[Senate Hearing 119-273]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]



                                                        S. Hrg. 119-273

                 NOMINATION TO THE NATIONAL AERONAUTICS
                    AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION AND THE
                   FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

=======================================================================





                                HEARING

                               before the

                         COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE,
                      SCIENCE, AND TRANSPORTATION
                          UNITED STATES SENATE 

                    ONE HUNDRED NINETEENTH CONGRESS

                             FIRST SESSION
                               __________

                             APRIL 9, 2025
                               __________

    Printed for the use of the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 
                             Transportation






               [GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] 
               
               
               
               
               
               
                Available online: http://www.govinfo.gov 
                                ______
                                
                   U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE

62-667 PDF                 WASHINGTON : 2026                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
              
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
       SENATE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND TRANSPORTATION

                    ONE HUNDRED NINETEENTH CONGRESS

                             FIRST SESSION

                       TED CRUZ, Texas, Chairman
JOHN THUNE, South Dakota             MARIA CANTWELL, Washington, 
ROGER WICKER, Mississippi              Ranking
DEB FISCHER, Nebraska                AMY KLOBUCHAR, Minnesota
JERRY MORAN, Kansas                  BRIAN SCHATZ, Hawaii
DAN SULLIVAN, Alaska                 EDWARD MARKEY, Massachusetts
MARSHA BLACKBURN, Tennessee          GARY PETERS, Michigan
TODD YOUNG, Indiana                  TAMMY BALDWIN, Wisconsin
TED BUDD, North Carolina             TAMMY DUCKWORTH, Illinois
ERIC SCHMITT, Missouri               JACKY ROSEN, Nevada
JOHN CURTIS, Utah                    BEN RAY LUJAN, New Mexico
BERNIE MORENO, Ohio                  JOHN HICKENLOOPER, Colorado
TIM SHEEHY, Montana                  JOHN FETTERMAN, Pennsylvania
SHELLEY MOORE CAPITO, West Virginia  ANDY KIM, New Jersey
CYNTHIA LUMMIS, Wyoming              LISA BLUNT ROCHESTER, Delaware
                 Brad Grantz, Republican Staff Director
           Nicole Christus, Republican Deputy Staff Director
                   Lila Harper Helms, Staff Director
                 Melissa Porter, Deputy Staff Director
                 
                 
                 
                 
                 
                 
                 
                 
                 
                 
                 
                 
                 
                 
                 
                 
                 
                 
                 
                 
                 
                 
                 
                 
                 
                 
                 
                 

   
                 
                 
                 
                            C O N T E N T S

                              ----------                              
                                                                   Page
Hearing held on April 9, 2025....................................     1
Statement of Senator Cruz........................................     1
Statement of Senator Cantwell....................................     3
    Letter dated March 4, 2025 to Hon. Ted Cruz and Hon. Maria 
      Cantwell from Mike Moses, President, Virgin Galactic.......    92
    Letter dated March 12, 2025 to Hon. Ted Cruz and Hon. Maria 
      Cantwell from Kay Ivey, Governor, State of Alabama.........    94
    Letter dated April 7, 2024 to Senator Ted Cruz and Senator 
      Maria Cantwell from Darren Pleasnce, President and CEO, 
      Aircaft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA)...............    95
    Letter dated April 7, 2025 to Ranking Member Chris Van Hollen 
      and Senator Angela Alsobrooks from Robert D. Braun, Head, 
      Space Exploration Sector, Johns Hopkins Applied Physics 
      Laboratory.................................................    96
    Letter to Hon. John Thune, Hon. Chuck Schumer, Hon. Ted Cruz 
      and Hon. Maria Cantwell from Zak Kukoff, Chair, Tech 
      Practice, Lewis-Burke Associates; Devin Bryant, Space Lead, 
      Lewis-Burke Associates; David Cowan, Managing Partner, 
      Bessemer Venture Partners; Delian Asparouhov, Co-Founder 
      and President, Varda Space Industries; Partner, Founders 
      Fund; Blake Scholl, Founder and CEO, Boom Aerospace; John 
      Gedmark, Founder and CEO, Astranis; Chris Power, CEO, 
      Hadrian; Austin Bishop, CEO, New American Industrial 
      Alliance; Patrick Blumenthal, Founder, Anomaly Fund; Adam 
      Grosser, Chairman, UP Partners; Saurav Shroff, Co-Founder, 
      Starpath; Xander Oltmann, General Partner, Commodity 
      Capital; Max Haot, CEO, Vast Space; Jonathan Lacoste, 
      General Partner, Space VC; Andy Lapsa, Founder and CEO, 
      Stoke Space; Jason Kim, CEO, Firefly Aerospace; AJ Piplica, 
      Founder and CEO, Hermeus; Bradley Cheetham, CEO, Advanced 
      Space; Jake Poliskin, Founding Partner, Shorewind Capital; 
      Yash Shevde, Founder, Ursa Bio; Solange Massa, CEO, 
      Ecoatoms; Casey Handmer, Founder, Terraform Industries; 
      James Barlia, Executive Director, Station DC; Ashley 
      Pilipiszyn, Founder and CEO, BESXAR........................    97
    Letter dated March 21, 2025 to Hon. Ted Cruz and Hon. Maria 
      Cantwell from Dave Cavossa, President, Commercial Space 
      Federation.................................................    99
    Letter dated March 14, 2025 to Hon. Ted Cruz and Hon. Maria 
      Cantwell from former astronauts: Robert Cabana, Leroy 
      Chiao, Ken Cockrell, Cady Coleman, Drew Feustel, Jack 
      Fischer, Mike Foreman, Ron Garan, John Grunsfeld,Ken Ham, 
      Brent Jett, Scott Kelly, Shane Kimbrough, Michael Lopez-
      Alegria, Ed Lu, Leland Melvin, Dottie Metcalf-Lindenburger, 
      Karen Nyberg, Steve Oswald, William Readdy, Garrett 
      Reisman, Stephen Robinson, Rusty Schweickart. Nicole Stott, 
      Steven Swanson, Jim Voss, Peggy Whitson, and George Zamka..   101
    Letter dated March 4, 2025 to Hon. Ted Cruz and Hon. Maria 
      Cantwell from Republican Governors: Governor Bill Lee, 
      State of Tennessee; Governor Sarah Sanders, State of 
      Arkansas; Governor Ron DeSantis, State of Florida; Governor 
      Brian Kemp, State of Georgia; Governor Mike Kehoe, State of 
      Missouri; Governor Kevin Stitt, State of Oklahoma and 
      Governor Greg Abbott, State of Texas.......................   102
    Letter dated April 8, 2025 to Hon. Ted Cruz and Hon. Maria 
      Cantwell from Tim F. Lussier, M.A.--San Antonio, Texas--
      United States of America--Planet Earth.....................   104
    Letter dated March 27, 2025 to Hon. Ted Cruz and Hon. Maria 
      Cantwell from Ed Bolen, President and CEO, National 
      Business Aviation Association..............................   105
    Letter dated April 9, 2025 to Hon. Ted Cruz and Hon. Maria 
      Cantwell from Will Marshall, Co-Founder and Chief Executive 
      Officer, Planet Labs PBC and Robbie Schingler, Co-Founder 
      and Chief Strategy Officer, Planet Labs PBC................   107
    Letter dated February 20, 2025 to Hon. Ted Cruz and Hon. 
      Maria Cantwell from Bill Woolf, CEO, President and Founder, 
      Space Force Association, Colonel, USAF (Ret.)..............   109
    Letter dated April 7, 2025 to Hon. Ted Cruz and Hon. Maria 
      Cantwell from Michael K. Powell, President and CEO, NCTA--
      The Internet & Television Association......................   110
    Letter dated April 8, 2025 to Hon. Ted Cruz and Hon. Maria 
      Cantwell from Jonathan Spalter, President and Chief 
      Executive Officer, USTelecom--The Broadband Association....   111
    Letter dated March 20, 2025 to Hon. Ted Cruz and Hon. Maria 
      Cantwell from Grant Spellmeyer, President and CEO, 
      America's Communication Association........................   112
    Letter dated February 28, 2025 to Hon. Ted Cruz and Hon. 
      Maria Cantwell from James Erwin, Executive Director, 
      Digital Liberty............................................   113
    Letter dated February 26, 2025 to Hon. John Thune, Hon. Chuck 
      Schumer, Hon. Ted Cruz and Hon. Maria Cantwell from Nathan 
      Leamer, Executive Director, Digital First Project; Harold 
      Furchtgott-Roth, Senior Fellow and Director, Center for the 
      Economics of the Internet, Hudson Institute; Grover 
      Norquist, President, Americans For Tax Reform; Evan 
      Swarztrauber, Senior Fellow, Foundation For American 
      Innovation; Tom Hebert, Executive Director, Open 
      Competition Center; James Erwin, Executive Director, 
      Digital Liberty; Mike O'Rielly, Senior Fellow, Free State 
      Foundation; David Williams, President, Taxpayers Protection 
      Alliance; Ashley Baker, Executive Director, Committee for 
      Justice; Yael Ossowski, Deputy Director, Consumer Choice 
      Center; Gerard Scimeca, Chairman, Consumer Action for a 
      Strong Economy; Jeff Mazzella, President, Center For 
      Individual Freedom.........................................   115
    Letter dated March 4, 2025 to Hon. Ted Cruz and Hon. Maria 
      Cantwell from ACT | The App Association, Alliance for 
      Telecommunications Industry Solutions, CEDIA, Consumer 
      Technology Association, CTIA--The Wireless Association, GPS 
      Innovation Alliance, INCOMPAS, Internet Infrastructure 
      Coalition, Information Technology Industry Council, 
      Institute for Education, USTelecom, TechNet, Wireless 
      Infrastructure Association and XR Association..............   117
    Letter dated April 9, 2025 to Hon. Ted Cruz and Hon. Maria 
      Cantwell from Morgan Reed, President, ACT | The App 
      Association................................................   119
    Letter dated April 2, 2025 to Hon. Ted Cruz and Hon. Maria 
      Cantwell from Fire Chief Josh Waldo, CFO, EFO IAFC 
      President and Board Chair 2024-2025........................   120
    Letter dated April 8, 2025 to Hon. Ted Cruz and Hon. Maria 
      Cantwell from David Zumwalt, President and CEO, WISPA--
      Broadband Without Boundaries...............................   121
Statement of Senator Wicker......................................     5
Statement of Senator Sheehy......................................     7
Statement of Senator Kim.........................................    59
Statement of Senator Fischer.....................................    61
Statement of Senator Klobuchar...................................    63
Statement of Senator Moran.......................................    65
Statement of Senator Peters......................................    67
Statement of Senator Blackburn...................................    69
Statement of Senator Lujan.......................................    71
Statement of Senator Sullivan....................................    73
Statement of Senator Blunt Rochester.............................    75
Statement of Senator Young.......................................    76
Statement of Senator Duckworth...................................    78
Statement of Senator Moreno......................................    80
Statement of Senator Markey......................................    82

                               Witnesses

Jared Isaacman, Nominee to be Administrator, National Aeronautics 
  and Space Administration.......................................     8
    Prepared statement...........................................    10
    Biographical information.....................................    12
Olivia Trusty, Nominee to be a Member, Federal Communications 
  Commission.....................................................    45
    Prepared statement...........................................    47
    Biographical information.....................................    47

                                Appendix

Response to written questions submitted to Jared Isaacman by:
    Hon. Ted Cruz................................................   123
    Hon. Roger Wicker............................................   127
    Hon. John Curtis.............................................   127
    Hon. Shelley Moore Capito....................................   128
    Hon. Maria Cantwell..........................................   128
    Hon. Brian Schatz............................................   137
    Hon. Edward Markey...........................................   138
    Hon. Gary Peters.............................................   140
    Hon. Tammy Baldwin...........................................   142
    Hon. Jacky Rosen.............................................   143
    Hon. Ben Ray Lujan...........................................   145
    Hon. John Hickenlooper.......................................   146
    Hon. Lisa Blunt Rochester....................................   148
Response to written questions submitted to Olivia Trusty by:
    Hon. Ted Cruz................................................   148
    Hon. Dan Sullivan............................................   149
    Hon. Marsha Blackburn........................................   149
    Hon. Todd Young..............................................   150
    Hon. John Curtis.............................................   151
    Hon. Shelley Moore Capito....................................   151
    Hon. Maria Cantwell..........................................   152
    Hon. Amy Klobuchar...........................................   159
    Hon. Brian Schatz............................................   159
    Hon. Edward Markey...........................................   160
    Hon. Gary Peters.............................................   161
    Hon. Tammy Baldwin...........................................   162
    Hon. Tammy Duckworth.........................................   163
    Hon. Jacky Rosen.............................................   163
    Hon. Ben Ray Lujan...........................................   165
    Hon. John Hickenlooper.......................................   166
    Hon. Lisa Blunt Rochester....................................   168

 
                           NOMINATION TO THE 
                     NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE 
                     ADMINISTRATION AND THE FEDERAL  
                       COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

                              ----------                              
                              
                        WEDNESDAY, APRIL 9, 2025

                                       U.S. Senate,
        Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
                                                    Washington, DC.
    The Committee met, pursuant to notice, at 10:25 a.m., in 
room SR-253, Senate Russell Office Building, Hon. Ted Cruz, 
Chairman of the Committee, presiding.
    Present: Senators Cruz, Wicker, Fischer, Moran, Sullivan, 
Blackburn, Young, Budd, Schmitt, Curtis, Moreno, Sheehy, 
Capito, Lummis, Cantwell, Klobuchar, Markey, Peters, Baldwin, 
Duckworth, Rosen, Lujan, Hickenlooper, Kim, and Blunt 
Rochester.

              OPENING STATEMENT OF HON. TED CRUZ, 
                    U.S. SENATOR FROM TEXAS

    The Chairman. Today, we will hear from Jared Isaacman, who 
has been nominated to lead the National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration, NASA; and from Olivia Trusty, who has been 
nominated to the Federal Communications Commission, the FCC.
    NASA has always been at the forefront of American 
leadership. In 1969, that meant putting a man on the Moon, 
today, it means returning there; this time to stay.
    Our nominee, Jared Isaacman, has been active in the 
commercialization of space exploration. In 2021, Mr. Isaacman 
commanded the first all-civilian spaceflight, Inspiration4.
    In 2024, he flew his second commercial mission, going 
further into space than any other manned mission since Apollo 
17. He brings a unique perspective to the challenges facing 
NASA and the space industry.
    Today, NASA is at a crossroads. The explosive growth of the 
commercial space sector, from hardware manufacturers to space 
tourism ventures, has transformed the celestial and economic 
landscape. Space is no longer the exclusive domain of sovereign 
nations and a handful of legacy defense contractors. The 
democratization of space has spurred growth, reduced launch and 
satellite costs, and fostered the curiosity of the next 
generation.
    At the same time, the future of the final frontier has 
never been more uncertain. In military terms, space is the 
ultimate high ground. A nation that dominates in space can 
deprive others, not only of intelligence capabilities, but 
modern conveniences like GPS and satellite internet. And make 
no mistake; the Chinese Communist Party has been explicit in 
its desire to dominate space, putting a fully functional space 
station in low Earth orbit and robotic rovers on the far side 
of the Moon.
    We are not headed for the next space race. It is already 
here. President Trump alluded to this race in his inaugural 
address when he envisioned American astronauts on Mars. I 
strongly support the President's vision. In fact, my 2017 NASA 
Authorization Act was one of the very first pieces of 
legislation President Trump signed in his first term, and it 
explicitly enshrined this goal in law.
    But the pursuit of the next horizon cannot mean abandoning 
American dominance where it is already established. The 
International Space Station has been continuously manned for 
more than 20 years, serving as a hub for research and testing 
together with our international partners in space exploration. 
While we will eventually have to retire the ISS, before that 
happens, we must put the necessary systems in place to support 
and command American astronauts continually in low Earth orbit. 
We cannot surrender low Earth orbit to the Chinese or to the 
Russians. Likewise, the Artemis mission, launched during 
President Trump's first term, is set to return American 
astronauts to the Moon and establish a sustained human presence 
there.
    Joining us in the audience today, as we heard earlier this 
morning, are the four Artemis II astronauts: Reid Wiseman, 
Victor Glover, Christina Koch, and Jeremy Hansen.
    [Applause.]
    The Chairman. In the next year, they will fly to and orbit 
the Moon, setting the course for Artemis III's return to the 
lunar surface in 2027. The Artemis mission and the entire Moon 
to Mars program, which have enjoyed consistent bipartisan 
support, serve as a stepping stone to landing American 
astronauts on Mars. In fact, this stepping-stone approach is 
explicitly in the law as enacted by Congress. We must stay the 
course.
    An extreme shift in priorities at this stage would almost 
certainly mean a red Moon, ceding ground to China for 
generations to come. I am hard-pressed to think of a more 
catastrophic mistake we could make in space than saying to 
Communist China: The Moon is yours, America will not lead.
    So I look forward to hearing from Mr. Isaacman about his 
goals for NASA, his commitment to Artemis, how he intends to 
refocus and reinvigorate the Agency in its core mission, and 
how he will ensure America continues to lead the world in space 
exploration.
    Let me now turn to the Federal Communications Commission, 
which faces its own set of challenges. The Agency's Universal 
Service Fund was recently challenged in the Supreme Court. Its 
Broadcast Ownership Rules are ill-adapted to the modern media 
environment. And most significantly, in March 2023, the FCC 
lost its authority to conduct Spectrum auctions for the first 
time ever. This ongoing lapse in auction authority has cost 
jobs and has weakened America's global standing.
    Increasing the amount of Spectrum available for commercial 
use will secure our preeminence in telecommunications and will 
unlock billions of dollars for domestic investment, creating 
hundreds of thousands of jobs.
    Olivia Trusty has nearly 20 years of relevant experience in 
telecommunications. She is currently a staff member at the 
Armed Services Committee, which is chaired by our colleague, 
Senator Wicker, who will be introducing her this morning. Ms. 
Trusty has also worked as a policy director here at the 
Commerce Committee, giving her well-rounded views of the 
interests of both the Department of Defense and the commercial 
industry when it comes to mid-band spectrum. I am confident 
that Ms. Trusty will be an asset at the FCC, where she will 
champion a Spectrum pipeline, protect free speech, and ensure 
access to fast and affordable Internet.
    I look forward to hearing from both of today's nominees and 
learning how they hope to advance American greatness within 
their institutions.
    I now turn to Ranking Member Cantwell for her opening 
remarks.

               STATEMENT OF HON. MARIA CANTWELL, 
                  U.S. SENATOR FROM WASHINGTON

    Senator Cantwell. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. And good morning 
to our two nominees: Mr. Isaacman, Ms. Trusty, congratulations 
on this nomination. Mr. Isaacman, obviously for NASA, and Ms. 
Trusty for the Federal Communications Agency.
    First, Mr. Isaacman, nominee for the Administrator of NASA, 
as my colleague was just saying, the space race is heating up. 
You will have a critical task of delivering mission-critical, 
on-time, and on-budget challenges for the United States of 
America over the next 4 years to make sure that we do not lose 
in that space race. This includes successful execution on the 
Artemis program, which will take the United States back to the 
Moon and ultimately the goal of getting to Mars.
    The NASA Authorization Bill, which Senator Cruz and I co-
sponsored, strongly backs the Artemis program. It includes a 
lunar lander redundancy, NASA's Space Launch SLS system, and 
critical to America's leadership in space, getting Americans 
back to the Moon.
    The State of Washington has long been a home to aviation, 
but now, with over 40 companies across the State of Washington 
producing space-related products, we have over 2,000 employees 
working just on the Artemis program. So we're invested. These 
companies supply components for the Gateway Space Station, the 
Orion crew capsule, the two crewed lunar landers, the SLS heavy 
lift rocket, and its ground system.
    Beyond space exploration, NASA is also one of the world's 
top R&D organizations. We had a chance to talk about that in my 
office, about NASA's discoveries and science that are helping 
us with our aerospace industry overall. NASA scientists and 
engineers provide the crucial evidence and information to both 
government and industry on issues like AI, quantum, advanced 
aerospace materials, and next-generation manufacturing.
    So I know a consortium in my state, standing up a tech hub, 
has been an applicant that NASA has been very supportive of.
    I do have concerns as we move forward about reports in the 
press about where the administration will come down on 
investments. I hope we can talk about this today and clarify 
your position as it relates to these priorities for our Nation. 
For example, in March of--last month, The Wall Street Journal 
reported that the Trump administration was considering major 
changes to the Artemis program. You, too, have also made past 
statements about changes to the program. And if NASA does 
terminate the SLS and relies only on commercial rockets, such 
as SpaceX and Blue Origin, New Glenn, experts say Americans 
will not get to the Moon before the end of the decade, so a lot 
of scientific analysis resting on your shoulders, and then the 
budget capabilities to convince our colleagues to make these 
investments.
    Like the Chairman, I want to win the race. I want to make 
sure that China does not beat us to Mars. And I hope that even 
with this recent announcement of theirs, that we beat them to 
the Moon. I strongly believe that safety and resiliency, built 
through redundancy and innovation through competition is a key. 
So I would like to hear your views on that this morning.
    We are also seeing the administration, and DOGE 
specifically, cancel research grants to fund science agency and 
lay off highly skilled technical experts across the Federal 
Government. According to the news reports, NASA has confirmed 
an announcement by DOGE that up to $420 million in agency 
contracts have been canceled. So this is of concern, sorting 
out how this cancellation impacts many different organizations.
    Meanwhile, tomorrow is the last day of work for several top 
NASA advisors, including the chief economist, the chief 
scientist, and the chief technologist, their positions were 
eliminated because of the DOGE agenda. Reports indicate that 
the Fiscal Year 2026 budget request might slash NASA's science 
funding by half.
    So Mr. Isaacman, all of these are in the news, and we will 
want to understand your commitment to these issues, or 
understanding your strategy about how you see us making these 
commitments to invest in science for the future.
    Now to Ms. Trusty; certainly welcome to you and your family 
who is here. I think you definitely outnumber the astronauts in 
the room, which is, we very much appreciate that.
    [Applause.]
    Senator Cantwell. It is good to have that support, and your 
nomination comes at a critical time for the FCC. We want to 
have a communications system that is admired by the world, and 
we know that you are no stranger to this issue, working very 
diligently for Senator Wicker, both here on this committee and 
now on the Armed Services Committee.
    The FCC plays a vital role in Spectrum policy management 
and commercial airwaves, and I have long advocated, as I said 
in my earlier statement, for an evidence-based system. During 
the first Trump administration, the rush to auction, I think, 
raised some concerns. Most notably, they sold the C-band 
without proper FAA coordination about the impacts of aircraft 
altimeters creating an unnecessary problem that almost caused 
flights to be grounded, and slowed down the implementation of 
5G.
    So I hope we will hear about that issue, how you see us 
getting a more balanced approach in communication. Because of 
the FCC's influence over some of our most important 
institutions, including the media, and the internet, and 
providers, the FCC is an independent agency not subject to 
direct Presidential control, but this tradition is under 
attack.
    The Trump administration is seeking to bring independent 
agencies, like the FCC, under the President's direct control. 
Recently, the President fired two Democratic commissioners at 
the independent Federal Trade Commission without cause. So let 
me be clear, removing independent commissioners based on their 
party affiliations sets a dangerous precedent.
    I expect this administration will maintain a full FCC staff 
with five commissioners, including two Democrats, and 
meanwhile, the Trump administration FCC Chair has launched a 
series of investigations into media companies that the 
President doesn't like, so I was very happy to see this recent 
decision on holding up the AP, very important to have a very, 
very competitive landscape when it comes to media and news 
production.
    The FCC should return to its longstanding role as a 
neutral, independent regulator, and so look forward to asking 
you questions about that as well today. But again, 
congratulations on your nomination.
    Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
    The Chairman. Thank you. And in a moment I will recognize 
Senator Wicker. But I do want to note in addition to the four 
Artemis II astronauts who are here, we actually have a total of 
ten astronauts in the room. We have had six more. We have the 
astronauts of Polaris Dawn: Scott Poteet, Sarah Gillis, and 
Anna Menon; and we have the astronauts of Inspiration4:, Hayley 
Arceneaux, Chris Sembroski, and Dr. Sian Proctor. So to the six 
of you as well, thank you for your service, and welcome.
    [Applause.]
    The Chairman. And I have to say, anytime you have ten 
astronauts in the room, that this may be the most badass 
assemblage at a Commerce Hearing that I have seen.
    And with that, I recognize Senator Wicker to make an 
introduction.

                STATEMENT OF HON. ROGER WICKER, 
                 U.S. SENATOR FROM MISSISSIPPI

    Senator Wicker. Well, thank you, Mr. Chairman. And yes, 
thank you for introducing all of our astronauts, and as you can 
see, Senator Fischer and I engaged in a little hero worship 
before you hit the gavel and started this.
    But I am absolutely delighted to introduce and recommend to 
the Committee and to the Senate, Olivia Trusty as the next 
member of the FCC.
    I am unqualified, actually, to tell what a great nominee 
she is. And also, I hope there is some work being done back at 
my office. We have a number of staffers who slipped away, and I 
think there are probably a number of people watching on the 
telephone. But I am profoundly appreciative for this honor, and 
appreciative to President Trump for making this nomination.
    I frankly cannot conceive of a more qualified nominee. 
Oliver Trusty performs work at the highest level of excellence 
and she does it for the right reasons, and for 7 years now I 
have been the beneficiary of her expertise, but frankly this 
Committee, and the Armed Services Committee, and Full Senate 
have also been the beneficiary of her expertise.
    When I became Chairman of the Commerce Committee, I was 
fortunate that Olivia agreed to join my committee staff. A few 
years later, I became a Ranking Member of the Armed Services 
Committee and I knew there was one member of this committee 
staff that I wanted to bring over to handle her portfolio 
there.
    Olivia Trusty has helped all of us advance initiatives that 
made America more connected and more secure, initiatives that 
fall squarely within the Federal Communication Commission's 
jurisdiction. On technology party, she has helped us pass 
legislation to improve maps. She has worked to ensure broadband 
funds are directed where they are most needed and where 
Congress intended them to be.
    She has brought us closer to getting more Americans 
connected to high-speed internet. And of course we are not 
quite where we need to be. I think she will help us in this new 
position get there quicker.
    Her work has contributed to national security. She was 
instrumental in advancing legislation to free our domestic 
networks from communications equipment manufactured by foreign 
adversaries.
    She has been a leader on Spectrum policy, an area that 
bridges both technology and national security. She has 
collaborated with members and staff across the Commerce and 
Armed Services Committees to find common ground between 
commercial and Federal interest. Olivia Trusty wants to help 
our country maintain our leadership without risking national 
security, and she has worked to make that happen.
    I could go on and on, but Olivia does like brevity. She 
chooses her words carefully and concisely. Let me just say she 
plays chess, not checkers. She sees around the corners. She 
shoots straight and she will shoot straight with members of 
this committee and the Senate. She uses common sense and 
adherence to the law, and she will do so as a commissioner.
    On a personal basis, she is serious about her faith. She is 
an NCAA gymnast at UNC Chapel Hill. She is a Mormon Republican 
from Maryland, for heaven's sake.
    [Applause.]
    Senator Wicker. And those of us who know her know that she 
will do a magnificent job. And actually we are fortunate that 
she has chosen to work in the public sector for the taxpayers, 
and I could not give a more resounding endorsement to her 
nomination.
    Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
    The Chairman. Well, I will say that it is very impressive, 
particularly that she plays chess, and not checkers and shoots 
straight, I will say shooting is a novel strategy in chess, but 
whatever works and gives you the checkmate. There is more than 
one way to defeat the king.
    And with that, I recognize the junior senator from Montana, 
Senator Sheehy, to introduce Mr. Isaacman.

                 STATEMENT OF HON. TIM SHEEHY, 
                   U.S. SENATOR FROM MONTANA

    Senator Sheehy. You had to put ``Junior.'' in front of it, 
didn't you, Ted?
    [Applause.]
    Senator Sheehy. For nearly 70 years the United States----
    The Chairman. I am still the junior senator from Texas; 
this place, that could stick around a long time.
    Senator Cantwell. I am the longest-serving junior member.
    [Laughter.]
    Senator Cantwell. So yes, 24 years you could still be the 
junior member.
    [Laughter.]
    Senator Cantwell. I wear it with a badge of honor.
    [Laughing]
    Senator Sheehy. Well, thank you, Chairman and Ranking 
Member. For nearly 70 years, the United States has been at the 
forefront of space exploration. President Trump knows how 
critical it is for our country to lead the way yet again as our 
space program aims to reach new heights and that is why he 
chose exactly the right man for the job, Jared Isaacman.
    I have personally known Jared for several years sharing an 
aviation community in Montana and cooperating with him on 
improving the education experience for our next generation of 
explorers, astronauts, engineers, and pilots who attend Space 
Camp at the U.S. Space and Rocket Center in Huntsville, 
Alabama.
    Of note, both Jared and I attended Space Camp, an arduous 
5-day program for small children, and I would say it lit a 
spark in both of us to chase the dream of aviation and 
aerospace. We both dreamed of being astronauts as children. The 
difference is Jared actually is one, whereas I had to settle 
for the decidedly less cool title of Senator.
    America has been the leader of global space travel for 
generations, pushing the boundaries of science and testing 
limits of human endurance and intellect. All Americans should 
be deeply proud of the incredible accomplishments of heroes 
like Alan Shepard, John Glenn, Neil Armstrong, Jim Lovell, and 
many others.
    The sacrifice and leadership of these brave astronauts is 
what most Americans know well. What they usually do not know is 
that behind each and every one of these heroes, many of whom 
sitting in front of us, is a massive team of dedicated 
engineers, program managers, innovators, test pilots, welders, 
electricians, truck drivers, and families who are the true 
heroes of our space program. To lead this incredible team 
requires a leader who not only understands and believes in the 
mission, but also has the interdisciplinary skill sets to 
coordinate these cross-functional teams to achieve critical 
outcomes.
    As we have unfortunately seen in recent days, NASA is 
struggling. And what is worse, it has been struggling for the 
past couple of decades. Since the tragedy of the Columbia 
disaster in 2003, which I remember like it was yesterday as I 
was preparing to enter the pool for a high school swim meet. 
NASA has been a struggling organization full of great people 
searching for revival.
    For 10 years the United States of America was paying the 
Russian Government taxi fare to send our own astronauts into 
space. This would make JFK and Ronald Reagan turn in their 
graves. And in light of the recent Starliner Mission to the ISS 
that left astronauts stuck in space for 9 months, we are 
reminded that much work still remains.
    President Trump, both, and Elon Musk, who is one of our 
greatest space entrepreneurs, both knew it was time for a 
change, and enter Jared Isaacman. Despite his childhood desire 
to be an Air Force pilot and an astronaut, Jared found out that 
he was smarter than most and started a disruptive software 
company in his garage as a teenager. That company grew to be a 
tremendous multi-billion dollar success, and that success 
fueled his ascension into the Hall of Fame as a record-setting 
jet pilot, an aggressive fighter pilot for our Air Force combat 
pilots, and most recently, the first civilian astronaut to ever 
conduct a spacewalk.
    On top of all that, Jared and I share another passion, 
pediatric philanthropy. Jared has personally donated millions 
of dollars to improve health care for at-risk children all over 
America, a cause which brought us together.
    NASA is at a point of great pride for a generation. It 
represents a moral obligation for us to continue to lead in the 
greatest frontier ever known, and it deserves strong 
leadership. Jared is an articulate leader, a great father and 
husband, and one of the smartest people in America. Jared 
understands not only how to manage complex, multi-billion 
dollar organizations, but also how to design and engineer 
critical systems. And to top it all off, he knows how to fly 
spaceships.
    America has given us a mandate to push the boundaries of 
outer space, and NASA is in need of spiritual and 
organizational rejuvenation, and that will take fresh, bold 
leadership. Jared is the perfect man for the job, and I look 
forward to adding NASA Administrator to his already remarkable 
resume.
    Thank you.
    The Chairman. Thank you. I now recognize Mr. Isaacman for 
his opening statement.

                  STATEMENT OF JARED ISAACMAN, 
                  NOMINEE TO BE ADMINISTRATOR, 
         NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

    Mr. Isaacman. Thank you, Senator Sheehy, for the very 
generous introduction. Thank you Chairman Cruz, Ranking Member 
Cantwell, distinguished Members of the Committee, I am honored 
and very grateful to be here before you today as President 
Donald Trump's nominee to lead the National Aeronautics and 
Space Administration.
    I have lived the American dream, and I owe this Nation a 
great debt. I would happily serve President Trump in any 
capacity, but to work alongside the people that have expanded 
the boundaries of exploration and brought humanity closer to 
the stars would be the privilege of a lifetime.
    Before I begin, I would like to acknowledge my crewmates, 
as you did earlier, Senator, along with my wife, Monica, and my 
two wonderful daughters that are sitting behind me, Mila and 
Liv.
    I do recognize I am a newcomer, so I thought I would share 
a bit about my story, along with my understanding of the 
challenges and the opportunities that lie ahead. I am an 
entrepreneur, and my journey began when I took a risk and left 
school at age 16 to build a company in my parents' basement. 
Despite my unconventional start, I found success very early in 
life and led my company into a multi-billion dollar enterprise 
that employs thousands. I am a pilot with an aeronautics 
degree. Over the last 20 years, I have flown over 7,000 hours 
in jets and ex-military aircraft, setting world records, and 
performing in air shows.
    My passion for aviation also led me to start another 
company, this time a defense aerospace business. As a company, 
we operated the world's largest private air force. Our job was 
to fly fighter jets as adversaries, executing enemy tactics, 
and training American warfighters. We managed hundreds of 
millions in defense contracts and saved taxpayers billions 
along the way.
    I am also an astronaut. Alongside a talented team, I led 
two record-breaking missions to space. On my last mission, we 
tested a new spacesuit while performing a spacewalk and orbited 
farther away from Earth than any human has gone since the last 
time Americans walked on the Moon. Along the way, my two 
crewmates, Sarah Gillis and Anna Menon, became the women who 
have journeyed farthest from Earth ever.
    I am an advocate for science. During these missions to 
space, my crew and I performed approximately 50 science and 
research experiments. I have also publicly supported the 
Chandra X-ray Observatory and offered to fund a mission to 
extend the life and capabilities of the Hubble Space Telescope.
    I care about the people back at home and our collective 
future here on Earth. My space career did not burden the 
taxpayers. They were privately funded and aimed at inspiring 
and helping people all over the world. One example is the over 
$250 million we raised to support St. Jude Children's Research 
Hospital and their critical work to ensure no child dies in the 
dawn of life. Alongside these efforts, I have personally 
donated hundreds of millions of dollars to charitable 
endeavors.
    I share all this because I am not a typical nominee for 
this position. I have been relatively apolitical. I am not a 
scientist. I never worked at NASA. I do not think these are 
weaknesses. In fact, I believe President Trump found them to be 
strengths. And if confirmed, I will bring all my experience to 
the greatest adventure in human history, the quest to discover 
the secrets of the universe.
    On that note, NASA is the most accomplished and respected 
space Agency in the world, but for all NASA's historic 
achievements, the Agency is not without challenges: Presidents 
have called for a return to the Moon and a path to Mars since 
1989, and well over a hundred billion has been spent without 
the intended results. Most programs, new telescopes, rovers, X-
planes, entire spaceships, are over budget and behind schedule. 
And this is discouraging because when people look up at the 
stars and wonder what is out there, they want those answers 
today and not decades down the road.
    And I know it is not lost on members of this committee that 
we have geopolitical rivals moving at impressive speeds. It is 
imperative for our national security, our pride, and all that 
we stand to gain in exploration that we never come in second 
place. If confirmed, and with the support and guidance of 
President Trump and Members of Congress, we will reinvigorate a 
mission-first culture at NASA with the following objectives.
    First, American astronauts will lead the way in the 
ultimate high ground of space. As the President stated, we will 
prioritize sending American astronauts to Mars, and along the 
way we will inevitably have the capabilities to return to the 
Moon and determine the scientific, economic, and national 
security benefits for maintaining a presence on the lunar 
surface. We will focus our technology development efforts on 
the world's greatest engineering challenges, such as the 
practical application of nuclear propulsion, so we can truly 
unlock humankind's ability to explore among the stars.
    Second, we will ignite a thriving space economy in low 
Earth orbit. By working alongside international partners and 
industry, we can unlock the true economic potential of space 
and deliver meaningful benefits to the American people, 
potentially even charting a course for NASA to become a 
financially self-sustaining Agency.
    Number three, NASA will be a force multiplier for science. 
We will leverage NASA's scientific talent and capabilities to 
enable academic institutions and industry to increase the rate 
of world-changing discoveries. We will launch more telescopes, 
more probes, more rovers, and endeavor to better understand our 
planet and the universe beyond.
    If confirmed, I will work alongside and recruit the most 
talented minds this Nation has to offer, and we will 
concentrate our resources toward achieving the near-impossible, 
the objectives that no other Agency, company, or institution is 
capable of accomplishing; we will do so knowing the risks and 
the ground-breaking opportunities that lie ahead, because some 
risks, like exploring the worlds beyond ours, are worth taking.
    We will do this not just to expand our knowledge or 
strengthen our national security, but to improve all life here 
on Earth and inspire the next generation to reach even further. 
This is why America needs NASA, why the world needs NASA, 
because there is no more important investment than inspiring 
our children to build a better and more exciting future. And 
the best way NASA can do that is by delivering on our mission 
and ushering in a new golden age of science and discovery. And 
we will not fail.
    Thank you.
    [The prepared statement and biographical information of Mr. 
Isaacman follow:]

  Prepared Statement of Jared Isaacman, Nominee to be Administrator, 
             National Aeronautics and Space Administration
    Thank you Chairman Cruz, Ranking Member Cantwell, and distinguished 
members of the committee. I am honored and very grateful to be here 
before you today as President Donald Trump's nominee to lead the 
National Aeronautics and Space Administration. I have lived the 
American dream and I owe this Nation a great debt. I would happily 
serve President Trump in any capacity but to work alongside the people 
that have expanded the boundaries of exploration and brought humanity 
closer to the stars, would be the privilege of a lifetime.
    Before I begin, I would like to acknowledge my family--my parents, 
Sandy & Don Isaacman, my wife Monica and my two wonderful daughters, 
Mila and Liv.
    I do recognize, I am a newcomer so I thought I would share a bit of 
my story, along with my understanding of the challenges and 
opportunities ahead.

   I am an entrepreneur and my journey began when I took a risk 
        and left school at age 16 to build a company in my parent's 
        basement. Despite my unconventional start, I found success very 
        early in life and led my company into a multi-billion-dollar 
        enterprise employing thousands.

   I am a pilot with an aeronautics degree. Over the last 20 
        years, I've flown over seven thousand hours in jets and ex-
        military aircraft, setting world records and performing in 
        airshows. My passion for aviation also led me to start another 
        company--this time a defense aerospace business. As a company, 
        we operated the world's largest private air force. Our job was 
        to fly fighter jets as adversaries, executing enemy tactics and 
        training American warfighters. We managed hundreds of millions 
        in defense contracts and saved taxpayers billions along the 
        way.

   I am also an astronaut. Alongside a talented team, I led two 
        record-breaking missions to space. On my last mission, we 
        tested a new space suit while performing a spacewalk and 
        orbited farther away from Earth than any human has gone since 
        the last time Americans walked on the Moon. Along the way, my 
        two crewmates, Sarah Gillis and Anna Menon, became the women 
        who have journeyed farthest from Earth . . . ever.

   I am an advocate for science. During these missions to 
        space, my crew & I performed approximately 50 science and 
        research experiments. I have also publicly supported the 
        Chandra x-Ray Observatory and offered to fund a mission to 
        extend the life and capabilities of the Hubble space telescope.

   I care about the people back at home and our collective 
        future here on Earth. My space career did not burden the 
        taxpayers. They were privately funded and aimed at inspiring 
        and helping people all over the world. One example is the over 
        $250 million we raised to support St. Jude Children's Research 
        Hospital and their critical work to ensure no child dies in the 
        dawn of life. Alongside these efforts, I have personally 
        donated hundreds of millions to charitable endeavors.

    I share all of this because I am not a typical nominee for this 
position. I have been relatively apolitical; I am not a scientist and I 
never worked at NASA. I do not think these are weaknesses. In fact, I 
believe President Trump found them to be strengths. And if confirmed, I 
will bring all my experience to the greatest adventure in human 
history--the quest to discover the secrets of the universe.
    On that note, NASA is the most accomplished and respected space 
agency in the world--but for all of NASA's historic achievements, the 
agency is not without challenges:

   Presidents have called for a return to the Moon and a path 
        to Mars since 1989 and well over a hundred billion has been 
        spent without the intended results.

   Most programs--new telescopes, rovers, X-planes, or entire 
        spaceships--are over budget and behind schedule.

   This is discouraging because people look up at the stars and 
        wonder what is out there today, not decades down the road.

    And I know it is not lost on any members of this committee that we 
have geopolitical rivals moving at impressive speeds. It is 
imperative--for our national security, our pride, and all that we stand 
to gain in space exploration--that we never come in second place.
    If confirmed, and with the support and guidance of President Trump 
and members of Congress, we will reinvigorate a mission-first culture 
at NASA with the following objectives:

    First--American astronauts will lead the way in the ultimate `high 
ground' of space.
    As the President stated we will prioritize sending American 
astronauts to Mars. Along the way, we will inevitably have the 
capabilities to return to the Moon and determine the scientific, 
economic, and national security benefits of maintaining a presence on 
the lunar surface. We will focus our technology development efforts on 
the world's greatest engineering challenges, such as the practical 
application of nuclear propulsion, so that we can truly unlock 
humankind's ability to explore among the stars.
    Second--We will ignite a thriving space economy in low Earth orbit.
    By working alongside international partners and industry, we can 
unlock the true economic potential of space and deliver meaningful 
benefits to the American people--potentially charting a course for NASA 
to become a financially self-sustaining agency.
    Third--NASA will be a force multiplier for science.
    We will leverage NASA's scientific talent and capabilities to 
enable academic institutions and industry to increase the rate of 
world-changing discoveries. We will launch more telescopes, more 
probes, more rovers and endeavor to better understand our planet and 
the universe beyond.
    If confirmed, I will work alongside & recruit the most talented 
minds this Nation has to offer and we will concentrate our resources 
toward achieving the near-impossible--the objectives that no other 
agency, company or institution is capable of accomplishing. We will do 
so knowing the risks and ground-breaking opportunities that lie ahead--
because some risks, like exploring the worlds beyond ours, are worth 
taking.
    We will do this not just to expand our knowledge or strengthen our 
national security, but to improve all life on Earth and inspire the 
next generation to reach even further. This is why America needs NASA--
why the world needs NASA--because there is no more important investment 
than inspiring our children to build a beaer, more exciting future. And 
the best way NASA can do that is by delivering on our mission and 
ushering in a new Golden Age of Science & Discovery--and we will not 
fail.
    Thank You.
                                 ______
                                 
                      a. biographical information
    1. Name (Include any former names or nicknames used): Jared Taylor 
Isaacman.
    2. Position to which nominated: Administrator of the National 
Aeronautics & Space Administration.
    3. Date of Nomination: January 20, 2025.
    4. Address (List current place of residence and office addresses):

        Residence: Information not released to the public.
        Office: 3501 Corp Parkway, Center Valley, PA 18034.

    5. Date and Place of Birth: Union, NJ.
    6. Provide the name, position, and place of employment for your 
spouse (if married) or domestic partner, and the names and ages of your 
children (including stepchildren and children by a previous marriage).
    Monica Isaacman, homemaker.
    7. List all college and graduate schools attended, whether or not 
you were granted a degree by the institution. Provide the name of the 
institution, the dates attended, the degree received, and the date of 
the degree.

        Embry Riddle Aeronautical University--Bachelor in Professional 
        Aeronautics (2011) (February 2010-November 2011).

    8. List all post-undergraduate employment, including the job title, 
name of employer, and inclusive dates of employment, and highlight all 
management-level jobs held and any non-managerial jobs that relate to 
the position for which you are nominated.

   Shift4 Payments, Founder and CEO (June 2000 to present)

   Draken International, Co-founder and CEO (November 2011-
        April 2020)

   Denmar, Consultant (October 2020 to present)

    9. Attach a copy of your resume.
    See attachment.
    10. List any advisory, consultative, honorary, or other part-time 
service or positions with Federal, State, or local governments, other 
than those listed above after 18 years of age.

        Honorary Commander--US Air Force Academy

    11. List all positions held as an officer, director, trustee, 
partner, proprietor, agent, representative, or consultant of any 
corporation, company, firm, partnership, or other business, enterprise, 
educational, or other institution.

   Shift4 Payments, Inc.--Chairman of the Board, CEO, and 
        Director, 6/2020 to present

   Shift4 Payments, LLC (fka Harbortouch Payments, LLC and 
        Lighthouse Network, LLC)--Chief Executive Officer, 3/2014 to 
        present

   Shift4 Subsidiaries

     C.C. Productions, LLC--President and CEO, 12/2022 to 
            present

     CFC & FP Enterprises, LLC--President and CEO, 12/2022 
            to present

     Credorax (USA) LLC--Authorized Person to sign entity 
            documents for filing, checks, notes in connection with bank 
            accounts, facilities or services per Operating Agreement, 
            12/2023 to present

     Pinnacle Hospitality Systems, LLC--President and CEO, 
            7/2022 to present

     POSITOUCH, LLC--Chief Executive Officer, 10/2017 to 
            present

     POSTEC, LLC--Chief Executive Officer 12/2021 to 
            present

     Revel Systems, Inc.--President and sole Director, 6/
            2024 to present

     SIDFT4 CORPORATION--President and CEO and sole 
            Director, 11/2017 to present

     Shift4 Payments Finance Sub, Inc.--President and 
            Director, 10/2020 to present

     Shift4Shop, LLC--Chief Executive Officer, 11/2020 to 
            present

     The Giving Block Holdings, LLC--Chief Executive 
            Officer, 2/2022 to present

     Micros Retail Systems, LLC--Chief Executive Officer, 
            10/2020 to present

     Venuenext, Inc--President, 4/21 to present

     Shift4 Shop, LLC (formerly 3dcart, LLC)--Chief 
            Executive Officer, 11/2020 to present

     S4-ML Holdings, LLC--Chief Executive Officer, 8/2019 
            to present

     MSI Merchant Services Holdings, LLC--Chief Executive 
            Officer, 3/2014-12/2021

     Restaurant Manager, LLC--Chief Executive Officer, 8/
            2017-12/2021

     Positouch, LLC--Chief Executive Officer, 10/2017-12/
            2021

     Future POS, LLC--Chief Executive Officer, 10/2017-12/
            2021

     Harbortouch Financial, LLC--Chief Executive Officer, 
            1/2011-12/2021

   Draken International, LLC--Chief Executive Officer, 11/2011-
        4/2020; Director/Manager, 11/2011-10/2020

   26 North Aviation, Inc.--Director, 1/2007 to present

   Rook Holdings, Inc--Director, President, Treasurer, 
        Secretary, 3/2014 to present

   Rook Aviation Holdings, LLC--Member and President, 1/2019 to 
        present

   Rook Investments, LLC--Member and President, 7/2019 to 
        present

   Black Diamond Jet HoldCo, Inc--President, CEO, and Director, 
        3/2019 to present

   Black Diamond Jet Holdings, LLC--President, CEO, and 
        Manager, 12/2019 to present

   JDI Holdings LLC--Member and President, 12/2005 to present

   Xenomorph, LLC (Dissolved)--Managing Member, 2/2021-2/2023

   Bone Horse Marine, LLC--Managing Member, 7/2021 to present

   Bone Horse, LLC--Managing Member, 4/2019-12/2024

   Bone Horse Hangars, LLC--Manager and Member, 7/2021 to 
        present

   RookX, LLC--Managing Member, 1/2021 to present

   Rook Public Strategies, LLC--Managing Member, 7/2021-12/2024

   PolarisX, LLC--Managing Member, 12/2022-12/2024

   Rook SPV I, LLC--President, Secretary, Treasurer, 3/2021 to 
        present

   Rook SPV II, LLC--President, Secretary, Treasurer, 8/2021 to 
        present

   Rook SPV III, LLC--President, Secretary, Treasurer, 12/2022 
        to present

   Rook SPV IV, LLC--President, Secretary, Treasurer, 3/2023 to 
        present

   Rook Space Investments, LLC--President, Treasurer, 
        Secretary, 2/2021 to present

    12. List all memberships you have had after 18 years of age or 
currently hold with any civic, social, charitable, educational, 
political, professional, fraternal, benevolent or religiously 
affiliated organization, private club, or other membership organization 
(You do not have to list your religious affiliation or membership in a 
religious house of worship or institution). Include dates of membership 
and any positions you have held with any organization. Please note 
whether any such club or organization restricts membership on the basis 
of sex, race, color, religion, national origin, age, or disability.

   Business Executives for National Security

   Association of Space Explorers

   Experimental Aircraft Association

   Aircraft Owners Pilot Association

   International Council of Air Shows

   CNBC CEO Council

    These organizations do not restrict membership on the basis of sex, 
race, color, religion, national origin, age, or disability.
    13. Have you ever been a candidate for and/or held a public office 
(elected, non-elected, or appointed)? If so, indicate whether any 
campaign has any outstanding debt the amount, and whether you are 
personally liable for that debt. No.
    14. List all memberships and offices held with and services 
rendered to, whether compensated or not, any political party or 
election committee within the past ten years. If you have held a paid 
position or served in a formal or official advisory position (whether 
compensated or not) in a political campaign within the past ten years, 
identify the particulars of the campaign, including the candidate, year 
of the campaign, and your title and responsibilities. None.
    15. Itemize all political contributions to any individual, campaign 
organization, political party, political action committee, or similar 
entity of$200 or more for the past ten years.
    See attachment.
    16. List all scholarships, fellowships, honorary degrees, honorary 
society memberships, military medals, and any other special recognition 
for outstanding service or achievements.

   Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Honorary Doctorate

   Foreign Policy Research Institute, Ben Franklin Award

   United States Air Force Academy, Honorary Commander

   FAA, Commercial Astronaut Wings

   National Business Aviation Association, Meritorious Service 
        to Aviation Award

   Ernst & Young, EY Entrepreneur of the Year

   National Space Society, NSS Space Pioneer Award for 
        Entrepreneurship

   UP Partners, UP Inspiration Award

   Living Legends of Aviation, Dr. Buzz Aldrin Space 
        Advancement Award; Eren Ozmen Entrepreneur of the Year Award; 
        Induction to Living Legends of Aviation

   Space Force Association, Advancing Human Presence in the 
        Space Domain Award

   EarthLight Foundation, Space Cowboy Award

   Global Lithuanian Leaders, The Laureate of Global Lithuanian 
        Award 2021

   Space Camp, Hall of Fame

   Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Eagle of Excellence 
        Award

   AOPA Hoover Trophy

   Everyday Astronaut Astro Awards, Most Inspiring, Most 
        Innovative and Important Mission of 2024 Award

   St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Michael F. Tamer 
        Award

   American Astronautical Society, Neil Armstrong Space Flight 
        Achievement Award

   Aim Higher Gala, Inspiration Award

   Commercial Spaceflight Federation. Commercial Space Business 
        & Finance Award

   Vladimir Komarov Diploma, FAI Astronautic Records Commission

   NAA/FAI, Numerous NAA/FAI World Records in Aviation and 
        Space

   Electronic Transactions Association, 40 Under 40

   Inc 500, 30 Under 30

   Air Force Association, John R. Alison Award

   Governor Rick Scott, FL, Draken International recognized for 
        local job growth

    17. List all books, articles, columns, letters to the editor, 
Internet blog postings, or other publications you have authored, 
individually or with others. Include a link to each publication when 
possible. If a link is not available, provide a digital copy of the 
publication when available.
    Not applicable.
    18. List all speeches, panel discussions, and presentations (e.g., 
PowerPoint) that you have given on topics relevant to the position for 
which you have been nominated. Include a link to each publication when 
possible. If a link is not available, provide a digital copy of the 
speech or presentation when available.

   Speech, Commencement Address at Embry-Riddle's Fall 2024 
        Undergraduate Commencement Ceremony, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical 
        University, Decem-
        ber 12, 2024. See the university's press release here, http://
        news.erau.edu/
        headlines/jared-isaacman-inspires-emb1y-riddle-grads-to-pursue-
        moonshots#:
        :text=%E2%80%9Clt%27s%20you%20who%20wil1%20make,Center%20in%20
        Daytona%20Beach%2C%20Florida., and a video of the address here, 
        https://
        www.youtube.com/watch?v=BjyyGjeYrKO.

   Fireside Chat, Space Force Power Conference, United States 
        Space Force, December 10, 2024. A recording of the event is 
        available here: https://www
        .youtube.com/watch?v=CdaqX3AMxy8

   Panelist, Astronaut Reunion, Association of Space Explorers, 
        December 5, 2024.

   Fireside Chat, Polaris Dawn Event, UC Davis for Spaceflight 
        Research, November 22, 2024.

   Fireside Chat, Beyond Earth Symposium, Beyond Earth 
        Institute, November 13, 2024. A recording of the event is 
        available here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0pZ1H4WjnVU

   Fireside Chat, Foreign Policy Research Institute's 18th 
        Annual Benjamin Franklin Award for Public Service, Foreign 
        Policy Research Institute, November 13, 2024.

   Panelist, Planetary Congress, Association of Space 
        Explorers, October 3, 2024.

   Panelist, Up.Summit, UP.Partners, September 30, 2024.

   Fireside Chat, Polaris Dawn Mission Briefing, Polaris Dawn, 
        August 19, 2024. A recording of the event is available here: 
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGtzDmwfkCY.

   Fireside Chat, X Takeover, Tesla Owners of Silicon Valley, 
        July, 28, 2024. A recording of the event is available here: 
        https://www.facebook.com/tesla
        siliconvalley/videos/full-interview-with-jared-isaacman-shares-
        the-ground-breaking-work-with-polaris-/8703988886355087/.

   Fireside Chat, Commercial Spaceflight Transportation 
        Conference Washington, DC, Commercial Space Federation, 
        February, 21, 2024.

   Fireside Chat, ICR Conference, ICR, January 8, 2024.

   Fireside Chat, Space Force Power Conference, United States 
        Space Force, December 13, 2023.

   Fireside Chat, LiveWIRED, WIRED, November 5, 2023. A 
        recording of the event is available here: http://www.wired.com/
        video/watch/lets-die-on-mars

   Fireside Chat, Space Cowboy Ball, EarthLight Foundation, 
        November 18, 2023.

   Fireside Chat, NBAA Annual Conference, NBAA, October 17, 
        2023.

   Panelist, EAA Aviation Museum Space Day Event, October 7, 
        2023.

   Panelist, Disrupt Conference, TechCrunch, September 19, 
        2023.

   Fireside Chat, International Space Development Conference, 
        National Space Society, May 25, 2023.

   Fireside Chat, National Character and Leadership Symposium 
        (NCLS), United States Air Force Academy, February 23, 2023.

   Fireside Chat, SpaceCom 2023--Accelerating the Global 
        Business of Space, SpaceCom, February 23, 2023.

   Fireside Chat, Space Force Culture Coalition, United States 
        Space Force, February 21, 2023.

   Fireside Chat, BENS Virtual Discussion on Polaris Dawn with 
        NY Metro Member Jared Isaacman, BENS, February 21, 2023.

   Acceptance Speech, Living Legends of Aviation, Kitty Hawk 
        Air Academy, January 20, 2023.

   Panelists, UP.Summit, UP.Partners, June 7, 2022.

   Fireside Chat, LOGIN '22, LOGIN, June 3, 2022.

   Speech, Commencement Address at Embry-Riddle's 2022 Spring 
        Commencement, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, May 14, 
        2022.

   Presenter, Easterseals Advocacy Awards, Easterseals April 
        12, 2022. A recording of the event is available here: https://
        www.youtube.com/watch?v
        =ehpBgLMJU7s.

   Fireside Chat, Agilysys User Conference, Agilysys, March 1, 
        2022.

   Acceptance Speech, Living Legends of Aviation, Kitty Hawk 
        Air Academy, January 21, 2022.

   Fireside Chat, Annual CNBC Technology Executive Council 
        Summit, CNBC, November 17, 2021.

   Panelist, ASCEND, The American Institute of Aeronautics and 
        Astronautics, November, 15, 2021. A recording of the event is 
        available here: https://youtube/VjHzpOqu5iU

    19. List all public statements you have made during the past ten 
years, including statements in news articles and radio and podcasts and 
television appearances, which are on topics relevant to the position 
for which you have been nominated, including dates. Include a link to 
each statement when possible. If a link is not available, provide a 
digital copy of the statement when available.
    See attached.
    20. List all digital platforms (including social media and other 
digital content sites) on which you currently or have formerly operated 
an account, regardless of whether or not the account was held in your 
name or an alias. Include the full name of an ``alias'' or ``handle'', 
including the complete URL and username with hyperlinks, you have used 
on each of the named platforms. Indicate whether the account is active, 
deleted, or dormant. Include a link to each account if possible.

   X/Twitter: @rookisaacman, https://x.com/rookisaacman

   Instagram: rookisaacman, https://www.instagram.com/
        rookisaacman/

   Shift4 personnel previously created a Linkedin account for 
        me, but I never used it, and it has been deleted.

    21. Please identify each instance in which you have testified 
orally or in writing before Congress in a governmental or non-
governmental capacity and specify the date, committee, and subject 
matter of each testimony.
    None.
    22. Given the current mission, major programs, and major 
operational objectives of the department/agency/commission/corporation 
to which you have been nominated, what in your background or employment 
experience do you believe affirmatively qualifies you for appointment 
to the position for which you have been nominated, and why do you wish 
to serve in that position?
    I believe many aspects of my background make me qualified to serve 
as NASA Administrator, and it would be an immense honor to do so. My 
education, experience as a pilot, time as a commercial astronaut, and 
work as an entrepreneur together reflect my life-long passions of 
aviation and spaceflight. Throughout my various endeavors, I have had 
the opportunity to work with the government as a partner in the private 
sector. This has provided me with unique insights into how we can 
improve and innovate NASA's operations. I am committed to NASA's quest 
to explore space, innovate for humanity, and inspire our Nation through 
discovery.
    As a student, I attended the Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University 
where I graduated with a bachelor's degree in professional aeronautics.
    As a pilot, I have more than 7,700 hours of jet pilot experience 
and the highest FAA ratings, which include my Airline Transport Pilot 
certificate with experimental type ratings to operate ex-military 
aircraft.
    As a commercial astronaut, I have spent the last four years helping 
plan, develop, train, and execute two commercial space missions through 
the Polaris Program. My crew and I flew farther into space than any 
other human has since Apollo 17-more than 50 years ago. Aspects of our 
missions reflect the exciting future of space, such as the testing of 
new spacesuits during our spacewalk and the use of laser communications 
to send a message to the world. These efforts renewed excitement about 
what the future holds for America as a spacefaring Nation, but we also 
remained dedicated to addressing the hardships and challenges of the 
world we live in today. In the course of the Polaris missions, we 
raised over $250 million for St. Jude Childrens Research hospital, of 
which I have contributed more than $125 million directly. My experience 
as an astronaut and leader for two missions has also given me a 
profound understanding of the coordination required between NASA, 
commercial partners, other government agencies, and outside 
collaborators to achieve mission success.
    As an entrepreneur, I have also created a career in business that 
is directly related to managing a large agency and advancing American 
aeronautical interests and innovation. I co-founded the world's largest 
private air force, Draken International, to train pilots for the United 
States Armed Forces and its allies. This defense aerospace business, 
involving high performance military aircraft, saved taxpayers hundreds 
of millions and enhanced the training of our military warfighters. I am 
also the founder and CEO of Shift4 Payments, an innovative payment 
processor company, which I started in my parents basement when I was 16 
years old. Throughout my long business career, I have run my companies 
efficiently, responsibly, and with thousands of employees.
    I hope to have the opportunity to advance the President's goal for 
America to lead in space, science, technology, and exploration as NASA 
Administrator.
    23. What do you believe are your responsibilities, if confirmed, to 
ensure that the department/agency/commission/corporation has proper 
management and accounting controls, and what experience do you have in 
managing a large organization?
    It is imperative that the Administrator of NASA manages the agency 
responsibly and efficiently to ensure its organizational resources are 
dedicated to consistently moving the ball forward and advancing our 
national interests.
    As the founder and CEO of two large companies, I am responsible for 
overseeing large budgets and have navigated complex logistics matters 
on a daily basis. As the founder and CEO of an aerospace defense 
contractor under government oversight, and a public company listed on 
the New York Stock Exchange, I also understand the importance of 
leading large organizations responsibly with proper governance and 
accounting controls.
    24. What do you believe to be the top three challenges facing the 
department/agency/commission/corporation, and why?
    NASA is the most respected and accomplished space agency in the 
world. The NASA logo inspires Americans and people the world over to 
dream of what the future may hold. However, the agency has faced 
significant challenges over the years that have impeded the mission.

  1.  NASA has been unable to return to the Moon or have an achievable 
        path to Mars, despite plans to do so as far back as President 
        George H.W. Bush's Administration in 1989.

  2.  The pace of world changing discoveries has slowed with flagship 
        missions consistently billions over budget and behind schedule.

  3.  The space economy has yet to be revealed. For over 60 years, the 
        space economy has had the same customers (governments) looking 
        for the same capabilities (communications and observation).

    I believe the challenges stem from:

   A distracting number of priorities that are not fully 
        aligned with the NASA mission.

   An organizational structure and policies that fuel 
        bureaucracy and throttle progress.

   A culture that needs to be reinvigorated to make better use 
        of capable commercial industry and to win against geopolitical 
        rivals that are quickly threatening the ever expanding ``high 
        ground''. If we do not lead, we follow, and if we follow, we 
        may never catch-up.

    I am committed to working tirelessly alongside some of the 
brightest minds in the Nation to solve the problems and return NASA's 
focus to executing on the mission.
                   b. potential conflicts of interest
    1. Describe all financial arrangements, deferred compensation 
agreements, and other continuing dealings with business associates, 
clients, or customers. Please include information related to retirement 
accounts, such as a 40l(k) or pension plan.
    My employment agreements and arrangements are described on my Form 
278e Public Financial Disclosure Report, which I am working on with the 
Office of Government Ethics (OGE) and NASA ethics officials. That form 
will disclose the following agreements and arrangements:

  1)  A corporation I own has a Tax Receivable Agreement (TRA) with 
        Shift4 Payments, Inc. Under the TRA, Shift4 Payments, Inc. 
        agrees to make payments to the historic equity owners in an 
        amount equal to a percentage of the benefit the corporation 
        derives from certain specific tax attributes, if, as and when 
        realized Prior to the IPO of Shift4 in 2020, the company 
        operated as a partnership for U.S. Tax purposes. Upon the IPO, 
        an umbrella partnership--C-Corporation structure was 
        established. The operating partnership (Shift4 Payments, LLC) 
        will be modified by reclassifying my interests as an original 
        owner into a new class of interest that is exchangeable for 
        Shift4 common stock (Class A). The TRA requires Shift4 to share 
        tax savings with the original partners.

  2)  Pursuant to my employment agreement with Shift4 Payments, LLC, 
        for 36 months after resignation, I will be eligible for health 
        insurance benefits and other reimbursed expenses for fees in 
        connection with former employment/ownership. I do not 
        anticipate participating in or accepting such benefits.

  3)  In February 2025, I anticipate receiving an annual RSU award from 
        Shift4 Payments, Inc. for the 2024 calendar year. RSU grant 
        levels for the Chief Executive Officer are decided in 
        conjunction with the Company's year-end compensation decisions 
        based on individual and Company performance from the prior 
        fiscal year.

    2. Do you have any commitments or agreements, formal or informal, 
to maintain employment, affiliation, or practice with any business, 
association, or other organization during your appointment? If so, 
please explain.
    An entity I own holds agreements with Space Exploration 
Technologies Corp. (SpaceX). These include agreements related to two 
future space flight missions in the Polaris Program. There are three 
space flight service agreements related to different missions in the 
Polaris Program.
    I am currently working with OGE and NASA ethics officials on 
addressing these contracts from an ethics and conflicts perspective. I 
am committed to working with OGE to identify an appropriate way to 
avoid conflicts of interest related to these contracts and work toward 
a resolution that, if necessary, will be fully described in my Ethics 
Agreement letter.
    3. Indicate any investments, obligations, liabilities, or other 
relationships which could involve potential conflicts of interest in 
the position to which you have been nominated. Explain how you will 
resolve each potential conflict of interest.
    I have equity interest in Shift4 Payments, Inc., a payments company 
that predominantly serves restaurants, hotels, sports stadiums and 
theme parks. Shift4 processes some of the payments for SpaceX Starlink 
Internet service, but this represents less than \1/2\ of a percent of 
the company's revenue. I intend to resign from my positions and will 
continue to work with OGE and NASA ethics officials on how to handle my 
interest in Shift4.
    I own ex-military aircraft that are occasionally used in a charter 
or lease arrangement by U.S. Government test pilot schools and for R&D 
testing.
    My separate involvement in contracts with SpaceX is described in 
the previous question.
    In all of these matters, I am working with OGE and NASA ethics 
officials to identify and resolve conflicts in the appropriate time 
frame. We are working toward an Ethics Agreement letter that will 
contain my commitments to resolve existing conflicts. As Administrator, 
I would be committed to full transparency on these issues and I would 
work closely with the agency's ethics staff and OGE to resolve any 
potential conflicts that should arise during my tenure.
    4. Describe any business relationship, dealing, or financial 
transaction which you have had during the last ten years, whether for 
yourself, on behalf of a client, or acting as an agent, that could in 
any way constitute or result in a possible conflict of interest in the 
position to which you have been nominated. Explain how you will resolve 
each potential conflict of interest.
    My involvement in contracts with SpaceX is described in the 
previous questions. As noted above, I am working with OGE and NASA 
ethics officials to identify and resolve conflicts in the appropriate 
time frame. As Administrator, I would be committed to full transparency 
on these issues and I would work closely with the agency's ethics staff 
and OGE to resolve any potential conflicts that should arise during my 
tenure.
    5. Identify any other potential conflicts of interest and explain 
how you will resolve each potential conflict of interest. None.
    6. Describe any activity during the past ten years, including the 
names of clients represented, in which you have been engaged for the 
purpose of directly or indirectly influencing the passage, defeat, or 
modification of any legislation or affecting the administration and 
execution of law or public policy. None.
                            c. legal matters
    1. Have you ever been disciplined or cited for a breach of ethics, 
professional misconduct, or retaliation by, or been the subject of a 
complaint to, any court, administrative agency, the Office of Special 
Counsel, an Inspector General, professional association, disciplinary 
committee, or other professional group? No.
    If yes:

  a.  Provide the name ofthe court, agency, association, committee, or 
        group;

  b.  Provide the date the citation, disciplinary action, complaint, or 
        personnel action was issued or initiated;

  c.  Describe the citation, disciplinary action, complaint, or 
        personnel action;

  d.  Provide the results of the citation, disciplinary action, 
        complaint, or personnel action.

    2. Have you ever been investigated, arrested, charged, or held by 
any Federal, State, or other law enforcement authority of any Federal, 
State, county, municipal, or foreign government entity, other than for 
a minor traffic offense? If so, please explain.
    Yes, in February 2010, when returning from a trip to watch the 
Olympics in Vancouver, I was detained by U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection on a warrant related to a charge for ``drawing and passing 
checks without sufficient funds,'' based on a dispute with the Palms 
Casino Resort in Las Vegas over a travel reimbursement that the resort 
promised and subsequently failed to honor. The dispute arose the month 
prior, and I was under the impression the matter was resolved. I was 
not aware that law enforcement was involved in the matter. As a result, 
I was very surprised when CBP took action. However, the matter was 
resolved in less than 24 hours and the charges were dismissed.
    I did then and still now disagree with the other party's handling 
of the matter. I considered civil action against the resort, but opted 
against it to avoid any further headache.
    Following this incident, the Nevada district court sealed all 
records associated with this incident, stating, ``All proceedings 
recounted in the sealed records are deemed never to have occurred.'' 
Although it remains sealed, in the interest of full transparency, I 
have disclosed it here for the Committee's awareness.
    3. Have you or any business or nonprofit of which you are or were 
an officer ever been involved as a party in an administrative agency 
proceeding, criminal proceeding, or civil litigation? If so, please 
explain.
    Shift4, the company of which I am currently CEO, and its 
predecessors and subsidiaries have collectively been in business for 
over 25 years. The company, which is publicly traded on the NYSE, is 
infrequently party to lawsuits filed by and against the company. Please 
see attached for PACER listings of litigation involving Shift4, as well 
as its predecessors Harbortouch Payments, LLC, and United Bank Card, 
Inc. Also attached are PACER listings of litigation involving Draken 
International, the company which I co-founded and for which was 
previously CEO, but with which I am no longer affiliated. Also attached 
is a PACER listing of litigation involving me individually.
    To the extent the Committee would like additional information on 
matters listed in the PACER attachments, such as a summary of 
litigation involving Shift4 over a certain time period, please do not 
hesitate to ask.
    With respect to agency proceedings, Shift4 recently settled a 
matter with the SEC involving allegations that the company failed to 
disclose on its annual 10-K forms and/or its proxy statements for FY 
2020 through FY 2022 related person transactions for a total of three 
individuals. This settlement began with outreach from the SEC 
requesting that Shift4 voluntarily provide documents and information 
regarding related persons transactions involving immediate family 
members of Shift4's officers and directors. Shift4 cooperated with the 
inquiry, in the course of which we learned that three individuals' 
names and compensations were inadvertently left off of SEC-required 
reports and disclosures. Those disclosures were made as of April of 
last year.
    Shift4 offered to pay $750,000 to settle the claim. For reference, 
$750,000 is about 0.03 percent of Shift4's annual revenue for 2023. The 
settlement order, which states, ``In determining to accept the Offer, 
the [SEC] considered remedial acts promptly undertaken by [Shift4], 
including making disclosures and improvements to policies and 
procedures concerning related person transactions, as well as 
cooperation afforded the Commission staff,'' is available on the SEC's 
website here: https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/adrnin/2025/34-
102146.pdf. SEC Order  11.
    4. Have you ever been convicted (including pleas of guilty or no/o 
contendere) of any criminal violation other than a minor traffic 
offense? If so, please explain. No.
    5. Have you ever been accused, formally or informally, of sexual 
assault, sexual harassment, or discrimination on the basis of sex, 
race, religion, or any other basis? If so, please explain. No.
    6. Please advise the Committee of any additional information, 
favorable or unfavorable, which you feel should be disclosed in 
connection with your nomination.
    I am a devoted philanthropist and have demonstrated a large 
financial commitment to various causes throughout my life. Below are 
details regarding the contributions of $50,000 or greater I have 
donated to 501(c)(3) organizations in my personal capacity:

   St. Jude Children's Research Hospital (2021, 2022, 2023): 
        $123,351,928

   Renaissance Charitable Foundation, Inc. (2022, 2023, 2024): 
        $13,150,247

   U.S. Space & Rocket Center Education Foundation (2022, 2023, 
        2024): $11,352,879

   Naval Aviation Museum Foundation, Inc. (2021): $5,533,456

   St. Luke's Health Network, Inc. (2023, 2024): $4,776,908

   Lehigh Valley Zoo (2024): $1,000,000

   Edward Charles Foundation (2021, 2022): $650,000

   Davinci Science Center (2022): $571,467

   Baylor College of Medicine (2022): $516,181

   House of Hope Foundation for Kids with Cancer (2023): 
        $500,000

   Space Force Historical Foundation (2024): $500,000

   California Institute of Technology (2025): $500,000

   Global Citizen (3-Year Pledge beginning in 2023) (2023, 
        2024): $500,000

   Kiddie Hawk (5-Year Pledge beginning in 2023) (2023, 2024): 
        $200,000

   Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University (2023): $150,000

   Los Angeles Dodgers Foundation (2024): $126,683

   Ukraine House DC Foundation (2022): $100,000

   Business Executives for National Security (2023): $80,000

   El Sistema USA (2023): $75,000

   The Mars Generation (2021): $50,000

   Earthlight Foundation (2023): $50,000
                     d. relationship with committee
    1. Will you ensure that your department/agency/commission/
corporation complies with deadlines for information set by 
congressional committees, and that your department/agency/commission/
corporation endeavors to timely comply with requests for information 
from individual Members of Congress, including requests from members in 
the minority? Yes.
    2. Will you ensure that your department/agency/commission/
corporation does whatever it can to protect congressional witnesses and 
whistleblowers from reprisal for their testimony and disclosures? Yes.
    3. Will you cooperate in providing the Committee with requested 
witnesses, including technical experts and career employees, with 
firsthand knowledge of matters of interest to the Committee? Yes.
    4. Are you willing to appear and testify before any duly 
constituted committee of the Congress on such occasions as you may be 
reasonably requested to do so? Yes.
                                 ______
                                 
                [GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]                          
                                 ______
                                 
                   Jared Isaacman--Part A Question 15

                                      POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS 2015-PRESENT
                                               (through 2/3/2025)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Jared Isaacman (Federal)         Date           Amount                            Notes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TRUMP VANCE INAUGURAL             11/27/2024     $2,000,000.00
 COMMITTEE, INC.
WHITESIDES VICTORY FUND           10/29/2024         $5,000.00  JFC contribution: allocated by JFC to California
                                                                 Democratic Party (see below)
(CALIFORNIA DEMOCRATIC PARTY)     10/29/2024         $5,000.00
DSCC                              10/23/2024        $41,300.00
MONTANANS FOR TESTER               10/1/2024         $3,300.00
MICHIGAN DEMOCRATIC STATE           8/1/2024        $10,000.00
 CENTRAL COMMITTEE
MITTEN PAC                          8/1/2024         $5,000.00
ELISSA SLOTKIN FOR MICHIGAN        7/29/2024         $3,300.00
ELISSA SLOTKIN FOR MICHIGAN        7/29/2024         $3,300.00
CASEY KEYSTONE VICTORY FUND        7/17/2024        $15,400.00  JFC contribution: allocated by JFC to
                                                                 Pennsylvania Democratic Party, Bob Casey for
                                                                 Senate, Inc., and Keystone America PAC (see
                                                                 below)
(KEYSTONE AMERICA PAC)             7/22/2024         $2,100.00
(BOB CASEY FOR SENATE INC)         7/22/2024         $3,300.00
(PENNSYLVANIA DEMOCRATIC PARTY)    7/22/2024        $10,000.00
GEORGE WHITESIDES FOR CONGRESS     2/20/2023         $3,300.00
GEORGE WHITESIDES FOR CONGRESS     2/20/2023         $3,300.00
MARK KELLY FOR SENATE              10/1/2022         $2,900.00  In-Kind Contribution--Fundraising Event Catering
DSCC                               7/11/2022        $26,500.00
DSCC                               7/11/2022        $23,500.00  Recount Account
MONTANANS FOR TESTER               3/31/2022         $2,900.00
BOB CASEY FOR SENATE INC           3/30/2022         $2,900.00  ................................................
SHAHEEN FOR SENATE                 3/30/2022         $2,900.00
DSCC                               3/29/2022        $10,000.00
FRIENDS OF MARK WARNER             3/29/2022           $900.00
FRIENDS OF MARK WARNER             11/2/2021         $2,000.00
SMP                               10/28/2021       $100,000.00
SUSAN WILD FOR CONGRESS           10/24/2021         $2,900.00
SUSAN WILD FOR CONGRESS           10/20/2021         $2,900.00
IMPACT                            10/20/2021        $10,000.00  $5,000 refunded on 11/2/2021
FRIENDS OF SCHUMER                10/20/2021         $2,900.00
FRIENDS OF SCHUMER                10/20/2021         $2,900.00
MARK KELLY FOR SENATE               7/3/2021         $2,900.00
FRIENDS OF DENNIS ROSS             11/8/2016           $500.00
FRIENDS OF DAVID JOLLY             10/7/2015         $1,000.00
GRAVES FOR CONGRESS                3/31/2015         $1,500.00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Jared Isaacman (State & Local)      Date           Amount                            Notes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JOSH SHAPIRO FOR GOVERNOR           3/2/2022           $50,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                   Jared Isaacman--Part A Question 19

               [GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] 
                                 ______                                
                                 
               [GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] 
                                 ______
                                 
               [GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]  
                                 ______
                                 
               [GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]             
                                 ______
                                 
               [GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] 
                                 ______
                                 
               [GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]                 
                                 ______
                                 
               [GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] 
                                 ______
                                 
               [GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]  
                                 ______
                                 
               [GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]  
                                 ______
                                 
               [GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]  
                                 ______
                                 
               [GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]   
                                 ______
                                 
               [GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] 
                                 ______
                                 
               [GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] 
                                 ______
                                 
               [GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]   
                                 ______
                                 
               [GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]       
                                 ______
                                 
               [GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]     
                                 ______
                                 
               [GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]             
                                 ______
                                 
               [GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] 
                                 ______
                                 
               [GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] 
                                 ______
                                 
            Jared Isaacman--Part C Question 3--PACER--Draken

[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] 
                                 ______
                                 
       Jared Isaacman--Part C Question 3--PACER--United Bank Card

[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] 
                                 ______
                                 
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] 
                                 ______
                                 
            Jared Isaacman--Part C Question 3--PACER--Shift4

[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] 
                                 ______
                                 
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] 
                                 ______
                                 
         Jared Isaacman--Part C Question 3--PACER--Harbortouch

[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] 
                                 ______
                                 
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]   
                                 ______
                                 
       Jared Isaacman--Part C Question 3--PACER--Isaacman, Jared

[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] 


    The Chairman. Thank you.
    Ms. Trusty.

  STATEMENT OF OLIVIA TRUSTY, NOMINEE TO BE A MEMBER, FEDERAL 
                   COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

    Ms. Trusty. Thank you. Chairman Cruz, Ranking Member 
Cantwell, members of the Committee, thank you for convening 
this hearing.
    Senator Wicker, thank you so much for your very kind 
introduction. It has been a privilege to work with you on your 
staff for nearly 8 years, serving the people of Mississippi and 
all Americans. Thank you so much for this opportunity.
    I also thank President Trump for the incredible honor of 
this nomination to be a Commissioner at the Federal 
Communications Commission.
    And last but not least, I thank my family for their love 
and support. And I will briefly introduce those here today and 
watching via webcast: My parents, Terry and Ellen Trusty; my 
sisters Lauren, Jennifer, Angela, Elizabeth, and Caroline, and 
my brother TJ; my brothers and sister-in-law, Thomas 
Ventimiglia, Matthew Burton, Saula Fifita, and Nain Trusty; and 
my precious nieces and nephews, Sofia, Thomas, and Julian 
Ventimiglia, Ella, Jack, Caroline Kay, and Henry Burton, and 
Isabelle, Summer, Ellen, and Lana Trusty. I love you all so 
very much.
    Growing up in a large family with five sisters and one 
brother, I was taught early on about the value of service. 
Through my parents' daily actions, they emphasized the 
importance of helping others, whether through small acts or 
larger commitments. As I have grown older, I have credited my 
parents' example to the example set by my paternal and maternal 
grandfathers, George Preston Trusty Sr., and Ernest DeWitt 
Powell Jr., both of whom served our country in World War II and 
the Korean War, respectively. Although my grandfathers came 
from different backgrounds, they shared a common commitment to 
defending this country and protecting the values we all hold 
dear.
    What brings me here today is my desire to continue the 
shared commitment to public service and love of country that 
has been in my family for generations.
    When I first moved to Washington, D.C., nearly 20 years 
ago, after graduating from the University of North Carolina at 
Chapel Hill, I began my career in the public policy office of a 
telecommunications company. This is where I was introduced to 
Universal Service principles and the critical mission of the 
FCC. During that time, I saw firsthand how access to modern 
communication services, particularly for Americans living in 
rural and remote areas could change lives.
    I also learned the value of a simple Internet connection, 
it not only gives communities the ability to stay connected 
with loved ones, but it opens the door to education, jobs, 
economic opportunities, and so much more. Indeed, it allows 
Americans to participate fully in society and an ever-expanding 
global digital economy. Following my time in the private 
sector, I have had the opportunity to work in the House of 
Representatives and in this hallowed chamber on 
telecommunications, technology, consumer protection, and most 
recently, national security.
    All of these policy areas are core to the FCC's mission to 
make available affordable, high-speed, reliable, and secure 
communication services.
    Now, in carrying out this mission, it is not lost on me 
that the problem set facing the Commission is both vast and 
diverse. The Agency must contend with unforgiving geographic 
landscapes to achieve universal connectivity. It must stay 
ahead of sophisticated illegal robocallers defrauding and 
scamming vulnerable populations like our youth and seniors. It 
must work with Federal partners to defend the security of our 
communications networks from the attacks of nation-state 
actors, and it must work collaboratively with private and 
public sector interests to ensure that the United States leads 
the world in next-generation communications.
    Notwithstanding these issues, given my unique experiences 
working on both, this distinguished Committee, and the Armed 
Services Committee, as well as the dedication and expertise of 
FCC staff, I believe these challenges can be overcome.
    In that spirit, I would like to offer a short list of 
commitments on which I hope there is bipartisan consensus, if 
confirmed. If confirmed, I will work with Congress and the 
administration to expand access to high-speed Internet services 
for all Americans, protect consumers from illegal robocalls, 
strengthen the security of the Nation's telecommunications 
networks, and restore America's leadership in next-generation 
communications technologies.
    Mr. Chairman, thank you again for holding this hearing. I 
look forward to answering any questions.
    [The prepared statement and biographical information of Ms. 
Trusty follow:]

  Prepared Statement of Olivia Trusty, Nominee to be a Commissioner, 
                   Federal Communications Commission
    Chairman Cruz, Ranking Member Cantwell, and members of the 
Committee. It is a tremendous honor to be nominated and I thank 
President Trump for this opportunity. I also thank my family for their 
love and support.
    Growing up in a large family with five sisters and one brother, I 
was taught early on about the value of service. Through my parents' 
daily actions, they emphasized the importance of helping others, 
whether through small acts or larger commitments. As I have grown 
older, I have credited my parents' example to the example set by my 
paternal and maternal grandfathers--George Preston Trusty, Sr. and 
Ernest Dewitt Powell, Jr. Both of whom served our country in World War 
II and the Korean War, respectively. Although my grandfathers came from 
different backgrounds, they shared a common commitment to defending 
this country and protecting the values we all hold dear. What brings me 
here today is my desire to continue the shared commitment to public 
service and love of country that has been in my family for generations.
    When I first moved to Washington, DC nearly twenty years ago after 
graduating from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, I 
began my career in the public policy office of a telecommunications 
company. This is where I was introduced to universal service principles 
and the critical mission of the FCC. During that time, I saw first-hand 
how access to modern communications services, particularly for 
Americans living in rural and remote areas, could change lives. I also 
learned the value of a simple Internet connection: it not only gives 
communities the ability to stay connected with loved ones, but it opens 
the door to education, jobs, economic opportunities, and so much more. 
Indeed, it allows Americans to participate fully in society and an 
ever-expanding global digital economy.
    Following my time in the private sector, I have had the opportunity 
to work in the House of Representatives and in this hallowed chamber on 
telecommunications, technology, consumer protection, and, most 
recently, national security. All of these policy areas are core to the 
FCC's mission to make available affordable, high-speed, reliable, and 
secure communications services.
    In carrying out this mission, it is not lost on me that the problem 
set facing the Commission is vast and diverse. The agency must contend 
with unforgiving geographic landscapes to achieve universal 
connectivity; it must stay ahead of sophisticated illegal robocallers 
defrauding and scamming vulnerable populations like our youth and 
seniors; it must work with Federal partners to defend the security of 
our communications networks from the attacks of nation state actors; 
and it must work collaboratively with private and public sector 
interests to ensure that the United States leads the world in next-
generation communications. Notwithstanding these issues, given my 
unique experiences working on both this distinguished committee and the 
Armed Services Committee, as well as the dedication and expertise of 
FCC staff, I believe these challenges can be overcome.
    In that spirit, I would like offer a short list of commitments on 
which I hope there is bipartisan consensus. If confirmed, I will work 
with Congress and the Administration to:

   Expand access to affordable, high-speed Internet services 
        for all Americans;

   Protect consumers from illegal robocalls;

   Strengthen the security of the Nation's telecommunications' 
        networks; and

   Restore America's leadership in next-generation 
        communications technologies.

    Mr. Chairman, thank you, again, for holding this hearing and I look 
forward to answering any questions.
                                 ______
                                 
                      a. biographical information
    1. Name (Include any former names or nicknames used): Olivia Britt 
Trusty.
    2. Position to which nominated: Commissioner at the Federal 
Communications Commission.
    3. Date of Nomination: February 11, 2025.
    4. Address (List current place of residence and office addresses):

        Residence: Information not released to the public.
        Office: 228 Russell Senate Office Building, Washington, DC 
        20510.
    5. Date and Place of Birth: Baltimore, Maryland.
    6. Provide the name, position, and place of employment for your 
spouse (if married) or domestic partner, and the names and ages of your 
children (including stepchildren and children by a previous marriage).
    Not applicable.
    7. List all college and graduate schools attended, whether or not 
you were granted a degree by the institution. Provide the name of the 
institution, the dates attended, the degree received, and the date of 
the degree.

        Undergraduate Degree:
                The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, August 
                2001 to May 2005, Bachelor of Arts Degree in Political 
                Science, Awarded May 2005

        Graduate Degree:
                Georgetown University, August 2005 to December 2006, 
                Master of Arts Degree in American Government, Awarded 
                December 2006

    8. List all post-undergraduate employment, including the job title, 
name of employer, and inclusive dates of employment, and highlight all 
management-level jobs held and any non-managerial jobs that relate to 
the position for which you are nominated.

        Qwest Communications, Senior Policy Representative and 
        Government Relations Assistant, May 2006-April 2010*

        Verizon, Senior Consultant and Legislative Assistant, April 
        2010-September 2013*

        Office of U.S. Congressman Bob Latta (R-OH), Legislative 
        Assistant, September 2013-September 2014*

        U.S. House Committee on Energy and Commerce, Subcommittee on 
        Digital Commerce and Consumer Protection, Professional Staff 
        Member, October 2014-April 2017*

        Office of U.S. Senator Roger F. Wicker, Legislative Assistant/
        Telecommunications Subcommittee Staff Director, May 2017-
        December 2018*

        U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, 
        Policy Director, January 2019-December 2022**

        U.S. Senate Committee on Armed Services, Professional Staff 
        Member/Cyber Lead, January 2023 to present**

        *Denotes non-managerial job that relates to the position for 
        which I have been nominated

        **Denotes managerial-level job that relates to the position for 
        which I have been nominated

    9. Attach a copy of your resume.
    Attached.
    10. List any advisory, consultative, honorary, or other part-time 
service or positions with Federal, State, or local governments, other 
than those listed above after 18 years of age. None.
    11. List all positions held as an officer, director, trustee, 
partner, proprietor, agent, representative, or consultant of any 
corporation, company, firm, partnership, or other business, enterprise, 
educational, or other institution.

        Gymnastics Teacher--Hill's Gymnastics, Gaithersburg, MD*

        Adjunct Lecturer--Georgetown University, Washington, DC*

        *I no longer hold these positions.

    12. List all memberships you have had after 18 years of age or 
currently hold with any civic, social, charitable, educational, 
political, professional, fraternal, benevolent or religiously 
affiliated organization, private club, or other membership organization 
(You do not have to list your religious affiliation or membership in a 
religious house of worship or institution). Include dates of membership 
and any positions you have held with any organization. Please note 
whether any such club or organization restricts membership on the basis 
of sex, race, color, religion, national origin, age, or disability. 
None.
    13. Have you ever been a candidate for and/or held a public office 
(elected, non-elected, or appointed)? If so, indicate whether any 
campaign has any outstanding debt, the amount, and whether you are 
personally liable for that debt. No.
    14. List all memberships and offices held with and services 
rendered to, whether compensated or not, any political party or 
election committee within the past ten years. If you have held a paid 
position or served in a formal or official advisory position (whether 
compensated or not) in a political campaign within the past ten years, 
identify the particulars of the campaign, including the candidate, year 
of the campaign, and your title and responsibilities. None.
    15. Itemize all political contributions to any individual, campaign 
organization, political party, political action committee, or similar 
entity of $200 or more for the past ten years.
    From 2016 to 2024, I have made political contributions to Donald J. 
Trump for President, WinRed, and the Trump National Committee. The 
cumulative amount of my contributions to WinRed exceeds $200. Those 
contributions are listed below.

        11/06/24--WinRed, $141.00

        10/16/24--WinRed, $47.00

        07/14/24--WinRed, $20.82

        08/30/20--WinRed, $5.00

        07/26/20--WinRed, $5.00

        06/14/20--WinRed, $5.00

        05/09/20--WinRed, $5.00

        12/20/19--WinRed, $5.00

    16. List all scholarships, fellowships, honorary degrees, honorary 
society memberships, military medals, and any other special recognition 
for outstanding service or achievements.

        Athletic scholarship at the University of North Carolina at 
        Chapel Hill (2001-2005)

        Eastern Atlantic Gymnastics League All-Academic Team (2001-
        2005)
        NACGC Academic All-America (2004-2005)

        Carolina Panthers Graduate Scholarship (2005)

        Black Women's Congressional Alliance Honoree (2023)

        Women in Cable Telecommunications ``Listen Award'' Recipient 
        (2023)

    17. List all books, articles, columns, letters to the editor, 
Internet blog postings, or other publications you have authored, 
individually or with others. Include a link to each publication when 
possible. If a link is not available, provide a digital copy of the 
publication when available. None.
    18. List all speeches, panel discussions, and presentations (e.g., 
PowerPoint) that you have given on topics relevant to the position for 
which you have been nominated. Include a link to each publication when 
possible. If a link is not available, provide a digital copy of the 
speech or presentation when available.

        2020 CTIA 5G Summit, Congressional Perspective: What's Ahead 
        for Washington--https://www.ctia.org/news/video-congressional-
        perspective-whats-ahead-for-wireless-in-washington

        2022 FCBA Annual Seminar Congressional Panel

        2024 Dynamic Spectrum Alliance Global Summit: Government and 
        Commercial Spectrum Sharing, Creating a Value Proposition for 
        Everyone

    19. List all public statements you have made during the past ten 
years, including statements in news articles and radio and podcasts and 
television appearances, which are on topics relevant to the position 
for which you have been nominated, including dates. Include a link to 
each statement when possible. If a link is not available, provide a 
digital copy of the statement when available. None.
    20. List all digital platforms (including social media and other 
digital content sites) on which you currently or have formerly operated 
an account, regardless of whether or not the account was held in your 
name or an alias. Include the full name of an ``alias'' or ``handle'', 
including the complete URL and username with hyperlinks, you have used 
on each of the named platforms. Indicate whether the account is active, 
deleted, or dormant. Include a link to each account if possible.

        X: @obritt3 https://x.com/obritt3 (active)

        LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/olivia-trusty-2b850398 (active)

        Instagram: @obritttrust https://www.instagram.com/obritttrust/ 
        (active)

        Instagram: @obtrusty https://www.instagram.com/obtrusty/ 
        (active)

        Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/public/Olivia-Trusty/ 
        (dormant)

    21. Please identify each instance in which you have testified 
orally or in writing before Congress in a governmental or non-
governmental capacity and specify the date, committee, and subject 
matter of each testimony. None.
    22. Given the current mission, major programs, and major 
operational objectives of the department/agency/commission/corporation 
to which you have been nominated, what in your background or employment 
experience do you believe affirmatively qualifies you for appointment 
to the position for which you have been nominated, and why do you wish 
to serve in that position?
    For nearly 20 years, I have had the opportunity to work on 
telecommunications, technology, consumer protection, and national 
security policy. Every employment experience I have had--which includes 
over seven years in the private sector and over 11 years on Capitol 
Hill--involved working on policy issues that are core to the FCC's 
mission. If confirmed, I look forward to applying the knowledge and 
skills I have gained throughout my professional career to advance the 
availability of affordable, high-speed, reliable, and secure 
communications services across the country.
    I wish to serve at the FCC because I love this country and I have 
seen the transformational impact that an Internet connection can have 
on individuals, families, and communities. If confirmed, my efforts 
would be dedicated to ensuring that every American has access to the 
Internet and the opportunity to participate in the 21st Century 
Internet economy.
    23. What do you believe are your responsibilities, if confirmed, to 
ensure that the department/agency/commission/corporation has proper 
management and accounting controls, and what experience do you have in 
managing a large organization?
    If confirmed, my responsibility would be to carry out the FCC's 
mission by making sure all Americans have access to communications 
services. As part of this effort, I would focus on promoting 
competition, innovation, and investment in U.S. communications 
networks, while protecting consumers and strengthening network 
security.
    Managing an organization in the U.S. government--large or small--
requires strong leadership that is guided by advancing the public 
interest and a commitment to the law. It also involves setting clear 
goals, and fostering a culture of transparency and accountability. A 
willingness to engage with stakeholders of all different backgrounds 
and perspectives is also critical to effective management and making 
informed decisions. My management and leadership experiences on the 
Senate Commerce Committee and the Senate Armed Services Committee have 
helped me to develop skills in each of these areas. They have also 
helped me find ways to build consensus and identify common ground on 
policy issues that can be highly technical and politically sensitive in 
nature. Altogether, my professional background has prepared me to take 
on more managerial responsibilities at the FCC, if I have the honor of 
being confirmed.
    24. What do you believe to be the top three challenges facing the 
department/agency/commission/corporation, and why?
    The top three challenges facing the FCC include the following:

        Achieving universal connectivity. The cornerstone of the FCC's 
        mission is to make communications services available to all 
        Americans. With the future of the Universal Service Fund in 
        question, it is imperative that the FCC work with Congress to 
        restore predictability and sustainability to the FCC's ability 
        to foster and promote the delivery of affordable, high-speed, 
        and reliable Internet services to all Americans.

        Strengthening network security. Nation states and malicious 
        cyber actors are targeting United States critical 
        infrastructure, including commercial telecommunications 
        networks, to degrade and disrupt America's economic stability 
        and national security. The FCC has a responsibility to work 
        with private industry and its Federal partners throughout the 
        U.S. government to strengthen the cyber defenses of 
        telecommunications networks against increasingly sophisticated 
        and hostile cyber threat actors.

        Renewing the FCC's spectrum auction authority. Making spectrum 
        available for commercial use is vital to continued innovation 
        and economic prosperity in the United States, as well as 
        America's global leadership in next-generation communications 
        technologies. The ongoing lapse of the FCC's auction authority 
        severely constrains the Commission's ability to meet the 
        growing spectrum demands of the private sector, risking the 
        Nation's economic security and technological leadership abroad. 
        The FCC should work with Congress to renew the FCC's auction 
        authority immediately to reach our economic goals in the United 
        States and remain competitive in the global digital economy.
                   b. potential conflicts of interest
    1. Describe all financial arrangements, deferred compensation 
agreements, and other continuing dealings with business associates, 
clients, or customers. Please include information related to retirement 
accounts, such as a 401(k) or pension plan.
    I have an Individual Retirement Account. I also have a Thrift 
Savings Plan.
    2. Do you have any commitments or agreements, formal or informal, 
to maintain employment, affiliation, or practice with any business, 
association, or other organization during your appointment? If so, 
please explain. No.
    3. Indicate any investments, obligations, liabilities, or other 
relationships which could involve potential conflicts of interest in 
the position to which you have been nominated. Explain how you will 
resolve each potential conflict of interest. None.
    4. Describe any business relationship, dealing, or financial 
transaction which you have had during the last ten years, whether for 
yourself, on behalf of a client, or acting as an agent, that could in 
any way constitute or result in a possible conflict of interest in the 
position to which you have been nominated. Explain how you will resolve 
each potential conflict of interest. None.
    5. Identify any other potential conflicts of interest and explain 
how you will resolve each potential conflict of interest. None.
    6. Describe any activity during the past ten years, including the 
names of clients represented, in which you have been engaged for the 
purpose of directly or indirectly influencing the passage, defeat, or 
modification of any legislation or affecting the administration and 
execution of law or public policy.
    I presently serve as a Professional Staff Member on the Senate 
Committee on Armed Services. I previously served as a Policy Director 
on the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. In 
both positions, I have been asked for my thoughts on legislative 
matters pending before Congress, and I have regularly advised Senate 
offices on communications policy and legislation.
                            c. legal matters
    1. Have you ever been disciplined or cited for a breach of ethics, 
professional misconduct, or retaliation by, or been the subject of a 
complaint to, any court, administrative agency, the Office of Special 
Counsel, an Inspector General, professional association, disciplinary 
committee, or other professional group? If yes:
    No.

  a.  Provide the name of the court, agency, association, committee, or 
        group;

  b.  Provide the date the citation, disciplinary action, complaint, or 
        personnel action was issued or initiated;

  c.  Describe the citation, disciplinary action, complaint, or 
        personnel action;

  d.  Provide the results of the citation, disciplinary action, 
        complaint, or personnel action.

    2. Have you ever been investigated, arrested, charged, or held by 
any Federal, State, or other law enforcement authority of any Federal, 
State, county, municipal, or foreign government entity, other than for 
a minor traffic offense? If so, please explain. No.
    3. Have you or any business or nonprofit of which you are or were 
an officer ever been involved as a party in an administrative agency 
proceeding, criminal proceeding, or civil litigation? If so, please 
explain. No.
    4. Have you ever been convicted (including pleas of guilty or nolo 
contendere) of any criminal violation other than a minor traffic 
offense? If so, please explain. No.
    5. Have you ever been accused, formally or informally, of sexual 
assault, sexual harassment, or discrimination on the basis of sex, 
race, religion, or any other basis? If so, please explain. No.
    6. Please advise the Committee of any additional information, 
favorable or unfavorable, which you feel should be disclosed in 
connection with your nomination. None.
                     d. relationship with committee
    1. Will you ensure that your department/agency/commission/
corporation complies with deadlines for information set by 
congressional committees, and that your department/agency/commission/
corporation endeavors to timely comply with requests for information 
from individual Members of Congress, including requests from members in 
the minority? Yes.
    2. Will you ensure that your department/agency/commission/
corporation does whatever it can to protect congressional witnesses and 
whistleblowers from reprisal for their testimony and disclosures? Yes.
    3. Will you cooperate in providing the Committee with requested 
witnesses, including technical experts and career employees, with 
firsthand knowledge of matters of interest to the Committee? Yes.
    4. Are you willing to appear and testify before any duly 
constituted committee of the Congress on such occasions as you may be 
reasonably requested to do so? Yes.
                                 ______
                                 
                        Resume of Olivia Trusty

[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] 


    The Chairman. Thank you to you both. Thank you to you both.
    All right, Mr. Isaacman, let us start. If you are 
confirmed, you will oversee NASA's various field centers, 
mission directives, and affiliated activities. This includes 
Artemis and the Moon-to-Mars Program, which aims to keep us one 
step ahead of nations like China in the fight for supremacy in 
space.
    The threat from China is very real. Just last week, General 
Saltzman, Chief of Space Operations for the Space Force, 
testified before the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review 
Commission that Beijing has been explicit as recently as 
October of last year, in stating that China intends to surpass 
the United States and become the world's preeminent space 
power.
    As General Saltzman put it, ``China's advancement in space 
technology, their stated desire to dominate, and Beijing's 
disregard for international norms for the responsible use of 
space make them an incredible danger to U.S. prosperity and 
security. China has said that they will put a man on the Moon 
by 2030, and that they will build a permanent lunar base there, 
along with Russia, by 2035.''
    Based on how quickly they have already progressed, I think 
it is quite possible that China reaches those milestones sooner 
than those dates, and indeed that China reaches the Moon before 
the end of President Trump's current term.
    Mr. Isaacman, if China beats us to the Moon, what 
consequences might America face?
    Mr. Isaacman. Mr. Chairman, I really appreciate that 
question, and I could not agree more with all of your 
commentary, sir, including in your opening remarks. We 
certainly cannot lose. If we do not lead the way and we are 
following, we may be following forever, and the consequence of 
which could be extraordinary.
    I mean, even if you are talking about things that have 
maybe even a low probability, let us say, for example, on the 
lunar surface, helium-3 becomes a new source of fusion power, 
it could shift the balance of power here on Earth. I do not 
think we can afford to find that out the hard way.
    As you said, sir, and I have agreed for a very long time, 
space is the ultimate high ground. We cannot afford to cede 
that ground.
    The Chairman. So my team did a visual representation of 
what the stakes are, and it is a simple question, what does the 
future look like in 2030? Now, I will note that my team used 
ChatGPT to make this poster, and my immediate comment on seeing 
it is the American flag is too damn small, and I was told it 
was difficult to get a bigger American flag on AI. That may be 
underscoring the need to win the race for AI as well, but it 
does give a sense of exactly what the choices we are facing 
now.
    When we met in my office, you said beating China back to 
the Moon was, ``critical for our national interests''. You also 
said that if President Trump turns on the television and sees 
Chinese astronauts on the surface of the Moon before Americans, 
you said you would be fired that day. In your written 
testimony, however, you said quote, ``We will prioritize 
sending American astronauts to Mars.'' There seems to be a bit 
of tension between the commitment you made in my office and 
your testimony.
    What is your view? Will you maintain course with the 
Artemis program so that we can return American astronauts to 
the Moon before President Trump leaves office?
    Mr. Isaacman. Mr. Chairman, I really, I really appreciate 
the statement. First, I could not agree more with the President 
and his inspiring and ambitious goal to send American 
astronauts to plant the stars and stripes on Mars. He did not 
say we should not go to the Moon. I suspect the President, as I 
feel and probably a lot of Americans is, is what is taking us 
so long to get back to the Moon and why does it cost so much 
money?
    I absolutely want to see us return to the Moon. As I 
mentioned in my prepared remarks, determine the economic, 
scientific and national security value, while we are also 
proceeding toward Mars. I do not think we have to make any 
tough trades here, Senator. I think if we can concentrate our 
resources as the world's greatest space agency, we do not have 
to make a binary decision of Moon versus Mars, or Moon has to 
come first versus Mars, I think we could be paralleling these 
efforts and doing the near impossible, which is exactly why the 
American taxpayers funded NASA in the first place.
    The Chairman. Well, I will say on the question of whether 
NASA has to implement Moon then Mars, United States law is 
explicit non-equivocal on that. 51 U.S.C. Section 20302, which 
Senator Cantwell and I wrote, says, ``The vision for space 
exploration, the administrator shall establish a program to 
develop a sustained human presence in cislunar space or on the 
Moon as a stepping stone to future exploration of Mars and 
other destinations.'' The notion of the Moon as a stepping 
stone is explicitly in U.S. law. Do you acknowledge that?
    Mr. Isaacman. Yes, I do, Senator.
    The Chairman. And let me ask you, given the current NASA 
budget, if we assume for a moment we are not going to see a 
dramatic shift and NASA's budget double tomorrow, do you 
believe it is possible to stand up a full mission to the Moon 
and a full mission to the Mars simultaneously?
    Mr. Isaacman. Senator, as I mentioned my prepared remarks, 
I think we can absolutely do that. We can figure out the space 
economy in low Earth orbit. We can run more scientific 
missions. This is the Agency that went from sending Alan 
Shepard on a suborbital mission, and 8 years later we saw Neil 
Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin on the surface of the Moon. Do I 
think that we can get back to the Moon, chart a course for Mars 
and do all the other things; absolutely, Senator.
    The Chairman. So do we have your commitment that you will 
not allow the scenario on the right on this poster to happen, 
that China will not beat us to the Moon, that one of these 
heroes sitting in this room will set his or her, and as a 
father of two daughters I am particularly excited that Artemis 
has committed, it will be a ``her'', the first woman will step 
foot on the Moon and she will be an American astronaut. Do we 
have your commitment that we will win the race to the Moon and 
China will not beat us?
    Mr. Isaacman. Senator, I only see the left-hand portion of 
that poster.
    The Chairman. And next time we will make the American flag 
bigger.
    Senator Cantwell.
    Senator Wicker. Mr. Chairman, I ask unanimous consent that 
the poster be placed in the record.
    The Chairman. An excellent idea.
    Senator Cantwell. I do agree.
    The Chairman. And a Chairman who is crossing his T's and 
dotting his I's would have done so already; without objection.
    [The chart referred to follows:]

    [GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] 
    

    The Chairman. Senator Cantwell.
    Senator Cantwell. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. And continuing 
on this same point; listen, I have no doubt of your 
capabilities at the technical side of this and the expertise 
both on the aviation and the space side. It is a question, I 
think, of a long-term challenge of different administrations to 
deliver on this goal and how each administration and each 
Congress does or doesn't support it. So I view your job as like 
wrangling the powers that be to support the mission and 
understand what it is going to take to support the mission.
    So like Senator Cruz, I want to understand a little bit 
more about your commitments. The most recent Economic Impact 
Report highlighted that in Fiscal Year 2023, NASA projects to 
generate more than $75 billion in economic output. And the 
National Academy Studies chaired by Norm Augustine found that 
NASA's budget office is often incompatible with the scope, 
complexity, and difficulty of its mission work. That means that 
we end up shortchanging it to certain degrees.
    So I want to make sure I understand what your commitment is 
because there is been so much in the press. Do you commit not 
to closing any of the NASA's ten centers or divesting from 
critical infrastructure without the expressed authorization of 
Congress?
    Mr. Isaacman. Senator, you absolutely have my commitment to 
work alongside Congress. I think NASA is going to require the 
best and brightest from across the Nation in all of our 
critical infrastructure in order to achieve its mission to do 
the near impossible for all humankind.
    Senator Cantwell. Do you see any reason to close these ten 
centers?
    Mr. Isaacman. Senator, there is only so much that I can be 
briefed on in advance of this opportunity. I fully expect to 
roll up my sleeves and determine where all of our best 
resources are so we can get back to achieving the mission as 
quickly as possible.
    Senator Cantwell. The 2024 National Academy's Report noted 
that the use of service and firm fixed-price contracts at early 
stage of technology development can jeopardize mission success 
and degrade NASA's own in-house technical capabilities. What 
are your thoughts about these fixed-term contracts?
    Mr. Isaacman. Senator, as some----
    Senator Cantwell. Do you agree with that statement? I 
guess, do you agree with that statement? They can be 
deleterious. I am just asking if you agree with that.
    Mr. Isaacman. I take two things away from that, Senator. 
First, having run a defense aerospace company for more than a 
decade, and generally I am a fan of fixed-firm price contracts 
and being held accountable to what we did. In terms of the 
difference between NASA's in-house expertise and what 
commercial industry is able to provide, I believe NASA should 
be working, again, per my prepared remarks, on the near 
impossible, what no one else is capable of doing, and when they 
figure it out, commercial industry takes over and brings the 
rest of the world to follow.
    Senator Cantwell. You might be one heck of an entrepreneur 
in relation to science. You said you are not a scientist. But 
that won't matter if we make very bad decisions based on 
somebody's arbitrary budget analysis instead of what is our 
long-term mission. So that is what we are trying to get out of 
you. How do you think we are going to accomplish this so that 
we have a more--listen, the more we can explain this to 
everybody, I guarantee you the more my colleagues will support 
it in a budget.
    The more it gets slashed and burned by different 
approaches, by DOGE, the more harmful it can become to people 
undermining the support for the mission overall. So you have a 
big challenge here. It is to move us forward at a critical 
moment.
    So do you believe that we should have a reduction in 
workforce, or the science budget, some of the things that I 
mentioned in my opening statement?
    Mr. Isaacman. Senator, I read what is on NASA Watch and in 
the news like everybody else. If I am confirmed, I am eager to 
understand all of the considerations, the discussions being 
made about a reorganization, I believe that we are going to 
need the best and brightest to do the near impossible, and we 
should be concentrating all of our resources on the most 
critical objectives that I kind of outlined in my opening 
remarks, ma'am.
    Senator Cantwell. Do you support the continued Artemis 
Mission with the Space Launch System?
    Mr. Isaacman. Senator, I believe that is currently the 
plan. I would like nothing more than to see this Artemis II 
crew get around the Moon, and then they are back at home 
watching their friends walk on the Moon. I think the real 
question is, again: Why has it taken so long? Why does it cost 
so much money?
    Senator Cantwell. But in the issue of: Are we going to 
commit to this? I think this and the Lander Redundancy are kind 
of like--people see that as a: We are going to the Moon and we 
are going to get this done. Not this discussion of like, we are 
going to skip these things, short change this, and then we are 
going to focus on Mars in a different route. That is what I am 
trying to get from you.
    Whether when you get there, I get that you are saying it is 
the current plan. I am asking as a nominee to run this 
organization, do you have a different view of that, that you 
think right now, yes, there is a different way to do this?
    Mr. Isaacman. Ma'am, I can tell you not just as a nominee, 
but as a space enthusiast who wants my daughters to see 
American astronauts walking on the Moon, it was the left-hand 
side of that poster that I am fully supportive of. I would like 
nothing more than to see Artemis II get around the Moon, and 
again see Americans walking on the Moon. And again, I do not 
think these are either/or. I mean, NASA is an extraordinary 
Agency that can do the near impossible. We can chart a course 
for Mars in line with the President's vision to return to the 
Moon before the Chinese can get there to figure out the space 
economy and do the other things, ma'am.
    Senator Cantwell. There is a lot here. The HiCAM program on 
thermoplastic composites, do you support that program at NASA?
    Mr. Isaacman. I think NASA has the best, brightest, most 
talented engineers and scientists and we should be working on 
cutting-edge technology.
    Senator Cantwell. OK. I will want for the record whether 
you support that in, you know, clarity, not just like, hey, I 
like cutting-edge technology. These are really big decisions 
that lots of us have already weighed in on, and we just want to 
know whether they are going to get slashed someday because the 
President wakes up and says he does not want to do it, and 
whether you are going to say yes, yes, go ahead? So this, it 
will take all of us working together.
    Ms. Trusty, I do not want you to keep going--ignored 
through the conversation. My time has expired. I will want to 
come back to you on the MVD, the broadcasters getting more 
ability in the marketplace, particularly as I mentioned 
earlier, you want a vibrant news competition, particularly when 
it comes to local journalism, reopening that case at the FCC. 
But I will take that for coming back on a second round.
    And I love that, Senator Wicker thinks that you play chess 
instead of checkers because we need a lot more chess playing at 
the FCC. Thank you.
    The Chairman. Grand Master Wicker.
    [Laughter.]
    Senator Wicker. Also, you can go out and shoot skeet and 
then come back and play chess. But thank you very much.
    Well, let me direct my first question to Mr. Isaacman. You 
probably know that NASA has eight field centers, one of which 
is the John C. Stennis Space Center in Mississippi. The Stennis 
Space Center is home to NASA's largest rocket propulsion test 
site. If we did not have that, we would have to build another 
one. The Stennis Space Center also hosts a number of companies 
working on commercial space programs; the Space Center's 
infrastructure represents substantial government investment as 
well as private investments.
    So the day after you are confirmed and sworn in, will you 
come to visit me in Mississippi at the Stennis Space Center?
    Mr. Isaacman. I will get there as soon as I possibly can, 
Senator.
    Senator Wicker. All right. Well, I think that is a fair 
answer.
    Now, Ms. Trusty, let us talk about the plan for Broadband 
Bill, we finally got that reported a few weeks ago, and you 
worked with members of this committee, even as a staff member 
for the Armed Services Committee, in getting some compromised 
language on the Plan for Broadband Act. Do we need it, and what 
accommodations did we make to get everybody on the same page?
    Ms. Trusty. Senator, thank you so much.
    Senator Wicker. You can take about a minute and a half.
    Ms. Trusty. OK. Thank you so much for the question. Thank 
you for your leadership on this issue. You know, interagency 
coordination is essential to closing the digital divide. I 
think as many members on this committee know, there are about 
130 broadband programs across 15 different agencies, and GAO 
has determined that those programs are fragmented and 
duplicative.
    And there is an opportunity to streamline, consolidate, and 
coalesce these programs so that the resources are better 
targeted to unserved areas so that we can get communication 
services to more rural, remote areas that lack connectivity 
right now, and expand and close the digital divide--or just 
close the digital divide, not expand it.
    And so I think the Plan for Broadband Act is the key to the 
solution, it creates a strategy that will help us to target 
these resources better to unserved communities so that 
everybody can fully participate in the global digital economy.
    Senator Wicker. And we had to accommodate high-cost areas, 
tribal areas, and also do some compromising on the spending 
cap. So I do appreciate that.
    Let me ask then in the last two minutes, during COVID-19, 
the broadband across Europe suffered several disruptions. Did 
we have that kind of disruption in the United States, or was 
there a difference, and why do you think things may have turned 
out differently in Europe as opposed to here in the United 
States?
    Ms. Trusty. Thank you so much, Senator. I appreciate this 
question. You know, I think the reason why we did not face the 
same issues here during the COVID pandemic as it relates to our 
Internet networks, is because competition and innovation, a 
light-touch regulatory framework we saw worked really well. We 
just have not seen the predicted harms materialize in the 
absence of more prescriptive legacy regulations.
    And so under your leadership, when I was on this committee, 
to ensure consumers were protected, even if competition and 
innovation fail, you set up a Bipartisan Net Neutrality Working 
Group to put together bipartisan legislation to ensure that 
consumers were protected regardless, but that we had a modern 
framework. I thought that was a great example of how to move 
forward with our next-generation networks, and ensure that 
consumers continued to have access to critical connectivity 
services.
    Senator Wicker. Has there been any throttling or blocking 
in the United States in recent years?
    Ms. Trusty. Senator, I am not aware of any of the predicted 
harms materializing that were projected during this debate a 
couple of years ago.
    Senator Wicker. Thank you very much.
    Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
    The Chairman. Thank you. Senator Kim.

                  STATEMENT OF HON. ANDY KIM, 
                  U.S. SENATOR FROM NEW JERSEY

    Senator Kim. Yes, thank you, Chair.
    Mr. Isaacman, I would just like to start with you. I guess 
I just wanted a little more clarity about, are you committed to 
having a permanent presence on the Moon?
    Mr. Isaacman. Senator, I think the biggest thing is we need 
to get back there. It has been taking a very long time and the 
American taxpayers have invested an awful lot.
    Senator Kim. I agree with you on that front. I think we can 
take that for granted between me and you, but I guess I wanted 
to get a sense because, you know, the Chairman laid this out 
actually, and then the poster that he had was not just about 
getting back to the Moon, but it was about sustaining a 
presence on the Moon. And I just feel like I do not have a good 
understanding of what your actual position is right now on 
that.
    Mr. Isaacman. Well, I think, Senator, again, the first step 
to me is to return to the Moon and determine its economic, its 
scientific, and its national security value for remaining 
there.
    Senator Kim. Yes. I saw that in your statement. And I 
guess, again, I was confused, because in your response to the 
Chairman, you were talking about how Helium-3, this is 
something that could very well shift the balance of power 
within the--you know, here on Earth. What else are you looking 
at? Like what else is in your mind right now beyond Helium-3 
and the impacts there when you are talking about scientific, 
economic, and national security?
    Mr. Isaacman. Well, Senator, I mean, that is what we need 
to get there to find out. You know, all the best science 
fiction movies out there have something like Helium-3 as the 
economic justification for an enduring presence, not just on 
the Moon, but throughout, you know, space exploration.
    Senator Kim. So I guess, you know, kind of as we have been 
talking about this, you know, Moon, Mars, two priorities, you 
were much more definitive about saying we need to get to Mars. 
So I guess I just want to ask you that same question. What are 
the scientific, economic, and national security priorities that 
you see more clearly when it comes to going to Mars right now 
than in terms of having a permanent presence on the Moon?
    Mr. Isaacman. Well, Senator, to be clear, I certainly hope 
in the future that we have lots of space stations, a full lunar 
outpost, a Mars outpost, and we are pushing even beyond that. I 
am just saying we need to get back to the Moon. We need to 
figure out why we need to be there, and I certainly hope there 
is a reason.
    Senator Kim. Why do we need to be--what I am trying to get 
a sense of, you seem much more definitive about saying we need 
to get to Mars and putting resources toward that effort. What 
are the specific economic, scientific, and national security 
interests you see there? Because I get a sense that you have 
some greater clarity there than you do when it comes to the 
Moon.
    Mr. Isaacman. Well, I would actually hope you are getting a 
sincere answer from me that we should be doing both and the 
other things. Now Mars----
    Senator Kim. Do you think we can do both Moon and Mars on 
the current NASA budget?
    Mr. Isaacman. I sure hope so. And NASA was built to do the 
near impossible and have a thriving space economy in low Earth 
orbit and continue extraordinary science missions to kind of 
unlock the secrets of the universe, sir.
    Senator Kim. Well, I guess I just want to reinforce what 
the Chairman said. I mean, I think we need to have much more 
clarity in how we are talking about, what is our objectives 
when it comes to the Moon? As mentioned, we have a lot more 
clarity about what China's objectives are, and I hope that that 
is something that you can clarify quickly if you are confirmed.
    When it comes to the International Space Station, what is 
your perceived timeline there in terms of when we should be 
starting to bring that down?
    Mr. Isaacman. Well, Senator, first of all, I do not know of 
any reason why we should be bringing it down before what is 
currently scheduled. What I do think we need to do is maximize 
its remaining life, get as much of the high potential science 
and research to the station, figure out what that space economy 
is so when the day does come to hand it off to the commercial 
LEO destinations, they are in a financially self-sustaining 
type way.
    Senator Kim. And you talked about that in terms of the 
space economy. In terms of what should succeed the 
International Space Station, do you believe that that should be 
commercial only, or do you see prospects of the U.S. 
Government, or a government-run space station to succeed the 
International Space Station?
    Mr. Isaacman. Well, right now, Senator, if we do not figure 
out the space economy, whether it is commercially operated or 
not, it is going to be entirely financially sustained by the 
Government.
    Senator Kim. So I guess I am asking what is your--do you 
have a preference, in terms of do you see a sense of need for a 
government-run--I guess I am just trying to ask you, what is it 
that NASA can do that commercial efforts cannot do?
    Mr. Isaacman. Well, I mean, that is a fantastic question, 
Senator. I mean, the line should be drawn, again, in terms of 
NASA undertaking the near-impossible challenges that, again, no 
company, organization, or agency anywhere in the world would be 
able to undertake it. I gave a very good example, I think, in 
my opening remarks on nuclear propulsion; that is something 
that no company would ever embark upon. There is no obvious 
economic return, there are regulatory challenges. That is 
exactly the kind of thing that NASA should be concentrating its 
resources on.
    Senator Kim. The last thing I just want to say here, and I 
know I am running out of time, I am really hard to see. I think 
we are all very proud of the astronauts that are here in this 
room. But I think I could speak for them and say, look, we also 
recognize the importance of the civil servants playing so many 
different roles for the safety and the innovation that is out 
there.
    As I expressed to you, I am concerned about how this 
administration has approached what I believe are indiscriminate 
cuts at different--and firings at different departments and 
agencies. And if you are confirmed, I hope that you stand up 
against indiscriminate cuts. I think we are all very--
recognizing that there are places for efficiencies and 
elsewhere. But we need to make sure that we are protecting the 
expertise that is out there.
    And with that, I will yield back.
    The Chairman. Thank you. Senator Fischer.

                STATEMENT OF HON. DEB FISCHER, 
                   U.S. SENATOR FROM NEBRASKA

    Senator Fischer. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and thank you to 
our two nominees today for your commitment to public service.
    Ms. Trusty, I appreciated meeting with you to learn more 
about your experience and your goals if you are confirmed as a 
FCC Commissioner. And as you know, one of my top goals is to 
maintain a steady and predictable Universal Service Fund. 
Congress' intent has been clear, we must keep all Americans 
connected. I also look forward to co-chairing the Universal 
Service Fund Working Group with Senator Lujan to advance this 
priority.
    Ms. Trusty, how do you view the Universal Service Fund and 
its mission to Universal Service?
    Ms. Trusty. Thank you so much for the question, Senator, 
and thank you for the time. It was great to meet with you and 
discuss your priorities.
    The Universal Service is the cornerstone of the FCC's 
mission. The Universal Service Fund itself has connected 
millions of Americans across the country. As you know, there is 
somewhat of an uncertain future with the Universal Service Fund 
as there is a constitutional challenge before the Supreme 
Court, and the contribution base is shrinking as more Americans 
shift to internet-based communications.
    And so I think it is incumbent upon the FCC to work closely 
with Congress and interested stakeholders to identify a 
specific, predictable, and sufficient form of support as 
required in the Communications Act to continue meeting the 
needs of Americans across the country.
    Senator Fischer. Thank you. From my experience serving on 
this committee and also on Armed Services Committee, I 
appreciate the differing cultures, missions, and priorities of 
the various Spectrum stakeholders, and I have seen the 
consequences when they conflict. I worry that Federal missions, 
including national security, can be undermined because of these 
frictions, particularly when collaboration among stakeholders 
is strained and consensus cannot be reached.
    Ms. Trusty, what do you think the appropriate role is for 
the FCC and its engagement with the Department of Defense?
    Ms. Trusty. Thank you, Senator. And I appreciate this 
question because I know this is such an important topic and a 
sensitive one, too. So you know, as you have noted, I have 
worked on both the Armed Services and Commerce Committees, both 
great experiences. During my time on the Armed Services 
Committee, I have certainly developed a greater appreciation 
for DOD's national security mission and how critical Spectrum 
is in carrying out that mission.
    I also know from my time on the Commerce Committee that 
Spectrum is the lifeblood of wireless communications. It is 
essential to meeting our economic objectives, both domestically 
and abroad. And so I think given these two experiences, I can 
certainly help find solutions where there is common ground, 
where we do not have to sacrifice our Spectrum for warfighting 
needs, but we can also create opportunities to repurpose 
Spectrum for commercial use.
    And I think the way to do that, frankly, is to have 
everybody in the same room at the same time hearing the same 
things. Otherwise, I think there is a lot of information that 
gets lost in translation, contributing to further misalignment 
on Spectrum policy. When we are all together, it can further 
promote transparency and accountability in these processes.
    Senator Fischer. Well, how do you think this dialogue can 
become more constructive? Do you have any suggestions on how to 
do that? As a member of the staff on the Armed Services 
Committee, you had access to classified briefings that others 
do not have access to. So you have a fuller understanding of 
what is at stake here. So how can we have a constructive 
dialogue?
    Ms. Trusty. Well, Senator, I think that is the issue. You 
know, when I was on the Commerce Committee, I did not have a 
full clearance, and so I was not privy to many of DOD's assets 
and capabilities. But when I was on the Armed Services 
Committee, I had a clearance and could understand better, or to 
a better degree, why some of the assets and systems were so 
essential. I will say, though, I think we have to find a way to 
accommodate both our national security and economic security 
interests. I worry that if either side of this debate fails, 
then our global competitors win, and I think that would have a 
devastating consequence to our economic and national security.
    Senator Fischer. And I think we are beginning to achieve 
that, this way forward.
    Ms. Trusty. Yes, ma'am.
    Senator Fischer. Looking at the international role on 
telecommunications, how can a more unified position among 
Federal agencies boost the United States' global leadership? 
How can we ensure that national security perspectives are 
included in an overall position that we have for this country?
    Ms. Trusty. Absolutely, Senator. Thank you for this. So I 
had the opportunity to attend the last WRC in Dubai, and I 
think the takeaway was that America did not put our best foot 
forward because we did not have a unified approach to our 
Spectrum policy. And so I think if we have a unified strategy 
where we highlight key U.S. interests, whether with respect to 
both our economic and national security, it gives us more time 
and space to work with our international partners and allies to 
develop coalitions where they have a lot of similar interests. 
And going into it that way, we can preempt those who are 
attempting to undermine U.S. values, among other things.
    Senator Fischer. And if confirmed as an FCC Commissioner, 
the Commission, as a whole, would definitely have a leadership 
role in that process, correct?
    Ms. Trusty. Absolutely. So the Department of State 
typically runs the WRC process, but NTIA and the FCC certainly 
contribute to that.
    Senator Fischer. Thank you very much.
    Thank you, Mr. Chair.
    The Chairman. Thank you. Senator Klobuchar.

               STATEMENT OF HON. AMY KLOBUCHAR, 
                  U.S. SENATOR FROM MINNESOTA

    Senator Klobuchar. Thank you, Mr. Chair. Thank you to both 
of you for being here. You win the prize as the best name for a 
nominee, Ms. Trusty.
    So I just wanted to have one follow up from Senator 
Fischer's questions, because I care a lot about Universal 
Service. Senator Thune and I have worked a lot on that 
together. How do you think the FCC should modernize the USF to 
ensure its long-term sustainability?
    Ms. Trusty. Thank you for the question, Senator. You know, 
I know that there are a number of proposals on the table, 
whether it comes from identifying a specific predictable or 
sufficient funding resource to ensure the Universal Service 
Fund can continue to meet connectivity needs across the 
country. There are proposals about a Federal appropriation or 
looking to other private sector entities to contribute to the 
contribution base.
    I think all of those things should be discussed between the 
FCC and Congress to ensure we can continue meeting connectivity 
needs across the country.
    Senator Klobuchar. Thank you. As you know, I work with 
Senator Wicker on the Data Act to improve the accuracy of the 
FCC's broadband availability maps, but we know more work needs 
to be done. If confirmed, how will you continue to work to 
ensure the accuracy of the maps?
    Ms. Trusty. Thank you, Senator. So you know, I was on this 
committee when the Broadband Data Act was passed with the goal 
of making sure we knew where broadband is available, where it 
is not, to better target resources to unserved areas. You know, 
as a part of that law, there is an opportunity for a challenge 
process where folks can challenge the accuracy of the data, 
which I think can help improve the accuracy of the maps.
    I also think the FCC should work with private sector 
stakeholders who produce their own maps to inform the accuracy 
of the maps so that we can better target resources to areas who 
remain unserved, or remain--yes, remain unserved.
    Senator Klobuchar. OK, very good. Thank you. And as you 
know, I care a lot about getting the broadband funding out. We 
have talked to a number of nominees about that. I will ask you 
a question in writing on 9-1-1.
    Ms. Trusty. Thank you, Senator.
    Senator Klobuchar. So thank you.
    Mr. Isaacman, welcome. We had a good talk over the phone. I 
mentioned STEM was really important to me. I was looking back--
in 2017, President Trump signed into law, and I remember 
because Senator Fischer called me from the White House, she was 
there, and she said, ``What is this bill of yours he is signing 
into law?'' because she happened to be there. And they did an 
event.
    So it was a bill authorizing the NASA Administrator to 
encourage women to study STEM--it is called the INSPIRE Women 
Act and pursue careers in aerospace. Could you talk about 
promoting the STEM workforce, and then your role if confirmed 
as NASA administrator, how you can inspire more people to go 
into STEM in general? I'm just coming off the robotics 
competition in Minnesota on Saturday. Thank you. I was there.
    Mr. Isaacman. Understood, Senator. First step is I am still 
working on getting my two daughters to want to grow up and 
enter a sphere--enter into the STEM fields. I have tried with 
space flight and I will get there. I would love to answer that 
really in two parts. I think the first thing is, first it is a 
fundamental obligation of NASA to inspire the next generation 
to want to be scientists, engineers, astronauts, pilots, 
doctors, researchers, and I think the best way NASA can do that 
is by executing on its mission.
    I mean, that is what is going to have children want to 
dress up as astronauts and scientists for Halloween, is to get 
back to the Moon, to get to Mars and to inspire the world with 
whatever the replacement is someday for James Webb that gives 
us a hundred times the resolution.
    The second part, ma'am, is what I mentioned in my opening 
remarks about NASA being a force multiplier for science. Once 
we inspire them in their youth to want to grow up and join this 
grand endeavor, we want to get them hands-on in their various 
academic institutions.
    I think NASA can lend its expertise, its talent, its bulk 
buying of rockets, its standard bus architecture, and get 
academic institutions to want to contribute, whether it is 
building probes, or sensors, get them hands-on so when they 
graduate they want to join the greatest space agency in the 
world.
    Senator Klobuchar. Very good. You know, I think not just 
with space but also with medical developments right now because 
of a combination of mapping of the human genome, home of the 
Mayo Clinic, Minnesota, as well as the potential of AI to do 
good when it comes to things like rare diseases. We are just on 
this cusp of scientific development kind of bursting out. I do 
get concerned about some of these cuts to science-based 
research and agencies across the government, not just space 
related. Will you be an advocate for science within the 
administration?
    Mr. Isaacman. Yes, ma'am. I do believe the President is 
looking to usher in a golden age of science and discovery. 
Personally, I just spent a few days ago with 50--40 different 
science and researchers sharing the results from my most recent 
mission to space. I am passionate about science. I would love 
nothing more than to continue to see NASA go out and try and 
unlock the secrets of the universe.
    Senator Klobuchar. Thank you.
    Senator Moreno [now presiding]. Phenomenal plugs for 
Minnesota in that questioning.
    Senator Klobuchar. I always find a way. You will learn that 
soon, Mr. Moreno.
    Senator Moreno. So, Senator Moran, see if you can top that 
for Kansas.

                STATEMENT OF HON. JERRY MORAN, 
                    U.S. SENATOR FROM KANSAS

    Senator Moran. Well, that was not what I intended to talk 
about, but I am happy to promote my state and have to, 
certainly, to Mr. Isaacman. Wichita, in particular, the air 
capital of the world, Wichita State, NIAR, and these 
astronauts, when I had a conversation with them by phone, asked 
me the question: Do you know that you have the greatest space 
museum in the world in Kansas? To which I said, I know that, I 
am just pleased that you know that. Can I tell the rest of the 
world that you are saying those things? And so I thank you for 
that opportunity, the Cosmosphere in Hutchinson, Kansas.
    Ms. Trusty, let me start with you. I am pleased by your 
nomination that President Trump has chosen to nominate you. I 
appreciate the friendship you and I have had over a long period 
of time of my office in Dirksen, and we have passed and had 
conversations in the hall for a long time. I have great faith 
in you.
    Let me ask you these--well, on that topic, let me tell you 
that it has been my disappointment over time to watch the FCC 
become much more partisan and incapable of reaching decisions. 
It has changed in the time that I have been in the Senate, as 
the Senate has changed in the time that I have been in the 
Senate, and I would encourage you to use every effort to find 
ways, to find solutions to problems, and to bring the 
Commission together to serve the American people. And I do not 
know that I need to ask you, but I assume you would say that 
you will do so?
    Ms. Trusty. Yes, absolutely, Senator.
    Senator Moran. Thank you. I want to mention just Spectrum 
policy, as a couple of my colleagues have mentioned before. 
Looking at Congress' options about authorities to the FCC, when 
it comes to reauthorizing that Spectrum Auction Authority, what 
would your recommendations be?
    Ms. Trusty. Thank you, Senator. I think this is very 
important. So I would recommend that Congress restore auction 
authority as quickly as possible. I think it can be a catalyst 
to investment and innovation, particularly as it relates to 
expanding broadband infrastructure across the country. I also 
think it serves as a signal to the rest of the world about how 
we are prioritizing our telecommunications policy and where we 
are going.
    This is underpinning every emerging application that we can 
think of, artificial intelligence, quantum computing, and so 
much more. And so I think by showing that we have confidence in 
our regulatory processes and frameworks to have auction 
authority restored to support that kind of innovation, I think 
that will go a long way.
    Senator Moran. Ms. Trusty, media ownership is back in the 
news again. Do you believe it is important for the FCC to rid 
us of the rules that are no longer necessary or inhibit 
competition that currently exist in media ownership rules?
    Ms. Trusty. I appreciate the question, Senator. I 
definitely think we need a modern regulatory framework that 
reflects the realities of today's video and media marketplace. 
As you know, the media marketplace has changed dramatically 
over the last two decades, driven largely by technology 
advancements and changes in consumer preferences.
    Consumers have access to all sorts of things, your 
traditional broadcast and cable, as well as live streaming 
video and social media, all things that make for a great 
personalized television viewing experience and things that I 
think the FCC should continue to promote that allows 
broadcasters to flexibly compete against technology companies 
for ad revenues, consumer viewers, as well as programming.
    Senator Moran. Ms. Trusty, that is particularly true in 
rural America where the options are fewer than they used to be, 
and local programming, is it difficult to task or accomplish. 
So I encourage you to pursue those changes.
    One more, BEAD implementation, one of things we are worried 
about is the timing of the FCC's efforts in deploying broadband 
funds when BEAD is yet uncompleted. Because one of the goals is 
to make sure that we do not overbill, and that you are not both 
providing dollars to the same opportunities to provide 
broadband and Internet services.
    So would you consider--how would you consider the FCC in 
holding off moving forward on allocating 5G funding until BEAD 
allocation decisions have been made in order to maximize the 
efficiency of those 5G funds?
    Ms. Trusty. I appreciate this question, Senator. This goes 
to the heart of interagency coordination. I think the FCC and 
NTIA need to be in constant contact about where BEAD is going, 
when it is going, so that we can be better stewards of taxpayer 
dollars, target funds to unserved areas, ensure that there is 
no duplication or overbuilding, as you mentioned, and there 
could be a possibility where BEAD infrastructure could be 
leveraged for USF funds or vice versa.
    But I think this all goes to interagency coordination and 
making sure we are the best stewards of taxpayer dollars. So 
you have my commitment that I would do that, Senator, if 
confirmed.
    Senator Moran. Thank you.
    Mr. Isaacman, let me tell you that I now have concern about 
your leadership capabilities. While you were indicating that 
you were working on getting your daughters to pursue STEM 
education, both of them were shaking their heads this way.
    [Laughter.]
    Senator Moran. I hope you can fare better at NASA.
    Mr. Isaacman. We are going to fix this, Senator.
    Senator Moran. In the short 12 seconds that I have left in 
my time, I will ask, I guess, one question. Do you believe that 
the current Artemis architecture featuring SLS Rocket or Orion 
Spacecraft is the best and fastest way to beat China to the 
Moon?
    Mr. Isaacman. Senator, this is the current plan. I do 
believe it is the best and fastest way to get there. I do not 
think it is the long-term way to get to and from the Moon and 
to Mars with great frequency. But this is the plan we have now 
and we have got to get this crew around the Moon and the 
follow-on crew to land on the Moon.
    Senator Moran. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
    Senator Moreno. I now recognize Senator from Michigan, Gary 
Peters.

                STATEMENT OF HON. GARY PETERS, 
                   U.S. SENATOR FROM MICHIGAN

    Senator Peters. Thank you, Senator. Congratulations to both 
of our nominees here, on your nomination to these important 
positions.
    Mr. Isaacman, we had a great opportunity to talk yesterday 
in my office about a variety of issues. Artemis came up 
frequently as I know it has come up at the hearing frequently 
as well, including Senator Moran in the previous question, and 
you suggested here and there that NASA can pursue the Artemis 
program, our mission to the Moon, and a potential Mars mission 
in parallel tracks, is how you have been describing it.
    I am concerned though about the possibility of achieving 
that. While we expect budget cuts to NASA, we have already seen 
cuts and somewhat significant cuts, I would argue, to staff at 
NASA. So my question for you is do you agree that budget cuts 
would undermine that vision that you are expressing?
    Mr. Isaacman. Well Senator, I think right now NASA has a 
pretty extraordinary budget. I believe it is close to every 
Federal law enforcement agency combined times two. With that 
budget and those resources available, I do believe we can do 
the near impossible. I think we can have multiple flagship 
scientific missions at once, which means we can have multiple 
space exploration missions at once, and try and solve the space 
economy in low Earth orbit, sir.
    Senator Peters. Even with budget cuts, you will be able to 
do that, and----
    Mr. Isaacman. Well, Senator, I am not familiar with what 
the--what is potentially being contemplated, but I will 
absolutely do the most with the resources available to try and 
deliver on NASA's world-changing mission, sir.
    Senator Peters. So given the--I think it is pretty clear we 
are likely to see constrained budgets. How do you envision 
speeding up our timeline for the Mars mission that you talked 
about while also ensuring that Artemis is properly resourced 
and protected from any future cuts that may come their way?
    Mr. Isaacman. Well, Senator, I think across the board we 
have to acknowledge, as I mentioned in our opening remarks, we 
do have problems here. The President--presidents have called 
for return to the Moon and a path to Mars since 1989. We spent 
a lot of money and we have not gotten this crew around the 
Moon, let alone landing on it. If I am confirmed, I absolutely 
am going to roll up my sleeves and get in the trenches with the 
best and brightest and figure out where we have our program 
challenges, what is impeding progress, clear those obstacles 
and get back to delivering on the mission.
    If we can do that, then we are going to get the 
inspirational side of NASA going, we are going to get the STEM 
side growing, and the next generation is going to grow up and 
want to reach even farther, sir.
    Senator Peters. As you know, public private partnerships 
between NASA and commercial space companies is a critical part 
of space exploration efforts, you know that firsthand from your 
flight to space twice with SpaceX. And I understand that you 
have business ties with SpaceX previous to your nomination as 
well.
    My question for you, given the fact that Elon Musk serves 
both as the CEO of SpaceX as well as--is a White House employee 
and leader over DOGE, which has significant influence over 
spending and contracts, at least that is what we have been 
seeing, certainly in our meeting, I was happy to hear you say 
to me that you are not beholden to Elon Musk in any way. So I 
want to give you an opportunity to say that on the record, if I 
may.
    So first, have you had any communication, e-mails, text or 
calls with Elon Musk regarding how your plan to manage NASA 
since you were nominated?
    Mr. Isaacman. Not at all, Senator.
    Senator Peters. What steps will you take, if confirmed, to 
ensure that he is not allowed undue influence, given the 
extensive contracts that he has with NASA, to make sure that he 
has no undue influence over the awarding or the implementation 
of those contracts?
    Mr. Isaacman. Well, I think, Senator, I absolutely want to 
be clear. My loyalty is to this Nation, the Space Agency and 
their world-changing mission. I have to imagine that in the 
1960s, Administrator Webb would have taken phone calls and 
welcomed the input from all the various contractors that were 
contributing to the endeavor. But they are the contractors. 
NASA is the customer. They work for us, not the other way 
around, Senator.
    Senator Peters. Very good. Ms. Trusty, you have a deep 
history working on defense related Spectrum issues that are 
absolutely critical, as you know, to our security apparatus. 
However, agencies other than the DOD use Spectrum for key 
public safety applications, and I believe that they need to be 
protected as well.
    One such band is 5.9, also known as the Auto Safety 
Spectrum, which is overseen by the Department of 
Transportation. This band allows for the deployment of safety 
technologies, including cellular vehicle to everything 
technology that certainly enables collision avoidance, freight 
efficiency movements and a whole lot more. In 2020, some of the 
Spectrum was allocated away from these auto safety purposes, 
which in my mind will reduce roadway safety in the long term. 
And I believe we cannot let that happen again.
    I think my Senator from Ohio will agree that we have to 
make sure auto safety is always put at the forefront of 
considerations when it comes to the Spectrum. So my question to 
you is, if confirmed, will you commit to protecting the 
remaining Auto Safety Spectrum for roadway safety innovation 
like the cellular vehicle to everything technology?
    Ms. Trusty. Senator, thank you for this question and it is 
really important to me. In my time in the House I worked 
closely with NHTSA on vehicle safety issues. So I am very 
familiar with the safe--the life saving potential of C-V2X, it 
will be--and so I think as a--if confirmed, my responsibility 
is to put Spectrum to its highest and best use, meaning 
maximizing its economic and societal benefits.
    When it comes to vehicle safety that will certainly be a 
part of the information in the record, and I would be happy to 
work with you to ensure that C-V2X can be deployed with the 
resources it needs so it is readily available to all Americans.
    Senator Peters. Well, I hope it is a priority and we'll--if 
confirmed we will work closely with you.
    Ms. Trusty. Thank you, Senator.
    Senator Moreno. Senator Blackburn.

              STATEMENT OF HON. MARSHA BLACKBURN, 
                  U.S. SENATOR FROM TENNESSEE

    Senator Blackburn. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Thank you to 
each of you for getting that testimony in and for being here 
today. We appreciate it and appreciate the opportunity to visit 
with you.
    Mr. Isaacman, I was so pleased to hear you talk about 
nuclear propulsion. We have Oak Ridge National Labs, we have 
Arnold Air, which is the only place you can do hypersonic 
testing, and of course, Huntsville and Marshall Space Flight is 
very close to our Tennessee border. We have a lot of 
Tennesseans that are there. So pleased to hear you put some 
emphasis on that, we agree with you that emphasis needs to be 
placed there.
    But I want you to just give me a synopsis of what you think 
is the most important area of competition as we look at what is 
happening with China, with Russia, with great power 
competition, what North Korea and Iran are doing?
    Mr. Isaacman. Senator, thank you very much for the 
question. For starters, competition can work really well. I 
think competition from a commercial perspective is doing great. 
We have gone from a world where at one point in time the Nation 
had a dependency on one launch provider, and foreign rocket 
technology. Now, we have a very mature commercial industry with 
several providers able to help us accelerate mass, and people 
and astronauts into orbit.
    Well, competition works well in the global stage as well, 
ma'am, so long as we do not lose. And right now, I mean, that 
could not be more important in the ultimate high ground of 
space. I mean that is a critically important domain. NASA will 
continue to press out, lead the way in that ultimate high 
ground. But we are going to need our partners in the Department 
of Defense, the Space Force, we are going need to be 
collaborating and making sure they are watching out for us.
    Senator Blackburn. Ms. Trusty, welcome. And I am so pleased 
to see so many of your family members here to support you. And 
to all of the--I guess it is nieces, and nephews that are here.
    Ms. Trusty. That is right, and siblings, and friends.
    Senator Blackburn. Just know she is really smart and she is 
working hard. OK. We talked a little bit about spectrum and as 
you know, it concerns me that 60 percent of our mid-band 
spectrum is held by Federal agencies. Much of that is sitting 
fallow, it is not being used. We cannot afford that. We are 
commercializing only 5 percent of that.
    So talk to me about the importance of NTIA conducting an 
inventory, the importance of the FCC supporting an inventory, 
the importance of Congress restoring the ability to have 
spectrum auction authority?
    Ms. Trusty. Thank you, Senator, for this question. So I 
will start kind of from the first part about restoring auction 
authority. As I mentioned previously, I think this is 
incredibly important to our economic and national security. I 
think auction authority serves as a catalyst to investment and 
innovation, not just for broadband deployment across this 
country, but for emerging technologies and applications that 
will allow us to be a global leader in technological 
innovation.
    As far as supporting an inventory, I think an inventory 
could be good. It tells us what spectrum is being used and how. 
As you know, there may be some things that are classified or 
sapped and they will not be available to the public. But 
certainly members of the Committee could have access to that 
information to make more informed decisions about spectrum 
management. But I think we do need to have a full view of what 
is available, what is being used, so that we can properly put 
Spectrum to its highest and best use for economical----
    Senator Blackburn. And maybe even share some of that 
spectrum?
    Ms. Trusty. Potentially, as the studies indicate. Yes, 
ma'am.
    Senator Blackburn. OK. Talk to me a little bit about USF. I 
know Senator Fischer and Senator Klobuchar asked you about 
that. And I think USF has outlived its usefulness and needs to 
be replaced with something different. We will see what the 
court has to say about it. So articulate reforms if they say 
you can keep USF, and replacement if they say you cannot?
    Ms. Trusty. Sure, Senator. I appreciate this question. So 
Universal Service is the cornerstone of the FCC's mission. It 
is a part of the Communications Act to advance and preserve 
Universal Service generally as a concept and----
    Senator Blackburn. Yes. I just want to know reforms. Yes.
    Ms. Trusty. Yes, Senator. So there could be distribution 
reforms, or contribution reforms, depending on what the facts 
tell us. I think there is an opportunity to have performance 
metrics for each of the programs to understand what the 
efficacy is of each of those programs in addressing the needs. 
There could be better oversight over eligibility requirements. 
There could also be better oversight over participating 
providers' compliance with those programs to ensure that those 
dollars are being targeted to those who need them.
    Senator Blackburn. Excellent. Thank you so much.
    Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
    I am going to send you one question on PAOLA.
    Ms. Trusty. Yes, ma'am.
    Senator Blackburn. Because that is so important to our 
artists there in Tennessee. And to each of you, all the 
children deserve ice cream. They have been awesome today.
    [Laughter.]
    Ms. Trusty. Thank you, Senator.
    The Chairman. I would ask, Senator Blackburn, is the ice 
cream limited to the children?
    Senator Blackburn. Senator Cruz, you showed up on time 
today, so you, too, deserve ice cream.
    [Laughter.]
    Senator Blackburn. I will be certain that at lunch I serve 
you ice cream.
    The Chairman. I will take it. Senator Lujan.

               STATEMENT OF HON. BEN RAY LUJAN, 
                  U.S. SENATOR FROM NEW MEXICO

    Senator Lujan. It looks like I am joining you for lunch, 
Mr. Chairman. Mr. Chairman, thank you for this hearing today.
    It is good to see you both here and with family support. 
That means something. Ms. Trusty, in last month's Supreme Court 
oral arguments in the USF case, the Solicitor General noted 
that the FCC Commissioners do not have statutory for-cause 
removal protections. In our meeting yesterday, you stated that 
the issue of for-cause removal was subject to pending 
litigation and that you would not weigh in.
    Regardless, it appears that President Trump believes he can 
fire you at-will when confirmed. How will you maintain your 
independence if the President can fire you simply because he 
may not like a position you take?
    Ms. Trusty. Thank you, Senator. I appreciate the question 
and I understand the importance of the issue. My job, if 
confirmed, is to focus on upholding and enforcing the law. 
Whatever happens with what is subject to pending litigation, my 
first obligation is to facts, the law, and with respect to the 
proceeding that comes before the Commission, and that is--I 
think the FCC has a very transparent and open process and my 
commitment would be to making sure that I have--what I commit 
to, I have no fear--without fear of favor, I would make a 
decision with respect to any individual or entity that comes 
before the Commission.
    Senator Lujan. I appreciate that. Yesterday when we spoke, 
I shared with you I was a former utility commissioner and the 
importance of the training I received as an administrative law 
judge. And while we may be able to gather information 
elsewhere, it is the importance of the record. The decisions 
that will be made that are in front of you will be based on the 
record that is established. Is that something you agree with?
    Ms. Trusty. Yes, Senator.
    Senator Lujan. I appreciate that. Ms. Trusty, as I shared 
with you yesterday, I have also been very disturbed by the 
actions taken by Chair Carr to investigate broadcast companies 
for their editorial decisionmaking. In January, Chair Carr 
reinstated complaints against ABC regarding its moderation of 
the debate between Trump and Harris. Trump complained that the 
debate was, quote, ``rigged'' and stated, ``They ought to take 
away their licenses for the way they did that.'' Do you think 
it is appropriate for the President to call for the revocation 
of broadcast licenses?
    Ms. Trusty. So Senator, I think President Trump has First 
Amendment rights to express his views. My responsibility, if 
confirmed, is to focus on the facts, FCC precedent and the law 
in carrying out whatever the decisionmaking process is for 
proceeding before the Commission.
    Senator Lujan. As part of that, In March 2025, Chair Carr 
gave an interview to Bloomberg News in which he said, ``any 
business that are looking for FCC approval, I would encourage 
them to get busy ending any sort of their invidious forms of 
DEI discrimination.'' In addition, Chair Carr said that ``CBS 
editorial decision regarding an interview with Vice President 
Harris would factor into the review.'' My question to you is: 
Do you think it is appropriate to consider a broadcaster's 
editorial decisions when reviewing a merger?
    Ms. Trusty. So Senator, with respect to mergers or 
transactions, I would be--I would look at them through the lens 
of what advances the public interest. As you know, these are 
very fact-specific cases that require a thoughtful and thorough 
review of information in the record, and I would be guided by 
the statute.
    Senator Lujan. Let me ask the question very clearly. Do you 
believe that the FCC should be weaponized against media 
organizations?
    Ms. Trusty. No, Senator.
    Senator Lujan. I appreciate that very much.
    Now, Mr. Isaacman, I have many questions for you. I want to 
be--I am always aware of my members'--my colleagues' time as 
well. I am going to submit your questions to the record.
    Ms. Trusty, I just want to conclude by sharing with you 
that you have an ethical record. You have a strong reputation 
on Capitol Hill, protect it. You have a bright future. We need 
good Democrats, good Republicans. I do not agree with all your 
positions, I do not agree with all my Democratic colleagues' 
positions, but the FCC should be a strong independent body. We 
need good people there. And I appreciate you being here today.
    I yield back.
    Senator Cantwell. Mr. Chairman, if I could, before we 
continue. For the record, Senator Fetterman would like to be 
recorded as an ``aye'' by proxy on the Roth nomination.
    The Chairman. Without objection, the record will be 
corrected to so reflect.
    Senator Sullivan.

                STATEMENT OF HON. DAN SULLIVAN, 
                    U.S. SENATOR FROM ALASKA

    Senator Sullivan. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. And to our 
nominees, congratulations, and thank you for willing to serve 
your country and your families, great to see so many families 
here.
    Ms. Trusty, I want to make sure I get your commitment off 
the bat to come to Alaska, see the many challenges we have in 
Alaska. You can bring your whole family, we can do it during 
the summer, go fishing, but I need you to get out to my state 
and see the challenges, particularly as it relates to 
communications, broadband, Internet connectivity. You know, 
people talk about rural, and then there is Alaska, which is 
just way more rural than everywhere else. Can I get your 
commitment to do that?
    Ms. Trusty. Absolutely, Senator.
    Senator Sullivan. And you know, when the FCC commissioners 
do that, they have all come to our state, they realize that in 
terms of the FCC, there is really, really the need for 
importance on embracing flexible policies as it relates to 
Alaska. The FCC came up with The Alaska Plan, as I am sure you 
are aware of, and then they have now referred to that as the 
FCC's Alaska Connect Fund.
    Will you commit to me to working with any--on any future 
changes? There is a midpoint pause in 2029 relating to the 
Alaska Connect pause that gives the FCC the opportunity to look 
at different flexibilities there. Can I get your commitment to 
work with me on both what was The Alaska Plan and now the 
Alaska Connect Fund?
    Ms. Trusty. Yes, Senator, I would be happy to.
    Senator Sullivan. That has strong bipartisan support over 
the last several years in the FCC, pretty much all the 
commissioners have supported it. Can I get your commitment on 
that?
    Ms. Trusty. Yes. Yes, Senator.
    Senator Sullivan. Great. I am going to ask you a question 
for the record on media ownership that I would like your 
response on.
    Mr. Isaacman, have you seen the movie ``The Martian''?
    Mr. Isaacman. I have, Senator.
    Senator Sullivan. OK. I have a--well, my daughters are 
older now, but when I took them to see that, they were very 
inspired. And you kind of have the Hollywood version, the live 
version right here, with all these smart, good looking 
astronauts in our hearing room today. Can you give me your 
ideas on how to promote better through media, maybe even 
through Hollywood, these upcoming missions to the Moon, 
missions to Mars, to inspire our young people?
    I think it is a really, really great opportunity. I do not 
think NASA has always embraced that opportunity, but we have so 
many exciting things on the horizon. And I mean it, when you 
look at these astronauts and how smart they are, and how 
inspiring they can be to young Americans to serve their 
country, to study science. Give me your thoughts on that, and 
what an opportunity we have to take advantage of that?
    Mr. Isaacman. Well, Senator, I completely agree. And as I 
mentioned before, I think it is a fundamental obligation of 
NASA to inspire the next generation to want to grow up and be 
scientists, engineers, astronauts, researchers, and set the bar 
even higher. And I do believe the first step on that journey is 
to execute on the mission.
    I mean, nothing is going to create more future scientists 
and engineers than seeing American astronauts on the Moon, 
American astronauts on Mars, in line with President Trump's 
vision, planting the stars and stripes on Mars.
    So I do think that is a fundamental obligation. I think 
that NASA right now we could do a better job, if confirmed, on 
emphasizing quality, content over quantity. There is, I think, 
about 300 different NASA social channels. They are awesome. 
They put a lot of good things out. I think we can narrow that 
down and make sure we are capturing the really inspirational 
footage, what everybody wants to see that inspires them to grow 
up and want to reach even higher.
    Senator Sullivan. Good. I think you will have strong 
bipartisan support for doing that. I also want to get your 
commitment, if confirmed, to come to Alaska?
    Mr. Isaacman. Senator, as a pilot, I have been fortunate to 
fly around Alaska quite a bit. And I would point out on 
aircraft that rolled off assembly lines in Wichita--I know 
Senator Moran would like to hear that--I am looking forward to 
returning.
    Senator Sullivan. Good. Because as you know, and you have 
helped pioneered commercial space flight, you know better than 
most that the future of space access is not just Cape 
Canaveral, or Vandenberg, it is increasingly spread across our 
entire country, including places like Alaska. The specific 
Spaceport Complex on Kodiak Island is the only high altitude, 
polar-capable spaceport in the United States. There is rising 
demand for facilities like that at Kodiak in terms of both 
government and commercial launches. They have done both.
    And I would love to take you out to Kodiak Island. Not just 
to see the largest brown bears in the world, of which we have 
thousands, but a really, really up and coming spaceport 
complex. Have you ever spent time out at the Kodiak Spaceport 
Complex?
    Mr. Isaacman. Senator, I have been there. I did not see any 
bears. I was looking and I would love to return, sir.
    Senator Sullivan. OK. So you and I are going to return, and 
we will get an eye on some bears, maybe do some fishing with 
Ms. Trusty when she brings her family.
    [Laughter.]
    Senator Sullivan. But in all seriousness, that is a 
spaceport complex that I think has enormous potential. Would 
you agree with that?
    Mr. Isaacman. Senator, I think that, as mentioned before, 
space is the ultimate high ground. It is a vitally important 
domain for national security. I frankly think we need more 
spaceports. We have to always ensure our access to low Earth 
orbit and ensure national security.
    Senator Sullivan. Great. Thank you.
    Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
    The Chairman. And by the way, if anything, Senator Sullivan 
is underselling the fishing in Alaska. It is phenomenal. It is 
not quite as big a state as Texas, but it, but it has enormous 
natural beauty.
    Senator Sullivan. OK, Mr. Chairman, you do not want to do 
the size stuff with me.
    [Laughter.]
    The Chairman. Senator Blunt Rochester; yet another massive 
state.

            STATEMENT OF HON. LISA BLUNT ROCHESTER, 
                   U.S. SENATOR FROM DELAWARE

    Senator Blunt Rochester. That is correct. That is correct, 
Delaware. And we are, that is right, we are the first state 
though. That is the important thing.
    Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and to Ranking Member Cantwell; 
welcome Ms. Trusty, and Mr. Isaacman, and your families.
    I would like to start my questions with Ms. Trusty. As an 
avid tech person myself, I love this stuff. Based on 
predictions, I have seen that 6G is coming sometime in the 
early 2030s. And I have heard exciting things about how 6G 
networks will be integrated with AI to enable better 
connectivity. In the House, I was fortunate to lead bills on 
immersive technology, and it really helped, helping us train 
our workforce. AI literacy was one of the bills that I focused 
on. And just the notion of being able to do things in real 
time, real-time adaptive changes presents a lot of 
opportunities, but it also presents challenges.
    There were some issues that delayed the initial 5G rollout, 
such as Huawei being used as a potential supplier, 
infrastructure build out issues and more. And I view the 6G 
rollout as a crucial step in our competition against China in 
the national security realm as well as technology spaces.
    Ms. Trusty, if confirmed, what specifically do you think 
the FCC can do to ensure that the 6G rollout is smoother than 
the 5G rollout was?
    Ms. Trusty. Great. Thank you for the question and I really 
agree with so much of what you said. I will start with 
cybersecurity and making sure networks are deployed in a secure 
way. And I applaud this committee on making sure the Rip and 
Replace Fund was fully funded.
    I have been interested to see the creation of the National 
Security Council at the FCC. And I think that is an opportunity 
for the FCC to leverage its authorities in the Secure and 
Trusted Communications Networks Act to ban other high-risk 
equipment and vendors from our Nation's communications 
networks. I also think the FCC can promote the adoption of open 
radio access network technology, which can help diversify and 
strengthen our domestic supply chain so that we are not overly 
reliant on one or two vendors. And I think it can help increase 
security, competition, and ultimately reduce the cost of 
providing these networks in the first place.
    Senator Blunt Rochester. I am a big supporter as well on 
strengthening our supply chains. We actually have a Cantwell, 
Blackburn, Blunt Rochester Bill. I like to call those my 
strange bedfellows bills where we come together on these issues 
that we know are going to affect all of us. I want to also 
discuss the potential security concerns about 6G, particularly 
given, again, the flaws in 4G and 5G networks, such as a study 
finding that 100 percent of 4G networks were susceptible to 
denial of service attacks, and 5G being vulnerable to network 
attacks. I know this is an easy one. So maybe it is a yes or 
no. Will you prioritize cybersecurity for 6G networks?
    Ms. Trusty. Yes, Senator.
    Senator Blunt Rochester. And what other potential measures 
do you think the FCC can take to best secure 6G networks in 
particular?
    Ms. Trusty. You know, I think this, a lot of this can be 
done through AI. I am really excited about the development of 
the technology, and I think there are tremendous use cases in 
not only detecting fraud and scams, but securing the network 
itself. So if I am confirmed, I would look to leverage 
artificial intelligence in these ways.
    Senator Blunt Rochester. You kind of preempted my next 
question, which deals with so many Americans. It is estimated 
that around four million--or four billion robocalls are made 
per month. In fact, Delaware, while we are the first state, I 
do not like the fact that we are the first state in robocall 
complaints. I think I probably received four of them while I 
was sitting here. And there is now this AI-powered grandparent 
scams.
    Back when I was in the House, as I mentioned, some of the 
legislation I introduced, but we had one on the Fraud and Scam 
Reduction Act, to help tackle scams that target seniors. And I 
encouraged the FCC--I am encouraged that they now cover AI 
voice calls under the TCPA. And last year, now Chair Carr 
supported requiring callers to disclose, upfront, to consumers 
when they receive an AI-generated call. Do you support 
requiring callers to disclose to consumers when it is an AI-
generated call?
    Ms. Trusty. I certainly think that can be helpful in 
protecting consumers from illegal robocallers, Senator.
    Senator Blunt Rochester. And I will say consumer protection 
is one of the areas that we are very much focused on. Should 
you be confirmed, we would like to continue to work with you on 
that.
    And Mr. Isaacman, we had a very good conversation as well. 
I will be submitting questions for the record because I respect 
the Chairman's time. So I yield back.
    The Chairman. Thank you. Senator Young.

                 STATEMENT OF HON. TODD YOUNG, 
                   U.S. SENATOR FROM INDIANA

    Senator Young. Well, thank you both for being here today. 
Mr. Isaacson--Isaacman, rather, the U.S. economy, national 
defense infrastructure, they all rely on satellites extensively 
these days, for GPS, for weather, for communications purposes, 
for surveillance, and much more. So a collision or a loss of 
key satellites could result in even catastrophic national 
security and economic costs. As you know, the TraCSS system, 
Traffic Coordination System for Space was launched in 2024. It 
is being developed to provide situational awareness data across 
civil, military, and commercial sectors.
    Mr. Isaacman, if confirmed, how would you ensure that NASA 
coordinates with the Department of Commerce and DOD on space 
situational awareness, and space traffic management efforts?
    Mr. Isaacman. Senator, thank you very much for the 
question. This is a subject that I am pretty passionate about. 
My two missions to space, the number one risk we faced was from 
orbital debris. For starters, I think NASA absolutely will play 
a role. As you know, this new frontier continues to open, and 
ideally, we have lots of space stations, and lots of activity, 
and a great, flourishing economic environment in space, I 
believe all of the information that we can gather from our 
assets on space debris should be funneled into a single mission 
control that has the ultimate situational awareness.
    But I have to say also, the biggest threat, Senator, is 
what we cannot track, what is so tiny, the millimeter-size 
objects at orbital velocity that can shred a satellite or a 
spacecraft. And in that respect, we have to stop adding to the 
problem.
    The United States is very good at not adding to the 
problem. I cannot say that is the same for some of our 
geopolitical rivals, sir.
    Senator Young. Maybe you could speak with a little more 
specificity about the gravity of the problem. Paint the picture 
for those who might be watching these proceedings about how 
extensive this challenge has become. I will just let you take 
it from there.
    Mr. Isaacman. Senator, absolutely. A lot of people think of 
whether it is a discarded second stage in orbit or a defunct 
satellite as the problem. We know where they are, and we can 
have trajectories that avoid them. The issue is the speck of 
paint that falls off that satellite that is now traveling at 
17,500 miles an hour and can collide with another object going 
17,500 miles an hour.
    I had an opportunity to visit the NASA facility, the White 
Sands Missile Range, and see what a one- and two-millimeter 
piece of aluminum does at near orbital velocities, and I can 
tell you what it penetrates through is pretty--it is eye-
opening, to say the least.
    It is an issue. We certainly need to do all we can to avoid 
any sort of kinetic conflict in low Earth orbit, to stop adding 
to the problem. Again, I think the United States does a 
fantastic job at doing this. We need to work really hard to 
make sure others, maybe less responsible actors do not add to 
the problem.
    Senator Young. Well, I would like to work with you on this 
challenge, should you be confirmed, as I believe you will be. 
So clearly, you are conversant in it, and it sounds like you 
will be prioritizing this.
    Ms. Trusty, the FCC's International Bureau Telecom and 
Analysis Division, TAD, issues licenses to own and operate 
submarine cables and associated landing stations in the United 
States. Commercial undersea telecom cables carry approximately 
99 percent of transoceanic digital communication, serving as a 
physical backbone for our internet. Since 2022, Russia has 
stepped up its attacks on this infrastructure. In 2023, Yi Peng 
3, a Chinese tanker that had previously departed a Russian 
port, cut two Baltic Sea cables.
    You know, incidents like this we are reading about them on 
a regular basis these days. Ms. Trusty, what steps is the FCC's 
TAD Office taking to protect undersea cable infrastructure and 
the sensitive data and information transmitted across undersea 
cables every day?
    Ms. Trusty. Thank you, Senator, for the question. I think 
this is such an important issue. I focused a lot on it during 
my time on the Armed Services Committee. This is such an 
important part of our critical infrastructure, and I think we 
need to do more to secure it. As you mentioned, the FCC works 
closely with Team Telecom to review and approve undersea cable 
applications. I think we can promote more transparency in our 
foreign ownership in these undersea cables, so we have a better 
sense of what the risk might be.
    I also think we should try to promote more U.S.-led 
undersea cable projects so that we can eliminate the risks 
entirely. In addition to that, I think exploring the 
diversification of undersea cable routes to ensure that there 
is no single point of failure to the extent an undersea cable 
is disrupted. But I think, as a protective measure, we should 
work on strengthening our disaster recovery and emergency 
response plans, given that some of these cables are so 
vulnerable to exploitation.
    If I am confirmed, Senator, this would be a priority of 
mine.
    Senator Young. My office will follow up with you on some of 
your answers for further elaboration, but I do get the sense 
you are very much dialed into this. I will just make one last 
comment, knowing that we have colleagues waiting.
    Setting standards, Ms. Trusty, at the FCC through 
international governing bodies is increasingly important. I 
think we have been outflanked over the years by the Chinese in 
particular, but also by others. We need to develop a unified 
position here at the Federal level between the FCC, and state, 
and the NTIA, and various other entities so that we can 
prioritize this moving forward. So we will follow up with a 
question for the record about that as well.
    Mr. Chairman.
    The Chairman. Thank you. Senator Duckworth.

              STATEMENT OF HON. TAMMY DUCKWORTH, 
                  U.S. SENATOR FROM ILLINOIS

    Senator Duckworth. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. As Ranking 
Member of the Aviation and Space Subcommittee, I am looking 
forward to getting a bipartisan NASA reauthorization done to 
make sure that NASA is able to execute its mission with a 
consistent vision and congressional support, free of undue 
influence from any temporary government employees.
    According to the Global Counterspace Capabilities Report 
published this month, the PRC is rapidly advancing a broad 
spectrum of counterspace capabilities as part of a sustained 
push to secure military power in orbit and expand their 
presence in space. The PRC has also started building its second 
satellite Internet constellation in low Earth orbit and has 
committed to continued human presence in LEO at its Tiangong 
space station.
    More than ever, NASA's missions need to be consistent and 
laser focused, and avoid major subversions of mission 
priorities and diversion of funds, not only for our global 
space leadership but also for our national security.
    I am going to, Mr. Isaacman, ask you a couple of yes/no 
questions, but first, I just want to say that a sustained human 
presence in low Earth orbit is crucial for advancing scientific 
research, testing technologies for future deep space missions, 
and fostering a thriving economy and global leadership, as LEO 
serves as a unique environment for research, development, and 
training due to its microgravity environment.
    By supporting extended human operations in LEO, NASA can 
test exploration systems, conduct human research, and maintain 
operational expertise vital for missions on the Moon and to 
Mars. These are not things that can be done by machine alone, 
and a gap in our human presence in LEO will likely result in 
ceding our leadership to the PRC.
    Mr. Isaacman, do you support maintaining continuous human 
presence in low Earth orbit?
    Mr. Isaacman. I do, Senator. I think if reusability has 
given us anything, it is a very affordable path to send 
American astronauts to and from low Earth orbit.
    Senator Duckworth. Thank you. Elon Musk has suggested that 
the International Space Station's strategic value has run its 
course and should be deorbited as soon as possible to focus on 
a mission to Mars. For the last--and that is quote, he said, 
``As soon as possible.'' For the last 26 years, the strategic 
value of the International Space Station has been invaluable, 
serving as a beacon of the United States' global leadership and 
a symbol of what we can accomplish through international 
cooperation.
    Funnily enough, although I do not think it is very funny at 
all, SpaceX has been awarded the contract to deorbit the 
International Space Station. Mr. Isaacman, do you believe there 
is still utility in maintaining a U.S. presence on the ISS, at 
least through 2030, as currently planned?
    Mr. Isaacman. Senator, as I mentioned in my prepared 
remarks, I think we need to use up every bit of life that is 
remaining on the International Space Station so we can crack 
the code on the space economy and better hand off those 
responsibilities to commercial industry. I am familiar with Mr. 
Musk's remarks in that. I do think he is a very accomplished 
entrepreneur. I would like to understand his rationale behind 
that. Just as I think, you know, Administrator Webb would want 
to hear from all of the commercial contract leaders from the 
1960s during the space race.
    Senator Duckworth. But you do not think that we should 
deorbit the ISS now?
    Mr. Isaacman. I do not think we should deorbit it now. I 
think we need to make the most use of the space station while 
we have it, and figure out what we can accomplish in the unique 
environment of microgravity, and figure out the space economy 
for Commercial LEO.
    Senator Duckworth. Thank you. The Artemis program is 
critical in our effort to return to the Moon, and returning to 
the Moon is seen as a stepping stone for broader human 
exploration, and critical for scientific discovery, advancing 
technology, and as a necessary preparation for eventually 
progressing to human missions to Mars. I know a few of my 
colleagues already today have tried to get a specific answer 
out of you, but you have avoided directly answering them today. 
So I ask again.
    Mr. Isaacman, do you support maintaining NASA's long-term 
mission to maintaining--maintaining NASA's long-term mission to 
maintain a human activity on the Moon?
    Mr. Isaacman. Senator, and I am sorry if I am not sounding 
clear on this. I think it is imperative that we do both. I 
think that is what NASA was created to do. I would love nothing 
more than to see this crew get around the Moon, for us to land 
on the Moon, figure out its scientific, economic, national 
security value, while we are also charting a course in line 
with President Trump's vision for American astronauts to plant 
the stars and stripes on Mars.
    Senator Duckworth. So you think we can do both 
simultaneously?
    Mr. Isaacman. I mean, we do multiple flagship scientific 
missions at NASA. We maintain a presence in LEO where we are 
undertaking dozens of scientific experiments at once. I think 
we can, ma'am.
    Senator Duckworth. Do you think we can maintain a mission--
a presence on the Moon and a mission to Mars simultaneously?
    Mr. Isaacman. I think we can do the Moon, and Mars, and 
beyond.
    Senator Duckworth. OK. You know, whatever we can do to 
support the space program, I am on board. I just have one final 
question, I am asking all the Trump nominees: If given an 
illegal or unconstitutional order by President Trump or your 
superiors, would you oppose it?
    Mr. Isaacman. I do not think President Trump would give an 
illegal order, but I would follow the law, ma'am.
    Senator Duckworth. And you would oppose--if he were?
    Mr. Isaacman. I do not believe the President would give me 
an illegal order, ma'am.
    Senator Duckworth. OK, that is fine. But if given an 
illegal or unconstitutional order, will you oppose it?
    Mr. Isaacman. I will always follow the law, ma'am.
    Senator Duckworth. So is that a yes? You will oppose an 
illegal order if given one by either the President or your 
superiors?
    Mr. Isaacman. Senator, I will always follow the law.
    Senator Duckworth. I am out of time, Mr. Chairman.
    The Chairman. Senator Moreno.

               STATEMENT OF HON. BERNIE MORENO, 
                    U.S. SENATOR FROM OHIO

    Senator Moreno. I will start with you, Mrs. Trusty. Thank 
you so much for taking the time in my office. We did not know 
each other before meeting with you. Your parents are beaming 
with pride, which I love to see, with good reason. You are 
somebody who has an incredibly great temperament, incredible 
intellect, and I cannot think of somebody more qualified to do 
your job, honestly.
    The one question I have for you is, there is a scourge of 
robocalls, it creates enormous amounts of scammers. Seniors are 
getting bilked of their life savings. How would you use 
advanced technologies to put an end to this?
    Ms. Trusty. Thank you, Senator. I really appreciate this 
question, because you are right. I worry about the 
susceptibility of our youth and seniors to robocall scams. And 
I really worry about how illegal robocallers, as we just 
discussed, are leveraging artificial intelligence to get around 
call authentication measures.
    So I think, generally, the FCC could benefit from stronger 
enforcement authorities and penalties to go after illegal 
robocallers. I also think the FCC can continue its work in 
working with international counterparts as well as state 
attorneys generals to go after these fraudsters. But I think we 
need to discuss more proactive call-blocking measures so that 
these calls never reach the end user. So again, I think 
artificial intelligence is the key here.
    Senator Moreno. Well, thank you, and I cannot wait to have 
you in that agency taking care of it.
    Ms. Trusty. Yes, sir.
    Senator Moreno. And I am sure you will. And again, thank 
you for serving this country.
    Ms. Trusty. Thank you, sir.
    Senator Moreno. Mr. Isaacson [sic], I am sure with your 
deep intellect that you know that the Aircraft Engine Research 
Laboratory in Cleveland, Ohio, was created 17 years before NASA 
was created. And there is a sign when you walk, or when drive 
into the center that says ``For the Benefit of All''; what does 
that mean to you?
    Mr. Isaacman. Well, Senator, I do believe that NASA's 
mission is to undertake the near impossible, to solve the most 
demanding, complex engineering challenges to bring the 
commercial--so the commercial industry can follow, and to bring 
the rest of the world along the way.
    Senator Moreno. And that is something that I am sure you 
have a passion, a deep passion, to make sure that we are always 
the leader; is that correct?
    Mr. Isaacman. A hundred percent, Senator.
    Senator Moreno. And just for the record, could you give me 
a sense of the scale of difficulty it was for you as a kid, if 
I can say that, as a teenager, to create a company that would 
become as successful as yours? Give me the scale of difficulty, 
and kind of some of--give me one example of a deep challenge 
you faced making that happen that you thought maybe was not 
possible?
    Mr. Isaacman. Senator, there is a--there was certainly a 
lot of ups and downs over the last 26 years. I would say 
probably some of the earliest challenges, although, I mean, as 
a company that went through the Dot-com, the Great Recession, 
the pandemic, we certainly had our fair share of obstacles 
along the way. Probably some of the hardest was the earliest 
days, Senator, where we tried to grow through our own cash-
flows, which is always a challenge. And I was 16 years old, so 
I had to make sure I hid myself from any trade shows, or in-
person meetings. Occasionally someone would show up at the 
house for a meeting, and my father fortunately took that for 
me.
    Senator Moreno. It is always hard to meet underachievers. 
So congratulations on that. How will you use that skill set at 
a complex organization like NASA?
    Mr. Isaacman. Senator, NASA is an extraordinary agency, and 
they are the most accomplished, well-respected space agency in 
the world. I want to do whatever I can and work alongside the 
best and brightest to continue that. I do suspect there are 
some things that I have learned through running two successful 
businesses over the last two--you know, more than two decades 
that I think I can help bring to the Agency.
    I would love to roll up my sleeves, figure out what is 
being--what are the challenges we have from a program 
management perspective that are causing everything to take 
longer than it should, and cost more than it should. I would 
like to instill a very strong mission-first culture at the 
Agency, that if we can execute on our mission and get to the 
Moon, get to Mars, and all the other things, the inspiration, 
the STEM education will all take care of itself.
    A culture of ownership and accountability, that when we 
make mistakes, we own them, we fix them, and we get back to 
delivering on their important objectives.
    Senator Moreno. Well, thank you for that. And I have one 
last question.
    Ms. Trusty, one hundred percent unequivocal support from 
me. I hope to see my Democrat colleagues join us and see if we 
can get as many votes for you as humanly possible.
    But for Mr. Isaacson [sic], I have one question. It does 
hinge for me, the entirety of whether I can support your 
nomination or not. Who is the most important character in the 
movie Armageddon?
    Mr. Isaacman. Clearly Bruce Willis, for the important self-
sacrifice for all mankind, sir.
    Senator Moreno. Let the record show he did not say Dan 
Truman, which makes me wonder of his judgment. But I will still 
reserve my vote for you.
    The Chairman. Thank you, Senator Moreno. I would note that 
when you were describing the motto ``For the Benefit of All'' 
at the facility in Ohio, I thought you were going to reference 
the phrase ``To Serve Man'', the classic Twilight Zone episode 
that ends with ``It is a cookbook. It is a cookbook.''
    Senator Markey.

               STATEMENT OF HON. EDWARD MARKEY, 
                U.S. SENATOR FROM MASSACHUSETTS

    Senator Markey. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
    Ms. Trusty, congratulations on your nomination. As you 
know, I authored the E-Rate, E for Education, program in the 
House of Representatives as part of the Telecommunications Act 
of 1996, because I believed then, and I believe now, that 
access to education should not depend on your ZIP code. Thanks 
to the E-Rate, thousands of schools in the United States now 
have high-speed Internet access. That is millions of students 
who can research, learn, and grow with the tools they need to 
succeed in the 21st century economy. Do you agree that the E-
Rate program has been a success?
    Ms. Trusty. Senator, thank you. Yes, I agree that E-Rate 
has been an important part of making sure students are 
connected across the country.
    Senator Markey. Student education has changed a lot since I 
created the E-Rate program nearly 30 years ago. Today, learning 
often extends outside the schoolhouse, putting many low-income 
and rural students who lack Internet access at home at a 
serious disadvantage. Do you agree that having access to high-
speed broadband at home is important for students and educators 
in our modern educational environment?
    Ms. Trusty. Certainly, Senator. I think having access to 
broadband at home, at school, everywhere across the country, is 
important.
    Senator Markey. And do you agree that a predictable funding 
source for E-Rate is critical for schools and libraries to stay 
connected?
    Ms. Trusty. Yes, Senator. The Communications Act requires a 
specific, predictable, and sufficient funding source for 
Universal Service.
    Senator Markey. Thank you. Now, let us turn to a different 
issue. Over the past few months, Chairman Carr has taken a 
series of steps to attack broadcasters over their news 
programming. He pressured CBS to release a transcript of an 
interview with Vice President Harris that supposedly contained 
evidence of deceptive editing.
    When the transcript clearly refuted that allegation, 
Chairman Carr still opened a docket to accept public comments 
on it. He has taken similarly baseless steps against ABC and 
NBC, and he opened an investigation into the underwriting 
practices of public broadcasters without citing any evidence of 
wrongdoing.
    Taken together, these actions indicate a Chairman intent on 
weaponizing the FCC's legal authorities for ideological and 
partisan purposes.
    Ms. Trusty, I understand you cannot comment on open 
proceedings, so I will ask generally. Do you agree that the FCC 
should not open or conduct investigations for political 
purposes?
    Ms. Trusty. Yes, Senator. I agree with that.
    Senator Markey. If asked to vote on an investigation or 
enforcement matter that violates the First Amendment, will you 
vote against that matter?
    Ms. Trusty. So Senator, I do not want to speculate on 
something that has not happened yet. But what I can tell you 
is----
    Senator Markey. If it is a violation of the First 
Amendment, will you vote against it?
    Ms. Trusty. What I can tell you is, I firmly believe in the 
First Amendment. And I will not do anything to violate it.
    Senator Markey. OK, that is what I wanted to hear, and I am 
glad to hear that you will take that position. And I am going 
to be closely monitoring the Commission's work to ensure that 
it complies with the First Amendment. Thank you.
    Mr. Isaacman, you have deep personal and financial ties to 
Elon Musk. You have invested tens of millions of dollars in 
SpaceX. You have paid millions of dollars to SpaceX for two 
private space flights. Your payments company, Shift4, has an 
ongoing, ``global strategic partnership'' with Starlink worth 
millions each year.
    And according to a recent Wall Street Journal report, Musk 
personally asked you to lead NASA. Given SpaceX's significant 
interest before NASA, you can understand why the public would 
be concerned about conflicts of interest here. So let us try to 
set a few things straight. I understand that you met with Elon 
Musk at Mar-a-Lago in late 2024; is that correct?
    Mr. Isaacman. No, Senator. I was in Mar-a-Lago to be 
interviewed by the President of the United States.
    Senator Markey. So you did not meet with Elon Musk at Mar-
a-Lago?
    Mr. Isaacman. I went to Mar-a-Lago to be interviewed by the 
President of the United States----
    Senator Markey. I did not ask you that. Did you meet with 
Elon Musk at Mar-a-Lago?
    Mr. Isaacman. I believe he was one of dozens of people that 
were around Mar-a-Lago at the time, Senator.
    Senator Markey. So did you meet with him?
    Mr. Isaacman. I would not say we had a meeting. We probably 
had a conversation in passing, Senator.
    Senator Markey. OK. During that same trip, then President-
elect Trump offered you the NASA Administrator job; is that 
correct?
    Mr. Isaacman. At the conclusion of the meeting, Senator, he 
did.
    Senator Markey. Thank you. Was Elon Musk in your meeting 
when Trump offered you the NASA position at Mar-a-Lago?
    Mr. Isaacman. Senator, I was interviewed by the President 
of the United States.
    Senator Markey. Was Elon Musk in the meeting when he 
offered you the job?
    Mr. Isaacman. Senator, my meeting was with the President of 
the United States.
    Senator Markey. So Elon Musk was not in the meeting; is 
that what you are saying?
    Mr. Isaacman. Senator, I was being interviewed and speaking 
with the President of the United States.
    Senator Markey. Can you just say he was not in the meeting? 
Was he in the meeting or not in the meeting?
    Mr. Isaacman. Senator, I am trying to be as transparent as 
I can. I was being interviewed by the President of the United 
States.
    Senator Markey. It is not a difficult question. Was Elon 
Musk in the room when the President offered you the job?
    Mr. Isaacman. Senator, I was--again, my meeting was with 
the President of the United States.
    Senator Markey. I am assuming that you do not want to 
answer the question directly because Elon Musk was in the room. 
I think that is the only conclusion anyone listening to this 
could reach, unless you want to dispel us of that notion.
    Mr. Isaacman. Senator, again, I was being interviewed by 
the President of the United States. I would also say I have 
no----
    Senator Markey. That is not what--I appreciate that. I am 
just trying to determine Elon Musk's role in this, and you are 
not willing to be fully transparent. Have you discussed your 
plans for NASA with Elon Musk?
    Mr. Isaacman. I have not.
    Senator Markey. So those questions obviously raise serious 
questions. And I want to turn to one more specific question. 
From monitoring sea level rise to polar ice loss, to wildfires, 
NASA's satellites are the backbone of climate research used by 
scientists, policymakers, and the public across the globe. 
NASA's Earth Observing System collects and archives more than 
147 terabytes of data each day. This data underpins climate 
action efforts at every level of the government, and it drives 
global research collaborations, and it informs life-saving 
disaster response.
    It is a public good. Yet the Trump administration is 
seeking to undermine that. A recent investigation found that 
large swaths of climate datasets, visualizations, and web 
tools, once publicly accessible, have been altered or taken 
down. This unprecedented rollback of public information 
compromises scientific continuity and transparency at a time of 
accelerating climate threats and extreme weather events.
    If confirmed, will you commit to fully restoring and 
maintaining access to data, as well as resisting any political 
pressure to sideline climate research at NASA?
    Mr. Isaacman. Senator, I can tell you I am very passionate 
about the Earth Sciences Division inside of NASA, especially 
with respect to anything that has impact on human life and the 
financial repercussions for remediating things such as 
wildfires, landslides, flooding. Earth Sciences also, it plays 
a big role in----
    Senator Markey. But will you----
    Mr. Isaacman.--near-earth asteroid protection.
    Senator Markey. But will you make a commitment to restore 
all of that information so that it is available to the public? 
It is vital scientific information.
    Mr. Isaacman. Senator, I have not been made aware of any 
information that is not being provided. I mean, I am just not 
familiar with any of these changes, Senator.
    Senator Markey. I am very disappointed in your question 
[sic]. All this information is vital to getting the information 
into the hands of scientists and ultimately ordinary citizens 
too.
    The Chairman. Thank you, Senator Markey.
    Senator Markey. And I appreciate your indulgence, Mr. 
Chairman.
    The Chairman. Mr. Isaacman, in response to Senator 
Duckworth, you said multiple times you will follow the law. 
Under every circumstance, you will follow the law. I appreciate 
that commitment.
    I want to go back and revisit the exchange you had with 
Senator Kim, because one component of the law, you have said, 
and I am glad to hear it, that under your leadership, America 
will beat China back to the Moon. That is important. But the 
law is clear beyond simply going to the Moon, that is part of 
it; that going to the Moon shall be a stepping stone for 
further exploration of Mars. The ultimate objective is Mars, 
but going to the Moon is critical.
    The law also specifies explicitly, ``The Administrator 
shall'', and when legislation uses the word ``shall'', it 
denotes a mandatory obligation, ``The Administrator shall 
establish a program to develop a sustained human presence in 
cislunar space or on the Moon.'' With respect to Senator Kim 
you were reluctant to commit on a sustained human presence on 
the Moon. Could you clarify your view on that to this 
committee?
    Mr. Isaacman. Well, Senator, as a space enthusiast, I would 
like nothing more, as I have said before, to see a number of 
lunar outposts, and Mars outposts, and for us to even progress 
farther out into our solar system. If we have--if we are in an 
unlimited budgetary environment and can maintain an ongoing 
presence on the lunar surface, I am more than supportive of it. 
I think it is imperative that we have to get back to the Moon 
first as quickly as we possibly can, figure out again the 
scientific, economic, national security value to being there, 
which I am very hopeful that we are going to find in order to 
support the ongoing presence on the lunar surface, sir.
    The Chairman. So the statute is written in the disjunctive. 
It gives the choice of either the surface of the Moon or 
cislunar orbit; what is your view on the Gateway project?
    Mr. Isaacman. Senator, that is an area that if I am 
confirmed, I would, again, would love to roll up my sleeves and 
get--further understand what is working right? What are the 
opportunities the Gateway presents to us? And where are some of 
the challenges? Because I think the Gateway is a component of 
many programs that are over budget and behind schedule, sir.
    The Chairman. So you are describing Gateway as over budget 
and behind schedule. I will say there is a long history in NASA 
of administrations coming in and canceling programs and causing 
massive delays. Barack Obama did that with Constellation, and 
NASA struggled for years as a consequence. As Administrator, 
are you going to cancel the Gateway program?
    Mr. Isaacman. Senator, I have no intention as of now to say 
that I would cancel any program. I need to, if I am confirmed, 
get in the job and understand where things are at. I want to 
assure you and this Committee that I want to see America win 
and succeed and lead in space, whether that be the Moon, Mars, 
low Earth orbit, and beyond. I do not want to see us come in 
second place, and I certainly do not want to see the right-hand 
side of that poster you put up, sir.
    The Chairman. So I want to ask you again, because you have 
said you will follow the law. Are you committed to a sustained 
human presence in cislunar space or on the Moon, and that is 
Federal Statute?
    Mr. Isaacman. Senator, if that is the law then I am 
committed to it.
    The Chairman. OK. All right. Let us talk LEO. The 
International Space Station is managed at Johnson Space Center 
in Houston, Texas. NASA is planning to retire the ISS by 2030, 
replacing it with one or more commercially developed space 
stations, funded partially by NASA and partially by outside 
customers. Unfortunately, both NASA and commercial replacements 
are behind schedule. Do you agree that we cannot have a gap 
period between the ISS and its successor, when there would be 
zero human U.S. presence in low Earth orbit?
    Mr. Isaacman. I do agree, Senator. We cannot cede low Earth 
orbit to the Chinese.
    The Chairman. Now, I would note, in the first Trump 
administration, there were those in the administration pushing 
to deorbit the International Space Station prematurely. Given 
that we have invested over $100 billion dollars in the station, 
I think that would be profoundly foolish to give up on that 
investment as long as it is safe to continue using it. After 
the administration floated this idea multiple times, the U.S. 
Senate passed legislation that I authored, 100 to nothing. 
Every Republican and every senator came through, committing 
that we would maintain the International Space Station at least 
until 2030, as long as it is safe and scientifically feasible. 
Will you commit to follow the law and not deorbit the space 
station before 2030?
    Mr. Isaacman. Senator, I will absolutely commit to follow 
the law, and I think we need to maximize the return that 
taxpayers have invested in that orbital laboratory, use every 
bit of time we have to crack the code on the space economy, and 
give Commercial LEO destinations a fighting chance when they 
inevitably take over, sir.
    The Chairman. Ms. Trusty, it has been 2 years since the FCC 
lost general auction authority, and 3 years since the last 
meaningful auction of Spectrum. The Spectrum Pipeline Act, 
which I introduced with Leader Thune and with Senator Blackburn 
last year, would restore the FCC's auction authority and would 
establish a clear pipeline of mid-band spectrum for commercial 
use.
    Ms. Trusty, should Congress restore the FCC's general 
auction authority with a clear pipeline of mid-band spectrum?
    Ms. Trusty. Yes, Senator, and to the extent it accommodates 
both our economic and national security interests, I believe it 
can.
    The Chairman. So what would be the benefits of restoring 
the auction authority with a clear pipeline of mid-band 
spectrum?
    Ms. Trusty. Thank you, Senator. I think there would be 
tremendous economic benefits: job creation, workforce 
productivity, the expansion of broadband services across the 
country, I also think it is foundational to our leadership 
internationally on global technologies.
    The Chairman. As you know, the Department of Defense has 
been highly resistant to giving up any Spectrum, and for a long 
time they have given a parade of horribles as to what would 
occur if any Spectrum moved to the commercial sector. I find 
that parade of horribles highly incredible and the result of 
bureaucratic intransigence. It is intransigence that began when 
General Milley was the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, and DOD 
chose a strategy of absolutely resisting and refusing to work 
on freeing up Spectrum.
    I recently had a classified briefing, of which you are 
aware, where I asked two questions to the senior leadership at 
DOD and also senior leadership of the intelligence community. 
The first question I asked was: Over 50 countries across the 
planet have moved substantial portions of the Spectrum in 
question to the commercial sector, and they are being used 
presently for commercial purposes, is it DOD's position that 
our Navy does not operate in the Pacific, that we can only 
defend Topeka, Kansas, and the rest of the world, our military 
is unable to defend the United States?
    You have unique expertise, having worked both on the 
Commerce Committee and the Senate Armed Services Committee. In 
your opinion, are we able to defend ourselves across the globe, 
even in areas where other countries have moved significant 
portions of Spectrum to be available for the commercial sector?
    Ms. Trusty. Senator, I appreciate this question. So I will 
say I am not privy to all of DOD's Spectrum assets and 
capabilities, but I do think there is an opportunity to move 
forward on Spectrum policy that protects both our national 
security and advances our economic interests. And I think what 
that really requires is, like you said, having classified 
briefings or briefings in the public, where multiple 
stakeholder perspectives are represented to challenge positions 
on various matters. I think it promotes transparency, and it 
ensures, I think, there is more cohesion on Spectrum matters 
going forward.
    The Chairman. The second question that I asked DOD that 
they had a totally insufficient answer to, was what would be 
the national security consequences, and I would add the 
economic security consequences, if America loses the race for 
6G, and the global telecom architecture is built by Huawei and 
controlled by the Chinese communists, and every active duty 
serviceman and woman who has their own cell phone is now 
communicating over Chinese telecom infrastructure. In your 
judgment, what would be the economic interest and the national 
security interest if that occurred, if we lose the race to 6G?
    Ms. Trusty. Senator, I think--I hope we could all agree 
that it would be devastating to our economic and national 
security interest if we had to be reliant on Chinese 
technologies.
    The Chairman. Senator Cantwell.
    Senator Cantwell. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I am glad I made 
it back. Ms. Trusty, you both look like you----
    The Chairman. I did filibuster a little bit for you.
    Senator Cantwell. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. I wanted 
to go back to that virtual multichannel video programming 
distribution issue at the FCC. I want to understand whether you 
think the FCC should reexamine and negotiate with online 
platforms the carriage of local news content. I am concerned 
that these large platforms, because of the way things have 
evolved with the affiliates kind of leaving the broadcasters to 
themselves, and yet they could have some ability.
    Right now, I believe local broadcasting is holding us 
together in a lot of ways. It is a trusted source of content 
that people believe in. They believe their local news 
organization. They think that model probably would not exist if 
the community did not believe in the product, and so we do not 
want to lose that.
    But as the digital age continue to evolve, and these 
products and services continue to evolve, like YouTube now 
being a dominant content distributor, then the ability to 
negotiate directly with them is a big revenue opportunity, if 
you will. So how do you look at that issue? Do you think that 
this should be looked at by the FCC and help level the playing 
field for local journalism?
    Ms. Trusty. Senator, I do. So you know, to your point about 
localism, I think it is extremely important. Broadcasters 
provide vital news and information about social and cultural 
events, educational programming, and information in disasters. 
And I think it is incumbent upon the FCC to work with Congress 
to ensure we have a modern regulatory framework that reflects 
the realities of today's media marketplace, that enables 
broadcasters to better compete against technology companies for 
viewers, for ad revenues, for programming, all things that they 
can generate resources by to reinvest into their news gathering 
operations and increase the availability of local news.
    Senator Cantwell. OK. And what do you think the best way 
for--I think they opened that case many years ago and then 
closed--then have not reopened it--or actually, technically, I 
am not sure about that. You probably know the answer.
    Ms. Trusty. I think the----
    Senator Cantwell. It is probably like in quasi-land, where 
you could just easily reopen it; is that right?
    Ms. Trusty. Well, I think it is still open before the 
Commission. I am happy to take a look at it, if confirmed. I 
know that it has been a question on your mind for the past 
couple of FCC nominations hearings, but I think it is an 
important issue, Senator. I am happy to take a look at it and 
ask the questions.
    Senator Cantwell. Right, but you think it should be 
relooked at, is that----
    Ms. Trusty. I am certainly happy to take a look at it.
    Senator Cantwell. Yes. Yes. OK. And then I cannot even--OK. 
I am sure you believe in the First Amendment. I am sure you 
believe in not weaponizing--making sure that we have a free 
press, back to this broadband issue. As we have continued to 
allocate resources and look to the FCC, what do you think the 
best thing the FCC could do now to put more clarity behind the 
shortfall in broadband inequities?
    Ms. Trusty. So I think when we talk about broadband 
inequities, I think about affordability and adoption. And so 
with respect to affordability, I think we can promote more 
competition, embrace more technologies. I think when you have 
more choice in the marketplace that helps to reduce the cost of 
the service.
    I also think we can focus on removing regulatory barriers 
that might impede broadband deployment or raise the cost of 
broadband deployment. If those regulatory barriers are out of 
the way, I also think that can reduce costs for consumers. Of 
course, we have the Lifeline program as well. So as the 
Committee is looking at potential reforms to USF, perhaps there 
is an opportunity to make adjustments to better target those 
services to communities in need.
    I would also speak to digital literacy programs. I know 
that the private industry and public interest groups have 
programs of that sort to help people understand how to maximize 
the benefit of this technology in their lives.
    Senator Cantwell. And what about the mapping? You know 
that--I mean, I think we might probably even have shared with 
you that Microsoft data that they came up with, which can tell 
you by household who does not have broadband.
    Ms. Trusty. Absolutely. I think maps are foundational to 
closing the digital divide. And we have the Broadband Data Act, 
but of course there is always room for improvement, so if I am 
confirmed, I would welcome the opportunity to work with private 
sector stakeholders, like your own constituents, to better 
improve the maps.
    Senator Cantwell. Well, I think it could help us elevate a 
conversation into what are the choices that we could have if we 
really understood that people at $40,000 of income probably 
aren't buying broadband, which means their kids, from a school 
perspective and other things, might not be getting the access 
that we want. And then obviously the impact it has on 
communities.
    And then back to the Spectrum. I listened to what you said 
earlier, even though I have been running in and out at various 
votes, that you believe that the DOD side of this equation 
needs to be thought through, that your experience here and then 
your experience there gave you two different viewpoints on 
this. How do you think the FCC could best help in resolving 
this issue?
    How do we--let me say it differently. Ten or fifteen years 
ago, we probably would have said the FCC is the undisputed 
scientific leader. You know, you would go to your scientist and 
you would say, this is what they say about interference, right? 
But now the world has changed, and we have so much more on the 
technology front. And now we have agencies disputing each 
other, right; DOD and FAA, or various things.
    How do you think you can reassert the FCC's scientific 
leadership on this issue when so much of the conversation ends 
up happening, you know, downstairs in a secure briefing room?
    Ms. Trusty. Sure. I appreciate this question. I think this 
is probably the heart of the issue that engineers do not agree 
on interference metrics, among other things. So this is where I 
think the FCC, NTIA, MOU, memorandum of understanding could 
probably come into play.
    Senator Cantwell. The one that they just did, or you mean a 
new one?
    Ms. Trusty. Maybe a new one.
    Senator Cantwell. OK.
    Ms. Trusty. That is updated and reflects some of these 
other considerations. Maybe we have to hire more engineers and 
technical people to help address this issue, who have 
experience in both camps as well. So those are, potentially, 
some ideas to address this.
    Senator Cantwell. And then what about the secure nature of 
this? I am pretty sure, Mr. Isaacman--it is interesting you are 
here together. It has made it harder for all of us because 
there is a lot--there are ample questions to ask both of you. 
But you are an intersection of a very big, important, what is, 
not just a communication system but is a vulnerability for 
national security if we do not get it right. And so I think Mr. 
Isaacman can tell you how broad he thinks this is going to go 
in the future, the constellations, not just the LEOs that he is 
talking about, but how much more of this communication is going 
to happen through the satellite system and why we have to have 
this layer of security.
    But do you have ideas that you think the FCC could do in 
listening more to the private sector--a framework by which the 
private sector and agencies could have more conversations about 
what the future looks like, and thereby, you know, find some 
more common ground?
    Ms. Trusty. So I think this goes back to a conversation we 
had a little bit earlier about folks having clearances, because 
much of this information is classified or in a special access 
program, and it is very sensitive. And so I know that some 
people in the industry do have clearances, but to the extent we 
can bring those folks into the same room with Federal agencies 
to have these robust conversations about what the needs and 
interests are, what the objectives are, to try to find common 
ground, I think that is the most important thing here.
    Senator Cantwell. I did not mean to engage you on this, but 
Mr. Isaacman, do you understand my point? That there is so much 
yet to still happen here, how do we get the dialogue toward the 
advancements that could happen when basically everybody needs a 
national security clearance, and yet at the same time give 
people an understanding of where we could come together?
    Ms. Trusty, you do support the effort, the NTIA's report 
that DOD and NTIA should look at dynamic spectrum sharing; you 
do support that?
    Ms. Trusty. Yes. I think we should be investing in dynamic 
spectrum sharing technologies.
    Senator Cantwell. OK. Mr. Isaacman, any thoughts here?
    Mr. Isaacman. Senator, I would not want to encroach on my 
nominee's clear command over the Spectrum here. I would say, at 
least through the lens of NASA, I am excited about what 
commercial industry is working on in terms of next-generation 
technology. My most recent mission to space, we tested out 
sending an awful lot of data securely over a laser link, a beam 
of light. I think that is a great way, at least from NASA's 
perspective, to not add to the demand problem with respect to 
the Spectrum.
    Senator Cantwell. Um-hum. Well, I do think this will be one 
of the big challenges we face is how do we--if we want this 
leadership position, how do we think ahead? How do we get this 
conversation with the private sector, who is really doing a lot 
of that thinking, but also get the DOD part of it, and then get 
the dynamic spectrum part of it done correctly?
    OK, well thank you both very much. Mr. Isaacman and Miss 
Trusty, I am going to ask you a final question required of all 
nominees: If confirmed, do you pledge to work collaboratively 
with this committee to provide thorough and timely responses to 
the Committee's request and appear before the Committee when 
requested?
    Ms. Trusty. Yes, Senator,
    Mr. Isaacman. I do, Senator.
    Senator Cantwell. Thank you. I have letters of support from 
various organizations for Mr. Isaacman and Ms. Trusty's 
nomination that I would ask unanimous consent to be inserted 
into the record.
    So, without objection, so ordered.
    [The information referred to follows:]

    [GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] 
    

    Senator Cantwell. Senators will have until the close of 
business Friday, April 11, to submit questions for the record. 
These nominees will have until the close of business Tuesday, 
April 15 to respond to these questions.
    I thank Senator Cruz for allowing me to come back and ask 
these questions.
    That concludes our hearing today. The Committee stands 
adjourned.
    [Whereupon, at 12:58 p.m., the hearing was adjourned.]


                            A P P E N D I X

      Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Ted Cruz to 
                             Jared Isaacman
    Question 1. Do you commit to providing NASA's initial reduction in 
force (RIF) plan, as submitted to OMB, to the Committee, if confirmed?
    Answer. To the extent it is permissible, yes. Like all Federal 
departments and agencies, NASA operates within a government-wide 
framework and must adhere to OMB and White House guidance regarding RIF 
procedures.

    Question 2. Do you commit to providing all subsequent RIF plans to 
the Committee prior to executing them?
    Answer. To the extent it is permissible, yes. Like all Federal 
departments and agencies, NASA operates within a government-wide 
framework and must adhere to OMB and White House guidance regarding RIF 
procedures.

    Question 3. In your testimony, you made several important points 
about the economics of space exploration. In particular, you emphasized 
the goal of a commercial low Earth orbit (LEO) economy and the need to 
understand the commercial potential of outer space beyond LEO. You 
promised that NASA would ``ignite a thriving space economy in low Earth 
orbit,'' discussed your desire to maximize the remaining life of the 
International Space Station (ISS), and said you would ``determine the 
economic . . . value'' of the lunar surface as part of your approach to 
lunar exploration.
    Such economic analysis may prove challenging in part because NASA 
recently disbanded the Office of the Chief Economist at NASA 
headquarters, telling Committee staff that ``there is no intention to 
maintain the function of the chief economist at the agency, and no plan 
to transfer those functions within other elements of the agency.'' 
Among other things, this office helped with cross-agency economic 
planning, conducted market assessments and economic analyses, and 
advised the Administrator on economic matters related to budget 
planning, program implementation and review, and procurement.

    a. Do you have a strategy for developing a robust space economy, 
particularly in LEO, where private investment, and not just NASA 
funding, sustains various space capabilities and activities? If so, 
please describe it.
    Answer. Yes, hopefully I have been clear and passionate in my 
testimony and responses that unlocking the true space economy is 
imperative. After 60 years of space exploration, we're still largely 
operating under a government-funded model focused on launch, 
communications, and observation. It is not reasonable for taxpayers to 
perpetually fund the future we all envision for space.
    If confirmed, my strategy starts with making the most of the ISS 
while it's deemed safe to operate. We need to prioritize science and 
research with real economic potential--particularly in biotech, 
pharmaceuticals, and advanced materials--to validate commercial use 
cases and give future LEO destinations the best possible chance of 
success. That is our best path to ``crack the code'' on the space 
economy.
    Second, we need to remove the friction and bureaucracy that slows 
commercial progress. That means streamlining NASA's infrastructure 
access, rethinking how we engage with and `do business' private 
industry, and ensuring our funding models don't just subsidize activity 
but instead catalyze scalable, sustainable outcomes.

    b. If confirmed, do you intend to seek out any market assessments, 
economic analyses, or other financial or economic products to inform 
decision making at the agency? If yes, from where or whom will you 
obtain this information?
    Answer. If confirmed, I would absolutely seek out credible economic 
and market analyses to inform decision-making at NASA--especially as we 
work to ignite a true space economy and ensure a responsible return on 
taxpayer investments.
    That said, I would also like to understand the current resources 
and internal capabilities within the agency. I'm aware that certain 
economic offices or roles were recently dissolved, and I'd want to 
review that rationale and determine whether that expertise should be 
restored or supplemented.

    Question 4. During your hearing, you criticized the speed of NASA's 
return to the lunar surface, citing the cost and schedule overruns. You 
said the President and many Americans are probably asking, ``what's 
taking us so long to get back to the Moon and why does it cost so much 
money?'' As you know, the Apollo program was primarily about putting 
man on the Moon, not maintaining a sustained human presence there. In 
contrast, the Artemis program is intended to create a ``sustained human 
presence in cis-lunar space or on the Moon.'' (emphasis added) 
Similarly, the overarching Moon-to-Mars program is intended to ensure 
that the efforts and technologies of the Artemis program feed forward 
to manned missions to Mars. I am concerned about suggestions that the 
United States abandon the statutory requirement for NASA to maintain a 
material presence on or near the Moon. Congress was clear that the 
Artemis architecture is not to be retired or disbanded just because we 
have once again reached the Moon. Rather, Artemis and particularly 
Gateway are to serve as something akin to a forward operating base in 
space.

    a. In your own words, how do understand the term ``sustained human 
presence'' found in Sec. 20302 of Chapter 51, United States Code?
    Answer. In my view, a ``sustained human presence'' means more than 
simply visiting or conducting one-off missions. It implies a continuous 
or regularly recurring physical presence that enables a broader 
strategic objective such as a scientific, economic or national security 
imperative.

    b. Do you believe a sustained human presence at or on the Moon is 
necessary to maintain American leadership in space?
    Answer. As I stated during the hearing, I'm committed to following 
the law--and as a lifelong space enthusiast, I would like nothing more 
than to see lunar operations become continuous, enduring, and routine. 
That said, maintaining American leadership in space will require 
flexible policies that ensure clear scientific, economic, and strategic 
value for the American taxpayer and allow the agency, working with the 
Congress, to adapt to meet the ever changing geopolitical landscape.

    Question 5. During your hearing, several members of the Committee, 
including me, questioned you about whether NASA can meet its existing 
statutory obligations while simultaneously embarking on a new, dual-
track mission to Mars under current budget levels. Do you believe that 
NASA--under current budget levels--can simultaneously have a continuous 
human presence in LEO through and beyond the life of the ISS as we 
transition to commercial LEO destinations (CLDs); establish a sustained 
human presence at the Moon; continue funding for other, existing 
complex science missions; and stand up a new manned mission to Mars?
    Answer. Historically, NASA managed multiple complex human 
spaceflight programs simultaneously--Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo--
alongside numerous exploration missions like Ranger, Surveyor, Pioneer, 
in an era with far less technological capability than we possess today. 
More than six decades later, with the advances in industry and 
innovation, I believe the world's premier space agency should be 
capable of executing multiple major initiatives at a time.
    I believe pursuing both lunar and Martian objectives is not 
inherently cost-prohibitive nor expressly prohibited by existing 
Federal statute should such efforts not detract from the near-term 
objective of returning to the Moon first. There is meaningful hardware 
commonality across the existing Artemis Human Landing System (HLS) 
providers. For instance, both contractors are already required to 
validate reusable heavy-lift launch capabilities--technologies 
essential for transporting mass beyond low Earth orbit, whether toward 
the Moon or Mars. In fact, many of the technologies and capabilities 
NASA is already investing in--such as surface nuclear power systems, 
nuclear electric propulsion, and nuclear thermal propulsion--are highly 
relevant for Mars exploration, though they remain underfunded and 
subscale.

    Question 6. During the hearing, when asked by Senator Moran if you 
believe the current Artemis architecture, featuring the Space Launch 
System and Orion, is the best and fastest way to beat China to the 
Moon, you answered, ``I don't think it's the long-term way [SLS and 
Orion] to get to and from the Moon, and to Mars, with great frequency, 
but this is the plan we have now. . .''

    a. What do you envision as the long-term way to get to/from the 
Moon and Mars?
    Answer. As I stated during the hearing, SLS is the current plan and 
the fastest way to send American astronauts back to the Moon ahead of 
our geopolitical rivals. And this is a race we can't risk losing. But 
once our initial lunar objectives have been met, I believe NASA should 
transition from competing with industry and focus again on what no 
other agency or organization is capable of accomplishing.
    The commercial launch market is more capable than ever, with 
numerous American providers investing in heavy-lift capabilities. NASA 
should take advantage of that competition and eventually refocus its 
world-class talent and infrastructure on what no one else is doing: 
developing the next generation of exploration technologies. That 
includes nuclear-powered spacecraft, which I believe represent the 
logical next step for long-duration, deep space missions beyond Mars.

    b. What is the time-frame in which you believe NASA could begin 
executing the plan you describe?
    Answer. Human Landing System (HLS) contractors are already 
developing heavy-lift capabilities as part of the Artemis program. As 
those vehicles prove themselves by supporting Artemis lunar missions, 
they will be well-positioned to take on greater responsibility for 
sustainable, affordable transport to the Moon and Mars.
    Beyond just the existing HLS contractors, there are additional 
commercial providers investing in similar heavy-lift capabilities. As 
commercial readiness increases, NASA will have the opportunity 
eventually to transition away from government-owned heavy-lift launch 
and shift its focus toward enabling technologies for deep space 
exploration.

    Question 7. There has been much speculation in the media about the 
administration's rumored desire to move NASA Headquarters out of 
Washington, DC, and to a NASA field center. Will you commit to 
notifying me or my committee staff of any NASA plans to move 
Headquarters outside of Washington, DC, well ahead of an official 
announcement?
    Answer. Yes.

    Question 8. NASA's Science Mission Directorate is responsible for 
the Mars Sample Return (MSR) mission and is managed by the Jet 
Propulsion Laboratory (JPL). The Mars Sample Return will be crucial for 
helping plan a manned mission to Mars. The astromaterials receiving 
facility at the Johnson Space Center will be responsible for receiving, 
processing, and housing these samples--as they do with all 
astromaterials--once they have returned to Earth. However, NASA has 
halted progress on the program after cost and schedule ballooned well 
beyond expectations. You have said you believe in commercialization and 
helping to spur the space economy. Currently, the commercial space 
company Rocket Lab has a proposal to manage MSR for less than half of 
the last estimate from the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL). Do you 
commit to taking a hard look at whether MSR should be outsourced to 
industry, if confirmed?
    Answer. Yes.

    Question 9. When we met in my office, you talked about potentially 
centralizing mission control and space traffic management. Currently, 
the Johnson Space Center is home to Mission Control for all manned 
missions in space. What is your view on the future of mission control 
and space traffic management?
    Answer. NASA currently operates multiple ``mission control'' 
functions across the country, and while that's understandable given the 
agency's diverse mission portfolio, I don't believe every mission 
requires its own bespoke mission control center. This problem will only 
further be exacerbated as commercial industry matures and the space 
economy is finally uncovered.
    If we truly envision a future with multiple space stations, regular 
lunar operations, Mars missions, and an expanding array of flagship 
science missions, then we need a more scalable, efficient, and 
centralized approach. This could include the consolidation of mission 
operations into a single, unified mission control architecture--a 
central command center that maintains real-time situational awareness 
across all peaceful space exploration activities. That doesn't mean 
eliminating specialized expertise, but rather integrating and 
streamlining operations where possible to improve coordination, 
resilience, and decision-making.

    Question 10. During your hearing, I asked if you intended, if 
confirmed, to cancel Gateway, the orbital lunar outpost that NASA 
currently plans to use as both the first step in a sustained human 
presence at the Moon and later on as the staging point for a manned 
mission to Mars. You said you ``have no intention, as of now to . . . 
cancel any program . . . if I'm confirmed.'' The Washington Post, 
however, reported on Friday, April 11th that when OMB completed ``pass 
back'' of the forthcoming NASA budget request for Fiscal Year 2026, it 
came to light that the administration intends to cancel Gateway. Just 
this month NASA took possession of the main module of Gateway, 
beginning the process of assembly and integration with other sections. 
Despite the fact that NASA has the hardware on hand, and despite the 
fact that other, partner nations are actually shouldering 60 percent of 
Gateway's cost, the administration appears to want to cancel the entire 
effort.

    a. Given that NASA intends to use Gateway to meet the statutory 
requirement for a sustained human presence at the Moon, how will NASA 
(and you, if confirmed) meet this statutory obligation if Gateway is 
terminated?
    Answer. I am not aware of any plans to cancel Gateway, and as I 
stated during the hearing, I am fully committed to following the law as 
written. I would have to look into the specifics of this matter more 
closely, if confirmed.

    b. If cancelled, how will you ensure the aforementioned 
international partners remain partners in the lunar exploration effort 
given that we might unilaterally upended their investments?
    Answer. American leadership in the ultimate high ground of space 
requires the contributions and trust of our international partners. Our 
credibility is paramount. I have no interest in seeing those 
relationships jeopardized or driving our allies into partnerships with 
geopolitical competitors.
    While, again, I am not aware of any plans to cancel Gateway, if 
such a situation arose, I would work closely with our partners--as I 
have done in countless complex international negotiations in my 
business career--to find an acceptable path forward. I have a long 
track record of bringing people together to accomplish difficult, high-
stakes objectives, and I would bring that same collaborative mindset to 
NASA.

    c. Would NASA need additional taxpayer dollars to repay the 
international partners of Gateway for the investments and hardware 
contributions they have made to this point if Gateway is cancelled?
    Answer. I wouldn't want to speculate on something I'm not aware is 
actually under consideration.

    Question 11. The Federal government is currently operating under a 
continuing resolution which extends the funding levels and funding 
provisions of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2024 appropriations act through the 
end of the current Fiscal Year. Importantly, Section 739 of the FY24 
appropriations act states that agencies may not change programs, 
projects, or activities unless such changes are approved in a 
subsequent law. Section 1105 of the FY25 continuing resolution, under 
which the Federal government is currently operating, extended this 
prohibition, stating:

        ``Except as otherwise expressly provided in this division, the 
        requirements, authorities, conditions, limitations, and other 
        provisions of the appropriations Acts referred to in section 
        1101 shall continue in effect through [the end of FY25].''

    Given these explicit prohibitions, do you believe the agency has 
the legal authority to unilaterally cancel Gateway or make any changes 
listed in the forthcoming President's Budget Request (PBR)?
    Answer. I am not currently a party to any budget discussions and am 
not aware of any planned program cancellations. As I mentioned during 
my hearing, I believe NASA is capable of managing multiple world-
changing endeavors--if we eliminate unnecessary bureaucracy and stay 
focused on the mission. I remain hopeful that tough trades won't be 
required, but if they are, I would work closely with the Congress to 
ensure the best possible outcomes and to remain fully compliant with 
existing law. The goal must always be to fulfill the agency's 
obligations while advancing American leadership in space.

    Question 12. Public reporting indicates that FY26 PBR will propose 
significant changes to multiple NASA programs, including a number of 
exploration and science-focused programs. If confirmed, will you 
maintain progress on those programs until any changes are made in law, 
as is required by both current authorizing and appropriations law?
    Answer. I am not currently a party to any budget discussions and am 
not aware of any planned program cancellations. As I mentioned during 
my hearing, I believe NASA is capable of managing multiple world-
changing endeavors--if we eliminate unnecessary bureaucracy and stay 
focused on the mission. I remain hopeful that tough trades won't be 
required, but if they are, I would work closely with the Congress to 
ensure the best possible outcomes and to remain fully compliant with 
existing law. The goal must always be to fulfill the agency's 
obligations while advancing American leadership in space.

    Question 13. In your testimony, you highlighted the strategic 
importance of the Moon as a source of Helium-3. There are several 
commercial entities seeking to extract and return Helium-3 to the Earth 
for applications such as fusion energy. What do you see as NASA's role 
in enabling a robust commercial marketplace for resource extraction on 
the Moon?
    Answer. As I've said before, it's imperative that we crack the code 
on the space economy and shift away from a model where taxpayers are 
solely funding the future we all want to see in space. The first step 
is to make the most of the ISS--prioritizing high-potential science and 
research and ensuring we fully leverage its remaining life.
    That said, I believe the next frontier of economic opportunity will 
extend to the lunar surface. If confirmed, I would support NASA in 
enabling early commercial efforts--through technical support, access to 
infrastructure, and policy leadership--while ensuring the agency 
remains focused on exploration, science, and stewardship of this new 
domain. If Helium-3 or other resources prove to be economically viable, 
NASA can play a vital role in catalyzing that marketplace in 
partnership with industry and international partners. This may very 
well be one of the paths to NASA becoming a self-sustaining agency.
                                 ______
                                 
    Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Roger Wicker to 
                             Jared Isaacman
    Question 1. NASA leadership at the John C. Stennis Space Center in 
Mississippi has made great strides in partnering with commercial space 
firms in rocket propulsion testing. However, barriers to more effective 
partnership, such as lengthy decision processes, cost, and risk 
acceptance persist within NASA.
    If confirmed, how will you transform NASA to remove the barriers 
that inhibit the full utilization of NASA's world class test 
capabilities, such as lengthy decision-making processes and outdated 
regulations? How will you utilize your authorities to grow NASA's 
partnerships with commercial space industry for the use of land and 
infrastructure at NASA centers?
    Answer. NASA Stennis is a great example of how the agency can 
reinvent itself to better support commercial industry. That kind of 
transformation needs to happen across more of the organization. I have 
no doubt that outdated regulations, unnecessary layers of bureaucracy, 
and slow decision-making are inhibiting NASA's ability to fully 
leverage its world-class infrastructure--and ultimately slowing down 
mission delivery.
    If confirmed, you can count on me to roll up my sleeves and get in 
the trenches to identify and remove those barriers. I will draw on 
everything I've learned from leading two successful companies, 
including in the aerospace and defense sectors, to help NASA become 
faster, more collaborative, and easier to do business with.
    I would also fully utilize the Administrator's authorities to 
expand public-private partnerships--ensuring that land, infrastructure, 
and talent at NASA centers are being used to their full potential to 
support American innovation, grow the space economy, and accelerate the 
agency's core mission.

    Question 2. NASA is increasing its reliance on the commercial space 
sector to execute its mission. For example, the International Space 
Station will be decommissioned in 2030, and will be replaced by 
commercial space stations. It is important for the United States 
government to both grow the commercial space industry and maintain 
government activity in space, especially as our key competitors, China 
and Russia, have increased their space presence and developed launch 
vehicles capable of reaching all orbits and satellite constellations 
for remote sensing, navigation, and communications.
    If confirmed, will it be a priority of yours to continue to invest 
in Federal capabilities at NASA field centers? I believe we can balance 
increasing opportunities for commercial space industry with the need to 
maintain Federal investments in space exploration. Is that a balance 
that you support?
    Answer. Yes, I believe that balance is not only possible--but 
essential. NASA has partnered with commercial industry since its 
inception, and the line of responsibility has always been clear: NASA 
should focus on the near-impossible--those missions and technologies 
that no other organization, company, or country is capable of 
achieving.
    When NASA accomplishes a major breakthrough, it should hand off 
that capability to commercial partners and shift its focus to the next 
frontier. That's how we scale innovation, grow the space economy, and 
maintain American leadership.
    For example, as industry continues to mature in chemical 
propulsion, NASA should already be shifting its focus toward nuclear 
propulsion and other next-generation technologies. That's what it means 
to push the edge of the possible. If confirmed, I would support 
continued investment in NASA's field centers--not just to preserve core 
capabilities, but to ensure we're always preparing for the next leap 
forward.
                                 ______
                                 
    Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. John Curtis to 
                             Jared Isaacman
Artemis/Defense in UT
    Question 1. Utah is home to Northrop Grumman's Solid Rocket Motor 
production. Companies in Utah are then able to leverage this technology 
to help lower the costs of no-fail national security missions. As a 
result, Artemis contributes to reducing costs for defense research and 
production. As Administrator, how would you implement efficiencies to 
lower production costs for Space Launch System components?
    Answer. Solid rocket motor production--like the work done in Utah--
is a critical national capability that not only supports Artemis but 
also strengthens our no-fail defense programs. I understand and 
appreciate the strategic importance of these industrial synergies, and 
I believe Artemis can and should contribute to a broader ecosystem of 
innovation, workforce development, and supply chain resilience.
    That said, SLS has faced well-documented cost and program 
challenges. If confirmed, I would work to implement greater 
accountability and transparency in the production of SLS components 
alongside a broader cultural mission-first transformation at the 
agency. It has taken long enough, cost enough and it's time to get back 
to the Moon, to do so before our rivals get there and press on to Mars.

    Question 2. Utah continues to face serious challenges related to 
drought, wildfire risk, and declining water levels, and particularly at 
the Great Salt Lake. If confirmed, how would you ensure that NASA 
continues to prioritize Earth Science efforts--like satellite-based 
drought monitoring and water resource modeling--that help states like 
Utah manage these risks?
    Answer. I believe Earth Science is one of NASA's most important 
missions--because it delivers real, measurable benefits to the American 
people. Satellite-based observations, including drought monitoring, 
wildfire forecasting, and water resource modeling, provide critical 
data that helps communities and those suffering from real hardships 
that cost billions to remediate.
    If confirmed, I will ensure that NASA continues to prioritize high-
impact science efforts that support agriculture, safeguard 
infrastructure, and help states respond to drought and natural 
disasters. We should be using our space-based assets not only to 
explore the solar system, but to protect and better understand our own 
planet.
                                 ______
                                 
Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Shelley Moore Capito to 

                             Jared Isaacman
WV Visit
    Question 1. Mr. Isaacman, thank you for your willingness to serve 
and for speaking with me on Monday. The IV&V Center in Fairmont, West 
Virginia is the home of NASA's IVV Program and is a critical resource 
to the agency. The center has identified and fixed thousands of 
software defects, including 18,000 for the Artemis I projects alone. I 
would love to host you at the IV&V Center in Fairmont so you can see 
for yourself how invested they are in safety and mission success.
    If confirmed can you commit to visiting this important facility 
with me?
    Answer. Yes. It would be my pleasure.
Space Collaboratives
    Question 2. I am a strong supporter of the Keystone Space 
Collaborative (KSC). As a Pennsylvanian I'm sure you recognize that the 
contributions to our space program and the aerospace industry aren't 
limited to just a few geographic regions. Ohio, Pennsylvania, and West 
Virginia offer the resources, expertise, research and workforce to make 
major contributions.
    How will you prioritize working with this collaborative and with 
other stakeholders across the country?
    Answer. Absolutely--as mentioned in the hearing, I believe NASA 
will need the best and brightest from across the Nation to achieve 
world-changing objectives. Organizations like the Keystone Space 
Collaborative are helping to ensure that Ohio, Pennsylvania, West 
Virginia, and other regions play a critical role in shaping the future 
of aerospace and space exploration.
                                 ______
                                 
   Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Maria Cantwell to 
                             Jared Isaacman
    DOGE, Workforce, Budgets. Mr. Isaacman, I appreciated our 
conversation about NASA's priorities and the importance of sustained, 
robust funding to achieving these goals. You yourself recognized you 
are a ``political newcomer,'' and told me you thought NASA's funding 
would be protected because ``everybody likes NASA.'' Unfortunately, the 
Trump Administration's DOGE team is signaling NASA's budget may be 
next.
    On March 10, pursuant to President Trump's DOGE executive order 
(EO), NASA carried out its first round of reductions in force--
terminating 23 employees, including NASA's Chief Scientist, 
Technologist, and Economist. A second round of large-scale terminations 
is expected soon.
    Meanwhile, according to recent press reports, the White House is 
considering proposing major cuts to NASA's science budget for FY 2026--
potentially up to 50 percent.

    Question 1. I know you have said you would like to work on the moon 
and Mars missions in parallel and believe it can be done with NASA's 
current budget. However, if there is enough funding only for a mission 
to the moon or a mission to Mars--which will you prioritize?
    Answer. Given existing law, I would prioritize the Artemis program. 
That said, I believe pursuing both lunar and Martian objectives in 
parallel is not inherently cost-prohibitive. There is meaningful 
hardware commonality across the existing Artemis Human Landing System 
(HLS) providers. For instance, both contractors are already required to 
validate reusable heavy-lift launch capabilities--technologies 
essential for transporting mass beyond low Earth orbit, whether toward 
the Moon or Mars.
    Historically, NASA managed multiple complex programs 
simultaneously--Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo--in an era with far less 
technological capability than we possess today. More than six decades 
later, with the advances in industry and innovation, I believe the 
world's premier space agency should be capable of executing multiple 
major initiatives at a time.

    Question 2. Yes or no: Would you support a 50 percent cut to NASA's 
science budget?
    Answer. I have not reviewed or been party to any official 
discussions, but a 50 percent reduction to NASA's science budget does 
not appear to be an optimal outcome.

    Question 3. Mr. Isaacman, you have expressed ambitious plans for 
NASA if confirmed. How do you plan to accomplish these priorities if 
the Administration tries to shrink NASA's budget and slash its 
workforce?
    Answer. As I stated during the hearing, NASA requires the best and 
brightest talent from across the Nation to accomplish what no other 
agency or organization can--especially in environments that demand 
doing more with less. I support the President's commitment to 
eliminating fraud, waste, abuse, and unnecessary bureaucracy that can 
hinder the agency's mission. If confirmed, I will advocate for NASA's 
priorities and the resources needed to pursue them as efficiently and 
effectively as possible.

    Question 4. In addition to lunar and Martian exploration, do you 
believe that NASA has other important missions to fulfill, such as 
conducting and supporting research and development (R&D) in Earth's 
orbit, space science, Earth science, and aeronautics R&D?
    Answer. Yes. As I noted in my prepared remarks, NASA has a vital 
role to play across science and exploration. The agency should continue 
to lead in the high ground of space--not only to return humans to the 
Moon and journey to Mars, but also to ignite a thriving space economy 
by maximizing the remaining life and utility of the International Space 
Station, and serving as a force multiplier for science. Through this 
work, NASA can accelerate the pace of world-changing discoveries.

    Question 5. Do you support reductions in force at NASA?
    Answer. As I stated during the hearing, NASA must be staffed with 
the best and brightest from across the country to take on its bold and 
complex mission--especially in times that require greater efficiency. I 
support the President's goal of eliminating fraud, waste, abuse, and 
unnecessary bureaucracy that can impede progress. If confirmed, I will 
advocate for the agency's priorities and the resources necessary to 
achieve them while ensuring that any organizational changes are 
thoughtful, mission-focused, and grounded in the need to enhance--not 
diminish--NASA's ability to deliver on the mission.

    Question 6. How will NASA maintain critical expertise in economic 
and technical areas after these reductions in force? Specifically, 
without the Office of the Chief Economist, how will the agency publish 
Economic Impact Reports and how will you make informed decisions 
regarding the economic feasibility and merits of NASA's efforts to 
support sustainable commercialization of space activities?
    Answer. If confirmed, I would want to fully understand the 
rationale behind these reductions--particularly in areas so closely 
tied to one of my top priorities: igniting a space economy. Like 
millions of others, I'm excited about the opportunities space offers, 
but I also recognize that taxpayers cannot carry the full burden of 
those ambitions indefinitely. To unlock the economic potential of 
space, we will need the insight of experts who understand how to 
translate scientific and technical achievements into sustainable, real-
world value. That type of expertise--economic and technical--must be 
preserved and utilized to ensure that NASA's commercial initiatives are 
both strategically sound and fiscally responsible.

    Question 7. Do you consider supporting NASA's workforce and 
physical infrastructure to be important budget priorities?
    Answer. NASA's people and infrastructure are foundational to the 
agency's success. The workforce represents the talent and expertise 
required to pursue groundbreaking science and exploration, while the 
infrastructure--developed over decades--is a key enabler.

    Question 8. In light of the ongoing reductions in force at NASA and 
potential large-scale budget cuts, are you concerned that NASA will 
lose and fail to attract the scientific and technical expertise that we 
need to stay ahead of our competitors?
    Answer. I firmly believe that if NASA continues to deliver on its 
mission--pursuing what no other agency or organization can--then 
recruitment, retention, STEM engagement, and public inspiration will 
follow. People are drawn to purpose, and few missions are as bold or as 
meaningful as the one NASA undertakes.

    NASA Thermoplastics Research and Development. NASA's aeronautics 
R&D is crucial for both aviation safety and America's global aerospace 
leadership. Through the Hi-Rate Composite Aircraft Manufacturing 
(HiCAM) project, NASA is developing technologies that achieve up to 50 
percent reduced cost for composite structures while enabling high-rate 
production for future aircraft.
    The Spokane Aerospace Tech Hub will complement this work by taking 
NASA's lab-proven technologies and completing the critical final steps 
needed for full-scale industrial production, focusing on thermoplastic 
composites where Europe and Asia currently lead. This capability 
represents both an economic opportunity and a national security 
imperative, ensuring domestic control of technologies essential for 
next-generation fixed-wing aircraft.

    Question 1. Mr. Isaacman, as Administrator, how will you ensure 
that NASA's aeronautics programs and projects such as HiCAM support 
critical initiatives like the Spokane Tech Hub that strengthen our 
domestic supply chains and help American manufacturers compete globally 
in next-generation lightweight aircraft materials?
    Answer. I care deeply about American competitiveness and believe 
NASA should focus on advancing next-generation technologies that align 
with the agency's mission and broader national priorities. If 
confirmed, I will quickly get up to speed on these initiatives and 
evaluate how NASA can best support projects like HiCAM and the Spokane 
Tech Hub to enhance our domestic capabilities and global leadership in 
aerospace.

    Question 2. Will you commit to continue supporting NASA 
participation in the Advanced Aerospace Materials and Manufacturing 
Center (AAMMC) as a member of the Tech Hub's consortium of public and 
private sector members?
    Answer. I am not yet fully familiar with the specifics of the 
AAMMC, but based on what I understand, it seems both logical and 
beneficial for NASA to participate in efforts that bring together 
public and private sector expertise to advance critical aerospace 
technologies.

    Aviation and Spaceflight Safety. This Committee has been focused 
for several years on our legislative and oversight responsibilities 
related to aviation safety. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 
Reauthorization Act of 2024 includes new measures to improve aviation 
safety. NASA plays a critical role as a technical advisor to the FAA 
and developer of technologies essential to both aviation and human 
spaceflight safety.
    In your private sector experience, you've been a pilot and founded 
a company that provided adversary air training services to the U.S. 
military. You've also participated in commercial human spaceflight 
missions.

    Question 1. Do you agree that NASA's R&D and technical advisory 
capabilities are vital to the safety of our aviation system and the 
safety of the flying public?
    Answer. Yes. NASA has a long and respected history of research and 
innovation that directly supports aviation safety. Its technical 
expertise has played a critical role in improving systems, procedures, 
and technologies that protect the flying public.

    Question 2. How would you ensure NASA continues to provide the 
technical expertise needed by regulatory agencies like the FAA for 
aviation and commercial spaceflight safety?
    Answer. NASA's management of the Aviation Safety Reporting System 
provides unique insight into self-reported safety-related incidents, 
positioning the agency to contribute meaningfully to safety 
improvements. If confirmed, I would collaborate closely with the FAA 
and industry stakeholders to identify the most pressing challenges in 
aviation and commercial spaceflight safety and ensure NASA's resources 
are directed toward developing solutions that produce measurable 
results.

    Lunar lander redundancy. You have publicly criticized many aspects 
of NASA and the current Artemis architecture. For example, you 
previously criticized NASA for supporting two Human Landing System 
(HLS) lunar landers from two providers. However, dissimilar redundancy 
ensures safety and competition between more than one provider spurs 
innovation.

    Question 1. Are you still opposed to redundancy? Or do you now 
support human lunar lander redundancy?
    Answer. Several years ago, I expressed concerns about redundancy 
after a competitive process had already concluded and a single provider 
had been selected. At the time, I found it difficult to reconcile 
having no redundancy for transporting astronauts to lunar orbit--given 
our reliance on a single vehicle like SLS--while simultaneously funding 
multiple redundant systems for the landing itself. My position stemmed 
from a genuine concern over program delays, budget overruns, and the 
risk that my children might not see American astronauts return to the 
Moon within a reasonable time-frame or budget.

    Question 2. If you now support HLS lunar lander dissimilar 
redundancy, please explain why your position has changed.
    Answer. I no longer oppose lunar lander redundancy because the 
decision has already been made, and significant investments have been 
committed. As a result, the United States now has an additional 
commercial provider with heavy-lift launch capability, which enhances 
national resilience and capacity in space exploration.

    Question 3. How would you ensure the safety of our astronauts 
without the added resiliency created through redundancy?
    Answer. Fortunately, we now have two commercial providers 
developing redundant lunar landers, which strengthens mission safety 
and flexibility. However, I believe it's important to highlight that we 
still lack redundancy in the systems that transport astronauts from 
Earth to lunar orbit and back. That remains a critical area of focus if 
we are to ensure complete mission resiliency and crew safety.

    Space Launch System (SLS). You previously called NASA's Space 
Launch System (SLS) ``outrageously expensive'' and suggested it was the 
result of the Federal government being ``lousy at capital allocation.''

    Question 1. Yes or No: Do you support continued Artemis missions 
with NASA's Space Launch System?
    Answer. Yes. As I mentioned during the hearing, the SLS is part of 
the current plan and represents the fastest path to returning American 
astronauts to the Moon. That said, the program has significant 
challenges. Even NASA's Inspector General has issued multiple reports 
critical of the SLS program's cost and schedule performance.

    Question 2. Yes or No: Do you plan to cancel NASA's Space Launch 
System, if confirmed?
    Answer. No. As I stated in the hearing, SLS is the current plan and 
the fastest means of sending American astronauts to the Moon ahead of 
our geopolitical rivals. As I emphasized during the hearing, this is a 
race the United States can't afford to lose. Once those obligations 
have been met, I believe NASA should transition away from competing 
with the commercial sector and instead focus its world-class talent and 
infrastructure on developing the next generation of exploration 
technologies--including nuclear spaceships--as a logical next step.

    Question 3. According to a March 29, 2025, Wall Street Journal 
report titled, ``Elon Musk's Mission to Take Over NASA--and Mars,'' the 
Trump White House plans to propose canceling SLS in its FY 2026 budget 
proposal. Are you aware of any such plan?
    Answer. I am not aware of any plan to cancel SLS.

    Question 4. Have you discussed the prospect of canceling SLS with 
any Trump Administration official?
    Answer. No.

    Question 5. Have you discussed the prospect of canceling SLS with 
any SpaceX representative?
    Answer. No.

    Question 6. Do you believe canceling SLS would be detrimental to 
U.S. efforts to return to the moon before China arrives?
    Answer. Yes.

    Question 7. If confirmed, do you intend to move NASA away from SLS 
and toward reliance on commercial heavy lift launch vehicles, such as 
the SpaceX Starship and Blue Origin New Glenn? Why or why not?
    Answer. As I've said, SLS is the plan today and provides the 
fastest pathway for returning American astronauts to the Moon and it is 
imperative we do not lose in this regard. However, at some point in the 
future, after NASA meets the imperative lunar objectives, I believe the 
agency should transition away from competing with commercial providers. 
Instead, NASA's focus should shift toward the technologies that no 
other agency or organization is capable of developing--such as nuclear-
powered spacecraft--that will enable deeper space exploration and 
sustain U.S. leadership in space.

    NASA Funding and Support to the Commercial Space Economy. In your 
written and verbal testimony before the Committee, you stated that one 
of your three main objectives for NASA was to ``ignite a thriving space 
economy in low Earth orbit.'' You further explained that by working 
alongside international partners and industry, ``we can unlock the true 
economic potential of space and deliver meaningful benefits to the 
American people--potentially charting a course for NASA to become a 
financially self-sustaining agency.''
    NASA's current support to fostering a thriving low Earth orbit 
space economy often involves partnerships with commercial industry that 
include cost sharing, in-kind technical support, and commitments to be 
an ``anchor tenant'' customer in specific mission areas and 
capabilities.

    Question 1. Given the nascent nature of many on-orbit commercial 
space activities and NASA's current role as a source of Federal funding 
and technical assistance to industry, what financial arrangements are 
you envisioning that would allow NASA to be self-sustaining and 
independent of significant Congressional appropriations?
    Answer. Like millions of others, I envision an exciting future in 
space--but I also recognize that budgets are not unlimited. For over 60 
years, American taxpayers have invested in the agency's pursuit and 
exploration of the final frontier. Moving forward, those taxpayer 
contributions should increasingly be supplemented by the economic 
potential space has to offer. Ideally, NASA should begin to explore 
mechanisms for generating offsetting revenue--similar in spirit to the 
FAA's use of the Airport and Airway Trust Fund.

    CLPS and Lunar Science. The Commercial Lunar Payload Services 
(CLPS) program has emerged as a critical component in supporting NASA's 
sustainable lunar presence and meeting civil and national security 
needs. Key modifications are being considered for CLPS 2.0, such as 
establishing a regular cadence of missions, adopting block buy 
contracts, expanding to heavier cargo-class landers, incorporating 
infrastructure providers, and making CLPS a multi-directorate program.

    Question 1. Will you commit to supporting these modifications to 
CLPS and increasing funding between the Space Technology Mission 
Directorate (STMD) and the Exploration Systems Development Mission 
Directorate (ESDMD) to expand commercial lunar surface demonstrations?
    Answer. While I cannot speak to future budget increases, I am a 
strong advocate for the Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) 
program and believe it represents a compelling model not only for lunar 
missions, but for future exploration and discovery efforts more 
broadly. CLPS embodies a templated, scalable approach that allows for 
more frequent, cost-effective ``shots on goal,'' in contrast to NASA's 
historic reliance on bespoke, high-cost science missions. Expanding 
this type of model can accelerate discovery, spur commercial 
innovation, and better position NASA to pursue a wide range of 
scientific objectives across the solar system.

    Astrophysics. We are aware of your past interest in proposing a 
servicing mission to the Hubble Telescope using private funding. U.S. 
leadership in astronomy dates back to more than a century, with space-
based telescopes revolutionizing our understanding of the universe. 
Sustaining the operations of our existing astrophysical observatories 
is at significant risk due to proposed steep cuts in their operating 
budgets, despite huge demand for observation time using these 
telescopes.

    Question 1. Will you commit to supporting the full operations cost 
of Hubble and JWST, to ensure that taxpayers receive the appropriate 
return on their investments in these missions?
    Answer. I strongly believe in maximizing the value of instruments 
that have already been funded and are delivering meaningful scientific 
returns. Telescopes like JWST, Hubble, Chandra, and others represent 
decades of investment and are producing groundbreaking insights.

    Heliophysics. Space weather caused by the relationship between the 
Sun and the Earth, is an area of NASA science that is vital to the 
global economy. Warning times for the impact of a direct hit on our 
planet from a coronal mass ejection (CME) remain dangerously low, 
putting at risk assets in space and critical infrastructure on Earth. 
Unfortunately, NASA's most recent budget requests for this field of 
research have been lower than expected.

    Question 1. Will you support growing the Heliophysics budget so 
that it reaches roughly a billion dollars a year to adequately address 
space weather risks?
    Answer. I am personally well aware of the risks posed by space 
weather--not only to our Nation's critical infrastructure but also to 
the lives of astronauts. If confirmed, I will be an advocate for 
continued investments in heliophysics and for ensuring that we remain 
vigilant in understanding and mitigating these risks.

    Question 2. What are your plans to implement the National Academies 
most recent Heliophysics decadal survey that called for developing the 
Geospace Dynamics Constellation (GDC)?
    Answer. I am not yet deeply familiar with the details of the GDC 
program, but if confirmed, I intend to become well-versed in the latest 
decadal recommendations and do everything I can to support their 
thoughtful implementation. The decadal surveys represent a vital, 
community-driven process for setting scientific priorities, and I take 
that guidance seriously.

    Question 3. Will you commit to protecting the operations and 
science data analysis budgets for currently operating missions like the 
Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) Mission so that U.S. scientists and 
researchers, rather than their Chinese counterparts, can continue to 
lead the world in the analysis needed to better understand the risks 
from space weather?
    Answer. I am not yet familiar with the specific status of the MMS 
mission, but I care deeply about maintaining U.S. leadership in science 
and ensuring that our investments continue to yield important data and 
discoveries. If confirmed, I will take a close look at the mission's 
contributions and work to understand both the risks it helps address 
and the opportunities it presents for continued leadership in 
heliophysics.

    Elon Musk and Conflicts of Interest. I understand you have a close 
relationship with Mr. Musk and his company, SpaceX.
    I want to be clear about my expectations: The American people must 
have confidence that their leaders are not beholden to any one person. 
If you are confirmed, I expect you will go above and beyond the bare 
minimum and clearly demonstrate that you are acting in the public's 
interest--not Mr. Musk's or your own.
Context:
    My relationship with SpaceX is not unlike NASA's, in that they are 
currently the only commercial provider offering crewed transportation 
to and from low Earth orbit. I do not have a close personal 
relationship with Mr. Musk. While I've spoken with him occasionally 
over the years in my capacity as a SpaceX customer, I would describe 
our interactions as professional. I admire and respect his 
contributions to space and technology, but it would be inaccurate to 
characterize our relationship as close.

    Question 1. How will you ensure that your relationship with Mr. 
Musk and SpaceX will not result in conflicts of interest or the 
appearance of conflicts?
    Answer. I disclosed all financial and contractual relationships 
during the ethics process and have fully complied with the guidance and 
conclusions provided by government ethics officials. I will not 
hesitate to involve NASA's General Counsel, or other designated agency 
ethics officials, on any matter that could even give the appearance of 
a conflict. I have no interest in personal gain or benefiting any 
contractor--I am here solely to serve my country and lead the world's 
greatest space agency with integrity and transparency.

    Question 2. Will you commit to recusing yourself from NASA 
decisions that would impact SpaceX or Mr. Musk?
    Answer. I fully commit to adhering to my ethics agreement, and 
whenever there is uncertainty, I will consult with the NASA General 
Counsel, or other designated agency ethics officials, to ensure full 
compliance.

    Question 3. If no, what will you do to ensure Mr. Musk does not 
inappropriately influence these decisions?
    Answer. The commercial launch market today is more competitive than 
at any point in the history of space exploration. NASA will continue to 
conduct open and fair competitions with the objective of delivering the 
best capability to taxpayers at the lowest cost.

    Question 4. What procedures will you put into place to ensure that 
Mr. Musk does not inappropriately influence the independent decision 
making of NASA?
    Answer. NASA has operated for decades alongside a broad base of 
major contractors--including Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, 
Blue Origin, and SpaceX. I trust the agency has well-established 
internal controls to preserve independent decision-making, and if 
confirmed, I will uphold and reinforce those standards across the 
board.

    Question 5. To promote public confidence and transparency, will you 
notify Congress every time Mr. Musk meets with you or anyone on your 
senior team?
    Answer. Upon confirmation, I will execute my duties as 
Administrator consistent with applicable government ethics laws and 
regulations and based on guidance from the NASA's General Counsel or 
other designated agency ethics officials.

    Question 6. You have made the decision to retain a 25 percent 
ownership interest in Shift4, rather than divesting entirely, while 
Shift4 maintains a financial relationship with Starlink that pays your 
company between $10-16 million per year. Given this ongoing financial 
relationship with one of Mr. Musk's companies, what specific steps will 
you take, if confirmed, to avoid the appearance of conflicts of 
interest with Mr. Musk or Starlink?
    Answer. Upon confirmation, I will resign from my positions with 
Shift4 Payments, LLC and Shift4 Payments, Inc, and its wholly owned 
subsidiaries. I will also surrender my majority voting control of the 
business. I will take these actions pursuant to my ethics agreement. 
Furthermore, upon confirmation, I will execute my duties as 
Administrator consistent with applicable government ethics laws and 
regulations and based on guidance from the NASA's General Counsel or 
other designated agency ethics officials.

    Question 7. Will you ensure SpaceX employees are not given access 
to NASA computer systems, databases, or facilities that present a 
conflict of interest, like what we have seen at the FAA?
    Answer. No vendor or contractor will have access to NASA systems or 
data beyond what is explicitly permitted under their agreement with the 
agency, existing agency policy, or would be otherwise inconsistent with 
applicable law or regulation.

    Question 8. At your hearing, you testified that you had a 
conversation with Mr. Musk at Mar-a-Lago in late 2024. I understand you 
told my staff this conversation pertained to Musk's DOGE efforts. What 
specifically did you discuss with Mr. Musk at Mar-a-Lago?
    Answer. My conversation with Mr. Musk was unrelated to my interview 
with President Trump for the position of NASA Administrator. We 
discussed the possibility of me volunteering to support the Trump 
administration.

    Question 9. According to a March 29, 2025, Wall Street Journal 
report titled, ``Elon Musk's Mission to Take Over NASA--and Mars,'' Mr. 
Musk called you late last year and asked you to become the head of 
NASA. In your interview with my staff on April 3, 2025, you said this 
reporting was ``1000 percent false.''
    Yes or No: Is the above reporting from the Wall Street Journal 
false?
    Answer. Yes, that reporting is false.

    Question 10. You testified at your hearing that you have not 
discussed your plans for NASA with Mr. Musk. For the record: Since 
November 5, 2024, have you ever discussed anything pertaining to NASA 
with Mr. Musk?
    Answer. No.

    Question 11. Since November 5, 2024, have you been on any text 
chains with Mr. Musk?
    Answer. No.

    Question 12. If your answer is yes to the above question, are any 
of these text chains conducted over a private messaging application 
like Signal?
    Answer. N/A.

    Question 13. Will you abide by all Federal records preservation and 
archiving laws, if confirmed?
    Answer. Yes.

    Question 14. How much money have you paid to SpaceX for the two 
spaceflights you purchased (Inspiration4 and Polaris Dawn)?
    Answer. Pursuant to my ethics agreement, I have terminated all 
space flight service agreements that I had with SpaceX and all money 
paid to SpaceX for future missions has been refunded. Furthermore, 
pursuant to my ethics agreement, I am committed to ensuring that these 
funds are reinvested in non-conflicting passive investments. The amount 
I paid to SpaceX for past missions is subject to confidentiality 
obligations in my contractual agreements with SpaceX.

    Question 15. According to a March 29, 2025, Wall Street Journal 
report titled, ``Elon Musk's Mission to Take Over NASA--and Mars,'' you 
talk ``frequently'' with SpaceX executive Michael Altenhofen, who was 
recently named a NASA senior adviser.
    Yes or No: Is the above reporting from the Wall Street Journal 
accurate?
    Answer. No.

    Question 16. What role and portfolio would Mr. Altenhofen hold at 
NASA under your leadership, if confirmed?
    Answer. Senior Advisor to the Administrator--Aerospace Engineering.

    Legal. I am aware you were detained by U.S. Custom and Border 
Patrol agents in 2010 on a warrant for drawing and passing checks 
without sufficient funds to a Las Vegas casino. I am aware you were 
also sued on four separate occasions around this time (2008-2010) in 
connection with casino debts and allegations of fraudulent checks, 
which I understand you dispute.

    Question 1. Do you agree that violating legal obligations is 
unacceptable, irrespective of one's ability to pay any fines or other 
related costs?
    Answer. Yes--I agree that violating legal obligations is 
unacceptable, regardless of one's financial means. That said, I believe 
some additional context is important. In my early 20s, I was fortunate 
to experience business success at a young age, and I spent time in 
casinos as an immature hobby. The legal matters referenced were, in 
fact, forms of negotiation and were all resolved promptly. The incident 
at the border, following my return from the Olympics, stemmed from a 
payment issue that had already been resolved, which is why I was 
detained for only a few hours.
    I fully acknowledge this was a brief and immature period in my 
youth and a poor use of my time and resources. Since then, I've 
redirected my focus toward far more meaningful and productive 
pursuits--starting a family, building successful companies, developing 
an accomplished aviation and space career, and engaging in significant 
philanthropic efforts. I have always been transparent about these 
matters in all security clearance documentation and have held a 
clearance since 2013 without issue.
    Mistakes made in youth don't excuse poor decisions, but I believe 
growth, accountability, and public service are powerful ways to 
demonstrate how far one has come.

    Question 2. Can you assure the Committee that this type of behavior 
is in your past?
    Answer. Yes.

    Climate and Earth Science. The Science Mission Directorate is an 
important part of NASA that funds scientists through more than 4,000 
openly competed research awards--including many in the Earth Science 
Division. The Earth Science Division operates more than 20 satellites 
in orbit, sponsors hundreds of research programs and studies, and funds 
opportunities to put data to use for societal needs. NASA's Climate 
Change webpage contains critical information based on NASA's collection 
of long-term observations of the planet.

    Question 1. Do you agree that man-made climate change is a real and 
serious issue?
    Answer. I am not a climate scientist. My background is in business, 
aviation, and commercial space exploration. I am confident that the 
Earth's climate has changed throughout its 4.5 billion year history. I 
believe in studying the causes and consequences of these changes to 
help mitigate the challenges we face on Earth as a result.

    Question 2. Do you support NASA's Earth Science Division and its 
efforts to develop cutting-edge sensors and data analysis technologies 
that can improve Earth observations important to climate science, 
weather modeling, resource management, and the mitigation and response 
to natural disasters such as wildfires?
    Answer. I fully support NASA's Earth Science Division and its work 
to advance technologies that improve our understanding of our planet 
and help respond to the challenges we face on Earth.

    Question 3. Do you commit to supporting continued funding through 
the Earth Science Division for research programs and researchers 
focused on understanding complex Earth systems and their dynamic 
interactions?
    Answer. I'm not currently aware of any proposed changes to the 
Earth Science Division's budget. If confirmed, I will seek to better 
understand these programs and the contributions they make, and I will 
advocate for investments that are aligned with NASA's mission and 
deliver meaningful value to the public.

    Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion. Mr. Isaacman, in the past you 
have seemed to implement diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives 
into your personal and professional life. You stated prior to the 
Inspiration4 mission that you did not want to send ``four rich white 
guys'' to space and you also implemented DEI policies at your 
companies, Draken and Shift4.

    Question 1. Do you still value diversity in the workplace?
    Answer. I value a merit-based culture that results in the most 
capable team that reflects excellence, commitment, and character--
regardless of race, gender, or sexual orientation.

    Question 2. In your interview with my staff, you said we need the 
``best and brightest'' at NASA. I agree. How did the DEI policies at 
Draken and Shift4 benefit your multi-million-and billion-dollar 
companies, and do you think similar policies could benefit the mission 
of NASA?
    Answer. I value a merit-based culture that results in the most 
capable team that reflects excellence, commitment, and character--
regardless of race, gender, or sexual orientation.

    Question 3. Do you think that targeting and eliminating DEI 
programs and policies will discourage the ``best and brightest'' from 
wanting to work at NASA?
    Answer. I was not involved in any decisions to remove specific DEI 
programs, but I believe that when NASA focuses on bold, challenging 
missions, it will naturally attract high-caliber individuals from all 
backgrounds who want to be part of something extraordinary.

    Question 4. NASA websites no longer state that the Artemis 3 lunar 
mission will aim to land the first person of color and the first woman 
on the moon--a longstanding goal of the Artemis program since the first 
Trump Administration. What message do you think it sends to the 
engineers, mathematicians, and scientists of tomorrow that NASA has 
taken this step to remove this language from the objectives?
    Answer. I was not involved in the decision to remove that language. 
What I do know is that it has been over 50 years since Americans last 
walked on the Moon, and despite commitments from every President since 
1989--and over $100 billion invested--we still haven't returned. Fixing 
that challenge should be our highest priority. If we can't get back to 
the Moon in an economic and safe way, then it won't matter who the crew 
is. Mission success, especially at an agency like NASA, will ultimately 
open the door to broader participation and lasting inspiration for 
future generations.

    Campaign Contributions. You made a $2 million contribution to the 
Trump-Vance Inaugural Committee on November 27, 2024. One week later, 
then-President-elect Trump posted on Truth Social his intention to 
nominate you for the NASA Administrator role.

    Question 1. Did anyone suggest to you that a contribution to 
President Trump's Inaugural Committee would position you to be 
nominated for a position in his Administration? If so, who?
    Answer. I reject the premise of this question, and no one ever 
suggested that a contribution would position me for a nomination.

    Question 2. In July 2024, you posted on X that you ``have never 
been in love with either candidate for President.'' At what point did 
this opinion change?
    Answer. That comment was part of a longer, multi-paragraph post 
that deserves proper context. In it, I expressed outrage over the 
assassination attempt and made clear that such violence has no place in 
the world's greatest democracy. I also stated that I believed President 
Trump would be our next President and wished him well in unifying and 
leading the Nation.
    To be clear, my position has not changed. I've never claimed to 
``love'' politics, but I have consistently supported President Trump.

    Tariffs. President Trump's tariffs are raising the cost of living, 
crashing the stock market, and causing uncertainty for our business 
community. As you pointed out in your testimony, most NASA programs are 
``over budget and behind schedule.''

    Question 1. Are you concerned that potential scarcity and cost 
increases within the aerospace manufacturing supply chain caused by 
tariffs will contribute to further delays and budget overruns?
    Answer. I am not deeply familiar with the full details of NASA's 
aerospace supply chain, but I would assume that, given the dual-use 
nature of many space technologies, most of NASA's hardware is 
manufactured and assembled in the United States. That domestic base 
likely provides a degree of insulation from tariff-related volatility, 
though I would want to better understand the nuances if confirmed.

    Question 2. Tariffs pose a particular challenge for small 
companies, which cannot absorb cost increases as easily as big 
contractors. Are you concerned that some start-up NASA partners will be 
unable to survive the uncertainty and disruption caused by the 
Administration's trade war?
    Answer. I support the President's broader objective of reducing the 
trade deficit and bringing more high-quality manufacturing jobs back to 
the United States. As someone who has led a public company for many 
years, I've learned that leadership requires looking beyond short-term 
market volatility to focus on long-term impact.
                                 ______
                                 
    Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Brian Schatz to 
                             Jared Isaacman
Support for Space Science
    Space science is the cornerstone of NASA's work, driving 
achievements and discovery and we face growing competition from China 
in space science investments.

    Question 1. Will you commit to increasing investment and providing 
not less than the FY25 Senate level of $7.576 billion for space science 
in the NASA budget, including in the fields of astrophysics, planetary 
science, earth science, lunar science, and heliophysics?
    Answer. I am deeply passionate about science and spoke extensively 
about its importance during the hearing. If confirmed, I will advocate 
for strong investment in space science--across astrophysics, planetary 
science, Earth science, lunar science, and heliophysics--and for 
securing as much funding as the government can reasonably allocate. I 
also believe we should look to amplify these efforts through 
partnerships with international partners, commercial industry, and 
academia whenever possible.
Support for Astronomical Science
    NASA's astrophysical observatories have received bipartisan support 
over decades. They are also areas where international partnerships will 
become increasingly important to bring the scale of investment needed 
to support advanced scientific infrastructure.

    Question 2. Will you commit to continuing NASA's leadership in 
astronomy and ensuring a full return on investment by supporting the 
full cost of operations for the Hubble Space Telescope and the James 
Webb Space Telescope?
    Answer. I am a strong believer in maximizing the value of 
instruments that have already been built, funded, and are producing 
meaningful scientific returns. The James Webb Space Telescope, Hubble, 
and Chandra all fall into this category. I've publicly supported each 
of these observatories and believe their continued operation is 
essential to advancing our understanding of the universe. I'm generally 
opposed to small-scale funding cuts that reduce the return on decades 
of investment in world-class scientific tools.

    Question 3. Will you commit to supporting the completion of the 
Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope?
    Answer. To my knowledge, the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope is 
nearing completion and remains on schedule and within budget--something 
that is unfortunately rare for flagship programs at the agency. I'm not 
aware of any reason why it should be canceled, and I would support its 
completion and successful deployment.

    Question 4. Will you commit to funding for the Habitable Worlds 
Observatory?
    Answer. I'm intrigued by the Habitable Worlds Observatory and the 
promise it holds, but I would need to learn more before making a 
commitment. My understanding is that it's not expected to launch until 
the 2040s. While I support the mission concept, I would also want to 
explore whether aspects of its scientific objectives can be accelerated 
through other near-term opportunities.

    Question 5. What role do you think international partnerships 
similar to those in the Habitable Worlds Observatory will play out in 
the future?
    Answer. I value international partnerships when they are focused, 
well-managed, and aligned around achieving ambitious goals. 
Collaboration can be a powerful multiplier when each partner is fully 
committed and accountable. However, I don't believe in pursuing 
partnerships simply for the optics--results matter. Effective 
international collaboration will continue to play an important role in 
NASA's future, especially for large-scale science missions and deep 
space exploration.
                                 ______
                                 
   Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Edward Markey to 
                             Jared Isaacman
Elon Musk
    In your nominations hearing, you repeatedly refused to answer 
whether Elon Musk was in the meet when then-President-elect Donald 
Trump offered you the position of NASA administrator. I want to give 
you another opportunity to clarify that question.

    Question 1. Was Elon Musk in the room when then-President-elect 
Donald Trump offered you the position of NASA administrator?
    Answer. My interview was with the President of the United States. 
The person asking me questions--and ultimately offering me the 
opportunity--was the President himself.

    Question 2. How many other people were in the room when then-
President-elect Donald Trump offered you the position of NASA 
administrator?
    Answer. My interview was with the President of the United States. 
The person asking me questions--and ultimately offering me the 
opportunity--was the President himself.

    Question 3. Did Elon Musk say anything when then-President-elect 
Donald Trump offered you the position of NASA administrator? If so, 
please describe those conversations.
    Answer. My interview was with the President of the United States. 
The person asking me questions--and ultimately offering me the 
opportunity--was the President himself.

    Question 4. The Wall Street Journal reported in March that Elon 
Musk called you ``late last year'' and asked whether you would become 
the head of NASA. Is that reporting accurate? If not, please describe 
any inaccuracies.
    Answer. No, that reporting is entirely false. Mr. Musk never called 
me to discuss becoming NASA Administrator, nor did we have any 
conversations about Mars-related objectives. The only call I received 
regarding this position came from Secretary Lutnick, who was serving as 
co-chair of the transition team. That phone interview ultimately led to 
my in-person meeting and interview with President Trump.
NASA Reduction in Force
    Mr. Isaacman, I am deeply troubled by the recent, seemingly rushed 
decision to dissolve the Office of the Chief Scientist and the Office 
of Technology, Policy and Strategy at NASA. The reported abrupt 
termination of approximately 15 dedicated civil servants, individuals 
with decades of invaluable experience across NASA's diverse centers and 
missions, is particularly concerning. These individuals, vital to 
providing unbiased, science-driven analysis, were given a mere 30-day 
notice of their Reduction in Force, a move that alarmingly predated any 
broader restructuring plan or even the Agency's own submission to OPM 
for such action. This raises serious questions about the rationale 
behind this decision, and whether it represents a troubling disregard 
for scientific expertise and the critical role these public servants 
play in ensuring NASA's mission is based on sound, evidence-based 
policy.

    Question 1. Given my concerns about the abrupt dissolution of these 
offices and the loss of non-partisan, experienced civil servants 
providing ``unbiased, science-driven analysis,'' as the potential next 
Administrator, would you have valued having these offices and their 
expertise to support you in leading NASA? Recognizing these non-
political civil servants provided mission-driven, agenda-free 
contributions to agency-wide strategy and policy development, distinct 
from the term appointees who led them, how would you ensure such 
valuable expertise is retained and utilized under your leadership?
    Answer. Over the last 26 years, I've founded, led, and grown two 
successful companies, including acquiring and reorganizing 
organizations to improve performance. I take great pride in assembling 
high-performing teams and retaining top talent--whether in business, 
aerospace, or human spaceflight. If confirmed, I intend to bring that 
same approach to NASA.
    Regarding the offices that were closed, I was not involved in those 
decisions. If confirmed, I will review the rationale behind those 
closures and evaluate whether the agency is retaining and properly 
utilizing the expertise necessary to support NASA's mission and 
strategic planning efforts.

    Question 2. If confirmed, would you commit to reviewing the 
decision to terminate these civil servants and prioritize their 
reinstatement to appropriate positions within NASA? This would ensure 
the agency retains their valuable experience and maintains continuity 
in its scientific and strategic planning efforts.
    Answer. As noted in my previous answer, if confirmed, I will review 
the rationale behind these decisions and assess whether reinstating any 
of these individuals would strengthen the agency's ability to deliver 
on its mission.
NASA Heliophysics and Decadal Survey Priorities
    Mr. Isaacman, Massachusetts was proud to see our homegrown Lunar 
Environment heliospheric X-ray Imager (LEXI), developed by students and 
faculty at Boston University, successfully land on the Moon aboard 
NASA's Blue Ghost Mission 1 spacecraft in March. LEXI is now sending 
back invaluable global images of the interaction between the solar wind 
and Earth's magnetic field--data that is essential to understanding the 
space environment around our planet.
    Heliophysics research is foundational to protecting our 
infrastructure, ensuring astronaut safety, and supporting the success 
of both human and robotic missions in space.

    Question 1. Given the release of the 2024 Solar and Space Physics 
Decadal Survey, how do you plan to support NASA's Heliophysics Division 
and advance its top priorities, including sustaining the Diversify, 
Realize, Integrate, Venture, Educate (DRIVE) initiative and expanding 
the cadence of the Heliophysics Explorers program, particularly the 
Small Explorer (SMEX) and Mid-sized Explorer (MIDEX) missions and 
Missions of Opportunity (MO)?
    Answer. I believe NASA should be a force multiplier for science. 
Advancing affordable, high-impact discovery must be a top priority. I'm 
very supportive of SMEX, MIDEX, and similar initiatives that can 
increase the cadence of meaningful scientific returns in a cost-
effective way. If confirmed, I would look forward to working closely 
with the Heliophysics Division, academic institutions, and other 
partners to help implement the priorities outlined in the Decadal 
Survey and accelerate the rate of breakthrough discoveries.

    Question 2. Do you agree that strategic investments in Heliophysics 
should remain a key priority for NASA?
    Answer. Given how central the sun is to our existence, it makes 
sense that we'd want to know as much about it as possible.
NASA Science Mission Directorate Funding
    Mr. Isaacman, NASA's science missions are foundational to the 
agency's global leadership in space and to the public's trust in its 
work. Programs like the Great Observatories--including Chandra, which 
is operated out of my home state of Massachusetts--provide essential 
data on everything from newborn stars to galaxy clusters, which cannot 
be captured from Earth. It supports approximately 200 jobs requiring 
highly specialized X-ray expertise.
    You've previously expressed support for these observatories. 
However, we've seen repeated attempts to siphon funds from the Science 
Mission Directorate to cover cost overruns in the Artemis program. That 
approach undermines NASA's long-term scientific mission.

    Question 1. Given the importance of NASA Science to the nation, can 
you commit that, under your leadership, funding for the Artemis program 
will not come at the expense of the Science Mission Directorate which 
manage flagship observatories like Chandra?
    Answer. As you've noted, I've been very public in my support for 
exploration assets like Chandra that continue to generate meaningful 
scientific returns. I don't believe in cutting small-dollar programs 
that are delivering real value--especially in science. If confirmed, I 
will advocate for protecting those investments and ensuring that 
science remains a core pillar of NASA's mission, even as we pursue 
ambitious goals through Artemis and other human spaceflight programs.
NASA and Climate Data
    Mr. Isaacman, from monitoring sea-level rise to polar ice loss to 
wildfires, NASA's satellites are the backbone of climate research used 
by scientists, policymakers, and the public across the globe.
    NASA's Earth Observing System collects and archives more than 147 
terabytes of data each day. This data underpins climate action efforts 
at every level of government, drives global research collaborations, 
and informs life-saving disaster response. It's a public good relied on 
by communities worldwide.
    Yet the Trump administration is undermining that work. A recent 
investigation found that large swaths of climate datasets, 
visualizations, and web tools--once publicly accessible--have been 
altered or taken down. This unprecedented rollback of public 
information compromises scientific continuity and transparency at a 
time of accelerating climate threats and extreme weather events.

    Question 1. If confirmed, will you commit to fully restoring and 
maintaining access to data as well as resisting any political pressure 
to sideline climate research?
    Answer. As I mentioned during the hearing, I am not currently aware 
of any restrictions related to public access to NASA data, but if 
confirmed, I would look into this matter closely. I strongly support 
Earth Science and believe the data NASA collects can play a critical 
role in supporting the agriculture industry and mitigating the impacts 
of wildfires, droughts, flooding, and other natural hazards.
                                 ______
                                 
    Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Gary Peters to 
                             Jared Isaacman
    Question 1. Mr. Isaacman, I was happy to hear you say in the 
hearing that it is a fundamental responsibility of NASA to inspire the 
next generation. I agree that NASA's missions play a key role in doing 
so. The NASA Office of STEM Engagement also develops the next 
generation of scientists by providing for Michigan's Space Grant 
Consortium, which funds graduate fellowships, undergraduate research 
grants, faculty research grants, educational programs at the K-12 
level, and NASA internships.
    President Trump's previous NASA Administrator proposed zeroing out 
the budget for NASA's Office of STEM Engagement--something Congress 
blocked. A failure to invest in the next generation hamstrings U.S. 
competitiveness and makes it difficult to build on the work we have 
already invested billions in.
    If confirmed, are you committed to continuing funding for NASA's 
STEM education programing? Do you agree that it is important for NASA 
to fund workforce initiatives that ultimately support their exploration 
accounts?
    Answer. I hope my track record--both through my human spaceflight 
missions and my financial support for programs like Space Camp--makes 
clear how much I value STEM education. As I emphasized during the 
hearing, it all begins with completing the mission. It's been over half 
a century since Americans last walked on the Moon. Until we deliver on 
those goals, we are not living up to our full inspirational potential.
    That said, I strongly support STEM initiatives that get students 
excited about science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.

    Question 2. Mr. Isaacman you've mentioned your passion for science 
and shared that you believe President Trump is hoping to usher in a 
golden age of science.
    I remain deeply concerns about potential budget and staffing cuts 
that would only favor funding for the exploration account. A 
fundamental part of the Artemis missions are its science missions which 
seek to better understand lunar resources in preparation of sending 
humans to the moon. Beyond supporting exploration efforts NASA's 
science budget includes programs to research things like space weather 
which impacts our everyday lives.
    Recent reporting suggests that OMB is planning to propose cutting 
NASA's Science budget by $3.4 billion, or about 45 percent. Do you 
think these cuts would reduce science capacity at the agency to unlock 
the future of space?
    Answer. I have not been privy to any internal budgetary planning or 
decision making conversations at the agency. If confirmed, I look 
forward to reviewing OMB's recommendations and working with Congress to 
determine the appropriate level of funding to ensure NASA can execute 
its mission. That said, I will always be an advocate for NASA and its 
science portfolio.

    Question 3. Recent reporting suggests that OMB is planning to 
propose cutting NASA's Science budget by $3.4 billion, or about 45 
percent. If confirmed, will you commit to pushing back on OMB and the 
President if they recommend these cuts?
    Answer. I have not been privy to any internal budgetary planning or 
decision making conversations at the agency. If confirmed, I look 
forward to reviewing OMB's recommendations and working with Congress to 
determine the appropriate level of funding to ensure NASA can execute 
its mission. That said, I will always be an advocate for NASA and its 
science portfolio.

    Question 4. Mr. Isaacman, in the hearing you stated your commitment 
to following existing law which directs the NASA Administrator to 
``establish a program to develop a sustained human presence in cis-
lunar space or on the Moon''. You also mentioned that you do not 
believe that the Space Launch System is a good long-term option for 
getting astronauts to and from the moon with great frequency. 
Commercial heavy lift launch vehicles have been suggested as potential 
alternatives for future missions to and from, but work is still being 
done to make them fully operational. What do you envision as the future 
alternative to the SLS and how will you ensure that NASA has the 
necessary resources to partner with commercial companies and invest in 
these alternatives?
    Answer. As I've said before, I believe the SLS and existing Artemis 
architecture represent the fastest way to get American astronauts back 
to the Moon. But over the long term, it's not a sustainable or 
affordable solution. Fortunately, the commercial launch market is 
stronger than ever. Since SLS was first established, companies like 
Blue Origin, ULA, SpaceX, and Rocket Lab have made major investments in 
heavy-lift capabilities. Competition drives down costs and accelerates 
innovation. In that respect, at some point the government will need to 
move on from competing with commercial industry in launch and invest in 
the next generation spaceship technology, what no other agency or 
organization is capable of delivering, like the practical application 
of nuclear propulsion.

    Question 5. Programs and contracts like those in Artemis support 
thousands of jobs across the U.S. manufacturing supply chain. This is 
extremely important in Michigan especially where suppliers are critical 
to NASA's mission and goals. Any cuts to NASA programs equate to job 
cuts in Michigan and across the country.
    Do you agree that part of the role NASA's programs can and do play 
is to strengthen critical national security manufacturing supply chains 
and jobs in aerospace?
    Answer. Absolutely--but I also believe that every partner, vendor, 
and program must deliver. We should be paying for results and holding 
all stakeholders accountable when expectations aren't met. I'm not 
putting all the responsibility on contractors--NASA's own program 
management plays a role as well. But no one should be satisfied that 
every President since 1989 has called for a return to the Moon and a 
path to Mars, and despite more than $100 billion invested across 
Constellation and Artemis, we have yet to fly a single crewed mission 
around the Moon let alone land on it. That must change.

    Question 6. Every year I coordinate a bipartisan letter to our 
Appropriations Commerce, Science, and Justice subcommittee asking that 
they support the funding necessary to ensure Artemis missions can 
launch on time. Delays in the launch schedule not only delay scientific 
discovery but can lead to additional costs.
    What is your plan to ensure that NASA has the necessary resources 
to maintain Artemis' launch schedule? If your plan is to speed up the 
launch schedule, how exactly do you plan to do so?
    Answer. My approach is shaped by 26 years of experience leading 
high-performance teams in business, along with a background in 
aerospace and commercial space. I've built companies from the ground 
up, led acquisitions and turnarounds, and flown to space twice on 
record-breaking missions. What I've learned is that results don't come 
from slogans or slide decks--they come from leadership that's present, 
hands-on, and relentlessly focused on mission execution. NASA knows 
this better than anyone--based on what has been accomplished 
historically--we just need to restore that mission-first culture.
    If confirmed, I'll roll up my sleeves, get in the trenches with the 
team, and lead a cultural and program management transformation. We'll 
take a hard look at the real problems--both internal and external--that 
slow progress and put timelines and budgets at risk. Key areas of focus 
will include:

   Reducing organizational bureaucracy to streamline 
        communication and accelerate decision-making

   Strengthening program management with clear ownership, 
        defined timelines, and measurable results

   Driving vendor accountability through transparent 
        performance metrics and consequences when expectations--
        especially those owed to taxpayers--are not met

   Reinforcing a culture of urgency and ownership at every 
        level of the agency--we don't go home until the day's problem 
        is solved because no one else will solve it for us--and then we 
        do it all over again the next day NASA has the talent and 
        resources to achieve the near-impossible. But when major 
        programs fall behind, it delays world-changing discoveries, 
        fails to meet our inspirational obligations, and undermines the 
        credibility of the agency the public entrusts with its hope for 
        future generations.

    Question 7. Mr. Isaacman, we have seen massive reductions in 
staffing across agencies. Earlier this year it was reported that NASA 
negotiated with the Office of Personnel Management to avoid mass 
layoffs. Additionally, there are reports that up to 5 percent of NASA's 
staff already accepted a buyout agreement.
    We have also heard that NASA staff are awaiting a realignment plan 
that will further reduce NASA staffing numbers. You have big plans for 
NASA, but I fail to see how we achieve them if we are not retaining 
talent.
    What is your plan to ensure that NASA remains sufficiently staffed? 
How do you plan to do that in an environment where NASA's budget 
decreases?
    Answer. If confirmed, I hope to be in a position to lead these 
discussions thoughtfully and constructively. As I stated in my prepared 
remarks, I'm stepping away from my business career--and my commercial 
spaceflight career--because I believe I owe a debt to this Nation and 
want to contribute to NASA's extraordinary mission.
    I'm not here for a title. I'm here to help the agency, not 
dismantle it. And if NASA is working on what no other organization on 
Earth can accomplish--world-changing missions--I believe it will 
continue to attract and retain the talent it needs to succeed.

    Question 8. Have you communicated with--including over messaging 
app, e-mail, or in person--Elon Musk since accepting your nomination?
    Answer. No.

    Question 8a. If yes, what was the substance of the communication?
    Answer. N/A.
                                 ______
                                 
   Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Tammy Baldwin to 
                             Jared Isaacman
1. Inspiring the Next Generation of STEM Professionals
    Each year, the Wisconsin Space Grant Consortium hosts an annual 
First Nations Launch National Rocket Competition. This competition 
serves as an opportunity for students at Tribal Colleges and 
Universities, Native American-Serving Nontribal Institutions, and 
members of American Indian Science and Engineering Society chapters to 
gain experience and explore engineering and design principles to 
inspire these students to pursue careers in aerospace.
    If confirmed, will you support programs, such as the First Nations 
Launch National Rocket Competition, that encourage, inspire and train 
students from diverse backgrounds to pursue careers in aerospace and 
STEM?
    Answer. While I am not directly familiar with the First Nations 
Launch National Rocket Competition, I firmly believe it is a core 
obligation of NASA to inspire the next generation to join the adventure 
and reach even higher. I am a strong advocate for STEM programs--
especially those that deliver high-impact outcomes from relatively 
small investments.
2. Role of Commercial Space Industry
    In your testimony, you briefly discussed the importance of 
determining the future of the space economy before the de-orbiting of 
the International Space Station.
    Why do you believe scientific innovation alone is not justification 
to continue investing in the ISS or future space stations? What do you 
picture the future of the space economy to look like and what economic 
value do you envision discovering if you are confirmed? What role do 
you believe commercial space companies should play in determining the 
economic activity in space?
    Answer. Like millions of others, I envision a future where humanity 
becomes a spacefaring civilization, rich in scientific discovery and 
exploration. But I'm also realistic--budgets are not unlimited. For 
space to reach its full potential, we must unlock its economic value. 
If the ISS or future space stations are to continue operating in the 
long term, they cannot rely solely on government funding; there must be 
a pathway toward sustainable commercial engagement.
    If confirmed, I would welcome input from the best and brightest 
across NASA, academia, and industry. In the near term, I believe the 
greatest opportunities are in the pharmaceutical and biotech sectors, 
where the microgravity environment can yield breakthroughs. Over the 
medium term, mineral extraction and on-orbit manufacturing may also 
become economically viable.
    Commercial space companies should play an active and collaborative 
role in shaping this future. Alongside international partners and 
academic institutions, they can help identify the highest-potential 
science and research that will ignite a true space economy. NASA's role 
should be to lead, convene, and help de-risk that future--while keeping 
its focus on what no other agency or organization can accomplish.
3. NASA Budget
    It has been reported that the preliminary version of President 
Donald Trump's budget calls for a cut of 47 percent to NASA science.
    If NASA's budget is cut by 47 percent, how would this impact future 
science projects at NASA? Would any projects be fully terminated?
    Answer. If confirmed, I look forward to reviewing OMB's 
recommendations and working with Congress to determine the appropriate 
level of funding to ensure NASA can execute its mission. That said, I 
will always be an advocate for NASA and its science portfolio.
4. Conflicts of Interests
    During your hearing, you refused to answer whether Elon Musk was in 
the room when President Trump interviewed you and offered you the NASA 
Administrator appointment.

    Question 4a. To your knowledge did Elon Musk recommend your 
nomination to President Trump?

    Question 4b. Do you believe it would have been improper for Elon 
Musk, who holds extensive contracts with NASA and deep conflicts of 
interest, to be in attendance for a nominee's interview with the 
President for the NASA Administrator appointment? If no, why?
    Answer to 4a and 4b. I've heard that several retired Generals and 
Admirals I worked with while running my defense company had recommended 
me for different positions. I also had just returned--about two months 
before my nomination--from a record-breaking space mission. During that 
mission, my crew and I traveled farther from Earth than any humans in 
more than half a century. Two of my crewmates became the women who have 
traveled farthest from Earth, and we conducted dozens of research 
experiments, tested a new EVA suit during a `spacewalk', and pioneered 
next-generation communications--all widely covered in the media. So, 
while the nomination personally came as a surprise and an honor, it 
does not seem that unusual that my name was being circulated.
    It is not my place to speculate on hypothetical situations. As I've 
said previously, my interview was with the President of the United 
States. He asked the questions, and he made the decision.
                                 ______
                                 
    Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Jacky Rosen to 
                             Jared Isaacman
Future of Space Stations
    The request for proposals for phase two of the Commercial Low Earth 
Orbit Development Program is expected to define NASA's level of 
investment and commitment, awarding contracts to two or more commercial 
providers to ensure redundancy and competition for services, which are 
essential to driving innovation and economic growth.

    Question 1. Given the critical need for these providers to be 
operational before the ISS deorbits, if confirmed, how do you plan to 
ensure the timely development and deployment of these stations?
    Answer. There are two parallel priorities I would focus on if 
confirmed.
    First, we need to prioritize the highest-potential science and 
research on the ISS that could help ``crack the code'' on a sustainable 
orbital economy. These commercial stations won't succeed unless there's 
a strong value proposition in space, and NASA has a role to play in 
identifying and advancing the research that could unlock it--
particularly in sectors like biotech, pharmaceuticals, and advanced 
manufacturing.
    Second, we need to identify and clear the obstacles currently 
holding back commercial providers--whether they're technical, 
financial, regulatory, or bureaucratic. That means working closely with 
the companies involved, understanding where delays or hardships are 
occurring, and eliminating roadblocks wherever possible.
    We are on the clock with the ISS's end of life timeline. If 
confirmed, I will do all I can to bring urgency and focus to ensuring a 
successful transition that doesn't leave a gap in our presence in low 
Earth orbit or jeopardize the emergence of a true space economy.
NASA's Commitment to Commercial LEO Destinations (CLDs) Project
    Commercial space companies have expressed concerns about 
overburdensome requirements, regulatory delays, indemnification, and 
the unpredictability of NASA's commitment to Commercial LEO 
Destinations project.

    Question 1. How will you ensure continuous presence in space and 
prevent a funding or policy gap that could undermine the success of 
these private space stations?
    Answer. One of the greatest accomplishments of the ISS has been its 
ability to sustain human life in low Earth orbit over long durations. 
Meanwhile, the cost of transporting astronauts to and from LEO has come 
down significantly from prior generation vehicles like Shuttle. So, the 
challenge today isn't launch--it's the economic viability of commercial 
LEO destinations.
    As currently contemplated, these future stations will rely in part 
on government subsidies, but that model is unlikely to be sustainable 
in the absence of a real on-orbit economy. That's why I emphasized 
during my testimony how critical it is to maximize the remaining life 
of the ISS--not just to continue exploration, but to crack the code on 
the space economy and give commercial providers the best possible 
chance to succeed. If confirmed, I'll prioritize this effort and do all 
I can to ensure a seamless transition that avoids a gap in presence and 
purpose in LEO.

    Question 2. Given your private sector background, what changes 
would you advocate for in NASA's approach to managing technical 
requirements, cost, schedule, and risk to make it more agile and 
commercially friendly while maintaining accountability?
    Answer. To start, I'm not convinced the current system enforces any 
real accountability. Programs run over budget, fall behind schedule, 
and the only consequence seems to be cancellation. That's not 
sustainable for an agency with world-changing goals.
    If confirmed, I will get in the trenches to understand the root 
causes. It's clear that bureaucratic layers have formed--often serving 
their own preservation rather than the mission. In the private sector, 
resources--whether people, capital, infrastructure, or leadership--are 
aligned around clear goals with defined outcomes and performance 
metrics. That makes it easy to spot when something is off track and 
implement course corrections early.
    I intend to bring that mindset and my experience running two large, 
successful companies--including in aerospace--into NASA. The agency 
doesn't lack talent or capability; it needs a clearer alignment between 
mission and execution, and a mission-first culture that values 
execution, ownership and urgency. That's how we'll restore momentum and 
complete the ambitious goals the Nation expects from NASA.
NASA EPSCoR Funding
    One of my top priorities in Congress is supporting growth in STEM 
fields by investing in education and workforce training that will 
bolster STEM opportunities for everyone. As you know, NASA EPSCoR is a 
joint federal-state program designed to allow more states to 
participate in space and aeronautics research. In Nevada, schools such 
as the University of Nevada, Reno and the Desert Research Institute 
rely on NASA EPSCoR seed funding for research and scholarships in order 
to enhance STEM opportunities.

    Question 1. How can Congress further support the ESPCoR program and 
ensure NASA can continue to grow the program's reach and its diversity 
in scientific research?
    Answer. As I mentioned during my testimony, NASA has a fundamental 
obligation to inspire the next generation to join this grand adventure 
and aim even higher. That inspiration starts by getting back to the 
mission--landing astronauts on the Moon and Mars, launching new 
telescopes, and delivering breakthrough scientific discoveries that 
captivate the world.
    But inspiration alone isn't enough--we also need to provide 
pathways for participation. Programs like EPSCoR are essential because 
they help connect students and researchers from underserved regions and 
institutions to the opportunities that NASA provides.
Initiatives in STEM Funding
    I'm proud to have introduced several bipartisan STEM-related bills 
over the past several years, including my STEM RESTART Act with Senator 
Hyde-Smith, the Rural STEM Act with Senator Wicker--which was included 
in the CHIPS and Science Act--and the Building Blocks of STEM Act with 
Senator Capito, which was signed into law in the 116th Congress. 
However, there is still more work to be done, particularly in breaking 
down barriers that stand in the way of students of all ages and 
backgrounds from pursuing STEM education and STEM careers.

    Question 1. How can NASA work to break down barriers to young 
people in STEM so that in the future you have the workforce you need to 
continue to make scientific breakthroughs?
    Answer. I firmly believe that if NASA can deliver on the mission--
what no other agency or organization on Earth can achieve--then 
recruiting, retention, STEM engagement, and inspiration will largely 
take care of themselves. That's the first step: accomplish bold, world-
changing goals that ignite imagination and ambition.
    But we also have to create tangible pathways for participation that 
also serve NASA's mission. As I mentioned in my remarks, NASA should be 
a force multiplier for science--leveraging its talent, infrastructure, 
and partnerships to push down opportunities to academia.
                                 ______
                                 
   Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Ben Ray Lujan to 
                             Jared Isaacman
    Question 1. I recently introduced legislation to hold special 
government employees, like Elon Musk, accountable and prevent them from 
acting in their own financial interest. I'm concerned to hear media 
releases that discuss SpaceX's connection to China, specifically, the 
article published March 26, 2025, titled ``How Elon Musk's SpaceX 
Secretly Allows Investment from China,'' which details how investors 
from China buy stakes in the company as long as funds are routed 
through offshore hubs. As you know, Musk's company SpaceX has been 
awarded many NASA contracts, including their human lander system (HLS) 
for the Artemis moon missions. I understand that the contracting 
officer at NASA who awarded SpaceX this contract now works for SpaceX 
overseeing the Starship development. Do you believe that companies with 
contracts like the HLS should receive investment from China? Will NASA 
proactively identify and mitigate conflicts of interest and enforce 
government transparency?
    Answer. I'm not familiar with the specific article or any related 
claims regarding a particular vendor. That said, I would hope that 
NASA--and the broader U.S. government--have implemented the appropriate 
safeguards to ensure open, fair competition while also protecting 
against influence from geopolitical adversaries. If confirmed, you can 
count on my full commitment to protecting American interests, ensuring 
transparency, and maintaining a level playing field that advances our 
national security and space leadership.

    Question 2. Commercial providers have put forth faster and cheaper 
solutions than the current NASA architecture has laid out. If 
confirmed, can you ensure that NASA will fairly consider all commercial 
procurement options to fund multiple industry concepts through early 
design phases to maximize innovation?
    Answer. Competition is a core ingredient of our economic system--
and I'm a strong believer in its power to drive both innovation and 
affordability. If confirmed, I will ensure that NASA remains open to 
new ideas and that we create space for commercial solutions to be 
evaluated fairly, particularly in early-phase development where 
multiple concepts can unlock future capability and cost efficiencies.

    Question 3. Congress has consistently supported the development of 
a sustainable Low-Earth Orbit (LEO) economy, including utilizing 
microgravity research, space-based manufacturing, and human 
spaceflight, while leveraging commercial platforms to reduce government 
costs and expand market opportunities. What role do you see for NASA in 
ensuring the United States is a leader in capabilities such as space-
based manufacturing and microgravity research?
    Answer. As I stated in my prepared remarks and throughout my 
testimony, unlocking a sustainable space economy is imperative. After 
more than 60 years of space exploration, the space economy remains 
centered around launch, observation, and communications--largely funded 
by government contracts. That is not enough for the future we all 
imagine in space.
    If confirmed, I will prioritize identifying the highest-potential 
science and research opportunities--especially in areas like 
biotechnology, pharmaceutical development, and on-orbit manufacturing--
and work closely with commercial partners, academia, and international 
allies to help ignite a true economic engine in space.

    Question 4. NASA's Commercial Low-Earth Orbit Development Program 
is critical to ensuring that China does not surpass the U.S. in 
leadership in LEO. The recently introduced NASA Transition 
Authorization Act pushes NASA to down select to two commercial 
providers by March of 2026, with one being operational by 2030. What 
actions will you take to ensure an orderly transition to commercial 
space stations to maintain our continuous human presence? What are the 
key challenges you foresee in ensuring there is no gap in human 
presence in LEO, and how should NASA support a smooth handover to 
commercial platforms?
    Answer. Keeping astronauts alive in space for long durations is one 
of the ISS's greatest achievements. Meanwhile, the cost of launching to 
and from LEO has declined steadily over the decades. So the challenge 
isn't the continuous `heart beat' in space--it's the economic viability 
of commercial space stations.
    As they are currently structured, many commercial platforms are 
expected to rely on government subsidies, yet we haven't seen a self-
sustaining on-orbit economy emerge. That's why, during my testimony, I 
emphasized the importance of making the most of the ISS's remaining 
lifespan--to help crack the code on the space economy and give 
commercial providers the best possible shot at success. If confirmed, I 
will make this a priority and ensure NASA provides the technical, 
logistical, and strategic support needed for a seamless transition.

    Question 5. Will you commit to supporting the development of a 
national strategy for commercial spaceports, funding for spaceports, 
and best practices that could be led by NASA?
    Answer. I believe it is a national security vulnerability to have 
too few facilities for the launch and recovery of space vehicles. If 
confirmed, I would work with the Department of Defense, FAA, and other 
stakeholders to ensure the United States has the infrastructure 
capacity to meet the growing demands of national security, commercial, 
and civil space operations.

    Question 6. The Suborbital Crew Program (SubC) offers government 
employees, including NASA astronauts and researchers, the opportunity 
to train aboard suborbital vehicles as a part of their preparations for 
longer-durations missions. The SubC program is also a way for 
astronauts to practice on experiments they might be conducting in 
microgravity in the future. Can you provide an update and explain your 
support for utilizing additional flight training in space and more time 
in microgravity for our NASA astronauts and researchers through the 
SubC program? After all, the first American in space flew a suborbital 
mission and we can all agree on the benefits Alan Shepherd's flight had 
on the future of the Astronaut Corps.
    Answer. Suborbital spaceflight offers meaningful microgravity 
experience at significantly lower cost and likely lower risk than 
orbital missions. It's an efficient capability that we should be using 
to prepare astronauts and researchers for longer-duration missions and 
experiment validation.
                                 ______
                                 
 Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. John Hickenlooper to 
                             Jared Isaacman
STEM & Science Missions
    NASA's missions fulfill national goals and advance science. From 
the Artemis Mission to return to the moon, the Hubble and James Webb 
Space Telescopes, and returning samples collected from asteroids and 
Mars, space is a powerful tool to attract students to STEM fields.

    Question 1. Mr. Isaacman, in what way could these key NASA missions 
inspire the next generation of scientists?
    Answer. Exactly right--NASA inspires by doing the mission. When we 
accomplish the near-impossible, when we explore the unknown and deliver 
breakthrough discoveries, we ignite the imagination of the next 
generation. That's how students choose to pursue science, technology, 
engineering, and math--not just because they're told to, but because 
they want to be part of something bold and meaningful.
    Hubble has inspired the world for decades. Now it's time to get the 
next generation of telescopes into orbit--and astronauts on the Moon 
and eventually Mars. That's how we continue the cycle of inspiration 
and achievement.

    Question 2. If confirmed, will you commit to prioritizing the 
advancement of NASA's existing portfolio of science and STEM missions, 
including funding new and existing space telescopes and partnerships 
with academic institutions?
    Answer. Consistent with my testimony, I want NASA to be a force 
multiplier for science. That means launching more missions--more 
telescopes, more probes, more rovers--and deepening partnerships with 
academia (and their healthy endowments) to ensure students and 
researchers are active participants in that work.
    If confirmed, you can expect me to be a passionate advocate for 
science. The discoveries we make--and the way we make them--are 
foundational to both our national competitiveness and our ability to 
inspire future generations.
Artemis and Gateway
    NASA is currently partnering with commercial space companies to 
return astronauts to the moon and establish an orbiting lunar outpost 
that can be used for scientific research and as a pathway for missions 
to Mars.

    Question 3. How do you plan to prioritize exploration on the Moon 
under the Artemis Program, led by NASA in collaboration with commercial 
partners?
    Answer. As I've stated in previous responses and during my 
testimony, I believe the current Artemis architecture is the fastest 
path to landing American astronauts back on the Moon--something every 
President has called for since 1989. That said, it's clear the program 
has struggled with cost, schedule, and execution. Over $100 billion has 
been invested in this effort, and yet we still haven't flown humans 
around the Moon let alone landing on it.
    If confirmed, I will focus on getting Artemis back on track. That 
means working alongside NASA leadership, commercial partners, and 
program managers to address the root causes of delays--bureaucracy, 
program misalignment, and lack of accountability--and restoring a 
mission-first culture across the agency. We must deliver results, 
demonstrate progress, and prove to the world that NASA can once again 
achieve the extraordinary.

    Question 4. If confirmed, how will you plan for human exploration 
on Mars while maintaining a consistent lunar presence?
    Answer. Artemis is the current plan, but that doesn't preclude 
parallel efforts to pursue the President's inspiring and ambitious goal 
of sending American astronauts to Mars. In fact, many of the 
technologies and capabilities NASA is already investing in--such as 
surface nuclear power systems, nuclear electric propulsion, and nuclear 
thermal propulsion--are highly relevant for Mars exploration, though 
they remain underfunded and subscale. Additionally, commercial partners 
under Artemis are developing very heavy-lift launch vehicles that could 
support both lunar and Mars missions.
Mission Priorities
    The Mars Sample Return mission is key to advancing our 
understanding of the red planet. NASA also conducts missions that 
observe the Earth to help support water conservation, forest health, 
and crop management.

    Question 5. How will you balance NASA's priorities between 
planetary exploration and Earth Science missions?
    Answer. I am passionate about all of NASA's science and exploration 
missions--including both planetary and Earth sciences. Prioritizing 
these efforts isn't about choosing one over the other, but rather about 
identifying where the greatest breakthroughs are possible.
    Some of this prioritization is guided by the decadal survey 
process, which I fully respect. But if confirmed, I would work closely 
with NASA's experts and stakeholders to evaluate missions based on 
their scientific promise, potential economic value, and relevance to 
national security. Whether we're uncovering the secrets of other worlds 
or advancing our understanding of Earth, the goal is the same: to 
deliver meaningful, world-changing results.
Spectrum
    Space operators rely on spectrum during launch, to support in-space 
operations, and for transmitting scientific data and imagery from Earth 
observations. As commercial uses of spectrum continue to increase, it 
is important to ensure that Federal agencies can continue conducting 
their missions while using spectrum efficiently.

    Question 6. How does NASA plan to continue working with Federal 
partners such as the NTIA and FCC to ensure sufficient spectrum is 
available to support science, commercial, and national security 
missions in a growing space ecosystem?
    Answer. If confirmed, I would advocate for preserving the spectrum 
NASA requires to fulfill its on-orbit mission requirements. That said, 
I also believe we can take a proactive approach to reducing future 
demand.
    Several commercial companies are already investing in advanced 
technologies like optical/laser forms of communications, which offer 
high-bandwidth alternatives to traditional systems.
Space Debris
    Satellites and space stations can be damaged or destroyed by 
orbital debris, threatening human lives in addition to commercial and 
national security missions in space. Globally, other nations are 
pursuing demonstration missions to refine their technologies to 
remediate space debris.
    While NASA has studied space debris issues extensively, the U.S. 
cannot fall behind in deploying its own technological capabilities.

    Question 7. How can NASA help catalyze investments in developing 
and demonstrating technologies on-orbit, such as active debris removal, 
to support the safe and resilient use of space?
    Answer. As I mentioned during my hearing, I'm very familiar with 
this issue--MMOD (Micrometeoroid and Orbital Debris) was the greatest 
threat to both of my space missions. While I'm not opposed to investing 
in active debris removal technologies, we need to be clear-eyed about 
the real challenge: the majority of the risk comes from millimeter-
sized debris traveling at orbital velocities--objects too small to see 
or track but large enough to cause serious damage.
    From a policy standpoint, the best thing we can do is stop making 
the problem worse. That means stronger international norms and 
accountability around responsible behavior in space--such as proper 
deorbiting practices, ending destructive ASAT testing, and avoiding 
uncontrolled satellite breakups, which are often caused by less 
responsible foreign actors.
International Space Station
    The International Space Station (ISS) is scheduled to operate 
through 2030, providing a platform for human presence in space and an 
opportunity to perform scientific research in microgravity.
    Currently, NASA is working with the commercial sector to support 
the development of future commercial LEO destinations, which will 
maintain the United States' presence in LEO and offer the opportunity 
for continued microgravity research on-orbit.

    Question 8. How do you recommend NASA manage the ISS transition to 
ensure a safe deorbit plan while maintaining continued U.S. presence in 
low earth orbit?
    Answer. To my understanding, NASA has already held a competition 
and selected a vendor to support the safe deorbiting of the ISS.
    As such, my priority would be to maximize the remaining value of 
the ISS before it is decommissioned. We must prioritize the highest-
potential science and research that can be conducted on the station--
and do everything possible to ``crack the code'' on an on orbit 
economy. The success of commercial LEO destinations will depend on what 
we learn and accomplish now.
                                 ______
                                 
Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Lisa Blunt Rochester to 

                             Jared Isaacman
    NASA's Space Grant program has played a critical role in expanding 
STEM education and research opportunities in states like Delaware.

    Question 1. If confirmed, will you commit to supporting the Space 
Grant program and ensuring its continued funding?
    Answer. Programs like Space Grant help turn that inspiration into 
action by providing hands-on opportunities, academic support, and real 
pathways into the workforce. If confirmed, I would strongly support 
efforts that connect students to NASA's mission and help develop the 
talent needed to lead in space, science, and innovation.

    Question 2. How do you view NASA's role in fostering STEM education 
and workforce development through programs like Space Grant?
    Answer. Inspiring the next generation to pursue careers in STEM is 
a fundamental obligation of NASA. Programs like Space Grant help turn 
that inspiration into action by providing hands-on opportunities, 
academic support, and real pathways into the workforce. If confirmed, I 
would strongly support efforts that connect students to NASA's mission 
and help develop the talent needed to lead in space, science, and 
innovation.
                                 ______
                                 
      Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Ted Cruz to 
                             Olivia Trusty
    Question 1. Many in Congress, including myself, are committed to 
ensuring broadband connectivity across the country. However, the 
Universal Service Fund--an annual, multi-billion-dollar program--has 
operated with minimal oversight or accountability from Congress since 
its establishment in 1996. This has led to significant mission creep, 
particularly during the Biden administration with respect to its 
unlawful expansion of the E-Rate program.
    As the ``contribution base'' has continued to shrink, there have 
been increasing calls to expand that base--more accurately, to broaden 
the consumer tax burden--to additional sectors and services. As I 
stated in my Blueprint for USF Reform, expanding the base alone would 
not reduce the amount consumers pay but merely change the method of 
collecting their payments. It would conceal, rather than fix, mission 
creep and unaccountable spending and undermine incentives for the FCC 
to lower costs or improve program performance.
    Expanding the revenue base before pursuing spending reform also 
puts the cart before the horse. As you acknowledged at your hearing, 
there are over 100 different overlapping broadband programs at 15 
different Federal agencies. As such, before expanding the tax base, it 
is necessary to examine what the programs themselves are paying for and 
to what extent they continue to be necessary. Spending reform must 
precede revenue reform.

    Do you agree that reform to root out mission creep and waste, 
fraud, and abuse must be pursued before revenue reform?
    Answer. Yes.

    Question 2. As we discussed in my office, will you commit not to 
expand the contribution base beyond clear, current FCC authority 
without explicit Congressional action to authorize such expansion?
    Answer. Yes.
                                 ______
                                 
    Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Dan Sullivan to 
                             Olivia Trusty
Alaska Connect Fund
    Question 1. In Alaska, communications access is critical for our 
communities, yet the terrain is unlike anywhere else. The weather is 
extreme. The building season is short. And, the permitting process is 
challenged by Federal land ownership. No other state has so many remote 
communities that are unconnected from any other infrastructure such as 
roads or utilities.
    Providers face numerous challenges from an abbreviated construction 
season, to lack of commercial power, to the need to charter flights to 
conduct maintenance and repairs, and more.
    In recognition of Alaska's challenges, the FCC has long recognized 
the importance of embracing flexible policies for Alaska.

    Will you commit to making sure that FCC policies are flexible so 
that they reflect the unique circumstances facing providers and need to 
tailor their universal service obligations accordingly?
    Answer. If confirmed, I commit to working at the FCC to promote 
policies, including policies that involve universal service 
obligations, that are flexible and reflect the unique connectivity 
needs in Alaska.
Outdated Media Ownership Requirements
    Question 1. Chairman Carr has called this a ``break glass moment 
for local broadcasting'' and has said that he will be looking at the 
current local broadcast ownership rules and seeing which ones are no 
longer necessary because of all of the disruption in the media 
marketplace and the many different ways people consume media.
    Updating, and in some cases eliminating these ownership rules, is 
important for a state like Alaska if we want to continue to receive 
important local news and information.
    I am a strong supporter of local broadcast stations in my home 
state of Alaska. They provide important news, weather and emergency 
information to my constituents. These stations and stations across the 
country face economic challenges today due to market competition. These 
economic issues can lead to a reduction in their local news coverage, 
which we've seen in areas of our state.

    Ms. Trusty, will you work to ensure that the FCC is pro-active in 
adopting policies that protect local stations' ability to continue to 
serve their key role in our communities, including by relaxing 
ownership rules that were enacted decades ago when the media space 
looked very different from today?
    Answer. If confirmed, I commit to promoting policies that protect 
local stations' ability to continue to serve their key role in 
communities across this country so that local broadcasters can better 
compete for viewers, programming, and advertising revenues in today's 
vibrant and dynamic media and video marketplace.
                                 ______
                                 
  Response to Written Question Submitted by Hon. Marsha Blackburn to 
                             Olivia Trusty
    Question. As you know, arrangements requiring musical performers to 
play at broadcast station events in exchange for airplay--particularly 
when coupled with threats of reduced airplay for non-compliance--
violate the FCC's payola rules. These rules prohibit broadcasters from 
making programming decisions based on receiving anything of value 
without on-air disclosure of such consideration. Last month, after I 
sent a letter to the FCC, Chairman Carr issued an enforcement advisory 
addressing complaints that broadcasters are coercing musical artists to 
perform for free at station events or festivals by threatening to 
reduce their airplay if they refuse. If confirmed, will you commit to 
protecting American artists and continued vigilant enforcement of the 
FCC's payola rules?
    Answer. Yes.
                                 ______
                                 
     Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Todd Young to 
                             Olivia Trusty
Undersea Cables
    Question 1. As global demand for data capacity grows and 
geopolitical competition intensifies, undersea cable infrastructure has 
become increasingly vital to national security, economic 
competitiveness, and digital resilience.

    What is the FCC's plan to support the private sector's increasing 
demands for greater deployment of subsea infrastructure?
    Answer. The FCC is actively reviewing subsea cable rules for the 
first time since 2001 through a notice of proposed rulemaking initiated 
in November 2024. Information collected through this proceeding will 
help inform the FCC's next steps pertaining to streamlining the 
licensing process of subsea cable infrastructure; more efficient 
coordination with Federal agencies regarding subsea cable projects; and 
enhancing the national security of this critical infrastructure.

    Question 2. What gaps do you see in FCC oversight of subsea 
infrastructure development and usage?
    Answer. Today the FCC lacks sufficient transparency into the 
foreign ownership of undersea cable infrastructure development, as well 
as the security measures that subsea cable operators are implementing 
to protect this critical infrastructure from sabotage, disruption, or 
compromise.

    Question 3. What can Congress do to better support the FCC's 
undersea cable efforts?
    Answer. To support the FCC's undersea cable efforts, Congress could 
do the following: help promote more U.S.-led undersea cable projects to 
reduce potential security risks stemming from the foreign ownership of 
undersea cables; explore the diversification of undersea cable traffic 
patterns or routes to ensure there is no single point of failure if 
there is a cable outage due to sabotage or natural disasters; and 
strengthen disaster recovery and emergency response plans for undersea 
cables that have been compromised.
NextGen Television Standard
    Question 1. Ms. Trusty, two years ago Senator Schatz and I wrote a 
letter to the FCC that was signed by 26 of our colleagues asking the 
Commission to expedite the continued rollout of the Next Generation 
Television Standard, or ATSC 3.0. The current standard, HD, has been 
around for almost 30 years and the new standard, NextGen, is a pro-
consumer, innovative technology that not only provides viewers with 
much better picture and audio quality but also allows for targeted 
weather and emergency alerts. Just this week, the FCC invited public 
comment on a petition for rulemaking on this very issue, underscoring 
the growing momentum and continued interest in accelerating the 
modernization of this important technology.

    If confirmed, can you commit to working with your colleagues, 
Congress and industry to ensure the transition to NextGen TV happens 
expeditiously and in a way that benefits television viewers?
    Answer. Yes.
FCC International Leadership/Standard Setting
    Question 1. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC), alongside 
other U.S. government agencies, is tasked with ensuring that American 
interests and values are effectively represented in these forums. Given 
the strategic importance of emerging technologies like 5G, satellite 
communications, and cybersecurity standards, U.S. engagement and 
leadership in global discussions is more important than ever.

    How do you view the FCC's role in international standard-setting 
bodies, and what steps can the Commission take to strengthen U.S. 
leadership in those forums?
    Answer. The FCC works in coordination with the State Department and 
NTIA to ensure that global standards align with U.S. regulatory 
frameworks and technical priorities to foster more efficient, cost 
effective and interoperable communications services around the world. 
To strengthen U.S. leadership in these global forums, the FCC can work 
with the State Department and NTIA to develop a unified U.S. strategy 
in advance of global meetings and conferences and support efforts to 
build coalitions among international allies and partners. This will 
help ensure the United States is better positioned to counter those 
seeking to undermine U.S. values and interests in global forums.

    Question 2. What are the risks if the U.S. does not actively 
participate or lead in global standard-setting conversations?
    Answer. If the U.S. does not actively participate or lead in global 
standards-setting forums, we risk losing our ability to lead in the 
development of next-generation communications technologies as well as 
our ability to lead in emerging technologies, such as artificial 
intelligence and quantum computing. Maintaining an active U.S. presence 
in these global forums is foundational to our continued ability to 
promote human flourishing, economic competitiveness, and national 
security.

    Question 3. How can the FCC better coordinate with other Federal 
agencies, like NTIA or the State Department, to present a unified U.S. 
position internationally?
    Answer. Coordination among the FCC, State Department, and NTIA is 
essential to advancing the United States' economic and national 
security interests abroad. This coordination can be guided by 
interagency working groups, memoranda of understanding, or joint 
strategic plans that define roles, responsibilities, and procedures for 
coordination and could provide strategic roadmaps for advancing U.S. 
interests in international forums.
                                 ______
                                 
    Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. John Curtis to 
                             Olivia Trusty
    Question 1. Local TV and radio stations are the backbone of our 
communities. They remain one of the last and best sources of local news 
in the areas they serve. But these local broadcasters are at risk of 
being left behind as FCC ownership rules--many of which predate the 
internet--limit their ability to compete with new forms of news 
consumption, like social media. Do you believe the FCC's media 
ownership rules are still appropriate in today's digital landscape? Why 
or why not?
    Answer. The media marketplace has changed dramatically over the 
last two decades. This change has been driven largely by technology 
advancements and changes in consumers preferences. Today, U.S. 
consumers now have access to a variety of programming options across 
multiple platforms, which makes for a more personalized television 
viewing experience.
    To ensure that local broadcasters and radio stations can compete 
and support their vital news gathering operations in the midst of this 
technological change, the FCC has a responsibility to modernize its 
regulatory framework to reflect the realities of this vibrant and 
dynamic media marketplace. Modern rules will better position local 
broadcasters and radio stations to compete for viewers, advertising 
revenues, and programming, which can ultimately foster greater 
investments into local news and investigative journalism in communities 
across the country.
                                 ______
                                 
Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Shelley Moore Capito to 

                             Olivia Trusty
R-DOF Transparency
    Question 1. Miss Trusty, thank you for your willingness to serve on 
the FCC. I enjoyed our conversation, and as I mentioned I care about 
the Rural Digital Opportunity Fund. I am looking forward to getting my 
Rural Broadband Protection Act signed into law, which will improve R-
DOF and other programs on the front end, but I have questions about how 
the program is being carried out right now.
    I would like to see a greater level of public reporting, such as 
state-by-state milestone reports for providers and their committed 
locations which would provide greater visibility into the progress of 
the program. This type of reporting would provide assurance that 
program participants are on track and expected to meet required 
milestones. Moreover, the FCC could detail its methods for performance 
testing and verify that service is being delivered as reported.

    Can you commit to working to improve transparency in R-DOF?
    Answer. Yes.
Designated Market Areas
    Question 2. I am glad to see the Chairman's ``Delete, delete, 
delete,'' effort underway. There are lots of burdensome regulations 
that the FCC should review. One that I have heard about from my state 
are Designated Market Area requirements for TV providers. Some parts of 
my state are forced to watch D.C. or Pittsburgh channels rather than 
West Virginia stations.

    Do you agree that D-M-A requirements should be reviewed?
    Answer. I agree that D-M-A requirements should be reviewed as part 
of efforts to expand access to local news in West Virginia and other 
states across the country.
Local Broadcasters
    Question 3. Staying on the broadcast topic, West Virginians trust 
and rely on their local stations more than any other media entity. 
Chairman Carr has stated that the local broadcast industry is at a 
``break glass moment.''

    Do you agree with that, and if so, what do you think can be done to 
ensure the industry's survival and allow it to better compete with the 
increasing threats from Big Tech in the marketplace?
    Answer. I agree with Chairman Carr that the local broadcast 
industry is at a ``break glass moment.'' To ensure local broadcasters 
can survive, I believe that the regulatory framework governing the U.S. 
media and video marketplace needs to be modernized to help broadcasters 
better compete against Big Tech for viewers, programming, and 
advertising revenues. I believe this will help increase localism and 
diversity, and advance the public interest in the media and video 
marketplace.
WV Visit
    Question 4. West Virginia is unlike any other state in terms of 
deploying broadband and if confirmed, I would like to host you in the 
state to get to see some of our challenges first hand.

    Can you commit to visiting West Virginia as a member of the FCC 
with me?
    Answer. Absolutely. I would be honored to visit West Virginia.
                                 ______
                                 
   Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Maria Cantwell to 
                             Olivia Trusty
    Local journalism. As discussed at your confirmation hearing, I 
believe local journalism is more important than ever, as are the local 
broadcast stations that serve their communities with access to trusted, 
on-the-ground news and reporting. The public deserves relevant, 
authentic local news that tells them what is happening in their 
communities.
    Our democracy relies on open debate, and no government official 
should use their authority to stifle reporting, interfere with 
editorial decisions, or undermine constitutional rights. To ensure that 
the public continues to have access to trusted, non-partisan 
information, we need to find ways to help broadcasters serve their 
communities free from government intimidation.

    Question 1. How can the Federal Communications Commission (FCC, the 
Commission) promote local journalism?
    Answer. The FCC can promote localism by modernizing the regulatory 
framework governing today's media marketplace. Modernizing rules can 
help local broadcasters and radio stations compete against Big Tech for 
viewers, advertising revenues, and programming. Broadcasters can then 
be better positioned to invest more resources into local news and 
investigative journalism in communities across the country.

    Question 2. Would modernizing FCC regulations like the treatment of 
virtual multichannel video programming distributors (vMVPDs) help level 
the playing field for local journalism?
    Answer. It is important for the FCC to conduct a holistic review of 
FCC regulations governing the media marketplace and modernize those 
rules based on information in the record. Such information will likely 
inform how the FCC should move forward to best increase the 
availability of local news and enhance local broadcasters' ability to 
compete against vMVPDs.

    Media and Free Speech Protections. Free speech is paramount under 
our laws, but we have witnessed the Trump Administration's efforts to 
target major outlets and smaller broadcast stations alike in repeated 
attacks against the truth. President Trump's FCC Chair, for example, 
has launched unprecedented attacks on the freedom of the press, using 
sham investigations to pressure and harass regulated companies in an 
effort to intimidate and bully them into submission.

    Question 1. Do you believe that the FCC should be weaponized 
against media organizations?
    Answer. No.

    Question 2. Will you reject efforts by the Commission to impede or 
restrict the freedom of the press?
    Answer. Yes.

    Question 3. Should the FCC exercise its regulatory powers, 
including but not limited to merger approvals, spectrum authorization, 
and licensing authority, to threaten companies simply if they do not 
agree with the current administration?
    Answer. No.

    Affordable Connectivity Program. The Affordable Connectivity 
Program (ACP) helped 23 million households pay for essential broadband 
service before it ran out of funding last year. I have long been 
concerned that we don't have the right strategy to make broadband 
affordable for all Americans.

    Question 1. Ms. Trusty, you said that affordable broadband was one 
of your top priorities. How will you accomplish this at the FCC?
    Answer. If confirmed, I will work to expand access to affordable 
broadband by promoting more competition and choice in the broadband 
marketplace. I believe that more choice in the marketplace will lead to 
lower prices for consumers. I will also work to remove regulatory 
barriers that increase the cost of deploying broadband for providers 
and ultimately increase the cost of purchasing broadband services for 
consumers.

    Question 2. Do you believe that the ACP should be renewed?
    Answer. I support the Committee's continued efforts to expand 
access to affordable broadband. I would ultimately defer to Congress as 
to whether the ACP should be renewed.

    Universal Service Fund. Promoting universal access to 
telecommunications services is one of the FCC's core principles. In 
Section 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, Congress 
directed the FCC to advance universal access to telecommunications 
services that are essential to education, public health, or public 
safety, and that are consistent with the public interest, convenience, 
and necessity. Yet the Universal Service Fund (USF) is at risk due to 
legal challenges to the FCC's ability to administer the Fund, and to 
Congress's right to direct the FCC to advance the goals of universal 
service. Moreover, a bipartisan group of members of this Committee has 
been working to ensure that the FCC can continue in its mission to 
offer connectivity to modern communications for all.

    Question 1. Yes or no: Will you support the Commission's efforts to 
advance universal service, consistent with the public interest, 
convenience, and necessity, for services essential to education, public 
health, and public safety?
    Answer. Yes.

    Question 2. While I am aware that the issue is currently being 
litigated, do you believe that Section 254 and the USF are legal?
    Answer. It would be imprudent for me to prejudge the legality of an 
issue that is currently being challenged before the Supreme Court.

    Free and Open Internet. Connectivity in the 21st Century depends 
upon access to a free and open Internet that protects consumers, 
competition, and innovation, and promotes public safety and national 
security. As the expert agency on communications, the FCC's policies 
must advance access to broadband without preference for any content or 
traffic online, and without favoring any particular service, 
technology, or provider.

    Question 1. Should Internet service providers be allowed to block 
websites or content?
    Answer. I believe that Congress is best positioned to determine the 
rules governing Internet service providers' network management 
practices to ensure the continuation of a highly competitive, robust, 
and innovative Internet economy that is available to all Americans. If 
confirmed, I would welcome the opportunity to be a part of any 
legislative effort related to this issue.

    Question 2. Should Internet service providers be allowed to 
prioritize a website or a service by speeding it up or slowing down 
other content in exchange for payment?
    Answer. I believe that Congress is best positioned to determine the 
rules governing Internet service providers' network management 
practices to ensure the continuation of a highly competitive, robust, 
and innovative Internet economy that is available to all Americans. If 
confirmed, I would welcome the opportunity to be a part of any 
legislative effort related to this issue.

    Question 3. Since the first Trump Administration repealed net 
neutrality rules in 2017, the FCC has received approximately 40,000 
consumer complaints about Internet service providers concerning 
``speed, throttling, open internet, and data cap'' concerns. Do you 
believe the FCC has a role to play in addressing these complaints?
    Answer. The FCC has a responsibility to investigate consumer 
complaints and act as necessary in accordance with facts in the record, 
FCC precedent, and the FCC's authorities under the law.

    Tribal Coordination and Outreach. Washington State is home to 29 
federally recognized Tribes, each with their own Tribal government 
working to preserve culture, protect resources, and improve the lives 
of those in their communities. Accessing modern communications like 
broadband is an essential tool for advancing these goals and requires 
coordination at the local, state, and Federal level.

    Question 1. Yes or no: Do you commit to working with Tribal 
governments on broadband connectivity and deployment issues relevant to 
their communities?
    Answer. Yes.

    Question 2. If confirmed, will you advance policies at the FCC that 
recognize the sovereignty of Tribal governments and encourage 
coordination with Tribal representatives?
    Answer. Yes

    Question 3. Recently, the Commission has invested in targeted 
outreach efforts to increase participation of Tribal libraries in the 
E-Rate program. If confirmed, what steps will you commit to continuing 
to prioritize support for Tribal libraries? What steps will you take to 
ensure such outreach continues, and what recommendations will you make 
to improve the Commission's efforts?
    Answer. The Universal Service Fund and the programs it supports are 
facing an uncertain future, in part, because of a shrinking 
contribution base. If confirmed, I commit to working with Congress and 
interested stakeholders to identify a ``specific, predictable, and 
sufficient'' form of support that empowers the FCC to continue 
addressing connectivity needs across the country, including the 
connectivity needs of Tribal libraries. I also commit to making 
recommendations and working within the Commission to streamline 
application processes, provide technical assistance, and promote the 
availability of digital literacy and workforce development programs in 
Tribal communities to improve the Commission's efforts to expand access 
to modern communications services in these areas.

    988. In recent years, the FCC has played an integral role in 
expanding access to 988--The Suicide & Crisis Lifeline, first by 
designating a three-digit number to make it easier for those in crisis 
to reach help, then by supporting texting to 988, and most recently by 
implementing geo-routing to route callers to their closest 988 call 
center. Yet the Trump Administration's cuts to the Federal workforce, 
including massive cuts at the Department of Health and Human Services, 
threaten to cripple support and staffing resources for 988, cutting off 
access to critical mental health services, including for the LGBTQIA+ 
community, veterans, and Spanish speakers.

    Question 1. If confirmed, will you support policies at the FCC that 
will continue to promote and expand access to 988 for all who need it, 
regardless of background, sex, gender, race, or creed?
    Answer. Yes.

    Robocalls and Robotexts. In your testimony, you pledged to protect 
consumers from illegal robocalls. Washingtonians receive tens of 
millions of robocalls each month, and one study in 2024 suggests that 
Washington consumers are among those who receive the most spam calls in 
the country. Unwanted text messages are also a growing nuisance.

    Question 1. How will you work to reduce the number of unwanted, and 
often fraudulent, robocalls for all Americans, including consumers in 
Washington State?
    Answer. If confirmed, I will work with Congress to help strengthen 
the FCC's authorities to combat unwanted and fraudulent robocalls. I 
will also work with international partners as well as state attorneys 
general to protect consumers from these abusive calls. If confirmed, I 
also commit to supporting efforts to develop more proactive call 
blocking measures to prevent robocalls from reaching consumers in the 
first place.

    Question 2. Do you support regulations that work to reduce the 
number of spam text messages?
    Answer. I support the idea that new regulations may be necessary to 
reduce the number of spam text messages.

    Cyber Security. The United States has been under increasing cyber-
attacks by hostile foreign powers, notably China and Russia. Last year, 
Chinese hackers, as part of the Salt Typhoon attack, hacked into U.S. 
telecom networks and monitored phone calls and text messages, targeting 
prominent figures, including Vice President J.D. Vance.

    Question 1. What is the FCC's role in mitigating attacks like Salt 
Typhoon, and what should the FCC do to help prevent future attacks?
    Answer. To mitigate future attacks like Salt Typhoon, the FCC has a 
responsibility to work with Federal partners to ensure 
telecommunications providers have the tools and resources they need to 
defend their networks against malicious cyber threat actors. To prevent 
future attacks, I believe the FCC should participate in ongoing whole-
of-government conversations about how to improve the efficacy of the 
United States' deterrence efforts against nation state actors. The FCC 
should also work with Federal partners and the private sector to 
diversify and strengthen the U.S. domestic supply chain for 
telecommunications network components to increase the security of the 
Nation's communications infrastructure.

    Public Media. Public media provides a vital community service by 
offering local content, breaking news, and weather. But public 
television and radio stations are under attack by the Trump FCC, where 
the current Chair has initiated sham investigations to intimidate 
public media organizations that the President has deemed unfavorable.

    Question 1. If confirmed, will you support policies that promote 
and preserve public media in communities across the country?
    Answer. If confirmed, I commit to ensuring that public media can 
operate in accordance with the law.

    FCC Independence. Congress established the FCC to oversee some of 
the most important institutions in our society, including the media 
industry. Because of this influence, the FCC is an independent agency 
and not subject to direct presidential control.
    President Trump is now wrongfully trying to bring independent 
agencies under his control, recently firing the two Democratic 
commissioners at the Federal Trade Commission, another independent 
agency.

    Question 1. Do you believe it is important for the FCC to be 
independent of the President?
    Answer. Whether agencies like the FCC are legally independent from 
the Executive Branch is subject to pending litigation. Whatever the 
FCC's legal status is determined to be, my commitment to this Committee 
and to Congress is that I will follow the facts in the record, FCC 
precedent, and the law with respect to any proceeding before the 
Commission, if confirmed.

    Question 2. Do you believe that the FCC benefits by having both 
Democratic and Republican Commissioners to debate and decide on policy 
and regulatory issues?
    Answer. If confirmed, I will strive to reach consensus with 
everyone and anyone at the FCC in carrying out the agency's mission.

    Question 3. If confirmed, do you commit to carrying out your duties 
independently?
    Answer. If confirmed, I will be guided by the facts in the record, 
FCC precedent, and the law with respect to any proceeding before the 
Commission.

    Question 4. Would you support the President's firing of an FCC 
Commissioner due solely to their political affiliation?
    Answer. I would defer to the President, the Senate, and the Courts 
regarding the oversight and management of nominees.

    Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion. President Trump's FCC Chair has 
initiated a startling display of agency overreach by sending letters to 
three regulated companies--Comcast-NBCUniversal, Verizon, and Disney/
ABC--informing them of investigations into their DEI practices. These 
letters, which cite concerns about each company's compliance with the 
FCC's equal employment opportunities rules, target policies that the 
Chair labels as ``invidious forms of DEI discrimination'' when they are 
in fact focused on encouraging and cultivating business opportunities 
for a diverse and qualified workforce.

    Question 1. Do you agree that a private company should be able to 
make a business decision to prioritize diversity free from FCC 
interference and second-guessing?
    Answer. In accordance with Section 151 of the Communications Act, 
the FCC has a responsibility to make sure communications services are 
available to all Americans without discrimination on the basis of 
protected characteristics, including ``race, color, national origin, or 
sex''. The FCC also has a responsibility to enforce civil rights 
protections contained in Sections 334 and 554 of the Communications Act 
regarding equal employment opportunity. If confirmed, my commitment is 
to uphold and enforce the law.

    Bipartisan cooperation. Nominees to fill open seats on independent 
commissions are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate. 
This Committee has long worked with the White House to ensure that 
there is bipartisan cooperation when there are vacant seats to be 
filled by both parties.

    Question 1. Yes or no: Will you commit to working with this 
Committee and responding to any inquiries, regardless of party?
    Answer. Yes.

    Question 2. Yes or no: Do you support having a fully staffed FCC 
with five Commissioners, including two Democrats?
    Answer. If confirmed, my job will be to work with everyone and 
anyone at the FCC to carry out the mission of the agency. I would defer 
to the President, the Senate, and the Courts on the oversight and 
management of FCC nominees.

    Question 3. Yes or no: Do you think the American people benefit 
from having a fully staffed FCC?
    Answer. I believe that the American people benefit when the FCC 
operates efficiently in carrying out its mission; is responsive to the 
connectivity needs of unserved or underserved communities across the 
country; and is a good steward of taxpayer dollars.

    Tariffs. President Trump's tariffs are raising the cost of living, 
crashing the stock market, and causing uncertainty for our business 
community.
    Ms. Trusty, you spoke about the importance of affordable broadband. 
A recent study by Price Waterhouse Coopers found that these tariffs 
could raise costs in the telecom and technology sectors by $126 
billion.

    Question 1. Yes or no: Do you think that these tariffs will make 
broadband less affordable?
    Answer. I am not an economic or finance policy expert and cannot 
offer an informed opinion on tariffs. That said, I have full faith and 
confidence in President Trump and his team to address trade imbalances 
that ultimately benefit the Nation's long-term domestic economic 
interests.

    Question 2. Yes or no: Do you think that tariffs will make 
broadband more expensive to deploy?
    Answer. I am not an economic or finance policy expert and cannot 
offer an informed opinion on tariffs. That said, I have full faith and 
confidence in President Trump and his team to address trade imbalances 
that ultimately benefit the Nation's long-term domestic economic 
interests.

    Question 3. Yes or no: Do you think that tariffs will increase 
costs for entities participating the USF's High Cost program? If so, 
how should the Commission address those increased costs?
    Answer. I am not an economic or finance policy expert and cannot 
offer an informed opinion on tariffs. That said, I have full faith and 
confidence in President Trump and his team to address trade imbalances 
that ultimately benefit the Nation's long-term domestic economic 
interests.
    As a general matter, to address any unanticipated increased costs 
in the USF High Cost program, the FCC should focus on removing Federal 
regulatory barriers, and working with states and localities to remove 
state and local regulatory barriers, to reduce the cost of broadband 
deployment. The FCC should also work to strengthen and diversify the 
Nation's domestic supply chain to promote more competition and choice 
in telecommunications components and equipment, which can further 
reduce the cost of broadband projects in the USF High Cost program.

    Question 4. Yes or no: Do you think that tariffs will increase 
costs for entities participating the USF's E-Rate program? If so, how 
should the Commission address those increased costs?
    Answer. I am not an economic or finance policy expert and cannot 
offer an informed opinion on tariffs. That said, I have full faith and 
confidence in President Trump and his team to address trade imbalances 
that ultimately benefit the Nation's long-term domestic economic 
interests.
    As a general matter, to address any unanticipated increased costs 
in the E-Rate program, the FCC should focus on removing Federal 
regulatory barriers, and working with states and localities to remove 
state and local regulatory barriers, to reduce the cost of broadband 
deployment to schools and libraries. The FCC should also work to 
strengthen and diversify the Nation's domestic supply chain to promote 
more competition and choice in telecommunications components and 
equipment, which can further reduce the cost of broadband projects to 
schools and libraries.

    Question 5. Yes or no: Do you think that tariffs will increase 
costs for entities participating the USF's Lifeline program? If so, how 
should the Commission address those increased costs?
    Answer. I am not an economic or finance policy expert and cannot 
offer an informed opinion on tariffs. That said, I have full faith and 
confidence in President Trump and his team to address trade imbalances 
that ultimately benefit the Nation's long-term domestic economic 
interests.
    As a general matter, to address any unanticipated increased costs 
in the Lifeline program, the FCC should focus on removing Federal 
regulatory barriers, and working with states and localities to remove 
state and local regulatory barriers, to reduce the cost of broadband 
deployment, which will ultimately reduce costs for end-users. The FCC 
should also work to strengthen and diversify the Nation's domestic 
supply chain to promote more competition and choice in 
telecommunications components and equipment, which can further reduce 
the cost of broadband projects, and reduce the cost of broadband 
services for low-income consumers.

    Question 6. Yes or no: Do you think that tariffs will increase 
costs for entities participating the Universal Service Fund's Rural 
Health Care program? If so, how should the Commission address those 
increased costs?
    Answer. I am not an economic or finance policy expert and cannot 
offer an informed opinion on tariffs. That said, I have full faith and 
confidence in President Trump and his team to address trade imbalances 
that ultimately benefit the Nation's long-term domestic economic 
interests.
    As a general matter, to address any unanticipated increased costs 
in the USF Rural Health Care program, the FCC should focus on removing 
Federal regulatory barriers, and working with states and localities to 
remove state and local regulatory barriers, to reduce the cost of 
broadband deployment projects that support access to health care in 
rural communities. The FCC should also work to strengthen and diversify 
the Nation's domestic supply chain to promote more competition and 
choice in telecommunications components and equipment, which can 
further reduce the cost of broadband projects and promote access to 
health care in unserved or underserved communities.

    Question 7. Yes or no: Do you think that tariffs will increase 
costs for entities participating in the FCC's Secure and Trusted 
Communications Networks Reimbursement Program? If so, how should the 
Commission address those increased costs? Will Congress need to 
appropriate additional funds to remove untrusted Chinese telecom 
equipment from U.S. networks?
    Answer. I am not an economic or finance policy expert and cannot 
offer an informed opinion on tariffs. That said, I have full faith and 
confidence in President Trump and his team to address trade imbalances 
that ultimately benefit the Nation's long-term domestic economic 
interests.
    As a general matter, to address any unanticipated increased costs 
in the FCC's Secure and Trusted Communications Networks Reimbursement 
Program, the FCC should promote the adoption of Open RAN technologies 
to diversify and strengthen the Nation's domestic supply chain. This 
can help promote more competition and reduce the cost of 
telecommunications equipment. To my knowledge, there is not a current 
need for Congress to appropriate additional funds to remove untrusted 
Chinese telecom equipment from U.S. networks.

    Spectrum. During the first Trump Administration, there were 
failures to coordinate on Federal and commercial spectrum policy.
    I believe we must create a coordinated approach to domestic 
spectrum policy, where agencies such as the Federal Aviation 
Administration, Department of Transportation (DOT), Department of 
Defense (DoD), and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration work 
together with the National Telecommunications and Information 
Administration (NTIA) and FCC--cooperatively--on spectrum.

    Question 1. How should the FCC coordinate spectrum auctions with 
Federal agencies, if authority is reinstated, to ensure that critical 
Federal systems and capabilities are not compromised or diminished?
    Answer. I believe that the FCC should coordinate with NTIA and 
consult with impacted Federal agencies, through established mechanisms 
such as the Interdepartment Radio Advisory Committee to ensure that 
spectrum management decisions, including auctions, are informed by 
economic and national security analyses.

    Question 2. Yes or no: Do you agree that we cannot put our national 
security and public safety at risk to free up spectrum for sale to the 
commercial sector?
    Answer. Yes.

    Question 3. Yes or no: Do you agree that proper coordination of 
spectrum use is vital?
    Answer. I agree that coordination between the FCC and NTIA on 
spectrum, as well as consultation with impacted Federal agencies, is 
vital to putting spectrum to highest and best use and advancing the 
Nation's economic and national security interests.

    Question 4. Do you think it's wise to auction Federal spectrum 
before technical studies are finished to determine the viability of 
relocating Federal systems?
    Answer. I believe that technical studies can help inform the 
spectrum management process and ensure that both NTIA and the FCC are 
putting spectrum to its highest and best use, in support of the 
Nation's economic and national security interests.

    Question 5. If confirmed, will you commit to collaborating on a 
spectrum policy that engages stakeholders from NTIA and the Department 
of Commerce, DoD, DOT, and industry, to work towards resolution to 
restore U.S. leadership in innovation?
    Answer. Yes.

    Question 6. Do you believe that spectrum reallocation studies in 
the Lower 3 GHz and 7/8 GHz need to be completed before the FCC begins 
a proceeding to auction those bands?
    Answer. Given that this is an active topic of debate before 
Congress, I would defer to Congress on how the technical studies of 
these bands should inform spectrum management processes at NTIA and the 
FCC.

    Question 7. Do you agree that if the DoD is required to surrender 
use of a band of frequencies for which the DoD is the primary user that 
the NTIA must make available, if necessary, an alternative band of 
frequencies as replacement for the band being surrendered as described 
in Section 1062(b)(1)(B) of the 2000 NDAA?
    Answer. I agree that Section 1062 (b)(1)(B) of the FY 2000 NDAA 
states the following: ``If, in order to make available for other use a 
band of frequencies of which it is a primary user, the Department of 
Defense is required to surrender use of such band of frequencies, the 
Department shall not surrender use of such band of frequencies until: 
the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, in 
consultation with the Federal Communications Commission, identifies and 
makes available to the Department for its primary use, if necessary, an 
alternative band or bands of frequencies as a replacement for the band 
to be so surrendered.''

    Question 8. Do you agree that the Secretary of Commerce, the 
Secretary of Defense, and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff 
must jointly certify to the Committee on Armed Services and the 
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate, and 
the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Commerce of the 
House of Representatives that the alternative band that is made 
available to the DoD provides comparable technical characteristics to 
restore essential military capability that will be lost as a result of 
the band of frequencies to be so surrendered as described in Section 
1062(b)(1)(B) of the 2000 NDAA?
    Answer. Yes.

    Question 9. Did this process occur in advance of FCC Auction 110 of 
the 3.45 to 3.55 GHz Band where the DoD was the primary user?
    Answer. I was not at the FCC during this time and therefore cannot 
speak to what processes did or did not occur in advance of Auction 110.

    Question 10. Will you commit to me that you will follow the law and 
not vote to auction a band of frequencies where the DoD is the primary 
user unless and until the process as described in Section 1062(b)(1)(B) 
of the 2000 NDAA is completed?
    Answer. If confirmed, I commit to following the law with respect to 
any proceeding that comes before the Commission.

    Section 230. Congress passed Section 230 in 1996 to provide a 
liability shield for the then-nascent Internet industry. While there 
have been discussions in Congress about updating the law, the FCC has 
rejected the idea that it has the authority to enforce Section 230 
since it was passed nearly 30 years ago. But the current FCC Chairman 
is now talking about attempting to interpret the law to say that the 
FCC can police what is said online, and that they will do so to favor 
conservative voices online.

    Question 1. Do you agree that it is Congress's role, not the FCC's, 
to update Section 230?
    Answer. I agree that Congress has the authority to amend or update 
Section 230 in the Communications Act.

    Question 2. Do you believe that online platforms have First 
Amendment rights?
    Answer. Yes.

    Mapping. It is critical that we have the best data to make 
important decisions about where to expend taxpayer funds for broadband 
deployment. While the FCC has improved its broadband maps over the last 
few years, more remains to be done. I am particularly concerned that 
the current maps wholly rely on providers' assertions about the speed 
and availability of their service.

    Question 1. Will you commit to working with me and this committee 
to continue to improve the FCC's broadband maps?
    Answer. Yes.
                                 ______
                                 
   Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Amy Klobuchar to 
                             Olivia Trusty
Next Generation 9-1-1
    Our 9-1-1 systems are outdated and in need of significant upgrades. 
As co-chair of the Senate Next Generation 9-1-1 Caucus, I've been 
working to secure funding to modernize America's 9-1-1 call centers 
through spectrum auction proceeds.

    Question 1. Do you agree we need to modernize our 9-1-1 
infrastructure?
    Answer. Yes.

    Question 2. If confirmed, will you commit to working with Congress 
to ensure America's 911 Centers have the cybersecurity, resiliency, and 
interoperability that Next Generation 911 technology provides?
    Answer. Yes.

    Question 3. What concrete measures should the FCC prioritize to 
promote Next Generation 9-1-1 deployment?
    Answer. To promote Next Generation 9-1-1 (NG911) deployment, the 
FCC can do the following: proactively enforce Commission rules against 
fee diversion to ensure resources are available for NG911 deployment; 
support the development of interoperability standards between states 
and localities to ensure nationwide NG911 interoperability; and promote 
public awareness and education about the benefits of NG911 technology 
to incentivize greater investments into the technology.
                                 ______
                                 
    Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Brian Schatz to 
                             Olivia Trusty
DOGE Access to FCC
    Reports have found that individuals identified as employees of DOGE 
have been listed in a public directory for FCC staff. Within the scope 
of FCC's jurisdiction includes policy and regulatory matters, including 
broadband and satellite communications, of relevance to Elon Musk's 
business interests.

    Question 1. Will you commit to ensuring that DOGE employees are 
conducting activities that do not pose any conflicts of interest with 
Elon Musk's business interests?
    Answer. If confirmed, I commit to acting without fear or favor 
toward any individual or entity petitioning the FCC for a certain 
outcome regarding any proceeding before the Commission regardless of 
who is employed at the FCC or any other Federal agencies.

    Question 2. Will you commit to ensuring DOGE employees abide by 
appropriate cybersecurity standards and data access restrictions if 
provided access to internal FCC systems and information?
    Answer. If confirmed, I commit to abiding by cybersecurity 
standards and data access restrictions to internal FCC systems and 
information, and ensuring that all individuals under my authority do 
the same.
White House Oversight of Independent Agencies
    On February 18, 2025, President Trump announced an Executive Order 
(EO) entitled, ``Ensuring Accountability for All Agencies.'' The EO 
institutes an unprecedented requirement for direct presidential 
oversight over actions and strategic plans by independent agencies, 
including the FCC.

    Question 3. As Commissioner, will you commit to upholding the 
independence of decision making at the FCC?
    Answer. If confirmed, I commit to making decisions based on facts 
in the record, FCC precedent, and the law.
Federal Trust Responsibility to Tribal and Native Communities
    It is critical that the United States continues to uphold its trust 
responsibility to Tribal and Native communities.

    Question 4. Please provide a description of your understanding of 
the Federal trust responsibility to American Indians, Alaska Natives, 
and Native Hawaiians, and how that necessitates continuance of programs 
that directly and indirectly serve these communities.
    Answer. The Federal Indian trust responsibility is a legally 
enforceable fiduciary obligation on the part of the United States to 
protect tribal treaty rights, lands, assets, and resources, as well as 
a duty to carry out the mandates of Federal law with respect to 
American Indian, Native Hawaiian, and Alaska Native tribes and 
villages.

    Question 5. At FCC, will you commit to upholding this trust 
responsibility?
    Answer. Yes.

    Question 6. Yes or no, will you commit to holding Tribal 
consultation before the FCC makes changes to programs that serve 
Tribes, or engages in Reductions in Force and agency reorganization 
efforts that may affect Tribes and service on Tribal lands?
    Answer. If confirmed, I commit to consulting with a wide range of 
stakeholders, including Tribes, on proceedings that come before the 
FCC.

    Question 7. Yes or no, will you continue to abide by the NTIA-FCC-
Department of the Interior Tribal Spectrum Memorandum of Understanding 
(MOU)?
    Answer. If confirmed, I commit to abiding by any and all MOUs in 
force and effect that involve the FCC's coordination with other Federal 
agencies.

    Question 8. Given the growing competition for mid-band spectrum 
between military and commercial users, how should policymakers view 
Tribal governments in this dynamic?
    Answer. Given that spectrum is a finite resource, policymakers 
should always strive to put spectrum to its highest and best use and 
maximize the economic and societal benefits of spectrum use to ensure 
the best return for all people across the country, including those 
living on Tribal lands.

    Question 9. Do Tribes represent a unique category of spectrum 
stakeholders, and what role does direct access to spectrum for them 
play in expanding competition in underserved areas?
    Answer. In Auction 108 (2.5 GHz), the FCC established a Tribal 
priority window in recognition of the unique connectivity needs and 
challenges facing Tribal lands. This particular auction can help inform 
how future opportunities for direct access to spectrum in Tribal 
communities can expand competition in unserved or underserved areas.

    Question 10. Yes or no, will you commit to maintaining the Office 
of Native Affairs and Policy at the FCC?
    Answer. If confirmed, I commit to working with the hardworking and 
dedicated staff at the FCC to address the Nation's connectivity needs 
across the country, including on Tribal lands.

    Question 11. Yes or no, will you commit to issuing internal 
guidance clarifying that Executive Order 14151 does not apply to Tribes 
and Tribal programs, as well as services and staff associated with the 
Commission's government-to-government relationship with Tribes?
    Answer. If confirmed, I commit to upholding and enforcing the law, 
which requires the FCC to make communications services available across 
the country without discrimination on the basis of protected 
characteristics. I also commit to promoting policies that acknowledge 
and support the unique connectivity needs of individuals, families, and 
communities living in rural and remote areas, including Tribal lands.
Next Generation Television/ATSC 3.0
    In 2023, I co-authored a bipartisan letter, signed by 28 senators, 
to the FCC urging the Commission to take an active role in a successful 
ATSC 3.0 transition. This transition will play an important role in 
supporting the competitiveness of local TV broadcasters and the 
services they provide to their communities, including expanded local 
news, advanced emergency alerting, and improved viewer experience.

    Question 12. Will you commit to ensuring that the FCC provides a 
timely regulatory framework and next steps for this initiative?
    Answer. If confirmed, I commit to working to ensure that the FCC 
provides a timely regulatory framework and next steps for this 
initiative.

    Question 13. Will you commit to ensuring the FCC takes an active 
role in addressing potential challenges posed by the transition from 
ATSC 1.0 to 3.0, including working with Congress, public broadcasters, 
industry, and consumer groups to ensure that consumers with legacy TVs 
are not harmed by any changes?
    Answer. Yes.
                                 ______
                                 
   Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Edward Markey to 
                             Olivia Trusty
Disability Accessibility
    People with disabilities rely on accessible services, including 
Telecommunications Relay Services, audio description, and accessible 
software to communicate and access video programming. The FCC has been 
tasked by Congress in numerous laws to ensure telecommunications and 
video programming providers make their services and products 
accessibility to people with disabilities.

    Question 1. If confirmed, will you commit to carrying out these 
laws and to ensuring the FCC fully enforces the laws within its 
jurisdiction, including the Communications and Video Accessibility Act?
    Answer. Yes.

    Question 2. If confirmed, will you ensure that the FCC itself 
maintains accessible websites, facilities, and services so that the 
public and employees with disabilities can fully benefit from, 
participate in, and contribute to the FCC's work?
    Answer. Yes.

    Question 3. If confirmed, will you commit to ensuring that people 
with disabilities continue to be able to access emerging communications 
services as technology evolves?
    Answer. If confirmed, I commit to working to ensure that people 
with disabilities can continue to access emerging communications 
services consistent with the law and the scope of the FCC's authority.
                                 ______
                                 
    Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Gary Peters to 
                             Olivia Trusty
FCC Independence
    Question 1. The FCC website states that the FCC is ``an independent 
U.S. government agency overseen by Congress.'' We have unfortunately 
seen this President undermine independent agencies by illegally firing 
Democratic commissioners at the Federal Trade Commission.

    a. Do you agree that the FCC is an independent agency?
    Answer. Whether Federal agencies like the FCC are legally 
independent from the Executive Branch is subject to pending litigation. 
Whatever the FCC's legal status is determined to be, if confirmed, I 
commit to following the facts in the record, FCC precedent, and the law 
with respect to any proceeding that comes before the Commission.

    b. What protections and practices make the FCC an independent 
agency?
    Answer. Whether Federal agencies like the FCC are legally 
independent from the Executive Branch is subject to pending litigation. 
Whatever the FCC's legal status is determined to be, if confirmed, I 
commit to following the facts in the record, FCC precedent, and the law 
with respect to any proceeding that comes before the Commission.

    c. If confirmed, will you commit to carrying out the FCC's mission 
free from undue influence or control from the President?
    Answer. If confirmed, I commit to following the facts in the 
record, FCC precedent, and the law with respect to any proceeding that 
comes before the Commission.
Weaponization of the FCC
    Question 2. President Trump has suggested on multiple occasions 
that licenses for major news organizations like CBS, ABC or NBC should 
be revoked when they conducted reporting he disagreed with. However, 
under the first amendment, major news organizations can and should 
publish news that is inconvenient or critical of politicians--including 
the President--without fear of retaliation.
    This isn't a partisan concern either--in 2017 former FCC Chairman 
Ajit Pai said: ``Under the law, the FCC does not have the authority to 
revoke a license of a broadcast station based on the content of a 
particular newscast.''
    If confirmed, will you oppose any attempt to weaponize the FCC to 
intimidate news media or limit freedom of the press?
    Answer. Yes.
Public Broadcasting and Emergencies
    Question 3. Public television and radio stations play an integral 
role in our Nation's emergency alert system. In 2022, FEMA selected CPB 
to administer the Next Generation Warning System (NGWS) grant program, 
providing public media stations funding to replace and upgrade 
infrastructure to expand alert, warning, and interoperable 
communications, creating a more resilient and secure public alerting 
system during emergencies.
    Delta College Public Media, which serves a largely rural and 
underserved audience in the crook of Michigan's thumb, received a grant 
allocation of up to $976,708 under this program. Modernizing emergency 
communications to be able to reach underserved areas is becoming 
increasingly crucial--particularly with recent ice storms in northern 
Michigan causing widespread power outages and a complete wipeout of 
phone and cellular services.
    If confirmed, do you commit to working to preserve this important 
funding stream to CPB and supporting public media stations' efforts to 
reach underserved communities during emergencies?
    Answer. If confirmed, I commit to ensuring that public media can 
operate in accordance with the law. I would defer to Congress on 
preserving funding streams to CPB as the FCC has no authority over 
these funds.
Public Broadcasting Community Good
    Question 4. Public broadcasting plays an essential role in local 
news and programming, education, public safety, and more. For 2025, 
Congress appropriated $535 million to the CPB, which is less than 1/
100th of a percent out of the total budget and costs, on average, only 
$1.50 per American per year.
    In my state, the Michigan Learning Channel is a publicly funded 
statewide initiative to improve math and literacy, and I always like 
watching Michigan Out-of-Doors, a program which promotes the outdoor 
recreation and beauty our state has to offer.
    Do you agree that public media plays an essential role in 
communities that traditional profit-based broadcasters are not able to 
fill?
    Answer. Public television was formally created in the late 1960s 
through the Public Broadcasting Act to serve and promote cultural, 
educational, and civic engagement. The FCC has a responsibility to 
ensure that public media (i.e., non-commercial stations) operate 
legally and in the public interest. I would defer to Congress as to 
whether public media plays an essential role in today's video and media 
marketplace.
Support for USF
    Question 5. You discussed in your testimony and during the hearing 
that one of your primary goals on the FCC will be closing the digital 
divide.
    One of the FCC's most powerful tools to that end has been the 
Universal Service Fund, which supports rural broadband, Internet access 
at schools and libraries, affordability, and more. As a member of the 
bipartisan USF Working Group, I know reforms are needed to make this 
fund sustainable for decades to come. Unfortunately, the USF has been 
under attack.
    Do you agree that the Universal Service Fund is a vital resource 
that must be maintained in some form if we are to close the digital 
divide?
    Answer. If confirmed, I commit to advancing and preserving 
universal service, as required by Section 254 of the Communications 
Act, to meet the connectivity needs of all Americans. I also commit to 
working with Congress to identify a ``specific, predictable, and 
sufficient'' form of support for the FCC to continue expanding access 
to modern communications services to communities across the country.
                                 ______
                                 
   Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Tammy Baldwin to 
                             Olivia Trusty
1. Robocalls and Scams
    Robocalls and ever increasingly sophisticated scams pose a serious 
threat to millions of Americans, especially to our seniors. These scams 
can lead to significant financial losses including people losing their 
life's retirement savings, breach of sensitive personal information, 
and loss of peace of mind as people are bombarded by these spam 
communications.
    As Commissioner of the FCC, how would you work to protect Americans 
from these increasingly dangerous scam calls and text messages?
    Answer. If confirmed, I will work with Congress to help strengthen 
the FCC's authorities to combat unwanted and fraudulent robocalls. I 
will also work with international partners as well as state attorneys 
general to protect consumers from these abusive calls. I will also 
support efforts to develop more proactive call blocking measures to 
prevent robocalls from reaching consumers in the first place.
2. Local Programming
    Unfortunately, Wisconsin is home to a number of ``orphan counties'' 
who find themselves put into out of state television media markets and 
are unable to access local programming such as local news and local 
sports.
    If confirmed, will you work with my office to address the issue of 
``orphan counties'' and help ensure Americans are able to obtain access 
to local, relevant television programming?
    Answer. Yes.
3. Rural Connectivity
    In your testimony you emphasized the importance of quality Internet 
connection for people to fully participate in our increasingly digital 
economy.
    As Commissioner, how would you work to increase broadband 
connectivity in rural areas? Additionally, how would you ensure that 
connectivity is financially accessible?
    Answer. If confirmed, I would work to increase broadband 
connectivity in rural areas by doing the following: coordinating with 
other Federal agencies with broadband programs to eliminate program 
fragmentation and duplication across the Federal government and ensure 
Federal resources are better targeted to unserved areas; remove 
regulatory barriers that impede or increase the cost of deploying 
broadband to rural areas; embrace new technologies such as satellite 
broadband or fixed wireless services that can provide a more cost 
effective solution in expanding connectivity to rural, unserved areas; 
and consider adjustments to USF programs to better target resources to 
unserved communities.
    To ensure connectivity is financially accessibility or affordable, 
if confirmed, I will work to promote more competition and choice in the 
broadband marketplace, which can improve the quality of service and 
reduce costs for consumers. I will also work to remove regulatory 
barriers that increase the cost of deploying broadband for providers 
and increase the cost of purchasing broadband services for consumers.
4. 988-lifeline
    The 988-lifeline program is a vital resource for Americans, 
offering support in critical times of need. LGBTQ+ people, especially 
youth, experience increasing rates of suicide, with these individuals 
being 8.4 times more likely to have reported an attempt to end their 
lives.
    To continue to support all Americans in times of need, will you 
commit to ensuring all existing FCC support services and resources for 
LGBTQ+ people will remain accessible?
    Answer. If confirmed, I commit to ensuring that FCC support 
services and resources are accessible to all Americans, including 
LGBTQ+ individuals.
                                 ______
                                 
  Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Tammy Duckworth to 
                             Olivia Trusty
Martha Wright-Reed Just and Reasonable Communications Act
    Question 1. In 2023, my bipartisan Martha Wright-Reed Just and 
Reasonable Communications Act was signed into law to prevent prison 
telecom providers from gouging consumers when they call their 
incarcerated loved ones. Last year, the FCC voted unanimously to 
implement the law, cutting the cost of a fifteen-minute phone call to 
or from large jails from as much as eleven dollars to just ninety 
cents. The FCC also took the first step and slashing the cost of video 
calls by implementing an interim rate cap on video calls as they 
collect more data.
    Had you been a member of the FCC last year, would you have joined 
all the other Commissioners in voting to adopt the rule implementing my 
Martha Wright-Reed Just and Reasonable Communications Act?
    Answer. In light of pending litigation regarding the FCC's 
implementation of the Martha Wright-Reed Just and Reasonable 
Communications Act, I believe it would be imprudent for me to comment 
or speculate on what I would have done, if I had been a member of the 
Commission. That said, if confirmed, I commit to protecting consumers 
from exploitation in the telecommunications marketplace.
                                 ______
                                 
    Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Jacky Rosen to 
                             Olivia Trusty
Network Security
    Our adversaries continue to grow more sophisticated and aggressive 
in their cyberattacks, including those in the telecom sector. A big 
part of network security is not just ensuring we have secure hardware--
though I am thankful we secured additional funding last fall for ``Rip 
and Replace'' to help providers use trusted equipment--but 
increasingly, our networks must have sophisticated and dynamic defenses 
against network intrusions, like Salt Typhoon.

    Question 1. What do you see the FCC's role in promoting secure 
networks and cybersecurity?
    Answer. To mitigate future attacks like Salt Typhoon, the FCC has a 
responsibility to work with Federal partners to ensure 
telecommunications providers have the tools and resources they need to 
defend their networks against malicious cyber threat actors. To prevent 
future attacks, I believe the FCC should participate in ongoing whole-
of-government conversations about how to improve the efficacy of the 
United States' deterrence efforts against nation state actors. The FCC 
should also work with Federal partners and the private sector to 
diversify and strengthen the U.S. domestic supply chain for 
telecommunications network components to increase the security of the 
Nation's communications infrastructure.

    Question 2. If confirmed, what steps would you take to move the 
telecom sector forward in adopting better cybersecurity practices and 
standards?
    Answer. If confirmed, I will promote the adoption of Open RAN 
technologies that can help strengthen and diversify the Nation's 
telecommunications supply chain and increase network security. I will 
also promote the use of the FCC's authorities in the Secure and Trusted 
Communications Networks Act to ban high-risk equipment and vendors from 
the Nation's communications infrastructure. If confirmed, I would also 
focus on increasing the security of undersea cable infrastructure to 
better protect the Nation's economic and national security interests.
USF Cybersecurity
    Hackers are increasingly targeting schools and health care 
organizations in ransomware attacks. In fact, Clark County School 
District was the target of a ransomware attack in 2023 that exposed the 
sensitive information of over 200,000 Nevada students. The previous FCC 
chair established a cybersecurity pilot program within the USF's E-Rate 
program, allowing schools and libraries to use E-rate funding for 
cybersecurity expenses.

    Question 1. If confirmed, would you support actions like this pilot 
program and work with Congress to help protect schools from ransomware 
attacks?
    Answer. Schools are a target-rich environment for cyber-attacks 
because they have legacy infrastructure that is vulnerable to 
exploitation and they store a lot of sensitive personal information. If 
confirmed, I commit to working with schools and libraries to strengthen 
their cybersecurity defenses from ransomware attackers and other cyber 
threat actors.
Broadband Affordability
    Ensuring that communities can afford broadband is just as critical 
as building the networks themselves, and not every option is 
affordable. Satellite Internet providers like Elon Musk's Starlink can 
be much more expensive for consumers than fiber or fixed wireless 
service. With monthly fees from $120 to $500, these prices are simply 
out of reach for many low-income and rural households.

    Question 1. If confirmed, would you support expanding the FCC's 
Lifeline program to provide a more robust, ACP-like subsidy--so that 
affordability doesn't remain a barrier for newly connected communities, 
and the investments in broadband deployment translate into meaningful 
adoption?
    Answer. If confirmed, I will work to expand access to affordable 
broadband by promoting more competition and choice in the broadband 
marketplace. I believe that more choice in the marketplace will lead to 
lower prices for consumers. I will also work to remove regulatory 
barriers that increase the cost of deploying broadband for providers 
and ultimately increase the cost of purchasing broadband services for 
consumers.
    I believe the FCC needs to work urgently with Congress to identify 
a ``specific, predictable, and sufficient'' form of support to continue 
meeting connectivity needs across the country, before making 
significant reforms to the USF programs.
Tribal Priority Windows
    The FCC's 2.5 gigahertz Tribal Priority Window, enacted by former 
Chairman Pai in 2020, helped hundreds of Tribes claim spectrum and 
deploy broadband where commercial providers failed to reach. The 
upcoming AWS-3 auction presents a similar opportunity--and it could be 
done without significantly delaying the auction or impacting the value 
of the licenses.

    Question 1. If confirmed, would you support creating future Tribal 
Priority Windows or other public interest set-asides to ensure Tribal 
Nations and unserved communities can access spectrum and grow their 
communities directly, rather than waiting on commercial deployment?
    Answer. If confirmed, I commit to putting spectrum to its highest 
and best use and maximizing the economic and societal benefits of 
spectrum use to ensure the best return for all people across the 
country, including those living on Tribal lands. In Auction 108 (2.5 
GHz), the FCC established a Tribal priority window in recognition of 
the unique connectivity needs and challenges facing Tribal lands. This 
particular auction can help inform how future opportunities for direct 
access to spectrum in Tribal communities can expand competition and 
access to modern communications services in unserved or underserved 
areas.
CBRS & DOD
    Since the FCC finalized the rules for the CBRS band, we have seen 
it being used in a variety of innovative ways. In Las Vegas, Cox worked 
with the City to launch a private network on CBRS that powers smart 
cities and Internet of Things (IoT) devices. As you know, CBRS is 
shared with the military, and has been an important model in how the 
FCC and the military can work together to enhance commercial spectrum 
use while protecting defense equities.

    Question 1. Will you commit to continuing to work with DoD and the 
NTIA to ensure any changes to CBRS's rules are not made unilaterally 
and do not harm our national defense?
    Answer. If confirmed, I commit to working with NTIA, DOD, and any 
other impacted Federal agency in spectrum proceedings that come before 
the FCC.
                                 ______
                                 
   Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Ben Ray Lujan to 
                             Olivia Trusty
    Question 1. I have been on the record in support of FCC policies 
that help many points of view reach the public. This does not just mean 
viewpoints I agree with. Whereas Chair Carr has put pressure on 
broadcasters that take positions President Trump dislikes, I have been 
supportive of rules that would help independent video programmers gain 
an opportunity to compete by bringing their content to the public no 
matter their viewpoint. I am similarly concerned that the broadcast 
industry is now asking the FCC to eliminate ownership limits 
altogether. Do you think there is any limit to how many households a 
single company can reach? As you know, although Congress set a national 
ownership cap at 39 percent of U.S. households, the way the FCC 
measures the cap means some companies already reach 70 percent of the 
U.S. audience. Is 70 percent of the country too large? How few 
independently owned TV stations in a single community or local market 
are too few?
    Answer. There is currently an active proceeding before the FCC on 
media ownership limits. To remain impartial, I believe it would be 
imprudent for me to comment on issues related to the active proceeding 
in my capacity as a nominee. As a general matter, for any media related 
proceeding before the FCC, I commit to following the facts in the 
record, FCC precedent, and the law, if confirmed.

    Question 2. As you know, Congress unfortunately failed to extend 
the American Connectivity Program (ACP), which expanded affordable 
broadband access to over 23 million households. That makes the FCC's 
Lifeline program, a part of the universal service fund (USF), even more 
important today for helping eligible, low-income Americans access 
wireless and Internet service. Could you share more about ways you 
believe Lifeline could be improved? Please be specific.
    Answer. I support the Committee's continued efforts to expand 
access to affordable broadband. To improve Lifeline, I believe the FCC 
should work with Congress to do the following: develop performance 
metrics to better track the program's effectiveness in expanding access 
to affordable communications services; conduct enhanced oversight over 
the eligibility of Lifeline recipients to ensure the resources are 
going to those in need; and closely align the Lifeline program with 
digital literacy efforts.

    Question 3. Yes or no, do you think that the Universal Service Fund 
should have a stable, dedicated funding source--rather than rely on 
annual appropriations?
    Answer. I believe that carrying out the FCC's universal service 
mission requires the funding source to be ``specific, predictable, and 
sufficient'' in accordance with Section 254 of the Communications Act.

    Question 4. How do you think the FCC should modernize the Universal 
Service Fund to ensure its long-term sustainability?
    Answer. I believe the FCC should modernize the USF to ensure its 
long-term sustainability by increasing transparency and accountability 
into how USF monies are spent across the four programs it supports. 
This will ensure that the funds are spent judiciously and go further in 
expanding access to communications services across the country. I also 
believe USF should be better coordinated with other Federal broadband 
programs, like BEAD, to avoid fragmentation, duplication, overbuilding, 
and the waste of taxpayer dollars.

    Question 5. Would you support creating future Tribal Priority 
Windows or other public interest set-asides to ensure Tribal Nations 
and unserved communities can access spectrum and grow their communities 
directly, rather than waiting on commercial deployment?
    Answer. If confirmed, I commit to putting spectrum to its highest 
and best use and maximizing the economic and societal benefits of 
spectrum use to ensure the best return for all people across the 
country, including those living on Tribal lands. In Auction 108 (2.5 
GHz), the FCC established a Tribal priority window in recognition of 
the unique connectivity needs and challenges facing Tribal lands. This 
particular auction can help inform how future opportunities for direct 
access to spectrum in Tribal communities can expand competition and 
access to modern communications services in unserved or underserved 
areas.

    Question 6. When we met in my office you said that both President 
Biden and President Trump were the ``certified'' winners in 2020 and 
2024 respectively. You would not say whether of them were ``lawfully'' 
elected. Yes or no, were 100 members of the currently sitting U.S. 
Senate lawfully elected?
    Answer. All 100 members of the sitting U.S. Senate were certified 
as the winners of each of their respective elections.
                                 ______
                                 
 Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. John Hickenlooper to 
                             Olivia Trusty
Media Oversight
    Chairman Carr has initiated investigations into Disney, ABC, 
Comcast, CBS, and others regarding what he sees as discriminatory 
practices or unfair news coverage. These investigations come at a time 
when Congress has worked on a bipartisan basis to attract journalists 
to newsrooms in Colorado and across the country.

    Question 1. Do you think Chairman Carr's investigations of 
broadcasters could negatively affect attracting future journalists to 
newsrooms? Why or why not?
    Answer. As a nominee to be a Commissioner at the FCC, I believe it 
would be imprudent for me to comment on the impact of any pending 
proceeding before the Commission. That said, I believe local news is 
vital to communities across the country. Local broadcasters provide 
news and information about social and cultural events, educational 
programming, and critical information during emergencies and disasters. 
If confirmed, I commit to promoting policies that empower local 
broadcasters to expand access to local news to all Americans.
Spectrum Relocation Fund
    The Spectrum Relocation Fund (SRF) provides a funding mechanism 
through which Federal agencies can recover the costs associated with 
relocating their radio communications systems or sharing the 
reallocated spectrum.

    Question 2. What changes do you think need to be made to the SRF to 
enable agencies to continue performing their Federal missions without 
harmful interference from potential commercial uses of reallocated 
spectrum? In your view, could a reformed SRF allow for increases in 
non-federal uses of spectrum? Will you commit to carefully considering 
the perspectives raised by Federal agencies and work to ensure spectrum 
decisions made by the FCC fully account for necessary steps to mitigate 
potential interference?
    Answer. I believe the Spectrum Relocation Fund (SRF) is an 
important tool in the spectrum management process. I am aware of 
concerns from Federal agencies regarding delays in accessing SRF 
resources and constraints on how the SRF monies can be used. I believe 
the SRF should be modernized to be a more effective tool in the 
spectrum management process. If confirmed, I commit to carefully 
considering the perspectives raised by Federal agencies and working to 
ensure spectrum decisions account for necessary steps to mitigate 
potential interference.

    Question 3. How can the FCC coordinate with industry and other 
Federal agencies to develop and incentivize the adoption of 
technologies that minimize harmful interference and increase flexible 
access to spectrum?
    Answer. I believe that the FCC should coordinate with NTIA and 
consult with impacted Federal agencies, through established mechanisms 
such as the Interdepartment Radio Advisory Committee and the Commerce 
Spectrum Management Advisory Committee to ensure that spectrum 
management decisions, including auctions, are informed by economic and 
national security analysis and incentivize the adoption of technologies 
that minimize harmful interference and increase flexible access to 
spectrum.
Data Privacy and Cybersecurity
    Breaches such as Salt Typhoon demonstrate the need for increased 
preventive and corrective cybersecurity measures. In the past, the FCC 
has pursued consent decrees with companies to resolve investigations 
over data breaches. Data breaches can cause harmful exposure of 
consumers' data and cyber attacks can damage key communications 
services.

    Question 4. In what specific ways could the FCC further incentivize 
measures to increase resiliency across the communications sector from 
data breaches and cybersecurity attacks? To date, do you believe the 
FCC's pursuit of consent decrees has been sufficient? Should the FCC 
consider new rulemakings to encourage enhanced protections from 
cyberattacks and data breaches?
    Answer. If confirmed, I will promote the adoption of Open RAN 
technologies, which can help strengthen and diversify the Nation's 
telecommunications supply chain and increase resiliency across the 
communications sector from data breaches and cybersecurity attacks.
    I believe the FCC should increase transparency into enforcement 
actions, to the extent possible, to ensure that consent decrees improve 
compliance, deterrence, and lead to a faster resolution of rule 
violations.
    To enhance network protections from cyberattacks and data breaches, 
I believe the FCC needs to work with Federal partners to ensure 
telecommunications providers have the tools and resources they need to 
defend their networks against malicious cyber threat actors. This 
includes working with telecommunications providers to improve their 
cyber hygiene to counter increasingly sophisticated and hostile cyber 
threat actors. I also believe the FCC should participate in ongoing 
whole-of-government conversations about how to improve the efficacy of 
the United States' deterrence efforts against nation state actors, 
which can further protect our Nation's networks from cyberattacks and 
data breaches.
Direct to Cell
    Reliable communications can be a lifeline in a public safety 
emergency or while exploring the great outdoors across the mountains of 
Colorado. Last month, the FCC approved rules for expanding cellular 
coverage for cellphones outside of cell tower range using satellite 
communications. In a remote environment, direct to cell service could 
help enhance public safety and save lives.

    Question 5. If confirmed, what will your priorities be to enhance 
the reliability and accessibility of public safety communications 
services? What future improvements do you see in the field of direct to 
cell services?
    Answer. If confirmed, I commit to working with Congress and 
interested stakeholders to improve back-up power solutions and promote 
the hardening of communications infrastructure to enhance the 
reliability and accessibility of public safety communications services. 
I would also advocate for more accurate, timely, and accessible 
information in the FCC's Disaster Information Reporting System.
    Some future improvements in direct-to-cell services could include 
broader device capability with these services, more support for 911 or 
location tracking capabilities during emergencies or disasters, and 
wider geographic coverage.
Telecom Supply Chain
    In order for us to succeed in our efforts to connect every American 
to high-speed and affordable broadband, we need reliable, secure, and 
readily-available supply of infrastructure network equipment.

    Question 6. What role should the FCC play in continuously 
monitoring and strengthening supply chains to support our existing and 
future communications networks? Do you believe the FCC should receive 
more voluntary notifications, on a timely basis, from the private 
sector about potential shortages of network equipment that could impede 
the timely completion of broadband infrastructure projects funded by 
the FCC?
    Answer. I believe that transparency into the health and resilience 
of the Nation's telecommunications supply chain is vital to the FCC's 
continued ability to close the digital divide and strengthen network 
security. Voluntary notifications from the private sector about 
potential equipment shortages could help the FCC quickly address such 
shortages and ensure the timely completion of broadband projects.
                                 ______
                                 
Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Lisa Blunt Rochester to 

                             Olivia Trusty
    Question 1. Should consumer protection be a top FCC priority?
    Answer. If confirmed, protecting consumers is among my top 
priorities. I believe that protecting consumers is critical to the 
FCC's mission in making communications services available to all 
Americans.

    Question 2. Ms. Trusty, do you think Federal workers at the FCC are 
crucial for advancing consumer transparency?
    Answer. FCC staff are critical to carrying out the mission of the 
agency in expanding access to communications services, advancing 
consumer transparency, and upholding and enforcing the law.

    Question 3. Last year, the FCC introduced ``broadband nutrition 
labels'' to show what ISPs charge. However, potential Federal staffing 
or funding cuts could jeopardize this and similar initiatives.
    Ms. Trusty, for consumer transparency purposes, will you commit to 
defending the broadband nutrition label program if it, and programs 
like it, face cuts?
    Answer. In accordance with the bipartisan Infrastructure, 
Investment, and Jobs Act, the FCC has a responsibility to establish 
rules requiring the display of broadband consumer labels (also referred 
to as the ``broadband nutrition label program''). If confirmed, I 
commit to uphold and enforce these rules--or any successor rules--in 
accordance with the law.

    Question 4. What concrete measures would you implement to improve 
telehealth access and quality for underserved Americans?
    Answer. If confirmed, I commit to coordinating with Federal 
partners to better target broadband funds to underserved areas to 
provide improved support for telehealth-enabling infrastructure. I also 
commit to promoting the use of the FCC's special temporary authority to 
experiment with expanding access to telehealth initiatives.

    Question 5. Ms. Trusty, what additional policy reforms or actions 
should the FCC pursue to ensure broadband deployment is strategically 
targeted to underserved communities?
    Answer. If confirmed, I would work to increase broadband 
connectivity in rural areas by doing the following: coordinating with 
other Federal agencies with broadband programs to eliminate program 
fragmentation and duplication across the Federal government and ensure 
Federal resources are better targeted to unserved areas; remove 
regulatory barriers that impede or increase the cost of deploying 
broadband to rural areas; embrace new technologies such as satellite 
broadband or fixed wireless services that can provide a more cost 
effective solution in expanding connectivity to rural, unserved areas; 
and consider adjustments to USF programs to better target resources to 
unserved communities.

                                  [all]