[House Hearing, 118 Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]


               MEETING THE CHALLENGES OF GLOBAL BRAIN 
                 HEALTH: DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT FOR 
                 THE 21ST CENTURY
=======================================================================

                                HEARING

                               BEFORE THE

                  SUBCOMMITTEE ON GLOBAL HEALTH, GLOBAL
                   HUMAN RIGHTS AND INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZA-
                   TIONS

                                 OF THE

                      COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS
                     U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                    ONE HUNDRED EIGHTEENTH CONGRESS

                             SECOND SESSION

                               __________

                           November 20, 2024

                               __________

                           Serial No. 118-136

                               __________

        Printed for the use of the Committee on Foreign Affairs

[GRAPHIC NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]       

Available: http://www.foreignaffairs.house.gov/, http://docs.house.gov,
                       or http://www.govinfo.gov
                       
                               __________
                               
                        U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE
63-407 PDF                     WASHINGTON : 2026
=======================================================================
                      
                      COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS

                   MICHAEL T. McCAUL, Texas, Chairman
                   
CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey     GREGORY MEEKS, New York, Ranking 
JOE WILSON, South Carolina               Member
SCOTT PERRY, Pennsylvania            BRAD SHERMAN, California
DARRELL ISSA, California             GERALD E. CONNOLLY, Virginia
ANN WAGNER, Missouri                 WILLIAM KEATING, Massachusetts
BRIAN MAST, Florida                  AMI BERA, California
TIM BURCHETT, Tennessee              JOAQUIN CASTRO, Texas
MARK E. GREEN, Tennessee             DINA TITUS, Nevada
ANDY BARR, Kentucky                  TED LIEU, California
RONNY JACKSON, Texas                 SUSAN WILD, Pennsylvania
YOUNG KIM, California                DEAN PHILLIPS, Minnesota
MARIA ELVIRA SALAZAR, Florida        COLIN ALLRED, Texas
BILL HUIZENGA, Michigan              ANDY KIM, New Jersey
AUMUA AMATA COLEMAN RADEWAGEN,       SARA JACOBS, California
    American Samoa                   KATHY MANNING, North Carolina
FRENCH HILL, Arkansas                SHEILA CHERFILUS-McCORMICK, 
WARREN DAVIDSON, Ohio                    Florida
JIM BAIRD, Indiana                   GREG STANTON, Arizona
MICHAEL WALTZ, Florida               MADELEINE DEAN, Pennsylvania
THOMAS KEAN, JR., New Jersey         JARED MOSKOWITZ, Florida
MICHAEL LAWLER, New York             JONATHAN JACKSON, Illinois
CORY MILLS, Florida                  SYDNEY KAMLAGER-DOVE, California
RICH McCORMICK, Georgia              JIM COSTA, California
NATHANIEL MORAN, Texas               JASON CROW, Colorado
JOHN JAMES, Michigan                 KWEISI MFUME, Maryland
KEITH SELF, Texas                    BRAD SCHNEIDER, Illinois
RYAN K. ZINKE, Montana
JAMES C. MOYLAN, Guam

                Brendan Shields, Majority Staff Director

                Sophia Lafargue, Minority Staff Director
                                 ------                                

 SUBCOMMITTEE ON GLOBAL HEALTH, GLOBAL HUMAN RIGHTS AND INTERNATIONAL 
                             ORGANIZATIONS

                CHRISTOPHER SMITH, New Jersey, Chairman
MARIA SALAZAR, Florida               SUSAN WILD, Pennsylvania, Ranking 
AMATA RADEWAGEN, American Samoa          Member
FRENCH HILL, Arkansas                AMI BERA, California
RICH MCCORMICK, Georgia              SARA JACOBS, California
JOHN JAMES, Michigan                 KATHY MANNING, North Carolina
                       
                       C  O  N  T  E  N  T  S

                              ----------                              

                            REPRESENTATIVES

                                                                   Page
Opening Statement of Subcommittee Chairman Christopher H. Smith..     1
Opening Statement of Representative Ami Bera.....................     4

                               WITNESSES

Statement of Gladys E. Maestre, M.D., Ph.D., Director, 
  Alzheimer's Disease Resource Center for Minority Aging 
  Research, University Of Texas..................................     6
  Prepared Statement.............................................     8
Statement of Benjamin C. Warf, M.D., Chairman, Neurokids.........    17
  Prepared Statement.............................................    19
Andy Shih, Ph.D., Chief Science Officer, Autism Speaks...........    23
  Prepared Statement.............................................    26
Statement of Yashodhara Rana, Ph.D., Associate Director of 
  Research, Eleanor Crook Foundation.............................    29
  Prepared Statement.............................................    31

                                APPENDIX

Hearing Notice...................................................    52
Hearing Minutes..................................................    54
Hearing Attendance...............................................    55

                        Materials for the Record

Alzheimer's Assoc. and Alzheimer's Impact Movement Statement, 
  submitted by Rep. Smith........................................    56
Statement for the record, submitted by Rep. Susan Wild...........    62

                        Questions for the Record

Questions submitted to Andy Shih by Rep. Smith...................    66
Questions submitted to Benjamin C. Warf by Rep. Smith............    68
Questions submitted to Gladys E. Maestre by Rep. Smith...........    73
Questions submitted to Gladys E. Maestre by Rep. McCormick.......    78

 
MEETING THE CHALLENGES OF GLOBAL BRAIN HEALTH: DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT 
                          FOR THE 21ST CENTURY

                              ----------                              


                      Wednesday, November 20, 2024

                  House of Representatives,
Subcommittee on Global Health, Global Human Rights, 
                   and International Organizations,
                              Committee on Foreign Affairs,
                                                    Washington, DC.

    The subcommittee met, pursuant to notice, at 2:30 p.m., in 
room 2172, Rayburn House Office Building, Hon. Christopher H. 
Smith (chairman of the subcommittee) presiding.

       OPENING STATEMENT OF CHAIRMAN CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH

    Mr. Smith. Good afternoon. The subcommittee hearing of the 
Global Health, Global Human Rights, and International 
Organizations will come to order. And first let me apologize 
for the lateness. I was on the floor along with Kathy Manning 
with a couple of bills that she sponsored and one that I 
sponsored, so I do apologize and it just finished, so please 
accept my apologies. And thank you so very, very much for being 
here.
    Without objection, the chair is authorized to declare a 
recess at any point and all members will have 5 days to submit 
statements, extraneous material, and questions for the record, 
subject to the length limitations of the rules. I note the 
presence of a quorum and I now recognize myself for an opening 
statement.
    Today, we turn our attention to the vitally important issue 
of global brain health with the specific focus of Alzheimer's 
disease, autism spectrum disorders, and hydrocephalus. Global 
brain health is critically neglected. The United States is the 
leader in health assistance globally with foreign assistance 
that has saved millions of lives through programs that target 
malaria, HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and many, many other diseases 
and infectious diseases as well. But comparatively, brain 
health is overlooked and misunderstood.
    A major new study shows that more than three billion people 
worldwide live with a neurological condition. Neurological 
conditions are the leading cause of poor health and disability 
globally. I would note parenthetically that my wife deals with 
a very rare disease that is known as Marfan's disease. It has 
to do with brain encephalitis. She is doing very well 
overcoming it, but it is everywhere and it is not being, I 
don't think, adequately addressed on a global scale at least by 
our Government.
    As life expectancy grows and healthcare costs rise, 
policymakers must consider the looming health crisis of brain 
diseases and disorders, especially in low-and middle-income 
countries. I have introduced my bill, the Global Brain Health 
Bill in Congress after Congress after Congress and have not 
been able to get it passed, but I am absolutely determined that 
in the next Congress we will see it come to fruition.
    Take Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimer's is the most common 
form of dementia, usually affecting persons aged 60 and older. 
As we all know, it is degenerative, irreversible, and a 
terrible disease that progressively corrodes the brain's 
memory, thinking, and reasoning skills. Currently over 55 
million people worldwide live with a form of dementia and 60 
percent of those are in developing countries. With life 
expectancy on the rise, a tsunami of Alzheimer's cases is on 
the global horizon. In 2011, when I chaired the very first 
congressional hearing on the topic of the global crisis of 
Alzheimer's disease, projections estimated at 80 million people 
would get Alzheimer's or another form of dementia by 2050. In 
2015, the projection was revised to a whopping to 115 million.
    Today, Alzheimer's Disease International estimates 139 
million cases of dementia by 2050 and again, things are getting 
worse, not better. This increase will be felt more drastically 
in the low-and middle-income countries as populations grow 
rapidly and life expectancy, good news story, lengthen.
    One recent study found that dementia cases in Sub-Saharan 
African will grow by over 300 percent. Low-and middle-income 
countries will struggle to manage this health challenge due to 
a small and untrained health workforce and inadequate and 
inaccessible care.
    Little public awareness and health professional training on 
the signs and symptoms of Alzheimer's pose a challenge. A 
global study by Alzheimer's Disease International found that 
over two-thirds of people incorrectly think that Alzheimer's 
and other forms of dementia are just normal parts of aging. As 
the co-founder and co-chair of the congressional Alzheimer's 
Task Force, Ed Markey and I formed it back in the year 2000. We 
have maintained--I have maintained and we have maintained for 
over a decade that the administration of both parties must pay 
more careful attention to this mounting crisis. Yes, we have 
provided more money to NIH. There has been a quadrupling of 
funding for research and that is absolutely welcome, but more 
needs to be done, again, on the international level.
    I also co-chair the congressional Autism Caucus which I 
founded in 1999 and I authored the Autism Statistics 
Surveillance Research and Epidemiology Act, a bill to authorize 
grants and contracts for the collection, analysis, and 
reporting of data on autism and pervasive developmental 
disabilities and establish regional centers of excellence in 
autism and epidemiology. Passed as part of the Child Health Act 
in 2000, it was offered as an amendment by yours truly, this 
provided the basis for future iterations of autism legislation 
including the Autism Cares Act.
    Earlier this year, the House passed my bill, H.R. 7213, the 
Autism Cares Act of 2024 and I am happy to say after it was 
blocked in the Senate, that block seems to have been lifted and 
maybe as early as tonight they may unanimous consent the bill, 
both sides through the hotline procedure, have agreed to it, so 
it will become law. And it is a substantial, not only 
reiteration of current policy and reauthorization, but an 
expansion as well.
    About 1 in 100 children all around the world it is 
estimated have autism, a spectrum disorder marked by degrees of 
difficulty with social interaction and communication. While 
research and care for autism has improved in wealthier 
countries, such as the U.S. and including chronically how many, 
it is seriously neglected in much of the developing world. For 
many living in low-income countries, care is often 
inaccessible. I will never forget I had a mother was from Cote 
d'Ivoire at one of my hearings on global autism and she 
testified and said I couldn't get any help for my son until she 
moved and migrated to Ohio and then received a plethora of very 
good intervention and her son was performing and doing very 
well. There was autism in their family. They were off often 
socially isolated and stigmatized. Some communities attribute 
autism to witchcraft which is horrible.
    The United States can play a vital role in supporting 
developing countries and addressing autism spectrum disorders 
by raising awareness, developing culturally appropriate 
screening tools, and training parents, teachers, and healthcare 
professionals on interventions so as to improve the lives of 
individuals with autism.
    Last Congress, I also introduced the Global Autism Act 
which would establish a program within USAID. I hope to update 
that and reintroduce that in the next Congress and hopefully we 
will have some success there.
    Finally, our third very important topic of discussion will 
be on the issue of hydrocephalus. Hydrocephalus is a condition 
where fluid buildup in the brain leads to swelling of the head 
and serious brain damage that often ends in death. 
Hydrocephalus is a tragically common childhood condition. There 
are nearly half a million cases annually and perhaps many, many 
more. The most precious gifts in our society, our emphasis on 
children are the most vulnerable when it comes to hydrocephalus 
and yet this condition also affects our elderly.
    Once again, hydrocephalus plagues infants in the developing 
countries and again we have a man here today who, Dr. Benjamin 
Warf, who has been before our committee before, who developed 
an amazing procedure that has been applied in Uganda and 
throughout Africa that doesn't require a stent. It has 
revolutionized the effort. And I will never forget, we had a 
few of the doctors that he worked with, including indigenous 
Ugandans, who testified via remote as well as in person and 
they said when the moms got their kids back and the pain, as 
well, is mitigated and ended through this, the flow of tears 
was just almost unimaginable.
    So Dr. Warf, you have been a lifesaver. You all have been. 
But you have been a lifesaver when it comes to hydrocephalus 
and we thank you. I thank you. We all thank you for the great 
work you have done.
    I will introduce our very, very fine group of individuals 
in a moment, but I would like to yield to Dr. Bera for any 
comments you may have.

          OPENING STATEMENT OF REPRESENTATIVE AMI BERA

    Mr. Bera. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. And I know the Ranking 
Member, Ms. Wild, is tied up as Ranking Member in the Ethics 
Committee and will join us as soon as she can. She has got an 
opening statement.
    But again, thank you for holding this hearing on an 
incredibly important topic.
    I am going to focus mostly on Alzheimer's disease with 
regards to brain health. As the chairman pointed out, the 
number of people living with Alzheimer's disease and dementia 
is projected to triple from over 55 million people today to 
more than 152 million by 2050. The cost of Alzheimer's disease 
and dementia to the global economy is $1.3 trillion in 2019 and 
it will continue to grow exponentially in the coming years as 
demographic transitions lead to an aging global population.
    And while the U.S. Government has increased the domestic 
R&D budget on Alzheimer's at the NIH by tenfold over the last 
decade from $400 million to $4 billion, there is currently no 
funding for global Alzheimer's and dementia programs at the 
global level. So as a doctor, I have seen acutely and as an 
internist, I am acutely aware of how Alzheimer's disease and 
dementia affect not only the patient, but also the impact it 
has on the caregivers and the family and disproportionally in 
cases affect the female population.
    In our district, we have held nine annual brain health 
forums working with our local Alzheimer's association to 
provide our constituents with information and resources on the 
latest Alzheimer's research and what is available to them to 
assist caregivers and persons living with Alzheimer's or other 
dementias. That said, however, nearly all Alzheimer's research 
has been conducted on Caucasian populations of lesser European 
origin leaving out 90 percent of the world which has 
significantly limited progress.
    That is why today I introduced the bipartisan Global 
Alzheimer's Initiative Now, or the GAIN Act, alongside my co-
leads, Representative Brian Fitzpatrick and Young Kim. The GAIN 
Act will authorize U.S. participation in and contributions to 
the Davos Alzheimer's Collaborative. The Davos Alzheimer's 
Collaborative, or DAC, was launched in 2021 as the first global 
alliance of governments, nonprofits, academia, and the private 
sector driving efforts to combat Alzheimer's disease. DAC aims 
to invest over $700 million over 6 years to link, scale, and 
build on existing efforts across every sector, and foster an 
innovative ecosystem to coordinate and accelerate the pace of 
innovation and Alzheimer's disease research and care and to 
improve brain health globally to achieve equitable and 
accessible healthcare.
    It is critical at this time that we leverage U.S. resources 
to most effectively combat the step saving disease for our 
constituents, their families and individuals impacted by 
Alzheimer's disease and dementia around the world. I look 
forward to hearing testimony and again, thank you for holding 
this hearing. I yield back.
    Mr. Smith. It is now my honor to introduce our very 
distinguished witnesses beginning with Dr. Gladys Maestre who 
is the Director of the Rio Grande Valley Alzheimer's Disease 
Resource Center for Minority Aging Research. She is a 
physician, scientist, who has devoted much of her professional 
life to Alzheimer's research in low-resource settings. Her 
research has explored cultural, educational, and genetic risks 
for Alzheimer's disease and cognitive decline, as well as 
cognitive function and health among minorities and ethnically 
diverse populations. Dr. Maestre was also the Co-Director of 
the South Texas Alzheimer's Disease Resource Center where she 
focuses on personalized medicine's approaches to improve 
prevention, treatment, and care for patients with Alzheimer's 
disease and related dementia.
    Dr. Benjamin Warf is the founding Chairman of NeuroKids, a 
nonprofit organization established in the year 2020 that exists 
to help children with hydrocephalus and spina bifida in low-
resource countries. Dr. Warf is also a Professor of Neurology 
at Harvard Medical School and Director of Neonatal and 
Congenital Anomalies Neurosurgery at Boston Children's 
Hospital. He served as Chief Pediatric Neurosurgery and 
Director of Surgical Education at the University of Kentucky 
Medical Center in 2000 when he and his wife and six children 
moved to Uganda as a medical missionary with Cure International 
to be the founding medical director of a pediatric neurosurgery 
specialty hospital. While there, Dr. Warf developed and 
validated a new endoscopic neurosurgical procedure to treat 
infant hydrocephalus known as ETV/CPC and I will leave it to 
you to say what that stands for. He is also the first to 
identify neonatal infection as the most common cause of infant 
hydrocephalus in East Africa. And again, has been before this 
committee several times and has been amazing with the 
leadership he has provided.
    Dr. Andy Shih is the Chief Science Officer at Autism 
Speaks, an organization we work very closely with on the Autism 
Caucus and I want to thank him. Dr. Shih has led important 
advancements toward the organization's mission including the 
development of several large international research consortia 
that delivered high impact scientific outcomes for the 
community. He was essential to the 2008 passage of the World 
Autism Awareness Day Resolution at the U.N. and subsequently 
led to the development of the Global Autism Public Health 
Initiative that provides technical support to country 
governments to enhance autism awareness advocacy and services 
worldwide. His leadership at Autism Speaks supports ministries, 
governments, agencies, and leading non-government organizations 
in more than 70 countries to deliver better outcomes. And of 
course, we all remember when G20 adapted a very, very 
monumental and you played such a role in it, to have a change 
in direction to come up with something that will ameliorate 
autism by 2025. It was a very, very important pivot and it 
helped us, all of us in countries and governments around the 
world to focus additional resources saying we have a target 
date, let's try to achieve it.
    And then we have Dr. Yashodhara Rana, who serves as the 
Associate Director for Research at the Eleanor Crook 
Foundation. In this role, Dr. Rana oversees ECF's multi-million 
dollar portfolio of grants in maternal and child nutrition and 
provides thorough leadership both to the ECF team and its 
community of partners. She is currently a member of the Power 
of Nutrition Technical Advisory Group and serves as a member of 
the Editorial Board of Maternal and Child Nutrition Journal.
    Prior to ECF, Dr. Rana was Associate Director at the 
Results for Development overseeing a nutrition team's data and 
learning practices. There, Dr. Rana led DataDENT, a 5-year 
initiative aimed at strengthening the nutrition data value 
chain and informing the African Development Bank's nutrition 
strategy in costing and financial analyses.
    Thank you all for being here. The testimony you will 
provide will be incredibly useful going forward as well as 
starting today. Dr. Maestre.

                 STATEMENT OF GLADYS E. MAESTRE

    Dr. Maestre. Chairman Smith, Ranking Member Wild, and I am 
pretty sure she is going to look at this, Dr. Bera, 
distinguished members of this committee, it is an honor to 
testify before you today. To harness the promise of science to 
mitigate the suffering of the millions experiencing Alzheimer's 
dementia across the globe, we need to advance scientific 
knowledge, but also design the infrastructure and resources 
required to make this promise a reality.
    A comprehensive, cohesive global agenda will allow our 
Nation to leverage the momentum that the national plan to 
address Alzheimer's Disease Act, known as NAPA, and the 
Alzheimers Accountability and Investment Act have facilitated. 
This bill was recently reauthorized with unanimous support in 
Congress. We are grateful to you, Chairman Smith, and all 
Members of the Congress who have championed and continue to 
support this bill, and Dr. Bera, for that initiative.
    As a result of these investments, seminal advances were 
made in diagnosing and treating Alzheimer's disease. For 
example, we now know that Alzheimer's begins 20 years or 
earlier before memory loss or other symptoms develop. And in an 
unprecedented move, the FDA approved two treatments that can 
modify some changes in the brain of Alzheimer's dementia 
patients.
    We are moving toward incorporating biomarker detection for 
Alzheimer's disease into routine preventive health care. Even 
though many aspects still needs to be clarified, we can now 
detect brain changes in vivo by measuring cerebrospinal fluid 
and plasma molecules. We refer to these molecules as biomarkers 
and they may function similarly to prostrate specific antigens, 
PSAs, where elevated levels from further assessments to rule 
out disease.
    Our global brain health agenda needs to be cohesive and 
should take advantage of the momentum and consider the 
following facts. First, Africa, the most genetically diverse 
continent, offers a vast, yet under utilized resource for 
studying how genetic and environmental factors contribute to 
chronic and infectious diseases. While the African diaspora in 
the U.S. is growing, it represents a fraction of the genetic 
diversity found on the continent.
    Second, the risk factors affecting every brain disease vary 
across ethnic groups due to genetic and cultural differences. 
However, most studies focus on European populations, limiting 
their applicability to other groups. For instance, ApoE, the 
most common genetic risk factor for Alzheimer's in Europeans, 
has minimal impact on African Americans or Hispanics.
    Third, without the knowledge of disease etiology in the 
ancestral source populations, our ability to fully address the 
needs of African Americans who are also experiencing a rising 
life expectancy remains limited.
    China and the U.S. compete for a strategic influence in 
Africa and Latin America, includes U.S. investment in health 
research and infrastructure offers a strategic, cost effective 
way to counter China's advance and rebuild trust in the global 
south. One example of this that we have done in Latin America 
is the Maracaibo Aging Study in Venezuela. Despite efforts to 
move from programs, projects, to a cohesive strategy, brain 
health, especially Alzheimer's, still lacks a clear, global 
agenda.
    I urge you to consider a global strategy to advance 
Alzheimer's research that benefits all people in America and it 
strengthens the U.S. position in African and all lower-income 
regions. This approach may leverage NIH funded programs that 
combine research training with community engagement such as the 
Resource Centers for Minority Aging Research, the RCMAR, and 
the Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers, ADRCs, and the 
Diversity Centers for Genomic Research.
    Partnership with Alzheimer's Associations and other patient 
advocacy groups, as well as professional societies like the 
Gerontological Society of America are instrumental in 
implementing a concerted agenda.
    Finally, we must develop a pipeline of experts in both 
brain health and foreign affairs. With over 250 North American 
universities offering global health education, we have the 
means to do that.
    Thank you very much for the opportunity to testify today. I 
look forward to answering any questions you may have.
    [The prepared statement of Dr. Maestre follows:]
    [GRAPHIC NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]
    
    Mr. Smith. Thank you very much, Doctor, and your very, very 
lengthy and scholarly testimony will be made a part of the 
record and any other extraneous material you want to include in 
the record. Dr. Warf.

                  STATEMENT OF BENJAMIN C. WARF

    Dr. Warf. Thank you, Mr. Chairman and Dr. Bera and other 
members that will be listening. Thank you for this invitation. 
It is an honor as always. And thank you, Mr. Chairman, in 
particular, for your commitment and support over the last many 
years now. It is very valuable and very much appreciated.
    Hydrocephalus is a common childhood condition that can be 
devastating or even fatal. The good news is that it is 
treatable. The bad news is that children in much of the world 
either get sub-optimal treatment or no treatment at all. The 
normal brain contains fluid-filled spaces called ventricles 
that communicate with the fluid space outside the brain. 
Anything that disrupts this circulation can cause a fluid 
called CSF, or cerebral spinal fluid, to accumulate within the 
ventricles which then enlarge under pressure. That is 
hydrocephalus. There are many causes of hydrocephalus. Some 
cases are congenital. And others are secondary to another 
condition.
    In resource-poor countries, the two most common causes are 
neonatal infection and neural tube defects, commonly referred 
to as spina bifida. Together, these account for about two 
thirds of all causes of hydrocephalus in the developing world. 
Thus, a great deal of hydrocephalus could be prevented by 
reducing the incidents of newborn infections and spina bifida. 
Hydrocephalus is the most common condition treated by pediatric 
neurosurgeons, with close to one half million new cases per 
year. But it is tragically most common among those children who 
have the least access to treatment. The incidence of congenital 
hydrocephalus is highest in Africa and Latin America and it is 
lowest in the United States and Canada.
    When you include cases related to neonatal infection and 
neural tube defects, the annual case volume in resource-poor 
countries is more than 20 times that for high-income countries. 
Three quarters of the world's case volume of childhood 
hydrocephalus can be found in Latin America, Africa, and 
Southeast Asia.
    Infant hydrocephalus, whatever its cause, results in 
expansion of the brain's ventricles which stretch and compress 
the surrounding brain tissue causing mechanical injury and 
decreased blood flow. The head enlarges dramatically and the 
child suffers from progressive symptoms and about half will die 
without treatment within 2 years. Survivors typically have 
severe neurocognitive disabilities and spasticity and 
blindness. Untreated hydrocephalus is also costly. The 
estimated annual economic burden of untreated infant 
hydrocephalus in Sub-Saharan Africa is between 1.4 and 56 
billion U.S. dollars per year using the value of a statistical 
life method. The estimated benefit-to-cost ratio for treatment 
is more than seven to one which is more than some of the other 
interventions that are more commonly performed.
    The standard and most widely practiced treatment for infant 
hydrocephalus is to implant a tube called a shunt, that allows 
CSF to escape from the brain's ventricles to the abdominal 
cavity, but 60 percent of shunts will have failed at least once 
within in the first 4 years and the risk of failure which can 
be life threatening never ends. A minimally invasive endoscopic 
brain operation caused ETV/CPC which stands for endoscopic 
third ventriculostomy and choroid plexus cauterization, which 
is why we call it ETV/CPC, can permanently treat infant 
hydrocephalus without the need for a shunt in around two out of 
three infants and has been shown at least as effective and safe 
as shunts and with a far lower risk of infection. But unlike 
shunts that can fail repeatedly over a lifetime, virtually no 
ETV/CPC treatment failures will occur after the first 6 months.
    It is notable that this procedure was originally developed 
and validated in Uganda with the support of funding from both 
USAID and NIH. Its subsequent adoption by major pediatric 
centers here in the U.S. demonstrates how Federal funding of 
projects abroad can benefit U.S. citizens.
    Countries with the highest volume of hydrocephalus have the 
fewest neurosurgeons with around 330 pediatric neurosurgeons 
caring for a population of 1.2 billion children in low-resource 
countries where shunt dependence is more dangerous. Children 
with shunt failure and no access to emergency surgery often 
die. Therefore, training and equipping these neurosurgeons to 
perform this procedure will substantially reduce the number of 
shunts placed and save lives while also reducing the number of 
repeated shunt operations on an overburdened neurosurgical 
workforce.
    NeuroKids is a nonprofit organization that uniquely focuses 
on training and equipping these neurosurgeons to perform ETV/
CPC using a combination of onsite training in their home 
institution and subsequent remote mentoring that employs 
virtual presence technology during surgery. We prioritize 
partnerships with neurosurgeons in high volume referral centers 
and subsequently leverage their training by adding them to our 
growing international team of neurosurgical mentors.
    NeuroKids currently works with partner sites in 13 
countries of Latin America, Africa, the Middle East, and 
Southeast Asia.
    In conclusion, more funding is needed to accelerate the 
elimination of untreated pediatric hydrocephalus and to 
minimize life threatening shunt dependence in low-resource 
countries, thus savings the lives of countless children. As 
well, public health strategies that reduce neonatal infection 
and neural tube defects would substantially reduce the number 
of children throughout the world who are affected by this 
condition.
    Thank you again for the opportunity of being here.
    [The prepared statement of Dr. Warf follows:]
    [GRAPHIC NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]
    
    Mr. Smith. Thank you, Dr. Warf. Thank you so very much for 
your leadership and being here. Dr. Shih.

                     STATEMENT OF ANDY SHIH

    Mr. Shih. Thank you, Chairman Smith, Ranking Member Wild, 
and distinguished--all distinguished member of the subcommittee 
for inviting me to testify and for holding this important 
hearing.
    I am Dr. Andy Shih, Chief Science Officer at Autism Speaks, 
a national and not-for-profit organization dedicated to 
creating an inclusive word for people with autism through their 
life-span. We do this through advocacy, services, supports, 
research and innovation, and advances in care.
    In addition to the work we engage in domestically, Autism 
Speaks has been committed for many years to developing and 
implementing strategies and programs that positively impact the 
lives of people with autism, other developmental disability 
around the world. The primary vehicle for this has been our 
Global Autism Public Health Initiative, also known as GAPH. 
GAPH is a community participatory research and advocacy 
programs where, in addition to facilitating high-impact science 
to inform program and policy development, we serve as technical 
advisors to governments and NGO's committed to enhancing 
support for our community. We help source expertise, support 
community-based knowledge co-production, and facilitate 
dissemination and implementation of sustainable solutions.
    What we've learned from our many years of work in this 
space and throughout our Autism Leadership Network, a 
distinguished group of leading international autism advocates 
that Autism Speaks has supported for over a decade, is that 
there are some absolutely incredible individuals and 
organizations working in countries across the globe to raise 
awareness of autism and increase service--access to services. 
These are truly some of the most remarkable caring people you 
will ever meet, who often work with extremely limited resources 
in difficult political climates. What we've also learned is 
that while these advocates have made a significant impact, have 
only scratched the surface in terms of building the awareness 
and acceptance of autism and infrastructure for services that 
needed around the globe to meet the needs of autistic people.
    Much of the work has engaged internationally involve--
involving working directly with community organizations. Last 
year we had the opportunity to collaborate with the World 
Health Organization and UNICEF on a first-of-its-kind report, 
the Global Report on Children with Developmental Disability. 
This report provides a comprehensive perspective on the 
prevalence and characteristic of children with developmental 
disability globally and serve as a call to action for all 
nations.
    Like to focus on a few of the findings and recommendation 
from this report. I think they are helpful for informing our 
conversation today. First, the report note that there are an 
estimated 317 million children and adolescents worldwide that 
have health condition that contribute to developmental 
disabilities and 95 percent have no access to appropriate care 
at all. Children and adolescents with developmental disability 
are at increased risk of mental health conditions and premature 
death due to illnesses such as obesity, diabetes, heart and 
respiratory diseases. Their needs are largely neglected and 
they continue to experience stigmatization, prejudice, 
institutionalization and barriers to participation, as well as 
social, economic, educational, and other forms exclusion and 
barriers in access health care along with poorer quality of 
care when compare with their peers. This result in widespread 
inequities in terms of health outcomes, and tragically, 
premature mortality for many people with developmental 
disabilities.
    Despite the depth of these challenges, this report provide 
hopes and a path forward. The overarching objective of this 
report is to take action for change. Children with 
developmental disability and their families have long been 
neglected to the margins, and that has to change. That has to 
change now. This report maps out 10 action area to accelerate 
change in policies and care system for children and young 
people with developmental disabilities. I encourage all member 
of the subcommittee to read through them.
    One key takeaway from the report is that improving health 
outcome for those children must involve a holistic approach. To 
truly make progress institutional barriers to care must be 
addressed and the same time more personalized approaches must 
be utilized to address each child's individual needs.
    To accomplish this one approach known as the stepped-care 
model is being increasingly recognized as an efficient and 
effective way to build tier system of care for children with 
developmental disabilities. This approach involve making 
available care options of varying levels of intensity linked 
through defined care systems.
    Recently Autism Speak implemented the stepped-care approach 
by supporting UNICEF pilot that focus on early identification 
and intervention for children with developmental delays in 
three countries: Bulgaria, Peru, and Uganda, as part of Care 
for Child Development Initiative. The work being done in these 
countries is already having a substantial impact, and the 
Global Report on Children with Developmental Disabilities will 
continue to serve as a rallying point as well as a road map to 
make progress around the world.
    Last, while millions of people with developmental 
disability around the world still struggle to access 
appropriate care--health care, like to acknowledge the progress 
that has been made in the development of tools to improve 
autism diagnosis. Autism Speaks support the development of two 
freely available tools: the Open Source Screening and 
Diagnostic tool, which is called OSSDx, for autism spectrum 
disorder, and the Nigerian Autism Screening Questionnaire. The 
ability to reliably screen and diagnose autism is critical in 
determining the most appropriate level of care for autistic 
children. High-quality screening tools like these are necessary 
to address the challenge and improving diagnosis and 
intervention.
    Chairman Smith, throughout your career you have been an 
incredible champion for autistic people, not just here in the 
United States, but around the world. If passed, the Global 
Autism Act that you have previously proposed would be a 
tremendous step in the right direction in helping to address 
the--some of the challenges I've mentioned today. I am grateful 
to you for inviting me to testify at this particular hearing 
where we're focused on neglected aspect of public health. 
People with autism and other developmental disability around 
the world have tragically been neglected for many years across 
the very system--across every system of care. As I said 
earlier, the time for change is now. I look forward to working 
with you and all members of subcommittee to making that change. 
Thank you again. I look forward to your questions.
    [The prepared statement of Mr. Shih follows:]
    [GRAPHIC NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]
    
    Mr. Smith. Mr. Shih, thank you so very much and thank you 
for the great work Autism--I mean, geez, I just--for the great 
work that you have done at Autism Speaks. It is just 
incredible. Matter of fact, in 2005, when the Autism bill was 
going to die because of House inaction, it was Autism Speaks 
that saved it. And so I will never forget that. So deeply 
appreciate it.
    Mr. Shih. Thank you, Chairman Smith.
    Mr. Smith. Let me now turn to Dr. Rana for your comments.

                  STATEMENT OF YASHODHARA RANA

    Ms. Rana. Chairman Smith, Ranking Member Wild, 
Representative Manning, thank you for the opportunity to 
discuss the critical role of combating malnutrition and 
promoting global brain health. Thank you to Chairman Smith and 
Ranking Member Wild for your leadership in the fight against 
child malnutrition.
    I serve as the Associate Director of Research at the 
Eleanor Crook Foundation, or ECF, a U.S.-based philanthropy 
solely focused on ending malnutrition. I manage a multi-million 
dollar portfolio of grants that is focused on child and 
maternal nutrition.
    Today I will summarize my written statement in three key 
points: First, malnutrition is harming the brain health of 
children worldwide. Second, the crisis of malnutrition is 
detrimental not only to children and their families, but entire 
nations and economies. And third, malnutrition is a solvable 
crisis. We have cost-effective solutions ready to be scaled 
today.
    To my first point, malnutrition is a leading cause of child 
death and children who survive face stunted growth and 
cognitive impairment. As we all know, brain development begins 
during pregnancy. By the 4th week a fetus has 10,000 brain 
cells and by the 24th week this number expands to 10 billion. 
In fact, by age three a brain--a child's brain is about 80 
percent the size of an adult's brain.
    The importance of proper nutrition during these early years 
cannot be overstated. Malnourished mothers are more likely to 
give birth to children who are too small or born too soon and 
these vulnerable babies are likely to have worse 
neurodevelopment and cognitive outcomes and also are at a 
serious risk of illness, and even death.
    This brings me to my second point, the harmful effects of 
malnutrition on brain health extend beyond individuals to 
entire nations and economies. As President Adesina of the 
African Development Bank frequently says, the greatest 
contributor to economic growth is not physical infrastructure; 
it's brain power, what he calls as gray matter infrastructure. 
Individuals who face childhood hunger earn 10 percent less over 
their life times and are 33 percent less likely to escape 
poverty. The economic cost is huge. Malnutrition is estimated 
to result in an annual productivity loss of up to $3 trillion.
    But for all these dire statistics there is hope, which 
brings me to my third point. Proven cost-effective solutions to 
malnutrition exist and are ready to be scaled up. Take the 
solution of prenatal multivitamins for pregnant women that you 
can see here, which we call as MMS. This complete prenatal 
vitamin is considered as one of the best buys in global health. 
It not only protects the health of the mother, but it also 
prevents kids from being born too early or born too small. And 
we have studies showing that babies born too small have lower 
IQs than their counterparts.
    On a personal note, when I had my two pregnancies here in 
the United States I took a prenatal multiple-vitamin just like 
MMS because I knew I wanted my children to have the best start 
in life and I could access these supplements. But in low and 
middle-income countries where the prevalence of malnutrition is 
much higher, pregnant women only get two nutrients: iron and 
folic acid.
    Another cost-effective solution is breastfeeding. Breast 
milk is nature's superfood that protects--and that protects 
children's brain health. And it also protects the health of 
mothers and babies, yet only 41 percent of kids worldwide are 
exclusively breastfed. When breastfeeding moms are supported 
they're twice as likely to continue to breastfeeding their 
children.
    Finally, despite global efforts to improve children's diet, 
there are still families that are still not able to meet the 
nutritional needs of infants. A food-based supplement here that 
I'm showing designed--is designed specifically for vulnerable 
children and it's called SQ-LNS. It's proven to save lives. 
It's proven to prevent malnutrition. And it contains the 
recommended intake of micronutrients as well as protein.
    I want to end my remarks by talking about the impact of 
U.S. leadership. The U.S. has historically been the largest 
donor in the fight against malnutrition. My birth country of 
Nepal offers a notable example of the benefits of this 
leadership.
    In 1995 Nepal had the highest stunting rate in the world. 
Seven out of ten children had delayed growth. But over the past 
20 years, with strong government leadership, policies, and 
donor support, specifically USAID's Nutrition Program, 
Suaahara, Nepal has reduced stunting by half. And thanks to 
U.S. Government leadership we've seen a historic surge in 
treatment for children with severe acute malnutrition. In 2023, 
an estimated 1.2 million children's lives were saved because of 
this treatment.
    This success highlights the critical role of bipartisan 
congressional support, but UNICEF recently reported that one in 
four children today is living in severe food poverty. That 
means 181 million children do not have the equal opportunity to 
grow, develop, and learn. That means 181 million minds are at 
risk of being wasted. It is not easy to comprehend a number so 
huge, but I urge you to remember that every one of that 
callosal figure stands for a child, a child who deserves to 
have ambitions and who, with the right nutrition and care, can 
grow and prosper. We know that progress is possible, and now we 
must stand--we must stay the course.
    Thank you and I look forward to your questions.
    [The prepared statement of Ms. Rana follows:]
    [GRAPHIC NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]
    
    Mr. Smith. Thank you so very much, Dr. Rana, for your 
testimony and leadership.
    Just a few opening questions: First of all, your 
testimoneys are--just answer many of the questions that all of 
us might have had, so that is deeply appreciated.
    With regards to the 2013 G8 Summit that was held of course 
for--trying to find a disease-modifying or a cure for 
Alzheimer's, I wonder if you could speak to how well or poorly 
we are doing on that time line. NAPA did help us, and that was 
a total bipartisan effort, to have a strategy to quadruple the 
amount of money that is going toward--most of it to NIH in the 
area of Alzheimer's research, but if you could speak to--as 
2025 rolls around--and of course the SDGs also speaks to health 
in a variety of ways, including in the dementia realm. If you 
could speak to that.
    Second, I would say and ask Dr. Warf, when you testified in 
the past, not only have you pioneered and helped save countless 
lives with your intervention, the non-stunt intervention, you 
had spoken of the effort to train Ugandans and Africans at Cure 
International and other initiatives to be the neurologists, to 
be the surgeons, to be the brain health experts. And I am 
wondering if you could update us on how well that might be 
doing, whether or not it needs a major push.
    And any estimate on how many--I mean, I remember you showed 
us pictures of kids in Uganda who--before and after, after 
their--unfortunately the fact that their brains had so swelled 
up and the after pictures with their parents with smiles from 
ear to ear because they had been cured. If you could speak to 
that.
    And again, further elaborate briefly if you would on the 
issue of the infection-based, because we had a lot of people--I 
chair the Spina Bifida Caucus as well here in the House and it 
is completely different. We know interventions in utero can 
help mitigate the impact of spina bifida, but you pointed out; 
and you had experts to verify, this was infections-based. 
Because I went and spoke, as I do every time--Samantha Power, 
Mark Green, all the USAID administrators are all wonderful 
people. They always say, well, we are dealing with infectious 
diseases. They do not want to cross that line into global brain 
health.
    That is why my bill has failed at the launching pad every 
year. It is not going to fail this coming year, and your 
testimoneys and your help will help make that happen. I mean, 
why aren't we doing this? And so many people are so mal-
affected by it. Yes, HHS does some good work, but it is mostly 
in the realm of diplomacy, health diplomacy, not funding 
projects, NGO's and the like to take all of the global brain 
health initiatives on.
    With Regards to autism, just a brief little story: I was in 
Abuja and then went over to Lagos in the year 2000. It was on a 
combating human trafficking trip. And I spoke to about 500 
people and a man came up and he says what are you doing about 
autism here? Nothing. So I went and had lunch with him, 
breakfast as you would say, and we had a great meeting. And I 
know you guys do a great work internationally and I thank you 
for that. But again, we need to make sure that our government 
is doing more, which is why this initiative I think just has to 
be--and I do think we can succeed.
    And, Dr. Rana, if I could with you, I am a great believe in 
the first 1,000 days from conception to the second birthday. 
Food nutrition for the mom so that both mother and baby are as 
healthy as humanly possible. And we do know that folic acid--
and this has come out of the research pursuant to the Autism 
Cares work and the--that folic acid can, if taken very early in 
the pregnancy or by a woman of reproductive age as she becomes 
pregnant--it greatly reduces autism. Greatly reduces it. And so 
the more of that initiative: ours and the U.N.'s and others, 
can be shared with everybody, the better.
    But first 1,000 days. I remember I was in Guatemala the day 
they announced their cooperation with a first 1,000 days 
initiative, because they have a stunting problem, as does 
Nigeria and so many other places. And it works. Mother's 
healthier. Baby's healthier. I mean, it is the most crucial 
time health-wise in any of our lives and it seems to me that we 
need to be doing more.
    We have the Global Food Security Act. I was the House 
sponsor. Got it passed twice. Went over to the Senate. It came 
back as a Senate bill. Who cares. It is a good bill. But are we 
doing enough when it comes to global food security? If you 
could speak to that.
    And you did mention folic acid, but--and thank you for 
bringing some of the other things that are so important. But if 
you could also--your presence here, your testimoneys, it will 
be the gist of a brand new, all-out effort to get the Global 
Brain Health Initiative enacted into law and to get as much by 
executive branch policy as possible, but also by statute. So I 
do ask you, if you could, speak to those issues as--and 
anything else you think we need to touch on.
    Gladys?
    Dr. Maestre. Thank you, Chairman Smith, for your question 
and your insights. So you asked me about the treatment and 
advances and how close are we to cure. And I have to elaborate 
a little bit on this. We didn't know the situation was so 
complex for the brain as the brain ages. So we thought we were 
going to have a patient with memory loss and dementia and that 
we were going to be able to treat it just like that.
    But we learned that it takes 20 years or more to get to the 
point of memory loss and other cognitive changes. So it takes 
20 years. So we are now looking forward to therapeutics that 
will begin early enough to really stop the progression to the 
disease. That's our hope.
    With the current medications which have been approved by 
FDA, they are--they do work taking out of the brain one of the 
proteins that deposit--that is deposited in the brain, that 
accumulates in the brain of people with dementia, which is the 
beta-amyloid. So they do work. They are monoclonal antibodies. 
They get to the amyloid and they clean it. So if--but if there 
is too much amyloid already, then there are going to be already 
other changes in the brain like neuron death, deposition of 
other things. So it's not enough to cause a clinical 
improvement. Not too much. It delays few months, but not--it's 
not a cure. Are we closer? Yes. Are we there? No.
    So we are hoping that we are going to develop similar 
techniques and that we are going to develop strategies for 
different elements in the brain of people already with dementia 
enough to at least stop the progression and maybe reverse. But 
what we are really hoping is to--once that we have the 
capability now to detect earlier before the symptoms appear 
that we are going to be able to develop therapeutics to stop 
right there, preventing the onset of the disease.
    Dr. Warf. My turn. So I'll try to address each of the--each 
of your categories of questions.
    So first of all, you asked about, Mr. Chairman, the 
progress in training surgeons. And so the last time that I was 
here in this place was in 2011. And at the time we had a 
training program onsite in the hospital that we started in 
Uganda where we brought neurosurgeons from other countries, 
developing countries to train them there in this technique for 
a period of time and then sent them back home. All right?
    And using--through that program we actually trained 
neurosurgeons in about 30 different countries.
    There were challenges though with that and one of those was 
that we were taking sometimes the only neurosurgeon in the--in 
that region and taking them away from their practice for two or 
3 months for training. They were being trained in an 
environment that was unlike the one they were going back to and 
treating a different population of children, and sometimes 
there were obstacles to implementing their training when they 
got home.
    The pandemic sort of made us appreciate the role of remote 
presence teaching and technology. And around that time we 
founded NeuroKids, which has a different paradigm of training. 
In this way we identified partner neurosurgeons in needy 
places, high-volume centers that are seeing a lot of 
hydrocephalus. And we have a Zoom-based pre-site visit 
protocol. We do then a site visit and do hands-on 
interoperative training.
    And then after the trainer goes back, what we're able to do 
is continue to mentor that surgeon through remote presence 
technology. For instance, I can sit at my desk in Boston and in 
real time with the screen, the video endoscope screen on my 
computer I can talk to the surgeon, take them through what 
they're doing. I can telestrate on the screen. They can see 
that. And so we can virtually be there in the operating room 
with them. And that continues their training over a few months 
thereafter.
    In the last couple of years we've been able to train in a 
number of sites in different countries, not just in Sub-Saharan 
Africa, but also South America, Southeast Asia. And by the end 
of this year we will have close to 20 different sites.
    And the strengths--one of the strengths of this program is 
that we aim to train trainers. And so the person that we train, 
once they're competent, we support their mentoring and training 
of other surgeons in the region. So that's--that helps us to 
scale this kind of work.
    In regard to the folate question, I won't speak a lot on 
that, but simply to say that because spina bifida/neural tube 
defects is a major cause of hydrocephalus, preventing that is 
very important. And if--when there is adequate folate 
supplementation or fortification of the grain supply, that has 
the potential to reduce the incidence of spina bifida in a 
country by about two--down to two-thirds of what it is. So it 
can make a significant impact on that condition.
    And then finally in regard to the infectious origins of 
hydrocephalus, the pathogen causing that is largely unknown in 
most places in the world. Over the course of about the past 10 
years and quite a bit of NIH funding we finally were able to 
identify, with the appropriate experts--not me--but we were 
able to, with leadership of Steve Schiff in particular, 
identify a new human pathogen that was actually causing the 
post-infectious hydrocephalus in Eastern Uganda to a bacteria 
called Paenibacillus. And that hadn't been known to be a 
pathogen in humans.
    And so the next stage will be learning how to better treat 
and prevent that particular infection, but we have no illusions 
that that's what's causing these infections elsewhere. And so 
what's needed is similar research programs to identify what's 
causing the infections in the neonates in other parts of the 
world.
    And then finally, one of the important interventions is a 
simple public health intervention around perinatal care. In 
Uganda, for instance, most of the children were born at home in 
the village without professional help. They're in an 
environment where they're constantly exposed to mud and animal 
dung. One of the practices was to place animal dung on the cut 
umbilical stump to staunch the bleeding after the baby was 
born.
    And so there are a lot of sort of simple things that could 
be done, but on a big scale in terms of advancing basic public 
health measures to prevent neonatal infection, which in low-
income countries neonatal infections are very, very common. We 
don't have that kind of burden here in the U.S. That's really a 
condition of poverty.
    Here in the U.S. one of the most common causes of 
hydrocephalus, if not the most common, is hemorrhage in the 
brain in prematurely born babies that are preserved and 
supported in our NICUs. That's a condition, post-hemorrhagic 
hydrocephalus of prematurity, which is really a condition of 
prosperity you might say. We don't see that in the developing 
world because those children, those prematurely born babies 
don't survive.
    Yes, so I think hopefully that covers some of your 
questions. Thank you.
    Mr. Smith. Mr, Shih?
    Mr. Shih. Thank you, Chairman Smith. I just wanted sum up 
some reflection here. I think one the last previous time that I 
testify in front of the committee may be almost 10 years ago 
now. I remember that time we focus on conversation around 
awareness and inclusion of our community.
    Part of the reason we did that is because there were no 
tools, right, and programs and policy that could really 
facilitate the inclusion of our community in society and system 
of care.
    But now that we have. I mention in my testimony about this 
diagnostic screening tool that we develop, like Nigerian autism 
screening tool and the OS--open-source diagnostic tool that we 
develop Sub-Saharan Africa, as well as the Care giver Skill 
Training Program, Early Intervention Program develop at WHO. 
They're now available globally. So is no longer a question of 
what to do, but how quickly can we do it, right? We have the 
tools now. We have the resources to make things--to make a 
change happen. So it's become a implementation problem. And 
that's why with U.S. leadership I think we can greatly 
accelerate the implementation process and bring a better 
tomorrow to all of our community around the world. Thank you, 
Chairman Smith.
    Ms. Rana. Thank you for the question, Chairman Smith. I 
just wanted to start by appreciating both the chair and ranking 
member for passing the Global Malnutrition Prevention and 
Treatment Act and for really codifying the approach of focusing 
on evidence-based cost-effective interventions.
    in my testimony I mentioned U.S. leadership in scaling 
treatment for severe malnutrition, which you all might now more 
commonly as Plumpy'nut, or RUTF. Because of bipartisan support 
from Congress and USAID, RUTF was accessed by nearly 9.3 
million children, saving 1.2 million lives in 2023.
    And I'm sharing this success story as a proof that when we 
focus on high-impact cost-effective solutions and become razor-
focused impact is possible.
    And this is what we're to do with these improved prenatal 
supplements. They also contain folic acid. But the case is we 
have a solution but we still need to figure out how deliver it. 
And the challenges can be multiple. Women not taking--women not 
coming to antenatal care on time; so the folic acid is not 
taken in the early stages of pregnancy, it's not going to work 
the magic that we need to. Women could be coming to antenatal 
care, but not be able to afford or access these prenatal 
supplements. They might not be getting counseled on the 
importance of these supplements and there could also be 
misconception or other adherence-related issues.
    So we have a solution, but there is still a lot of work to 
be done in order to deliver it to get to impact. For this 
reason our foundation along with three other philanthropies has 
developed a road map for how we can reach women in the 45 high-
burden countries with these improved prenatal supplements.
    So over the next 6 years with an investment of 1.1 million 
we aim to reach nearly 260 million women with these improved 
prenatal supplements which has the potential to save nearly 
600,000 lives and prevent 5 million vulnerable births. And 
these births are at risk for also having impaired brain health. 
Thank you.
    Mr. Smith. Thank you.
    Ms. Manning?
    Ms. Manning. Thank you.
    Thank you to my good friend, Chairman Chris Smith and also 
to my friend--my good friend Susan Wild, who is in another 
meeting right now. It has been a real honor to work with you on 
this subcommittee. Let me just say how much I will miss this 
work in the future.
    To our witnesses, thank you so much for your testimony 
today. You have given us wonderful examples of what can be done 
to help prevent or treat devastating brain and health issues 
with the right tools, training, and resources from the U.S.
    So, Dr. Warf, I want to ask you a question first. The 
President-elect plans to establish a Department of Government 
Efficiency to cut government spending. Do you believe that cuts 
to medical research should be on the table and would reducing 
funding to entities like NIH, CDC, CMS, HHS hurt efforts to 
find the kinds of tools you have described or cures for 
diseases--cures or treatments I should say for diseases like 
Alzheimer's?
    Dr. Warf. Well, thank you for that question. I of course 
think that reducing support for the entities that you describe 
would be harmful to the health of children in most of the 
world. I also think; and this is partly in reference to what my 
colleague to the right of me here pointed out, in my opinion, 
for what's worth, when the U.S. invests in helping other people 
in other countries, we show our best side. And I think few 
things could be more valuable to diplomacy, not that I know 
anything about that. But that's my humble opinion as I think--I 
think we need to show our best, which is caring about the rest 
of the world and being willing to invest and help them, because 
it--in a sense, if we want to look at it from a selfish way, 
that does come back to help us as well.
    Ms. Manning. Thank you for that.
    Dr. Maestre, would you like to comment on that as well?
    Dr. Maestre. Sure. Thank you very much, Representative 
Manning, for coming here today and for these thoughtful 
questions.
    I like efficiency. I like to do things better. So I can 
only be hopeful that the advantages of research and aid will 
come up. So I don't think that it's--I hope, right, that the 
funding will only keep increasing and being redirected to the 
needs and where we have a chance to be more impactful. 
Alzheimer's disease without doubt we are at a moment where we 
need to take advantage of where we are and what we can do at 
the global level.
    Ms. Manning. So in 2023, the NIH announced $3 million in 
funding for Alzheimer's research, a collaboration between the 
U.S. and countries in Africa. Can you share just a little bit 
about what the impact of funding for programs like that can do?
    Dr. Maestre. The main success is that we have access to 
resources that we don't have in our Nation, and that's at 
least--to mention one of them is DNA, the diversity, the 
genetic and genomic diversity that we don't have. So and this 
implies that we have access to cures, to targets that we don't 
have now. And that--it's the leadership that we need in the 
world. We need to have access to resources in ways that we can 
use them right away. Because we have the technology, we have 
the infrastructure, and we have the desire.
    I also want to mention that we have, I think, a secret 
weapon which is not a secret, which is the African American 
scientists. I think they are very eager to work even more with 
African scientists and the African communities. So I think that 
we have a lot of pieces to really accelerate the discoveries 
that we need to bring back home, but also to make stronger 
partnerships in Africa and in other low and middle-income 
countries. Thank you.
    Mr. Manning. Dr. Shih, the President-elect's nominee to be 
the Secretary of Health and Human Services, Robert F. Kennedy, 
Jr., said in a 2023 Fox News interview the following: He said, 
I do believe that autism does come from vaccines. As a doctor 
do you agree with him?
    Mr. Shih. Thank you for that question, Representative 
Manning. So there have been numerous studies that have been 
done, both in the U.S. and around the world to look at the 
causal link between autism and vaccine, and today there has 
been no established evidence that link the two, vaccination 
with autism. So it is a settled scientific question.
    Ms. Manning. I am sorry. Can you say that Again, please?
    Mr. Shih. It's a settled scientific question for the 
research community.
    Ms. Manning. That vaccines do not cause autism?
    Mr. Shih. That's correct.
    Ms. Manning. Are you at all concerned about the potential 
head of HHS who might hold these views?
    Mr. Shih. We have worked successfully with both parties 
over the years to advance the interests of our community, the 
well-being of our community, and we strongly believe that we'll 
be able to continue to.
    Ms. Manning. I have heard some discussion about the fact 
that people believe that autism is on the rise. You described I 
think in your testimony some of the tools' better ability to 
diagnose autism. So do you believe autism on the rise or is 
there--are we better able to diagnose autism which gives higher 
numbers?
    Mr. Shih. So certainly we're diagnosing autism more than 
ever before in history. And certainly part of the reason that 
we're able to do that has been the improvement in knowledge, 
right, and awareness, efficacy of clinicians, and so on, the 
tools that we have to assist in these processes. But I think 
there's still uncertainties. We know that autism is the result 
of genetic environmental factors interaction. We have some 
understanding of the genetic factors that are at play. We're 
beginning to understand what environmental factors are at play. 
So I think over time we'll have a better understanding on what 
are all the factor that are really contributing to this 
condition.
    Ms. Manning. And when you say over time, will it just occur 
or would investment in more research be helpful?
    Mr. Shih. Absolutely investment in more research.
    Ms. Manning. Thank you. Individuals with autism are far 
more likely than their peers to suffer from social isolation, 
exclusion, mental health conditions such as depression and 
anxiety. How can we help first of all reduce the stigmas around 
autism, but second try to address some of those issues?
    Mr. Shih. Yes, that's a excellent question. So I think 
first of all awareness, right? And not only about awareness of 
autism, but really advocating for acceptance and understanding 
of autism I think is crucial to make progress in the particular 
area.
    And I think the second thing is to really try to create 
accommodations for autistic people and their loved ones on our 
community so they can be actively intentionally included in 
family life and in social life and so on and so forth.
    Ms. Manning. And gainfully employed?
    Mr. Shih. Absolutely. That is so crucial, right? Because 
with--by addressing all these social determinants that can lead 
to better health we can actually improve the well-being and 
outcome of our community overall.
    Ms. Manning. Wonderful. I have a question from my colleague 
who won't be able to make it here. Dr. Shih, in your written 
testimony you highlighted your collaboration with the World 
Health Organization and UNICEF to help publish the first Global 
Report on Children with Developmental Disabilities. How 
important are multilateral institutions including the WHO and 
UNICEF in supporting global autism and health research 
initiatives?
    Mr. Shih. I think it's very important because obviously as 
an organization we're limited in our reach and ability to 
influence programs and policy, but by collaborating with 
multinational organization like WHO UNICEF it allows us to 
expand our reach and further disseminate sustainable solution 
to community in need.
    Ms. Manning. Thank you.
    Dr. Rana, Thank you for holding up some of those very small 
packages of items that can have just a huge impact on the 
health of children and the nutrition for families. Can you tell 
us what aspects of U.S. global nutrition assistance programs 
have proven the most effective, and also which have proven the 
least effective?
    Ms. Rana. Thank you, Representative Manning, for your 
question. The ones that have proven most effective in my 
perspective had been the ones that have focused on cost-
effective solutions. having a razor-focus on really upping the 
coverage of these interventions that we know works. It's a 
tragedy that we have these solutions but we haven't still 
figured out how to scale them at high coverage so that every 
woman everywhere and babies are able to access them.
    On what has not worked is a question I'd like to followup 
with a written response because I haven't seen the entire 
portfolio of programs and it wouldn't be right for me right now 
make a comment beyond that.
    Ms. Manning. Thank you. I think that would be helpful 
because we do talk about wanting to make sure that we are 
putting our efforts in the right place. And I agree we want to 
be efficient and effective. So sometimes it is important not to 
just know what does work, but what is not working, what we 
should stop doing so that we can devote our resources to the 
things that are working.
    And I had another question here. Dr. Rana, how can global 
health partnerships help feed children with neurodevelopmental 
needs in malnutrition-prone regions? How can we be partnering? 
We had a bill on the floor that we were discussing earlier 
today about the war in Sudan and how 14 million people have 
been impacted by that war, either relocated or put in 
devastating circumstances where they are at risk of 
malnutrition. How can we be partnering to address some of the 
nutritional needs that are going to be--that are affecting 
people in such difficult circumstances?
    Ms. Rana. Thank you again for that thoughtful question, 
Representative Manning, especially as there are multiple 
crisises worldwide that are happening simultaneously. And the 
people who bear the biggest brunt are pregnant women and young 
children, what you, Chairman Smith, called precious to our 
society.
    We have again these cost-effective solutions. If you look 
at the packet of ready-to-use therapeutic food, it is 
specifically for kids who are severely malnourished. Given 
their condition, taking a normal meal is not going to be easy 
for them and so this provides them with the required nutrition 
for their treatment.
    SQ-LNS, that I talked about, is also from a prevention 
angle of how do we get kids early on before they get too 
wasted? And similarly for pregnant women we are talking about 
solutions like prenatal vitamins that are more holistic. But 
also in some cases when women are very undernourished we are 
looking at supplements for lactating and pregnant women also. 
So there are solutions that are feasible, that are possible.
    But then the challenge again is financing. How do we 
finance given the scale at which these crisises are happening 
and how do we reach these populations, which some of the U.N. 
agencies like UNICEF and WFP--they have baskets of food and 
services for both pregnant and vulnerable populations.
    Ms. Manning. Thank you. Well, let me just thank you all for 
the really important work you do. Thank you for being here 
today. My sister specializes in treating Alzheimer's patients 
at the UVA Medical School, so I am well aware of how 
devastating Alzheimer's can be for patients and families, how 
desperate they are for treatments that work either to arrest or 
prevent the disease from developing.
    So I hope we continue to invest in the research and the 
great organizations and great researchers who can provide 
solutions and treatments for all of the diseases that we have 
been talking about today and that we continue to share our 
knowledges and our resources with the areas of the world that 
are most prone to having these problems where our small amount 
of help can provide an enormous benefit.
    And not only do we help them, but, Dr. Warf, as you 
suggested, it also helps us in our standing in a world where 
there is great power competition right now and it is a good 
effective way for us to build friends and alliances. So thank 
you.
    With that, I yield back.
    Mr. Smith. Thank you very much.
    If I could just recognized Scott Badesch, who is now on my 
staff. Ten years as president of Autism Society and has been 
very helpful and as we write this new bill with all of the 
groups.
    And, Stewart, great to see you again as always. We miss you 
already.
    He just retired in September. Did a wonderful job in the 
Autism CARES legislation.
    And I want to thank you especially for that.
    But as we go forward, this is going to be an all-out push 
and I think we can succeed. I mean, your testimoneys, but your 
work, your life work is so important. You have saved so many 
lives and can enhance the lives of so many others. They have 
improved the quality of life. It is just extraordinary. So 
thank you for that.
    I do have just one brief question to Dr. Shih about the--I 
remember when thimerosal was all the rage. Of course that has 
been out of our immunizations for quite some time. And some 
people still cling to that, but it is not there anymore, so how 
can you be suffering from that and contributing to autism?
    And one of my first amendments I offered here as a new 
second-term Member of Congress was to provide $50 million for 
the Child Survival Fund. It passed; it became law. And it was 
for one of the pillars of the Child Survival Fund was 
immunizations. And I actually traveled to El Salvador, and many 
Central American countries and African countries later, but for 
Days of Tranquility, when the FMLN were fighting against 
Duarte's government and they would stop all fighting to 
immunize the children against diphtheria, polio, pertussis, the 
leading killers of children. So I do believe there is an 
absolute important role to be played.
    But there is an argument made; and I would appreciate your 
thoughts on this, that if too many vaccinations are given at 
once that that could have a negative impact, maybe contributing 
to autism, but could have a negative impact on that child 
because of the absorption capacity of a very young child. If 
you get five immunizations at once, what does that do? So 
spreading them out might be a wise and prudent course of action 
for mothers. Just wondering what your thoughts are on that. Get 
the vaccination, but spread it out?
    Mr. Shih. Right. Whether or not it's vaccination, just 
spread it out. So this has been an issue in the community, as 
you know, for a couple of decades now. Certainly there's no 
evidence that suggests that having receiving multiple doses of 
vaccines a day isleads to autism or associative autism.
    My understanding is that the developing child are able to 
tolerate this kind of vaccine schedule, right? And we have seen 
through history this is not a new program that's introduced. 
It's been around for decades and we certainly have not seen the 
evidence that this kind of vaccine schedule actually lead to 
significant harm for children's health.
    Mr. Smith. I appreciate that.
    Let me just conclude. My hope is that your testimoneys, the 
work you have done builds on a renewed call to action to the 
incoming administration to really take on global brain health. 
And we will do it by way of legislation. I do think we can get 
it passed this time. I have already spoken to some of the 
leadership including the Speaker about this. This is an idea 
whose time has come to quote, or paraphrase Victor Hugo. And 
you have been doing it. You all have been doing it. And we just 
need to do even more to make sure that USAID and not just HHS 
through diplomacy is embracing this achievable goal. So I want 
to thank you so much.
    Anything else you wanted to add now or by way of written 
submissions? Please, yes, Gladys?
    Dr. Maestre. Thank you very much, Chair Smith. I wanted to 
reaffirm some of the comments you made. I have been devoted all 
my life to international work, not only because I come from 
Venezuela and that Imy work has been in Africa and Latin 
America, but because now I work at the University of Texas, Rio 
Grande Valley, which is located in Brownsville, Texas. This is 
10 minutes from the Rio Grande, from the river and 40 minutes 
from SpaceX.
    Many of my patients and participants, when I talk to them, 
they mention the adversity of human trafficking in their lives. 
At least I would say that 20 to 25 percent of the women that I 
see as Alzheimer patients have been subjected to this type of 
abuse. And I wanted to lay that out because I think that the 
social determinants of health that we are experiencing in the 
border are many--in many ways related to what's happening in 
low and middle-income countries, the lack of access and the new 
opportunities that we have now to bring together issues which 
you have led for many, many years. And now we can envision a 
global health strategy with these diseases and these 
strategies, but also too that will benefit not only low and 
middle-income countries, but low-resource settings like the Rio 
Grande Valley in South Texas.
    Mr. Smith. Thank you for that. Are you suggesting trauma-
induced Alzheimer's?
    Dr. Maestre. We----
    Mr. Smith. Is it because of beatings or because of sexual 
assault?
    Dr. Maestre. We believe that adversity of that level
    Mr. Smith. Right.
    Dr. Maestre [continuing]. Is increased vulnerability of the 
brain to confront aging and to develop a healthy life.
    Mr. Smith. Thank you for that. That bears us really 
focusing on that.
    Just for the record, I am the author of the Frederick 
Douglass Trafficking Victims Prevention Act. Passed the House 
in February; still pending in the Senate. It is probably going 
to die in the dustbin called the U.S. Senate. It just kills me 
that it is just sitting there. And I have been calling. I have 
been asking. And it looks like it is going to die in the next 3 
weeks. We are going to reintroduce it, start it all over again. 
And the original TVPA, which I wrote in the year 2000, took 3 
years to get enacted. And we didn't know until the very end 
whether or not it would be pocket vetoed or approved by the 
Clinton administration. Clinton did sign it. Thank God for 
that.
    But I mean it is like why isn't this a no-brainer and just 
do it? But that is an area that we need to look into. I have 
never heard that before, so I thank you.
    So thank you so much. And we look forward to all of your 
input on what the bill should further look like. And maybe you 
might consider a collaborative letter from your organizations 
to Trump. We could highlight it as well. I will do one from 
Members of Congress. And I am sure I could get bipartisan 
signatures for it because we want to make sure there is no 
diminution of what we are focusing on. We don't want to see 
money stop going to Alzheimer's research, or autism, or all 
these other important initiatives. But I think we need to go 
big. And I thank you so very, very much.
    Hearing is adjourned.
    [Whereupon, at 3:53 p.m, the subcommittee was adjourned.]

                                APPENDIX

                              ----------                              


               Material Submitted for the Hearing Record
[GRAPHIC NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]

                               [all]