[Senate Hearing 118-791]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]



                                                        S. Hrg. 118-791

                               NOMINATION
                  TO THE FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION,
                 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD,
                   AND THE AMTRAK BOARD OF DIRECTORS

=======================================================================




                                HEARING

                               before the

                         COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE,
                      SCIENCE, AND TRANSPORTATION
                          UNITED STATES SENATE

                    ONE HUNDRED EIGHTEENTH CONGRESS

                             SECOND SESSION 
                               __________

                           SEPTEMBER 25, 2024 
                               __________

    Printed for the use of the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 
                             Transportation





                [GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] 





                Available online: http://www.govinfo.gov  
                
                                ______
                                
                   U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE

63-644 PDF                 WASHINGTON : 2026                 
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                



















                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
       SENATE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND TRANSPORTATION

                    ONE HUNDRED EIGHTEENTH CONGRESS

                             SECOND SESSION

                   MARIA CANTWELL, Washington, Chair
AMY KLOBUCHAR, Minnesota             TED CRUZ, Texas, Ranking
BRIAN SCHATZ, Hawaii                 JOHN THUNE, South Dakota
EDWARD MARKEY, Massachusetts         ROGER WICKER, Mississippi
GARY PETERS, Michigan                DEB FISCHER, Nebraska
TAMMY BALDWIN, Wisconsin             JERRY MORAN, Kansas
TAMMY DUCKWORTH, Illinois            DAN SULLIVAN, Alaska
JON TESTER, Montana                  MARSHA BLACKBURN, Tennessee
KYRSTEN SINEMA, Arizona              TODD YOUNG, Indiana
JACKY ROSEN, Nevada                  TED BUDD, North Carolina
BEN RAY LUJAN, New Mexico            ERIC SCHMITT, Missouri
JOHN HICKENLOOPER, Colorado          J. D. VANCE, Ohio
RAPHAEL WARNOCK, Georgia             SHELLEY MOORE CAPITO, West 
PETER WELCH, Vermont                   Virginia
                                     CYNTHIA LUMMIS, Wyoming
                   Lila Harper Helms, Staff Director
                 Melissa Porter, Deputy Staff Director
                     Jonathan Hale, General Counsel
                 Brad Grantz, Republican Staff Director
           Nicole Christus, Republican Deputy Staff Director
                     Liam McKenna, General Counsel 
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                            C O N T E N T S

                              ----------                              
                                                                   Page
Hearing held on September 25, 2024...............................     1
Statement of Senator Cantwell....................................     1
Statement of Senator Cruz........................................     3
Statement of Senator Wicker......................................    75
Statement of Senator Klobuchar...................................    77
Statement of Senator Capito......................................    79
Statement of Senator Sullivan....................................    84

                               Witnesses

Hon. Mitt Romney, U.S. Senator from Utah.........................     4
Hon. Carl W. Bentzel, Nominee to be a Commissioner, Federal 
  Maritime Commission............................................     5
    Prepared statement...........................................     7
    Biographical information.....................................     9
Hon. Thomas B. Chapman, Nominee to be a Member, National 
  Transportation Safety Board....................................    22
    Prepared statement...........................................    23
    Biographical information.....................................    24
Lanhee J. Chen, Nominee to be a Director, Amtrak Board of 
  Directors......................................................    57
    Prepared statement...........................................    59
    Biographical information.....................................    60

                                Appendix

Response to written questions submitted to Hon. Carl W. Bentzel 
  by:
    Hon. Tammy Duckworth.........................................    87
    Hon. Ted Cruz................................................    87
    Hon. Dan Sullivan............................................    90
    Hon. Eric Schmitt............................................    91
Response to written questions submitted to Hon Thomas B. Chapman 
  by:
    Hon. Tammy Duckworth.........................................    91
    Hon. Amy Klobuchar...........................................    92
    Hon. Ted Cruz................................................    93
Response to written questions submitted to Lanhee J. Chen by:
    Hon. Tammy Duckworth.........................................    95
    Hon. Eric Schmitt............................................    96

 
                               NOMINATION 
                  TO THE FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION, 
                 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD, 
                   AND THE AMTRAK BOARD OF DIRECTORS

                              ----------                              

                     WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 25, 2024

                                       U.S. Senate,
        Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
                                                    Washington, DC.
    The Committee met, pursuant to notice, at 10:02 a.m., in 
room SR-253, Russell Senate Office Building, Hon. Maria 
Cantwell, Chair of the Committee, presiding.
    Present: Senators Cantwell [presiding], Klobuchar, Peters, 
Tester, Cruz, Wicker, Fischer, Sullivan, Young, Schmitt, and 
Capito.

           OPENING STATEMENT OF HON. MARIA CANTWELL, 
                  U.S. SENATOR FROM WASHINGTON

    The Chair. Good morning. The Senate Commerce Committee will 
come to order.
    We are here to consider three of the nominees for various 
positions. First, we have Carl W. Bentzel, who has been 
renominated as the Federal Maritime Commissioner. Mr. Bentzel 
is a Commerce Committee staff alum, having served as a Senior 
Democratic Counsel, spent four years with the House on the 
Merchant Marine and Fisheries Committee, and has served on the 
FMC since 2019, where he spent a great deal of time focused on 
the issues that we experienced through the COVID pandemic, 
obviously U.S. supply chain disruption, but more importantly, 
carriers who were leaving U.S. products on the dock and 
returning without our cargo.
    Mr. Bentzel has been very active in the Commission's 
efforts to increase transparency, awareness, and accountability 
for those involved in the maritime shipping supply chain and 
the impacts that we suffered under. Under the Shipping Act the 
Commission protects shippers and consumers from unfair and 
deceptive practices in the shipping industry.
    The COVID-19 pandemic exposed deep maritime supply chain 
resiliency challenges, and Congress responded in two important 
ways. To address the capital challenge, we had a historic $2.25 
billion in port infrastructure in the Bipartisan Infrastructure 
Law, and we passed the Ocean Shipping Reform Act, which 
provides the Commission with the tools they need to crack down 
on bad actors, protect American businesses and consumers. And 
we look forward to hearing from you on that continued important 
work on the Commission.
    Next, we have Tom Chapman, who has been nominated to serve 
as a Member of the National Transportation Safety Board, where 
he has been a Member since 2020. In his four years on the 
Board, Mr. Chapman has been a strong advocate for safety system 
approaches to everything from highway traffic safety, and has 
championed NTSB's research into preventing intoxicated driving 
and speeding-related deaths. Mr. Chapman is also a strong 
advocate for safety at highway grade crossings for rail 
workers, having lost his grandfather in a grade-crossing 
accident when he was younger.
    I am sorry for that loss, Mr. Chapman.
    I must note that Mr. Chapman also has roots here in the 
Committee, first working for Senator Nelson, and then on the 
Aviation Subcommittee for a time period before he went to NTSB. 
With more than four decades of experience in transportation-
related matters, Mr. Chapman has served in roles at U.S. 
Airways, Southwest Airlines, and the Aircraft Owners and Pilots 
Association. He has also earned his own private pilot 
certificate, and I believe his background on aviation is 
critical to the ongoing Alaska Investigation. I believe that 
the NTSB's work has never been more important or more needed, 
East Palestine's Ohio rail derailment, or the Alaska issue, or 
the San Francisco Scott Key Bridge incident in Baltimore.
    So it is important that our Committee reauthorized the NTSB 
for another five years, given its highest funding authorization 
that it has received in decades, to have more investigators 
respond to emerging technology and continue its mission to save 
lives.
    The FAA authorization also directed the FAA to implement 
critical NTSB recommendations to strengthen aviation safety, 
including a new requirement to install a 25-hour cockpit voice 
recorder in commercial aircraft to help investigators at the 
NTSB, and also directing the FAA to adopt surface surveillance 
technology, ASDE-X, at every large and medium hub airport to 
reduce close calls across the country. We appreciate Mr. 
Chapman's tireless work on these issues in the NTSB 
investigations, and I am sure we will hear more about how to 
enhance safety, from Mr. Chapman.
    And last, but certainly not least, we have Mr. Lanhee J. 
Chen, who has been nominated to serve on Amtrak's Board of 
Directors. The Amtrak Board of Directors plays an important 
role in ensuring safety and quality service on our Nation's 
transportation system. I think we are here this morning as 
opposed to last week because I do not think we have the 
paperwork finished, and so that is why you were not included 
with some of the other colleagues.
    But including overseeing the historic investment in Amtrak 
in the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, Mr. Chen has had a 
distinguished career in academia, public service, and the 
private sector. And from 2014 to 2018, he was confirmed by the 
Senate as a Member of the Social Security Advisory Board, 
previously serving as a senior official at the Department of 
Health and Human Services during the Bush administration.
    He has also served as Policy Director for Senator Mitt 
Romney's 2012 Presidential Campaign. Our colleague is here from 
Utah, I am sure, to give us some more words of wisdom on 
support of Mr. Chen. So we thank you for joining us today. And 
after I turn to my colleague, we will then turn to you for your 
remarks.
    But Amtrak is in the middle of one of the most significant 
transformation--transportation changes since its founding more 
than 50 years ago, with ridership on track to exceed pre-
pandemic levels this year. As we said earlier this month, we 
are happy to consider the nominees who bring much-needed 
geographic diversity to the Board, and thanks to the advocacy 
of my colleagues from the West, like Senator Tester, on these 
issues, we are seeing that diversity.
    So I look forward to hearing from all of you. Thank you for 
your willingness to serve and come before the Committee. Now I 
will turn to Ranking Member Cruz for his opening remarks.

                  STATEMENT OF HON. TED CRUZ, 
                    U.S. SENATOR FROM TEXAS

    Senator Cruz. Thank you, Madam Chair. This morning, we will 
hear from nominees to the Amtrak Board of Directors, the 
Federal Maritime Commission, and the National Transportation 
Safety Board, the (NTSB). The nominee to the Amtrak Board is 
Mr. Lanhee Chen. Mr. Chen received his J.D. and Ph.D. from 
Harvard and has deep experience in business, financial 
management, and policy.
    In addition to serving on the Boards of both private 
companies and nonprofits, he was nominated and confirmed by 
voice vote to the Social Security Advisory Board in 2014. Mr. 
Chen would be a strong addition to the Amtrak Board. Having a 
director with his acumen is particularly important as Amtrak 
examines service expansions and struggles to manage major 
capital projects effectively. I look forward to hearing more 
about his qualifications for this important post from Senator 
Romney, his former boss, and our colleague, who will be 
formally introducing him in just a moment.
    The Federal Maritime Commissioner, Carl Bentzel, will also 
appear before us today. Mr. Bentzel has been nominated for a 
second term on the Federal Maritime Commission, or the FMC. The 
FMC is the Federal agency charged with ensuring ocean 
transportation is competitive and abides by the Shipping Act, 
protecting both American consumers and shippers. Last Congress, 
Senators Thune and Klobuchar worked on legislation to 
reauthorize the FMC, the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 2022. I 
look forward to hearing from Mr. Bentzel on the Commission's 
progress implementing that legislation, as well as his views on 
what may be next for the FMC.
    Mr. Bentzel's confirmation hearing is timely, as the U.S. 
teeters on the brink of the first union strike among East and 
Gulf Coast ports since 1977. As usual, the Biden-Harris 
administration seems to have been caught unaware of the 
potential for a strike and has shown little leadership in 
bringing the parties together to negotiate a deal and prevent a 
strike.
    Let us be clear about the potential consequences of a 
strike. A J.P. Morgan analysis, quoted in The New York Times 
yesterday, projected that a port strike could cost the American 
economy $5 billion per day. I hope the administration is able 
to avert that strike.
    While the FMC will not have a role in the negotiations 
themselves, the Commission issued a notice on Monday that it 
will continue to monitor transportation stakeholder practices 
for any violations of the Shipping Act as transportation 
providers and shippers look to move their goods.
    Finally, we will hear from Thomas Chapman, who has been 
nominated for a second term on the NTSB. The NTSB investigates 
transportation accidents and other incidents to identify their 
causes and to recommend safety improvements to prevent similar 
incidents in the future. The NTSB is not a regulator and has no 
power to mandate the adoption of its recommendations. But 
because of the NTSB's reputation for thorough and accurate 
investigations, the results of its investigations are well 
regarded around the world, and agencies and companies often 
implement NTSB recommendations, voluntarily.
    The NTSB also provides valuable information for Congress 
and Federal agencies to consider when developing transportation 
policy. Mr. Chapman has many years of experience working on 
aviation issues, including on staff to this very Committee. 
During his first term at the NTSB, Mr. Chapman increased his 
attention on roadway safety and recommended several changes to 
traffic policy. I agree that roadway safety is an important 
priority. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety 
Administration, there were almost 41,000 motor vehicle traffic 
fatalities last year. I look forward to hearing from Mr. 
Chapman on how we might reduce those numbers without burdensome 
regulations or reducing consumer choice.
    Thank you, Madam Chair.
    The Chair. Thank you, Senator Cruz. And before I turn to 
our colleague, Senator Romney; I just want to note that in the 
audience with us today is NTSB Chair, Jennifer Homendy. Thank 
you for being here. I am assuming in support of our nominee.
    We also have two FMC Commissioners, Commissioner Vekich and 
Senator--I mean, Commissioner Maffei, thank you for being here 
as well.
    Senator Romney, welcome to the Commerce Committee. We look 
forward to hearing your remarks.

                 STATEMENT OF HON. MITT ROMNEY, 
                     U.S. SENATOR FROM UTAH

    Senator Romney. Thank you, Chair Cantwell, and thank you, 
Ranking Member Cruz. I have to admit that had I seen this 
hearing room before, I might have been very tempted to become a 
member of this Committee. It is a lot better than the ones I 
normally attend.
    I am delighted today to be able to introduce a friend of 
mine, a colleague, and someone I respect very deeply, Lanhee 
Chen. He has been an adviser for me for more than a decade, and 
I actually think he would be an excellent member of the Board 
of Directors of Amtrak.
    Obviously, Amtrak's Board is responsible for setting policy 
and overseeing management, and the strategic direction of 
Amtrak. And I cannot think of a person more intellectually and 
emotionally suited for a role of that nature than Lanhee Chen, 
because he is brilliant, because he is a man of integrity, and 
because his life experience shows that he has had a career that 
has spanned the government sector, the private sector, policy 
areas, and academia, really quite an extraordinary man.
    As you know, he is the son of Taiwanese immigrants, and he 
attended Harvard College, where he graduated magna cum laude in 
Government. Then he went on to get a Ph.D. in political science 
at Harvard University and get a law degree from Harvard Law 
School. It seems no other university would take him.
    [Laughter.]
    Senator Romney. Lanhee has served on the Board of both of 
my Presidential campaigns, and I entrusted him to spearhead the 
policy direction for my campaign, and to be my chief policy 
adviser. He did that without a partisan bent; he did that 
entirely based upon the intellectual capacity that he brought 
to the team, and offered superb advice.
    From 2014 to 2018, as Chair Cantwell has indicated, he was 
appointed by President Obama to serve as a member of the Social 
Security Advisory Board. He is currently the Director of 
Domestic Policy Studies, and a lecturer at Stanford University, 
as well as a fellow at the Hoover Institution. He lives in the 
Bay Area with his wife, Cynthia who, by the way, is brilliant 
in her own right. And they have two children. Lanhee Chen.
    The Chair. Thank you. Thank you, Senator Romney. I very 
much appreciate you in your busy schedule, coming here to 
advocate on behalf of Dr. Chen. So thank you.
    We will now turn to our nominees and witnesses. And we will 
start with you, Mr. Bentzel. Thank you for being here.

      STATEMENT OF HON. CARL W. BENTZEL, NOMINEE TO BE A 
           COMMISSIONER, FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

    Mr. Bentzel. Chair Cantwell, Ranking Member Cruz, Members 
of the Committee, good morning, and thank you for the 
opportunity to appear here to be considered for nomination as 
FMC Commissioner.
    I would ask your permission for my formal statement to be 
inserted in the record.
    The Chair. Without objection.
    Mr. Bentzel. I would like to recognize my Chairman, Dan 
Maffei, and Commissioner Vekich, and thank them for being here 
in support of my attendance. And most importantly, I want to 
recognize my wife, Suzanne Bentzel, whom I met and fell for 
while I was a staffer here in the Senate Commerce Committee. I 
would also like to----
    The Chair. Mark one down for the Commerce Committee.
    Mr. Bentzel. Finally, I would like to thank President Biden 
for renominating me. When I came before this Committee as a 
nominee 5 years ago, the world and the Federal Maritime 
Commission were in a different place. The pandemic had not yet 
gripped the country. The shipping industry, although essential 
to the Nation's economy, was invisible to the public eye. Then 
it wasn't.
    The earliest part of the pandemic resulted in reductions of 
over 20 percent of imports through our West Coast ports. By 
early summer, we swung to over 30 percent increases, a stunning 
change in demand. During the entirety of the pandemic, we saw 
27 percent increases in imported containers, and one percent 
increases of exports. The movement of enhanced cargo volumes 
was first stymied on the West Coast with a lack of intermodal 
chassis, and then by Chinese Government-controlled container 
manufacturers intentionally suppressing production of 
containers.
    Container shipping lines were ultimately forced to wait off 
the coast of the United States for one to two weeks over, 
essentially, what became a two-year period. The result of 
congestion and enhanced supply need were that spot shipping 
rates increased by factors of 10 to 15 times prior to the 
pandemic. And even more importantly, transits took more than 
three times longer.
    In my view, this was the single most important factor in 
driving inflationary costs. Congress, and specifically this 
Committee, responded to the shipping challenges by passing the 
Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 2022. And since that time, the 
Commission has been busy and engaged in the implementation of 
the Act.
    This summer, the Commission released final rules on 
detention and demurrage and refusals of service. In addition, 
the FMC has put in place a charge complaint process mandated 
through OSRA that allows shippers to file complaints and get 
streamlined resolution for shipper conflicts. Over $12 billion 
were assessed in detention and demurrage by ocean carriers and 
marine terminals over the course of the pandemic, some were 
justified, others were not.
    The FMC is challenged in accommodating the volume of legal 
cases and are currently processing more complaints than at any 
time in our history.
    The FMC is an independent Agency with specialized 
experience in international ocean liner transportation 
services. The Agency is charged with the responsibility of 
administering a law that, in addition to protecting the public 
from unfair practices, provides a focused antitrust regulatory 
regime tailored to factors affecting regularly scheduled 
international ocean shipping trade.
    For the sake of brevity, the FMC's objectives are to 
maintain an open, competitive, and reliable international ocean 
shipping system and to protect the shipping public from 
unlawful, unfair and deceptive ocean shipping practices. I did 
want to identify a few general policy areas that I believe will 
be important as the FMC moves to the future.
    The maritime industry is increasingly tied to the 
efficiencies of their intermodal partners in moving cargo 
through marine terminals and ports and onto the surface 
transportation modes. There are multiple players involved in 
port and maritime terminal management, and throughput 
infrastructure is often a shared venture. Fostering greater 
intermodal connectivity, while addressing societal, 
environmental, and quality-of-life challenges, will continue to 
be at the forefront of any new investments.
    Another area of potential concern, are impacts of 
consolidation. While I believe the ocean shipping market 
remains strongly competitive, I also recognize the need for 
continued vigilance. The U.S. Antitrust guidelines governing 
competition, used by the FMC, can be used to conclude that the 
international ocean liner industry market is very competitive. 
However, we need to continue to require greater scrutiny given 
the nationalization of some of the shipping lines, and the 
economic stakes that could be involved in potential market 
manipulation.
    I would be remiss if I did not mention one area of 
particular concern related to the overall health and long-term 
stability of the international shipping industry, and that is 
the concerted efforts by the People's Republic of China to 
secure market dominance in international shipping. The PRC has 
invested heavily to ensure that China will continue to dominate 
in multiple aspects of maritime trade as an instrument of its 
foreign policy. Chinese Government-controlled companies 
manufacture over 98 percent of the marine containers used in 
world trade, 80 percent of the intermodal shipping chassis used 
in trucking containers, 60 percent of the ships used in the 
international commercial fleet, and over 20 percent of our 
regularly scheduled ocean carrier service providers are 
government-controlled.
    In my view, this issue needs more attention than what we 
can do at the FMC, but it is an expanding risk.
    Chair Cantwell, and Ranking Member Cruz, I want to thank 
you and your staffs again for your courtesies. And I am pleased 
to answer any questions that you have.
    [The prepared statement and biographical information of Mr. 
Bentzel follow:]

 Prepared Statement of Carl W. Bentzel, Nominee to be a Commissioner, 
                    U.S. Federal Maritime Commission
    Chair Cantwell, Ranking Member Cruz and members of the Committee, 
good morning and thank you for the opportunity to appear here before 
you today as a nominee to be Commissioner of the Federal Maritime 
Commission (FMC). I would also thank you both for the courtesies that 
your staff extended to me throughout the nomination process. I would 
like to recognize my Chairman, Dan Maffei and thank him for being here 
in supportive attendance. Most importantly, I would like to recognize 
my wife, Suzanne, who I met and fell for while working here on the 
Commerce Committee. Finally, I would like to thank President Biden for 
nominating me for a second term.
    When I came before this Committee, as a nominee, five years ago, 
the world and the Federal Maritime Commission were in a different 
place. The pandemic had not yet gripped the country. The shipping 
industry although essential to the Nation's economy was invisible to 
the public eye. Then it wasn't. The earliest part of the pandemic 
resulted in reductions of over 20 percent imports of containerized 
cargo through West Coast ports, and then by early summer swung to over 
30 percent increases, a stunning change in demand. During the entirety 
of the pandemic, we saw 27 percent increases of imported containers and 
1 percent increases of exports.
    Movement of enhanced cargo volumes were at first stymied on the 
West Coast with the lack intermodal chassis, and then by intentional 
suppression of container availability, as the Chinese government-
controlled container manufacturers intentionally suppressed production. 
Container shipping lines ultimately were forced to wait off the U.S. 
coast for 1-2 weeks before berthing. The result of congestion and 
enhanced supply needs were that shipping rates were increased on the 
spot market by 10 to 15 times the rate prior to the pandemic, and 
transits took more than three times longer. In my view this was the 
most singularly important factor in driving inflationary cost.
    Congress and specifically this Committee, responded to the shipping 
challenges by passing the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 2022, which the 
President signed into law on June 16, 2022. Since that time, the 
Commission has been busy and engaged in implementing OSRA-22. This 
summer the Commission released two final rules, on Detention and 
Demurrage and the second a rule on Refusal to Deal or to provide 
service.
    In addition, the FMC has put in place a charge complaint process, 
mandated through OSRA, that allows shippers to file complaints and get 
streamlined resolution to their shipping conflicts. This has been a 
revelation for smaller and larger shippers alike, especially exporters 
that do not have the financial resources to file large scale cases. It 
has also demanded that the ocean carriers come to the table and engage 
in conflict resolution. Over 12 billion dollars was assessed in 
detention and demurrage by ocean carriers and marine terminals over the 
course of the pandemic, while many of these penalties could be 
justified, others were unfairly assessed. The Federal Maritime 
Commission is currently stressed accommodating the volume of legal 
challenges to the evaluation of the reasonableness of penalty 
assessments. We are currently processing more complaints than any other 
time in our history.
    The FMC is an independent agency with specialized experience in the 
international ocean transportation industry. The agency is charged with 
the responsibility of administering a law that, in addition to 
protecting the public from unfair practices, provides a focused 
antitrust regulatory regime tailored to factors affecting regularly 
scheduled international ocean shipping trade. Under the Shipping Act of 
1984, as amended by the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 1998, Congress 
found that collaborative joint venture agreements between and among 
ocean carriers and marine terminal operators may and can provide 
efficiencies and reduced costs that ultimately benefit U.S. importers 
and exporters and save the U.S. consumer money. The Commission's 
responsibility is to review agreements and determine that they do not 
unreasonably reduce competition or increase transportation costs. The 
FMC reviews and continues to actively monitor these joint 
collaborations and agreements under the Shipping Act to ensure that 
pro-competitive efficiencies and cost savings are obtained for the 
benefit of U.S. consumers.
    The FMC also engages in a variety of activities to protect the 
public from financial harm, including licensing, registration, and 
monitoring the practices of intermediaries and implementing financial 
bond requirements for over 6,000 ocean transportation intermediaries 
(OTI). Our statutes require the FMC to investigate and prosecute 
unreasonable or unjust practices or rules on private party complaints 
alleging Shipping Act violations. These activities contribute to the 
competitiveness, integrity, fairness, and efficiency of the Nation's 
import and export supply chains and the ocean transportation system.
    The FMC has authority under the Foreign Shipping Practices Act of 
1988, and Section 19 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 to evaluate the 
practices of foreign governments to determine whether they are 
unfavorable or discriminatory. The FMC is authorized to take certain 
actions in response to the discriminatory practices of foreign 
governments, after investigation and due process, to help address anti-
competitive discriminatory foreign shipping practices. Finally, the FMC 
is required to impose certain additional protections with respect to 
foreign carriers that are operate under government control to ensure 
that they do not engage in predatory pricing practices.
    In sum, the FMC's objectives are to maintain an open, competitive 
reliable international ocean shipping system, and protect the shipping 
public from unlawful, unfair and deceptive ocean shipping practices.
    It is with great pleasure and honor that I was re-nominated for 
this position. In 1995, I was hired to work as a Senior Counsel for the 
Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation where I worked 
for Senators Hollings, Breaux and Inouye on maritime and surface 
transportations issues. During this time, we worked closely and on a 
bi-partisan basis with Senators Stevens and Lott to deregulate ocean 
shipping requirements to allow confidential shipping contracts, and to 
furnish the current regulatory structure governing international ocean 
liner shipping and FMC operations today. The Ocean Shipping Reform Act 
of 1998 was a landmark change in the way we regulate ocean shipping, 
where I believe we adequately balanced the need for a more competitive 
regulatory environment with a proper degree of oversight.
    My time spent as a staffer working for the Senate Commerce 
Committee was a work career highlight and gave me opportunities to 
learn more about the maritime industry than perhaps any other 
employment position. I have had the opportunity to experience 
firsthand, port and marine terminal operations, visit shipping lines to 
understand their logistics challenges, and garner a greater 
understanding of intermodal trucking and rail issues pertaining to 
services through our ports. I feel graced to have had this opportunity.
    While it would not be appropriate to comment on specific areas 
where the FMC is currently considering policy, I did want to identify a 
few general policy areas that I believe will be important for the FMC 
as the agency moves forward to the future.
    The maritime industry is increasingly tied to the efficiencies of 
their intermodal partners in moving cargo through marine terminals and 
ports and onto the surface transportation modes of trucking and rail. 
There are multiple players involved in port and maritime terminal 
management, and throughput infrastructure is often a shared venture. 
Freight volume increases, while providing economic benefit, also carry 
with it negative impact on surrounding community's environmental 
quality.
    Another area of potential concern are the impacts of consolidation. 
However, I believe that the ocean shipping market remains strongly 
competitive, but also recognize the need for continued vigilance. The 
U.S. antitrust guidelines governing competition utilized by the FMC in 
consideration of filed agreements generally can be used to conclude 
that the international ocean liner industry market is very competitive, 
but I believe that we need to continue to require greater scrutiny 
given the nationalization of some of the shipping lines, and the 
economic stakes that could be involved in potential market 
manipulation.
    I would be remiss if I did not mention some of the macro-supply 
chain challenges that are and will continue to stress the shipping 
industry and will cause competitive impacts and reduce efficiency of 
our supply chain.
    First, the People's Republic of China (PRC) has invested heavily to 
ensure that China will continue to dominate in multiple aspects of 
maritime trade as an instrument of foreign policy. Chinese government-
controlled companies manufacture, conservatively, over 98 percent of 
the marine containers used in world trade, 80 percent of the intermodal 
shipping chassis used in trucking containers, 60 percent of the ships 
used in the international commercial trade. Over 20 percent of our 
regularly scheduled ocean carrier service providers are Chinese 
government controlled. We need to continually scrutinize this market 
for potential market abuse to protect against what has already been 
established as Chinese market dominance.
    Secondly, Red Sea shipping attacks on innocent merchant shipping 
and the effective closure of the Suez Canal are actions with 
international consequence, and I do not believe that the public 
understands the costs to world economies that we are already paying as 
result of international inaction. International will seems to be 
lacking. The Red Sea shipping route is an international maritime 
superhighway, could you imagine the reaction if a terrorist 
organization highjacked usage of I-95--but that's what is essentially 
happening.
    Finally, an International Maritime Organization (IMO) rule, 
commonly referred to as ``IMO 2050'', requires ocean carriers reach an 
enhanced common ambition to achieve net-zero GHG emissions from 
international shipping by or around, i.e., close to, 2050. While I 
believe that the target is attainable and support the target, I am 
concerned that implementation of the new requirements will shift the 
fuel used in maritime transportation from a single petroleum source to 
3 or 4 alternative fuels. We need further assessment to ensure that 
clean energy sourcing can occur, consistent with other societal 
protections and energy use obligations. Ultimately, the market will 
adjust to the new fuel requirements.
    Chair Cantwell and Ranking Member Cruz, if given the privilege of 
continuing to serve as a Federal Maritime Commissioner, I pledge to you 
that I will follow the statutory requirements of the law in an 
objective and unbiased basis. I also pledge to be fully responsive and 
engaged with any demand or request of this Committee as you discharge 
of your legislative and regulatory oversight of the FMC.
    I wish to thank you and your staffs once again, and I am pleased to 
answer any questions that you might have.
                                 ______
                                 
                      a. biographical information
    1. Name (Include any former names or nicknames used): Carl Whitney 
Bentzel.
    2. Position to which nominated: Commissioner, Federal Maritime 
Commission.
    3. Date of Nomination: July 11, 2024.
    4. Address (List current place of residence and office addresses):

        Residence: Information not released to the public.
        Federal Maritime Commission (FMC) (Office) Suite 1026, 800 
        North Capitol St NW, Washington, DC 20573.

    5. Date and Place of Birth: 07/25/1963; Bethesda, MD.
    6. Provide the name, position, and place of employment for your 
spouse (if married) and the names and ages of your children (including 
stepchildren and children by a previous marriage).

        Spouse: Suzanne Marie Bentzel employed by the West Virginia 
        University.
        Children--C.J. Bentzel (21),

    7. List all college and graduate schools attended, whether or not 
you were granted a degree by the institution. Provide the name of the 
institution, the dates attended, the degree received, and the date of 
the degree.

        B.A. Degree (History), St. Lawrence University, 1985

        J.D. Degree, University of Alabama, 1989

        L.L.M. Degree in Admiralty Law, Tulane University, 1990

    8. List all post-undergraduate employment, including the job title, 
name of employer, and inclusive dates of employment, and highlight all 
management-level jobs held and any non-managerial jobs that relate to 
the position for which you are nominated.

        Democrat Counsel for Maritime Policy, House Committee on 
        Merchant Marine and Fisheries (1990-1994).

        Democrat Senior Counsel, Subcommittee on Surface Transportation 
        and Merchant Marine, Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and 
        Transportation (1995-2004).

        Vice President, DCI Group LLC (2004-2014). Partner, SB Capitol 
        Solutions (2014-2016).

        Principal, Bentzel Strategies LLC (2016-2019).

        Commissioner, U.S. Federal Maritime Commission (2019 to 
        present).

    9. Attach a copy of your resume.
    Attached at end of questionnaire.
    10. List any advisory, consultative, honorary, or other part-time 
service or positions with Federal, State, or local governments, other 
than those listed above after 18 years of age.
    Not Applicable.
    11. List all positions held as an officer, director, trustee, 
partner, proprietor, agent, representative, or consultant of any 
corporation, company, firm, partnership, or other business, enterprise, 
educational, or other institution.
    List of entities for whom I consulted:

   Hydrogen Energy California LLC

   Specialized Carrier and Rigging Association

   American Roll-on Roll-off Carriers

   American Task Force Argentina

   CEMEX

   Exxon Mobil

   Great River Economic Development Foundation

   Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA)

   Verizon

   Inspire STEM Coalition

   Intelligent Car Coalition

   DCI Group LLC

    12. Please list each membership you have had after 18 years of age 
or currently hold with any civic, social, charitable, educational, 
political, professional, fraternal, benevolent or religiously 
affiliated organization, private club, or other membership 
organization. (For this question, you do not have to list your 
religious affiliation or membership in a religious house of worship or 
institution.). Include dates of membership and any positions you have 
held with any organization. Please note whether any such club or 
organization restricts membership on the basis of sex, race, color, 
religion, national origin, age, or disability.

        Propeller Club of Washington DC (2008-2012, est.)

        Country Club at Woodmore (2004 to present)

        Both organizations do not discriminate.

    13. Have you ever been a candidate for and/or held a public office 
(elected, non-elected, or appointed)? If so, indicate whether any 
campaign has any outstanding debt, the amount, and whether you are 
personally liable for that debt.
    Not applicable.
    14. List all memberships and offices held with and services 
rendered to, whether compensated or not, any political party or 
election committee within the past ten years. If you have held a paid 
position or served in a formal or official advisory position (whether 
compensated or not) in a political campaign within the past ten years, 
identify the particulars of the campaign, including the candidate, year 
of the campaign, and your title and responsibilities.
    Not applicable.
    15. Itemize all political contributions to any individual, campaign 
organization, political party, political action committee, or similar 
entity of $200 or more for the past ten years.

        Joe Manchin ($2516)

        Cheri Bustos ($500)

        Rick Nolan ($500)

        Garret Graves ($1500)

        Sam Graves ($1000)

        Shelley Moore Capito ($250)

        Patrick McHenry ($500)

        Dan Lipinski ($500)

    16. List all scholarships, fellowships, honorary degrees, honorary 
society memberships, military medals, and any other special recognition 
for outstanding service or achievements.

        Coast Guard's Medal for Meritorious Public Service
        Maritime Security Council's Man of the Year Award

    17. List each book, article, column, letter to the editor, Internet 
blog posting, or other publication you have authored, individually or 
with others. Include a link to each publication when possible. If a 
link is not available, provide a digital copy of the publication when 
available.
    Prior to my position as Commissioner, I published the following 
materials related to my expertise in maritime shipping, transportation 
and energy, and have included access to these materials below.
Book:
        McGraw-Hill's Handbook on Homeland Security, port security 
        chapter, (chapter 36).
Op-Eds:
   Security in U.S. ports is severely lagging 3/1/2006:
        https://maritime-executive.com/article/2006-03-01commentary-by-
        carl-benzel-on-dubai-por

   All of the Above Transportation Funding 3/17/2017:
        https://morningconsult.com/opinions/transportation-funding-its-
        all-of-the-above/

   Trump Should Reverse Obama-Era South Atlantic Oil and Gas 
        Restrictions
        4/07/2017
        https://morningconsult.com/opinions/trump-reverse-obama-era-
        south-atlantic-oil-gas-restictions/

   It's Not About a Wall, but It Is All About Over, Under, 
        Around, and Through 11/27/2017:
        https://morningconsult.com/opinions/its-not-about-a-wall-but-
        it-is-about-over-around-under-through/

    As Federal Maritime Commissioner I have issued the following two 
reports:

   Assessment of the People's Republic of China's Control of 
        Container and Intermodal Chassis Report:
        https://www.fmc.gov/wpcontent/uploads/2022/03/
        ContainerandChassisManu-
        facturingFinalReport.pdf

   Maritime Transportation Data Initiative (MTDI) Views and 
        Report:
        content/upioads/2023/04/MTDIReportandViews.pdf

    18. List all speeches, panel discussions, and presentations (e.g., 
PowerPoint) that you have given on topics relevant to the position for 
which you have been nominated. Include a link to each publication when 
possible. If a link is not available, provide a digital copy of the 
speech or presentation when available.
    During the course of my close to fifteen-year work experience in 
both the House of Representatives and the Senate, I was asked on 
average about five times a year to provide legislative update speeches 
to groups involved in maritime and transportation policy. All speeches 
were given under the constraints of my professional obligations to the 
House and Senate Committees where I worked. All remarks that I made 
were made off of the cuff, and I do not have notes either. I have 
attached Internet access to all speeches and events that I could 
readily locate that discussed my comments.

        http://www.thebreakingnews.com/files/articles/
        ncorpcharlestontranscript.pdf. National Council on Readiness 
        and Preparedness (port security on 11/30/2006)

        https://www.upi.com/Washington-Agenda-GeneraU627910216632l6/ 
        Center for Strategic and International Studies holds a program 
        with U.S. Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta to discuss 
        Post-9/11 Environment. (port security on 5/20/2002)

        http://www.tvworldwide.com/events/hdi/070307/ Border, Maritime 
        and
        Transportation Security Conference (port security on 3/7/2007)

        https://m.marinelog.com/docs/MLEGMMIV/mle2MMIV2.html Marine Log
        Conference (maritime legislative update on 9/23/2004)

        https://www.truckinginfo.com/108276/in-the-end-truckers-costs-
        are-shippers-costs-too NIT League panel discussion (trucking 
        driver shortage on 5/23/2012)

        http://www.island.lk/2004/07/05/busine06.html Washington Press 
        Club
        Panel Discussion (port security on 5/7/2004)

    During the course of my close to five-year work experience on the 
Federal Maritime Commission, I was asked on average about three to five 
times a month to provide maritime policy and maritime regulatory policy 
update speeches to groups involved in maritime and transportation 
policy. All speeches were given under the constraints of my 
professional obligations as a Federal Maritime Commissioner. I have 
included my schedule of speaking events, however, most remarks that I 
made were made off of the cuff, I have attached any power point 
presentations that are still accessible as. I have attached Internet 
access to all speeches and events that I could readily locate that 
discussed my comments.
    19. List all public statements you have made during the past ten 
years, including statements in news articles and radio and television 
appearances, which are on topics relevant to the position for which you 
have been nominated, including dates. Include a link to each statement 
when possible. If a link is not available, provide a digital copy of 
the statement when available.
    Below is a list of speaking engagements to industry groups. The 
topics have typically been educating on the FMC mission, pandemic and 
supply chain disruptions, Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 2022 (OSRA-22) 
Maritime Transportation Data Initiative (MTDI) and general agency and 
industry updates. Many of my presentations had a standard power point 
document, prepared to provide structure to the discussion. I have 
linked these presentations with the speaking engagement whenever 
possible.

   January 8, 2020. Speaking Engagement Port of Houston. I 
        accompanied a fellow Commissioner and provided general comments 
        and background on myself as a new Commissioner. (Houston, TX).

   Sept 22, 2020. Charleston Maritime Exchange (1647 King 
        Street St. Extension). No prepared remarks but provided 
        comments on my background working with the S.C. delegation as a 
        staffer for the Commerce Committee and to former Chairman 
        Hollings. (Charleston, SC).

   October 22, 2020. U.S. Department of Commerce. Supply Chain 
        Advisory Committee Meeting Inland Waterway)

   February 16, 2021. National Association of Waterfront 
        Employers (NAWE) Keynote Presentation. NAWE

   February 18, 2021. American Association of Port Authorities 
        (AAPA). Communications, Administration & Legal Issues Seminar--
        Carl Bentzel Recording Session (Detention and Demurrage)

   February 18, 2021, Agriculture Transportation Coalition. 
        USDA Ag Shipper Workshop w/FMC Commissioners Bentzel and Maffei 
        (No prepared remarks).

   February 22, 2021. The State of Shipping, featuring 
        Commissioner Carl Bentzel of the Federal Maritime Commission 
        National Association of Chemical Distributors (NACD) 
        presentation and conversation with shipping industry subjects 
        that may include the shipping delays, customer service, rate 
        increases, port issues, and more.

   March 4, 2021. AAPA Anywhere: Winter Security Committee 
        Meeting

   March 18, 2021. European Maritime Law Organization (EMLO) 
        ``U.S. Maritime Policy Under the Biden Administration: 
        Continuity or Change?'' The other panelists include Bill Doyle 
        (port focus) and R. Adm. Mike Rodriguez.

   March 18, 2021. National Industrial Transportation League 
        (NITL) Summit presentation (No prepared remarks)

   March 30, 2021. In Conversation with FMC's Commissioner Carl 
        Bentzel--Demurrage and Detention & Managing Port Operations

   May 10, 2021. Institute of Scrap Recycling Industries Board 
        meeting;

   May 12, 2021. Five California District Export Councils 
        Virtual Meeting Virtual Capitol Summit (CalChamber--CA 
        Legislative Issues Summit)

   June 3, 2021. TIA Airfreight & International Logistics 
        Conference Quarterly Meeting Featuring Commissioner Bentzel, 
        FMC

   June 24, 2021. American Trucking Association (ATA) IMCC 
        Board Presentation regarding FMC priorities and discuss key 
        motor carrier concerns.

   July 15, 2021. Steptoe Supply Chain University

   July 26, 2021. DISCUS Webinar on International Shipping with 
        the Federal Maritime Commission (Join DISCUS for a conversation 
        with Federal Maritime Commissioner Carl W. Bentzel to discuss 
        FMC's role in addressing the various challenges facing 
        importers and exporters, such as demurrage and detention 
        practices, increased freight costs, container shortages, and 
        port delays.

   August 11, 2021. NACD Board Meeting: (San Antonio TX)

   August 25, 2021. State of Shipping U.S. Exporters 
        Competitive Maritime Council (ECMC)

   August 25, 2021. Commissioner Bentzel Meeting with Global 
        Soy Trade Exchange and Specialty Grains Conference (St. Louis, 
        MO)

   August 30, 2021. Roundtable, ``Build Back Better--the Supply 
        Chain'' (Port of Oakland).

   September 1, 2021. Stakeholder Roundtable on Data 
        Transparency with Commissioner Bentzel and Congressman 
        Lowenthal Mario Cordero and Gene Seroka, 415 W. Ocean Blvd., 
        Long Beach, CA 90802 (No prepared remarks--this was a listening 
        session).

   September 17, 2021. Tulane Maritime Law Society Virtual 
        Presentation by Federal Maritime Commissioner--Carl Bentzel on 
        Maritime Law Industry

   September 24, 2021. American Pyrotechnics Association Annual 
        Convention (Keynote Speaker) San Antonio TX)

   September 28, 2021. American Automotive Leasing Association 
        Annual Meeting (Keynote) Houston, TX)

   September 29, 2021. Breakbulk Conference Speech (Houston, 
        TX).

   October 5, 2021. Cal Chamber (Zoom meeting re Port 
        Congestion)

   October 13, 2021. NYSHEX Symposium (Washington DC)--General 
        Remarks on the history of shipping act reauthorization bills 
        (no prepared remarks).

   October 14, 2021--Private Railcar Food and Beverage 
        Association Meeting--What's Going On With Ocean Freight?

   October 23, 2021--Wine and Spirits Shippers Association 
        (WSSA) (Savanah, GA).

   November 8, 2021--International Chemical Trade Association 
        (What's Going On With Ocean Freight?). (no prepared remarks).

   November 15, 2021. Port and Ocean Shipping Task Force 
        Webinar (National Association of Manufacturers Port Task 
        Force). (no prepared remarks).

   November 29, 2021. NTD News Business Interview with 
        Commissioner Bentzel

   January 26, 2022. American Ship Brokers Association Annual 
        General Meeting in NYC (Keynote Speaker)

   February 15, 2022. Keynote Speaker The National Association 
        of Foreign-Trade Zones (NAFTZ) 2022 Legislative Summit 
        (Washington, DC)

   February 25, 2022. Keynote Remarks Ecosystem of the American 
        Maritime Industry (Teams)

   February 28, 2022. Trans-Pacific Maritime (TPM) Conference 
        Speaking Engagement (with Peter Tirshwell) (Long Beach, CA).

   March 17, 2022. The National Association of Maritime 
        Organizations (NAMO) (to speak on MTDI) (Washington, DC). (no 
        prepared remarks).

   May 2, 2022. Intermodal Association of North America 
        Education Session (Chicago, IL).

   May 10, 2022. AASHTO Water Transportation Council on the 
        Assessment of the People's Republic of China's Control of 
        Container and Intermodal Chassis Manufacturing Report (Zoom).

   May 14, 2022. Transportation Lawyers Association Annual 
        Conference (Keynote) Williamsburg, VA

   May 15, 2022. World Ports Conference Talk on Maritime 
        Transportation Data Initiative (MTDI) (Vancouver BC).

   June 7, 2022. Call with Retail Industry Leaders Assn 
        (RILA)--member companies (BCOs)

   June 9, 2022. Maritime Trades Department speaking engagement 
        (Philadelphia)

   June 15, 2022. USA Poultry & Egg Export Council Annual 
        Meeting (Keynote) (TEAMS)

   July 11, 2022. Commissioner Bentzel Interview with Digital 
        Container Shipping Association (DCSA).

   September 22, 2022. Chamber of Commerce's Transportation 
        Infrastructure Logistics Committee

   September 30, 2022. Utah Chamber of Commerce (Washington DC)

   October 6, 2022. Lunch Keynote Speaker--Maritime Security 
        Symposium (Navy League Event) (NY, NY).

   October 17, 2022. AAPA Legislative Policy Committee (LPC) on 
        MTDI, Orlando, FL.

   November 3, 2022. NYSHEX Annual Conference Panel (MTDD (NY, 
        NY).

   December 15, 2022. NAWE Annual Conference

   January 4, 2023. Specialty Soy and Grains Alliance Remarks 
        (prerecorded).

   February 2, 2023. NY/NJ Foreign Freight Forwarders 
        Association in Jersey City

   February 7, 2023. American Chemistry Council Board Rail, 
        Transportation and Infrastructure Committee (no prepared 
        remarks).

   February 15, 2023. Department of Commerce Supply Chain 
        Advisory Committee (OSRA-22 Implementation) (no prepared 
        remarks).

   February 27, 2023. TPM Keynote Discussion (OSHRA-22 
        Implementation) (no prepared remarks). (Long Beach, CA).

   March 13-17, 2023. Ports of Antwerp and Rotterdam Europe 
        Trip (Meeting with EU on MTDI and DCSA Standards Committee on 
        MTDI)

     March 15th--Commissioner Bentzel MTDI Presentation to 
            Digital Container Association Board of Directors, 
            Amsterdam, Netherlands.

   April 5, 2023. Creating Standards for Port Optimization 
        Systems--Port of the Future Conference (Houston, TX).

   April 18, 2023. Institute of Scrap Recycling Industries 
        Convention & Exposition Maritime Transportation Data Initiative 
        (MTDI Recommendation, Memphis, TN

   April 24, 2023. OMSA Membership and Board of Directors 2023 
        Spring Conference (Washington, DC). (no prepared remarks).

   April 25, 2023. Construction Industry Supply Chain 
        Roundtable (Washington, DC) (no prepared remarks).

   April 26, 2023. Cargomatic Fireside Chat (zoom)

   April 27, 2023. Chamber of Commerce Infrastructure Committee 
        (Washington, DC). (no prepared remarks).

   May 16, 2023. Ocean Carrier Equipment Management Association 
        (OCEMA) Lunch Speaker (Washington, DC). (no prepared remarks).

   May 23, 2023. Freight Buyers Club Interview (Mike King). (no 
        prepared remarks).

   June 16, 2023. American Cotton Shippers Association 
        (``ACSA'') Keynote, Park City, Utah

   September 11, 2023. NCBFAA Annual Government Affairs 
        Conference (GAC) (Washington, DC)

   September 12, 2023. Global Shipping Crime Conference 
        (USDOT). (no prepared remarks).

   October 5, 2023. Maritime Security Conference (NY, NY). (no 
        prepared remarks).

   October 11, 2023. NITL Engage Conference--The Supply Chain 
        Nexus: A Forward Thinking Conversation with FMC, STB and DOT 
        (Columbus, OH).

   October 31, 2023. Houston International Maritime 
        Conference--How OSRA Continues to Impact the Industry 2nd 
        Annual Houston International (Houston, TX).

   November 1, 2023. ASTM--Maritime Transportation Data 
        Initiative (MTDI Preliminary Recommendations And Next Steps

   November 3, 2023. NYSHEX Ocean Strategy Forum (NY, NY)

   November 7, 2023. Legal/Regulatory Hot Topics: A 
        Conversation with Commissioner Bentzel (Health & Personal Care 
        Logistics Conference) (Chicago)

   December 5, 2023. Harnessing and Harmonizing Data Through 
        Information Sharing FMC Commissioner Carl W. Bentzel Smart 
        Digital Ports of the Future Conference 2023--Halifax, Canada

   February 28, 2024. Supply Chain & Logistic Summit, PR 
        Manufacturers Association (Keynote speaker) San Juan, Puerto 
        Rico. (no prepared remarks).

   March 13, 2024. Illinois Trucking Association (Teams 
        meeting). (no prepared remarks).

   March 27, 2024. Participant in Port of Gulfport, MS 
        Roundtable (see linked agenda. No prepared remarks)

   May 1, 2024. Brief Remarks at ZEBOX (Arlington, VA) (no 
        prepared remarks)

   May 14, 2024. Northwest Seaport Alliance-Peak Season 
        Planning Conference presentation

   May 15, 2024. Expeditors State of the Industry, Key Note 
        Presentation (Seattle, WA)

   May 22-23, 2024. Crossroads of the World Summit, Utah 
        Chamber of Commerce Participant (no prepared remarks. Agenda 
        linked)

   July 31, 2024. AgTC-USDA Ag Shipper Workshop: Federal 
        Maritime Commissioner Carl Bentzel (No prepared remarks)

   August 19, 2024. National Shipper Advisory Committee--August 
        2024 Meeting (No prepared remarks)

    During my term as an FMC Commissioner, I provided regular updates 
on Road Dog Trucking (channel 146) featuring Mark Willis (Road Dog 
News) and Dan Ronan (Transport Topics) on industry conditions and 
issues of the day. My remarks have been my own and not of the FMC. The 
general issues I have discussed over the past four years have been 
pandemic shipping and supply chain conditions, passage and deliberation 
of the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 2022, the Maritime Transportation 
Data Initiative (MTDI); Detention and Demurrage (D&D). Below are the 
dates that I have appeared on Trucker Radio. The clips are only posted 
for three days after the appearance.

   February 13, 2020--Road Dog Trucking (channel 146) featuring 
        Mark Willis

   May 7, 2020--Road Dog Trucking (channel 146) featuring Mark 
        Willis

   May 12, 2020-Road Dog Trucking (channel 146) Dan Ronan--
        Transport Topics

   July 13, 2020--Road Dog Trucking (channel 146) featuring 
        Mark Willis

   January 12, 2021--Road Dog Trucking (channel 146) Dan 
        Ronan--Transport Topics

   March 15, 2021--Road Dog Trucking (channel 146) Dan Ronan--
        Transport Topics

   April 17, 2021--Road Dog Trucking (channel 146) featuring 
        Mark Willis

   June 21, 2021--Road Dog Trucking (channel 146) featuring 
        Mark Willis

   September 15, 2021--Road Dog Trucking (channel 146) 
        featuring Mark Willis

   October 21, 2021--Road Dog Trucking (channel 146) featuring 
        Mark Willis

   March 15, 2022--Road Dog Trucking (channel 146) Dan Ronan--
        Transport Topics

   June 6, 2022--Road Dog Trucking (channel 146) featuring Mark 
        Willis

   June 21, 2022--Road Dog Trucking (channel 146) Dan Ronan--
        Transport Topics (Passage of OSRA-22)

   June 24, 2022--Road Dog Trucking (channel 146) featuring 
        Mark Willis (Passage of OSRA-22)

   August 23, 2022--Road Dog Trucking (channel 146) Dan Ronan--
        Transport Topics

   October 11, 2022--Road Dog Trucking (channel 146) featuring 
        Mark Willis

   December 19, 2022--Road Dog Trucking (channel 146) featuring 
        Mark Willis

   May 8, 2023, Interview w/Dan Ronan on Dave Nemo Show 
        (Trucker Radio-146)

   October 23, 2023--Road Dog Trucking (channel 146) featuring 
        Mark Willis

   March 12, 2024--Road Dog Trucking (channel 146) featuring 
        Mark Willis

   April 22, 2024--Road Dog Trucking (channel 146) featuring 
        Mark Willis

   May 6, 2024--Road Dog Trucking (channel 146) featuring Mark 
        Willis

   August 1, 2024--Road Dog Trucking (channel 146) featuring 
        Mark Willis

    Additional Radio and TV appearances, news articles, and statements:

   January 23, 2020. FMC's newest commissioner dives into role

   October 7, 2020. Commissioner Bentzel Tours South Atlantic 
        Ports

   December 06, 2021. FMC Commissioner Bentzel's grade on U.S. 
        logistics system: D-plus

   January 28, 2021. Rural Radio Interview David Nelson 
        Interview (Live)

   Feb 9, 2021. Commissioner Bentzel Interview with Brian 
        Sullivan (NBC) Empty Containers

   March 9, 2021. Demurrage, Detention & Managing Port 
        Operations: A Conversation with FMC's Commissioner Carl Bentzel

   May 11, 2021. Rural Radio on CA Port--export issues (live)

   June 15, 2021. Chairman Maffei and Commissioner Bentzel Tour 
        the Port of New York and New Jersey, Meet with Stakeholders on 
        Cargo Operations and FMC Enforcement Priorities

   September 16, 2021. Commissioner Bentzel hosts two 
        roundtables in California, meets with Supply Chain Stakeholders 
        and Federal and State Officials

   November 12, 2021. Letter of Commissioners Carl Bentzel and 
        Louis Sola to Secretary Janet Yellen

   The Beacon Winter 2021 Online-OP/ED The Health of Our 
        Maritime Industry Will Lead Our Economy Back

   November 18, 2021. Why Utah is positioned to move goods 
        throughout the West and beyond Federal maritime commissioner 
        docks in Utah to talk supply chain issues

   November 29, 2021. NTD Business Commissioner on New Plan to 
        Improve Supply Chain Data Sharing

   December 8, 2021. Commissioner Bentzel Hosts Inaugural 
        Meeting of FMC Data Initiative

   March 30, 2022. Statement by Commissioner Bentzel On the 
        release of the Assessment of the People's Republic of China's 
        Control of Container and Intermodal Chassis Manufacturing

   April 1, 2022. China's chassis, container role 'entrenched' 
        by government: FMC's Bentzel

   April 5, 2022. Commissioner Bentzel Interview with John 
        Gallagher (FreightWaves) on Data Initiative

   April 25,2022. What the Truck (12:02-12:10) (Radio 
        Interview)

   May 20, 2022. Statement of Commissioner Bentzel Summarizinv; 
        Remarks Delivered to the International Association of Ports and 
        Harbors on the Maritime Transportation Data Initiative and the 
        need for Continuing Engagement on National & Global Data 
        Standards

   Aug 9, 2022. by The Maritime Executive Bentzel: Buildup of 
        Empties at East Coast Ports Near ``Emergency Level''

   September 29, 2022. Statement by Commissioner Bentzel On 
        Surface Transportation Board Testimony On Kansas City Southern 
        and Canadian Pacific Merger

   October 18, 2022. FMC Commissioner Carl Bentzel Proposes 
        Rule Emphasizing Transparency

   Decem her 1, 2022. Statement of Commissioner Carl Bentzel on 
        Coalition for Reimagined Mobility Report: Solving the Global 
        Supply Chain Crisis with Data Sharing

   December 7, 2022. Statement by Commissioners Bentzel and 
        Sola Following Meetings with Gulf Coast Region

   December 8, 2022. Statement by Commissioners Bentzel and 
        Vekich on Amending Statutes Governing Review of VOCC and MTO 
        Agreements

   March 31, 2023. Statement of Commissioner Carl W. Bentzel On 
        Meeting with the Digital Container Shipping Association (DCSA) 
        Board of Directors Regarding a Data Standards Framework for 
        International Container Shipping

   April 3, 2023. Commissioner Bentzel to release final 
        recommendations relating to MTDI soon

   April 12, 2023. Statement of Commissioner Carl Bentzel 
        Concerning the Uyghur Forced Labor Protection Act and Potential 
        Supply Chain Disruptions

   May 2, 2023. FMC Commissioner Calls for Transparency in 
        Shipping Industry

   August 23,2023. Statement of Commissioner Carl W. Bentzel on 
        the Release of the Maritime Transportation Data Initiative 
        (MTDD Request for Information (RFI)

   February 7, 2024. Opening Statement of Commissioner Carl 
        Bentzel at Informal Hearing of the Federal Maritime Commission 
        Examining Impacts to Shipping Resulting from Current Conditions 
        in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden Regions

   February 20, 2024. Statement of Commissioner Carl W. Bentzel 
        on his IAMPE ``Port Perspectives'' Podcast Interview

   February 23, 2024. Statement of Commissioner Carl W. Bentzel 
        on the Demurrage and Detention Billing Requirements Final Rule

   March 1, 2024--Can anyone crack China's monopoly on shipping 
        containers?

   March 18, 2024--What the Truck?

   March 19, 2024--AAPA Commissioner's Seminar (No prepared 
        remarks)

   April 2, 2024 Statement By Commissioner Carl W. Bentzel on 
        the Puerto Rico Manufacturers Association's Inaugural Supply 
        Chain & Logistic Summit

   April 16, 2024 Statement by Commissioner Carl W. Bentzel On 
        The Release of the Second Request for Information for the 
        Maritime Transportation Data Initiative

   April 22, 2024 Commissioner Carl Bentzel's call to action to 
        supply chain stakeholders--2nd RFI

   April 23, 2024--Statement of Commissioner Carl W. Bentzel on 
        Letter to President Biden on Suggested Relief for Impacted 
        Workers and Companies Due to the Francis Scott Key Bridge 
        Collapse

   June 4, 2024 By Land and By Sea podcast

   June 11, 2024 Statement of Commissioner Carl W. Bentzel on 
        the Northwest Seaport Alliance Peak Planning Session 
        participation and Expeditors Keynote speech

   July 26, 2024--Statement of Commissioner Carl W. Bentzel on 
        The Refusal to Deal Final Rule

    20. List all digital platforms (including social media and other 
digital content sites) on which you currently or have formerly operated 
an account, regardless of whether or not the account was held in your 
name or an alias. Include the full name of an ``alias'' or ``handle'', 
including the complete URL and usemame with hyperlinks, you have used 
on each of the named platforms. Indicate whether the account is active, 
deleted, or dormant. Include a link to each account if possible.

        LinkedIn:
        https://www.linkedin.com/in/carl-bentzel-2732all/

        Face book:
        https://www.facebook.com/people/Carl-Bentzel/100015626198312

        Twitter:
        https://twitter.com/cbentstrat1

    All accounts are mostly dormant except Linkedln, and none had an 
alias.
    21. Please identify each instance in which you have testified 
orally or in writing before Congress in a governmental or non-
governmental capacity and specify the date and subject matter of each 
testimony.
    Presidential Advisory Commission on Conferences in Ocean Shipping: 
4/1992. I participated as a Congressional Staff Advisor to a Commission 
advising the President as to potential regulatory changes to our system 
of regulating international ocean shipping. https://www.archives.gov/
files/recordsmgmt/rcs/schedules/independent-agencies/rg-0220/nl-220-92-
011_sfl_15.pdf
    Interagency Commission on Crime and Security in U.S. Seaports: Fall 
2000. I participated as a Congressional Staff Advisor to a Commission 
advising the President as to issues related to port security. https://
www.hsdl.org/?abstract&did=437742
    The Coast Guard held a public meeting on 11/9/2012 to receive 
comments on the development of a Facility Security Officer training 
program, pursuant to the requirements of Section 821 of the Coast Guard 
Authorization Act of 2010 (Pub. L.111-281). I testified on behalf of 
the National Association of Waterfront Employers about the issues 
raised in this Federal Register Notice. (https://
www.federalregister.gov/documents/2012/10/ll/2012-25055/facility-
security-officer-training-requirements). I did not provide written 
testimony.
    United States Department of Energy, Quadrennial Energy Review, 
Public Stakeholder Meeting. I testified on a panel on Barge -Waterborne 
Transportation of Energy in the Inland Waterway, Across the Great 
Lakes, and Along Our Nation's Coasts (8/8/2014). https://
www.enen?V.,i;ov/sites/prod/files/20l4/08/f18/
transcript_chicago_ger.pdf
    United States Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation. I 
testified and provided written testimony for my nomination as Federal 
Maritime Commissioner. https://www.commerce.senate.gov/2019/7/
nominations-hearing Nomination Hearing July 24, 2019 (1:15.03)
    Hawaii Public Utilities Commission. In an individual capacity, I 
wrote a letter of testimony in Hawaii P.U.C. Docket No. 2020-0084, 
Emergency Investigative Proceeding Regarding Young Brothers L.L.C. 
Financial Condition, Order No. 374. PUC Case: 2020-0084 (site.com)
    United States Surface Transportation Board. I testified and 
provided testimony, on behalf of myself, in opposition to the Canadian 
Pacific--Kansas City Southern railroad merger. Docket No. FD_36500 
https://www.stb.gov/proceedings-actions/dockets-and-service-lists/
    22. Given the current mission, major programs, and major 
operational objectives of the department/agency to which you have been 
nominated, what in your background or employment experience do you 
believe affirmatively qualifies you for appointment to the position for 
which you have been nominated, and why do you wish to serve in that 
position?
    During the course of my close to fifteen years of service as a 
staffer in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, I was the 
primary Democrat staffer assigned responsibility of overseeing the 
operations of the Federal Maritime Commission (FMC). I handled all 
oversight of their budget and operations functions, and considered 
issues related to any legislation.
    While a House staffer, I participated as a congressional advisor to 
a Presidentially appointed commission reviewing the functions of the 
FMC. While in the Senate, in 1996, I was the primary Democrat staffer 
involved in amending the organic legislative structure governing 
international ocean shipping. I believe that I have a deep and thorough 
knowledge in this area of policy, and I enjoy the continuing ability to 
learn in my role as Commissioner.
    The criticality of the maritime shipping network has become ever 
more salient to me during my time as a Federal Maritime Commissioner 
(FMC). After being appointed and confirmed in 2019 right before the 
pandemic took hold of the country, I systematically witnessed the 
impact our supply chain, ports, terminals and labor play on a daily 
basis. Starting with the toll COVID-19 took on the maritime workforce. 
I worked directly with the White House, MARAD and the Department of 
Health & Human Services to raise awareness and funding for access for 
testing early on in the pandemic and later for vaccinations for 
maritime workers. Coinciding with this effort, I worked with the 
Administration on the tremendous surges of cargo volumes through our 
ports.
    Throughout the pandemic I identified choke point challenges 
impacting our supply chain, starting with the realization of our 
Nation's reliance on the Chinese government control of manufacture of 
all international marine containers. I documented this policy failing 
in a report I issued in 2022. I then identified the need for 
harmonization of maritime operational information and data, after 
review of most all major seaport operations as a major impediment and 
cost to the economy, and in large part contributing to the costs of 
inflation. This initiative, started in 2022, was supported by the 
convening of eighteen public meetings on what has become the Maritime 
Transportation Data Initiative. This was followed up by a Final Report 
released last Spring, work continues on this important initiative. I am 
pleased throughout my tenure as a Commissioner to have worked openly 
and transparently with all members of Congress, the Administration and 
the shipping public.
    23. What do you believe are your responsibilities, if confirmed, to 
ensure that the department/agency has proper management and accounting 
controls, and what experience do you have in managing a large 
organization?
    If confirmed, as one of five commissioners serving the Federal 
Maritime Commission, I would have limited authority to manage the 
budget of the agency, as that is reserved for the Chairman of the 
Commission. However, I would have authority to manage the budget of the 
office of a commissioner, and I would pledge to manage the budget 
functions required of the Office of Commissioner in a fiscally prudent 
manner.
    The Chairman of the Federal Maritime Commission is required to 
consult with all Commissioners on major operational issues, and, if re-
nominated, will continue to exercise a role in consultation. In 
addition, I meet at least annually to discuss proper management and 
fiscal controls with the FMC's Office of Inspector General.
    24. What do you believe to be the top three challenges facing the 
department/agency, and why?
    I think the three major challenges facing the FMC are: 1) 
increasing industry consolidation of international maritime shipping 
companies and what that means to the U.S. port and maritime service 
providers and U.S. shippers, 2) the challenges of helping to establish 
the proper regulatory environment to foster the challenge of 
transferring maritime shipments off to their modal railroad and 
trucking partners, importantly including harmonization of standards for 
maritime/intermodal shipping data and, 3) responding to the unique 
challenges posed to global commerce by political and force majeure 
issues impacting international shipping, such as merchant shipping 
attacks in the Red Sea, restrictions on Panama Canal usage, and efforts 
expended by the People's Republic of China to exert control over 
maritime trade.
                   b. potential conflicts of interest
    1. Describe all financial arrangements, deferred compensation 
agreements, and other continuing dealings with business associates, 
clients, or customers. Please include information related to retirement 
accounts, such as a 401(k) or pension plan.
    Not Applicable.
    2. Do you have any commitments or agreements, formal or informal, 
to maintain employment, affiliation, or practice with any business, 
association, or other organization during your appointment? If so, 
please explain.
    Not Applicable.
    3. Indicate any investments, obligations, liabilities, or other 
relationships which could involve potential conflicts of interest in 
the position to which you have been nominated. Explain how you will 
resolve each potential conflict of interest.
    In connection with the nomination process, I have consulted with 
the Office of Government Ethics and the agency's designated agency 
ethics official (DAEO) to identify potential conflicts of interest. Any 
potential conflicts of interest will be resolved in accordance with the 
terms of an ethics agreement that I have entered into with the DAEO and 
that has been provided to this Committee. I am not aware of any other 
potential conflicts of interest.
    All of the investments owned by myself, or my wife are in publicly 
available mutual funds.
    4. Describe any business relationship, dealing, or financial 
transaction which you have had during the last ten years, whether for 
yourself, on behalf of a client, or acting as an agent, that could in 
any way constitute or result in a possible conflict of interest in the 
position to which you have been nominated. Explain how you will resolve 
each potential conflict of interest.
    Not Applicable.
    5. Identify any other potential conflicts of interest and explain 
how you will resolve each potential conflict of interest.
    In connection with the nomination process, I have consulted with 
the Office of Government Ethics and the agency's designated agency 
ethics official (DAEO) to identify potential conflicts of interest. Any 
potential conflicts of interest will be resolved in accordance with the 
terms of an ethics agreement that I have entered into with the DAEO and 
that has been provided to this Committee. I am not aware of any other 
potential conflicts of interest. Commission's regulations and 
requirements governing conflicts of interest, and how they should be 
addressed. I will abide by any agency, or general government standards, 
governing conflicts of interest.
    6. Describe any activity during the past ten years, including the 
names of clients represented, in which you have been engaged for the 
purpose of directly or indirectly influencing the passage, defeat, or 
modification of any legislation or affecting the administration and 
execution of law or public policy.
    Prior to assumption of my current five-year service period as 
Federal Maritime Commissioner, I was involved in the business of 
representing clients and their interests in the execution of 
regulations and policies and legislation. During this five-year time 
frame, I was less involved in lobbying Congress directly on 
legislation, and more involved in issues at Federal agencies.
    Prior to the ten-year time frame and since transitioning from 
service as Senior Counsel on the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science 
and Transportation in 2004, I had been involved in consulting and 
lobbying for companies and Associations that were engaged in 
transportation, infrastructure development, energy or chemical 
regulation. I had also been involved on a more limited basis in 
lobbying and consulting on immigration and environmental policy.
                            c. legal matters
    1. Have you ever been disciplined or cited for a breach of ethics, 
professional misconduct, or retaliation by, or been the subject of a 
complaint to, any court, administrative agency, the Office of Special 
Counsel, an Inspector General, professional association, disciplinary 
committee, or other professional group? If yes:

  a.  Provide the name of court, agency, association, committee, or 
        group;

  b.  Provide the date the citation, disciplinary action, complaint, or 
        personnel action was issued or initiated;

  c.  Describe the citation, disciplinary action, complaint, or 
        personnel action;

  d.  Provide the results of the citation, disciplinary action, 
        complaint, or personnel action.

    Not Applicable.
    2. Have you ever been investigated, arrested, charged, or held by 
any Federal, State, or other law enforcement authority of any Federal, 
State, county, or municipal entity, other than for a minor traffic 
offense? If so, please explain.
    Yes, in 1990, after attending a college football game in 
Greenville, North Carolina, Pitt County. I was arrested and convicted 
of a DUI. I complied with the terms of my sentence, and since then, 
other than minor traffic violations have had no further legal issues.
    3. Have you or any business or nonprofit of which you are or were 
an officer ever been involved as a party in an administrative agency 
proceeding, criminal proceeding, or civil litigation? If so, please 
explain. No.
    4. Have you ever been convicted (including pleas of guilty or nolo 
contendere) of any criminal violation other than a minor traffic 
offense? If so, please explain.
    Yes. See Question #2 above.
    5. Have you ever been accused, formally or informally, of sexual 
harassment or discrimination on the basis of sex, race, religion, or 
any other basis? If so, please explain. No.
    6. Please advise the Committee of any additional information, 
favorable or unfavorable, which you feel should be disclosed in 
connection with your nomination.
    No further relevant information.
                     d. relationship with committee
    1. Will you ensure that your department/agency complies with 
deadlines for information set by congressional committees, and that 
your department/agency endeavors to timely comply with requests for 
information from individual Members of Congress, including requests 
from me1nbers in the minority? Yes.
    2. Will you ensure that your department/agency does whatever it can 
to protect congressional witnesses and whistleblowers from reprisal for 
their testimony and disclosures? Yes.
    3. Will you cooperate in providing the Committee with requested 
witnesses, including technical experts and career employees, with 
firsthand knowledge of matters of interest to the Committee? Yes.
    4. Are you willing to appear and testify before any duly 
constituted committee of the Congress on such occasions as you may be 
reasonably requested to do so? Yes.
                                 ______
                                 
                            Carl W. Bentzel
                     Federal Maritime Commissioner
FMC Commissioner
Commissioner
December 2019 to Present

Confinned by the Senate and sworn in on December 9. After the onset of 
the Pandemic, immediately went to work assessing the health of the 
maritime industry and supply chain. Worked to establish maritime labor 
as essential workers, streamlining prioritization for testing and 
vaccinations for workforce. Identified the fluidity of containers as 
chassis as key to a balanced supply chain and identifying in a 
nationally recognized report that close to 100 percent of maritime 
containers are manufactured in the PRC. Identified information and data 
sharing as a key component for freight fluidity. Convened 18 pubJic 
meetings with over 80 supply chain experts and issued a report on data 
availability and transmission of information. The result was a Final 
Recommendations and Views Repo11, released in April 2023 is currently 
pending further Commission action. Adjudicated maritime regulatory 
issues under the purview of the Federal Maritime Commission.
Principal
Bentzel Strategies L.L.C.
August 2016-November 2019

Established my own public policy consulting finn focused on policies 
related to transportation, energy and other areas off ederally 
regulated commercial and environmental law. Assess policy issues, 
provide strategic advice, represent client interests on Capitol HiJl 
and before foderal agencies, as well as helping clients develop third 
party alliances. Areas of focus included introducing myself to 
potential press opportunities in strategic areas of interest.
Partner
SB Capitol Solutions L.L.C.
June 2014-August 2016

Partnered with a smaller boutique public relations/lobbying shop 
centrally located on Capitol Hill, primarily focused on transportation 
issues. Helped to develop an active fundraising profile for the firm, 
and re-brand the company.
Vice President
DCI Group L.L.C.
August 2004-June 2014

Led the lobbying division for the DCI Group. DCI Group is one of the 
largest public relations/grassroots lobbying frrms in Washington D.C., 
and I provided political and legislative insight to the firm's larger 
public relations efforts, as well as directly lobbying for DCI's 
clients, and those clients developed on my own. Participated in the 
creation and development of third-party coalitions. Worked to provide 
government relations services for Fortune 50 companies, associations 
and other entities. Focused on realizing the benefits of grassroots 
activism and third-party coalition building supporting policy 
initiatives on Capitol Hill or at Federal agencies.
Senior Counsel
Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation
January 1995-August 2004

Functioned as the primary legislative and policy counsel for the Senate 
Subcommittee on Surface Transportation and Merchant Marine. Explicitly 
assigned to provide legislative counsel and advice to Senators John 
Breaux and Daniel Inouye. Was engaged, in the negotiation and passage 
of all legislation on trucking, railroad, maritime, pipeline and 
hazardous materials transpo1tation legislation, as well as homeland 
security aspects of these modes of transportation. Spearheaded the 
Committee's efforts to pass national standards for port security, and 
an:international treaty on port security, and worked on organic 
homeland security legislation. Handled Committee issues requiring 
national security clearance.
Counsel/Counsel for Maritime Policy
House Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries
August 1990-December 1994

Hired to work as maritime counsel to work on implementation of the Oil 
Pollution Act of 1990, and to cover all issues related to international 
maritime shipping. After an internal Committee transition, was employed 
inanexpanded role to cover all issues relatedto maritime policy, 
including shipping and offshore oil and gas or other resource 
development.
Education
Bachelor of Arts (B.A.), St. Lawrence University, 1985
Juris Doctor (J.D.), University of Alabama School of Law, 1989
Master's degree in law (L.L.M.) in Admiralty Law, 1990
Honors
Coast Guard's Medal for Meritorious Public Service
Maritime Security Council's Man of the Year Award
Publications
McGraw-Hill's Handbook on Homeland Security, pmt security chapter
``Assessment of P.R.C Control of Container and Intermodal Chassis 
Manufacturing.'' March 2022
''Final Recommendations on the Maritime Transportation Data System 
Requirements'' April 2023

    The Chair. Thank you, Mr. Bentzel, and we will definitely 
get to those very important FMC questions, and the Shipping 
Reform Act, and many other things.
    Mr. Chapman, welcome back, welcome back to the Committee.
    Mr. Chapman. Thank you. Thank you.
    The Chair. Thank you for your willingness to serve another 
term.

 STATEMENT OF HON. THOMAS B. CHAPMAN, NOMINEE TO BE A MEMBER, 
              NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD

    Mr. Chapman. Chair Cantwell and Ranking Member Cruz, thank 
you very much for the opportunity to appear before you today. I 
am honored to be nominated by the President to serve a second 
term as a Member of the National Transportation Safety Board.
    I very much appreciate the support of NTSB Board Chair, 
Jennifer Homendy, who is here with us today. And I am grateful 
to my remarkable colleagues at NTSB for all they do to promote 
safety. My work as a board member has been a rewarding 
opportunity to apply my experience and skills in a role 
allowing me to give back through public service.
    Before proceeding, I want to say a few words about the two 
people most important to me, for an important reason I will 
explain, neither of them were able to accompany me today. My 
wife, Scotty O'Connell, is my partner, and my best friend, and 
she has been for these past 38 years. Scotty is currently in 
London with our amazing son, Patrick, helping him to settle 
into what the British call ``a flat''. Next week, Patrick 
begins his course of study in pursuit of a master's degree at 
the London School of Economics, and his old mom and dad could 
not be more proud.
    Madam Chair, my more than four decades of experience, most 
of it in the aviation industry, have prepared me well for the 
tasks I find so fulfilling at NTSB. Throughout my career, I 
have been deeply involved in an extensive range of issues, 
often playing a key role in identifying and negotiating 
resolutions. And in varying degrees, virtually every aspect of 
aviation involves considerations of safety. Consequently, an 
awareness and a sensitivity to a pervasive culture of safety is 
embedded in my professional approach.
    I have sought to bring that perspective to my work as a 
board member in pursuit of the critical safety mission of the 
NTSB. In addition to my experience, I bring at least two 
qualities to the position, which I believe are valuable.
    First, I benefit from an established reputation for 
collegiality and consensus-building. Second, I am committed to 
public service, and I believe that much is expected from those 
who are most fortunate.
    I am an aggressive advocate for the policy positions I am 
professionally obliged or personally committed to represent, 
however, I strive to demonstrate respect and appreciation for 
the views of those with whom I may disagree. And I believe in 
compromise. I take pride in crafting solutions that will 
accommodate, seemingly, conflicting points of view. Many of 
those I consider my most valued professional friends and 
associates are also those with whom I have most significantly 
clashed over past policy disputes.
    As for my commitment to service, I view it as a 
responsibility for those who are fortunate to have prospered 
from professional life in the private sector. Immediately prior 
to joining NTSB, I was privileged to serve for 6 years on the 
staff of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and 
Transportation. In 2014, I left the airline industry and joined 
the Aviation Subcommittee staff in anticipation of the major 
legislative effort required to reauthorize the Federal Aviation 
Administration.
    Throughout my years with the Committee, I worked 
collaboratively with the bipartisan Senate team, and our 
efforts contributed to the passage of various significant 
legislative measures, including the FAA Extension, Safety, and 
Security Act of 2016, and the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018.
    As an NTSB Board Member, I devote much of my attention to 
traffic safety because that is where our greatest safety 
challenges lie. I speak extensively on the Safe System approach 
to traffic safety, pedestrian safety, alcohol and drug 
impairment, and rail worker and highway-rail grade crossing 
hazards. I am especially active on key initiatives to address 
two stubbornly persistent challenges, that is alcohol-impaired 
driving and excessive speed.
    I am proud of the important public policy accomplishments 
to which I have contributed, as a former member of the Commerce 
Committee staff, and since joining the National Transportation 
Safety Board. I welcome the prospect of building on those 
efforts through additional service as a second-term member of 
the NTSB.
    That concludes my formal remarks. And I am happy to respond 
to questions.
    [The prepared statement and biographical information of Mr. 
Chapman follow:]

   Prepared Statement of Thomas B. Chapman, Nominee to be a Member, 
                  National Transportation Safety Board
    Chair Cantwell and Ranking Member Cruz, thank you for the 
opportunity to appear before you today. I am honored to be nominated by 
the President to serve a second term as a Member of the National 
Transportation Safety Board. And I am grateful to my remarkable 
colleagues at NTSB for all they do to promote safety in transportation. 
My work as a Board Member has been a rewarding opportunity to apply my 
experience and skills in a role allowing me to give back through public 
service.
    Before proceeding, I want to say a few words about the two people 
most important to me. For an important reason I will explain, neither 
of them were able to accompany me today. My wife Scotty O'Connell is my 
partner and best friend, and she has been for these past 38 years. 
Scotty is currently in London with our amazing son Patrick, helping him 
to settle in to what the British call a ``flat.'' Next week, Patrick 
begins his course of study in pursuit of a Master's degree at the 
London School of Economics. His old Mom & Dad couldn't be more proud.
    Madam Chair, my more than four decades of experience, most of it in 
the aviation industry, have prepared me well for the tasks I find so 
fulfilling at NTSB. Throughout my career, I have been deeply involved 
in an extensive range of issues, often playing a key role in 
identifying and negotiating resolutions. In varying degrees, virtually 
every aspect of aviation involves considerations of safety. 
Consequently, an awareness and sensitivity to a pervasive culture of 
safety is imbedded in my professional approach. I have sought to bring 
that perspective to my work as a Board Member, in pursuit of the 
critical safety mission of the NTSB.
    In addition to my experience, I bring at least two qualities to the 
position which I believe are valuable. First, I benefit from an 
established reputation for collegiality and consensus building. Second, 
I am committed to public service and believe that much is expected from 
those who are most fortunate.
    I am an aggressive advocate for the policy positions I am 
professionally obliged or personally committed to represent. However, I 
strive to demonstrate respect and appreciation for the views of those 
with whom I may disagree. I believe in compromise, and I take pride in 
crafting solutions that will accommodate seemingly conflicting points 
of view. Many of those I consider my most valued professional friends 
and associates are also those with whom I have most significantly 
clashed over past policy disputes.
    As for my commitment to service, I view it as a responsibility for 
those who are fortunate to have prospered from professional life in the 
private sector. Immediately prior to joining NTSB, I was privileged to 
serve for six years on the staff of the Senate Committee on Commerce, 
Science, & Transportation. In 2014, I left the airline industry and 
joined the Aviation Subcommittee staff in anticipation of the major 
legislative effort required to reauthorize the Federal Aviation 
Administration. Throughout my years with the Committee, I worked 
collaboratively with the bipartisan Senate team. Our efforts 
contributed to passage of various significant legislative measures, 
including the FAA Extension, Safety, and Security Act of 2016 and the 
FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018.
    As an NTSB Board Member, I devote much of my attention to traffic 
safety, because that is where our greatest safety challenges lie. I 
speak extensively on the Safe System Approach to traffic safety, 
pedestrian safety, alcohol and drug impairment, and rail worker and 
highway-rail grade crossing hazards. I am especially active on key 
initiatives to address two stubbornly persistent challenges--alcohol 
impaired driving and excessive speed.
    I am proud of the important public policy accomplishments to which 
I have contributed as a former member of the Commerce Committee staff 
and since joining the National Transportation Safety Board. I welcome 
the prospect of building on those efforts through additional service as 
a second-term member of the National Transportation Safety Board.
    That concludes my formal remarks. I am happy to respond to 
questions.
                                 ______
                                 
                      a. biographical information
    1. Name (Include any former names or nicknames used): Thomas B. 
Chapman.
    2. Position to which nominated: Board Member, National 
Transportation Safety Board.
    3. Date ofNomination: July 31, 2024.
    4. Address (List current place ofresidence and office addresses):

        Residence: Information not released to the public.
        Office: National Transportation Safety Board, 490 L'Enfant 
        Plaza, Washington, DC 20594.

    5. Date and Place of Birth: December 18, 1954; Denver, Colorado.
    6. Provide the name, position, and place of employment for your 
spouse (if married) and the names and ages of your children (including 
stepchildren and children by a previous marriage).

   Married January 25, 1986, to Mary Scott O'Connell 
        (``Scotty''). My wife retired in 2015 from the National Air & 
        Space Museum. She was with the Smithsonian Institution for 25 
        years, nearly all of it at the Air & Space Museum.

   Proud parents of Patrick Thomas O'Connell Chapman, born May 
        31, 2002. Currently pursuing a Master's degree at the London 
        School of Economics. (Age 22)

    7. List all college and graduate schools attended, whether or not 
you were granted a degree by the institution. Provide the name of the 
institution, the dates attended, the degree received, and the date of 
the degree.

        American University Washington College of Law, Washington, D.C.
        Attended September 1979 through May 1982.
        Juris Doctor, May 1982.
        Admitted to the practice of law in Washington, D.C. and 
        Maryland.

        C.W. Post College, Greenvale, N.Y.
        Attended September 1973 through May 1978.
        Bachelor of Fine Arts in Music, May 1978.
        Full participant in Honors Program.
        Areas of concentration: political science, literature, and 
        education.

    8. List all post-undergraduate employment, including the job title, 
name of employer, and inclusive dates of employment, and highlight all 
management-level jobs held and any non-managerial jobs that relate to 
the position for which you are nominated.

        Board Member
        National Transportation Safety Board
        January 2020 to Present.
        Serve as the 46th Member of the National Transportation Safety 
        Board.

        Counsel
        Senate Subcommittee on Aviation Operations, Safety, & Security
        Committee on Commerce, Science, & Transportation
        Senator Bill Nelson, Ranking Member
        July 2014 to January 2020.
        Joined Aviation Subcommittee staff in anticipation of 
        legislative effort to reauthorize the Federal Aviation 
        Administration. Worked collaboratively with bipartisan Senate 
        team throughout the 114th Congress to develop comprehensive FAA 
        Reauthorization bill passed by the Senate in April of 2016. 
        Subsequent negotiations with the House culminated in the FAA 
        Extension, Safety, and Security Act of 2016, passed by Congress 
        in July of 2016. Efforts to agree on long-term, comprehensive 
        legislation continued in the 115th Congress, resulting in 
        passage of the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018, signed into law 
        October 5, 2018. The five-year package negotiated on a 
        bipartisan basis ensured long-term stability and various 
        important reforms of the FAA. It also reauthorized and reformed 
        the Transportation Security Administration and the National 
        Transportation Safety Board.

        Vice President for Government Affairs
        US Airways, Washington, D.C.
        October 2006 to January 2014.
        Recruited to manage Washington, D.C. office for the ``new'' 
        U.S. Airways. Newly established company resulted from 2005 
        merger of former U.S. Airways and America West Airlines. Served 
        as primary Washington representative on legislative matters and 
        contributed significantly to Federal regulatory work and 
        dealing with news media on government affairs matters. During 
        tenure, launched enhanced internal fundraising campaign for US 
        Airways Political Action Committee, doubling the rate of 
        employee participation and tripling PAC financial resources. 
        Heavily involved in developing and implementing government 
        affairs strategies promoting industry consolidation--a company 
        priority. Efforts to promote consolidation helped build 
        foundation for successful agreement merging U.S. Airways and 
        American Airlines, creating the world's largest airline.

        Legislative Counsel
        Southwest Airlines Co., Washington, D.C.
        January 1998 to October 2006.
        Recruited to establish and manage new Washington, D.C. office 
        to represent Southwest Airlines. Establishment of full-time 
        Washington office significantly enhanced the effectiveness of 
        the Company's government affairs efforts. Served as primary 
        Washington representative on legislative and regulatory 
        matters. Frequently called upon to represent the Company in 
        state and local government affairs arena, particularly in the 
        airline's newer east coast destination cities. Helped organize 
        and launch the Company's first ever PAC, the Southwest Airlines 
        Freedom Fund. Dealt with news media on government affairs 
        matters.

        Senior Vice President for Government & Technical Affairs
        Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association, Washington, D.C.
        December 1996 to January 1998.
        Promoted to direct all federal, state, and local government 
        affairs activities for AOPA--a major national association 
        representing interests of over 340,000 members. Managed full-
        time professional staff of eighteen in AOPA's Washington, D.C. 
        and Frederick, Maryland offices. Also managed state and local 
        activities of twelve Regional Representatives. AOPA's 
        government affairs program often cited as among the most active 
        of all national membership associations.

        Vice President & Legislative Counsel
        Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association, Washington, D.C.
        November 1988 to December 1996.
        Promoted to direct Federal and state legislative programs and 
        PAC for AOPA. Managed staff of six in AOPA's Office of 
        Legislative Affairs. During tenure, substantially increased 
        effectiveness and organization of AOPA's legislative programs. 
        Increased PAC fund-raising capability to secure it solidly 
        among 50 largest PACs in the United States.

        State Legislative Counsel
        Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association, Washington, D.C.
        June 1985 to November 1988.
        Promoted to expand and direct AOPA's state legislative program. 
        Coordinated state legislative activities of twelve Regional 
        Representatives.

        Associate Counsel, Office of the General Counsel
        Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association, Washington, D.C.
        May 1982 to June 1985.
        Established and coordinated successful state legislative 
        program for AOPA. Drafted or reviewed all Association contracts 
        and participated heavily in contract negotiations. Responsible 
        for all trademark and copyright issues. Gained experience in 
        broad spectrum of corporate legal matters.

    9. Attach a copy of your resume.
    Attached.
    10. List any advisory, consultative, honorary, or other part-time 
service or positions with Federal, State, or local governments, other 
than those listed above after 18 years of age.
    None to report.
    11. List all positions held as an officer, director, trustee, 
partner, proprietor, agent, representative, or consultant of any 
corporation, company, firm, partnership, or other business, enterprise, 
educational, or other institution.
    None to report other than those listed in response to Question No. 
8, above.
    12. Please list each membership you have had after 18 years of age 
or currently hold with any civic, social, charitable, educational, 
political, professional, fraternal, benevolent or religiously 
affiliated organization, private club, or other membership 
organization. (For this question, you do not have to list your 
religious affiliation or membership in a religious house of worship or 
institution.). Include dates of membership and any positions you have 
held with any organization. Please note whether any such club or 
organization restricts membership on the basis of sex, race, color, 
religion, national origin, age, or disability.
    Member of the 116 Club, a private lunch club located at 234 3rd 
Street, NE, in Washington, DC. Member since 2012.
    I have never been a member of nor have I associated with any club 
or organization which discriminates on the basis of sex, race, color, 
religion, national origin, age, or disability.
    13. Have you ever been a candidate for and/or held a public office 
(elected, non-elected, or appointed)? If so, indicate whether any 
campaign has any outstanding debt, the amount, and whether you are 
personally liable for that debt. No.
    14. List all memberships and offices held with and services 
rendered to, whether compensated or not, any political party or 
election committee within the past ten years. If you have held a paid 
position or served in a formal or official advisory position (whether 
compensated or not) in a political campaign within the past ten years, 
identify the particulars of the campaign, including the candidate, year 
of the campaign, and your title and responsibilities.
    None to report.
    15. Itemize all political contributions to any individual, campaign 
organization, political party, political action committee, or similar 
entity of $200 or more for the past ten years.
    None to report.
    16. List all scholarships, fellowships, honorary degrees, honorary 
society memberships, military medals, and any other special recognition 
for outstanding service or achievements.
    Recognized by the ARC of Frederick County, Maryland for voluntary 
fundraising efforts in support of the organization's programs to help 
people with developmental disabilities.
    Recognized by both the National Parks Service and the Federal 
Aviation Administration for efforts as one of nine members appointed by 
the Clinton Administration to serve on the National Park Overflights 
Working Group. Over a two-year period, the Working Group successfully 
forged a compromise that formed a solid foundation for the FAA to 
develop reasonable regulations applying to scenic air tours over 
National Parks.
    17. List each book, article, column, letter to the editor, Internet 
blog posting, or other publication you have authored, individually or 
with others. Include a link to each publication when possible. If a 
link is not available, provide a digital copy of the publication when 
available.
    I am providing a link to the page on the NTSB website which lists 
each of the blogs and podcasts I have generated during my time as a 
member of the National Transportation Safety Board--
    Blogs & Podcasts: https://safetycompass.wordpress.com/thomas-
chapman/
    Prior to my term at NTSB. Through Internet research and a review of 
my personal files, I was able to identify several articles published in 
my name. In a separate file, I am providing a digital copy of each 
article listed below.
    Additional articles were likely published in my name, especially 
during my tenure on the staff of the Aircraft Owners & Pilots 
Association. However, I no longer have access to that material, nor was 
I able to identify other publications in the course of my research.

   ``Daschle is right about duplicate checks,'' Sioux Falls 
        Argus-Leader, June 3, 1995.

   ``Election `94--Aviation's Political Spectrum,'' AOPA Pilot 
        Magazine, February 1, 1994.

   ``Capitol Dispatch,'' AOPA Pilot Magazine, February 1992.

   ``Taxing Struggles: Legislative Update--1991,'' AOPA Pilot 
        Magazine, February 1991.

   ``State Affairs: 1987 in Review,'' AOPA Pilot Magazine, 
        January 1988.

    18. List all speeches, panel discussions, and presentations (e.g., 
PowerPoint) that you have given on topics relevant to the position for 
which you have been nominated. Include a link to each publication when 
possible. If a link is not available, provide a digital copy of the 
speech or presentation when available.
    I am providing a link to the page on the NTSB website which lists 
each of the speeches I have delivered during my time as a member of the 
National Transportation Safety Board--

        Speeches:
        https://www.ntsb.gov/Advocacy/Activities/Pages/
        activities.aspx?BoardMember
        Name=Thomas%20B.%20Chapman

    I delivered few formal speeches during my career prior to becoming 
an NTSB Board Member. I no longer have copies of those speeches, nor 
was I able to find them via online searches. During those years, I 
participated in significant numbers of panel discussions, conferences, 
and question-and-answer sessions. The instances during which I 
participated in such events are too numerous to recall.
    19. List all public statements you have made during the past ten 
years, including statements in news articles and radio and television 
appearances, which are on topics relevant to the position for which you 
have been nominated, including dates. Include a link to each statement 
when possible. If a link is not available, provide a digital copy of 
the statement when available.
    As an NTSB Board member, it is my responsibility to participate in 
formal Board meetings at which final accident investigation reports are 
discussed and adopted or at which key evidence is sought relevant to a 
pending investigation. Likewise, I regularly participate in and often 
serve as the host for safety advocacy events sponsored by NTSB. I have 
also recorded several public service announcements advocating NTSB's 
position on key safety priorities. Finally, when I ``launch'' with our 
investigators to the scene of a major transportation accident, an 
important part of my role is to serve as the agency spokesperson in 
media briefings conducted during the first few days of the 
investigation.
    These appearances are typically captured on video, and NTSB 
maintains a YouTube channel on which most or all have been posted for 
later viewing.
    I am providing a link to the NTSB YouTube channel: https://
www.youtube.com/user/NTSBgov
    In the wake of these video appearances, Board members are often 
quoted in print media reporting on the topics discussed. This is 
especially the case when I or a fellow Board member conduct a media 
briefing in the early stages of an NTSB investigation of a major 
transportation accident. Such instances are generally numerous and 
difficult to track. For that reason, I am unable to provide a list of 
news articles in which I have been quoted or radio or TV reports which 
have included my recorded remarks.
    Prior to my term at NTSB. For the period prior to my term at NTSB, 
through Internet research and a review of my personal files, I was 
unable to identify any other relevant public statements I made during 
the past ten years.
    20. List all digital platforms (including social media and other 
digital content sites) on which you currently or have formerly operated 
an account, regardless of whether or not the account was held in your 
name or an alias. Include the full name of an ``alias'' or ``handle'', 
including the complete URL and username with hyperlinks, you have used 
on each of the named platforms. Indicate whether the account is active, 
deleted, or dormant. Include a link to each account if possible.

        @tbchapman01
        https://www.instagram.com/tbchapman01/

    21. Please identify each instance in which you have testified 
orally or in writing before Congress in a governmental or non-
governmental capacity and specify the date and subject matter of each 
testimony.
    I am providing a link to the page on the NTSB website which lists 
all of the congressional and state legislative testimony I have 
delivered during my time as a member of the National Transportation 
Safety Board--

        Testimony:
        https://www.ntsb.gov/news/Testimony/Pages/
        testimony.aspx?BoardMember
        Name=Thomas%20B.%20Chapman

    Prior to my term at NTSB. I testified before the Senate Commerce 
Committee at my first confirmation hearing on December 11, 2019.
    To the best of my recollection, I testified before Congress on two 
previous occasions--both prior to 1998, while I was still employed by 
the Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association.
    I represented AOPA at a hearing before the Aviation Subcommittee of 
the House Committee on Public Works & Transportation. I testified 
regarding the impact of the so-called Wright Amendment, which limited 
flights out of Dallas Love Field in the State of Texas. I also 
represented AOPA at a hearing of the Senate Transportation 
Appropriations Subcommittee and testified regarding funding priorities 
for the coming Fiscal Year.
    Despite efforts to identify the details, I am unable to reference 
the precise dates on which these hearings took place.
    22. Given the current mission, major programs, and major 
operational objectives of the department/agency to which you have been 
nominated, what in your background or employment experience do you 
believe affirmatively qualifies you for appointment to the position for 
which you have been nominated, and why do you wish to serve in that 
position?
    I am honored to be nominated to serve a second term as a Member of 
the National Transportation Safety Board. My work as a Board Member has 
been a rewarding opportunity to apply my experience and skills in a 
role allowing me to give back through public service.
    My more than four decades of experience, most of it in the aviation 
industry, have prepared me well for the task. Throughout my career, I 
have been deeply involved in an extensive range of issues, often 
playing a key role in identifying and negotiating resolutions. In 
varying degrees, virtually every aspect of aviation involves 
considerations of safety. Consequently, an awareness and sensitivity to 
a pervasive culture of safety is imbedded in my professional approach. 
I have sought to bring that perspective to my work as a Board Member, 
in pursuit of the critical safety mission of the NTSB.
    In addition to my experience, I bring at least two qualities to the 
position which I believe are valuable. First, I benefit from an 
established reputation for collegiality and consensus building. Second, 
I am committed to public service and believe that much is expected from 
those who are most fortunate.
    Immediately prior to joining NTSB, I was privileged to serve for 
six years on the staff of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, & 
Transportation. Throughout my years with the Committee, I worked 
collaboratively with the bipartisan Senate team. Our efforts 
contributed to passage of various significant legislative measures, 
including the FAA Extension, Safety, and Security Act of 2016 and the 
FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018.
    As an NTSB Board Member, I devote much of my attention to traffic 
safety, because that is where our greatest safety challenges lie. I am 
especially active on key initiatives to address two stubbornly 
persistent challenges--alcohol impaired driving and excessive speed.
    I am proud of the important accomplishments to which I have 
contributed as a member of the Commerce Committee staff and since 
joining the National Transportation Safety Board. I welcome the 
prospect of building on those efforts through additional public service 
as a second-term member of the National Transportation Safety Board.
    23. What do you believe are your responsibilities, if confirmed, to 
ensure that the department/agency has proper management and accounting 
controls, and what experience do you have in managing a large 
organization?
    If confirmed, I will continue to work collaboratively with the 
Chairman, my fellow Board Members, and the staff of NTSB to ensure the 
limited resources available to the agency are targeted efficiently and 
appropriately to fulfill the NTSB's legislative mandate and to achieve 
its priority objectives. As I understand those objectives, they include 
serving as a global leader in conducting independent accident 
investigations, promoting transportation safety through creation of 
relevant materials and products, stakeholder engagement in the 
advancement of transportation safety, and promoting NTSB staff 
involvement and innovation to ensure effectiveness of the agency.
    My experience as an executive for three large entities has prepared 
me well for a leadership role at NTSB. I am familiar and experienced 
with budgeting and cost control practices, having been responsible for 
developing and managing budgets for the various departments I have led 
throughout my career. Likewise, I have managed teams involving 
significant numbers of employees, focusing on establishment and 
fulfillment of team objectives, response and adaptation to changing 
circumstances, and growth and development of individual team members.
    I look forward to applying my management experience and skills to 
help ensure the continuing success and effectiveness of the world's 
premier transportation safety agency.
    24. What do you believe to be the top three challenges facing the 
department/agency, and why?
    My views regarding the top challenges facing NTSB have remained 
consistent since I was first nominated to serve as a Board member in 
2019. With the benefit of my several years of tenured service, I 
believe the agency is responding appropriately to meeting these 
challenges:

    Autonomous vehicles & new technology. Advances in automation and 
the development of autonomous vehicles hold great promise for enhancing 
transportation safety. However, these advances present new questions 
and challenges--some of which will be difficult to anticipate. NTSB 
must keep pace with the rapid changes. It must ensure that appropriate 
staff expertise is maintained and that appropriate tools and technical 
skills are available or developed to meet the challenge.
    Keeping pace with demand. NTSB's reputation as the world's premier 
transportation safety agency is well deserved. With such a reputation 
comes high expectations, and meeting those expectations in a timely 
fashion is ever more important. The resources available to the agency 
are limited and may become more so. The agency has performed admirably 
in ensuring that resources are targeted effectively. Maintaining that 
discipline will remain essential.
    Maintaining & developing staff. NTSB staff are renowned for their 
skill and expertise. The work of the agency is highly dependent on the 
dedication and unique abilities of its employees. Recruiting and 
retaining skilled team members is a challenge for any government 
agency, and particularly for one such as NTSB which requires such 
unique skillsets.
    Key to success in this area is ensuring the well-regarded culture 
and work environment of the agency is maintained.
                   b. potential conflicts of interest
    1. Describe all financial arrangements, deferred compensation 
agreements, and other continuing dealings with business associates, 
clients, or customers. Please include information related to retirement 
accounts, such as a 401(k) or pension plan.
    Pursuant to an Executive Change in Control & Severance Benefits 
Agreement with U.S. Airways Group, Inc. & U.S. Airways, Inc., my family 
and I receive lifetime flight privileges on American Airlines.
    2. Do you have any commitments or agreements, formal or informal, 
to maintain employment, affiliation, or practice with any business, 
association, or other organization during your appointment? If so, 
please explain.
    None to report.
    3. Indicate any investments, obligations, liabilities, or other 
relationships which could involve potential conflicts of interest in 
the position to which you have been nominated. Explain how you will 
resolve each potential conflict of interest.
    In connection with the nomination process, I have consulted with 
the Office of Government Ethics and the NTSB's DAEO to identify 
potential conflicts of interest. I agreed to take those actions that 
are outlined in the letter to the DAEO. A copy is enclosed. These 
commitments constitute my ethics agreement as identified in the ethics 
regulations.
    4. Describe any business relationship, dealing, or financial 
transaction which you have had during the last ten years, whether for 
yourself, on behalf of a client, or acting as an agent, that could in 
any way constitute or result in a possible conflict of interest in the 
position to which you have been nominated. Explain how you will resolve 
each potential conflict of interest.
    In connection with the nomination process, I have consulted with 
the Office of Government Ethics and the National Transportation Safety 
Board's DAEO to identify potential conflicts of interest. I agreed to 
take those actions that are outlined in a letter to the DAEO. A copy is 
enclosed.
    These commitments constitute my ethics agreement as identified in 
the ethics regulations. I am not aware of any other potential conflicts 
of interest.
    5. Identify any other potential conflicts of interest, and explain 
how you will resolve each potential conflict of interest.
    In connection with the nomination process, I have consulted with 
the Office of Government Ethics and the NTSB's DAEO to identify 
potential conflicts of interest. Any potential conflicts of interest 
will be resolved in accordance with the terms of an ethics agreement 
that I have entered into with the NTSB's DAEO and that has been 
provided to this Committee. I am not aware of any other potential 
conflicts of interest.
    6. Describe any activity during the past ten years, including the 
names of clients represented, in which you have been engaged for the 
purpose of directly or indirectly influencing the passage, defeat, or 
modification of any legislation or affecting the administration and 
execution of law or public policy.

   From July 2014 to January 2020, served continuously as 
        Counsel to the Senate Subcommittee on Aviation Operations, 
        Safety, & Security.

   From January 2020 to the present, have served continuously 
        as a Member of the National Transportation Safety Board.
                            c. legal matters
    1. Have you ever been disciplined or cited for a breach of ethics, 
professional misconduct, or retaliation by, or been the subject of a 
complaint to, any court, administrative agency, the Office of Special 
Counsel, an Inspector General, professional association, disciplinary 
committee, or other professional group? If yes:

  a.  Provide the name of court, agency, association, committee, or 
        group;

  b.  Provide the date the citation, disciplinary action, complaint, or 
        personnel action was issued or initiated;

  c.  Describe the citation, disciplinary action, complaint, or 
        personnel action;

  d.  Provide the results of the citation, disciplinary action, 
        complaint, or personnel action.
    No.
    2. Have you ever been investigated, arrested, charged, or held by 
any Federal, State, or other law enforcement authority of any Federal, 
State, county, or municipal entity, other than for a minor traffic 
offense? If so, please explain. No.
    3. Have you or any business or nonprofit of which you are or were 
an officer ever been involved as a party in an administrative agency 
proceeding, criminal proceeding, or civil litigation? If so, please 
explain.
    I have not personally been a party to or otherwise involved in any 
administrative agency proceeding, criminal proceeding, or civil 
litigation. Each of the private sector organizations which has employed 
me during my professional career was involved in business related 
litigation typical of any large and sophisticated corporate entity. 
While I was often aware of such proceedings, I was never a party in 
interest nor did I actively participate in the litigation.
    4. Have you ever been convicted (including pleas of guilty or nolo 
contendere) of any criminal violation other than a minor traffic 
offense? If so, please explain. No.
    5. Have you ever been accused, formally or informally, of sexual 
harassment or discrimination on the basis of sex, race, religion, or 
any other basis? If so, please explain. No.
    6. Please advise the Committee of any additional information, 
favorable or unfavorable, which you feel should be disclosed in 
connection with your nomination.
    None to report.
                     d. relationship with committee
    1. Will you ensure that your department/agency complies with 
deadlines for information set by congressional committees, and that 
your department/agency endeavors to timely comply with requests for 
information from individual Members of Congress, including requests 
from members in the minority? Yes.
    2. Will you ensure that your department/agency does whatever it can 
to protect congressional witnesses and whistleblowers from reprisal for 
their testimony and disclosures? Yes.
    3. Will you cooperate in providing the Committee with requested 
witnesses, including technical experts and career employees, with 
firsthand knowledge of matters of interest to the Committee? Yes.
    4. Are you willing to appear and testify before any duly 
constituted committee of the Congress on such occasions as you may be 
reasonably requested to do so? Yes.
                                 ______
                                 
                           THOMAS B. CHAPMAN
                          PROFESSIONAL IDSTORY
Board Member
National Transportation Safety Board
January 2020 to Present
Serves as the 46th Member of the National Transpo1iation Safety Board. 
Speaks extensively on the Safe System Approach to traffic safety, 
pedestrian safety, alcohol and drng impai1ment, and rail worker and 
highway-rail grade crossing hazards. Active on key initiatives to 
address two stubbornly persistent safety challenges--alcohol impaired 
driving and excessive speed. Leading advocate for requi1ing all new 
vehicles be equipped with passive vehicle-integrated alcohol impaiiment 
detection systems or advanced driver monitoring systems capable of 
detecting driver impai1ment by alcohol. Regularly promotes NTSB's 
recommendation that states establish a per se Blood Alcohol 
Concentration limit of .05 or lower. Also advocates requii·ing 
all new vehicles be equipped with Intelligent Speed Assistance systems 
that, at a minimum, warn the driver when the vehicle exceeds the speed 
limit.

Counsel
Senate Subcommittee on Aviation Operations, Safety, & Security
Committee on Commerce, Science, & Transportation
Senator Bill Nelson, Ranking Member
July 2014 to January 2020.
Joined Aviation Subcommittee staff in anticipation of legislative 
effort to reauthorize the Federal Aviation Administration. Worked 
collaboratively with bipa1iisan Senate team throughout the 114th 
Congress to develop comprehensive FAA Reauthorization bill passed by 
the Senate in April of 2016. Subsequent negotiations with the House 
culminated in the FAA Extension, Safety, and Security Act of 2016, 
passed by Congress in July of 2016. Efforts to agree on long-te1m, 
comprehensive legislation continued in the 115th Congress, resulting in 
passage of the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018, signed into law October 
5, 2018. The five-year package negotiated on a bipa1iisan basis ensured 
long-te1m stability and various impo1iant refo1ms ofthe FAA. It also 
reauthorized and refonned the Transpo1iation Security Administration 
and the National Transportation Safety Board.

Vice President for Government Affairs
US Airways, Washington, D.C.
October 2006 to January 2014.
Recruited to manage Washington, D.C. office for the ``new'' U.S. 
Airways. Newly established company resulted from 2005 merger of former 
U.S. Airways and America West Airlines. Served as primary Washington 
representative on legislative matters and contributed significantly to 
Federal regulatory work and dealing with news media on government 
affairs matters. During tenure, launched enhanced internal fundraising 
campaign for US Airways Political Action Committee, doubling the rate 
of employee participation and tripling PAC financial resources. Heavily 
involved in developing and implementing government affairs strategies 
promoting industry consolidation--a company priority. Efforts to 
promote consolidation helped build foundation for successful agreement 
merging U.S. Airways and American Airlines, creating the world's 
largest airline.

Legislative Counsel
Southwest Airlines Co., Washington, D.C.
January 1998 to October 2006.
Recruited to establish and manage new Washington, D.C. office to 
represent Southwest Airlines. Establishment of full-time Washington 
office significantly enhanced the effectiveness of the Company's 
government affairs efforts. Served as primary Washington representative 
on legislative and regulatory matters. Frequently called upon to 
represent the Company in state and local government affairs arena, 
particularly in the airline's newer east coast destination cities. 
Helped organize and launch the Company's first ever PAC, the Southwest 
Airlines Freedom Fund. Dealt with news media on government affairs 
matters.

Senior Vice President for Government & Technical Affairs
Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association, Washington, D.C.
December 1996 to January 1998.
Promoted to direct all federal, state, and local government affairs 
activities for AOPA--a major national association representing 
interests of over 340,000 members. Managed full-time professional staff 
of eighteen in AOPA's Washington, D.C. and Frederick, Maryland offices. 
Also managed state and local activities of twelve Regional 
Representatives. AOPA's government affairs program often cited as among 
the most active of all national membership associations.

Vice President & Legislative Counsel
Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association, Washington, D.C.
November 1988 to December 1996.
Promoted to direct Federal and state legislative programs and PAC for 
AOPA. Managed staff of six in AOPA's Office of Legislative Affairs. 
During tenure, substantially increased effectiveness and organization 
of AOPA's legislative programs. Increased PAC fund-raising capability 
to secure it solidly among 50 largest PACs in the United States.

State Legislative Counsel
Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association, Washington, D.C.
June 1985 to November 1988.
Promoted to expand and direct AOPA's state legislative program. 
Coordinated state legislative activities of twelve Regional 
Representatives.

Associate Counsel, Office of the General Counsel
Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association, Washington, D.C.
May 1982 to June 1985.
Established and coordinated successful state legislative program for 
AOPA. Drafted or reviewed all Association contracts and participated 
heavily in contract negotiations.
Responsible for all trademark and copyright issues. Gained experience 
in broad spectrum of corporate legal matters.
                               EDUCATION
American University Washington College of Law, Washington, D.C.
Juris Doctor, May 1982.
Admitted to the practice of law in Washington, D.C., and Maryland.

C.W. Post College, Greenvale, N.Y.
Bachelor of Fine Arts in Music, May 1978.
Full participant in Honors Program.
Areas of concentration: political science, literature, and education.
                          PERSONAL INFORMATION
   Born December 18, 1954, Denver, Colorado.

   Married January 25, 1986, to Mary Scott O'Connell 
        (``Scotty'').

   Proud parents of Patrick Thomas O'Connell Chapman, born May 
        31, 2002.
                                 ______
                                 
               [GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] 
                                 
                                 ______
                                 
AOPA

                              ELECTION '94

                     AVIATION'S POLITICAL SPECTRUM

                            February 1, 1994

AOPA allies from coast to coast. During the months leading up to the 
November election, AOPA Legislative Action has profiled prominent 
congressional candidates up for election who are especially strong 
allies of general aviation.
AOPA allies from coast to coast.
    During the months leading up to the November election, AOPA 
Legislative Action has profiled prominent congressional candidates up 
for election who are especially strong allies of general aviation.
    With the election just weeks away, however, it is appropriate to 
make pilots aware of all the candidates who have received the support 
of the AOPA Political Action Committee. AOPA-PAC is one of the largest 
and most effective candidate support organizations in the country, and 
the PAC is a valuable tool in our lobbying efforts on behalf of general 
aviation.
    As you review the list of candidates on the next few pages. you may 
be surprised to find the names of men and woman representing nearly 
every point on the political spectrum--conservatives and Liberals, 
Republicans and Democrats. The list contains approximately 130 names, 
divided nearly evenly between the two political parties. Many are 
welcome newcomers. Others are well-known Leaders who have dedicated 
productive and distinguished careers to public service.
    You may agree or disagree with some of these individuals when it 
comes to other important issues of the day. But if the subject is 
general aviation. you'll find that everyone on the List has 
demonstrated support in one way or another. Some more than others, to 
be sure. The List tends to change somewhat from election to election, 
reflecting the inevitable shifts in our network of congressional 
contacts. But, in total, these are the people who have consistently 
shown that they understand the important contributions of general 
aviation.
    As you review the list. keep in mind the factors which influence 
whether AOPA-PAC will support a specific candidate. First, those who 
are general aviation pilots obviously receive serious consideration 
because of their demonstrated interest and familiarity with aviation 
issues.
    Second, you'll notice that members of several specific 
congressional committees tend to be among those who have earned PAC 
support. These are the so-called ``committees ofjurisdiction·--
the committees which have responsibility for matters affecting general 
aviation. In the House, these important committees are the full 
Committee on Public Works and Transportation and its subcommittee on 
aviation, and also the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology and 
its subcommittee on technology, environment, and aviation. The Public 
Works Committee has broad responsibility over most aviation issues, 
while the Science Committee has more limited jurisdiction over the 
FAA's research programs.
    In the Senate, most aviation matters come within the jurisdiction 
of the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and its 
subcommittee on aviation. And in both the House and Senate, the 
appropriations committees play a key role by determining the spending 
priorities for Federal dollars allocated to aviation programs. The 
FAA's annual budget is crafted by the transportation appropriations 
subcommittees of both the House and Senate, and several of the members 
of these two powerful subcommittees are among those with whom we work 
most closely.
    Finally, a host of other factors may influence whether a candidate 
receives support--such as assistance provided as a member of the 
congressional leadership or as a member of other important committees, 
including the Ways and Means Committee or the House Rules Committee 
(which controls the flow of legislation to the House floor). But all of 
these candidates have one thing in common: each has demonstrated an 
understanding of the importance of general aviation.
    With these factors in mind, here are the candidates who have earned 
AOPA-PAC support in 1994.--Thomas B. Chapman, Vice President Executive 
Director, AOPA Legislative Action

ALABAMA

   Representative Sonny Callahan (R)--Energy and Commerce 
        Committee member, helpful with environmental issues.

   Representative Bud Cramer (D)--Member of both Public Works 
        and Science committees.

ALASKA

   Representative Don Young (R)--Established AOPA supporter.

ARIZONA

   Representative Jon Kyl (R)--Established AOPA supporter, 
        running for Senate.

ARKANSAS

   Representative Tim Hutchinson (R)-Public Works Committee 
        member.

CALIFORNIA

   Representative Bill Baker (R)--Member of both Public Works 
        and Science committees.

   Representative George E. Brown (D)--Chairman of Science 
        Committee.

   Representative Randy Cunningham (R)--AOPA member and pilot. 
        established AOPA supporter.

   Representative Bob Filner (D)--Public Works Committee 
        member.

   Representative Dan Hamburg (D)--Public Works Committee 
        member.

   Representative Steve Horn (R)--Aviation subcommittee member.

   Representative Jay C. Kim (R)--Aviation subcommittee member.

   Representative Howard McKeon (R)--Aviation subcommittee 
        member.

   Representative Norman V. Mineta (D)--Chairman of Public 
        Works Committee, former chairman of aviation subcommittee, 
        established AOPA supporter.

   Representative Ron Packard (R)--Appropriations Committee 
        member, former aviation subcommittee member, established AOPA 
        supporter.

COLORADO

   Representative David E. Skaggs (D)--Appropriations Committee 
        member, former aviation subcommittee member, established AOPA 
        supporter.

CONNECTICUT

   No candidates in 1994.

DELAWARE

   No candidates in 1994.

FLORIDA

   Representative Corrine Brown (D)--Aviation subcommittee 
        member.

   Representative John L. Mica (R)--Aviation subcommittee 
        member.

   Representative Douglas Peterson (D)--Pilot established AOPA 
        supporter.

GEORGIA

   Representative Mac Collins (R)--Aviation subcommittee 
        member.

   Representative Nathan Deal (D)--Member of both Public Works 
        and Science committees.

   Representative Newt Gingrich (R)--Former ranking Republican 
        on aviation subcommittee, member of House Republican Leadership 
        (minority whip), established AOPA supporter.

   Representative John Lewis (D)--Ways and Means Committee 
        member, former aviation subcommittee member, member of House 
        Democratic Leadership (chief deputy whip).

HAWAII

   No candidates in 1994.

IDAHO

   No candidates in 1994.

ILLINOIS

   Representative Jerry F. Costello (D)--Aviation subcommittee 
        member.

   Representative Richard J. Durbin (D)--Pilot, transportation 
        appropriations subcommittee member.

   Representative Thomas W. Ewing (R)--Aviation subcommittee 
        member.

   Representative William O. Lipinski (D)--Aviation 
        subcommittee member.

INDIANA

   Representative Dan Burton (R)--Established AOPA supporter.

IOWA

   Representative Jim Lightfoot (R)--AOPA member and pilot. 
        Appropriations Committee member, former aviation subcommittee 
        member, established AOPA supporter.

KANSAS

   Representative Dan Glickman (D)--Cochairman of Congressional 
        Aviation Forum, member of technology, environment, and aviation 
        subcommittee, leading proponent of product liability reform, 
        established AOPA supporter.

KENTUCKY

   Representative Jim Bunning (R)--Ways and Means Committee 
        member.

LOUISIANA

   Representative Jimmy Hayes (D)--Aviation subcommittee 
        member.

MAINE

   No candidates in 1994.

MARYLAND

   Senator Paul S. Sarbanes (D)--Established AOPA supporter.

   Representative Benjamin L Cardin (D)--Ways and Means 
        Committee member.

   Representative Wayne T. Gilchrest (R)--Aviation subcommittee 
        member.

   Representative Steny H. Hoyer (D)--Appropriations Committee 
        member, member of House Democratic leadership (caucus 
        chairman).

   Representative Constance Morella (R)--Member of technology, 
        environment, and aviation subcommittee.

MASSACHUSETTS

   Representative Peter I. Blute (R)--Member of both Public 
        Works and Science committees.

   Representative Joseph Moakley (D)--Chairman of Rules 
        Committee.

   Representative John W. Olver (D)--Appropriations Committee 
        member.

MICHIGAN

   Representative Bob Carr (D)--AOPA member and pilot. chairman 
        of transportation appropriations subcommittee, established AOPA 
        supporter, running for Senate.

   Representative James A. Barcia (D)--Public Works Committee 
        member.

   Representative David E. Bonier (D)--Member of House 
        Democratic leadership (majority whip).

   Representative John D. Dingell (D)--Chairman of Energy and 
        Commerce Committee, helpful with product liability and 
        environmental issues.

   Representative Vern Ehlers (R)--Aviation subcommittee 
        member.

   Representative Peter Hoekstra (R)--Public Works Committee 
        member.

   Representative Dale E. Kildee (D)--Established AOPA 
        supporter.

   Representative Fred Upton (R)--Former aviation subcommittee 
        member, member of Energy and Commerce Committee.

MINNESOTA

   Representative James L. Oberstar (D)--Chairman of aviation 
        subcommittee, established AOPA supporter.

   Representative Collin C. Peterson (D)--AOPA member and 
        pilot, chairman of government operations subcommittee on 
        employment. housing, and aviation, established AOPA supporter.

   Representative Martin 0. Sabo (D)--Transportation 
        appropriations subcommittee member, chairman of Budget 
        Committee.

MISSISSIPPI

   Senator Trent Lott (R)--Member of Commerce, Science, and 
        Transportation Committee. established AOPA supporter.

   Representative Mike Parker (D)--AOPA member and pilot. 
        aviation subcommittee member, established AOPA supporter.

MISSOURI

   Representative Patricia Danner (D)--Aviation subcommittee 
        member.

   Representative Bill Emerson (R)--Aviation subcommittee 
        member.

   Representative Richard A. Gephardt (D)--House majority 
        leader.

   Representative Mel Hancock (R)--AOPA member and pilot, Ways 
        and Means Committee member, former aviation subcommittee 
        member, established AOPA supporter.

   Representative Alan Wheat (D)--Rules Committee member, 
        established AOPA supporter, running for Senate.

MONTANA

   Senator Conrad Burns (R)--Member of both Appropriations and 
        Commerce, Science, and Transportation committees, established 
        AOPA supporter.

NEBRASKA

   Senator Robert Kerrey (D)--Appropriations Committee member, 
        established AOPA supporter.

   Representative Bill Barrett (R)--Pilot, established AOPA 
        supporter.

NEVADA

   Senator Richard Bryan (D)--Aviation subcommittee member, 
        established AOPA supporter.

   Representative Barbara F. Vucanovich (R)--Pilot, established 
        AOPA supporter.

NEW HAMPSHIRE

   Representative Dick Swett (D)--Aviation subcommittee member.

   Representative Bill Zeliff (R)--Public Works Committee 
        member.

NEW JERSEY

   Senator Frank Lautenberg (D)--Chairman of transportation 
        appropriations subcommittee, helpful with DUATS funding issue, 
        established AOPA supporter.

   Representative Robert Franks (R)--Public Works Committee 
        member.

   Representative Robert Menendez (D)--Public Works Committee 
        member.

NEW MEXICO

   Senator Jeff Bingaman (D)--Established AOPA supporter.

   Representative Joe Skeen (R)--AOPA member and pilot, 
        Appropriations Committee member.

NEW YORK

Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan (D)--Chairman of Finance Committee.

   Representative Sherwood L Boehlert (R)--Aviation 
        subcommittee member.

   Representative David A. Levy (R)--Aviation subcommittee 
        member.

   Representative Susan Molinari (R)--Public Works Committee 
        member.

   Representative Jack Quinn (R)--Public Works Committee 
        member.

   Representative Gerald B. Solomon (R)--Ranking Republican on 
        Rules Committee.

NORTH CAROLINA

   Representative Cass Ballenger (R)--Former aviation 
        subcommittee member, established AOPA supporter.

   Representative David Price (D)--Transportation 
        appropriations subcommittee member.

NORTH DAKOTA

   Senator Kent Conrad (D)--Finance Committee member, 
        established AOPA supporter.

OHIO

   Lt. Governor Mike DeWine (R)--Established AOPA supporter. 
        running for Senate.

   Representative Ralph Regula (R)--Transportation 
        appropriations subcommittee member.

OKLAHOMA

   Representative Bill Brewster (D)--Ways and Means Committee 
        member. former Public Works Committee member. established AOPA 
        supporter.

   Representative James M. lnhofe (R)--AOPA member and pilot, 
        cochairman of Congressional Aviation Forum, aviation 
        subcommittee member. responsible for modifying secretive 
        Petition for Discharge rules. established AOPA supporter. 
        running for Senate.

   Representative Frank D. Lucas (R)--Established AOPA 
        supporter.

OREGON

   No candidates in 1994.

PENNSYLVANIA

   Representative Robert A Borski (D)--Aviation subcommittee 
        member.

   Representative William F. Clinger (R)--Ranking Republican on 
        aviation subcommittee, established AOPA supporter.

   Representative Thomas M. Foglietta (D)--Transportation 
        appropriations subcommittee member.

   Representative Rick Santorum (R)--Established AOPA 
        supporter, running for Senate.

   Representative Bud Shuster (R)--Ranking Republican on Public 
        Works Committee, established AOPA supporter.

RHODE ISLAND

   No candidates in 1994.

SOUTH CAROLINA

   Representative James E. Clyburn (D)--Public Works Committee 
        member.

SOUTH DAKOTA

   Representative Tim Johnson (D)--Established AOPA supporter.

TENNESSEE

   Senator Jim Sasser (D)--Chairman of Budget Committee, 
        Appropriations Committee member.

   Representative Bob Clement (D)--Aviation subcommittee 
        member, established AOPA supporter.

   Representative John J. Duncan (R)--Aviation subcommittee 
        member.

   Representative Bart Gordon (D)--Rules Committee member.

   Representative James H. Quillen (R)--Former ranking 
        Republican on Rules Committee, helpful with flight service 
        station issues, established AOPA supporter.

TEXAS

   Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison (R)--Member of Commerce. 
        Science, and Transportation Committee, established AOPA 
        supporter.

   Representative Richard K. Armey (R)--Member of House 
        Republican leadership (conference chairman), established AOPA 
        supporter.

   Representative Henry Bonilla (R)--Appropriations Committee 
        member.

   Representative Jim Chapman (D)--AOPA member and pilot, 
        Appropriations Committee member, established AOPA supporter.

   Representative Ronald D. Coleman (D)--Transportation 
        appropriations subcommittee member.

   Representative Thomas D. Delay (R)--Transportation 
        appropriations subcommittee member, member of House Republican 
        Leadership (deputy whip and conference secretary). established 
        AOPA supporter.

   Representative Chet Edwards (D)--AOPA member and pilot, 
        established AOPA supporter.

   Representative Pete Geren (D)--Aviation subcommittee member, 
        established AOPA supporter.

   Representative Eddie Bernice Johnson (D)--Public Works 
        Committee member.

   Representative Sam Johnson (R)--AOPA member and pilot, 
        established AOPA supporter.

   Representative Greg Laughlin (D)--Aviation subcommittee 
        member, established AOPA supporter.

   Representative Charles W. Stenholm (D)--Established AOPA 
        supporter.

UTAH

   Representative James V. Hansen (R)--AOPA member and pilot, 
        Leading proponent of product liability reform, established AOPA 
        supporter.

   Representative Bill Orton (D)--Pilot. established AOPA 
        supporter.

VERMONT

   Senator James M. Jeffords (R)--Established AOPA supporter.

VIRGINIA

   Senator Charles S. Robb (D)--Member of Commerce, Science, 
        and Transportation Committee, established AOPA supporter.

   Representative Herbert H. Bateman (R)--Established AOPA 
        supporter.

   Representative Thomas J. Bliley (R)--Energy and Commerce 
        Committee member, helpful with environmental issues.

   Representative Leslie L. Byrne (D)--Public Works Committee 
        member.

   Representative Bob W. Goodlatte (R)--Established AOPA 
        supporter.

   Representative Lewis F. Payne (D)--Ways and Means Committee 
        member, former aviation subcommittee member, established AOPA 
        supporter.

   Representative Frank R. Wolf (R)--Ranking Republican on 
        transportation appropriations subcommittee, established AOPA 
        supporter.

WASHINGTON

   Senator Slade Gorton (R)--Aviation subcommittee member, 
        Appropriations Committee member, established AOPA supporter.

   Representative Maria Cantwell (D)--Aviation subcommittee 
        member.

   Representative Jennifer Dunn (R)--Aviation subcommittee 
        member.

   Representative Thomas S. Foley (D)--Speaker of the House.

WEST VIRGINIA

   Senator Robert C. Byrd (D)--Chairman of Appropriations 
        Committee.

   Representative Nick J. Rahall (D)--Aviation subcommittee 
        member.

   Representative Robert E. Wise (D)--Public Works Committee 
        member.

WISCONSIN

   Representative David R. Obey (D)--Chairman of Appropriations 
        Committee.

   Representative Thomas E. Petri (R)--Aviation subcommittee 
        member.

WYOMING

   Representative Craig Thomas (R)--Pilot, established AOPA 
        supporter, running for Senate.
        
        [GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] 
        

    The Chair. Thank you, Mr. Chapman.
    Dr. Chen, welcome. We look forward to your remarks.

  STATEMENT OF DR. LANHEE J. CHEN, NOMINEE TO BE A DIRECTOR, 
                   AMTRAK BOARD OF DIRECTORS

    Dr. Chen. Thank you, Chair Cantwell, Ranking Member Cruz, 
and Members of the Committee. My name is Lanhee Chen, and I am 
honored to appear before you today as a nominee for the Amtrak 
Board of Directors. I am grateful to the President for the 
trust he has placed in me and honored by Leader McConnell's 
support of me over many years. I am also deeply indebted to 
Senator Romney, who has been a mentor and friend, and humbled 
by his overly kind introduction of me.
    I am so happy to be joined today by my daughter, Adeline, 
who gets to see her daddy, and perhaps more importantly, the 
Senate at work. There are two other members of my family who 
could not be here today; my wife, Cynthia, for whom I am always 
grateful, and our son, Tobin.
    I was born in North Carolina, the son of two immigrants 
from Taiwan whose decisions to come to America made all of this 
possible, and for that, I am grateful. I grew up in Southern 
California and now live in the San Francisco Bay Area. I have 
spent my career at the intersection of business, government, 
and public policy, and believe this background will bring much-
needed perspective to the Amtrak Board.
    I have significant experience as a board member in 
corporate, nonprofit, and government settings. For example, I 
have served since 2015 on the Board of El Camino Health, a 
community-based healthcare system in Northern California. I 
chaired the Board for 5 years, currently chair its Governance 
Committee, and formerly chaired both the Audit and Executive 
Compensation Committees.
    I was nominated by President Obama and confirmed by the 
Senate to serve on the Social Security Advisory Board from 2014 
to 2018, which provides counsel on the Social Security program 
to policymakers in Congress, and beyond.
    My interest in passenger trains began when I was a young 
boy. I would visit the Fullerton, California, railroad station 
with my dad to see the Amtrak trains that stopped there. We 
scoured local hobby shops for model Amtrak locomotives and 
coaches, which I proudly displayed in my room or sometimes got 
to run on tracks, which took over our entire living room.
    I am fortunate to still live in California, which has 
frequent Amtrak service along multiple corridors that link many 
of its major metropolitan areas and smaller communities in 
between, thanks largely to past state investments. I have been 
a passenger on Amtrak state-supported routes in California, 
like the Pacific Surfliner and Capitol Corridor, and on trains 
along the Northeast Corridor. I believe that Congress clearly 
intended to have more representation from the national network 
on the Amtrak Board, and as a Californian, I look forward to 
helping to realize that goal.
    There are several things I believe I would bring to the 
Amtrak Board if confirmed. The first is Board experience in a 
quasi-public setting. The health system board on which I have 
served for nearly a decade has both fiduciary responsibilities 
and a public mission. That is also true of Amtrak, which by law 
is directed both to operate like a business and to provide 
passenger rail service that may not produce financial returns 
but benefits the travelers and communities it serves, 
particularly those without other transportation options. 
Balancing financial prudence and a public mission is not an 
unfamiliar concept to me.
    I also have significant business experience. I furnished 
counsel to corporate leaders on strategic and reputational 
concerns, evaluated and recommended investments in early stage 
companies, and advised businesses as they navigate the 
marketplace and consider the impacts of regulation and policy 
on their work.
    Finally, I have familiarity with both Federal and State 
policy issues, including infrastructure and publicly funded 
programs, as a result of my service on the Social Security 
Advisory Board, my work as a policy adviser to four 
Presidential campaigns, my candidacy for the position of 
California State controller, my state's chief fiscal officer, 
and my work in academia at the Hoover Institution, one of 
America's leading research institutes.
    From my board service, I recognize that one of the most 
important responsibilities of any director is to ensure that 
management is accountable for results. That obligation is 
heightened for organizations like Amtrak, which receives 
government funding intended to benefit the American people. 
This accountability must extend beyond the Board to Amtrak's 
customers, employees, taxpayers, and the elected officials like 
you who approve its funding.
    Amtrak's Board has a responsibility not only to ensure that 
the taxpayer dollars the organization receives are well spent, 
but also to emphasize the importance of maintaining the highest 
standards of safety, timeliness, and customer service, and to 
help formulate a strategy to increase revenues so that more 
funding is available for services and investments that fulfill 
the organization's mission.
    If confirmed to the Amtrak Board, I will work to ensure 
that Amtrak does business transparently, operates in a fiscally 
responsible manner, and serves the needs of passengers who ride 
its trains, and the states that provide funding both for daily 
service and longer-term capital investments.
    Again, thank you for the opportunity to appear before you 
today, and I look forward to answering your questions.
    [The prepared statement and biographical information of Dr. 
Chen follow:]

   Prepared Statement of Dr. Lanhee Chen, Nominee to be a Director, 
                       Amtrak Board of Directors
    Chair Cantwell, Ranking Member Cruz and members of the committee: 
My name is Lanhee Chen, and I am honored to appear before you today as 
a nominee for the Amtrak Board of Directors.
    I was born in North Carolina, grew up in Southern California, and 
now live in the San Francisco Bay Area. I have spent my career at the 
intersection of business, government, and public policy, and believe 
this experience will bring much needed perspective to the Amtrak Board. 
Today, I am a Fellow at the Hoover Institution, teach at Stanford 
University, and am a partner at the Brunswick Group, a global business 
advisory firm.
    I have significant experience as a board member in corporate, 
nonprofit, and government settings. For example, I have served since 
2015 on the board of El Camino Health, a community-based healthcare 
system in Northern California. I chaired the board for five years, 
currently chair its governance committee, and formerly chaired both the 
audit and executive compensation committees. I was nominated by 
President Obama and confirmed by the Senate to serve on the Social 
Security Advisory Board from 2014 to 2018, which provides counsel on 
the Social Security program to policymakers in Congress and beyond.
    My interest in passenger trains began when I was a young boy. I 
would visit the Fullerton, California railroad station with my dad to 
see the Amtrak trains that stop there. We scoured local hobby shops for 
model Amtrak locomotives and coaches, which I proudly displayed in my 
room or sometimes got to run on tracks which took over our entire 
living room.
    I am fortunate to still live in California, which has frequent 
Amtrak service along multiple corridors that link many of its major 
metropolitan areas and smaller communities in between, thanks largely 
to past state investments. I have been a passenger on Amtrak's state-
supported routes in California, like the Pacific Surfliner and the 
Capitol Corridor, and on trains along the Northeast Corridor. I believe 
that Congress clearly intended to have more representation from the 
National Network on the Amtrak Board and, as a Californian, I look 
forward to helping realize that goal.
    There are several things I believe I would bring to the Amtrak 
Board if confirmed. The first is Board experience in a quasi-public 
setting. The health system board on which I have served for nearly a 
decade has both fiduciary responsibilities and a public mission. That 
is also true of Amtrak, which by law is directed both to operate like a 
business and to provide passenger rail service that may not produce 
financial returns, but benefits the travelers and communities it 
serves, particularly those without other transportation options. 
Balancing financial prudence and a public mission is not an unfamiliar 
concept to me.
    I also have significant business experience. I have furnished 
counsel to corporate leaders on strategic and reputational concerns; 
evaluated and recommended investments in early-stage companies; and 
advised businesses as they navigate the marketplace and consider the 
impacts of regulation and policy on their work.
    Finally, I have familiarity with both Federal and state policy 
issues, including infrastructure and publicly-funded programs, as a 
result of my service on the Social Security Advisory Board; my work as 
a policy advisor to four presidential campaigns; my candidacy for the 
position of California state controller, my state's chief fiscal 
officer; and from my work in academia, at one of America's leading 
research institutes.
    From my board service, I recognize that one of the most important 
responsibilities of any Director is to ensure that management is 
accountable for results. That obligation is heightened for 
organizations like Amtrak, which receives government funding intended 
to benefit the American people. This accountability must extend beyond 
the Board, to Amtrak's customers, employees, taxpayers, and the elected 
officials like you, who approve its funding. Amtrak's Board has a 
responsibility not only to ensure that the taxpayer dollars the 
organization receives are well spent, but also to emphasize the 
importance of maintaining high standards of safety, timeliness, and 
customer service, and to help formulate a strategy to increase 
revenues, so that more funding is available for services and 
investments that fulfill the organization's mission. If confirmed to 
the Amtrak board, I will work to ensure that Amtrak does business 
transparently; operates in a fiscally responsible manner; and serves 
the needs of the passengers who ride its trains and the states that 
provide funding both for daily service and longer-term capital 
investments.
    Again, thank you for the opportunity to appear before you today, 
and I look forward to answering your questions.
                                 ______
                                 
                      a. biographical information
    1. Name (Include any former names or nicknames used): Lanhee Joseph 
Chen.
    2. Position to which nominated: Board of Directors, AMTRAK.
    3. Date ofNomination: September 9, 2024.
    4. Address (List current place ofresidence and office addresses):

        Residence: Information not released to the public.
        Office: 434 Galvez Mall, Stanford, CA 94305-6010.

    5. Date and Place of Birth: July 4, 1978; Fayetteville, NC, USA.
    6. Provide the name, position, and place ofemployment for your 
spouse (ifmarried) and the names and ages ofyour children (including 
stepchildren and children by a previous marriage).

        Cynthia Fung Chen, Employed by State of California, County of 
        Santa Clara, Superior Court San Jose CA

    7. List all college and graduate schools attended, whether or not 
you were granted a degree by the institution. Provide the name of the 
institution, the dates attended, the degree received, and the date of 
the degree.

        Harvard University (2000-09), Graduate School of Arts and 
        Sciences, PhD in Political Science (2009)

        Harvard University (2000-09), Graduate School of Arts and 
        Sciences, AM in Political Science (2004)

        Harvard Law School (2004-07), JD cum laude (2007)

        Harvard College (1995-99), AB magna cum laude in Government 
        (1999)

    8. List all post-undergraduate employment, including the job title, 
name of employer, and inclusive dates of employment, and highlight all 
management-level jobs held and any non-managerial jobs that relate to 
the position for which you are nominated.
    Please see Attachment A-8, for the information requested here.
    9. Attach a copy of your resume.
    Please see Attachment A-9, for my current resume.
    10. List any advisory, consultative, honorary, or other part-time 
service or positions with Federal, State, or local governments, other 
than those listed above after 18 years of age.
    Not Applicable.
    11. List all positions held as an officer, director, trustee, 
partner, proprietor, agent, representative, or consultant of any 
corporation, company, firm, partnership, or other business, enterprise, 
educational, or other institution.

        Partner, Brunswick Group, San Francisco, CA (2023 to present)

        Owner, Launch Policy Strategies (Sole Proprietorship), Mountain 
        View, CA (2013 to present)

        Director, El Camino Health, Mountain View, CA (2015 to present)

        Director, Foundation for Research on Equal Opportunity, Austin, 
        TX (2016 to present)

        Director, David A. Winston Health Policy Fellowship, 
        Washington, DC (2022 to present)

    12. Please list each membership you have had after 18 years of age 
or currently hold with any civic, social, charitable, educational, 
political, professional, fraternal, benevolent or religiously 
affiliated organization, private club, or other membership 
organization. (For this question, you do not have to list your 
religious affiliation or membership in a religious house of worship or 
institution.). Include dates of membership and any positions you have 
held with any organization. Please note whether any such club or 
organization restricts membership on the basis of sex, race, color, 
religion, national origin, age, or disability.

        Member, State Bar of California, Bar Number 258185 (admitted 
        12/2/2008, inactive 2/1/2012-10/21/2015)

        Member, Policy Advisory Board, Free the Facts, a Project of 
        Entitlements How, Inc., Washington, DC (2016 to present)

        Member, Advisory Council, The Asian American Foundation (TAAF), 
        New York, NY (2021 to present)

        Member, Committee of 100, New York, NY (2015 to present)

        Member, Council of Scholars, Better Medicare Alliance, 
        Washington, DC (2017 to present)

        Member, Advisory Board, Global Taiwan Institute, Washington, DC 
        (2020 to present)

        Founder, Golden State Watchdog PAC, Irvine, CA (2023 to 
        present)

        Member, Advisory Board, Golden Together, Los Angeles, CA (2023 
        to present)

        Member, Nixon Seminar on Conservative Realism and National 
        Security, Yorba Linda, CA (2021 to present)

        Member, Advisory Committee, Aspen Institute/Anti-Defamation 
        League Civil Society Fellowship, Aspen, CO (2019 to present)

        Member, External Advisory Committee, Association of American 
        Medical Colleges (AAMC) Research and Action Institute (2021 to 
        present)

        JAMA Forum Contributor, JAMA Health Forum, a Journal of the 
        American Medical Association (2022 to present)

        Former Member, Board of Directors, Healthcare Consumer Rights 
        Foundation (2020-2022)

        Former Member, Editorial Board, Salem Radio Network (2017-2022)

        Former Member and Director, Aspen Economic Strategy Group 
        (Director, 2017-18; Member 2017-21)

        Former Member, National Advisory Committee, Democracy Fund 
        (2018-2020)

        Former Visiting Thought Leader, China Europe International 
        Business School, Shanghai, China (2019)

        Former Member, International Advisory Board and Health Advisory 
        Board, APCO Worldwide (2014-2018)

    13. Have you ever been a candidate for and/or held a public office 
(elected, non-elected, or appointed)? If so, indicate whether any 
campaign has any outstanding debt, the amount, and whether you are 
personally liable for that debt.

        Candidate for California State Controller, 2022, campaign has 
        no outstanding debt

    14. List all memberships and offices held with and services 
rendered to, whether compensated or not, any political party or 
election committee within the past ten years. If you have held a paid 
position or served in a formal or official advisory position (whether 
compensated or not) in a political campaign within the past ten years, 
identify the particulars of the campaign, including the candidate, year 
of the campaign, and your title and responsibilities.

        Founder, Golden State Watchdog PAC (FEC #C00838219)

        Delegate and former member of the Initiatives Committee, 
        California Republican Party Senior Adviser on Policy, National 
        Republican Senatorial Committee (2014, 2018)

        Senior Adviser, Marco Rubio for President (2015-16)

    15. Itemize all political contributions to any individual, campaign 
organization, political party, political action committee, or similar 
entity of $200 or more for the past ten years.

        Kevin Faulconer, Faulconer for Supervisor (San Diego County, 
        CA), $500, 6-30-2024; 12-08-2023

        Tom Cotton, Cotton for Senate, $2,600, 4-14-2014

        Elise Stefanik, Stefanik for Congress, $300, 3-2-2014

        Jim Bognet, Bognet for Congress, $1,000, 3-31-2020

        Greg Bledsoe, Bledsoe for Arkansas, $1,000, 2-6-2021

        Republican Party of California, $850, 4-1-2022

    16. List all scholarships, fellowships, honorary degrees, honorary 
society memberships, military medals, and any other special recognition 
for outstanding service or achievements.

        Harvard College, John Harvard Scholar

        Harvard College, Harvard College Scholar

        Harvard College, Dean's List

        Harvard University, Thomas E. Upham Class of 1868 Scholarship

        Harvard University, Derek Bok Center for Learning and Teaching, 
        Certificate of Distinction in Teaching

        Harvard University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, 
        Summer Research Fellowship

        The Heritage Foundation, Winnie Neubauer Visiting Fellowship in 
        Health Policy Studies

        Hoover Institution, David and Diane Steffy Fellow in American 
        Public Policy Studies

    17. List each book, article, column, letter to the editor, Internet 
blog posting, or other publication you have authored, individually or 
with others. Include a link to each publication when possible. If a 
link is not available, provide a digital copy of the publication when 
available.
    I have written and commented extensively on public policy issues. 
Attachment A-17 provides a listing of radio and television interviews 
from 2020-2024 inclusive, as well as additional resources for written 
material in the years prior. The listing represents best efforts to 
compile the requested information and may not be comprehensive.
    18. List all speeches, panel discussions, and presentations (e.g., 
PowerPoint) that you have given on topics relevant to the position for 
which you have been nominated. Include a link to each publication when 
possible. If a link is not available, provide a digital copy of the 
speech or presentation when available.

        California Chamber of Commerce, 2017 Capitol Summit, May 31, 
        2017, Sacramento, CA

        Peter G. Peterson Foundation, 2019 Fiscal Summit, ``From One 
        Generation to the Next: Our Fiscal and Economic Legacy, June 
        11, 2019, Washington, DC

        Hoover Institution, Hoover Council Virtual Event, ``Biden's 
        First 100 Days and the Conservative Policy Response,'' February 
        18, 2021, Online (Powerpoint Here)

    19. List all public statements you have made during the past ten 
years, including statements in news articles and radio and television 
appearances, which are on topics relevant to the position for which you 
have been nominated, including dates. Include a link to each statement 
when possible. If a link is not available, provide a digital copy of 
the statement when available.

        ``This bill is a win-win for Democrats and Republicans,'' CNN 
        Opinion, June 24, 2021

        Radio Interview on Left, Right and Center, KCRW Public Radio, 
        ``Infrastructure Week, maybe for real this time,'' April 2, 
        2021

    20. List all digital platforms (including social media and other 
digital content sites) on which you currently or have formerly operated 
an account, regardless of whether or not the account was held in your 
name or an alias. Include the full name of an ``alias'' or ``handle'', 
including the complete URL and username with hyperlinks, you have used 
on each of the named platforms. Indicate whether the account is active, 
deleted, or dormant. Include a link to each account if possible.
    All accounts listed below are active and I have no accounts that 
are dormant or have been deleted.

        X/Twitter: @lanheechen: https://twitter.com/lanheechen

        Facebook (Lanhee Chen): https://www.facebook.com/lanhee.chen

        Facebook (Chen For California, Campaign Page):
        https://www.facebook.com/ChenforCalifornia/

        Instagram (Lanhee Chen): https://www.instagram.com/lanheechen

        LinkedIn (Lanhee Chen): https://www.linkedin.com/in/lanheechen/

    21. Please identify each instance in which you have testified 
orally or in writing before Congress in a governmental or non-
governmental capacity and specify the date and subject matter of each 
testimony.

        September 6, 2024. Remarks before the House Committee on 
        Foreign Affairs, Subcommittee on Indo-Pacific, Member 
        Roundtable: ``Global Ties, Local Impact: Why Taiwan Matters for 
        California''

        January 28, 2014. Testimony before the House Committee on Ways 
        and Means, Hearing on the Impact of the Affordable Care Act 
        (ACA) Employer Mandate's Definition of Full-Time Employee on 
        Jobs and Opportunities. Committee transcript, including verbal 
        testimony, linked here. Submitted testimony will be attached.

        May 8, 2014. Testimony before the Senate Committee on Finance, 
        Hearing to consider presidential nominations. Submitted 
        testimony linked here and committee proceedings available here.

    22. Given the current mission, major programs, and major 
operational objectives of the department/agency to which you have been 
nominated, what in your background or employment experience do you 
believe affirmatively qualifies you for appointment to the position for 
which you have been nominated, and why do you wish to serve in that 
position?
    I believe that my general business background--including extensive 
experience on corporate, nonprofit and government boards, in addition 
to my work an investor and critical issues adviser, qualifies me for 
appointment to the AMTRAK Board of Directors. In my academic and 
research roles over the course of my career, I've also had occasion to 
analyze and discuss some of the public policy issues that will come 
before the AMTRAK Board.
    23. What do you believe are your responsibilities, if confirmed, to 
ensure that the department/agency has proper management and accounting 
controls, and what experience do you have in managing a large 
organization?
    This is one of the principal responsibilities of each member of 
AMTRAK's Board of Directors, and I intend to take very seriously my 
mandate to ensure that there are proper management and accounting 
controls at the corporation. This is particularly significant given 
that AMTRAK benefits from billions of dollars in taxpayer funding each 
year. I have significant experience in overseeing and managing large 
organizations, including as former Chair of the Board, former Chair of 
the Audit and Compliance and Executive Compensation Committees, and 
current Chair of the Governance Committee of El Camino Health, a 
billion-dollar health care system in Northern California, as well as in 
a wide variety of operational settings over the course of my career.
    24. What do you believe to be the top three challenges facing the 
department/agency, and why?
    First, modernizing our rail network and ensuring that we are making 
proper investments in improving infrastructure--not just in the 
Northeast Corridor, but throughout AMTRAK's national network. Second, 
ensuring that AMTRAK continues to meet the needs of customers 
throughout the country in an effective and efficient manner, including 
in those communities that depend on AMTRAK for their critical 
transportation needs. Finally, ensuring proper and rigorous oversight 
of taxpayer dollars, to ensure that resources are being wisely 
stewarded and well spent.
                   b. potential conflicts of interest
    1. Describe all financial arrangements, deferred compensation 
agreements, and other continuing dealings with business associates, 
clients, or customers. Please include information related to retirement 
accounts, such as a 401(k) or pension plan.
    My arrangements are fully described in Part III of my Executive 
Branch Confidential Financial Disclosure Report (OGE Form 450).
    In connection with the nomination process, I have consulted with 
the designated Amtrak ethics representative to identify potential 
conflicts of interest.
    Any potential conflicts of interest will be resolved in accordance 
with the Amtrak Board of Directors' Code of Business Conduct and Ethics 
and the terms of Amtrak's Ethics Opinion Letter which has been provided 
to this Committee.
    I am not aware of any other potential conflicts of interest.
    2. Do you have any commitments or agreements, formal or informal, 
to maintain employment, affiliation, or practice with any business, 
association, or other organization during your appointment? If so, 
please explain.
    As I have been nominated to serve on a part-time Board, I intend to 
continue all current employment arrangements and affiliations as 
detailed above.
    3. Indicate any investments, obligations, liabilities, or other 
relationships which could involve potential conflicts of interest in 
the position to which you have been nominated. Explain how you will 
resolve each potential conflict of interest.
    In connection with the nomination process, I have consulted with 
the Office of Government Ethics and AMTRAK's designated agency ethics 
official (DAEO) to identify potential conflicts of interest. Any 
potential conflicts of interest will be resolved in accordance with the 
terms of an ethics agreement that I have entered into with the 
Administration's DAEO and that has been provided to this Committee. I 
am not aware of any other potential conflicts of interest.
    4. Describe any business relationship, dealing, or financial 
transaction which you have had during the last ten years, whether for 
yourself, on behalf of a client, or acting as an agent, that could in 
any way constitute or result in a possible conflict of interest in the 
position to which you have been nominated. Explain how you will resolve 
each potential conflict of interest.
    In connection with the nomination process, I have consulted with 
the Office of Government Ethics and AMTRAK's designated agency ethics 
official (DAEO) to identify potential conflicts of interest. Any 
potential conflicts of interest will be resolved in accordance with the 
terms of an ethics agreement that I have entered into with the 
Administration's DAEO and that has been provided to this Committee. I 
am not aware of any other potential conflicts of interest.
    5. Identify any other potential conflicts of interest, and explain 
how you will resolve each potential conflict of interest.
    In connection with the nomination process, I have consulted with 
the Office of Government Ethics and AMTRAK's designated agency ethics 
official (DAEO) to identify potential conflicts of interest. Any 
potential conflicts of interest will be resolved in accordance with the 
terms of an ethics agreement that I have entered into with the 
Administration's DAEO and that has been provided to this Committee. I 
am not aware of any other potential conflicts of interest.
    6. Describe any activity during the past ten years, including the 
names of clients represented, in which you have been engaged for the 
purpose of directly or indirectly influencing the passage, defeat, or 
modification of any legislation or affecting the administration and 
execution of law or public policy.
    Not Applicable.
                            c. legal matters
    1. Have you ever been disciplined or cited for a breach of ethics, 
professional misconduct, or retaliation by, or been the subject of a 
complaint to, any court, administrative agency, the Office of Special 
Counsel, an Inspector General, professional association, disciplinary 
committee, or other professional group? If yes:

  a.  Provide the name of court, agency, association, committee, or 
        group;

  b.  Provide the date the citation, disciplinary action, complaint, or 
        personnel action was issued or initiated;

  c.  Describe the citation, disciplinary action, complaint, or 
        personnel action;

  d.  Provide the results of the citation, disciplinary action, 
        complaint, or personnel action.

    No.
    2. Have you ever been investigated, arrested, charged, or held by 
any Federal, State, or other law enforcement authority of any Federal, 
State, county, or municipal entity, other than for a minor traffic 
offense? If so, please explain. No.
    3. Have you or any business or nonprofit of which you are or were 
an officer ever been involved as a party in an administrative agency 
proceeding, criminal proceeding, or civil litigation? If so, please 
explain. No.
    4. Have you ever been convicted (including pleas of guilty or nolo 
contendere) of any criminal violation other than a minor traffic 
offense? If so, please explain. No.
    5. Have you ever been accused, formally or informally, of sexual 
harassment or discrimination on the basis of sex, race, religion, or 
any other basis? If so, please explain. No.
    6. Please advise the Committee of any additional information, 
favorable or unfavorable, which you feel should be disclosed in 
connection with your nomination.
    Not Applicable.
                     d. relationship with committee
    1. Will you ensure that your department/agency complies with 
deadlines for information set by congressional committees, and that 
your department/agency endeavors to timely comply with requests for 
information from individual Members of Congress, including requests 
from members in the minority? Yes.
    2. Will you ensure that your department/agency does whatever it can 
to protect congressional witnesses and whistleblowers from reprisal for 
their testimony and disclosures? Yes.
    3. Will you cooperate in providing the Committee with requested 
witnesses, including technical experts and career employees, with 
firsthand knowledge of matters of interest to the Committee? Yes.
    4. Are you willing to appear and testify before any duly 
constituted committee of the Congress on such occasions as you may be 
reasonably requested to do so? Yes.
                                 ______
                                 
                [GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] 
                                 
                                 ______
                                 
Lanhee J. Chen
More Significant Writings, Media and Longer Form Interviews (2020 and 
        Prior)
   1.  Columns written during time as a columnist for Bloomberg View, 
        the opinion page of the Bloomberg media network: https://
        www.bloomberg.com/opinion/authors/AQwQdiROxoc/lanhee-j-chen

   2.  Podcast I hosted called ``Crossing Lines'': https://
        www.listennotes.com/podcasts/crossing-lines-with-lanhee-chen-
        the-umpIWe-5cvB/

   3.  Doctoral Dissertation, ``Essays on Elections,'' Faculty of Arts 
        and Sciences, Harvard University, 2009, Copy Appended

   4.  Bloomberg Television Appearances (Many in 2020 and Prior)

   5.  Fox Business Television Appearances (Many in 2020 and Prior)

   6.  KQED (SF PBS Affiliate) Television Appearances (Some 
        Interviews Itemized in 2021-24)

   7.  Hoover Institution Podcasts

      a.  ``Rationalizing Immigration'': June 27, 2014

      b.  ``COVID-19 and the Politics of the WHO'': May 21, 2020

      c.  ``Lanhee Chen: Republican Rift?'': Oct. 31, 2019

      d.  ``Fiery But Mostly Peaceful'': Aug. 28, 2020

   8.  Hoover Institution Videos

      a.  Available by search here, only the first 13-15 entries appear 
            relevant.

      b.  ``COVID-19, China and the Political Fallout''

      c.  PolicyEd Videos: Public Option; Health Insurance Competition

      d.  ``Federalism and COVID-19'': A conversation with Gov. Larry 
            Hogan

      e.  ``A Discussion on America's Future After COVID-19'': A 
            conversation with Sen. Marco Rubio

   9.  Aspen Institute Programs

      a.  Lanhee Chen and Andy Slavitt: A Major Difference of Opinion 
            (full discussion here).

      b.  Mitt Romney and Lanhee Chen: Aspen Ideas Festival

      c.  Follow the Money: Investing in Health

      d.  KHN's `What the Health' Podcast Taping

  10.  Major Television Appearances (2020 and Previous)

      a.  This Week with George Stephanopoulos (ABC): 6/25/2017, 11/19/
            2017, 2/25/2018, 9/9/2018, 4/7/2019, 6/2/2019, 10/11/2020

      b.  Meet the Press (NBC): 6/5/2016, 10/14/2018, 2/24/2019, 4/7/
            2019, 6/28/2019, 10/27/2019, 4/12/2020, 6/6/2021

      c.  Face the Nation (CBS): 9/18/2016, 11/20/2016, 1/22/2017, 2/
            26/2017, 7/2/2017, 12/10/2017, 10/28/2018, 4/28/2019, 9/22/
            2019, 1/26/2020, 2/23/2020, 5/13/2020,12/13/2020

      d.  Fox News Sunday: 8/2/2020

      e.  State of the Union with Jake Tapper: 8/31/2014, 9/14/2014, 3/
            22/2020

      f.  Real Time with Bill Maher: 9/23/2016

  11.  Other Videos

      a.  Veritas Forum: Faith & Politics, Perspectives Across the 
            Aisle

      b.  Committee of 100: ``Chinese American Journeys: Lanhee Chen, 
            Hoover Institution, Stanford University''

      c.  CBS News Red&Blue: Lanhee Chen on GOP's Future

      d.  Foundation for American Innovation: Lanhee Chen on Elections

      e.  AmCham China: How important is China to the U.S. election?

      f.  USPAACC LiveTalk: Realistic and Responsible Plan to Reopen 
            the Economy

      g.  Wide World of News (Mark Halperin): A Conversation with 
            Lanhee Chen

      h.  Hugh Hewitt Conversation with Andrew Slavitt and Lanhee Chen 
            on WH Covid Response

      i.  CPAC 2019 Panel

      j.  Stanford CDDRL: Public Policy and the 2020 Elections

      k.  ASU GSV Summit (2016): Why is Education Not More Central to 
            the American Political Discourse?

                                                  CONFIDENTIAL
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                 Duties and                              Reason for
      Position Held           Responsibilities           Dates            Leaving                Notes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Research Fellow, Hoover   Conduct research and     Feb. 2013-Present  Still in role
 Institution; Lecturer     provide analysis and
 in Public Policy and      commentary on public
 Director of Domestic      policy issues. Teach
 Policy Studies in the     classes in public
 Public Policy Program,    policy and participate
 Stanford University       in associated faculty
 Partner, Brunswick        discussions
 Group
Provide public affairs    Jan. 2023-Present        Still in role
 and communications
 counsel to clients of
 critical issues
 business consulting
 firm
NBC News Contributor,     Provide on-air           Dec. 2023-Present  Still in role    Not an employee;
 NBC Universal Inc.        commentary for Meet                                          compensated as
                           the Press                                                    independent contractor
Member of the Board of    Provide oversight for    Jul. 2015-Present  Still in role    Not an employee;
 Directors, El Camino      community-based                                              compensated as
 Health/El Camino          nonprofit health                                             independent contractor
 Hospital                  system
Regular Contributor, CNN  Write columns for CNN    Jan. 2021-July     Opinion page     Not an employee;
 Opinion, Turner           Opinion                  2024               ceased           compensated as
 Entertainment Group                                                   operations       independent contractor
Inaugural Director and    Direct meetings and      Sep. 2017-Jan.     Term of          Compensated by Aspen
 Member, Aspen Economic    priorities of            2021               participation    Institute through 2019
 Strategy Group            bipartisan group of                         ended            as Director and then was
                           economic policy                                              not compensated as a
                           leaders                                                      regular member of the
                                                                                        group
Operating Partner,        Source and diligence     2018-2020          Fund exited      Not an employee;
 NewRoad Capital           health care deals for                       health care      compensated as
 Partners                  Fund III of private                         investing        independent contractor;
                           equity firm                                                  retain carried interest
                                                                                        in Fund III
Editorial Board Member,   Provide editorial        Nov. 2016-Jul.     Voluntary        Not an employee;
 Salem Media Group         guidance and publish     2021               departure, to    compensated as
                           commentaries for radio                      run for CA       independent contractor
                           network                                     statewide
                                                                       office
Counsel, Arent Fox        Provide legal and        Oct. 2015-Oct.     Voluntary        Not an employee;
                           public affairs counsel   2018               departure, to    compensated as
                           to clients of law firm                      accept           independent contractor
                                                                       different role
Board Member, Social      Serve as presidentially- Sep. 2014-Sep.     Term ended, was  Compensated as part-time,
 Security Advisory Board   appointed and Senate     2018               not              special government
                           confirmed member of                         reappointed      employee
                           board providing
                           recommendations on
                           Social Security
                           program to relevant
                           Federal policymakers
William E. Simon          Teach class on           Aug. 2017-Dec.     Academic term
 Visiting Professor,       policymaking and         2017               ended
 Pepperdine University     advise graduate
 School of Public Policy   students
Lecturer in Law,          Teach law school         Jan. 2014-Apr.     Voluntary
 Stanford Law School,      classes                  2018               departure, was
 Stanford University                                                   no longer
                                                                       needed to
                                                                       teach courses
                                                                       assigned
Political Commentator,    Provide on-air           Jul. 2016-Dec.     Voluntary        Not an employee;
 CNN, Turner               commentary for CNN and   2016               departure; to    compensated as
 Entertainment Group       CNN International                           accept           independent contractor
                           programming                                 different role
Columnist, Bloomberg      Write columns for        Feb. 2013-Feb.     Voluntary        Not an employee;
 View, Bloomberg LP        Bloomberg View           2015               departure, to    compensated as
                           (Opinion Page)                              accept           independent contractor
                                                                       different role
Policy Director, Romney   Provide policy advice    Jan. 2011-Nov.     Campaign ended
 for President and Mitt    to presidential          2012
 Romney's Free and         candidate and run
 Strong America PAC        policy shop of PAC and
                           then presidential
                           campaign
Deputy Campaign Manager   Provide policy advice    Jun. 2009-Aug.     Campaign ended
 and Policy Director,      to gubernatorial         2010
 Poizner for Governor      candidate and run
 (CA)                      policy shop of CA
                           gubernatorial campaign
Associate Attorney        Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher  Nov. 2008-Jun.     Voluntary        Also worked as a Summer
                           LLP                      2009               departure, to    Associate here, May 2006-
                                                                       accept           Aug. 2006
                                                                       different role
Senior Counselor to the   Provide counsel to       May 2008-Nov.      Voluntary
 Deputy Secretary,         Deputy Secretary of      2008               departure; to
 Department of Health      Health and Human                            accept
 and Human Services        Services                                    different role
Domestic Policy           Provide domestic policy  Jun. 2007-Feb.     Campaign ended
 Director, Romney for      advice to presidential   2008
 President, Inc.           candidate
Summer Associate, Paul,   Author legal memos,      May 2005-Aug.      End of summer,
 Hastings Janofsky &       conduct legal research   2005               return to law
 Walker LLP                and fulfill other                           school
                           responsibilities for
                           law firm
Visiting Fellow,          Conduct research and     May 2003-Aug.      Term of
 Heritage Foundation       provide analysis and     2003               fellowship
                           commentary on health                        ended,
                           policy issues                               returned to
                                                                       graduate
                                                                       school
Health Policy Advocate,   Advocated for the        Jul. 2001-Aug.     Voluntary
 The ERISA Industry        employee health          2002               departure, to
 Committee (ERIC)          benefits interests of                       return to
                           America's large                             graduate
                           employers                                   school
Teaching Fellow, Harvard  Served as teaching       Feb. 2003-May      End of academic  The academic terms worked
 University                assistant for a          2005               terms            were: Spring 2003 (Feb.
                           variety of                                                   2003-May 2003); Fall
                           undergraduate classes                                        2003 (Sep. 2003-Jan.
                           in the Department of                                         2004); Spring 2004 (Feb.
                           Government at Harvard                                        2004-May 2004); Fall
                           University                                                   2004 (Sep. 2004-Jan.
                                                                                        2005); Spring 2005 (Feb.
                                                                                        2005-May 2005).
Staff Assistant, APCO     Provide public affairs   Jul. 1999-Jan.     Voluntary
 Worldwide, Inc. (then     and communications       2000               departure, to
 APCO Associates, Inc.)    counsel to clients of                       attend
                           public relations firm                       graduate
                                                                       school
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    The Chair. Thank you, Dr. Chen.
    We will now go to questioning. And I will start this off 
with you, Mr. Bentzel. Detention and demurrage fees greatly 
impact our shippers, and this was part of the Ocean Reform 
Shipping Act, as well as the American consumer. And between 
2020 and 2022, nine of the largest carriers serving U.S. liner 
trade charged approximately $8.9 billion in demurrage and 
detention fees above the shipping costs.
    Last week, the Commission published a final rule on 
detention and demurrage and what practices could be used to 
help cut down on costs and improve transparency. Can you 
explain how you think this new rule will help American 
businesses?
    Mr. Bentzel. Yes, Chairman. Well, I believe that what you 
did here in the Commerce Committee to provide guidance on how 
to evaluate these claims for detention and demurrage was the 
singular most important thing that we could have done, and 
challenging those that were unfairly assessed really gave a 
prescriptive set of requirements on how you should provide a 
billing and assessment to the claims.
    So I think the steps that you took to require a simplified 
process is the number one tool that we can use to challenge 
those that are unfairly assessed. We also, Chairman Maffei, 
established an audit of all of the ocean carriers to assess 
their process, and our staff works routinely with them. I think 
those two efforts have really taken a lot of the challenge that 
we would have faced ordinarily without legislative change.
    The Chair. Well, this was a very bipartisan effort, 
obviously, our colleagues, Senator Klobuchar, and Senator Thune 
taking the lead on that legislation, and then us working with 
our House colleagues, and Congressman Garamendi, to make sure 
that we got this over the goal line. But what is it in the 
transparency aspect that is allowing the U.S. to feel more 
comfortable? Is it that we are being able to discern these 
issues and thereby being able to detect something that is an 
unfair practice?
    Mr. Bentzel. You know, we do not have as much transparency 
as I would like in the ocean shipping world. If I were to take 
a--try to get an airline ticket to LA five months from now, I 
would know exactly what was going to happen and when it would--
when it would arrive. And so I am looking at issues related to 
creating greater transparency on the system of movement.
    Really, we are now not in a position of allowing U.S. 
consumers to do advance planning or to anticipate when there 
are delays in shipping, and there are delays. And it is not 
always the fault of the carriers; it is issues related to the 
Red Sea, and Suez Canal, and Panama. But we do need----
    The Chair. Or you would say that when U.S. products--U.S. 
agricultural products were left on the docks and ships returned 
empty because they could make more money by hurrying back than 
taking U.S. products back, that was a problem.
    Mr. Bentzel. It is a huge problem. We are here to protect 
the U.S. consumer, and to ensure that services are fair and 
reasonably accessible to all parties.
    The Chair. I think our point was if you are calling on U.S. 
ports, then you have to have a fair trade; you have to have a 
fair transportation trade. You can't have mysterious practices 
where all of a sudden you have to go, and leave things on the 
dock. So that was our main point. Unfortunately, I have got to 
get to other people.
    Dr. Chen--and it may take me two rounds on all our 
questions, but that is OK we have lots of colleagues who want 
to ask questions--thank you again for your willingness to 
serve. You know, these issues about the Amtrak Board and 
experience, and you certainly have a wealth of experience, and 
so it is good to hear your love and passion for the rail 
system.
    One of the things that came up is your work, obviously, 
working for Senator Romney and the fact that some--you have 
expressed support for President Trump's (sic) budget. I just 
need to know where you are on long-distance Amtrak service? 
What are your thoughts about that?
    Dr. Chen. Chair Cantwell, thank you for the question. I am 
very supportive of Amtrak's long-distance mission. I think 
Amtrak has a couple of goals, as I noted in my introductory 
remarks. Obviously, there is a mandate for Amtrak to be run as 
a business, but more importantly perhaps, there is a public 
mission to Amtrak as well, and the long-distance component is 
critically important to the future of Amtrak. If you look 
historically, it is a big part of Amtrak's heritage as well.
    So if confirmed to the Board, I would be an advocate and 
supporter of long-distance trains and long-distance rail and 
the communities it serves throughout the United States, urban 
and rural.
    The Chair. Thank you, that is good to hear. And I am glad 
to hear of your support on the high-speed rail corridor in 
California. I am sure Californians will be happy about that. We 
obviously have our own ideas in the Northwest about what we 
would like to see, but we will get to that in a second round.
    Senator Cruz.
    Senator Cruz. Thank you, Madam Chair; and thank you to each 
of the three nominees for being here today.
    Mr. Bentzel, since the horrific October 7th massacre in 
Israel, almost one year ago, the Houthi terrorists in Yemen 
have been launching attacks on commercial vessels in the Red 
Sea. So far, the Houthis have targeted over 70 vessels, 
including U.S. flagships which resulted in sinkings, shipping 
delays, and increased costs as many vessels were diverted 
around Africa. Mr. Bentzel, you noted the Houthis are targeting 
international trade to support Hamas against Israel.
    During a recent FMC hearing, you said that you were 
evaluating whether the Houthis, quote, ``Politically generated 
attacks on international shipping are violations of U.S. and 
international law.'' You explained that, ``Yemen could be the 
target nation for failure to adequately protect the right of 
innocent passage through its territorial waters.''
    Mr. Bentzel, you clearly believe supporting the Houthis 
rocket attacks is a violation of international law, and I agree 
with you. What countries are supporting the Houthis?
    Mr. Bentzel. I am not the best person to get into that 
issue, but I believe there are some issues related to Chinese 
support of the Houthis. There are issues in Iran as well that 
affect shipping. So the issue has been a hotspot, a troubled 
area. Most nations adhere to the law of the sea, which requires 
the protection of innocent passage through their waters. And so 
looking at that, I feel reasonably comfortable in saying they 
are in violation, at least in Yemen, which is questionable in 
terms of their territorial prerogatives and sovereignty, of 
violating the articles of the--in the Law of the Sea that 
require them to protect innocent passage.
    Senator Cruz. Well, you are certainly right that both China 
and Iran have active involvement in the Houthis' attacks. 
Although the Houthis operate out of Yemen, Iran is providing 
them with money, with training, with equipment, and strategic 
information, according to the Defense Department, without 
Iran's assistance, quote, ``The Houthis would struggle to 
effectively track and strike vessels navigating shipping lines 
through the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden. What is more, China 
is knowingly facilitating these attacks by purchasing 90 
percent of Iran's oil.'' Do you believe Iran and China may be 
violating international law themselves by supporting the 
Houthis?
    Mr. Bentzel. I would not feel qualified to get into that 
area. I do believe there is potential violations of 
International Maritime Law on the protection of access into and 
out of areas that are required for transit. I would not be--I 
could not evaluate those other areas that might be potential 
violations.
    Senator Cruz. Have you approached the State Department 
about your concerns?
    Mr. Bentzel. I have talked to the State Department about 
shipping issues related to the attacks on merchant shipping, 
yes.
    Senator Cruz. And has the State Department taken any action 
in response to your concerns?
    Mr. Bentzel. Not yet.
    Senator Cruz. OK. In your judgment, why is it important to 
address the Houthis attacks on shipping and Iran's support for 
those attacks?
    Mr. Bentzel. I mean, we go back historically, I think the 
last time that you had seen a navigational strait under attack, 
military attack, was in the 1800s when the Barbary Pirates were 
attacking access into the Mediterranean. So there has always 
been an importance on the protection of navigational straits. 
They are sort of a maritime superhighway. So I believe that 
there should be more focus on restrictions. Right now, 80 
percent of the cargo that went through the Red Sea and the Suez 
Canal is not going there.
    Senator Cruz. Thank you. Dr. Chen. Thank you for being 
here, thank you for your service. Please tell the Committee, in 
your judgment, what in your background qualifies you to serve 
on the Board of an entity that is at the intersection of both 
the public and private sectors?
    Dr. Chen. Thank you, Ranking Member Cruz, for the question. 
I believe that I bring both, experience in public policy as 
well as in business, and more importantly, in governance and 
oversight. The governance and oversight piece, Senator Cruz, I 
believe is particularly important at this stage of Amtrak's 
development and growth. I think it is important to have board 
members who understand the fiduciary responsibility that the 
Board has to the American people, to the American taxpayer, to 
you who provide funding to Amtrak. I think I have got deep 
experience particularly in the quasi-public setting, which 
makes Amtrak unique.
    I also think that given my experience in public policy, 
understanding some of the challenges and issues that lie ahead 
with respect to the implementation of the infrastructure bill, 
continued issues around how to improve customer service, and 
looking at what the future of Amtrak will be in states 
throughout this country, I think that combination of policy and 
business background would be unique to the Board.
    I would also be remiss if I did not mention the fact that I 
am from California, and I think representation of the national 
network is crucially important.
    Senator Cruz. Well, having married a native Californian, I 
will agree with that proposition as well. Thank you.
    Thank you.
    The Chair. Senator Wicker.

                STATEMENT OF HON. ROGER WICKER, 
                 U.S. SENATOR FROM MISSISSIPPI

    Senator Wicker. Well, thank you, and I congratulate all 
three of the nominees for being selected----
    The Chair. If I could just interrupt, before you arrived, 
Senator Romney praised the decor of this room, and so we want 
to give due gratitude to you and your leadership for this.
    Senator Wicker. Well, yes, I think he expressed committee 
envy. OK.
    [Laughter.]
    Senator Wicker. Well, OK. If I might, before you start my 
clock running.
    [Laughter.]
    Senator Wicker. Of course, many things that begin as bad 
news turn out to be fortuitous. We were the first Committee 
during my chairmanship to have an opportunity to redecorate 
because there was a flood on one of the floors above us, and it 
had to be repaired. But I think Senator Romney should also 
speak to my wife, Gayle, about her sense of color and 
proportions. So thank you for that. And again, thank you to all 
the people who are here to serve.
    I am here today because I am absolutely delighted at Dr. 
Chen's appointment to the Amtrak Board, and I think Dr. Chen, 
you will be a great addition. And I loved what you said about 
governance oversight and the fact that this is quasi-public and 
answers both to the customers and the public, as well as to 
those of us who have a legislative sense.
    There will be, soon, perhaps in January, perhaps in 
February 2025, a new line reopened. It has been closed between 
Mobile, running through Mississippi with four stops, and going 
to New Orleans on a twice-daily basis. We are very excited 
about this. It is amazing to me that a line that had to close 
because of Hurricane Katrina, in 2005, has taken this long to 
be restored, but it has been a lot of work, and we have made a 
lot of assurances.
    As you know, Dr. Chen, the railroad companies got out of 
the passenger business in an agreement with Amtrak and the 
Federal Government that the Amtrak trains could run on the 
privately owned rail lines, and there would be an accommodation 
there. When it was clear that we were determined to reopen this 
line, there was naturally some concern, some questions by the 
freight rail lines as to how this would affect them, and 
eventually a lawsuit had to be filed by Amtrak before the 
Surface Transportation Board, which brought this matter to a 
head, and there was finally a settlement.
    The result really is that the freight lines have been 
enhanced, and that will accommodate more freight and also 
accommodate our hope to run this rail line on time and as an 
advantage to the people who live along the coastline between 
New Orleans.
    If we have a grand opening and a ribbon cutting, you are 
not averse to coming and visiting with your many, many friends 
on the Gulf Coast of Mississippi and being part of that grand 
opening, are you?
    Dr. Chen. I look forward, Senator Wicker, to visiting, 
hopefully you, and the great people of your state. And I, too, 
am looking forward to that reopening of service.
    Senator Wicker. Well, thank you very, very much. We are 
excited about it, and the governments of all three states, and 
the municipalities have been a part of this. I appreciate your 
answer to the distinguished Chairwoman about long-distance 
passenger rail. And let me just say on the record, she and I 
are together on that issue, and that answer was very reassuring 
to me.
    As someone who has had to make the trains run on time in 
other respects, do you have any thoughts about how we are going 
to make sure that the customer is going to be able, on all of 
our lines, to rely on reliable service and adherence to the 
schedules?
    Dr. Chen. Senator, thank you for the question. The first 
priority of Amtrak needs to be safety, the safe transport of 
our passengers. But certainly, reliability is a very important 
factor as well. There are a number of reasons why there have 
been challenges on the on-time issues. Some of that is because 
of the behavior of the host railroads not making available 
right of way when they have been obligated to, and that is an 
issue that, as you noted, is being addressed via litigation.
    I would also say we have to make sure that Amtrak is making 
the necessary investments in fleet, as well as in all of the 
administrative elements, to make sure that we are doing our 
part to get passengers from A to B in a safe and timely manner. 
So it is a combination, I think, Senator, of ensuring that 
Amtrak is doing its job. We also need our host railroads to do 
their job as well to ensure that passengers are able to 
reliably get from where they are at, to where they are going.
    Senator Wicker. Thank you very much. And thank you, Madam 
Chair, for passing along that compliment. You and I have been 
advocates of reliable quasi-government passenger rail for a 
long, long time, and I appreciate you continuing to ask the 
question about long-distance service. This is indeed a national 
agreement and something that should be able to work. And I will 
just tell you, I do not know why someone like Dr. Chen has not 
been nominated long ago, because he is such an excellent public 
servant, and I welcome and support his nomination. I yield 
back.
    The Chair. Thank you, Senator.
    Senator Wicker. Thank you, ma'am.
    The Chair. Thank you. I think in our last hearing of Amtrak 
Nominees, we brought up the I-10 Corridor, and just Amtrak is a 
big economic development tool that connects communities and 
builds capacity. So we are just very big fans of this whole 
discussion on long-distance service throughout the West, 
throughout the South, you know, obviously the East Coast has an 
established service, but there is more to do to knit together 
very small communities that really would benefit from this and 
the traveling public. So thank you for emphasizing that so 
much.
    While we are waiting for some of our colleagues, I am going 
to go to--oh, I see Senator Klobuchar. So we are not waiting, 
Senator Klobuchar.

               STATEMENT OF HON. AMY KLOBUCHAR, 
                  U.S. SENATOR FROM MINNESOTA

    Senator Klobuchar. Very good. Thank you, and thank you for 
holding this hearing.
    I think I am going to start, Dr. Chen, about Amtrak here. 
Minnesota, you just added a route, Amtrak added a route between 
Chicago and Minnesota as part of the Empire Builder, I would 
like to note that it has had ridership no one expected. It is 
been very high, so we now have two routes. I think people like 
that. And so we are going to just mention how important this 
is. As you know, the Empire Builder route is one of Amtrak's 
largest rail lines, provides a vital link, and contributes 
greatly to the economy. Can you speak, Mr. Chen, about the 
economic importance of long-distance routes? Because I know 
there is a lot of emphasis on the East Coast, get it, but how 
important is that for rural communities?
    Dr. Chen. Thank you, Senator Klobuchar. The Empire Builder 
is an impressive route that starts out in the west, actually, 
Senator Cantwell, and makes its way through the Upper Midwest 
states. All of Amtrak's long-distance routes are of critical 
importance to the economies of the states through which they 
run.
    We are talking about a few elements, Senator Klobuchar. 
First of all, it is not just the well-paying good jobs that 
Amtrak itself creates, but also the economic vibrancy of the 
towns through which these routes run. It plays an important 
role in generating economic growth in those towns, but also, 
more importantly, provides for tourism and various elements 
that allow people to see parts of the country that they would 
not be able to see otherwise. And so I think that that is why 
long distance is an important element of this; it is because it 
gives people that opportunity.
    Senator Klobuchar. Yes, and one pitch I want to make is 
that there is--that DOT has prioritized its Northern Light 
Express route from Twin Cities to Duluth, and we are still 
working out some details on that. But it has been trying--we 
have been trying to get it done for quite a while, so I hope it 
is something that you can look at.
    Commissioner Bentzel, thank you for your work on the Ocean 
Shipping Reform Act, for implementing it. I understand that the 
Federal Maritime Commission has already received over twice as 
many new cases in the first two months of 2024 as in the entire 
year of 2020. Could you talk about how the Ocean Shipping 
Reform Act has empowered shippers to file complaints about 
unreasonable practices?
    Mr. Bentzel. Well, thank you for the question, Senator. It 
has been a big change. The market is relatively restricted in 
that there are only a few carriers, 10 or 11, that are 
internationally providing services. So there has always been a 
little reticence about trying to engage and protect yourself. I 
think the work that you did, and your colleagues did on the 
Committee----
    Senator Klobuchar. Senator Thune, I would note, was the 
lead Republican on it, yes.
    Mr. Bentzel. OK. Senator Thune, and you, and all of those 
that did that, set up a simplified process for challenging 
these complaints. I think that was the singular most important 
thing that occurred to change the willingness to challenge 
what, in certain cases, can be allegations of unfair treatment 
and penalties that would be implemented as a result of that. We 
have also taken some steps in the Agency. Our Chairman directed 
an audit of all of the ocean carriers to review their 
practices.
    So we sort of have a carrot-and-stick approach to upgrading 
these invoices, to make sure they are fair, but there were just 
an immense amount, I guess I think in total $12 billion of 
assessments over the course of the pandemic when you had 
congestion, and it was difficult to pick up cargo, and retrieve 
cargo, and put your containers back. So I give a lot of the 
credit to this Committee for what we have been able to achieve.
    Senator Klobuchar. Thank you. Mr. Chapman, I have worked 
hard on a train derailment issue in Raymond, Minnesota, with 
the rail company, with Burlington Northern, as well as with the 
NTSB. I appreciate that, and I am glad we passed the Railway 
Safety Act last May. I think I will ask you a question on the 
record about that, but in my remaining time, I wanted to ask 
you about close calls and runway incursions.
    There have been an alarming number of close calls on 
runways in recent years. A recent collision in January at the 
Tokyo Airport and some close ones in the U.S., we need to 
ensure planes are equipped with, of course, existing technology 
that would alert pilots to the presence of other planes on the 
runway. Could you talk about how that technology would make 
planes safer and what else we should be doing to ward off what 
could be accidents with disastrous consequences?
    Mr. Chapman. Absolutely, Senator. And thank you for the 
question. It is not a matter of just technology in the 
airplane; it is also technology at the airports to----
    Senator Klobuchar. Exactly.
    Mr. Chapman.--to ensure that we are able to detect when an 
incursion is occurring or is about to occur, and then ensure 
that the people who most need to know that are alerted. That 
includes controllers, but also those operating the aircraft, 
the crews onboard the aircraft. We have technology that can do 
that. We need to ensure that that technology is in place and 
functioning. We have an outstanding safety record over 
particularly the last 15 years, but there are some serious red 
flags that all of us are aware of, and all of us are taking 
very seriously. We need to pursue those and ensure that we 
address whatever is occurring out there that is resulting in 
this uptick in close calls.
    Senator Klobuchar. Very good. Thank you.
    And thank you, Madam Chair.
    The Chair. Thank you, Senator Klobuchar. And we did give 
you and Senator Thune praise for your work in getting the Ocean 
Shipping Reform Act before the Committee, and everyone's hard 
work, and our colleague Congressman Garamendi----
    Senator Klobuchar. Yes.
    The Chair.--for his work in the House.
    Senator Klobuchar. And Rusty of South Dakota, Rusty 
Johnson.
    The Chair. Yes.
    Senator Klobuchar. But it would not have happened without 
you, Madam Chair, so thank you for your work.
    The Chair. Well, thanks to everybody. I think that is the 
way we solve these changing supply chain issues. So we are glad 
that Congress, on this particular point, paid attention to give 
our farmers really, and some of our other shippers, really, the 
type of backup that they needed to deal with international 
carriers. So I am very excited about what the FMC has been able 
to achieve. But again, thank you for your leadership.
    Senator Klobuchar. Thanks.
    The Chair. We will now, as we are waiting--oh, I see 
maybe--Senator Capito, if you would like to go, that would be 
great, if not, I can give you a minute, so it is up to you.
    Senator Capito.

            STATEMENT OF HON. SHELLEY MOORE CAPITO, 
                U.S. SENATOR FROM WEST VIRGINIA

    Senator Capito. Yes. Thank you, Madam Chair. Thank you to 
all of the three gentlemen for being willing to take on some 
onerous roles. And I appreciate that.
    I am going to start with the NTSB candidate, and I would 
like to ask you--and we talked about this in my office, on the 
train derailment issue in East Palestine. What lessons did the 
NTSB learn from the way you reacted and the way the reactions 
were that we can help with the community response, in 
particular, that we talked about, to be able to make sure that 
the community gets, not just the full information, but as 
quickly as possible?
    Mr. Chapman. Yes, thank you, Senator. And I enjoyed our 
visit yesterday, and I enjoyed our discussion about this issue, 
which is very important. Certainly, there were lots of lessons 
learned from the investigation itself. I have to say, from a 
sort of a process standpoint, as I indicated when we spoke 
yesterday, I felt that the onsite visits--the onsite meetings 
that we convened in East Palestine last--summer before last, a 
two day investigative hearing, and then in this past summer our 
final meeting and the adoption of our report.
    I felt that those were incredibly productive, helpful 
exercises in terms of demonstrating support and concern, 
listening to the community, and helping the community 
understand that there are people out there that are sensitive 
to their concerns, and the harm that they have suffered as a 
result of that horrible accident. I think that it is not 
something we can do all the time, but I do think it is 
something that is a very useful exercise when you have a 
particularly egregious incident like East Palestine.
    Senator Capito. Yes. And I think something that you told me 
yesterday that stuck with me, and I think is certainly true in 
cases like this, is that people want to be heard. They want to 
feel like you care, that you are listening, and that whatever 
formulations you are taking in are going to have an impact on 
what your decisions might be in the future. So I appreciate 
that.
    Mr. Chen, again thank you for the visit. And a topic I 
brought up with you, and if you ascend to the Board, which I 
plan to support your nomination for that, the prices at Amtrak 
are going up, some of them pretty steep, particularly what I 
see at the Northeast Corridor. How do you address that? I mean, 
not so much do you bring them down; I am not asking for that 
kind of promise. I am asking, what kind of lens do you look 
through when you are looking at pricing?
    Dr. Chen. Senator Capito, thank you for the question. I 
think it is something I look forward to digging into. There is 
obviously a business question, which is what is the optimal 
pricing to ensure that all the different factors that need to 
be accounted for are accounted for. But there are other factors 
as well. For example, we want to make sure that we are 
investing in the right technology so that the rails are safe. I 
think that is important. We want to make sure that we do 
everything we can to keep the trains timely, and all that 
requires resources. So it is something I look forward to 
looking into more if I am confirmed, because certainly, we also 
want it to be affordable. We want people to be able to access 
the rail experience as well.
    Senator Capito. Right. And it is--obviously it is important 
in certain corridors for ease of traffic. You know, as I always 
say, you want to make sure the trains run on time, but at the 
same time, it is rather eye-popping, at least for me, when I 
look to price a ticket. It seems as though the prices have gone 
up. The only change I see in the service, and it has been very 
much on time, which I appreciate, has been the assigned 
seating, which I hear people grousing about all the time. But I 
actually, I kind of like it because then you know where you are 
going. You know where you are going to sit. So I would 
encourage you to keep that aspect of it.
    Mr. Bentzel, I have been asked about the--and excuse me if 
you have been asked this question, and welcome--about the 
possibility of a dockworker strike. This would have really 
devastating effects on all kinds of goods and services as we 
are moving into the holiday season, I am sure that is something 
that a lot of merchants are thinking about as well. Where are 
you all on this, and do you have any indications of what the 
administration is thinking?
    Mr. Bentzel. Well, statutorily, our agency is actually 
immunized from the collective bargaining process. We are not 
supposed to get involved in it; we are more involved on the 
consumer side. So we have provided some advice to consumers who 
may be impacted, shipping consumers, to ensure that they still 
have rights and protections at the Federal Maritime Commission 
that went out yesterday. It is a big--huge economic concern. It 
worries me because of the volume of trade that our economy 
needs and relies on.
    So it is in the collective bargaining process, which is 
sort of immunized from a lot of the other elements of 
government. So I am hopeful that they will get an agreement to 
not go into a work dispute. I am in contact when the 
administration calls to ask about some of the industry 
participants, and I will continue to do that on an ad hoc 
basis, but we are mostly out of the game other than protecting 
the rights of consumers during a strike.
    Senator Capito. Let me just add one quick little follow-up 
question here just for history and my own edification. They 
renegotiate every 5 years, correct? Am I correct on that?
    Mr. Bentzel. It depends, but there is--basically an 
agreement, coastwise agreement on the West Coast that covers 
Vancouver to San Diego, and then an Atlantic and Gulf Coast 
agreement. So they can negotiate the terms, but five or six 
years is usually the term.
    Senator Capito. OK. Is it customary that we get this close 
to a--I mean, have we gotten this close to a strike in the 
recent past?
    Mr. Bentzel. No.
    Senator Capito. No.
    Mr. Bentzel. In the East Coast, traditionally there has 
been a little bit more labor peace freedom; it has been a 
little bit more contentious on the West Coast. In this case, 
what happened was the ocean carriers had incredible profits 
during the pandemic, and the labor union was not with a rate 
structure that reflected that, so they are far apart on wages.
    Senator Capito. I see. All right, thank you.
    Thank you, Madam Chair.
    The Chair. Thank you, Senator Capito.
    I am going to turn to you now, Mr. Chapman, but I just want 
to say to my colleagues, if there is anybody else who plans to 
come to the hearing, now would be a great time to do it. 
Otherwise, after my questions, we will probably close out.
    But Mr. Chapman, I did not get a chance to ask you in the 
first round, so I have a couple of different issues I want to 
cover. First, June of this year marked the 25th anniversary of 
the Olympic Pipeline Explosion in Bellingham, Washington, which 
killed three children. The company's negligence was so severe 
that multiple company executives were sentenced to jail, and 
the judge in the case decried the lack of effective Federal 
oversight.
    One of the issues we have had concern about is the lack of 
resources preventing NTSB from being an effective safety 
watchdog in the accident part. The Board failed to investigate 
the 2022 Keystone leak, which resulted in the largest onshore 
oil spill in the last decade, and another leak in Mississippi 
which struck dozens of people, making them sick. So the FAA 
Authorization Bill, which we all fought hard for here, 
authorized an eight percent increase in funding for NTSB. How 
would those additional resources help the NTSB effectively 
investigate accidents in the pipeline area?
    Mr. Bentzel. First of all, Madam Chair, thank you to you 
and the Committee for your support and your good work on the 
FAA Reauthorization, generally, but specifically with regard to 
the NTSB component of that. Very important, and very important 
with respect to the resources made available to us, the 
authorized funding levels. The staffing is certainly our 
biggest challenge at NTSB. We are a small agency, and we can 
only be where we have the staff to allow us to be.
    And so the increase in funding that we have seen over this 
last year, or so, and the increase in reauthorization is very 
helpful to us with regard to those staffing levels, pipeline 
and rail to the areas where we, frankly, need the most help I 
think. That and highway, I would say, where we have some real 
challenges.
    The Chair. What is the expertise do you think we need at 
NTSB on pipeline?
    Mr. Bentzel. Well, the sorts of folks, first of all, that 
have that kind of expertise--that is a fairly limited group of 
people, so we need to be able to attract those people to the 
Agency and ensure that we can make it attractive enough for 
them to stay. But we need folks that do have experience and 
expertise in pipeline issues, and the increased resources will 
help us in that regard.
    The Chair. Thank you. You mentioned in your opening 
statement about traffic fatalities and the leading cause. Last 
year we had over 40,000 people die in accidents on our road. 
You are saying intoxicated driving and speeding are two of the 
biggest issues. What are the most important things that we can 
do now to improve safety on our transportation system?
    Mr. Chapman. Well, we have a lot of tools in the toolbox. I 
believe strongly that with regard to, frankly, what I see as 
the three biggest challenges, certainly impairment, alcohol 
impairment, specifically, is still a huge problem for us. 
Speeding, excessive speed, and then distraction as well. I 
believe that technology has a major role to play in helping us 
address those issues going forward.
    We have a lot of technology on our automobiles right now 
that, frankly, a lot of folks are not even aware is there, they 
do not know. And that is not all bad because often it is 
working passively. But there is more we can do with regard to 
alcohol impairment. We have recommended the installation of 
passive alcohol detection technology on all newly manufactured 
vehicles, or driver monitoring systems that can detect alcohol 
impairment as well as, by the way, fatigue or distraction. Or 
those technologies in combination, we think that that has a lot 
of potential for addressing alcohol impairment going forward.
    We believe that with regard to speeding, intelligent speed 
assistance, a technology that will, at a minimum, warn a driver 
when they have exceeded the speed or has exceeded by a certain 
amount. Distraction, again, driver monitoring systems hold a 
lot of promise. There are plenty of other tools that we are 
working on, we are advocating for, a 0.05 blood alcohol content 
with regard to alcohol impairment. We would like to see all the 
states adopt 0.05. I spent a lot of time on that issue, but I 
do think technology has a lot of promise moving forward.
    The Chair. And does the NTSB have the expertise in emerging 
technologies?
    Mr. Chapman. We do have that expertise, and these are major 
areas of focus for us in terms of traffic safety.
    The Chair. Well, I think this would be a subject that the 
Committee would like to hear about in the future and understand 
that expertise and those recommendations and the illumination, 
as Chair Homendy has said in the past, the lessons of an 
accident investigation and what are like the top ten things we 
should do. I think that would be, particularly, as it relates 
to our highways, something the Committee should look at in the 
future.
    Mr. Chapman. I know the Chair would agree with me, this 
is--or Chair Homendy would agree with me, this is our number 
one concern, our number one priority is getting our arms around 
the tragedy on our highways.
    The Chair. Thank you. If I could turn to the NTSB's two-day 
investigation hearing on August 6 and August 7 into the Alaska 
Airline Flight 1282 door plug accident. The Board examined the 
FAA's oversight of manufacturers, including production line 
audits. The FAA 102 audits from January and February of this 
year found widespread safety failings at both Boeing and Spirit 
aerosystems, even after the FAA told me in an April letter that 
they had conducted a collection of 298 audits of both 
manufacturers in the past years. This was an effort with then 
Acting Administrator Billy Nolen to get a response to the need 
for audits.
    At NTSB's investigative hearing, the FAA highlighted its 
work to implement enhanced, across the aviation system safety; 
however, after hundreds of FAA audits over the last two years, 
we are still seeing persistent production quality issues, so 
this does not reassure the traveling public that the FAA is 
identifying, proactively, the issues in front of the Agency. 
Let alone the issues about the manufacturers, but its oversight 
in general.
    Based on the NTSB's preliminary investigations, do you 
think it is important for the FAA to have an effective 
agencywide Safety Management System to strengthen the 
coordinated effectiveness oversight?
    Mr. Chapman. I do, Senator. And I support the concepts that 
are represented in the legislation that I know that you have 
introduced. We are big advocates of Safety Management Systems, 
and that certainly is not limited to private sector operators. 
I think there is a lot to be said for embracing the principles 
of Safety Management Systems in government and at the FAA.
    As you, undoubtedly, saw during the hearing, there are, I 
would say, three areas that we are particularly focused on. And 
I do not want to get too far ahead of our investigators on 
this, but at least in terms of the way I saw the discussion at 
the hearing, certainly we want to find out exactly what 
happened, specifically what happened. But we also are focused 
heavily on Boeing's safety culture, but also FAA's oversight. 
And I would go so far as to say FAA's safety culture as well.
    The Chair. Well, I think in that regard that is why we have 
called for an SMS, but instead of just--I think where the 
Committee has been, as people allowed for a voluntary SMS, you 
can see through the expert panel testimony, a lot of confusion 
on the ground out at Boeing, about what that even means, or if 
there is one safety system or reporting.
    I did like that, FAA Administrator Whitaker did testify 
before this Committee that, yes, the workforce should have a 
direct pipeline system. That is, be able to raise safety 
awareness issues directly to the FAA without being, somehow, 
gone through a process first at the company. So I very much 
appreciated that. But we need the FAA to have a robust safety 
system, management system too. And so, I think we, Senator 
Duckworth and I, the Co-Chair of the Subcommittee, have looked 
at this issue and thought the expert panel did such great work, 
that exactly how an SMS would be used at the FAA would be a 
helpful tool, as opposed to just going through another process 
where somebody implements a half-step on safety management 
system.
    I do not know if you could speak to this, but the Board's 
consideration of FAA production line audits during the 
investigation, do you think it is important the FAA be able to 
conduct surprise audits or short notice on these safety and 
quality issues?
    Mr. Chapman. I know that your legislation that you and 
Senator Duckworth have put forward calls for shortening the 
timeframe, I do not know that we have a recommendation; I do 
not believe we do have a recommendation on that specifically. I 
personally support it. I think that these audits are effective 
when they are conducted on relatively short notice. We should 
not be, essentially, signaling that this is coming and allowing 
operators and manufacturers to sort of clean up the place 
before the audit occurs.
    The Chair. Thank you. Thank you for that. And again, thank 
you for your willingness to serve another term. I thought if I 
put out a clarion call for all members that somehow my 
colleague from Alaska would show up.
    And so would you like to ask questions now, Senator 
Sullivan?

                STATEMENT OF HON. DAN SULLIVAN, 
                    U.S. SENATOR FROM ALASKA

    Senator Sullivan. I just have one question. Safety, I 
always think about safety and vulnerability, and I do not want 
to give bad people ideas, but you know, occasionally when you 
drive--and when you take Amtrak, you see vulnerabilities. So 
how do we--what are we thinking about, you know, you have had 
some--you have had some issues on trains in Europe and stuff, 
how are we thinking about that? Mr. Chen.
    Dr. Chen. Senator, thank you for the question. I think, 
first of all, we need to make sure that we are investing enough 
in the infrastructure that we need to ensure the safe passage 
of passengers on Amtrak rails.
    Senator Sullivan. But you know what I mean? If like a bad 
guy wants to get on a train and do some damage to passengers 
the way they have done on airplanes. That it looks like--again, 
I do not like giving people ideas, but I hope we are doing 
more, like I hope we have more kind of stuff going on, that 
maybe you do not see as a rider. Do you know what I mean?
    Dr. Chen. It is something, if confirmed, Senator, I will 
commit to working on. I think it is important, and I agree with 
you because safety should be the first priority. No question 
about it.
    Senator Sullivan. And just a maybe a kind of deep dive on 
vulnerabilities, given what has happened in, you know, 
passenger trains overseas.
    Dr. Chen. Senator, certainly that is something I am happy 
to commit to, if confirmed.
    Senator Sullivan. OK, thank you. Thank you, Madam Chair, 
that is the one question I had.
    The Chair. Thank you, Senator Sullivan. And I am assuming, 
Dr. Chen, that Amtrak working with other agencies on threats 
and on hardening the safety procedures are a critical aspect of 
what you think needs to happen?
    Dr. Chen. Indeed, Chair Cantwell, that interaction is very 
important.
    Senator Sullivan. What we do not want to have happen is 
have something happens and then we react. You know what I mean? 
We need to be proactive, and if you get on and just walk 
around, you can see vulnerabilities. I do not want to make it 
like getting on an airplane, but we can still do a lot to 
prevent, you know, bad guys from hurting the Amtrak passenger 
and scaring people.
    The Chair. Thank you.
    Senator Sullivan. Thank you.
    The Chair. Thank you, Senator Sullivan, thank you for being 
here this morning.
    Before we close today's hearing, I have one more question, 
which is to ask all the nominees, if confirmed, will you pledge 
to work collaboratively with this Committee, and provide 
thorough and timely responses to our requests, and information 
that, as we put together and address important policy issues, 
appear before the Committee, as requested?
    Mr. Bentzel. I will.
    Mr. Chapman. Yes, Madam Chair.
    Dr. Chen. Yes, Madam Chair.
    The Chair. Thank you for that commitment. I kind of thought 
that would be the answer, and very much appreciate that.
    Senators will have until close of business Monday, 
September 30, to submit questions for the record to the 
Committee. Witnesses will have until close of business October 
7 to respond to those questions.
    Thank you all, again, for being here, and for your 
testimony.
    That concludes today's hearing.
    [Whereupon, at 11:18 a.m., the hearing was adjourned.]


                            A P P E N D I X

  Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Tammy Duckworth to 
                          Hon. Carl W. Bentzel
People's Republic of China Shipping Dominance
    It is no secret that China has become the world's leading 
shipbuilder. In terms of gross ship tonnage, China, Korea and Japan 
build over 90 percent of the total world tonnage. The United States 
builds about 0.2 percent. At the end of 2022, it was reported that 
China had 1,794 commercial ships under construction and the U.S. had 5. 
This is in spite of Federal programs to support and boost U.S. domestic 
commercial ship building.

    Question 1. How will you continue your work on the Federal Maritime 
Commission to improve U.S. competitiveness in the commercial shipping 
industry?
    Answer. I will continue to work on behalf of the U.S. shipper and 
exporter in ensuring that they receive timely and reasonable ocean 
liner service. This means keeping abreast of industry trends as well as 
ensuring, along with my colleagues, that the Federal Maritime 
Commission (FMC) continues to process complaints and utilize its 
enforcement capabilities, when appropriate. I am committed to this 
premise, and consistent with other statutory and legal obligations, 
will continue to promote the need for a robust U.S. shipping industry.
    Finally, the FMC has authority under the Foreign Shipping Practices 
Act and Section 19 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 to investigate 
actions impacting shipping in the foreign commerce and take certain 
actions to remedy unfavorable conditions. Additionally, FMC statutes 
require additional scrutiny of government-controlled carriers, most of 
which are owned by China. I favor aggressive utilization of these 
statutes when considering issues impacting our Nation's maritime 
industrial base.

    Question 2. How can the Federal Maritime Commission work with the 
Maritime Administration and other maritime agencies to increase the U. 
S's focus on expanding our shipping capabilities?
    Answer. The FMC does work and collaborate with the Maritime 
Administration whenever possible. The Maritime Administration is the 
promotional arm of the U.S. maritime industry, while the FMC is the 
regulatory arm. Both serve an important purpose. As an FMC Commissioner 
I believe it is important the U.S. maritime industry continue to expand 
its presence in the supply chain discussions. These discussions will 
lead to great understanding of the need for the U.S. to expand its U.S. 
maritime capabilities, which I am committed to fostering.
                                 ______
                                 
      Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Ted Cruz to 
                          Hon. Carl W. Bentzel
Maritime Transportation Data Initiative
    You have spent a considerable amount of time on your Maritime 
Transportation Data Initiative (MTDI), which recommends a suite of 
regulations to require data sharing. Several stakeholders have raised 
concerns about the burdens of your MTDI proposals. For example, the 
Houston Port Authority and the Northwest Seaport Alliance noted they do 
not have all the information you would require ports to share, as well 
as that there would be significant costs for the software, more 
personnel time required, and additional data server capacity needed to 
share the data.

    Question 1. Considering your recommendation to mandate ocean 
carriers, marine terminal operators (MTOs), ports, and railroads to 
share the data you described in the MTDI, how much will your 
recommendations cost in money and resources for these stakeholders to 
implement? Please provide a dollar amount for the cost.
    Answer. Before drafting the initial MTDI Recommendations and Views, 
I convened 18 one-hour meetings that included over eighty supply chain 
experts. These meetings were public and are currently housed on the 
Federal Maritime Commission (FMC) YouTube channel. In these meetings 
the same four questions focused on information availability and 
information sharing were asked of each meeting participant. Industry 
meeting participants spanned the supply chain, ranging from truck 
drivers, Class 1 railroads, technology companies, BCOs, chassis 
providers, terminals, ocean carriers and Federal government partners.
    Throughout every meeting, what became evident was that all 
stakeholders were running into the same problems, lack of visibility, 
lack of timely information, lack of a standardized lexicon that often 
led to additional miscommunication. I do not have an exact cost that 
this level of inefficiency cost the U.S. economy, but conservatively 
the lack of reliable ocean shipping information has cost our Nation 
billions of dollars.
    As for mandating, we are still refining where, and if, within the 
supply chain these mandates should occur. The MTDI seeks to establish 
an agreed upon common practice for information attendant to the 
movement of goods for those cargo movements subject to FMC regulation. 
The MTDI recommendations do not require the FMC to collect data or 
store data but would require the ocean carriers to provide reliable 
updated schedule and arrival information using the internet. The 
recommendations would not require the creation of new data sets, and 
information would largely continue to flow through existing private 
sector resources. Simply put the recommendations would require ocean 
carriers to share operational information in a timely and efficient 
manor for the purpose operational fluidity. This information is already 
available, but not always readily shared.
    The MTDI recommendation for Marine Terminal Operators (MTO) would 
require a terminal provide advance information on terminal access and 
to harmonize the status of cargo while under its control. The 
harmonization recommendations were made, after consultation with 
terminal operating systems companies, to make sure that harmonization 
could be made within the construct of existing data and technology. 
Importantly, in my view the recommendation does not compromise 
competition, because information on shipper cargo would be required to 
be kept confidential, as it is currently, but rather reduce 
inefficiency by allowing a shipper to receive more reliable information 
to help with cargo delivery or retrieval.
    The MTDI as it is proposed now would not cost operators substantial 
additional funding or resources, however, it would require operators to 
convey operational information that could impact the shipment to 
colleagues that provide outward facing Internet informational service. 
I have been in continued dialogue with both the Port of Houston and the 
Northwest Seaport Alliance over the course of the development of the 
MTDI recommendations and agree that they do not have the necessary MTDI 
information to share, but both ports shared with me their interest in 
receiving more reliable data to allow them to manage their terminals 
and ports. Technology costs for the ports to collect information will 
not be insubstantial, in the overall scheme a relatively lower cost 
vis-a-vis other infrastructure costs, but I believe the government has 
a role in supporting the implementation of this technology.
    Ranking Member Cruz, I cannot provide an estimate at this point on 
cost. However, the recommendation in its current form would not require 
any new data formulation, all information is already collected and 
available. The data would not be required to be transmitted or 
collected in any other format than what it is currently provided, i.e., 
the internet. The primary cost would be the cost of operational 
personnel transferring more frequently updated and reliable information 
within their own company to those operational personnel managing 
company websites.

    Question 2. What software, personnel, and data server capacity do 
you expect these entities would require complying with the MTDI? Please 
be specific about the costs and feasibility of acquiring such 
resources.
    Answer. MTDI is technology-neutral and does not recommend software 
or data server capacity, it only requires information to be available 
through an Application Programming Interface (API). MTDI is simply the 
establishment of practice in sharing information in a timely manner. 
Already every carrier, marine terminal and port has in place the 
information system to deliver this information. This operational 
information will be shared at some point, the MTDI recommendation 
focusses on squeezing the inefficiency out of supply chain operations 
by ensuring reliable information on a timely basis. The cost would be 
nominal and is highly dependent on the sophistication of the entities 
operational and information sharing structure.

    Question 3. Given the MTDI requirements are expected to be, ``a 
major undertaking and a financial risk for ports,'' have you considered 
whether ocean carriers, ports, MTOs, and railroads may have to raise 
prices to meet the requirements described in the MTDI?
    Answer. Given that there is no technology requirement and that the 
information to be shared is already collected and generated by MTOs, 
ocean carriers and railroads, I would not anticipate that industry 
would have to raise prices to meet the information reliability standard 
that is proposed by MTDI.

    Question 4. What is the FMC's statutory authority to mandate these 
data sharing requirements on railroads?
    Answer. The FMC's statute was amended under the Shipping Act of 
1984 to provide clarification that ocean carriers and non-vessel-owning 
carriers (NVOCC's) had authority to provide international intermodal 
shipping contracts by defining carrier authority to offer through rates 
for through transportation (46 U.S.C. Sec. Sec. 40102(25)(26)).
    The FMC does not have any explicit authority over a railroad acting 
independently as they are not subject the prohibited acts section of 
our statute, which is only applicable to ocean common carriers, marine 
terminal operators, Ocean Transportation Intermediaries (FMC regulated 
entities). However, in instances where a railroad delivers cargo as a 
subcontractor for an ocean carrier the FMC is not restricted from 
reviewing all aspects of the practices of the intermodal move.
    In pertinent part 46 U.S.C. Sec. 41102(c) requires FMC regulated 
entities to ``establish, observe, and enforce just and reasonable 
regulations and practices relating to or connected with receiving, 
handling, storing, or delivering property''.

    Your MTDI report endorses the lexicon developed by the Digital 
Container Shipping Association (DCSA) to impose the recommended 
reporting requirements. However, DCSA, in comments responding to the 
MTDI, said that mandating a standard would be counterproductive because 
it could pause industry efforts to voluntarily adopt standards. 
Moreover, updating standards through regulation would be much slower 
and harder to do in response to changes in the industry.

    Question 1. Given this concern from DCSA, whose standards you 
endorsed, do you share DCSA's concerns that new mandates would slow 
adoption of those standards?
    Answer. DCSA has a large standard setting agenda, primarily focused 
on ocean carriers, and has done a good job getting consensus within 
most of the global shipping industry. For instance, they provide a wide 
range of materials harmonizing the process of soliciting and booking of 
cargo, and implementation of electronic Bills of Lading and other trade 
facilitation areas. We have worked closely with them on one area of 
focus, and that was the DCSA Track and Trace methodology, in order to 
facilitate the transparency of the container movement. The lexicon 
selected was only selected to implement a Track and Trace Methodology. 
The MTDI recommendation is to implement the DCSA methodology and as 
such it does not rely on standards but would require implementation of 
this methodology through timely reporting. The industry has not adopted 
voluntary standards to implement more reliable shipping information.

    Question 2. Do you share DCSA's concerns that mandating standards 
could make it more difficult to amend the standards in the future to 
address changes in the industry because any changes would have to go 
through a formal FMC process?
    Answer. The MTDI recommendation is to implement the DCSA 
methodology and as such it does not rely on standards but would require 
implementation of this methodology through timely reporting. I believe 
that the supply chain is always in evolution. The MTDI is not intended 
to lock companies and entities into an operational standard that would 
hinder efficiency and operational flexibility. Rather, establishing an 
operational practice where information is shared in a timely and 
efficient manor will be a process that will evolve and, in many cases, 
foster innovation.

    Question 3. Have you consulted with DCSA to determine, or otherwise 
evaluated, whether the very proposal of mandatory standards might have 
already begun to chill voluntary adoption? If so, what methodology have 
you employed to conduct the evaluation?
    Answer. Yes, I have talked with DCSA throughout this process. It 
has been a collaborative effort. They have been great at keeping us 
abreast of their standards and how and when they have been implemented. 
To date, we have not yet found any area where MTDI recommendations 
differ from the proposal by DCSA for implementation of their Track and 
Trace methodology, and we continue to talk regularly.
Inflation
    Question 1. In your written testimony, you said the transportation 
and supply chain challenges during the pandemic were, ``the most 
singularly important factor in driving inflationary cost.'' Do you 
believe that government spending contributed to inflation, yes or no?
    Answer. Yes, I do, in part.
Independence of FMC
    Question 1. Do you believe the Federal Maritime Commission is an 
independent agency? If so, please describe in your own words what that 
means.
    Answer. By statute, the Federal Maritime Commission is ``an 
independent establishment of the United States Government.'' 46 U.S.C. 
46101(a). When the Commission was first created under Reorganization 
Plan No. 7 of 1961, that Plan explained that the ``Commission shall not 
be a part of any executive department or under the authority of the 
head of any executive department.'' What that means to me is that my 
role as an independent Commissioner is to evaluate and enforce our 
statutes separate and apart from the considerations of any executive 
department.

    Question 2. To whom do you report as a Commissioner?
    Answer. As a Commissioner, I officially report to the President of 
the United States. I also work with my fellow Senate-confirmed 
Commissioners and the Chairman. The Chairman manages Agency operations 
and is required to consult with Commissioners on operations. And of 
course, I am responsive to the U.S. Senate and U.S. House of 
Representatives.
                                 ______
                                 
    Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Dan Sullivan to 
                          Hon. Carl W. Bentzel
    During the negotiation of the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 2022, 
Congress debated extending the FMC's authority to regulate additional 
parties, to include Intermodal Equipment Providers. That authority was 
intentionally excluded from that legislation. The FMC's ruling in IMCC 
vs. OCEMA (Docket #20-14) goes against Congressional intent.
    The FMC denied a petition for reconsideration on IMCC vs. OCEMA, 
cited that the ruling was ``not final''. Despite this, the FMC recently 
announced that the Bureau of Enforcement, Investigations & Compliance 
was launching an investigation in response to reports that chassis 
providers are not complying with a cease-and-desist order issued by the 
FMC on February 13.

    Question 1. What authority does the FMC have to investigate the 
alleged non-compliance despite the ruling not being final?
    Answer.

    1. Intermodal Motor Carriers Conference v. OCEMA

    As background, a brief review of the Federal Maritime Commission's 
decision in Intermodal Motor Carriers Conference v. OCEMA (OCEMA) may 
be helpful. Docket No. 20-14, 2024 WL 641501 (FMC Feb. 13, 2024). The 
decision addresses motor carriers' (truckers) claims that ocean common 
carriers and their associations (OCEMA Respondents) imposed rules and 
restrictions that unreasonably and unjustly prevent truckers and 
shippers from negotiating with and using the chassis provider of their 
choice. Ocean common carriers (and other entities regulated by the 
Commission) are prohibited by 46 U.S.C. Sec. 41102(c) from establishing 
and enforcing unjust or unreasonable ``regulations and practices 
related to or connected with receiving, handling, storing, or 
delivering property.'' The Commission found the OCEMA Respondents' 
rules assigning an exclusive chassis provider for merchant haulage and 
using that requirement to their financial advantage to obtain lower 
chassis rental rates for themselves violates section 41102(c). When 
shippers choose merchant haulage, they are responsible for arranging 
and paying for the chassis rental yet were deprived of the opportunity 
to negotiate rates and service terms with the chassis provider of their 
choice. The Commission ordered the OCEMA Respondents to cease and 
desist these unlawful practices.
    The cease-and-desist order only requires action and rule changes by 
the OCEMA Respondents--all of whom are ocean common carriers obligated 
to comply with section 41102(c) and other Shipping Act prohibitions. It 
does not direct the chassis providers to take any action or cease 
engaging in any practice. To the extent that chassis providers may be 
affected indirectly by changes the OCEMA Respondents make to their 
contracts and business practices, that is the result of how the OCEMA 
Respondents chose to structure their business and contractual 
relationships with the chassis providers and how they decide to change 
those rules to comply with the cease-and-desist order.
    Regulated entities cannot evade Shipping Act restrictions or 
Commission oversight by incorporating terms in their contracts with 
third parties, then claiming those terms render their practices exempt 
from Commission review or Shipping Act compliance because discontinuing 
them will disrupt third parties' business operations. If that were 
permissible, regulated entities could evade compliance by simply 
incorporating questionable rules or practices into their third-party 
contracts, then invoking repercussions on third parties to justify 
noncompliance with the Shipping Act and Commission orders.
    The Commission has not yet ruled on the OCEMA Respondents' motion 
to reconsider the February 2024 decision and cease and desist order. 
The Commission issued an order holding that motion in abeyance until 
Administrative Law Judge Erin Wirth resolves other claims that remain 
in the case.

    2. Commission Authority to Enforce the Cease-and-Desist Order

    The Commission has received informal reports that the OCEMA 
Respondents are not complying with the cease-and-desist order. If those 
reports are true, the OCEMA Respondents are violating the Shipping Act 
(section 41102(c)) and the cease-and-desist order on an ongoing basis. 
The Commission directed its Bureau of Enforcement, Investigations, and 
Compliance (BEIC) to investigate the OCEMA Respondents' current 
practices for merchant haulage so that it has verifiable information 
and a reliable basis for determining whether there are grounds for 
seeking injunctive relief 46 U.S.C. Sec. 41307(a) to halt ongoing 
violations. BEIC is conducting the investigation under the Commission 
rules governing non-adjudicatory investigations. See 46 C.F.R. 
Sec. 502.281-291.
    The Shipping Act authorizes the Commission to investigate ``any 
conduct'' that it ``believes'' may be in violation of the Act. 46 
U.S.C. Sec. 41302(a). This investigative authority is directly tied to 
authorization under section 41307(a) to seek a temporary restraining 
order or preliminary injunction to halt conduct that violates the 
Shipping Act. Section 41307(a) provides that:

        In connection with an investigation under section 41301 or 
        41302 of this title, the Federal Maritime Commission may bring 
        a civil action to enjoin conduct in violation of this part 
        After notice to the defendant, and a showing that the standards 
        for granting injunctive relief by courts of equity are met, the 
        court may grant a temporary restraining order or preliminary 
        injunction for a period not to exceed 10 days after the 
        Commission has issued an order disposing of the issues under 
        investigation.

    46 U.S.C. Sec. 41307(a) (emphasis supplied). Under section 
41307(a), the Commission can enforce Shipping Act restrictions and take 
action to halt ongoing violations while a case is still before the 
agency and a final decision has not yet been issued.
                                 ______
                                 
    Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Eric Schmitt to 
                          Hon. Carl W. Bentzel
    Question 1. Has the Federal Maritime Commission engaged with the 
State Department or other relevant agencies regarding the impact of the 
People's Republic of China's grey-zone activities on maritime commerce? 
How does the increased assertiveness of the Chinese Coast Guard affect 
freedom of navigation and adherence to international maritime laws, 
particularly in terms of disrupting global trade and transportation 
routes?
    Answer. The FMC does communicate and on occasion collaborate with 
the State Department. However, I am unaware if the FMC as a whole has 
engaged the State Department on the PRC's gray zone activities as it 
pertains to maritime commerce.
    However, as an independent Commissioner, I am concerned about 
Chinese activity, including potentially disruptive impacts on passages 
through the Strait of Malacca. I strongly believe in the adherence to 
international maritime laws, specifically the Law of the Sea provisions 
governing innocent passage and causing the disruption of global trade 
and transportation routes. I further believe that the Houthi attacks 
from within Yemon on ocean shipping carriers on the Red Sea is a direct 
violation of international maritime law and am evaluating our statutes 
to consider whether we could challenge these kinds of degradations to 
international shipping and the right of innocent passage.
                                 ______
                                 
  Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Tammy Duckworth to 
                         Hon Thomas B. Chapman
NTSB Authorization Levels
    The last Federal Aviation Administration reauthorization bill 
increased the NTSB's authorization level to $738 million through FY28.
    Question 1. Can you explain why this funding increase is so 
critical to NTSB's work?
    Answer. We are grateful for the good work of this Committee in the 
effort to ensure NTSB's authorization level was increased. Relative to 
most of our Federal partners, NTSB is a small agency. Yet we make a 
vital contribution to transportation safety across the Nation and in 
all modes of transportation. Further, NTSB's reputation as the world's 
premier transportation safety agency is well deserved. Increased 
resources are essential to ensure NTSB is able to invest in the skilled 
workforce and enhanced authorities our agency needs to advance 
transportation safety.

    Question 2. How do these funding levels relate to the NTSB's 
ability to maintain a robust workforce and complete timely 
investigations?
    Answer. NTSB staff are renowned for their skill and expertise. The 
work of the agency is highly dependent on the dedication and unique 
abilities of our employees.
    Recruiting and retaining skilled team members is a challenge for 
any government agency, and particularly for one such as NTSB which 
requires such unique skillsets. Increased resources are essential to 
ensure we are able to attract and retain qualified team members. Also 
key to success in this area is ensuring the well-regarded culture and 
work environment of the agency is maintained.
Highway-Rail Crossings
    The Department of Transportation has reported, in the year of 2024, 
a total of 12 fatalities at Highway-Rail Grade Crossings in Illinois. 
The reported data includes any impact between on-track railroad 
equipment with an automobile, bus, truck, motorcycle, bicycle, or 
pedestrian. We need to do a better job at making our Nation's rail 
crossings safe.

    Question 1. Can you speak to how you will continue NTSB's work 
identifying additional safety enhancements that can help save lives at 
rail crossings?
    Answer. For personal reasons, I have an especially strong interest 
in rail safety, generally, and specifically in grade crossing safety. 
In the early 1950s, my grandfather was struck and killed in a railroad 
grade crossing crash. My grandfather was a volunteer firefighter. He 
and a colleague were returning from a call when the collision occurred. 
My mother was a high school student at the time, and the tragedy had a 
devastating impact on her and her family. It is for these reasons I 
have made grade crossing safety a personal priority during my time on 
the Board.
    I welcome and actively seek opportunities to advocate improved 
safety on and around tracks and at highway-rail grade crossings. 
Likewise, I support and participate in effective public awareness 
campaigns such as those led by our friends at Operation Lifesaver.
    Measures to mitigate grade crossing risks include physically 
reconfiguring crossings or eliminating them altogether (when possible). 
Technology can also play a role, with ``connected vehicle'' 
capabilities holding great promise. Existing navigation apps should be 
configured to warn drivers of upcoming crossings.
    The statistics have improved over the years, and the trend is 
positive. The work of NTSB has undoubtedly contributed to that 
progress. Yet we continue to lose more than 200 of our fellow citizens 
in grade crossing accidents each year. Every one of these losses is a 
preventable death, and each is tragic and far reaching. We have plenty 
of work to do.
                                 ______
                                 
      Response to Written Questions Submitted by Amy Klobuchar to 
                         Hon. Thomas B. Chapman
Railway Safety Act
    Train derailments--from East Palestine, Ohio to Raymond, 
Minnesota--have shown the high stakes of rail safety. Communities along 
rail routes are counting on us to make sure our country has modernized 
rail infrastructure, adequate community and emergency preparedness, and 
robust safety standards. I cosponsor the Railway Safety Act, 
legislation to put in place stronger rail safety standards and more 
accountability for violations, such as allowing for more time for 
inspections. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) determined 
that the cause of the March 2023 derailment in Raymond, Minnesota was a 
broken rail along a section of BNSF track near the town.

    Question 1. How would NTSB's current recommendation for railways 
increase the frequency of autonomous track inspections prevent these 
types of accidents?
    Answer. Various factors contribute to train derailments. The East 
Palestine derailment, for example, resulted from a failed bearing on an 
individual car. The bearing overheated and caused the axle to separate, 
derailing the train and leading to a postderailment fire. NTSB's 
investigation report on the East Palestine derailment included 
recommendations intended to help address bearing failures as a cause of 
train derailments.
    In contrast, the Raymond, Minnesota derailment was caused by a 
broken rail--as you note. Track conditions were also determined to be 
the probable cause of a tragic Amtrak derailment which occurred in 
September of 2021 near Joplin, Montana. Eight of the ten passenger cars 
derailed, killing three of the 165 passengers and crew onboard the 
Amtrak train. Another 49 people were injured.
    In the investigation report on the Joplin derailment, NTSB 
concluded that the expanded use of automated ``vehicle/track 
interaction'' monitoring systems could reduce the likelihood of 
derailments through early detection of problematic track geometry 
conditions. For that reason, NTSB recommended that all Class 1 and 
intercity railroads operating on main tracks equip all trains with an 
autonomous monitoring system, such as ``vehicle/track interaction'' 
systems, to detect track geometry defects.
    NTSB also recommended that the Federal Railroad Administration 
establish interoperability requirements among railroads to implement a 
process in which a predetermined critical alert from a ``vehicle/track 
interaction'' system would require an immediate slow order. Such a slow 
order should remain in place until a walking inspection is performed 
and repairs are completed.
    Faulty track conditions are a significant cause of train 
derailments. If fully implemented, NTSB's Joplin recommendations would 
help prevent such incidents by increasing the frequency and 
effectiveness of automated track inspections.
                                 ______
                                 
      Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Ted Cruz to 
                         Hon. Thomas B. Chapman
    Question 1. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has 
called for passive intelligent speed assistance technology in all new 
cars to help reduce speeding. This technology uses a car's GPS and 
cameras to monitor and compare a car's speed to the posted speed limit. 
If the car exceeds the speed limit, the system will alert the driver 
and may also override the driver and force the car to slow down.

    a. Given the historical challenges in consumer acceptance of safety 
technologies like seatbelts, to what extent have you factored in 
consumer acceptance of intelligent speed assistance technology?
    Answer. I appreciate the opportunity to comment on NTSB's 
technology-related recommendations to help address two of our most 
persistent safety challenges . . . that is, alcohol impaired driving 
and excessive speed.
    With respect to alcohol impairment, the latest figures compiled by 
the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration indicate there were 
13,524 traffic fatalities in 2022 in which alcohol-impairment was a 
factor. That is 32 percent of all U.S. traffic fatalities for the year. 
With respect to speed, NHTSA statistics indicate there were 12,151 
speeding-related fatalities in 2022. That is 29 percent of all U.S. 
traffic fatalities for the year.
    Regarding intelligent speed assistance, or ISA, we know from past 
experience that consumer acceptance of new safety technologies can be 
an issue. It's possible that might be the case when it comes to ISA.
    A recent survey conducted by the Insurance Institute for Highway 
Safety is encouraging. The survey found that more than 60 percent of 
drivers would find it acceptable if their vehicle provided an audible 
and visual warning when they exceed the posted speed limit. This 
capability is known as ``passive'' ISA. Also interesting is that, 
according to IIHS, about half of the drivers surveyed said ``they 
wouldn't mind vehicle technology that makes the accelerator pedal 
harder to press or automatically restricts speed.'' This technology is 
generally referred to as ``active'' ISA.
    In terms of promoting consumer acceptance, the U.S. is positioned 
to learn from the experience of European safety regulators. The U.S. 
trails Europe, which made intelligent speed assistance mandatory for 
every new car sold in the European Union beginning this year. And since 
2009, the European New Car Assessment Program has promoted the 
installation of speed assistance systems that help drivers to control 
their speed.

    b. With active intelligence speed assistance systems relying on GPS 
and location data, what measures do you think should be taken to 
protect drivers' privacy?
    Answer. In my view, intelligent speed assistance systems should be 
designed to ensure they do not retain tracking data related to the 
locations, routes, or driving patterns of individual drivers. This is 
not a matter of concern exclusive to ISA systems, of course, since most 
of us carry personal devices which are GPS and location enabled. To the 
extent data is retained by such technologies, access should be subject 
to constitutional and relevant privacy law protections.

    c. In your opinion, how should intelligent speed assistance 
technologies account for the different driving and traffic conditions 
in urban and rural areas, if at all?
    Answer. It might prove to be appropriate to adjust the parameters 
of intelligent speed assistance systems to account for different 
driving conditions. Precisely whether or how to do so is difficult to 
anticipate at this early stage. The experience of European regulators 
could be helpful, since intelligent speed assistance was made mandatory 
for every new car sold in the European Union beginning this year.

    d. Should insurers be provided access to the data collected by this 
technology for assessing insurance premiums as an additional deterrent 
to speeding?
    Answer. For privacy reasons, I do not believe insurers should be 
provided routine access to data retained by intelligent speed 
assistance systems. Any impact on insurance premiums should be related 
to an individual driver's claims history and record of speeding or 
other serious traffic law violations.

    Question 2. The NTSB has called for all new vehicles to have 
alcohol impairment detection systems. These systems are designed to 
detect a driver's blood alcohol concentration (BAC) and prevent the 
vehicle from starting if the driver's BAC is over the legal limit. One 
approach is a breath-based system that captures the driver's exhaled 
breath through a sensor in the vehicle. Another method is a touch-based 
system using infrared light to detect a driver's BAC when the driver 
touches the ignition button or gearstick.

    a. How do you foresee such technology handling false positives or 
system malfunctions that prevent sober individuals from starting their 
vehicles?
    Answer. I do not presume to suggest I am an expert in the 
engineering necessary to design and implement passive vehicle-
integrated alcohol impairment detection systems. These technologies 
remain in development, and there is widespread sensitivity to the 
implications of false positive and other system malfunctions--including 
failures to detect potential impairment. It is incumbent on those with 
the expertise and opportunity to continue refining such systems to 
ensure the likelihood and consequences of potential malfunctions is 
mitigated to the greatest extent possible.

    b. Do you expect insurers to impose higher rates on drivers whose 
vehicles are not equipped with these systems?
    Answer. It would be disappointing if insurers were to penalize 
drivers whose vehicles are not equipped with these systems. Rather, I 
anticipate insurers would incentivize drivers to equip vehicles by 
offering discounts or credits against base premiums otherwise charged. 
It's my understanding that has been the approach by insurers to 
encourage drivers to adopt features such as seat belts, anti-lock 
brakes, air bags, daytime running lights, and anti-theft devices.

    Question 3. The NTSB has also called for advanced driver monitoring 
systems. These systems could use cameras or other technologies to 
monitor a driver's performance, such as detecting the driver's eyes or 
facial behavior to see if the driver is looking away from the road or 
closing his or her eyes for too long. If a vehicle detects that a 
driver is distracted or impaired the vehicle could take steps such as 
alerting the driver with sounds or haptic warnings.

    a. How do you foresee such technology handling false positives or 
system malfunctions that affect the performance of the vehicle?
    Answer. As I indicated in the context of passive alcohol impairment 
detection systems, I am likewise not an expert in the engineering 
necessary to design and implement driver monitoring systems. Here, too, 
there is widespread sensitivity to the implications of false positive 
and other system malfunctions--including failures to detect potential 
impairment or distraction. It is incumbent on those with the expertise 
and opportunity to continue refining such systems to ensure the 
likelihood and consequences of potential malfunctions is mitigated to 
the greatest extent possible.

    b. What measures, if any, do you think should be taken to protect 
drivers' privacy?
    Answer. In my view, advanced driver monitoring systems should be 
designed to ensure they do not retain data related to the behavior or 
driving patterns of individual drivers. To the extent data is retained 
by such technologies, access should be subject to constitutional and 
relevant privacy law protections.

    c. Do you support insurers imposing higher rates on drivers whose 
vehicles are not equipped with these systems in order to increase 
compliance?
    Answer. I would not support insurers imposing higher rates on 
drivers whose vehicles are not equipped. Rather, I anticipate insurers 
would incentivize drivers to equip vehicles by offering discounts or 
credits against base premiums otherwise charged. It's my understanding 
that has been the approach by insurers to encourage drivers to adopt 
features such as seat belts, anti-lock brakes, air bags, daytime 
running lights, and anti-theft devices.

    d. Should underwriters be able to use the collected data to 
determine premiums?
    Answer. For privacy reasons, I do not believe insurers should be 
provided routine access to data retained by advanced driver monitoring 
systems. Any impact on insurance premiums should be related to an 
individual driver's claims history and record of serious traffic law 
violations.

    Question 4. NTSB maintains its reputation for transportation safety 
by undertaking thorough investigations that take time. Yet when a major 
transportation incident makes headlines, media outlets and stakeholders 
often rush to prejudge the case and offer speculative solutions.

    a. Do you agree it is generally important for regulators and 
Congress to wait for the NTSB to complete its final report on an 
investigation along with any recommendations it may have?
    Answer. I agree it is generally prudent to reserve judgment until 
NTSB has completed an investigation and issued any relevant 
recommendations. NTSB's role is to avoid speculation and determine the 
facts. Our investigations take time because facts may not be obvious.

    b. Why it is important to understand the cause of an accident 
before taking action? Please cite specific examples.
    Answer. Without an understanding of the cause of an accident, the 
factual basis for taking action is necessarily incomplete. NTSB's role 
is to determine the cause of accidents and to issue recommendations to 
help ensure similar accidents are avoided. All of us associated with 
the agency are proud of NTSB's record of success in fulfilling that 
role.
    I offer two high profile examples which help illustrate the 
significance of NTSB's investigative findings in terms of crafting 
appropriate actions.
    The first is NTSB's investigation of TWA Flight 800, which exploded 
and crashed off the coast of Long Island, NY. The accident occurred on 
July 17, 1996. In the days immediately following the accident, there 
was widespread speculation that Flight 800 was brought down as the 
result of terrorism. In fact, NTSB determined the probable cause of the 
TWA Flight 800 accident was an explosion of the center wing fuel tank, 
resulting from ignition of the flammable fuel & air mixture in the 
tank. The appropriate action to address the actual cause was 
dramatically different from what might have been called for had the 
Flight 800 disaster been the result of terrorism.
    A more recent example is the derailment and subsequent fire and 
hazardous materials release in East Palestine, Ohio. The derailment and 
the events which followed occurred over several days beginning on 
February 3, 2023. NTSB's investigation determined that a relatively 
complicated chain of factual incidents resulted in the derailment, 
first, and then compounded the consequences of the derailment. 
Initially, an overheated bearing caused an axle to separate, derailing 
the train and leading to a postderailment fire. The fire likely began 
with the release of a flammable liquid from a DOT-111 category tank car 
that was punctured during the derailment--a category of tank cars which 
NTSB has long recommended should be phased out. The community was 
further traumatized by the flawed and unnecessary decision to conduct a 
rare vent and burn procedure on five hazardous materials tank cars 
carrying vinyl chloride monomer.
    It is unlikely a full range of actions to address the East 
Palestine derailment could have been crafted in the absence of the 
factual understanding afforded by NTSB's investigation. The 
recommendations issued by NTSB seek to address each of the chain of 
events which occurred in East Palestine--for example, better detection 
of failed and overheating bearings, accelerated phase out of DOT-111 
tank cars, improved sources of information and better decision-making 
processes relating to vent and burn procedures, and better training and 
preparation of first responders to ensure their safety in similar 
circumstances.
                                 ______
                                 
  Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Tammy Duckworth to 
                             Lanhee J. Chen
Long Distance Rail
    Amtrak is a national network that plays a vital role in the 
transportation of customers to all corners of the U.S. Long-distance 
Amtrak routes connect large cities to small rural towns and vice versa. 
Chicago plays an outsized role in that network--50 percent of all of 
Amtrak's long-distance customers ride trains that either begin or end 
at Chicago Union Station.

    Question 1. If confirmed, would you continue to support Amtrak 
long-distance routes?
    Answer. Yes. Long-distance routes are an important part of Amtrak's 
past, present, and future, and if I am confirmed, I will work to ensure 
that Amtrak retains its long-distance network.
Chicago Hub Improvement Program (CHIP)
    Amtrak's Chicago Hub Improvement Program (CHIP) would help 
alleviate rail congestion in Chicago. This congestion slows down 
intercity passenger rail across the Midwest and across the country. The 
CHIP program would be particularly helpful for Michigan, Indiana, 
Missouri, Minnesota and Wisconsin, as well as Illinois.

    Question 1. If confirmed, will you commit to visiting Chicago Union 
Station to see this project?
    Answer. Yes.

    Question 2. If confirmed, will you agree to maintain the 
commitments Amtrak has made to the Midwest region on improving 
intercity passenger rail through Chicago?
    Answer. Yes.
                                 ______
                                 
    Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Eric Schmitt to 
                             Lanhee J. Chen
    On July 22, 2019, Eileen Larence, Acting Assistant Inspector 
General for Audits, released a report titled Safety and Security: 
Physical Security Vulnerabilities at Washington Union Station and Ivy 
City Yard (OIG-A-2019-009). The report noted that since Amtrak did not 
own Washington Union Station then, the review would focus on security 
measures in areas the company controlled or subleased.
    However, on July 29, 2024, Amtrak assumed full control of 
operations at Washington Union Station, including safety and security 
oversight. The report highlighted significant security deficiencies at 
Amtrak's second-busiest station, citing issues such as inadequate 
perimeter and interior security, poor lighting, nonfunctional video 
surveillance cameras, and an outdated incident reporting process, 
exacerbated by obsolete radio equipment.

    Question 1. If confirmed, how will you ensure clear attribution of 
roles and responsibilities for providing security that effectively 
protects travelers at Washington Union Station?
    Answer. The safety of Amtrak's passengers when they are riding the 
rails, as well as their security while transiting through stations, 
will be of paramount importance to me if confirmed as a member of the 
Board of Directors. I look forward to learning more about the specific 
security deficiencies identified by the Office of Inspector General at 
Washington Union Station. I concur with its recommendation that the 
company have a plan to address the deficiencies and that the plan 
delineate ``clear roles and lines of accountability, resources, 
timeframes, and performance metrics to assess progress.'' If confirmed 
as a Board Member, I will ensure proper oversight of the company's 
efforts to furnish appropriate security to protect the traveling 
public.

                                  [all]