[Senate Hearing 118-358]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]


                                                        S. Hrg. 118-358

                OVERSIGHT OF THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION

=======================================================================

                                HEARING

                               BEFORE THE

                 COMMITTEE ON RULES AND ADMINISTRATION
                          UNITED STATES SENATE

                    ONE HUNDRED EIGHTEENTH CONGRESS

                             SECOND SESSION
                               __________

                         TUESDAY, JUNE 18, 2024
                               __________

    Printed for the use of the Committee on Rules and Administration
    
    
                  [GRAPHIC NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]    


                  Available on http://www.govinfo.gov

                               __________

                    U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE
                    
56-072                    WASHINGTON : 2024   



                 COMMITTEE ON RULES AND ADMINISTRATION

                             SECOND SESSION

                  AMY KLOBUCHAR, Minnesota, Chairwoman

CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York         DEB FISCHER, Nebraska
MARK R. WARNER, Virginia             MITCH McCONNELL, Kentucky
JEFF MERKLEY, Oregon                 TED CRUZ, Texas
ALEX PADILLA, California             SHELLEY MOORE CAPITO, West 
JON OSSOFF, Georgia                      Virginia
MICHAEL F. BENNET, Colorado          ROGER WICKER, Mississippi
PETER WELCH, Vermont                 CINDY HYDE-SMITH, Mississippi
LAPHONZA R. BUTLER, California       BILL HAGERTY, Tennessee
                                     KATIE BOYD BRITT, Alabama

                    Elizabeth Farrar, Staff Director
                Jackie Barber, Republican Staff Director





                         C  O  N  T  E  N  T  S

                              ----------                              
                                                                  Pages

                         Opening Statement of:

Hon. Amy Klobuchar, Chairwoman, a United States Senator from the 
  State of Minnesota.............................................     1
Hon. Deb Fischer, a United States Senator from the State of 
  Nebraska.......................................................     3
Lonnie G. Bunch III, Secretary, Smithsonian Institution, 
  Washington, DC.................................................     4

                         Prepared Statement of:

Lonnie G. Bunch III, Secretary, Smithsonian Institution, 
  Washington, DC.................................................    22

                  Questions Submitted for the Record:

Hon. Amy Klobuchar, Chairwoman, a United States Senator from the 
  State of Minnesota to Lonnie G. Bunch III, Secretary, 
  Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC........................    25
Hon. Deb Fischer, a United States Senator from the State of 
  Nebraska to Lonnie G. Bunch III, Secretary, Smithsonian 
  Institution, Washington, DC....................................    27






 
                OVERSIGHT OF THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION

                              ----------                              


                         TUESDAY, JUNE 18, 2024

                               United States Senate
                      Committee on Rules and Administration
                                                    Washington, DC.
    The Committee met, pursuant to notice, at 2:45 p.m., in 
Room 301, Russell Senate Office Building, Hon. Amy Klobuchar, 
Chairwoman of the Committee, presiding.
    Present: Senators Klobuchar, Fischer, Warner, Butler, and 
Britt.

         OPENING STATEMENT OF HONORABLE AMY KLOBUCHAR,

            CHAIRWOMAN, A UNITED STATES SENATOR FROM

                     THE STATE OF MINNESOTA

    Chairwoman Klobuchar. Good afternoon. I call to order this 
hearing of the Rules Committee on Oversight of the Smithsonian. 
I would like to thank Ranking Member Fischer and our colleagues 
for being here, as well as Secretary of the Smithsonian, Lonnie 
Bunch.
    I will note that I was saying to Deb that we actually got 
bling from you guys. Like, we never get anything here from the 
Rules Committee and this is very cool--your pocket guide to the 
Smithsonian. We welcome you once again to the Committee, 
Secretary. I know that you planned the announcement of the 
return of the pandas to coincide with our hearing, so thank 
you.
    Today's hearing is an opportunity to discuss the ongoing 
priorities and what is next for the Smithsonian as it works to 
maintain and share with the public its vast collection of 
treasures, including some that you have brought for us today, 
including from a Minnesota perspective.
    Everyone should go over and see these items when we are 
done here. A comic book about Minnesota's own Hubert Humphrey. 
These are just part of the institution's nearly 157 million 
artifacts, in addition to the 2.25 million volumes in its 21 
research libraries. Its collection is just part of what makes 
the Smithsonian a global leader.
    In fact, since its founding in 1846, the Smithsonian has 
grown to become the world's largest museum, education, and 
research complex, and its researchers are tackling cutting edge 
questions at the frontiers of science.
    Earlier this year, Deputy Secretary of the Smithsonian Park 
testified in this Committee about the impact that AI is having 
on the institution and the work researchers are doing to 
harness its potential from astrophysics to conservation efforts 
while guarding against risks.
    Importantly the Smithsonian is reaching people in all 50 
states and across the globe. In recent years, it has broadened 
public access through its online resources, welcoming nearly 
170 million visitors to its website last year. This has 
expanded the Smithsonian's reach, building on the many millions 
of in-person visits, 17.7 million last year, that it hosted in 
its 21 museums and the National Zoo, sites that have remained 
popular and in some cases far more popular than expected over 
time.
    To cite one example, the National Air and Space Museum was 
originally designed for 2 million visitors annually, but it is 
so popular that it has welcomed many more visitors, up to 7 
million a year. We look forward to the completion of the Air 
and Space Museum's needed renovations, and to it fully 
reopening, and in time for the country's 250th anniversary in 
July 2026, along with other cultural activities that Secretary 
Bunch is planning to honor 250 years that will be taking place 
on the National Mall.
    I also look forward to hearing about the ongoing efforts 
with the two new museums established with bipartisan support 
after legislation passed this Committee unanimously in 2020, 
the American Women's History Museum and the National Museum of 
the American Latino.
    Progress is well underway with fundraising for both new 
museums at over $65 million each. That is $65 million each--
private money for the two museums.
    There are two open sites on the National Mall that would 
look even better with the new museums, as the Smithsonian Board 
of Regents has determined, and the work to develop these 
museums is ongoing. Dr. Elizabeth Babcock started work as 
Director of the Women's Museum this month, joining Jorge 
Zamanillo, founding Director of the Latino Museum, and staff 
are working hard to build these collections.
    These museums represent a critical opportunity to help 
families visiting Washington to learn about the remarkable 
contributions of Latino Americans and women to the fabric of 
our country and our shared American story.
    At the same time, we know that addressing the backlog 
maintenance project at the institution must remain a priority. 
I look forward to hearing about the Smithsonian's work to 
assess its facilities and what else is needed to complete 
ongoing maintenance and repair projects to protect collections 
for future generations.
    The Smithsonian will continue to play a critical role in 
preserving and telling our country's history, and at the same 
time, it will write new chapters through its groundbreaking 
research.
    I know I forever cherish my photo that is in a little black 
and white polaroid from eighth grade when I made my first visit 
to Washington and posed in what is now, I know, an antiquated 
astronaut costume with my face in it that went right in my 
scrapbook proudly displayed on the first page.
    So many kids are having that same experience, maybe a 
little more modernized. Thank you, Secretary, for being here. I 
will now recognize Ranking Member Fischer for her opening 
statement.

  OPENING STATEMENT OF HONORABLE DEB FISCHER, A UNITED STATES 
               SENATOR FROM THE STATE OF NEBRASKA

    Senator Fischer. Thank you, Chairwoman Klobuchar for 
calling this oversight hearing today. I want to thank our 
witness. Welcome, Secretary Bunch. As Secretary, you are 
steward of 21 museums and research facilities, the National Zoo 
and a growing collection of over 155 million objects and 
specimens.
    Speaking of the National Zoo, congratulations, Mr. 
Secretary, to you and your team on the exciting news that the 
zoo will welcome a new pair of pandas, Bao Li and Qing Bao. We 
are grateful that you----
    Chairwoman Klobuchar. I did not know you knew them 
personally. That is impressive.
    [Laughter.]
    Senator Fischer. I get out. I get out. We are going to see 
them at the end of the year is my understanding. It is a 
national treasure, our Smithsonian, and we are grateful that 
you are joining us today to tell us about the Smithsonian's 
successes and also the challenges that it faces. Over the past 
several Congresses, my colleagues and I have regularly heard 
about the challenges faced by the Smithsonian, including its 
deferred maintenance backlog.
    I understand the deferred maintenance backlog has tripled 
in the last several years, now totaling $3.3 billion. In 
addition to the deferred maintenance on the public facing 
museum, this amount includes deferred maintenance for the 
700,000 square feet of space in aging storage facilities that 
are inadequate to house these important institution's 
collections.
    The nation is so fortunate to have the Smithsonian's 
collections, and the buildings to store and display them are 
foundational to protecting them for future generations. I am 
looking forward to seeing the paperweight that you brought from 
William Jennings Bryan when he was Secretary of State under 
Woodrow Wilson.
    It is, I understand, a plowshare, which he had swords 
turned into plowshares before the First World War. I find that 
amazing, so I am looking forward to seeing that. As we look to 
the needs that the Smithsonian has, it is especially crucial as 
the museums and the Smithsonian continues to expand.
    In 2020, Congress authorized two new museums, the National 
Museum of the American Latino and the Smithsonian of American 
Women's History Museum. I look forward to hearing about efforts 
to address the deferred maintenance backlog while balancing the 
addition of these two new museums.
    Of course, the museum buildings in Washington, DC are not 
the only way that Americans experience the Smithsonian. I have 
heard wonderful things about the traveling exhibits of the 
Smithsonian's Museum on Main Street. This partnership between 
the Smithsonian's Travel Exhibitions Service and State 
Humanities Councils brings the Smithsonian out of Washington.
    I was pleased to see Nebraska included in this endeavor 
over the last year. The Voices and Votes, Democracy in America 
exhibit made stops in Howells, Kearney, Belvidere, Wahoo, 
Gering, and Omaha, and I got to see it in Kearney. The 
Waterways Exhibit at the Kearney Rails and Trails Museum opened 
on March 2nd.
    I was delighted to have the Smithsonian come to Nebraska, 
and I want to congratulate the many Nebraskans who coordinated 
with the Smithsonian to make this happen. Initiatives like 
Museums on Main Street connect the Smithsonian to Nebraskans 
and to all Americans nationwide who are unable to visit here in 
Washington.
    I hope to hear more about the ways the Smithsonian is 
seeking to connect with Americans and increase that access to 
its collections. Thank you again for being here, Secretary. It 
is an excellent opportunity for Committee Members to learn more 
about the challenges and the opportunities facing the 
Smithsonian. Thank you, Madam Chairwoman.
    Chairwoman Klobuchar. Thank you, Ranking Member Fischer. As 
I noted, our witness today is Lonnie Bunch. He became the 14th 
Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution in June of 2019. 
Secretary Bunch previously served as a founding director of the 
Smithsonian's National Museum of African American History and 
Culture, which welcomed its 10 millionth visitor in September--
impressive.
    Secretary Bunch is a published author and has held many 
teaching positions. Earlier in his career, he worked for the 
National Museum of American History and the Chicago Historical 
Society. He received his undergraduate and graduate degrees 
from American University. I will now swear in our witness.
    Do you swear that the testimony you give before the 
Committee shall be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but 
the truth, so help you God?
    Mr. Bunch. I do.
    Chairwoman Klobuchar. Thank you. You can be seated, and we 
will now proceed to your testimony and recognize you for five 
minutes. Thank you.

     OPENING STATEMENT OF LONNIE G. BUNCH III, SECRETARY, 
            SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION, WASHINGTON, DC

    Mr. Bunch. Thank you. Good afternoon, Chairwoman Klobuchar, 
Ranking Member Fischer, and Members of the Committee.
    I want to thank you for this opportunity to testify before 
you today, because it has been a couple of years since I last 
met with you, and in that time, the Smithsonian has seen 
approximately 34 million in-person visits to our museums, 
education centers, and research facilities.
    We have become an increasingly digital institution, seeking 
out partners to implement technologies smartly and safely, so 
we can bring the vast resource of the Smithsonian to people 
around the country. With the help of Congress, some of our 
renowned buildings like the Castle and the National Air and 
Space Museum, have been undergoing substantially and needed 
renovations.
    This enduring institution has meant so much to the American 
people and the citizens of the world for 178 years. It is 
nearly impossible to adequately describe all that we do, from 
protecting cultural heritage in war-torn nations, to helping 
people explore their genealogy, to examining the surface of 
Mars.
    We engage with and educate people on important topics like 
the essence of the American experience, the diversity of the 
world's cultures, the sustainability of the planet, and the 
nature of the universe. In some ways, we are at the center of 
civic, educational, scientific, and artistic life of the nation, 
and our international reach to more than 100 countries includes 
robust research programs, partnerships, and knowledge 
exchanges. Finally, we are responsible for the safety and 
security of more than 6,500 employees, more than 3,800 on-site 
volunteers, and millions of annual visitors to our museum.
    My vision for the Smithsonian's future is to be a reservoir 
of knowledge that anyone can dip into it anytime, anyplace. It 
is embodied in the way that we have expanded our educational 
research with a presence in every state in the Union and dozens 
of countries worldwide. In the fiscal year 2023, more than 
600,000 educators and students used the resources of our 
learning lab, and nearly 3 million students used our 
Smithsonian Science in the Classroom Curriculum.
    We can see a glimpse of the Smithsonian's future in our two 
new Congressionally authorized museums. These museums will not 
only help us tell a more robust, expansive, and inclusive 
version of America, but they will also be built as the first 
digital-first museums. Their programing has already begun 
reaching audiences well before concrete is poured.
    Building new museums is something I know, and it requires a 
massive outlay of money, as do other needs inherent in 
buildings in such a vast institution like the Smithsonian. From 
addressing deferred maintenance, to meeting increased salary 
requirements, we increased our reach and impact by 
collaborating with other agencies, organizations, and 
governments whose goals align with us. We rely heavily on the 
generosity of donors and the public who value all the work that 
we do. We are grateful candidly that for the past three years 
have been the most record-breaking philanthropy the 
Smithsonian's ever had. Of course, the United States Congress 
remains our most valuable partner. We take our fiscal 
responsibility seriously and look to spend taxpayers' dollars 
conscientiously in a way that maximizes our reach and our 
impact.
    Our strategic plan lays out bold goals for the 
Smithsonian's future. Our actions over the past few years 
reflect those goals. To be more digital and ways to reach more 
Americans. To be nimbler and more effective in our operations. 
To elevate our scientific endeavors. To expand our educational 
efforts, and to really be a more trusted source. This will be 
foundational to my goal of reaching every home and being in 
every classroom across the nation.
    The nation's 250th anniversary in 2026 will be a pivotal 
moment for us to unveil just how much progress we have made. It 
will serve as a celebration of what we have been, but also give 
a glimpse of what we can be. We plan to activate the National 
Mall with a vibrant cultural festival, and the renovated 
National Air and Space Museum should be fully open to the 
public in time for the commemoration. I have asked my 
colleagues as well to work towards opening, at least 
temporarily, the Castle for the public for that celebration as 
well.
    To coincide with those milestones, we have programing that 
both celebrates and contemplates who we are as a nation and the 
Smithsonian's place in it. We will invite Americans to explore 
all corners of our complex histories and find ways to have 
honest conversations that transcend our differences and connect 
our shared humanity. It will be an opportunity for us to showcase 
the myriad ways in which the Smithsonian has become nimbler, 
more relevant, and more effective. Our institution is 
undergoing a transformation.
    Like any moment, it is filled with challenges, but I would 
argue more than anything, it is a moment of opportunity to 
truly fulfill the vision of our founder, James Smithson. 
Decades before it was built, he foresaw this institution as a 
gift to the American people. Recently, a couple of 
announcements highlighted the Smithsonian's global reach.
    The first, of course, we were able to secure giant pandas 
to the National Zoo. I have always felt the key was never to be 
the Secretary who lost to pandas, and I am so pleased to say 
that as a result of the hard work, we will have the pandas by 
the end of the year.
    But also, a team led by the Smithsonian, the National 
Oceanic Atmospheric Administration, created the National Ocean 
Biodiversity Strategy. It is a vital plan for ocean 
conservation, and it is a first nationwide strategy to improve 
scientists' ability to serve and to gather knowledge on 
critical biodiversity.
    Both speak to our ability to work collaboratively, to think 
creatively, to act decisively, to help find solutions to the 
world's biggest challenge. I am more confident than ever that 
the Smithsonian is uniquely positioned to do this.
    Thank you for this hearing, and most importantly, for your 
ongoing support and your commitment to work with us. I am happy 
to answer any questions you have.
    [The prepared statement of Mr. Bunch was submitted for the 
record.]
    Chairwoman Klobuchar. Very good. Well, that is exciting. I 
had not focused on the 250th anniversary. We tend to focus on 
right now, today, in this place. I think that is really 
exciting. Two hundred and fifty years since the signing of the 
Declaration of Independence and such an opportunity to reflect 
on our great nation. How long has it been since the Castle was 
opened?
    Mr. Bunch. The Castle just closed about a year ago.
    Chairwoman Klobuchar. Okay. Then you are going to reopen 
parts of it?
    Mr. Bunch. Right. The goal is that the amount of work that 
has to be done in the Castle--the initial plan was for the 
Castle basically to have the Mall torn up during the 250th. I 
said, we cannot do that.
    What we are going to do is do interior work so that we can 
have the Castle open for the 250th, and then after the 250th, 
we will do all the earthquake work that is going to tear the--
that is going to really help make it difficult for people to 
visit the Castle.
    Chairwoman Klobuchar. Okay. You know, since the pandemic, I 
was just seeing that your average visitors up in Air and Space, 
before you closed down for the work I assume, 7 million. But 
you know, what has it been like? Because a lot of people were 
worried we would not bounce back.
    Mr. Bunch. I think the numbers have been really good. We 
are now at pre-pandemic levels throughout the entire 
Smithsonian.
Then couple that with all the digital work we are doing, we are 
reaching more people than ever before.
    Chairwoman Klobuchar. Can you talk about that, what you 
have done to make it more accessible, the museum, virtually, 
for people maybe in a little town in Nebraska, farmers that are 
not going to be able to leave and--or, you know, because they 
have got their crop coming in. Talk about how you have made 
this accessible.
    Mr. Bunch. What I realized is that the Smithsonian needed 
to have people who really could help us lead the digital 
transformation.
    I created a unit to do just that. We are really looking at 
how to really be in every home and in every classroom. Part of 
what we are doing is making sure that we find the right 
partners that we can collaborate with. Because I have realized 
that the Smithsonian, no matter how creative it is, does not 
have broad enough shoulders to do everything.
    We are working with a variety of entities to make sure that 
we can digitally share the information we want to do, but also 
we are partnering with people like the 4-H clubs and looking at 
different organizations that have never worked with the 
Smithsonian to allow us to reach these many communities.
    I think what I have really said to everybody is the 250th 
is our opportunity to demonstrate all of that change. I am 
using that as the marker to say, we are going to do everything 
so that by the 250th you can see a new Smithsonian.
    Chairwoman Klobuchar. Very good. Let's talk about the two 
new museums. When you last appeared before the Committee, we 
talked about the ongoing efforts to establish the museum. Since 
then, as I noted, they both hired founding directors. We have 
got that over $65 million for each museum, private money.
    The efforts are going forward to build the collections. 
There is a lot of excitement, bipartisan excitement in both 
Houses for moving forward. While it is not at this point a 
funding issue as much as the location, could you--and we have 
been able to establish now with the agreement of both groups 
two locations that I have seen.
    I think they are really a good idea. What can you tell us 
briefly about that progress? What is being done to talk to the 
public about this? Well answer that first.
    Mr. Bunch. Well, I think that first of all, things are 
going very well with these museums. The $65 million that was 
raised is really important.
    When I was building the African American Museum, it took me 
four years to get to $65 million, so there is already a great 
deal of excitement about these new museums. But also, what I 
have said is that these new museums, even though they are not--
they do not have a building, they have got to share content. 
They have got to do things digitally.
    We are doing programs, education programs around the 
country through the lens of each of these museums to build 
excitement, to let people know about it. Candidly, the hiring 
of Elizabeth Babcock as the new director, that is a way to sort 
of get more attention because she is new, there is a lot of 
articles about her.
    Basically, the goal here is to begin to do work to say the 
history of women, the history of Latinos, cannot wait for a 
decade. It has got to be done now. We are looking at different 
ways to do that. How do we make sure that we are doing programs 
around the country now to build that support? I think that from 
a vantage point of where we are, we are in a good place.
    The challenge, candidly, is finalizing the sites because 
fundraising will pick up even more when you are able to 
finalize a site. Two, you cannot plan on what the museums will 
be without those sites. Therefore, it is really hard to sort of 
keep people excited as you are saying, eventually we can tell 
you what is going to be there.
    Chairwoman Klobuchar. I mean, it is kind of extraordinary. 
All these funds have been raised without the sites. But before 
Senator Fischer was the Ranking, Senator Blunt and I went out 
and looked at the sites.
    Could you talk about those sites and how they fit in with 
the vision of the--I know the Board of Regents has approved 
these sites? Architects, historians, preservations are 
consistent with this area of the Mall in our Nation's Capitol.
    Mr. Bunch. Well, I looked at 26 sites around Washington. We 
looked at sites that were vacant. We looked at sites that were 
historic buildings. After looking at all these sites, we 
realized that what was essential was to have these museums as 
close to the Mall as possible. That the Mall is where the world 
comes to understand what it means to be an American, and to be 
able to have women's history and Latino history on the Mall was 
crucially important.
    We looked at these sites, one that we call the South 
Monument site, which is across from the National Museum of 
African American History and Culture, which is this really sort 
of gem like site that is going to be the spot for the Women's 
History Museum. Then we have another site that is behind the 
Holocaust Museum that would be the site of the Latino Museum.
    What is important is that these sites allow several things. 
One, there is great excitement in the various communities that 
they are going to be able to build these museums on the Mall. 
Two, it allows these museums to craft architectural vision. To 
be able to say, we want a building that reflects our culture, 
much like we did with the National Museum of African American 
History and Culture.
    There is great excitement about the potential of new 
buildings on new sites. Candidly, while there is always a 
question of how do you preserve green space, what I love is the 
building of the African American Museum has enriched the Mall.
    It has not encountered--it has not hurt the Mall at all. I 
think these new museums will do the same thing.
    Chairwoman Klobuchar. Okay. Very good. Thank you. I will 
turn it over to Ranking Member Fischer.
    Senator Fischer. Thank you, Chairwoman Klobuchar. Secretary 
Bunch, in February, Nebraska's Winnebago tribal chairwoman and 
council members visited the National Museum of the American 
Indians Cultural Resources Center, and they viewed some of 
their cultural artifacts at that time.
    They told me that it was a very powerful experience for 
them, and that your staff there was extremely helpful. Thank 
you very much. While they have not yet made an official 
repatriation request for the artifacts, if they do, what does 
that process look like? What does it entail for them?
    Mr. Bunch. We have a very robust sense of repatriation. 
They will put a request in, the Smithsonian Museum of American 
History will look--Museum of American Indian will look at it. 
Will then sort of assess their basic questions.
    Is it a federally sponsored tribe, etcetera. Once those 
questions are answered, then what we do is bring people back to 
Washington to look at the particular artifacts they are 
interested in and then make some final determination.
    It is a process, but it is something that is fair and has 
worked very well with other tribes.
    Senator Fischer. Do you--and I assume your answer will be 
yes. Do you work with the tribes in looking at the facilities 
that need to be in place where these artifacts are going to be 
stored to make sure that they are going to be preserved in a 
manner that has to be adhered to? Then, do you help with 
funding for that? Do they need to handle that on their own? 
Where do we go on that?
    Mr. Bunch. What we do is we want to make sure that both the 
tribe is satisfied, but that the artifacts are preserved. 
Therefore, we look to see what facilities they have, what 
capability they have. There are times that we will give 
direction that would be very helpful to do this.
    We unfortunately do not have the resources to actually help 
them. But I think the most important thing is to recognize that 
we want to be able to return what the communities really want, 
and that is really part of our goal.
    Senator Fischer. Right. I know the chairwoman and the 
council members, of course, they want to make sure that they 
are looking not just at the needs of their current generation 
of the tribe, but of the generations that these artifacts 
belong to.
    To make sure that they adhere to their beliefs and 
principles, and then, of course, meet the conditions that you 
would put on them as well.
    Mr. Secretary, I also understand that on March 24th, there 
was a food truck parked at 12th Street and Constitution Avenue 
in between the Smithsonian American History and the Natural 
History Museums. It caught fire. It was fully engulfed in 
flames when the firefighters arrived.
    The photos that I have seen from that incident were very 
alarming, to say the least. Are these food trucks a regular 
safety concern for you?
    Mr. Bunch. You know, I understand the convenience of the 
food trucks. I understand how it is important within the City 
of Washington, DC for the business that these food trucks 
create.
    But candidly, they really cause a problem for us because 
there are two levels of food trucks. There are those that have 
the permits, which really are in the right spots. Then those 
that just sort of take whatever spot they can.
    It has become a problem on several levels. First of all, 
there is a problem of it really has impact on my staff if there 
are trash issues, they are taking care of the rodents issues. 
But also, the way that these trucks are parked is people then 
sort of take advantage of the green space and there is a lot of 
damage to the property of the Smithsonian.
    We are working with the City of Washington, DC, the 
National Park Service, and others. But I want to be candid, we 
have not resolved that yet. Luckily, the truck that burst on 
fire did not catch--did not affect any other trucks. The person 
was not severely hurt. But to me, it is a warning.
    It is a warning that says that we want to be as fair as we 
can, but we have really got to protect the public and protect 
the Smithsonian.
    Senator Fischer. Well, let us know if we can do anything on 
that. I think it is a big problem. Your team recently completed 
70 percent of the Smithsonian's Facilities Conditions 
Assessment Program using a new methodology designed to provide 
a more comprehensive assessment. What have you learned from 
that so far? What is the significance of the new data that has 
been compiled from it, please?
    Mr. Bunch. Well, it is part of my strategic sense of how we 
should address the deferred maintenance. Part of the issue for 
me was that we wanted to no longer look at deferred maintenance 
and capital as two different things.
    To really think about strategically, how we put together 
those two entities so that, for example, when we did the 
National Air and Space Museum, we also took care of a lot of 
the backlog. Then the question was, do we have realistic 
numbers? We put together a new process that said to us, here 
are ways to look at valuation. Here are ways to understand and 
calculate inflation.
    The numbers are now high, but it is not the fact that there 
are new problems. It really is that the numbers allow us have a 
more realistic way of doing it. Now what that allows me to do 
is to figure out where we should put our priorities based on 
what is the greatest need, and what is the greatest need that 
allows us to continue to serve the public as effectively as we 
can.
    This has really been part of an overarching strategy that 
allows us to really sort of focus our resources, make the 
changes we want, and begin to deal with deferred maintenance. 
The reality is, for having buildings that have, you know, 29 
million people that go through them for 364 days a year, 
deferred maintenance is probably one of the biggest challenges 
we face.
    Senator Fischer. Thank you.
    Chairwoman Klobuchar. Thank you very much, Senator Fischer. 
We are joined by Senator Warner, who is very eagerly awaiting 
the return of pandas to the Zoo from the great State of 
Virginia, right nearby.
    Senator Warner. Thank you, Madam Chairwoman. What you do 
not know, and Madam Ranking Member----
    Chairwoman Klobuchar. Is that you are responsible for 
bringing back the pandas?
    Senator Warner. That is classified. I cannot share. That is 
classified.
    [Laughter.]
    Senator Warner. But, you know, when I was--one of my 
mentors in the Senate was Chris Dodd. He said, ``you know, one 
of the committees to get on is Rules, because not everybody 
knows that Rules Committee actually has jurisdiction over the 
Smithsonian, which is obviously terribly important for the DMV.''
    We are very proud of the fact that we have got a number of 
Smithsonian Institution's kind of back office operations across 
the Commonwealth of Virginia. I am leaving an extraordinarily 
classified hearing, which I was chairing, to make sure I could 
come and do three things.
    One, I want to commend you, Secretary Bunch, for--I think 
you are doing a great job. I am--you know, your history of the 
African American Museum. Now as overall Secretary of the 
Smithsonian. I have watched how you have, you know, taken on 
this challenge, worked with the community across the region, as 
well as across the country.
    You know, we spent a lot of time here, up here criticizing 
folks, but I think, I wanted to come and say kudos and 
congratulations for, I think, a job well done and hopefully one 
that you will consider--continue for a long time, even though 
since I know most of your board and some of them are very 
difficult people to deal with. I will not get into names on 
that.
    But I have a couple of questions. You know, fastest growing 
population in Virginia is first generation African diaspora. I 
think it may even be the same in Minnesota. While the African 
American Museum, you know, it is magnificent, it is mostly the 
story of descendants of slaves.
    You know, as you think about the Smithsonian's mission, you 
know, we have got 128,000, you know, extraordinary 
entrepreneurial--how do we build the ongoing stories of new 
diasporas that come, you know and my particular interest in 
this question is the African diaspora and how that is weaved 
into the Smithsonian's story of America.
    Mr. Bunch. The African diaspora is so important, and it is 
really being addressed in three different parts of the 
Smithsonian.
    The National Museum of African Art has really been taking 
the lead and working with these communities to sort of one, 
bring them into the fold, to be able to sort of look at the 
cultures of those communities and whether or not that is the 
kind of culture that gets collected in that museum.
    The National Museum of African American History and Culture 
has actually now brought in two curators who just work on that 
area of the diaspora. They are reaching out, doing new kinds of 
exhibitions, online exhibitions that begin to build those 
relations.
    Then the Museum of American History is really looking at 
how do we collect the local African diaspora community, so 
those collections are there. As you know, the key to the 
success of a museum is not necessarily what it is doing today, 
but what it plans for, for tomorrow.
    I want to make sure that while we are doing programs with 
the community today, that we have the kind of collections that 
allow that story to be told in the future.
    Senator Warner. Did we tip you off on that question? That 
was a pretty good answer. I thought I was going to come at you 
and kind of like--kind of semi stump you.
    [Laughter.]
    Senator Warner. Did you tip him off? Well, I----
    [Laughter.]
    Senator Warner. Sound like a little--thought I was going 
to, got you----
    Chairwoman Klobuchar. This is not an Intel hearing.
    [Laughter.]
    Senator Warner. Yes, this is a--I stand by my earlier 
statement. You are doing a good job because that is a pretty 
darn comprehensive answer. But I do think you have this--the 
constant remaking of the American story. I really hope, you 
know, make sure you were not thrown off. What are you doing on 
the on the South Asian diaspora?
    Mr. Bunch. Well, I think that again, we are seeing some 
attempt to do a better job of that. I think what I have asked 
is that through our educational committee community, to reach 
out, to begin to bring more involvement with these various 
communities.
    I have to be honest, the National Museum of Asian Art is 
really spectacular in terms of being able to deal with local 
communities. They had a recent exhibition that looked at 
Southeast Asian art, and there was a variety of people coming 
from different communities.
    Senator Warner. Although I am chair of the India Caucus, I 
do think there is a unique contribution from South Asia 
separately, but I want to get my----
    Mr. Bunch. Right.
    Senator Warner. You know, I am glad you did not come back 
and say, I have got four points on that one the way that, you 
know. You know, and I do not think this issue has been raised, 
but I do--would like to get your thoughts. I mean, one of 
things we are all grappling with is AI.
    You know, artificial intelligence as we--has enormous 
ability to enhance, but we can also embed biases. We also have 
to, I think, you know, think through, you know, do we actually 
have the notion of some kind of, in a better sense, walled 
garden around all of the intellectual property and images and 
parts of our history the Smithsonian protects.
    Because, you know, just as deepfakes can manipulate our 
political process, you know, you could see AI tools at scale 
and speed manipulate our history and cultural in ways that 
could be frankly devastating. Talk to me about that.
    Mr. Bunch. You know, there is real challenges with AI. I 
mean, obviously, we want to make sure that we use it as an 
effective tool. But the biggest concern we have is the 
Smithsonian is a trusted source. That people know they can 
count on the Smithsonian.
    Trying to really sort of do more than dip our toe, but 
understand how we can use AI and not lose that trusted source. 
Part of what we are doing as we move toward the 250th is we are 
taking some opportunities to test, to see, you know, if we can 
we make AI work for us.
    For example, while we are already doing a lot with it, we 
are doing a lot in our astrophysical work, we are also using it 
to help us scrub all of our documents to understand if we are 
missing the history of women, for example, in a lot of the 
scientific discoveries.
    But I think that we are really trying to figure out how not 
to be at the tip of the spear. We do not want to be at the end. 
We arereally trying to figure out how to make this work for us. I 
think we have to be involved. There have been--we have already 
been approached about, do you want to use Smithsonian content 
for machine learning and the like.
    We are looking at a variety of opportunities. But the most 
important thing is I do not ever want to lose the trusted 
source. Right now, you cannot trust everything that happens 
with AI.
    Senator Warner. Thank you. While I have great, you know, 
respect for California, Minnesota, Nebraska, remember the 250th 
in many ways was--and regardless what those folks in Boston 
say, it is more Williamsburg. It is, you know, across the 
Commonwealth of Virginia and extraordinarily important. I will 
go back----
    Chairwoman Klobuchar. If you look at the artifacts over 
there, which include Nebraska----
    Senator Warner. I have got to go back to my classified 
hearing.
    Chairwoman Klobuchar. Are you aware of the virtual 
expansion of the Smithsonian?
    Senator Warner. I think it is wonderful. But if you want to 
see the real stuff, come to Virginia.
    [Laughter.]
    Senator Warner. Thank you, Mr. Secretary.
    Chairwoman Klobuchar. All right. Very good. Next up, we 
have several new Members of the Committee. Senator Britt, who 
was here earlier. Senator Laphonza Butler who is here for 14 
months, so she asks your questions really fast.
    No, not really--because she has to get a lot done quickly. 
With that, I turn it over to Senator Butler of the State of 
California.
    Senator Butler. Thank you, Chairwoman Klobuchar, Ranking 
Member Fischer. Secretary, thank you so much for coming. There 
are so many accolades, I am sure, that have been lauded onto 
you deservingly about your work here in Washington. But for an 
Angeleno, it all starts at camp.
    Mr. Bunch. Yes.
    Senator Butler. Your contribution to generations of 
Angelenos teaching us about the history of our city, in the 
place that we belong, I think was just remarkable. All of the 
platitudes earned, but I want to make sure that even 
Washington, DC knows that California was where this started.
    Hopefully--and they are continuing to see your leadership 
from Los Angeles. Thank you for your work and service and for 
being here. I do sort of move a little bit rapidly, so I am 
going to try to move around a couple of big topics pretty 
quickly in my time. The Chair has allotted us five minutes for 
questions, but you have said that there are, in your strategic 
plan, sort of five focus points.
    You noted in your response to Senator Warner, the asset of 
the Smithsonian as a trusted source for the American people, 
and indeed, travelers around the world who want to understand 
the history of our country. You talk specifically about this 
trusted source as it relates to complex topics like social 
justice, like climate.
    Here are two quick questions. Can you say a little bit 
about how you are working to ensure that Americans who are 
unable to visit DC can understand the Smithsonian as a trusted 
source?
    I think some of what you are talking about relative to 
virtual exhibits could be responsive to that. But also, how you 
and your teamare telling the tough stories that are the truth 
around these complex issues in the story of our country.
    Mr. Bunch. Well, I think, first of all, what is really 
important for us is to use all the Smithsonian assets to make 
sure the country reaps the benefit of the Smithsonian. While a 
lot of is virtual, also it is our traveling exhibitions.
    The other thing we do is we do a lot of programs with 
students that we bring students in from wherever they are into 
Washington. We basically really have, as in our DNA, the 
recognition that we are more about outside of Washington then 
we are inside of Washington. Now, the second question is this 
real issue of the difficult issues.
    I have really felt that that is really the Smithsonian's 
job. That at a time when you need clarity, at a time when there 
is a debate, you want the Smithsonian to sort of bring its 
scholarship, bring its perspective to help people grapple with 
these issues.
    When I built the African American Museum, the real key was 
to make sure that I was not trying to sort of point fingers or 
guilt. What I was trying to do is say, here is a way we 
understand ourselves by looking at this complexity.
    I would argue whether it is climate change, whether it is 
issues of social justice, that the Smithsonian, because it has 
art, history, culture, science can really bring our expertise 
to bear. But what we also do is want to recognize that we do 
not want to sort of get into controversy for controversy sake.
    But we also recognize that if you are going to tell history 
or science, controversy is there, so we will not run away from 
it. All I ask from my colleagues is, let's think very carefully 
about what we do.
    Let's make sure it is always about driven by scholarship, 
and then let's make sure it is always about the greater good. 
To make sure that this is about how the Smithsonian is this 
reservoir of understanding and a reservoir of hope. If we can 
continue to do that, we can help the country move forward.
    Senator Butler. I love that reservoir of hope. My last 
question, just in the spirit of time, I know you talked a good 
deal already about the two new museums and the waiver that is 
necessary from Congress. Talk to us about the consequences of 
that waiver not being granted.
    Mr. Bunch. In some ways, if the waiver is granted but it is 
two years down the road, what it really means is that you are 
15 or 20 years away from an actual museum being built. Right 
now there is attention focused on these museums.
    There is fundraising. But if people feel that it is 
stalled, there is going to be less sort of attention and 
excitement to it. Now, candidly, if the waiver is not granted, 
then the question is I am not sure.
    Because we have looked at so many sites, and there are 
sites that just say to you, knock down a building and move a 
whole department of x. I do not know if--I do not think you can 
do that. Right now I am committed and focused to working with 
people like Senator Klobuchar to make sure that we can get a 
waiver.
    Chairwoman Klobuchar. One other thing I would add is doing 
it sooner rather than later means that you are still the 
Secretary for when we get started on this. Then we will require 
you to stay 15 years.
    But I think that would be helpful to have a seasoned leader 
there when we get--at least to get this off the ground, as you 
did with the African American Museum. You went a lot further 
with that, as we know, with the 10 millionth visitor just 
having visited there. That is another appealing thing, which I 
think you have a lot of support on both sides of the aisle to 
move this forward in a good way and the trust of the Regents.
    I was going to--the question I was asked--I want to just 
air for maybe my constituents next to the pandas, they would 
like to know about the Air and Space Museum and what you are 
doing there. Could you give us some details on that. What is 
happening with that renovation?
    Mr. Bunch. Well, you know, as somebody who started at the 
Air and Space Museum in my career, it is what I really care a 
lot about. What I am pleased is, is to say, look at how the Air 
and Space has changed already.
    The new exhibitions that we opened in 2022, the public 
cannot get enough of them. They are really--what is powerful is 
while they are rife with stories of aviation, they are also 
rife with technology and rife with education.
    They are really accessible. Then I think that what is also 
happening is that--Udvar-Hazy out in Dulles is really getting 
more and more visitors because of the large numbers of 
airplanes and the work we are doing out there.
    But I think what excites me in some ways about Air and 
Space is that we also have this new Bezos Learning Center that 
is going to be a part of it. What that really is, it gives the 
Smithsonian opportunity to really do STEM and STEAM.
    Yes, about aviation, but it is about the Smithsonian writ 
large. It allows us to serve more students from around the 
country to come to Washington. The Air and Space Museum and 
where we are is, thanks to your support, the federal 
transformation is now done.
    Now, over the next two years, we will use private money to 
build, rebuild, and open the new exhibitions. That, as I said, 
by the time we get to 2026, the whole Air and Space Museum will 
be open, and Udvar-Hazy will then be the place that even the 
larger parts of aviation history.
    Chairwoman Klobuchar. Very good. Just one of the things you 
mentioned. I know, previously, the Smithsonian's effort to 
protect collections most vulnerable to deterioration and 
damage. We have certainly seen other parts of the country when 
they are not protected or they are not in a safe place, 
including preparing staff to rescue collections in an 
emergency. Could you talk about what is going on with the 
management of those vulnerable collections?
    Mr. Bunch. Preserving the collections of the Smithsonian is 
one of the key priorities of any Secretary. Those 155 million 
artifacts are really not artifacts of nostalgia, but artifacts 
of scholarship, artifacts of understanding, artifacts of 
effective use.
    What we have done is we have actually had a major look over 
the last three or four years at how do we sort of improve our 
collection storage. How do we also make sure that vulnerable 
collections are protected?
    For example, when we built the National Museum of African 
American History and Culture, the goal was to really build 
everything in there to handle flooding and climate change 
issues. Now, we are looking to make sure we do that at the 
American History Museum. We are looking at where we are most 
vulnerable, how to make those changes.
    In our fiscal year 2025 budget request, we request 
resources that would allow us to bring, you know, slurry walls 
and dams and pumps to the air into the American History Museum. 
Basically, what we have done is we realized that we have to do 
this on several levels.
    One is address climate change and the possibility of the 
flooding. We are looking at that. Two, training staff. We have 
staff who are trained just to handle any kind of emergency. We 
have already moved the most vulnerable collections away from 
the lower levels so that as we are doing everything we can to 
make sure that we are prepared when the inevitable happens.
    That as we can continue then to put the resources into 
addressing the challenge of climate change, we can protect the 
institute, the museums we need to. The good thing, for example, 
about the space is where we are looking for the new museums, 
they are not in spaces of where they are at risk.
    While we may do things to make sure that they can handle 
the water, it is really the museums that are on the 
Constitution Avenue side that are really most at risk, and that 
is what we are focusing on.
    Chairwoman Klobuchar. Okay. One last question. My favorite 
museum to visit is the Portrait Gallery. Maybe because it is 
not all portraits, but my favorite exhibit ever was, People Who 
Remained Cool Through Time, which included two Minnesotans, Bob 
Dylan and Prince. Just how is that museum doing?
    Mr. Bunch. The Portrait Gallery was the first Smithsonian 
Museum I ever visited when I came here to go to college. It is 
something that is really important because, as you have said, 
it is portraiture, but it is more than that.
    It is rich history. It is popular culture. They are doing 
very well. Kim Sajet, the Director, has really sort of 
redefined notions of portraiture and have really brought in 
people from around the country to give it the kind of financial 
resources it needs to do wonderful things.
    The Portrait Gallery, and its sister institution, the 
Smithsonian American Art Museum are doing very well. They have 
become a destination for many younger Americans who come to 
Washington because they are one of the few Smithsonian that is 
open late.
    Chairwoman Klobuchar. Very interesting. With that, any 
other questions, Senator Fischer?
    Senator Fischer. Yes. Thank you, Madam Chairwoman. Just a 
couple here. I am a cattle rancher, and I also sit on the AG 
Committee, along with the Chairwoman of Rules, and I was 
encouraged to see the Smithsonian partner with 4-H last summer 
as part of the Rural Initiative.
    Can you tell us a little bit about the Rural Initiative, 
but also then how has the 4-H partnership gone so far?
    Mr. Bunch. I really felt that the Smithsonian does a lot of 
work in urban communities, but that it is rural and smaller 
communities that need our attention. I wanted to build on work 
we have done, the Museum on Main Street model of bringing the 
Smithsonian to small towns, to shopping malls, to where--is 
really brilliant.
    But what I wanted was to be more systematic and strategic. 
What I did with the Rural Initiative is that we have actually 
had people going around the country to find out what the needs 
are, and to find out how it is less about the Smithsonian 
coming to rural America and more about a partnership that 
allows the Smithsonian to be made better by understanding what 
are the issues that rural communities need.
    For us, it is--the 4-H club has been really powerful 
because the 4-H clubs have, as you know, deep relationships 
around the country and they have got amazing programs that we 
are able to leverage.
    The notion of being able to create dialogs around 
democracy, to use the 4-H clubs to really help young Americans 
not just look at the history of democracy, but understand their 
obligation, their responsibility to sort of protect the 
democracy has been really very moving.
    Last summer we brought 700 students through the 4-H clubs 
to the Smithsonian. They spent time at each of the museums. 
They worked with curators. What I realized is that this is what 
the Smithsonian does well, to give people a way to sort of find 
wonder, to find new ways to think about their future, and new 
ways to think about their community.
    With the 4-H clubs, while we are doing, I think, important 
work, I think we are also changing the Smithsonian.
    Senator Fischer. Thank you. One last question. As we look 
at leadership for the new museums, what is the process for 
candidate selection, and how does the Smithsonian work with a 
search firm, for example, to find and select a candidate?
    Mr. Bunch. Running a cultural institution is hard work. 
Running a conservatorship in the Smithsonian is unbelievably 
challenging. Part of what we do is we look at this through 
several lenses.
    One, we try to hire important consulting firms that can 
help tease out candidates, but also we reach out. I reached out 
very directly around the Women's History Museum to people that 
I thought were the kind of either the leaders or the next 
generation of leaders that would sort of help the Smithsonian 
move forward.
    The process then is, you know, once we get a pool, we make 
sure that they spend time not just with sort of senior 
leadership, but with other museum directors, so they can 
understand the challenge of the Smithsonian. Because, quite 
candidly, when you run a museum that is not the Smithsonian, 
you really are the CEO.
    At the Smithsonian, you run a museum, you are a mid-level 
manager, right. You have got other people on top of you. 
Basically, we want people to understand the challenge of being 
a director at the Smithsonian.
    But then what we do is after they go through the process, I 
get to speak to the final two candidates and really ask them 
questions to guide my sense that they can embrace the ambiguity 
of leadership, especially if you are building new museums. If 
they understand the challenge of bureaucracy, and if they have a 
vision.
    Because basically, to build a new museum, you have got to 
have a vision that you believe in that can carry you for a 
decade.
    Senator Fischer. I know there was a situation in the past 
on a director for a new museum--and I hope this new process, or 
a more complete process can be followed in the future.
    Mr. Bunch. We wanted to make sure that instead of just 
counting on a search firm to vet a candidate, we also have our 
own private way of doing that.
    We make sure that even after a search firm may say this is 
a strong candidate, we have a process that allows us to sort of 
vet it even further and to make sure that there are no 
surprises, because I hate being surprised.
    Senator Fischer. Me too. Thank you, Secretary.
    Chairwoman Klobuchar. Did you have any additional 
questions, Senator Butler?
    Senator Butler. I am happy to ask if I am given extra time, 
Chairwoman.
    Chairwoman Klobuchar. Yes, yes.
    Senator Butler. Thank you so much, I appreciate it. 
Secretary, what are you--there is a lot of sort of criticism, 
conjecture, sort of being laid upon this--the sort of newer 
generations of Millennials, Gen Zs, call them Gen Y, call them 
whatever you want.
    I am curious about your ability, the institution's ability 
to analyze data, relative to who are the participants in--
across all the platforms of the Smithsonian, in person, 
virtual, traveling exhibits, partnerships and what do--if you 
have the capacity to examine and analyze that data, what are 
the trends that we are seeing relative to future generations 
being interested in the story of this country?
    What are you doing about those trends? There is a lot of 
ifs, but I have some great curiosities as to how do we continue 
the legacy and tradition of this trusted source----
    Chairwoman Klobuchar. Says the mother of a nine-year old.
    Senator Butler. Says the mother of a nine-year old who 
cannot get her daughter to finish the African American Museum. 
We have been three times.
    [Laughter.]
    Mr. Bunch. I think, first of all, it is crucial that the 
Smithsonian has data. We really sort of look at who comes, who 
participates in programs, who we are looking at virtually. In 
some ways, the technology has allowed us to capture something 
we could not capture in the past. We now have a much stronger 
idea.
    But also, what we find is that we have shaped programs to 
different parts of our community, Gen X, Gen Z, to make sure 
that we are asking the questions they want to ask. What I find 
fascinating has been that when we are often building a museum, 
people say, well, you know, these younger generations, they 
want the virtual.
    What they want is to realize that they have never seen the 
actual and that we use the virtual to get them into the actual, 
and that really works. We have many, many more people that are 
grappling with it. I think the other thing that is so important 
that the
Smithsonian is trying to do with these different generations is 
really shape the educational community.
    We are doing a lot of work. I created Under Secretary for 
Education for the first time. We are doing a lot of work in 
different communities to make sure that younger Americans 
understand the power of history, the importance of science, the 
joy of the creativity of art, so we see sort of millions of 
young Americans engaging in the Smithsonian besides that trip 
in eighth grade.
    Senator Butler. That is super helpful. That is one of the 
things really what I was trying to get at. Senator Klobuchar 
really noted the point that I view most of, if not everything, 
through a lens of one, urgency because of my short time in the 
Senate, but also through the lens of being a parent.
    You know, as I offer the story in jest in terms of my 
daughter and the African American Museum, but does the data, do 
the learnings offer you anything relative to footprint of new 
museums?
    One of the things that my nine-year old says, take it for 
what it is worth, the science that it is worth, ``it is too 
big, mama.'' I just want to do this little part. Does the data 
give you any insight or any learnings across the industry and 
field, give you any insight relative to what is the right 
footprint for as we think about new museums, particularly as we 
are grappling with the complexity of space and climate and all 
of those things, as well as the attention of a nine-year old?
    Mr. Bunch. I think what we found through the data is that 
the museum needs to be compartmentalized. That regardless of 
the footprint, you really want to be able to sort of not have 
people try to do the entire experience.
    Really trying to do pieces of it. I think that is something 
that will shape as we are building the new museum. I think the 
other thing is that to really--we are actually using a lot of 
child psychologists and others to help us think about, all 
right, what is the best level to engage?
    Because as you know, in a museum, you are engaging a whole 
array of people. We are looking at, do we use technology even 
differently. Do we really craft opportunities that this really 
works for sixth graders, this technology, this--and so, we are 
looking at what are all the possibilities.
    Chairwoman Klobuchar. Very good. Good questions. Thank you 
very much, Senator Butler. I was thinking you will have to come 
to Minnesota, Secretary Bunch, and see the country's biggest 
state fair for your own cultural experience.
    Mr. Bunch. Absolutely.
    Chairwoman Klobuchar. We do not count Texas because they 
are open 30 days. It is--there is a huge 4-H presence. I was 
thinking about that since you have worked with them. Then you 
could see the butter carving and think of it, of the Princess 
Kay and the Milky Way out of huge butter bus that go in a 
revolving refrigerator, and you could think of that as a future 
exhibit.
    Mr. Bunch. You are broadening my cultural horizons.
    Chairwoman Klobuchar. Yes, exactly. That would be a lot of 
fun. We have some great museums there, as you well know. I want 
to thank Senator Fischer and the Members of the Committee for a 
productive hearing.
    As well as you, Secretary, for your testimony on the 
ongoing work of the Smithsonian. Your vision for the future, 
both for the existing collection and then all the exciting new 
work going on with the two museums. I meant what I said, this 
is our moment, near the end of the year, to allow you to get 
these things launched. I look forward to continuing my work 
with my colleagues to support the important work of the 
Smithsonian.
    The hearing record will remain open for a week. Do you want 
to add anything, Senator Fischer? Okay, good. We are adjourned. 
We are going to look at those artifacts. Thank you.
    Mr. Bunch. Thank you.
    [Whereupon, at 3:53 p.m., the hearing was adjourned.]




                      APPENDIX MATERIAL SUBMITTED

[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]



  

                                  [all]