[House Hearing, 119 Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]


                 UNIVERSAL BASIC FRAUD: VULNERABILITIES
                      IN MEDICAID WAIVER PROGRAMS
=======================================================================

                                HEARING

                               BEFORE THE

                   TASK FORCE ON DEFENDING CONSTITUTIONAL 
                  RIGHTS AND EXPOSING INSTITUTIONAL ABUSES

                                 OF THE

                        COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND 
                            GOVERNMENT REFORM

                     U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                    ONE HUNDRED NINETEENTH CONGRESS

                             SECOND SESSION

                               __________

                              JUNE 3, 2026

                               __________

                           Serial No. 119-64

                               __________

Printed for the use of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

[GRAPHIC NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]

    Available on: govinfo.gov, oversight.house.gov or docs.house.gov
    
                              __________
                              
                  U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE
63-891 PDF               WASHINGTON : 2026
=======================================================================
   
              COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM

                    JAMES COMER, Kentucky, Chairman

Jim Jordan, Ohio                     Robert Garcia, California, Ranking 
Mike Turner, Ohio                        Minority Member
Paul Gosar, Arizona                  Eleanor Holmes Norton, District of 
Virginia Foxx, North Carolina            Columbia
Glenn Grothman, Wisconsin            Stephen F. Lynch, Massachusetts
Michael Cloud, Texas                 Raja Krishnamoorthi, Illinois
Gary Palmer, Alabama                 Ro Khanna, California
Clay Higgins, Louisiana              Kweisi Mfume, Maryland
Pete Sessions, Texas                 Shontel Brown, Ohio
Andy Biggs, Arizona                  Melanie Stansbury, New Mexico
Nancy Mace, South Carolina           Maxwell Frost, Florida
Pat Fallon, Texas                    Summer Lee, Pennsylvania
Byron Donalds, Florida               Greg Casar, Texas
Scott Perry, Pennsylvania            Jasmine Crockett, Texas
William Timmons, South Carolina      Emily Randall, Washington
Tim Burchett, Tennessee              Suhas Subramanyam, Virginia
Lauren Boebert, Colorado             Yassamin Ansari, Arizona
Anna Paulina Luna, Florida           Wesley Bell, Missouri
Nick Langworthy, New York            Lateefah Simon, California
Eric Burlison, Missouri              Dave Min, California
Elijah Crane, Arizona                Ayanna Pressley, Massachusetts
Brian Jack, Georgia                  Rashida Tlaib, Michigan
John McGuire, Virginia
Brandon Gill, Texas
Richard McCormick, Georgia

                                 ------                                

                       Mark Marin, Staff Director
                   James Rust, Deputy Staff Director
                     Ryan Giachetti, Chief Counsel
                          Jack Furla, Counsel
                          Rodney Rios, Counsel
         Mallory Cogar, Director of Operations and Chief Clerk

                      Contact Number: 202-225-5074

                Robert Edmonson, Minority Staff Director
                      Contact Number: 202-225-5051
                                 ------                                

      Task Force on Defending Constitutional Rights and Exposing 
                          Institutional Abuses

                     Brandon Gill, Texas, Chairman

Jim Jordan, Ohio                     Lateefah Simon, California, 
Michael Cloud, Texas                     Ranking Member
Andy Biggs, Arizona                  Dave Min, California
Byron Donalds, Florida               James Walkinshaw, Virginia
Brian Jack, Georgia                  Ayanna Pressley, Massachusetts
                         
                      C  O  N  T  E  N  T  S

                              ----------                              

                           OPENING STATEMENTS

                                                                   Page

Hon. Brandon Gill, U.S. Representative, Chairman.................     1

Hon. Lateefah Simon, U.S. Representative, Ranking Member.........     3

                               WITNESSES

Mr. Luke Rosiak, Investigative Reporter, Daily Wire
Oral Statement...................................................     6

Hon. Keith Faber, Ohio Auditor of State
Oral Statement...................................................     9

Hon. Michael Dovilla, The Ohio House of Representatives, District 
  17
Oral Statement...................................................    11

Hon. Nickie Antonio (Minority Witness), The Ohio Senate, District 
  23
Oral Statement...................................................    13

Written opening statements and bios are available on the U.S. 
  House of Representatives Document Repository at: 
  docs.house.gov.

                           INDEX OF DOCUMENTS

  * Article, AZ Family, ``Arizona Nurse Practitioner Sentenced''; 
  submitted by Rep. Biggs.

  * Article, Chicago Sun-Times, ``Biden Commutes Sentences of Two 
  Illinois Mega Fraudsters''; submitted by Rep. Biggs.

  * Article, Breitbart, ``DOJ Azerbaijan National Charged in $90 
  Million California Healthcare Fraud Scheme''; submitted by Rep. 
  Biggs.

  * Article, Fox News, ``Five Arrested in Alleged $267 Million 
  Hospice Fraud Scheme That Exploited California's Medi-Cal 
  System''; submitted by Rep. Biggs.

  * Article, Fox News, ``Hospice Fraud Uses Stolen Identities For 
  Fake Patients''; submitted by Rep. Biggs.

  * Article, Fox News, ``Minnesota Medicaid Operator's Bankruptcy 
  to Riches Rise Crashes Into Fraud Probe''; submitted by Rep. 
  Biggs.

  * Article, North Dakota Monitor, ``North Dakota Judge Blasts 
  Biden for Setting Fraudsters Free''; submitted by Rep. Biggs.

  * Article, Daily Signal, ``Ohio Rocked By Fraud. Now What?''; 
  submitted by Rep. Biggs.

  * Article, Fox News, ``RFK Jr. Announces Largest Autism Fraud 
  Bust in American History With $46.6M Medicaid Scheme 
  Indictment''; submitted by Rep. Biggs.

  * Article, Politico, ``White House Cuts $1.3 Billion in 
  Medicaid Payments to California''; submitted by Rep. Biggs.

  * Press Release, U.S. Department of Justice, ``California Man 
  Pleads Guilty to Orchestrating $270 Million Medication 
  Reimbursement Fraud Scheme''; submitted by Rep. Biggs.

  * Report, Ohio Auditor of State, Keith Faber, ``Ohio Department 
  of Medicaid Cost of Concurrent Enrollment''; submitted by Rep. 
  Biggs.

  * Report, Ohio Auditor of State, Keith Faber, ``Ohio Department 
  of Medicaid Electronic Visit Verification''; submitted by Rep. 
  Biggs.

  * Report, House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 
  Majority Staff, ``The Cost of Doing Nothing: How Tim Walz and 
  Keith Ellison Fueled Minnesota's Fraud Explosion''; submitted 
  by Rep. Comer.

  * Article, Daily Wire, ``Daily Wire Investigation Reveals One 
  of the Biggest Government Waste Scandals Hiding in Plain 
  Sight''; submitted by Rep. Donalds.

  * Article, Daily Wire, ``He Was Convicted for Defrauding The 
  Government. Now Medicaid Pays His Wife Millions''; submitted by 
  Rep. Donalds.

  * Article, Daily Wire, ``Inside Ohio's Home Health Empire: 7 
  Buildings, 288 Medicaid Companies, $250 Million''; submitted by 
  Rep. Donalds.

  * Article, Daily Wire, ``Refugees From Bhutan Billed Medicaid 
  Millions Now They Drink Champagne in Private Jets''; submitted 
  by Rep. Donalds.

  * Article, Cleveland.com, ``Medicaid Fraud Scheme in Ohio 
  Pushed in Testimony at Senate Hearing''; submitted by Rep. 
  Gill.

  * Transcript, Rep. Ansari statement on fraud, ``Oversight of 
  Fraud and Misuse of Federal Funds in Minnesota: Part II 
  Hearing'', House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform; 
  submitted by Rep. Gill.

  * Article, Truthout, ``Trump Grants Clemency to Executive Who 
  Orchestrated $205M Medicare Fraud Scheme''; submitted by Rep. 
  Pressley.

  * Article, NBC, ``Immigrants Contributed Trillions More in 
  Taxes Than They Received in Benefits: Study''; submitted by 
  Rep. Simon.

  * Article, Cleveland.com, ``Ohio Republicans Are Rage-Baiting 
  Over Medicaid Fraud, But They've Run the Program Since 2011''; 
  submitted by Rep. Simon.

  * Article, KFF, ``Trump's Health Fraud Focus At Odds With Past 
  Pardons''; submitted by Rep. Simon.

  * Article, Washington Post, ``Trump's Pardons Wipe Out Payments 
  to Defrauded Victims''; submitted by Rep. Simon.

  * Report, Protect Our Care, ``The Real Fraud Trump Pardoned''; 
  submitted by Rep. Simon.

  * Statement from Ancor, ``Universal Basic Fraud: 
  Vulnerabilities in Medicaid Waiver Programs''; submitted by 
  Rep. Simon.

The documents listed above are available at: docs.house.gov.

                          ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS

  * Questions for the Record: Hon. Nickie J. Antonio; submitted 
  by Rep. Simon.

  * Questions for the Record: Hon. Michael D. Dovilla; submitted 
  by Rep. Simon.

  * Questions for the Record: Hon. Keith Faber; submitted by Rep. 
  Simon.

These documents were submitted after the hearing, and may be 
  available upon request.


 
                 UNIVERSAL BASIC FRAUD: VULNERABILITIES
                      IN MEDICAID WAIVER PROGRAMS

                              ----------                              


                        WEDNESDAY, JUNE 3, 2026

                     U.S. House of Representatives

              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

      Task Force on Defending Constitutional Rights and Exposing 
                          Institutional Abuses

                                                   Washington, D.C.

    The Task Force met, pursuant to notice, at 10:06 a.m., Room 
2154, Rayburn House Office Building, Hon. Brandon Gill, 
[Chairman of the Task Force] presiding.
    Present: Representatives Gill, Comer, Jordan, Biggs, 
Donalds, Jack, Simon, Walkinshaw, and Pressley.
    Also present: Representative Brown.
    Mr. Gill. This hearing on the Task Force on Defending 
Constitutional Rights and Exposing Institutional Abuses will 
come to order.
    Welcome, everybody. Without objection, the Chair may 
declare recess at any time. I now recognize myself for the 
purpose of making an opening statement.

           OPENING STATEMENT OF CHAIRMAN BRANDON GILL

                   REPRESENTATIVE FROM TEXAS

    Good morning, and welcome to the first hearing for the Task 
Force on, again, Defending Constitutional Rights and Exposing 
Institutional Abuses.
    America's Medicaid system was designed to provide 
healthcare for low-income Americans. Unfortunately, as 
reporting from Luke Rosiak at the Daily Wire has recently 
revealed, fraudsters and cheats are stealing billions in hard-
earned American tax dollars. This is something we have seen 
before, unfortunately. Just a couple months ago, the House 
Oversight Committee examined a similar problem in Minnesota 
where Somali fraudsters stole over $16 billion from American 
taxpayers.
    Today, we are going to be focusing on Ohio, which appears, 
in many ways, quite similar. Ohio broadened its Medicaid 
program through home and community-based services, or HCBS, 
waivers authorized under the Social Security Act. HCBS waivers 
allow states to provide home-based healthcare, as opposed to 
providing healthcare in hospitals or other institutions. These 
waivers also allow states to cover non-medical personal care 
services such as cooking and cleaning, as well as companionship 
and conversation.
    The problem is that fraudsters are billing Medicaid for 
personal care services that were never actually provided in 
many cases. Here is how it works. A fraudster finds an elderly 
person in Ohio, oftentimes a family member, who he believes 
will qualify for Federally-funded home health services. The 
fraudster then gets a note from a doctor which vouches for the 
elderly person's supposed needs. Because the fraudster is 
unequipped to deal directly with the Medicaid bureaucracy, he 
contracts with a home health business, who acts as an 
intermediary between himself and the Federal Government. The 
business then facilitates Medicaid payments from the taxpayer 
to the fraudster while taking a cutoff of the top. In the 
personal care Medicaid waiver program in Ohio alone, taxpayers 
have lost an estimated $1.2 billion due to fraud; $1.2 billion 
of hard-earned American tax dollars are now in the hands of 
criminals.
    So, who are these fraudsters? Well, just like in Minnesota, 
many of them are Somali. There are an estimated 60,000 Somalis 
living in Ohio right now. That means that Ohio is the second 
largest Somali population in America, second only to Minnesota. 
In addition to Somali fraudsters, Ohio is home to the largest 
population of Bhutanese immigrants in America. Recent reporting 
shows that many of the Somali and Bhutanese communities commit 
a large portion, if not the majority, of home health Medicaid 
fraud in Ohio. That may not be the politically correct thing to 
say, but we believe that is the truth.
    So, what do we know about these businesses that are 
facilitating Medicaid fraud? Thanks to Rosiak's investigative 
reporting, we know quite a bit. They oftentimes have names like 
Capital Home Health, Continental Home Health, Dynamic Home 
Health Care, or Ohio Senior Home Health Care, or some 
derivation of a similar name. Many of them operate out of 
largely abandoned, often windowless buildings like the one at 
6161 Busch Boulevard, which is home to 94 different companies 
that have recently billed Medicaid $66 million. There have also 
been multiple reports of other abandoned buildings, companies 
sharing the same address and corporate names that are 
identical. Indeed, many of these companies appear virtually 
indistinguishable from one another. They do not advertise 
themselves, they charge the same rates, and offer no clear 
explanation of how they even acquired large numbers of 
patients, often seemingly overnight.
    So, I think what the American people would like to better 
understand, and one of the purposes of this hearing, is why was 
this allowed to happen? Of course, part of the answer is, in 
fact, immigration. The reality is that America would not have a 
problem with Somali and Bhutanese fraud if we did not import 
large numbers of Somali and Bhutanese people. That is a fact. 
This appears to be the tip of the iceberg of a gross abuse of 
America's immigration system. For too long, our government 
allowed foreigners from low-trust societies with very little 
vetting to pour into our communities.
    Now, as elected officials, we cannot stand idly by as these 
fraudsters exploit our welfare system and get rich off American 
taxpayers, and we cannot back down to fraud simply because of 
spurious accusations of racism.
    Second, as we will discuss, we have a problem with 
verifying the integrity of America's welfare programs. Programs 
like the Electronic Visit Verification system, including its 
GPS tracking system, were not properly utilized. That means 
that in many cases, we cannot even verify if any of the billed 
home health services were even provided. In many cases, family 
members are billing Medicaid for alleged services provided to 
their own relatives. At the same time, we have seen billboards 
in Columbus advertise that people can get paid for caring for a 
loved one at home.
    The result is that fraudsters and fraudulent home health 
businesses are stealing massive sums of money by abusing and 
defrauding Federal Medicaid. This is not just about 
safeguarding our constituents' hard-earned tax dollars, but it 
is also about saving our society from fraudsters and cheats and 
protecting the availability of critical programs for the 
American people. According to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid 
Services Administrator Oz, half of all fraud in Federal 
Government programs is in healthcare. He recently revealed that 
eliminating fraud in Medicare alone would double the life 
expectancy of the Medicare Trust Fund without any other 
legislative fixes.
    The purpose of this hearing is to better understand the 
nature, scale, and scope of Medicaid fraud in Ohio, to 
understand why it happened, and to better understand who is 
responsible.
    I want to thank our witnesses for appearing today on this 
important topic.
    And with that, I would like to yield to Ranking Member 
Simon for her opening statement.

              OPENING STATEMENT OF RANKING MEMBER

                         LATEEFAH SIMON

                 REPRESENTATIVE FROM CALIFORNIA

    Ms. Simon. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and thank you for our 
witnesses and members of the public for attending today.
    This is the first hearing convened by the Task Force on 
Defending Constitutional Rights and Exposing Institutional 
Abuses. And I have to say, if this hearing is any indication of 
what this Task Force intends to do, I think the American people 
have reason to be a bit concerned because they are being 
gaslit. Families across the country are struggling to afford 
rent, they are struggling to afford groceries, they are 
struggling to afford healthcare, and they are struggling to 
afford childcare. And many, particularly our elders, are 
wondering how they are going to retire one day. Seniors are 
worried about the future of Medicare and Social Security. Our 
disabled populations are fighting every day to access the care 
for the services that they need to live.
    And yet, we are here. We are here having this conversation. 
Republicans have called this hearing on universal basic fraud. 
But before we have heard a single witness--and again, thank you 
all for being here--before we have received a single finding, 
the conclusion has already been written. The premise is that 
the public benefit programs are inherently suspect--inherently 
suspect--and that the people who rely on them should be viewed 
with both skepticism and distrust rather than compassion. And I 
wholeheartedly and forcefully reject this premise.
    Now let me be clear--and I want this to be heard again loud 
and clear--fraud should and must be investigated. Inefficient 
systems must be addressed. Bad actors should be held 
accountable wherever they exist. But one bad actor, even a few 
bad actors do not and should never define an entire program. 
Millions, and we mean millions, of Americans rely on Medicaid. 
Seniors rely on it. Disabled folks rely on it. Working families 
rely on it. Caregivers rely on it.
    And as somebody--me--who has cared for a terminally ill 
person, the person that I love most in the world, my husband, 
we received and got a ton of community support, including home 
health. I know that these services are not just lifelines, but 
they are often the difference between stability and literal 
crisis.
    Well, what concerns me most is that too often conversations 
like this one are not actually about accountability. They 
become the justification for gutting the social safety net that 
Americans have paid into. They become a justification for 
making it harder for people to access care, the people that we 
care most about. They become the justification for undermining 
programs that millions of people depend on each and every day. 
And they become the justification for subjugating entire 
classes of people. Yes, subjugating entire classes of people.
    So, if Republicans are truly concerned, truly concerned 
about fraud and waste, then we as a body should be willing to 
apply that standard consistently. We and my Republican 
colleagues should be willing to explain why, why they have 
pursued the largest cuts to Medicaid in American history while 
supporting and funding an illegal and immoral war and a 
ballroom at the White House.
    The question before us is not whether fraud should be 
addressed. It should be the question of why my colleagues are 
spending our time--are spending our time--tearing down a 
program that helps real people, the sick, the disabled, the 
elderly, instead of addressing the high cost and conditions 
that families in this country are dealing with on a daily 
basis.
    I hope today's hearing focuses on solutions, and, Mr. 
Chairman, I hope we can distinguish between isolated instances 
of wrongdoing, real wrongdoing, and the millions of people who 
rely on these services in good faith. And I hope that we 
remember that protecting the integrity of Medicaid ultimately 
lifts up and benefits all Americans, all Americans.
    Thank you, and I yield back.
    And actually, I would love to enter unanimous consent.
    Mr. Gill. Without objection.
    Ms. Simon. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
    Mr. Chairman, I ask unanimous consent that Representatives 
Brown, Landsman, and Sykes of Ohio be allowed to participate in 
today's hearing.
    Mr. Gill. I will, in fact, object to that. We have 
discussed through the staff earlier that we are not having 
waive-ons for this hearing.
    Ms. Simon. Well, and I understand that, but what is really 
important, I would like to ask the question of why. I have a 
parliamentary inquiry, Mr. Chairman. This hearing is about 
Ohio. Ohio Democrats asked to waive on, and we were told by 
Committee Republicans that they could. And just yesterday, just 
yesterday, we were told at the last minute that you are no 
longer allowing Ohio Members to participate in a hearing about 
Ohioans. I would love to ask why.
    So, Mr. Chairman, what is the reason for your refusal to 
allow Ohioans, who are representing their people, to 
participate in today's hearing?
    Mr. Gill. I mean, waive-ons are at the discretion of the 
Chair, and we have decided that it is going to be best if we 
keep this hearing limited to just the Members of the Chair, but 
I appreciate the inquiry.
    Ms. Simon. Mr. Chairman----
    Ms. Brown. But Mr. Chairman, if I may----
    Ms. Simon. Mr. Chairman, I am confused because we have 
Members who are elected by the people of Ohio who sit on the 
Oversight Committee and other Members of Congress----
    Mr. Gill. And they could have been added----
    Ms. Simon [continuing]. And they have asked to waive on.
    Mr. Gill [continuing]. To this Committee so----
    Ms. Simon. Well, you actually said yes----
    Mr. Gill [continuing]. They could have been added to the 
Committee----
    Ms. Simon. Mr. Chairman, yesterday, you asked----
    Mr. Gill. No, we are----
    Ms. Simon. You said that they could.
    Mr. Gill [continuing]. Going to keep this--we are going to 
move on, and I would like to briefly recognize----
    Ms. Simon. That is extremely unfortunate.
    Ms. Brown. Mr. Chairman, if I may, parliamentary inquiry, 
please.
    Mr. Gill. Sure.
    Ms. Brown. As the Member--as the one Democrat----
    Mr. Gill. The gentlelady is not recognized. I recognize Mr. 
Jordan----
    Ms. Brown. As the one Member----
    Mr. Gill. The gentlelady is not recognized.
    Ms. Brown [continuing]. Of the Democratic Member of Ohio on 
this Committee----
    Mr. Gill. The gentlelady is not recognized.
    Ms. Brown. I am on the Committee. Why are you not allowing 
me to speak as a Member of the Committee, the Committee of----
    Mr. Gill. You are not on this Task Force. You are not 
recognized. We are going to move on.
    I now recognize Mr. Jordan very briefly.
    Mr. Jordan. I thank the Chairman. I just wanted to 
welcome--I have been in Congress a few years, and I do not know 
if we have ever had a hearing where we had three folks from our 
great state testifying, folks that I do not know, Hon. Ms. 
Antonio, but I do know Mr. Dovilla, and of course, I have known 
Mr. Faber for a long time. They have served our state well, and 
we appreciate that. In fact, I think auditor is actually stuck 
with me as his Member of Congress, so, God bless you for 
putting up with me.
    But we want to welcome the folks from Ohio, appreciate you 
being here today. And, of course, we welcome Mr. Rosiak as 
well.
    And with that, I would yield back.
    Mr. Gill. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. And now I would like to 
welcome our witnesses. Thank you all for taking the time to be 
here.
    First, we have Luke Rosiak. Luke is an investigative 
reporter for the Daily Wire. Mr. Rosiak broke the story on 
Medicaid HCBS, the waiver program in Ohio. So, thank you for 
being here.
    Next, we have Keith Faber. He is the Ohio State Auditor. 
Mr. Faber took office in 2019. Under his leadership, his office 
has conducted audits identifying improper and fraudulent 
Medicaid billing.
    Next, we have Michael Dovilla, a Member of the Ohio House 
of Representatives from the 17th District. Mr. Dovilla served 
for years previously in the legislature but most recently took 
office in 2025 and serves as the Vice Chairman of the Ohio 
House Finance Committee. He is an outspoken critic of Medicaid 
fraud and an advocate for oversight and reforms.
    Finally, we have Nickie Antonio, State Senator for Ohio's 
23d Senate District. Senator Antonio has been in office since 
2019 and serves as Ohio Senate Minority Leader.
    Thank you all for joining us, and I very much look forward 
to your testimony.
    Mr. Gill. Pursuant to Committee rule 9(g), the witnesses 
will please stand and raise their right hand.
    Do you solemnly swear or affirm that the testimony that you 
are about to give is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing 
but the truth, so help you God?
    Mr. Rosiak. I do.
    Mr. Dovilla. I do.
    Mr. Faber. I do.
    Ms. Antonio. I do.
    Mr. Gill. Let the record show that the witnesses answered 
in the affirmative. Thank you. You can take a seat.
    We appreciate you being here today, and I look forward to 
all of your testimonies. Let me remind the witnesses that we 
will have read your written statement in full, and it will 
appear in full in the hearing record. Please limit your oral 
statements to 5 minutes. As a reminder, please press the button 
on the microphone in front of you so that it is on and the 
Members can hear you. When you begin to speak, the light in 
front of you will turn green. After 4 minutes, the light will 
turn yellow. When the red light comes on, your 5 minutes will 
have expired, and we will ask you to please wrap up.
    With that said, we will begin with your testimonies, and I 
would like to recognize Luke Rosiak for his opening statement.

                  STATEMENT OF MR. LUKE ROSIAK

               INVESTIGATIVE REPORTER, DAILY WIRE

    Mr. Rosiak. Thank you, Chairman Gill, Ranking Member Simon, 
Task Force Members. It is an honor to be with you to discuss 
the Daily Wire's investigation into Medicaid home health waiver 
fraud.
    The Federal Government built a program so easy to game that 
a convicted fraudster can get approved to send unsupervised and 
untrained workers into elderly Americans' homes, and a refugee 
family can collect $90,000 a year simply by having one family 
member claimed to be the other's caregiver, with no 
verification and little oversight. Medicaid calls this personal 
services home healthcare, and my investigation found 
millionaire tax cheats, almost all of them foreign-born, 
ripping off taxpayers at a scale that threatens to bankrupt 
America.
    We all have families, all of us have parents that will get 
old, and yet in some states, Medicaid will pay you simply for 
being a normal person, as a home health aide whose job it is to 
provide cooking, cleaning, or just companionship and 
conversation to your own family member. The Federal Government 
has agreed to give waivers to certain states, letting them run 
these programs, even though 70 percent of that cost is paid by 
the Feds.
    This was something that was sold to us as saving money 
because it would be used as an alternative to nursing homes, 
but it did not work out that way. A lot more people started 
claiming to be sick when there was a financial benefit to their 
family for being sick. And so, this program has more than 
doubled in cost in just the last few years. The number of 
people doing this in some communities has become so large that 
you can see it in aggregate job statistics. The State of 
California recently reported gaining jobs while it actually 
lost jobs, unless you count the people that are getting paid by 
the government to take care of their own family members. In New 
York State, it is the most common job now of any profession to 
be a home health aide. That is the scale we are talking about 
here.
    Now, in February, The Department of Health and Human 
Services (HHS) released data listing corporations that are paid 
by Medicaid. By far, the largest billing code is personal 
services at $140 billion over the last several years. Personal 
services is the medical jargon for stuff that is not medical at 
all. It is these housekeepers and people providing conversation 
and companionship.
    I did some data analysis to identify suspicious patterns. 
The data immediately pointed me to Columbus, Ohio. It turns out 
you can drive down the street in parts of northeast Columbus, 
and every single building is basically a home healthcare 
provider. One building had 94 businesses inside that billed a 
combined $66 million to taxpayers. I began looking up these 
companies in public records, and what I found was really 
shocking. Many of the owners, maybe most of them, had other 
full-time jobs. This was a side hustle for them to get a couple 
million bucks, sometimes a year, sometimes a month, from 
Medicaid. A lot of times they had tax liens against them. They 
were getting all this money from taxpayers, and yet they were 
not paying their own taxes. They oftentimes or sometimes had 
criminal records.
    True Home Healthcare is run by a man with three fraud 
convictions and by his wife who has three theft convictions, a 
nice couple there. When I asked them basic questions about what 
his business did, you know what he did? He threatened my 
family. These are the kind of people that our government pays 
to go into the homes of little old ladies where anything could 
happen. There is no--they are inside private residences. And 
the same reason it makes it so hard to prevent fraud in this 
program because it is very hard to show that somebody actually 
went to the private residence that they said they were.
    Other times it seems when the business is not in the name 
of a criminal, it is--oftentimes seems like it was put in the 
straw--in a straw owner's name. There was an example where 
Omega Home Health Services was incorporated by the wife of a 
felon who had previously been convicted of ripping off the 
Federal Government by giving out these fake, nonexistent 
services to old people. So, he gets caught, and then his wife 
creates a company doing the same thing, and the Federal 
Government says, yes, that is fine, have $6 million.
    There is a company that was founded on paper by a teenager, 
and the teenager turned out to be the son of a convicted money 
launderer. And so, you know, you can think maybe the teenager 
was not actually the one running this company.
    Only after my database queries highlighted the 
abnormalities in Columbus did I learn that there was another 
similarity to Minnesota. Columbus contained the second largest 
concentration of Somalis in the United States, as well as the 
largest concentration of Bhutanese people outside of Bhutan. 
Now, I visited hundreds of home healthcare companies and only 
saw, I think, two people that did not have an accent.
    Whistleblowers in the area tell me companies knock on doors 
in ethnic neighborhoods where most people are on Medicaid and 
most people live in multigenerational households. And they tell 
the older family member to go to particular doctors and claim 
particular symptoms, and then they will put the younger family 
member on their payroll with the parent as their only patient. 
Now, that triggers payments of up to $90,000 a year, which the 
company splits with the younger relative, and the younger 
relative splits with the older relative.
    Eighty-one percent of Bhutanese are on welfare, a fact that 
some of the remainder use to become obscenely rich. And I had a 
story just yesterday. A 29-year-old named Roshan Adhikari works 
at his dad's home healthcare company. His social media 
documents a life fit for a rapper or a movie star. He is 
drinking champagne on private jets. He is on his yacht. He is 
making movies, starring himself. This was funded. His dad was--
his dad has this company that was paid $17 million for taking 
care of old people. Well, he has got apparently another full-
time job. He is doing this on the side. The dad has not paid 
taxes in like five years. He has got tax liens in Ohio at the 
state level and at Cuyahoga County. And the 25-year-old brother 
has his own home healthcare company that got $10 million. So, 
these are people that came here as refugees, and now they are 
living as millionaires, and they are getting the money because 
the other refugees are all on Medicaid and then are claiming to 
be very sick.
    Any private nurse--you do not even have to be a doctor--can 
sign off on somebody being so sick. And that is, I think, at 
the root of the problem here, is we have people claiming to be 
eligible for this program who really should not be. Companies 
are committing fraud by paying kickbacks for no-show jobs. The 
patients are committing fraud. But we are just beginning to 
look into the root of the monster, the network of doctors who 
rubberstamp this fraud. That is a criminal enterprise that I 
think----
    Ms. Brown. Regular order. I know I am not waived onto the 
Committee, but this is ridiculous.
    Mr. Gill. Ma'am, you are not recognized.
    Ms. Brown. As a person from Ohio----
    Mr. Gill. You are not on this Committee at all.
    Ms. Brown. As a person from Ohio----
    Mr. Gill. This is not your Committee.
    Ms. Brown [continuing]. Who cannot speak, and you are just 
going to let----
    Mr. Gill. You are not recognized.
    Ms. Brown. Please----
    Ms. Simon. I would ask----
    Mr. Gill. You are not recognized.
    Ms. Simon [continuing]. Myself to be recognized that we 
have----
    Ms. Brown. This is absolutely absurd.
    Ms. Simon [continuing]. Regular order for--I would ask to 
be recognized.
    Mr. Gill. Mr. Rosiak is finishing up. You have got----
    Mr. Rosiak. Correct.
    Mr. Gill [continuing]. 5 seconds to finish.
    Mr. Rosiak. I am finished.
    Mr. Gill. Correct.
    Ms. Simon. Just my 5 seconds I would love to take----
    Mr. Gill. And we will give your side----
    Ms. Simon [continuing]. Is I just would love----
    Mr. Gill [continuing]. That as well.
    Ms. Simon [continuing]. Because you have gone over a 
minute, for the rest of the witnesses to have the same ability 
to speak.
    Mr. Gill. You are not recognized. You are not recognized.
    Ms. Simon. Okay.
    Mr. Gill. We are going to move on.
    Ms. Simon. I hope you are going to be fair in this hearing.
    Mr. Gill. We will be fair.
    I now recognize Auditor of the State, Keith Faber, for his 
opening statement.

                 STATEMENT OF HON. KEITH FABER

                     OHIO AUDITOR OF STATE

    Mr. Faber. Well, thank you, Chairman Gill, Ranking Member 
Simon, and Members of the Task Force. Thank you for the 
opportunity to testify today regarding fraud risk and oversight 
concerns with Medicaid.
    As Ohio's Auditor of State, my office is responsible for 
ensuring taxpayer dollars are spent legally, transparently, and 
efficiently. American taxpayers do not care whether dollars 
originate from the Federal Government or the state. They simply 
know that it is their money, and they do not want it stolen, 
wasted, or abused.
    Since taking office, my administration has worked 
aggressively to identify fraud, waste, and abuse, and control 
failures. To date, we have identified more than $9 billion in 
unsupported or fraudulent public expenditures with Medicaid and 
unemployment programs representing the two largest areas of 
concern.
    As auditor, my office has secured convictions in more than 
164 public officials, while also expanding fraud reporting 
initiatives, fraud awareness campaigns, and cybersecurity 
training efforts. Most recently, my office has engaged with our 
Federal partners on public benefits fraud, including 
participation in the Vice President's Task Force here in 
Washington.
    Earlier this year, when significant Medicaid concerns 
surfaced in Ohio, we quickly shared our findings with the 
Federal partners to help inform broader oversight and 
enforcement efforts. But our work has not stopped at the 
Federal level. Over the last several months, I have testified 
multiple times before the Ohio General Assembly, repeatedly 
raising these concerns, outlining the weaknesses our audits and 
reviews have identified, and urging lawmakers to strengthen 
oversight, accountability, and fraud prevention across the 
Medicaid program.
    There is one point I want to make clear. Our role as 
auditors is not to administer the Medicaid programs or 
adjudicate eligibility decisions. We audit government and look 
for control weaknesses. It is the benefit agency's 
responsibility to detect and identify individual beneficiary 
waste, fraud, and abuse. Our role is to identify weaknesses and 
controls, detect anomalies, investigate credible tips, and 
report findings so corrective action can occur.
    In this year's single state audit, which is a rigorous, 
comprehensive financial compliance audit, we identified 
potentially up to $4.4 billion in fraud-related exposure 
connected to ineligible recipients in Ohio's Medicaid programs. 
Our testing found an ineligible rate of 15.6 percent. This 
year's findings remain--again highlighted the need for 
sustainably and substantially stronger oversight and internal 
controls.
    Today, I want to focus on two areas where our office 
identified significant concerns: the electronic visit 
verification, or the GPS system that ensures providers are 
where they say they are, and individuals who are enrolled in 
Medicaid in multiple states at the same time. Congress required 
EVV systems to help ensure accountability in Medicaid-funded 
home care services. The purpose is straightforward. Verify that 
services occurred, the right caregiver provided those services, 
and that the services occurred at the authorized time and 
location.
    Our audit found that approximately 56 percent of home care 
services were not processed through the EVV system, 
representing an estimated $1.1 billion of a nearly $2 billion 
in paid claims that were not matched with EVV visits. This is a 
significant control weakness. Our audit work identified 
problems involving incomplete or inaccurate visit data, 
inconsistent provider compliance, and insufficient oversight 
mechanisms.
    One important lesson from this work is that collecting 
large amounts of data does not automatically create 
accountability. Technology alone does not prevent fraud. 
Oversight agencies must have the staffing, analytical tools, 
and authority necessary to identify suspicious patterns and to 
act quickly when concerns emerge. Most importantly, they need 
to be motivated to enforce those controls.
    Our office has recommended stronger transparency measures, 
enhanced provider monitoring, and better use of predictive 
analytics to identify abnormal billing activity before improper 
payments occur in the Department of Medicaid. In fact, in March 
2024, our office released a report on concurrent enrollment, 
finding that more than 124,000 individuals were enrolled in 
Ohio Medicaid and at least one other state for three 
consecutive months. Ohio paid managed care organizations more 
than $1 billion associated with these enrollees. These findings 
highlight broader systemic challenges facing Medicaid oversight 
nationally, including fragmented data systems, outdated 
technology, delayed reporting, limited real-time monitoring 
capabilities, and insufficient interstate data.
    Too often, Medicaid oversight still operates under a pay-
and-chase model where taxpayer dollars go out first and 
recovery happen--efforts happen later, sometimes years later. 
Prevention is substantially more effective than post-payment 
recovery.
    Our office recently provided recommendations to both the 
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services focused on 
strengthening Medicaid program integrity. These recommendations 
included expanding predictive analytics, improving interstate 
data sharing, strengthening provider screening processes, 
enhancing transparency tools, and improving prepayment review 
systems.
    Medicaid was created to protect society's most vulnerable. 
Unfortunately, bad actors are abusing the system to enrich 
themselves. Across the country, those administering these 
programs have failed to protect taxpayers. Core safeguards have 
been compromised, removed, or simply ignored. As a result, 
everyday Americans are finding it harder to afford their own 
lives. They are subsidizing the abuse of the system. This is an 
affront to fiscal responsibility and rule of law. We must stop 
this waste, fraud, and abuse to ensure that there are resources 
to serve those who truly need these services and, equally 
important, to avoid passing on even more debt to our children 
and grandchildren.
    Thank you for the opportunity to testify, and I look 
forward to answering your questions.
    Mr. Gill. Thank you, Mr. Faber.
    I now recognize Ohio Representative Michael Dovilla for his 
opening statement.

               STATEMENT OF HON. MICHAEL DOVILLA

         THE OHIO HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, DISTRICT 17

    Mr. Dovilla. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
    Chairman Gill, Ranking Member Simon, and Members of the 
Task Force, thank you for the opportunity to appear before you 
today. My name is Mike Dovilla. I represent the 17th District 
in the Ohio House of Representatives. I previously served in 
the House from 2011 to 2016, chairing the Oversight Committee 
and serving as Majority Whip. I have also served twice as a 
Presidential appointee at the U.S. Office of Personnel 
Management and professional staff member on the Senate 
Governmental Affairs Committee. For more than 25 years, I have 
worked to increase accountability and transparency in 
government as a steward of taxpayer dollars.
    When I first served in the legislature, I opposed Medicaid 
expansion. I believe then, as I do now, that expanding the 
program without adequate safeguards places taxpayers at risk 
and undermines the very people it is designed to serve. 
Medicaid must be preserved for those who genuinely need it: 
low-income families, expectant mothers, seniors, individuals 
with disabilities who depend on a functioning safety net. But a 
safety net cannot work if it becomes a target for fraud, waste, 
and abuse.
    My current work on this issue began the way many 
legislative investigations do, with a constituent. A concerned 
citizen from Strongsville brought to my attention serious 
questions about eligibility verification within our state's 
Medicaid program, particularly in the aged, blind, disabled 
eligibility group. That concern led my office to begin asking 
basic questions.
    In April 2025, I contacted third-party vendors involved in 
Medicaid eligibility verification. My request was 
straightforward. Provide information on how Ohio verifies 
eligibility, how data are used to detect ineligible recipients, 
and what happens when potential problems are identified.
    The responses raised more questions than they answered. One 
vendor reported its asset verification tool had reviewed a 
portion of Ohio's Medicaid Aged, Blind and Disabled (ABD) 
population and identified a significant number of individuals 
whose assets appeared to exceed the eligibility limits. To be 
clear, a data flag is not a final eligibility determination. 
Some assets may be exempt, and every individual deserves a 
proper review.
    But the obvious next question was, what did ODM, the Ohio 
Department of Medicaid, do with those flags? That is where 
oversight deficiencies became clear. When my office pressed 
ODM, the answers were unsatisfactory. The department pointed to 
county-level determinations and the role of the Social Security 
Administration. Those factors are real, but they do not relieve 
the state of its obligation to know whether taxpayer dollars 
are being spent properly. At a minimum, the state should be 
able to track what happens when its own eligibility systems or 
vendors identify potential ineligibility.
    If a department cannot tell legislators what happened to 
flag cases, cannot clearly identify why hundreds of thousands 
of people left the rolls, and cannot demonstrate a reliable 
statewide process for reconciling eligibility concerns, then we 
do not have program integrity. We have fragmentation.
    That is why in June 2025 I introduced House Bill 356. The 
bill required a data-sharing agreement between ODM and the 
auditor of state and directed a full ABD audit. As a member of 
the Biennial Operating Budgets Conference Committee, I was 
successful in inserting and retaining those provisions of my 
bill in the final report. While Governor DeWine used his line-
item veto on 67 budget items, to my surprise, he did not veto 
this provision, allowing the audit to become law.
    It is important to be candid about the nature of this work. 
An audit of Medicaid is not a quick exercise. It involves a 
large number of people, multiple data systems, sensitive 
personal information, eligibility categories, asset rules, 
county-level determinations, Federal requirements, and 
historical records. It takes time to conduct the work properly. 
But the audit is essential. It is not enough to exchange 
letters, make public statements, and move on. We need data, 
verification, and corrective action. And when public funds have 
been improperly paid, we need recovery and consequences.
    Speaker Huffman recently appointed me to the Medicaid 
Committee of the House, where I am working with colleagues on a 
comprehensive Medicaid integrity bill, including provisions to 
strengthen provider enrollment, improve electronic visit 
verification, impose additional safeguards on high-risk 
providers, enhance fraud reporting, and increase penalties for 
fraud. Our purpose is simple: verify eligibility and services, 
identify bad actors earlier, and ensure real consequences when 
people defraud taxpayers. We expect that bill to move for swift 
passage by next week.
    This should not be a partisan issue. Medicaid fraud harms 
taxpayers, certainly, but it also harms legitimate providers 
who follow the rules. It harms caseworkers and public servants 
whose work is undermined by weak systems. Most importantly, it 
harms the truly vulnerable Ohioans who depend on Medicaid and 
whose care is threatened when finite resources are diverted to 
those who do not qualify or to providers who exploit loopholes.
    We can have a serious debate about the size and scope of 
Medicaid. We can have a serious debate about the proper 
relationship of Federal and state governments. But there should 
be no debate about whether government has an obligation to 
protect--to prevent fraud, recover misspent dollars, and 
protect those whom the program is intended to serve.
    My message today, Mr. Chairman, is simple. Medicaid is for 
the people who need it, not for those who have learned how to 
manipulate it. Oversight is not cruelty. Verification is not 
extremism. Accountability is not partisanship. It is the 
minimum taxpayers expect and the minimum our most vulnerable 
citizens deserve.
    Thank you for the opportunity to testify today. I look 
forward to answering questions and working alongside you to 
improve accountability and transparency in the administration 
of the Medicaid program for Ohio and the Nation.
    Mr. Gill. Thank you, Mr. Dovilla.
    Now I recognize Ohio Senator Nickie Antonio for her opening 
remarks. If you can turn your microphone on. Thank you.

      STATEMENT OF HON. NICKIE ANTONIO (MINORITY WITNESS)

                  THE OHIO SENATE, DISTRICT 23

    Ms. Antonio. Okay. Can we start again? Thank you.
    Thank you, Chair Gill, Ranking Member Simon, and Members of 
this Task Force, for the opportunity to testify today.
    During my 16 years in the Ohio legislature, I have served 
as Ranking Member on the House and Senate Health Committees. I 
have witnessed the impact of Ohio's Medicaid program to the 
state's most vulnerable. It is a privilege to be a steward of 
hard-earned taxpayer dollars that fund our programs. Doing 
everything we can to prevent fraud is certainly an important 
part of the stewardship.
    In 2020--2014, I was one of the ten legislators appointed 
to the inaugural Joint Medicaid Oversight Committee, JMOC. 
JMOC's purpose was to provide oversight to improve the rate of 
spending and quality of Medicaid. JMOC proved to be true and 
effective to its mission when it exposed problems with pharmacy 
benefit managers, PBMs, who were strong-arming pharmacists and 
using anticompetitive business practices. As a result of JMOC's 
oversight, Ohio created the single PBM system currently in 
operation, saving Ohio Medicaid over $140 million.
    In 2025, this oversight Committee was abolished by the 
Republican Majority. Why? Some question the timing. JMOC was 
conducting an investigation into contracts with Gainwell, the 
Nation's largest Medicaid claims processor. Coincidence? I do 
not know. What I do know is that Democrats in the legislature 
were opposed to dismantling JMOC.
    While Ohioans struggle to afford to put food on the table, 
fill their gas tank, or pay their skyrocketing utility bills, 
the Republican majority has continuously showed how out of 
touch they are. They have prioritized handouts to the wealthy 
and the well-connected on the backs of hard-working everyday 
Ohioans. At the top of the list is the largest public 
corruption case in Ohio history, House Bill 6, a $61 million 
dark money bribery and racketeering scandal that put former 
Republican Speaker of the House in Federal prison for 20 years. 
The administration has refused to pay nursing homes almost $1 
billion in back pay, despite being ordered to do so by the Ohio 
Supreme Court. Given $1.6 billion in tax breaks, $1.4 billion 
more than the administration calculated, to the wealthy tech 
corporations to build data centers that place heavy resource 
burdens on local communities.
    Exhibit A, Republicans' one-party veto-proof rule has 
controlled the state for the last 15 consecutive years. They 
hold the House, the Senate, the Governor's Office, and four 
statewide offices. If there is fraud in Medicaid, it has 
happened on the Republican Majority's watch. Perhaps it is time 
to clean Ohio's House.
    Recently, Senator Ernst opined, ``Government employees are 
caught with their hands in the cookie jar, abusing their 
positions for personal gain.'' Well, Ohio Republicans appear to 
be emulating the playbook of the White House. The President of 
the United States is fleecing taxpayers across the country to 
fight endless wars, attempting to bankroll numerous vanity 
projects, and tried to stick his hand in a cookie jar, a $1.8 
billion cookie jar made especially for January 6 insurgents.
    With an unpopular Republican gubernatorial candidate in 
Ohio and even more out-of-touch policies, I am not surprised 
that we suddenly have a call for fraud reform in Ohio--
Medicaid. If there is fraud, we should root it out and remedy 
the situation. I am surprised that somehow the Republicans 
think they are not responsible, as the supervision of the 
Department of Medicaid has happened on their watch.
    I applaud the goal of this Task Force, which was described 
``going after institutions that stop fearing accountability and 
abuse the American people.'' We should absolutely be doing 
everything we can to expose and prevent fraud, use new 
technologies to provide oversight and accountability. These are 
not and should not be partisan but should be a welcome part of 
any system that serves the people.
    Members of my caucus and I are ready to work with everyone 
to tackle issues of fraud, especially the abuse of taxpayer 
dollars, which is in its essence abuse of the American people. 
We must maintain fiscal responsibility while ensuring that 
Medicaid is available to those eligible, people who are aged, 
blind, disabled, children, and families in need.
    Thank you for this opportunity to testify. I will do my 
best to answer your questions.
    Ms. Simon. Mr. Chairman?
    Mr. Gill. Yes.
    Ms. Simon. I would like to ask unanimous consent to enter 
into the record. Is that okay?
    Mr. Gill. Without objection.
    Ms. Simon. Thank you. I would like to enter into the record 
an article, February 4, 2026, from NBC entitled ``Immigrants 
Contributed Trillions of Dollars More in Taxes Than They 
Received in Benefits.''
    Mr. Gill. Without objection.
    Ms. Simon. Thank you, sir.
    Mr. Donalds. Mr. Chairman, I request unanimous consent to 
enter some items----
    Mr. Gill. Yes.
    Mr. Donalds [continuing]. Into the record.
    Mr. Gill. Go for it.
    Mr. Donalds. The first one is an article titled ``Daily 
Wire investigation reveals one of the biggest government waste 
scandals hiding in plain sight.''
    Mr. Gill. Without objection.
    Mr. Donalds. The second is ``Inside Ohio's home health 
empire: 7 buildings, 288 Medicaid companies, $250 million.''
    Mr. Gill. Without objection.
    Mr. Donalds. The third is ``Meet the convicted fraudster 
running a million-dollar Medicaid business.''
    Mr. Gill. Without objection.
    Mr. Donalds. The fourth is ``He was convicted for 
defrauding the government. Now Medicaid pays his wife 
millions.''
    Mr. Gill. Without objection.
    Mr. Donalds. The fifth is ``Refugees from Bhutan billed 
Medicaid millions. Now they drink champagne in private jets.''
    Mr. Gill. Without objection.
    Ms. Simon. Mr. Chairman, I ask to enter into a unanimous 
consent.
    Mr. Gill. Okay.
    Ms. Simon. I would ask to enter into the record from May 
20, 2026, an article from Cleveland.com entitled ``Ohio 
Republicans are rage-baiting over Medicaid fraud, but they have 
run the program since 2011.''
    Mr. Gill. Without objection.
    All right. Well, thank you again to the witnesses for 
taking the time to be here. We certainly appreciate your time 
and your testimonies. And now we are moving on to the question 
portion of the hearing. So, without further ado, I would like 
to recognize Chairman Comer for 5 minutes.
    Chairman Comer. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and thank you for 
leading this, what I think is going to be a very effective Task 
Force for the frustrated American taxpayers.
    Mr. Rosiak, your reporting highlights what seems to be the 
same problems that we saw in Minnesota and California, 
fraudsters claiming Medicaid reimbursement for services that 
they never provided, allegations of racism against anyone 
looking into the fraud, and state enforcement officials not 
doing their part in flagging rapid, unexplained growth. During 
your investigation in Ohio, what raised your suspicions that 
these providers were committing fraud?
    Mr. Rosiak. Well, the first thing is that it was not their 
full-time job. Most Americans, I think if you are making $1 
million a month, you at least have to show up. It is not part-
time. But they are oftentimes working in trucking, they are 
working in nonprofit activism, and things like that.
    And there was also just nobody in these buildings. You 
would walk down the hall, and there are literally just dozens 
of buildings. There are stray cats living like in the parking 
lot because nobody ever comes here. There are like smoke 
alarms, batteries chirping because nobody is there. It was a 
very creepy thing, and it did not seem normal at all.
    Chairman Comer. Same thing we saw in Minnesota. How many 
providers did you see located at the same address, and why is 
that a red flag for fraud?
    Mr. Rosiak. Well, in one building, we saw 94 companies. 
There is one landlord that owns----
    Chairman Comer. How many?
    Mr. Rosiak. Ninety-four.
    Chairman Comer. In one address?
    Mr. Rosiak. Mm-hmm.
    Chairman Comer. Wow. You would think a state employee would 
catch that. I mean, part of the problem, in my opinion, Mr. 
Chairman, with Medicaid is it is overwhelmingly Federal 
dollars, but it is administered by the states, so the states 
are not as concerned because it is Federal money. It is not 
their money. And that is a joke, and I am glad we are doing 
something about it. I am glad the Vice President is interested 
in it, this Committee is interested in it.
    Mr. Rosiak, did you see any other signs that services were 
not being provided, like abandoned office space?
    Mr. Rosiak. Yes, I saw an office space that was totally 
abandoned. I saw offices that had signs that said ``We have 
just stepped out to lunch,'' but it was clear that was an 
attempt to deceive because there was, for example, stacks of 
mail piled up at the door, sometimes postmarked months ago.
    Chairman Comer. You also reported companies with rapid and 
unusual growth. Should state oversight authorities have been 
alarmed by these trends?
    Mr. Rosiak. Yes. I mean, for example, there was a janitor 
who renamed her LLC to be Mental Health and started billing 
Medicaid $100,000 in the first month, later up to $650,000 in 
one month, and then she left the country. And so, if you were 
to start a roofing business, it takes time to build clients. 
How do you get $100,000 in business the first month? That is 
something people could ask.
    Chairman Comer. Well, I really appreciate your 
investigative work. You are curious, and that is what a 
journalist is supposed to be. But unfortunately, a lot of the 
journalists today are not curious when it comes to fraud and 
abuse of taxpayer dollars. So, thank you for your great work.
    Auditor Faber, you have been investigating Medicaid fraud 
in Ohio for years. It sounds like the recent reporting is not 
the first time that you have tried to bring these issues to the 
public's attention. What is going on in Ohio with these waiver 
programs, and why are they so susceptible to fraud?
    Mr. Faber. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, Congressman. The short 
answer is that whenever we have a big government program, we 
essentially historically have predicated these on this trust 
concept. You sign up, you say you are eligible, we will believe 
you. But the backside of that is we need to be less trusting 
and more verifying.
    Chairman Comer. Absolutely.
    Mr. Faber. And so, we started identifying in 2019 
weaknesses in the program where we were seeing systemic 
failures in the verification side. And we have now issued a 
number, five, six, seven reports where we keep identifying that 
you are not going out and checking to see that the people who 
you have got on the program are truly eligible and truly 
beneficiaries.
    You know, in the office, what we always say, we look for 
control weaknesses. I do not go out and look to see whether Joe 
Smith is supposed to be on Medicaid or not. That is the 
department's responsibility. It is the agency's responsibility 
to do those verifications. And what we find is, historically, 
these verification programs are just not robust and are not 
being done efficiently.
    Chairman Comer. And that is one of the things that we were 
hoping would happen with the states with the Big Beautiful Bill 
that they get--I will use Kentucky as an example, my own state. 
Once you are on Medicaid, you are pretty much on Medicaid 
forever. And Medicaid was created to be a temporary safety net 
program. And what has happened, especially in the states that 
have expanded Medicaid, it is become an entitlement.
    And there is no accountability with respect to all these 
new programs. Anytime there is autism, the number of--if there 
is more money for autism, it seems like the number of people 
that are declared autistic skyrockets. Anytime there is money 
put in for mental health, you just have all these providers 
that show up and all these people that supposedly are receiving 
mental health services, and no one really knows that much about 
it.
    So, I appreciate the work that you two have done.
    Again, Mr. Chairman, thank you for your leadership on this 
issue.
    And before I yield, I ask unanimous consent to enter into 
the record the Oversight Committee staff report, and I 
encourage everyone to read it, ``The Cost of Doing Nothing: How 
Tim Walz and Keith Ellison Fueled Minnesota's Fraud 
Explosion.''
    Mr. Gill. Without objection.
    Chairman Comer. Thank you.
    Ms. Simon. Mr. Chairman, I would ask to enter into the 
record, unanimous consent.
    Mr. Gill. Mm-hmm.
    Ms. Simon. Thank you. I would ask to enter into the record 
April 21, 2026, a report from Protect Our Care entitled, ``The 
Real Fraud: Trump Pardoned the Nation's Biggest Healthcare 
Fraudsters,'' which describes how President Trump pardoned over 
$2 billion in fraud.
    Mr. Gill. Without objection.
    Ms. Simon. Thank you, sir.
    Mr. Gill. Thank you. And we will turn it back over to you. 
And I now recognize Ranking Member Simon for her 5 minutes of 
questions.
    Ms. Simon. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
    I have learned a lot from our witnesses today, so again, I 
want to thank you for traveling all this way.
    You know, Democrats do believe, as do our colleagues across 
the aisle, that it is critically important to prevent fraud, 
waste, and abuse so that the taxpayer dollars actually help 
real people and communities that they were intended to help. 
Those found guilty of fraud should be held accountable. That is 
without question.
    My colleagues on the other side of the aisle say that their 
pursuit of fraud is to strengthen the Federal programs that 
struggling Americans turn to for help. But it is beyond clear 
that that is not the truth. Republicans' signature law, the One 
Big Beautiful Bill, cut more than $1 trillion from Medicaid; 
SNAP, which feeds hungry Americans; children's health insurance 
programs; and other programs that help folks meet their very 
basic needs, the most low-income among us, while this 
affordability crisis is drowning our people across the country.
    In Ohio, more than 450,000 people are expected to lose 
their health insurance coverage by 2034 due to the One Big 
Beautiful Bill so that Republicans can instead provide tax cuts 
for the wealthiest among us.
    This question is for Mr. Faber. Do you agree with my 
colleagues in the Republican Party and their decision to rip 
health insurance away from over 450,000 Ohioans?
    Mr. Faber. First of all, Mr. Chairman, to the 
representative, I am not sure that the auditor's position has--
is relevant in that analysis, and I am not sure that that 
analysis is one that I would agree with.
    What I would say with regard to the question that you are 
identifying is whether or not we are looking at fraud or waste 
and abuse, I think it is important to distinguish the two. As a 
prosecutor, somebody who has a criminal prosecution division, 
for us, fraud is a very legal determination.
    Ms. Simon. Absolutely.
    Mr. Faber. Waste and abuse is a broader question.
    Ms. Simon. Thank you.
    Mr. Faber. And to the extent that we can do things----
    Ms. Simon. I am going to move on.
    Mr. Faber [continuing]. Cooperatively to eliminate waste 
and abuse, I think we can save an awful lot of money in the 
system to provide more benefits for more Ohioans and more 
Americans.
    Ms. Simon. Sir, thank you so much for your answer. And I 
think it is worth noting that yourself and other Members of the 
Majority, including the Governor, have a responsibility to 
oversee this program; identify waste, fraud, and abuse; and 
provide opportunities not only just to identify but to weed 
them out and create a stronger system where folks are not able 
to defraud the system so easily. That seems like that is the 
problem that we should be talking about. How and why did this 
happen, not just the folks who committed the fraud. Why was it 
so easy?
    I have another question for Representative Dovilla. Am I 
pronouncing your name correctly?
    Mr. Dovilla. Yes, you have it, just like vanilla----
    Ms. Simon. Vanilla. People mispronounce my name----
    Mr. Dovilla [continuing]. And just as boring, I can assure 
you.
    Ms. Simon [continuing]. All the time, so I always ask.
    Do you agree with the decision to rip away health insurance 
from an additional 450,000 Ohioans?
    Mr. Dovilla. Mr. Chairman, to the Member, I do not think 
that is an accurate characterization. And again, you know----
    Ms. Simon. Well, that is helpful. That is helpful to know. 
I am going to move on, actually.
    I want to make clear why we are asking these questions is 
we are trying to, too, get to the bottom of the issue. The 
Republican candidate for the Ohio Governorship has called 
Medicare and Medicaid mistakes and ``particularly Medicaid,'' 
the very program Republicans are supposed to be here talking 
about serving and saving today.
    Senator, I have a question for you, Senator Antonio. Are 
Medicare and Medicaid mistakes?
    Ms. Antonio. Absolutely not. Medicare and Medicaid protect 
thousands, hundreds of thousands of people in our country and 
provide them with the healthcare so they can stay healthier, 
and actually, in the long run, it is cost-effective.
    Ms. Simon. And that is including disabled children who are 
bound to their beds and bound to their homes. That is 
including, Senator, elders, who are on literally their last 
years. That includes folks in deep hospice care, are supported 
by these programs. Would you say that is correct?
    Ms. Antonio. Absolutely.
    Ms. Simon. Across all faiths, races, across, you know, all 
parts of Ohio, folks who need these services are granted 
support from Medicaid and Medicare. Is that correct?
    Ms. Antonio. Yes, absolutely.
    Ms. Simon. There are about 120,000 Ohioans who depend on 
the Medicaid waiver each year. The home and community-based 
health services waivers allow seniors, our elders, with the 
opportunity to live with dignity. That is also including folks 
with disabilities. I am so thankful for this opportunity to 
discuss these incredibly important programs and how Ohio can do 
a better job at securing these programs so that people who 
really need them can get them.
    Thank you so much, and I yield back.
    Mr. Gill. Thank you, Ranking Member Simon.
    And I would now like to move on and recognize Mr. Jordan 
for 5 minutes for questions.
    Mr. Jordan. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
    Mr. Rosiak, who is Ismail Mohamed?
    Mr. Rosiak. Ismail Mohamed is a State Legislator----
    Mr. Jordan. State Representative in Ohio?
    Mr. Rosiak. Correct.
    Mr. Jordan. Currently serving, right? And is he Somali-
American descent?
    Mr. Rosiak. Yes.
    Mr. Jordan. He is. Okay. In addition to serving in the 
legislature, what is his profession? Do you know?
    Mr. Rosiak. A lawyer.
    Mr. Jordan. He is a lawyer. Do you happen to know where his 
law office is?
    Mr. Rosiak. Yes. When I was going through these buildings 
that were entirely populated by home healthcare firms, I 
noticed one thing--one business. I turned to my colleague, and 
I said, we finally found something that is not a home 
healthcare business. It is a law office. And we did not think 
anything of it. I later learned that was the Ismail Law Office, 
which is also the campaign headquarters for----
    Mr. Jordan. Somali-American, State Representative. His law 
office is I think 1395 East Dublin Granville Road. And in that 
same facility, there are 35 of these--what did you call them--
$2 million side hustle businesses, right, where they are 
ripping off the tax--35 in that--do you happen to know if Mr. 
Mohamed was the lawyer who helped set up these LLCs who were 
ripping off the taxpayers of the country in the State of Ohio?
    Mr. Rosiak. I do not know.
    Mr. Jordan. Do not know? Probably a fair question to 
explore. Maybe that is the next thing you can dig into, find 
out if he was actually setting these organizations up, right, 
you know, right across the hall. I am going to--well, we will 
create this organization.
    Do you know if any of these organizations gave campaign 
contributions to Mr. Mohamed?
    Mr. Rosiak. I did not look specifically. I wrote about 
another candidate that owned a home healthcare business and ran 
for office, and his campaign was funded largely by campaign--by 
fellow home healthcare owners.
    Mr. Jordan. Well, and that guy gave contributions to Mr. 
Mohamed, too, right? The guy you looked into got campaign 
contributions----
    Mr. Rosiak. Mm-hmm.
    Mr. Jordan [continuing]. From these LLCs, 35 of them in the 
same building where the state rep has his law office.
    Mr. Rosiak. Mm-hmm.
    Mr. Jordan. That guy you just talked about gave 
contributions to Ismail Mohamed. But we did look it up, and he 
received thousands of dollars from these companies in his 
building that he may or may not have set up, but you are going 
to check that out as a good journalist, right? You are going to 
find out if that is the case? Wow, that is amazing because we 
got the chart from the State Senator that says Republicans. It 
is all Republicans, even though they have indicted, I think, 
153 indictments, 110 convictions, but somehow it is the 
Republicans' fault.
    Oh, but I forgot to ask this question. Was Mr. Mohamed, 
Ismail Mohamed, in the General Assembly, whose law office is at 
the same facility where there are 35 of these HCBS, home 
community-based services providers ripping off the taxpayers, 
is he a Republican or Democrat?
    Mr. Rosiak. He is a Democrat, and like many of the home 
healthcare operators, he also had tax debts when I looked him 
up, and he also had created a company called the Chiropractic 
Center, some sort of medical office or another that was 
apparently running, I guess, out of his law office.
    Mr. Jordan. It is funny because the good Senator from Ohio, 
who has the R's for--you know, the red R's there on her chart, 
did not seem to want to mention Mr. Mohamed, who is right in 
the middle of this. Literally, his office is right in the 
middle of it. But no, no, he did not--no, no way Democrats are 
involved.
    Here is the pattern I see, and the Chairman of the Full 
Committee kind of pointed this out. The similarities between 
Minnesota and--well, first, let me ask you this question. Did 
anyone call you a racist for trying to just uncover what is 
happening to millions, frankly, as the auditor said, billions 
of dollars of taxpayer money? Did you get called that?
    Mr. Rosiak. Yes. So, half of Ohio's budget roughly is spent 
on Medicaid, and that is doubled in the last few years. I tried 
to ask one healthcare owner, and I have his exact quote in 
response. ``Blah, blah, blah. Who cares? You do not pay my 
bills. I am just going to tell everybody you are a racist.''
    Mr. Jordan. Yes, that is what always happens. That is how 
the left operates. I always point out the left has a template. 
The left will tell a lie. We are actually providing services to 
elderly Ohioans going into the--the left will tell a lie. Big 
media will report, oh, this is wonderful. Big tech will amplify 
the lie. You tell the truth. They call you racist. It has 
happened in Minnesota. This is the pattern, and this is what 
the Chairman was getting at.
    Minnesota, it was the same thing, fraud on a huge scale, 
Somali-American population involved in it. When they check it 
out, they call them racist. The only difference is--the only 
difference is in Ohio, they are actually doing something about 
it, 153 indictments, 110 convictions. In Minnesota, it was all 
the U.S. attorneys. It was not the state. They did not do 
squat. And the reason they did not do squat, we have the quote. 
This is a person who worked in the Attorney General's Office in 
Minnesota. ``There was a perception that forcefully tackling 
this issue might cause political backlash among the Somali 
community, which is a core voting bloc.'' Politics stopped them 
in Minnesota. It is not stopping Mr. Faber, Mr. Dovilla from 
doing their work.
    The State Senator wants to just criticize Republicans, even 
though the guy in the middle of all this is the Democrat State 
Representative in the same darn building. Did I get anything 
wrong in that assessment, Mr. Faber?
    Mr. Faber. Congressman, Chairman, no.
    Mr. Jordan. All right. I appreciate it.
    With that, I yield. And I want to thank the Chairman for 
his good work on this broad issue and what he is doing, 
outstanding Member of Congress. We appreciate that.
    With that, I yield back.
    Mr. Gill. Thank you, Mr. Jordan.
    And I now recognize Mr. Walkinshaw from Virginia for 5 
minutes.
    Mr. Walkinshaw. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
    The Task Force on Defending Constitutional Rights and 
Exposing Institutional Abuses, I am really excited to be here.
    Suspending funds that Congress appropriated in violation of 
the Impoundment Control Act and the Constitution; firing 
independent inspectors general to cover up their waste, fraud, 
and abuse; an unconstitutional executive order on birthright 
citizenship plainly violating the 14th Amendment of the 
Constitution; defying a court order to return Kilmar Abrego 
Garcia to the United States; stripping a former Cybersecurity 
and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) cybersecurity 
director of their security clearance in a clear act of 
political retaliation; altering Federal employees' email to 
include partisan language, an act ruled illegal and 
unconstitutional; giving DOGE access to individual Social 
Security numbers and bank account numbers; illegally sharing 
Federal agency data on outside servers; attempting to exempt 
DOGE from FOIA; illegally deploying the United States military 
inside the United States; using the Department of Justice to 
target perceived political enemies, taking place today as we 
speak; dismantling cyber and election security; violating the 
Emoluments Clause, and accepting billions of dollars in gifts 
from foreign leaders, these are just a few of the examples in 
which the Trump Administration has violated the Constitution, 
abused institutions, disregarded the rule of law.
    I know that Chairman Gill has expressed his concerns about 
seeing Muslim families in malls in Dallas, but he and Mr. 
Jordan had no concerns with President Trump accepting a $400 
million airplane from the Emir of Qatar, Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad 
Al Thani. Muslim families in malls is a huge problem. A $400 
airplane from the Qatari sheikh, not a problem.
    Let us not forget the $1.8 billion slush fund they tried to 
ram through to pay off insurrectionists who attempted to 
overturn the results of a free and fair election, to pay off 
their buddies. When President Trump was asked about the 
Constitution and whether he had a responsibility to uphold it, 
he said, ``I do not know.''
    ``Blatantly unconstitutional.'' That is a direct quote. 
That is not from me. That is Judge John Coughenour, a 
Republican-appointed Federal judge.
    ``Targeted deportation proceedings continue 
unconstitutionally to chill freedom of speech.'' Again, not me, 
Judge William Young, a Republican-appointed judge.
    The lust--``The lust for unbridled power and the imposition 
of cruelty in its quest know no bounds in our bereft of human 
decency.'' That is District Judge Fred Biery.
    This Task Force should be doing everything in its power to 
prevent institutional abuses and protect the integrity of the 
United States Constitution, and there is a long list of things 
we could work on that are taking place right now as we speak. 
So, if we are serious about our work here, we should direct it 
to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue because that is where the 
Constitution is being violated. That is where institutions are 
being abused.
    Senator Antonio, Ohio saw a surge in ICE activity over the 
course of the last year as a result of the Trump 
Administration's out-of-control mass deportation policies, 
often unconstitutional, by the way. Federal judges have said 
ICE violated the law, violated court orders more than a hundred 
times. Can you just speak to the impact that these policies 
have had on your community?
    Ms. Antonio. There is a general state of fear in our local 
communities. Folks are afraid to attend everything from grocery 
stores to their children's schools, show up for court 
appearances where they are trying to follow the law, and 
everything in between, even show up for their faith 
communities. There is fear. There is a level of fear, and 
certainly they are unable to go to work.
    Mr. Walkinshaw. Are the American citizens you represent 
confident that this Administration will follow the 
Constitution, follow the law, and not abuse the institutions it 
controls? Are your constituents, who are American citizens, 
confident of those facts?
    Ms. Antonio. My constituents are watching and paying 
attention to what is going on both in our communities and 
across the country. There is a level of fear. There is not the 
faith that the Federal policies and the policies that are 
coming from the administration at the Federal level are there 
to protect them. They fear that they are to persecute and 
prosecute them.
    Mr. Walkinshaw. Thank you. I yield back.
    Mr. Gill. Awesome. Thank you, Mr. Walkinshaw.
    Before I turn it over to Mr. Biggs, I would like to enter 
into the record two different things. First, a transcript from 
the March 4, 2026, hearing on fraud and misuse of Federal funds 
in Minnesota; part II, where Ms. Ansari said that it was 
``outrageous'' that this fraud is what we are choosing to spend 
our time on the Oversight Committee.
    Second, I would like to enter into the record this article 
from Cleveland.com, ``Medicaid fraud scheme in Ohio pushed in 
testimony at Senate hearing,'' where Ms. Antonio said, ``I 
question whether it is real or not to begin with,'' referring 
to fraud. And without objection, those will be entered into the 
record.
    And now I would like to recognize Mr. Biggs from Arizona 
for 5 minutes.
    Mr. Biggs. Thank you.
    Senator Dovilla, you were asked about 450,000 people that 
had been ripped off of Medicaid in Ohio, if you were okay with 
that, and you said you thought that was a mischaracterization, 
and you were prohibited from expanding on that. I would like 
you to answer that, please.
    Mr. Dovilla. Yes, thank you, Mr. Chairman, and to Mr. 
Biggs.
    What I was going to say was a reaction to the comments from 
the Ranking Member toward the beginning, where she indicated 
that Americans are struggling to pay bills and a number of 
other things, and I just wanted to indicate that those 
challenges are exacerbated by the fraud that we are seeing in 
this system. And just to underscore the point that the people 
who are on Medicaid, aged, blind, disabled, others who are 
qualified for the system under the eligibility requirements 
prescribed by Federal law and at the state level, those are the 
people that we are looking out for. Every dollar that is being 
defrayed and diverted to go somewhere else in the way of waste, 
fraud, or abuse is a dollar that cannot be used for someone on 
the system who legitimately can benefit from it.
    Mr. Biggs. Mr. Faber, you mentioned in your written 
statement that there were 164 public officials--you actually 
mentioned in your opening statement, too--who your office has 
convicted for fraud. What kind of public officials are these? 
Are these elected officials or are they bureaucrats?
    Mr. Faber. Both. We have criminal jurisdiction when 
somebody involved in government is lying, stealing, and 
cheating with government money. And so, if it is a public 
official, I have convicted county sheriffs, I have convicted 
county commissioners, I have convicted transit authority 
directors. In fact, I am the first auditor in state history to 
do a four day jury trial myself against a regional transit 
authority official who was stealing both Federal and state 
dollars.
    Mr. Biggs. All right. And you mentioned in your statement 
that in March 2024, you found that there were 124,000 
individuals who were enrolled in Ohio's Medicaid program and at 
least one other state, and that you said, ``Ohio paid managed 
care organizations more than $1 billion associated with these 
enrollees.'' Is that an accurate statement? Are we talking $1 
billion for 124,000 people that are multiple enrolled?
    Mr. Faber. Correct. What happens is somebody, for whatever 
reason, is enrolled in multiple states. This is not a new 
problem. It is something the Federal Government and Centers for 
Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) knows about. It is a 
problem that Ohio has known about. We have identified it on at 
least two or three different occasions. And at one point, our 
former Medicaid Director, who candidly did a lot to take down 
controls in the system and create some of the problems, 
essentially downplayed it. And despite us saying, okay, are 
these Medicaid managed care organizations somehow going to be 
held accountable for this? Let us get the money back. The 
answer historically has been we are aware of the problem, and 
nothing to see here.
    Mr. Biggs. Yes. We will get to it later. We have the same 
problem in Arizona, billions of dollars of Medicaid fraud.
    I am going to go next to you, Mr. Rosiak. So, when you say 
the largest billing pool is personal services for Department of 
Human Services (DHS) is $140 billion. Over how long a period of 
time for that?
    Mr. Rosiak. This is dating back to 2019-ish.
    Mr. Biggs. Okay. So, five, six years, including COVID time?
    Mr. Rosiak. Correct.
    Mr. Biggs. Okay. And please tell us about one building had 
94 companies billing Medicaid more than $66 million. Tell us 
about that one building and what you found.
    Mr. Rosiak. Sure. I think that the best way to encapsulate 
it, the auditor actually found 15 percent of all spending, home 
healthcare spending, in the State of Ohio went to two ZIP 
codes. And so, when you are talking about all these buildings 
in one place and all these recipients in two ZIP codes, what it 
makes you think is how is it that the residents of northeast 
Columbus are so sick more than anybody else? And Ohio is a big 
state, and they have got people from all kinds of walks of 
life. You would assume that they would be encountering 
debilitating illnesses in their old age at roughly similar 
rates.
    And so, the issue is when you see buildings with these 
concentrations and 15 percent in two ZIP codes is crazy. And it 
gets to the idea that there are certain subcommunities in Ohio 
that are feigning illness or claiming to be eligible for this 
program that was intended to be for old ladies that are on the 
verge of death, and they are actually middle-aged and they are 
perfectly healthy.
    Mr. Biggs. You mentioned one lady in Massachusetts who 
stole $100 million by charging for nonexistent home healthcare. 
Have we seen that in Ohio as well?
    Mr. Rosiak. There have been--I believe it happens very 
commonly in Ohio, and there was a GPS rule that was supposed to 
make sure people actually were going, and that rule was 
actually removed. And so, there is no way to prove they did not 
actually go and visit these patients.
    Mr. Biggs. Thank you.
    Mr. Chairman, I have several UCs I would like to bring 
forward.
    Mr. Gill. Okay.
    Mr. Biggs. ``Biden commutes sentences of two Illinois mega 
fraudsters.''
    Mr. Gill. Without objection.
    Mr. Biggs. ``North Dakota judge blasts Biden for setting 
fraudsters free.''
    Mr. Gill. Without objection.
    Mr. Biggs. ``Ohio auditor of State, Keith Farber's report, 
Electronic Visit Verification, November 2024.''
    Mr. Gill. Without objection.
    Mr. Biggs. Same Auditor Farber--Faber. How do you say that? 
Faber?
    Mr. Faber. Faber.
    Mr. Biggs. Faber, Auditor Faber, ``Cost of concurrent 
enrollment.''
    Mr. Gill. Without objection.
    Mr. Biggs. ``Analysis: Ohio rocked by fraud. Now what?''
    Mr. Gill. Without objection.
    Mr. Biggs. ``Arizona nurse practitioner sentenced for role 
in Medicaid fraud scheme.''
    Mr. Gill. Without objection.
    Mr. Biggs. ``Minnesota Medicaid operators bankruptcy-to-
riches rise crashes into fraud probe.''
    Mr. Gill. Without objection.
    Mr. Biggs. ``DOJ: Azerbaijan national charged in $90 
million California healthcare fraud scheme.''
    Mr. Gill. Without objection.
    Mr. Biggs. ``Five arrested in alleged $267 million hospice 
fraud scheme that exploited California's Medi-Cal system.''
    Mr. Gill. Without objection.
    Mr. Biggs. ``Hospice fraud uses stolen identities for fake 
patients.''
    Mr. Gill. Without objection.
    Mr. Biggs. ``RFK Jr. announces largest autism fraud bust in 
American history with $46.6 million Medicaid scheme 
indictment.''
    Mr. Gill. Without objection.
    Mr. Biggs. ``California man pleads guilty to orchestrating 
$270 million medication reimbursement fraud scheme.''
    Mr. Gill. Without objection.
    Mr. Biggs. And ``White House cuts $1.3 billion in Medicaid 
payments to California.''
    Mr. Gill. Without objection.
    Mr. Biggs. Thank you, sir. I yield back.
    Ms. Simon. Mr. Chair, I have two UC requests, please.
    Mr. Gill. Yes.
    Ms. Simon. Thank you. I ask unanimous consent to enter into 
the record an April 4, 2025, article that KFF Health News 
titled, ``Trump health fraud focused at odds with past 
pardons,'' which points to the hypocrisy in President Trump's 
pardoning convicted fraudsters.
    My second UC----
    Mr. Gill. Without objection.
    Ms. Simon. Thank you, sir. My second UC, excuse me, it is 
from a December 19, 2025, article from The Washington Post 
entitled, ``Trump's pardon wipes out payments to defrauded 
victims,'' which shows how our President lets criminals and 
fraudsters walk free so long as they donated to his campaign.
    Mr. Gill. Without objection.
    Great. And now I would like to recognize Representative 
Pressley from Massachusetts for her 5 minutes.
    Ms. Pressley. Thank you, Mr. Chair.
    Today's hearing is the first one convened by the so-called 
Task Force on Defending Constitutional Rights and Exposing 
Institutional Abuses. And yet, we are ignoring the fact that 
Donald Trump is the single largest threat to our constitution, 
and judges across our country have consistently ruled, in fact, 
that he has violated the law. And when it comes to 
institutional abuses, Trump created a $1.8 billion fund to 
directly send taxpayer dollars to his friends and political 
allies. That is what I call fraud.
    But Republicans want to ignore Trump's culpability, so let 
us discuss a Federal Government response to what is happening 
in Ohio. Mr. Faber, given your role as state auditor, when 
public funds are stolen, what do you consider to be meaningful 
accountability?
    Mr. Faber. Chairman, Representative, essentially, the 
question is, is what do you think needs to happen to people who 
are caught stealing, lying, cheating with government money, as 
we have done in 165 different cases? You hold them accountable. 
If it is convictable fraud, meaning a crime, you prosecute them 
and send them to prison.
    On the other hand, a lot of what we see, as I talked about 
earlier, as somebody who prosecutes fraudsters, is waste or 
abuse. And that is essentially a public policy question. You 
need to tighten the controls, tighten the eligibility, tighten 
the parameters of the program to limit waste and abuse. We lose 
more money in waste and abuse than we do in other areas. But 
fraud is certainly something--if you catch somebody who 
violates the law, you hold them accountable and you prosecute 
them. That is what I have done.
    Ms. Pressley. Okay. Well, I will just say, yes/and. In my 
opinion, accountability must also include restorative justice, 
so that means making communities whole. It means putting the 
stolen money back into programs that it was taken from and 
sending a clear message that theft of public funds simply does 
not pay. It is unacceptable.
    I do not feel that is the standard that is being modeled by 
Republicans. In today's hearing, we have seen and heard people 
castigate and attack caregivers who bathe our elders, who cook 
for disabled neighbors and keep families together in their 
homes. And so, when it comes to holding bad actors accountable 
and helping victims, Trump and Republican sycophants seem to me 
to be deeply unserious. And that is a choice. It is a 
deliberate choice.
    Mr. Faber, do you believe that individuals--and this is a 
yes or no question, please--that individuals convicted of 
healthcare fraud should have to pay restitution, yes or no?
    Mr. Faber. Absolutely. We have issued tens of--hundreds of 
millions of dollars of----
    Ms. Pressley. Thank you.
    Mr. Faber [continuing]. Findings for recovery for 
restitutions, not just on convictions, but when we find 
somebody has violated the rules.
    Ms. Pressley. All right. And I will just ask for the entire 
dais. Mr. Rosiak----
    Mr. Rosiak. Yes.
    Ms. Pressley [continuing]. Do you believe individuals 
convicted of healthcare fraud should have to pay restitution, 
yes or no?
    Mr. Rosiak. Yes.
    Ms. Pressley. Okay. And Representative Dovilla?
    Mr. Dovilla. Yes.
    Ms. Pressley. And Senator Antonio?
    Ms. Antonio. Yes.
    Ms. Pressley. All right. So, you agree, but you know who 
does not? Donald J. Trump. In fact, I want to ask a unanimous 
consent to enter into the record a June 2025 article from 
Truthout titled, ``Trump grants clemency to executive who 
orchestrated $250 million in Medicaid fraud scheme.''
    Mr. Gill. Without objection.
    Ms. Pressley. Now, look, I support using the clemency power 
to rectify injustices when the criminal legal system gets it 
wrong. But Donald Trump, with the support of Republicans in 
Congress, is using his authority to reward fraudsters, and he 
is doing so at the expense of victims of fraud.
    I published a report called ``Trump's Clemency Gap.'' It 
reveals how Trump has prioritized pardoning people who 
collectively defrauded the Federal Government of over $2 
billion in taxpayer money. For example, in 2011, Florida 
resident Lawrence Duran, owner of American Therapeutic 
Corporation, was sentenced to 50 years in Federal prison for 
orchestrating a $205 million Medicare fraud scheme involving 
false and fraudulent claims for mental health services. A 
Federal judge ordered Duran to pay more than $87 million in 
restitution, which Trump wiped away. This Task Force should 
have a hearing about that.
    Senator Antonio, do you support Trump denying $87 million 
in restitution to victims when he commuted Lawrence Duran? Yes 
or no?
    Ms. Antonio. No.
    Ms. Pressley. Representative Dovilla?
    Mr. Dovilla. It is not an issue I have looked at, and it is 
not relevant to this hearing.
    Ms. Pressley. I am asking you now. So, I would just like 
your opinion----
    Mr. Dovilla. It is not germane to this hearing, 
Congresswoman.
    Ms. Pressley. It is pretty clean. Do you support Trump 
denying $87 million in restitution to victims when he commuted 
Lawrence Duran? Yes or no?
    Mr. Dovilla. I stand by the statement I have given you. 
Thank you.
    Ms. Pressley. Okay. Mr. Rosiak?
    Mr. Rosiak. The same answer as Mr. Dovilla.
    Ms. Pressley. Well, I do not know. I guess I just have to 
take that as a no.
    Mr. Faber?
    Mr. Faber. I am not familiar with the facts. The short 
answer is----
    Ms. Pressley. It was publicly reported and----
    Mr. Faber [continuing]. The President has diplomacy----
    Ms. Pressley [continuing]. I am making you aware of it 
right now, so you could just tell me----
    Mr. Faber. You are--not without me understanding both 
sides. Without the President's facts in the commutation, he has 
that power. When----
    Ms. Pressley. Well, there is really no ``both sides'' 
there.
    Mr. Faber [continuing]. He commutes somebody, it is----
    Ms. Pressley. Somebody----
    Mr. Faber. It is his decision.
    Ms. Pressley. Okay.
    Mr. Faber. Now, the fact is, is there are things that I 
disagreed with the Biden pardons as well, but the short 
answer----
    Ms. Pressley. Fair enough, but that also is not the subject 
of this hearing, so that is not germane. But this is, and we 
should be having a hearing about that.
    Thank you.
    Mr. Gill. Thank you, Ms. Pressley.
    And now I would like to recognize the great Brian Jack for 
5 minutes.
    Mr. Jack. Well, first, Mr. Chairman, I open my time by 
congratulating you. For those watching at home, this hearing is 
a direct byproduct of the meritocracy of the House Republican 
Conference. Chairman Gill and I are Members of the 119th 
Congress' freshman class. And though just a freshman, Chairman 
Gill distinguished himself over the past 17 months as one of 
the best investigators and worst enemies of waste, fraud, and 
abuse. Chairman Comer and many others across our conference 
recognized that leadership and specifically created a Task 
Force to expose the institutional abuses and fraud across our 
government. And he appointed a freshman, Chairman Gill, as its 
Chairman of this Task Force.
    So, I congratulate you, Mr. Chairman, on this first hearing 
and also the meritocracy of the Republican Majority in 
Congress.
    I would like to start, if I could, with Mr. Faber. We 
represent similar states. Georgia is my home state. I represent 
the 3d District of Georgia. And our states have similar 
economies, similar populations. I would say similar football, 
but we have seen in recent years that is not necessarily the 
case.
    But I would ask you, if you could, to help personify to my 
constituents who may be watching at home just what the impact 
is. If you could try to estimate for the average Ohioan the 
waste, fraud, and abuse that you have to battle with every day, 
what is the cost to the average Ohioan for that?
    Mr. Faber. It is real money. As I always say, Bob and Betty 
Buckeye do not care whether the money comes out of their front 
pocket, their back pocket, their left pocket, or their right 
pocket. If somebody is stealing their money, whether it is 
state money, local money, or Federal money, it is their money. 
And so, as they are trying to pay for gas, as they are trying 
to pay for healthcare, as they are trying to pay for food on 
their table, they take anybody who is ill-gotten in their gains 
seriously.
    In this regard, one of the things I have identified is not 
just Medicaid fraud, it is unemployment fraud during the 
pandemic. I can put that in real money. In Ohio, we could say 
roughly $6 billion of waste, fraud, and abuse occurred in the 
pandemic unemployment system. That is the equivalent of $2,000 
for each and every Ohio employee, everybody who works in Ohio. 
If I took Medicaid into the system, and if we assume Medicaid 
is a similar number, roughly between $4 and $6 billion in 
waste, fraud, and abuse, you can equivalent that to about 
$2,000 for every Ohio employee. That is real money. It is money 
that people are paying in state taxes. It is money that they 
are paying in local taxes. It is money that certainly they are 
paying in Federal taxes.
    And in that regard, this is--means a lot to your 
constituents, just like it means a lot to Bob and Betty 
Buckeye. They expect government to work. And when you have 
weaknesses in controls and programs that are designed to put 
more people on the rolls without ever asking the question, do 
you really need these services, that ultimately you are going 
to have less faith in the system. And that is what we see 
through the things that we have been identifying.
    Mr. Jack. Thank you, Auditor.
    Mr. Rosiak, I want to congratulate you on your reporting. 
You have done a great service to your country, and people are 
going to be reading your reporting for many years to come.
    But I am curious, as we wrap up this Task Force today, this 
hearing, what are some of the themes you have seen across the 
country? I mean, are there specific pockets of the country 
where you see this institutional abuse, or what themes have you 
seen in your reporting and your investigative work?
    Mr. Rosiak. One of the things that I think is important for 
Congress to grapple with is that this is almost entirely among 
foreign-born people, at least the part that I saw in Columbus. 
It was primarily Bhutanese people and Somalian, to some extent, 
from Ghana and Sierra Leone. But some of this is being used 
systematically by refugees to bring money back to their home 
countries. And so, Congress created this program as medical 
aids, and there are people that are turned into foreign aid. 
And if Congress wants to send money to Bhutan, it needs to do 
that above board.
    There is a--one family with the name Adhikar--that is a 
Bhutanese name--that has been paid $350 million over the last 
several years just from Medicaid in Ohio alone. So, that is 
just one state, just one Bhutanese name. That is $350 million 
in Medicaid. That is 1/10 of the GDP of Bhutan. And what I 
found is that all of the Bhutanese advocacy organizations and 
charities are tied to, sometimes share an address with, home 
healthcare companies. And they are taking that money from 
Medicaid and then sending it even to fund public school systems 
in foreign countries.
    Mr. Jack. You know, I am glad you mentioned that family. 
And with the 30 seconds left, I want you to share to this Task 
Force and the people watching at home some of the lavish 
lifestyle that was promoted by that family. They posted a lot 
on social media. Could you share with us some of the things you 
found in your reporting?
    Mr. Rosiak. Drinking champagne on private jets, private 
yachts, you know, wearing Prada clothes, giving birthday gifts 
of Range Rovers and Escalades.
    Mr. Jack. So, to everyone watching at home, those are your 
tax dollars that went to this family that fraudulently 
defrauded you, the American people, and your home and your 
families of the resources that you deserve.
    So, Mr. Chairman, I congratulate you again on the first 
hearing of this Task Force, and I congratulate our witnesses. 
Thank you for helping us do a better job serving the American 
people. Thank you.
    Mr. Gill. Thank you.
    And I will now recognize myself for 5 minutes for the 
purpose of asking questions.
    Mr. Rosiak and all the witnesses, thank you all again for 
coming here.
    Mr. Rosiak, you have identified multiple individuals and 
LLCs that you believe engaged in fraud. How many of these had 
Somali or Bhutanese or other African origin names?
    Mr. Rosiak. One hundred percent.
    Mr. Gill. One hundred percent. And how many did you look 
through? I mean, that is 100 percent of how many, roughly?
    Mr. Rosiak. I looked at the names of hundreds of companies. 
I looked more deeply into maybe 50.
    Mr. Gill. More deeply into 50, you looked into hundreds of 
companies and 100 percent, you are telling me, had names that 
were Somali, Bhutanese, or other sort of African origin 
derivation.
    Mr. Rosiak. Correct. I thought I saw an American, and I was 
very excited, but it turned out to be the teenage son of that 
money launderer who was actually just a proxy for this woman 
from Ghana.
    Mr. Gill. What are some of these names that you come 
across? Do you hear the same names, or are they different 
names?
    Mr. Rosiak. Yes, it is funny because this started off, I 
was investigating a guy named Robert Acheampong. And then I 
found a different scammer named Roberta Acheampong. And I 
thought they were related, but they were not. It is just that 
is how common it is to scam Medicaid when your name is 
Acheampong. And then I did the same thing with a guy named 
Alieu Conte who has 30 criminal charges in Cuyahoga County or 
in Franklin County and threatened my family, malicious 
wounding, crazy stuff. This guy's a career criminal.
    And then there was a different guy named Alfred Conte who 
was convicted of Medicaid fraud, but Ohio, Franklin County 
expunged his record. They let him plead down, and then they 
expunged his record. He did not have to pay any money back 
except like 500 bucks. And the Ohio Nursing Board let him keep 
his license. So, you have got the Contes, the Acheampongs, and 
it just seems to be the family business is billing Medicaid.
    Mr. Gill. And criminal rings. We did a lot of work 
previously this year on Medicaid fraud in Minnesota. There seem 
to be a lot of similarities here. Can you tell us in your 
investigation, have you found any connections between Ohio 
Medicaid fraud and the Somali fraud that we saw in Minnesota?
    Mr. Rosiak. Yes, it is the same people. They all have 
relatives in both places, and they move back and forth. First 
of all, I think there was $130 million in cash that transferred 
from the Columbus airport to the Minnesota airport and then to 
Somalia. And so, they are moving basically pallet--briefcases 
of cash. And the same--there is one guy that had--basically, he 
racked up $30,000 in tax debts in Columbus running this daycare 
center and not paying his taxes, so then he started a home 
healthcare company in Minnesota, billed $35,000 in one month, 
and then dissolved the company.
    Mr. Gill. So, I just want to be clear. Your testimony is 
that there is a large interstate criminal enterprise of Somali 
fraudsters that are defrauding the Federal Government in 
multiple states of potentially billions of dollars. Is that 
your testimony?
    Mr. Rosiak. Correct.
    Mr. Gill. And can you give us a sense of the scale of this 
fraud? We saw it in Minnesota, we are seeing it here, but have 
you seen it in other places? Or can you give us a sense for 
either dollar values or the number of people involved in your 
opinion?
    Mr. Rosiak. There are thousands of people involved. I would 
say the majority of Bhutanese people are either on Medicaid 
home healthcare or are providing Medicaid home healthcare 
services. They had recently 15,000 people, this nonprofit 
group, this advocacy group, which is tied to--actually funded 
by a guy--founded by a home healthcare guy. They had 15,000 
Bhutanese people come to this party in Ohio, and they bussed in 
all the participants on their Medicaid vans because everybody 
there has their own Medicaid company.
    And so, I think Bhutanese people are systematically using 
Medicaid not only in Ohio but also in Pennsylvania and Kentucky 
and New York and in other states where they perceive that they 
will pay the family member, and they will pay for non-nursing 
services. And those are the two big vulnerabilities.
    Mr. Gill. So, it is not just the Somalis, it is also 
Bhutanese. It is across multiple states. They are coordinating 
with each other. There is a network of foreigners running 
criminal fraud rings within our government--within our country, 
I should say, defrauding our Federal Government.
    Thank you so much for the work that you have done on this. 
It has been fantastic reporting, so we really appreciate this.
    Senator Antonio, thank you for being here. Has Somali 
immigration been good for Ohio?
    Ms. Antonio. You know, that is really outside of my purview 
of----
    Mr. Gill. You are a state Senator.
    Ms. Antonio [continuing]. Information.
    Mr. Gill. Would you like to see more----
    Ms. Antonio. Well----
    Mr. Gill [continuing]. Immigration from Somalia?
    Ms. Antonio [continuing]. As far as--I am processing your 
question, and I am--I have to say that I was almost brought to 
tears just now----
    Mr. Gill. Seventy-two percent of Somali----
    Ms. Antonio [continuing]. Because the rate----
    Mr. Gill [continuing]. Immigrants are on welfare.
    Ms. Antonio [continuing]. The rate and the level of hateful 
rhetoric based on----
    Mr. Gill. They are defrauding your state----
    Ms. Antonio [continuing]. False information----
    Mr. Gill [continuing]. At an astounding rate, and I think 
that----
    Ms. Antonio [continuing]. Is shocking----
    Mr. Gill [continuing]. Most Ohioans would have a problem--
--
    Ms. Antonio [continuing]. Is shocking to me----
    Mr. Gill [continuing]. With that.
    Ms. Antonio [continuing]. The lack of even humanity to 
group a group of----
    Mr. Gill. I think it is inhumane to allow your own state--
--
    Ms. Antonio [continuing]. People together----
    Mr. Gill [continuing]. To be defrauded----
    Ms. Antonio [continuing]. I am shocked----
    Mr. Gill [continuing]. At astounding rates----
    Ms. Antonio. I am shocked and appalled----
    Mr. Gill [continuing]. Billions of dollars taken out----
    Ms. Antonio [continuing]. By the behavior here right now--
--
    Mr. Gill [continuing]. Of the pockets of working-class 
people----
    Ms. Antonio. I am----
    Mr. Gill [continuing]. Going to----
    Ms. Antonio. I am shocked----
    Mr. Gill [continuing]. Criminal fraudsters.
    Ms. Antonio [continuing]. Because----
    Mr. Gill. I certainly have a major problem----
    Ms. Antonio [continuing]. In every--in every----
    Mr. Gill [continuing]. With that.
    Ms. Antonio [continuing]. Community, there are----
    Mr. Gill. I think that that is an issue----
    Ms. Antonio [continuing]. Good people and there are----
    Mr. Gill [continuing]. And I think most Americans agree.
    Ms. Antonio [continuing]. Bad people----
    Ms. Simon. Chair, regular order.
    Mr. Gill. I agree there are good people----
    Ms. Antonio [continuing]. Want to try to save----
    Ms. Simon. I understand we are not supposed to----
    Mr. Gill [continuing]. And bad people.
    Ms. Antonio [continuing]. That every----
    Ms. Simon. We are not supposed to disrespect our witnesses.
    Ms. Antonio [continuing]. Single member----
    Mr. Gill. With that said, we are out of time----
    Ms. Antonio [continuing]. Of a group----
    Mr. Gill [continuing]. Ms. Antonio.
    Ms. Simon. We are not supposed to disrespect our witnesses.
    Mr. Gill. We are out of time.
    Ms. Antonio [continuing]. Is somehow a criminal----
    Mr. Gill. We have already gone over here.
    Ms. Antonio [continuing]. Is shocking to me.
    Mr. Gill. We are----
    Ms. Antonio. I am shocked and appalled.
    Mr. Gill. We are already out of time here.
    That said, thank you to the witnesses for taking the time 
to come here. It is always fun on the Oversight Committee, 
always exciting.
    In closing, I want to formally thank you guys for your 
testimony today. With that and without objection, all Members 
have five legislative days within which to submit materials and 
additional written questions for the witnesses, which will be 
forwarded to the witnesses.
    If there is no further business, without objection, the 
Task Force stands adjourned.
    [Whereupon, at 11:37 a.m., the Task Force was adjourned.]

                            [all]