[House Hearing, 119 Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]





                     IN THEIR CORNER: CREATING MORE
                   OPPORTUNITIES FOR AMERICAN BOXERS

=======================================================================

                                HEARING

                               Before The

                 SUBCOMMITTEE ON WORKFORCE PROTECTIONS

                                 of the

                  COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION AND WORKFORCE
                     U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                    ONE HUNDRED NINETEENTH CONGRESS

                             FIRST SESSION

                               __________



            HEARING HELD IN WASHINGTON, DC, DECEMBER 4, 2025

                               __________


                           Serial No. 119-36

                               __________


    Printed for the use of the Committee on Education and Workforce






                 [GRAPHIC NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]
               
               




        Available via: edworkforce.house.gov or www.govinfo.gov

                               ______
                                 

                 U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE

64-314PDF                 WASHINGTON : 2026










                  COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION AND WORKFORCE

                    TIM WALBERG, Michigan, Chairman

JOE WILSON, South Carolina           ROBERT C. ``BOBBY'' SCOTT, 
VIRGINIA FOXX, North Carolina            Virginia,
GLENN THOMPSON, Pennsylvania           Ranking Member
GLENN GROTHMAN, Wisconsin            JOE COURTNEY, Connecticut
ELISE M. STEFANIK, New York          FREDERICA S. WILSON, Florida
RICK W. ALLEN, Georgia               SUZANNE BONAMICI, Oregon
JAMES COMER, Kentucky                MARK TAKANO, California
BURGESS OWENS, Utah                  ALMA S. ADAMS, North Carolina
LISA C. McCLAIN, Michigan            MARK DeSAULNIER, California
MARY E. MILLER, Illinois             DONALD NORCROSS, New Jersey
JULIA LETLOW, Louisiana              LUCY McBATH, Georgia
KEVIN KILEY, California              JAHANA HAYES, Connecticut
MICHAEL A. RULLI, Ohio               ILHAN OMAR, Minnesota
JAMES C. MOYLAN, Guam                HALEY M. STEVENS, Michigan
ROBERT F. ONDER, Jr., Missouri       GREG CASAR, Texas
RYAN MACKENZIE, Pennsylvania         SUMMER L. LEE, Pennsylvania
MICHAEL BAUMGARTNER, Washington      JOHN W. MANNION, New York
MARK HARRIS, North Carolina          ADELITA S. GRIJALVA, Arizona
MARK B. MESSMER, Indiana
RANDY FINE, Florida

                     R.J. Laukitis, Staff Director
              Veronique Pluviose, Minority Staff Director

                                 ------                                

                 SUBCOMMITTEE ON WORKFORCE PROTECTIONS

                 RYAN MACKENZIE, Pennsylvania, Chairman

MARK B. MESSMER, Indiana             ILHAN OMAR, Minnesota,
GLENN GROTHMAN, Wisconsin              Ranking Member
JAMES COMER, Kentucky                HALEY M. STEVENS, Michigan
MARY E. MILLER, Illinois             GREG CASAR, Texas
RANDY FINE, Florida                  MARK TAKANO, California









                         C  O  N  T  E  N  T  S

                              ----------                              
                                                                   Page

Hearing held on December 4, 2025.................................     1

                           OPENING STATEMENTS

    Mackenzie, Hon. Ryan, Chairman, Subcommittee on Workforce 
      Protections................................................     1
        Prepared statement of....................................    14
    Omar, Hon. Ilhan, Ranking Member, Subcommittee on Workforce 
      Protections................................................    16
        Prepared statement of....................................    18

                               WITNESSES

    Jack, Hon. Brian, a Representative in Congress from the State 
      of Georgia.................................................    20
        Prepared statement of....................................    22
    Horsford, Hon. Steven, a Representative in Congress from the 
      State of Nevada............................................    26
        Prepared statement of....................................    29
    Epstein, Mr. Lawrence, Senior Executive Vice President and 
      Chief Operating Officer, Ultimate Fighting Chamionship.....    31
        Prepared statement of....................................    33
    Ali, Mrs. Lonnie, Widow of Muhammad Ali and Cofounder, 
      Muhammad Ali Center........................................    39
        Prepared statement of....................................    42
    English, Mr. Patrick, Principal, Partner, and Owner, Dines 
      and English, LLC...........................................    44
        Prepared statement of....................................    46
    Foster, Mr. Andy, Executive Officer, California State 
      Athletic Commission........................................    50
        Prepared statement of....................................    52

                         ADDITIONAL SUBMISSIONS

    Chairman Mackenzie:
        Letter of support dated December 3, 2025, from the 
          International Brotherhood of Teamsters.................     4
        Letter of support dated October 25, 2025, from Mike Tyson     5
        Letter of support dated August 26, 2025, from the 
          Association of Boxing Commissions......................     6
        Letter of support dated November 5, 2025, from TGB 
          Promotions, LLC........................................     8
        Letter of support dated October 17, 2025, from PPG Paints 
          Arena..................................................    10
        Letter of support dated October 17, 2025, from Chartway 
          Arena..................................................    12
        Letter of support dated October 21, 2025, from the 
          California State Athletic Commission...................    93
        Letter of support dated October 20, 2025, from Anschutz 
          Entertainment Group, Inc. (AEG)........................    95
        Letter of support dated October 20, 2025, from Dr. Paul 
          Wallace................................................    97
        Letter from Cory Rapacz, Rapacz Boxing, LLC..............    99
        Letter of support dated October 14, 2025, from MGM 
          Resorts................................................   101
        Letter of support dated September 3, 2025, from Loyola 
          Marymount University...................................   103
        Letter of support dated October 20, 2025, from Madison 
          Square Garden Entertainment............................   104
        Letter dated November 18, 2025, from 313 Presents........   106
        Letter of support from Skipper Kelp......................   108
        Letter of support dated October 13, 2025, from State Farm 
          Arena..................................................   109
        Letter of support dated September 9, 2025, from Sports 
          Medicine Research & Testing Laboratory (SMRTL).........   111
        Letter of support dated October 29, 2025, from Georgia 
          Athletic and Entertainment Commission..................   113
        Letter dated October 15, 2025, from Legends Global.......   115
    Ranking Member Omar:
        Article dated November 15, 2025, from the Las Vegas 
          Review-Journal, entitled ``Commentary: UFC Should Be 
          Investigated, Not Granted New Privileges''.............    72
        Article dated November 2, 2025, from The Wall Street 
          Journal, entitled ``Lawmakers and MMA Threaten Boxing--
          A New Bill Claims to Be an Extension of the Muhammad 
          Ali Act, but It's Bad for Fighters''...................    74
        A Tweet by Nico Ali Walsh................................    76
        Article dated September 15, 2025, from Bad Left Hook, 
          entitled `` `It Would Be a Tragedy': Bob Arum Doesn't 
          Want To See Ali Act Amended''..........................    77
        Letter dated December 3, 2025, from Robert Arum, Top 
          Rank, Inc..............................................    78
        Open letter dated December 3, 2025, from the Mixed 
          Martial Arts Fighters Association (MMAFA)..............    80
        Letter dated November 12, 2025, from Carlos ``the Ronin'' 
          Newton.................................................    85
        Letter dated December 3, 2025, from Sara McMann..........    87
        Number of Fights in U.S. from BoxRec.....................    88
        Letter dated December 3, 2025, from Rob Maysey, Founder 
          of MMAFA...............................................    90

                        QUESTIONS FOR THE RECORD

    Responses to questions submitted for the record by:
        Mr. Patrick C. English...................................   118
        Mr. Lawrence Epstein.....................................   126
        Mr. Andy Foster..........................................   137









 
                     IN THEIR CORNER: CREATING MORE
                   OPPORTUNITIES FOR AMERICAN BOXERS

                              ----------                              


                       Thursday, December 4, 2025

                  House of Representatives,
             Subcommittee on Workforce Protections,
                      Committee on Education and Workforce,
                                                    Washington, DC.
    The Subcommittee met, pursuant to notice, at 10:55 a.m., in 
Room 2175, Rayburn House Office Building, Hon. Ryan Mackenzie 
(Chairman of the Subcommittee) presiding.
    Present: Representatives Mackenzie, Messmer, Grothman, 
Comer, Miller, Fine, Walberg, Allen, Omar, and Scott.
    Staff present: Vlad Cerga, Director of Information 
Technology; Halle Greenbaum, Staff Assistant; Trey Kovacs, 
Director of Workforce Policy; Campbell Ladd, Clerk; R.J. 
Laukitis, Staff Director; Danny Marca, Director of Information 
Technology; Brad Mannion, Professional Staff Member; John 
Martin, Deputy Director of Workforce Policy/Counsel; Audra 
McGeorge, Communications Director; Ethan Pann, Deputy Press 
Secretary and Digital Director; Kane Riddell, Legislative 
Assistant; Sara Robertson, Press Secretary; Katherine Anne 
Russo, Director of Member Services and Coalitions; Heidi 
Schneider, Professional Staff Member; Ann Vogel, Director of 
Operations; Thomas White, Deputy Clerk; James Whittaker, 
General Counsel; Damian Arambula, Minority Intern; Ilana 
Brunner, Minority General Counsel; Natalie Glezen, Minority 
Running Start Fellow; Scott Estrada, Minority Professional 
Staff; Bob Shull, Minority Senior Labor Policy Counsel; Raiyana 
Malone, Minority Press Secretary; Kevin McDermott, Minority 
Director of Labor Policy; Marie McGrew, Minority Press 
Assistant; Eleazar Padilla, Minority Staff Assistant; and 
Veronique Pluviose, Minority Staff Director.
    Chairman Mackenzie. This Subcommittee on Workforce 
Protections will come to order. I note that a quorum is 
present.
    Without objection, the chair is authorized to call a recess 
at any time.
    I appreciate everybody's willingness to hang with us here 
because we were conducting votes on the floor, but we have a 
very exciting hearing today. The topic of today's hearing is to 
examine the current State of the boxing industry and show how 
H.R. 4624, the Muhammad Ali American Boxing Revival Act, can 
help usher in a new golden age for the sport.
    For most of the 20th century, boxing stood at the heart of 
American sports and culture. It gave us legends like Jack 
Johnson, Sugar Ray Robinson, Jack Dempsey, and Muhammad Ali, 
and I should also note, from the Seventh congressional District 
in Pennsylvania, Larry Holmes. We recognize exceptional boxers 
like world champion Christy Martin, who was elected to the 
International Boxing Hall of Fame in the first year that women 
were on the ballot. We also honor more recent champions like 
the great English boxer Ricky ``The Hitman'' Hatton, whose 
untimely passing reminds us of the lasting bond between 
fighters and the fans across the world.
    These boxers were champions in the ring and icons outside 
of it. Boxing has long been a symbol of grit, determination, 
and the will to overcome impossible odds, qualities that are at 
the heart of the American spirit.
    Today we must face a hard truth. Boxing is failing to meet 
the high standards of American sports. What was once a 
respected and unified sport became fragmented, plagued by 
inconsistent standards, weak enforcement, and a troubling lack 
of accountability. Too often, fighters are pushed into 
dangerous matches without proper medical oversight. The result 
is a system that too frequently exploits the athletes instead 
of protecting them. That is why, again, it is a very 
appropriate topic for our Subcommittee on Workforce 
Protections.
    All of that must change. Professional boxing needs clear, 
consistent standards that safeguards fighters' health and 
restores integrity to the profession. As we learn more about 
the long-term dangers of CTE and performance-enhancing 
substances, we should honor fighters' courage with a system 
that protects their health and safeguards the sport. That is 
the purpose of H.R. 4624, the Muhammad Ali Boxing Revival Act.
    Building on the foundation of the Professional Boxing 
Safety Act of 1996, this bipartisan legislation will bring real 
change to the sport by putting fighters first. This bill 
establishes Unified Boxing Organizations, or UBOs, to set 
uniform safety and fairness standards. Under these 
organizations, boxers would receive regular medical exams and 
routine MRI screenings with additional precautions for boxers 
over 40. Medical personnel will be present at every match. A 
strict, transparent anti-doping policy will also be enforced.
    This bill would set new industrywide standards for medical 
insurance coverage and set a floor for per-round pay for 
boxers. Whether a boxer competes inside or outside a UBO, fair 
pay and medical protection will no longer be optional. They 
will be the standard.
    This is about rebuilding trust, protecting athletes, and 
reigniting the passion that once made boxing a cornerstone of 
American life. More importantly, it is about ensuring the sport 
does not sacrifice the health and dignity of its athletes. 
Boxing can be great again. It can inspire, uplift, and unify. 
H.R. 4624 can help revive a proud tradition while ensuring 
every fighter, from the first bell to the final round, is 
treated with dignity and respect.
    This is great legislation, and I want to commend those who 
are joining us here today as champions of this legislation in 
Congress. You and the work that you are doing embodies 
America's fighting spirit, and this administration, President 
Trump, and this Congress--who are all fighting to make America 
great again--want to join you in starting with that work and 
improving our boxing system right here in the United States.
    We also would like to enter into the record six letters in 
support of H.R. 4624 for the following organizations and 
individuals: The International Brotherhood of Teamsters; boxing 
champion, Mike Tyson; the Association of Boxing Commissions; 
Tom Brown, president of TGB Promotions; PPG Paints Arena, the 
home of the Pittsburgh Penguins; and also Chartway Arena in 
Virginia.
    [The information referred to follows:]


[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]    

    Chairman Mackenzie. Again, I want to thank everybody for 
being here, not only my colleagues who are going to give brief 
testimony, but also our panelists.
    With that, I yield back to the ranking member for an 
opening statement.
    [The prepared statement of Chairman Mackenzie follows:]

[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]    

    Ms. Omar. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and thank you to our 
witnesses for your testimony today.
    When Republicans first noticed us of today's hearing, I was 
immediately excited. I have long been a fan of professional 
boxing and mixed martial arts, and I was hopeful that we could 
have a bipartisan discussion about revitalizing a sport that I 
love. I came to this issue not as a legislator but as someone 
who admires the courage and the craft of fighters who put their 
bodies on the line in the pursuit of greatness.
    At the turn of the century, Congress passed two landmark 
pieces of legislation to protect and support American boxers. 
In 1996, Congress passed the Professional Boxing Safety Act, or 
PBSA, which outlined the health and safety provisions and 
mandated the State athletic commissions to oversee all 
professional boxing events.
    In 2000, Congress strengthened PBSA with the Muhammad Ali 
Boxing Reform Act. The Ali Act was designed to clean up the 
business side of boxing after decades of corruption that harmed 
boxers' livelihoods and integrity of the sport. It required 
better financial disclosures, increased transparency of ranking 
and title decisions, and limited conflicts of interest so that 
a single company or individual could not do--could not both 
control a boxer's contract and access to titles. This was meant 
to stop promoters from demanding that boxers sign away their 
entire career just to have a chance at a title. In practice, 
the Ali Act's provisions helped give boxers more information 
and leverage to negotiate for a fairer share of the money that 
their fights generated and free themselves from any coercive 
and restrictive contract terms.
    We should build on these successes and take time to explore 
other critical issues, such as the long-term cost of brain 
injury and the need for athletes in other combat sports like 
MMA to enjoy these protections. My hope is that we can use this 
hearing to discuss these issues thoughtfully and productively. 
However, my fear is that we are likely to focus on just one 
bill, H.R. 4624, the Muhammad Ali American Boxing Revival Act, 
and consider moving it quickly, but I urge my colleagues to 
take a moment to pause and hold two things in our minds at 
once.
    First, there are some genuinely promising provisions in the 
Revival Act. For example, a national $150-per-round minimum 
payment would lessen financial strain on boxers who are still 
finding their footing in the sport. The bill would also set a 
national $25,000 floor for insurance coverage that the PBSA 
currently requires for every fight.
    Unfortunately, there are sections of the Revival Act that 
raise serious questions about who will actually control the 
future of boxing. It would remove guardrails that prevent 
influential promoters from controlling the industry and forcing 
boxers into contracts that they do not benefit from. This 
legislation could also allow major corporations to completely 
take over the sport, leaving boxers without the leverage or the 
ability to advocate for themselves and their physical and 
financial health. These provisions prioritize Goliath to the 
detriment of David.
    Boxers who put their bodies on the line deserve to fight in 
an industry that pays them well, values their health and 
safety, and does not make them vulnerable to economic 
exploitation. While I do not entirely--while not entirely 
harmful, this bill, as crafted, gives more power to promoters 
and big corporations than to boxers. This is why many 
professional boxers are speaking out against it, including 
Evander Holyfield, Oscar De La Hoya, Claressa Shields, Jake 
Paul, and Nico Ali Walsh.
    I am not here to reflexively support or oppose H.R. 4624. I 
am here to ask important questions to everyone involved--the 
promoters, the regulators, and especially the corporations that 
stand to gain the most--because we have to make sure that any 
revival of boxing does not come at the expense of the very 
athletes we say we are here to protect. I want this hearing to 
be the start of a longer, serious bipartisan conversation about 
how we support our boxers and bring investment into sport 
without sacrificing the necessary antimonopoly firewalls that 
prevent American boxers from being exploited by powerful 
corporate actors and foreign investors.
    I look forward to our discussion today, and I yield.
    [The prepared statement of Ranking Member Omar follows:]

[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]    

    Chairman Mackenzie. Thank you to the ranking member.
    It is a pleasure to be joined by a bipartisan duo of our 
colleagues, and we look forward to sharing the bipartisan 
spirit that they are bringing to us as we actually move forward 
with this legislation.
    Pursuant to Committee Rule 8(c), all members can insert 
written testimony and statements into the record and may do so 
by submitting them to the committee electronically in Microsoft 
Word by 5 p.m., 14 days after this hearing.
    Without objection, the hearing record will remain open for 
14 days to allow such statements and other extraneous materials 
noted during the hearing to be submitted to the official 
record.
    I note that some of our colleagues who are not permanent 
members of the subcommittee may be waiving on for the purposes 
of today's hearing.
    With that, I will introduce our two panelists. First, we 
have Congressman Brian Jack, who represents Georgia's Third 
congressional District. Our second witness is Congressman 
Steven Horsford, who represents Nevada's Fourth congressional 
District. We appreciate both of you being here today. You are 
fully aware of the procedures and testimony and the lighting 
system and timing. I do not need to go into that.
    With that, we will recognize Representative Jack.

STATEMENT OF THE HON. BRIAN JACK, A REPRESENTATIVE IN CONGRESS 
                   FROM THE STATE OF GEORGIA

    Mr. Jack. Chairman Mackenzie, Ranking Member Omar, Chairman 
Walberg, Ranking Member Scott, Chairman Comer, and 
Representatives Messmer, Grothman, Miller, Fine, Stevens, 
Allen, Casar, and Takano, thank you for welcoming my testimony 
today.
    I am honored to submit H.R. 4624, the Muhammad Ali American 
Boxing Revival Act, for your consideration. I authored and 
introduced this legislation--which is bipartisan--with 
Representative Sharice Davids, a talented athlete and a chief 
deputy whip within the House Democratic Caucus.
    Professional boxing in America has an incredibly rich and 
storied history. It is a sport that demands courage, 
perseverance, and determination from its champions, and its 
heroes have inspired greatness, ignited dreams, and forged 
generations of memories and tradition.
    Thirty 9 years before Jackie Robinson bravely broke 
barriers in Major League Baseball, Jack Johnson, the Galveston 
Giant, reigned as the first Black heavyweight champion of the 
world from 1908 to 1915. Decades before the New York Knicks 
were formed, thousands of spectators crammed into Madison 
Square Garden to see Jack Dempsey fight. Many of you may recall 
storied bouts during boxing's golden era, like Leon Spinks 
versus Muhammad Ali in 1978, Marvin Hagler versus Thomas Hearns 
in 1985, and Mike Tyson's championship fights in the 1990's.
    Unfortunately, American boxing has since faced a steady 
decline. Thirty 7 years have passed since an American won a 
heavyweight gold medal at the Olympics, and the majority of 
boxing's premier fights are now overseas many, many time zones 
away. In recent years, HBO World Championship Boxing and 
Showtime Championship Boxing, long home to the greatest fights, 
ceased operations. Just a few months ago, ESPN's contract with 
a leading boxing promotion ended without renewal.
    Today, we submit legislation before you that will fix 
boxing's downturn and revive this great American sport. For 
over a century, individual States enacted legislation to 
regulate professional boxing, but the patchwork of regulations 
without uniform minimum standards led to widespread 
exploitation and rampant corruption. Since the 1950's, Congress 
has considered legislation to address these problems, and after 
multiple attempts in the 1990's, Congress finally acted, 
passing the Professional Boxing Safety Act of 1996 and the 
Muhammad Ali Boxing Reform Act in 2000. As a result, boxing is 
the only professional sport regulated by Congress. The Muhammad 
Ali American Boxing Revival Act amends the Professional Boxing 
Safety Act of 1996 and preserves and protects the original Ali 
Act in its entirety.
    First, our legislation clarifies ambiguities in current law 
that have stifled innovation and investment into this sport. 
This bill allows for the creation of alternative systems, 
called Unified Boxing Organizations, otherwise known as UBOs, 
that will provide professional boxers with more protections, 
better pay, and greater protections. The UBO system will not 
replace the current structure involving sanctioning 
organizations. Instead, UBOs will be a separate, parallel 
system to the sanctioning organizations that will provide 
boxers with the freedom to choose which of the two systems 
works best for them. Additionally, this bill will return 
premier boxing events to our country, spurring economic growth 
and success across those communities.
    For this reason, the operators of many of America's 
greatest venues endorse this bipartisan legislation, including 
State Farm Arena in Atlanta, Georgia; Madison Square Garden in 
New York City, New York; Target Center and U.S. Bank Stadium in 
Minneapolis, Minnesota; Little Caesars Arena in Detroit, 
Michigan; Crypto.com Arena in Los Angeles, California; Moody 
Center in Austin, Texas; and Chartway Arena in Norfolk, 
Virginia. Just yesterday, this legislation received a letter of 
support from the 1.3 million members of the International 
Brotherhood of Teamsters, one of America's largest unions.
    To improve the safety and well-being of boxers, this 
legislation establishes a minimum payment per round of $150 for 
professional boxers, aligning the patchwork of existing State 
laws to a uniform standard that will protect boxers from 
exploitation, especially in the early stages of their career. 
Additionally, this act strengthens existing health and safety 
protections for boxers to extend their careers and earning 
potential.
    Finally, to safeguard the integrity of the sport, this 
legislation implements strict anti-betting policies and 
restricts UBOs from charging boxers' fees for placement in 
rankings or participation in championship matches. Sadly, 
earlier this week, super middleweight champion of the world 
Terence ``Bud'' Crawford was stripped of his championship belt 
for allegedly failing to pay fees to the sanctioning 
organization. Our legislation prohibits this practice for 
boxers who elect to join a UBO.
    In closing, the Muhammad Ali American Boxing Revival Act 
provides us with a chance to make history. Once enacted, this 
legislation will be celebrated for decades to come. Let us join 
together in a spirit of bipartisanship and revive one of 
America's greatest sports in the name of one of America's 
greatest athletes, Muhammad Ali. I yield back.
    [The prepared statement of Representative Jack follows:]

[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]    

    Chairman Mackenzie. Thank you.
    Our second witness is Congressman Steven Horsford, and we 
will now turn to you.

  STATEMENT OF THE HON. STEVEN HORSFORD, A REPRESENTATIVE IN 
               CONGRESS FROM THE STATE OF NEVADA

    Mr. Horsford. Thank you to the Workforce Protection 
Subcommittee Chair, Mr. Mackenzie, and to the ranking member, 
Ms. Omar, and to the full committee chair, Mr. Walberg, and the 
ranking member, Mr. Scott, as well as all the other members for 
allowing me to testify along with my colleague before this 
Subcommittee today in support of creating more opportunities 
for American boxers. I will keep my remarks brief, but I am 
here in support.
    Why am I here today? That answer is simple. Las Vegas is 
the undisputed fight capital of the world, and our community 
knows better than most what boxing means. Many of the sports' 
most iconic bouts took place under the neon glow of the Nevada 
desert. I remember the legendary Hagler-Hearns fight at Caesars 
Palace in 1985, the fight that electrified the Nation and 
showcased boxing at its very best.
    This sport is woven into the fabric and culture of the 
Silver State. Its intertwined history dates back to March 17, 
1897, when Nevada hosted the very first legalized boxing match 
in the United States. That heritage continues to grow stronger 
with every event. In fact, as of 2023, researchers at the 
University of Nevada, Las Vegas, estimated that one in four 
workers in Las Vegas and nearly 30 percent of the city's GDP is 
tied to recreation and entertainment services, including 
sports.
    Out-of-town visitors attending sporting events generated 
nearly $2 billion in direct economic output in Fiscal Year 2022 
for our community. UNLV forecasts more than 12 percent growth 
in performing arts and spectator sports industries by 2030. 
That is 3,000 new and permanent jobs. In other words, when 
sports thrive, Nevada's economy thrives, and thousands of 
workers feel the impact.
    It has now been 25 years since Congress enacted the 
original Ali Act to confront corruption, exploitation, and 
dangerous gaps in boxing. That landmark law made a meaningful 
difference, but the world of professional boxing has changed 
dramatically since its passage. Today, in this room, we have an 
obligation to evaluate where the system is working and where it 
is clearly falling short for fighters, and that is why H.R. 
4624, the Muhammad Ali American Boxing Revival Act, is so 
important.
    This bill allows a new, modernized business model to exist 
alongside the current sanctioning body system, a system that 
many across the sport agree is not adequately serving boxers or 
fans. H.R. 4624 creates room for innovation, competition, and 
expanded opportunities. It establishes a new pathway that can 
increase stability, elevate safety standards, and ultimately 
give fighters more control over their career. These reforms 
move the sport in the right direction.
    At the same time, I want to be candid. The bill is not 
perfect, and there are areas that deserve a closer look. These 
concerns should be part of the bipartisan dialog as the 
legislation moves forward. I urge all of you, together with 
Representative Jack and myself and the bill's other cosponsors, 
to listen closely today to the expert panel of witnesses and to 
identify what works and pinpoint areas that need refinement. By 
doing so, we can craft a final product that strengthens 
protections for boxers while fostering a healthier, more 
competitive boxing landscape. congressional action transformed 
professional boxing a generation ago. Today, we have the 
opportunity and the responsibility to act again. If we do so 
thoughtfully, collaboratively, and with a commitment to the 
athletes at the center of the sport, we can help usher in a 
revival worthy of Muhammad Ali's name and legacy.
    Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and I yield back.
    [The prepared statement of Representative Horsford 
follows:]

[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]

    Chairman Mackenzie. Thank you to Congressman Jack and 
Horsford for coming to testify before the Subcommittee on 
Workforce Protections today as we discuss H.R. 4624, the 
Muhammad Ali American Boxing Revival Act. We share your 
interest in fostering greater investment and innovation in 
American boxing. Ultimately, we know that will lead to greater 
competition, more people involved, and increasing the abilities 
of American boxers. This legislation and this hearing is just 
the start of our efforts to make American boxing great again, 
and we appreciate you being here today.
    With that, we will now seat the second panel, and we will 
pause for a minute as the panel gets situated. I will ask those 
witnesses to come forward at this time.
    All right. Well, now that the second panel of witnesses has 
been seated, I want to welcome all of you.
    Our first witness is Mr. Lawrence Epstein, senior executive 
vice president and chief operating officer of the Ultimate 
Fighting Championship from Las Vegas, Nevada.
    Our second witness is Mrs. Lonnie Ali, widow of Muhammad 
Ali and cofounder of the Muhammad Ali Center in Louisville--or 
from Louisville, Kentucky.
    Our third witness is Mr. Patrick English, the principal 
partner and owner of Dines and English LLC from Clifton, New 
Jersey.
    Our final witness is Mr. Andy Foster, the executive officer 
of the California State Athletic Commission from Sacramento, 
California.
    Again, welcome to all of you. We want to thank you for 
being here, and we look forward to your testimony.
    I should note that, pursuant to committee rules, I will ask 
each of you to limit your oral testimony to a 3-minute summary 
of written testimony, which you have provided. As committee 
members may have questions for each of you, the clock will 
count down from 3 minutes. Pursuant to committee rule 8(d), the 
committee practice, however, is not to cutoff any individual 
and their testimony until you reach the 5-minute mark.
    I would also like to remind the witnesses to be aware of 
their responsibility to provide accurate information to the 
subcommittee.
    With that, I will recognize our first witness today. Mr. 
Epstein, you are recognized for your testimony.

STATEMENT OF LAWRENCE EPSTEIN, SENIOR EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT 
 AND CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER, ULTIMATE FIGHTING CHAMPIONSHIP, 
                       LAS VEGAS, NEVADA

    Mr. Epstein. Thank you very much, Chairman Mackenzie, 
Ranking Member Omar, and distinguished members of the 
subcommittee. Thank you for the opportunity to appear before 
you today to discuss H.R. 4624, the Muhammad Ali American 
Boxing Revival Act.
    My name is Lawrence Epstein. I am the senior executive vice 
president and chief operating officer of the UFC, the world's 
premier mixed martial arts organization. I have worked in 
combat sports for nearly three decades, first as a private 
practice lawyer representing clients across combat sports and 
now as an executive with the UFC, where we have spent many 
years and invested billions of dollars building a global sport 
that has benefited thousands of athletes, many local 
communities, and hundreds of millions of fans.
    I deliver these remarks today as a proud boxing fan. My 
father first introduced me to the sport in its golden era of 
the 1970's and 1980's when I watch watched American boxing 
legends like Muhammad Ali, Mike Tyson, Sugar Ray Leonard, and 
Marvelous Marvin Hagler captivate millions of fans with their 
otherworldly courage, determination, and athleticism. I am 
honored to sit here today alongside Lonnie Ali, cofounder of 
the Muhammad Ali Center and guardian of Muhammad's legacy, to 
discuss our support of this legislation.
    It is undeniable that professional boxing has suffered a 
steady decline in popularity in the United States. The sport's 
evolution and growth have been stifled, reducing opportunities 
for boxers and undermining the fan experience. The Muhammad Ali 
American Boxing Revival Act can reverse this decline by 
creating a new space for an innovative model that will enhance 
and grow the industry and create more choices and opportunities 
for boxing.
    This bill establishes a framework for alternative systems 
called Unified Boxing Organizations, or UBOs, which would 
provide professional boxers with more career opportunities, 
better pay, and greater health and safety protections. UBOs 
would not replace--I want to repeat this--UBOs would not 
replace sanctioning organizations. Instead, UBOs would exist as 
a separate, parallel system. Boxers would have the freedom to 
choose between the two systems: the sanctioning organization 
model that currently exists or the UBO model. Whatever one is 
best for them, they will be able to choose.
    UBO boxers would benefit from additional health and safety 
protections, including enhanced comprehensive medical exams, 
more licensed physicians and ambulance units present at each 
event, and--perhaps most importantly--health coverage for 
injuries sustained during training, which corrects a massive 
deficiency in the current system.
    UBOs would also offer independently administered anti-
doping programs with no-notice testing both in and out of 
competition to ensure that no boxer has an unfair and dangerous 
advantage over his or her opponent. UBOs would also maintain 
strict anti-betting policies to safeguard the integrity of 
competition.
    Beyond UBOs, this bill would also provide benefits to 
boxers fighting in the sanctioning organization system. The 
bill establishes a national minimum payment of $150 per round 
for all professional boxers. The Association of Boxing 
Commissions believes this change will help boxers since six 
States have minimums less than $150 per round, while most 
States have absolutely no minimum at all.
    Last, through this legislation, all professional boxers 
would have access to better health insurance, including a 
first-time national minimum of $25,000 of coverage for injuries 
sustained during a bout, higher than the current minimum in 43 
States.
    It is also very important to know that my company, UFC, 
already has extensive experience in operating a best-in-class 
combat sports organization. For more than two decades, UFC has 
worked to become the gold standard for athlete health and 
safety in combat sorts. We are proud of our track record, and 
we certainly bring that expertise to bear in the boxing 
industry.
    As boxing is the only professional sport regulated by 
Congress, we believe that congressional action in the form of 
bipartisan H.R. 4624 is needed to clarify the ambiguity in 
current law that has stifled investment and led to the problems 
we have that have diminished the sport for athletes and fans 
alike. This bill is a thoughtful solution that preserves the 
original Ali Act while providing boxers with access to more 
choices and opportunities, greater health and safety 
protections, and better pay.
    I want to thank the subcommittee for giving me the 
opportunity to testify here today. I would be happy to take any 
questions you may have. Thank you.
    [The prepared statement of Mr. Epstein follows:]

[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]    

    Chairman Mackenzie. Thank you.
    Now I recognize Mrs. Ali for your testimony.

 STATEMENT OF LONNIE ALI, WIDOW OF MUHAMMAD ALI AND COFOUNDER, 
           MUHAMMAD ALI CENTER, LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY

    Mrs. Ali. Thank you, Chairman Mackenzie.
    Chairman Mackenzie. If you could just tap the microphone, 
please, there, ma'am.
    Mrs. Ali. Sorry.
    Chairman Mackenzie. Thank you.
    Mrs. Ali. Thank you, Chairman Mackenzie, Ranking Member 
Omar, and distinguished members of the Workforce Protection 
Subcommittee. Thank you for the opportunity to appear before 
you today to discuss H.R. 4624, the Muhammad Ali American 
Boxing Revival Act. My name is Lonnie Ali, and I am honored to 
speak to you as the wife and partner of the greatest boxer of 
all time, the self-proclaimed, globally recognized, and 
original GOAT, Muhammad Ali.
    I met Muhammad in 1963 when I was 6 years old and living in 
Louisville, Kentucky. Back then, the young Cassius Clay played 
a role in my life as a hometown hero and a growing global icon 
whose influence extended far beyond the ring throughout his 
career. After his retirement from boxing, we married, and I 
stood beside him for more than three decades as his closest 
companion, advocate, and eventually his caregiver.
    Muhammad went on to become an Olympic champion and three-
time heavyweight champion of the world, earning numerous 
accolades, including the Presidential Medal of Freedom in 2005 
from President George W. Bush. Boxing gave Muhammad a platform 
to speak truth to power, to fight for civil rights, and to 
inspire millions around the world. He believed that boxing gave 
him the public platform to serve others, to be the voice for 
the voiceless. Muhammad often said service to others is the 
rent you pay for your room here on Earth. Needless to say, he 
lived his life practicing what he preached. He appreciated and 
utilized the immense platform boxing gave him to serve others 
and speak out about issues that moved him.
    Today, as cofounder of the Muhammad Ali Center in 
Louisville, I carry forward Muhammad's legacy of promoting 
respect, hope, and understanding throughout the world. The 
Center serves as both a museum and a cultural institution 
celebrating his global legacy and as an educational institution 
that inspires young people to find their own greatness.
    This brings me to why I strongly support H.R. 4624. 
Congress has long recognized that boxing needs help. Twenty-
five years ago, Congress honored Muhammad by enacting the 
Muhammad Ali Boxing Reform Act to address corruption and other 
problems in boxing. These issues were not new to Muhammad, to 
Congress, or to the country. Indeed, in the 1960's, it was 
well-known that the mob controlled much of boxing.
    In the late 1990's and the early 2000's, Muhammad and I 
were honored to work with the late and Honorable Senator John 
McCain of Arizona to strengthen reforms throughout the Muhammad 
Ali Boxing Reform Act. Twenty 5 years later, boxing has 
suffered a steady decline in both popularity and integrity. 
Young athletes who might have once seen boxing as a pathway to 
success now face a system plagued by structural limitations, 
inadequate safety protections, and limited opportunities for 
fair compensation. One needs only to understand that HBO, 
Showtime, and ESPN have dropped boxing programming to know that 
boxing is in trouble.
    I was asked about this bill and felt a personal obligation 
to assess whether it would be good for boxing and for boxers. I 
certainly cannot speak for Muhammad. As you know, he had a way 
with words. The perspective I bring is whether this bill 
reinforces Muhammad's life work, and it does.
    In addition to injecting some much-needed competition into 
the current system, this bill has significant health, safety, 
and integrity provisions that will no doubt be good for the 
sport. These three elements are particularly meaningful to me: 
minimum compensation, mandatory MRI testing which will require 
MRI and MRA tests every 3 years, and performance and recovery 
centers.
    Muhammad's perspective on boxing transcended its demanding 
physical aspects. He was well-known for his focus on the mental 
and emotional strength, courage, and self-belief gained through 
the sport, viewing boxing as a platform for expressing 
convictions and inspiring others. He believed in the importance 
of mental fortitude and willpower, professing that the will 
must be stronger than the skill.
    If Muhammad were here today, I know he would want to ensure 
that boxing remains strong and viable for generations to come, 
providing opportunities for other athletes to pursue their 
goals and dreams just like he did. This legislation has the 
potential to create countless opportunities for young athletes 
while establishing the safety standards and ethical practices 
that should have been in place long ago. It can help restore 
boxing's position as a respected American sport while ensuring 
that fighters who make it great are treated with dignity and 
the protection they deserve.
    Given its enhanced protections for boxers, I believe 
Muhammad would be proud to have his name associated with this 
legislation. Thank you very much for your time and 
consideration. I look forward to working with you to pass this 
important legislation, and I am happy to answer any questions 
you may have at this time.
    [The prepared statement of Mrs. Ali follows:]

[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]    

    Chairman Mackenzie. Thank you. Next we will recognize Mr. 
English for his testimony.

 STATEMENT OF PATRICK ENGLISH, PRINCIPAL, PARTNER, AND OWNER, 
          DINES AND ENGLISH, LLC, CLIFTON, NEW JERSEY

    Mr. English. Thank you very much.
    Chairman Mackenzie. Microphone as well, please. Is it on? 
There you go.
    Mr. English. Thank you.
    Chairman Mackenzie. Thank you, sir.
    Mr. English. Thank you. Why am I here today, is the 
question. I have been involved in all of the boxing reform 
movements since the original Boxing Health and Safety Act--very 
involved--to the extent of working with the staff of John 
McCain in both acts to help draft them.
    Now, I am going to be in the minority here. I am glad that 
Congress is taking a new look because there are things that 
should be corrected and modified, but this Act is not the way 
to go. What the real purpose of this Act is, in addition to the 
things that Lonnie Ali said--they are all good, and I am all in 
favor of that; I have them down on my little pad here--is to 
give a monopoly power or attempt to give a monopoly power to a 
particular UBO, which is Zuffa.
    Most boxers, through their organizations and individually, 
are opposed to this Act. Nobody, to my knowledge, has gathered 
them together to speak as they have before the ABC, before the 
California Athletic Commission, and many other places.
    When it became known that I was going to testify today, I 
was deluged with folks that said, ``Make sure they ask this, 
make sure they ask that.'' Well, it is not my role, nor do I 
have the time to do that but let me tell you really quickly how 
the other acts that I mentioned were generated. There was no 
one who was a lobbyist who was involved in those acts. They 
were a group--including John McCain--of people who cared and 
wanted to help a sport that needed help. They worked 
collectively together in a long series of hearings. Sadly, it 
took years, but it got better.
    The Muhammad Ali Act is an example. It broke to some 
extent--not to the extent I would like--a grip of ratings 
organizations in a way that was very bad. ``Corrupt'' is the 
word that I would choose to use. This bill unfortunately takes 
away some of the guidelines that were so important particularly 
in the Muhammad Ali Act.
    For instance--I have provided written testimony--but just 
certain things. The firewall provision will not apply to the 
UBO. That is not helpful to anyone except somebody who wants to 
control. The next thing of many is that it does not require 
that positive drug tests be reported as they are now. Right 
now, they are reported to the local commission. They are 
reported to the ABC, and, of course, through the ABC to the 
organization that reports results. It is called BoxRec, and it 
has a contract with the ABC. This bill says, ``or it goes to 
those or the UBO.'' That is wrong. There has been lots of 
suspect that results have been held, not recorded, or 
manipulated. That can't be. It is a formula for a problem.
    I have written testimony. I know you have read it. I am 
running out of time here, but I really would like to answer any 
questions that you have, recognizing that I am really in the 
minority of this panel.
    [The prepared statement of Mr. English follows:]

[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]    

    Chairman Mackenzie. All right. Well, thank you. We 
appreciate everybody being here.
    Last, we will recognize Mr. Foster for your testimony.

 STATEMENT OF ANDY FOSTER, EXECUTIVE OFFICER, CALIFORNIA STATE 
          ATHLETIC COMMISSION, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA

    Mr. Foster. Good afternoon, Chairman Mackenzie, Ranking 
Member Omar, and distinguished members of the committee. My 
name is Andy Foster, and I serve as executive officer of the 
California State Athletic Commission and multiple leadership 
positions within the Association of Boxing Commissions. I was 
also a professional fighter. Thank you for holding this 
important hearing for consideration of the Muhammad Ali 
American Boxing Revival Act.
    Members of Congress, in 44 States right now, a professional 
boxer can fight four, six, or sometimes eight rounds, get 
knocked unconscious, concussed, need stitches, suffer a broken 
orbital or worse, and the check they are handed at the end of 
the night is literally $1. I have stood ringside and watched it 
happen. In some cases, fighters actually pay the promoter a fee 
just to be on the card. They leave the venue worse off both 
financially and physically than when they arrived. Members of 
Congress, that is not a sport; that is sanctioned exploitation.
    In 2016, California said ``no more.'' The Commission banned 
$1 contracts and set a minimum purse of $100 per scheduled 
round. In 2023, Governor Gavin Newsom signed legislation that 
the Commission sponsored that doubled purses to a minimum of 
$200 per round, the highest in the country. A four-round 
fighter in California now walks away with at least $800. It is 
still modest money, but for the thousands of club-level 
fighters who keep this sport alive, it is enough money to get 
you home. H.R. 4624 would finally bring the rest of America to 
a reasonable floor: $150 per round, meaning $600 for a four-
rounder. That single provision would be the biggest pay raise 
the working-class boxer has ever seen.
    Money is only part of the picture. Boxing injuries can be 
brutal and expensive. Too many promoters today carry $5,000 or 
$10,000 insurance policies. When a fighter needs an overnight 
hospital stay, an MRI, emergency surgery, those bills go unpaid 
and often get sent to the fighter himself. This bill fixes that 
by requiring every professional card in the country to carry at 
least $25,000 in no-deductible medical coverage paid for by the 
promoter and not the athlete. That is real protection. That is 
what boxing needs. That will help boxing.
    The legislation also establishes the first Federal medical 
baseline, an annual physical, dilated eye exam, and blood 
testing for hepatitis B, C, and HIV. California and a handful 
of other States already greatly exceed these standards, and the 
bill wisely lets us continue to do so, but no boxer in any 
State will again be cleared with just a quick blood pressure 
check and a handshake.
    The California State Athletic Commission voted unanimously 
to support this bill, and we particularly urge you to add one 
amendment that we have requested: An automatic inflation 
adjustment so that these person insurance minimums and these 
protections do not erode over time.
    We also strongly back the Unified Boxing Organizations 
framework in the bill. It gives fighters genuine choice in how 
they want to pursue titles without the crushing sanctioning 
fees that drain purses today. It gives the fighters a choice.
    Mr. Chairman, professional boxers put their health and 
their future on the line every single time they step through 
the ropes. H.R. 4624 says that their safety, their basic 
dignity, and their ability to pay a medical bill are not 
negotiable. California regulates more combat sports events than 
any other State in the country by a wide margin, and we are 
proud to stand with Congressman Jack and Congresswoman Davids--
who is also a fighter--and the other Members of Congress to 
support this bipartisan bill. Please pass this bill, add the 
inflation adjustment, and give American boxers the protection 
that they have earned in blood and sweat.
    Thank you, and I am happy to answer your questions.
    [The prepared statement of Mr. Foster follows:]

[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]

    Chairman Mackenzie. Thank you.
    Under Committee Rule 9, we will now ask questions of the 
witnesses and under the 5-minute rule. I would recognize myself 
first, but I am going to yield to our full committee chairman, 
Mr. Walberg from Michigan.
    Mr. Walberg. I thank the gentleman for your kindness in 
doing that, and I appreciate panel for being here very much so.
    I guess I would add a few more names to the Little Caesars 
Arena in Detroit. You have got to remember ``The Fist'' Joe 
Louis in the Joe Louis Arena and Kronk Gym, which is making a 
comeback. Certainly, I am so proud that the longtime home of 
Muhammad and Lonnie Ali was in my district, and so good to have 
you here.
    Mr. Epstein, being a wrestler--I guess a pugilist to some 
degree--myself and having five shoulder surgeries as a result 
of that--chicken wings, arm bars, Granby rolls, and all of the 
rest--I would not--not do it over again but that was amateur. I 
guess I would like to hear more about the medical coverage of 
the Ultimate Fighting Championship that goes on specifically--
goes on in a person's life as well as especially the training 
aspect. What is covered there?
    Mr. Epstein. Congressman, thanks for that question. You 
know, most injuries actually take place--with mixed martial 
arts athletes, combat sports athletes--in training because, 
every fight they participate in, many, many hours are used to 
train for that particular bout, and that is when many injuries 
occur.
    Over a decade ago at the UFC, we instituted what we call an 
accident insurance policy for all of the athletes at the UFC 
that are currently under contract with us. That accident 
insurance policy provides coverage for any--I am going to 
underline any--acute injury sustained by the athlete in 
training or any other situation, frankly, leading up to the 
event.
    You heard a little bit about what we would like to do with 
this bill, which would be to increase the amount of coverage 
that would be for injuries sustained in a bout, but the 
coverage that we provide, you know, obviously dovetails that. 
It covers all injuries, any acute injury that is sustained 
during training, and, frankly, any injury that the athlete 
sustains while they are under contract. That is a very 
significant thing because, in many situations, athletes--you 
know, they don't have coverage and they will actually go into a 
bout injured in order to avail themselves to the, at this 
point, fairly limited accident insurance policy they will have 
relating to a bout injury.
    We are very proud of that. We have done it for, as I said, 
over a decade now, and it is something that we think is central 
to the UBO model and a requirement that all UBOs should have to 
implement before they can have the status.
    Mr. Walberg. That industrywide standard is greatly 
appreciated. Thank you.
    Mr. Epstein. Thank you.
    Mr. Walberg. Mrs. Ali, you cofounded the Muhammad Ali 
Center with your late husband. A core mission of the center, as 
I understand, is the continuous legacy for promoting respect 
and inspiring positive change. How do you believe H.R. 4624 
works toward achieving those goals?
    Mrs. Ali. Thank you for that question, Congressman. My 
husband spent his life trying to inspire and uplift people, 
especially those who did not have a voice of their own. In this 
situation, a lot of the boxers do not have that voice either.
    I appreciate this bill in particular because it addresses 
not only the legacy of Muhammad in his sport of boxing where it 
will maintain that presence of boxing in American sports 
culture but also what it does for the people who participate 
and make that sport possible for us to watch. It will uplift 
them with minimum payment for each round they box.
    The health and safety standards that are--that have been 
incorporated into this act, especially the MRI and MRA brain 
testing, which is especially important to me--every 3 years, 
beginning the first year and then every 3 years thereafter, 
they are required to take that test as well as the--as I said, 
the performance and recovery institutes that they have. My 
husband never had any kind of opportunity to have that kind of 
support as an athlete. A lot of other league athletes do, and 
boxers are entitled to that as well. I believe that my husband 
would approve of the provisions in this act that uplift those 
boxers and provide a pathway--just the way it provided a 
pathway for him--to a bigger platform to make an honest living, 
a decent living, and to be protected while doing so.
    Mr. Walberg. Thank you.
    Before I yield back, because I have to here, I want to say, 
Mr. Foster, thank you for bringing reality in your testimony to 
what the sport is about and what fighters go through. Thank 
you. I yield back.
    Chairman Mackenzie. Thank you, Chairman.
    I will next recognize our ranking member of the 
subcommittee for 5 minutes of questioning.
    Ms. Omar. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
    Mr. English, thank you so much for joining us. Can you 
briefly remind us of what the world of boxing looked like 
before the Ali Act, and what were the conditions and practices 
that led to the Ali Act?
    Mr. English. Competing, in my view, was thoroughly corrupt. 
Ratings were sold. We know that as a fact because there was a 
conviction as a result of it. There was a coziness--I think I 
say in my written testimony--between promoters and managers. 
Now, managers should have a fiduciary duty to a fighter, a 
manager meaning anyone who gets a percentage of the fighter's 
purse who is not a promoter. That was not the case. We had and 
still do have issues where you have relatives who manage 
fighters where a promoter has an interest.
    If you are asking also about the Health and Safety Act, it 
was a start. It was not the completion. There was a lot more 
that needed to be done. The biggest thing that happened was the 
suspension list administered through the ABC into a company 
called BoxRec. Right now, it is BoxRec. It was something else 
then.
    Ms. Omar. Let me ask you this. If the Revival Act was 
passed, would Unified Boxing Organizations, or UBOs, be allowed 
to undertake any of the practices that the Ali Act prohibited?
    Mr. English. Yes. One major one is the ``coziness''--and I 
use that word--between managers and the UBO, whether it is the 
UFC, Zuffa, or anybody else who may come along. Nobody else 
exists right now.
    I have seen provisions of contracts that require the 
signing with a, quote, ``advisor,'' unquote, for 15 percent of 
a boxer's income. You know, it was in a promotional contract, 
so--and that was an entity that was a Zuffa-related entity. 
That is absolutely prohibited. Now, I do not know whether that 
contract was provisioned on the completion of this bill, but it 
is there.
    Ms. Omar. Yes.
    Mr. English. I do not know why, but it is there.
    Ms. Omar. Thank you.
    Mr. Epstein, the UFC settled a longstanding antitrust case 
after allegations of using restrictive contracts, keeping 
fighters' pay at roughly 15 to 20 percent of revenue, as Mr. 
English was kind of alluding to. What minimum share of event 
revenues can you commit today that boxers could receive under 
Zuffa Boxing League?
    Mr. Epstein. Yes. First, let me just address, you know, 
sort of the lawsuit, which was part of your question. We did 
settle the lawsuit. It was 10 years of litigation. We made a 
business decision to settle it. I want to be clear: There was 
no finding of any liability or anything along those lines.
    As far as committing to any percentage today, obviously, we 
cannot do that. You know, we are starting a new business. If 
this legislation is passed, we are going to be starting a new 
business, and it is going to be----
    Ms. Omar. Okay. Well, then let me ask you this. UFC is 
being sued again, not only with more claims of wage suppression 
but also new allegations of discovery violation--even though 
you just said there was no discovery--possibly withholding a 
substantial amount of evidence that was crucial to the UFC's 
bid to force their antitrust claims into arbitration. With all 
these lawsuits, I am having a hard time seeing why any of the 
fighters would ever be able to trust that they will be paid 
fairly in the system.
    Mr. Epstein, what would you tell the many boxers who are 
worried about being trapped in a long, coercive contract, or 
how will you make sure that the economic freedom of boxers will 
not be taken away under this model that you are advocating for?
    Mr. Epstein. What I would tell them is they are going to 
have a choice. What is very clear from this legislation is that 
the existing Ali Act is not going to change at all. We are 
adding new provisions that will add for what we have talked 
about, the Unified Boxing Organizations or UBOs. There is going 
to be a choice for athletes to make. I do not see how choice is 
a bad thing. If our system is not providing the economic 
opportunities for athletes, they can avail themselves to the 
existing system.
    The problem we have got is the current State of boxing is 
just a disaster. As was mentioned in previous testimony from 
witnesses on this panel, there are no major media companies in 
the United States of America that currently broadcast in any 
way, shape, or form a consistent cadence of boxing events. If 
we look back 10 or 15 years ago, you had HBO; you had Showtime; 
you had ESPN Friday Night Fights--which I loved--Tuesday night 
fights on USA.
    I mean, I am a huge boxing fan, too. I want this sport to 
be successful. I want it to win, and I really do believe that 
the UBOs will give it a chance. Ultimately, it is going to be a 
choice for athletes. If they do not like it, they can choose to 
stick with the existing system.
    Ms. Omar. Thank you. I yield back.
    Mr. Epstein. Thank you.
    Chairman Mackenzie. Thank you.
    Mr. Epstein, I will go to myself for the next round of 
questions, and I would like to continue and pick up where the 
ranking member left off.
    When it comes to competition amongst different 
organizations and the potential for increased competition 
through H.R. 4624, I would like to hear how UFC's safety 
standards compare to other existing boxing industry standards 
that are in place today.
    Mr. Epstein. Thank you for that question. I mean, you know, 
we believe that the UFC standards for health and safety are 
truly the gold standard in the combat sports industry. As I 
mentioned in a previous question, we provide accident insurance 
policies for all of our athletes. I think we have 750 athletes 
currently under contract. All 750-plus have what is called an 
accident insurance policy that covers them for all acute 
injuries.
    It was also mentioned by Mrs. Ali that we have a UFC 
Performance Institute. That Performance Institute is a physical 
space that we have in several locations around the world that 
provides world-class training, nutrition, injury recovery, and 
sports science to all of our athletes free of charge. Those are 
just two things that we are doing to set the industry standard 
when it comes to combat sports.
    The final thing which I will mention--because Mr. English 
did mention it--is drug testing, and I was a bit confused by 
his comments. I agree with him that there should be absolute 
transparency when it comes to adverse drug testing and 
performance-enhancing drug testing results.
    Over 10 years ago, we instituted what I believe to be is 
the gold standard not in the world of combat sports but in the 
world of professional sports: a 365-day, random, out-of-
competition testing protocol for all of our athletes all 
administered by a third party--we do not decide who gets 
tested, when they get tested, for what they get tested--and all 
of the adjudication of any adverse results is handled by a 
third party.
    This is the industry-leading stuff that we are doing for 
the health and safety of the UFC, and we absolutely intend to 
do this in a Unified Boxing Organizations structure.
    Chairman Mackenzie. Thank you. I would note, I mean, when 
it comes to boxing and a regulated sport like this, we are 
talking about compensation for fighters. We are talking about 
the opportunity for more competition, more highlighting of the 
sport on national TV, but safety standards and health 
provisions are critically important to those boxers, and I do 
believe that that is one area where competition in the 
marketplace could actually increase those standards for 
everybody across the industry as well, because boxers are going 
to be picking and choosing where they want to compete, and they 
are going to be looking at that whole array of issues, not just 
the compensation and exposure but also the health and safety of 
the competing organizations. I think that is critically 
important that we highlight that here.
    Mr. Foster, I will go to you next. I do want to talk about, 
with your long tenure in the industry and especially now as a 
regulator, how have you seen the boxing industry change since 
the passage of the Muhammad Ali Boxing Reform in 2000, and how 
do you believe that the changes that we are trying to correct 
can be remedied with the legislation that is being discussed 
today?
    Mr. Foster. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Some of the changes 
that I have saw have been somewhat negative over the years. I 
mean, we lost HBO. We lost Showtime. We lost Fox. We lost ESPN. 
We are not on TV. Boxing is not on TV anymore. DAZN, they are 
based in the U.K. They are broadcasting, but that has been one 
area.
    Another area that has been helpful is, you know, like Pat 
said, we have the suspension list, and now that BoxRec's doing 
it, we have got really good with communicating with the other 
States. We do not have fighters fighting on suspension. That 
has been helpful with the Reform Act.
    One of the things, Mr. Chairman, when we talk about what 
happened in 1996 and what happened in 2000, now we are in 2025, 
is not how much it has changed. How much is still the same? The 
boxers are still being exploited. Look, it was $100 a round 25 
years ago. I am talking about the minimum standard, okay? I 
mean, dollar contracts are relatively, from my experience, a 
relatively newer type idea, giving the fighters the tickets to 
sell, and that is how you are paid. Making them do this kind of 
thing and then this idea of having to use--whether you are 
going to have to use your money that you just made to pay the 
deductible to get your stitches done, these are not okay. This 
bill addresses those particular issues.
    Just final, because I am running out of time here, I think 
that adding competition will help the industry, because the 
sanctioning organizations, it is interesting to me that their 
fees are all the same, okay? Roughly all the same. IBF will 
give you a break at 2 percent if you are a champion, I think, 
but the fees are essentially all the same. Is that not 
interesting? I think it is interesting.
    Chairman Mackenzie. Thank you again, and for our next 
questions, we will go to Mr. Grothman from Wisconsin.
    Mr. Grothman. Yes, thanks. First of all, just, you know, 
you do not see boxing on TV much anymore, but was not there a 
time in this country where, if you were in the service, you 
either had to pick to be a boxer or a wrestler? Anyone want to 
comment on that?
    Mr. Epstein. Yes, I can just jump in here quickly and just 
say, you know, virtually every branch of the U.S. military now 
trains in some form of combat sports, mixed martial arts, 
boxing, wrestling, et cetera. I think what you are saying is 
absolutely accurate.
    Mr. Grothman. Yes. I think during the 1950's if you were in 
the military. Okay. Your written testimony--this is for you, 
Mr. Epstein. Your written testimony also says the current mega 
event model in boxing financially benefits a few boxers at the 
top. How would the creation of a UBO organization promote 
growth for this sport and success spread out among boxers a 
little bit more?
    Mr. Foster. Yes. I think the model really is what we have 
done at the UFC. We purchased the UFC in 2001. We were doing a 
handful events, four or five events per year. In 2026, we will 
do 43 events. Typically, that is 12 to 14 bouts per event, so 
that is, you know, essentially 24 to 28 athletes competing. 
This is the type of stuff that we are going to do in the world 
of boxing. We are going to increase capacity. We are going to 
not just create opportunities for one or two boxers every few 
years to do a mega fight but create a consistent cadence of 
events, which of course means a consistent cadence of work for 
a huge number of boxers.
    I mentioned, at UFC, we are 750 athletes currently, plus or 
minus a few. This is the type of aspirations that certainly we 
have for the boxing industry, and that means, as I said, not 
just more athletes making more money on a per round basis, but 
actually more athletes making money in general.
    Mr. Grothman. Okay. How would the unified boxing 
organizations coordinate with State athletic commissions?
    Mr. Epstein. State athletic commissions are a key part and 
really the linchpin for all of the regulatory health and safety 
athlete payment issues that relate to boxing in this country. 
Every single event that we would do in the United States of 
America would only be done if it was sanctioned by a State 
athletic commission. We do a lot of work with Andy in 
California. That would be the case if we did events in 
California. I also want to repeat that we would not be doing 
any events in this country without them being fully sanctioned 
by athletic commissions.
    Mr. Grothman. I remember the golden days of boxing, and I 
remember it was always on Friday nights on ESPN I would like to 
watch. It was just tremendous. That being said, I also love to 
watch football, and there have been lawsuits and such over 
football players. Even though they are okay when they are 
playing, the real injuries kick in when they are 55 or 60 years 
old. In boxing, we have a sport in which the goal is even to 
knock people out, which you do not have in football. That is a 
rare thing that you see. How would you respond to criticism, 
and are there any statistics available on the number of, say, 
boxers who have Alzheimer's or whatever they get, say 20 years 
after they retire, compared to football players and the 
injuries that they get?
    Mr. Epstein. You raise a very important issue, one that, at 
the UFC, we have been involved in for almost 15 years now in 
investigating these issues. I think the primary goal that we 
have is to allow our athletes to make informed decisions about 
their health and safety, provide them with information so they 
can make informed decisions. What we have been doing for the 
last 15 years approximately is funding being the primary 
funder, along with some of the boxing promoters, by the way. 
They have contributed.
    In a groundbreaking study with the Cleveland Clinic, the 
Cleveland Clinic has an outpost in Las Vegas. The goal of this 
study is twofold. No. 1, are certain people just predisposed 
toward brain injury because of their physiology? No. 2, are 
there early indications that we can see before someone starts 
manifesting a cognitive deficit, we can see they are heading 
down the wrong path and, you know, get them out of the sport. 
It is not great to diagnose somebody with CTE after they got 
it, but figuring out ways to stop people from getting it is the 
key. This study that we have been involved in, as I said, with 
UFC athletes, with boxers, with other workers that have 
potential for brain injury, lots of data has come out of that, 
and we can share that data with this committee if you are 
interested in that. I think around 40 or 50 peer-reviewed 
journals have looked at that data, and we are getting closer 
every day to a way where we can hopefully make as a condition 
of licensure for MMA athletes, for boxers, some sort of a test 
that will indicate if you are predisposed to a brain injury or 
you are heading down the wrong path; you are out of the sport, 
and you cannot get a license.
    Mr. Grothman. I will just leave you with something. I knew 
a guy who was a very good football player, on the collegiate 
level, but very, very good, and after he graduated from 
college, he started his own business, very successful, super 
guy, but he wound up getting Alzheimer's when he was, like, in 
his early 50's, and nobody is ever going to convince me that 
that was a coincidence that this guy who used to brag to me 
that he hit guys with the crown of his helmet, which you are 
not supposed to do, but was a good football player and a damn 
shame he died before he was 60. Remind you guys as you work 
through this to think about that, because just because a guy 
does not have a serious injury the day of the fight or the week 
after the fight does not mean that, over the course of 20 
fights, he is going to have something that pops up when he is 
55 years old, which is what is happening in the NFL now, so 
thanks.
    Mrs. Ali. Excuse me, may I add something to the testimony 
that Mr. Epstein just gave?
    Chairman Mackenzie. Please, Mrs. Ali, go ahead.
    Mrs. Ali. Thank you so much, and thank you, Congressman, 
for your question, because I think they are important. As I 
said in my testimony, brain health is especially important to 
me, because my husband suffered with Parkinson's disease not 
from boxing, but I have seen what boxing can do to people. As 
you said, hitting people with your head can later in life bring 
on Alzheimer's. That is why I am so proud and happy that this 
particular act brings in brain health as an issue, as a 
component where this MRI--MRAs will be performed every 3 years 
so that the detection of brain health, the boxer will know 
where he is headed, how his brain health is, because you can 
see the imaging. You can see the damage that might be done and 
where it might lead to, especially when you are being seen by a 
neurologist, who that is their expertise.
    As Mr. Epstein mentioned out in--the Cleveland Clinic out 
in Las Vegas does that specifically for boxers, so no other 
provision in this--that parallel, I should say, the parallel 
boxing industry provides for this. No one asked my husband to 
take a required MRI to be sanctioned, to be licensed. This was 
something we did later, of course, in his life and found out 
about the Parkinson's disease, but it was not asked for any 
other boxer. This is a provision I think that is a strength 
that shows that the UBOs would be very, very interested and 
protective of the athlete and one of the provisions, as I said, 
that I am so proud to have in there.
    Mr. Grothman. Thank you.
    Chairman Mackenzie. Thank you for adding that, and next we 
will go for--turn to questions for Mr. Messmer from Indiana.
    Mr. Messmer. Thank you, Chairman, and thank you to our 
witnesses for being here today.
    Mr. Foster, in your written testimony, you discuss how the 
current four-belt system has created a self-serving incentive 
to emphasize the ranking of a few boxers at the top at the 
expense of competitive entertaining matches that could grow the 
sport. Can you discuss how this bill would foster healthy 
competition in boxing?
    Mr. Foster. Yes. Thank you, Congressman. To answer your 
question, sir, you have to understand the way that boxing 
works, the current system, the four belt system. What you have 
is you have a promoter who signs a fighter, and that is the 
promoter's fighter, and then this is early in their career. 
What happens is you look for a--that promoter will promote a 
fight and look for somebody that that guy--that person can 
beat, okay? Has to be good enough to pass my approval or 
whichever State's approval, but has to be reasonable but 
beatable. Okay. Those people in boxing are called opponents. 
That is the term that we use.
    Then, when you get a really good opponent, they are called 
the gate keeper. Okay. We have some of them in the various 
weight classes, and then they move up. This goes on and on and 
on until you get an undefeated fighter. Okay. This is what is 
happening.
    Then, over here on the other side of the country or nearby, 
you have another promoter doing essentially the same thing. 
Okay. They are doing this. Now, all these people that have been 
beat all the time, they are attracting just loss after loss 
after loss, and they have got really no kind of recourse. They 
have got no promoter. They are not being promoted, but the 
undefeated fighter is.
    Now, at the end of this rainbow, all this way up, the 
sanctioning bodies have issued, like, the regional belt, the 
this and that belt, whatever belt. They have a lot of belts. 
Let me give you, sir, in 1996, when the Professional Boxing Act 
was passed, 619 titles were issued across the world by the 
sanction organizations. Last year, that number was 2,156. Okay. 
You saw an increase in the number of titles. It is good for, 
like, the fighters like to have them, and the whole thing, but 
they are charging every time the thing they charge for the 
belt. That system that I just explained to you is exploitive in 
a way.
    Now, under a UBO system, if a promoter has both sides of 
the card, their financial interest shifts. Their business model 
shifts from wanting to make sure that the--that their fighter 
wins to making a competitive match that the public will want to 
see, because it is driven by--it is a different model. You want 
to have, like, a fight that people will want to tune in and 
see. The first model is, like, well, you have got a fight that 
is kind of okay; people might tune in, but you are searching 
for the mega fight at the end where you have, like, a big 
champion that has won all this stuff versus the other 
promoter's big champion, and you promote a big thing. They are 
just different business models. When the focus shifts from 
trying to protect your fighter and getting the opponent beat to 
making competitive matches, in my view, that is--that would be 
a good for boxing.
    One final caveat to that that goes along with it: Let us 
say you have got one of these fighters that are promoted, and 
they take a loss. Okay. Their earnings potential just plummets 
the next go around, the next fight. It just goes so far down 
whereas, under a system where they have got both sides of the 
card, if the guy loses, so what? They have got a contract. They 
know what they are going to get the next time. This is the--
this is what is happening in boxing, and I think that adding a 
UBO model, not taking away the current system, because, 
remember, there is a difference here, sir. This is for the U.S. 
boxers. This is for American boxers, okay? These sanction 
organizations deal throughout the world. We are dealing with 
world titles. This is for American. I think that the name of 
the bill, the Revival Act, the Muhammad Ali American Boxing 
Revival Act, I believe it will revive American boxing by 
providing competition for our fighters. I hope that answers 
your question.
    Mr. Messmer. Well done. Thank you, and I will yield back 
the rest of my time.
    Chairman Mackenzie. Thank you, sir.
    Next we go to Mr. Comer from Kentucky.
    Mr. Comer. Thank you.
    Mrs. Ali, it is an honor to have you here today, a fellow 
Kentuckian and someone that obviously has left a huge positive 
impact in our State. I fly out of Louisville Muhammad Ali 
Airport every week to come to Washington, and I am a big fan of 
the Muhammad Ali Center there in Louisville and all the great 
work that you all do. On behalf of everyone in Kentucky, we 
thank you for the great work that you do in Kentucky.
    It is inspiring to see the foundation continue to do so 
many good things, especially the pursuit to improve the boxing 
industry and raise awareness of neurological diseases. I know 
that your husband would be very proud of this legislation and 
everything that honors his name, that bears his name that does 
good for the industry.
    In addition to enacting Representative Jack's legislation, 
the Muhammad Ali Boxing Revival Act, what more can be done to 
address general safety and health concerns in boxing?
    Mrs. Ali. Well, I am not the expert, sir, but I think this 
is--we are off to a good start with this bill. As I said, the 
brain health is what is most important to me. I think we are 
doing that. If I was to suggest is maybe it would be more 
often, maybe every year instead of every 3 years.
    With regards to the physicals, I know that is important, 
the health and safety of the physicals, and I know that is also 
something that ends up with the State athletic commissions to 
make sure that the boxer is healthy, but also, as Mr. English 
mentioned and Mr. Epstein mentioned, about drug testing and 
making sure that that is done randomly, it is transparent, and 
results are shared.
    What is important is that, when you think about the health 
of a boxer, it is not just the physical health. It is also 
about the economic health of a boxer and how that plays into 
this. The minimum standard that we are--that the bill is 
offering is $150 per round, which is more than what is in 40 
plus States already. This gives an opportunity for boxers to 
earn a decent wage while boxing, which is important, and also 
gives them an opportunity in this system to ascend rightfully, 
competitively in their ranks to earn even more money.
    When I think about this bill and how it promotes Muhammad's 
legacy, it is about lifting people up, preserving boxing for 
America, making sure, like I said, that opportunity exists for 
other athletes, other people who want to pursue boxing, because 
this is, as you said, it is a sport that has been in America 
for a very long time, over 100 years. It is the common man's 
sport, and everybody deserves an opportunity and access to be 
able to walk into a boxing gym and pick up a pair of gloves and 
aspire to be something greater.
    Mr. Comer. What would you hope to see change in this sport 
to foster new interest in boxing?
    Mrs. Ali. I think that, right now, we are looking at a 
barren landscape. Boxing is not there. We need to change that, 
and how do we do that? The existing model, even though it is 
there, it is still fraught with problems and challenges for 
boxers. This is a parallel organization opportunity for boxers 
to participate in that will enhance I think the opportunity for 
boxing to be on a regular cadence, as Mr. Epstein said, on 
television, promoted to bring back boxing. This is the start.
    This UBO is one organization. That does not prevent other 
UBOs from coming into existence, which is important. So, when 
you see that competitive spirit and the ability to create that 
spectator sport, which is what all professional sports really 
are, I think it is something that will increase awareness of 
the sport and really regain that fan base.
    Mr. Comer. Very good. Well, I appreciate that. I am glad to 
support this legislation. Hopefully, we can revive the sport in 
Kentucky where Muhammad Ali is without a doubt the most famous 
athlete to ever come out of Kentucky. We are proud of him and 
his legacy and the great work that you all do and happy to 
support this legislation. I yield back.
    Chairman Mackenzie. Thank you.
    Next we will go to Mr. Fine from Florida.
    Mr. Fine. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
    I have got a few questions for Mr. English. I spent more 
than 10 years of my life in the casino business, and boxing was 
an important part of driving that business since I entered it 
back in the early 2000's. I want to talk about how boxing has 
grown or declined over time. Would you say there are more cards 
today, more or fewer cards today than there were 10 years ago?
    Mr. English. Well, it is a misnomer that there are 
substantially fewer. I got the research, and I provided it to 
the staff. I would take more time than it is worth, but it is 
not hugely lower.
    Mr. Fine. Actually, it is. In the 1990's there were 250 to 
300. I used to do this for a living, and actually in the 2020's 
there was about 100 to 130. We have seen about a 50 percent 
decline in U.S. cards over time. It is your contention, so I 
understand, that the boxing industry, if you will, the 
opportunities available for boxers today is the same as it was 
in the 1970's, 1980's, 1990's. It is just as good. The industry 
is just----
    Mr. English. No, it is not the same at all.
    Mr. Fine. The opportunities are the same--better or worse 
today than they were 20, 30 years ago?
    Mr. English. Very different. I cannot judge whether the 
fact--look, if Mr. Ali was a world champion today, and I always 
say this, when--how goes the heavyweight division goes boxing. 
It is true. We do not have right now the prominent--and I am 
speaking generally, of course--we do not have the prominent 
American boxers that we once did.
    Mr. Fine. Sure. Perhaps it is because the number of 
opportunities available to become that are smaller. My next 
question for you is this. Do you think if we created a second 
vehicle--UFC has been extraordinarily successful, created an 
industry out of nothing. Do you think that if it was created, 
that what we are talking about here, would there be more or 
less opportunities for boxers to engage in the sport and the 
profession that they want to participate in? More or fewer?
    Mr. English. Just to be very clear, I am not arguing that 
there should not be a UBO or whatever you want to call it. What 
I am arguing is that the guardrails that are in the Muhammad 
Ali Act should apply universally.
    Mr. Fine. Let us talk about guardrails. Earlier this week, 
Terence Bud Crawford was stripped of his championship belt by a 
sanctioning organization because he did not pay an exorbitant a 
fee to the sanctioning organization. Are you aware of that?
    Mr. English. Yes.
    Mr. Fine. There are pretty big problems with what goes on 
today.
    Mr. English. Many times I have suggested to fighters that 
they do not need a particular belt or any belt. I could give 
you the names of the fighters, but it is not important. 
Sometimes fighters transcend those belts.
    Mr. Fine. You also said there are not a lot transcending 
right now. We do not have a lot of transcenders right now. 
There are not----
    Mr. English. We do not have as many as we did. I can think 
of a handful.
    Mr. Fine. Okay. You were involved actually in an Ali Act 
case involving Jeff Lacy versus your clients. You worked with 
this group called Main Events, who is sort of involved in this 
space. When was the last time Main Events promoted a televised 
card? I am focused on opportunities for boxers. Was it a year 
ago, 5 years, 10 years?
    Mr. English. I am not here as a representative of Main 
Events. I want to make it very clear.
    Mr. Fine. I understand. I am asking a fact question.
    Mr. English. I do--they have got a card that they are co-
promoting in January.
    Mr. Fine. When is the last time before that?
    Mr. English. It was in Florida last year, maybe early this 
year.
    Mr. Fine. A couple opportunities. Look, the fact of the 
matter is this. In the 1980's and the 1990's, boxing was 
considered one of the big three sports. There were massive 
opportunities available for people who want to participate. It 
was not only good for them, but it was good for the facilities, 
the entertainment venues for the business that I came from. 
Everybody won by these increased opportunities. That industry 
is now in decline, and I think that we can oppose a bill like 
this because we want to keep the equivalent of the horse-and-
buggy system of boxing going and watch it continue to decline, 
watch it continue to create fewer and fewer opportunities for 
boxers, or we can live in the world the way it is today. What 
we have seen is UFC has taken over several decades something 
that basically did not exist and turned it into something 
extraordinary. I think we would all benefit; I think boxers 
would benefit if they had access to that same kind of 
opportunity, too. I am very grateful to Representative Jack for 
bringing this bill forward, and I am going to be excited to 
vote for it if and when it comes before us for markup.
    Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I yield back.
    Chairman Mackenzie. Thank you.
    Next we will go to the ranking member of the full 
committee, Mr. Scott from Virginia.
    Mr. Scott. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
    Mr. Foster, who does oversight right now in the Federal 
law?
    Mr. Foster. The Association of Boxing Commissions has some 
degree of oversight, but it is relatively limited, and with the 
Muhammad Ali Boxing Reform Act, it allows our State attorney 
generals to take an action if we need to do that or it takes--
we can send it to the Federal Department of Justice.
    Mr. Scott. Who would do oversight if this bill passed? Who 
would do oversight for compliance with the provisions of this 
law?
    Mr. Foster. I would assume substantial compliance would be 
the State athletic commissions.
    Mr. Scott. Okay. What is the difference between a UBO and 
the present sanctioning organizations?
    Mr. Foster. Well, the current sanctioning organizations, 
they rate fighters. There is four of them. There is the World 
Boxing Council, the IBF. World Boxing Council is based in 
Mexico City. The IBF is based in New Jersey. The WBO, that is 
the World Boxing Organization, they are based in Puerto Rico. 
The WBA, I think they are Medellin, Colombia. I think that is 
right. Yes, I think they are Medellin, Colombia. They rank the 
fighters, but the promoters, sir, have to--they work with the 
sanction organizations to, like----
    Mr. Scott. What does a UBO do that they do not do then?
    Mr. Foster. Well, the UBO would essentially be the 
promoter, and that is kind of the big difference is the UBO 
would be ranking their own fighters they would have both sides 
of the card, and there is a lot of benefit to that, sir, 
because you do not have to wait to ask who can fight who. Okay. 
Like, there is all these mandatories that happen once a year or 
about annually. What happens is you have four different lists. 
You have four groups. There are four different lists.
    Now, some of these people are the same on the list. A whole 
lot of them are not. Like, if somebody gets a mandatory, you 
have to--the champion is supposed to--gets a letter and says, 
``Hey, congratulations, you are the champion. You have got, 
like, 6 weeks or 8 weeks to negotiate a deal with the No. 1 
contender or our mandatory champion.'' It sounds great when you 
say it, like--but it is not what happens in reality. A lot of 
times what happens is, if there is a better fight for financial 
reasons, they will try to do what is called a special exception 
or a special----
    Mr. Scott. How would a UBO fix that?
    Mr. Foster. A UBO would have their fighters fight the fight 
that they believe is reasonable for the rankings. I got to 
think that they are going to do it the way that the other group 
does it and have the media do the rankings. I am older, but the 
newspaper or the internet media people would do the rankings, 
and you would not have to be forced into a mandatory. You could 
have the champion fight the No. 6 if that made common--made 
sense, but most of the time, it is the No. 1 contender versus 
the champion.
    Mr. Scott. Does the bill anticipate a specific organization 
to be a UBO, and can others qualify?
    Mr. Foster. Absolutely. I think that there is going to be----
    Mr. Scott. Absolutely what?
    Mr. Foster. I think absolutely there will be multiple UBOs 
in a short amount of time if this bill were to pass. I would 
think three or four would pop up within three or 4 years of 
this bill passing, because it will take a little bit of time to 
get going, but at least three or four.
    Mr. Scott. Now, there are several provisions in here, 
minimum amount per round, insurance requirements, and things 
like that. Is it better to do that by statute or by regulation 
where it would be easier to update the amount per round or the 
insurance coverage or the kinds of health requirements? Would 
it be better to do that in statute or by regulation?
    Mr. Foster. Congressman Scott, that is an excellent 
question, sir. That is an excellent question he just asked. We 
have been trying--look, we did it by regulation the first time 
and by statute the second time, but we are one State. We had I 
think 90 or almost 100 boxing events last year, but that is 
one. To get the entire country on the same page of a minimum, 
we have to have the U.S. Congress do this, because 50 State 
legislatures or thereabouts are not going to take this up; 50 
State commissions are not going to run regulations. It is going 
to take Congress.
    Mr. Scott. Thank you, unless, Mr. Chairman, you had a 
national commission. Mr. Chairman, my time is expired.
    Mr. English. Can I just have half a second to address that 
issue? John McCain was moving toward preparing a bill that 
would create a national commission, which would do exactly what 
Congressman Scott was talking about. Obviously, he got 
partially diverted by Presidential politics and then, 
unfortunately, an illness, but that is something that this 
Congress could do and, in my opinion, should explore.
    Chairman Mackenzie. Thank you.
    Finally, we will go to Mr. Allen from Georgia.
    Mr. Allen. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and I want to thank you 
for allowing me to waive on the committee, and I did that 
because growing up in the late 1960's and 1970's, boxing, 
football, and sports and athletics was everything to young men. 
In fact, in high school, when you wanted to settle a difference 
that resulted in a fight, and our coaches came up with this, 
rather than expel the young men, they went to the gym, put on 
their gloves, and settled it, usually ending in both exhausted, 
hugging each other, walking out of the gym. It is amazing. In 
fact, we did that--we settled it in college. My fraternity 
brothers, golden gloves, nobody messed with him in the State of 
Florida.
    My hometown of Augusta is mostly known for golf, but we 
have the Augusta Boxing Club, and I wanted to lift this up and 
lift this club up. It is better to sweat in the gym than bleed 
in the streets. Augusta Boxing Club, with assistance from area 
law enforcement agencies, is structured as an after school 
community support organization with a goal to curtail drug 
abuse and crime among young adults and children. There is a 
great story in boxing, and I wanted to lift that up.
    I can tell you, Mrs. Ali, what is it? Float like a 
butterfly, sting like a bee. I mean, I will never forget that, 
and I never missed one of those boxing matches. It was amazing. 
Your testimony talks about, and we have all talked about the 
steady decline and popularity and integrity. We talked about 
what H.R. 4624 does address as far as industry, but how is it 
going to elevate the sport's prominence to where it once was? 
Do you have--do you believe it has got the potential to do 
that?
    Mrs. Ali. I do not know all the answers to that, sir, but I 
do believe it has the potential, and what you just mentioned 
about the fighter, the boxing club that is in Augusta, and you 
lifting that up, that is one thing that this unified boxing 
organization and this bill talk about, that they intend to 
invest in those police athletic leagues that are in different 
communities.
    As I said, this is a sport for the common man, where a 
child can walk in with a pair of sneakers, and that is all they 
need, and get a pair of boxing gloves, and it takes them off 
the street. It gives them community. It gives them goals. It 
gives them hope. It gives them inspiration, gives them guidance 
and coaching, and that is important. The investment into those 
police athletic leagues that used to exist when my husband came 
along that he became a part of, Joe Martin, the officer who 
coached my husband for a very long time, was the head of that 
police athletic league that gave my husband that platform, that 
start to become who he was, a global icon, so that, you know, 
the sky is the limit. This is really important--pushing that 
pipeline of children into that----
    Mr. Allen. It is big in Augusta. We have the Augusta 
Exchange Club agricultural fair, but the biggest draw is this 
boxing club performs and we give prize money for them 
displaying their skills in the ring in front of fair goers, and 
it has become a tremendous success.
    Mr. Foster, you referred to the Unified Boxing Organization 
model as a league style model. Can you tell us how a league 
style model would result in more competitive matches, which 
would in turn result in greater interest from the public in 
these fights?
    Mr. Foster. Yes, Mr. Allen. Thank you for the question. It 
is like I mentioned in a previous question is, when you have 
the--when you have both sides of the card, you have a financial 
incentive to make a good fight. okay. It is not trying to 
protect the A-side boxer to have a pretty good fight but a 
fight that you know that you can win all the way up until you 
get to the undefeated end of the rainbow, so to speak. You have 
a financial incentive to make a good fight every month or every 
2 months or however the frequency of the fights are going to 
happen. I believe that that would answer your question. I think 
it is pretty obvious why that would make a better fight. You 
would be financially incentivized to do so.
    Mr. Allen. I want to thank all of you for taking your time 
to be here today, and I want to help you. I want to get back to 
the kind of boxing that we enjoyed, that I enjoyed growing up 
early in life, and if there is anything I can do to help you, I 
want to do that.
    With that, Mr. Chairman, I yield back.
    Chairman Mackenzie. Thank you, and that concludes 
questioning from our members. We are going to go to closing 
remarks. I would like to recognize the ranking member for her 
closing statement.
    Ms. Omar. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and, once again, thank 
you to our witnesses for speaking with us today.
    Boxing is a sport that requires fighters to push their 
bodies and minds to the limit to achieve greatness and provide 
entertainment for millions of viewers. These incredible feats 
of athleticism deserve our utmost respect and our commitment to 
ensuring these fighters get paid fairly, retain their leverage 
in the industry, and have their health and safety prioritized.
    While this bill is not entirely bad, the Muhammad Ali 
American Boxing Revival Act does not yet live up to that 
promise. We have already gotten recommendations for an 
amendment from Mr. Foster. I do recommend that, before this 
bill moves any further, that my colleagues take a moment and 
check in with the people who will actually feel the impact of 
these reforms. Talk to your State athletic commission, your 
local boxing gym, the small venues, and mostly talk to boxers 
in your community. We should hear all perspectives and make 
sure that we are making fully informed policy decisions that 
truly helps workers and small businesses around sports. I 
welcome future bipartisan discussions on how to best serve 
boxers and improve the boxing industry.
    Mr. Chairman, I request unanimous consent to enter into the 
record.
    Chairman Mackenzie. Without objection.
    Ms. Omar. An op-ed by Oscar De La Hoya and Evander 
Holyfield opposing H.R. 4624; a Tweet by Nico Ali Walsh 
opposing the bill; an interview with a promoter Bob Arum 
expressing opposition to the bill; an open letter from Mr. Arum 
to the combat sports community and Congress opposing the 
Revival Act; a letter from MMA Fighters Association opposing 
the bill; a letter from Carlos ``The Ronin'' Newton, a member 
of the MMA Fighters Association; a letter from Sara McMann, a 
2004 Olympic silver medalist in wrestling, former UFC 
contender, and now owner of a martial arts gym also opposing 
the Revival Act.
    I would also like to enter data from BoxRec about the 
number of fights and boxing events in recent years.
    Chairman Mackenzie. Without objection.
    [The information referred to follows:]

[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]    

    Chairman Mackenzie. I would just like to thank all of our 
testifiers again for joining us here today. I think we all got 
to share in some of the remembrances of not only the great 
Muhammad Ali but other great fighters that we enjoyed watching 
growing up and during that heyday and that golden age of 
boxing, and again, Larry Holmes resides in our community, the 
Easton Assassin. He has been there for a long time, and as a 
child, I remember growing up and in school the talk and the 
buzz was all about the Tyson/Holyfield fights and, you know, 
what was coming up on pay per view. Everybody enjoyed those and 
really looked forward to them, and it is something that we want 
to try to get back to.
    That is what this legislation is hoping to achieve by 
reviving American boxing, and we know that it is such a great 
sport, but in some ways, it is being constrained by the current 
regulatory structure that is in place, by the outdated 
practices not only for paying fighters but also keeping them 
safe, and we want to make sure that we revive American boxing, 
bring it back to its greatness and its glory, and I think can 
we by working in a bipartisan fashion. Your testimony here 
today is critically important as we start the process for H.R. 
4624, the Muhammad Ali American Boxing Revival Act. This 
hearing is just the beginning of the legislative process that 
goes on here in Congress.
    Look forward to welcoming amendments to be considered by 
the Full Committee as we will hopefully take this legislation 
up soon. Again, hopefully we can get back to a golden age of 
American boxing and, as I say, make American boxing great 
again. Thank you all for being here. With that, this meeting is 
adjourned.
    [Whereupon, at 12:38 p.m., the Subcommittee was adjourned.]
    [Additional submissions from Ranking Member Omar follows:]

[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]    

    [Additional submissions from Chairman Mackenzie follows:]

[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]    

    [Questions and responses submitted for the record by Mr. 
Patrick C. English follows:]

[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]

    [Questions and responses submitted for the record by Mr. 
Lawrence Epstein follows:]

[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]

    [Questions and responses submitted for the record by Mr. 
Andy Foster follows:]

[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]

                              [all]