[Senate Hearing 119-423]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
S. Hrg. 119-423
NOMINATION TO THE NATIONAL
AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
AND THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
=======================================================================
HEARING
BEFORE THE
COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE,
SCIENCE, AND TRANSPORTATION
UNITED STATES SENATE
ONE HUNDRED NINETEENTH CONGRESS
FIRST SESSION
__________
DECEMBER 3, 2025
__________
Printed for the use of the Committee on Commerce, Science, and
Transportation
[GRAPHIC NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]
Available online: http://www.govinfo.gov
__________
U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISING OFFICE
63-883 WASHINGTON : 2026
=======================================================================
SENATE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND TRANSPORTATION
ONE HUNDRED NINETEENTH CONGRESS
FIRST SESSION
TED CRUZ, Texas, Chairman
JOHN THUNE, South Dakota MARIA CANTWELL, Washington,
ROGER WICKER, Mississippi Ranking
DEB FISCHER, Nebraska AMY KLOBUCHAR, Minnesota
JERRY MORAN, Kansas BRIAN SCHATZ, Hawaii
DAN SULLIVAN, Alaska EDWARD MARKEY, Massachusetts
MARSHA BLACKBURN, Tennessee GARY PETERS, Michigan
TODD YOUNG, Indiana TAMMY BALDWIN, Wisconsin
TED BUDD, North Carolina TAMMY DUCKWORTH, Illinois
ERIC SCHMITT, Missouri JACKY ROSEN, Nevada
JOHN CURTIS, Utah BEN RAY LUJAN, New Mexico
BERNIE MORENO, Ohio JOHN HICKENLOOPER, Colorado
TIM SHEEHY, Montana JOHN FETTERMAN, Pennsylvania
SHELLEY MOORE CAPITO, West Virginia ANDY KIM, New Jersey
CYNTHIA LUMMIS, Wyoming LISA BLUNT ROCHESTER, Delaware
Brad Grantz, Republican Staff Director
Nicole Christus, Republican Deputy Staff Director
Lila Harper Helms, Staff Director
Melissa Porter, Deputy Staff Director
C O N T E N T S
----------
Page
Hearing held on December 3, 2025................................. 1
Statement of Senator Cruz........................................ 1
Statement of Senator Cantwell.................................... 2
Statement of Senator Sheehy...................................... 5
Letter dated December 1, 2025 to Senator Ted Cruz and Senator
Maria Cantwell from Tony LaRosa, Founder and Managing
Director, Interplanetary Chamber of Commerce............... 6
Letter dated November 19, 2025 to Chairman Ted Cruz and
Ranking Member Maria Cantwell from Dr. Jonathan Cirtain,
Chief Executive Officer and President, Axiom Space......... 6
Letter dated December 1, 2025 to Chairman Ted Cruz and
Ranking Member Maria Cantwell from Matt Gialich, Chief
Executive Officer, AstroForge, Inc......................... 7
Letter dated November 25, 2025 to Chairman Ted Cruz and
Ranking Member Maria Cantwell from Jason Kim, CEO, Firefly
Aerospace.................................................. 8
Letter dated December 1, 2025 to Chairman Ted Cruz and
Ranking Member Maria Cantwell from Steve Place, CEO,
Corillian.................................................. 9
Letter dated November 21, 2025 to Chairman Ted Cruz and
Ranking Member Maria Cantwell from Rob Meyerson, CEO,
Interlune Corporation...................................... 9
Letter dated November 26, 2025 to Chairman Ted Cruz and
Ranking Member Maria Cantwell from Mason Angel, Founding
Partner, Industrious Ventures and Taylor Sargent, Partner,
Industrious Ventures....................................... 10
Letter dated November 26, 2025 to Chairman Ted Cruz and
Ranking Member Maria Cantwell from Stephen Altemus, Chief
Executive Officer, Intuitive Machines...................... 11
Letter dated November 13, 2025 to Chairman Ted Cruz and
Ranking Member Maria Cantwell from Tom Mueller, CEO,
Impulse Space.............................................. 11
Letter dated November 17, 2025 to Hon. Ted Cruz and Hon.
Maria Cantwell from Bradley Cheetham, Chief Executive
Officer, Advanced Space LLC................................ 12
Letter dated November 20, 2025 to Chairman Ted Cruz and
Ranking Member Maria Cantwell from Joshua Brost, Chief
Revenue Officer, Relativity Space, Inc..................... 13
Letter dated November 26, 2025 to Chairman Ted Cruz and
Ranking Member Maria Cantwell from Twyman Clements,
President and Co-Founder, Space Tango...................... 13
Letter dated December 2, 2025 to Chairman Ted Cruz and
Ranking Member Maria Cantwell from Karan Kunjur, Co-Founder
and CEO, K2 Space and Neel Kunjur Co-Founder and CTO, K2
Space...................................................... 14
Letter dated November 25, 2025 to Chairman Ted Cruz and
Ranking Member Maria Cantwell from Dylan Taylor, Chairman
and CEO, Voyager Technologies.............................. 15
Letter dated December 1, 2025 to Chairman Ted Cruz and
Ranking Member Maria Cantwell from Kevin Lowdermilk, Chief
Executive Officer, Vaya Space.............................. 15
Letter dated November 28, 2025 to Chairman Ted Cruz and
Ranking Member Maria Cantwell from Tejpaul Bhatia, Founder
and CEO, Plan Z Capital Inc................................ 16
Letter dated November 30, 2025 to Chairman Ted Cruz and
Ranking Member Maria Cantwell from Michael Anderson, Chief
Executive Officer, Seagate Space Corporation............... 17
Letter dated November 12, 2025 to Ranking Member Chris Van
Hollen and Senator Angela Alsobrooks from Robert D. Braun,
Head, Space Exploration Sector, Johns Hopkins Applied
Physics Laboratory......................................... 17
Letter dated December 1, 2025 to Hon. Ted Cruz and Hon. Maria
Cantwell from Michael Gold, President, Civil and
International Business, Redwire Space...................... 18
Letter dated December 1, 2025 to Chairman Ted Cruz and
Ranking Member Maria Cantwell from Dr. Angel Smith,
Executive Director, SmallSat Alliance...................... 19
Letter dated December 2, 2025 to Hon. Ted Cruz and Hon. Maria
Cantwell from Robbie Robertson, CEO and Co-Founder, Sedaro. 20
Letter dated December 2, 2025 to Chairman Ted Cruz and
Ranking Member Maria Cantwell from Ryan Kriser, Chairman,
Board of Directors, Space for Humanity and Antonio
Peronace, Executive Director, Space for Humanity........... 21
Letter dated November 30, 2025 to Chairman Ted Cruz and
Ranking Member Maria Cantwell from Mr. Thomas Marotta, CEO,
The Spaceport Company...................................... 21
Letter dated December 2, 2025 to Hon. Ted Cruz and Hon. Maria
Cantwell from Geoff Freeman, President and CEO, U.S. Travel
Association................................................ 22
Letter dated November 24, 2025 to Chairman Ted Cruz and
Ranking Member Maria Cantwell from Andy Lapsa, CEO, Stoke
Space...................................................... 23
Letter dated November 26, 2025 to Chairman Ted Cruz and
Ranking Member Maria Cantwell from Marshall Smith, Chief
Executive Officer, Starlab Space........................... 23
Letter dated November 26, 2025 to Chairman Ted Cruz and
Ranking Member Maria Cantwell from Blair Bigelow May,
Founder and CEO. Selene Space Corporation.................. 24
Letter dated December 3, 2025 to Chairman Ted Cruz and
Ranking Member Maria Cantwell from Raymond Tonsing, Member,
Caffeinated Capital Management, LLC........................ 25
Letter dated December 1, 2025 to Chairman Ted Cruz and
Ranking Member Maria Cantwell from Ryan Kriser, Partner,
Type One Ventures.......................................... 26
Letter dated November 17, 2025 to Hon. Ted Cruz and Hon.
Maria Cantwell from Will Marshall, Co-Founder and Chief
Executive Officer, Planet Labs PBC and Robert Schingler,
Co-Founder and Chief Strategy Officer, Planet Labs PBC..... 27
Letter dated March 25, 2025 to Hon. Ted Cruz and Hon. Maria
Cantwell from Kyle J. Cozad, RADM USN (Ret), President and
CEO, Naval Aviation Museum Foundation...................... 28
Letter dated November 13, 2025 to Hon. Ted Cruz and Hon.
Maria Cantwell from Captain Wes Pulver, USCG (Ret.),
President, National Coast Guard Museum Association......... 28
Letter dated November 21, 2025 to Hon. Senator Ted Cruz and
Hon. Senator Maria Cantwell from Saleem Miyan, Co-founder
and CEO, Max Space Inc..................................... 29
Letter dated November 21, 2025 to Hon. Ted Cruz and Hon.
Maria Cantwell from Ed Bolen, President and CEO, National
Business Aviation Association.............................. 31
Press Statement dated November 12, 2025 entitled, ``Statement
on the re-nomination of Jared Isaacman for NASA
Administrator'' by Danielle Gunn, The Planetary Society.... 32
Letter dated November 12, 2025 to Chairman Ted Cruz and
Ranking Member Maria Cantwell from Dave Cavossa, President,
Commercial Space Federation................................ 33
Statement from Redwire Corporation........................... 34
Letter dated November 24, 2025 to Hon. Ted Cruz and Hon.
Maria Cantwell from Mike Moses, President, Virgin Galactic. 34
Letter dated November 26, 2025 to Chairman Ted Cruz and
Ranking Member Maria Cantwell from Bill Woolf, Colonel,
USAF (Ret.), CEO, President and Founder, Space Force
Association................................................ 35
Tweet on Truth Social dated November 4, 2025 from President
Donald J. Trump............................................ 36
Statement of Senator Moran....................................... 87
Statement of Senator Moreno...................................... 89
Statement of Senator Kim......................................... 91
Statement of Senator Schmitt..................................... 93
Statement of Senator Peters...................................... 95
Statement of Senator Markey...................................... 98
Statement of Senator Budd........................................ 100
Statement of Senator Lujan....................................... 102
Statement of Senator Klobuchar................................... 103
Statement of Senator Young....................................... 106
Statement of Senator Rosen....................................... 107
Statement of Senator Capito...................................... 109
Statement of Senator Hickenlooper................................ 111
Letter dated November 22, 2025 to Hon. Ted Cruz and Hon.
Maria Cantwell from former NASA Astronauts................. 113
Letter dated November 21, 2025 to Hon. Roger Wicker and Hon.
Cindy Hyde-Smith from Michelle D. Hanlon, Executive
Director, Air and Space Law Program, University of
Mississippi................................................ 114
Letter dated November 24, 2025 to Senator Tommy Tuberville
from Brenda Perez, Interim Chief Executive Officer, Chief
Financial Officer, U.S. Space and Rocket Center............ 114
Letter dated November 24, 2025 to Senator Katie Britt from
Brenda Perez, Interim Chief Executive Officer, Chief
Financial Officer, U.S. Space and Rocket Center............ 115
Letter dated December 1, 2025 to Hon. Ted Cruz and Hon. Maria
Cantwell from the undersigned 12,329 members of the
national #SaveChandra Community............................ 116
Letter dated November 29, 2025 to Chairman Ted Cruz and
Ranking Member Maria Cantwell from Sinan Kanatsiz,
Chairman, Internet Marketing Association................... 128
Witnesses
Hon. Bill Hagerty, U.S. Senator from Tennessee................... 4
Jared Isaacman, Nominee to be Administrator, National Aeronautics
and Space Administration....................................... 38
Prepared statement........................................... 40
Biographical information..................................... 41
Steven H. Haines, Nominee to be an Assistant Secretary of
Commerce for Industry and Analysis, U.S. Department of Commerce 74
Prepared statement........................................... 76
Biographical information..................................... 77
Appendix
Response to written questions submitted to Jared Isaacman by:
Hon. Ted Cruz................................................ 129
Hon. Roger Wicker............................................ 129
Hon. Jerry Moran............................................. 130
Hon. Dan Sullivan............................................ 131
Hon. Ted Budd................................................ 131
Hon. Eric Schmitt............................................ 132
Hon. Maria Cantwell.......................................... 133
Hon. Edward Markey........................................... 136
Hon. Gary Peters............................................. 137
Hon. Tammy Duckworth......................................... 137
Hon. Jacky Rosen............................................. 138
Hon. John Hickenlooper....................................... 138
Hon. John Fetterman.......................................... 142
Response to written questions submitted to Steven H. Haines by:
Hon. Roger Wicker............................................ 143
Hon. Todd Young.............................................. 143
Hon. Maria Cantwell.......................................... 144
Hon. Amy Klobuchar........................................... 146
NOMINATION TO THE NATIONAL
AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
AND THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
----------
WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 3, 2025
U.S. Senate,
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
The Committee met, pursuant to notice, at 10 a.m., in room
SR-253, Russell Senate Office Building, Hon. Ted Cruz, Chairman
of the Committee, presiding.
Present: Senators Cruz [presiding], Fischer, Moran,
Sullivan, Young, Budd, Schmitt, Moreno, Sheehy, Capito,
Cantwell, Klobuchar, Markey, Peters, Rosen, Lujan,
Hickenlooper, Fetterman, and Kim.
OPENING STATEMENT OF HON. TED CRUZ,
U.S. SENATOR FROM TEXAS
Chairman Cruz. Good morning. The Senate Committee on
Commerce, Science, and Transportation will come to order.
Today, we will consider the nominations of Jared Isaacman
to serve as Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space
Administration, which I have to say, for a moment, feels a bit
like Groundhog Day, and also Steven Haines to serve as an
Assistant Secretary of Commerce.
NASA is at the forefront of American leadership in science
and technology. It is critical to our national security amid
what I have called the second ``space race.'' But the agency
finds itself at an inflection point. Its next leader must be
both disciplined and purposeful, candidly assessing what is
working and what is not, while recognizing that each policy
decision has tradeoffs. NASA cannot do everything it wants to;
the agency must prioritize if we are to beat China back to the
Moon and back to Mars.
If confirmed, Mr. Isaacman will be taking the helm just as
NASA is set to launch Artemis II, the agency's first crewed use
of the Space Launch System rocket and the first crewed mission
on the Orion spacecraft, which will bring American astronauts
closer to the lunar surface than at any point since 1972.
I know Mr. Isaacman will be a strong leader who sees that
Artemis II launches safely, successfully, and without delay.
He must then turn to Artemis III, landing Americans on the
Moon before China, which is aimed to send its own taikonauts
there by 2030. NASA cannot take its eye off the ball.
Fortunately, Congress has given clear direction and
substantial funding to achieve this goal. In the One Big
Beautiful Bill, President Trump and a Republican Congress
committed nearly $10 billion to specific parts of the space
program, including the Space Launch System and future lunar
missions of Artemis IV and V; the Gateway space station at the
Moon; and the International Space Station. The vision for NASA
enshrined in the One Big Beautiful Bill is unambiguous, and
Congress expects that it will be executed faithfully.
And I will note that our friend and colleague, Senator
Katie Britt, from Alabama, has come to join us. Alabama
obviously has intense interest in NASA and space, and Senator
Britt, we welcome you to the Committee this morning.
Investments in hardware alone will not guarantee mission
success. Equally indispensable is NASA's workforce. Houston's
Johnson Space Center is home to one of the most capable,
experienced, and mission-driven workforces in the world. JSC is
home to our astronaut corps, America's spacefaring heroes, who
represent the best of our Nation. Preserving that talent is
essential, and I trust that JSC will continue to thrive under
Mr. Isaacman's leadership.
Mr. Isaacman, I believe, will prioritize stability,
accountability, and respect for the men and women who make the
agency's missions possible. As the commander of Inspiration 4,
the first all-civilian spaceflight, and the first private
citizen to walk in space, he knows that every successful
mission depends on the skills and the dedication of its crew,
as well as the countless professionals supporting them from the
ground.
Mr. Isaacman, I know that you are as committed to American
supremacy in the final frontier as is this Committee and the
entire Senate. The United States must remain the unquestioned
leader in space exploration, and this imperative is why we need
to confirm your nomination as expeditiously as possible. My
hope is that you will be confirmed and in this role before the
end of this year.
Finally, a word about our nominee to lead Industry and
Analysis within the International Trade Administration at the
Department of Commerce. If confirmed, Steven Haines will also
help us compete with China. He will support U.S. companies with
actionable market intelligence, help them navigate trade
barriers, and identify opportunities for expansion into foreign
markets. He brings experience as a foreign service officer and
from across multiple Federal agencies.
Both our nominees before us will advance American
interests, whether in outer space or here at home.
I now turn to Ranking Member Cantwell for her opening
remarks.
STATEMENT OF HON. MARIA CANTWELL,
U.S. SENATOR FROM WASHINGTON
Senator Cantwell. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and thank you
for this hearing. Congratulations, Mr. Isaacman on being
renominated to lead NASA and Mr. Haines on your nomination to
be an Assistant Secretary of Commerce. I too would like to
welcome our colleague, Senator Britt, from a state that has a
very robust aerospace community, and look forward to continuing
to work with her. And I would like to say a special welcome to
two Washingtonians who are here--Bill Nye, the Science Guy,
from Washington, and Mr. Detrick, who is Mr. Haines' father-in-
law. Great to have you here as well in support of him.
Mr. Isaacman, I supported your nomination the first time
you came before the Committee, and I hope to do so again. I, as
the Chairman mentioned, hope to get you in this position before
the end of the year. But there is no secret that a lot of NASA
changes have been made since the last time you were before this
Committee, including the NASA decision to re-compete for the
Lunar Lander, the release of the President's proposed NASA
budget, which calls for cutting the agency's budget by nearly a
quarter in the workforce, and nearly a third of the science
funding cut in half.
So given all that, I am glad you are here. I am glad you
are here to answer questions about NASA's future, and I hope
that today's hearing will show that there is bipartisan
agreement, strong bipartisan agreement, that we must redouble
our efforts to get American astronauts back to the surface of
the Moon as soon as possible.
At our Committee hearing in November, we heard concerning
testimony from several expert witnesses who left little room
for doubt that the current SpaceX Lunar Lander would not be
ready to put Americans back on the Moon either in 2027 or 2028.
And we almost certainly would lose the race to China, and I
know that you are going to have robust competition. In
response, Acting Administrator Duffy reopened the contract and
its competition for the Lunar Lander that can be ready sooner,
by the end of 2028. And I think this was the correct decision,
and I expect you to continue executing on this plan, if
confirmed.
To be clear, winning the race to the Moon is not just about
short-term token victories. It is the first step in
accomplishing a very long-term presence on the lunar surface,
which is strategic economically and is a national security
imperative. Mr. Isaacman, I expect to hear from you today about
how you will ensure we achieve these goals.
NASA is also much more than just a moon exploration
program. The agency leads in a number of other vital strategic
missions, including aeronautic research, space technology and,
of course, the agency's critical science mission.
NASA is one of the world's leading research and development
organizations. I think that is why we have, I don't know, about
50 people waiting outside to get in this hearing room. I think
they really believe you are going to get confirmed, and they
all want to be first in line to talk about all these
developments. NASA is one of the leading research and
development organizations and an agency that feeds a multiple
of sectors of innovation, including AI, quantum, advanced
aerospace materials, manufacturing, and aviation safety.
You and I have had a chance to talk about this issue as it
relates to my home state. Over 1,500 companies form a robust
aerospace supply chain, including 40 Artemis Program suppliers,
and this issue of a tech hub working on next-generation
thermoplastics that is so critical to all space and aerospace
manufacturing to develop high-rate composite manufacturing
production.
Nevertheless, as we have discussed these issues, OMB
Director Vought has been working to gut NASA's budget,
especially in science. Earlier this year, multiple NASA
whistleblowers provided evidence showing that OMB was pushing
NASA to implement the dangerous cuts requested in the
President's budget for Fiscal Year 2026, disregarding the law
and the impacts that this would leave on NASA. This is just
unacceptable. Mr. Isaacman, if confirmed, I expect you will
push back on these dangerous ideas and advocate for NASA's
budget.
Oh, I also invite you to visit Washington State. We would
love to continue this discussion on how to generate the next
aviation innovation. It is clear that there is a lot going on
that will help us on the Moon-to-Mars mission, not just the 40
Artemis suppliers, but a lot of other issues in how to
guarantee our satellite communication for the future and how to
make sure that is secure. So thank you again for your
willingness to step up to these challenges.
Turning to you, Mr. Haines, if confirmed as the Assistant
Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Analysis you will be
responsible for strengthening the globe's competitiveness in
U.S. industry and overseeing key trade analyses. You would lead
a team charged with value-added analysis and tools to support
economic policy decisions. No doubt, there has been a big sea
change since COVID about supply chain issues and supply chain
vulnerabilities and the interest that Commerce play a larger
role in identifying those risk sectors.
Myself and Senator Risch have been leading a charge on
fusion technology and hoping that we can be very aggressive on
supply chain issues if, in fact, fusion technology gets to the
actual point of manufacturing in the United States.
So I look forward to working with you on those supply chain
issues, and I want us to continue to know that we have to
reduce tariffs. In my mind, tariffs are causing Americans to be
challenged on affordability issues, and I look forward to
working with you and asking you questions about that agenda as
well. And welcome to our colleague from Tennessee, Senator
Hagerty.
Chairman Cruz. Thank you. I will now turn to our colleague
from the great state of Tennessee, Senator Hagerty, to
introduce Mr. Haines. Senator Hagerty, welcome to the
Committee.
STATEMENT OF HON. BILL HAGERTY,
U.S. SENATOR FROM TENNESSEE
Senator Hagerty. Thank you, Chairman Cruz and Ranking
Member Cantwell. Thank you for holding this important hearing.
Mr. Isaacman, I want to congratulate you on your nomination and
look forward to your confirmation.
The reason I am here today, though, is to introduce a
former staffer, a good friend, and a fellow Tennessean, Steven
Haines. Steven Haines is President Trump's nominee to serve as
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Analysis.
But before I get into his introduction I would like to
actually address all of the staff sitting along the walls here
today. I hope you will take a lesson from Steven Haines. He did
a remarkable job serving on my team, a great member of my
national security team, and frankly, touched many aspects of
our office. He is taking that knowledge and moving it into the
administrative branch, in the Executive Branch in this
Administration, and he is going to go on to do great things.
And I just think it is a testament to the fact that the hard
work that all of you put in, on both sides of the aisle, to
support our Nation and to generate the type of opportunities we
want to see for our children and grandchildren, can manifest
itself in a career like Steven's. And I hope, Steven, that you
will continue to advance your career. It is one of the greatest
honors I have to be here and speak on behalf of my former
staffer, and to all of you. Thank you for your hard work that
you do every day, and I hope that someday I will be seeing you
sitting in a seat just like Steven.
Steven was one of my national security advisors for 2
years. His counsel was critical, covering nearly every issue
that came to my office, from supporting my role as Ranking
Member of the Banking and National Security Subcommittee that
covers export controls and CFIUS work to State Department
reauthorization and consular issues on the Senate Foreign
Relations Committee, to the important work of funding the
government through the appropriations process, there was not
much that Steven did not touch in my office.
Before his time in the Senate, Steven served as a
Presidential Management Fellow, then as a Foreign Affairs
Officer at the Department of State's Bureau of East Asian and
Pacific Affairs. Steven is a graduate of the University of
Nevada and holds a masters in Asian Studies from the George
Washington University Elliott School of International Affairs.
Steven's understanding of how Federal agencies operate and
his deep knowledge of foreign policy and national security were
evident from the first day he joined my team. This expertise
served the constituents of Tennessee remarkably well, and his
love for this country and serving the American people is
palpable.
He is a man of conviction, a man of loyalty and integrity,
and precisely the caliber of person we need serving in
government.
I thank you for considering Steven's nomination, and I
encourage my colleagues to support his nomination as he
advances his call to public service. Congratulations, Steven.
Thank you.
Chairman Cruz. Thank you, Senator Hagerty. I will now turn
to our colleague, Senator Sheehy, to introduce Mr. Isaacman.
Senator Sheehy, the floor is yours.
STATEMENT OF HON. TIM SHEEHY,
U.S. SENATOR FROM MONTANA
Senator Sheehy. Thank you, Chairman. Welcome back, Jared. I
would say this is a once-in-a-lifetime experience, but I think
we are on number two now. Monica, great to see you. Thanks for
bringing the girls.
Before I introduce Jared, Chairman, I would like to enter
in 40 letters of support for Mr. Isaacman's nomination, please.
Chairman Cruz. Without objection.
Senator Sheehy. Thank you.
[The information referred to follows:]
Interplanetary Chamber of Commerce
December 1, 2025
Senator Ted Cruz,
Chair,
Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee,
Washington, DC.
Senator Maria Cantwell,
Ranking Member,
Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee,
Washington, DC.
Dear Chairman Cruz and Ranking Member Cantwell,
On behalf of the Interplanetary Chamber of Commerce (ICoC) and our
members spanning six continents across the global space economy, we
write in strong support of the confirmation of Jared Isaacman as
Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration
(NASA).
Mr. Isaacman represents a new generation of leadership uniquely
suited to NASA's current moment. As a civilian astronaut, accomplished
pilot, entrepreneur, and philanthropist, he brings rare, firsthand
experience operating at the intersection of human spaceflight, advanced
technology, risk management, and mission execution. His leadership of
pioneering missions has demonstrated not only operational excellence
and safety discipline, but also a deep commitment to expanding access
to space and inspiring global participation in space exploration.
Equally important is Mr. Isaacman's proven ability to work
constructively with the commercial sector while respecting public
mission objectives. NASA's success over the next decade will depend
upon deep, trusted partnerships with industry across launch,
spacecraft, communications, data, and emerging in-space infrastructure.
Mr. Isaacman's experience building and leading complex organizations,
while collaborating with government agencies and international
partners, positions him exceptionally well to guide NASA through this
era of sustained lunar activity, preparation for Mars, and expansion of
the broader space economy.
From our international perspective, NASA's leadership sets the tone
not only for U.S. space policy, but for global norms in safety,
interoperability, sustainability, and responsible exploration. Mr.
Isaacman understands the importance of these principles and has
consistently demonstrated a values-driven approach that aligns
innovation with long-term stewardship and public benefit.
The Interplanetary Chamber of Commerce represents companies and
institutions engaged in space across civil, commercial, academic, and
emerging market sectors worldwide. Our members strongly believe that
Mr. Isaacman's confirmation would strengthen NASA's role as a catalyst
for innovation, international collaboration, and economic growth, while
maintaining its core mission of exploration, science, and inspiration.
We respectfully urge the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and
Transportation, and the full United States Senate, to confirm Jared
Isaacman as NASA Administrator without delay.
Respectfully,
Tony LaRosa,
Founder & Managing Director,
Interplanetary Chamber of Commerce.
______
Axiom Space
November 19, 2025
Chairman Ted Cruz,
U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
Ranking Member Maria Cantwell,
U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
Dear Chairman Cruz and Ranking Member Cantwell:
On behalf of Axiom Space, I am writing to convey our strong support
for the confirmation of Mr. Jared Isaacman as Administrator of the
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
NASA is entering the most consequential transition in human
spaceflight since the end of the Shuttle program, requiring decisive
leadership during this pivotal period for the United States' civil and
commercial space enterprises. The retirement of the International Space
Station in 2030 demands timely decisions and coordinated execution of
the Commercial Low-Earth Orbit Development (CLD) program to ensure a
smooth transition. Simultaneously, NASA is charged with beating
formidable geopolitical adversaries to the Moon and being the first one
to Mars.
While the mission at hand is profound, these endeavors will serve
to organize and measure the best of our country's energies and skills.
A confirmed administrator is urgently needed to oversee and ensure that
the United States' national posture, technological superiority,
economic dominance, and international leadership in space are
maintained and advanced. Expeditiously approving the appointment of an
administrator avoids delaying critical programs at a moment when our
competitors, especially China, are accelerating their own LEO and Lunar
and Maritain initiatives.
Axiom Space strongly believes that Mr. Isaacman's proven business
leadership, historic space achievements, and detailed understanding of
commercial capabilities positions him uniquely to navigate this
defining moment. Therefore, Axiom Space respectfully urges the
Committee to give full and favorable consideration to Mr. Jared
Isaacman's nomination.
Sincerely,
Dr. Jonathan Cirtain,
Chief Executive Officer and President,
Axiom Space.
______
AstroForge
December 1, 2025
Chairman Ted Cruz,
U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
Ranking Member Maria Cantwell,
U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
Dear Chairman Cruz and Ranking Member Cantwell,
On behalf of AstroForge, I am writing to express my strong support
for Jared Isaacman's nomination to serve as Administrator of the
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
As the CEO of AstroForge, I lead an American space company that is
dedicated to making the United States less dependent on foreign-sourced
critical minerals by developing innovative mining technologies for
asteroids and terrestrial use cases. Our company is built on the belief
that private industry plays a critical role in propelling our Nation
forward by taking on extreme challenges. This is especially true in
space, where technical moon shots above often lead to advancements here
at home.
The future that Mr. Isaacman envisions for space exploration,
science, and infrastructure is one that will make our Nation stronger.
He brings a rare combination of operational experience, aerospace
leadership, and a commitment to advancing U.S. capabilities in space
that could change our country's space program forever. These are
critical leadership skills we need at a time when space is more
contested and congested than ever before.
In recent years, NASA has taken important steps to support public-
private partnerships, commercial innovation, and long-term exploration
architectures. We hope NASA continues to grow these types of efforts.
AstroForge is currently preparing to launch its third mission to a
target asteroid and is developing hardware to demonstrate space-based
mineral processing. Our work depends on continued stability and vision
at the agency level. I believe Mr. Isaacman is qualified to lead NASA
through its next chapter and will bring the right focus to ensure the
United States continues to lead in this critical domain.
Thank you for your consideration,
Sincerely,
Matt Gialich,
Chief Executive Officer,
AstroForge, Inc.
______
Firefly Aerospace
Cedar Park, TX, November 25, 2025
Chairman Ted Cruz,
U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
Ranking Member Maria Cantwell,
U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
Dear Chairman Cruz and Ranking Member Cantwell,
On behalf of Firefly Aerospace, I am writing to convey Firefly's
support for the confirmation of Mr. Jared lsaacman to serve as the next
Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Firefly is a Texas-born, Texas-proud public company that is
pioneering the next era of lunar exploration. We recently completed the
first successful commercial Moon landing for NASA's CLPS (Commercial
Lunar Payload Services) initiative and continue to set new responsive
space records as we launch, land, and orbit. We are expanding our
facility to concurrently build 4 lunar landers in Texas this year to
keep growing our capacity to meet the growing demand, while making
Texas the capital of Lunar Landers.
This team of Fireflies embodies Texas's ''go big'' motto as we
tackle bold missions. We recognize and celebrate those with similar
values who push the boundaries of exploration and bring new innovative
strategies to keep America first in space--these are all
characteristics and core beliefs of Mr. lsaacman as he serves our
Nation.
Mr. lsaacman's passion for space exploration is exemplified as he
self-funded five research-focused space missions, two of which have
been completed. During these missions, the crew conducted extensive
biomedical research, collaborating with top medical universities,
including Baylor College of Medicine in Texas. The objective of this
research supports human exploration beyond our planet. Other mission
objectives included carrying STEM-focused payloads and fundraising for
ST. Jude Children's Research Hospital. This selfless leadership will be
an asset for NASA.
Mr. lsaacman further brings commercial CEO leadership that can
optimize NASA's business operations and ensure the most beneficial use
of taxpayer funds. As a successful entrepreneur of multiple companies,
Mr. lsaacman's track record is proven. His company Shift4 is an example
of more than two decades of successful operations, showcasing strategic
use of investment capital and innovation to support customers. He also
founded, grew and then sold a company that trained military pilots,
supporting the U.S. Air Force. He understands how commercial companies
can provide innovation in technology and business models that provide
game-changing capabilities for our Nation.
This is a pivotal time for NASA, and a strong entrepreneur
visionary and strategic leader is required. Among its many missions and
activities, the agency is working to return astronauts to the Moon,
operating the International Space Stations, developing follow-on
commercial space stations, and exploring the solar system. In addition,
China's ambition to compete with U.S. leadership in space and build
international alliances to counter western-Democracy coalitions is a
critical issue this committee has rightly focused on. NASA's leadership
and subsequent activities over the next three years very well may
determine the balance of power in space, and Firefly is here to support
the Nation and NASA.
With decades of experience as an entrepreneur, business leader, and
space pioneer, Mr. lsaacman is well suited to lead NASA. During Mr.
lsaacman's hearing before the committee in April 2025, he demonstrated
his understanding of the near-and long-term competition with China, as
well as his respect for Congress's oversight responsibilities and the
laws directing NASA's activities. Furthermore, Mr. lsaacman's selfless
pursuits in space exploration, research, STEM, philanthropy, and
serving our Nation support NASA's focus on space science, space
technology, aeronautics, and human exploration. Mr. lsaacman brings
ingenuity, business acumen, integrity, technical know-how, and a deep
passion that will position NASA to take on the many opportunities to
advance humankind and keep American first in space.
On behalf of Firefly Aerospace and our more than 1,300 employees,
we fully support the confirmation of Mr. lsaacman and encourage this
committee confirm Jared lsaacman as NASA Administrator.
Sincerely,
Jason Kim,
CEO,
Firefly Aerospace.
______
Corillian
December 1, 2025
Chairman Ted Cruz,
U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
Ranking Member Maria Cantwell,
U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
Dear Chairman Cruz and Ranking Member Cantwell,
Our nation was the first to set foot on the moon, but our advantage
in space has been diminished by our adversaries. The future of
America's space program needs strong, visionary leadership to get the
United States back on track so we may survive and thrive in an
increasingly competitive landscape.
Mr. Isaacman is the leader we need to shepherd NASA into this new
age.
The next NASA Administrator will need to galvanize the public and
private sectors in order to push forward jaw-dropping technical
achievements. The next NASA Administrator will need to inspire a
generation of young people to take on scientific moonshots that are in
the national interest. Most importantly, the next NASA Administrator
will need to overcome fierce competition from adversaries who do not
share our same values or vision for space.
Mr. Isaacman is the most capable leader to operationalize and
execute these mission-critical efforts.
As the CEO of Corillian, I build and invest in defense and
aerospace companies. It's my job to spot talent--in founders and
businesses alike--and to make a determination on their ability to chart
a path forward amidst seemingly impossible odds. The role that the next
NASA Administrator is stepping into is challenging and will have long-
lasting repercussions for our Nation. I believe Mr. Isaacman is the
best person to take on that challenge.
The United States will regain its position as the leader for space
innovation, but we need the right NASA Administrator to ensure this
outcome. Mr. Isaacman is the right leader for the job. Please support
his nomination.
Respectfully,
Steve Place,
CEO,
Corillian.
______
Interlune
Seattle, WA, November 21, 2025
Chairman Ted Cruz,
U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
Ranking Member Maria Cantwell,
U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
Dear Chairman Cruz and Ranking Member Cantwell:
On behalf of Interlune, I am honored to express my strong support
for the confirmation of Mr. Jared Isaacman as Administrator of the
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
At Interlune, we are building innovative technologies to extract
and commercialize natural resources from space, starting with Helium-3,
to help establish a sustainable in-space economy led by the United
States. As a commercial space company, we understand that close
alignment between NASA's strategic direction and the growth of the
commercial space sector is critical. This alignment requires bold
vision, technical credibility, and a deep appreciation for the role of
private industry in expanding America's reach in space.
Mr. Isaacman embodies these qualities. Across his career, he has
built and led multi-billion-dollar enterprises, managed complex
technical organizations, and worked extensively with the Federal
government--experience that will serve him well in leading an agency as
large and multifaceted as NASA. His companies are known for driving
innovation, reducing inefficiencies, and empowering high-performing
teams, all while expanding into new markets. Each of these
characteristics is essential as NASA navigates aging infrastructure,
budget pressures, and growing international competition.
Just as importantly, Mr. Isaacman brings a rare perspective as a
commercial space pioneer. Through the Inspiration4 mission and his
subsequent spaceflights, including the first commercial spacewalk, he
has developed a deep understanding of the risks, rigor, and discipline
required to advance human spaceflight safely. He understands what it
will take to build a sustainable space economy rooted in public-private
partnership. For companies like Interlune that are committed to
unlocking commercial activity on the lunar surface, his leadership
would strengthen the collaboration needed to maintain U.S.
technological and economic advantage.
Mr. Isaacman is uniquely prepared to guide NASA at this pivotal
moment. Interlune looks forward to working with Mr. Isaacman to ensure
that the United States remains the global leader in space. Thank you
for your consideration of this letter in support of Jared Isaacman's
confirmation as the Administrator of NASA.
Sincerely,
Rob Meyerson,
CEO,
Interlune Corporation.
______
Industrious Ventures
November 26, 2025
Chairman Ted Cruz,
U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
Ranking Member Maria Cantwell,
U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
Dear Chairman Cruz and Ranking Member Cantwell:
On behalf of Industrious Ventures, a venture capital firm focused
on advancing America's industrial and aerospace leadership, I write to
express our strong support for the swift confirmation of Mr. Jared
Isaacman to serve as Administrator of the National Aeronautics and
Space Administration (NASA).
As you know, NASA is a large and strategically important agency
that benefits significantly from stable leadership. The agency's
responsibilities span human exploration, space science, aeronautics,
technology development, and the inspiration of the next generation of
great scientists and engineers. NASA is simultaneously preparing for
sustained lunar operations under the Artemis Program, managing the
transition to commercial Low Earth Orbit destinations, and advancing
new programs in Earth observation and planetary science. These efforts
occur against the backdrop of increasing geopolitical competition.
Clear and consistent leadership will be essential as the agency makes
decisions that could shape the balance of power in space and on the
lunar surface for decades to come. For NASA to accomplish its long-term
objectives of permanent lunar habitation and scientific exploration to
better understand our place in the universe, it will require a
knowledgeable and transparent leader who can empower the numerous
stakeholders and contractors that support the Artemis Accords.
Mr. Isaacman brings decades of operational, entrepreneurial, and
technical experience that make him well suited to lead NASA at this
pivotal time. His experience as commander of Inspiration4 and leader of
the Polaris Program reflects his deep understanding of human
spaceflight, mission preparation, crew safety, and spacecraft
operations. His testimony before the committee earlier this year showed
a clear appreciation for the strategic challenges facing the United
States, as well as respect for Congress's oversight responsibilities.
He has a comprehensive picture of the space industry and its
geopolitical forces, he has a palpable urgency, and he is driven to
ensure the U.S. plays the leading role in space development and
exploration.
Mr. Isaacman has also shown a sincere commitment to all aspects of
NASA's mission portfolio, including science, aeronautics, technology,
and lunar exploration. His perspective is particularly valuable as NASA
continues to work closely with the commercial space sector. Companies
across our portfolio, including Stoke Space, which is developing fully
reusable launch systems, and Lunar Outpost, which is advancing lunar
mobility and robotics, represent only a small part of the broad
commercial ecosystem that relies on clear NASA leadership to guide
standards, support partnerships, and cultivate long-term industrial
growth. An informed Administrator is essential to ensuring that NASA
and commercial partners can work together effectively and objectively
to advance national interests and spread democratic values beyond earth
and into the stars.
On behalf of Industrious Ventures, we respectfully request that the
committee prioritize Mr. Isaacman's confirmation, given the importance
and urgency of NASA's responsibilities and his demonstrated alignment
to NASA's mission.
Sincerely,
Mason Angel,
Founding Partner,
Industrious Ventures.
Taylor Sargent,
Partner,
Industrious Ventures.
______
Intuitive Machines
26 November, 2025
Chairman Ted Cruz,
U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
Ranking Member Maria Cantwell,
U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
Dear Chairman Cruz and Ranking Member Cantwell,
On behalf of Intuitive Machines, I write in strong support of the
swift confirmation of Mr. Jared Isaacman as the next Administrator of
NASA.
The United States is in a moment where execution and focus will
determine whether we maintain our lead in the strategic high ground of
space. Mr. Isaacman has already demonstrated an unambiguous commitment
to mission outcomes, cost discipline, and the urgency that this era
demands. His vision aligns directly with NASA's core mandate to achieve
what no other nation or organization can.
Furthermore, we at IM believe that there must be a whole-of-
government effort to locate, extract, and secure lunar critical
minerals before China can assert control over lunar commerce. As a
Next-Gen Space Prime, we are ready to build, connect, and operate the
essential infrastructure required to establish industrial enterprise on
the Moon and create a sustainable path to Mars. This integrated
capability stack directly supports Mr. Isaacman's objectives: pulling
forward human exploration timelines, igniting a real orbital-to-lunar
economy, and making NASA a force multiplier for science.
IM strongly agrees with his emphasis on speed and accountability.
Firm-fixed-price and service contracts that pay for performance are the
approach required to regain American momentum.
Mr. Isaacman understands the stakes, and that China is moving fast.
The next three years will shape the balance of power in space, and NASA
cannot afford incremental thinking or business-as-usual management.
Mr. Isaacman brings the needed operational discipline, technical
depth, and strategic clarity. For these reasons, Intuitive Machines
urges the Committee to advance his nomination without hesitation.
Stephen Altemus,
Chief Executive Officer,
Intuitive Machines.
______
Impulse Space
November 13, 2025
Chairman Ted Cruz
U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
Ranking Member Maria Cantwell,
U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
Dear Chairman Cruz and Ranking Member Cantwell,
On behalf of Impulse Space, I want to reiterate our strong support
for the swift confirmation of Mr. Jared Isaacman as the Administrator
of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
The United States cannot afford to lose momentum in this defining
decade for space leadership, and NASA stands at a pivotal moment. The
agency needs leadership to guide it through an era of ambitious
national goals in space exploration--an era defined by rapid innovation
and unprecedented public-private collaboration.
At Impulse Space, we build in-space mobility vehicles to accelerate
our future beyond Earth. We know firsthand that the next great era of
space exploration demands a NASA Administrator who understands and
embraces the commercial sector's growing capabilities. Mr. Isaacman is
that leader; an accomplished entrepreneur, innovator, and astronaut, he
embodies the qualities needed to lead NASA into this next chapter of
exploration. His leadership would bring renewed energy, efficiency, and
partnership to an agency whose success depends on collaboration with
the commercial space sector.
The Senate has an opportunity to act decisively and ensure that
NASA has the leadership it needs. We respectfully urge the Committee
and the full Senate to move swiftly on Mr. Isaacman's confirmation so
that he can begin leading NASA in this transformative moment for
American space exploration.
Thank you again for your thoughtful consideration and for your
continued support of America's leadership in space.
Sincerely,
Tom Mueller,
CEO,
Impulse Space.
______
Advanced Space LLC
Westminster, CO, November 17, 2025
Hon. Ted Cruz,
Chair,
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
United States Senate,
Washington, DC.
Hon. Maria Cantwell,
Ranking Member,
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
United States Senate,
Washington, DC.
Dear Chairman Cruz and Ranking Member Cantwell:
I write to you in my capacity as Chief Executive Officer of
Advanced Space LLC, a U.S.-based aerospace services company committed
to supporting national space policy, human spaceflight, and commercial
partnerships--to express my strong support for the confirmation of
Jared Isaacman as Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA).
Mr. Isaacman brings a rare combination of entrepreneurial vigor,
operational aerospace experience, and a personal record of spaceflight.
His background as a private astronaut, pilot, business leader, and
space-mission pioneer positions him uniquely to help NASA navigate the
evolving landscape of commercial space, international competition, and
human exploration. Multiple organizations in the space sector, such as
the Commercial Space Federation, have similarly recognized his
qualifications and urged a timely confirmation.
From our vantage at Advanced Space, this critical time in space
exploration demands bold leadership at NASA. The United States is
facing increasingly capable space competitors, and the commercial
sector is moving at a pace that challenges traditional institutional
models. Mr. Isaacman understands both sides of this coin--how
government and commercial actors must collaborate, and how to execute
ambitious missions with agility and accountability.
I believe his leadership would serve NASA and the Nation in several
key ways:
1. Bridging Government and Commercial Space. Mr. Isaacman's
experience in privately funded spaceflight missions gives him
an acute understanding of the commercial sector's capabilities,
risks, and innovation cycles. That insight is valuable for NASA
as it implements public-private partnerships, optimizes
procurement, and leverages the commercial space economy for
national benefit.
2. Business Leadership & Results Orientation. His entrepreneurial
track record--building high-growth enterprises, managing risk,
and delivering results--augments NASA's need for leadership
that can manage large, complex programs while fostering
innovation, cost discipline, and performance accountability.
3. Vision for Exploration and Inspiration. Mr. Isaacman has spoken
clearly about advancing not only lunar objectives but also Mars
and beyond, and about ensuring NASA remains a global leader in
science, technology, exploration, and workforce inspiration.
That vision aligns well with America's long-term strategic
interest in space.
At Advanced Space, our work frequently involves collaboration with
NASA centers and we welcome leadership that is open to new modalities
of partnership, mission assurance, cost-conscious execution, and
renewed urgency. In Mr. Isaacman, we believe there is the potential to
advance all of these.
In closing, I respectfully urge the Committee to consider Mr.
Isaacman's confirmation with priority and to forward his nomination
favorably to the full Senate. America's next chapter in space
exploration--human, robotic, and commercial--deserves leadership that
matches the moment. I believe Mr. Isaacman is ready to lead.
Thank you for your careful consideration of this endorsement. I am
available to provide any further context or comment the Committee may
require.
Sincerely,
Bradley Cheetham,
Chief Executive Officer.
______
Relativity Space
Long Beach, CA, November 20, 2025
Chairman Ted Cruz,
U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
Ranking Member Maria Cantwell,
U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
Dear Chairman Cruz and Ranking Member Cantwell,
Relativity Space strongly supports the speedy confirmation of Jared
Isaacman to serve as Administrator of the National Aeronautics and
Space Administration (NASA). Relativity is developing Terran R, a
medium-heavy reusable launch vehicle, which will launch from Cape
Canaveral, FL next year. The company also undertakes ambitious research
and development efforts focused on manufacturing and exploration
applications tied to the Nation's most pressing requirements.
Mr. Isaacman is the right leader for the agency at this inflection
point for global competition in space. He is clearly committed to an
ambitious vision of American exploration leadership, enabled by a
diverse and competitive launch ecosystem. He is well-qualified to
quickly and realistically assess the challenges facing the agency and
take swift action to build on Secretary Duffy's commendable work to
accelerate America's return to the Moon and win the race to Mars.
As the primary commercial tenant at NASA Stennis Space Center,
Relativity has partnered with NASA throughout the development of Terran
R and will soon rely on NASA to enable the testing of hundreds of
engines and dozens of integrated stages every year. Relativity is
confident in Mr. Isaacman's support for Stennis, expanded commercial
operations there, and maturing propulsion development and testing
across the NASA enterprise.
Mr. Isaacman has already completed an extensive vetting process,
won broad bipartisan support in the Senate, and continuously
demonstrated his commitment to work with Congress and all stakeholders
on NASA's path to modernization. It is critical that he be confirmed
this year. Continued uncertainty may not only lead to lasting
consequences for NASA's civil servants, launch providers, and
industrial base--but undermine hard-won American global leadership at a
time of Chinese ascendancy in orbit.
Relativity supports his confirmation without reservation and looks
forward to continued partnership with NASA and this Committee.
Sincerely,
Joshua Brost,
Chief Revenue Officer,
Relativity Space, Inc.
______
Space Tango
Lexington KY, November 26, 2025
Chairman Ted Cruz,
U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
Ranking Member Maria Cantwell,
U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
Dear Chairman Cruz and Ranking Member Cantwell,
On behalf of Space Tango, I am writing to convey our strong support
for the swift confirmation of Mr. Jared Isaacman to serve as
Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration
(NASA).
Space Tango is an Implementation Partner for the ISS National
Laboratory and a supporting partner on NASA's AVATAR program with it's
maiden flight on Artemis II. Our mission is to build a robust
commercial economy in low-Earth orbit and beyond, translating space-
based research into meaningful terrestrial value across healthcare and
medicine. NASA remains a vital partner in this mission, and effective
execution of these efforts requires a confirmed Administrator with the
vision and expertise to drive innovation and strengthen U.S. industry
partnerships.
Mr. Isaacman's decades of experience as an entrepreneur, business
leader, and space pioneer uniquely position him for this role. His
April 2025 testimony underscored a clear understanding of the strategic
competition with China and NASA's critical role in sustaining American
innovation and economic growth. We especially value his commitment to
ensuring NASA remains a force-multiplier for science, a philosophy that
aligns closely with Space Tango's work to translate research into
commercial value.
Mr. Isaacman's ingenuity, business acumen, and entrepreneurial
spirit will strengthen NASA at a moment when the stakes for U.S.
leadership could not be higher. On behalf of Space Tango, I
respectfully urge the Committee to prioritize Mr. Isaacman's
confirmation and provide NASA with the stable, dynamic leadership
needed to advance the Nation's strategic and economic interests in
space.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Twyman Clements,
President and Co-Founder,
Space Tango.
______
K2 Space
December 2, 2025
Chairman Ted Cruz ,
U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and
Transportation.Washington, DC
Ranking Member Maria Cantwell,
U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
Dear Chairman Cruz and Ranking Member Cantwell:
On behalf of K2 Space, a new space company manufacturing high power
satellites at scale, we write to convey our strong support for the
swift confirmation of Mr. Jared Isaacman to serve as Administrator of
the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). NASA plays a
central and enduring role in America's scientific progress and economic
competitiveness. As global competition intensifies, America's ability
to maintain leadership in space exploration, cislunar development, and
space-based science and research has never been more important.
Mr. Isaacman's extensive experience as a business leader,
entrepreneur, and space pioneer make him the right person to lead NASA
into this new chapter. Many on our team have worked with Mr. Isaacman
in the past and all have spoken about his unwavering commitment to the
furthering of space exploration and science. A NASA Administrator who
understands the value of public-private cooperation is essential to
sustaining the agency's momentum over the past decade to leverage
commercial space companies to accelerate innovation, reduce costs, and
strengthen the U.S. industrial base.
K2 Space was founded as a commercial space company with the
ultimate goal of using its new class of spacecraft to explore and
develop the solar system. We stand ready and eager to work with Mr.
Isaacman to ensure that NASA's missions continue to benefit from the
agility and technological strength of the U.S. commercial sector.
Sincerely,
Karan Kunjur,
Co-Founder and CEO,
K2 Space.
Neel Kunjur,
Co-Founder and CTO,
K2 Space.
______
Voyager Technologies
Denver, CO, November 25, 2025
Chairman Ted Cruz,
U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
Ranking Member Maria Cantwell,
U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
Dear Chairman Cruz and Ranking Member Cantwell:
On behalf of Voyager Technologies (VOYG NYSE), I am writing to send
our wholehearted support for the swift confirmation of Mr. Jared
Isaacman to serve as Administrator of the National Aeronautics and
Space Administration (NASA).
NASA plays an indispensable role in safeguarding America's
leadership in space. At a moment when China is executing a long-term,
centrally coordinated campaign to surpass the United States in low-
Earth orbit (LEO), cislunar space, and deep space exploration, the need
for Senate-confirmed leadership at NASA could not be more urgent.
China's rapid advances--including its planned permanent presence on the
lunar surface, partnerships with nations seeking alternatives to U.S.-
led coalitions, and a concerted effort to dominate LEO as the ISS nears
retirement--present a direct challenge to America's ability to shape
norms, alliances, and the economic foundation of the space industrial
base.
Stable, confirmed leadership at NASA is essential to ensuring the
United States does not experience a gap in human presence in LEO, a gap
in national laboratory capabilities, or a gap in U.S. industrial
momentum--all cornerstones of our national leadership in space for
decades. The Administrator will be required to make crucial decisions
regarding commercial destination development, cargo and crew services,
and the long-term framework that will define America's post-ISS
strategy in LEO and cislunar space. These decisions carry profound
implications not only for exploration, but for national security,
diplomacy, scientific research, and the emerging commercial space
economy.
Mr. Jared Isaacman is exceptionally qualified to guide NASA through
this pivotal period. His experience as an entrepreneur and operator in
complex, safety-critical environments, along with his achievements as a
pioneering commercial astronaut, provides him with a rare combination
of operational experience, technical insight, vision, and understanding
of the importance of a robust commercial ecosystem. His testimony
before the Committee in April 2025 demonstrated a clear understanding
of the long-term strategic competition with China, and the strategic
importance of accelerating U.S. progress in space commercialization. He
also expressed strong support for Congress's oversight role and the
statutory direction governing NASA's activities.
Mr. Isaacman's record of innovation, mission execution, and
commitment to public-private partnership aligns precisely with the
challenges facing NASA today--from ensuring uninterrupted American
presence in LEO, to strengthening Artemis, to advancing the
technologies needed for exploration beyond the Moon. His leadership
would provide NASA with the stability, technical acumen, and decisive
management approach required to position NASA for long-term success.
I respectfully urge the Committee to prioritize and expedite Mr.
Isaacman's confirmation. The stakes for American leadership in space--
scientific, economic, and strategic--could not be higher.
Sincerely,
Dylan Taylor,
Chairman and CEO,
Voyager Technologies.
______
Vaya Space
Cocoa, FL, December 1, 2025
Chairman Ted Cruz,
U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
Ranking Member Maria Cantwell,
U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
Dear Chairman Cruz and Ranking Member Cantwell:
On behalf of Vaya Space, a space and defense company located in the
Space Coast of Florida, I am writing to express our support for the
confirmation of Mr. Jared Isaacman to serve as Administrator of the
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
Vaya Space is focused on advancing hybrid propulsion, improving
launch safety, and strengthening the small-launch ecosystem in the
United States. NASA's leadership directly affects how emerging
technologies mature, how new launch capabilities are integrated, and
how the United States maintains competitiveness in an evolving global
space environment. We believe Mr. Isaacman would provide steady,
practical leadership that supports these goals.
Mr. Isaacman's background gives him a working understanding of the
needs of payload customers and the realities faced by launch providers.
His experience supporting commercial missions and investing in new
technologies reflects an appreciation for the importance of expanding
domestic launch capacity and encouraging a wider range of American
launch solutions.
On behalf of the entire Vaya Space team, I respectfully request
that you prioritize Mr. Isaacman's confirmation.
Sincerely,
Kevin Lowdermilk,
Chief Executive Officer,
Vaya Space.
______
Plan Z Capital
November 28, 2025
Chairman Ted Cruz,
U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, D.C.
Ranking Member Maria Cantwell,
U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
Re: Letter of Support for Jared Isaacman as NASA Administrator
Dear Chairman Cruz and Ranking Member Cantwell,
On behalf of Plan Z Capital, I am writing to convey my strongest
support for the confirmation of Mr. Jared Isaacman to serve as the next
Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
My name is Tejpaul Bhatia and I am the founder and CEO of Plan Z
Capital, the economic operating system for space. I was most recently
CEO of Axiom Space and prior to that a long time entrepreneur and tech
executive.
I joined the space industry five years ago with a clear mission: to
commercialize space. In that short time, I demonstrated how trust,
consistency, and an unwavering belief in achieving the impossible drove
billions of dollars of undeniable value, revenue, and capital into the
global space economy. In my time at Axiom, I worked closely with NASA
and the former administrator to expand access to space for everyone
through the historic Axiom human spaceflight missions that put India,
Italy, Poland, Sweden, Hungary, Turkiye, and Saudi Arabia in space,
alongside commercial partners like Amazon, Dallara, Oakley, Nokia,
Prada, and many others.
I mention this track record to highlight a critical reality:
outsiders drive outsized impact.
As I transition to launching and building Plan Z Capital, I
recognize that the space market is ripe for business model innovation
across all sectors. However, the status quo--``Plan A''-is too linear,
conventional, and predictable. It relies on accepting yesterday's
approach. For NASA to maintain American leadership in an increasingly
contested global domain, Plan A is no longer enough.
We need an asymmetric leap. We need leadership that has the
audacity to find the win when there is no playbook. Mr. Isaacman
represents the ``Plan Z'' mindset. He does not simply accept the first
answer; he taps into collective exceptionalism to engineer the
inevitable. His track record with Shift4 and the Polaris Program
demonstrates that he understands what it takes to take civilization
off-planet. He understands that with government support as the
foundation, global investors need the financial and geo-political
infrastructure to back endeavors that push the frontier.
The time for commercial space is now. The ``now'' is ours to build.
Mr. Isaacman possesses the ingenuity, the commercial acumen, and the
perspective required to ensure NASA does not just oversee the future,
but actively defines it.
I urge the committee to confirm Jared Isaacman as NASA
Administrator.
Sincerely,
Tejpaul Bhatia,
Founder and CEO,
Plan Z Capital Inc.
______
Seagate Space Corporation
November 30, 2025
Chairman Ted Cruz,
U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
Ranking Member Maria Cantwell,
U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
Dear Members of the U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and
Transportation:
As the Chief Executive Officer of Seagate Space Corporation, a
maritime venture developing offshore infrastructure for the space
industry, I am writing to convey our company's support for the swift
confirmation of Mr. Jared Isaacman to serve as Administrator of the
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
The United States stands at a critical juncture in the global race
for space innovation. As China accelerates its investments in advanced
aerospace capabilities, our Nation must ensure that innovation keeps
pace--not only through government programs but by empowering commercial
solutions that can move faster and take calculated risks. NASA will
remain the cornerstone of America's space ambitions, but its success
increasingly depends on partnership with private entities who can
complement government efforts with agility and boldness. I believe
Jared Isaacman is an exemplar of this imperative that our Nation can
rally around.
Mr. Isaacman's record as a bold entrepreneur and risk taker
underscores why his nomination is timely for NASA. He has shown a
willingness to push boundaries that show the best of collaboration
between private industry and NASA, done with his own capital and
directly participating in the missions. These qualities and firsthand
experience are essential for maintaining U.S. leadership in an era
where speed, adaptability, and innovation are decisive. I look forward
to seeing the impact Mr. Isaacman can have when he is entrusted with
the resources of NASA, a national jewel that has put the fingerprints
of our Nation upon the heavens.
I respectfully request that you prioritize Mr. Isaacman's
confirmation and express our full support for him as NASA's next
administrator.
Sincerely,
Michael Anderson,
Chief Executive Officer,
Seagate Space Corporation.
______
Johns Hopkins
Applied Physics Laboratory
November 12, 2025
Ranking Member Chris Van Hollen,
Washington, DC.
Senator Angela Alsobrooks,
Washington, DC.
Dear Ranking Member Van Hollen and Senator Alsobrooks:
I am writing to convey my full support for the confirmation of Mr.
Jared Isaacman as Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA). NASA and Maryland will both benefit from Jared's
leadership as NASA Administrator.
I've spent my 35-year career working across the U.S. space program
as a NASA civil servant, an aerospace engineering faculty member in
academia, and as the NASA Chief Technologist in 2010 and 2011. I also
led multiple space science teams at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory
before joining APL.
Our nation needs a strong NASA, and that requires decisive and
innovative leadership. Jared Isaacman will bring these qualities to the
Agency. He possesses deep experience across aeronautics and space, has
worked with NASA to push humanity's boundaries outward, and understands
that U.S. space leadership is of paramount importance to our Nation
today. Jared has expressed to me his strong desire to improve and
expedite NASA's space science enterprise, which the Nation and Maryland
need now more than ever.
Jared cares deeply about the balanced, multi-mission nature of the
Agency and its talented people. As you know, Jared bravely led two
spaceflight missions himself and conducted the first-ever spacewalk by
a private astronaut. From my conversations with Jared, I am confident
he has what it takes to lead NASA during this important time, as the
Nation looks to return to the Moon, go to Mars, and execute first-of-a-
kind space science missions that are crucial to our society and engage
the science and technology community across the state of Maryland.
I ask that you meet with Jared and support him in the upcoming
confirmation process in the Senate. NASA is in need of decisive and
stable leadership to achieve its ambitious goals. I know that Jared is
the right person to lead the Agency at this time.
Sincerely,
Robert D. Braun,
Head, Space Exploration Sector.
cc: Chairman Ted Cruz
Ranking Member Maria Cantwell
______
Redwire Space
Jacksonville, Florida, December 1, 2025
Hon. Ted Cruz,
Chairman,
Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee,
United States Senate,
Washington, DC.
Hon. Maria Cantwell,
Ranking Member,
Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee,
United States Senate,
Washington, DC.
Dear Chairman Cruz and Ranking Member Cantwell:
On behalf of all of us at Redwire Space with facilities across the
United States including Indiana, Colorado, Massachusetts, and New
Mexico, it is our pleasure to express strong support for the
confirmation of Jared Isaacman as NASA Administrator.
Mr. Isaacman has a singular background with an unprecedented
understanding of the private sector. For example, we're grateful that
Mr. Isaacman has already noted the importance of space-based
pharmaceutical and biotech development. At Redwire, via our
BioFabrication Facility on the International Space Station (ISS), we
printed the first ever human meniscus in space, and also printed live
cardiovascular tissue, which was returned to Earth while still live.
The ability to leverage the microgravity environment to print biologic
tissues and eventually whole organs in space has tremendous potential.
Additionally, we have flown 42 Pharmaceutical In-Space Laboratories
(PIL-BOXes) on the ISS, which have demonstrated that larger and more
uniform pharmaceutical seed crystals can be grown in the microgravity
environment, which can then be used to create new drug formulations
with better efficacy, longevity, and fewer side effects. The space and
biotech fields are about to merge in a way that will transform both
industries, and we believe Mr. Isaacman is ideally suited to support
and accelerate this technological revolution.
As a commercial entrepreneur, Mr. Isaacman has an innate
understanding of the private sector and the support companies will need
to transform ideas into reality. NASA is at an inflection point with
the introduction of commercial space stations, and Mr. Isaacman has
substantial commercial and even human spaceflight experience that will
allow him to guide the agency through this critical period. NASA must
ensure that America remains the global leader in microgravity,
research, development, and manufacturing and, again, we're confident
that Mr. Isaacman's background is uniquely suited to ensure that
America maintains a continuous crewed presence in Low Earth Orbit
(LEO), avoids a gap in crewed operations, and always has more
capabilities and astronauts in LEO than China or other adversary
nations.
Moreover, America must beat China to the Moon and on the Moon. We
believe that Mr. Isaacman can guarantee this occurs by leveraging the
incredible work that was done to secure vital funding in the One Big
Beautiful Bill Act. As an astronaut who enjoys the endorsement of
numerous other astronauts, we're confident that Mr. Isaacman is
personally dedicated to making certain that America and its
international partners reach the Moon before China. Additionally, with
the funding provided by the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, we also believe
Mr. Isaacman will support the creation of critical infrastructure such
as Gateway, to enable long-duration stays on the Moon while maintaining
American credibility, relationships, and contributions from our
important international partners here on Earth.
Finally, we believe Mr. Isaacman will bring a new and vital energy
to NASA, looking at enhanced efficiencies such as centralizing human
spaceflight at Johnson Space Center, creative public-private
partnerships, and ensuring that NASA plays a pro-active role in
addressing regulatory challenges such as export control, obsolete
planetary protection policies, and adopting a pro-growth mission
authorization regime.
For all of these reasons, we respectfully request that you support
the confirmation of Mr. Isaacman with alacrity. If I can provide
additional information or answer questions, please feel free to reach
out to me at any time. My e-mail address is
[email protected] and my cell phone number is (202) 997-
3230.
Thank you for your time and attention to this nomination.
Sincerely,
Michael Gold,
President, Civil and International Business,
Redwire Space.
______
SmallSat Alliance
December 1, 2025
Chairman Ted Cruz,
U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
Ranking Member Maria Cantwell,
U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
Subject: SmallSat Alliance--Letter of Support for Jared lsaacman
Dear Chairman Cruz and Ranking Member Cantwell:
On behalf of the SmallSat Alliance, representing more than SO
companies across America's rapidly growing commercial space sector. I
write to express our strong support for the swift confirmation of Mr.
Jared lsaacman as Administrator of NASA
NASA is entering one of the most consequential periods in its
history. China is executing a centralized, state-directed strategy to
challenge U.S. leadership across human spaceflight, cislunar
operations, science, and Earth observation. Beijing is seeking to
proliferate its standards, secure coalitions contrary to American
goals, and dominate the space technology leadership that will shape the
next SO years in space. In this environment, NASA requires confirmed
leadership with the credibility to move fast, partner effectively, and
leverage America's innovation economy and free-market industrial base.
Over the last 15 years, NASA has pioneered and perfected the
public-private partnership model that has become the backbone of U.S.
space success. Commercial Cargo and Crew, Commercial Lunar Payload
Services, and the emerging commercial space station ecosystem have
proven that competition, private capital, and commercially derived
architectures deliver capability with greater speed, lower cost, and
far greater resilience. These models have been so successful that the
Department of Defense is now following them as it shifts away from
legacy, monolithic systems.
NASA's Earth Science division has similarly led the Federal
government in adopting hybrid space architectures by integrating
commercial small satellites, hosted payloads, and commercial data
services to improve revisit rates and global coverage. These hybrid
approaches are enhancing national resilience and provide climate and
environmental insights essential to policymakers, farmers, emergency
managers, and scientists at a fraction of traditional program costs. We
must continue to evolve and perfect these approaches as China races to
deploy its own global remote sensing and environmental monitoring
systems.
Mr. lsaacman is uniquely qualified to advance this strategy. As an
entrepreneur, operator, and space pioneer, he has spent decades proving
that competitive, commercial approaches can meet national needs better
and faster than traditional models. His testimony before this Committee
in April 2025 demonstrated a clear understanding of the long-term
strategic competition with China and the need for NASA to continue
leaning into the commercial partnerships it created and perfected. He
recognizes that maintaining U.S. leadership will require broadening and
making even more competitive the successful frameworks that have made
America the global leader in launch, human spaceflight, and space-based
services. '
For these reasons, and on behalf of the members of the SmallSat
Alliance, I respectfully urge you to prioritize Mr. Isaacman's
confirmation. The United States cannot afford further delay. NASA needs
a leader who understands that America
wins in space by harnessing the speed, innovation, and competitive
power of its commercial sector.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Dr. Angel Smith,
Executive Director,
SmallSat Alliance.
______
Sedaro
December 2, 2025
Hon. Ted Cruz,
Chair,
Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee,
United States Senate
Washington, DC
Hon. Maria Cantwell,
Ranking Member,
Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee,
United States Senate,
Washington, DC.
Dear Chairman Cruz and Ranking Member Cantwell,
On behalf of Sedaro, I am writing to express our strong support for
the nomination of Mr. Jared Isaacman as the next Administrator of NASA.
His operational experience, commercial leadership, and commitment to
U.S. space innovation aligns directly with the transformational moment
NASA now faces.
Sedaro's origins trace to NASA-supported research that helped
catalyze our technical foundation. Yet as we scaled, structural and
bureaucratic hurdles made it difficult for emerging, modern commercial
solutions to transition from R&D into operational use. That experience
gives us a clear perspective: NASA's talent and ingenuity are
unmatched, but traditional acquisition processes often prevent the
agency from fully benefiting from the speed, flexibility, and
innovation now commonplace in the commercial sector.
Mr. Isaacman is precisely the kind of leader who can bridge that
gap. His record across commercial spaceflight, high-performance
aviation, and advanced mission architecture demonstrates technical
fluency, disciplined execution, and a deep understanding of how
commercial and government capabilities must work together to keep NASA
at the forefront of global space leadership.
This leadership is especially critical in today's rapidly evolving
and increasingly contested threat environment. U.S. competitors are
accelerating development cycles and tightly integrating commercial-
military space capabilities. NASA plays a foundational role in the
broader U.S. space enterprise, with significant spillover into civil
space, national security, and dual-use technologies. Few leaders
understand this full landscape as clearly as Mr. Isaacman.
Mr. Isaacman has repeatedly championed the digital-first approaches
necessary to transform how complex programs are conceived, tested, and
delivered. Under his leadership, NASA can meaningfully accelerate this
transformation, enabling the agency to:
Adopt modern digital engineering as a core mission
capability;
Accelerate collaboration with innovative commercial
partners;
Strengthen the U.S. industrial base through dual-use, space-
relevant technologies;
And reestablish itself as the global standard for technical
excellence and rapid program execution.
NASA needs a leader with both pragmatic operational judgment and an
aspirational vision for the future. Mr. Isaacman brings the discipline
of an operator, the urgency of an entrepreneur, and the imagination of
an explorer. His nomination is an opportunity to modernize the agency,
inspire the nation, and ensure U.S. advantage across civil and national
security space domains.
Sedaro stands ready to support the agency's forthcoming
modernization efforts and to deepen collaboration with NASA under his
leadership. We strongly endorse his nomination.
Sincerely,
Robbie Robertson,
CEO and Co-Founder,
Sedaro.
______
Space for Humanity
December 2, 2025
Chairman Ted Cruz,
U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
Ranking Member Maria Cantwell,
U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
Dear Chairman Cruz and Ranking Member Cantwell,
Space for Humanity offers its support for Mr. Jared Isaacman as the
next NASA Administrator.
The United States stands at a critical juncture in space
exploration. Global competitors are accelerating their capabilities,
commercial industry is advancing at an unprecedented rate, and NASA's
role as a scientific, economic, and diplomatic engine has never been
more important. This moment demands a leader with strategic vision,
operational rigor, and a deep understanding of the rapidly evolving
space ecosystem. In short, this moment requires Mr. Isaacman. He is
uniquely positioned to provide the vision, leadership, and stability
NASA needs at this pivotal moment in its history.
Mr. Isaacman's track record speaks for itself. As an entrepreneur,
aviator, and pioneering commercial astronaut, he has demonstrated the
rare combination of technical fluency, risk-aware leadership, and long-
term vision the agency needs. He has not only participated in the
modern commercial space revolution, he has helped launch it.
America's commitment to space exploration has fueled many of
humanity's greatest scientific and technological achievements. For more
than 60 years, NASA has pushed the boundaries of discovery, deepened
our understanding of the universe, and reminded us of our shared place
in the cosmos. A bold, science-driven NASA will not only lead the world
in returning us to the Moon and venturing on to Mars, but will also
galvanize billions of onlookers, expand humanity's collective
perspective, and help chart our course to becoming a truly spacefaring
species. The agency's future hinges on the ability to unite science,
exploration, innovation, and national competitiveness under a coherent,
forward-looking strategy. Mr. Isaacman understands that a strong
commercial space sector strengthens NASA, and a strong NASA uplifts the
entire ecosystem.
While organizations like ours do not endorse political nominees, we
deeply recognize the importance of stable, visionary leadership at
NASA. It is for these reasons that we respectfully urge this committee
to advance Mr. Isaacman's nomination. He has earned the trust of those
building America's space future, and we are confident he will bring
principled, forward-looking leadership to NASA at a moment when it
matters most.
At Space for Humanity, we have long championed a future in which
space is accessible, inclusive, and transformative for all people. We
believe space is a catalyst for positive change. We thank you and the
Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation for your
consideration of this nomination, your ongoing legislative work, and
for your continued dedication to America's leadership in space.
Respectfully,
Ryan Kriser,
Chairman, Board of Directors,
Space For Humanity.
Antonio Peronace,
Executive Director,
Space for Humanity.
______
The Spaceport Company
November 30, 2025
Chairman Ted Cruz,
U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation
Washington, DC.
Ranking Member Maria Cantwell,
U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Washington, DC.
Dear Chairman Cruz and Ranking Member Cantwell:
NASA is in crisis. Lacking strategic direction, NASA's workforce,
effectiveness, and international prestige are deteriorating. The United
States desperately needs NASA to succeed to protect American national
security. NASA plays an essential role countering malign foreign
interests on the global stage, incubating bleeding edge technologies,
deepening allied relationships, and motivating American youth to pursue
challenging technical careers. A great NASA means a safer and more
prosperous world for all Americans, and a more inspirational future for
all humankind.
Mr. Jared Isaacman is the right person to restore NASA's greatness.
He is accomplished yet modest, a technologist and a successful
entrepreneur. In short, he is a person with the expertise, intellect,
and temperament to advance America's national interests, revitalize
NASA's workforce, and help America lead humanity to new frontiers in
space.
Mr. Isaacman's hearing before the committee in April 2025
demonstrated his understanding of the near and long-term competition
with China, as well as his respect for Congress's oversight
responsibilities and the laws directing NASA's activities. Furthermore,
Mr. Isaacman has shown his commitment to all parts of NASA--space
science, space technology, aeronautics, and human exploration. Mr.
Isaacman brings ingenuity, business acumen, technical know-how, and a
deep passion to this role, which will position NASA to overcome its
near-term challenges, and thrive over the long-term.
Therefore, I respectfully request you prioritize Mr. Isaacman's
confirmation, given the criticality of NASA's many ongoing missions to
American national security.
Sincerely,
Mr. Thomas Marotta,
CEO,
The Spaceport Company.
______
U.S. Travel Association
Washington, DC, December 2, 2025
Hon. Ted Cruz,
Chairman,
U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
Hon. Maria Cantwell,
Ranking Member,
U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
Dear Chairman Cruz and Ranking Member Cantwell:
As the leading voice of the travel industry, the U.S. Travel
Association strongly supports the nomination of Steven Haines to serve
as Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Analysis, and we
urge his swift confirmation.
The Department of Commerce plays a significant role in stimulating
economic growth and prosperity in the United States, enhancing the
international competitiveness of American industries, and promoting
U.S. exports. Over the next decade, the United States will host an
unprecedented number of global events, including America's 250th
anniversary, the 2026 FIFA World Cup, the 2028 Summer Olympic and
Paralympic Games in Los Angeles, and the 2034 Winter Olympic and
Paralympic Games in Salt Lake City. These landmark events present
extraordinary economic opportunities for communities across the country
and will place the United States at the center of global attention.
Travel is one of America's largest exports, and international
visitors to the United States generate substantial revenue for our
economy, contributing $181 billion in U.S. exports in 2024. At the same
time, we are projected to reach a $60 billion travel trade deficit by
the end of this year, underscoring the urgent need for strong,
coordinated Federal leadership to grow inbound travel and maximize our
share of the global travel market. In this context, the role of the
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Analysis is more
important than ever. Through leadership of the National Travel and
Tourism Office and coordination with federal, state, and local
partners, the Assistant Secretary plays a critical role in developing
and implementing strategies to expand travel exports, strengthen
America's economic competitiveness, and ensure we fully capitalize on
the opportunities presented by this upcoming decade of major global
events.
Mr. Haines brings a deep understanding of economic and
international policy, legislative affairs, and the interagency process,
and he is exceptionally well positioned to lead these efforts at a
pivotal moment for the Nation. His experience will be invaluable in
advancing a strategic approach to boost travel exports and support
American jobs and communities nationwide.
It is crucial that we are prepared to maximize the opportunities of
the major events that lie ahead. We look forward to working closely
with Mr. Haines upon his confirmation, and we urge the Committee to
report his nomination favorably to the full Senate as soon as possible.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
Geoff Freeman,
President and CEO,
U.S. Travel Association.
______
Stoke Space
November 24, 2025
Chairman Ted Cruz,
U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
Ranking Member Maria Cantwell,
U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
Dear Chairman Cruz and Ranking Member Cantwell:
On behalf of Stoke Space, a Washington-based startup building the
next-generation of fully reusable launch vehicles, I am writing to
express strong support for Mr. Jared Isaacman's nomination as the
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Administrator.
As I noted during the Economist Space Summit on November 5, it is
important for our national space program to have a clear direction and
concrete future. Mr. Isaacman's distinguished record as an
entrepreneur, business leader and commercial space pioneer renders him
uniquely qualified for this critical role. He has demonstrated vision,
discipline, and a proven ability to build and guide successful, high-
performing organizations. His direct experience commanding the
Inspiration4 and Polaris Dawn missions, coupled with his commitment to
innovation, reflects both the spirit and the practical expertise
necessary to guide NASA into its next era.
NASA's mission is vital to maintaining America's leadership in
space exploration, scientific discovery, and technological advancement.
Evolving this mission, as competition with peer and near-peer
adversaries in space intensifies, will require tenacity, creativity and
increasingly close collaboration with America's vibrant and growing
commercial space ecosystem. Ultimately, it is the dynamism of our
private sector coupled with NASA's proud tradition of pushing the
boundaries of what is possible that will preserve and strengthen
America's competitive edge in space. Mr. Isaacman's first-hand
knowledge of our domestic commercial space sector and his commitment to
advancing the cause of American primacy in space will ensure that our
national space program has a clear direction and a concrete future.
We look forward to working closely with both Mr. Isaacman and our
stakeholders on the Commerce Committee in the coming years to preserve
and enhance American leadership in space. I respectfully encourage you
and your colleagues to support Mr. Isaacman's confirmation as NASA
Administrator.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Andy Lapsa,
CEO,
Stoke Space.
______
Starlab Space
November 26, 2025
Chairman Ted Cruz,
U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
Ranking Member Maria Cantwell,
U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
Dear Chairman Cruz and Ranking Member Cantwell:
On behalf of Starlab Space, I am writing to express our strong
support for the swift confirmation of Mr. Jared Isaacman to serve as
Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration
(NASA).
NASA's leadership is foundational to sustaining America's
preeminence in human space exploration. Today, China is executing a
long-term strategy to expand its influence in space--establishing
permanent operations in low-Earth orbit (LEO) as quickly as possible,
pursuing sustained activity on the lunar surface, and deepening
commercial and governmental partnerships with nations seeking
alternatives to U.S.-led coalitions. As China accelerates these efforts
and increasingly seeks to shape international norms and alignment, it
is essential that the United States maintain a continuous human
presence in LEO, advance the Artemis campaign, and ensure a seamless
transition from the International Space Station (ISS) to commercial
destinations. These are strategic imperatives that will determine
whether the United States or China sets the standards for the next era
of human spaceflight.
Starlab Space is proud to partner with NASA during this pivotal
moment in history. We are constructing a next-generation commercial
space station, built here in the U.S., supporting microgravity
research, human spaceflight operations, and long-duration missions
critical for the scientific community, commercial users, and
international partners, as well as our national security. Delivering
this capability on the timeline required to avoid a gap in permanent
LEO presence is essential to ensuring the United States does not
relinquish leadership to China. Doing so also demands clear, stable,
Senate-confirmed leadership at NASA; leadership capable of guiding the
agency's decisions on commercial destination development, LEO crew and
cargo services, and the policy and programmatic frameworks that will
define America's post-ISS future.
Mr. Isaacman understands what is at stake for the nations and
brings a uniquely relevant combination of operational experience,
technical proficiency, and firsthand understanding of human
spaceflight. His accomplishments as an entrepreneur, mission commander,
and commercial astronaut give him a rare perspective on the realities
of crewed space operations and the role that innovative public-private
partnerships must play in advancing national objectives. His engagement
with policymakers and the broader space community reflects a clear
grasp of the strategic competition unfolding in space and the urgent
need to strengthen U.S. leadership across LEO and beyond.
On behalf of Starlab Space and our employees, I respectfully urge
the Committee to advance Mr. Isaacman's confirmation without delay. His
leadership will provide NASA with the strategic focus, operational
credibility, and forward-leaning vision necessary to fortify America's
position in LEO, advance human spaceflight, and ensure that the United
States remains the world's leader in exploration for decades to come.
Sincerely,
Marshall Smith,
Chief Executive Officer,
Starlab Space.
______
Selene Space Corporation
November 26, 2025
Chairman Ted Cruz,
U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
Ranking Member Maria Cantwell,
U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation.
Washington, DC.
Dear Chairman Cruz and Ranking Member Cantwell:
On behalf of Selene Space Corporation, I am writing to express my
strong support for the nomination of Mr. Jared Isaacman to serve as the
next Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space
Administration.
Selene is a new American orbital infrastructure company focused on
ensuring that the United States maintains leadership in low Earth orbit
(LEO) and on the Moon. We are building the next generation of large
commercial space stations designed to replace and augment the volume
and capabilities of the International Space Station and to anchor
American industrial, commercial, and international activity in space.
Expandable habitat technology is the foundation of our platforms and
provides a superior solution for commercial activity in LEO, long-
duration exploration missions as well as sustainable human habitation
on the lunar surface.
The United States cannot afford gaps in orbital infrastructure, as
these gaps have direct implications for national security, economic
prosperity, and global leadership. Robust commercial stations and a
sustained lunar presence are essential elements of a stable space
architecture that protects American interests and ensures our
competitors cannot define the rules of the domain. This is a pivotal
national transition, and it requires a NASA Administrator with
operational experience, strategic vision, and the ability to unite
government, industry, and global partners.
I want to express my immense appreciation to Chairman Cruz for his
consistent leadership in highlighting the importance of the Moon to
America's long-term strategic and economic position in space, and for
his ongoing support of a strong and stable NASA budget. His recognition
and appreciation that lunar activity will shape the next several
decades of global positioning is both timely and essential.
Mr. Isaacman brings a rare combination of qualifications. He has
commanded multiple orbital missions giving him firsthand understanding
of human spaceflight operations, mission preparation, and the
engineering and safety discipline required for NASA's work. He also has
more than two decades of experience building and leading high-
performance companies in aviation and technology, demonstrating the
ability to manage complex programs, develop technical workforces, and
deliver ambitious long-term goals. In fact, I think he may be the most
uniquely qualified candidate to ever lead NASA.
He understands the strategic environment facing the United States.
LEO is becoming the industrial foundation of the space economy, and
without a capable successor to the ISS, America risks losing its
central role in that ecosystem. Competitive pressure is already evident
as China expands the Tiangong space station and offers anticompetitive
alternatives to international partners, creating an increasingly
difficult environment for U.S. commercial station providers to
withstand. The Moon is rapidly emerging as the front line for
geopolitical influence, and we risk surrendering the next great
economic frontier, a domain rich with critical materials, energy
potential, and infrastructure advantages that could define twenty-
first-century supply chains. Other nations are moving quickly, forming
coalitions, and investing in infrastructure that will shape their
global posture for decades.
NASA needs an Administrator who understands that this moment is
defined by robust infrastructure, strategic advantage, and the urgency
of timely execution. Mr. Isaacman has the operational grounding,
leadership experience, and long-horizon perspective required to guide
the agency through this transition. His background aligns with the
needs of NASA as it prepares for robust commercial LEO infrastructure
and a sustained American presence on the lunar surface.
For these reasons, I respectfully urge the Committee to advance his
nomination. His leadership will strengthen the Nation's position in low
Earth orbit, support meaningful cislunar and lunar activity, and ensure
that the United States remains the partner of choice for industry and
international collaboration.
Thank you for your consideration.
Warmly,
Blair Bigelow May,
Founder and CEO,
Selene Space Corporation.
______
Caffeinated Capital Management, LLC
Aspen, CO, December 3, 2025
Chairman Ted Cruz,
U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
Ranking Member Maria Cantwell,
U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
Dear Chairman Cruz and Ranking Member Cantwell,
On behalf of Caffeinated Capital Management, LLC (Caffeinated
Capital), a venture capital firm supporting technology leaders
delivering critical space capabilities to the United States, I am
writing to convey my support for the confirmation of Mr. Jared Isaacman
to serve as Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA).
Caffeinated Capital has significant investments in enterprises
advancing the technological primacy of the United States in the space
domain. Our portfolio includes Varda Space, which is delivering
critical cost-efficient in-space manufacturing and hypersonic reentry
capabilities to the United States; Antares Nuclear, which is developing
small modular nuclear reactors addressing terrestrial and space-based
strategic energy needs; and Amca, Hadrian, and Senra Systems, which are
delivering critical domestic manufacturing capabilities in service of
our world-leading aerospace and defense industrial base.
Mr. Isaacman's commitment to American astronauts and their future
endeavors in space, deep respect for the technologies and world-class
industries essential to our leadership in the space domain, and focus
on sustainable paths forward for NASA have prepared him to steward the
agency as it continually asserts American leadership in space
technology and science.
NASA sits at a critical moment in its history. I believe that Mr.
Isaacman's dedication to American spacefaring and bold vision for the
future of the agency warrants his swift confirmation as the fifteenth
Administrator of NASA. Thank you for taking the time to consider our
input.
Raymond Tonsing,
Member,
Caffeinated Capital Management, LLC.
______
Type One Ventures
Malibu, CA, December 1, 2025
Chairman Ted Cruz,
U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
Ranking Member Maria Cantwell,
U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
Dear Chairman Cruz and Ranking Member Cantwell:
I am writing to express my strong support for Mr. Jared Isaacman as
the next Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA). As a Partner at Type One Ventures, a venture
capital firm dedicated to advancing the U.S. space economy, I have the
privilege of working closely with founders and companies that are
expanding American leadership in space, creating high-quality jobs
across the country, and driving substantial economic growth. Most
recently, I aligned with Mr. Isaacman for my Breakthrough Summit
featuring 80 New Frontier leaders.
At Type One Ventures, we back frontier-technology and space
companies that are directly furthering U.S. competitiveness. Our
portfolio includes organizations building next-generation launch
systems, in-space logistics, defense-critical capabilities, and
enabling technologies essential for the emerging commercial space
infrastructure. These companies operate at the intersection of
innovation and national strategy, and the success of their missions
depends on stable, forward-thinking leadership at NASA.
Throughout my work in this sector, it has become clear that Jared
Isaacman embodies the experience, vision, and operational discipline
required to guide NASA at this pivotal moment. His record as a mission
commander, entrepreneur, and private-sector leader demonstrates a level
of commitment and technical fluency suited to the agency's current
challenges. Mr. Isaacman not only understands the dynamics of the
commercial space ecosystem, but he has also helped shape it. His
leadership has inspired a generation of engineers, builders, and
investors who are directly contributing to America's economic and
strategic strength.
NASA now stands at the center of a rapidly evolving global space
landscape. With China and other competitors accelerating their
capabilities, the United States must ensure that its civil space
program is led by an administrator who can integrate innovation,
safety, economic growth, and long-term national interest. Mr.
Isaacman's experience pioneering private human spaceflight, supporting
key national innovations, and fostering partnerships across commercial
and defense sectors positions him exceptionally well to steward NASA's
next era.
For these reasons, I respectfully urge the Committee to move
forward with Mr. Isaacman's confirmation. He has earned the confidence
of entrepreneurs, investors, engineers, and mission leaders across the
space economy, and he has my strongest support.
Thank you for your consideration and for your continued leadership
on matters vital to America's future in space.
Respectfully,
Ryan Kriser,
Partner,
Type One Ventures.
______
Planet Labs PBC
November 17, 2025
Hon. Ted Cruz,
Chairman,
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
U.S. Senate,
Washington, DC.
Hon. Maria Cantwell,
Ranking Member,
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
U.S. Senate,
Washington, DC.
Dear Chairman Cruz and Ranking Member Cantwell:
We write to express our strong support for the nomination of Jared
lsaacman to serve as the next Administrator of the National Aeronautics
and Space Administration (NASA) and urge you to advance his nomination
swiftly. Mr. lsaacman is a visionary entrepreneur who demonstrates the
leadership and passion that would enable him to lead NASA into the
future as we push to expand our understanding of the Earth and explore
our solar system.
If confirmed as Administrator, Mr. lsaacman will drive innovation
in NASA's collaborations across the space ecosystem. We are confident
he will leverage technology and reimagine space exploration by
capitalizing on the many advancements of our Nation's commercial space
sector. His commitment to commercial space will redefine NASA's
partnerships, advance national space priorities, and get more missions
into space faster with greater cost efficiency, strengthening U.S.
leadership.
Further, Mr. lsaacman's deep appreciation of science will advance
NASA's role in maintaining U.S. leadership with international partners
in cutting edge scientific discoveries over China. He understands we
need to create opportunities for the U.S. to remain at the forefront of
human space exploration while simultaneously expanding humanity's
knowledge through scientific discovery. Importantly, Mr. lsaacman
values the role of scientific discovery to improve our understanding
and management of natural disasters like wildfires and flooding, border
security, land and water management, agriculture, national security,
and countless commercial sectors. He also appreciates the capabilities
of the commercial space industry to complement and supplement NASA and
other international data sets to advance these applications and improve
decision making in our communities.
We also appreciate Mr. lsaacman's interest in engaging with the
private sector, academia, and the scientific community to develop new
ideas to sustain scientific observations, accelerate getting new
scientific instruments on orbit, and push the boundaries of scientific
discovery by leveraging the best of NASA, industry, and academia.
Planet has pioneered innovative pubic private partnerships by engaging
with NASA JPL, central to the Carbon Mapper coalition and the
development of the Tanager spacecraft. This is a collaboration that can
serve as a template for other NASA-commercial collaborations that can
drive innovation, develop more science missions faster, and deliver
cost savings across government.
Jared lsaacman's experience as an astronaut, his understanding of
commercial space capabilities, and his executive experience will help
him lead NASA through the next phase of exploration, scientific
discovery, and innovation. We wholeheartedly support his nomination and
strongly believe he should be confirmed quickly so NASA can have
Senate-confirmed leadership as soon as possible. This will enable our
shared goals to advance our Nation's space priorities and continue
NASA's long history of scientific exploration and discovery. Thank you
for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Will Marshall,
Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer,
Planet Labs PBC.
Robbie Schingler,
Co-Founder and Chief Strategy Officer,
Planet Labs PBC.
______
Naval Aviation Museum Foundation
Pensacola, FL, March 25, 2025
Hon. Ted Cruz,
Chair, Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee,
United States Senate,
Washington, DC.
Hon. Maria Cantwell,
Ranking Member, Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee,
United States Senate,
Washington, DC.
Dear Chairman Cruz and Ranking Member Cantwell,
I am writing to express my support for President Trump's nomination
of Mr. Jared Isaacman to be NASA Administrator. As a space explorer,
entrepreneur, acclaimed aviator and strong advocate for STEM Education,
he is a leader of the highest character and an exceptional selection
for NASA Administrator. As a 35-year Navy veteran and current President
& CEO of the Naval Aviation Museum Foundation, my support for his
confirmation as the next Administrator of NASA is unequivocal.
Mr. Isaacman has been a peerless supporter of the National Naval
Aviation Museum s mission through his philanthropy. His support was
critical to our continuity of operations during our closure during the
COVID pandemic. Over the past decade, he has not only impacted our
quality of exhibits but have also had an immeasurable impact on our
National Flight Academy the country s premier aviation themed STEM
academy. His personal impact on hundreds of thousands of visitors to
our museum and STEM programs has been foundational to our mission
encouraging visitors to Dream Inspire and Remember.
Mr. Isaacman's involvement and insight from his experiences in
aviation both in high performance aircraft to pioneering the boundaries
of civilian space exploration have been essential as we develop
programs to continue to inspire and engage both the next generation of
aerospace enthusiasts and future STEM workforce for decades to come.
I enthusiastically encourage you and your Senate colleagues to act
expeditiously to confirm Mr. Isaacman. Thank you for your consideration
and support.
Sincerely,
Kyle J. Cozad,
RADM USN (Ret),
President and CEO,
Naval Aviation Museum Foundation.
______
National Coast Guard Museum Association
New London, CT, November 13, 2025
Hon. Ted Cruz,
Chair, Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee,
United States Senate,
Washington, DC.
Hon. Maria Cantwell,
Ranking Member, Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee,
United States Senate,
Washington, DC.
Dear Chairman Cruz and Ranking Member Cantwell,
It is my distinct honor to express my support for the nomination of
Mr. Jared Isaacman to serve as Administrator of the National
Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). Over the course of my
career in the United States Coast Guard and now as President of the
National Coast Guard Museum Association, I have had the privilege of
working with exceptional leaders across government, industry, and
philanthropy. Mr. Isaacman stands among those rare individuals whose
entrepreneurial drive, technical acumen, and spirit of service have
combined to yield visionary achievements in aviation, business, and
education. These very qualities would serve our Nation and its space
program with distinction.
My awareness of Mr. Isaacman's leadership and values developed
through his philanthropic support of the National Coast Guard Museum.
Mr. Isaacman's deep commitment to National service and STEM education
is both authentic and inspiring. His transformational gifts of $10
million in 2022 and $15 million in 2025 to the U.S. Space & Rocket
Center's Space Camp have expanded access to advanced aerospace training
for America's youth-ensuring that the next generation of engineers,
scientists, and explorers is prepared to lead. His generosity also
extends to institutions that honor those who serve, including his
significant contribution to the National Coast Guard Museum, reflecting
a profound respect for the Armed Services and the ideals they uphold.
These actions reveal a patriotism rooted not in rhetoric, but in
tangible, enduring impact.
In the process of codifying Mr. Isaacman's gift to the Museum, I
had the privilege of working closely with members of his philanthropy
team. I have long believed that a leader's character is best reflected
in the people they empower. Each member of Mr. Isaacman's team
demonstrated professionalism, humility, and excellence-qualities that
stem from his example and leadership.
For these reasons, I offer my strong and enthusiastic endorsement
of Mr. Jared Isaacman's nomination as Administrator of NASA and
respectfully commend him for your most favorable consideration.
Respectfully,
Captain Wes Pulver, USCG (Ret.),
President,
National Coast Guard Museum Association.
______
Max Space
Exploration Park, FL, November 21, 2025
Hon. Senator Ted Cruz, (R-Texas),
Chair, Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
United States Senate,
Washington, DC.
Hon. Senator Maria Cantwell, (D-Washington),
Ranking Member, Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
United States Senate,
Washington, DC.
Re: Strong Support for the Nomination of Mr. Jared Isaacman to be
Administrator of NASA
Dear Chair Cruz, Ranking Member Cantwell and Members of the Committee:
On behalf of Max Space and our team of engineers, investors,
entrepreneurs, and former astronauts dedicated to building the next
generation of American space stations and habitats, I write to express
our strong and unequivocal support for the nomination of Mr. Jared
Isaacman to serve as Administrator of the National Aeronautics and
Space Administration.
Mr. Isaacman is uniquely positioned to lead NASA at a moment when
America's ambitions in low Earth orbit (LEO), on the Moon, and
eventually Mars depend on a deep, practical partnership between
government and an increasingly capable commercial space sector. As
founder and CEO of Shift4, an accomplished aviator, and mission
commander of both lnspiration4, the world's first all-civilian orbital
mission, and Polaris Dawn, which achieved the first commercial
spacewalk and highest altitude by a crewed mission since the Apollo
program, he has personally demonstrated the courage, discipline,
technical understanding and the immense challenges that human
spaceflight and maintaining a permanent presence in space demands.
Equally important, Mr. Isaacman has shown that space can serve the
public interest, not only through exploration and technology, but also
through his philanthropy and inspiration. lnspiration4 alone helped
raise hundreds of millions of dollars for St. Jude Children's Research
Hospital while proving that private citizens can safely and responsibly
participate in orbital missions. That concrete demonstration--that
spaceflight can be both commercially innovative and socially
beneficial--is precisely the mindset I believe NASA needs to maintain
American leadership in a rapidly evolving space economy.
Our company, Max Space was founded and exists because the United
States chose to lean partnership between commercial sector and
Governmental priorities and were looking to embrace and support truly
innovate, disruptive and cutting-edge U.S. technologies to maintain our
countries leadership in space and space exploration. We are a proud
American company, which has flown our expandable habitats and space
real estate multiple times and are committed to accelerating this in
the interest of the United States.
Our American engineered and manufactured modules are large-volume,
expandable habitats designed to provide significantly lower-cost,
exceptionally robust, and scalable real estate in space which are ready
to support the ISS decommissioning and replacement options serving U.S.
LEO presence--at a fraction of the cost of other legacy module designs,
and ultimately providing permanent, low cost, light weight, superstrong
habitats serving the U.S. interests for the lunar surface, and Mars.
Our work builds directly on NASA's own pioneering legacy in ``soft-
goods'' habitats and expandable structures. We intend for our first
350-cubic-meter station module to support both U.S. government and
commercial users in LEO while providing a clear pathway for the
architectural bridge to Moon and Mars missions.
In our view, Mr. Isaacman deeply understands three essential truths
about the moment we are in:
1. America must not cede leadership in LEO as the ISS era winds
down. The next generation of commercial stations and habitats--
developed under programs such as Commercial Leo Destination
(CLD)--will determine whether American astronauts, industry,
and allies continue to lead in microgravity research,
(advanced) manufacturing and critical and emerging
technologies, national security applications, and maintain the
capability for a continuous human presence to advance human
space exploration, scientific discoveries, international
cooperation and United States economic competitiveness and
commercial participation in low-Earth orbit through and beyond
the useful life of the International Space Station.
2. Enduring presence on the Moon and Mars will only be affordable
and sustainable if we embrace disruptive, lower-cost
architectures--including expandable habitats, modular systems,
and new logistics models--rather than relying solely on one-off
approaches.
3. The full strength of the United States lies in its innovative
private sector, from emerging companies like ours to larger,
established primes, all operating under a clear national
strategy and consistent policy direction from NASA and the
Administration.
For companies like Max Space, the stakes of this nomination are
tangible. The policy environment that Administrator Isaacman shapes
will determine whether new American station providers and moon and Mars
habitat developers can flourish--creating high-value jobs at home,
strengthening supply chains, and ensuring that the volume, safety, and
affordability of our habitats give the United States and its partners
decisive and unparalleled advantages over strategic competitors and
rogue nations.
We believe Mr. Isaacman is uniquely equipped to:
Champion a vibrant ecosystem of commercial space stations
and habitats in LEO as ISS operations wind down--ensuring there
is no ``gap'' in U.S. presence and that NASA technology and
astronauts continue to fly from American soil to American-led
platforms.
Push for architectures that are both ambitious and fiscally
responsible, leveraging industry innovations--such as
expandable, high-volume, low-mass habitats--to significantly
multiply NASA's capabilities per dollar invested.
Strengthen public-private partnerships that preserve NASA's
role as the world's leading civil space agency while giving
American companies the room to invent, compete, and deliver.
Align LEO, lunar, and Mars strategies into a coherent
campaign, where commercial stations and habitats in LEO serve
as the training ground, test bed, and proving environment for
future lunar and Martian outposts.
From our vantage point, Mr. Isaacman has already demonstrated,
through action rather than rhetoric, that he understands how to set
clear objectives, accept and manage risk, execute complex missions, and
communicate a compelling vision to the public. These are exactly the
qualities that will be required to:
complete Artemis successfully,
transition from ISS to commercial stations smoothly, and
lay the foundations for a genuine, long-term human presence
beyond Earth to the Moon and Mars.
If confirmed, we respectfully encourage the Committee and Mr.
Isaacman to work together to ensure that NASA's policies:
Continue to open doors for innovative American entrants in
habitats, logistics, and in-space manufacturing;
Prioritize competition, performance, and cost effectiveness
in program design and contracting; and
Embrace architectures that make persistent habitation in
LEO, on the Moon, and ultimately Mars both technically
achievable and economically sustainable.
Max Space is committed to playing its part in that vision--
designing and delivering safe, scalable, expandable real estate in
space that amplifies NASA's capabilities and keeps the United States
decades ahead of its competitors. Mr. Isaacman's nomination gives us
confidence that NASA will remain a bold partner to companies like ours,
willing to harness disruptive American innovation in service of
exploration, security, and prosperity.
For all these reasons, I strongly urge the Committee to support Mr.
Jared Isaacman's confirmation as Administrator of NASA. We look forward
to working with him, with NASA, and with this Committee to ensure that
the next era of human spaceflight--across LEO, the Moon, and Mars--is
led by the United States, powered by American innovation, and open to
the next generation of explorers and entrepreneurs.
Thank you for your consideration.
Respectfully submitted,
Saleem Miyan,
Co-founder and CEO,
Max Space Inc.
cc. Mr. Jared Isaacman
U.S. Transportation Secretary, Sean P. Duffy
NASA Associate Administrator, Amit Kshatriya
______
National Business Aviation Association
November 21, 2025
Hon. Ted Cruz,
Chairman,
Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
Hon. Maria Cantwell,
Ranking Member,
Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
Dear Chairman Cruz and Ranking Member Cantwell,
I write on behalf of the National Business Aviation Association's
(NBAA) 11,000 members to support the confirmation of Mr. Jared Isaacman
as Administrator of National Aeronautics and Space Administration
(NASA).
Mr. Isaacman possesses an exceptional blend of operational
expertise, strategic vision, and mission-driven leadership that makes
him uniquely suited to serve as NASA Administrator. A proven
entrepreneur with deep business acumen, Mr. Isaacman has built and led
successful companies in both the financial and aerospace sectors,
demonstrating the ability to guide complex organizations through
innovation and growth. At the same time, he is one of the very few
civilian astronauts with hands-on experience commanding two space
missions, including the first all-civilian orbital flight, an
achievement that highlights his technical competence, decisiveness, and
commitment to expanding human spaceflight.
Beyond his professional accomplishments, Mr. Isaacman is widely
recognized for his philanthropic leadership. Through his high-profile
missions and personal initiatives, he has raised hundreds of millions
of dollars for charitable causes, earning broad recognition across the
aviation and aerospace community. In 2023, NBAA honored him with its
highest recognition, the Meritorious Service to Aviation Award, for his
contributions to aviation and his extraordinary humanitarian impact.
Mr. Isaacman's rare combination of aviation experience, spaceflight
expertise, and technological understanding is precisely what NASA needs
as it advances next-generation aerospace capabilities. His background
aligns directly with the agency's work to strengthen safety
partnerships with the FAA, advance UAS traffic management, accelerate
autonomous flight research, and enable the safe integration of advanced
air mobility, including electric air taxis and emerging drone
operations. His leadership will be instrumental in sustaining America's
aerospace leadership and guiding NASA's efforts to explore, innovate,
and inspire.
Founded in 1947 and based in Washington, DC, NBAA is the leading
organization for companies that rely on general aviation aircraft to
help make their businesses more efficient, productive and successful.
The association provides more than 100 products and services to the
business aviation community, including cutting-edge innovations in
aerospace technologies.
As NASA prepares for the next phase of innovation and space
exploration, Mr. Isaacman stands ready to take the helm. We urge the
Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation and the U.S.
Senate to confirm Mr. Isaacman's nomination as soon as possible.
Sincerely,
Ed Bolen,
President and CEO,
National Business Aviation Association.
______
Statement on the re-nomination of Jared Isaacman for NASA Administrator
PRESS STATEMENT
November 12, 2025
CONTACT
Danielle Gunn
Pasadena, CA. (November 12, 2025)--Members of the Save NASA Science
coalition, led by The Planetary Society, released the following
statement in response to the President's re-nomination of Jared
Isaacman for NASA administrator:
Members of the Save NASA Science campaign--representing a
diverse coalition of academic, commercial, nonprofit, and
professional space science organizations--extend sincere
congratulations to Jared Isaacman on his nomination to be NASA
Administrator. Mr. Isaacman is an outspoken proponent for space
exploration and the role of NASA in driving the space research
enterprise, and has publicly stated his interest in
accelerating the pace of science missions.
We continue to express grave concern for the cuts proposed by
the Office of Management & Budget in the FY 2026 budget request
for NASA. Thousands of space advocates have rallied nationwide
over the past year in support of a balanced program for space
science, and Congress has, in a bipartisan manner, largely
rejected the proposed cuts as destructive to the nation's long-
term interests.
Building on the momentum of the historic Save NASA Science day
of action just one month ago, we reiterate the need to maintain
steady funding to develop and operate flight projects that
answer critical scientific questions, address the workforce
crisis through improved communication and institutional
support, and ensure future discoveries are made possible by
investing in scientific research and STEM education.
As we look to the future of NASA in FY 2026 and beyond, we
stand ready to work with the NASA Administrator and their
leadership team to accelerate scientific discovery, protect
American leadership in fundamental research, and inspire the
next generation of doers.
In addition to The Planetary Society, the organizations co-signing
this statement are:
Black in Astro
Explore Mars, Inc.
IFPTE
Maryland Aerospace Alliance
The Mars Society
National Space Society
Stand Up For Science
TexSpace Collective
______
About The Planetary Society
With a global community of more than 2 million space enthusiasts,
The Planetary Society is The world's largest and most influential space
advocacy organization. Founded in 1980 by Carl Sagan, Bruce Murray, and
Louis Friedman and today led by CEO Bill Nye, we empower the public to
take a meaningful role in advancing space exploration through advocacy,
education outreach, scientific innovation, and global collaboration.
Together with our members and supporters, we're on a mission to explore
worlds, find life off Earth, and protect our planet from dangerous
asteroids. To learn more, visit www.planetary.
______
Commercial Space Federation
Washington DC, November 12, 2025
Chairman Ted Cruz,
U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
Ranking Member Maria Cantwell,
U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
Dear Chairman Cruz and Ranking Member Cantwell:
On behalf of the Commercial Space Federation (CSF), the leading
trade association representing the U.S. commercial space industry, I am
writing to convey CSF's support for the swift confirmation of Mr. Jared
Isaacman to serve as Administrator of the National Aeronautics and
Space Administration (NASA).
As you know, NASA is a large agency that has had three acting
administrators named since late January. NASA's budget eclipses that of
several cabinet agencies, and its operations span nearly 20 centers and
installations across the United States. Among its many missions and
activities, NASA is working to return astronauts to the Moon,
continuously operating the International Space Station while developing
follow-on commercial space stations, and exploring the solar system and
beyond. The agency is best able to execute its important missions with
stable leadership confirmed by the Senate. Leadership at NASA is made
all the more important given China's ambition to eclipse U.S.
leadership in space and build international alliances to counter
western-Democracy coalitions--an issue the committee has rightly
focused on. NASA's activities over the next three years very well may
determine the balance of power in space.
With decades of experience as an entrepreneur, business leader, and
space pioneer, Mr. Isaacman is well suited to lead NASA. Mr. Isaacman's
hearing before the committee in April 2025 demonstrated his
understanding of the near and long-term competition with China, as well
as his respect for Congress's oversight responsibilities and the laws
directing NASA's activities. Furthermore, Mr. Isaacman has shown his
commitment to all parts of NASA--space science, space technology,
aeronautics, and human exploration. Mr. Isaacman brings ingenuity,
business acumen, technical know-how, and a deep passion to this role,
which will position NASA to take on the many challenges it faces.
On behalf of CSF and our more than 90 member organizations, I
respectfully request you prioritize Mr. Isaacman's confirmation, given
the criticality of NASA's many ongoing missions.
Sincerely,
Dave Cavossa,
President,
Commercial Space Federation.
______
______
Virgin Galactic
November 24, 2025
Hon. Ted Cruz,
Chairman,
Committee Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
United States Senate,
Washington, DC.
Hon. Maria Cantwell,
Ranking Member,
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
United States Senate
Washington, DC.
Dear Chairman Cruz and Ranking Member Cantwell:
On behalf of Virgin Galactic, I am writing to express our strong
support for the confirmation of Jared Isaacman as Administrator of the
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). Mr. Isaacman's
exceptional experience in business, aviation, and spaceflight, makes
him an outstanding candidate for this crucial position.
Virgin Galactic is a pioneering spaceflight company dedicated to
opening space for everyone. As a key player in the commercial
spaceflight industry, we recognize the vital role NASA plays in
advancing space exploration and technology. Mr. Isaacman's appointment
is not only of great interest to our industry but to all those who care
about the future of space research and exploration and America's
leadership in this critical domain. Virgin Galactic firmly believes
that Mr. Isaacman's leadership will bring a fresh, innovative approach
to NASA, crucial for maintaining America's leadership in space
exploration and technology. His proven track record in the private
sector, aviation, and spaceflight positions him uniquely to address the
complex challenges at the intersection of space exploration,
technology, and commerce.
Mr. Isaacman's impressive career spans multiple sectors directly
relevant to NASA's mission. Through his work as an entrepreneur and a
leader at various companies, he has showcased his ability to innovate
and lead in complex, high-stakes industries directly related to
technology, aviation, and national security--all critical components of
NASA's multifaceted operations. Moreover, his experience as commander
of the Inspiration4 mission, the first all-civilian orbital flight, and
his involvement in the Polaris Program highlight his deep understanding
of spaceflight operations and the commercial space sector. Mr. Isaacman
became the first private citizen to perform a spacewalk during the
Polaris Dawn mission, further exemplifying his commitment to advancing
human spaceflight capabilities. Through the Inspiration4 mission, over
$240 million was raised for St. Jude Children's Research Hospital. This
included a personal pledge of $125 million from Isaacman himself. His
commitment to philanthropy extends beyond Inspiration4, as evidenced by
his continued support through the Polaris Dawn mission. These
substantial contributions demonstrate his dedication to using space
exploration for the benefit of humanity, aligning well with NASA's
mission to lead an innovative and sustainable program of exploration
that enables human expansion across the solar system and brings new
knowledge and opportunities back to Earth.
We believe Mr. Isaacman's expertise in business, aviation, and
spaceflight, will be invaluable in addressing the challenges and
opportunities facing NASA and the broader space industry. His firsthand
experience as a commercial astronaut provides him with unique insights
into the needs and potential of human spaceflight. This knowledge will
be crucial in shaping policies that support the growth of commercial
space activities while advancing NASA's core missions.
We look forward to working with Mr. Isaacman and NASA to advance
policies that promote innovation, foster economic growth in the space
sector, and strengthen America's position as a global leader in space
exploration. We strongly urge his swift confirmation as NASA
Administrator.
Sincerely,
Mike Moses,
President,
Virgin Galactic.
______
Space Force Association
Colorado Springs, CO, 26 November 2025
Chairman Ted Cruz,
U.S. Senate,
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
Ranking Member Maria Cantwell,
U.S. Senate,
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
Dear Chairman Cruz and Ranking Member Cantwell:
On behalf of the Space Force Association (SFA), the only private
non-profit organization solely dedicated to advocating for the U.S.
Space Force, I strongly support the swift confirmation of Mr. Jared
Isaacman as NASA Administrator.
A private astronaut and accomplished entrepreneur, Mr. Isaacman has
deep respect for ability to advance scientific exploration, drive
innovation, strengthen national security partnerships, and expand
commercial space opportunities. With decades of experience spanning
government contracting and publicly traded enterprises, he is uniquely
positioned to ensure the United States remains the global leader in
space.
As space becomes increasingly contested by adversaries like China
and Russia, Mr. Isaacman's timely confirmation is critical to lead NASA
at the nexus of civil space exploration, military security, and
economic growth. SFA is confident he will champion the commercial space
sector by fostering innovation in spaceflight and integrating
commercial services into NASA's missions.
Thank you for your consideration of this letter in support of Mr.
Jared Isaacman's confirmation as the NASA Administrator.
Sincerely,
Bill Woolf,
CEO, President and Founder,
Space Force Association,
Colonel, USAF (Ret.).
______
Senator Sheehy. For nearly 70 years, the United States has
been at the forefront of space exploration. President Trump
knows how critical it is for our country to lead the way yet
again as our space program aims to reach new heights, and that
is why he chose exactly the right man for the job, Jared
Isaacman.
I have personally known Jared for several years, chairing
an aviation community in Montana and cooperating with him on
approving the education experience for our next generation of
explorers, astronauts, engineers, NASA administrators, at Space
Camp in Huntsville, Alabama. Both Jared and I attended Space
Camp, and although I would say lit a spark in both of us to
chase the dream of aviation and aerospace, he has been far more
successful than I have. We both dreamed of being astronauts as
children. The difference is Jared actually is one, whereas I
had to settle for the title of Senator.
America has been the leader of global space travel
generations, pushing the boundaries of space, and testing the
limits of human endurance and intellect. All Americans should
be deeply proud of the incredible accomplishments of heroes
like Alan Shepard, John Glenn, Neil Armstrong, Jim Lovell, and
many others. The sacrifices and leadership of these brave
astronauts is what most Americans know.
What they usually do not know is that behind each and every
one of these explorers is a massive team of dedicated
engineers, program managers, innovators, test pilots, welders,
electricians, truck drivers, and families, who are the true
heroes of our space program. To lead this incredible team
requires a leader who not only understands and believes in the
mission, but has the interdisciplinary skill set to coordinate
these cross-functional teams to achieve critical outcomes.
Since the tragedy of the Columbia disaster in 2003, NASA
has been an organization of great people searching for revival.
And after the cancellation of the shuttle program for 10
years--it is important to remember, for 10 years--the United
States was paying Russia taxi fare to send our own astronauts
into space. This would make John F. Kennedy, Ronald Reagan, and
dozens of other American leaders turn in their grave. And in
light of the recent Starliner mission to the ISS that left
astronauts stuck in space for almost 9 months, we are reminded
that much work remains. President Trump knew it was time for a
change, and he chose the right man for the job.
Despite Jared's desire to be an Air Force fighter pilot and
an astronaut as a child, he found out that he was smarter than
most and started a disruptive software company in his garage as
a teenager. That company grew to be a tremendous multi-billion
dollar success, and that success fueled his ascension in the
Hall of Fame as a record-setting jet pilot, an aggressor pilot
for our Air Force fighter pilots, and most recently, the first
civilian ever to conduct a spacewalk.
On top of all that, Jared and I share another passion,
pediatric philanthropy. Jared has personally donated millions
to improve health care for at-risk children all over America,
yet again underlining his commitment to this great nation.
NASA is a point of great pride for our Nation. It has
carved out new frontiers for mankind and shown the world the
power of freedom. China is progressing at a breakneck pace to
overtake our space infrastructure and beat us back to the Moon,
and they fully intend to win. If we do not focus our efforts
and commit to victory now, we will find ourselves going to bed
under the glow of a red moon. We have a moral obligation to
continue to lead in the greatest frontier ever known, and it
requires strong leadership.
Jared is an articulate leader, a great father and husband,
and one of the smartest people in America. Jared understands
not only how to manage a complex, multi-billion dollar
organization but how to design and engineer critical systems.
And to top it off, he knows how to fly space ships.
NASA is in need of spiritual rejuvenation, and that will
take fresh leadership. Jared is the perfect man for the job,
and I look forward to adding NASA Administrator to his already
remarkable resume.
Thank you, Chairman.
Chairman Cruz. Thank you, Senator Sheehy. We will now
recognize Mr. Isaacman for his opening statement.
STATEMENT OF JARED ISAACMAN,
NOMINEE TO BE ADMINISTRATOR,
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
Mr. Isaacman. Thank you Chairman Cruz, Ranking Member
Cantwell, Senator Sheehy for that very generous introduction,
and distinguished members of the Committee. I am honored and
grateful to be here before you again as President Donald
Trump's nominee to lead the National Aeronautics and Space
Administration.
To begin, I would like to acknowledge my family, my
parents, Sandy and Don Isaacman behind me, my wife Monica, and
my two wonderful daughters, Mila and Liv. Over the years, I
have found many ways to challenge their patience, and politics
is certainly no exception. We are also joined today by seven
astronauts, some of my closest friends and crewmates, together
with NASA astronauts that have come to this hearing in support.
Thank you very much.
I also want to acknowledge and appreciate that Senator
Britt from the state of Alabama is here today, so not only home
to Marshall Space Flight Center but also to Space Camp, which
is where my journey began.
As mentioned before, I have lived the American dream. I
have been fortunate to have an amazing business and aeronautics
career, to have led two notable missions to space, to help
charitable causes that matter deeply to my family, and now I am
beyond thankful for a chance to repay my debt to this Nation by
serving alongside the brilliant minds at the world's most
accomplished space agency.
The last time I sat before you, I introduced myself, my
qualifications, and the challenges and opportunities ahead.
This time, I am here with a message of urgency. After more than
a half-century, America is set to launch NASA astronauts around
the Moon in just a matter of months. This is a challenging
endeavor to say the least, and one that requires full-time
leadership.
Secretary Duffy, in his letter to this Committee endorsing
my nomination, emphasized this point. That message is shared by
more than two dozen other letters of support, including an
online petition started by members of the NASA workforce and a
letter from 36 NASA astronauts, who, like me, have sat through
anomaly investigations, launch and flight readiness reviews,
have accepted the risks of going to space, and understand what
is at stake.
And I know it is not lost on anyone in this room that we
are in a great competition with a rival that has the will and
the means to challenge American exceptionalism across multiple
domains, including in the high ground of space. This is not the
time for delay but a time for action, because if we fall
behind, if we make a mistake, we may never catch up, and the
consequences could shift the balance of power here on Earth.
This Congress, and specifically this Committee, understand
the urgency of the moment--placing a historic investment in
human space exploration that President Trump signed in the One
Big Beautiful Bill. It is now time for NASA and its partners to
deliver.
To that end, I want to assure you, Senators, I am not here
for personal gain, to favor or enrich contractors, to close
centers, or to disrupt programs that are essential to
completing America's objectives in space. If confirmed, I am
here to bring urgency and an extreme focus to the mission, to
do all I can working with the best and brightest at NASA to
lead humanity's efforts to unlock the secrets of the universe
and ensure American leadership across the last great frontier.
In concert with that grand endeavor, we will ensure the
following. The success of the Artemis program that President
Trump began during his first term. America will return to the
Moon before our great rival, and we will establish an enduring
presence to understand and realize the scientific, economic,
and national security value on the lunar surface.
Along the way, we will pioneer the next ``giant leap'' in
capabilities to extend America's reach even further into space,
including expanding and accelerating investments into nuclear
propulsion, both nuclear electric and nuclear thermal, and
surface power programs. These efforts, in addition to industry
partners building reusable launch vehicles, will set the stage
for future missions to Mars and beyond.
We will never accept a gap in capabilities again, not with
our space station presence in low-Earth orbit or our ability to
send American astronauts to the Moon.
We will strive to build an orbital and lunar economy that
can fund the future we all want to see in space someday, and
not rely exclusively on the taxpayer. We will begin making the
investments now for the inevitable spacefaring future that is
just on the horizon.
We will make the most efficient use of every dollar
allocated, pushing for more x-planes, more rovers and
telescopes, more exciting missions like Hubble, James Webb, and
Dragonfly, with the aim of enlightening the world through
breakthrough scientific discoveries, knowing that if NASA does
not do it, no one else will.
Some of the most talented people in America show up to work
at NASA. Alongside a reinvigorated culture and an intense focus
on achieving the near-impossible, what no other organization is
capable of or even dares to accomplish, we will achieve these
objectives. And when, not if, we get the job done, it will be
because of the professionals at NASA, our international and our
commercial partners, this Committee and Congress, and President
Trump's administration that will have succeeded in ushering in
a new golden age of science and discovery. We will do it for
America, for humankind, and in doing so, we will inspire the
world and the generations to follow to take us even farther.
We are just getting started on the greatest adventure in
human history, and with urgency, purpose, and extreme focus on
the mission, NASA will lead the way. Thank you.
[The prepared statement and biographical information of Mr.
Isaacman follow:]
Prepared Statement of Jared Isaacman, Nominee to be Administrator,
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Thank you Chairman Cruz, Ranking Member Cantwell, and distinguished
members of the committee. I am honored and grateful to be here before
you again as President Donald Trump's nominee to lead the National
Aeronautics and Space Administration.
To begin, I would like to acknowledge my family--my parents, Sandy
and Don Isaacman, my wife Monica, and my two wonderful daughters, Mila
and Liv. Over the years, I have found many ways to challenge their
patience, and politics is certainly no exception. We are also joined
today by 8 astronauts, some of my closest friends and crewmates
together with retired NASA astronauts that have come to this hearing in
support.
As mentioned before, I have lived the American dream. I have been
fortunate to have an amazing business and aeronautics career, to have
led two notable missions to space, to help charitable causes that
matter deeply to my family, and now I am beyond thankful to have a
chance to repay my debt to this Nation by serving alongside the
brilliant minds at the world's most accomplished space agency.
The last time I sat before you, I introduced myself, my
qualifications, and the challenges and opportunities ahead. This time,
I am here with a message of urgency.
After more than a half-century, America is set to launch NASA
astronauts around the Moon in just a matter of months--a challenging
endeavor to say the least--and one that requires full-time leadership.
Secretary Duffy, in his letter to this committee endorsing my
nomination, emphasized this point. That message is shared by more than
two dozen other letters of support, including an online petition
started by members of the NASA workforce and a letter from 36 NASA
astronauts--who, like me, have sat through anomaly investigations,
launch and flight readiness reviews, have accepted the risks of going
to space, and understand what is at stake.
And I know it is not lost on anyone in this room that we are in a
great competition with a rival that has the will and means to challenge
American exceptionalism across multiple domains, including in the high
ground of space. This is not the time for delay, but for action,
because if we fall behind--if we make a mistake--we may never catch up,
and the consequences could shift the balance of power here on Earth.
The Congress, and specifically this Committee, understand the
urgency of the moment--placing a historic investment in human space
exploration that President Trump signed in the one big beautiful bill.
It's now time for NASA and our partners to deliver.
To that end, I want to assure you, Senators, I am not here for
personal gain, to favor or enrich contractors, to close centers, or to
disrupt programs essential to completing America's objectives in space.
If confirmed, I am here to bring urgency and an extreme focus to the
mission--to do all I can working with the best and brightest at NASA to
lead humanity's effort to unlock the secrets of the universe and ensure
American leadership across the last great frontier. In concert with
that grand endeavor, we will ensure the following:
1. The success of the Artemis program that President Trump began
during his first term. America will return to the Moon before
our great rival, and we will establish an enduring presence to
understand and realize the scientific, economic, and national
security value on the lunar surface.
2. Along the way, we will pioneer the next `giant leap' capabilities
to extend America's reach even further into space, including
expanding and accelerating investments into nuclear propulsion
and surface power programs. These efforts, in addition to
industry partners building reusable launch vehicles, we will
set the stage for future missions to Mars and beyond.
3. We will never accept a gap in capabilities again--not with our
space station presence in low Earth orbit or our ability to
send American astronauts to the Moon.
4. We will strive to build an orbital and lunar economy that can
fund the future we all want to see in space and not rely
exclusively on the taxpayer. We will begin making the
investments now for the inevitable spacefaring future that is
just on the horizon.
5. We will make the most efficient use of every dollar allocated--
pushing for more x-planes, more rovers & telescopes, more
exciting missions like Hubble, James Webb, and Dragonfly with
the aim of enlightening the world through breakthrough
scientific discoveries--knowing that if NASA doesn't do it, no
one else will.
Some of the most talented people in America show up to work at
NASA. Alongside a reinvigorated culture and intense focus on achieving
the near-impossible--what no other organization is capable of or dares
to accomplish--we will achieve these objectives . . . And when, not if,
we get the job done--it will be because of the professionals at NASA,
our international & commercial partners, this committee and Congress,
and President Trump's administration that will have succeeded in
ushering in a new golden age of science and discovery. We will do it
for America, for humankind, and in doing so, we will inspire the world
and the generations to follow to take us even farther.
We are just getting started on the greatest adventure in human
history--and with urgency, purpose, and extreme focus on the mission,
NASA will lead the way.
Thank you.
______
a. biographical information
1. Name (Include any former names or nicknames used): Jared Taylor
Isaacman.
2. Position to which nominated: Administrator of the National
Aeronautics & Space Administration.
3. Date of Nomination: January 20, 2025.
4. Address (List current place of residence and office addresses):
Residence: Information not released to the public.
Office: 3501 Corp Parkway, Center Valley PA 18034.
5. Date and Place of Birth: Union, NJ.
6. Provide the name, position, and place of employment for your
spouse (if married) or domestic partner, and the names and ages of your
children (including stepchildren and children by a previous marriage).
Spouse: Monica Isaacman, homemaker.
7. List all college and graduate schools attended, whether or not
you were granted a degree by the institution. Provide the name of the
institution, the dates attended, the degree received, and the date of
the degree.
Embry Riddle Aeronautical University--Bachelor in Professional
Aeronautics (2011) (February 2010-November 2011).
8. List all post-undergraduate employment, including the job title,
name of employer, and inclusive dates of employment, and highlight all
management-level jobs held and any non-managerial jobs that relate to
the position for which you are nominated.
Shift4 Payments, Founder and CEO (June 2000 to present)
Draken International, Co-founder and CEO (November 2011-
April 2020)
Denmar, Consultant (October 2020 to present)
9. Attach a copy of your resume. See attachment.
10. List any advisory, consultative, honorary, or other part-time
service or positions with Federal, State, or local governments, other
than those listed above after 18 years of age.
Honorary Commander--US Air Force Academy.
11. List all positions held as an officer, director, trustee,
partner, proprietor, agent, representative, or consultant of any
corporation, company, firm, partnership, or other business, enterprise,
educational, or other institution.
Shift4 Payments, Inc.--Chairman of the Board, CEO, and
Director, 6/2020 to present
Shift4 Payments, LLC (fka Harbortouch Payments, LLC and
Lighthouse Network, LLC)--Chief Executive Officer, 3/2014 to
present
Shift4 Subsidiaries
C.C. Productions, LLC--President and CEO, 12/2022 to
present
CFC & FP Enterprises, LLC--President and CEO, 12/2022
to present
Credorax (USA) LLC--Authorized Person to sign entity
documents for filing, checks, notes in connection with bank
accounts, facilities or services per Operating Agreement,
12/2023 to present
Pinnacle Hospitality Systems, LLC--President and CEO,
7/2022 to present
POSITOUCH, LLC--Chief Executive Officer, 10/2017 to
present
POSTEC, LLC--Chief Executive Officer 12/2021 to
present
Revel Systems, Inc.--President and sole Director, 6/
2024 to present
SIDFT4 CORPORATION--President and CEO and sole
Director, 11/2017 to present
Shift4 Payments Finance Sub, Inc.--President and
Director, 10/2020 to present
Shift4Shop, LLC--Chief Executive Officer, 11/2020 to
present
The Giving Block Holdings, LLC--ChiefExecutive
Officer, 2/2022 to present
Micros Retail Systems, LLC--Chief Executive Officer,
10/2020 to present
Venuenext, Inc--President, 4/21 to present
Shift4 Shop, LLC (formerly 3dcart, LLC)--Chief
Executive Officer, 11/2020 to present
S4-ML Holdings, LLC--Chief Executive Officer, 8/2019
to present
MSI Merchant Services Holdings, LLC--Chief Executive
Officer, 3/2014-12/2021
Restaurant Manager, LLC--Chief Executive Officer, 8/
2017-12/2021
Positouch, LLC--Chief Executive Officer, 10/2017-12/
2021
Future POS, LLC--Chief Executive Officer, 10/2017-12/
2021
Harbortouch Financial, LLC--Chief Executive Officer,
1/2011-12/2021
Draken International, LLC--Chief Executive Officer, 11/2011-
4/2020; Director/Manager, 11/2011-10/2020
26 North Aviation, Inc.--Director, 1/2007 to present
Rook Holdings, Inc--Director, President, Treasurer,
Secretary, 3/2014 to present
Rook Aviation Holdings, LLC--Member and President, 1/2019 to
present
Rook Investments, LLC--Member and President, 7/2019 to
present
Black Diamond Jet Hold Co, Inc--President, CEO, and
Director, 3/2019 to present
Black Diamond Jet Holdings, LLC--President, CEO, and
Manager, 12/2019 to present
JDI Holdings LLC--Member and President, 12/2005 to present
Xenomorph, LLC (Dissolved)--Managing Member, 2/2021-2/2023
Bone Horse Marine, LLC--Managing Member, 7/2021 to present
Bone Horse, LLC--Managing Member, 4/2019-12/2024
Bone Horse Hangars, LLC--Manager and Member, 7/2021 to
present
RookX, LLC--Managing Member, 1/2021 to present
Rook Public Strategies, LLC--Managing Member, 7/2021-12/2024
PolarisX, LLC--Managing Member, 12/2022-12/2024
Rook SPY I, LLC--President, Secretary, Treasurer, 3/2021 to
present
Rook SPY II, LLC--President, Secretary, Treasurer, 8/2021 to
present
Rook SPY III, LLC--President, Secretary, Treasurer, 12/2022
to present
Rook SPY IV, LLC--President, Secretary, Treasurer, 3/2023 to
present
Rook Space Investments, LLC--President, Treasurer,
Secretary, 2/2021 to present
12. List all memberships you have had after 18 years of age or
currently hold with any civic, social, charitable, educational,
political, professional, fraternal, benevolent or religiously
affiliated organization, private club, or other membership organization
(You do not have to list your religious affiliation or membership in a
religious house of worship or institution). Include dates of membership
and any positions you have held with any organization. Please note
whether any such club or organization restricts membership on the basis
of sex, race, color, religion, national origin, age, or disability.
Business Executives for National Security
Association of Space Explorers
Experimental Aircraft Association
Aircraft Owners Pilot Association
International Council of Air Shows
CNBC CEO Council
These organizations do not restrict membership on the basis of sex,
race, color, religion, national origin, age, or disability.
13. Have you ever been a candidate for and/or held a public office
(elected, non-elected, or appointed)? If so, indicate whether any
campaign has any outstanding debt the amount, and whether you are
personally liable for that debt. No.
14. List all memberships and offices held with and services
rendered to, whether compensated or not, any political party or
election committee within the past ten years. If you have held a paid
position or served in a formal or official advisory position (whether
compensated or not) in a political campaign within the past ten years,
identify the particulars of the campaign, including the candidate, year
of the campaign, and your title and responsibilities. None.
15. Itemize all political contributions to any individual, campaign
organization, political party, political action committee, or similar
entity of$200 or more for the past ten years.
See attachment.
16. List all scholarships, fellowships, honorary degrees, honorary
society memberships, military medals, and any other special recognition
for outstanding service or achievements.
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Honorary Doctorate
Foreign Policy Research Institute, Ben Franklin Award
United States Air Force Academy, Honorary Commander
FAA, Commercial Astronaut Wings
National Business Aviation Association, Meritorious Service
to Aviation Award
Ernst & Young, EY Entrepreneur of the Year
National Space Society, NSS Space Pioneer Award for
Entrepreneurship
UP Partners, UP Inspiration Award
Living Legends of Aviation, Dr. Buzz Aldrin Space
Advancement Award; Eren Ozmen Entrepreneur of the Year Award;
Induction to Living Legends of Aviation
Space Force Association, Advancing Human Presence in the
Space Domain Award
EarthLight Foundation, Space Cowboy Award
Global Lithuanian Leaders, The Laureate of Global Lithuanian
Award 2021
Space Camp, Hall of Fame
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Eagle of Excellence
Award
AOPA Hoover Trophy
Everyday Astronaut Astro Awards, Most Inspiring, Most
Innovative and Important Mission of 2024 Award
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Michael F. Tamer
Award
American Astronautical Society, Neil Armstrong Space Flight
Achievement Award
Aim Higher Gala, Inspiration Award
Commercial Spaceflight Federation. Commercial Space Business
& Finance Award
Vladimir Komarov Diploma, FAI Astronautic Records Commission
NAA/FAI, Numerous NAA/FAI World Records in Aviation and
Space
Electronic Transactions Association, 40 Under 40
Inc 500, 30 Under 30
Air Force Association, John R. Alison Award
Governor Rick Scott, FL, Draken International recognized for
local job growth
17. List all books, articles, columns, letters to the editor,
Internet blog postings, or other publications you have authored,
individually or with others. Include a link to each publication when
possible. If a link is not available, provide a digital copy of the
publication when available.
Not applicable.
18. List all speeches, panel discussions, and presentations (e.g.,
PowerPoint) that you have given on topics relevant to the position for
which you have been nominated. Include a link to each publication when
possible. If a link is not available, provide a digital copy of the
speech or presentation when available.
Speech, Commencement Address at Embry-Riddle's Fall 2024
Undergraduate Commencement Ceremony, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical
University, Decem
ber 12, 2024. Seethe university's press release here, http://
news.erau.edu/headlines/jared-isaacman-inspires-embry-riddle-
grads-to-pursue-moonshots#:
:text=%E2%80%9CIt%27s%20you%20who%20wil1%20make,Center%20in%20
Daytona%20Beach%2C%20Florida, and a video of the address here,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BjyyGjeYrKO.
Fireside Chat, Space Force Power Conference, United States
Space Force, December 10, 2024. A recording of the event is
available here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CdaqX3AMxy8
Panelist, Astronaut Reunion, Association of Space Explorers,
December 5, 2024.
Fireside Chat, Polaris Dawn Event, UC Davis for Spaceflight
Research, November 22, 2024.
Fireside Chat, Beyond Earth Symposium, Beyond Earth
Institute, Novem-
ber 13, 2024. A recording of the event is available here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0pZ1H4WinVU
Fireside Chat, Foreign Policy Research Institute's 18th
Annual Benjamin Franklin Award for Public Service, Foreign
Policy Research Institute, November 13, 2024.
Panelist, Planetary Congress, Association of Space
Explorers, October 3, 2024.
Panelist, Up.Summit, UP.Partners, September 30, 2024.
Fireside Chat, Polaris Dawn Mission Briefing, Polaris Dawn,
August 19, 2024. A recording of the event is available here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v
=rGtzDmwfkCY.
Fireside Chat, X Takeover, Tesla Owners of Silicon Valley,
July, 28, 2024. A recording of the event is available here:
https://www.facebook.com/tesla
siliconvalley/videos/full-interview-with-jared-isaacman-shares-
the-ground-break
ing-work-with-polaris-/8703988886355087/.
Fireside Chat, Commercial Spaceflight Transportation
Conference Washington, DC, Commercial Space Federation,
February, 21, 2024.
Fireside Chat, ICR Conference, ICR, January 8, 2024.
Fireside Chat, Space Force Power Conference, United States
Space Force, December 13, 2023.
Fireside Chat, LiveWIRED, WIRED, November 5, 2023. A
recording of the event is available where: http://
www.wired.com/video/watch/lets-die-on-mars
Fireside Chat, Space Cowboy Ball, EarthLight Foundation,
November 18, 2023.
Fireside Chat, NBAA Annual Conference, NBAA, October 17,
2023.
Panelist, EAA Aviation Museum Space Day Event, October 7,
2023.
Panelist, Disrupt Conference, TechCrunch, September 19,
2023.
Fireside Chat, International Space Development Conference,
National Space Society, May 25, 2023.
Fireside Chat, National Character and Leadership Symposium
(NCLS), United States Air Force Academy, February 23, 2023.
Fireside Chat, SpaceCom 2023--Accelerating the Global
Business of Space, SpaceCom, February 23, 2023.
Fireside Chat, Space Force Culture Coalition, United States
Space Force, February 21, 2023.
Fireside Chat, BENS Virtual Discussion on Polaris Dawn with
NY Metro Member Jared Isaacman, BENS, February 21, 2023.
Acceptance Speech, Living Legends of Aviation, Kitty Hawk
Air Academy, January 20, 2023.
Panelists, UP.Summit, UP.Partners, June 7, 2022.
Fireside Chat, LOGIN '22, LOGIN, June 3, 2022.
Speech, Commencement Address at Embry-Riddle's 2022 Spring
Commencement, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, May 14,
2022.
Presenter, Easterseals Advocacy Awards, Easterseals April
12, 2022. A recording of the event is available here: https://
www.youtube.com/watch?v=ehp
BgLMJU7s.
Fireside Chat, Agilysys User Conference, Agilysys, March 1,
2022.
Acceptance Speech, Living Legends of Aviation, Kitty Hawk
Air Academy, January 21, 2022.
Fireside Chat, Annual CNBC Technology Executive Council
Summit, CNBC, November 17, 2021.
Panelist, ASCEND, The American Institute of Aeronautics and
Astronautics, November,15, 2021. A recording of the event is
available here: https://youtu.beNjHzpOqu5iU
19. List all public statements you have made during the past ten
years, including statements in news articles and radio and podcasts and
television appearances, which are on topics relevant to the position
for which you have been nominated, including dates. Include a link to
each statement when possible. If a link is not available, provide a
digital copy of the statement when available.
See attached.
20. List all digital platforms (including social media and other
digital content sites) on which you currently or have formerly operated
an account, regardless of whether or not the account was held in your
name or an alias. Include the full name of an ``alias'' or 'handle'',
including the complete URL and username with hyperlinks, you have used
on each of the named platforms. Indicate whether the account is active,
deleted, or dormant. Include a link to each account if possible.
X/Twitter: @rookisaacman, https://x.com/rookisaacman
Instagram: rookisaacman, https://www.instagram.com/
rookisaacman/
Shift4 personnel previously created a Linkedin account for
me, but I never used it, and it has been deleted.
21. Please identify each instance in which you have testified
orally or in writing before Congress in a governmental or non-
governmental capacity and specify the date, committee, and subject
matter of each testimony. None.
22. Given the current mission, major programs, and major
operational objectives of the department/agency/commission/corporation
to which you have been nominated, what in your background or employment
experience do you believe affirmatively qualifies you for appointment
to the position for which you have been nominated, and why do you wish
to serve in that position?
I believe many aspects of my background make me qualified to serve
as NASA Administrator, and it would be an immense honor to do so. My
education, experience as a pilot, time as a commercial astronaut, and
work as an entrepreneur together reflect my life-long passions of
aviation and spaceflight. Throughout my various endeavors, I have had
the opportunity to work with the government as a partner in the private
sector. This has provided me with unique insights into how we can
improve and innovate NASA's operations. I am committed to NASA's quest
to explore space, innovate for humanity, and inspire our Nation through
discovery.
As a student, I attended the Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University
where I graduated with a bachelor's degree in professional aeronautics.
As a pilot, I have more than 7,700 hours of jet pilot experience
and the highest FAA ratings, which include my Airline Transport Pilot
certificate with experimental type ratings to operate ex-military
aircraft.
As a commercial astronaut, I have spent the last four years helping
plan, develop, train, and execute two commercial space missions through
the Polaris Program. My crew and I flew farther into space than any
other human has since Apollo 17-more than 50 years ago. Aspects of our
missions reflect the exciting future of space, such as the testing of
new spacesuits during our spacewalk and the use of laser communications
to send a message to the world. These efforts renewed excitement about
what the future holds for America as a spacefaring Nation, but we also
remained dedicated to addressing the hardships and challenges of the
world we live in today. In the course of the Polaris missions, we
raised over $250 million for St. Jude Childrens Research hospital, of
which I have contributed more than $125 million directly. My experience
as an astronaut and leader for two missions has also given me a
profound understanding of the coordination required between NASA,
commercial partners, other government agencies, and outside
collaborators to achieve mission success.
As an entrepreneur, I have also created a career in business that
is directly related to managing a large agency and advancing American
aeronautical interests and innovation. I co-founded the world's largest
private air force, Draken International, to train pilots for the United
States Armed Forces and its allies. This defense aerospace business,
involving high performance military aircraft, saved taxpayers hundreds
of millions and enhanced the training of our military warfighters. I am
also the founder and CEO of Shift4 Payments, an innovative payment
processor company, which I started in my parents basement when I was 16
years old. Throughout my long business career, I have run my companies
efficiently, responsibly, and with thousands of employees.
I hope to have the opportunity to advance the President's goal for
America to lead in space, science, technology, and exploration as NASA
Administrator.
23. What do you believe are your responsibilities, if confirmed, to
ensure that the department/agency/commission/corporation has proper
management and accounting controls, and what experience do you have in
managing a large organization?
It is imperative that the Administrator of NASA manages the agency
responsibly and efficiently to ensure its organizational resources are
dedicated to consistently moving the ball forward and advancing our
national interests.
As the founder and CEO of two large companies, I am responsible for
overseeing large budgets and have navigated complex logistics matters
on a daily basis. As the founder and CEO of an aerospace defense
contractor under government oversight, and a public company listed on
the New York Stock Exchange, I also understand the importance of
leading large organizations responsibly with proper governance and
accounting controls.
24. What do you believe to be the top three challenges facing the
department/agency/commission/corporation, and why?
NASA is the most respected and accomplished space agency in the
world. The NASA logo inspires Americans and people the world over to
dream of what the future may hold. However, the agency has faced
significant challenges over the years that have impeded the mission.
1. NASA has been unable to return to the Moon or have an achievable
path to Mars, despite plans to do so as far back as President
George H.W. Bush's Administration in 1989.
2. The pace of world changing discoveries has slowed with flagship
missions consistently billions over budget and behind schedule.
3. The space economy has yet to be revealed. For over 60 years, the
space economy has had the same customers (governments) looking
for the same capabilities (communications and observation).
I believe the challenges stem from:
A distracting number of priorities that are not fully
aligned with the NASA mission.
An organizational structure and policies that fuel
bureaucracy and throttle progress.
A culture that needs to be reinvigorated to make better use
of capable commercial industry and to win against geopolitical
rivals that are quickly threatening the ever expanding 'high
ground'. If we do not lead, we follow, and if we follow, we may
never catch-up.
I am committed to working tirelessly alongside some of the
brightest minds in the Nation to solve the problems and return NASA's
focus to executing on the mission.
b. potential conflicts of interest
1. Describe all financial arrangements, deferred compensation
agreements, and other continuing dealings with business associates,
clients, or customers. Please include information related to retirement
accounts, such as a 40l(k) or pension plan.
My employment agreements and arrangements are described on my Form
278e Public Financial Disclosure Report, which I am working on with the
Office of Government Ethics (OGE) and NASA ethics officials. That form
will disclose the following agreements and arrangements:
1) A corporation I own has a Tax Receivable Agreement (TRA) with
Shift4 Payments, Inc. Under the TRA, Shift4 Payments, Inc.
agrees to make payments to the historic equity owners in an
amount equal to a percentage of the benefit the corporation
derives from certain specific tax attributes, if, as and when
realized Prior to the IPO of Shift4 in 2020, the company
operated as a partnership for U.S. Tax purposes. Upon the IPO,
an umbrella partnership--C-Corporation structure was
established. The operating partnership (Shift4 Payments, LLC)
will be modified by reclassifying my interests as an original
owner into a new class of interest that is exchangeable for
Shift4 common stock (Class A). The TRA requires Shift4 to share
tax savings with the original partners.
2) Pursuant to my employment agreement with Shift4 Payments, LLC,
for 36 months after resignation, I will be eligible for health
insurance benefits and other reimbursed expenses for fees in
connection with former employment/ownership. I do not
anticipate participating in or accepting such benefits.
3) In February 2025, I anticipate receiving an annual RSU award from
Shift4 Payments, Inc. for the 2024 calendar year. RSU grant
levels for the Chief Executive Officer are decided in
conjunction with the Company's year-end compensation decisions
based on individual and Company performance from the prior
Fiscal Year.
2. Do you have any commitments or agreements, formal or informal,
to maintain employment, affiliation, or practice with any business,
association, or other organization during your appointment? If so,
please explain.
An entity I own holds agreements with Space Exploration
Technologies Corp. (SpaceX). These include agreements related to two
future space flight missions in the Polaris Program. There are three
space flight service agreements related to different missions in the
Polaris Program.
I am currently working with OGE and NASA ethics officials on
addressing these contracts from an ethics and conflicts perspective. I
am committed to working with OGE to identify an appropriate way to
avoid conflicts of interest related to these contracts and work toward
a resolution that, if necessary, will be fully described in my Ethics
Agreement letter.
3. Indicate any investments, obligations, liabilities, or other
relationships which could involve potential conflicts of interest in
the position to which you have been nominated. Explain how you will
resolve each potential conflict of interest.
I have equity interest in Shift4 Payments, Inc., a payments company
that predominantly serves restaurants, hotels, sports stadiums and
theme parks. Shift4 processes some of the payments for SpaceX Starlink
Internet service, but this represents less than \1/2\ of a percent of
the company's revenue. I intend to resign from my positions and will
continue to work with OGE and NASA ethics officials on how to handle my
interest in Shift4.
I own ex-military aircraft that are occasionally used in a charter
or lease arrangement by U.S. Government test pilot schools and for R&D
testing.
My separate involvement in contracts with SpaceX is described in
the previous question.
In all of these matters, I am working with OGE and NASA ethics
officials to identify and resolve conflicts in the appropriate time
frame. We are working toward an Ethics Agreement letter that will
contain my commitments to resolve existing conflicts. As Administrator,
I would be committed to full transparency on these issues and I would
work closely with the agency's ethics staff and OGE to resolve any
potential conflicts that should arise during my tenure.
4. Describe any business relationship, dealing, or financial
transaction which you have had during the last ten years, whether for
yourself, on behalf of a client, or acting as an agent, that could in
any way constitute or result in a possible conflict of interest in the
position to which you have been nominated. Explain how you will resolve
each potential conflict of interest.
My involvement in contracts with SpaceX is described in the
previous questions. As noted above, I am working with OGE and NASA
ethics officials to identify and resolve conflicts in the appropriate
time frame. As Administrator, I would be committed to full transparency
on these issues and I would work closely with the agency's ethics staff
and OGE to resolve any potential conflicts that should arise during my
tenure.
5. Identify any other potential conflicts of interest and explain
how you will resolve each potential conflict of interest. None.
6. Describe any activity during the past ten years, including the
names of clients represented, in which you have been engaged for the
purpose of directly or indirectly influencing the passage, defeat, or
modification of any legislation or affecting the administration and
execution of law or public policy. None.
c. legal matters
1. Have you ever been disciplined or cited for a breach of ethics,
professional misconduct, or retaliation by, or been the subject of a
complaint to, any court, administrative agency, the Office of Special
Counsel, an Inspector General, professional association, disciplinary
committee, or other professional group? No.
If yes:
a. Provide the name of the court, agency, association, committee, or
group;
b. Provide the date the citation, disciplinary action, complaint, or
personnel action was issued or initiated;
c. Describe the citation, disciplinary action, complaint, or
personnel action;
d. Provide the results of the citation, disciplinary action,
complaint, or personnel action.
2. Have you ever been investigated, arrested, charged, or held by
any Federal, State, or other law enforcement authority of any Federal,
State, county, municipal, or foreign government entity, other than for
a minor traffic offense? If so, please explain.
Yes, in February 2010, when returning from a trip to watch the
Olympics in Vancouver, I was detained by U.S. Customs and Border
Protection on a warrant related to a charge for ``drawing and passing
checks without sufficient funds,''based on a dispute with the Palms
Casino Resort in Las Vegas over a travel reimbursement that the resort
promised and subsequently failed to honor. The dispute arose the month
prior, and I was under the impression the matter was resolved. I was
not aware that law enforcement was involved in the matter. As a result,
I was very surprised when CBP took action. However, the matter was
resolved in less than 24 hours and the charges were dismissed.
I did then and still now disagree with the other party's handling
of the matter. I considered civil action against the resort, but opted
against it to avoid any further headache.
Following this incident, the Nevada district court sealed all
records associated with this incident, stating, ``All proceedings
recounted in the sealed records are deemed never to have occurred.''
Although it remains sealed, in the interest of full transparency, I
have disclosed it here for the Committee's awareness.
3. Have you or any business or nonprofit of which you are or were
an officer ever been involved as a party in an administrative agency
proceeding, criminal proceeding, or civil litigation? If so, please
explain.
Shift4, the company of which I am currently CEO, and its
predecessors and subsidiaries have collectively been in business for
over 25 years. The company, which is publicly traded on the NYSE, is
infrequently party to lawsuits filed by and against the company. Please
see attached for PACER listings of litigation involving Shift4, as well
as its predecessors Harbortouch Payments, LLC, and United Bank Card,
Inc. Also attached are PACER listings of litigation involving Draken
International, the company which I co-founded and for which was
previously CEO, but with which I am no longer affiliated. Also attached
is a PACER listing of litigation involving me individually.
To the extent the Committee would like additional information on
matters listed in the PACER attachments, such as a summary of
litigation involving Shift4 over a certain time period, please do not
hesitate to ask.
With respect to agency proceedings, Shift4 recently settled a
matter with the SEC involving allegations that the company failed to
disclose on its annual 10-K forms and/or its proxy statements for FY
2020 through FY 2022 related person transactions for a total of three
individuals. This settlement began with outreach from the SEC
requesting that Shift4 voluntarily provide documents and information
regarding related persons transactions involving immediate family
members of Shift4's officers and directors. Shift4 cooperated with the
inquiry, in the course of which we learned that three individuals'
names and compensations were inadvertently left off of SEC-required
reports and disclosures. Those disclosures were made as of April of
last year.
Shift4 offered to pay $750,000 to settle the claim. For reference,
$750,000 is about 0.03 percent of Shift4's annual revenue for 2023. The
settlement order, which states, ``In determining to accept the Offer,
the [SEC] considered remedial acts promptly undertaken by [Shift4],
including making disclosures and improvements to policies and
procedures concerning related person transactions, as well as
cooperation afforded the Commission staff,'' is available on the SEC's
website here: https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/admin/2025/34-
102146.pdf. SEC Order 11.
4. Have you ever been convicted (including pleas of guilty or no/o
contendere) of any criminal violation other than a minor traffic
offense? If so, please explain. No.
5. Have you ever been accused, formally or informally, of sexual
assault, sexual harassment, or discrimination on the basis of sex,
race, religion, or any other basis? If so, please explain. No.
6. Please advise the Committee of any additional information,
favorable or unfavorable, which you feel should be disclosed in
connection with your nomination.
I am a devoted philanthropist and have demonstrated a large
financial commitment to various causes throughout my life. Below are
details regarding the contributions of $50,000 or greater I have
donated to 501(c)(3) organizations in my personal capacity:
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital (2021, 2022, 2023):
$123,351,928
Renaissance Charitable Foundation, Inc. (2022, 2023, 2024):
$13,150,247
U.S. Space & Rocket Center Education Foundation (2022, 2023,
2024): $11,352,879
Naval Aviation Museum Foundation, Inc. (2021): $5,533,456
St. Luke's Health Network, Inc. (2023, 2024): $4,776,908
Lehigh Valley Zoo (2024): $1,000,000
Edward Charles Foundation (2021, 2022): $650,000
Davinci Science Center (2022): $571,467
Baylor College of Medicine (2022): $516,181
House of Hope Foundation for Kids with Cancer (2023):
$500,000
Space Force Historical Foundation (2024): $500,000
California Institute of Technology (2025): $500,000
Global Citizen (3-Year Pledge beginning in 2023) (2023,
2024): $500,000
Kiddie Hawk (5-Year Pledge beginning in 2023) (2023, 2024):
$200,000
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University (2023): $150,000
Los Angeles Dodgers Foundation (2024): $126,683
Ukraine House DC Foundation (2022): $100,000
Business Executives for National Security (2023): $80,000
El Sistema USA (2023): $75,000
The Mars Generation (2021): $50,000
Earthlight Foundation (2023): $50,000
d. relationship with committee
1. Will you ensure that your department/agency/commission/
corporation complies with deadlines for information set by
congressional committees, and that your department/agency/commission/
corporation endeavors to timely comply with requests for information
from individual Members of Congress, including requests from members in
the minority? Yes.
2. Will you ensure that your department/agency/commission/
corporation does whatever it can to protect congressional witnesses and
whistleblowers from reprisal for their testimony and disclosures? Yes.
3. Will you cooperate in providing the Committee with requested
witnesses, including technical experts and career employees, with
firsthand knowledge of matters of interest to the Committee? Yes.
4. Are you willing to appear and testify before any duly
constituted committee of the Congress on such occasions as you may be
reasonably requested to do so? Yes.
______
Jared Isaacman--Part A Question 15
POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS 2015-PRESENT
(through 2/3/2025)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jared Isaacman
(Federal) Date Amount Notes
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TRUMP VANCE INAUGURAL 11/27/2024 $2,000,000.00
COMMITTEE, INC.
WHITESIDES VICTORY 10/29/2024 $5,000.00 JFC contribution:
FUND allocated by JFC
to California
Democratic Party
(see below)
(CALIFORNIA DEMOCRATIC 10/29/2024 $5,000.00
PARTY)
DSCC 10/23/2024 $41,300.00
MONTANANS FOR TESTER 10/1/2024 $3,300.00
MICHIGAN DEMOCRATIC 8/1/2024 $10,000.00
STATE CENTRAL
COMMITTEE
MITTEN PAC 8/1/2024 $5,000.00
ELISSA SLOTKIN FOR 7/29/2024 $3,300.00
MICHIGAN
ELISSA SLOTKIN FOR 7/29/2024 $3,300.00
MICHIGAN
CASEY KEYSTONE VICTORY 7/17/2024 $15,400.00 JFC contribution:
FUND allocated by JFC
to Pennsylvania
Democratic Party,
Bob Casey for
Senate, Inc., and
Keystone America
PAC (see below)
(KEYSTONE AMERICA PAC) 7/22/2024 $2,100.00
(BOB CASEY FOR SENATE 7/22/2024 $3,300.00
INC)
(PENNSYLVANIA 7/22/2024 $10,000.00
DEMOCRATIC PARTY)
GEORGE WHITESIDES FOR 2/20/2023 $3,300.00
CONGRESS
GEORGE WHITESIDES FOR 2/20/2023 $3,300.00
CONGRESS
MARK KELLY FOR SENATE 10/1/2022 $2,900.00 In-Kind
Contribution--Fun
draising Event
Catering
DSCC 7/11/2022 $26,500.00
DSCC 7/11/2022 $23,500.00 Recount Account
MONTANANS FOR TESTER 3/31/2022 $2,900.00
BOB CASEY FOR SENATE 3/30/2022 $2,900.00
INC
SHAHEEN FOR SENATE 3/30/2022 $2,900.00
DSCC 3/29/2022 $10,000.00
FRIENDS OF MARK WARNER 3/29/2022 $900.00
FRIENDS OF MARK WARNER 11/2/2021 $2,000.00
SMP 10/28/2021 $100,000.00
SUSAN WILD FOR 10/24/2021 $2,900.00
CONGRESS
SUSAN WILD FOR 10/20/2021 $2,900.00
CONGRESS
IMPACT 10/20/2021 $10,000.00 $5,000 refunded on
11/2/2021
FRIENDS OF SCHUMER 10/20/2021 $2,900.00
FRIENDS OF SCHUMER 10/20/2021 $2,900.00
MARK KELLY FOR SENATE 7/3/2021 $2,900.00
FRIENDS OF DENNIS ROSS 11/8/2016 $500.00
FRIENDS OF DAVID JOLLY 10/7/2015 $1,000.00
GRAVES FOR CONGRESS 3/31/2015 $1,500.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jared Isaacman (State
& Local) Date Amount Notes
------------------------------------------------------------------------
JOSH SHAPIRO FOR 3/2/2022 $50,000 ..................
GOVERNOR
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jared Isaacman--Part A Question 19
[GRAPHIC NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]
Jared Isaacman--Part C Question 3
PACER--Draken
[GRAPHIC NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]
PACER--United Bank Card
[GRAPHIC NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]
PACER--Shift4
[GRAPHIC NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]
PACER--Harbortouch
[GRAPHIC NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]
PACER--Isaacman, Jared
[GRAPHIC NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]
Chairman Cruz. Thank you, Mr. Isaacman. I now recognize Mr.
Haines for his opening statement.
STATEMENT OF STEVEN H. HAINES, NOMINEE TO BE AN
ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INDUSTRY
AND ANALYSIS, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Mr. Haines. Thank you, Mr. Cruz. And here I was thinking
that all the fanfare outside was for Industry and Analysis, but
it is not the first time I have had my bubble burst.
Chairman Cruz, Ranking Member Cantwell, and distinguished
members of the Committee, it is an honor to be with you here
today. I would like to thank President Trump, Secretary
Lutnick, and Under Secretary William Kimmitt for putting their
confidence in me to serve as Assistant Secretary of Commerce
for Industry and Analysis. I would also like to extend my
deepest gratitude to Senator Hagerty for introducing me today.
I feel incredibly fortunate to have his mentorship and support.
It is also an honor to have several of my family members
here with me, starting with my incredible wife, Erica Haines,
who is sitting behind me. In our first year of marriage, she
asked me what I wanted to do with my life, career-wise, and I
thought I gave her the right answer, which was to ``be a good
dad, to be a good husband.'' And she gently reminded me that
that was the bare minimum and challenged me to aim higher. Her
continual love and support over the past 10 years of marriage
has challenged me to do just that.
Our first son, Henry, is here, as well. It is the honor of
my life to be his dad and to have him by my side today. His
little brother, Oscar, has been on the planet for a total of 10
weeks, so he decided to forego the hearing to stay home with
his grandmother. He probably taking a nap right now.
My father-in-law, Guy Detrick, is here from Washington
State--thank you for being here--as well as one of my three
older sisters, Heather Pray, and her husband and my best
friend, Charlie Pray. My parents, Paul and Christy, were unable
to make the trip to Washington, D.C. today, but they are
proudly watching from home in Franklin, Tennessee. I inherited
a tenacious work ethic and a drive for excellence from my
father and a sense of faith and conviction from my mother. They
shaped me to the man I am today, and there is no way I could
ever repay them for that.
I grew up in Franklin, Tennessee, in the 1990s, at the
height of Pax Americana. I distinctly remember driving home
from school with my mom, and her telling me that we lived in
the greatest country in the world. Even at a young age, I was
filled with a sense of pride, and excitement, and expectation
for the future. I truly felt lucky to be an American.
I carried that pride with me as I left America to study
abroad and then start a career in the oil and gas industry in
Asia. No matter where I went, who I met, what I did, I always
carried that sense that there was no place like home, my home,
the United States of America.
In the early 2010s, I started to notice a shift, like a lot
of people, in the global, geopolitical, and economic landscape,
and for the first time in my life, America's future felt
uncertain, and not guaranteed. So through the loving
encouragement of my wife, who is from the area, I decided to
move to Washington, D.C., leave the private sector, and pursue
a career in foreign policy and national security via public
service. That journey has led me to multiple roles at the
Department of State, the Pentagon, here in the U.S. Senate, and
now, for the second time, at the Department of Commerce. The
colleagues I have worked with, along with the experiences that
I have gained, have all somehow culminated in the necessary
preparation for this specific nomination.
For six months prior to this nomination, I had the
privilege of performing the duties of the Assistant Secretary
of Commerce for Industry and Analysis, learning its policies,
its people, its portfolios, budget, contracts, learning every
facet of the organization. And it is because of that I feel a
sense of pride and excitement to have the opportunity to lead
the organization in an official capacity. And if confirmed, my
singular focus will be supporting America industry's
competitiveness through robust understanding and analysis of
sectors and supply chains, improving and growing I&A's
analytical capabilities to better respond to trade questions
facing U.S. policymakers, and empowering the professionals, the
people who work at I&A to approach their work with a sense of
subject matter expertise, mastery, autonomy, and purpose. And
to that end, I look forward to working constructively with this
Committee.
Thank you for your time, and I look forward to your
questions.
[The prepared statement and biographical information of Mr.
Haines follow:]
Prepared Statement of Steven H. Haines, Nominee for Assistant Secretary
of Commerce for Industry and Analysis, U.S. Department of Commerce
Chairman Cruz, Ranking Member Cantwell, and distinguished members
of the Committee: It's an honor to be with you here today. I am
grateful to President Trump for my nomination, and to Secretary Lutnick
and Under Secretary Kimmitt for their confidence in me to serve as
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Industry & Analysis. I would also
like to extend my deepest gratitude to Senator Hagerty for introducing
me today. I'm incredibly fortunate to have his support and mentorship.
It is also an honor to introduce my incredible wife, Erica, who is
sitting behind me. In our first year of marriage, she asked what I
wanted to do with my life. I told her, ``Be a good husband and
father.'' She said that was the bare minimum and challenged me to aim
higher. Her unwavering love and support continue to inspire me to do
just that. Our first son, Henry, is also here. It is the privilege of
my life to be his father and to have him by my side today. Henry's
little brother, Oscar, has been on this planet a total of 12 weeks and
decided to skip the hearing to stay home with his grandmother. My
father-in-law, Guy Detrick, is here from Washington State, and one of
my three sisters is also with me today--Heather Pray--who is
accompanied by her husband and my best friend, Charlie Pray. My
parents, Paul and Christy Haines, were unable to make the trip to
Washington, D.C. today, but are proudly watching from their home in
Franklin, TN. I inherited a tenacious work ethic and a drive for
excellence from my father and a sense of conviction and faith from my
mother. I will never be able to repay them for shaping me into the man
I am today.
I grew up in Franklin, Tennessee in the '90s--the height of Pax
Americana. I distinctly remember my mother driving me home from school
one day, listening to the radio, and her explaining to me that America
was the greatest country in the world. Even at a young age, those words
filled me with a sense of pride, wonder, and expectation for the
future. I felt incredibly lucky to be an American.
I carried that pride with me as I studied abroad and eventually
started my career in the oil & gas industry in Asia. No matter where I
traveled in the world, I always felt that there truly was no place like
home.
In the early 2010s, I began to see the global economic and national
security landscape shift. For the first time in my life, America's
future did not feel guaranteed. Through the encouragement of my wife, I
decided to leave the private sector and pursue a career in foreign
policy and national security through public service. That journey led
me to jobs at the Department of State, the Pentagon, the United States
Senate, and now the Department of Commerce.
The colleagues I have worked with, along with the experiences I
have gained, have all culminated in the necessary preparation for this
role.
For six months prior to my nomination, I had the privilege of
performing the duties of assistant secretary of Commerce for Industry
and Analysis, learning the policies, portfolios, people, budget,
contracts, and products within the office's jurisdiction. I feel a
sense of pride and excitement to be presented with the opportunity to
lead the organization in an official capacity.
I&A--as it is affectionately called by those who work there--is
comprised of 23 offices that cover approximately 90 percent of the U.S.
economy. Its dedicated staff--currently hovering just north of 190
people--are passionate professionals who engage in their work with
expertise and a sense of mission.
In addition to leading the Committee on Foreign Investment in the
United States (CFIUS) for the Department, I&A is also the only unit
within the Department of Commerce that provides essential trade data
and analytical support that feeds into a wide variety of trade policy
workstreams and decisions.
In short, I&A continually punches above its weight, especially at a
time when the global trading order is being rapidly reshaped to benefit
the United States for decades to come.
If confirmed, my singular focus will be supporting American
industry's competitiveness through robust understanding and analysis of
sectors and supply chains, growing and improving I&A's analytical
capabilities to better respond to the complex trade questions U.S.
policymakers are facing, and empowering the professionals who work at
I&A to engage in their work with a sense of mastery, autonomy, and
purpose.
I look forward to working constructively with this Committee to
that end. Thank you. I look forward to your questions.
______
a. biographical information
1. Name (Include any former names or nicknames used): Steven Harold
Haines.
2. Position to which nominated: Assistant Secretary of Commerce for
Industry and Analysis.
3. Date of Nomination: September 3, 2025.
4. Address (List current place of residence and office addresses):
Residence: Information not released to the public.
Office: Information not provided.
5. Date and Place of Birth: Information not provided.
6. Provide the name, position, and place of employment for your
spouse (if married) or domestic partner, and the names and ages of your
children (including stepchildren and children by a previous marriage).
Erica Haines, Client Advisor, Oak Rose Group
7. List all college and graduate schools attended, whether or not
you were granted a degree by the institution. Provide the name of the
institution, the dates attended, the degree received, and the date of
the degree.
University of Nevada, Reno, 2006-2009, BA International
Affairs, May 2009
National Taiwan Normal University, 2007, Study Abroad
Southwest University for Nationalities, 2007-2009, Study Abroad
George Washington University, 2017-2019, MA Asian Studies, May
2019
8. List all post-undergraduate employment, including the job title,
name of employer, and inclusive dates of employment, and highlight all
management-level jobs held and any non-managerial jobs that relate to
the position for which you are nominated.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security,
Senior Advisor, Sept. 2025 to present
U.S. Department of Commerce, International Trade
Administration, Senior Advisor, April 2025-Sept. 2025
U.S. Department of State, Member Policy Planning Staff, Jan.
2025-April 2025
Office of Senator Bill Hagerty, Brookings LEGIS Fellow, Jan.
2023-Jan. 2025
Black Walnut Brewery, Bartender, April 2023-November 2024.
U.S. Department of State, Foreign Affairs Officer, Mar. 2020-
Jan. 2023
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security,
Export Analyst Nov. 2021-Feb. 2022 (Detail from State)
U.S. Department of Defense, Country Director for China, Jan.
2021-July 2021
U.Group (Now IntelliBridge, LLC), Senior China Research
Analyst, Dec. 2019-Mar. 2020
Ernst & Young, LLC, Associate, Oct. 2018-Dec. 2019
Panton, Inc., Director of Business Development, Feb. 2016-Aug
2018
Ruelco, Inc., International Business Development Manager, Sept.
2009-Feb.2016
9. Attach a copy of your resume. Attached.
10. List any advisory, consultative, honorary, or other part-time
service or positions with Federal, State, or local governments, other
than those listed above after 18 years of age. None.
11. List all positions held as an officer, director, trustee,
partner, proprietor, agent, representative, or consultant of any
corporation, company, firm, partnership, or other business, enterprise,
educational, or other institution. None.
12. List all memberships you have had after 18 years of age or
currently hold with any civic, social, charitable, educational,
political, professional, fraternal, benevolent or religiously
affiliated organization, private club, or other membership organization
(You do not have to list your religious affiliation or membership in a
religious house of worship or institution). Include dates of membership
and any positions you have held with any organization. Please note
whether any such club or organization restricts membership on the basis
of sex, race, color, religion, national origin, age, or disability.
Council on Foreign Relations, 2022-2027
Alexander Hamilton Society, 2021
Foundation for Defense of Democracies, 2021
The Heritage Foundation, 2020
Sigma Phi Epsilon 2006-2009 (male only)
13. Have you ever been a candidate for and/or held a public office
(elected, non-elected, or appointed)? If so, indicate whether any
campaign has any outstanding debt, the amount, and whether you are
personally liable for that debt. No.
14. List all memberships and offices held with and services
rendered to, whether compensated or not, any political party or
election committee within the past ten years. If you have held a paid
position or served in a formal or official advisory position (whether
compensated or not) in a political campaign within the past ten years,
identify the particulars of the campaign, including the candidate, year
of the campaign, and your title and responsibilities. None.
15. Itemize all political contributions to any individual, campaign
organization, political party, political action committee, or similar
entity of $200 or more for the past ten years. None.
16. List all scholarships, fellowships, honorary degrees, honorary
society memberships, military medals, and any other special recognition
for outstanding service or achievements.
Superior Honor Award, U.S. Department of State, 2021 & 2023
Council on Foreign Relations, Term Member, 2022-2027
Alexander Hamilton Society Security and Strategy Seminar
Fellow, 2021
Foundation for Defense of Democracies National Security Fellows
Program Fellow, 2021
Young Professional in Foreign Policy U.S.-China Futures Project
Participant, 2020
The Heritage Foundation George C. Marshall Fellowship, 2020
Presidential Management Fellow (PMF) Finalist, 2019
William Johnson Outstanding Graduate Student Award in Asian
Studies, 2019
Scottish Rite Graduate Endowment Fellowship, 2018-2019
National Security Education Program (NSEP) David L. Boren
Fellowship Recipient, 2018 (Declined)
Foreign Language Area Studies (FLAS) Fellowship--Mandarin
Chinese, 2017-2018
Foreign Language Area Studies (FLAS) Fellowship--Mandarin
Chinese, 2018-2019
Freeman-ASIA Scholarship, 2008-2009
University Studies Abroad Consortium (USAC)/International
Affairs Scholarship, 2009
UNR-NTNU Intensive Chinese Language Study Scholarship, 2007
17. List all books, articles; columns, letters to the editor,
Internet blog postings, or other publications you have authored,
individually or with others. Include a link to each publication when
possible. If a link is not available, provide a digital copy of the
publication when available. None.
18. List all speeches, panel discussions, and presentations (e.g.,
PowerPoint) that you have given on topics relevant to the position for
which you have been nominated. Include a link to each publication when
possible. If a link is not available, provide a digital copy of the
speech or presentation when available. None.
19. List all public statements you have made during the past ten
years, including statements in news articles and radio and podcasts and
television appearances, which are on topics relevant to the position
for which you have been nominated, including dates. Include a link to
each statement when possible. If a link is not available, provide a
digital copy of the statement when available. None.
20. List all digital platforms (including social media and other
digital content sites) on which you currently or have formerly operated
an account, regardless of whether or not the account was held in your
name or an alias. Include the full name of an ``alias'' or ``handle'',
including the complete URL and username with hyperlinks, you have used
on each of the named platforms. Indicate whether the account is active,
deleted, or dormant. Include a link to each account if possible.
https://www.linkedin.com/in/stevenhaines2/ (active)
https://x.com/stevenhaines (active)
21. Please identify each instance in which you have testified
orally or in writing before Congress in a governmental or non-
governmental capacity and specify the date, committee, and subject
matter of each testimony.
Not Applicable.
22. Given the current mission, major programs, and major
operational objectives of the department/agency/commission/corporation
to which you have been nominated, what in your background or employment
experience do you believe affirmatively qualifies you for appointment
to the position for which you have been nominated, and why do you wish
to serve in that position?
I have served in policymaking and operational roles at the
Department of Commerce, Department of State and the U.S. Senate that
are directly relevant to issues within the purview of the International
Trade Administration. Prior to my nomination, I performed the duties of
the Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Analysis (I&A) for
six months. During this time, I became intimately involved in the
policies and portfolios that are housed under l&A as a business unit,
in addition to the administrative, personnel, and budgetary engines
that make I&A run.
Previous relevant experience includes directly supporting U.S.-
manufactured oil and gas equipment exports internationally, conducting
U.S. industry competitive analysis for U.S. government agencies, and
directly leading interagency policy initiatives for multiple U.S.
agencies.
23. What do you believe are your responsibilities, if confirmed, to
ensure that the department/agency/commission/corporation has proper
management and accounting controls, and what experience do you have in
managing a large organization?
While performing the Duties of the Assistant Secretary, I
personally reviewed, approved, or denied every financial and personnel
decision within l&A. l&A's budget team is outstanding and supported me
in this effort. Additionally, I ensured that key leadership roles,
including the six Deputy Assistant Secretaries in I&A, and the office
directors and team leads in all 23 offices within I&A were filled and
focused on administration and departmental priorities. My
responsibilities, if confirmed, will be to ensure that tax dollars are
focused on actual policy priorities that will provide a return on
investment for the American people.
24. What do you believe to be the top three challenges facing the
department/agency/commission/corporation, and why?
1) Rebalancing global trade: For the past several decades, America
has exported its industries, businesses, and jobs overseas for
lower costs and bigger margins at the expense of the American
people. Restoring our industrial base is an immense challenge
and will take coordinated, intentional policy, drive and focus.
2) Modernization: The Department of Commerce's infrastructure,
technology, and workforce need to be brought into the 21st
century. Centralized management of IT systems through multiple,
redundant contracts hamper progress. Modernizing the Department
in these areas will require hard decisions, prioritization, and
coordination with Congress, 0MB, and others.
3) Implementing Policy Objectives: The President and Secretary have
set ambitious policy goals that I&A is directly responsible for
implementing, including onshoring and revitalizing U.S.
manufacturing, securing critical mineral supply chains, and
ensuring that key events like the FIFA World Cup and the 2028
Olympics are a success. If confirmed, focusing the resources
within I&A to achieve these objectives will be a tremendous
challenge, but one that the team is up for, and one that I am
ready to lead, if confirmed.
b. potential conflicts of interest
1. Describe all financial arrangements, deferred compensation
agreements, and other continuing dealings with business associates,
clients, or customers. Please include information related to retirement
accounts, such as a 40l(k) or pension plan.
Thrift Savings Plan (TSP)
2. Do you have any commitments or agreements, formal or informal,
to maintain employment, affiliation, or practice with any business,
association, or other organization during your appointment? If so,
please explain. No.
3. Indicate any investments, obligations, liabilities, or other
relationships which could involve potential conflicts of interest in
the position to which you have been nominated. Explain how you will
resolve each potential conflict of interest. None.
4. Describe any business relationship, dealing, or financial
transaction which you have had during the last ten years, whether for
yourself, on behalf of a client, or acting as an agent, that could in
any way constitute or result in a possible conflict of interest in the
position to which you have been nominated. Explain how you will resolve
each potential conflict of interest. None.
5. Identify any other potential conflicts of interest and explain
how you will resolve each potential conflict of interest.
Not Applicable.
6. Describe any activity during the past ten years, including the
names of clients represented, in which you have been engaged for the
purpose of directly or indirectly influencing the passage, defeat, or
modification of any legislation or affecting the administration and
execution of law or public policy. None.
c. legal matters
1. Have you ever been disciplined or cited for a breach of ethics,
professional misconduct, or retaliation by, or been the subject of a
complaint to, any court, administrative agency, the Office of Special
Counsel, an Inspector General, professional association, disciplinary
committee, or other professional group? If yes:
a. Provide the name of the court, agency, association, committee, or
group;
b. Provide the date the citation, disciplinary action, complaint, or
personnel action was issued or initiated;
c. Describe the citation, disciplinary action, complaint, or
personnel action;
d. Provide the results of the citation, disciplinary action,
complaint, or personnel action.
No.
2. Have you ever been investigated, arrested, charged, or held by
any Federal, State, or other law enforcement authority of any Federal,
State, county, municipal, or foreign government entity, other than for
a minor traffic offense? If so, please explain. No.
3. Have you or any business or nonprofit of which you are or were
an officer ever been involved as a party in an administrative agency
proceeding, criminal proceeding, or civil litigation? If so, please
explain. No.
4. Have you ever been convicted (including pleas of guilty or nolo
contendere) of any criminal violation other than a minor traffic
offense? If so, please explain. No.
5. Have you ever been accused, formally or informally, of sexual
assault, sexual harassment, or discrimination on the basis of sex,
race, religion, or any other basis? If so, please explain. No.
6. Please advise the Committee of any additional information,
favorable or unfavorable, which you feel should be disclosed in
connection with your nomination. None.
d. relationship with committee
1. Will you ensure that your department/agency/commission/
corporation complies with deadlines for information set by
congressional committees, and that your department/agency/commission/
corporation endeavors to timely comply with requests for information
from individual Members of Congress, including requests from members in
the minority? Yes.
2. Will you ensure that your department/agency/commission/
corporation does whatever it can to protect congressional witnesses and
whistleblowers from reprisal for their testimony and disclosures? Yes.
3. Will you cooperate in providing the Committee with requested
witnesses, including technical experts and career employees, with
firsthand knowledge of matters of interest to the Committee? Yes.
4. Are you willing to appear and testify before any duly
constituted committee of the Congress on such occasions as you may be
reasonably requested to do so? Yes.
[GRAPHIC NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]
Chairman Cruz. Thank you, gentlemen. Congratulations on
both your nominations. And I will say, Mr. Haines, your 10-
week-old son would have certainly been welcome here this
morning. With some frequency, Senators have been known to cry
and sleep fitfully, so he would have fit well in this body.
Mr. Isaacman, welcome back. As you know, NASA's human
spaceflight program and its Artemis, in particular, is critical
to maintaining U.S. leadership in space. But as I think you can
appreciate, space flight comes at a significant cost. Its
success requires program stability. The United States cannot
dominate in space if our commitments change wildly from one
administration to the next, or from one appropriation process
to the next.
That is why the NASA section of the One Big Beautiful Bill
Act, which I authored, outlines a stable path forward for the
agency. It gives clear guidance on the Artemis Moon mission, it
paves the way for commercial space stations in low-Earth orbit,
and it invests in NASA's infrastructure to be able to execute
its exploration missions.
Will you commit to this Committee and to the Senate to full
and timely compliance with the law's requirements, if you are
confirmed?
Mr. Isaacman. Yes, Senator, I do.
Chairman Cruz. Let's dive into those requirements. Congress
wrote into the One Big Beautiful Bill that there shall be a
stable, fully funded path for Artemis at least through Artemis
V. Congress also dedicated money for the Gateway Lunar Orbit
Space Station and the Orion Crew Capsule.
Artemis is the key, I believe, to both beating China to the
lunar surface and to maintaining a U.S. presence at the Moon.
What concrete steps will you take to maintain the Artemis
program's long-term stability?
Mr. Isaacman. Senator, I appreciate the question, and
similar to my previous hearing I absolutely believe that the
current architecture with SLS is the fastest path to achieving
our near-term lunar objectives, which should be to return to
the Moon before our great rival and establish the
infrastructure so that we can recognize the scientific,
economic, and national security value.
Now, we have the first mission, which is approaching in
just a matter of months, which is Artemis II, where we will fly
around the Moon. The next mission, Artemis III, we are going to
land astronauts on the Moon. There is a lot that has to happen
in between Artemis II and III. So in that respect I am grateful
that the One Big Beautiful Bill affords us the opportunity of
additional heavy-launch vehicles through Artemis IV and V.
Now, with respect to the continuity of the mission,
Senator, in order for us to actually land the astronauts on the
Moon, it will mean that, one, or ideally two, commercial
partners will have pioneered reusable, heavy-launch lift
capabilities and orbital propellant transfer to get the lander
to the lunar environment. And when we see American astronauts
walk on the moon again it means one or both of them were
successful.
So in doing so, after completing the Artemis V mission,
which is already contemplated in the One Big Beautiful Bill, we
should have numerous options available to us to have routine
and affordable missions to the lunar surface for continuity
beyond Artemis V.
Chairman Cruz. It is also part of U.S. law that it is
American policy to have sustained human habitation either on
the Moon or in cislunar orbit. Do you agree with that
objective, and do you commit to doing everything humanly
possible to achieving it?
Mr. Isaacman. I do, Senator. I think the President of the
United States would be very excited to see a lunar base.
Chairman Cruz. And I will say, just a minute ago you talked
about competing providers. I want to be very clear. I have no
particular interest in one provider versus another. My interest
is in making sure the objective is achieved. And at times, some
have suggested that the objective of going to the Moon and the
objective of going to Mars are intention. I do not believe they
are intention. I believe both are critical.
America will be the first to land on Mars. That is
critically important. That is written into law, and I was proud
to author that provision in law. But I also think, at the same
time, we cannot lose the Moon and lose the race to the Moon to
China. Do you agree that both are critical priorities?
Mr. Isaacman. I do, Senator. And again, consistent with my
prior testimony before this Committee, there actually are
parallel efforts underway. Now, there is no question the
overwhelming near-term priority is to return American
astronauts to the Moon and again, establish an enduring
presence on what is a very scarce piece of real estate that we
are interested in at this time.
But as I mentioned before, in order for those American
astronauts to step foot off a lander onto the lunar surface it
means one or both, and actually potentially many more,
commercial providers will have pioneered reusable heavy-lift
launch capabilities and on-orbit prop transfer, which is the
same capability, really the next giant leap capability, that
America needs for missions to the Moon, Mars, and beyond.
Chairman Cruz. The International Space Station, which is
managed from Texas's Johnson Space Center, is scheduled to be
retired by 2030. It will be replaced by one or more
commercially developed stations, partially funded by NASA, and
partially by private partners.
Congress has been clear that a gap in our presence in low-
Earth orbit would jeopardize U.S. strategic interests. Will you
commit to guaranteeing a continuous human presence in low-Earth
orbit, and a continuous American presence, during your tenure,
and to ensure that there is no gap between the retirement of
the ISS and the transition to commercial LEO destinations?
Mr. Isaacman. I absolutely commit to that, Senator. As I
mentioned in my opening remarks, we can never accept a gap in
our capabilities again, not in low-Earth orbit or our ability
to reach the Moon. I, like a lot of space enthusiasts, dream of
the day where we have multiple commercial space stations in
low-Earth orbit. But I think in order for that to be a
financially viable model, we have to absolutely maximize the
remaining life of the International Space Station, get the
highest potential science and research to the Space Station, to
crack the code on the orbital economy, to give all these
commercial space stations a fighting chance.
Chairman Cruz. Thank you. Senator Cantwell.
Senator Cantwell. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Sorry, I had to
step out for a minute and take a call from another member. But
I just want to make sure I heard everything you just said
correctly on this. So when Secretary Duffy, as the Acting,
announced NASA would reopen to compete Artemis III human lander
to ensure America would reach the lunar surface in 2028, you
agree with that decision, and will you fully commit to this re-
competition?
Mr. Isaacman. Well, Senator, I mean, both SpaceX and Blue
Origin were already awarded contracts through a competitive
process to build the lander, and I do not think it was lost on
either one of those organizations that the first company that
is capable of delivering a lander to take American astronauts
to the lunar surface and back is the one that this Nation is
going to go with. I think that competition is fantastic. I
think the best thing for SpaceX is a Blue Origin right on their
heels, and vice versa.
Senator Cantwell. Great. Well, we are glad they re-
competed, and when I first became Ranking Member of the
Committee we argued for the redundancy of competition. There is
nothing like competition to get the product that we need. And I
think the decision that was made was based on the urgency to
return by 2028. So you believe in that process?
Mr. Isaacman. Senator, I absolutely agree with competition.
I think we need competition for the vendors that support NASA's
critical mission. I think competition among world powers is
actually a really good thing, just as long as we do not lose.
Senator Cantwell. Yes, OK. The R&D issue about high-rate
composites, I mentioned in my opening statement the HiCAM
project, which does have NASA's support in trying to generate
more composites. We have, with Idaho, established a tech hub in
thermal plastics, and really believe that the United States
should not lose this race for hi-rate composite manufacturing.
Will you fight to keep for NASA's aeronautic budget to
sufficiently fund such HiCAM operations and support the
technology development that is needed for aerospace materials?
Mr. Isaacman. Senator, I think it is squarely in the
responsibility of the aeronautics portion of NASA to work on
the absolute cutting-edge materials that will ensure the
competitiveness of our aeronautics industry well in the future.
Senator Cantwell. OK. And then how can you further leverage
NASA's university work for development and research?
Mr. Isaacman. I think, I mean, there are a couple of parts
to that, Senator. First, I think, in general, it is part of
NASA's responsibility toward inspiration and STEM education to
award grants to academic institutions that give students hands-
on opportunities with hardware, ideally inspire them to want to
graduate and either work at NASA or contribute to industry.
Also, I just think it is a great way to crack the code on
important research that is going to bubble up toward NASA
achieving its important objectives.
Senator Cantwell. Thank you. And Mr. Haines, how do we get
the supply chain onshoring or supply chain materials, similar
to the same subject? One of the reasons I became interested in
the tech hub is actually an Idaho employer came to me and said,
``Do you understand the Europeans are trying to buy us?'' and I
was like, ``No, I didn't understand that.'' And he said, ``Yes.
Everybody is looking for the best technology, and they see it
in our country, and they want to buy it, and we are not doing
it and creating the supply chain.''
So how do you think in this job and role you can help
improve supply chain identifications for America's
competitiveness, particularly in manufacturing?
Mr. Haines. Thank you, Senator. One word simply is mapping.
We are doing this across a wide variety of sectors, critical
minerals one, mine the market, the term that we use often. We
have to understand the supply chain, understand where their
chokepoints are, if any. There are two components within
Industry Analysis that do supply chain analysis, the Trade
Policy and Analysis, or TP&A, division, as well as the Supply
Chain Center. There is a good amount of overlap there. If
confirmed, one of my sole focuses is going to be supercharge
our analytic capabilities, bring some currently out-of-house
tools in-house, to be able to answer specific questions just
like that, and to be able to have a little bit more control in
terms of mapping and analytics and supply chains.
Senator Cantwell. And do you look at this issue as a true
competition issue with China and other countries, to make sure
that we are mapping these supply chains?
Mr. Haines. It absolutely is. It is a competitive issue
across the board. I would say yes, Senator.
Senator Cantwell. OK. And then there is legislation
sponsored by myself, Blackburn, Blunt Rochester, and Young on
promoting resilient supply chain. Will you look at that and
tell us whether you can support that legislation?
Mr. Haines. I have looked at it. We provided initial TA,
and if passed I would be happy to implement it to the fullest
extent and work with the Committee to do so.
Senator Cantwell. You do not see any problems with it now?
Mr. Haines. I would have to read the bill over again. The
current text is escaping me. But I am happy to do that and get
back to you.
Senator Cantwell. For the record that would be great. Thank
you so much, Mr. Chairman.
Chairman Cruz. Thank you. Senator Moran.
STATEMENT OF HON. JERRY MORAN,
U.S. SENATOR FROM KANSAS
Senator Moran. Chairman, thank you. Thank you and Senator
Cantwell for exhibiting greater speed than the normal Senate
process in having this hearing in hopes that----
Chairman Cruz. I am pretty sure glaciers move at greater
speed.
Senator Moran. We share that view, Mr. Chairman, and nice
to see that this Committee is moving forward in regard to
confirmation, consideration and confirmation of a new NASA
Administrator. And I look forward to his confirmation and look
forward to the Senate considering--the approval of this
Committee and the Senate approving it, presumably next week.
Mr. Isaacman, let me start with you. My intended questions
changed a bit because I received a letter this week from a
Kansas farmer, and it captured my attention because I certainly
share the views of Senator Cantwell and Senator Cruz in regard
to the Moon and Mars, and I suppose nationally what the public
thinks about NASA is we are on our way to some object in space,
and we are exploring space. But NASA has lots of roles. You
have talked about STEM education being one of them.
I want to mention, for a moment, the mission directive of
science, and the letter that captured me is from a Kansas
farmer named Mr. Roth. And he indicates to me that ``NASA's
earth science investments''--I am reading from his letter--
``now directly support U.S. farmers in ways that were
unimaginable even a decade ago. Tools based on NASA's data and
science, like OpenET, NISAR, the Rangeland Analysis Platform
provide real-time, field-level insight into soil moisture,
biomass, drought stress, water use, yield stability. These are
not ``future technologies,'' he says. ``They are already built,
functional, and being used in states like mine today.'' He
mentions, ``FIAT is a national farmer-science partnership that
brings early development producers together with NASA
researchers to co-develop practical on-farm tools using
satellite data. This mission is to unite farmers with NASA to
turn Earth observation technology into real-world decisions
that support profitability, water efficiency, and risk
reduction.''
A Kansas farmer found value in NASA. It is something we do
not always talk about and think about when we think about
space.
I am looking for your thoughts in response to what this
farmer is reminding me of. How do you see NASA supporting or
operationally developing the satellites that support precision
agriculture? Tell me your response to this idea that NASA has a
role to play in the everyday lives of Kansas and American
agriculture?
Mr. Isaacman. Thank you for the question, Senator. I mean,
at the present time we only inhabit one planet, and earth
science is pretty vitally important. It is a role that NASA has
had since the agency was established. We have Landsat
satellites up there that are looking down, understanding
droughts and flooding and wildfires, natural disasters, almost
essentially in real time, that obviously play a direct role on
the agriculture community. There is obviously our GPS
constellations that are going to go hand-in-hand with
agriculture equipment for next-generation farming. So I do see
this as a vital role that NASA continues to fulfill.
Senator Moran. I thank you for that statement, that
commitment. I am pleased to be a member of this Committee, and
I chair the Subcommittee on Aviation and Space. But I also
serve as the Chairman of the Senate Appropriations Committee
that funds NASA as well as the Department of Commerce. And Mr.
Isaacman, have you had a chance to look at our budget, our
appropriations bill, and any response to what our committee has
approved and what we expect to be on the Senate floor in the
next two weeks?
Mr. Isaacman. Well, Senator, I do not think I can really
comment on any pending legislation other than to say that we
will absolutely maximize every dollar Congress affords to the
agency.
Senator Moran. Would you expand that commitment to say that
you will execute the funding that we provide to NASA in this
legislation as it is intended to be spent?
Mr. Isaacman. Senator, I will always follow the law, sir.
Senator Moran. Thank you. I would also use this opportunity
to indicate on our success in bringing the Commerce, Justice,
Science bill to the Senate floor. I encourage all my colleagues
who are so excited about space exploration and going to the
Moon, and going to Mars, and maybe who have an interest in
agriculture and earth sciences, I would encourage them to
actually vote for the appropriation bill so that we can, in
addition to authorizing and confirming personnel, we can
actually accomplish the goals that this Committee is spending
time this morning highlighting.
Let me ask about another aspect. I have 14 seconds. Let me
a question, in fairness, so that the gentleman from Tennessee
is not ignored, that a bit follows the question of Senator
Cantwell, and that is making sure that using ITA not only as a
trade remedy and for export promotion but to be a proactive
partner in shaping industrial policy, improving supply chain
resiliency, and strengthening U.S. competitiveness. Tell me
that you believe that is a significant component of what your
job is and will be?
Mr. Haines. Thank you, Senator. That is the core component
of the job.
Senator Moran. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Chairman Cruz. Thank you, Senator Moran. And Senator Kim
has very kindly agreed to allow Senator Moreno to skip in front
of him in line since Senator Moreno has to preside on the
Senate floor. So thank you, Senator Kim, and I recognize
Senator Moreno.
STATEMENT OF HON. BERNIE MORENO,
U.S. SENATOR FROM OHIO
Senator Moreno. Thank you, Senator Kim, and that does not
mean I am going to be less harsh on you in the pickleball
court. But thank you for doing that. I appreciate that. Thank
you, Mr. Chairman, and thank you, Mrs. Isaacman, for putting up
with this double-take process. I am sure having a great,
supportive spouse has been critical in your life like it has
been for mine.
Mr. Isaacman, as the Administration looks to accelerate
Golden Dome and strengthen national security space
capabilities, how do you see NASA and the U.S. Space Force
better coordinating their work in power, propulsion,
communications, and hypersonic missile testing, especially
given the unique test environments at places like Armstrong
Test Facility, to avoid duplication and move faster?
Mr. Isaacman. Thank you for the question, Senator. So
clearly NASA's job is the peaceful exploration of air and
space. It is also not lost on us that this is a domain that is
of great strategic importance, and I do think in a fiscally
constrained environment it is important that we are not having
duplicate infrastructure or various bespoke programs when we
could have a more unified approach to it.
For example, a lot of the work that is done both at Glenn
and Marshall Space Flight Center with nuclear has applications
for peaceful exploration of space, surface power programs, but
also Department of War implications. And I would hope that we
could collaborate, at least with some of our counterparts in
other agencies, again to avoid any duplicative spending or
inefficient application of resources.
Senator Moreno. That is great. Speaking of nuclear, at NASA
Glenn Research Center we are leading in the development of a
100-kilowatt lunar fusion reactor. How should NASA build on
this leadership in nuclear power and propulsion to ensure that
the U.S. stays ahead in returning to the Moon and reaching
Mars?
Mr. Isaacman. Senator, I love that question. I think NASA
is funded by the taxpayers to do the near impossible, as I
mentioned in my opening remarks, what no other agency or
organization or even company is capable of doing or dares to
do. I think NASA should be evolving to work on grand, almost
mini-Manhattan Project nuclear programs that have the benefit
for surface power applications, especially when you are out of
sunlight or you are undertaking discovery missions, let's say
past Mars, for example, or even actually on the surface of Mars
for manufacturing propellant.
So I think this working, whether it is on nuclear electric
propulsion, nuclear thermal propulsion, surface power programs,
there are a ton of applications that NASA should be working on
in that regard. And when NASA does work on the near impossible,
what no one else is doing, it attracts the kind of talent that
wants to participate in those programs and achieve these kinds
of, I guess, world-changing breakthroughs.
Senator Moreno. I appreciate that, and I look forward to
having you and hosting you in Cleveland at NASA Glenn. A very
easy trip from home. So I will not keep him long. He will be
home for dinner if he comes and visits, as opposed to Texas,
really far away. It is a very out-of-your-way trip to go down
there. But Cleveland, right around the corner.
Mr. Haines, the U.S. depends on specialized aerospace
supply chains. What is your plan to strengthen domestic
component manufacturing and reduce reliance on Chinese
suppliers?
Mr. Haines. Thank you for that question, Senator, and thank
you again for meeting with me yesterday. I appreciated the time
and hearing what your priorities are.
I would say three things. One is the role of Industry
Analysis is to support a wide variety of trade policies. We are
currently conducting a number of different investigations. We
are supporting a number of different investigations, like
Section 232s, 301s at USTR. And as a part of that we are
understanding what these supply chains are, where they head,
and how to create the incentives to bring those back here to
the United States. We are meeting with industry regularly. Our
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Manufacturing was just at the
Dubai Air Show, met with Boeing, met with a number of different
aviation companies, understanding what their needs are and
coming up with creative solutions to bring that back here to
America.
Senator Moreno. And last question, you do, obviously, a lot
of data. I mean, your jobs is to really make certain that
people understand what the set of circumstances are. Others
opine and make decisions, et cetera. Would it be possible
without President Trump's policies for us to have gone from 51
percent of the cars sold in America being made in America at
the beginning of this calendar year, to where we are right now,
which is at 57 percent and climbing of the cars sold in America
being made in America? Without President Trump's policies,
would that 6-point swing in less than a year have been
possible?
Mr. Haines. No, Senator.
Senator Moreno. Thank you. No questions. Thank you, Mr.
Chairman.
Chairman Cruz. Thank you, and now I recognize Senator Kim.
STATEMENT OF HON. ANDY KIM,
U.S. SENATOR FROM NEW JERSEY
Senator Kim. Thank you, Chairman. Mr. Isaacman, good to see
you again. Last time around we had a lot of opportunities to be
able to talk between the two of us. We both stressed how
important NASA is and space exploration is to our country, to
our science. And while we did not see eye-to-eye on everything,
I was willing to support you.
Now you come before us again, and one thing that has come
up that is on my mind right now is having seen a document named
``Project Athena''. So I guess I just want to ask you, what is
Project Athena, and do you stand by what is in that document?
Mr. Isaacman. Thanks for the question, Senator. At the time
of my previous nomination, moving into a new environment such
as government service, and that responsibility is great as the
leadership of NASA, I had caught a draft document that I
continued to update, based on my interactions with, well, the
briefing leadership at NASA's agency, my interactions with
various Senators and their staff, basically ideas, thoughts on
the direction the agency research requests. It was always
something that was meant to be, you know, refined with actual
data should I have been confirmed in it. But I do stand behind
everything in the document. Even though it was written 7 month
ago, I think it was all directionally correct, consistent with
prior testimony and my interactions with various Senators.
Senator Kim. So you were the author of the document?
Mr. Isaacman. I am, Senator.
Senator Kim. Are you the sole author of the document?
Mr. Isaacman. I am, Senator.
Senator Kim. So I guess the challenge that I have is when
you came before this Committee a couple of months, actually in
response to the Chairman, you said to him, quote, ``Senator, I
have no intention as of now to say that I would cancel any
program. I need to, if I am confirmed to be getting a job,
understand where things are at.'' And what we had talked about
is that if you were confirmed that you would go in, you would
allow yourself to be in the job before you make these
decisions, you would engage with the NASA employees and others.
So when I see in ``Project Athena'' comments like calling
for a reevaluation of sustained lunar presence, I mean, you
said to the Chairman today that you are committed to Artemis,
committed to an enduring presence on the lunar surface. But
then you just tell me right now that you stand behind the
document and stand behind, I assume, this statement about
reevaluating a sustained lunar presence?
So I am just having trouble understanding what to believe.
So do you stand by that comment, that line in Project Athena,
about reevaluating a sustained lunar presence?
Mr. Isaacman. Well, Senator, I mean, it was 62 pages worth
of material, so I imagine any one sentence or so can be taken
out of context. But in my prior testimony before this Committee
I said it was imperative for us to realize our near-term lunar
objectives. I think at the time I said, and determine the
scientific, economic, and national security value of being on
the lunar surface. I think today I come before you because
there is overwhelming clarity within the Administration of not
only to return to the Moon before our rival but also establish
the infrastructure for an enduring presence. So that naturally,
you know, 6, 7 months is an awful lot of time.
But, you know, I would say, Senator, there are probably 10
pages within that plan that call for research requests, to make
sure that you gather the accurate information to inform a
definitive plan. But I certainly do stand behind the idea that
if anyone is going into a position of great responsibility it
is better to go in with a plan than none at all, sir.
Senator Kim. But isn't it better also to have humility in
the job and to be able to go and engage the experts and
scientists who have been doing this work? I mean, I do not mind
people having a vision and having priorities, but you had told
this Committee that you would hold off on making up your mind.
But the document very much came--and I was not trying to take
anything out of context. I am giving you the opportunity to
explain it.
For instance, you responded to a colleague of mine about
the importance of climate science and the role that science is
playing, NASA is playing in that way. But in the Project Athena
you said, quote, well, you say, quote, ``NASA should be taken
out of taxpayer-funded climate science business and leave it
for academia to determine.'' That stands in contrast, I feel
like, with things that we have heard you say before.
So I guess I wanted to ask you, do you stand by that
statement of taking NASA out of the climate science business?
Mr. Isaacman. Well, and Senator, first of all, I completely
agree with you, by the way. I think humility is an important
quality of leadership. And that is why, again, I would say if
it is not 10 pages it could be 20 pages of the 62 that
specifically call for research requests from across the
associate administrators, the various subject matter experts,
to inform a definitive plan. That is throughout the entire
document. There are very----
Senator Kim. Did not seek a request. It was determinative
in saying that it should take out. And also in terms of laying
out cutting of thousands of civil servant positions. So look, I
am out of time. We will follow up. But as I said, I am trying
to be someone who can work together. I think this needs to be
bipartisan going forward. But some of what I saw in that
document was in contrast to things that I heard you say before,
at least that you had assured me about. It is OK to say that
you changed your mind or that you do not agree with everything
that you said in that document. I had expected you to say that.
But instead when you come here before us today and say that you
stand behind what is in that document, that causes us to have
further follow up here to understand what your positions are.
Mr. Isaacman. And Senator, I would welcome any opportunity
to get together, and I would happily talk through anything in
that plan or that document and give you the rationale behind
it, and I would welcome your feedback. To do this job is going
to absolutely take the collaboration and cooperation with this
Committee and Congress.
Senator Kim. Thank you for that. And with that I yield
back.
STATEMENT OF HON. ERIC SCHMITT,
U.S. SENATOR FROM MISSOURI
Senator Schmitt [presiding]. Thank you. Mr. Isaacman, I
wanted to ask you. So, let's just pretend you are in Missouri,
among a group of students, constituents, just a good cross-
section of my state. If you were to answer the question, why is
it important that the United States of America gets to the Moon
first or gets to Mars first ahead of the Chinese, what would be
your answer?
Mr. Isaacman. Well, Senator, I think there are a couple
reasons, one of which is fulfilling a promise that has been
made by every President since 1989, and over $100 billion that
has been funded by taxpayers on our grand return to the Moon. I
think it is imperative that we do so, and failing to do so
calls into question American exceptionalism beyond just our
expertise in the high ground of space.
Second, I do believe, as I mentioned in my opening remarks,
that when we return, we will have an opportunity to determine
and realize the scientific, economic, and national security
value on the lunar surface. Now, an example I used in my
previous hearing is that there is helium-3 on the Moon, not a
lot of it, but certainly more than there is here on Earth, and
that is predicted to be a more efficient source of fusion
power.
Now, I mean, our foreign policy and wars have been fought
for a century over sources of power. To get that wrong could
have implications here on Earth that could change the balance
of power.
Senator Schmitt. We have, in this country, I think, a
pretty robust ecosystem of new companies, small businesses,
disruptors that have entered the fray here as it relates to
whether it is commercial space exploration or travel or what
have you. How can NASA, in your role, help cultivate that work
with them? Because I do think that is one of the advantages we
have over China in this race. What can you do in potentially
this new role?
Mr. Isaacman. Senator, it is a great question. And a lot of
people do believe generally these are new developments, but in
reality, going back to the 1960s in the space race, NASA worked
alongside some of our great aerospace companies. I mean,
whether it was Boeing or McDonnell Douglas----
Senator Schmitt. McDonnell Douglas.
Mr. Isaacman.--and Northrop for sure, sir. So, a lot of
those names are still very relevant within the space program
today. And then there are also a lot of new names that is
referred to sometimes as new space or commercial space. I think
it is going to take the contributions of the many to do the
near impossible.
Now, where NASA can play a role, as consistent in the past,
which is sharing its expertise and talent to help these new
companies. When NASA does tend to figure out the near
impossible and it is mature enough technology to hand it off to
industry where innovation can improve upon the capability and
lower cost, that is a great outcome.
I also think NASA can do a very good job expressing the
need. What is the requirement? Because there are lots and lots
of commercial space companies now. I think Ranking Member
Cantwell mentioned, I think said over 1,000 in her state alone.
That is fantastic. We just want to make sure they are all
working on things that bubble up to our most important
objectives.
So, I think NASA can do an even better job of working with
industry to outline the problems that need to be solved and
ensure we are concentrating American ingenuity in the right
direction, sir.
Senator Schmitt. Well, I think that to put on the parochial
hat for a moment, I think St. Louis is a defense tech hub with
former McDonell Douglas and Boeing with their defense side, the
NGA West, which is completing their new facilities, a lot of
opportunities, which leads to sort of the next question on
quantum. Washington University in St. Louis is doing a lot of
really important work here. How do you see NASA's role in
furthering that mission, to be on the cutting edge?
Because I think what I was getting at with the first
question, all of this, civilizations come and go, right? And in
many ways, whoever has the most advanced technology, whether it
is warfare or on more of the commercial side, they tend to
thrive and win out, win this great competition. And NASA is
playing a very important role, and will continue to play an
important role. How do you see, on the quantum side, NASA
working with research institutions and the private sector?
Mr. Isaacman. It is an excellent, excellent question,
Senator.
Senator Schmitt. Thank you, by the way. Thank you for that.
Mr. Isaacman. I mentioned earlier about the importance of
determining the orbital economy. So for 60 years, other than a
few exceptions, the space economy has still come down to
launch, observation, and communication, which is largely funded
by the government. And if we do want a very exciting space-
faring civilization in the future with lots of space stations
and orbital lunar outposts and Mars bases, we are going to
actually have to figure out that economy. There is a lot of
prospect when it comes to quantum computing, quantum
communications.
And what I would like to do is ensure that the highest
potential science and research has an expeditious path to the
International Space Station, so we can maximize that remaining
life and then hopefully crack the code on the orbital economy
that gives all the commercial space stations a fighting chance.
So, quantum has a number of applications that can take
advantage of the unique environment of microgravity, sir.
Senator Schmitt. Well, thank you for your service, and I
wish you all the best in this new position. Good luck. Yep.
STATEMENT OF HON. GARY PETERS,
U.S. SENATOR FROM MICHIGAN
Senator Peters. Welcome, gentlemen. Welcome to the
Committee and congratulations on your nominations. Mr.
Isaacman, welcome back to the Committee. You were here before
for this position. And as we all know, President Trump withdrew
your nomination earlier, citing concerns with your, I believe,
political donations to Democratic candidates. And in a July 6th
post on Truth Social, the President also stated that it would
be absolutely inappropriate for you to head NASA given your
close relationship with SpaceX CEO, Elon Musk.
Since that time, there have been additional reports that in
the time between your nomination being pulled and now being
renominated by the President, I think you have donated roughly
$2 million to President Trump's Super PAC.
So, based off this information, I am concerned that the
decisionmaking around this position may not have been about
ensuring NASA has strong leadership to carry out its mandate.
So could you please explain what happened to make President
Trump reconsider the decision to pull your nomination and what
assurances you may have provided, if any, that your
relationship with Elon Musk and SpaceX would not create a
significant conflict of interest for you in this role?
Mr. Isaacman. Well, Senator, there is a lot there, so I
will try and hit it all. If I miss----
Senator Peters. Attack it all.
Mr. Isaacman.--If I miss anything, please ask me to
correct. So, first and foremost, I would not even begin to want
to speculate why the President nominated me, withdrew it, and
renominated me other than to say I was grateful for the
opportunity in the first place. It was an incredible
experience. When the President pulled my nomination, he gifted
me an extended summer vacation where I could take my kids on
some adventures before they lose interest in me. And then I
understand that he ran a competitive process and interviewed
several candidates. I was grateful for consideration at the
time and happy to be here now.
In terms of donations, I think it was covered over the
summer, I actually felt I had enough exposure to Washington and
got over maybe some of the initial intimidation factors, so
much so that I thought perhaps I would have a political career,
maybe be able to contribute for all the right reasons. So it
should not be surprising that I supported the Republican Party.
I mean, at the same time period, I probably made 30 times that
amount in donations to charitable causes.
And then with respect to Elon Musk, that question comes up.
In fact, every story I see that writes about my nomination
refers to the Musk ally or the Musk friend. It is funny that in
a world where everybody has a phone with a camera on it, there
are no pictures of us at dinner, at a bar, on an airplane, or
on a yacht, because they do not exist. My relationship with Mr.
Musk is the fact that I led two missions to space at SpaceX
because it is the only organization that can send astronauts to
and from space since the shuttle was retired. And in that
respect, my relationship is no different than that of NASA.
Senator Peters. Very good. Mr. Haines, congratulations on
your nomination to such a critical role, as well. If confirmed
as the Assistant Secretary, you will oversee the Office of
Industry and Analysis, which is housed under the International
Trade Administration. As part of the office's responsibilities,
I&A produces trade data that is responsible for informing trade
policies and decisions across the Federal Government. I think
it is safe to say, and I hope you agree, that without accurate
data, the Federal Government and this Administration risk
making shortsighted and ill-informed decisions that could
impact domestic industries and workforces, as well as alienate
some of our closest international allies.
As you may be aware, earlier this year, the President fired
the Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, which is
responsible for compiling critical economic data like
employment numbers, as well as the inflation rate. Not only was
this firing clearly political in nature, because the President
did not like what the data said, it also calls into question
the accuracy of data produced going forward from the BLS.
So my fear is that this firing and other offices throughout
the Federal Government, including I&A, which you will oversee,
will face political pressures from the President to produce
certain figures, certain metrics that align with his policy
goals, rather than actually publishing what the country needs,
which is unbiased data and statistics.
So my question for you, do you believe that there is any
political influence in the data currently being produced by the
Office of Industry and Analysis? And how do you plan, if
confirmed, in ensuring that I&A continues to produce the
unbiased data, which is absolutely essential to policymaking?
Mr. Haines. Thank you for that question, Senator Peters.
The short answer is no, there is no political bias in the data
that we produce. And if confirmed, it will be one of my highest
priorities to ensure that the data we receive both from
industry partners, American companies, and from unbiased data
sources, both private proprietary will remain of the highest
integrity.
Chairman Cruz [presiding]. Thank you. Senator Sheehy.
Senator Sheehy. Thank you, Chairman. Mr. Haines, we have
heard a lot about the politicization of job numbers and
economic statistics over the past year since President Trump's
taken office, but isn't it accurate that Gina Raimondo had an
800,000-job revision when she was Secretary of Commerce under
the Biden administration?
Mr. Haines. That is possible, Senator. I am not sure the
exact statistics, but----
Senator Sheehy. Yes. No, that is what happened. That is the
facts. So we are routinely told that this Administration of the
Republican Party has politicized numbers, we have warped data,
and we have lied to the American people. And the truth is, we
saw manufacturing flee this country, 97 percent of rare earths
and critical minerals are processed in China. That data did not
seem to move the needle at all despite us watching for decades
as manufacturing-critical industries fled this country under
overburdensome regulation and incentivization that sent those
industries to other countries.
And every administration, whether they had politicized
data, non-politicized data, they chose to either ignore the
data or lie about the data and sent those industries overseas.
And now we are paying for that every single day.
And Jared's job is going to be exponentially harder because
so much of the critical materials he is going to need to send
our astronauts back to the Moon and maintain space dominance
does not come from America. And some of our most sensitive
technology is built with components that are made in China, the
very country that is working every single day to undermine our
supremacy.
So I would like to hear your plan on making sure that not
just that we have the data, but you are ensuring that data is
shared in a timely manner so that we can make sure we are
making policy decisions in this body, as well as in the
Executive Branch, to ensure that we are bringing those
industries back and ensuring we have dominance for the next
century?
Mr. Haines. Thank for that question, Senator Sheehy. First,
you do have my commitment that we will be able to share that
data with this Committee and work collaboratively to solve
these critical issues.
In the Executive Branch, I can give one specific example.
I&A plays a critical role in the investment committee that is
currently tasked with solving our critical mineral supply chain
issues. We are mapping mine-to-markets for all 54 critical
minerals. We have identified over 700 projects, and have
already deployed or committed letters of intent and term sheets
for about $16 billion worth of projects, covering about half of
the 54 critical minerals. That is just one aspect of the work
that I&A is doing in terms of providing that data and making
sure that principals and decisionmakers in the White House,
obviously Secretary Lutnick, have the information they need to
make the decisions to solve these problems. And we will
continue to do that, if confirmed.
Senator Sheehy. Is there a statute that structurally ties
you to the Department of War so that the economic data that you
are gathering and synthesizing is actually communicated in a
timely manner to the people that need to know at DoW?
Mr. Haines. I am not aware of a specific statute. We do
have good connectivity with the Pentagon, Office of Strategic
Capital, and other areas within acquisition sustainment, partly
due because we have just some cross-pollination of personnel
and just good relationships with the folks over there, but it
could be strengthened. And if there are ideas from this
Committee of how to strengthen that, I will be willing to share
them and would be willing to work with you to do that.
Senator Sheehy. Yes. I would encourage you to do that
because obviously what we have seen, again, especially in the
last 35 years, is we have seen a pretty sclerotic bureaucracy
overtake our defense acquisition system, which has placed
process over outcomes. There needs to be a forcing function
that ensures that DoW is not making procurement decisions and
national economic strategy decisions related to our defense
industrial base that are delinked from the economic reality of
what happens here.
And unfortunately, there is not a real feedback loop there,
and the results have been apparent. China build ships 230 times
faster than we do. They have the ability to put more planes in
the air at times than we have missiles to shoot them down. They
have more materiel on the battlefield, the ability to project
that power. And when we talk about the space economy, every
American interacts every single day with space a thousand times
a day. They do not even realize it, you know, GPS. Without
thinking about, we press go on the Apple Maps and do not
realize that if we do not have an orbital infrastructure that
provides that GPS data, life shuts down. I mean, Uber does not
show up at the street corner with you anymore. Your DoorDash
does not arrive.
Our entire life evolves around an orbital economy that will
be critical in Jared's new role, but probably even more
critical given your role to ensure we understand that those
rare earths, the quantum computing that Senator Schmitt talked
about, that all is going to derive from the data you provide
DoW to make sure that our economic supremacy goes hand-in-hand
with our military supremacy.
So I would encourage you to try to make that link a little
more structural and strengthen that because it is going to be
absolutely critical in the next 10 years. Thank you.
Mr. Haines. Thank you, Senator.
Chairman Cruz. Thank you. Senator Markey.
STATEMENT OF HON. EDWARD MARKEY,
U.S. SENATOR FROM MASSACHUSETTS
Senator Markey. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Good to see you
again, Mr. Isaacman. You may recounter that during your last
nomination hearing, you refused to confirm whether Elon Musk,
with whom you have deep personal and financial ties, was
present at the meeting that then President-Elect Trump offered
you the job of NASA Administrator. So I wanted to give you one
more chance to set the record straight. Was Elon Musk in the
meeting at Mar-a-Lago when President Trump offered you the job?
Mr. Isaacman. Senator, it is great to have a conversation
again. I thought we really ran this one to the ground last
time. But what I will tell you, Senator, and I wish I had the
opportunity to explain it further before, is my first interview
with the President--I think I have had several opportunities
since to reengage--was in a ballroom type setting, Senator.
There were dozens of people moving in and out that I would not
say were in the meeting.
Senator Markey. It is a very simple question. Was President
Trump in the room when--was Elon Musk in the room when
President Trump offered you the job?
Mr. Isaacman. Senator, my interview, my conversations with
the President, and there were dozens of people moving in and
out of the room, and I do not think it is fair to bring any of
them into this matter.
Senator Markey. So once again, you are refusing to tell us
whether Elon Musk was in the room that day. And that actually
makes me think that Elon Musk was in the room that day, but
that you understand that it is a clear conflict of interest
that he was there. You are asking us to confirm you as the next
NASA Administrator, and SpaceX gets $15 billion from American
taxpayers for its business with NASA. You also have multiple
financial relationships with Elon Musk, including investments
in SpaceX, a contract between his company, Starlink, and your
payments company. And even more, you bought space flights from
SpaceX. Mr. Isaacman, what was the value of these contracts for
space flights with SpaceX?
Mr. Isaacman. Well, I mean, Senator, just to clarify on
these points, I have no direct or indirect equity exposure to
any aerospace company, including SpaceX. I have disclosed all
of my financial ties to the ethics officials at NASA as well as
the Office of Government Ethics. They have generated an ethics
letter. I fully intend to adhere to it.
I more than acknowledged that I went to space twice with
SpaceX, but I point out they are the only company capable of
sending astronauts to and from space since the shuttle was
retired. My relationship with them is no different than NASA's.
In fact, if there was more than one company, I suspect I would
have paid less.
Senator Markey. So what was the value of the contracts for
space flights with SpaceX?
Mr. Isaacman. I mean, Senator, I do not think it is lost on
anyone that going to and from space is rather expensive. We
never disclosed the----
Senator Markey. Well, your financial paperwork suggests
that was over $50 million. So was it $100 million? Was it $200
million?
Mr. Isaacman. Senator, I mean, we have never disclosed it
other than the fact that we were able to raise substantially
more than the cost of the mission for charitable causes like
St. Jude.
Senator Markey. So you won't tell us how much you paid the
man who publicly campaigned for your nomination. Will you
request that SpaceX release you----
Mr. Isaacman. They did not give me a discount, Senator.
Senator Markey. I appreciate that, but you were paying him.
Will you request that SpaceX release you from the NDA so that
you can provide the Committee with this information?
Mr. Isaacman. Senator, I will commit to always work with
the appropriate ethics professionals to make sure I am
continuously in compliance with my ethics agreement.
Senator Markey. Will you ask them to release you from the
NDA so that you can provide that information to the Committee?
Mr. Isaacman. I have no issue asking them to release me
from non-disclosure, Senator.
Senator Markey. OK. That would be helpful. Mr. Isaacman,
can you tell us, since President Trump initially withdrew your
nomination, have you had any communication with Mr. Musk about
the job of NASA Administrator?
Mr. Isaacman. I have not, Senator.
Senator Markey. You have not. So the American people
actually deserve to know how much money you have spent
personally on SpaceX and whether the head of SpaceX and
Starlink, Elon Musk, was personally involved in your
nomination, because we are looking at conflicts of interest so
big that they have their own center of gravity, and we just
have to make sure that it is all out there and it is fully
understood by the American people.
And since your last nomination, we have received the
President's 2026 budget request, which proposes a nearly 50
percent cut to NASA's science funding. Do you support President
Trump's proposal to cut NASA's science funding in half?
Mr. Isaacman. Senator, I certainly support the President's
goal of reducing the deficit and shrinking our national debt.
Now, an awful lot has happened from the initial Presidential
budget request, to the Continuing Resolution that we have been
operating in, to the One Big Beautiful bill that has plussed up
additional funding for NASA. So if I am confirmed, I would love
to get my arms around where we are presently at.
Senator Markey. Well, a 50 percent cut to the NASA science
budget is dramatic. And considering reports about your, quote,
``Project Athena'' plan for NASA, which literally banks on the
decimation of our scientific abilities, among other things this
document calls for NASA to stop collecting its own data and
instead set up a taxpayer-funded subscription service from
private companies for their products, companies that will set
their own price for data that NASA needs to function on an
ongoing basis.
Would Starlink or SpaceX be companies that NASA would
potentially have to turn to to obtain data?
Mr. Isaacman. Well, Senator, first of all, I think pretty
much everything you just said there was not correct. What that
draft document contemplated was working with commercial
companies for certain types of earth observation data, not
SpaceX or Starlink. I think I specifically called out Planet
and BlackSky as examples of companies that might be able to
deliver Earth observation and climate science data at lower
costs, specifically to free up resources for other planetary
science missions that commercial companies are not capable of
doing.
Senator Markey. Well, I would say this. The proposal--and
this is the truth--the proposal would strip NASA of parts and
instead transfer taxpayer funds directly to the bank accounts
of Starlink and SpaceX, companies owned by the very same man
who may or may not have been in the room when Trump offered you
the job. And we are just going to have to keep a very close eye
on what will unfold at NASA if you are confirmed.
OK. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Chairman Cruz. Thank you. Senator Budd.
STATEMENT OF HON. TED BUDD,
U.S. SENATOR FROM NORTH CAROLINA
Senator Budd. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Thank you all for
being here. Mr. Isaacman, great to see you again. Let's talk
about NASA's Quesst program of quiet supersonic. It is designed
to derisk the science, validate the quiet supersonic
technologies, and then let American industries like Boom, for
instance, which has a presence in North Carolina, let them take
the lead in building the commercial market.
So as Administrator, how will you ensure that NASA stays
focused on enabling that new industry and avoids creating
unintentional regulatory or technical barriers for the next
generation supersonic flight?
Mr. Isaacman. Well, Senator, this is certainly a subject
that I am pretty passionate about. I do think it is NASA's job,
I believe it is funded by taxpayers, to explore the near
impossible in air and space. And when they arrive at a major
development and that capability is mature enough, to hand it
off to industry where competition can drive innovation and
bring down costs.
X-59 is an interesting example. There is some overlap with
what Boom's doing. I think actually Boom is an extraordinary
company. I would love to see a lot more American companies
trying to break the status quo and take on big, bold projects
like that.
I think NASA just needs a lot more X-planes, honestly. That
was a really exciting one that we all had an opportunity to
watch rather recently alongside the recent performance from
Boom. But I would love to see us have multiple programs that
are exploring radical designs in airframe and propulsion. And
when they do have those breakthroughs, not dissimilar to the
1970s, 1980s when NASA was experimenting with fly by-wire and
thrust vectoring capabilities that have made their way in
commercial aircraft as well as military aircraft like the F-22.
Senator Budd. Do you think there is a problem with Quesst
eventually competing against Boom? Do you think that is a
potential problem?
Mr. Isaacman. No. I would certainly hope----
Senator Budd. I would say the whole industry, not just Boom
in particular.
Mr. Isaacman. I would certainly hope not, Senator. I
actually do not think NASA is at its best when it is doing what
industry is doing, because at that point, talent would
naturally probably gravitate to industry where they get the
advantage of, who knows, appreciating stock options and such. I
think NASA should constantly be recalibrating to work on that
near impossible, what no one else is doing, which is going to
attract that kind of exciting technology, that is going to
attract that kind of talent to work on that exciting
technology. When they figure it out, they hand it off to
industry, and they recalibrate to the next big, bold endeavor.
I think that serves the talent workforce and the mission of
NASA very well.
Senator Budd. Thank you. In your testimony earlier, you
were clear that United States is in the middle of a second
space race. The great rival that you mentioned spent more than
a decade establishing a space Silk Road, offering collaboration
on satellite space launch, space infrastructure development to
more countries across the Middle East and North Africa.
So how does this sort of space diplomacy from an adversary
affect our prospects for continuing dominance in space? And
what is your vision for space diplomacy of ours?
Mr. Isaacman. Well, Senator, I think there are a couple
parts to that. So first, NASA has always been referred to as a
soft power. There are lots of diplomatic implications to their
mission. A lot of our greatest endeavors are worked on with our
allies across Europe, the Middle East, Canada, for example.
I think what is concerning now is that some of these
countries have more than one choice. So for the longest time
period, America owned the ultimate high ground of space, and
that attracted the interest of many nations to want to
collaborate and partner with us. The Chinese do have their own
space station now. They went from a single taikonaut in orbit
approximately 20 years ago to having a space station where they
are launching at an extraordinary cadence.
So I think this is why there needs to be urgency to take a
close look at NASA, what is going right, and do a lot more of
that, and the things that are going wrong, to clear those
obstacles and paths so we can get back to doing world-changing
missions again.
Senator Budd. Yes. Sounds great. Thanks again for your
time. Chairman.
Chairman Cruz. Thank you. Senator Lujan.
STATEMENT OF HON. BEN RAY LUJAN,
U.S. SENATOR FROM NEW MEXICO
Senator Lujan. Mr. Chairman, thank you so very much for
that and for calling this hearing. Mr. Isaacman, welcome back
to the Commerce Committee. I guess I will just start out by
simply asking, Mr. Isaacman, do you believe in science?
Mr. Isaacman. Of course, Senator.
Senator Lujan. Do you support science?
Mr. Isaacman. I do, Senator.
Senator Lujan. You have conducted a lot of science
experiments throughout not just your youth, but through your
career. Correct, sir?
Mr. Isaacman. Yes, sir.
Senator Lujan. I appreciate that. Now, a few of my
colleagues have raised the concern about the nearly 50 percent
cut to NASA's Science Mission Directorate, a directorate that
is explicitly foundational to NASA's 1958 congressional
charter. I think by the very nature of the number of questions
that you are receiving today from colleagues about NASA, it
shows the broad support for the science mission at NASA, as
well. Congress has already made clear that we rejected these
cuts and will continue to fund the scientific missions that
uphold NASA's statutory purpose.
My question, yes or no, is do you agree that NASA has a
statutory obligation under its founding charter to conduct and
support Earth and space science for the benefit of the nation?
Mr. Isaacman. Yes, sir.
Senator Lujan. I appreciate that. This is going great, Mr.
Isaacman. Many of NASA's science programs are not commodities.
You cannot run a value-added calculation on dual-use
information that supports both science discovery and national
security. Now, for example, these missions provide
indispensable space weather data. We were chatting about that
before. I appreciate my colleague reminding us all across
America when we pull out our devices or we are depending on the
simple services that we interact with every day, that we are
touching some of this, and we depend on it.
Like your friend, Mr. Musk, I would say some of the
commercial actors, they depend on after solar activity has
repeatedly disrupted their constellations, as well. Now, NASA,
Earth Science assets also ensure GPS integrity, track
environmental changes, everything you just described. U.S.
military readiness, critically important. National security,
the importance of the Science Directorate.
So let me ask you directly, yes or no, will you execute the
funds appropriated by Congress for NASA's critical science
missions exactly as Congress has directed?
Mr. Isaacman. Yes, sir. We will maximize the scientific
value of every dollar that Congress affords the agency.
Senator Lujan. I appreciate that very much. My last
question is, while I did not support the reconciliation bill
that passed over the summer, there are pieces of it,
particularly in NASA's section, that hold promise, and I
appreciate the inclusion of them. For example, the NASA section
funds a Mars telecommunications orbiter, specifically one that
was proposed independently when NASA solicited its commercial
industry for Mars sample return mission architecture from
space. I see you nodding. You are very familiar with this, I
imagine.
Mr. Isaacman. Reasonably familiar, Senator.
Senator Lujan. The orbiter would not only support future
exploration missions, but most importantly it would help
support the critical comms relay needed for existing and future
science missions like the Mars sample return.
Now, New Mexico is home to companies like Rocket Lab who
produced the world's highest efficiency space-grade solar and
powered critical NASA missions and would power the MTO, for
example.
So yes or no, do you commit to following through on the
letter of the law and ensuring a rapid acquisition strategy for
the MTO to be able to deliver it by the law's 2028 due date?
Mr. Isaacman. Senator, my commitment to you and all the
other members is always to follow the law. As a space
enthusiast, I am super excited about any activities that open
up further science and discovery on Mars.
Senator Lujan. I appreciate that very much. Thank you, Mr.
Chairman.
Chairman Cruz. Thank you. Senator Klobuchar.
STATEMENT OF HON. AMY KLOBUCHAR,
U.S. SENATOR FROM MINNESOTA
Senator Klobuchar. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. And I
am going to start out with a kind of interesting question about
agriculture data, Mr. Isaacman. I do not think many people
understand that NASA satellite data is hugely valuable for
farmers. Programs like NASA Acres and NASA Harvest use
satellite imaging to forecast production and monitor crop
yields. I am the Ranking Member on the Ag Committee, and I have
introduced legislation called the ``Agriculture Innovation
Act'' to strengthen that data collection.
Could you talk about your plans to preserve and expand
those types of monitoring programs, weather patterns, and the
like, and how you can better work with the Department of
Agriculture?
Mr. Isaacman. Sure, Senator. I appreciate the question. As
I mentioned with Senator Moran before, at the present time we
at least inhabit only a single planet, and it is probably
important for us to continue to study it to the greatest extent
possible. NASA has had a long-running program with Intelsat. I
fully support that we should be gathering data that especially
contribute to hardships here on Earth. I mean, obviously there
are great agriculture opportunities, but these can be impacted
by droughts and wildfires and flooding. And grateful that NASA
has the capability to gather some of this data in real time. I
do not see that going away ever.
Senator Klobuchar. Thank you. Other end of our state, Mayo
Clinic, which I am sure you are aware of, they have been
involved in space medicine since 1960, when research related to
the force of gravity during acceleration influenced the
position of seats for the Mercury space flight program. And
most recently, they have identified some important research
project in the field of aging, regenerative medicine, that can
be conducted in space.
How will you continue to support NASA and institutions like
Mayo's efforts to advance science that helps here on Earth?
Mr. Isaacman. Senator, I could not agree with this area of
study more. We are actually quickly reaching a point where it
is no longer a technological limitation for deep space type
missions, but human physiology and psychology. So in that
respect, I obviously fully support all the studies that can be
done so that when the day comes that we actually send NASA
astronauts to Mars, that they can come home healthy enough to
tell us about it. This is probably the single greatest
accomplishment we have had on the International Space Station
over the last quarter of a century, is keeping humans alive in
an environment that is quite challenging.
Senator Klobuchar. Mm-hmm. And then just on the research
side, a lot of academic institutions like the University of
Minnesota rely on publicly funded data from NASA's missions.
And as NASA continues to partner with private firms, the
commercial data is not as easily accessible to researchers. And
I think it is a balance. Obviously the partnering with private
has brought with its some success, but then you want to have
the public institutions be able to access that data for the
public portion of this, which has helped us. I am not going to
go through all the inventions and things that have come out of
this type of space mission.
So what steps will you take to ensure that data from NASA
missions continues to remain available for researchers across
the country?
Mr. Isaacman. Senator, I actually, I fully support it, and
I think this actually goes to some of the questions from
Senator Markey before. I absolutely think that NASA should be
making available all of its data, especially its earth
observation data, freely to academia so they can draw their own
conclusions from it. I do not think it is the most helpful
every 4 or 8 years when administrations change that certain
scientific positions become overly political. I think that we
should be making that data available to academic institutions
and let their scientists and research draw their own
conclusions.
Senator Klobuchar. Thank you very much. Mr. Haines,
congratulations on your nomination. We have a lot of
manufacturers in my state, a lot of them high-end robotics
manufacturers. We do a huge amount of trade, not just in the Ag
area where we are fourth in the country for Ag exports, but
throughout our industries.
Could you talk about data that the Department of Industry
and Analysis can provide Congress and the public transparency
data with the price impacts of things? We are obviously
concerned about tariffs.
Mr. Haines. Thank you, Senator. I would say a few things.
We usually provide data as it compares to bilateral trade flows
and sectoral competitiveness, not provide broad economic data
in terms of labor statistics or GDP growth or anything like
that. Any data that we do have on specific sectors, especially
as they are in your state, I am happy to discuss those with you
and your staff. And by the way, thank you to your staff for
meeting with me yesterday and understanding a little bit more
about your priorities on the Committee. So absolutely, if
confirmed, a commitment to you to provide the data that we do
have.
Senator Klobuchar. Very good. And I think my time is
running out. I will put this in writing. But I do a lot with
Brand USA. And Senator Sullivan and I just introduced major
reauthorization of this. And Senator Rosen over here cares a
little bit about this, representing Las Vegas. And so just
anything you can do to strengthen programs like Brand USA, that
do not use taxpayer dollars, to ensure we continue to remain
competitive with U.S. tourism, and especially with World Cup,
the 2028 Olympics, and other major, major events that are
coming up.
Mr. Haines. Yes, ma'am, Senator, you absolutely have my
commitment to do that. I have met with Fred Dixon and Brand USA
multiple times. The Secretary has met with them multiple times.
And we look forward to working with them in a collaborative
effort to make sure that travel and tourism remains
competitive.
Senator Klobuchar. OK. Thank you.
Chairman Cruz. Thank you. Senator Young.
STATEMENT OF HON. TODD YOUNG,
U.S. SENATOR FROM INDIANA
Senator Young. Well, thank you, Chair. I thank our nominees
so much for your interest in serving. Mr. Isaacman, enjoyed our
breakfast some days ago, and I expect to support your
nomination and very much appreciate your presence here.
Mr. Haines, congratulations. The global economy is
increasingly driven by cross-border data flows, digital
services, and online platforms. And U.S. firms are facing more
foreign barriers such as data localization rules and
discriminatory digital taxes.
Within ITA, Industry and Analysis is already involved in
tracking these digital barriers and advising on market access
for U.S. providers. If confirmed, Mr. Haines, how do you see
I&A's role in digital trade evolving, and what would be your
top priorities for ITA's work on open digital markets and
cross-border data flows?
Mr. Haines. Thank you for that question, Senator Young, and
I appreciate also speaking to your staff yesterday.
Senator Young. Yes, sir.
Mr. Haines. It was good to hear your priorities.
I would say two things. Within the Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Services, which is under the Assistant Secretary
for Industry and Analysis, we run two specific programs that
focus on data privacy. One is the cross-border privacy rules,
or CBPR. It is a voluntary certification where U.S. companies
can opt into essentially adhere to robust data protections. And
we then request that various countries recognize those rules
and adhere to those standards.
As we have been going through the agreements on reciprocal
tariffs or any of the bilateral trade agreements, we have been
making sure that CBPR is front and center in terms of the
standard that we want to hold our bilateral trading partners to
in the digital space.
The second program and its sister programs would be the
U.S.-EU data privacy framework. We have also started a program
with the U.K. and the Swiss. I think it provides a very firm
foundation in terms of allowing free flow of personal data from
Europe to the United States. I think those are two good
foundations that we could expand upon, especially as we are
getting into the U.S.-EU trade agreements, as Secretary Lutnick
is heavily involved in, and we will be supporting him and his
efforts, knowing that that is going to be a cornerstone of the
agreement.
Senator Young. Thank you, Mr. Haines. Mr. Haines, on
another matter, China's predatory practices in sectors like
steel, critical minerals, and advanced manufacturing have
continuously put sustained pressure on U.S. companies. Inside
ITA, Industry and Analysis brings together industry engagement
and trade policy analysis, so it sees both what companies are
experiencing and how the rules of the system are working in
practice.
If confirmed, Mr. Haines, what are a few concrete things
you would build or change inside I&A to sharpen ITA's China
work? For example, specific analytic products, priority
sectors, or support for trade agreement enforcement.
Mr. Haines. Thank you, Senator. The most current concrete
example I can provide you again is our current work on mapping
critical mineral supply chains. I mean, this is the main trade
issue in the U.S.-China trading relationship, and one that the
President and Secretary Lutnick are laser focused on solving.
Currently, we are providing mapping information for all 54
minerals. We are really focusing on the processing and refining
side of the equation, given that, in that sense, China
dominates the supply chains there. And we are going to continue
to work with the White House-led Investment Committee to ensure
that we not only understand those supply chains but are able to
secure them and thus secure a number of different sectors that
are downstream that require these critical components. So if
confirmed, that would be one of my main focuses is to continue
that work and help to secure those supply chains.
Senator Young. Well, since your point of emphasis is on
critical minerals, maybe you could speak to this. I have
advocated for a number of years running that our country
developed a national economic security strategy. This would be
an analog to our national defense strategy. A subset of an
economic security strategy would be a strategy for critical
mineral resilience and sourcing on an ongoing basis.
Might I&A play a role in development of a written strategy
subject to scrutiny, but ultimately some measure of consensus
around what the policy is so that we could develop a policy
that would endure beyond this Administration, just as we do
through a national defense strategy?
Mr. Haines. Yes, sir, Senator. I would imagine that any
strategy like that would probably be White House-led, like a
national security strategy, national defense strategy. And if
something like that were to come into existence, I would
imagine that we would absolutely be asked to provide support in
developing that. And if it does come to fruition and I am
confirmed, I would be delighted to do so.
Senator Young. Well, great. Well, I hope we will have an
opportunity to work together on that broader matter, which I
agree would have to come from the White House. I know they are
listening, so I thought I would bring it up. But I expect that
I will be supporting your nomination, and thank you for
answering my questions. Chairman.
Senator Sheehy [presiding]. Senator Rosen.
STATEMENT OF HON. JACKY ROSEN,
U.S. SENATOR FROM NEVADA
Senator Rosen. Well, thank you, Mr. Chairman, and thank you
to the witnesses here for taking us to space and a little bit
more, I will say, Nevada specific because we have a proud
graduate of University of Nevada Reno here who knows lots about
critical minerals in our state and tourism in our state. And I
fully support working on a national strategy because Nevada, of
course, has some of the largest critical mineral deposits in
the country. And so we are very mineral rich, as you know, and
thank you for being here.
But I am going to focus a little bit on tourism. I am going
to bring us down to Earth and ask about my travel and tourism
work and some of the bills that we have had. Because in 2023, I
had a bipartisan bill, the Omnibus Travel and Tourism Act was
signed into law. And that bill created a position of Assistant
Secretary of Travel and Tourism at the Department of Commerce.
The new position is a first tourism-dedicated Assistant
Secretary in the United States, and among other matters, is
responsible for setting annual visitation goals, creating
whole-of-government strategies to ensure that visitation goals
are met, establishing interagency coordination to support U.S.
tourism, which I would argue is in the top economic driver of
every state in our great nation. This new office will also play
an essential role to reducing barriers to travel and leveraging
new technologies to make travel safer and more efficient.
However, despite the critical importance of this role,
especially as the tourism industry continues to face
significant challenges amid global uncertainty, the position
remains vacant. Moreover, there is currently no Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Travel and Tourism in place either. As
a result, the National Travel and Tourism Office is led today
by an Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary, further underscoring
the leadership gap in this space.
And so it all means that tourism remains a suboffice,
although critical to our national economy, remains a suboffice
overseen by the Assistant Secretary for Industry and Analysis
position, for which you are nominated, rather than by a new
Assistant Secretary dedicated solely to focusing on the
ecosystem. And it is an ecosystem. It is weather, it is
infrastructure, it is workforce, it is broadband. We could go
on and on, but someone who really focuses on this strategy for
our economic growth.
So Mr. Haines, fully implementing the Omnibus Travel and
Tourism Act, filling these key leadership roles are essential
to strengthening our travel and tourism sector, our business
sector. So can you speak to the importance of prioritizing
travel and tourism substantial benefits, the tourism industry
provides the economic impact tourism business travel provides
and how will you support that, if confirmed, and until such
time we can get an Assistant Secretary for Travel and Tourism?
Mr. Haines. Thank you, Senator Rosen. I knew I could expect
a good robust travel and tourism question from you in the great
state of Nevada.
Senator Rosen. Like I said, you lived in Nevada a long time
so you know how to even say Nevada. Thank you.
Mr. Haines. Yes, ma'am. So a lot to unpack there. Well,
first you will be happy to know that our Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Travel and Tourism is going to start in January,
Rob Leary. He is going to be absolutely excellent. We are
excited to have him. And he will be spearheading a lot of the
important work that you just highlighted.
Senator Rosen. Come bring him to our office to meet our
team, please.
Mr. Haines. Yes, ma'am. I would love to have the same
invitation as well, if possible.
Senator Rosen. Yes, absolutely.
Mr. Haines. I would say three things that I would be
focused on to boost travel and tourism. Number one would be to
modernize the survey for International Air Travelers Program,
which is housed within NTTO. It is currently done by hand. We
have only been able to get about 100,000 surveys of
international visitors a year, well short of the one percent
mandate by this Committee. We just put out a competitive bid a
few months ago to digitize and automate that, hopefully getting
more robust insights into travel and tourism trends and be able
to capture a larger data set, and through that, be able to come
up with better strategies at a more granular level to attract
visitors.
The second piece would be, we are rolling out a new tool
this month, hopefully. And if confirmed, I would love to come
talk to you about that. And it is going to be a 50-state travel
and tourism competitiveness matrix to where we currently
understand where the United States fits in terms of global
travel and tourism competitiveness. This would be able to say
the state of Nevada hypothetically ranks number nine in
attractiveness because they love the gaming, the food, the
entertainment, but international visitors thought the weather
was bad, the infrastructure, just you name it. And be able to
come up with concrete recommendations for every 50 states of
how to increase their competitiveness as a travel and tourism
destination. This is a program that we are very excited about,
and we would like to roll out far and wide.
Senator Rosen. I would look forward to collaborating with
you on that because we have been doing a lot of work on it over
the last 6 or 7 years, and I have some significant input that
might be helpful to you. And I welcome you coming, working with
our team to make it as robust as possible, because there are a
lot of pieces and parts that go into making places attractive.
A lot of it is infrastructure. And so there is a lot to talk
about there. So I appreciate that.
Mr. Haines. Yes, ma'am, Senator Rosen. And on the Assistant
Secretary piece, obviously, only the President can nominate
someone. I will say with the, let's say bureaucratic minutia,
the authorization is well recognized. I know that Secretary
Lutnick puts a high value on that. Still would need an
appropriation to build it out. I think it is going to be about
$3.5 million.
Senator Rosen. We have appropriated the money in prior
budgets.
Mr. Haines. Currently, our NTTO budget is about $7 million,
$6 million of that is SIAT, and at least within the $56 million
or budget within I&A. I do not want to say there is no money in
the banana stand, but I think we would be looking to a specific
appropriation from CJS to build that out.
Senator Rosen. Thank you. I see my time is up. I see
Senator Capito there. Thank you. Mr. Isaacman. I will submit my
questions on microgravity and other things and all great space
for the record. Thank you.
STATEMENT OF HON. SHELLEY MOORE CAPITO,
U.S. SENATOR FROM WEST VIRGINIA
Senator Capito. Thank you. Thank you both for being here,
and Mr. Haines, thank you for your willingness to serve. I
think most of my questions are going to go to Mr. Isaacman, so
I did not want you to take that as a slight in any form or
fashion.
I have been a strong supporter of the growing West
Virginia--we talked about this--West Virginia, Pennsylvania,
Ohio space economy for many years, and believe that this
region, perhaps best known for its energy and infrastructure
prowess, has a unique opportunity to emerge as a leader in
space energy and infrastructure.
So Mr. Isaacman, as someone who has built successful
businesses in Pennsylvania, what role do you see for states
like Pennsylvania, West Virginia, and Ohio working regionally
that can share the space and technology attributes that are not
in Texas, Alabama, Florida, California--I am glad Senator Cruz
is not here--in shaping the future of America's space
ambitions?
Mr. Isaacman. Senator, I really appreciate the question.
Certainly as a resident of Pennsylvania, I would love nothing
more than to see more of our students who graduate go in fields
that are relevant to aerospace. But I have said many times, I
mean, in order to deliver on NASA's world changing mission, it
is going to require contributions from the best and brightest
around the Nation. So all those states you mentioned before are
certainly incredibly important. They have centers that are
located in them that contribute greatly to NASA's mission, but
we are going to need an incredibly growing workforce over the
years that is going to come from across the Nation.
Senator Capito. I like the answer, the Keystone Space
Collaborative, which is what I was talking about. I think also
when you have centers of excellence around and participating in
the manufacturing or the technology or innovation, it inspires
the next generation. You can have cooperative agreements,
internships, and other things to get that next generation.
I would note yesterday I was sent a letter that was sent to
the Chairman and Ranking Member where numerous former
astronauts spoke in favor of your nomination. I think when you
and I spoke before, I spoke about one in particular that I have
great admiration for, and I saw her name on the list, Peggy
Whitson. So that is good enough for me. She is a remarkable
astronaut woman and inspiration to the generations. And she
came to West Virginia with me, and our young girls were just
awestruck by her. So congratulations on securing that letter. I
think that goes a long way.
I want to talk about IV&V that is located in the Katherine
Johnson Parkersburg--it is not in Parkersburg--in Bridgeport.
Katherine Johnson IV&V facility, as you know, this does the
independent verification and validation. There is always this
sort of looming threat that all of this is going to get
privatized. I would certainly argue for that facility being
very cost-effective, efficient, and the capabilities are
tremendous there. I would like to talk to you about this in
greater depth when your nomination is positively affirmed by
this Senate, and by looking to not outsource what they do, but
to maybe grow that presence. And so would you be willing to
work with me on this?
Mr. Isaacman. Absolutely, Senator. And also very, very
grateful that an Astronaut Hall of Famer like Peggy signed the
letter of support. It means so much, along with all the other
35 astronauts who signed it.
I am very interested in taking that visit, ma'am, because I
think in a world that we all envision someday in the future
with lots of space stations and deep space missions, the
reliance traditionally on mission control and hardware will
diminish as we need to have more onboard decisionmaking and
perhaps even the inclusion of AI onto some of our vehicles and
even satellites, which will only increase the importance in
terms of the integrity of the software. So I think it will
obviously have a continuing role to support NASA, but perhaps
many other agencies within the government as well.
Senator Capito. Good. Yes, we have been trying to expand
that.
I would just very quickly, and this is not a short answer
kind of question, but as we see the pursuit of our space
program and others around the world, the Chinese in particular,
to try to get back to the Moon, there is a lot of discussion on
power generation on the Moon. And I do not know what your
thoughts are here. I do not know if lunar surface power
programs, I know it is talked about nuclear, but also solar. I
mean, what are your ideas here and how far along are we on
this?
Mr. Isaacman. Senator, so I love this topic, so I could far
exceed our time here. So I want to offer up, I would welcome
any opportunity to discuss further, but I am very big in
nuclear and space. I mean, there are numerous applications for
it. There are propulsion applications with nuclear electric,
nuclear thermal propulsion. There are surface power
requirements. We are going to need surface power for
applications that do not have direct sun exposure. We are going
to need surface power to likely manufacture propellant for
missions to and from Mars and certainly deeper space
exploration missions where just there is less solar
effectiveness. So it is an area that I think is squarely within
NASA's mission to be working on the near impossible to do what
no one else can do and attract the talent that will want to
work on exciting many Manhattan Project-like programs.
Senator Capito. Thank you. Thank you both, and thank you
both for your willingness to serve.
STATEMENT OF HON. JOHN HICKENLOOPER,
U.S. SENATOR FROM COLORADO
Senator Hickenlooper [presiding]. Thank you, Senator
Capito. Let me start with Mr. Haines. We followed the
discussions around critical minerals. I want to make sure we
emphasize that is a bipartisan effort. I think the coordination
and continuity of programs, there is not a pendulum going back
and forth between administrations, focusing on the access to
capital, workforce training. We are woefully behind not just
China, but many of our allies in terms of how we find that
workforce. So I will not rebuild that or re-litigate that
discussion. I just only want to emphasize it is bipartisan.
This is something that should be a high priority.
I do want to talk a little bit about some of the things,
telecommunications, cyberspace, AI, quantum technologies.
Colorado has a dense ecosystem there. And I think especially
along with AI, quantum has--it is a field of intense
competition between the United States and our rivals, our
adversaries. So as our capabilities mature in quantum, in
quantum sensing, quantum communication, computing, obviously,
how can you help ensure that our quantum technologies are only
exported to trusted markets?
Mr. Haines. Thank you for that question, Senator. I would
say the Assistant Secretary for Industry and Analysis does not
play an active role in export licensing policy. That is our
colleagues at the Bureau of Industry and Security, or BIS. I
will say that we have and will continue to gauge actively with
industry to see where those markets exist and also understand
the national security implications of those technologies, where
they rack and stack in terms of competitiveness with
international competitors. And we could provide that
information to the Bureau of Industry Security as they are
making their licensing decisions, but we are not actively
involved in any export licensing policies or decisions.
Senator Hickenlooper. Great. I appreciate that. And I think
we have got a lot of work to do on there.
Mr. Isaacman, we share the same bipartisan goal that the
United States should be laser-focused on returning American
astronauts to the Moon, reaching the next frontiers in space
exploration. I think I am still the only scientist in the
Senate who has actually provided peer-reviewed papers.
Back in May, you answered some of our written questions. I
thought this was very well stated, and so I repeat it, that you
want NASA to be a force multiplier for science, which I think
is essential, launching more missions, more telescopes, more
probes, more rovers. You also said that you can be expected to
be a passionate advocate for science. All of NASA's science and
exploration missions, including both planetary and earth
sciences, prioritizing these efforts is not about choosing one
over the other, but rather identifying where the greatest
breakthroughs are possible.
Certainly now you are dealing with a budget issue that is
fairly dramatic. So I wanted to see how you balance that. Can
you confirm where you believe NASA's scientific and exploration
mission--I mean, are they complimentary or do they end up
becoming, because of budget issues, mutually exclusive?
Mr. Isaacman. Well, Senator, first, I think the scientific
side of NASA is just as important as human exploration, as is
our work in aeronautics and technology development. I think
that, as I mentioned to some of the other Senators before, I
understand earlier this year we had a Presidential budget
request. Of course, I do absolutely support the President in
the goal of reducing the deficit and ensuring the Nation is on
good footing.
But that said, a lot has changed since then. I mean, and
this is something that if I am confirmed, I would love to get
my arms around because we have been on a Continuing Resolution.
I mean, earlier this year, I understood that perhaps even the
Nancy Grace Roman telescope might not launch under initial
budget requests. I have since been informed that that is no
longer the case.
So simply put, Senator, I would love to know where we stand
today, but as I have told other Senators, in terms of dollars
allocated from Congress, we will absolutely maximize the
scientific value of every one of them.
Senator Hickenlooper. Sure. I appreciate that. And the
Nancy Grace Roman telescope is a good example. Is Goddard Space
Flight Center in a similar position in terms--I know that they
are looking at certain potentially draconian changes to their
budget.
Mr. Isaacman. I mean, Senator, nothing more than I would--I
mean, I would read the same things that other people do. If you
ask me, I think Goddard is very important to spearheading the
scientific efforts of NASA.
Senator Hickenlooper. Right. Great. We agree. I appreciate
that. And I do recognize the difficult choices that tight
budgets create for all of you, and appreciate that,
I am out of time, even though now I am left to be the
Chair, I think the compulsion is that I have to curtail my
questions, but I have a couple more questions I am going to
submit in writing to you guys. And again, I appreciate both of
your willingness to serve the country in these roles.
So Mr. Isaacman and Mr. Haines, my last question, which I
am not just allowed, but required to ask of all nominees, if
confirmed, do you pledge to work collaboratively with this
Committee to provide thorough and timely responses to this
Committee's requests and to appear before the Committee when
requested?
Mr. Haines. Yes, Senator.
Mr. Isaacman. Yes, Senator. I do not think NASA can
accomplish its world-changing mission without the support of
Congress.
Senator Hickenlooper. Right. Well, I think it has to be a
close partnership, especially all the more so in these days of
tight budgets.
So thank you. I have literally dozens of letters of support
from various organizations for both of your nominations, and we
ask unanimous consent these letters be inserted into the
hearing record. Without objection, so ordered. It is hard to
have any objections when you control the room.
[The information referred to follows:]
November 22, 2025
Hon. Ted Cruz,
Chair, Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee,
United States Senate,
Washington, DC.
Hon. Maria Cantwell,
Ranking Member, Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee,
United States Senate,
Washington, DC.
Dear Chairman Cruz and Ranking Member Cantwell,
We, the undersigned former NASA Astronauts, write again to express
our continued support for the confirmation of Jared Isaacman as the
next Administrator of NASA.
Having dedicated our careers and lives to support NASA and space
exploration, we are deeply concerned about the Agency's future. It is
critical that NASA maintains its position as the preeminent space
development organization. Our nation is at a turning point where we
face international competition from China and we are increasingly
cognizant of the geopolitical importance of space. It is crucial that
we have a NASA Administrator who champions and delivers the kind of
revolutionary advancements in space that only NASA can achieve while
also fully leveraging the capabilities and opportunities presented by a
rapidly advancing commercial space sector and the steady international
support from our partner nations.
We believe that Jared Isaacman is clearly qualified to lead NASA at
this critical juncture. As an entrepreneur, pilot, and commander of two
groundbreaking space missions, he brings credibility and capability to
make a difference now. Most importantly, Jared has a genuine passion
for space exploration and a genuine admiration for NASA as an American
institution. He will bring renewed energy and sense of purpose to NASA.
NASA is facing many challenges right now including the rapidly
approaching launch of the Artemis II mission. We therefore urge the
Senate to move expeditiously towards Mr. Isaacman's confirmation.
Thank you for your attention. We appreciate your commitment to
ensuring NASA has the vision, expertise, and leadership necessary to
advance America's space ambitions.
Sincerely,
Charles F. Bolden Jr. Shane Kimbrough
Robert Cabana Wendy Lawrence
Greg Chamitoff Steve Lindsey
Cady Coleman Leland Melvin
Leroy Chiao Michael Lopez-Alegria
Ken Cockrell Ed Lu
Drew Feustel Dottie Metcalf-Lindenburger
Jack Fischer Bill McArthur
Mike Foreman Stephen Oswald
Ron Garan William Readdy
Linda Godwin Garrett Reisman
John Grunsfeld Stephen Robinson
Ken Ham Rusty Schweickart
Jose Hernandez Nicole Stott
John Herrington Steve Swanson
Rick Hieb Jim Voss
Joan Higginbotham Peggy Whitson
Scott Kelly George Zamka
______
University of Mississippi
November 21, 2025
Hon. Roger Wicker,
United States Senate,
Washington, DC.
Hon. Cindy Hyde-Smith,
United States Senate,
Washington, DC.
Dear Senator Wicker and Senator Hyde-Smith:
I strongly support the confirmation of Jared Isaacman as NASA
Administrator.
Although I have not met Mr. Isaacman, his example has profoundly
inspired both my students and me. That kind of influence is rare, and
it matters.
Humanity stands at a threshold: for the first time, we can use
space resources to sustain life on Earth and expand beyond it. U.S.
leadership is not just advantageous--it is essential.
As Executive Director of the Center for Air and Space Law and
President of For All Moonkind, I have spent years working at the
intersection of public institutions, commercial innovation and global
space governance. Few individuals illustrate the power of private
initiative to advance public purpose as clearly as Mr. Isaacman.
Mr. Isaacman's accomplishments reflect both technical ambition and
civic commitment. His leadership in pioneering private orbital
missions--funding, flying and shaping them--speaks to an unusual blend
of vision and practical capability. These missions have broadened not
only the boundaries of commercial spaceflight but the public
imagination about who space is for.
His leadership is timely, as space has become a stage for strategic
competition. China and other nations are accelerating their space
programs; the U.S. must respond with ambition and principled
leadership. NASA plays a defining role in shaping norms that will
govern shared space activities, and that requires an Administrator who
can engage competitors with both confidence and clarity, advancing
innovation while reinforcing responsible global conduct.
NASA is entering a transformative era defined by deep-space
infrastructure, commercial partnerships and complex regulatory and
diplomatic challenges. Mr. Isaacman's experience positions him uniquely
to bridge these domains with realism and vision.
For these reasons, I offer my strong support for his nomination and
urge your favorable consideration. Thank you for your thoughtful
attention.
Sincerely,
Michelle L.D. Hanlon,
Executive Director, Air and Space Law Program,
University of Mississippi.
______
U.S. Space & Rocket Center
Huntsville, AL, November 24, 2025
Senator Tommy Tuberville,
Washington, DC.
Dear Senator Tuberville,
I am pleased to once again express the U.S. Space & Rocket Center's
support for Jared Isaacman, President Trump's nomination to be NASA
Administrator. As you may remember from our previous letter of support,
Jared attended our Aviation Challenge program when he was 12 years old,
an experience that inspired him to become a pilot.
Jared has done far more than that, however. He is an entrepreneur
who has used his success to pursue space exploration and advance
science in his own right, raising funds along the way to support St.
Jude's Children's Research Hospital as well as Space Camp.
Because of Jared's generosity, Space Camp will open the
Inspiration4 Skills Training Complex in 2026, expanding our mission of
building America's skilled workforce. This 55,000-square-foot facility
will include new simulations and futuristic missions that will engage
students' imagination and give them a vision for their own futures.
Jared is a person of the highest character and brings together a
sound business approach to the wonders of exploration. He would be an
exceptional leader of our Nation's space program, and we encourage you
and your colleagues in the Senate to act expeditiously to confirm him.
Thank you for your consideration and support.
Sincerely,
Brenda Perez,
Interim Chief Executive Officer,
Chief Financial Officer.
______
U.S. Space & Rocket Center
Huntsville, AL, November 24, 2025
Senator Katie Britt,
Washington, DC.
Dear Senator Britt,
I am pleased to once again express the U.S. Space & Rocket Center's
support for Jared Isaacman, President Trump's nomination to be NASA
Administrator. As you may remember from our previous letter of support,
Jared attended our Aviation Challenge program when he was 12 years old,
an experience that inspired him to become a pilot.
Jared has done far more than that, however. He is an entrepreneur
who has used his success to pursue space exploration and advance
science in his own right, raising funds along the way to support St.
Jude's Children's Research Hospital as well as Space Camp.
Because of Jared's generosity, Space Camp will open the
Inspiration4 Skills Training Complex in 2026, expanding our mission of
building America's skilled workforce. This 55,000-square-foot facility
will include new simulations and futuristic missions that will engage
students' imagination and give them a vision for their own futures.
Jared is a person of the highest character and brings together a
sound business approach to the wonders of exploration. He would be an
exceptional leader of our Nation's space program, and we encourage you
and your colleagues in the Senate to act expeditiously to confirm him.
Thank you for your consideration and support.
Sincerely,
Brenda Perez,
Interim Chief Executive Officer,
Chief Financial Officer.
______
[GRAPHIC NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]
______
Internet Marketing Association
November 29, 2025
Attention:
Chairman Ted Cruz,
U.S. Senate,
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
Ranking Member Maria Cantwell,
U.S. Senate,
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
Washington, DC.
Dear Chairman Cruz and Ranking Member Cantwell:
I write to you in my capacity as Chairman of the Internet Marketing
Association (IMA), an organization deeply engaged in the advancement of
emerging technologies, national competitiveness, and the fast-growing
space economy. It is my privilege to offer my endorsement for Mr. Jared
Isaacman to serve as the next Administrator of the National Aeronautics
and Space Administration (NASA).
Through my work convening 150 leaders of the New Frontier for
IMPACT 25 Washington D.C. in October 2025, including innovators,
defense visionaries, policymakers, and commercial space pioneers, I
have had the opportunity to witness firsthand the extraordinary impact
Jared Isaacman has had on America's commercial space sector. His
entrepreneurial record, operational experience, and unwavering
commitment to strengthening U.S. leadership in space make him
exceptionally well suited to lead NASA at this pivotal moment.
Last week, I hosted Breakthrough at Mar-a-Lago, where leaders
shaping the future of the space economy met directly with policymakers.
The conference featured Type One Ventures, along with a broad slate of
innovators working at the intersection of national security, frontier
technology, and commercial space. Our discussions centered on America's
ability to maintain its strategic and technological edge, precisely the
domain where Mr. Isaacman has proven to be a uniquely influential
leader. Additionally, we brought together national leaders,
entrepreneurs, investors, and technologists to support a shared vision
for advancing U.S. capabilities in orbit and beyond. In these forums,
Mr. Isaacman's work consistently stands out as emblematic of the
ingenuity, mission-driven leadership, and public-private collaboration
required to navigate the challenges ahead.
As NASA undertakes essential work, from returning Americans to the
Moon, to fostering commercial space station development, to furthering
exploration across the solar system, stable, visionary leadership is
indispensable. Mr. Isaacman possesses a rare combination of operational
expertise, business acumen, technical fluency, and demonstrated passion
for human spaceflight. His understanding of the U.S.-China strategic
competition in space, his respect for congressional oversight, and his
commitment to safeguarding American leadership are clearly aligned with
the priorities of this Committee and the needs of the nation.
For these reasons, and on behalf of the many leaders and
organizations within the IMA and the broader New Frontier community, I
respectfully urge the Committee to advance Mr. Isaacman's nomination
swiftly. His confirmation would provide NASA with the capable, future-
focused leadership it requires at a moment when America's trajectory in
space will shape global power dynamics for decades to come.
Thank you for your consideration and for your continued dedication
to America's leadership in science, technology, and the space economy.
Respectfully,
Sinan Kanatsiz,
Chairman,
Internet Marketing Association.
Senator Hickenlooper. Senators will have until the close of
business on December 4 to submit additional questions for the
record. The nominees will have until 11 a.m. on December 7 to
respond to those questions. That is a pretty quick turnaround,
but hopefully that does not put you in too difficult a
position.
That will conclude today's hearing. The Committee stands
adjourned.
[Whereupon, at 12:04 p.m., the hearing was adjourned.]
A P P E N D I X
Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Ted Cruz to
Jared Isaacman
Question 1. During your testimony, when I asked about the
architecture of the Gateway program and your plans to utilize the lunar
orbiting station's capabilities, you noted that ``the President of the
United States would be very excited to see a lunar base.'' While a
lunar base is certainly part of the overall Artemis architecture, the
Lunar Gateway is intended to serve as a cislunar habitation, staging,
and logistics point to enable more robust long-duration missions in
cislunar orbit and on the lunar surface--Gateway as a lunar station
plays a critical role in enabling the future Artemis missions.
a. Can you expand upon your plans for Gateway and unlocking the
cislunar orbit?
b. Can you clarify your response and explain how you intend to
support the Gateway cislunar space station program, including how you
plan to utilize the One Big Beautiful Bill Act funding consistent with
congressional intent to develop and sustain an orbital cislunar
platform?
Answer. As I noted in my opening remarks and testimony, I believe
it is essential for the United States to return to the Moon ahead of
our strategic competitors and to build the infrastructure required for
an enduring presence in and around the lunar environment. I will, of
course, follow the law as written in carrying out those objectives as
urgently as possible.
Question 2. Submitted on behalf of Senator Britt: During your line
of questioning, I appreciated your commitment to utilizing the One Big
Beautiful Bill Act dollars as outlined by the law. You also responded
that the funds afford NASA with the opportunity to utilize additional
heavy lift vehicles for the Artemis IV and V missions. Do you commit to
using the SLS rocket for Artemis IV and V as directed by Congress and
stated in the law?
Answer. SLS is the fastest path to achieving America's near-term
lunar objectives through Artemis V. Pivoting to another architecture
earlier than contemplated in the One Big Beautiful Bill could place the
Nation at an unacceptable risk of a strategic capability gap. I will,
of course, follow the law.
______
Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Roger Wicker to
Jared Isaacman
Question #1: John C. Stennis Space Center
The John C. Stennis Space Center is home to NASA's largest
propulsion and engine test site. The Stennis Space Center has played a
pivotal role in developing and testing our launch capabilities from the
beginning of our space program. It also hosts commercial space
companies including Rocket Lab, Relativity Space, and L3Harris. As NASA
increasingly relies on the commercial space sector to execute its
mission, industry at the Stennis Space Center is growing. Because of
the Stennis Center's location and buffer zone, it is an ideal place for
new commercial space companies to invest in or move to. At the Stennis
Space Center, NASA supports the commercial space industry by providing
numerous services, including sharing water and chemicals, such as
nitrogen and hydrogen.
Question. Thank you for your commitment to expanding space industry
in the United States. As America's largest rocket propulsion test site,
the John C. Stennis Space Center exemplifies how NASA can work with
commercial space industry.
Commercial space tenants at the Stennis Space Center are
revitalizing existing test stands and building new stands to support
their rocket propulsion testing. Modernizing existing test
infrastructure can provide cost savings to the company and NASA. Do you
agree that existing test infrastructure can support both ongoing and
future space missions for NASA and commercial space industry?
Answer. Stennis Space Center is a great example of a NASA center
evolving to support both government and commercial programs. While
Stennis continues to support several government efforts, it has also
revitalized key test platforms and infrastructure to successfully
enable commercial industry.
Question #2:
In your testimony, and publicly released statements, you have
outlined your plan for the future of NASA. This plan prioritizes
removing excessive bureaucracy, putting more astronauts in space for
enduring missions, enhancing partnerships for scientific exploration,
maximizing an orbital economy, and investing in and certifying
commercial space missions.
Question. As the Administrator, you will have the opportunity to
implement your vision for NASA and shape the future of the United
States' space capabilities. Under your leadership, how will NASA
support and transform the Stennis Space Center to ensure its long-term
success?
Answer. Stennis Space Center is a national treasure for engine
testing and already serves as a model for evolving to meet current and
future missions. Stennis has attracted investments and tenants from
some of the most notable commercial space companies, and I see that
trend continuing well into the future.
Question # 3: Reconciliation Funding
The One Big Beautiful Bill Act included funding for projects that
will support Mississippi's space equities including $700 million for
the Mars Telecommunications Orbiter, $120 million for infrastructure
projects at the Stennis Space Center, and $4.1 million for the Space
Launch System, which will enable the United States to continue its
missions to the Moon. The Senate marked up Commerce, Justice, and
Science appropriations bill for Fiscal Year 2026 includes $48.2 million
for the Rocket Propulsion Test Program as well as accompanying report
language, which will ensure that the Stennis Space Center can continue
its critical work.
Question. The historic investments in the One Big Beautiful Bill
Act will bolster the Stennis Space Center's equities through critical
infrastructure improvements and engagement with the commercial space
sector. Will you commit to quickly obligating funds provided by the One
Big Beautiful Bill Act, once confirmed? Will you also commit to working
with commercial entities to rapidly move forward on the Mars
Telecommunications Orbiter program?
Answer. Yes. I believe it is imperative for NASA to move with
urgency in achieving our near-term lunar objectives, for which
considerable funding and support have been provided in the One Big
Beautiful Bill. I further believe, consistent with my prior testimony,
that NASA is capable of undertaking multiple world-changing missions in
parallel. In that context, investments in the communications
capabilities required to support future Mars missions is certainly
worth exploring.
______
Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Jerry Moran to
Jared Isaacman
Question 1. How critical is NASA's Aeronautics Mission Directorate
initiatives such as Hi-CAM and high-speed flight programs? How will you
support those programs while also enhancing partnership with industry?
Answer. As a pilot, I am very excited about the Aeronautics Mission
Directorate and ensuring an intense focus on research and test programs
that push the boundaries of speed, altitude, and the materials and
sciences that underpin the competitiveness of our aerospace industry.
The Hi-CAM program is certainly the kind of study NASA should be
investing resources in.
Question 2. If confirmed, will you work to prioritize the
modernization of NASA's King Air aircraft?
Answer. I am not familiar with the specific modernization request
for the King Air aircraft, but if confirmed, I would like to conduct a
holistic assessment of the NASA fleet to ensure it is modernized and
fully capable of supporting the agency's transportation, research, and
inspirational missions. This could include expanding the fleet with
both new and existing civil and military aircraft.
Question 3. Before sending humans to Mars, we need to solve the
problem of landing vehicles safely on an unprepared surface. What can
we start doing now to use affordable robotic missions to explore
potential landing sites and to get high resolution images and data that
NASA and its commercial partners can use to pick the best landing sites
and land safely?
Answer. With considerable focus on achieving NASA's near-term lunar
objectives, including returning American astronauts and establishing an
enduring presence, it would also be prudent to evaluate affordable
robotic missions to Mars in parallel to increase our rate of learning
ahead of future crewed missions.
Question 4. What plans do you have to maximize use and modernize
these resources across the entire civil, commercial, and national
security enterprise?
Answer. While NASA pursues the peaceful exploration and discovery
in air and space, these domains are also vitally important to national
security. If confirmed, I would work with counterparts across OSTP,
DoW, DOE, DOT, and other agencies to avoid needless duplication or
bespoke programs where synergy is possible. This would help ensure the
smooth flow of information, timely decision-making, responsible
resource allocation, and faster results.
______
Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Dan Sullivan to
Jared Isaacman
Question 1. The Geophysical Institute at the University of Alaska
Fairbanks hosts unique, nationally critical assets, including the Poker
Flat Research Range and a collection of polar-orbiting satellite
downlink antennas, which support national security, military readiness,
and space weather research.
If confirmed, can you commit to visiting Alaska, and
specifically the University of Alaska Fairbanks, early in your
tenure to see firsthand the strategic importance of this high-
latitude research infrastructure?
Answer. If confirmed, I would be happy to make that commitment and,
if possible, also tour the Pacific Spaceport Complex.
Question 2. The proposed FY26 budget includes reductions to the
Science Mission Directorate (SMD) and the elimination of the Office of
STEM Engagement (OSTEM), programs which are critical to Arctic science
and Alaska's aerospace workforce pipeline. Additionally, the NASA
Research Opportunities in Space and Earth Sciences (ROSES) program is
foundational to U.S. excellence in scientific discovery and national
security.
If confirmed, will you work to ensure that SMD and OSTEM are
adequately funded in the President's budget request to support
the fundamental science and workforce development needed to
ensure United States space superiority?
Answer. If confirmed, I can commit to being an advocate for science
and a strong American workforce and will do all I can to maximize the
scientific value of every dollar provided by Congress.
Question 3. Alaska Satellite Facility (ASF) serves as NASA's
Distributed Active Archive Center (DAAC) for strategically important
synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data. It is my understanding that NASA
is considering DAAC consolidation that could shift responsibilities to
Washington, D.C., potentially undermining mission effectiveness and
harming critical Arctic operations.
If confirmed, can you commit to evaluating any proposed DAAC
reorganization and flagging any potential impacts to the Alaska
Satellite Facility with my office before a final decision is
made?
Answer. I am not familiar with any plans to consolidate or
reorganize the DAAC, but would commit to working with your office and
Congress on any potential implications.
Question 4. The Pacific Spaceport Complex on Kodiak Island is the
only high-latitude, polar-capable spaceport in the United States. It's
state-owned, strategically located, and has already supported both
government and commercial launches. With rising demand for orbital
launch, facilities like Kodiak could become even more important--not
just for commercial growth, but for national security.
What role do you see commercial spaceports like the Pacific
Spaceport Complex Alaska playing in the future access to space?
Answer. The nation already lacks sufficient complexes to meet
anticipated commercial and national security launch requirements--and I
see existing facilities like the Pacific Spaceport Complex as a logical
path to help meet that demand.
______
Response to Written Question Submitted by Hon. Ted Budd to
Jared Isaacman
Question 1. Since 1998 the NASA Michoud Assembly Facility (MAF) has
been home to the National Center for Advanced Manufacturing, and more
than $62 million has been invested in equipment, facilities, and people
to ensure this is a nationally relevant capability.
With the retirement of the Space Shuttle, NASA moved to a multi-
tenant model, enabling commercial partners to leverage this asset.
Unfortunately, in recent years it has become more difficult for
external partners to leverage the facility's unique capabilities.
Do you support allowing commercial companies to leverage the MAF
and allowing that facility to become a key part of the rebuilding of
America's industrial base? Do you see such a model being an example for
other capabilities across NASA facilities?
Answer. I believe NASA must constantly evaluate how to maximize its
unique facilities and test infrastructure to best support the mission
of the agency, commercial partners, and the broader industrial base.
Several NASA centers have already taken positive steps in this
direction, and it should remain an area of focus going forward.
______
Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Eric Schmitt to
Jared Isaacman
Question 1. Mr. Isaacman, China has used radioisotope power systems
to survive the lunar night since 2019, giving it the only continuous
presence on the Moon, and it plans to launch more missions using this
technology in 2028. U.S. landers, by contrast, are limited to 14 days
because they cannot operate through the lunar night. While NASA has
announced plans for a fission reactor by 2030, that system does not
address the immediate need for continuous power on lander missions this
decade. Can you speak to what you see as the future of nuclear power in
space and the need to have this technology incorporated into future
NASA missions?
Answer. I am very passionate about NASA continuously recalibrating
to focus on the near-impossible--the things no other agency or
organization is capable of accomplishing. In that regard, it is
imperative that NASA dramatically expand and accelerate investments in
nuclear programs, including propulsion and surface-power systems. This
should include high-and low-power reactors on timelines much faster
than 2030, in addition to more traditional RTGs.
Question 2. Mr. Isaacman, NASA has a wide portfolio of space
science programs, ranging from satellites and rovers to sounding
rockets and balloons. Programs like NASA's high-altitude balloon
missions provide a unique, cost-effective platform for testing
instruments, conducting research, and training the next generation of
scientists. Institutions such as Washington University in St. Louis,
through the McDonnell Center for the Space Sciences, depend on these
suborbital programs to develop and flight-test cutting-edge instruments
and to train students and early-career researchers in hands-on space
science and instrumentation. Could you explain why it is important for
NASA to maintain a diversity of mechanisms, including balloon programs,
sounding rockets, and other suborbital platforms, for advancing space
science, and how these complement larger satellite and deep-space
missions?
Answer. Orbital and deep space missions are costly and carry far
more risk than various suborbital alternatives. To the greatest extent
possible, NASA should look to suborbital platforms to capture relevant
science and test data that can derisk or supplement expensive orbital
missions. I also more than acknowledge and value the associated STEM
benefits of these suborbital programs working alongside academic
institutions.
Question 3. Mr. Isaacman, in 2028, China plans to fly International
partners' payloads to Mars on their Mars Sample Return mission,
Tianwen-3. China has made up to 15 kilograms of mass available for
international collaboration projects on the mission's Earth return
orbiter (ERO) spacecraft and a further 5 kg on the Mars orbiter (MO).
United States commercial providers have over 1000 kg of additional
payload capacity available to fly international partners' payloads to
Mars on a 2028 mission. How is NASA and the Science Mission Directorate
working to ensure our international partners fly their Martian payloads
on American spacecraft, built and flown from American soil, rather than
on Chinese spacecraft, built and flown from China?
Answer. As mentioned in my opening remarks, NASA is faced with a
great competitor moving at impressive speed. Competition can be a good
thing, but this is not a race we can afford to lose. It is imperative
that NASA:
Clear obstacles and bureaucracy that impede progress and
give our competitor room to move faster, while also making it
easier for commercial and international partners to work with
the agency.
Intense mission focus -including the contributions of our
international and commercial partners--this includes: American
leadership in the high ground of space, the return of American
astronauts to the Moon and establishment of an enduring
presence, investment in next ``giant leap'' capabilities such
as nuclear propulsion and surface power, and accelerated Mars
exploration. We must also establish the orbital economy to fund
the future we all want to see in space and evolve NASA into a
force-multiplier for science to increase the rate of world-
changing discoveries.
______
Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Maria Cantwell to
Jared Isaacman
Commitment to Competition and Redundancy for Critical Missions As
we discussed during the hearing, NASA's exploration programs are faced
with steep competition from China. Given significant taxpayer
investment in these programs, the United States cannot afford to allow
critical missions to have a single point of failure and must ensure
that contract formulation fosters competition among commercial
providers.
Question 1. I appreciated the comments you made during our exchange
in support of competition between SpaceX and Blue Origin. However, I
have been made aware that contracting differences between the two HLS
providers may not provide an even playing field for them to compete for
the Artemis III mission. For example, SpaceX is contracted for Artemis
III with fewer requirements, while Blue Origin is not on contract to
deliver until the Artemis V mission and has more requirements. What is
your plan to put both providers on equal footing, making Artemis III a
true competition so the U.S. can beat China to the Moon?
Answer. If confirmed, I fully intend to solicit feedback from all
commercial partners on ways to reduce requirements and remove obstacles
that impede America's near-term lunar objectives. This applies not only
to Blue Origin and SpaceX, but to Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Northrop,
and every other vendor contributing to Artemis and NASA's broader
mission. As I stated during the hearing, America is best served when
both HLS providers are able to compete--and as a nation, we must select
the first landing system ready to ensure the United States returns to
the Moon before China.
Question 2. Reconciliation provided $700 million for a Mars
Telecommunications Orbiter (MTO) mission. However, the law limits the
competition to two or perhaps even one bidder. What is your plan to
ensure a true competition for the MTO spacecraft and mission in order
to maximize the investment to deliver a system capable of meeting Mars
communication relay needs for at least the next decade?
Answer. I believe NASA is capable of advancing multiple world-
changing missions in parallel, including discovery and exploration
efforts on Mars. In that respect, it makes sense to begin investing in
the capabilities required to support those missions, including the MTO
program. If confirmed, I will review the agency's approach to this
effort and ensure it is pursued through a lawful and competitive
process.
Question 3. The Lunar Terrain Vehicle is the rover that Artemis
astronauts are expected to use to traverse the lunar surface and extend
their exploration of the Moon, beginning with Artemis V. To minimize
the risk of delay, NASA has planned to have two of the three commercial
LTV teams proceed to the Critical Design Review phase. Assuming that
Congress provides adequate funding, do you agree that this plan will
put NASA in the best position to maintain the Artemis timeline?
Answer. I am not familiar with the current contracting approach for
the Lunar Terrain Vehicle. However, it is imperative that the vehicle
be ready to meet mission requirements and timelines--particularly as we
work toward a growing and enduring presence on the lunar surface. If
confirmed, I will review the state of the program and ensure it is
competitive and properly resourced to minimize risk to Artemis
objectives.
NASA FY26 President's Budget Request Implementation and
Whistleblower Report. In September, my office released a report which
included multiple accounts and documents from brave NASA whistleblowers
showing the Administration's efforts to illegally implement the
dangerous cuts in the President's Fiscal Year 2026 Budget Request. This
not only disregarded Congress's constitutional role to determine
spending; it jeopardized NASA's missions and their safety.
Question 1. Will you fully implement the funding levels Congress
sets for NASA in 2026 and beyond?
Answer. As stated in my testimony, I commit to always follow the
law and to maximize the scientific value of every dollar afforded by
Congress.
Question 2. Will you be a strong advocate for NASA and protect its
resources from misguided cuts?
Answer. I am a passionate supporter of NASA and will do all I can,
with the resources provided, to execute on its world-changing mission.
Question 3. When you testified previously, you called potential
drastic cuts to NASA's science budget ``suboptimal.'' Do you stand by
that testimony, and will you defend NASA's science budget if confirmed?
Answer. I support the President's goal of returning the Nation to a
sound fiscal position, and that will likely require government agencies
to do more with less. I do not believe NASA should be an exception. If
confirmed, I will do all I can to advocate for and maximize the
scientific potential of every dollar afforded by Congress.
Project Athena. In May 2025 you drafted your Project Athena
Strategic Plan which detailed your vision for NASA, if confirmed. While
the plan shows your commitment to maintain continuity in space
exploration through the Artemis Program, it lacks robust discussion of
other key areas of NASA's mission including aeronautics and space
technology development.
The plan also introduces the idea of `science-as-a-service' as a
method of reducing the costs of scientific research. During the
December 3 confirmation hearing you said that you ``stand behind
everything in the document.''
Question 1. Do you believe that there is a need for NASA to
continue collecting its own observations in addition to leveraging
commercial imagery?
Answer. The draft document included research requests in areas
where information was either unavailable or not accessible to a
nominee, so it should be understood that some sections were less
developed than others. That said, the collection of scientific data is
not binary. In Earth observation, for example, there will be cases
where data can be acquired more affordably through commercial
constellations, and others where only NASA possesses the necessary
capability. This evolution has already occurred across other government
and national security observation missions and could similarly free
resources for planetary science and other missions commercial providers
cannot support.
Question 2. Can you commit to ensuring that any cost savings,
particularly those achieved by using science-as-a-service for Earth
observations, will be reinvested in NASA's capacity to conduct world
class research focused on both Earth and space science disciplines?
Answer. Yes, that was always the concept worth exploring.
Question 3. Can you commit to pursuing sufficient funding for a
robust NASA aeronautics portfolio that develops pre-competitive
technology that supports U.S. aerospace industry leadership worldwide?
Answer. Yes. NASA Aeronautics should be working on cutting-edge
test programs that push the boundaries of speed, altitude, and
materials necessary to ensure the competitiveness of American aerospace
industries.
Workforce Plans and Reorganization: You noted in your testimony
that some of the most talented people in America show up to work at
NASA. Under the current Administration, NASA has seen over 4,000
employees--roughly 20 percent of its workforce--opt to leave under the
deferred resignation program or early retirement, in addition to normal
attrition. In Project Athena, you propose to consolidate all ongoing
staff reductions and reorganization initiatives into a single,
comprehensive plan.
Question 1. Before implementing this plan, will you commit to
sharing it and discussing it with this committee?
Answer. Should I be confirmed, I will work alongside Congress and
this committee specifically. It is worth noting that the draft document
was several months old and developed during a period when NASA was
contemplating multiple RIF and reorganization efforts. Given how much
time has passed and how much has changed since then, I am not certain a
comprehensive reorganization, at least on the scale previously
contemplated, is even still necessary.
Question 2. Considering the turmoil Federal agencies experience
when subjected to poorly justified structural overhauls, can you commit
to also ensuring that any proposed major reorganization of NASA will be
based on clear, evidence-based justification and transparent strategic
need and will be shared and discussed with this committee before
implementation?
Answer. The idea--if necessary at all--was always intended to be a
data-driven reorganization informed by broad input, including from this
committee.
Human Spaceflight Safety and Oversight: As the only private sector
astronaut to conduct extra vehicular activity in orbit, you have unique
experience with the role that NASA plays or should play in ensuring the
safety of commercial human spaceflight activities. In this regard, and
referencing the current limited regulatory framework for commercial
human spaceflight known as the ``learning period,'' your Project Athena
Strategic Plan proposes a study for a ``Starfleet Academy'' that would
be capable of certifying launch and spaceflight hardware for operation,
training operators and flight crew members, and certifying the
competence of such personnel.
Question 1. For NASA's human spaceflight programs and missions,
what principles should guide certification processes and operational
decisions that appropriately balance cost and schedule, mission
objectives, and safety requirements?
Answer. It is worth noting that the draft document was intended
to--at a much later stage--initiate research, discussion, and input
across the agency, industry, and Congress to begin addressing these
types of questions. At present, I believe the existing learning period
remains appropriate until industry reaches a more mature state. That
stated, researching and preparing for the future seemed prudent, and
NASA is likely the organization best positioned to lead in defining
what a post-learning-period certification environment should look like.
Question 2. Based on your experience, do you believe that NASA's
certification processes and expertise in human spaceflight are being
effectively utilized by commercial industry and the FAA Office of
Commercial Space Transportation?
Answer. I believe NASA possesses the ultimate subject-matter
expertise to help shape the future of commercial hardware, operator,
and crew certification. I also suspect there is significant learning to
be captured--and improvements to be made--based on experience from the
HLS, Commercial Crew and Cargo programs.
Question 3. Given that an institution such as your proposed
Starfleet Academy could be an effective mechanism for defining and
implementing an appropriate role for NASA in commercial human
spaceflight oversight, will you commit to sharing the results of the
proposed study with Congress?
Answer. I would, as I believe--like all major NASA endeavors--
success depends on collaboration and advocacy from all key
stakeholders.
NASA Aeronautics Research and Development and the Spokane-Coeur
d'Alene Tech Hub. NASA's aeronautics R&D is essential to maintaining
the global competitiveness of our aerospace industry. For example, in
partnership with industry, NASA's Hi-Rate Composite Aircraft
Manufacturing (Hi-CAM) Project develops advanced composite materials
that promise to make aircraft lighter and more fuel efficient. This is
key for ensuring that next generation aircraft are manufactured here in
the U.S.
We have established a Washington and Idaho Tech Hub in Spokane
focused on advanced thermoplastics with the goal of enabling
manufacturing by industry at scale. This is an ambitious goal, and the
NASA and industry Advanced Composites Consortium has been very
supportive of this initiative.
Question 1. Will you fight for NASA's aeronautics budget to
sufficiently fund projects such as Hi-CAM, and will you support pre-
competitive technology development initiatives that keep our aerospace
industry ahead of our competitors, such as the Advanced Aerospace
Materials and Manufacturing Tech Hub?
Answer. Yes. I am very passionate about NASA's Aeronautics program,
and I believe the agency can do far more through research and test
programs that push the boundaries of speed, altitude, and advanced
materials.
NASA's Role in Developing Aviation Technology. NASA's research has
played a pivotal role in advancing the aviation industry, driving
innovations that and capabilities later used by the FAA enhance both
safety and cost-efficiency within the National Airspace System (NAS).
Examples include the System-Wide Safety (SWS) project, where NASA
has conducted research to understand how the modernization of industry
and aircraft can affect overall safety, and is developing an In-Time
Aviation Safety Management System (IASMS) to address operational risks
and hazards of a transformed NAS.
Question 1. Will you commit to maintaining NASA's focus on leading
edge technologies that will improve the safety of aviation and the NAS?
Answer. Yes--this is an area in which NASA has historically been
very successful.
Question 2. As we look to the future, what specific actions will
you take to further support and accelerate NASA's efforts in developing
next-generation commercial aviation technologies?
Answer. This goes to the heart of NASA's Aeronautics mission, and
it begins with a thorough review of the portfolio to ensure resources
are focused on what no other agency or organization is capable of
accomplishing. From there, it becomes cultural and organizational--
eliminating obstacles that impede progress and ensuring the best and
brightest are working urgently on the breakthroughs NASA, including
Aeronautics, was meant to deliver.
______
Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Edward Markey to
Jared Isaacman
Question 1. Mr. Isaacman, I want to recognize your support for the
continued operation of NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory. Chandra is
proudly operated for NASA and includes U.S. Military Veterans on its
staff. Science has always been the heartbeat of NASA. In fact, the very
first objective listed in the National Aeronautics and Space Act of
1958 is ``the expansion of human knowledge of phenomena in the
atmosphere and space.''
a) With that founding mandate in mind, do you agree that
maintaining a robust science portfolio is critical to U.S. leadership
in discovery?
Answer. Yes.
b) If so, can you explain specifically your view on how long-term
flagship missions--like Chandra, our space telescopes, and planetary
rovers--as a sustained priority that must run parallel to human
exploration?
Answer. I have always been a strong advocate for science, and I
believe it would be a mistake to prematurely retire flagship missions
that continue to deliver meaningful results at very low overhead cost.
Chandra and our telescope missions such as Hubble are great examples
where the scientific yield relative to the ongoing cost remains highly
favorable.
Question 2. Mr. Isaacman, during your hearing, you said I
mischaracterized your recent suggestion that NASA purchase `science-as-
a-service' for Earth observations. While NASA has used commercial data
to supplement Earth science, some Earth-observing capabilities are
inherently governmental--they require decades-long continuity,
transparent calibration, and open public access, forming the baseline
for both Federal agencies and commercial providers.
a) Please detail why, in your view, it is important for NASA to
maintain operating certain data capabilities, such as these
foundational systems.
Answer. I believe it is a mistake to assume that collecting data or
calibrating systems the same way we have for decades remains the most
appropriate or affordable path. Many national security missions have
already evolved from bespoke satellites to procuring data from
commercial providers at far lower cost. That approach could free
resources for missions--such as planetary science or heliophysics--that
commercial providers cannot address. This is not binary. There will be
Earth observation missions that NASA must retain for technical or
strategic reasons, but we should still take advantage of affordable
alternatives where they exist.
b) How would you balance and leverage existing government-owned
capabilities with obtaining commercially available data?
Answer. Similar to the above, I would work with experts within the
agency and solicit input from academia and commercial providers to
identify opportunities to achieve the same or superior science at lower
cost.
Question 3. The 2024 Solar and Space Physics Decadal Survey
highlighted the success of NASA's three Drive Science Centers,
including the SHIELD Center, which is building a ``digital twin'' of
the heliosphere to study cosmic radiation. This work is critical for
both fundamental solar science and preparing for human missions to Mars
and beyond. As the initial contracts for these Centers come to an end,
how will you sustain their research and the benefits they provide,
particularly for SHIELD?
Answer. If confirmed, I will work with the best and brightest at
NASA and across academia to ensure we never allow a lapse in scientific
missions vital to achieving the agency's overarching goals.
Question 4. Do you agree that climate observations are integral to
our understanding of atmospheric conditions on our own planet and other
planetary bodies in our solar system? Why or why not?
Answer. We inhabit only one planet at this time, so we should
invest scientific resources in understanding it--especially the
conditions that affect human life through flooding, wildfires,
droughts, and weather. At the same time, we should study other planets
to the greatest extent possible as we work to unlock the secrets of the
universe and prepare for the day American astronauts may operate for
extended periods of time on other celestial bodies.
______
Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Gary Peters to
Jared Isaacman
Question 1. In many of your answers in your last hearing, you noted
that you were not privy to any internal budgetary planning
conversations. However, you did share that you looked forward to
reviewing the Office of Management and Budget's recommendations and
working with Congress to determine the appropriate level of funding to
ensure NASA can execute its mission.
Now the president's request has been made public, and it includes a
24.3 percent decrease in overall funding and a 47 percent cut in
funding for the Science Mission Directorate. Further, O-M-B has
instructed NASA to comply with the request without approval from
Congress.
If confirmed, are you prepared to push back against these efforts
to ensure that we do not continue to see cuts to NASA's budget and
staff without Congressional approval?
Answer. I support the President's goal of reducing the deficit and
ensuring the Nation remains on sound financial footing. That stated, if
confirmed, I will work with Congress and always follow the law--
ensuring NASA maximizes the scientific value of every dollar allocated.
Question 2. We have seen massive reductions in staffing across
agencies. The president's budget request for Fiscal Year 2026 includes
a significant reduction in staff at NASA. The Office of Management and
Budget has directed NASA to comply with the president's budget request
without approval from Congress.
As a result, we have already seen over 3,000 employees leave NASA
since January. This loss in staff jeopardizes NASA's ability to
complete missions safely and efficiently. You have big plans for NASA,
but I fail to see how we achieve them if we are not retaining talent.
What is your plan to ensure that NASA remains sufficiently staffed?
How do you plan to do that in an environment where NASA's budget
decreases?
Answer. I believe NASA can only achieve its world-changing
mission--to undertake the near-impossible on behalf of all humankind--
with the support and contributions of the best and brightest across the
Nation. When NASA focuses on what no one else can do, it will naturally
attract the talent that seeks to work at the world's most accomplished
space agency. If confirmed, I will do all I can with the resources
afforded by Congress to support the mission.
Question 3. The Artemis program--in addition to achieving a key
national strategic goal--supports thousands of jobs across the U.S.
manufacturing supply chain. This is extremely important in Michigan
where suppliers are critical to NASA missions and goals.
Unfortunately, the past year has been unpredictable and erratic for
our Nation's space program creating a lot of uncertainty for companies
supporting NASA missions--especially small businesses.
Although Congress has stepped in to provide some base funding
stability through Artemis V, delays in one element of Artemis can lead
to inefficient workflow and costs for those who are ready to deliver.
As Administrator how will you work to provide a stable environment
that ensures Artemis maintains its launch schedule?
Answer. If confirmed, I will do all I can to pull the present
launch schedule forward, as it has been consistently delayed and over
budget. NASA is faced with a rival moving at impressive speed, and it
is imperative that we remove obstacles impeding progress and return to
delivering world-changing missions as quickly and affordably as
possible.
______
Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Tammy Duckworth to
Jared Isaacman
Question Topic: U.S. Space Leadership
Question 1. Ensuring multiple commercial providers of
transportation and other mission components is critical to improve
safety, ensure efficiency, maintain leadership and successfully
complete missions. NASA has long supported that approach as shown in
the ``ISS Lessons Learned'' report, in which NASA wrote that
``dissimilar redundancy in transportation has been critical to the
preservation of the ISS . . . Future exploration programs must be
structured with alternative transport vehicles, so there is no
particular system that becomes a single-point-of-failure.''
Do you agree with the approach of securing multiple commercial
providers for transport components of missions, as stated in NASA's
``ISS Lessons Learned'' report? Please explain your reasoning.
Answer. I believe that for capabilities vital to national security,
it is imperative that the Nation maintain redundancy--such as launch
vehicles, human-rated spacecraft, and landers. It is worth noting that
for much of the past two decades, and even today, U.S. space policy
relies on a single heavy-lift launch platform for crewed lunar
missions. Fortunately, industry investment and innovation now stand to
reduce that dependency in the near future.
Question 2. In your opening statement, you said ``we are in a great
competition with a rival that has the will and means to challenge
American exceptionalism across multiple domains, including in the high
ground of space. . .if we fall behind--if we make a mistake--we may
never catch up, and the consequences could shift the balance of power
here on Earth.'' This is a sentiment I agree with and we are much less
likely to make a mistake that causes us to fall behind if no one
mistake can derail a mission.
How do you plan to ensure that all aspects of the Artemis missions
have redundancies and therefore help protect our global leadership?
Answer. While I don't believe it is always appropriate for the
government to buy two of everything, capabilities vital to national
security--such as launch, human-rated spacecraft, and landers--justify
having more than one path to mission success. As noted above, for more
than two decades it has been U.S. policy to rely on a single launch
vehicle for human lunar objectives, but thanks to commercial industry
investments, that dependency will likely diminish.
Should this include the Human Landing System of the Artemis III
mission, that has consistently been delayed?
Answer. I believe it is factual that there have been extensive
delays across the entire Artemis architecture, and that must be
addressed through improvements within NASA and across our commercial
and international partners.
______
Response to Written Question Submitted by Hon. Jacky Rosen to
Jared Isaacman
Question Topic: Future of NASA
I'd like to discuss your vision for NASA's future and how you
intend to position the agency for long-term U.S. leadership is space.
Microgravity research--the conducting of experiments not possible here
on Earth -has historically produced major breakthroughs in biomedical
science, materials development, and advanced manufacturing.
Question 1. Mr. Isaacman: Given the competitive international
landscape, do you support elevating microgravity research as a national
strategic priority? And would you support partnering with commercial
microgravity research payload services to promote American leadership
and avoid ceding this domain to foreign competitors?
Answer. Consistent with my testimony, I believe it is imperative
that NASA help unlock an economy that directly requires the unique
environment of microgravity--otherwise the future of space will remain
largely taxpayer-funded. In that respect, NASA should do all it can,
alongside industry and academia, to prioritize the highest-potential
science and research on the ISS and through suborbital providers where
appropriate, in order to accelerate the emergence of a sustainable
orbital and eventually lunar economy.
______
Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. John Hickenlooper to
Jared Isaacman
Scientific Workforce Pipeline
Mr. Isaacman, your ``Project Athena'' strategic plan aligns with
the President's budget request to cut NASA's Science Mission
Directorate by nearly 50 percent. You have also advocated for NASA to
adopt a ``science-as-a-service'' model where we buy data from industry
rather than running missions ourselves. NASA science funding not only
pays for data, it pays for people. NASA grants directly fund the
tuition and stipends of the students and postdocs who become our
nation's experts in aerospace, space sciences, and physics. These
proposed cuts effectively fire the next generation of American
scientists before they even graduate.
Question 1. Mr. Isaacman, how will you ensure American dominance in
space when these proposed cuts could dismantle the training pipeline
for the very workforce we need to maintain it?
Answer. To be clear, the draft document referenced never made any
determinations to cut agency budgets or programs and science-as-a-
service was something to research specific to certain earth-observation
missions . Referring broadly to science and the future workforce
pipeline, the objective was always to make NASA a force multiplier for
science--applying agency resources and talent to enable academia to
increase the rate of world-changing discovery. Consistent with my
testimony, I believe it is fundamental to NASA's mission to direct
grants to academic institutions that develop the pipeline of future
scientists, engineers, researchers, and astronauts, and to support
science and technology development aligned with agency objectives.
Question 2. Mr. Isaacman, China is actively increasing its
investment in STEM education. If we push our brightest young minds out
of the field by defunding their training supported by NASA, aren't we
just handing our advantage over to our adversaries?
Answer. I believe inspiration and STEM engagement are inherent in
everything NASA does. By executing on the mission--which naturally
requires extensive collaboration with academic institutions--
inspiration and STEM education will follow. That next generation can
then join the great adventure, whether at NASA or in industry,
strengthening America's competitiveness and national interests.
Science Cuts' Impact on Partnerships
Mr. Isaacman, ``Project Athena'' aims to terminate active
scientific programs and close NASA facilities. Our scientific
partnerships are built on decades of trust, stability, and
collaboration among researchers at NASA Centers. If we abruptly shutter
labs, terminate scientists and engineers, and cancel programs, we
aren't saving money: we are burning bridges with international allies.
Question 3. Mr. Isaacman, how can NASA remain the partner of choice
for the world's best scientists and space agencies if these commitments
are abandoned?
Answer. The Athena document, as referenced, does not make any
determinations regarding active scientific programs or the closure of
any facilities.
Question 4. Mr. Isaacman, if a university or international partner
has spent millions building an instrument for a NASA mission, what
impact would cancelling that mission to save cash have, why would any
international partner trust a signed agreement with NASA ever again?
Answer. As previously note, the Athena document does not make any
such determinations. That said, while I am a strong advocate for
science, I do not believe every mission or endeavor should be funded
solely because an academic institution or international partner has
contributed to it. NASA must be responsible for the resources afforded
by congress and focus on the world-changing missions the agency was
created to pursue--missions no other organization is capable of
accomplishing. And to be clear, academic institutions and international
partners are essential to achieving those goals.
NASA Facilities Infrastructure
NASA's ten Centers across the country play a key role in our space
enterprise. These Centers design experiments and analyze data to
produce key scientific findings; assemble, test, and prepare leading-
edge payloads and spacecraft for in-space operations; and serve as
mission control centers and collaboration hubs with researchers across
the U.S. and world. In Project Athena, you expressed certain views
which question the role or efficacy of NASA's network of Centers.
Question 5. Mr. Isaacman, if any of NASA's Centers are closed or
consolidated, how would you ensure NASA--and the U.S.--does not lose
any critical capabilities in science?
Answer. Consistent with my testimony, I do not believe it is a good
use of time or resources to close centers when NASA requires the best
and brightest to achieve world-changing missions. The document in
question focused more on logically organizing assets across the
agency--for example, considering Armstrong, which manages aircraft,
actually oversee NASA's aviation fleet. Likewise, it suggested
potentially repurposing resources that are currently supporting
infrastructure or test assets in disrepair and with little-to-no
demand, toward infrastructure and capabilities that are in great demand
and vital to NASA's mission and to national security.
Impact of Goddard Closures
Mr. Isaacman, we have received reports that critical spaces
essential for the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope at the Goddard
Space Flight Center are being closed on a compressed timeline. Earth
observation missions like AQUA and TERRA are being shuttered. The
DAVINCI mission to study the atmosphere of Venus is also on the
chopping block. These events will have ripple effects throughout the
space science ecosystem.
Scientists, universities, and companies across the country,
including in Colorado, are contributing to these missions, using the
data they produce, and improving life for us here on earth.
Question 6. Mr. Isaacman, how does the cancellation of productive
investments like these align with your stated goal to ``maximize the
likelihood of discovering scientific value''?
Answer. I am not aware of any specific facility closures or
cancellations of science programs. I am an advocate for science, and I
have publicly defended missions--even offering to help personally fund
some, including Nancy Grace Roman, Hubble, and the Chandra X-ray
Observatory. I believe flagship missions that continue to yield
meaningful scientific data at relatively low cost should operate as
long as the cost-to-yield ratio remains favorable.
Earth Observation Capabilities
Space assets play a crucial role not just in exploring the cosmos,
but also in protecting life and livelihoods here on Earth. Satellite-
based observations for flooding, winds, lightning, drought, space
weather, wildfires, and crop yields drive safety and economic strength
across America.
Question 7. Mr. Isaacman, what are your plans for ensuring
continuity of space-based observations and assured U.S. access to the
data we need to protect American citizens and drive national economic
growth?
Answer. I have always defended the importance of Earth observation
data and making it freely available to academic institutions. We should
also remain open-minded about how to capture that data affordably,
recognizing that several Earth observation constellation providers are
now capable of delivering portions of the mission at lower cost.
Leveraging those commercial capabilities and capacity could free
resources for exciting planetary science missions that only NASA is
capable of undertaking.
Microgravity Research
NASA has led the world in delivering countless scientific
breakthroughs thanks to research experiments conducted on the
International Space Station (ISS). We have analyzed how proteins can
crystallize in space, which led to drug development for conditions like
muscular dystrophy. Over its decades in space, the ISS is now on track
to be retired later this decade. Going forward, we believe it is
essential the United States continues our sustained human presence and
microgravity research in space.
Question 8. Mr. Isaacman, if confirmed, how will you ensure NASA
and Federal agencies have continued access to new commercial space
stations to conduct scientific research?
Answer. I have always taken the position that NASA should maximize
the remaining life of the ISS and prioritize high-potential research--
including the areas you referenced--so we can accelerate the
development of an orbital economy and give commercial space stations
the best chance of success. I have also consistently supported
maintaining a ``continuous heartbeat in space'' and believe the United
States should never accept a capability gap in low-Earth orbit, for
scientific, economic, and national security reasons.
National Academies Decadal Surveys
Decadal surveys represent a consensus from the scientific community
on the highest priority scientific questions for NASA to investigate,
and help enable efficient use of taxpayer dollars through this
prioritization process. However, you have suggested in past remarks
that the Decadal Survey process is too slow to incorporate new
discoveries and that these documents are overly prescriptive when it
comes to NASA priorities.
Question 9. Mr. Isaacman, can you provide further context for your
suggestion that the decadal prioritization process should be
reevaluated?
Answer. Given the extent of the commercial space economy today--
with numerous launch providers, lower costs, and rapid data analysis
enabled by AI--a faster approach to prioritizing science than once per
decade should be considered. Just because we have conducted our
processes a certain way for decades does not mean it remains the most
effective or efficient model for this new space age.
NASA Science Mission Directorate
NASA's most transformational missions typically take many years to
go from formulation to development to launch to operations, often going
beyond any one term or majority in Congress. There has been a push to
speed up implementation time, but this is unlikely to happen any time
soon and there are currently a slate of missions in development that
have years left until completion.
Question 10. Mr. Isaacman, how do you plan to address the current
slate of science missions to ensure that during your tenure they
continue on to launch and minimize costs to the taxpayer?
Answer. I fully acknowledge that some missions will inherently span
longer than a single administration to plan, build, and launch. Certain
challenges demand those timelines. However, NASA should not grow
comfortable with `generational programs' when there is clear hunger for
data and discovery. If confirmed, I would intend to challenge the
system to pursue breakthrough scientific missions as quickly and
affordably as possible.
Question 11. Mr. Isaacman, how will you sustain a scientific
community working on these projects that relies on long-term stability
and programmatic direction to achieve their strongest and most creative
outputs?
Answer. I do not believe most scientists want to build careers
around a single program, but rather contribute to families of missions
that build on previous successes--as we saw with Explorer, Pioneer, and
Mariner. These iterative programs are not a replacement for exquisite
flagship missions such as JWST, Dragonfly, or Europa Clipper, but we
should not be comfortable with single scientific programs that unfold
over decades when there should be hunger for data, iteration, and
mission success at a much higher cadence.
Mars Sample Return Mission
The United States has led the world in the exploration of Mars
since Vikings I and II landed in 1976. During questions from your first
hearing, it was discussed how the Mars Sample Return mission will be
crucial for planning a human mission to Mars. It is becoming
increasingly clear delaying Mars Sample Return or waiting for
astronauts to pick up the samples will make the human exploration of
Mars much more costly and potentially dangerous, and it will cede
decades of U.S. space exploration leadership to China. Martian soil has
substances known to be toxic, as well as uncharacterized biological
potential.
Question 12. Mr. Isaacman, what is your plan to assess offers from
U.S. companies to perform the Mars Sample Return mission as a
commercial service for a fraction of the previous estimated cost?
Answer. I believe a Mars Sample Return mission could lead to the
most consequential scientific discovery in human history, and in that
respect, I am eager to investigate the opportunities to pursue such a
mission.
Space Resources Utilization
Space resources, and the extraction and mining of such resources,
have the potential to support and enable future mission architectures,
reduce reliance on Earth-sourced materials, and expand what is possible
in space exploration. Developing the science of space resources and the
technology to advance them is critical to maintaining our preeminent
position as a spacefaring nation.
Question 13. Mr. Isaacman, how will you ensure that NASA's approach
to space resources--across research, policy, and partnerships--promotes
responsible use while strategically integrating these capabilities into
future exploration architectures, commercial missions, and potential
Earth-supply applications?
Answer. NASA is fortunate to have many talented subject-matter
experts, along with numerous avenues to solicit input from industry and
academia. I am particularly interested in resource utilization as a
means to ignite an orbital and lunar economy capable of helping fund
the space-faring future so many hope to see realized. There are, of
course, significant scientific benefits to resource analysis, as well
as practical applications--including shielding and habitats--that will
likely be essential for sustained human operations on the Moon and
Mars.
Small Satellite Deep-Space Missions
Colorado is home to one of the Nation's largest aerospace
workforces and multiple major research universities and Federal labs.
Small satellites are increasingly critical for scouting, communications
relays, technology demonstrations, and space weather monitoring.
Question 14. Mr. Isaacman, what role do you see for small
satellites in enabling human and robotic missions in cislunar and deep-
space? What policy support or funding mechanisms would best enable a
sustainable cadence of small deep-space missions?
Answer. As you may be aware, I have spoken and written extensively
about NASA serving as a force-multiplier for science--leveraging
talent, bulk buys of launch and spacecraft buses, and enabling academia
to undertake more meaningful discovery missions, including in cislunar
and deep space. I believe programs of this nature could help
differentiate academic institutions and provide access to exploration
assets that attract students and researchers. I have had initial
conversations with academic institutions and industry on this topic
and, if confirmed, would look forward to exploring the concept further.
STEM Education & NASA
You have stated previously that you view STEM Education as crucial
for inspiring future generations and driving innovation as we compete
with China and other countries. As you know, NASA's Office of STEM
Engagement (OSTEM) and Space Grant Consortium works with non-profit
affiliates across Colorado and nationwide to deliver quality STEM
engagement programs to K-12 and college students. These programs
successfully build a STEM workforce, connect students and faculty with
NASA programs, and bridge academia to industry.
Question 15. Mr. Isaacman, will you work with me to ensure that
these OSTEM programs continue to grow to meet the challenges ahead?
Answer. I believe STEM education and inspiration is inherent in all
that NASA endeavors to accomplish and is vital to the long-term success
of the agency.
Artemis Mission Supply Chain
In response to a question regarding the One Big Beautiful Bill's
funding for the Space Launch System (SLS) for Artemis missions through
Artemis V, you seemed to indicate that by that point, there will be
other heavy lift options available and thus revised architectures may
be possible. However, hardware is in flow now that supports SLS and
Orion for flights beyond Artemis V. To interrupt the existing supply
chain would risk putting in place another gap in U.S. human spaceflight
capability--and as you rightfully stated in your testimony, we can
never afford to let that happen again.
Question 16. Mr. Isaacman, since we may not know the status or
success of these alternative launch vehicles and landers for at least
3-4 more years, will you commit to maintaining the existing supply
chain and progress on hardware to support future Artemis missions
beyond Artemis V at least until such time as we have a new vehicle (or
vehicles) in place that is fully certified to fly with humans?
Answer. I will certainly commit to working with Congress and will
always follow the law. As it stands, the One Big Beautiful Bill
contemplates funding through Artemis V, and in that respect, I agree
that SLS and Orion are the most expeditious path to meeting near-term
lunar objectives. However, it is worth acknowledging the cost of SLS as
highlighted by NASA's Inspector General, and recognizing that if we
want an enduring presence on the Moon--with mission cadence greater
than every few years--and future missions to Mars and beyond, it will
be imperative to eventually pivot to an architecture that enables more
frequent and affordable launches.
______
Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. John Fetterman to
Jared Isaacman
Question 1. Mr. Isaacman, President Trump signed an executive order
on August 28th that ended collective bargaining agreements between
Federal employee unions and various Federal agencies, including NASA.
In its justification for this move, the Administration stated that
these collective bargaining agreements impede national security because
they could delay implementation of ``time-sensitive'' national security
measures. While the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 allows for the
suspension of collective bargaining in limited national security
circumstances, this August 28th decision covered every single Federal
employee at NASA.
Do you believe that every NASA employee that was represented by a
union before August 28, 2025, is engaged in work which directly affects
national security?
Answer. I believe NASA undertakes work that is vital to the
national interest and, in many cases, essential to America's
competitiveness and national security.
Question 2. Mr. Isaacman, the American people expect NASA to lead
and execute on the President's plan to return to the Moon. I am
particularly interested in what you are going to do to ensure success
on the power generation missions, which are crucially important for any
exploration on the lunar surface. Congress has historically highlighted
the importance of a mix of power solutions, including utilizing solar
array technologies. These systems increase the odds that we can beat
China back to the Moon and claim key locations around the south pole
while also being less expensive and faster.
How do you view solar power generation fitting into the overall
lunar surface power portfolio going forward?
Answer. There is scarce real estate on the lunar surface that
provides access to both solar power and vital resources. I believe it
is imperative that NASA return to the Moon before our great competitor
and establish the infrastructure necessary to realize the scientific,
economic, and national security benefits of a sustained presence. That
certainly includes solar power, of which I am a strong proponent. That
said, not every scientific mission will be able to rely on solar
energy--whether due to distance from the Sun in deep space, power-
generation requirements (resource manufacturing), or other
constraints--which is why I am also a strong advocate for urgent
investment in space-based nuclear programs (propulsion and surface
power).
______
Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Roger Wicker to
Steven H. Haines
Question #1:
Recent global events have highlighted risks in our supply chains
supply chains. These events, such as natural disasters and the COVID-19
pandemic, caused significant delays and shortages. These obstacles can
cause consumers in the U.S. to have to pay higher prices for everyday
goods and lack access to critical products, such as medical supplies.
The U.S. is heavily reliant on single countries for critical supply
chain segments, including manufacturing components, critical minerals,
and active pharmaceutical ingredients. This concentration poses a
significant risk of disruption. Reported estimates suggest that more
than 90 percent of U.S. manufacturing companies do not have complete
visibility throughout their entire supply chain.
The Industry & Analysis (I&A) unit at the International Trade
Administration houses a dedicated Supply Chain Center charged with
increasing the resilience of critical supply chains, integrating
industry expertise and data analytics to develop supply-chain risk-
assessment tools. The unit develops innovative supply chain risk
assessment tools and coordinates case studies on critical supply
chains.
Question. Mr. Haines, as the Assistant Secretary of Commerce for
Industry and Analysis, you would drive policy for U.S. manufacturing
industries and supply chains. What actions do you think are necessary
to rebuild domestic manufacturing capacity and advance U.S. supply
chain resiliency?
Do you agree that strengthening America's supply chains will ensure
our economic competitiveness?
Answer. I believe that strengthening America's supply chains is
critical to our competitiveness and our national security.
If I am confirmed as Assistant Secretary for Industry & Analysis, I
will be charged with helping the Administration implement the America
First Trade Policy and strengthen critical supply chains.
As Assistant Secretary, I will ensure that I&A provides the most
sophisticated analysis possible on supply chains, and works closely
with American companies to make their supply chains stronger and more
resilient by developing enhanced data resources and tools.
______
Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Todd Young to
Steven H. Haines
ITA's mandate is to support U.S. industry competitiveness, but it
increasingly has to supply analysis for tariff actions and inclusion
decisions that are justified on national security grounds.
Question. If confirmed, how do you envision using ITA's analysis
within the existing petition-and-comment process for tariff inclusions
to ensure that decisions are grounded in clear, consistently applied
criteria rather than trending over time toward very broad or automatic
coverage of petitions?
Answer. If confirmed as Assistant Secretary for Industry &
Analysis, I will ensure that any future role I&A plays in any tariff
inclusion process is grounded in clear, consistently applied, and
evidence-based criteria. This includes a focus on objective factors
such as U.S. and allied production capacity, lead times, quality
requirements, and risks of circumvention or over-reliance on non-market
economies.
______
Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Maria Cantwell to
Steven H. Haines
Data Integrity. We have seen the integrity of Federal economic data
threatened by this Administration. This summer, the Commissioner of the
Bureau of Labor Statistics was fired after publishing jobs data that
the president did not like. If confirmed, you would be responsible for
providing critical analysis and data to support trade policy decisions.
Question 1. If the Secretary or the President threatened to fire
you if you released accurate economic data they did not like, would you
risk losing your job to maintain data integrity?
Answer. The President and the Secretary are committed to ensuring
the accuracy and integrity of Federal data. If confirmed, I look
forward to sharing their commitment to data accuracy and integrity.
Question 2. Yes or No: Will you commit to never compromise the
integrity of government economic data?
Answer. If confirmed, I will follow the law.
Supply Chains. The U.S. manufacturing sector employs nearly 13
million American workers and accounts for 10.3 percent of our GDP, yet
one supply chain shock can cause widespread disruption causing
shortages and price increases.
As we discussed during the hearing, my bill, the Promoting
Resilient Supply Chains Act (co-sponsored by Senators Blackburn, Blunt
Rochester, and Young), would expand the responsibilities of the
Assistant Secretary for Industry and Analysis. These new
responsibilities would include promoting the stability of critical
supply chains and emerging technologies by identifying, preparing for,
and responding to supply chain shocks. I appreciate your commitment to
implementing the legislation to the fullest extent if enacted, and hope
that you can elaborate on your view of the bill for the record.
Question 1. Yes or No: Do you support my Promoting Resilient Supply
Chains Act, and will you work with me to get this bill signed into law?
Answer. The resiliency and security of America's supply chains is a
top priority for the Industry & Analysis unit. I have been closely
monitoring the potential enactment of the Promoting Resilient Supply
Chains Act to ensure that I&A is ready to deliver on these new
responsibilities if enacted.
Question 2. What specific improvements do you think we should make
to better protect our supply chains?
Answer. President Trump is taking steps to restore American
manufacturing and encourage the growth of key industries domestically.
These efforts will incentivize demand for U.S.-made products and
technologies and increase supply chain resiliency.
In far too many areas, the United States has become reliant on
imports of critical components and materials from adversaries,
requiring bold action to secure American supply chains.
Dependence on foreign sources introduces external vulnerabilities,
heightening the risk of disruptions that could have significant
consequences for U.S. economic security.
Better understanding our exposure to producers in adversarial
nations and identifying supply chain chokepoints is critical to helping
American industry better restore, support, and safeguard their supply
chains against unexpected shocks.
If confirmed, I will continuously monitor and evaluate data sources
to ensure it can map critical sectors. This data driven approach helps
inform targeted actions by the U.S. government, whether through trade
enforcement, supply chain interventions, investment reviews, or
domestic industrial development.
Tariffs' impact on American Families. The Trump Administration's
unpredictable tariffs agenda has been felt the hardest by hard working
American families and small businesses. In my home state, Teri's
Toybox, a small toy store that has been in business for over 40 years,
is experiencing 30 to 50 percent cost increases. This is forcing the
store owners to absorb extra costs heading into the holiday shopping
season and threatening the affordability of children's gifts.
The Supreme Court is weighing a case right now that will determine
if there has been presidential overreach.
Question 1. Do you support the President's tariff agenda? Why or
why not.
Answer. Yes. President Trump's trade actions have been necessary
and deliberate responses to years of unfair trade practices that have
harmed American workers, manufacturers, and critical supply chains.
Question 2. Do you believe the Administration's tariff policies are
contributing to the affordability crisis impacting the American public?
Why or why not.
Answer. Under President Trump's leadership, we have seen record
investment pour into the United States from around the world. We are
also seeing wage increases outpace the rate of inflation, which has
slowed after reaching 40-year highs under the Biden administration.
Question 3. You have been working for this Administration since
January. Are you aware of whether the Administration has developed
specific contingency plans if the Supreme Court strikes down its IEEPA
tariffs? If yes, please describe them.
Answer. The President has a number of tools and trade authorities
at his disposal, and he stands ready to use them as necessary.
Question 4. What do you say to the small businesses like Terri's
Toybox that are struggling with massive cost increases due to the
Administration's tariffs and looming uncertainty?
Answer. The Administration's trade policies are focused on
revitalizing American manufacturing and encouraging the growth of
strong domestic industries. If confirmed, I look forward to engaging
with stakeholders from across the country to understand how businesses
are impacted by trade policies.
Tariff Analysis and Data. you served as Acting Assistant Secretary
for Industry and Analysis earlier this year. You should be very
familiar with the experts who collect key economic data for American
trade and policy. However, the Administration has thus far failed to
publish important analysis on how tariffs are impacting Americans and
the U.S. economy.
Economic analysis should underpin U.S. trade policy. And Congress,
businesses and American consumers should know what analyses the
Administration is relying on to justify this tariff chaos.
Question 1. Would you agree that the office of Industry and
Analysis has the expertise and ability to conduct analyses of the
impact of tariffs on businesses, consumers, and the U.S. economy?
Answer. Yes. Among its roles, I&A specializes in providing
expertise, data, and advanced analytics to support stakeholders and
inform decision-making on tariffs and trade, investment, and other
matters affecting U.S. competitiveness.
Question 2. If confirmed, will you commit to publishing economic
impact analyses with data on critical American industries, supply
chains, and the economy as a whole?
Answer. If confirmed, I will ensure that I&A analysts continue to
provide the most sophisticated, data-driven analysis possible, and work
closely with stakeholders, including American companies, to provide
analytical products on trade, supply chains, industries, and the
broader economy.
Tariffs Clothing and Textiles Impact. The Administration's chaotic
trade policies have fostered confusion and disruption among key
industries including the apparel and footwear industry. The Yale Budget
lab estimates President Trump's import taxes will cause especially high
price increases--22 percent for leather goods like shoes and 21 percent
for apparel.
The outdoor clothing industry is particularly vital to my state,
representing $22.5 billion in GDP and more than 121,000 jobs in
Washington alone.
Question 1. Do you disagree with the Yale Budget Lab's analysis
that apparel and footwear are facing major price increases due to
tariffs? If so, what studies or data support your position?
Answer. I recognize the importance of the apparel and footwear
industries, including outdoor clothing, and if confirmed I am committed
to supporting policies that advance fair trade and investment.
Question 2. How long would it take to shift the current supply
chains for these goods so more of their manufacturing can be done in
the U.S.?
Answer. The Trump Administration has taken several actions to
ensure U.S. textile and apparel companies can manufacture competitively
in the United States and employ American workers including closing the
de minimis loophole and supporting this sector through policies that
advance fair trade, investment, and sustainability.
Question 3. What actions will you take to protect the apparel
industry and small businesses, which currently face undue harm by the
Trump Administration's tariff policies?
Answer. The U.S. textile and apparel industry is a major engine of
economic growth, supporting hundreds of thousands of jobs and
generating billions in output and exports. To protect American
producers from unfair competition while also preserving our industrial
capacity, the Trump Administration made it a priority to close the de
minimis loophole around the world and advance fair trade.
Spokane Tech Hub. The goals of the Economic Development
Administration's Tech Hub program are to diffuse our innovation
capacity to all regions of the United States, onshoring our supply
chains, and increasing our capacity for advanced materials
manufacturing.
We have established a Washington and Idaho Tech Hub in Spokane
focused on advanced thermoplastic composite materials with the
ambitious goal of enabling manufacturing by industry at scale.
Question 1. Do you agree that the goals of the Tech Hub program are
essential to our global competitiveness in the aerospace and aviation
sectors?
Answer. Supporting a healthy, robust manufacturing industry is
central to the Department of Commerce's mission. I defer to officials
at the Economic Development Administration about the specifics of that
program.
Question 2. Will you be an advocate within the Department of
Commerce for the Spokane-Cour d'Alene Tech Hub?
Answer. If I am confirmed, I look forward to working with your
office to learn more about this topic.
______
Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Amy Klobuchar to
Steven H. Haines
Question Topic: Tourism
The travel and tourism industry still face headwinds, including
visa delays, workforce shortages, and a decline in international
visitors--all of which affect U.S. services exports and regional
economies like Minnesota's. The Department of Commerce's Industry &
Analysis unit's data and competitiveness analysis will be key to our
efforts to address these issues.
How would you use the analytical tools of the office of
Industry & Analysis to identify the barriers to travel and
tourism recovery and turn those findings into recommendations
that support this sector of the economy?
Answer. If confirmed, I will work with the National Travel and
Tourism Office to further strengthen and capitalize on its important
programs for the sector.
Question Topic: Brand USA
I have long been an advocate for Brand USA, a public-private
partnership that promotes international travel to the United States.
International visitors generate an estimated $4,000 per trip and
support more than 80,000 American jobs annually. I co-lead the
bipartisan VISIT USA Act with Senator Sullivan to offset recent funding
cuts to Brand USA.
If confirmed, how will you work to strengthen programs like Brand
USA--which does not use taxpayer dollars--to ensure the U.S. remains
competitive in attracting international visitors, especially with major
upcoming events like the World Cup, America's Semiquincentennial
celebrations, and the 2028 Olympics?
Answer. If confirmed, I will work with Brand USA to ensure that the
program meets its statutory requirements.
[all]