanisms to spur commercial 
shipbuilding in the United States?
    Answer. A critical component of rebuilding our shipbuilding 
ecosystem is fixing the financing side of the equation. The current 
Title XI program is inadequate to the task--it doesn't provide true 
construction financing or refund guarantees, both of which are 
essential to support modern shipbuilding at competitive cost and risk 
levels. There are several adjustments to the Title XI program that can 
address these shortcomings and aligns financing mechanisms with the 
broader goal of moving U.S. shipbuilding down the cost curve and 
attracting private capital participation.

    Question 3. Do you commit to working with Congress on legislation 
to grow the U.S. shipbuilding capacity and the maritime industrial 
base?
    Answer. If confirmed, I commit to working with Congress on 
implementing any legislation it passes effectively and efficiently.

    Mariner Workforce. A key aspect of the Maritime Administration's 
(MARAD) mission is to train and educate our next generation of U.S. 
mariners. However, the United States has a serious shortage of 
credentialed mariners, and in 2024, both the USTRANSCOM Commander and 
the former MARAD Administrator testified regarding their concerns about 
the mariner shortage.

    Question 1. What specific steps will you take to address our 
Nation's shortage of mariners?
    Answer. The mariner shortage we're seeing isn't simply about 
headcount--it's a structural problem. A major factor is the Ready 
Reserve Force (RRF) model, which depends on sudden surges in manpower. 
When RRF activation stresses the labor pool, it shows the system is 
unbalanced: if we can surge the RRF, we have too many mariners for 
normal operations; if we can't, the model isn't sustainable.
    To fix this, I'd start by working closely with our union partners 
to realign how we develop and sustain the workforce. We must build 
mariner employment in tandem with new ship construction and operations, 
so people have steady jobs, not just surge demand. This means 
integrating workforce planning with programs like fleet 
recapitalization and sealift renewal.
    We also need to modernize mariner training and credentialing--for 
example, expanding simulation-based training, easing transitions for 
military and offshore energy mariners into deep-sea service, and 
strengthening the pipeline through the state maritime academies. 
Lastly, we need to work closely with the USCG to bring the mariner 
credentialing system into the 21st century, a frustration I hear often 
from our mariners.
    If we get those structural and workforce elements right, we won't 
just patch a temporary shortage--we'll rebuild a strong, steady U.S. 
mariner base that supports both national security and commercial 
competitiveness.

    Question 2. What are your plans to improve the conditions at the 
U.S. Merchant Marine Academy to include aging infrastructure and 
outdated curriculum?
    Answer. There are already important programs underway to address 
this issue, including the campus modernization plan, which I am fully 
committed to supporting. Once confirmed, my first step will be to 
conduct a detailed review of what MARAD is currently doing or planning 
in this area, ensuring that ongoing efforts are effective and properly 
aligned with our broader mission. The Committee will be informed as we 
work collaboratively to identify any gaps or needed improvements.
    As an Academy alumnus, I am deeply concerned about the state of our 
maritime education system. I am committed to working aggressively--in 
partnership with Congress and all stakeholders--to ensure these 
programs deliver the modern facilities, training, and support our 
future mariners deserve.

    Sexual Misconduct. When a USMMA cadet, known as Midshipman-X, came 
forward in 2021 alleging she was raped on a Maersk ship, I wrote to 
MARAD. We went on to include specific provisions in the 2023 NDAA to 
prevent sexual assault and sexual harassment while at sea. Sexual 
misconduct is a crime, and we have to protect both our current and 
future mariners.

    Question 1. Will you prioritize mitigating sexual misconduct in the 
maritime industry if confirmed as MARAD Administrator?
    Answer. My time as a ship's captain, where I sailed with female 
crew members, provided me with direct, practical experience in managing 
crew welfare, particularly concerning safety and professional conduct. 
This experience gave me firsthand insight into the specific logistical 
and cultural adjustments necessary to ensure a safe, respectful, and 
fully compliant working environment for all personnel. This includes 
implementing and strictly enforcing policies to prevent and promptly 
address sexual misconduct and harassment.
    This isn't just a policy issue; it's about culture. Every mariner 
deserves to know they'll be safe and respected at sea, and I'll make 
that a top priority. As I said at my hearing, this is a simple issue at 
its core: treating each other with respect and not tolerating those who 
don't.

    Question 2. During your staff interview, you said you were not 
personally involved in Maersk's handling of the matter involving 
Midshipman-X or a subsequent matter involving Midshipman-Y. Is that 
correct?
    Answer. Yes. By the time this occurred, the internal division 
within MLL had already taken place, and I was running the USMMI 
business unit, not directly involved in ``Blue Fleet'' operations.

    Question 3. Have you ever discouraged Maersk, or any other entity 
with which you were employed, from reporting an allegation of sexual 
harassment or assault under 46 U.S.C. Sec. 10104?
    Answer. No.

    Question 4. What specific measures would you put into place to 
mitigate sexual misconduct throughout the maritime industry if 
confirmed?
    Answer. This is an issue I take very seriously. As a Master, I've 
sailed with mixed crews, including female officers and mariners, and I 
know firsthand that safety and respect must be built into the ship's 
culture from day one.
    If confirmed, I'd bring that same culture to MARAD--ensuring strong 
reporting systems, real accountability, and consistent enforcement 
across the industry. I'd also work closely with unions, the Coast 
Guard, academies, and operators to share best practices and strengthen 
prevention training.
    This isn't just a policy issue; it's about culture. Every mariner 
deserves to know they'll be safe and respected at sea, and I'll make 
that a top priority. As I said at my hearing, this is a simple issue at 
its core: treating each other with respect and not tolerating those who 
don't.

    Question 5. At the hearing, you said Kings Point has a ``long way 
to go'' in terms of dealing with sexual misconduct. Please elaborate on 
this testimony, including by explaining why you believe this and what 
specific actions you will pursue at the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy to 
protect our future mariners if confirmed.
    Answer. Thank you for the question and the opportunity to expand on 
my initial answer. When I said Kings Point has a long way to go, I was 
referring to all aspects of its operations, not just issues related to 
SASH (Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment). My direct experience with 
the Academy is somewhat dated, so if confirmed, I intend to take a 
fresh, detailed look at the current situation before drawing firm 
conclusions.

    Question 6. Were you aware of any instances of sexual harassment or 
sexual assault at the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy while serving on the 
Board of Directors that you believe were not properly reported or 
investigated? If so, please detail these matters.
    Answer. I am not aware of any such instances.

    Tariffs. In 2022, you gave a speech stating that ``every firm in 
every country in the supply chain'' feels the pain of tariffs, and that 
politicians ``enacting tariffs actually have no idea who and where they 
are causing pain.''

    Question 1. If confirmed, how do you intend to use your role as 
MARAD Administrator to help address the ``pain'' from the current 
tariffs?
    Answer. The MARAD Administrator does not hold the primary authority 
to set or impose tariffs; this power rests mainly with the President 
(via the USTR) and Congress MARAD's role is not tariff setting and is 
not a primary function of the role of which I am nominated for.

    Surface Transportation Reauthorization. The Bipartisan 
Infrastructure Law provided $2.25 billion for the Port Infrastructure 
Development Grant Program, among other investments. The Surface 
Transportation Reauthorization bill would be an excellent opportunity 
to secure funding and provisions to support the industry.

    Question 1. Do you think maritime issues should be part of the next 
Surface Transportation Reauthorization?
    Answer. If confirmed, I look forward to working proactively with 
your office on priorities pertinent to MARAD, at any point and under 
the direction of Congress.

    Food Aid. Food aid is one of the largest sources of cargo 
guaranteed to U.S. flag ships, and the Administration's dismantling of 
USAID has had major implications on the fleet. In Fiscal Year 2024, the 
USAID's Title II Food for Peace program ordered about 606,301 metric 
tons of food aid, and as of July 29 of Fiscal Year 2025, only 259,000 
metric tons have been ordered.

    Question 1. How does the cancellation of food aid impact the U.S. 
Merchant Marine, and do you have solutions?
    Answer. The rebuilding of our maritime enterprise must be rooted in 
carrying the Nation's commerce. A strong U.S. Merchant Marine must once 
again be central to how America moves its goods, competes globally, and 
secures its supply chains.
    That commitment is essential to our economic strength and directly 
supports MARAD's mission. It is also the only viable path to developing 
the cargo base we need, at the scale required to accomplish the overall 
goal of revitalizing and rebuilding the domestic U.S. maritime industry 
and workforce.

    Question 2. What are the consequences of the fleet not having 
enough cargo?
    Answer. Maritime shipping is a business, and the movement of cargo 
is our service. As in any business, when demand for our services drops, 
the business becomes unviable and fails. This is also true for the 
industry writ large: it will fail or become wholly dependent on 
government support.

    Port Infrastructure Development Program. In August 2025, MARAD 
withdrew six projects and terminated five projects within its Port 
Infrastructure Development Program (PIDP), resulting in a total 
retraction of $177 million and approximately $75 million in Federal 
funding, respectively.

    Question 1. Do you support the Port Infrastructure Development 
Program?
    Answer. If confirmed, I can commit to working with your office to 
continue to follow the law, as passed by Congress.

    Question 2. Regardless of your current familiarity with PIDP, will 
you commit to protecting the grants in this program from politicized 
termination?
    Answer. I am committed to ensuring that every dollar provided under 
the PIDP is awarded and administered based on merit, transparency, and 
statutory criteria. My focus will be on maintaining the program's 
integrity and ensuring that projects are selected and executed to 
deliver the maximum public benefit consistent with law and 
Administration priorities.

    Logging System. The United States lacks a modern cargo tracking 
system that could help the maritime industry address supply chain 
issues.

    Question 1. How could the United States implement a modern logging 
system for maritime cargo?
    Answer. I fully agree that developing a modern, integrated cargo 
visibility system is a critical national priority.
    At present, U.S. ports and supply chain nodes operate largely as 
islands of information, without a unified national operating picture of 
cargo movement. This severely limits our ability to anticipate and 
respond to disruptions, optimize logistics performance, and protect 
against data-driven vulnerabilities.
    This urgency is underscored by competitors like China. Its Logink 
system provides real-time access to global trade flow data and is 
utilized at ports they operate globally, giving them significant 
leverage in understanding--and potentially influencing--supply chain 
dynamics. The United States lacks a comparable system, and that gap 
poses both economic and security risks.
    The solution is not necessarily new data collection, but 
integration. We must create a secure, interoperable, and trusted data 
architecture that connects existing information from ports, carriers, 
terminals, and Federal systems.
    Such a framework would dramatically improve supply chain 
transparency, resilience, and cybersecurity while securely protecting 
proprietary and national security-sensitive data.
    MARAD can play a key convening and technical role in this effort. 
Its functions should include aligning standards, engaging stakeholders 
across the public and private sectors, and ensuring the resulting 
system supports both commercial competitiveness and national security 
objectives consistent with Administration priorities.

    Trade Agreements. International trade agreements offer an 
opportunity to negotiate and secure cargo on U.S. flag vessels, and 
consulting MARAD during this process would be advantageous for the U.S. 
maritime industry.

    Question 1. What do you think are the potential opportunities 
surrounding maritime cargo in international trade negotiations to 
support the U.S. maritime industry?
    Answer. I completely agree--the rebuilding of our maritime 
enterprise must be rooted in carrying the Nation's commerce. A strong 
U.S. Merchant Marine must once again be central to how America moves 
its goods, competes globally, and secures its supply chains.
    That commitment is essential to our economic strength and directly 
supports MARAD's mission. It is also the only viable path to developing 
the cargo base we need, at the scale required to accomplish the vision 
set forth by President Trump in his Restoring America's Maritime 
Dominance Executive Order.
                                 ______
                                 
   Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Edward Markey to 
                           Stephen M. Carmel
    Question 1. I authored the No Spills Act to strengthen the review 
process that the Maritime Administration uses to approve offshore 
fossil fuel terminals and increase penalties on corporations whose 
operations result in oil spills. Do you believe it is important to take 
public opinion into account when considering license applications for 
new offshore export terminals?

    A. Do you believe the maintenance of a healthy environment is in 
our national interest?
    Answer. Public input is an essential part of the review process for 
offshore terminal projects. The Maritime Administration's licensing 
process under the Deepwater Port Act is designed to be transparent and 
inclusive, ensuring that local communities, environmental stakeholders, 
and industry all have a voice. That public participation strengthens 
the legitimacy and quality of our decisions.
    As Administrator, my commitment would be to ensure that every 
application is reviewed rigorously, based on science, safety, and law--
and that the process reflects both environmental responsibility and the 
national interest in a secure, efficient energy and trade system.

    Question 2. As a former tanker captain, you're well aware that fuel 
efficiency is a key to profitability. Do you support the Maritime 
Environmental and Technical Assistance program, which helps shipping 
companies cut fuel costs and compete in the global economy?

    A. Would you protect this program from funding cuts or 
politicization?
    Answer. As a former tanker captain and shipping executive, I know 
fuel efficiency is central to profitability and competitiveness. If 
confirmed, I commit to awarding and administering programs based on 
merit, transparency, and statutory criteria. My focus will be on 
maintaining the program's integrity and ensuring that projects are 
selected and executed to deliver the maximum public benefit consistent 
with law and Administration priorities.

    Question 3. Greener ships are the worldwide trend, and many nations 
are looking to adopt standards for ships they will allow to dock at 
their ports. As we look to expand the number of American-flagged ships 
carrying goods, do you agree that lower-emission ships will be a 
necessary part of that mission?
    Answer. MARAD's job is to enable our U.S. carriers through 
providing tools and technical support to stay competitive in global 
trade. If confirmed, I will work to that end.
                                 ______
                                 
   Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Tammy Baldwin to 
                           Stephen M. Carmel
    Question 1. As Maritime Administrator, you would be charged with 
administering the Small Shipyard Grant Program, which provides crucial 
support for a key component of America's maritime industrial base. 
Small shipyards are often the lifeblood of coastal communities, 
supporting commercial fishing fleets, tugs and barges, ferries, dredges 
and government ships like Coast Guard cutters, firefighting and law 
enforcement boats. Will you commit to including adequate resources for 
the Small Shipyard Grant Program in your future budget requests?
    Answer. If confirmed, I will commit to award and administer 
programs under MARAD's purview based on merit, transparency, and 
statutory criteria.

    Question 2. In September 2023, the Department of Transportation 
published a waiver of Buy America requirements for de minimis costs and 
small grants. Despite the Department's waiver, will you commit to 
requiring all Small Shipyard Grant recipients, even those awarded less 
than $500,000 in Small Shipyard Grant funds, to comply with the 
domestic preference requirements for their projects?
    Answer. If confirmed, I look forward to working with your office on 
this issue and commit to furthering my understanding of this particular 
matter.

    Question 3. MARAD is tasked with fostering, promoting and 
developing the maritime industry of the United States to meet the 
Nation's economic and security needs. This includes efforts to support 
commercial shipbuilding in the United States, including through the 
Title XI Loan Guarantee Program, Small Shipyard Grant Program, and Port 
Infrastructure Development Program. In a time where it is increasingly 
obvious that the United States must strengthen our commercial 
shipbuilding industry, what will you do as Maritime Administrator to 
ensure our Nation can surge this capacity?
    Answer. I agree that strengthening our commercial shipbuilding 
industry is essential to both our economic and national security.
    The reality is this capability cannot be ``surged'' in a crisis. 
Shipbuilding capacity, workforce skills, and supplier networks must be 
built and sustained consistently over time. If we want that capability 
in an emergency, we must foster and develop it in peacetime.
    As Maritime Administrator, should I be given the honor of 
confirmation, my focus would be on creating the conditions for that 
long-term stability. I would use tools like a reimagined and 
strengthened Title XI Program--representing construction financing, not 
just loan guarantees--the Small Shipyard Grant Program, and the Port 
Infrastructure Development Program to rebuild capacity across the 
industrial base.
    That means helping U.S. yards move down the cost curve, invest in 
modern technology, and compete in international markets so that steady 
commercial work sustains them between defense cycles.
    Rebuilding this capacity isn't just about production; it's about 
restoring a maritime ecosystem: shipyards, suppliers, mariners, and 
carriers all working together. That is how we will ensure the United 
States can respond when needed--not by surging from a cold start, but 
by maintaining a living, capable industry every day.

    Question 4. In the 2023 Port Infrastructure Development Program 
(PIDP) award cycle, DOT announced $653 million to 41 ports, of which 
only two Great Lakes ports received grants. Ports in the Great Lakes 
region only received two percent of the distributed funds. I am 
concerned that applicants from the Great Lakes are not being fairly 
considered for PIDP awards, despite the critical need for investment. 
Do you commit to considering regional distribution of PIDP funds when 
awarding grants?
    Answer. If confirmed, I will commit to award and administer 
programs under MARADs purview based on merit, transparency, and 
statutory criteria.
                                 ______
                                 
  Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Tammy Duckworth to 
                           Stephen M. Carmel
Auxiliary Shipbuilding
    TRANSCOM's number one unfunded priority for Fiscal Year 2026 was 
sealift capacity, both into a theater as well as within a theater, and 
the Maritime Administration (MARAD) has a huge role to play in enabling 
the military in a wartime scenario.

    Question 1. Please provide your assessment of the current capacity 
of the United States Government to enable commercial or military 
shipyards in the United States to surge production of lift/auxiliary 
vessels in a wartime scenario to maintain fleet capacity necessary to 
support the military's needs?
    Answer. My assessment is straightforward: the United States today 
does not have the near-term ability to ``surge'' large-scale commercial 
or military shipbuilding and repair from a cold start to meet wartime 
lift/auxiliary needs. True surge capacity must be resident in the force 
in peacetime--yards, suppliers, skilled crews, material pipelines, and 
contract mechanisms--and much of that ecosystem is currently thin or in 
need of rebuilding. You cannot surge what you have not sustained. There 
are many reasons for this conclusion, but key reasons are:

   Industrial base shrinkage--there are relatively few U.S. 
        shipyards with the scale, military-spec experience, and modern 
        production facilities needed for rapid, high-volume output of 
        lift/auxiliary vessels.

   Workforce shortfalls--skilled shipbuilders, naval 
        architects, welders, and supervisors are limited; training and 
        apprenticeship pipelines are inadequate for a fast expansion.

   Fragile supplier chain--many critical components (engines, 
        generators, specialist steel, reduction gears, certain 
        electronics) have long lead times and limited domestic 
        producers.

   Production rhythm--shipbuilding depends on steady workloads; 
        yards cut costs and maintain capacity by doing continuous 
        commercial and defense work, not by waiting for crises.

    Question 2. Many of the United States' partners have strong 
domestic industries dedicated to commercial shipbuilding and building 
of specialized auxiliary vessels, such as cable-laying or cable-repair 
ships or landing craft utility vessels.
    If confirmed to be MARAD Administrator, would you support greater 
co-production and co-sustainment of auxiliaries with allies and 
partners to expand capacity and reduce risk--and what barriers exist to 
achieving this goal?
    Answer. If confirmed, I would support actively working through 
these barriers--aligning standards, identifying pilot opportunities, 
and ensuring that cooperation with allies complements our national 
industrial goals. The objective is not to replace U.S. capability, but 
to expand and reinforce it through trusted partnerships.
    I strongly support the idea of greater co-production and co-
sustainment of auxiliary vessels with our allies and partners. This is 
a strategic way to expand capacity, reduce risk, and strengthen the 
resilience of our collective maritime industrial base.

    Question 3. If confirmed to be MARAD Administrator, what is your 
plan to address the aging fleet and address significant maintenance 
issues plaguing the fleet?
    Answer. I plan to attract private capital and gradually reduce the 
need for government involvement with the ultimate objective of 
reestablishing shipbuilding as a self-sustaining, commercially 
competitive industry. By restoring competitiveness and scale in the 
private sector, we can both strengthen our industrial base and ensure 
that the maritime and logistics sectors contribute fully to U.S. 
economic and national security objectives.

    Question 4. What is your assessment of the Vessel Construction 
Manager program, and if confirmed to be MARAD Administrator, will you 
expand this program?
    Answer. My assessment is that the Vessel Construction Manager (VCM) 
program has been a clear success. It has improved cost control, 
schedule discipline, and technical oversight in complex shipbuilding 
projects. Its strong reputation has led other agencies, including the 
Army and NAVSEA, to explore similar models.
    Expanding the VCM, however, is not something MARAD can do 
unilaterally, since most applicable ship construction programs 
originate outside of our agency. That said, we can absolutely play a 
key assistance role: sharing best practices, supporting other agencies 
that want to adopt the model, and using the VCM ourselves whenever it 
is appropriate and within our authority.
Grants
    The Port Infrastructure Grant Program is crucial to keeping the 
important flow of commerce moving smoothly through the maritime 
environment.
    In 2024, Illinois received $82M in much needed funding to address 
infrastructure projects. However, in prior years, the Great Lakes 
community received a disproportionality small share of Port 
Infrastructure Grant Program funds that amounted to less than 3 percent 
of the total funding amount.

    Question 1. If confirmed to be Administrator, will you commit to 
building on this progress to make sure Port Infrastructure Grant 
Program funds are effectively distributed to Illinois projects and 
other non-coastal communities?
    Answer. I agree that ports in Illinois and across the Great Lakes 
are essential to our national economy. They move the raw materials and 
finished goods that keep American industry running, so continued 
investment there is critical. If confirmed, I look forward to working 
with your office on this issue and commit to furthering my 
understanding of this particular matter.

    Question 2. If confirmed, will you commit to disbursing all grant 
funding that has been awarded to Illinois in full and without undue 
delay, while opposing any efforts by the Office of Management and 
Budget or other entities to improperly abuse grant program disbursement 
to reward or punish perceived political allies or enemies?
    Answer. If confirmed, I commit to awarding and administering 
programs based on merit, transparency, and statutory criteria. My focus 
will be on maintaining the program's integrity and ensuring that 
projects are selected and executed to deliver the maximum public 
benefit consistent with law and Administration priorities.
Federal Elections
    Question 1. Setting aside the Congressional count and 
certification, do you believe President Donald Trump received more 
votes than Vice President Kamala Harris in the 2024 U.S. presidential 
election?
    Answer. Senator, with great respect, I do not believe it would be 
appropriate for me to offer any personal views or opinions on electoral 
matters.
    My responsibility as Maritime Administrator, if confirmed, would be 
to carry out the duties of the office with integrity, impartiality, and 
full respect for the law and for all those elected to serve.
    Personal political opinions have no bearing on that responsibility. 
I will ensure, for my part, that I conduct myself in a way that 
reflects the nonpartisan trust placed in this position at all times.

    Question 2. Setting aside the official Congressional count and 
certification, do you believe President Joe Biden received more votes 
than President Donald Trump in the 2020 U.S. presidential election?
    Answer. Senator, with great respect, I do not believe it would be 
appropriate for me to offer any personal views or opinions on electoral 
matters.
    My responsibility as Maritime Administrator, if confirmed, would be 
to carry out the duties of the office with integrity, impartiality, and 
full respect for the law and for all those elected to serve.
    Personal political opinions have no bearing on that responsibility. 
I will ensure, for my part, that I conduct myself in a way that 
reflects the nonpartisan trust placed in this position at all times.
                                 ______
                                 
    Response to Written Question Submitted by Hon. Dan Sullivan to 
                             Laura DiBella
Federal Maritime Commission Investigation Into Transit Constraints at 
        International Maritime Chokepoints
    Background: On March 14th of this year, The U.S. Federal Maritime 
Commission (FMC) noticed an investigation into global maritime 
chokepoints, including Russia's Northern Sea Route (NSR), reflecting 
its growing significance in international shipping.
    As Arctic sea ice diminishes, the NSR offers a shorter and more 
fuel-efficient route between Europe and Asia, presenting potential 
commercial and strategic opportunities for U.S. maritime interests. The 
opening of the NSR has generated governance disputes. Russia asserts 
control over the route and imposes fees on transiting vessels, while 
other nations advocate for freedom of navigation and international 
access.
    The NSR's strategic importance is underscored by increased Russian 
and Chinese military activities, including joint Arctic patrols, 
construction of new bases, and expansion of icebreaker fleets. These 
developments reflect the route's relevance to nuclear deterrence, 
missile defense, and broader Arctic security. The FMC's investigation, 
which also examines chokepoints such as the Suez and Panama Canals, 
highlighting heightened U.S. interest in Arctic maritime policy and 
security.
    FMC oversight and policy decisions regarding the NSR will have 
implications for Alaska's ports, Arctic shipping supply chains, and 
national defense readiness. Understanding the commercial, legal, and 
strategic dynamics of the NSR is essential to ensure that U.S. maritime 
infrastructure and Arctic operations are both competitive and secure, 
while maintaining compliance with international maritime law.

    Question 1. (Focused on Arctic Access): Given the growing 
accessibility of Arctic waters, how would you, as an FMC Commissioner, 
ensure that U.S. maritime policy protects Alaska's ports and Arctic 
supply chains--while balancing international navigation rights, 
national security interests, and the commercial opportunities presented 
by new Arctic shipping routes?
    Answer. If I am confirmed as an FMC Commissioner, I will ensure a 
competitive and reliable international ocean transportation system that 
supports the U.S. economy, protects Alaskan interests, and aligns with 
broader national security and international policy objectives. Ways in 
which I would go about this would involve leveraging the FMC's economic 
regulatory authority, closely monitoring shipping rates, surcharges, 
and service contracts for vessels using Arctic routes to and from U.S. 
ports, particularly those in Alaska. This will ensure that U.S. 
shippers are not subject to unjust and unreasonable charges or unfair 
practices as commercial activity increases. As a member of the U.S. 
Committee on the Marine Transportation System (CMTS), I would advocate 
for the robust development of a detailed maritime transportation and 
infrastructure strategy for the U.S. Arctic that includes adequate port 
facilities in Alaska to ensure that Alaska's ports remain competitive 
amidst the growing needs of the shippers in the Arctic waters. I would 
collaborate with and support our Federal partners that have a primary 
national security role like the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG), U.S. Maritime 
Administration (MARAD), and U.S. Department of War as America's 
economic security is a key part of national security. I would also 
coordinate with agencies like the USCG, NOAA, and the Department of 
Homeland Security (DHS) to support their efforts in charting unmapped 
waters, developing port access routes, and ensuring safe navigation. I 
would ensure that any FMC initiatives are developed in consultation 
with state, regional, and tribal representatives, as well as the 
National Shipper Advisory Committee (NSAC), to ensure local 
communities' needs and concerns are considered in the development of 
new shipping routes and port operations. I would ensure all FMC actions 
are consistent with U.S. foreign policy and international law, 
including the principle of freedom of navigation and the ``Arctic 
exception'' under UNCLOS Article 234, which grants coastal states 
authority to enforce pollution control laws in ice-covered areas. I 
would use the FMC's authority to conduct investigations into transit 
constraints at international maritime chokepoints, including potential 
Arctic routes, to gather data on shipping conditions and inform policy 
decisions. And finally, I would promote transparency in the industry by 
ensuring all tariffs and charges related to new Arctic routes are 
publicly available and clear, allowing the market to function 
efficiently and fairly.

    Question 2. (Competition and Sovereignty in the Arctic): As Arctic 
shipping lanes, particularly the Northern Sea Route, become more 
active, how would you help safeguard U.S. competitiveness--especially 
for Alaska's strategic ports--in the face of foreign control, 
navigation fees, and evolving international claims, while ensuring 
alignment with international maritime law and national security 
priorities?
    Answer. If I am confirmed as an FMC Commissioner, I would safeguard 
U.S. competitiveness in the Arctic with a multi-faceted approach that 
would combine diplomatic and persistent military presence, along with 
robust, dual-use infrastructure development and investment (to include 
icebreaker fleet expansion), regulatory measures, international 
cooperation, and strategic messaging to ensure the U.S. and Alaska 
remain competitive and secure in the evolving Arctic landscape. 
Asserting international law principles through operational presence, 
enhanced military presence, and strengthening partnerships with allies 
and local communities will address foreign control, i.e., Russia's 
attempts to control the Northern Sea Route (NSR), navigation fees, and 
evolving international claims while aligning with maritime law and 
national security priorities. And incentivizing routes that align with 
U.S. priorities will improve the safety and efficiency of U.S. 
shipping, reducing reliance on foreign-controlled passages.

    Question 3. (Supply Chain and National Security): Alaska's ports 
are critical to the state's economy and serve as key national defense 
assets. How would you work with Federal partners, including the Coast 
Guard and Department of Defense, to ensure Alaska's maritime supply 
chains remain resilient and secure as Arctic maritime traffic 
increases?
    Answer. If I am confirmed as an FMC Commissioner, I would 
collaborate with and support our Federal partners that have a primary 
national security role like the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG), U.S. Maritime 
Administration (MARAD), and U.S Department of War as America's economic 
security is a key part of national security. I would also coordinate 
with agencies like the USCG, NOAA, and the Department of Homeland 
Security (DHS) to support their efforts in charting unmapped waters, 
developing port access routes, and ensuring safe navigation. As 
previously mentioned, I will ensure a competitive and reliable 
international ocean transportation system that supports the U.S. 
economy, protects Alaskan interests, and aligns with broader national 
security and international policy objectives. Ways in which I would go 
about this would involve leveraging the FMC's economic regulatory 
authority, closely monitoring shipping rates, surcharges, and service 
contracts for vessels using Arctic routes to and from U.S. ports, 
particularly those in Alaska. This will ensure that U.S. shippers are 
not subject to unjust and unreasonable charges or unfair practices as 
commercial activity increases. As a member of the U.S. Committee on the 
Marine Transportation System (CMTS), I would advocate for the robust 
development of a detailed maritime transportation and infrastructure 
strategy for the U.S. Arctic that includes adequate port facilities in 
Alaska to ensure that Alaska's ports remain competitive amidst the 
growing needs of the shippers in the Arctic waters. I would ensure that 
any FMC initiatives are developed in consultation with state, regional, 
and tribal representatives, as well as the National Shipper Advisory 
Committee (NSAC), to ensure local communities' needs and concerns are 
considered in the development of new shipping routes and port 
operations. I would ensure all FMC actions are consistent with U.S. 
foreign policy and international law, including the principle of 
freedom of navigation and the ``Arctic exception'' under UNCLOS Article 
234, which grants coastal states authority to enforce pollution control 
laws in ice-covered areas. I would use the FMC's authority to conduct 
investigations into transit constraints at international maritime 
chokepoints, including potential Arctic routes, to gather data on 
shipping conditions and inform policy decisions. And finally, I would 
promote transparency in the industry by ensuring all tariffs and 
charges related to new Arctic routes are publicly available and clear, 
allowing the market to function efficiently and fairly.
                                 ______
                                 
  Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Marsha Blackburn to 
                             Laura DiBella
    Question 1. As an FMC Commissioner, can you commit to implementing 
the FMC's authorities as written by Congress and holding true to the 
Commission's foundational principles, which focus on being a 
nondiscriminatory regulator for the common carriage of goods in the 
foreign commerce of the United States?
    Answer. Yes, I can.

    Question 2. Freight forwarders and other Ocean Transport 
Intermediaries fill a crucial role in the American supply chain by 
helping American small, medium and large businesses efficiently move 
cargo via ocean. How do you view the FMC's role in empowering these 
Ocean Transport intermediaries to help American small and medium 
business compete?
    Answer. The FMC's role is to foster a fair, competitive, and 
transparent marketplace, providing oversight and consumer protection, 
and offering dispute resolution services. This helps build trust and 
integrity in the U.S. supply chain by creating a more level playing 
field for large and small shippers alike giving them better access to 
services at competitive rates. The FMC helps ensure that businesses of 
all sizes, through their freight forwarders and Ocean Transport 
Intermediaries, can navigate the complexities of international ocean 
shipping with greater confidence and fewer barriers, allowing them to 
compete more effectively in the global marketplace.

    Question 3. There are many parties in ocean transportation that are 
essential to a well-run national economy. Shippers, Consignees, Freight 
forwarders/OTIs, and the carriers themselves as well as custom-house 
brokers. If your nomination proceeds, would you support outreach to and 
listening to feedback from the industry to enhance compliance with 
existing regulations and to improve the competitiveness of American 
small and medium businesses?
    Answer. Yes, industry feedback and participation are critical to 
improving the competitiveness of American small and medium sized 
businesses.
                                 ______
                                 
      Response to Written Question Submitted by Hon. Ted Budd to 
                             Laura DiBella
    Question 1. The FMC currently has a case before it involving 
intermodal chassis that has been going on for over five years. The 
Commission's ALJ dismissed the remaining issues in the case nearly a 
year ago. Once confirmed, will you commit to promptly looking into this 
case and ending the prolonged uncertainty its reaming open has caused?
    Answer. Yes, I will.
                                 ______
                                 
   Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Maria Cantwell to 
                             Laura DiBella
    Jones Act. A long-standing tool to protect the U.S. maritime 
industry is the Jones Act, which requires that water-borne cargo 
carried between domestic ports must be on U.S. flag, U.S. built, and 
U.S. crewed ships. The Jones Act fleet consists of approximately 40,000 
vessels, supports 650,000 American family wage jobs, and contributes 
more than $150 billion to the national economy annually.

    Question 1. Do you support the Jones Act?
    Answer. Yes, I do.

    Lower Costs for Consumers. In 2022, Congress's Ocean Shipping 
Reform Act gave the Commission a shot in the arm providing additional 
authorities to go after bad actors, self-initiate investigations, boost 
enforcement, and lower costs for American consumers. Since OSRA was 
signed into law, we have yet to see the Commission use this power to 
increase investigations into bad actors.

    Question 1. As a Commissioner, what will you do to drive down costs 
for consumers?
    Answer. As a Commissioner, I will get to the heart of every matter 
that keeps costs high in terms of shipping, seeing through to swift 
completion several efforts that are currently under investigation, for 
example:

        Chokepoint interference keeps shipping costs high because 
        disruptions to these narrow waterways lead to significant 
        delays, mandatory rerouting, and increased operational expenses 
        like fuel and insurance which are ultimately passed down to the 
        consumer.

        Flags of Convenience, although in principle are designed to 
        keep costs low, have the potential to result in higher overall 
        risks to the supply chain due to lax oversight, potentially 
        leading to safety and reliability issues. Reduced oversight 
        could lead to catastrophic incidents that could compromise the 
        supply chain and have a disastrous effect on the U.S. 
        consumer's bottom line.

        Stymying the International Maritime Organization's (IMO) Net 
        Zero vote that was recently delayed until 2026 is critical to 
        driving down costs as the implementation of the Net Zero 
        Framework will not only increase costs across the board due to 
        the need to retrofit and accommodate new fuel types on vessels, 
        it also greatly benefits China's shipbuilding capacity as they 
        dominate the market. It is a win-win for them and lose-lose for 
        basically everyone else.

    Question 2. Will you support efforts to increase investigations by 
the Commission?
    Answer. Yes, I will.

    Question 3. How will you address cargo diversion to ensure that 
American ports will continue to be a preferred customer?
    Answer. Addressing the Harbor Maintenance Tax loophole along with 
cargo preference laws (i.e., Jones Act, American Cargo for American 
Ships Act) would combat this immediately. In tandem with this, a 
combination of robust infrastructure investment and enhancements 
throughout the system (which is how we need to view this) would ensure 
supply chain visibility and better collaboration with all involved to 
help develop contingency plans in the face of disruptions.

    Independent Agencies. President Trump has illegally fired over 25 
Members from independent Boards and Commissions this year, including at 
the FTC, NTSB, CPSC, and STB. Like those agencies, Congress created the 
FMC to be independent, and we should all expect its Commissioners to 
maintain their independence.

    Question 1. Do you believe in the importance of bipartisanship on 
independent boards and commissions like the FMC?
    Answer. Yes, I do.

    Question 2. Yes or No: Will you commit to maintaining the 
independence of the FMC as Congress intended, if confirmed?
    Answer. Yes, I will.

    Question 3. Yes or No: If the President or anyone else in this 
Administration threatened to fire you unless you took an action you 
disagreed with, would you refuse?
    Answer. I do not believe the President would ask me to do so; if 
confirmed, I pledge to uphold the law.

    Rail Merger/Connections to Ports. Awareness of the broader freight 
transportation market is important to performing the role of an FMC 
Commissioner.

    Question 1. Are you concerned about the effects of consolidation in 
the U.S. domestic rail market as it relates to the competitiveness of 
our ports and lowering costs of maritime shipping?
    Answer. Consolidation of any kind will have impacts, potentially 
both good and bad, and, if I am confirmed, I would appreciate hearing 
more about the impacts from the industry to ensure that competition 
remains high among our ports, along with costs remaining low in 
maritime shipping.

    Question 2. What information do you think would be helpful to the 
Federal Maritime Commission and the Surface Transportation Board to 
have from the railroads to better understand the impact of the proposed 
merger on our ports and American businesses exporting goods abroad?
    Answer. Understanding the type of cargo and ultimate destination of 
the cargo is where the conversation must begin as that will outline the 
current system in place and then help ascertain how the merger could 
rearrange the current supply chain and thus, its impacts on ports and 
American exporters.
                                 ______
                                 
  Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Tammy Duckworth to 
                             Laura DiBella
Federal Elections
    Question 1. Setting aside the Congressional count and 
certification, do you believe President Donald Trump received more 
votes than Vice President Kamala Harris in the 2024 U.S. presidential 
election?
    Answer. Congress certified that Donald Trump won the 2024 election 
on January 6, 2025.

    Question 2. Setting aside the official Congressional count and 
certification, do you believe President Joe Biden received more votes 
than President Donald Trump in the 2020 U.S. presidential election?
    Answer. Congress certified that Joe Biden won the 2020 presidential 
election on January 7, 2021.
                                 ______
                                 
  Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Marsha Blackburn to 
                             Robert Harvey
    Question 1. As an FMC Commissioner, can you commit to implementing 
the FMC's authorities as written by Congress and holding true to the 
Commission's foundational principles, which focus on being a 
nondiscriminatory regulator for the common carriage of goods in the 
foreign commerce of the United States?
    Answer. Yes.

    Question 2. Freight forwarders and other Ocean Transport 
Intermediaries fill a crucial role in the American supply chain by 
helping American small, medium and large businesses efficiently move 
cargo via ocean. How do you view the FMC's role in empowering these 
Ocean Transport intermediaries to help American small and medium 
business compete?
    Answer. To be mindful of the regulatory burdens and cost of 
compliance on American small, medium, and large businesses who 
efficiently move cargo via ocean, when exercising FMC's regulatory 
responsibilities.

    Question 3. There are many parties in ocean transportation that are 
essential to a well-run national economy. Shippers, Consignees, Freight 
forwarders/OTIs, and the carriers themselves as well as custom-house 
brokers. If your nomination proceeds, would you support outreach to and 
listening to feedback from the industry to enhance compliance with 
existing regulations and to improve the competitiveness of American 
small and medium businesses?
    Answer. Yes.
                                 ______
                                 
      Response to Written Question Submitted by Hon. Ted Budd to 
                             Robert Harvey
    Question 1. The FMC currently has a case before it involving 
intermodal chassis that has been going on for over five years. The 
Commission's ALJ dismissed the remaining issues in the case nearly a 
year ago. Once confirmed, will you commit to promptly looking into this 
case and ending the prolonged uncertainty its reaming open has caused?
    Answer. Yes.
                                 ______
                                 
   Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Maria Cantwell to 
                             Robert Harvey
Jones Act
    A long-standing tool to protect the U.S. maritime industry is the 
Jones Act, which requires that water-borne cargo carried between 
domestic ports must be on U.S. flag, U.S. built, and U.S. crewed ships. 
The Jones Act fleet consists of approximately 40,000 vessels, supports 
650,000 American family wage jobs, and contributes more than $150 
billion to the national economy annually.

    Question 1. Do you support the Jones Act?
    Answer. Yes.
Lower Costs for Consumers
    In 2022, Congress's Ocean Shipping Reform Act gave the Commission a 
shot in the arm providing additional authorities to go after bad 
actors, self-initiate investigations, boost enforcement, and lower 
costs for American consumers. Since OSRA was signed into law, we have 
yet to see the Commission use this power to increase investigations 
into bad actors.

    Question 1. As a Commissioner, what will you do to drive down costs 
for consumers?
    Answer. As stated in my hearing testimony, I support robust 
enforcement by the FMC to go after bad actors, self-initiate 
investigations, boost enforcement, and lower costs for American 
consumers.

    Question 2. Will you support efforts to increase investigations by 
the Commission?
    Answer. Yes.

    Question 3. How will you address cargo diversion to ensure that 
American ports will continue to be a preferred customer?
    Answer. Use FMC's investigation and enforcement authority to reduce 
cargo diversion to ensure that American ports will continue to be a 
preferred customer.
Independent Agencies
    President Trump has illegally fired over 25 Members from 
independent Boards and Commissions this year, including at the FTC, 
NTSB, CPSC, and STB. Like those agencies, Congress created the FMC to 
be independent. And we should all expect its Commissioners to maintain 
their independence.

    Question 1. Do you believe in the importance of bipartisanship on 
independent boards and commissions like the FMC?
    Answer. Yes.

    Question 2. Yes or No: Will you commit to maintaining the 
independence of the FMC as Congress intended, if confirmed?
    Answer. Yes.

    Question 3. Yes or No: If the President or anyone else in this 
Administration threatened to fire you unless you took an action you 
disagreed with, would you refuse?
    Answer. Yes.
Relevant Experience
    Your prior experience as a securities attorney and in business 
development does not appear to reflect the background that prior FMC 
Commissioner nominees possessed.

    Question 1. Do you have any prior maritime experience specifically?
    Answer. In terms of prior maritime experience, I state as follows:

    First, I served with the United States Navy on active duty and at 
Naval Station Great Lakes, Illinois. After active duty, I served as a 
reservist with Amphibious Group 2, Little Creek, Virginia and U.S. 
Naval Forces Europe, London, United Kingdom.
    The lesson learned from my time in the Navy is that economic 
security and national security are inseparable. U.S. national security 
protects our economic assets, including critical infrastructure, supply 
chains, port access, and international trade routes, from both 
traditional and emerging threats.
    Second, as President and Executive Director of the Florida 
Opportunity Fund (FOF), I have become familiar with emerging 
technologies in the maritime sector. For example, FOF has invested in: 
(1) cybersecurity/information technology companies that protect 
critical infrastructure; including vessels, ports and marine 
infrastructure; (2) companies that fuse real-time data with artificial 
intelligence to monitor maritime emissions and improve operational 
efficiency, at sea and ashore, and; (3) logistics companies providing 
multimodal last-mile delivery solutions, which improve visibility and 
reduce shipping time and cost.
    Additionally, FOF has begun to review investments in quantum 
solutions for the marine industry, enabling potential breakthroughs in 
route and fleet optimization, quantum sensing and navigation, secure 
quantum communication, and predictive maintenance and environmental 
modeling.
    Third, my economic development activities have been in a state with 
1300 miles of coastline, sixteen public seaports, and seven cruise 
ports. That experience has given me an even greater appreciation for 
the maritime industry, supply chains, and port access, not only for 
Florida but the entire country. Furthermore, in my role as Executive 
Director of Florida Development Finance Corporation, I understand the 
costs of port modernization for infrastructure projects like ports, 
docks, wharves, and related facilities.

    Question 2. Detail why the U.S. Senate should be confident you are 
prepared for this role.
    Answer. I believe my over 35 years of diverse experience in the 
military, legal and regulatory affairs, business, investment and 
finance, technology, and economic development will allow me to 
positively contribute to FMC's vital mission.
Legal Advocacy
    As a practicing attorney, you joined two Amici Curiae briefs in the 
case of U.S. v. Michael T. Flynn--the first on May 28, 2020, in the DC 
District Court, and the second on June 2, 2020, in the DC Circuit Court 
of Appeals. The briefs both supported dismissing the Federal case 
against Michael T. Flynn, a former Trump National Security Advisor who 
had pleaded guilty to making false statements to the FBI related to his 
contacts with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak.

    Question 1. What were the circumstances that led to your 
involvement with these briefs, including but not limited to when you 
first became aware of the first Amici Curiae brief, how you became 
aware, and who contacted you about it.
    Answer. As I recall, the initial outreach was made to members of 
the Republican National Lawyers Association.

    Question 2. Which individual(s) or organization(s) led or 
coordinated the Amici Curiae?
    Answer. Leslie McAdoo Gordon, McAdoo Gordon & Associates, P.C., 
authored both briefs and the coordination was led by the Republican 
National Lawyers Association.

    Question 3. Why did you decide to join these two Amici Curiae 
briefs?
    Answer. The amici curiae were a bipartisan group of attorneys with 
extensive experience in the Federal court system, including many who 
practice criminal law in the relevant courts, and other Federal courts. 
Some were prosecutors, government attorneys, or judges.
    All had an interest in the proper application of Fed.R.Crim.P 48 in 
light of Separation of Powers principles.

    Question 4. Did you receive any compensation in connection with 
either of these Amici Curiae briefs? If so, please detail the source 
and amount of compensation.
    Answer. No.
                                 ______
                                 
  Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Tammy Duckworth to 
                             Robert Harvey
Federal Elections
    Question 1. Setting aside the Congressional count and 
certification, do you believe President Donald Trump received more 
votes than Vice President Kamala Harris in the 2024 U.S. presidential 
election?
    Answer. Congress certified that Donald Trump won the 2024 
presidential election on January 6, 2025.

    Question 2. Setting aside the official Congressional count and 
certification, do you believe President Joe Biden received more votes 
than President Donald Trump in the 2020 U.S. presidential election?
    Answer. Congress certified that Joe Biden won the 2020 presidential 
election on January 7, 2021.
                                 ______
                                 
    Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Roger Wicker to 
                             Timothy Petty
Aquaculture
    Background: Seafood production is a cornerstone of Mississippi's 
coastal economy--supporting thousands of jobs and contributing hundreds 
of millions of dollars each year through our commercial fisheries, 
processors, and seafood markets. Yet nationwide, the United States 
continues to import roughly 80 percent of the seafood we consume, 
resulting in a seafood trade deficit that now exceeds $20 billion 
annually. I see that as a missed opportunity for American workers and 
coastal communities. NOAA must play a central role in closing that gap.
    Expanding marine aquaculture will help ensure that more of the 
seafood on American plates is produced by American hands.

    Question 1. If confirmed, will you commit to prioritizing the 
growth of U.S. marine aquaculture as part of NOAA's broader strategy to 
reduce our seafood trade deficit and support coastal economies like 
those in Mississippi?
    Answer. A central tenet of the Administration's agenda is the 
advancement of American marine aquaculture. The President's Executive 
Order, ``Restoring America's Seafood Competitiveness,'' included 
provisions for streamlining aquaculture permitting, a commitment NOAA 
is actively pursuing. NOAA intends to continue working with the various 
regulatory agencies to streamline permitting for greater efficiency and 
predictability, while continuing to advance aquaculture research and 
promote sustainable practices.
Ocean Observations and Technology
    Background: The Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS) is the 
Nation's leading resource for community-driven coastal, ocean, and 
Great Lakes sensor information. This vital program supports a vast 
network of buoys, gliders, high frequency radars, and other sensors 
that monitor U.S. waters. IOOS deploys, operates, and maintains more 
than 300 observing assets at 11 Regional Associations. Mississippi's 
Gulf Coast is home to national leaders in ocean observing and research, 
including the University of Southern Mississippi, the Stennis Space 
Center, and the Gulf Coastal Ocean Observing System.

    Question 1. As NOAA's Deputy Administrator, how would you ensure 
IOOS data and research are fully applied to improve coastal management, 
strengthen forecasting, and support local industries across the Gulf 
region?
    Answer. I support NOAA's efforts to keep regional ocean observing 
data publicly accessible. I will champion the integration of ocean data 
from diverse sources--including Federal agencies, universities, 
industry, and non-profits--to strengthen our collective understanding. 
Continued access to this data is vital for supporting defense 
operations, safe maritime navigation, economic activity, public health, 
weather prediction, fisheries, conservation, and the responsible 
management of ocean and Great Lakes ecosystems.

    Question 2. The Gulf Coast is also expanding as a center for marine 
technology and innovation, from autonomous systems and advanced sensors 
to new data tools that support weather and ocean forecasting. Do you 
agree that NOAA should continue to partner with universities, small 
businesses, and private industry to expand economic opportunities and 
strengthen America's leadership in ocean technology?
    Answer. Yes, I support NOAA's continued engagement with 
universities, small businesses, and the private sector to expand 
economic opportunities and technological leadership. Strategic 
partnerships are key to advancing NOAA's mission while also supporting 
regional economies, especially along the Gulf Coast. By leveraging 
external expertise and innovation, NOAA can enhance its science-based 
modeling, forecasting capabilities, improve fishery monitoring, and 
support a thriving blue economy.
NOAA Cooperative Institutes
    Background: The Ocean Exploration Cooperative Institute has 
supported and continues to support the Trump administration's 
priorities through U.S. leadership in ocean exploration and technology 
development. It is the go-to for critical minerals discovery in the 
ocean due its expertise with long-endurance autonomous surface and 
subsurface vehicles. This work is accelerated through public-private 
partnerships with industry.

    Question 1. What are your priorities for further implementation of 
public-private partnerships with NOAA Cooperative Institutes? How do 
you plan to utilize your authorities to incentivize innovative ocean 
research and training in the United States?
    Answer. If confirmed, I will focus on strengthening NOAA's 
partnerships with universities, Tribal nations, states, private sector 
and industry to ensure that ocean research and workforce development 
reflects the regional and local communities. I will work to broaden 
access to NOAA's scientific resources, support collaborative projects 
in emerging marine and fishery technologies, and champion training 
pathways that prepare the next generation of ocean leaders.
                                 ______
                                 
    Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Dan Sullivan to 
                             Timothy Petty
Restoring American Seafood Competitiveness
   Alaska alone supplies more than half of the seafood produced 
        in the entire United States, and it is integral to our way of 
        life.

   Over the last several years, the U.S. seafood industry has 
        experienced significant economic hardship and drastic declines, 
        primarily due to unfair and predatory practices from Russia and 
        China.

   In April, President Trump gave fishermen a shot in the arm 
        with his Executive order for Restoring American Seafood 
        Competitiveness. We are so thankful to the President for 
        putting forward such a meaningful EO to help our fishermen.

   This EO provides a roadmap to restore the U.S. domestic 
        fishing industry to greatness.

   This EO provides several direct pathways to further support 
        our Alaska fishermen and our communities, including strategies 
        to promote marketing, sale, and export of U.S. seafood 
        products.

     I look forward to working with you, NOAA Administrator 
            Neil Jacobs, Secretary Lutnick, and all of the other agency 
            heads tasked with ushering in a new Era of Seafood Policy 
            under this Executive Order. I ask that you use me and my 
            office as a resource as we move forward on these efforts.

   Alaska is the superpower of seafood, supporting 1.6 million 
        jobs nationwide and providing 10 billion meals each year.

   More than $1.7 billion in Alaska seafood products are 
        exported annually, contributing $15.8 billion to the U.S. 
        economy.

   But, to accomplish all of this, U.S. fishermen need a few 
        basic things from the Federal government:

     Robust and timely fish surveys to inform accurate 
            science-based stock assessments; and

     Timely promulgation of regulations to manage--and 
            open--the fisheries.

   Unfortunately, NOAA's fisheries surveys and stock 
        assessments are increasingly challenged by aging survey 
        vessels, data gaps, and delayed reporting, which can lead to 
        managers being overly cautious and reduce the amount of fish 
        that can be caught.

   This means less money in our American fishermen's pockets 
        and fewer opportunities for our people to have prime wild-
        caught fish--this is real economic harm for Alaska's and 
        America's fishing communities.

   We are the gold standard for sustainable management.

   However, if we want to stay competitive and close the 
        seafood trade gap while keeping

     fisheries the most sustainable in the world, NOAA has 
            to modernize its science, its surveys, and its technology.

   That means better data collection, faster processing, and 
        tools that can give fishermen and managers real-time insights.

   A strong NOAA and National Marine Fisheries Service--along 
        with a dedicated, professional workforce--is also critical to 
        generating this economic activity and furthering the goals of 
        the President's EO.

   There is a reason these surveys must take place, and we need 
        to make sure that NOAA's fisheries science centers conduct this 
        work not just this year, but in future years.

    Question 1. Dr. Petty, will you commit to prioritizing the 
modernization of NOAA's fisheries science, including improved survey 
capacity, data collection, and technology upgrades, so that Alaska's 
fishermen and coastal communities can continue to rely on the best 
science in the world to sustain their livelihoods and our Nation's 
seafood supply?
    Answer. Yes.

    Question 2. Dr. Petty, I mentioned the EO on Restoring American 
Seafood Competitiveness, and how it includes seafood marketing, yet 
NOAA has zeroed out the Saltonstall-Kennedy grant program in FY25 and 
have not yet allocated money for FY26. Can you commit to ensuring there 
is funding for the Saltonstall-Kennedy FY26 grant program?
    Answer. If confirmed, I commit to keeping you informed regarding 
the implementation of the President's Executive Order on Restoring 
American Seafood Competitiveness. I also look forward to staying in 
touch as the Administration develops the FY2027 President's Budget 
request to Congress.
IUU Fishing
   Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated or ``IUU'' fishing 
        poses a significant threat to global marine ecosystems, 
        economies, and food security. It's estimated that IUU fishing 
        accounts for up to 20 percent of the global catch, which 
        translates to global losses between $10 billion and $50 billion 
        annually.

   IUU fishing is generally not an issue in the United States; 
        our fisheries are the most sustainable in the world. But 
        sustainably-sourced, legally-caught, high-quality seafood can't 
        compete with illegally sourced seafood that that is being 
        plundered from our oceans.

   We cannot have IUU fishing continue to threaten the 
        livelihoods of U.S. fishermen, undermine fair competition, and 
        deplete global fish stocks. Despite existing enforcement 
        mechanisms, illegal operators continue to exploit loopholes and 
        evade oversight, often engaging in forced labor and 
        environmentally destructive practices.

   Because of these threats to U.S. industry, I introduced the 
        Fighting Foreign Illegal Seafood Harvest (FISH) Act, which 
        combats IUU fishing globally. The FISH Act is a very bipartisan 
        bill and is just passed the Senate as an amendment to the FY 26 
        NDAA.

    Question 1. Dr. Petty, can you commit to strengthening enforcement 
against IUU fishing and ensuring that American fishermen are competing 
on a level playing field?
    Answer. Under the new Seafood Competitiveness directive, DOC and 
USTR are charged with developing a coordinated strategy to enhance the 
vitality of the U.S. seafood sector, including through the Seafood 
Trade Task Force. If confirmed, I will leverage this initiative to 
improve access to foreign markets, confront unfair trade practices, and 
reinforce a fair and thriving domestic marketplace for American seafood 
producers through strong interagency and industry collaboration.
NOAA Ocean Data/Research
   Dr. Petty, western Alaska is still recovering from the 
        devastation caused by the remnants of Typhoon Halong, which 
        brought destructive winds and record storm surges that 
        displaced families and destroyed homes across Western Alaska.

   Events like that remind us just how much is at stake for 
        Alaska's coastal communities--and how essential NOAA's research 
        and observing systems are for protecting lives and livelihoods.

   Alaskans know better than most that accurate, long-term 
        forecasting can mean the difference between safety and 
        catastrophe.

   In addition to ensuring the safety of our coastal 
        communities, ocean data and research are critical drivers for 
        supporting our Nation's economy, and I commend this 
        Administration for its focus on unleashing technology and 
        innovation.

   Alaskans know firsthand how important our coasts and oceans 
        are, several spending much of the year out on the water or 
        harvesting along our coasts.

   However, to fully unleash Alaska's economic potential and 
        allow our communities to thrive, Alaska needs the tools and 
        weather forecasts to improve safety, enhance the economy, and 
        protect the environment for our coastal communities.

   For this reason, I cosponsored a bill with my colleague 
        Senator Wicker to reauthorize the Integrated Ocean Observing 
        System (IOOS) at NOAA.

   The goals of IOOS decrease risks for Alaska. With better, 
        faster, and more cost-effective technologies and essential data 
        we can unlock our economic potential and protect lives and 
        livelihoods.

    Question 1. Will you commit to empowering NOAA's ocean data and 
research functions to ensure that Alaska doesn't lose the scientific 
capacity for important operational and long-term forecasting?
    Answer. Yes.
Alaska Salmon Research Task Force
   I now want to turn to what is truly the lifeblood of my 
        state: salmon.

   Salmon is a way of life in Alaska and a primary food source 
        for many in the state. We don't buy our salmon in the store 
        like you all do, we fish for it, and we put it up to eat 
        throughout the year. Salmon closures shake the foundation of 
        our daily lives.

   Over the last several years, we have seen huge disparities 
        in our salmon runs. Bristol Bay has had fantastic Sockeye 
        returns, while the Yukon and Kuskokwim are seeing abysmal 
        returns of King salmon and seasons continue to be closed.

   It is imperative that we get to the bottom of what is 
        causing these fluctuations and poor salmon returns.

   Luckily, you've got a basis to work on. My Alaska Salmon 
        Research Task Force Act was signed into law in 2022 and had 
        NOAA collaborate with salmon experts in Alaska to chart a path 
        forward to research why we are seeing such decreased abundance 
        of salmon.

   The report was released last summer with suggestions of 
        discrete, meaningful research projects that we can undertake to 
        get to the bottom of this issue.

   A major research gap that was identified was that we are 
        doing very little research on the middle of salmon's lives when 
        they are in the ocean. That research is crucial to 
        understanding how to ensure sustainable salmon runs.

    Question 1. Can you commit to working with me to prioritize and 
build upon the work we have started to better understand why our salmon 
runs are decreasing in Alaska?
    Answer. Yes.
Russian Seafood Reciprocity Executive Orders
   Dr. Petty, I want to bring up something that we talked about 
        during our meeting and that is the current reciprocal ban on 
        Russian Seafood.

   Russia has banned U.S. seafood from its markets since 2014. 
        However, for many years, Russia was not subject to any special 
        import duties in the U.S. Meanwhile, Russia has drastically 
        increased seafood production since 2022 and is openly working 
        to flood both U.S. and global markets with cheap seafood to 
        push out U.S. product.

   All the while, our hardworking fishermen could not export a 
        single fish to Russia. For nearly 10 years we allowed them to 
        do this and for years, I advocated to address this asymmetrical 
        and very unfair trade relationship. I was finally successful in 
        getting the last Administration to roll out a couple of 
        executive orders to put a stop to this and restore reciprocity. 
        If we can't enter the Russian market, they shouldn't be able to 
        flood ours, too.

   EO 14068 in 2022 banned imports of Russian seafood. However, 
        Russia found a loophole by laundering their seafood through 
        China to circumvent the ban. EO 14114 in 2023 closed this 
        loophole and made it abundantly clear than any seafood 
        harvested in Russia is banned from import into the U.S.--even 
        if it goes through processing in another country.

   Russia is our biggest competitor in a lot of the seafood 
        market, and just like China, they don't play fair.

    Question 1. Will you commit to working with Secretary Lutnick to 
keep these reciprocal executive orders--EO 14068 and EO 14114--in 
place? They are critical to keeping our seafood trade fair.
    Answer. If confirmed, I will collaborate with both Secretary 
Lutnick, Under Secretary Jacobs, and other stakeholders to ensure these 
executive orders are implemented effectively and reflect the 
President's priorities. I will also advocate for data-driven 
assessments and stakeholder engagement to keep our seafood trade 
policies aligned with industry needs and global standards.
                                 ______
                                 
  Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Marsha Blackburn to 
                             Timothy Petty
    Question 1. Last year, at the urging of Chairman Cruz and myself, 
NOAA issued a two-year pause on new permitting restrictions for 
undersea cables. This pause was a step in the right direction, but it's 
only temporary. That's why I recently introduced the Undersea Cable 
Protection Act, which would make that pause permanent and ensure NOAA 
cannot impose burdensome regulations that unnecessarily slow down the 
deployment of critical subsea cable infrastructure. Given the 
importance of undersea cables to our national security, global 
communications, and economic competitiveness, do you agree that we need 
to eliminate burdensome regulations at NOAA and streamline permitting 
so these projects can continue without delay?
    Answer. The vital importance of undersea cables for national 
security and economic competitiveness is fully acknowledged. The 
agency's core responsibility is to ensure that its regulatory processes 
are efficient and appropriately streamlined for the deployment of this 
critical infrastructure. If confirmed, I commit to prioritizing the 
review and efforts to streamline processes related to permitting and 
address any unnecessary administrative burdens.

    Question 2. Mr. Petty, many industries rely on publicly available 
NOAA datasets for the purpose of not only assessing and protecting 
against immediate weather risks, but also for historical knowledge that 
influences long-term infrastructure planning. NOAA's data and cutting-
edge research helps all taxpayers better understand what risks weather 
poses to their communities and properties, and it affects how we act 
before and after some of our country's biggest emergencies. In your 
view, what is NOAA's proper role in making their data available to the 
public?
    Answer. NOAA's role in public data access is central to its 
mission. By providing open, high-quality datasets, NOAA empowers 
communities, industries, and governments to prepare for weather 
extremes, design resilient infrastructure, and respond effectively to 
emergencies. If confirmed, I will work to strengthen data delivery 
systems, improve user interfaces, and deliver science-based datasets to 
ensure NOAA's science reaches those who need it most.
                                 ______
                                 
   Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Maria Cantwell to 
                             Timothy Petty
NOAA Workforce Reductions
    I have serious concerns about the current state of NOAA's 
workforce. Since January 2025, NOAA has lost a combined 27,000 years of 
experience. The resulting brain drain has impacted the entire agency. 
Overall, NOAA now has more than 3,000 vacant positions across the 
agency.
    On February 19, 2025, I sent a letter to Secretary Lutnick urging 
him to protect NOAA's critical workforce from the Trump 
Administration's reduction-in-force initiatives and hiring freeze, 
which would jeopardize the safety of the American public. Despite this 
warning, NOAA has lost over 2,000 employees through probationary 
firings and voluntary separation programs. These staffing shortages are 
disrupting NOAA's core functions. For instance, over a dozen stock 
assessments in New England and the mid-Atlantic have been canceled this 
year due to staffing shortages, and additional surveys in the Gulf and 
Hawaii were also canceled.

    Question 1. Yes or No: Do you believe NOAA can operate at its peak 
effectiveness when it has over 3,000 positions vacant?
    Answer. If confirmed, my efforts will center on maintaining and 
enhancing our critical work in science, dedicated NOAA service, and 
effective stewardship.

    Question 2. Yes or No: Do you think that the agency's ability to 
carry out its mission effectively has been impacted by the loss of 
about 2,000 officials since January?
    Answer. NOAA has articulated its foundational mission and 
operational priorities. Upon confirmation, my focus will be on driving 
performance and accountability across these critical mission areas.

    Question 3. Yes or No: Will you commit to fill these vacant NOAA 
positions under your purview without delay if confirmed?
    Answer. Upon confirmation, I will take steps to ensure NOAA 
maintains the staffing levels required to execute its vital mission and 
strategic goals effectively.

    Question 4. What specific steps would you take to ensure the 
National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) and National Ocean Service 
(NOS) has sufficient staff to conduct critical activities like stock 
assessments, permitting, and oil spill response?
    Answer. Upon confirmation, I will immediately collaborate with 
NMFS, NOS, and NOAA's Human Capital Services to ensure the skilled 
workforce has adequate resources that are essential to advancing our 
fisheries and ocean mission and delivering on strategic goals.

    Question 5. Will you ensure NOAA is adequately staffed so that 
Tribes are able to access meaningful government-to-government 
consultation and technical assistance on NOAA programs, including 
grants?
    Answer. I recognize and uphold the importance of government-to-
government consultations with Tribes in shaping effective and inclusive 
policy.

    Question 6. What is your plan for rebuilding the base of expertise 
that has been lost, ensuring that our science remains cutting edge, and 
retaining experts that are otherwise likely to leave for work in other 
nations?
    Answer. Upon confirmation, I will work to strengthen NOAA's 
foundation of expertise by cultivating a culture that empowers and 
values our researchers--enabling them to deliver innovative, high-
impact science for the benefit of the American people.
National Marine Fisheries Service
    American fisheries are the best managed fisheries in the world 
because of science. However, recent staffing cuts and the ongoing 
Federal hiring freeze have left NOAA with a shortage of fishery 
managers, scientists, and mariners that NOAA needs to operate its 
ships.
    As a result, many of NOAA's research vessels were tied up at the 
dock this summer, resulting in stock assessments being cancelled. 
Without stock assessments, NOAA will have to lower harvest levels. That 
means fewer fish, fewer fishing jobs, and a damaging ripple effect 
throughout coastal economies that rely on seafood.

    Question 1. What is your plan to address stock assessment 
shortfalls?
    Answer. If confirmed, I will collaborate with Congress to secure 
the resources NOAA needs to prioritize critical surveys--addressing 
mariner workforce gaps and expanding the use of uncrewed systems to 
enhance survey capabilities.

    Question 2. Yes or No: Do you support moving NMFS, the Office of 
Protected Resources, or any of their activities and functions out of 
NOAA? If yes, explain why.
    Answer. The FY 2026 President's Budget request for NOAA proposes 
transferring responsibilities under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) 
and Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) from the National Marine 
Fisheries Service's Office of Protected Resources to the U.S. Fish and 
Wildlife Service within the Department of the Interior. This shift aims 
to enhance interagency coordination, increase operational efficiency, 
and streamline the implementation of these laws--ultimately reducing 
regulatory burdens for both the public and industry.
Northwest Fisheries Science Center
    A significant portion of salmon research occurs at the Northwest 
Fisheries Science Center in Seattle. That building is in dire need of 
replacement. I previously secured funding for a new building that could 
be collocated with the University of Washington, but it was rescinded 
by the reconciliation bill.

    Question 1. Do you support replacing the Northwest lab facility?
    Answer. NOAA's infrastructure, including the Northwest Fisheries 
Science Center, is central to advancing scientific research and 
conservation goals. These facilities contribute directly to the 
recovery of Pacific salmon and steelhead--species that are integral to 
the Pacific Northwest's economy, cultural identity, and Tribal Treaty 
obligations. Strategic investment in these assets is important but must 
be guided by practical and sustainable planning. If confirmed, I will 
work closely with Congress, GSA, and local partners to explore 
appropriate next steps for the Northwest Fisheries Science Center.
Salmon Infrastructure
    Salmon are central to the state of Washington's economy, culture, 
Tribal Treaty Rights, and our identity in the Pacific Northwest. We 
need a refined strategy with bold actions that restores critical 
habitats and advances innovative science to turn the tide on salmon 
declines so that we can make meaningful progress on salmon restoration.

    Question 1. Do you support including salmon infrastructure, such as 
funding for hatcheries and culvert removal, in future infrastructure 
and surface transportation packages?
    Answer. The health of Northwest salmon populations depends on 
effective management of infrastructure and tributary systems. NOAA 
views these elements as critical and will continue to collaborate 
closely with regional stakeholders to ensure sustainable fisheries for 
future generations.

    Question 2. If confirmed, will you work with me to solve problems 
that harm salmon populations such as culverts and hazardous tire 
chemicals?
    Answer. The health of salmon populations in the region depends 
heavily on the condition of infrastructure and water quality systems. 
While transportation management, water quality resources and chemical 
oversight fall outside NOAA's direct authority, the agency is dedicated 
to working in partnership with state, local, and Federal entities to 
ensure these critical resources are managed effectively for the 
enduring viability of salmon.

    Question 3. Yes or No: Do you support further investments in Tribal 
salmon hatchery infrastructure?
    Answer. I recognize the deep connection between Tribes and 
fisheries resources, and if confirmed, I will work to maintain strong, 
enduring partnerships with Tribal governments to address fisheries 
management challenges together.
Bipartisan NOAA Programs
    I along with Senator Wicker have introduced bills to reauthorize 
both the Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS) and National Sea 
Grant College programs, which would be eliminated in the President's FY 
2026 budget. NOAA's buoy provides access to high quality ocean, coastal 
and Great Lakes data that weather forecasters, fishermen, marine 
transportation, and other ocean users depend on for safety and to 
support coastal economic development. And Sea Grant helps protect 
coastal communities while supporting our fishermen. Last year, 
Washington Sea Grant generated over $60 million in economic benefits to 
the State of Washington, nearly 20 times the Federal investment.

    Question 1. Do you support the IOOS program?
    Answer. I support NOAA's efforts to keep regional ocean observing 
data publicly accessible. I will champion the integration of ocean data 
from diverse sources--including Federal agencies, universities, 
industry, and non-profits--to strengthen our collective understanding. 
Continued access to this data is vital for supporting defense 
operations, safe maritime navigation, economic activity, public health, 
weather prediction, fisheries, conservation, and the responsible 
management of ocean and Great Lakes ecosystems.

    Question 2. Do you support the Sea Grant program?
    Answer. The President's 2026 budget request provides a clear 
framework for prioritizing federal expenditures.

    Question 3. Do you commit to maintaining programs within NOAA that 
are Congressionally mandated?
    Answer. If confirmed, I will faithfully follow the law and remain 
committed to advancing NOAA's essential work--from ocean and marine 
stewardship, fisheries management and to weather forecasting--with 
scientific rigor, transparency, and impact effectiveness.
Fisheries Disasters
    An important role of NOAA Fisheries is to administer disaster 
assistance funds for declared fisheries disasters. U.S. fishermen are 
currently waiting on $300 million in appropriated funds for fisheries 
disasters assistance to be administered.

    Question 1. Do you commit to ensuring NOAA Fisheries quickly 
administers appropriated fisheries disaster assistance funds once 
confirmed?
    Answer. I recognize the critical importance of NOAA's management of 
fisheries disaster assistance, which provides support to coastal 
economies and fishing communities following catastrophic events. If 
confirmed, I commit to working closely with the Department to 
administer assistance funds without unnecessary disruption.

    Question 2. What steps will you take to ensure fisheries disaster 
funds are administered without delay in the future?
    Answer. If confirmed, I commit to working with the resources that 
Congress provides, and to working with the Department and OMB to 
prioritize streamlining the disbursement process to deliver these 
critical funds to the impacted states, tribes, and territories.
Illegal, Unregulated, and Unreported (IUU) Fishing
    IUU fishing is a key driver of global overfishing that threatens 
marine ecosystems, food security, and regional stability. It's a major 
global challenge that requires a whole-of-government approach by U.S. 
agencies for effective data collection, sharing of information, and 
enforcement efforts. The recent Executive Order 14276 on seafood 
competitiveness emphasized the urgency of protecting U.S. markets and 
maritime security from threats posed by IUU fishing and those products 
entering U.S. supply chains. It explicitly calls for enhanced Federal 
efforts to counter IUU fishing, improve traceability of seafood 
products, and coordinate more effectively across agencies, including 
Customs and Border Protection, Coast Guard, and the State Department. 
Given the scale of the threat and the vulnerabilities in U.S. seafood 
supply chains, this EO represents an opportunity and responsibility for 
NOAA to lead and act quickly.

    Question 1. What actions will you take to ensure NOAA's efforts to 
address IUU fishing is prioritized and sufficiently resourced?
    Answer. Ensuring the competitiveness of American seafood means 
confronting IUU fishing head-on. If confirmed, I will support NOAA's 
efforts to enhance enforcement, expand monitoring of seafood imports, 
and build stronger global coalitions to prevent illegally caught fish 
from entering the U.S. supply chain.

    Question 2. What actions will you take to improve coordination 
between NOAA and other agencies and ensure a whole-of-government 
approach to combating IUU fishing?
    Answer. The Executive Order on Seafood Competitiveness, expanding 
upon EO 13921, calls on DOC and USTR to evaluate seafood trade dynamics 
and develop a unified strategy, while establishing the Seafood Trade 
Task Force under joint leadership. If confirmed, I will actively engage 
this mechanism to pursue improved market access, combat unfair trade 
practices, and ensure a level playing field for American seafood 
producers.
                                 ______
                                 
   Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Edward Markey to 
                             Timothy Petty
    Question 1. Sound, unbiased ocean and atmospheric research is at 
the heart of the component of NOAA you would supervise if confirmed. Do 
you agree with the scientific communities' consensus that climate 
change is real and already impacting the ocean including American 
fisheries?

    a. Do you believe that it is NOAA's responsibility to conduct 
research and educate the public about all aspects of our changing 
climate and how it will impact their daily lives?
    Answer. I believe NOAA has a vital responsibility to conduct 
rigorous applied research and to communicate its findings with 
transparency and clarity. It is essential that the public understands 
how changes in our oceans and atmosphere influence daily life--from 
weather systems and coastal resilience to food supply and public 
safety.

    b. If confirmed, how will you ensure that NOAA leads the way in 
developing and implementing climate-ready fisheries policies--
supporting adaptive management, advancing ocean and climate science, 
and strengthening the resilience of U.S. fishermen and coastal 
communities facing these accelerating environmental changes?
    Answer. If confirmed, I will ensure NOAA leads with science-based, 
adaptive fisheries policies that respond to changing environmental and 
economic conditions. I will prioritize investments in ocean science, 
fishery surveys and strengthen data-driven management, while working 
closely with fishermen, stakeholders, states, Tribal partners, and 
coastal communities to build resilience in the face of international 
competition, IUU impacts and environmental change.

    Question 2. NOAA has lost significant portions of its workforce 
since this administration has begun, hampering its ability to operate. 
Do you commit to advocating for and protecting the remaining staff at 
NOAA from further reductions in force in order to successfully oversee 
the operations of the National Marine Fisheries Service, National Ocean 
Service, and other agency components under your supervision?
    Answer. If confirmed, I will work closely with NOAA's line offices, 
including the National Marine Fisheries Service and National Ocean 
Service, and coordinate with the Office of Human Capital Services to 
ensure we have the best workforce to deliver on our mission and advance 
strategic goals and priorities across the agency.

    Question 3. During your nomination hearing you stated that you 
believe artificial intelligence (AI) will be critical to addressing 
issues managing our fisheries. Yet fisheries management will not be 
possible without adequate staff as AI cannot replace many of the 
critical staff roles currently vacant due to ongoing reductions in 
force. Please list at least three ways you plan to remediate the 
staffing issues at the National Marine Fisheries Service caused by the 
reductions in force, voluntary resignation program, and overall 
attrition (i.e., retirements and early departures).
    Answer. If confirmed, I will work to strengthen staffing at the 
National Marine Fisheries Service. First, by reinforcing foundational 
roles in research and applied science, build law enforcement measures, 
and stakeholder engagement that are central to NOAA's fisheries 
mission. Second, by investing in people by improving retention 
strategies, supporting professional development, and fostering a 
culture of excellence. Third, using AI as a tool--not a substitute--to 
support staff, streamline operations, and free up human capacity for 
priority mission areas and collaboration.

    Question 4. You also stated during your nomination hearing that you 
understand the dangers posed by algal blooms to our water quality, 
public health, and environmental health. If confirmed, will you commit 
to supporting career scientists' unbiased assessments of all of the 
contributing factors to harmful algal blooms, including from 
agriculture?
    Answer. If confirmed, I will uphold NOAA's commitment to scientific 
transparency and integrity. Supporting career scientists in evaluating 
drivers harmful to fisheries and oceans underpin the economic drivers 
for a robust fishery population.

    a. Will you commit to supporting the recommendations made by career 
NOAA scientists to address harmful algal blooms even if they come into 
conflict with Department of Agriculture priorities?
    Answer. If confirmed, I will guide NOAA with the understanding that 
transparency, rigorous science, and open communication are essential to 
earning public trust and advancing our core science mission.
                                 ______
                                 
  Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Tammy Duckworth to 
                             Timothy Petty
Federal Elections
    Question 1. Setting aside the Congressional count and 
certification, do you believe President Donald Trump received more 
votes than Vice President Kamala Harris in the 2024 U.S. presidential 
election?
    Answer. After securing certification through the constitutional 
process, President Donld Trump assumed office as the 47th President of 
the United States on January 20, 2025.

    Question 2. Setting aside the official Congressional count and 
certification, do you believe President Joe Biden received more votes 
than President Donald Trump in the 2020 U.S. presidential election?
    Answer. After securing certification through the constitutional 
process, former President Joseph Biden assumed office as the 46th 
President of the United States on January 20, 2021.
                                 ______
                                 
 Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. John Hickenlooper to 
                             Timothy Petty
Colorado River Basin Forecast Center
    The Colorado River is the hardest working river in the West. It 
supplies water to 40 million people across 7 states while supporting 
farms, communities, and economies. Given the climate-induced drought 
over the last 25 years, it is critical to closely track the river's 
supply.
    NOAA plays a vital role in collecting and sharing timely 
information to communities about forecasts-including through the 
Colorado River Basin Forecast Center, which examines reservoir inflows, 
streamflow forecasts, and provides flash flood guidance.

    Question 1. Dr. Petty, if confirmed, how will you ensure the 
Colorado River Basin Forecast Center continues and expands its critical 
water security mission?
    Answer. If confirmed, I will ensure that NOAA's foundational 
missions--including collaborative research in the Colorado River 
Basin--remain resilient and effective, upholding scientific rigor and 
interagency cooperation through any structural or administrative 
changes.
NOAA's Facilities and Cooperative Institutes
    NOAA's presence in Boulder stretches back over 25 years. NOAA's 
collaborations across the scientific community in Boulder extend to 
Colorado's NIST campus, NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research 
(NCAR), and two Cooperative Institutes supported by NOAA: the 
Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere (CIRA); and 
Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES).
    Dr. Petty, in our conversation, you shared with me your desire to 
preserve and expand public access to NOAA's key datasets.

    Question 1. Dr. Petty, if confirmed, will you commit to preserving 
the integrity of NOAA's essential research functions and Cooperative 
Institute partnerships?
    Answer. If confirmed, I will lead NOAA with a commitment to 
continuity and excellence in its core missions--from weather 
forecasting to fisheries oversight--ensuring they remain effective and 
scientifically sound. I will prioritize research that is focused, 
agile, and responsive to the evolving needs of communities across the 
Nation.
Western Water
    The United States should always strive to represent the global gold 
standard for weather forecasting and modeling. Emerging technologies 
such as quantum computing and artificial intelligence are transforming 
every sector of our economy. Dr. Petty, in our conversation, you shared 
with me how you would like to help NOAA leverage emerging technologies 
like AI and quantum to help address major issues such as drought.

    Question 1. Dr. Petty, how would you ensure NOAA's climate and 
hydrological data, forecasts, and modeling capabilities are effectively 
deployed to help Western states better manage water resources under 
worsening drought and aridification?
    Answer. If confirmed, I will ensure NOAA's hydrological expertise 
is deployed with transparency and open science modeling to support 
Western states and Tribal communities facing water stress and demand. I 
will champion open data access, support co-developed solutions with 
local stakeholders, and maintain scientific rigor in all modeling and 
forecasting efforts to guide sustainable water resource decisions.

    Question 2. Dr. Petty, how would you strengthen NOAA's 
collaboration with state, local, and tribal governments in inland 
regions-including farmers, ranchers, and outdoor recreationists-to 
expand access to actionable data?
    Answer. If confirmed, I will strengthen NOAA's inland partnerships 
by using regional engagement through listening sessions and stakeholder 
roundtables, ensuring that farmers, ranchers, and outdoor 
recreationists have a direct voice in shaping NOAA's data priorities. I 
will work to improve the accessibility of NOAA's hydrological tools and 
models, allowing local communities to tailor them to meet the 
operational needs of inland communities. Additionally, I will support 
Tribal and local partnerships to co-develop their own data products 
that reflect regional priorities, ensuring that NOAA's science is both 
responsive and inclusive.
Wildfire Preparedness
    The Mountain West is increasingly threatened by devastating 
wildfires. NOAA and the National Weather Service play a key role in 
helping forecast, model, and identify areas prone to wildfires.
    Earlier this week, on Tuesday, October 21st, we were proud to 
advance the bipartisan Fix Our Forests Act in the Senate Committee on 
Agriculture, to help increase our preparedness against wildfires.

    Question 1. Dr. Petty, how will you ensure NOAA's weather and 
climate forecasting tools--particularly those related to precipitation 
and fire weather--are improved and communicated in ways that help state 
and local officials plan for and mitigate these extreme events?
    Answer. If confirmed, I look forward to working with you and your 
staff to advance fire weather forecasting. As new technologies, 
observations, and data become available, I will work with the NOAA 
Administrator and Assistant Secretary for Environmental Observations 
and Prediction to ensure NOAA advances forecasting in the area of fire 
weather.

                                  [all]