[House Hearing, 119 Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]


             BEFORE THE WHISTLE: ASSESSING INFORMATION 
               SHARING AND SECURITY COLLABORATION 
               AHEAD OF MAJOR EVENTS
=======================================================================

                                HEARING

                               BEFORE THE

                     COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                    ONE HUNDRED NINETEENTH CONGRESS

                             SECOND SESSION

                               __________

                           FEBRUARY 24, 2026

                               __________

                           Serial No. 119-40

                               __________

       Printed for the use of the Committee on Homeland Security
                                     

[GRAPHIC NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]                                

        Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.govinfo.gov

                               __________
                               
                  U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE
63-779                   WASHINGTON : 2026
=======================================================================

                     COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY

                Andrew R. Garbarino, New York, Chairman
Michael T. McCaul, Texas, Vice       Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi, 
    Chair                                Ranking Member
Michael Guest, Mississippi           Eric Swalwell, California
Carlos A. Gimenez, Florida           J. Luis Correa, California
August Pfluger, Texas                Shri Thanedar, Michigan
Tony Gonzales, Texas                 Seth Magaziner, Rhode Island
Morgan Luttrell, Texas               Daniel S. Goldman, New York
Dale W. Strong, Alabama              Delia C. Ramirez, Illinois
Josh Brecheen, Oklahoma              Timothy M. Kennedy, New York
Elijah Crane, Arizona                LaMonica McIver, New Jersey
Andrew Ogles, Tennessee              Julie Johnson, Texas, Vice Ranking 
Sheri Biggs, South Carolina              Member
Gabe Evans, Colorado                 Pablo Jose Hernandez, Puerto Rico
Ryan Mackenzie, Pennsylvania         Nellie Pou, New Jersey
Brad Knott, North Carolina           James R. Walkinshaw, Virginia
Vince Fong, California               Troy A. Carter, Louisiana
Matt Van Epps, Tennessee             Al Green, Texas
Vacant
                     Keighle Joyce, Staff Director
                  Hope Goins, Minority Staff Director
                       Sean Corcoran, Chief Clerk
                           
                           C O N T E N T S

                              ----------                              
                                                                   Page

                               Statements

Honorable Andrew R. Garbarino, a Representative in Congress From 
  the State of New York, and Chairman, Committee on Homeland 
  Security.......................................................     1
Honorable Nellie Pou, a Representative in Congress From the State 
  of New Jersey..................................................     3
Honorable Bennie G. Thompson, a Representative in Congress From 
  the State of Mississippi, and Ranking Member, Committee on 
  Homeland Security:
  Prepared Statement.............................................     5

                               Witnesses

Mr. Mike Sena, President, National Fusion Center Association:
  Oral Statement.................................................     8
  Prepared Statement.............................................    10
Mr. Raymond A. Martinez, Chief Operating Officer, FIFA World Cup 
  2026 Miami Host Committee:
  Oral Statement.................................................    16
  Prepared Statement.............................................    17
Mr. Joseph Mabin, Deputy Chief, Kansas City Missouri Police 
  Department:
  Oral Statement.................................................    20
  Prepared Statement.............................................    21
Mr. Travis Nelson, Deputy Chief of Staff and Homeland Security 
  Advisor, Office of the Governor, State of Maryland:
  Oral Statement.................................................    23
  Prepared Statement.............................................    25

                             For the Record

Honorable Andrew R. Garbarino, a Representative in Congress From 
  the State of New York, and Chairman, Committee on Homeland 
  Security:
  Letter From Chairman Andrew R. Garbarino.......................     6
  Letter From Honorable Steve Scalise............................     7

 
    BEFORE THE WHISTLE: ASSESSING INFORMATION SHARING AND SECURITY 
                  COLLABORATION AHEAD OF MAJOR EVENTS

                              ----------                              


                       Tuesday, February 24, 2026

             U.S. House of Representatives,
                    Committee on Homeland Security,
                                            Washington, DC.
    The committee met, pursuant to notice, at 10:07 a.m., in 
room 310, Cannon House Office Building, Hon. Andrew R. 
Garbarino [Chairman of the committee] presiding.
    Present: Representatives Garbarino, McCaul, Gimenez, 
Pfluger, Strong, Crane, Biggs, Evans, Van Epps, Thompson, 
Correa, Hernandez, Pou, Carter, Green, and Walkinshaw.
    Also present: Representative Alford.
    Chairman Garbarino. Committee on Homeland Security will 
come to order. Without objection, the Chair may declare the 
committee in recess at any point.
    Without objection, I seek unanimous consent that the 
gentleman from Missouri, Mr. Alford, be permitted to sit with 
the committee and ask questions of the witnesses.
    The purpose of today's hearing is to assess the 
information-sharing environment and the security operations 
among our Federal, State, local, and nongovernment partners 
ahead of a record number of major national events. The Chair 
reminds all Members that the Chair will enforce the rules of 
decorum at all times and urges all Members to be mindful of 
their remarks.
    I now recognize myself for an opening statement.
    Good morning. I want to start by thanking our witnesses for 
appearing before the committee today. The United States is 
preparing to host a mega decade of mass gathering events 
starting this summer with the 2026 FIFA World Cup and 
nationwide celebrations to mark the 250th anniversary of our 
Nation. These events are an incredible opportunity to showcase 
the best of America, but they also will be--will also require 
unprecedented collaboration between leaders at the Federal, 
State, and local levels to secure the events and keep the 
public safe. Today we will hear directly from some of those 
leaders about the security preparations already under way to 
ensure that we already meet this moment.
    The 2026 FIFA World Cup will be held throughout North 
America in June and July and will include more than 70 matches 
played in 11 different cities across the United States. With 5 
million fans traveling to the United States and as many as 6 
billion viewers expected worldwide, this will be the largest 
sporting event in history.
    At the same time, America 250 celebrations will be held in 
communities across the country this summer to commemorate the 
250th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of 
Independence. Recognizing the years of planning that have 
already gone into these efforts, the committee established its 
Task Force on Enhancing Security for Special Events in the 
United States last spring to ensure continued prioritization of 
these events by Congress, Federal agencies, and State, local, 
and private-sector partners. I want to thank the task force 
Chairman, Mr. McCaul, and Ranking Member Ms. Pou for their 
leadership, and all Members of the committee for their 
consistent engagement on these security preparations through 
the many briefings, hearings, and roundtables that have 
convened.
    Over the last year, Congress has taken concrete action to 
ensure the United States will be well-equipped and well-
prepared for the months and years ahead. I am proud of the role 
that this committee has played and will continue to play in 
moving these critical priorities forward.
    One of the greatest security risks facing our Nation today 
is the malicious use of unmanned aircraft systems or drones. 
The prospect of weaponized drones being used to attack mass 
gatherings in open-air stadiums is a scenario that keeps policy 
makers and law enforcement professionals up at night. In 
response to these threats, I was proud to work with the Trump 
administration and lead efforts to pass vital counter-UAS 
authorities to for State and local law enforcement in the 2026 
National Defense Authorization Act, which will help support 
real-time mitigation efforts and counter the adversarial use of 
this technology.
    Republicans of Congress also provided historic security 
investments to the enactment of the One Big Beautiful Bill last 
summer, which included $625 million for the 2026 FIFA World Cup 
security and $500 million for State and local investments in 
counter-UAS capabilities.
    As we approach the 25th anniversary of the September 11 
terrorist attacks later this year, the solemn milestone 
reemphasizes the importance of our collective mission in the 
face of constantly-evolving threats. The Department of Homeland 
Security and this committee were both created after 9/11 to 
ensure that a similar attack on the United States would never 
happen again. In just the last 3 months, this committee has 
heard directly from Secretary Noem and leaders from several DHS 
components, including TSA, CBP, and CISA, whose agencies will 
play critical roles in safeguarding these events.
    Twenty-five years later, the threat landscape has not 
diminished. It has intensified, diversified, and evolved in 
ways that demand constant vigilance and decisive action. But 
DHS and the Federal Government cannot achieve this mission 
alone. Close collaboration, communication, and information 
sharing between Federal, State, local, Tribal, and territorial 
governments, along with industry stakeholders and private-
sector partners, is essential. These games and festivities 
designed to bring people together, enjoy in celebration also 
present an array of targets from nefarious actors who seek to 
carry out violent attacks or exploit these gatherings for other 
illicit purposes.
    It is not an even playing field. The dedicated men and 
women who protect our communities every day must overcome these 
threats every single time. Those who seek to inflict harm only 
need to be right once. But that doesn't mean we give up. It 
means we must be prepared for every possibility and ready to 
combat any threat.
    The goal of today's hearing is to engage directly with 
representatives from law enforcement, host cities, and fusion 
centers that serve on the front lines of this whole-of-society 
security effort. Our shared objective is to ensure these 
partners are receiving the timely intelligence, resources, and 
coordination they need to carry out their responsibilities 
effectively and safeguard the communities they serve. If there 
are challenges, we have a collective responsibility to identify 
them and work together to find actionable solutions.
    Protecting public safety is not a partisan issue. It is 
imperative that we work together to do so. As Chairman, I am 
committed to ensuring that all partners in this effort are 
receiving the support they need to succeed. I look forward to 
the witnesses' testimony today and to a productive discussion 
on how we can all work together on these efforts moving 
forward.
    I now recognize the gentlelady from New Jersey, Ms. Pou, 
for her opening statement.
    Ms. Pou. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and good 
morning. Good morning to all.
    Thank you so very much, Mr. Chairman, for calling this very 
important hearing and welcome to our witnesses. I want to thank 
you for your valuable testimony that I know we are all going to 
be receiving from you today. I am stepping in for Ranking 
Member Thompson, who will be joining us momentarily.
    I serve as the Ranking Member of this committee's Task 
Force on Enhancing Security for Special Events in the United 
States. Our task force has a deeply important mission as our 
country prepares to host some of the world's largest gatherings 
and celebrations over the next 3 years. Events like the 250th 
anniversary of America's founding, the 78 matches of the 2026 
FIFA World Cup, and the 2028 Olympic and Paralympic Games will 
put the United States on display for the entire world to see. I 
am particularly proud that the final match of the 2026 World 
Cup will be held in my district in Northern New Jersey.
    While the hospitality and the camaraderie of these events 
are exciting, it is essential that we ensure the safety and 
security of these mass gatherings. Both Congress and the 
Executive branch have a responsibility to make certain that our 
State, our local, Tribal, and territorial partners have all the 
resources that they need to get the job done. That is why 
today's hearing is so, so very important.
    While conducting oversight as Ranking Member of the task 
force, I have seen first-hand how this administration's actions 
are jeopardizing our security preparedness. Over the last year, 
the Trump administration has dismantled security cooperation at 
all levels of government, reduced counterterrorism personnel 
and resources, politicized FEMA funding and grants, and has 
openly refused to work with States run by Democratic Governors 
and elected officials. Now the Trump administration is choosing 
to withhold $625 million in security funding that Congress has 
already appropriated for the 2026 FIFA World Cup. This is money 
meant to help cities and States keep their games safe. These 
funds are just sitting there collecting dust, waiting for FEMA 
approval and to be disbursed. States, host cities, and local 
law enforcement are begging FEMA to release this money to be 
able to prepare for and secure the World Cup games.
    The time for action is short. This isn't competency. It is 
chaos. I urge my Republican colleagues to join me and my 
Democratic colleagues in calling for the administration to 
release these funds now. These communities must have the 
resources needed to ensure the events are safe for everyone.
    As we go forward, we must keep in mind that it is not just 
stadiums and parking lots we must protect. It is fan festivals, 
entertainment districts, bars, and gathering spaces where 
countless people will be celebrating. Still, New Jersey will do 
whatever we can to provide safe and fun activities for the 
World Cup. In doing so, we will ensure that all people and 
spaces are adequately protected.
    I want to be clear. Everyone, everyone deserves to be free 
and safe at the upcoming games. Whether it is my constituents 
traveling from Paterson to East Rutherford or fans arriving 
from the other side of the world, all fans and players deserve 
to enjoy the games and know that our Federal Government is 
doing everything imaginable to make these events safe and 
secure.
    I have repeatedly stated concerns about Secretary Kristi 
Noem's out-of-control and unlawful enforcement actions. We have 
all seen dangerous DHS violent immigration tactics which were 
especially apparent during the recent outrageous operations in 
Minnesota. DHS personnel killed 2 American citizens and harmed 
countless others. So when Director Lyons refused to rule out 
conducting ICE enforcement at and around the World Cup events, 
when I asked him this very question, chaos ensued.
    Countries have issued travel advisories. Groups and 
businesses are raising alarms. Residents and fans are 
expressing fear for their safety. All while local officials 
report minimum communication by ICE about what exactly it plans 
to do. These tactics pose an unacceptable risk not just to 
Americans, but all foreign visitors seeking to enjoy the World 
Cup and other events.
    Make no mistake, security planning cannot succeed amid 
complete uncertainty, opaque planning, and unilateral decision 
making. We need to explore these issues further and conduct 
real oversight of DHS's out-of-control immigration enforcement 
policy to ensure the World Cup is safe for everyone.
    I have seen first-hand the amazing work that men and women 
at the State and local level are doing to make these the most 
secure games we have ever seen. Fusion centers in New Jersey 
are working. Police departments in my districts are planning. 
Governor Sherrill's office are coordinating together. These are 
groups that are getting ready before the first whistle blows. 
The question is whether or not DHS will do the same.
    This committee has the responsibility to ensure that 
Homeland Security's policy is not driven by politics or 
retaliation, but by risk assessment, operational realities, and 
Federal and State coordination. Because when millions gather in 
my district in New Jersey or Miami or Kansas City, the American 
people will not care about the interagency turf battles or 
grant paperwork backlog. Americans will expect that their 
Government works together because security is a shared 
responsibility. But leadership starts at the top, and it is 
time for DHS to lead.
    I look forward, Mr. Chairman, to hear from our witnesses 
today and about how we can ensure that this agency can improve 
and do just that because time is really running out.
    Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I yield back.
    Chairman Garbarino. Other Members of the committee are 
reminded that opening statements may be submitted for the 
record.
    [The statement of Ranking Member Thompson follows:]
             Statement of Ranking Member Bennie G. Thompson
                           February 24, 2026
    I welcome the opportunity to discuss information sharing and 
security collaboration for upcoming events like the America 250 
celebration, 2026 FIFA World Cup, and 2028 Los Angeles Summer Olympics 
and Paralympics. Democratic Members of the committee represent 
communities that will host these events, and we all have a vested 
interested in ensuring their security for local residents and visitors 
alike.
    Rep. Nellie Pou, who serves as the Democratic lead on the 
committee's ``Task Force on Enhancing Security for Special Events in 
the United States'' and whose district will host the World Cup final, 
is an outstanding leader on this issue.
    Several of our other Members from New Jersey, New York, and 
California represent districts that will host or are located near World 
Cup and LA 2028 events. They, too, are championing robust Federal, 
State, and local partnerships to ensure successful events.
    The Federal Government has a critical role to play to support State 
and local governments that are hosting these events, which will draw 
millions of visitors from across the country and around the world.
    Historically, administrations of both parties have collaborated 
with communities hosting major events like these.
    Their relationships may have not always been perfect, but everyone 
worked from the premise that a safe, successful event was good for the 
host communities and the country as a whole.
    Unfortunately, that has not been the case with the Trump 
administration. In fact, the Trump administration's record when it 
comes to supporting communities through information sharing, law 
enforcement collaboration, and necessary Federal funding is--in a 
word--atrocious.
    President Trump has politicized the Federal Government's 
relationship with States and cities. He has called Governors and mayors 
he disagrees with names, sent troops and secret police to their 
streets, and blocked State and local law enforcement from 
investigations in their own jurisdictions.
    The Trump administration has even withheld Congressionally-
appropriated funding based on whether communities are ``red'' or 
``blue.'' Apparently, this President thinks that only those Americans 
who voted for him deserve support from the Federal Government. That's 
not how our country is supposed to work.
    His petulant, punitive behavior toward communities he doesn't like 
is a warning sign about whether his administration will fulfill its 
responsibilities to World Cup and LA 2028 communities and stakeholders.
    Right now, I am extremely concerned that the Federal Government is 
withholding critical financial support to communities that will soon 
play host to World Cup events.
    Congress appropriated $625 million last year to help World Cup host 
cities bolster security and ensure the safety of everyone associated 
with the matches and fan events. It is FEMA's job to provide these 
funds through the State Homeland Security Program, but DHS is weeks 
overdue awarding the money.
    Kristi Noem has no problem wasting taxpayer money to buy herself 
multiple new jets, but she can't manage to get this money to 
communities where it is desperately needed. It's outrageous.
    States and host cities--who are already laying out huge sums of 
their own taxpayer dollars and have dedicated untold local resources 
for these events--are getting worried--and rightfully so. Time is 
running out to finalize security preparations. Congress has already 
appropriated this money--there is no excuse for DHS to stick local 
taxpayers with the tab. It must be released without further delay.
    To make matters worse, several States are already suffering under 
Republican cuts to the State Homeland Security Grant Program, Urban 
Area Security Initiative, and Emergency Management Preparedness Grants.
    The Trump administration needs to stop playing politics with 
security. Today I hope to hear from our witnesses about what the lack 
of Federal support means for their communities--and what keeps our 
witnesses up at night as they think about the events later this year.
    And finally, to the Governors, mayors, and public safety 
professionals across the country working to make America 250, the World 
Cup, and LA 2028 safe and successful--Democrats see your hard work and 
are doing everything we can to ensure the White House fulfills its 
responsibilities to you. I hope my Republican colleagues in Congress 
will do the same.

    Chairman Garbarino. I would now like to formally introduce 
our witnesses.
    Mr. Mike Sena serves as president of the National Fusion 
Center Association and executive director of the Northern 
California High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area and the 
Northern California Regional Intelligence Center. He brings 28 
years of law enforcement experience, including serving as the 
veteran investigator at the State and local level.
    Mr. Ray Martinez serves as the chief operating officer of 
the 2026 FIFA World Cup Miami Host Committee. He has 35 years 
of law enforcement experience, beginning his career in 1979 in 
the Miami Police Department, where he rose to the ranks from 
police officer to assistant chief of police. He later served as 
assistant chief and subsequently chief of police for the Miami 
Beach Police Department.
    A limited exception was made today due to unforeseen 
circumstances and inclement weather disrupting travel to allow 
Mr. Martinez to appear before this committee virtually. Without 
objection, I will enter into the record two letters: the first 
requesting this exception be made under those circumstances, 
and the second from the Majority leader permitting this virtual 
testimony today.
    [The information follows:]
                Letter From Chairman Andrew R. Garbarino
                                 February 23, 2026.
The Honorable Steve Scalise,
Majority Leader, U.S. House of Representatives, H-107 Capitol, 
        Washington, DC 20515.
    Dear Majority Leader Scalise: On Tuesday, February 24, 2026, the 
Committee on Homeland Security (Committee) will hold a hearing titled, 
``Before the Whistle: Assessing Information Sharing and Security 
Collaboration Ahead of Major Events.'' This hearing will allow the 
Committee to examine operational and strategic considerations involved 
in the collection, analysis, and sharing of information among Federal, 
State, local, tribal, territorial and private sector partners in 
preparation for major events scheduled to take place in the United 
States, including the 2026 FIFA World Cup.
    One of the witnesses scheduled to testify is Mr. Raymond A. 
Martinez, Chief Operating Officer for the FIFA World Cup 2026 Miami 
Host Committee. Mr. Martinez's travel has been disrupted because of 
inclement weather. Despite his best efforts, he is unable to get to 
Washington, D.C. before the hearing. Mr. Martinez's perspective is 
vital to the Committee's understanding of the preparation, needed 
resources, and multi-entity coordination required to carry out various 
major mass gathering events safely.
    The Committee formally requests that Mr. Martinez be permitted to 
testify virtually using Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) approved 
software from a remote location.
    Should you require any further information, please contact Keighle 
Joyce, Staff Director with the Committee at 202-281-5786. Thank you for 
your consideration, the Committee looks forward to your response.
            Sincerely,
                                       Andrew R. Garbarino,
                                                          Chairman.
                                 ______
                                 
                  Letter From Honorable Steve Scalise
                                 February 24, 2026.
The Honorable Andrew R. Garbarino,
Chairman, Committee on Homeland Security, U.S. House of 
        Representatives, Washington, DC 20515.
    Dear Chairman Garbarino: This letter serves as written approval for 
the Committee on Homeland Security to receive remote participation from 
committee witness Mr. Raymond A. Martinez, Chief Operating Officer for 
the FIFA World Cup 2026 Miami Host Committee, during the February 24, 
2024 hearing titled, ``Before the Whistle: Assessing Information 
Sharing and Security Collaboration Ahead of Major Events.''
    Your February 23, 2026 letter requesting the remote participation 
of Mr. Martinez affirms that his travel was disrupted due to inclement 
weather and that his testimony is necessary to inform the Committee of 
preparations for the upcoming 2026 FIFA World Cup. I have determined 
that Mr. Martinez's inability to travel due to the winter storm passing 
through Washington, DC on February 22-23, 2026 constitutes an 
``exceptional circumstance'' under the 119th Congress' ``Regulations 
for the Remote Participation of Committee Witnesses.''
    Please ensure that Mr. Martinez's remote participation adheres to 
the requirements described in the 119th Congress' ``Regulations for the 
Remote Participation of Committee Witnesses.'' Further, please ensure 
that your February 23, 2026 letter and this response letter are entered 
into the official hearing record.
            Sincerely,
                                             Steve Scalise,
                    Majority Leader, U.S. House of Representatives.

    Chairman Garbarino. I appreciate----
    Ms. Pou. Mr. Chairman.
    Chairman Garbarino. Yes, the gentlelady is recognized.
    Ms. Pou. I am reserving the right to object. Mr. Chairman, 
I will not object. But I would like to get your assurance that 
witnesses invited by the committee Democrats will be afforded 
the same opportunity to participate remotely in committee 
proceedings. On behalf of the Ranking Member Thompson, can I 
get your commitment to work with our side in the future when 
remote participation is required by our witnesses?
    Chairman Garbarino. Yes, and I will--as I was saying, this 
was a very limited exception. It is in the rules and it was a 
very difficult lift. I am happy that the Majority Leader 
agreed. It took a lot of convincing, but because of the weather 
and the gentleman not being able to make it up here, we were 
granted this very late last night to allow him to do this.
    So I will work with you if same situation arises. You have 
my word I will do what I can to get the same cooperation from 
the Majority Leader in the future again. But as I was told by 
the Majority leader, this is a very limited circumstance due to 
the weather that--and how the District of Columbia doesn't 
really know how to handle a snowstorm, which we didn't get 
anyway. But I will do my best in the future. You have my 
commitment.
    Ms. Pou. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Although it is 55 
degrees----
    Chairman Garbarino. Yes, I know.
    Ms. Pou [continuing]. In Florida, I might add.
    Chairman Garbarino. Well, I am pretty sure Mr. Martinez 
just didn't want to come up and leave the beautiful weather 
that is down in Florida. We should have done a field hearing 
down there.
    Ms. Pou. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
    Chairman Garbarino. So I do appreciate the Majority 
Leader's willingness to grant this rare exception in order to 
ensure the committee can hear Mr. Martinez' valuable and time-
sensitive testimony as the beginning of the World Cup games are 
only months away.
    Deputy Chief Joe Mabin serves as commander of the Patrol 
Bureau for Kansas City Missouri Police Department. He 
previously served as interim chief for the police and deputy 
chief of the Investigations Bureau. He has progressed steadily 
through the ranks, serving as sergeant, captain, major, and 
ultimately deputy chief with nearly half the department's 
personnel under his command.
    Mr. Travis Nelson serves as the deputy chief of staff and 
homeland security advisor for the Maryland Office of the 
Governor, officially assuming the role in June 2025, after 
serving as acting director for over a year. He has over 20 
years' experience in the public safety, emergency management, 
and law enforcement, including 19 years with the Maryland State 
Police.
    I thank all the witnesses for being here today. Pursuant to 
committee rule VII(C), I ask that the witnesses please rise and 
raise their right hand.
    [Witnesses sworn.]
    Chairman Garbarino. Let the record reflect that the 
witnesses have all answered in the affirmative. Thank you very 
much and please be seated.
    I now recognize Mr. Sena for 5 minutes to summarize his 
opening statement.

   STATEMENT OF MIKE SENA, PRESIDENT, NATIONAL FUSION CENTER 
                          ASSOCIATION

    Mr. Sena. Chairman Garbarino, Ranking Member Pou, and 
Members of the committee, thanks for the opportunity to testify 
today. My name is Mike Sena and I am the president of the 
National Fusion Center Association, which represents the 80 
designated fusion centers across America.
    Fusion centers are the backbone of the Homeland Security 
information-sharing enterprise. Every day, over 3,200 analysts 
and officers from every level of government work side-by-side 
with the private sector to identify threats, share 
intelligence, and coordinate operations. During major events we 
collaborate with real-time crime centers, High Intensity Drug 
Trafficking Areas, regional information-sharing system, watch 
centers, intelligence commanders with the major county sheriffs 
and major city chiefs, the U.S. Attorney's Offices, the FBI's 
Joint Terrorism Task Forces, the Homeland Security Task Forces, 
and the Center for Internet Security to ensure actionable 
intelligence reaches decision makers.
    Two weeks ago, we wrapped up security operations at Super 
Bowl LX, which happened to be in my area of responsibility. I 
want to share a few examples of how we worked together and how 
things played out in real time and why it is so important for 
Congress to continue supporting us.
    In Sacramento, law enforcement mitigated a potential drone 
threat to the Super Bowl based on a tip from the Central 
California Intelligence Center days before the game. The night 
before the Super Bowl, CISA and DHS I&A briefed our team on the 
passenger rail sabotage threats that occurred the previous day 
at the Winter Olympics in Italy. Our analysts quickly 
identified the tactics and patterns, developed a Threat 
Bulletin that we sent out to first-line responders across the 
Bay Area before the crowds arrived the next morning.
    We also helped law enforcement and nongovernment 
organizations in their fight against human trafficking, 
contacting 73 adults and 10 juvenile human trafficking victims, 
including a 12-year-old child. Law enforcement arrested 29 
suspected human traffickers and our fusion center analysts 
played an important role supporting the Santa Clara County 
Human Trafficking Task Force.
    That level of collaboration was made possible by our use of 
technology that combined mapping, communication, and 
collaboration in a single platform. We were able to integrate 
tips, share on-line indicators of human trafficking, analyze 
field reports, and receive investigative requests from multiple 
agencies.
    While we're proud of the accomplishments, and I want to 
point out that we do have gaps that I believe Congress can help 
us address, we must address the ability to integrate the many 
threat reporting systems that remain fragmented today. Upcoming 
major events will test our ability to coordinate across 
jurisdictions under very compressed time lines. There are 
multiple systems which are not fully integrated with State and 
local platforms, creating delays and, more importantly, 
operational risk.
    We also must strengthen the field presence of DHS's Office 
of Intelligence and Analysis. I&A is the only element in the 
intelligence community required by law to share intelligence 
with State and local partners. We appreciate this committee for 
including the NFCA for discussions on how I&A can be improved. 
Any reform must strengthen I&A's presence at all AD fusion 
centers while keeping a strong core component at headquarters.
    Regarding drones, we are grateful that Congress gave State 
and local law enforcement the legal authority to mitigate drone 
threats by passing the Safer Skies Act last year. Now Congress 
must provide the resources to expand the counter-UAS training 
we are required to complete to use the authorities. Congress 
should also provide dedicated resources for first responders to 
integrate drones for our daily operations.
    Congress should continue to provide robust support for the 
State Homeland Security Grant Program, SHSGP, and the Urban 
Area Security Initiative, UASI. These programs support 
analysts, training, and technology that make information 
sharing and threat analysis possible at every level every day. 
Without those two grants, fusion centers cannot fully 
contribute to the security of major events or the overall 
Homeland Security mission.
    Congress should also help resolve on-going uncertainty 
around FEMA grant guidance and restrictions. The ability to 
carry out missions like ours at the fusion centers should not 
be penalized for policy decisions we do not control. When 
eligibility requirements shift and when disbursements are 
delayed it doesn't just affect local budgets, it derails 
national priority projects designed to prevent major threats.
    Cyber threats may present the greatest risks surrounding 
major events. A cyber attack of power, water, or transportation 
during the World Cup would create cascading failures that 
overwhelm response. Congress should require Federal cyber 
partners to better integrate with and provide cyber analytical 
training to State and local partners.
    Congress should provide DHS the resources to accelerate 
security clearance processing for fusion center personnel. 
Clearance delays can lock out people from secure coordination 
spaces at the moment they are needed most. That is a gap in 
coverage we cannot afford.
    Finally, reliable public safety communications are an 
absolute requirement at major events. FirstNet has been an 
essential partner and Congress should ensure it continues by 
reauthorizing the FirstNet authority this year.
    In closing, planning for threat analysis and information 
sharing around major events is not optional. It is mission-
critical. When information sharing is timely and properly 
resourced, threats can be mitigated before harm occurs.
    We appreciate this committee's leadership and I appreciate 
your invitation to testify today.
    [The prepared statement of Mr. Sena follows:]
                    Prepared Statement of Mike Sena
                           February 24, 2026
                              introduction
    Chairman Garbarino, Ranking Member Thompson, and Members of the 
committee, thank you for the opportunity to testify today on 
information sharing, intelligence coordination, and security 
preparations for major national events--where timely, accurate 
intelligence and effective coordination are essential to public safety.
    My name is Mike Sena, and I serve as president of the National 
Fusion Center Association (NFCA), representing the 80 State and major 
urban area fusion centers that make up the National Network of Fusion 
Centers nationwide. I also serve as executive director of the Northern 
California Regional Intelligence Center (NCRIC) and the Northern 
California High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (NC HIDTA), where our 
team works daily with Federal, State, local, Tribal, territorial, and 
private-sector partners on threat identification, intelligence 
analysis, investigative support, information sharing, and operational 
coordination in collaboration with Real-Time Crime Centers (RTCCs), 
Fusion Centers, High-Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas (HIDTAs), the 
Regional Information Sharing Systems' (RISS) Watch Centers, and the 
Center for Internet Security (CIS).
    I want to thank Members of this committee, including Subcommittee 
on Counterterrorism and Intelligence Chairman Pfluger and Ranking 
Member Magaziner and Chairman Strong and Ranking Member Kennedy, for 
including NFCA and our law enforcement association partners in broader 
discussions on major event security, information sharing, and proposed 
reforms to DHS intelligence and field operations at the Office of 
Intelligence and Analysis (I&A). These discussions are critical as we 
all recommit to securing the homeland from a wide range of threats. 
Decisions about intelligence reform, field engagement, investigative 
tools, training, and information-sharing systems directly affect how 
fusion centers and State and local agencies identify threats and 
respond in real time--especially during major events, where time lines 
are compressed and consequences are immediate.
    Across the National Network of Fusion Centers, more than 3,200 
personnel from State, local, Federal, and private-sector partners 
collaborate every day to analyze threats, share intelligence, and 
support operational coordination, while safeguarding privacy, civil 
rights, and civil liberties. Since 2001, fusion centers have become a 
cornerstone of the homeland security enterprise, complementing Federal 
partners such as the FBI's Joint Terrorism Task Forces, the Homeland 
Security Task Forces, as well as other DOJ and DHS components. During 
major national events in particular--such as the upcoming FIFA World 
Cup, America 250 celebrations, and the 2028 Olympic and Paralympic 
Games--fusion centers function as the primary hubs for consolidating 
threat information, coordinating across jurisdictions, and ensuring 
that actionable intelligence reaches decision makers and front-line 
agencies when it matters most. There is no substitute for the National 
Network of Fusion Centers--they fill a unique role that cannot be 
replicated by any one entity. Working together with the Intelligence 
Commanders Groups of the Major Cities Chiefs Association (MCCA) and the 
Major County Sheriffs of America (MCSA), and in collaboration with 
State-wide investigative agencies that are part of the Association of 
State Criminal Investigative Agencies (ASCIA), fusion centers play an 
essential role helping to protect America.
    Today, I will focus on how information sharing should function 
during major events, what we have seen work well in recent large-scale 
security operations, and where gaps remain--particularly in threat 
reporting, real-time coordination, staffing, training, and access to 
intelligence. I will also discuss the role of DHS I&A and other Federal 
partners in supporting fusion centers in both steady-state operations 
and during major events, including the resources and authorities needed 
to ensure this system functions effectively in the years ahead.
                        major event preparation
    Major events such as the FIFA World Cup, America 250 celebrations, 
and the Olympic Games place extraordinary demands on the homeland 
security enterprise. These events are not single venue or single 
jurisdiction challenges. They extend across multiple cities, counties, 
and States well beyond the secured perimeter.
    Threats associated with major events often emerge far from the 
venue and long before the event itself, surfacing through routine law 
enforcement encounters, on-line activity, and tips from the public. The 
scale and duration of these events test how well our information-
sharing systems work in practice, making real-time, multi-
jurisdictional coordination mission-critical. Fusion centers exist to 
meet this challenge by consolidating tips and leads, integrating 
intelligence from multiple sources, identifying patterns across 
jurisdictions, and ensuring actionable information reaches the right 
partners in time to act.
                            what is working
    When Federal, State, and local partners are aligned in the field, 
our Nation's information-sharing apparatus works the way it was 
intended by the recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Report. When 
Federal partners deploy alongside fusion center analysts and threat 
liaison officers with a shared mission and real-time access to 
disparate sources of information, communication improves immediately. 
Intelligence products become more timely and relevant, questions are 
resolved more quickly, and operational decisions move faster.
    The collaboration that occurred in my area of responsibility during 
and preceding Super Bowl LX, which happened in the city of Santa Clara, 
Santa Clara County, and included NFL events in the city and county of 
San Francisco, is a clear example of how the information-sharing 
environment approach was intended to work. Sustained planning and real-
time coordination between the FBI, HSI, the U.S. Attorney's Office, and 
other Department of Justice and Department of Homeland Security 
components, including the Office of Intelligence and Analysis (I&A) and 
the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), along with 
fusion centers, the Bay Area Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI), 
Center for Internet Security (CIS), and State and local public safety 
agencies, enabled integrated threat reporting and shared situational 
awareness. That coordination allowed partners to identify risks early, 
align protective measures, and respond quickly as conditions evolved.
    For example, days before the Super Bowl, the Central California 
Intelligence Center (CICC) in Sacramento identified a subject that had 
shared on-line content indicating his intention to violate restricted 
air space during the game at Levi's Stadium with an Unmanned Aircraft 
System (UAS). The significance of the threat was that the subject had 
been convicted of violating the same restricted air space and dropping 
objects from a drone after entering Levi's Stadium on November 26, 
2017. Thanks to CICC's swift action in passing the lead to the NCRIC, 
all the personnel that were protecting the venue were aware of the 
threat and law enforcement partners in Sacramento were able to mitigate 
the planned drone incursion by seizing the drone.
    The night before the Super Bowl, the NCRIC team and our public 
safety intelligence and transportation security partners were briefed 
in the Super Bowl Regional Coordination Center (RCC) in the city of San 
Jose, on passenger rail sabotage threats related to the 2026 Winter 
Olympics in Italy by our CISA and I&A partners. The tactics, 
techniques, and patterns were quickly identified and a team of local, 
State, and Federal analysts worked with our fusion center personnel to 
develop a bulletin that was quickly disseminated to front-line 
personnel from multiple agencies around the San Francisco Bay Area to 
increase awareness and improve the ability to detect and mitigate 
potential threats to the public.
    During the weeks ahead of this month's Super Bowl, law enforcement 
and Non-Governmental Organizations (NGO's) worked together to fight 
against human trafficking and contacted 73 adult and 10 juvenile human 
trafficking victims, including a 12-year-old child, and offered the 
victims of sex trafficking support to escape their traffickers. Law 
enforcement also arrested 29 suspected human traffickers by the time 
the first whistle was blown on Super Bowl Sunday. The Santa Clara 
County Human Trafficking Task Force spearheaded the collaboration with 
over 60 partner agencies in 11 counties, with the support of NCRIC 
analysts.
    By consolidating human trafficking data sources through an 
information-sharing environment that combined the technologies from a 
common public safety Geographic Information System (GIS) analysis tool 
with a commonly-used chat, video, and file-sharing technology, analysts 
and officers were able to integrate tips, on-line threat indicators, 
field reporting, and investigators' requests for information across 
multiple jurisdictions. The fusion center analysts were able to 
identify patterns and support the joint investigative effort of the 
partner agencies with real-time analysis that would not have been 
possible through isolated reporting or other information-sharing 
platforms.
          persistent gaps in threat reporting and coordination
    Despite these successes, it is imperative that we improve how 
information sharing, information access, and analytical collaboration 
function when those functions must operate at scale and speed ahead of 
and during major events.
    Threat reporting overall, despite improvements, remains fragmented. 
Tips and leads enter the system through multiple pathways--including 
local agencies, Federal partners, private entities, venue security, and 
the public. But there is no single, reliable workflow to rapidly 
consolidate, deconflict, and disseminate that information across 
jurisdictions. During fast-moving events, this fragmentation can 
undermine shared messaging and situational awareness.
    At the same time, Federal systems used by DHS and the FBI are not 
fully interoperable with State and local platforms. Agencies are often 
working from partial information, and critical data does not always 
reach the right analysts or decision makers in time, which means that 
front-line personnel who are best positioned to recognize, report, and 
respond to potential threats are less aware. During major events, these 
gaps are not theoretical, as during the Super Bowl, we had several 
information-sharing platforms that operated at the same time. This 
creates an operational risk at large-scale events and creates stress on 
an already overtaxed network of analysts and officers.
    The upcoming FIFA World Cup highlights these challenges in very 
real ways. In some host regions, State and local law enforcement 
agencies are facing significant security responsibilities without clear 
coordination or operational alignment across all partners involved in 
the sprawling events from practice locations, team hotels, to official 
and unofficial events for fans. As a result, local agencies are not as 
connected as they should be for planning, staffing, coordination, and 
real-time information sharing for a complex, multi-jurisdictional 
event.
    For events of this scale, that approach means serious risks may go 
unaddressed. World Cup security is not confined to a single venue or 
jurisdiction; it extends across host cities and surrounding 
communities. Without clear coordination, defined roles, and aligned 
support, information sharing becomes more difficult, and local agencies 
whose resources are already stretched too thin, are left to manage 
complex, multi-jurisdictional threats under significant time pressure.
    These challenges underscore why major international events require 
a coordinated, multi-jurisdictional approach that aligns Federal, 
State, local, and private-sector partners around shared information, 
shared expectations, data security, and shared responsibility.
                dhs office of intelligence and analysis
    Within the broader information-sharing framework, the DHS Office of 
Intelligence and Analysis plays a unique and irreplaceable role. I&A is 
the only element of the U.S. intelligence community statutorily charged 
with facilitating intelligence sharing with State, local, Tribal, and 
territorial partners, including the National Network of Fusion Centers, 
regarding terrorism and other threats to the homeland.
    From our perspective in the field, I&A is most effective when it is 
forward-deployed with access to Federal information and the authority 
to appropriately share it with State and local partners. I&A personnel 
embedded in fusion centers enable a timely two-way flow of information 
and the collaborative analysis and development of intelligence--
increasing the likelihood that the reporting of threats reaches State 
and local partners quickly, while insights developed at the local level 
inform the national intelligence picture. During major events, this 
field presence can determine whether threat-related information and 
intelligence arrives in time to help personnel on the ground recognize 
and prevent an incident, or whether it is too late to be useful.
    In major urban areas that host major events, a single I&A 
representative is insufficient. Effective support requires that field 
teams have access to the right information and the authority to share 
that information and develop joint intelligence products with State and 
local partners. I was lucky enough to have the highest tier of support 
possible from DHS I&A during the Super Bowl, as they sent 14 members of 
their team from their Field Intelligence Directorate and Special Events 
Program to assist the NCRIC. Those forward-deployed intelligence 
analysts and officers must also be supported by a headquarters 
structure at I&A that is capable of sustaining and scaling those 
efforts for future major events and daily fusion center operations.
    For these reasons, we are grateful that the committee has included 
NFCA and our law enforcement partners in discussions on proposed 
legislative reforms to strengthen I&A's ability to support State and 
local law enforcement and all our communities. Stakeholder input is 
essential. Decisions about staffing, authorities, release processes, 
and coordination mechanisms directly affect whether intelligence 
sharing works under the compressed time lines and heightened risk of 
major events. Any reform effort should strengthen--not weaken--I&A's 
field presence and ensure it is backed by a robust headquarters 
enterprise with access to relevant information from other Federal 
partners and the intelligence community and the authority to share 
appropriately with State and local partners including fusion centers.
                     drone threats at major events
    Unmanned aircraft systems present a growing threat to both major 
events and everyday public safety. We appreciate Congress's action in 
December 2025 through the Safer Skies Act, which passed as part of the 
fiscal year 2026 National Defense Authorization Act, which granted 
State and local law enforcement and correctional agencies the authority 
to detect, track, and mitigate malicious and unauthorized drones, 
subject to appropriate training and equipment requirements.
    From the field perspective, the challenge now is implementation. 
Access to the FBI's required counter-UAS training is severely limited, 
and demand already far exceeds available capacity. As a result, many 
State and local agencies--particularly those preparing for major 
events--do not yet have trained personnel in place to operationalize 
this authority in a meaningful way. We are encouraged by the 
administration's intent to consult closely with State and local law 
enforcement and corrections as implementation of the Safer Skies Act 
begins this year. We encourage Congress to allocate the funding 
necessary to increase availability of FBI training for State and local 
agency personnel so we can take quick action to mitigate drone threats 
to our major events and every-day community safety.
    Under the Safer Skies Act Congress also authorized the use of 
existing Justice Department grant programs, specifically Byrne JAG and 
COPS grants, to support the acquisition of drones for public safety 
missions and also counter-UAS systems. In addition, funding provided in 
the One Big Beautiful Bill Act through FEMA's State Homeland Security 
Grant Program supports law enforcement activities that include counter-
UAS and other capabilities relevant to major event security. These 
tools are critically important, but they are not sufficient on their 
own. Counter-UAS capabilities require sustained investments in 
training, staffing, equipment, and operational integration that exceed 
what these programs can support. I urge Congress to consider how the 
Federal Government can support State and local efforts to build and 
maintain robust drone first-responder capabilities and counter-drone 
operations to protect the public.
    Addressing these gaps will require additional, flexible Federal 
resources. Without that support, State and local agencies will continue 
to face challenges translating the new authority that Congress has 
provided into effective protection for our communities.
                          grants and resources
    Federal grant programs play a critical role in enabling State and 
local agencies to contribute to the national security mission every day 
and to scale those capabilities for major events. These resources 
support the personnel, training, technology, and coordination that make 
timely information sharing and threat detection possible across 
jurisdictions.
    Fusion centers and our State and local partners use programs such 
as the State Homeland Security Grant Program (SHSGP) and the Urban Area 
Security Initiative (UASI) to support analysts, training, analytical 
technology, and multi-jurisdictional exercises and coordination. These 
programs are central to local, regional, and national threat prevention 
efforts, yet agencies continue to take on expanding responsibilities 
and increasingly complex threat environments while planning and 
execution have been complicated by uncertainty around grant guidance, 
eligibility requirements, and the timing of fund disbursements that if 
not resolved soon, will hinder or derail national priority projects 
that have been designed to prevent and mitigate major threats to our 
Nation.
    Information-sharing capacity does not scale up on demand without 
dedicated planning and resourcing. The analytical workforce and 
coordination mechanisms required for major events such as the FIFA 
World Cup, America 250 celebrations, and the Olympic Games must be 
built and sustained over time. Because threat actors routinely cross 
State lines and international borders, and because each part of 
Federal, State, and local governments may have information, 
capabilities, or resources, the Federal Government has a responsibility 
to contribute funding and personnel to supplement and help sustain 
State and local capabilities. Delayed guidance or funding time lines 
directly affect readiness across the system.
    As this committee considers homeland security and public safety 
priorities, it should ensure that FEMA preparedness grant programs 
provide predictable funding, timely guidance, and sufficient 
flexibility to support sustained information-sharing capabilities 
across jurisdictions. These investments enable fusion centers and our 
partners to fully contribute to the homeland security and national 
security missions and ensure coordinated readiness for major national 
and international events.
                             cyber threats
    Cyber threats may represent the greatest vulnerability surrounding 
major events because adversaries do not necessarily need physical 
proximity to cause harm. A successful cyber attack against power, 
water, communications, or transportation systems during a major event 
could create cascading effects that overwhelm response capabilities.
    For major events, cyber threats underscore the need for real-time 
information sharing well beyond the event's geographic footprint. 
Fusion centers often lack timely access to cyber threat indicators and 
trend data, and despite progress in recent years there is no fully 
integrated national approach to State and local cyber threat response. 
Fusion center and partner agency analysts also need continued DHS ITA 
Cyber Analyst Seminar and Webinar training, as well as advanced cyber 
analyst training.
    Strengthening information sharing in this area will require better 
integration between Federal cyber partners, fusion centers, and other 
State and local officials. It will also require clearer pathways for 
sharing actionable cyber threat information from Federal entities to 
State and local agencies, and sustained investment in analytic capacity 
at the State and local levels. Without these connections in place, 
cyber risks associated with major events will continue to outpace our 
ability to detect and respond in time.
           law enforcement tools and investigative technology
    Effective information sharing for major event security depends on 
access to a range of lawful tools and data--not a single technology. 
Fusion centers and their partners rely on investigative technologies, 
including commercially-available data, to identify potential threats 
early, connect disparate data points, and support timely operational 
decisions before and during large-scale public events.
    Tools such as automated license plate recognition (LPR), facial 
recognition, and social media open-source intelligence analysis support 
threat detection and situational awareness for planned and unplanned 
events. These tools help identify patterns and emerging risks early 
enough to share information across jurisdictions, enabling coordinated 
prevention and response efforts before harm occurs.
    As Congress considers consumer data privacy frameworks, it is 
critical that any approach be developed in consultation with State and 
local law enforcement and account for the real-world public safety 
needs. Data privacy proposals could have a major impact on 
investigative efforts given the ubiquity of data across our world 
today. One of those proposals--the Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act 
(FANFSA)--would force analysts and investigators who are trying to 
prevent harm and protect the public to be blind to information that 
others can readily access. That makes no sense from a public safety or 
homeland security standpoint. Efficient, timely, and privacy-protective 
sharing of digital evidence is essential. Legislative frameworks must 
preserve lawful access necessary for timely information sharing while 
maintaining strong privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties 
protections.
                 communications and information access
    Effective information sharing for major event security depends on 
reliable communications and timely system access. Fusion centers 
require access to local, regional, State, and Federal information at 
both the Classified and unclassified levels, including law enforcement 
records, criminal intelligence databases, the Homeland Security 
Information Network, the Homeland Security Data Network, FBI Criminal 
Justice Information Services systems, DHS law enforcement and screening 
systems, and tip and lead intake platforms.
    This access allows fusion centers to add critical local context to 
national intelligence and support coordinated, multi-jurisdictional 
threat prevention efforts. During major events, delays or barriers to 
system access directly undermine situational awareness and slow 
decision making for personnel responsible for public safety on the 
ground.
    Current Federal platforms offer some functionality, but they remain 
limited in their ability to support real-time, large-scale coordination 
across agencies and jurisdictions. As Congress considers legislative 
reforms to DHS I&A and other Federal components, any legislative or 
policy changes should ensure fusion centers retain timely, operational 
access to necessary systems and prioritize interoperability and real-
time communications across jurisdictions that allow analysts and 
officers to enter the data once, instead of the several times that they 
have to enter the same data today into multiple systems. Without these 
capabilities, fusion centers are far less able to support major event 
security or rapidly share threat information before harm occurs.
                          security clearances
    Timely security clearances are essential to effective information 
sharing during major events. On-going delays limit fusion center 
personnel's ability to access critical intelligence and fully 
participate in secure coordination with Federal, State, and local 
partners.
    During major events, personnel without timely clearances may be 
unable to access or share threat information or participate in secure 
coordination spaces, directly undermining joint situational awareness 
and response planning.
    As Congress and the administration consider reforms to personnel 
security and information-sharing policies, I urge you to prioritize 
timely clearance processing and access for State and local fusion 
center personnel, including appropriate use of reciprocity and 
provisional access to meet time-sensitive operational needs.
                                closing
    The upcoming World Cup, America 250 celebrations, and Olympic Games 
will test the homeland security enterprise in ways we have not 
experienced in decades. Threat-related analysis and information sharing 
is not a supporting function for these events--it is an essential 
mission that must be developed and exercised routinely to protect our 
communities.
    Fusion centers sit at the center of that mission, connecting 
Federal intelligence with State and local operational response. When 
information sharing is timely, integrated, and properly resourced, 
threats can be identified and mitigated before they reach the public.
    We appreciate the committee's engagement and its inclusion of the 
NFCA in discussions on major event security, information sharing, and 
I&A reform. We stand ready to continue working with you to ensure our 
analytical and information-sharing systems and practices are prepared 
for the challenges ahead.

    Chairman Garbarino. Thank you, Mr. Sena.
    I now recognize Mr. Martinez for 5 minutes to summarize his 
opening statement.

STATEMENT OF RAYMOND A. MARTINEZ, CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER, FIFA 
              WORLD CUP 2026 MIAMI HOST COMMITTEE

    Mr. Martinez. Thank you, Commissioner Garbarino, Ranking 
Member Pou, and distinguished Members of this committee. Thank 
you for the opportunity to testify regarding public safety and 
security preparations for the FIFA World Cup.
    My name is Ray Martinez and I serve as the chief operating 
officer for the Miami Host Committee. As stated previously, 
I've served for 35 years in local law enforcement, my last 2\1/
2\ years as the chief of police of the Miami Beach Police 
Department. Upon my retirement from law enforcement, I moved 
into the event world and have worked on several large-scale 
international events, including music festivals, the college 
football playoffs in 2021 and just last month here in Miami. I 
also served as the president and CEO of the Super Bowl Host 
Committee for the 2020 game, which was held in Miami.
    Working with me on the Host Committee are several law 
enforcement executives with similar, if not more impressive, 
backgrounds. Those experiences and lessons learned from the--
learned informed the approach we are taking with World Cup 
planning.
    The FIFA World Cup 2026 will be the largest sporting event 
ever conducted globally. Miami is one of 16 host cities across 
3 countries and North America hosting matches. We will host 7 
matches, including a quarterfinal and the bronze medal final 
match. The Miami Host Committee is planning on producing a 23-
day fan festival where we expect hundreds of thousands of 
international visitors. This presents a tremendous opportunity, 
but also a historic operational challenge.
    On behalf of the 11 U.S. World Cup committees, I want to 
thank this committee for providing the $625 million in security 
funding to the host cities. Those resources are critical to 
ensuring that host committees have capabilities necessary to 
execute a safe and secure tournament across multiple weeks and 
venues.
    In Miami, our security framework is built on three pillars: 
unified command; integrated local, State, and Federal 
partnership; and intelligence-driven operations.
    First, a unified command. Public safety operations in Miami 
are led by the Miami-Dade Sheriff's Office under a unified 
command structure that integrates municipal police, fire and 
rescue, emergency management, and State agencies across 
multiple jurisdictions.
    Second, integrated Federal partnership with State and local 
agencies. The White House Task Force on the World Cup has 
played a central role in aligning Federal agency support with 
local agencies and host committee planning. We are grateful to 
the White House Task Force and Executive Director Andrew 
Giuliani's efforts to support and partner with the FIFA World 
Cup host committees. Federal partners, including the FBI, 
Secret Service, FEMA, CISA, DHS, provide threat assessments, 
intelligence integration, cybersecurity protection, contingency 
planning. This coordination ensures access to national 
capabilities and support if threat conditions evolve.
    Third, intelligence-driven operations. The South Florida 
Fusion Center, working with the FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force 
and Federal intelligence partners, lead to proactive 
information sharing and threat monitoring. Both the Miami 
Stadium and Bayfront Park will operate with layered security 
perimeters, credential and entry screening, dedicated emergency 
access lanes, and a Joint Operations Center that provide real-
time situational awareness and coordinated decision making.
    One of the most significant emergency threats is 
unauthorized drone activity. Malicious or reckless drone 
operation presents risks ranging from surveillance to 
operational disruption. In coordination with Federal partners, 
we will be implementing temporary flight restrictions, 
detection capabilities, and counter-UAS planning integrated 
into our overall security posture. We appreciate the 
Congressional support, and particularly this committee as well 
as President Trump's administration, for dedicated counter-UAS 
funding to support these efforts.
    The Department of Homeland Security has assigned elevated 
Special Assessment--Special Event Assessment Ratings to the 
Miami matches, including a SEAR 1 designation for the Bronze 
Medal final match. These designations reflect the scale into 
international visibility of the event and reinforce the 
importance of robust Federal, State, and local coordination, 
which is well under way.
    Miami's preparedness reflects the on-going coordinated 
efforts of all 11 U.S. host committees as we work each day to 
ensure a safe and secure and successful FIFA World Cup. 
Together we are committed to demonstrating that no nation is 
better equipped to host and deliver a World Cup than the United 
States of America.
    I thank you for this opportunity to appear for you today 
and I look forward to answering your questions. Thank you.
    [The prepared statement of Mr. Martinez follows:]
               Prepared Statement of Raymond A. Martinez
                           February 24, 2026
                              introduction
    Chairman Garbarino, Ranking Member Thompson, and distinguished 
Members of the committee, thank you for the opportunity to testify 
before you today regarding public safety and security preparations 
associated with the FIFA World Cup 2026TM and, specifically, 
Miami's role as one of the official host cities. I appreciate the 
committee's leadership and continued oversight in ensuring that major 
international events hosted in the United States are conducted safely, 
securely, and in a manner that reflects the highest standards of 
intergovernmental coordination and operational readiness.
     overview of the fifa world cup 2026 in miami and operational 
                              environment
    The FIFA World Cup 2026TM represents the largest 
sporting event ever conducted globally. Miami has been designated as 
one of 16 host cities for the FIFA World Cup 2026TM, and 
will host 7 official matches at Hard Rock Stadium in Miami Gardens, 
which will be rebranded as Miami Stadium for the duration of the 
tournament. These matches will include group stage matches, a Round of 
32 match, a quarterfinal match, and the bronze, or third-place, game. 
The tournament will run from June 11 through July 19, 2026, and will 
also include a 23-day FIFA Fan Festival in downtown Miami's Bayfront 
Park, which will serve as a major public gathering and celebration 
site.
    This global event is expected to attract hundreds of thousands of 
international visitors, and the Miami metropolitan area faces both an 
extraordinary opportunity and a historic operational challenge. Public 
safety planning encompasses law enforcement, fire rescue, emergency 
management, health care infrastructure, transportation, cybersecurity, 
and community engagement components to ensure coordinated and resilient 
operations across all venues and activation zones. We thank the 
committee for providing $625 million in security funding in Pub. L. 
119-21. These funds will be vital to support the complex safety 
operations associated with an event of this scale.
    To support State-level preparation, the South Florida Regional 
Multi-Agency Coordination Group (MAC) was formally established to 
ensure unified planning, coordinated response capabilities, and 
strategic policy alignment across jurisdictions. At the Federal level, 
the White House Task Force on the FIFA World Cup has been established 
to coordinate nationwide interagency support, accelerate security and 
infrastructure readiness, and align host city preparations with Federal 
capabilities, intelligence resources, and operational support 
frameworks. We are grateful for the White House Task Force and 
Executive Director Giuliani's efforts to support and partner with the 
FIFA World Cup.
    The MAC structure is designed to coordinate executive-level policy 
decisions, resource prioritization, and strategic guidance for complex 
incidents or major planned events. It serves as the bridge between 
executive leadership and operational Incident Command, ensuring unity 
of effort across multiple jurisdictions and disciplines. Public safety 
planning for the World Cup in Miami is centered on a unified command 
structure led by the Miami-Dade Sheriff's Office. The Sheriff's Office 
is responsible for stadium security, perimeter control, and crowd 
safety operations, working in close coordination with Miami-Dade Fire 
Rescue, which provides emergency medical support, fire safety services, 
specialized rescue capabilities, and on-site incident response. The 
city of Miami Police Department and Fire Rescue Department provide 
operational support for downtown venues, including festival operations 
and transportation hubs. State law enforcement and transportation 
agencies support traffic management, surge staffing, and specialized 
operational needs.
    Federal partners, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation, 
United States Secret Service, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, and the Department of 
Homeland Security, play critical roles in threat assessment, 
intelligence integration, cybersecurity protection, and contingency 
planning. The White House Task Force on the FIFA World Cup has played 
an essential role in ensuring that Federal partnerships are maximally 
leveraged to create a safe environment for fans to enjoy the event.
    The United States Department of Homeland Security classifies 
special events using Special Event Assessment Ratings (SEAR) Levels 1 
through 5 with SEAR 1 events being the most significant. These 
designations reflect factors such as the presence of high-profile 
attendees, international media interest, geopolitical considerations, 
and the level of Federal coordination required. The 7 matches scheduled 
in Miami carry significant SEAR designations, with the first 6 matches 
classified as SEAR 2 events and the Bronze Medal match classified as a 
SEAR 1 event. The concurrent FIFA Fan Festival is rated as a SEAR 2 
event. These ratings necessitate elevated interagency coordination at 
the Federal, State, and local levels.
    The Miami-Dade Department of Emergency Management has hosted 
several full-scale and tabletop exercises available for all public 
safety agencies during the past year. In January 2026, a multi-agency 
Region 4 World Cup tabletop exercise was conducted to test emergency 
response protocols, evacuation procedures, intelligence sharing, cyber 
disruption scenarios, and incident command coordination under the 
National Incident Management System framework. These exercises 
strengthen interagency coordination, validate operational 
communications, and enhance preparedness for complex and evolving 
threat scenarios.
       information-sharing framework and operational integration
    The South Florida Fusion Center, in coordination with its regional 
intelligence partners--including the FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force--
continues to conduct proactive intelligence collection, comprehensive 
threat assessments, and robust information sharing across local, State, 
Federal, Tribal, and international agencies.
    This effort includes close collaboration with FIFA's Safety and 
Security Intelligence Group to ensure unified situational awareness and 
operational alignment. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security's 
Office of Intelligence and Analysis provides weekly intelligence 
briefings to support planning and decision making. The Intelligence 
Operations Center serves as the regional clearinghouse for intelligence 
matters, maintaining direct liaison with Federal agencies and host city 
fusion centers nationwide. Sensitive information is disseminated to all 
participating partners through the Department of Homeland Security's 
Homeland Security Information Network.
     venue security, public safety operations, and emerging threat 
                              preparedness
    Security planning at Miami Stadium incorporates lessons learned 
from prior high-attendance events and international best practices. 
These measures include multi-layered security perimeters, early ticket 
verification and credential screening, expanded screening capacity 
including bag checks and X-ray systems, hardened fencing and engineered 
pedestrian flow corridors, and rapid deployment crowd control units.
    Operational readiness is supported through real-time situational 
awareness platforms and joint operations centers, enabling continuous 
coordination and rapid decision making among participating agencies. 
These capabilities support proactive threat identification and 
coordinated operational responses.
    Bayfront Park will serve as the official FIFA Fan Festival site, 
accommodating up to 30,000 daily visitors over 23 days. Public safety 
measures at this location include secured perimeters with controlled 
entry and exit points, magnetometer screening, dedicated emergency 
access lanes, and coordinated ingress and egress management. On-site 
public safety infrastructure includes emergency medical services, fire 
suppression capabilities, rapid medical transport access, and 
coordinated law enforcement and private security staffing. High-
visibility patrols and a robust volunteer program will support 
situational awareness, public safety, and visitor assistance.
    One of the most significant emerging threat vectors associated with 
this event involves Unmanned Aerial Systems, commonly referred to as 
drones. Recent threat assessments indicate a significant rise in 
malicious or unauthorized drone activity at large-scale events 
worldwide. These systems present risks including aerial surveillance of 
security operations, delivery of hazardous payloads, unauthorized 
incursions that could disrupt operations or create panic, air space 
conflicts with law enforcement and emergency aircraft, coordinated 
swarm activities, and signal interference affecting communications 
systems.
    Mitigation measures include the implementation of Temporary Flight 
Restrictions coordinated with Federal aviation authorities, deployment 
of counter-UAS detection technologies such as radio frequency sensors 
and radar systems, joint counter-drone coordination with Federal 
technical teams, public awareness and enforcement campaigns, rapid 
interdiction protocols, and specialized response team training. 
Counter-UAS planning is fully integrated into operational planning and 
emergency response exercises. We appreciate this committees' support 
for $500 million in C-UAS grant funding through the Department of 
Homeland Security and the Trump administration's efforts to prioritize 
the first half of that funding for FIFA World Cup 2026TM 
host cities.
    In addition, the Miami-Dade State Attorney's Office leads proactive 
human trafficking prevention initiatives, including enforcement 
operations, victim services coordination, public awareness campaigns, 
and reporting mechanisms. Regional transportation agencies are 
implementing adaptive signal timing, expanded transit operations, 
managed ride-share staging, pedestrian safety corridors, and 
coordinated traffic management strategies to ensure safe and efficient 
movement of visitors and residents.
  federal coordination, community engagement, and operational support
    The White House Task Force on the FIFA World Cup serves as the 
central Federal coordination body supporting World Cup Host Committees. 
The Task Force assists host cities synchronizing Federal agency support 
across security, transportation, border operations, and infrastructure 
protection, facilitating intelligence sharing and threat assessments, 
coordinating Federal grant pathways and resource allocations, and 
aligning national counterterrorism and cybersecurity capabilities with 
local operational planning. This coordination enhances host city access 
to Federal intelligence streams, specialized technical capabilities, 
and rapid Federal surge support if threat conditions evolve. We are 
grateful for the good relationship between Host Committees and the Task 
Force. In particular, Executive Director Giuliani and his team have 
been extremely helpful and attentive to addressing Host Committee 
issues as they arise. This relationship has been fundamental in 
ensuring that Federal resources are leveraged to enhance our security 
operations.
    Community engagement and public communication are essential 
components of World Cup preparation. Pre-event outreach includes 
presentations to community organizations, businesses, and local 
stakeholders. During the event, a large-scale volunteer deployment will 
support multilingual visitor assistance, safety messaging, crowd flow 
management, and emergency reporting awareness. Public communications 
will emphasize entry procedures, prohibited items, drone restrictions, 
emergency contacts, and transportation guidance.
                               conclusion
    Miami's World Cup preparedness reflects a layered, intelligence-
driven, and Federally-integrated public safety framework. Unified 
command leadership by the Miami-Dade Sheriff's Office, supported by 
municipal police departments, fire rescue agencies, Federal partners, 
counter-UAS capabilities, and coordinated Federal support through the 
White House Task Force on the FIFA World Cup, positions Miami to 
deliver a secure, resilient, and globally-credible tournament 
environment.
    These efforts ensure the safety of participants, visitors, and 
residents while establishing a model for interagency coordination and 
public safety operations for future major international events hosted 
in the United States.
    Thank you for the opportunity to appear before you today. I look 
forward to answering your questions.

    Chairman Garbarino. Thank you very much, Mr. Martinez.
    I now recognize Deputy Chief Mabin for 5 minutes to 
summarize his opening statement.

 STATEMENT OF JOSEPH MABIN, DEPUTY CHIEF, KANSAS CITY MISSOURI 
                       POLICE DEPARTMENT

    Mr. Mabin. Chairman Garbarino, Ranking Member Pou, and 
distinguished Members of the committee, thank you for the 
opportunity to testify today on information sharing and 
security collaboration ahead of major events.
    My name is Deputy Chief Joseph Mabin and I command the 
Patrol Bureau of the Kansas City Missouri Police Department, 
which is a member of the Major City Chiefs Association. KCPD 
has a current staffing of over 1,100 sworn law enforcement 
officers serving a city of more than half a million residents.
    In less than 16 weeks, Kansas City is projected to welcome 
more than 650,000 visitors during the 2026 FIFA World Cup. 
Kansas City has hosted major events in the past, including 
championship parades and iconic American sporting events, such 
as the MLB All-Star Game and the NFL Draft. However, this event 
will require the largest coordinated deployment of mutual aid 
partners in our city's history.
    The 2026 FIFA World Cup is the single largest sporting 
event in the world. For the Kansas City metropolitan area, it 
represents both an extraordinary opportunity and a historic 
challenge. Kansas City is the smallest market among the 11 U.S. 
host cities, yet we will operate one of the largest overall 
footprints. We'll host 6 matches and 4 team base camps. In 
addition, Kansas City is planning a FIFA fan festival that will 
operate for 18 days throughout the tournament.
    Our tournament footprint spans 10 counties across 2 States, 
Missouri and Kansas. This bipartisan--excuse me, bi-State 
effort requires a unified approach to emergency preparedness, 
response, and recovery. Crossing State line adds complexity to 
communication and coordination, making seamless information 
sharing essential. The scope and visibility of this event 
require thoughtful, comprehensive planning. Safety and security 
remain our top priorities. Our goal is to deliver a safe, 
seamless, and welcoming experience for residents and visitors 
alike.
    As with any event of this scale, we are preparing for a 
range of potential public safety considerations, including 
unauthorized UAS, cyber disruptions, routine criminal activity, 
and increased demand on emergency and health care services. 
Central to our approach is timely, actionable information 
sharing with local, State, Federal, and international partners.
    Since 2003, Federal Homeland Security grants, particularly 
the Urban Area Security Initiative and State Homeland Security 
Grant Program, have allowed our region to build a mature, 
multidisciplinary preparedness framework. These investments 
helped establish and continue to sustain the Kansas City 
Regional Fusion Center, our primary intelligence hub. Through 
this Federal support, we have built interoperable radio 
communications and strengthened intelligence sharing. We have 
enhanced specialized response capabilities, including HAZMAT, 
EOD, and tactical WMD response teams. We conduct thousands of 
hours of training each year through tabletop functional and 
full-scale exercises. All of this allows for real-time 
situational awareness and response across jurisdictions.
    These capabilities are the direct result of sustained 
Federal and local partnerships, which are critical to our 
success. They are the foundations on which we are building our 
World Cup security posture.
    The challenges facing Kansas City are driven primarily by 
the scale and complexity of the tournament's footprint within 
the region. This is not a single venue or single-day event. It 
involves coordination of operations across multiple sites, 
jurisdictions, and several weeks. At the same time, we must 
operate with finite resources. Law enforcement personnel, 
specialized teams, and critical equipment are limited not only 
locally, but also nationally. Host cities will draw from the 
same pool of Federal resources and specialized capabilities.
    We are grateful for this committee's work and support 
toward World Cup safety and security. The counter-UAS 
authorities under the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act 
provide critical resources to detect, track, and mitigate UAS 
threats. The FIFA World Cup Security Grant Program is necessary 
to fund the personnel, equipment, and operational needs 
required to deliver a safe event. We appreciate the continued 
support and partnership as we approach this historic 
tournament.
    Kansas City's investments, backed by Federal homeland 
security grants and State and local commitments enhance not 
only our regional readiness, but our Nation's preparedness for 
high-profile international events. Before the first whistle 
blows later this year, we want to ensure that information flows 
faster than threats, that partnerships are stronger than 
vulnerabilities, and that everyone experiences a safe and 
secure World Cup.
    Thank you for your continued partnership and support. I 
look forward to your questions.
    [The prepared statement of Mr. Mabin follows:]
                   Prepared Statement of Joseph Mabin
                           February 24, 2026
    Chairman Garbarino, Ranking Member Thompson, and distinguished 
Members of the committee, thank you for the opportunity to testify 
today on ``Information Sharing and Security Collaboration Ahead of 
Major Events.''
    My name is Deputy Chief Joseph Mabin, and I command the Patrol 
Bureau of the Kansas City Missouri Police Department, which is a member 
of the Major Cities Chiefs Association. I lead the Department's largest 
bureau within an agency of over 1,100 sworn law enforcement officers 
serving a city of more than half a million residents.
    In less than 16 weeks, Kansas City is projected to welcome more 
than 650,000 visitors during the 2026 FIFA World Cup. Kansas City has 
hosted major events in the past--including championship parades and 
iconic American sporting events such as the MLB All-Star Game and the 
NFL Draft. However, this event will require the largest coordinated 
deployment of mutual aid partners in our city's history.
    The 2026 FIFA World Cup is the single-largest sporting event in the 
world. For the Kansas City metropolitan area, it represents both an 
extraordinary opportunity and a historic operational challenge.
    Kansas City is the smallest market among the 11 U.S. host cities, 
yet we will operate one of the largest overall footprints. We will host 
6 matches and 4 team base camps, including 3 of the top 10 ranked teams 
in the world. In addition, Kansas City is planning an ambitious FIFA 
Fan Festival that will operate for 18 days throughout the tournament.
    Our tournament footprint spans 10 counties across 2 States--
Missouri and Kansas. This bi-State effort requires a unified approach 
to emergency preparedness, response, and recovery. Crossing State lines 
adds complexity to communication and coordination, making seamless 
information sharing essential.
    The scope and visibility of this event require thoughtful, 
comprehensive planning. Safety and security remain our top priorities. 
Our goal is to deliver a safe, seamless, and welcoming experience for 
residents and visitors alike. As with any event of this scale, we are 
preparing for a range of potential public safety considerations, 
including unauthorized unmanned aircraft systems, cyber disruptions, 
routine criminal activity, and increased demand on emergency and health 
care services. Central to our approach is timely, actionable 
information sharing with local, State, Federal, and international 
partners to ensure coordinated and effective operations.
    Since 2003, Federal homeland security grants--particularly the 
Urban Area Security Initiative and the State Homeland Security Grant 
Program--have allowed our region to build a mature, multi-disciplinary 
preparedness framework. These investments helped establish and continue 
to sustain the Kansas City Regional Fusion Center, our primary 
intelligence hub.
    Through this Federal support, we have built interoperable radio 
communications and strengthened intelligence sharing. We have enhanced 
specialized response capabilities--including hazmat, explosive ordnance 
disposal, and tactical WMD teams--that train together and can deploy 
region-wide. We conduct thousands of training hours each year through 
tabletop, functional, and full-scale exercises. All of this allows for 
real-time situational awareness and response across jurisdictions.
    These capabilities are the direct result of sustained Federal-local 
partnerships, which are critical to our success. They are the 
foundations on which we are building our World Cup security posture.
    The challenges facing Kansas City are driven primarily by the scale 
and complexity of the tournament's footprint within our region. This is 
not a single-venue or single-day event--it involves coordination of 
operations across multiple sites, jurisdictions, and weeks, requiring 
sustained planning and collaboration at every level.
    At the same time, we must operate with finite resources. Law 
enforcement personnel, specialized teams, and critical equipment are 
limited not only locally, but nationally. Host cities will draw from 
the same pool of Federal resources and specialized capabilities. 
Additionally, Federal funding time lines create uncertainty in 
operational planning, staffing, and logistics.
    We have strengthened communications across agencies, but at the 
scale of a global event, this remains a challenge. The World Cup 
requires coordination not only locally, but nationally and 
internationally. Beyond connected systems, the greater challenge is 
identifying and communicating actionable intelligence to support real-
time decision making.
    We are grateful for this committee's work and support toward World 
Cup safety and security. The counter-UAS authorities under the 2026 
National Defense Authorization Act provide critical resources to 
detect, track, and mitigate UAS threats. The FIFA World Cup Security 
Grant Program is necessary to fund the personnel, equipment, and 
operational needs required to deliver a safe event. We appreciate 
continued support and partnership as we approach this historic World 
Cup tournament.
    Kansas City's investments--backed by Federal homeland security 
grants, and State and local commitments--enhance not only our regional 
readiness, but our Nation's preparedness for high-profile international 
events. These capabilities represent thousands of hours of planning, 
training, and coordination among public safety partners.
    Before the first whistle blows later this year, we want to ensure 
that information flows faster than threats, that partnerships are 
stronger than vulnerabilities, and that everyone experiences a safe and 
secure World Cup.
    Thank you for your continued partnership and support. I look 
forward to your questions.

    Chairman Garbarino. Thank you, Chief.
    I now recognize Mr. Nelson for 5 minutes to summarize his 
opening statement.

STATEMENT OF TRAVIS NELSON, DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF AND HOMELAND 
  SECURITY ADVISOR, OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR, STATE OF MARYLAND

    Mr. Nelson. Chairman Garbarino, Ranking Member Pou, and 
distinguished Members of the committee, thank you for the 
opportunity to testify today.
    I serve as the deputy chief of staff and homeland security 
advisor for Wes Moore, Governor of Maryland. I receive public 
safety and homeland security for Governor Moore with direct 
oversight of State departments, including the Department of 
Emergency Management, State Police, Department of Public 
Safety, Office of Homeland Security, and others representing 
first responders, emergency managers, and law enforcement 
professionals who work tirelessly to secure our communities. I 
am deeply grateful for and appreciate the essential work of our 
local, State, and Federal public servants who continue to do 
their duties in a constantly evolving world.
    As all of you know, our Nation is entering a time of major 
special events that we have not encountered in decades, from 
the celebrations of America 250 to the multicity hosting of the 
2026 FIFA World Cup and 2028 Summer Olympics in Los Angeles. 
While these events are proud moments for our Nation, they can 
also strain local resources and come with an increased threat 
to our critical infrastructure. However, as the threat profile 
expands and the demand on our State and local resources 
increases, the financial support provided by the Federal 
Government to State and local partners is diminishing.
    The events of September 11, 2001, underscore the critical 
need for seamless collaboration between local, State, and 
Federal agencies during major events. This realization drove 
the development of coordinated planning and preparedness 
strategies. With crucial Federal financial assistance, 
standardized and interoperable plans, training, and equipment 
were adopted nationwide. The foundational work, centered on the 
Incident Command System and the National Response Framework, 
ensures that limited resources can be rapidly deployed and 
integrated across the country as personnel share a common 
operating framework.
    Advisory councils composed of subject-matter experts from 
local jurisdictions have guided policies and procedures based 
on unique experiences. FEMA training centers allow first 
responders, hospital clinicians, and emergency managers to 
learn alongside their colleagues from across the country. This 
model empowers Federal field office personnel from local 
offices to become familiar with their Government counterparts, 
developing trusting relationships and collaborating. Maryland's 
CCTV Situational Awareness platform, MView, networks 399 
Federal, State, and local first responder agencies to over 
40,000 cameras used to prepare for, prevent, and respond to 
major events or incidents. The program supports first 
responders in Virginia, the District of Columbia, Maryland, 
Pennsylvania, and New Jersey. This includes over 950 Federal 
first responders from 44 agencies.
    Many of the Federal users of the platform are directly 
responsible for the security of Federal assets. The MView 
platform is a proven tool, having been deployed for hundreds of 
major planned events, including Fleet Week, inauguration, and 
professional sporting competitions. It has also been vital 
during emergency response, such as the aircraft collision over 
the Potomac River and the Key Bridge collapse. The MView team 
is currently collaborating with organizers for the upcoming 
FIFA World Cup to integrate Delaware and New York into the 
platform. Furthermore, MView is scheduled for use as a force 
multiplier to assist in monitoring potential threats for 
tonight's State of the Union address. A large portion of this 
program is directly dependent upon UASI funding, but, 
unfortunately, the dramatic reduction in the NCR allocations 
left the future of the program uncertain.
    The Maryland License Plate Reader Program is another 
initiative that directly supports criminal investigations, 
critical infrastructure security, and major event security 
throughout the region. The program is carefully managed to 
uphold citizens' civil rights and civil liberties, exclusively 
focusing its support on criminal investigations. In recent 
years, this program has directly contributed to thousands of 
Federal partner criminal investigations, including security 
operations.
    Following the sudden reduction of Federal funds from the 
State Homeland Security Grant Program, Emergency Preparedness 
Grant, and the Urban Area Security Initiative has left several 
States, including Maryland, very vulnerable and faced with no 
option but to reduce personnel and capabilities. The 
cancellation of the Targeted Violence Terrorism Program on July 
21, 2025, is deeply concerning in regards to the rising threats 
against local officials. Between the Federal fiscal year 2024 
and 2025, we saw a reduction of over 1.3 million in SHSGP and 
UASI's funding was cut by 44 percent, a total of 21 million. 
Then with the fiscal year 2026 grant notification, the NCR was 
further decreased from 25.5 million to 4.4 million, a 90 
percent reduction.
    The administration and Congress deserves praise for their 
efforts in tackling the threat posed by unmanned aerial 
systems. This response highlights the readiness of local and 
State officials to collaborate seamlessly with Federal agencies 
to address this complex threat, which spans multiple 
jurisdictions. Maryland is eager to continue working with the 
National Security Council and others.
    Failure to address the funding shortfalls jeopardizes the 
safety of upcoming special events regardless of their size and 
scope. Thank you for your leadership and commitment to our 
safety in our homeland. I look forward to your questions.
    [The prepared statement of Mr. Nelson follows:]
                  Prepared Statement of Travis Nelson
                           February 24, 2026
    Chairman Garbarino, Ranking Member Thompson, and distinguished 
Members of the committee, thank you for the opportunity to testify 
today. I serve as the deputy chief of staff and homeland security 
advisor for Wes Moore, Governor of Maryland. I oversee public safety 
and homeland security for Governor Moore, with direct oversight of 
State departments including the Maryland Department of Emergency 
Management, Maryland State Police, Maryland Department of Public Safety 
and Correctional Services, the Governor's Office of Homeland Security, 
and others representing first responders, emergency managers, and law 
enforcement professionals who work tirelessly to secure our 
communities. I am deeply grateful for and appreciate the essential work 
of our local, State, and Federal public servants, who continue their 
duties in a constantly-evolving environment.
    As you all know, our Nation is entering a time of major special 
events that we have not encountered in decades--from the semi-
quincentennial celebrations of America 250 to the multi-city hosting of 
the 2026 FIFA World Cup and 2028 Summer Olympics in Los Angeles, 
California. While these events are proud moments for our Nation, they 
also can strain local resources and come with an increased threat to 
our critical infrastructure. However, as the threat profile expands and 
the demand on State and local resources increases, the financial 
support provided by the Federal Government to State and local partners 
is diminishing.
    The events of September 11, 2001, underscored the critical need for 
seamless collaboration between local, State, and Federal agencies 
during major incidents. This realization drove the development of 
coordinated planning and preparedness strategies. With crucial Federal 
financial assistance, standardized and interoperable plans, training, 
and equipment were adopted nationwide. This foundational work, centered 
on the Incident Command System and the National Response Framework, 
ensures that limited resources can be rapidly deployed and integrated 
across the country, as personnel share a common operational framework.
    Advisory councils composed of subject-matter experts from local 
jurisdictions have guided policies and procedures based on unique 
experiences. FEMA training centers allow first responders, hospital 
clinicians, and emergency managers to learn alongside their colleagues 
from across the country. This model empowers Federal field office 
personnel from local offices to become familiar with their local 
government counterparts, developing trusting relationships to share 
information and plan collaboratively for upcoming events. It has also 
helped us to adapt to the constantly-evolving threats that we are faced 
with.
    Following the Paris Attacks of 2015, when 9 terrorists launched 
coordinated shootings and suicide bombings in Paris and Saint-Denis--
killing 130 people and injuring over 400--I chaired a work group in the 
National Capital Region focused on ensuring we could quickly share 
resources and information across jurisdictional boundaries with little 
notice. This identified the need for dedicated liaisons embedded within 
State and local organizations for speedy assessments and to prevent 
cascading incidents. Effective public safety preparedness for special 
events relies heavily on Emergency Management and fusion center 
personnel and programs. This approach builds upon the established 
success of our fusion centers, which are significantly bolstered by 
Federal grant funding and personnel. They dedicate themselves to months 
and years of advanced planning to dramatically reduce risk and ensure 
adequate resources are efficiently positioned and utilized. Based on my 
experience participating in the planning and execution of numerous 
special events, our most significant vulnerabilities and oversights 
have consistently stemmed from rushed or inadequate planning due to 
insufficient resources. The tools we have developed over the years are 
now essential to our success.
    Maryland's CCTV situational awareness platform, MView, networks 399 
Federal, State, and local first responder agencies to over 40,000 
cameras used to prepare for, prevent, and respond to major events or 
incidents. The program supports first responders in Virginia, DC, 
Maryland, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey. This includes over 950 Federal 
first responders from 44 agencies. Many of the Federal users of the 
platform are directly responsible for the security of Federal assets. 
The MView platform is a proven tool, having been deployed for hundreds 
of major planned events, including fleet weeks, inaugurations, and 
professional sporting competitions. It has also been vital during 
emergency responses, such as the aircraft collision over the Potomac 
River and the Key Bridge collapse. The MView team is currently 
collaborating with organizers for the upcoming FIFA World Cup to 
integrate Delaware and New York onto the platform. Furthermore, MView 
is scheduled for use as a force multiplier to assist in monitoring 
potential threats during tonight's State of the Union Address. A large 
portion of this program is directly dependent upon the National Capitol 
Region (NCR) Urban Area Security Initiative funds.
    Unfortunately, the dramatic reduction in the NCR allocation has 
left the future of the program uncertain. Although nearly all of the 
National Special Security Events that Maryland supports within the 
National Capital Region are located in the District of Columbia, we 
understand the significant risk and impact and the need to be a part of 
the process.
    Recent incidents, such as the 2024 France railway arson attacks 
during the Summer Olympics Opening Ceremony and the suspected network 
attack that recently disrupted Italian rail service during the 2026 
Winter Olympics, highlight the vulnerability of critical 
infrastructure. These events underscore the urgent need for robust 
cyber resilience, demonstrating how quickly and with little warning 
operations and services can be significantly disrupted.
    The Maryland License Plate Reader program is another initiative 
that directly supports criminal investigations, critical infrastructure 
security, and major event security throughout the region.
    The program is carefully managed to uphold citizens' civil rights 
and civil liberties, exclusively focusing its support on criminal 
investigations. In recent years, this program has directly contributed 
to thousands of Federal partner criminal investigations, including 
national security cases. For instance, in 2025 alone, the Maryland 
Fusion Center responded to over 670 requests from Federal partners 
related to criminal cases. Unfortunately, the program has received only 
partial financial support through UASI grant funding.
    The sudden reduction of Federal funds from the State Homeland 
Security Grant Program, Emergency Management Preparedness Grant and 
Urban Area Security Initiative has left several States, including 
Maryland, very vulnerable and faced with no option but to reduce 
personnel and capabilities, which our neighboring States and Federal 
partners have relied heavily upon. The cancellation of the Targeted 
Violence and Terrorism Program on July 21, 2025, is deeply concerning, 
especially given the unprecedented level of threats currently facing 
local and State elected officials. This program was vital for assisting 
States with early detection and intervention concerning individuals 
showing a pathway to violence.
    Between Federal fiscal year 2024 and 2025, we saw a reduction of 
over $1.3 million in the State Homeland Security Grant Program. The NCR 
UASI grant was cut by 44 percent, a total of over $21 million. Then, 
with the FFY26 grant notification, the NCR was further decreased from 
$25.5 million to $4.4 million, a 90 percent reduction. Following a 
catastrophic flood in Western Maryland, which significantly exceeded 
the minimum State threshold for FEMA assistance, the much-needed 
Federal funding was ultimately denied despite having bipartisan support 
from Maryland's Congressional Delegation. This decision forced the 
State and local jurisdictions to independently manage the devastating 
financial burden on the rural community. The inability to rely on 
Federal FEMA funds further complicates budgeting for preparedness 
activities when there is such a high level of uncertainty for Federal 
support following a disaster.
    While we would welcome working with the Department of Homeland 
Security to reimagine grant distribution in the interest of being more 
efficient; this sudden reduction has left us with no choice but to 
decrease capabilities. Due to the upcoming special events, maintaining 
the service level of previous years will be extremely challenging.
    Information sharing is one of the most basic and fundamental 
services the Federal Government can provide to States to enhance 
preparedness. In June 2025, the United States Fire Administration 
discontinued the EMR-ISAC. The EMR-ISAC shared unclassified 
intelligence products with a significant distribution list of over 
187,000 police officers, emergency managers, firefighters, and EMTs. 
Currently, this resource is unmanaged. In March 2025, at the direction 
of FEMA Headquarters, the U.S. Fire Administration stopped hosting 
monthly Fire Service Intelligence Exchange calls. This regularly 
scheduled call was canceled without discussion or input from any of the 
participating agencies. Recognizing the importance of information 
sharing among this community, the Maryland Fusion Center has managed 
the calls since then and has been working to expand its reach. Multiple 
agencies, including the FDNY Center for Terrorism and Disaster 
Preparedness appreciate the value of these calls and their role in 
continuing to protect the homeland. Currently, 123 unique agencies from 
27 States and D.C. are represented.
    The administration and Congress deserve praise for their efforts in 
tackling the threat posed by Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS). This 
response highlights the readiness of local and State officials to 
collaborate seamlessly with Federal agencies to address this complex 
threat, which spans multiple administrative jurisdictions. Maryland is 
eager to continue working with the National Security Council, FAA, US-
DOT, DHS, DOW, and our neighboring jurisdictions to establish a leading 
model for Counter-UAS programs.
    Failure to address these funding shortfalls jeopardizes the safety 
of upcoming special events, regardless of their size or scope. The 
impact, though not immediately apparent, will certainly be felt by our 
already over-extended, hard-working public safety professionals. This 
moment offers the United States a chance to demonstrate our national 
strength and resilience. Thank you for your leadership and for your 
commitment to the safety of our homeland. I look forward to your 
questions.

    Chairman Garbarino. Thank you, Mr. Nelson.
    Members will be recognized by order of seniority for their 
5 minutes of questioning. I will be--well, maybe not today. I 
will be strictly keeping to the 5-minute rule, but if we go 
over, it is OK today.
    I now recognize myself for 5 minutes of questioning.
    Mr. Martinez, can you explain what goes into the planning? 
You are the head of the World FIFA World Cup Miami Committee. 
Can you explain what goes into the planning for the city of 
Miami?
    Mr. Martinez. Sure. Thank you. Obviously, it's very intense 
and very detailed, obviously, working collaboratively through 
the Miami-Dade Sheriff's Office. As I indicated in my opening, 
the sheriff's office is the lead law enforcement agency here at 
the local level. We have recently created a regional committee 
to cross jurisdictional lines. The multi-agency committee 
includes agency directors and representatives from across four 
counties, not only Miami-Dade County, but Broward County, Palm 
Beach County, and Monroe County to our south, bringing together 
stakeholders, public safety agencies to coordinate on the 
planning and coordination of the activities that are going to 
be taking place here in South Florida.
    Chairman Garbarino. It is not just the games, though. There 
are other things that you are planning for, festivals and like 
watch parties, those things like that?
    Mr. Martinez. Yes, sir.
    Chairman Garbarino. How much planning for security goes 
into that? How much--I mean, it takes quite a bit, correct?
    Mr. Martinez. It's immense. I mean, we've never handled 
anything like this even though we are used to working on major 
events here in South Florida and Miami. But a 23-day fan 
festival in downtown Miami in a city park is something that has 
never been tried and never been done. But, you know, we're 
expecting, you know, as I indicated, hundreds of thousands of 
people to come to South Florida to be part of the game and 
understanding that, you know, not everybody's going to get into 
the stadium. So, you know, the fan fest is going to be the 
location where people are going to go to enjoy the matches, to 
see the matches, to be with their, you know, fellow countrymen, 
and to be able to celebrate hopefully their victories.
    Then on top of that there will be regional watch parties 
across the three counties and really across the State of 
Florida. So you know, that coordination is critical and making 
sure that these, the information is shared and you know, goes 
across jurisdictional lines.
    Chairman Garbarino. So the money we--the One Big Beautiful 
Bill had--the reconciliation bill had $625 million in FEMA 
grants for measures. I think Miami was supposed to get around 
$70 million of that. I think that is what you all applied for. 
Has any of those funds been received yet?
    Mr. Martinez. No, sir, they have not.
    Chairman Garbarino. Now, let me ask you a question. What 
happens when--I mean, I am sure you put it into your budget, 
these FEMA grants, what happens if you don't get that money? So 
when is the drop-dead date for you to start having to cancel 
things if you don't get that money in?
    Mr. Martinez. I mean we're quickly approaching that. We're 
107 days out from the tournament, but, more importantly, we're 
about 70-something days out from starting to build the fan 
fest. These decisions have to be made, I mean, generously I'd 
say within the next 30 days is the drop-dead date. I know that 
the local agencies are very anxious, but without receiving this 
money it could be catastrophic for our planning and 
coordination.
    Chairman Garbarino. So if you don't get the FEMA grants in 
the next 30 days, the city of Miami, is going to have to start 
canceling because you can't prepare for the security of those 
sites.
    Mr. Martinez. That is correct. We have to start making some 
really tough decisions and it starts with our fan festival. 
Obviously, the matches up at the stadium, you know, will take 
place but, you know, preparing for all of the impromptu events 
and, you know, watch parties that we're expecting to see will 
become--will be in jeopardy as we continue.
    Chairman Garbarino. I appreciate that answer. I am running 
out of time so I want to move over.
    Mr. Sena, we heard about Special Assessment Ratings, SEAR, 
and these events are getting SEAR 1 or SEAR 2 events, so extra 
resources are made available following those designations. We 
are currently experiencing a partial Government shutdown, 
specifically Homeland, the Department of Homeland, and I want 
to know has the shutdown negatively affected information-
sharing networks that you deal with? You know, being with the 
fusion centers, head of fusion centers, are you seeing a 
negative effect from the shutdown or do you expect to see if 
this lasts longer a negative effect from the shutdown?
    Mr. Sena. Currently, we're not seeing a major issue with 
the shutdown, but as time progresses, I definitely believe that 
we will. We rely heavily on our coordination with our partners 
in the Department of Homeland Security. If any of their 
resources are available, one of the primary ones is, you know, 
that coordination with FEMA on the grant process. I mean, we're 
already dealing with many delays, which we don't know if and 
when we're going to get funding to continue operations. So the 
longer they are not around and not at their desk and not 
working on this process, the longer we don't know what's going 
to happen with the money we need to execute for these World Cup 
games.
    Chairman Garbarino. Thank you very much. My time has 
expired.
    I now recognize the Ranking Member for today, Ms. Pou, for 
5 minutes of questions.
    Ms. Pou. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Again, thank you to all 
the witnesses for testifying today.
    I just want to make sure to mention once again that, you 
know, we all understand that recent DHS enforcement has raised 
some serious alarms about its impact on public safety. Polls 
show that most Americans believe that actions have gone too far 
and makes us less safe. As we prepare to host the World Cup in 
my district, including the title game, which we cannot have 
roaming packs of masked ICE agents harassing fans and players.
    At our last hearing, I directly asked Director Lyons about 
ICE plans at the World Cup. He confirmed ICE presence and 
refused to rule out immigration raids. His refusal raised 
concerns, grave concerns, within my district and sent 
shockwaves across America and the world.
    Mr. Martinez, has DHS directly briefed you regarding the 
ICE plan at the World Cup matches in Miami, yes or no?
    Mr. Martinez. No.
    Ms. Pou. OK. ICE publicly stated that it would have a key 
role at that World Cup. Are you concerned about that, yes or 
no?
    Mr. Martinez. Not at the moment, no.
    Ms. Pou. Mr. Martinez, are you aware that conversations 
between FIFA and DHS regarding ICE enforcement activity at the 
World Cup, yes or no, sir?
    Mr. Martinez. Yes.
    Ms. Pou. Has FIFA specifically asked DHS to suspend 
immigration enforcement actions at the official World Cup venue 
or events--and events?
    Mr. Martinez. I am not aware of whether FIFA has made that 
request or not.
    Ms. Pou. What is the point of giving President Trump a 
Peace Prize if we cannot keep his masked agents from 
terrorizing fans and players? It is absolutely absurd.
    Mr. Martinez, if a fan is detained by ICE at a Miami World 
Cup game or FIFA fan event, have you and DHS set a process to 
inform family members or legal counsel?
    Mr. Martinez. We have been in constant communication with 
our Federal partners and we have received no indication of 
immigration enforcement that will be taking place during the 
tournament. We are laser-focused here at the Miami Host 
Committee and providing a safe and secure event. The only thing 
I can base on is in recent experience during the last year of 
our major events, which includes the College Football National 
Championship, Formula One, and the Club World Cup, which was 
held this past summer, and we did not experience any ICE 
enforcement activity as described.
    Ms. Pou. OK. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Martinez. Mr. 
Martinez, with only roughly 4 months to go, some cities still 
reports that they have not received this funding. I think you 
have just--the Chairman just asked you that very question and 
you have indicated that you have not received that. This is 
completely unacceptable and certainly close to kickoff. As you 
have pointed out, you have a drop-dead date of time of 30 
minutes. Officials in Foxborough, Massachusetts, for example, 
are still waiting for $1 million. They say they cannot hold 
games if they do not receive the money.
    Mr. Martinez and Deputy Chief Mabin, have either of you 
received Federal funding? I know, Mr. Martinez, you indicated 
that you have not. Mr. Chief--Deputy Chief Mabin, can you tell 
me if you have received any information with regards to the 
actual funding that you are expected to receive? Have you 
received that or not?
    Mr. Mabin. No, ma'am, we have not.
    Ms. Pou. What kind of delays or impact will that have if 
you do not get that and, similar to what the Chairman asked, 
what your drop-dead time frame in order to do that? I have like 
34 seconds, so let's do real quick.
    Mr. Mabin. The drop-dead date is immediate. We need 
commitments from mutual aid partners to help supplement our 
officers just because of the scope, scale, and duration of the 
games, and they need assurances that they will get reimbursed 
for overtime, for travel expenses, for lodging. So we need that 
information right now.
    Ms. Pou. Is there any concern on the overtime of your 
personnel as a result of not having the wherewithal to do that?
    Mr. Mabin. Yes, ma'am. That is a consideration for our 
budget. We definitely need an answer on that and to release the 
funds as soon as possible.
    Ms. Pou. Thank you, Deputy Chief and Mr. Martinez. My time 
has run off. Thank you so very much. I yield back.
    Chairman Garbarino. The gentlelady yields back.
    I now recognize the Chairman of the task force and the 
former Chairman of this committee, Mr. McCaul from Texas, for 5 
minutes of questions.
    Mr. McCaul. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Let me start out by 
saying I remember back when I chaired this committee, the 
Boston Marathon bombing, just really a sporting event that went 
really bad and it was avoidable. It was preventable had 
Federal, State, and local been sharing information. The FBI had 
information about Mr. Tamerian's trip to Dagestan where he 
radicalized, came back. They did not share that adequately with 
the Joint Terrorism Task Force. Specifically, the Commissioner 
of Boston didn't have any of that information, even though he 
had 2 agents or 2 officers on the task force. We changed that 
by law. But it is all about connecting the dots.
    Mr. Sena, you are in charge of the fusion center, which 
sometimes comes under criticism. We formed the fusion centers 
to share--you know, everybody talks about connecting the dots 
after 9/11. That is exactly what you are doing. What do you see 
as one of the biggest threats as you look at the environment 
out there and the threat matrix? What keeps you up at night the 
most?
    Mr. Sena. It's a combination of things. You know, the first 
thing in the back of my head always right now is the financial 
piece, because we do need the resources to get things going.
    Mr. McCaul. I will get to that in a minute, yes. Big 
threat.
    Mr. Sena. It's a threat because if we don't have the right 
people in place----
    Mr. McCaul. Correct.
    Mr. Sena [continuing]. To do the job, it won't get done. 
The other thing is the multimodal communication systems that 
we've got right now, the lack of getting that tip and lead, 
that piece of information. We do a lot of work educating our 
law enforcement, public safety, private-sector partners on what 
we need as far as those tips and leads, those suspicious 
activity reports. But we have a lot of different places those 
go right now, multiple Federal systems, multiple private-sector 
parties that take tips and leads. The problem is when you have 
so many silos, how do you connect them all? Then when it comes 
to game day and those operations ahead of time, how do you 
bring people together?
    For example, during Super Bowl we had 7 different systems 
up. So that worries me tremendously, merging those 
technologies.
    Mr. McCaul. Well, the Super Bowl is a test.
    Mr. Sena. It's a test for us because we're having a--FIFA's 
coming to town, so that was a test.
    Mr. McCaul. Yes.
    Mr. Sena. I can tell you that came up in the after-action 
when people were talking, you know, how do I watch 7 systems 
that I'm having to put data into 7 different platforms, my own 
people especially? But how do we merge those? Technology is 
there. It's policy and practice and training.
    Mr. McCaul. Well, the technology is there. Is it policy and 
practice prohibiting that?
    Mr. Sena. It is. Everyone has their own silo, so everyone 
has their own policy.
    Mr. McCaul. OK. That is a real problem because we only 
have--it is going to be March and they start in June. You got 
100 games----
    Mr. Sena. Yep.
    Mr. McCaul [continuing]. Over 100 games in 3 countries, you 
know, Mexico, Canada, United States. Let me ask you quickly. We 
were down in Mexico and got a joint training program with our 
military, both respective United States and Mexico, passed by 
their parliament. We saw the recent events in Mexico. They have 
drones, the violent uptick after the Jalisco cartel member was 
taken out. I know this is not in your purview, but you have to 
learn from those mistakes. How concerned are you about the 
games in Mexico?
    Mr. Sena. The big concern I've got, especially with drone 
activity, is that--and for that example, I had a person that 
was planning on flying a drone right into the Super Bowl. So 
that part of that is that we can and have countermeasures 
there, but there are so many other locations that we don't have 
people trained and equipment in place for countermeasures, that 
they can go anywhere a crowd is at and immediately hit those 
targets and cause mass destruction. We don't have the 
capability across the board to fight every drone threat.
    Mr. McCaul. That is a great segue to my next point and that 
is under the Safer Skies Act the Chairman introduced and my 
task force recommended, we got that passed in the National 
Defense Authorization. That gives the ability to share with 
State and local as the counter drone authorities, which is 
critically important. I am surprised we had any opposition to 
that.
    However, about $625 million, we passed a continuing 
resolution out of the House on DHS funding. That was already 
authorized and appropriated by Congress to go forward and be 
implemented under FEMA to security for the FIFA games. However, 
the Senate is playing politics with this and had decided to 
shut down the Federal Government. I would argue it is going to 
be on their head if they don't get this Government back open 
and get this money directly to your fusion centers and these 
State and locals here. If something bad happens, it is going to 
be on their head, you know. I urge them to get this thing done 
and stop playing games because at the games we are talking 
about, you are going to see another Boston bombing if we don't 
get that money out the door.
    I think all of you have testified how important that grant 
funding is. I know the Chairman and Ranking Member here were 
both very vigilant about staying, you know, on top of that.
    Final minute on--well, I will talk to you off the record 
later about your drone mitigation at the Super Bowl, but I 
think that is really the threat here.
    I yield back.
    Chairman Garbarino. The gentleman yields back.
    I now recognize the gentleman from California, Mr. Correa.
    Mr. Correa. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I want to welcome our 
witnesses today being here and sharing your intel.
    A little history, 9/11 we had silos, information on one 
hand, information on the other hand, they could have been 
shared, maybe 
9/11 could have been prevented. That's why Homeland Security 
was created, sharing information.
    Mr. Mabin, you talk about the fact that FIFA will be the 
single largest sporting event in the world. That is impressive 
and that is also a big target. Mr. Sena, you mentioned that 
shared info is the backbone of intel.
    A few months ago, we had my good Sheriff Don Barnes from 
Orange County here, 8 months ago, and he was talking about the 
withholding of billions of dollars of FEMA funding for fusion 
centers. He said, and I quote him, ``stepping back from our 
posture in our fusion centers.'' I think Sheriff Barnes is 
trying to say that not getting that FEMA funding is going to 
hurt your posture defending our citizens, preventing a major 
catastrophe. God knows we have a lot of frenemies out there 
right now.
    So your fusion center in Northern California is 100 percent 
funded through FEMA preparedness grants. How long has it been 
since you have gotten these grants?
    Mr. Sena. Actually, we've been receiving these grants for 
our center since 2004.
    Mr. Correa. Lately?
    Mr. Sena. Well, we have not gotten our last 2025 
allocation, so we are going to be short this year if it doesn't 
show up.
    Mr. Correa. So right now you are beginning to feel the 
challenges of not being properly funded in order to defend our 
citizenry with this FIFA coming up and the Olympics coming up 
and so on and so forth.
    Mr. Sena. Absolutely, sir. Without the personnel to do the 
analysis, without the threat liaison officers to do the 
outreach and training on suspicious activity report, without 
the technology in place, and some of the technology we have 
built is actually supporting all of FIFA for the entire Nation. 
So without that, those resources and capabilities, we will, you 
know, be blinded to the threats.
    Mr. Correa. Well, I just wanted to thank you for being here 
today. I am in concurrence with my colleagues. We got to stop 
playing politics with this stuff, with these funds that are so 
critical to defending our country. We had a lesson, 9/11. I 
don't want to relive that lesson.
    Sheriff Don Barnes, who I think you know very well, he has 
got to protect Disneyland. We are a very high target on 
people's lists. We have the Anaheim Angels, the Anaheim Ducks, 
a lot of things going on in Southern California. I guess I am 
going to ask you to help us get the message out.
    In Washington, there are a lot of things that we get caught 
up with that are supposed to be important, but heaven forbid we 
have another 9/11 coming at us. It will change us again in ways 
we can't even imagine. So I would ask you to continue to come 
up here and talk to my colleagues and myself, both sides of the 
aisle, remind people how important it is to protect our 
citizens through proper funding and hopefully we get that FEMA 
funding up and running so that you can do your job.
    Fusion centers, love what you do out there. Very 
impressive, good intel, and, God knows, there is a lot of 
information out there you got to sift through to get to the 
bottom. So thank you very much and I just wanted to, again, 
invite you to come back and let us know what is important at 
the end of the day.
    Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
    Chairman Garbarino. The gentleman yields back.
    I now recognize the gentleman from Florida, Mr. Gimenez, 
for 5 minutes of questions.
    Mr. Gimenez. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. As I am sitting here 
listening to some of my colleagues on the other side of the 
aisle complaining about ICE enforcement and apparently ICE 
enforcement is the issue that has caused us to shut down DHS. 
The problem is that ICE is funded like through 2027. So what it 
is that they are all complaining about and shutting the 
Government down, it doesn't affect the thing that they are 
complaining about. So this is all political theater and, 
unfortunately, you are going to be paying the price because the 
people that are supposed to be processing the grants are 
nonessential, therefore, they are not working. So those folks 
that you are relying on to get the money for the FEMA grants, 
it is not coming until the Government reopens. I hope that that 
doesn't mean that there is going to be some kind of tragedy 
happening in the United States because the Government and DHS 
itself is closed.
    Now, the facts are there are some jurisdictions that are 
going to be able to absorb this a little bit better than 
others. I know that you are all going to do what you have to do 
in order to protect the public regardless if we give you the 
money. We will give you the money. Eventually you will get it. 
OK? The question is your capacity to float, you know, that 
until you finally get the money. Because we are notorious here 
for saying we are going to give you stuff and we won't give it 
to you for about 5 years. OK? So just think about that.
    Chief Martinez, good to see you. I mean, I know you are in 
Miami, you are smart guy just stayed there. My concern for--my 
main concern, a big concern I have is drones and the usage of 
drones and as a potential terrorist threat. Do you feel that 
you have the authorities needed in order to handle that threat 
now?
    Mr. Martinez. Well, certainly with the changes that have 
been made, we feel more confident. Local representatives from 
the major agencies, including Miami-Dade Sheriff, city of Miami 
Police, Broward County, Florida Highway Patrol, have either 
attended or are scheduled to attend the required training. So 
we feel confident that we will be able to deploy teams to these 
critical sites, both at the stadium and the fan fest. The issue 
is being able to cover other areas that may be popping up, you 
know, impromptu celebrations, watch parties that could hold, 
you know, 500, 1,000, 2,000 people across the region. So, you 
know, we don't have the resource to cover every spot, but we do 
feel confident that we will have the resources and the 
technology to cover the main ones, which are the stadium and 
the fan fest.
    Mr. Gimenez. Do you feel that you have the technology that 
will allow you to actively incapacitate any drone that may be a 
threat to, you know, to the population?
    Mr. Martinez. Well, I know the agencies are in the process 
of obtaining and procuring those resources and those 
technologies. They have not been received yet. So, you know, 
we're hope, obviously we're piggybacking on the Federal 
Government to be able to source those technologies. So, you 
know, again, yes, we do feel confident if everything comes to 
fruition and we feel that, you know, we're moving in the right 
direction to support that.
    Mr. Gimenez. Will you require Federal resources for that? 
Are they going to be the only ones that have the authority to 
do something about that or has that authority been delegated 
also down to the local law enforcement agencies?
    Mr. Martinez. Some of it has been delegated down to a 
limited scope, and that's what the required training is for. 
But we also will be depending on our Federal partners to assist 
us in those matters, especially at the stadium.
    Mr. Gimenez. Are you comfortable with that or would you 
feel more comfortable and also getting additional authority to 
be able to handle the situation as you see fit?
    Mr. Martinez. I mean, certainly having additional 
authority, you know, would be beneficial, no question. You 
know, understanding the difficulty in doing that, you know, 
we're thankful for what we have, but certainly we would 
welcome, you know, increased authority, especially, you know, 
as it relates to these international type of games and matches 
where, you know, obviously the crowd size and the target and 
the threat, you know, is significant.
    Mr. Gimenez. Fair enough. Thank you very much. I yield 
back.
    Chairman Garbarino. The gentleman yields back.
    I now recognize the gentleman from Louisiana, Mr. Carter, 
for 5 minutes.
    Mr. Carter. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and thank you to our 
witnesses for joining us today.
    I proudly represent New Orleans, the greatest city in the 
world to host major events, like last year's Super Bowl. The 
allure of the city means we are responsible for protecting 
countless mass gatherings throughout the year: Mardi Gras, Jazz 
Fest, Essence Fest, the Sugar Bowl, Taylor Swift concerts, the 
list goes on and on. The terrorist attack last year on the 
early hours of New Year's Day on Bourbon Street served as a 
stark reminder of how terrorist tactics are evolving and the 
importance of enhanced coordination between our Federal, State, 
and local security agencies during these events.
    However, the administration has repeatedly obstructed FEMA, 
politicizing the agency in delaying disaster preparedness and 
response. Last week, it reportedly told FEMA to halt all 
travel, seemingly to create fallouts from DHS's funding lapse, 
despite FEMA's testimony to Congress that it will continue 
disaster response use of funds unaffected by the shutdown. The 
politicization of FEMA makes America less secure every day, 
especially while preparing for large-scale events when 
communities are most vulnerable to security threats.
    Mr. Nelson, Maryland is no stranger to the Trump 
administration's politicization of disaster aid. When historic 
flooding hit Western Maryland in 2025, did Maryland meet the 
criteria for receiving Federal assistance? Do you feel that 
President Trump made an objective, nonpolitical decision when 
he rejected Governor Moore's request for assistance?
    Mr. Nelson. Well, thank you for that question and, yes, we 
did meet the threshold. We are currently at $34 million in 
damage for the $13 million minimum and was really not given any 
true reason for why it was denied.
    Mr. Carter. For each of our other speakers, would you agree 
that the disbursement of emerging emergency funds should not, I 
underscore not, be decided by politics or party?
    Mr. Sena. For me, sir?
    Mr. Carter. Just yes or no?
    Mr. Sena. Yes, sir.
    Mr. Carter. Thank you.
    Mr. Mabin. Yes, sir.
    Mr. Nelson. Yes.
    Mr. Martinez. Yes, sir.
    Mr. Carter. Thank you very much. Has there been or could 
there have been in the future a fiscal impact on Maryland's 
taxpayers or local government if DHS continues to delay these 
reimbursements?
    Mr. Nelson. Yes, absolutely.
    Mr. Carter. We have witnessed an increase in attacks on 
religious institutions recently, including an arsonist who set 
fire of a synagogue in Ranking Member Thompson's district in 
Mississippi. Despite this heightened threat environment, DHS 
has not released nearly $300 million in nonprofit security 
grants that Congress appropriated almost a year ago.
    Mr. Nelson, are you concerned that delays in disbursing 
funding for nonprofit security grant programs could further 
jeopardize the security of houses of worship in Maryland?
    Mr. Nelson. Yes, I am.
    Mr. Carter. Can you expound on that?
    Mr. Nelson. Absolutely. So the instability, these are funds 
that are directly distributed to places of worship, so it's 
difficult for them to be able to budget and to balance in the 
security needs. If we can't commit to them, the funding that is 
going to be passed down to them, they have to make difficult 
decisions on what they are going to invest in with their places 
of worship, ultimately opening up to vulnerabilities.
    Mr. Carter. Thank you. Let the record reflect, Mr. 
Chairman, that all of the witnesses said affirmatively that the 
disbursement of funds for natural disasters that happen not by 
party, not by race, not by socioeconomic standards, but by 
Mother Nature, by acts of perhaps the issues of mankind with 
climate change, should not be withheld for political party, 
political purpose, political theater. They should be given 
according to meeting the minimal thresholds of a natural 
disaster or an emergency declaration, which Maryland did. We 
are hopeful that we will not see further cases where resources 
are withheld because it wasn't my party, wasn't my president, 
not my problem. We are Americans. Natural disaster and FEMA and 
the resources should be given as needed, regardless of any 
politics.
    Mr. Chairman, I yield.
    Chairman Garbarino. The gentleman yields back.
    I now recognize the gentleman from Alabama, Mr. Strong, for 
5 minutes of questions.
    Mr. Strong. Thank you, Chairman Garbarino, Ranking Member 
Thompson.
    As we prepare to host the FIFA World Cup, Olympics, America 
250, and even college sporting events, we face an unprecedented 
mix of security challenge. It is past time to unleash counter-
UAS to defend America and its citizens from drone attacks. Much 
of that technology is developed in my district. Our ability to 
protect fans, athletes, and host communities will depend on how 
well we are prepared, trained, and share information and 
respond under pressure.
    I am proud to represent Redstone Arsenal in Huntsville, 
Alabama, where the FBI recently opened the National Counter 
Unmanned Aircraft Systems Training Center, America's premier 
hub for training law enforcement and security professionals to 
counter the threat posed by drones, all under one roof.
    Deputy Chief Mabin, the threat posed by rogue unmanned 
aircraft systems to stadiums and fan venues may represent one 
of the greatest security challenges we face in hosting these 
large-scale events. Congress recently extended authorities to 
State and local law enforcement to mitigate these drone 
threats. How do you anticipate these expanded authorities will 
help your officers secure World Cup sites, stadiums, and fan 
festivals, which is, you think about the World Cup itself, it 
is equivalent to 7 Super Bowls at the same time?
    Mr. Mabin. Absolutely. It's a question of scale. We will 
get Federal support, counter-UAS support, but it's limited. By 
expanding these authorities to local police departments, we're 
able to cover down on the other areas. It's more than just the 
stadium. It's also the FIFA fan festival areas. So once we get 
the training and procure the resources, then we'll be able to 
be better positioned to counter any kind of UAS threats.
    Mr. Strong. Thank you. Has anyone from your department 
coordinated with or received training through the FBI's 
Counter-UAS Training Center at Redstone Arsenal?
    Mr. Mabin. Yes, sir. We have individuals scheduled to go 
down for the training right now.
    Mr. Strong. Thank you. Mr. Martinez, building on that 
point, how have organized committees been working with Federal, 
State, and local partners to ensure strong counter-UAS 
mitigation procedures in place?
    Mr. Martinez. So we've been making sure, obviously, that 
the, you know, responsible agencies, as I mentioned earlier, 
from the Miami-Dade Sheriffs, the city of Miami Police 
Department, Broward County Sheriffs, and across the State from 
the Florida Highway Patrol are able to receive that training. 
As I indicated, many have already received it, and those that 
have not are scheduled to receive it in the next month or two. 
So working with our Federal partners, you know, to ensure that 
those trainings are provided for those jurisdictions is 
critical. We're continuing to work, obviously, with our Federal 
partners in communicating, you know, what our overall drone 
plan will be and, you know, collaborating with them on the 
deployment of these resources.
    Mr. Strong. Do you see any gaps in preparedness as we 
approach summer?
    Mr. Martinez. Well, the gaps for us is really in the 
funding as been highlighted. You know, it is absolutely 
critical to be able to get this funding. You know, as 
Congressman Gimenez indicated, you know, the agencies will step 
up and provide, you know, the resources that are needed. But 
our fear is that decisions will be made on budget instead of 
threat assessment, especially as we get closer and the actual 
scale of it starts to show itself. So that's why we feel it's 
absolutely essential to be able to get that money released so 
the agencies have the comfort in knowing that they will be 
reimbursed.
    Mr. Strong. Thank you. Switching gears, with over 36 years' 
experience as an emergency medical technician and 40 years as a 
firefighter, I take emergency response and public safety 
extremely serious. When we host events of this scale, it is 
critical that fire and EMS officials are not only present, but 
fully trained, equipped, and integrated into security planning.
    Mr. Martinez, what are the greatest areas of need for fire 
and EMS officials ahead of these games? How are you ensuring 
they are fully prepared to respond if the unthinkable occurs?
    Mr. Martinez. Absolutely. We've been working very closely 
with the major fire and emergency management agencies here, 
including the Miami-Dade Fire Department and the Miami-Dade 
Department of Emergency Management. We have held already 
several large-scale, full-scale exercises, as well as numerous 
tabletop exercises to develop responses and capabilities and 
understanding of what those capabilities are for all of the 
agencies involved. The Miami-Dade Fire Department is taking the 
lead and coordinating with local municipal fire departments, 
including city of Miami, Miami Beach, Coral Gables, for mutual 
aid and as well as coverage in their jurisdictions. So we feel 
we have a very strong, you know, assessment of our capabilities 
as well as training, on-going training that has been taking 
place over the last year-and-a-half, and it will continue on 
leading up to the games themselves.
    Mr. Strong. I want to thank all of our witnesses. Mr. 
Chairman, I yield back.
    Chairman Garbarino. The gentleman yields back.
    I now recognize the Ranking Member of the full committee, 
Mr. Thompson, 5 minutes.
    Mr. Thompson. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. I welcome 
all our witnesses today.
    According to several States and stakeholders, the Trump 
administration continues to withhold over $1.2 billion in FEMA 
counterterrorism funding that should have been provided to 
communities almost 6 months ago for programs such as Urban Area 
Security Initiative and Nonprofit Security Grant Program. The 
Trump administration is even challenging court orders that 
would make this funding available immediately to first 
responders, nonprofits, and other local partners. In many 
communities, this lack of funding is jeopardizing security 
preparations for upcoming large events, such as the FIFA World 
Cup, America 250 celebrations, and 2028 Olympic Games. As my 
colleague Mr. Carter mentioned, we had a synagogue bombed in my 
district recently, and the money that identified the culprit 
was the Nonprofit Security Grant Program, that the cameras 
caught him, and subsequently he has admitted to the cause.
    So if this money is not available or delayed as it 
currently is, Mr. Nelson, can you discuss those impacts on 
Maryland's preparedness when DHS delays and fight court orders 
to provide necessary counterterrorism funding going to 
nonprofits, first responders, and other local partners?
    Mr. Nelson. Thank you, Ranking Member Thompson. So in 
response to that, we recognize that it's critical and, in fact, 
the State was deeply concerned that the Federal Government 
would not provide the funds and actually found a way to 
supplement some State funding because of our increased concern 
around this risk area. So in that sense, we are deeply 
concerned about the sustainability of the nonprofit security 
grant and distributing those funds efficiently down to the 
places of worship and other eligible applicants to better 
protect those vulnerable populations.
    Mr. Thompson. So your testimony is that those programs are 
not only essential, but pretty much required if we are going to 
protect houses of worship and other places like that?
    Mr. Nelson. Yes, sir. As much as Governor Moore has 
dedicated State funding to back up that fact.
    Mr. Thompson. Well, another comment that, Mr. Chairman, we 
come in contact with is right now, the Secretary is signing 
each grant award of $100,000 or more.
    Chief Martinez, do you--right now are you applying for 
monies in excess of $100,000?
    Mr. Martinez. Yes, sir.
    Mr. Thompson. Would a delay in this execution of those 
contracts create a problem for your agency?
    Mr. Martinez. Yes, sir, they would. It could be 
catastrophic for us.
    Mr. Thompson. Mr. Mabin.
    Mr. Mabin. Yes, sir.
    Mr. Thompson. Would that be a problem for you, too?
    Mr. Mabin. Yes, it would, sir.
    Mr. Thompson. Well, and as I think a lot of us have already 
indicated, that is for the third-largest Government agency to 
get down to the 100,000 contract signing, that slows down the 
process. Mr. Chairman, I look forward to us trying to work with 
the Secretary to unblock the backlog of contracts on her desk 
because that creates a problem.
    Now, the other question, Mr. Nelson, UASI is a good 
program, and do you see any dangers in not funding those UASI 
cities in a timely manner?
    Mr. Nelson. Absolutely. To the point that the response 
today for the State of the Union address, some of those 
capabilities will be diminished in future years if we don't 
receive the funding.
    Mr. Thompson. Yes, and that is for the big cities. You 
know, it is not for the little folk. But we created a special 
program for those large areas because they need the assistance. 
If, for whatever reason, those funds are not made available, 
then those communities become susceptible to potentially any 
kind of danger. So I look forward to trying to unblock the log 
jam and get the monies to the communities where they need it.
    I yield back, Mr. Chairman.
    Chairman Garbarino. The gentleman yields back.
    I now recognize the gentleman from Arizona, Mr. Crane, for 
5 minutes of question.
    Mr. Crane. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, for holding this 
committee. Thank you to our witnesses for showing up today.
    You know, it is just unbelievable to me that we sit here in 
this hearing today, which is about security and intelligence 
sharing for these large events coming up in the United States 
of America, like the FIFA World Cup, the Olympics, et cetera, 
and my Democrat colleagues continue to blast the Trump 
administration for not funding the Department of Homeland 
Security and all of our efforts that are designed to keep these 
people, our citizens, foreign travelers, and these events safe 
from attack. Yet not one single one of them voted for the 
Department of Homeland Security appropriations bill.
    People ask me all the time, is Washington, DC, as bad as we 
think it is? This committee hearing right here is a perfect 
example of how bad it really is. They will sit here and talk 
about the Trump administration and how they are not 
distributing funds for these events and to keep our communities 
safe, and yet not one of them voted for the Department of 
Homeland Security appropriations. That covers the Coast Guard, 
it covers CISA, cybersecurity, it covers ICE, Department of 
Homeland Security, all of it. They didn't vote for any of it.
    Mr. Sena, what are your thoughts on that?
    Mr. Sena. From my perspective, you know, what we're able to 
do and capable of doing right now has been built up over 20-
plus years, and we're still not quite where we need to be as 
far as the information sharing and overcoming the silos. I 
think on the funding piece that----
    Mr. Crane. No, that's not what I asked you, sir, with all 
due respect.
    Mr. Sena. Yes, sir.
    Mr. Crane. I know, I get it. I get it. You are trying to be 
a nice guy in here. I asked you, when you hear all these 
comments from people that voted against funding the Department 
of Homeland Security, is there a part of you that is like, 
really? This is political theater. That is what it really is.
    Mr. Sena. I do think that the impasse that we have right 
now with the grant funding and with the support of the 
Department overall, I can tell you that on a daily basis, we 
work with partners from all of the DHS components and without 
their resources in place, we can't be successful. So without 
them being fully open and operational, it causes problems for 
us in fighting the threats from transnational organized crime 
to human trafficking to counterterrorism. They need the 
resources as much as possible to get, and that includes DHS 
Office of Intelligence & Analysis. Without their backbone 
supporting us, that's a problem.
    Mr. Crane. How about TSA? Right?
    Mr. Sena. Huge.
    Mr. Crane. The folks that, you know, work in airports every 
day to make sure that folks coming into these events are going 
to be able to get here and attend these events. Is that open 
right now? Is that funded?
    Mr. Sena. That's a problem. Especially the support that we 
get from the Federal Air Marshal Services on counter-drone 
activities and detection. I mean, they are great partners in 
this. So there's a lot of components with the DHS that the 
longer that they don't have funding, the longer we have huge 
gaps that we will see.
    Mr. Crane. I want to read some quotes that I heard just in 
this hearing today from some of our Democrat members. ``This 
admin has jeopardized Homeland Security efforts. The time for 
action is short. Release these funds now. Everyone deserves to 
be safe and free at these events. Security planning cannot take 
place during insecurity. We are Americans. Funding should be 
given regardless of politics.'' Did you guys hear those?
    I just want to make the point again, if you are a Democrat 
on this dais and you voted to fund the Department of Homeland 
Security, please raise your hand.
    That is what I thought. So, you know, it is just too hard 
to sit here and listen. They are hoping that nobody calls them 
out on their gaslighting. They are hoping that nobody does and 
that we all just play nice in here. I am not going to do it. 
That is not why my constituents sent me to Washington, DC.
    Chief Mabin, if you guys don't get the funding that you 
need, how is it going to impact Americans that not just in 
their regular lives, but if they are going to trying to go to 
the FIFA World Cup?
    Mr. Mabin. Specifically with FIFA, our security plans rely 
on mutual aid partners, and they need assurances that they will 
be refunded or be able to seek overtime and travel funds. So 
that would negatively impact our security posture.
    Mr. Crane. Mr. Sena, I do want to hear more about this 
droning attempt with the NFL. Did that drone have a payload?
    Mr. Nelson. It was intended to have something, but it 
turned out to be flyers. But it could have been anything 
attached to it.
    Mr. Crane. Thank you. I yield back.
    Mr. Pfluger [presiding]. The gentleman's time has expired.
    The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Texas, Mr. Green.
    Mr. Green. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I thank the Ranking 
Member as well. I say sincerely that I am most appreciative for 
this hearing.
    I did not vote to support many of the things that I find 
onerous within Homeland Security. But that is a discussion that 
I will be willing to debate at another time with a Member who 
is appropriately ready to debate.
    Now, moving on to today's hearing, I don't have any gotcha 
questions. I really want to find out what we are doing in the 
area of human trafficking. I want to find out because my 
county, Harris County, is one of the leading counties in the 
country when it comes to human trafficking. I am interested in 
knowing what is our approach, how will we deal with recovery 
and response, rehabilitation to a certain extent, how will we 
deal with prevention?
    These are some serious questions that we need to answer 
because with human trafficking being more than $200 billion in 
terms of an enterprise globally, more than $200 billion, we 
have got to concern ourselves about the young ladies, the 
children who are going to be trafficked at an event such as 
what we will have in Houston, Texas. I am concerned about the 
entire country, but I just want to make sure that we protect 
people who are going to be at this event.
    Chief, if I may ask you, Deputy Chief, what are your 
thoughts in terms of where we are with human trafficking in 
terms of preparedness to deal with it? Because we know that it 
will occur and it will occur in a huge, massive way in Houston, 
Texas, if we are not careful. So how do we deal with it?
    Mr. Mabin. I'm glad you raised that issue, a very important 
issue. Major sporting events around the world are known to have 
human trafficking occur when they happen. So we're educating 
our front-line officers and teaching them to recognize the 
signs of human trafficking. We're partnered with the FBI on 
different task forces that target human traffickers and 
internet crimes against children crimes. We're also reaching 
out to our private partners, hotels, to let them know what the 
signs are, and the airport. We're really doing a broad 
education campaign so that people can report these signs and we 
can respond appropriately.
    So I think we are positioned well to combat human 
trafficking, and we know it is a major concern. Thank you.
    Mr. Green. Well, thank you very much. I appreciate you 
saying it is a major concern and where you are positioned. But 
it is my understanding that you need money to facilitate and to 
activate the necessary people power to make the difference.
    Ms. Sena, is that correct?
    Mr. Sena. That's correct, sir. Without the resources, I 
mean, we have analysts that are working every day to fight this 
issue. I have to compliment, you know, Mike McDaniel, the HIDTA 
director for Houston, who's been at the forefront of this in 
this human trafficking effort. But one of the things that we do 
is bring together technology, bringing together our Microsoft 
Teams and ESRI platform, which we used successfully at the 
Super Bowl. Thanks to, you know, the task force there, led by, 
you know, our team from Santa Clara County, we were able to 
bring together over 60 agencies and identify----
    Mr. Green. Let me intercede just a moment and ask this 
question, please. We are less than 4 months away from this 
activity actually being initiated. So with this limited amount 
of time, at some point you can receive dollars and you cannot 
use them efficaciously because time is not on your side. Do you 
not need to have the funds now?
    Mr. Sena. We needed them 6 months ago, actually, but we do 
need them now. We've got--and the other part of this is that 
there are gaps in this. As you mentioned earlier, once we 
contact victims, getting them the support that they need, it's 
horrendous the situation we're in right now with no place to 
put people, no housing, not having Child Protective Services 
folks available and others to help out in that situation.
    Mr. Green. You said Child Protective Services. Children. 
We're talking about children as old--as young as what, sir?
    Mr. Sena. At the Super Bowl? Twelve years old.
    Mr. Green. Twelve years old being trafficked.
    Mr. Sena. Being trafficked.
    Mr. Green. Well, and you can prevent much of this if you 
have the funds that you need for recovery and response, which 
means to help them through the trauma that they are suffering. 
This is a part of it, is it not?
    Mr. Sena. Absolutely, sir. Without those resources, we 
can't get the victims to help and they can get pulled back into 
being trafficked again.
    Mr. Green. Thank you for the time, Mr. Chairman.
    Mr. Pfluger. Thank you. The gentleman's time has expired.
    The Chair now recognizes myself for 5 minutes.
    I thank you all for being here. We have a lot of activities 
that are going to be on-going in the next 2 to 3 years: 
America's 250th birthday, the World Cup, the Olympics, not to 
mention the normal pace that we keep up with just normal events 
around the country. So I will start by saying thank you. The 
work that you do is incredibly important.
    I have visited several fusion centers, and, Mr. Sena, I 
appreciate just how nuanced it is and agree with my colleague, 
Mr. Crane, that if this is not bipartisan, if we can't move in 
a bipartisan way to fund the security of our homeland, then 
what are we doing? You know, let's get to some of those 
questions about just how important it is.
    So given the activity that we have seen from the cartels 
recently that have happened in Mexico in the last 3 to 4 days, 
what kind of threat are we looking at, at the possibility? Is 
this something that you are concerned about?
    Mr. Sena, I will ask you, what can the fusion centers be 
doing? What are they doing to mitigate that threat?
    Mr. Sena. Transnational organized crime groups out there 
are a tremendous threat to our country. You know, fusion 
centers and the HIDTAs and risk partners have worked for a long 
time to fight those threats. But every day we see this increase 
in rhetoric. Not only that now we see, you know, violence south 
of our border. They are not that far away to cause problems 
here. Our country is a location where they raise funds and we 
are the source of their income. But we don't know how they will 
react to whatever threat they perceive from anyone, whether it 
be Mexico or the United States, and what harm they may cause.
    I mean, right now with fentanyl trafficking, and I think 
we've discussed this, you know, privately, is that, you know, I 
had and still have over 500 Hondurans that have been operating 
in our region, at one point all selling dope in a square mile 
area in San Francisco. We have fought back on that thanks to 
the support the city and county of San Francisco, the mayor's 
office, the district attorney, the police chief, and the 
sheriff, as well as the United States Attorney's Office and our 
DAs from around the region, the sheriffs and other chiefs of 
police.
    We are going to be receiving an award for the HIDTA program 
for our San Francisco Metro Task Force because we have pushed 
back on that. The city is much cleaner place. It's a much safer 
place. People are not dying in the numbers and droves that they 
were in that city before. But we cannot turn our backs on these 
groups because they continue to be a major threat.
    When we talk about special events, those folks are there to 
sell fentanyl, to sell dangerous drugs, and to sell human 
beings. And there's no reason they can't turn to violence while 
they're there, depending on what the geopolitical environment 
is at the time.
    Mr. Pfluger. Well, thank you for that.
    Chief Mabin, thank you for being here. From the local and 
State level, how important is it to have qualified I&A 
personnel for deployed to the fusion centers? What kind of 
information do you need? How do you work together? Give us a 
sense of what we just heard mitigating these threats.
    Mr. Mabin. Thank you. It's absolutely important to have 
them work in the fusion center. We can't just show up one day 
in the middle of a critical incident and start working 
together. So we have to have them embedded in the fusion center 
real time, for months in advance, years in advance, to 
establish those relationships. They act as a critical bridge 
between other cities, between the IC community, and local law 
enforcement, to be able to push out intelligent products and 
safely secure these events. So it is critical.
    Mr. Pfluger. Let's talk about drones. That was a previous 
discussion. Just looking at the rapid expansion, I know there 
is many, many drone incursions that happen on the Southwest 
Border. We saw one in El Paso recently, or I think alleged that 
it was a drone activity. What can we be doing? How do the 
fusion centers react and what is the threat that we are worried 
about mitigating at the major events in the next year, Mr. 
Sena?
    Mr. Sena. For me, it's, (A), you know, having State and 
local partners, not just with the authorities, but the tools 
and resources to prevent the threat. Without those, we're lost.
    The other piece of this is that the ability for drones to 
carry a payload, even if it's a small payload, can cause panic. 
If it's a white powder dropped, well, who knows what that is? 
The stampede alone will injure people. Even worse if it's, you 
know, some type of, you know, poison that could harm people, 
like fentanyl. You know, there are a lot of threats out there, 
but we need the resources, early detection, and that 
integration like we see in Las Vegas, where we have Federal Air 
Marshal Service personnel in the fusion center. We need the 
people in the center. That's the whole purpose of a fusion 
center, is to bring people together.
    So without those Federal, State, and local resources in the 
same place at the same time, looking for the same threats, 
we're going to miss things.
    Mr. Pfluger. Thank you. My time has expired.
    The Chair now recognizes the gentleman from Virginia, Mr. 
Walkinshaw.
    Mr. Walkinshaw. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, for convening 
today's hearing and to our witnesses for joining us.
    I represent Fairfax County, a proud part of the national 
capital region, largest jurisdiction in the National Capital 
Region. As Mr. Nelson knows, our region is designated as a 
high-threat, high-density area, which permits us, and I know 
this has been discussed by the Ranking Member and others, to 
receive Urban Area Security Initiative Grant funding, which 
enhances our regional preparedness, strengthens public safety, 
helps fund and refund terrorist response training, camera 
networks, emergency alert systems, and coordination tools, all 
of the tools that keep our national capital region in our 
Nation's Capital safe.
    But as the threat levels remain very high for our region as 
we prepare for major events, America 250, the World Cup, the 
administration moved last year to slash $40 million in Homeland 
Security funding from our region, cutting preparedness grant 
funding by 90 percent. I know there has been some conversations 
around the DHS funding situation and the shutdown at DHS right 
now, which we need to work together to resolve. But it is 
important to note that the administration has been shutting 
down elements of DHS throughout this term, and this grant 
program is one of them.
    So State and local entities in Virginia and across our 
region have served as reliable partners in emergency response 
efforts. We sent law enforcement and first responders to help 
recovery efforts after the tragic and deadly collision near 
National Airport. I was just at an event with the families of 
those who lost their lives in that tragic collision. Fairfax 
County police officers were here at the Capitol on January 6, 
2021, working to repel the insurrectionists. But these drastic 
cuts to grants would erode Fairfax County's and, I think, other 
jurisdictions in our region overall emergency preparedness and 
response capabilities. National security--national special 
security events occur frequently in our region. It is not a 
rare thing. It is a weekly thing.
    It would also hinder our ability to conduct training and 
obtain new equipment that might no longer be able to be paid 
for by local funding and reimbursed. It is defunding the police 
is what it is when the administration cuts these grant programs 
that help to fund local law enforcement. It jeopardizes safety 
of Americans in our region all across the country. I think 
Virginians and all residents of our region deserve clear 
answers as to why the administration believes they don't need 
the resources to protect against terrorist threats and other 
incidents.
    I want to ask Mr. Nelson, in the past year, in your view, 
has the threat level to our region, the national capital 
region, increased or decreased, the overall threat level?
    Mr. Nelson. Increased and also in regards to at the local 
and State level. So the Federal threat has always been high 
here. However, we're seeing an increase in threats at the State 
and local level that is also increasing now, which is making it 
even more complex.
    Mr. Walkinshaw. OK. Can you just speak specifically how 
these grant cuts, the cuts to these Homeland Security grants, 
UASI and others, would hinder the District of Columbia, 
Maryland, and Virginia State and local law enforcement from 
working collaboratively to respond to incidents? You know, 
there is a lot of conversation with nationally right now about 
the need for Federal law enforcement and local law enforcement 
to cooperate and partner. How do these cuts or would these cuts 
make that cooperation more difficult?
    Mr. Nelson. It would make it much more difficult. Following 
the Paris attacks in 2015, I actually chaired the National 
Capital Region Complex Coordinated Attack Working Group where 
we built systems, information-sharing platforms, and resource 
management programs to address the complex threats in this 
region. Those programs will likely erode and be demobilized as 
a result of the decrease in funding.
    Mr. Walkinshaw. Maybe specifically, how would it or will it 
hinder our ability to prepare for America 250, 4th of July 
celebrations, big upcoming events like that?
    Mr. Nelson. In addition to breaking down the products such 
as the CCTV program or other types of information-sharing 
platforms, it also--there's other existing programs outside the 
grant program, such as the information-sharing platform that 
was run by DHS that has also been sunsetted that we had to pick 
up as a State and begin running for the Nation to try to ensure 
that that information flow still occurs.
    Mr. Walkinshaw. OK. Thank you Mr. Chairman. I yield back.
    Chairman Garbarino [presiding]. The gentleman yields back.
    I now recognize gentleman from Tennessee, Mr. Van Epps, for 
5 minutes of questions.
    Mr. Van Epps. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, for holding this 
hearing and to our witnesses for joining us. Thank you for your 
efforts to keep Americans safe.
    Like many Americans, I am excited for the America 250 
celebrations and the World Cup matches. I also recognize the 
huge security concerns that these events bring with them and 
our law enforcement's significant work to ensure the United 
States hosts the most successful and peaceful events in the 
world. Among them, DHS I&A is specifically and uniquely 
equipped to manage threat response during national special 
security events. But the threats are always changing. Modern 
UAS and generative AI means nearly anyone anywhere can disrupt 
these events with serious consequences. We must ensure that 
never happens.
    Sticking with the theme of interagency coordination and 
information sharing, Mr. Sena, what real-time intelligence-
sharing mechanisms are there to ensure all threats are reported 
accurately during these events? I know you talked about the 7 
systems and some of the synchronization challenges, but if you 
would care to expound upon any of that.
    Mr. Sena. No, definitely. At the Classified level we have 
the Homeland Security Data Network, HSDN, which fusion centers 
have within their operations to connect with DHS intel and 
what's available within that platform. But on the FBI side you 
also have their own separate high-side systems as well, and 
JWICS and military-side technologies.
    We also have the Homeland Security Information Network, 
which has a SharePoint site which is, you know, Microsoft-based 
technology, along with an Adobe Connect system. Those two 
systems don't actually talk to each other.
    We also have within our partners at the FBI, within their 
CJIS Division, they also manage the LEEP, Law Enforcement 
Enterptise Portal, Virtual Command Center, VCC. We also have a 
number of partners at the State and local level that are using 
everything from Microsoft to Slack to Signal to communicate. We 
also have local emergency operations channels and various EOC-
type communication areas.
    The problem we have with much of these technologies is that 
none of them connect to each other. Many of them have similar 
tools and resources. But ultimately, because folks don't want 
to pick a favorite and everyone has their own, it's hard for 
people to communicate.
    That's why a lot of work's been done over the last 4 years 
to do that direct integration between Microsoft Teams and ESRI 
because most of government has Microsoft and most of government 
has ESRI technology. So that was what really helped us out 
tremendously on our human trafficking effort during Super Bowl. 
But, you know, ultimately we've got to figure out bridges 
between technology, otherwise they fall into pockets.
    As far as the reporting of threats, we have the National 
Threat Operations Center, the NTOC, which is at CJIS Division 
in West Virginia. They handle about 1.3 to 1.6 million tips and 
leads per year. I have to tell you, that's overwhelming.
    We also have various hotlines for human trafficking. So 
those go into those pots of information. But the ultimate issue 
we have is with all these multiple pots of tips and leads 
information, they all aren't consolidated. So we don't know 
what we're missing until bad things happen.
    Even during the Super Bowl, there was a belief that we were 
missing some tips and leads from one source party. One of our 
partners actually called in a tip to see if somebody would send 
us the tip, and it never came in.
    So those are the types of issues we have trying to make 
sure that there is a constant flow of communication. Fusion 
centers were designed to help facilitate that and to help move 
the data. But as, you know, technology has not progressed with 
the issues we have today, we have these silos of excellence 
that don't connect anybody.
    Mr. Van Epps. So building off of that, could you, and maybe 
this is for Mr. Martinez as well, but could you walk us through 
what the intelligence-sharing process would look like if there 
was an active threat at one of the World Cup events? You know, 
what are the crucial communicating tools and the potential gaps 
there as well?
    Mr. Sena. Absolutely. Unfortunately, each of those systems 
I mentioned would be one of those things that analysts probably 
have to enter data into. But the real thing is people in the 
room talking to each other.
    So what we've done and built in the past and which every 
location will have is a regional collaboration, coordination, 
and communication centers. There will be ops centers, but I can 
tell you that we had about 6 operation centers just during the 
Super Bowl. So I can only imagine that there'll be many more 
based on how spread out the FIFA operations are to bring 
information together.
    But if there's a critical threat it's going to be 
communication between people in the room and then the ability 
to bring people in, most oftentimes in that Microsoft Teams 
environment, to host a call very quickly to say, this is the 
threat. That's what I've done in the past in my own center. If 
something escalates to a point where we've got to get general 
information out, people are not always tied to their email. 
They're not always tied to even their text messages. But if you 
get the alert out and bring people together physically and 
virtually, brief them on the threat as quickly as possible.
    The only problem comes in if the threat is Classified and 
then trying to get the classification down. That's where 
clearances become important for especially our State and 
locals. We have had that, you know, that effort to try to get 
people as many clearances as possible to bring them into a room 
and tell them this is the threat. But not everyone has remote 
communications at a Classified level. So there are urgencies 
that we have to get information out.
    I can tell you, years ago, we had that same problem in San 
Francisco. Ultimately, they built a room that we could hold 300 
people to get them briefed. That's a rarity. Not many cities, 
locations have a place that is reasonable to get to in a 
Classified space to get briefed up on urgent threats.
    But ultimately, when there's a crisis, we communicate 
because we work together, we train together, we have tabletop 
exercises, and we plan out and get to know each other before 
the event, before the big game day. Then we work on these are 
the communications channels we will use, but we make sure that 
that happens. Everyone in my region has my cell phone number 
and I have theirs, so we can talk to each other if all else 
fails.
    Mr. Van Epps. Thank you. Thank you, sir. My time has 
expired. Mr. Chairman, I yield back.
    Chairman Garbarino. That was a great answer. That is why I 
let you go long, because it was very important to get on the 
record.
    I recognize the gentleman from Puerto Rico, Mr. Hernandez, 
for 5 minutes of questions.
    Mr. Hernandez. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. This hearing is 
about security preparedness. What concerns me the most is that 
DHS has shown a consistent pattern of failing American 
citizens, the United States, the 50 States, the commonwealths, 
and the territories in securing their reconstruction after 
natural disasters, after major events, and in securing their 
citizens and their residents from their policies. Now, this is 
a direct failure of leadership and policy at the DHS level.
    We have in place what I have to call a stupid policy that 
requires the DHS Secretary to approve any expense over 
$100,000, and that is delaying the reconstruction and the 
projects in Puerto Rico and in many States that will prepare us 
to better handle major events or major natural disasters. I 
have received outreach from constituents. Projects like the 
Hector Sola Coliseum in Caguas or projects like the back-up 
generators from Fundacion Comunitaria that give power and water 
to over 37,000 residents in Puerto Rico are stalled because of 
this stupid policy. I am concerned that as we speak of major 
events, like the World Cup, like the Olympics, we are not ready 
to meet the demands of these events if we have not been able to 
meet the lesser demands of previous events.
    So, Mr. Nelson, it is my understanding that DHS owes 
Maryland nearly $1 billion in disaster-related expenses, 
including for costs that the Federal Government approved years 
ago. Can you describe the types of projects currently stalled 
because of the delays?
    Mr. Nelson. Yes, sir. Thanks for the question because there 
has been an extreme delay. What this also is causing is not 
just for these projects to be completed, similar to as they are 
in Puerto Rico, where we've had projects that are started, but 
we are uncertain if we'll be able to continue them because of 
the policy of the $100,000, but it's also the local time that 
these employees are investing into trying to manage these 
projects. Those are a lot of the same employees who are 
dedicated to special event planning and doing other emergency 
management activities that are now bogged down with the 
administrative--just administrative burden of trying to manage 
this unpredictable nature.
    Mr. Hernandez. Can you speak to how the time line for 
disbursement has changed since this new policy was implemented?
    Mr. Nelson. Certainly. Well, there--I think it's fair to 
say that we don't know what the time line is. There's 
consistent holds that are put for administrative review and 
there's no real certainty on when the funds would be released. 
So we're still trying to rectify, you know, 2025 and 2024 
funds. The future is really uncertain if we don't even know 
when those funds will be released.
    For example, we're on a deadline to accept awards by the 
end of 27 February. However, those funds haven't been released, 
so we don't even know how can we accept them if there's an 
administrative hold? It gives us a very tight window by which 
we can do anything if we're not even notified in time to react.
    Mr. Hernandez. So if another major disaster were to strike 
tomorrow in Maryland, would your State be in a weaker position 
because of these funding delays?
    Mr. Nelson. Maryland will always lean in and take care of 
their people first. The Governor is committed to doing that. 
However, it has greatly changed our posture and put more stress 
on our local governments and our State budget of trying to 
always put public safety first and ensuring that. But other 
critical programs will likely have to sacrifice as a result.
    Mr. Hernandez. So by extension, other States, 
commonwealths, and territories would also face, due to these 
policies, more strains, more risks, more adversity in accessing 
disaster funding and prevention capabilities?
    Mr. Nelson. Maryland also realizes that we're in a position 
where we often lend assistance to other States and territories 
in a time of need. We'll be less positioned to do that because 
of decreasing capabilities and personnel. So it doesn't just 
impact Maryland. It impacts our ability to support other States 
and the regions because of our limited capability and needing 
to maximize our resources.
    Mr. Hernandez. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I yield back.
    Chairman Garbarino. The gentleman yields back.
    I recognize the gentlelady from South Carolina, Mrs. Biggs, 
for 5 minutes of questions.
    Ms. Biggs. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Thank you to our 
witnesses for being here today.
    This year, it is a special year for the United States. 
Between the America 250 celebration and the FIFA World Cup, our 
country will host over 70 major events across more than a dozen 
States. Each event will need varying levels of security with 
millions of Americans and foreign tourists and athletes 
traveling around the country.
    As we go into an eventful year, we must contend with a new 
potential avenue for threats, which is drones, which we have 
already talked about a little bit. The 2026 NDAA expanded the 
drone mitigation, and the counter-UAS authority is given to 
State and local authorities. I know we talked a little bit with 
my friend from Alabama about the training and what is going to 
be required and even with technology. But I would like to hear 
a little bit more on how you think the Federal, State, and 
local authorities will work together to mitigate those threats 
of drones to the major events in dozens of cities across the 
United States. Is there any way that counter-UAS authorities 
could be improved for quicker and more efficient response to 
threats?
    I will leave that open to anyone who wants to respond.
    Mr. Nelson. If I may start, Mrs. Biggs. The area that we're 
currently in, the national capital region, has the most complex 
air space of anywhere in the country. So the ability for us to 
deal with countering UAS is extremely important. However, I 
would just say that in addition to the capabilities, which has 
been--it's been great and moving at a great pace. However, we 
need to ensure that the plans and procedures are there and the 
network of which we're sharing information about the threats 
and our policies.
    During the Army-Navy game in Baltimore just this past 
December, there were several occasions where different Federal 
agencies were mitigating drones. We're not properly 
communicating that with our State and local partners to know 
what other risks may be at play. So I would just again 
highlight the importance of good planning and coordination 
between all levels in addition to training and capabilities.
    Mr. Mabin. I'll echo that. We have a wonderful working 
relationship with our Federal partners in Kansas City. So one 
aspect is to detect, identify, mitigate, but we also have to 
have boots on the ground to go to interdict the operators. So 
we're working to train together so that we're ready and 
prepared for a World Cup.
    Mr. Sena. For the last few years, across the world, people 
have been expanding drone capabilities to implement attacks. At 
the same time, we've been fighting to get those resources at 
the State and local level. Now that we finally have the 
authorities to implement, now it's getting the training and 
technology in place.
    The problem is that we have to defend large perimeters, 
large areas that need coverage, not just the game day facility, 
but the practice fields, the fan fest areas, the official ones, 
and the unofficial ones. How do we cover all those places with 
mitigation technology? It's very difficult because we're way 
behind.
    I feel that, you know, if we had been having this 
conversation 2 years ago, we'd be in better shape. But today as 
we're approaching these games, we're nowhere near the 
capability we need. But we continue to have to press forward 
with the technology and the training and getting it out to the 
largest group of people possible from the law enforcement side 
so we can cover all those simultaneous events that you were 
talking about that are spread across a huge geographical area. 
It's something that we have not dealt with in a long time to 
cover this much area in such a very short period of time with 
limited resources.
    Ms. Biggs. If there is one thing that you could ask 
Congress to step in and help with right now, what would that be 
to help you be prepared?
    Mr. Sena. That prioritization of funding to train the 
personnel and get them to that training site. We need that 
immediately.
    Mr. Mabin. The release of the FIFA funding would be 
critical for our staffing and our mutual aid partners to come 
in and assist because we just don't have enough officers within 
my own department to cover down on all the threats. But we're 
going to be relying on those mutual aid partners and 
connections.
    Mr. Nelson. Yes to both their comments. In addition to the 
personnel that are working on these plans and coordination are 
the same limited personnel that are doing the other special 
event planning and that are also--many of their salaries are 
contingent on the funds that have not been released. So we are 
at a pivotal time where we may not just lose that capability, 
but the block from Jenga is about to cause the whole thing to 
come down.
    Ms. Biggs. Well, thank you so much for the work that you 
do. Mr. Chairman, I yield back.
    Chairman Garbarino. Mr. Martinez, look like you might be 
about to say something. Did you want to just say anything?
    Mr. Martinez. No, I just like to echo what the other 
witnesses stated. You know, the release of the funds that have 
already been approved is absolutely critical.
    Chairman Garbarino. The gentlelady yields back.
    I now recognize the gentleman from Colorado, Mr. Evans, for 
5 minutes.
    Mr. Evans. Thank you, Chairman, and, of course, our Ranking 
Member, for this important hearing. Want to thank the witnesses 
for being here today and for all of your on-going work and 
everything that you do to keep our Nation and our communities 
safe.
    We are, unfortunately, all aware right now that we are in a 
partial Government shutdown because my Democrat colleagues want 
to hold the Federal Government hostage and hold that funding 
hostage for vital national security and law enforcement 
agencies. Just in case we need a reminder, ICE has already been 
funded under provisions we secured last year in the Working 
Families Tax Cut. By refusing to pass the DHS funding bill, ICE 
isn't being defunded. What is being defunded is FEMA and TSA 
and the Coast Guard and FLETC, Federal Police Academy, and 
multiple other safety measures that are absolutely necessary 
ahead of massive events like the World Cup.
    In my home State of Colorado, let's talk about FEMA. There 
have been historically low amounts of snowfall this winter, 
which sets us up for a very dry season accompanied by very high 
wildfire risk. FEMA support is absolutely vital to the safety 
of my constituents, even before a wildfire begins. I know this 
because I served in the U.S. Army and the Colorado Army 
National Guard for 12 years. I was a Black Hawk helicopter 
pilot. I have flown on, dropped water on, and commanded 
National Guard soldiers assigned to fighting type 1, so 
national priority, incidents in the State of Colorado.
    To prepare for that, we would always do, typically in 
April, a pre-operation planning conference just to make sure 
everybody is on the same page. Multiple different agencies, you 
know, 15, 20 agencies, Federal, State, and local, are on the 
same page to support and strengthen that collaboration in 
preparation for the wildfire season ahead. Without adequate 
funding for DHS, for agencies like FEMA, this interagency 
coordination is jeopardized and more communities, more lives 
are at risk, to say nothing of the environmental damage that 
happens if we can't respond to things like wildfires.
    In addition to being in the National Guard, Mr. Mabin, my 
first question will be to you, I was also a local cop for 10 
years, city of Arvada, first ring suburb, just to the northwest 
of Denver, which is another major city's agency. So I wanted to 
ask you about, from your perspective, working for a major 
cities but local government agency, what lapses in funding are 
you seeing as a host city for the World Cup? What information 
and what resources and capabilities do you see potentially 
lacking to close any information sharing or other planning gaps 
as you prepare to be a host city?
    Mr. Mabin. As far as information sharing, we are seeing, 
you know, the regional Kansas City Fusion Center is our major 
intelligence-sharing hub and we haven't seen any lapses with 
regard to that. The information is flowing. We're sharing with 
our Federal partners, our other State and local partners. We 
chip in and help each other to cover down on those kind of 
incidents.
    But just more broadly, we do need to see a release of the 
FIFA funds so that we can get staffing for officers. Because 
when it comes to the end of the day, we need X-number of 
officers in these point positions, control positions, to 
execute our planning for World Cup.
    Mr. Evans. Thank you. So, again, I was a cop for 10 years 
and so I kind-of know how to read between the lines. So when 
you say ``chip in and help each other,'' that makes it sound 
like there is probably some Band-Aids that are being applied. 
Obviously, we are in an open forum here. We don't want to 
forecast any mission-critical shortfalls. People would be 
surprised to know how many cops I often didn't have when I was 
trying to keep a city of 125,000 people peaceable and getting 
along. So I appreciate you commenting about chipping in and 
helping each other and the implications that go along with 
that.
    I am also glad to hear you talk about fusion centers. My 
next question will be to Mr. Sena. Again, I mentioned 12 years 
in the National Guard, Black Hawk helicopter pilot. So rotary 
wing, low-level aviation operations, things like drones, 
counter-drone technology, super important to me both as a 
rotary wing aviator, also a police officer, and everything that 
happens typically between 0 and 3,000 feet AGL. So here, in my 
remaining about 30 seconds here, can you just comment on what 
is needed in this information-sharing space to be able to 
effectively counter the emerging UAS threat?
    Mr. Sena. The detection equipment, the personnel in place, 
the threat liaison officers to get the information out there on 
suspicious activity reporting. We need tips and leads. That 
Central California Intelligence Center threat to the Super Bowl 
that we received regarding drones, it's tips and leads. That's 
the bottom line.
    So we need people that can do the outreach, we need people 
that can do the training. We also have field intelligence team 
members that are out there on the ground looking for those 
threats and working with teams to mitigate them as quickly as 
possible. Without the funding, without the resources, those 
teams aren't there, those analysts aren't there, those tips and 
lead processes are not there.
    Mr. Evans. I think as we have seen, this is a game-changing 
threat that we need to be able to counter.
    Mr. Chairman, I yield back.
    Chairman Garbarino. The gentleman yields back.
    I now recognize the gentleman from Missouri, Mr. Alford, 
for 5 minutes of questions.
    Mr. Alford. Well, thank you, Chairman Garbarino, for 
allowing me to waive on to this important hearing today.
    Kansas City is proud to serve, as you all know, as one of 
the host cities of the World Cup in Missouri's 4th 
Congressional District. Across the Kansas City region, local, 
State, and Federal partners have been working diligently to 
prepare for the influx of visitors and the complex security 
environment that comes with an event like this. That is why 
today's hearing is so important.
    Strong, timely intelligence sharing between Federal, State, 
and local and Tribal territories and private-sector partners is 
essential for preventing threats, managing crowds, and ensuring 
public safety. When that information flow works well, it 
enhances situational awareness and allows our local law 
enforcement to act quickly and confidently. I am particularly 
interested in ensuring that host cities like Kansas City are 
receiving the support, intelligence, and resources they need to 
execute security missions effectively.
    Deputy Chief Mabin, good to see you here in the swamp.
    Mr. Mabin. Thank you.
    Mr. Alford. Yes. Thank you for appearing before this 
committee today. The funding is not coming through from the 
Federal Government due to the hold-up. What does that mean to 
Kansas City? Because the Kansas City budget is in trouble as it 
is. In fact, Chief Stacey Graves, who has done a wonderful job 
of managing the great Kansas City Missouri Police Department, 
is now having to cut costs severely to ensure just basic 
services. How is this hold-up in funding affecting our plans to 
keep Americans safe in Kansas City this summer?
    Mr. Mabin. We began planning, full-time planning, for this 
probably 2 years ago. We've taken into account multiple 
different contingencies. We have planning at the stadium, at 
the different hotel venues, at the fan fest, equipment, 
intelligence, and just operationally. As we have those plans in 
place, if we do not have people to execute those plans, then 
those plans are ineffective. So right now we're in a critical 
stage where we need those funds committed and released so that 
our mutual aid partners have assurances and they can come in 
and assist us with just boots on the ground for those plans.
    Mr. Alford. For those who don't know, Kansas City is in the 
heart of America, Heart of Missouri, Heart of America. It sits 
at the intersection of I-49 and I-70, which before now was 
already a hub for human trafficking. I know that is a huge 
concern for your department and those also dealing with the 
safety talk about that.
    Mr. Mabin. We are aware that on major sporting events it's 
also always a concern of human trafficking. So we're trying to 
get that message out to our local partners. We're working with 
hotels and the airport to recognize signs of human trafficking. 
We've trained our officers to recognize signs and to be able to 
respond and get folks resources. We're also working with the 
FBI on task forces so we can combat human trafficking. It is a 
major concern and that--it features heavily in our plans for 
the World Cup.
    Mr. Alford. Of course, the border is shut down a lot better 
than it was under President Biden, but fentanyl, 
methamphetamine, cocaine are still big issues in the Kansas 
City region.
    Mr. Mabin. Yes, they are as they are with other large 
cities. So we work closely with our Federal partners on task 
forces to combat drug trafficking organizations, human 
trafficking, and other violent criminal organizations.
    Mr. Alford. Well, Deputy Chief, thank you again for being 
here. To all of our partners in Kansas City, thank you as well. 
It is going to be a fabulous turnout. We are expecting some 
600,000 people to converge on Kansas City for this, to show off 
Kansas City once again.
    I will say to the Democrats out there listening now, we 
have fully funded ICE through the One Big Beautiful Bill, so 
that fight is not a good fight for you to take up right now. 
What you are putting in jeopardy is the safety of American 
citizens that rely on FEMA, that rely on the Coast Guard, that 
rely on the Secret Service, that rely on cybersecurity to keep 
us safe in America. It is time to end the partial shutdown led 
by the Democrats.
    With that, I yield back.
    Chairman Garbarino. The gentleman yields back.
    I want to thank the witnesses all for traveling here today. 
One thing clear, got to get you all the money. So that is our 
job. So thank you all again for being here.
    I want to--I have additional questions that I will be 
submitting in writing and the Members of the committee may have 
some additional questions for you. We would ask that you all 
respond to these in writing. Pursuant to committee rule VII(E), 
the hearing record will be held open for 10 days.
    Without objection, this committee stands adjourned.
    [Whereupon, at 12:15 p.m., the committee was adjourned.]

                                 [all]