[Senate Hearing 117-992]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]




                                                        S. Hrg. 117-992

NOMINATIONS OF: MR. JOHN SHERMAN TO BE CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER OF THE 
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE; MR. ASHISH VAZIRANI TO BE DEPUTY UNDER SECRETARY 
  OF DEFENSE AND PERSONNEL AND READINESS; AND MS. CARRIE RICCI TO BE 
             GENERAL COUNSEL OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

=======================================================================


                                HEARING

                               before the

                      COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES
                          UNITED STATES SENATE

                    ONE HUNDRED SEVENTEENTH CONGRESS

                             FIRST SESSION

                              __________

                           OCTOBER 28, 2021

                              __________

         Printed for the use of the Committee on Armed Services



                 [GRAPHIC NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]
                
                
                
                 Available via: http://www.govinfo.gov
               
                               ______
                                 

                 U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE

63-359 PDF                WASHINGTON : 2026








                      COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES

                  JACK REED, Rhode Island, Chairman
                  
JEANNE SHAHEEN, New Hampshire	       JAMES M. INHOFE, Oklahoma
KIRSTEN E. GILLIBRAND, New York	       ROGER F. WICKER, Mississippi
RICHARD BLUMENTHAL, Connecticut	       DEB FISCHER, Nebraska
MAZIE K. HIRONO, Hawaii		       TOM COTTON, Arkansas
TIM KAINE, Virginia		       MIKE ROUNDS, South Dakota
ANGUS S. KING, Jr., Maine	       JONI ERNST, Iowa
ELIZABETH WARREN, Massachusetts	       THOM TILLIS, North Carolina
GARY C. PETERS, Michigan	       DAN SULLIVAN, Alaska
JOE MANCHIN III, West Virginia	       KEVIN CRAMER, North Dakota
TAMMY DUCKWORTH, Illinois	       RICK SCOTT, Florida
JACKY ROSEN, Nevada		       MARSHA BLACKBURN, Tennessee
MARK KELLY, Arizona                    JOSH HAWLEY, Missouri
                                       TOMMY TUBERVILLE, Alabama                                 

                 Elizabeth L. King, Staff Director
              John D. Wason, Minority Staff Director




                                  (ii)

  






                            C O N T E N T S

                              __________

                            october 28, 2021

                                                                   Page
Nominations of: Mr. John Sherman to be Chief Information Officer      1
  of the Department of Defense; Mr. Ashish Vazirani to be Deputy 
  Under Secretary of Defense and Personnel and Readiness; and Ms. 
  Carrie Ricci to be General Counsel of the Department of the 
  Army.

                           Members Statements

Reed, Senator Jack...............................................     1

Inhofe, Senator James M..........................................     3

                           Witness Statements

Sherman, John, Nominee to be Chief Information Officer of the         3
  Department of Defense.
  Advance Policy Questions.......................................    32
  Questions for the Record.......................................    60
  Nomination Reference and Report................................    72
  Biographical Sketch............................................    73
  Committee on Armed Services Questionnaire......................    75
  Signature Page.................................................    79

Vazirani, Ashish, Nominee to be Deputy Under Secretary of Defense     6
  for Personnel and Readiness.
  Advance Policy Questions.......................................    79
  Questions for the Record.......................................   103
  Nomination Reference and Report................................   106
  Biographical Sketch............................................   107
  Committee on Armed Services Questionnaire......................   110
  Signature Page.................................................   117

Ricci, Carrie, Nominee to be General Counsel of the Department of     8
  the Army.
  Advance Policy Questions.......................................   117
  Questions for the Record.......................................   147
  Nomination Reference and Report................................   151
  Biographical Sketch............................................   152
  Committee on Armed Services Questionnaire......................   154
  Signature Page.................................................   160



                                 (iii)


  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  





              This hearing is printed to include all available 
                information 
                requested or required to be inserted for the 
                record.



                                  (iv)
                                  







 
NOMINATIONS OF: MR. JOHN SHERMAN TO BE CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER OF THE 
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE; MR. ASHISH VAZIRANI TO BE DEPUTY UNDER SECRETARY 
  OF DEFENSE AND PERSONNEL AND READINESS; AND MS. CARRIE RICCI TO BE 
             GENERAL COUNSEL OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

                              ----------                              


                       THURSDAY, OCTOBER 28, 2021

                              United States Senate,
                               Committee on Armed Services,
                                                    Washington, DC.
    The Committee met, pursuant to notice, at 9:30 a.m. in room 
SD-G50, Dirksen Senate Office Building, Senator Jack Reed 
(Chairman of the Committee) presiding.
    Committee Members present: Senators Reed, Shaheen, 
Gillibrand, Blumenthal, Kaine, King, Warren, Peters, Manchin, 
Duckworth, Rosen, Kelly, Inhofe, Ernst, Tillis, Scott, Hawley, 
and Tuberville.

             OPENING STATEMENT OF SENATOR JACK REED

    Chairman Reed. Good morning, and let me call the hearing to 
order. The Committee meets today to consider the nominations of 
Mr. John Sherman to be Chief Information Officer of the 
Department of Defense, Mr. Ashish Vazirani to be Deputy Under 
Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, and Ms. 
Carrie Ricci to be General Counsel of the Department of the 
Army.
    I thank the nominees for their long careers of service to 
the United States and their willingness to assume these 
important responsibilities.
    I would also like to welcome the family members who are 
with us today. Mr. Sherman, I welcome your wife, Liz; daughter, 
Savannah; and son, Brad.
    Mr. Vazirani, I welcome your wife, Deborah.
    Ms. Ricci, I welcome your brother, doctor John and daughter 
Maria. I had to get the ``doctor'' in there.
    Mr. Sherman, you are nominated to be the Chief Information 
Officer of the Department of Defense. The CIO is the principal 
advisor to the Secretary of Defense for a broad range of 
information and technology issues, including national security 
systems and information resource management.
    I would note your long record of distinguished public 
service, including your tenure as the CIO for the intelligence 
community.
    The Defense Department is struggling with all aspects of 
IT, which is critical to defense systems and the operations of 
the Department as an effective enterprise. We have seen 
continuous cybersecurity failures in the face of ever-
increasing threats, as well as failures in acquisition programs 
ranging from the JEDI cloud computing effort to software 
failures on the F-35 to the recent termination of the Navy's 
contract-writing system programs.
    At the same time, the Defense Department is struggling to 
hire IT professionals to work in software development, 
cybersecurity, IT operations, and IT acquisition. Furthermore, 
the IT industrial base, especially the important hardware that 
runs these systems like microelectronics and printed circuit 
boards are increasingly moving offshore and will not remain 
trusted parts in Defense supply chain.
    I look forward to hearing how you will address these 
challenges if you are confirmed.
    Mr. Vazirani, you are nominated to be Deputy Under 
Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness. If confirmed, 
you will assist the Under Secretary in addressing many 
challenges for the Department, including first and foremost, 
ensuring that our military has adequate numbers of ready and 
trained servicemembers of sufficiently high character and 
talent to meet our defense objectives. You will be responsible 
for assisting the Under Secretary in military and civilian 
personnel policy; military, family, and childcare programs; the 
Defense Department-run school system; and working with the 
military servicemembers to ensure the health and welfare of the 
force.
    As the former CEO of the National Military Family 
Association, and as a Navy veteran, I would ask that you share 
what military family issues you believe need to be addressed 
most and what recommendations you have to improve readiness. In 
addition, the challenge of sexual harassment and sexual assault 
in the military has eroded trust and faith in leaders' ability 
to effectively address this issue. I would ask that you share 
your plans for addressing this problem.
    Ms. Ricci, you are nominated to be General Counsel of the 
Department of the Army. This position has a broad scope of 
responsibilities, including serving as legal advisor to the 
Secretary of the Army, Chief Legal Officer of the Department of 
the Army, and coordinating legal and policy positions Army-
wide. Your extensive legal career in the Army, including prior 
service in the Army General Counsel's Office while on active-
duty should serve your well.
    There are a number of important duties that will require 
your attention within the Department. It will be your 
responsibility to assist the Secretary of the Army in 
addressing extremism in the military and implementing the 
Independent Review Commission's recommendations regarding 
prevention and response to sexual assault.
    As a member of the Fort Hood Independent Review Committee 
yourself, I would ask that you share how you plan to use the 
information you have gained to assist the Army in addressing 
sexual assault.
    Thank you, again, to our nominees. I look forward to your 
testimonies.
    Now, let me recognize the ranking member, Senator Inhofe.
    Senator?

               STATEMENT OF SENATOR JAMES INHOFE

    Senator Inhofe. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
    Thanks to our witnesses for being here. I enjoyed the 
opportunity to personally meet them. We are very fortunate to 
have this group here with us this morning.
    As this Committee has heard again and again from the 
military and the civilian officials, every threat we face 
continues to worsen our situation since the last National 
Defense Strategy came out in 2018. That is the book that we 
continue to keep here and try to use this as our pattern, as we 
have in the past.
    I certainly hope that the next National Defense Strategy, 
with knowledge of the success of this in the past, can give us 
the right direction for the future. If we want to have any hope 
of keeping pace, we have got to achieve real growth in Defense 
spending. I am very worried that inflation next year will not 
only cut our troops' pay but will also significantly delay the 
pace of our modernization efforts.
    We have seen the shocking pace of Chinese military 
modernization from missiles to ships, and now nuclear expansion 
and hypersonic strike weapons. You know, we have been hearing 
about this for a long time; now, we have seen it. It is 
happening. It is a reality.
    Some of the most difficult challenges are the less obvious 
ones, but just as important; in particular, the National 
Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence told us, quote, 
China, and this is a quote, China possesses the might, talent, 
and ambition to surpass the United States as the world's leader 
in AI in the next decade if current trends do not change.
    That is a shocker. That is something that we are not used 
to in this country; a recognition that we are not number one in 
everything. You know, when we talk to people, when we go back 
to our districts and talk to people on the ground, the real 
people that are paying for all of this fun that we are having 
up here, they are the ones that realize that, are starting to 
realize the problems that we are having now, they are really 
unprecedented.
    So, I am very much concerned about it. I am concerned about 
what is going to happen with our troops and the things that 
they are looking at now in terms of their futures, and we need 
strong, capable civilian leadership in the Department.
    So, I thank you all again for your willingness to serve.
    Thank you, Chairman Reed.
    Chairman Reed. Thank you very much, Senator Inhofe.
    Now, let me recognize Mr. Sherman for his statement.
    Go ahead, sir.

  STATEMENT OF JOHN SHERMAN, NOMINEE TO BE CHIEF INFORMATION 
              OFFICER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

    Mr. Sherman. Good morning Chairman Reed, Ranking Member 
Inhofe, and Committee Members.
    I am honored to be President Biden's nominee to be the 
Department of Defense Chief Information Officer and am grateful 
for the chance to speak with you today.
    First and foremost, I would like to thank Liz, my wife of 
29 years, who also serves in national security. Her support and 
love have been my rock. We are both so proud of our grown 
children, Brad and Savannah, and their spouses, Oksana and 
Kurt. I also want to recognize my parents, who are no longer 
with us, but are no doubt here in spirit. Along with a bit of 
their Texas accents, their lessons about hard work, respect, 
and citizenship have stuck with me.
    That word, citizenship, has really meant service to me and 
my family. Following my time as an Army officer, I served in 
the intelligence community and DOD for nearly 25 years, 
starting as an imagery analyst and later taking on a number of 
roles; ranging from Duty Officer in White House Situation Room 
on 9/11, to leading our impressive officers and senior 
executives in several agencies.
    I have also had the opportunity to employ and manage new 
technologies on missions ranging from overhead reconnaissance 
to open-source intelligence. I saw firsthand how we gain 
advantage through capabilities like cloud computing and large-
scale data analytics, and my experience in these areas led to 
my selection as the CIO of the entire IC.
    Working with talented colleagues from across the community, 
we built upon the flagship modernization effort known as the IC 
Information Technology Enterprise. We made tough 
recommendations to cancel things that weren't working, 
reinforced successes in areas like cloud, and sharpened our 
focus on cybersecurity and interoperability. Put simply, we 
ensured the IC's technology transformation would remain an 
exemplar.
    I was then humbled when asked to serve at DOD, first as the 
Principal Deputy CIO, and for 8 months as the Acting CIO. As we 
drove to achieve to Secretary Austin's priority to stay ahead 
of our China pacing threat, our team pivoted to an enterprise 
multi-cloud approach, which is foundational for key priorities 
such as Joint All Domain Command and Control (JADC2) and the 
Artificial Intelligence and Data Accelerator Initiative, or 
(ADA). Additionally, we oversaw the successful rollout of an 
enduring collaboration and productivity capability to millions 
of DOD users and began moving the Department towards stronger 
cybersecurity with an approach called Zero Trust. The team also 
made substantial progress on other critical portfolios, to 
include electromagnetic spectrum, positioning, navigation, and 
timing, IT reform, special access program IT, data 
transformation, software development, and support to artificial 
intelligence. The progress on these fronts has been substantial 
as well.
    Throughout my career, enabling mission has always been my 
foremost priority. At DOD, I believe the CI's success is 
ultimately measured on how our warfighters, especially in the 
Indo-Pacific, are able operate in a remote and disconnected 
environment, and whether a pilot can still strike targets when 
an adversary is trying to jam her GPS signal.
    These examples and many others are based on the 
Department's ability to transform at scale, with the very best 
technologies and cybersecurity, through constant and agile 
change, and with the whole team. If confirmed, I would be 
honored to shepherd and lead this effort.
    I get out of bed every morning knowing our adversaries are 
not standing still in the technology realm, and we must not 
either.
    Thank you for your time and consideration, and I look 
forward to your questions.
    [The prepared statement of Mr. Sherman follows:]

                   Prepared Statement by John Sherman
    Good morning Chairman Reed, Ranking Member Inhofe, and Committee 
Members. I am honored to be President Biden's nominee to be the 
Department of Defense Chief Information Officer (DOD CIO) and am 
grateful for the chance to speak with you today.
    First and foremost, I would like to thank Liz, my wife of 29 years, 
who also serves in national security. Her support and love have been my 
rock. We are both so proud of our grown children, Brad and Savannah, 
and their spouses, Oksana and Kurt. I also want to recognize my 
parents, who are no longer with us, but are no doubt here in spirit. 
Along with a bit of their Texas accents, their lessons about hard work, 
respect, and citizenship have stuck with me.
    That word, citizenship, has really meant service to me and my 
family. Following my time as an Army officer, I've served in the 
Intelligence Community (IC) and DOD for nearly 25 years, starting as an 
imagery analyst and later taking on a number of roles, ranging from 
duty officer in White House Situation Room on 9/11 to leading our 
impressive officers as a senior executive in several agencies.
    I've also had the opportunity to employ and manage new technologies 
on missions ranging from overhead reconnaissance to open source 
intelligence. I saw firsthand how we gain advantage through 
capabilities like cloud computing and large-scale data analytics, and 
my experience in these areas led to my selection as the CIO of the 
entire IC. Working with talented colleagues from across the community, 
we built upon the flagship modernization effort known as the IC 
Information Technology Enterprise. We made tough recommendations to 
cancel things that weren't working, reinforced successes in areas like 
cloud, and sharpened our focus on cybersecurity and interoperability. 
Put simply, we ensured the IC's technology transformation would remain 
an exemplar.
    I was then humbled when asked to serve at DOD, first as the 
Principal Deputy CIO, and for eight months as the Acting CIO. As we 
drove to achieve to Secretary Austin's priority to stay ahead of our 
China pacing threat, our team pivoted to an enterprise multi-cloud 
approach, which is foundational for key priorities such as Joint All 
Domain Command and Control (JADC2) and the Artificial Intelligence and 
Data Accelerator (ADA) Initiative. Additionally, we oversaw the 
successful rollout of an enduring collaboration and productivity 
capability to millions of DOD users and began moving the Department 
towards stronger cybersecurity with an approach called Zero Trust. The 
team also made substantial progress on other critical portfolios, to 
include electromagnetic spectrum, positioning, navigation, and timing, 
IT reform, special access program IT, data transformation, software 
development, and support to AI. The progress on these fronts has been 
substantial as well.
    Throughout my career, enabling mission has always been my foremost 
priority. At DOD, I believe the CIO's success is ultimately measured on 
how our warfighters, especially those in the Indo-Pacific, are able 
operate in a remote and disconnected environment, and whether a pilot 
can still strike targets when an adversary is trying to jam her GPS 
signal. These examples and many others are based on the Department's 
ability to transform at scale, with the very best technologies and 
cybersecurity, through constant and agile change, and with the whole 
team. If confirmed, I would be honored to shepherd and lead this 
effort. I get out of bed every morning knowing our adversaries are not 
standing still in the technology realm, and we must not either.
    Thank you for your time and consideration, and I look forward to 
your questions.

    Chairman Reed. Thank you very much, sir.
    Let me now recognize Mr. Vazirani, and I apologize for the 
multiple pronunciations of your name, sir.
    Mr. Vazirani. Well, thank you Chairman Reed.

   STATEMENT OF ASHISH VAZIRANI, NOMINEE TO BE DEPUTY UNDER 
        SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR PERSONNEL AND READINESS

    Mr. Vazirani. Good morning, Chairman Reed, Ranking Member 
Inhofe, and distinguished Committee Members. Thank you for the 
opportunity to speak with you today.
    I am humbled and honored to be with you today as President 
Biden's nominee for Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for 
Personnel and Readiness and appreciate the confidence President 
Biden, Secretary Austin, and Under Secretary Cisneros have in 
me.
    My father and his family fled Pakistan for India during 
partition. They knew danger and turmoil; they left their home 
with nothing but hope seeking opportunity. My father's journey 
brought him to the United States to complete his post-doctoral 
studies. It is here, in America, where he met my mother, the 
daughter of an Indian Foreign Service Officer stationed in 
Washington. After marrying, my parents returned to India, where 
they started their family.
    Having had a taste of the opportunity America offered, in 
1967 they moved our young family to the United States, to 
pursue their American dream. My parents understood achieving 
that dream would require hard work, service, and sacrifice. 
After my father passed, my single mother of five children, put 
herself through law school and eventually married a Marine who 
lost his sight fighting in Vietnam. My stepdad's blindness 
didn't stop him; he continued serving as an advocate for 
veterans, founding the Blinded American Veterans Foundation and 
retired from the federal workforce after serving at the 
Corporation for National and Community service, where he helped 
establish the Vietnam Veterans Leadership Program.
    Also a patriot and dedicated to service to our country, my 
mother served as professional staff member in the
    Maryland Legislature and United States Congress, serving as 
counsel for several House committees including Government 
Reform and Civil Service, all while caring for her children and 
a blinded Marine.
    I am humbled to have grown up in a home where service to 
Nation and community was the family business. Growing up, I 
learned that the American dream is about more than what you 
achieve and build for yourself, but what you do for others. 
These are values my wife Deborah and I have tried to instill in 
our two amazing children, one of whom is currently serving as a 
Marine, stationed in Twentynine Palms.
    My parents' example of service above self, to improve where 
needed, and innovate when required, inspired my decision to 
serve in the United States Navy and later, a career working 
with organizations, both public and private, to drive 
transformative change and care for our military families. I am 
honored to have the opportunity to continue that service as 
Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness.
    I believe the reason our military is the greatest the world 
has seen is the people, military and civilian, who are our 
defense community. They dedicate their lives and those of their 
families, to a cause greater than themselves. They serve at the 
front lines, the garrisons, and in the Pentagon, making sure 
that we are ready to deter and, if necessary, fight and win 
wars. We must provide for the training, education, health, 
safety, and well-being of those who serve, in or out of 
uniform, to maintain readiness and because it is the right 
thing to do. That care extends to military families, 
transitioning servicemembers, retirees, caregivers, and 
survivors who have made countless sacrifices for our Nation.
    If confirmed, I would strive to sustain a defense community 
that continues to safeguard the freedom and opportunity that my 
family has been fortunate to enjoy and privileged to protect. 
The contemporary challenges to readiness are significant: 
sexual assault, harassment, suicide, spouse unemployment, 
COVID, and financial and food insecurity. We face challenges in 
recruitment and retention, shaping a defense community that 
reflects America and is comprised of diverse, effective teams, 
prepared for tomorrow's fight. I believe America's people offer 
us our greatest distinct advantage over our adversaries, and 
that we must maintain the high levels of personnel readiness to 
maintain that edge.
    To meet these challenges and support the people who put 
country first requires innovation: a willingness to ask and 
answer tough questions, rapidly test and learn, and scale 
solutions. That is the role of the Deputy Under Secretary for 
Personnel and Readiness.
    If confirmed, I will work closely with the Under Secretary 
for Personnel and Readiness, Deputy Secretary, Service 
Secretaries, and Secretary to care for the total force and our 
military families, to meet readiness requirements, and achieve 
the nation's national security objectives.
    I commit, if confirmed, that I will bring my best each day 
to serve those who serve us. I also commit to collaborating 
with this Committee in a transparent, agile, and responsive 
manner, to ensure that the Department is meeting our sacred 
obligation to support warfighters and their families.
    Senators, thank you for the opportunity to be with you here 
today. I look forward to your questions.
    [The prepared statement of Mr. Vazirani follows:]

               Prepared Statement by Mr. Ashish Vazirani
    Good morning, Chairman Reed, Ranking Member Inhofe, and 
distinguished Committee Members. Thank you for the opportunity to speak 
with you today.
    I'm humbled and honored to be with you today as President Biden's 
nominee for Deputy Undersecretary of Defense for Personnel and 
Readiness and appreciate the confidence he, Secretary Austin, and 
Undersecretary Cisneros have in me.
    My father and his family fled Pakistan for India during partition. 
They knew danger and turmoil; they left their home with nothing but 
hope seeking opportunity. My father's journey brought him to the United 
States to complete his post-doctoral studies. It is here, in America, 
where he met my mother, the daughter of an Indian Foreign Service 
Officer stationed in Washington. After marrying, my parents returned to 
India, where they started their family. Having had a taste of the 
opportunity America offered, in 1967 they moved our young family to the 
United States, to pursue their American dream. My parents understood 
achieving that dream would require hard work, service, and sacrifice. 
After my father passed, my single mother of five children, put herself 
through law school and eventually married a Marine who lost his sight 
fighting in Vietnam. My stepdad's blindness didn't stop him and he 
continued serving as an advocate for veterans, founding the Blind 
American Veterans Foundation and retired from the Federal workforce 
after serving at the Corporation for National and Community service, 
where he helped establish the Vietnam Veterans Leadership Program. Also 
a patriot and dedicated to service to our country, my mother served as 
professional staff member in in the Maryland legislature and United 
States Congress, serving as counsel for several House committees 
including Government Reform and Civil Service, all while caring for her 
children and a blinded Marine.
    I'm humbled to have grown up in a home where service to Nation, and 
community, was the family business. Growing up I learned that the 
American dream is about more than what you achieve and build for 
yourself, but what you do for others. These are values my wife and I 
have tried to instill in our two children, one of whom is currently 
serving as a Marine, stationed in Twentynine Palms. My parents' example 
of service above self, to improve where needed and innovate when 
required, inspired my decision to serve in the US Navy and later, a 
career working with organizations - both public and private - to drive 
transformative change and care for our military families.
    I am honored to have the opportunity to continue that service as 
Deputy Undersecretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness.
    I believe the reason our military is the greatest the world has 
seen is the people - military and civilian - who are our defense 
community. They dedicate their lives and those of their families to a 
cause greater than themselves. They serve at the frontlines, the 
garrisons, and in the Pentagon, making sure that we are ready to deter 
and, if necessary, fight and win wars. We must provide for the 
training, education, health, safety, and well-being of those who serve 
- in or out of uniform -to maintain readiness and because it is the 
right thing to do. That care extends to military families, 
transitioning servicemembers, retirees, caregivers, and survivors who 
have made countless sacrifices for our Nation.
    If confirmed, I would strive to sustain a defense community that 
continues to safeguard the freedom and opportunity that my family has 
been fortunate to enjoy and privileged to protect. The contemporary 
challenges to readiness are significant - sexual assault, harassment, 
suicide, spouse unemployment, COVID, and financial and food insecurity. 
We face challenges in recruitment and retention - shaping a defense 
community that reflects America and is comprised of diverse, effective 
teams, prepared for tomorrow's fight. I believe America's people offer 
us our greatest distinct advantage over our adversaries, and that we 
must maintain the highest levels of personnel readiness to maintain 
that edge.
    To meet these challenges and support the people who put country 
first requires innovation: a willingness to ask and answer tough 
questions, rapidly test and learn, and scale solutions. That's the role 
of the Deputy Undersecretary for Personnel and Readiness. If confirmed, 
I will work closely with the Undersecretary for Personnel & Readiness, 
Deputy Secretary, Service Secretaries and Secretary to care for the 
Total Force and our military families, to meet readiness requirements 
and achieve the nation's national security objectives.
    I commit, if confirmed, that I will bring my best each day to serve 
those who serve us. I also commit to collaborating with this Committee, 
in a transparent, agile, and responsive manner, to ensure that the 
Department is meeting our sacred obligation to support warfighters and 
their families.
    Senators, thank you for the opportunity to be here today, I look 
forward to your questions.

    Chairman Reed. Thank you very much.
    Ms. Ricci, please?

STATEMENT OF CARRIE RICCI, NOMINEE TO BE GENERAL COUNSEL OF THE 
                     DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

    Ms. Ricci. Thank you, Chairman Reed, Ranking Member Inhofe, 
and distinguished Members of the Committee. It is an absolute 
honor to come before you today as President Biden's nominee for 
General Counsel of our great Army.
    I am joined here today by my brother, Dr. John Ricci of New 
Jersey, and my daughter Maria Smith, a 10th grader with 
straight As, who happens to be missing her Government class 
today, and in her precocious way, was delighted to note that 
she would be seeing Government in action, so it would be okay.
    My son, who is 21 years old, and a college student, could 
not be here. He was called on to work a shift at our local 
grocery store, much as he did during the height of the 
pandemic, where he worked 12 to 14 days straight and answered 
the call of duty.
    This call of duty, this type of demonstration, it is 
endemic in our family, and I must thank my parents for that, 
Hector and Maria Ricci, who proudly hail from Puerto Rico and 
are watching today. It is they who instilled in me a great 
sense of duty and selflessness. They also instilled in me 
personal discipline, goodwill, and a belief in people, for 
which I am grateful.
    I am also grateful to President Biden, Secretary Austin, 
and Secretary Wormuth for the confidence they have shown in me 
by nominating me for this position. If confirmed, I would be 
incredibly excited to return home to the Army and resume my 
service to its soldiers and civilians.
    I served as an Army officer for just short of 22 years, 
first as a personnel officer, and then as a Judge Advocate, 
retiring at the rank of Lieutenant Colonel. Every day, I had 
the immense privilege of watching soldiers put their team, 
mission, and country first, taking great risks and making 
personal sacrifices to achieve our shared goals.
    I remain grateful to my family and those of all our 
servicemembers and civilians who make such service possible.
    Should I be confirmed, my experiences in the Army have 
prepared me well to assume the duties of General Counsel and do 
right by our do right by our soldiers, civilians, and family 
members. As a Judge Advocate, I worked on a broad spectrum of 
legal issues including military justice, equal opportunity, 
fiscal law, and operational and administrative law. I deployed 
to the Middle East twice, first for Operation Desert Storm in 
1992 and then in support of Operations Iraqi Freedom and 
Enduring Freedom in 2004. I have served in operational and 
intelligence units and on service and combatant command staffs. 
I have also served in the Office of the Judge Advocate General 
and the Office of the General Counsel.
    I understand the importance of the collaborative 
relationship that must exist between these two offices. I have 
been fortunate to work with many of the lawyers who are still 
serving in these offices, including the current Judge Advocate 
General of the Army, an extraordinary leader with whom I served 
at Fort Hood.
    Since retiring from the Army, I have worked as a federal 
civilian lawyer, currently leading a dynamic team of attorneys 
in the Office of the General Counsel at the Department of 
Agriculture, many of whom insisted on watching today, and I 
thank them for their support.
    Last year, I was privileged to serve the Army as a civilian 
member of the Fort Hood Independent Review Committee, where our 
five-member team completed a comprehensive review of the Fort 
Hood command, climate and culture that has been the impetus for 
great change at Fort Hood and across the Army and even DOD.
    If confirmed, I commit to serve our soldiers and civilians 
selflessly in ensuring the Office of the General Counsel 
provides the highest quality legal services to Secretary 
Wormuth and the Department, and to further the cooperative 
relationship enjoyed by the Department and this Committee.
    This is a momentous time; a time of great change for the 
Army where they are embarking on a complete cultural 
transformation for the benefit of its soldiers. At Fort Hood, I 
witnessed the damage inflicted on soldiers and their units by 
the prevalence of sexual assault and sexual harassment.
    If confirmed, I will ensure that current initiatives 
respect the rule of law and due process and assist Army leaders 
in bringing about real change for the brave men and women that 
serve our country. The current momentum must not fade: success 
is a must.
    I am also committed to helping the Department tackle a 
range of challenges such as quality housing, on and near Army 
installations, beating the COVID pandemic, and ensuring we have 
the appropriate acquisition authorities to get our warfighters 
the equipment they need.
    For my Spanish-speaking friends and families who are 
watching: Gracias por su apoyo. Thank you for your support.
    Senators, thank you for your consideration of my 
nomination. I look forward to answering your questions.
    [The prepared statement of Ms. Ricci follows:]

                 Prepared Statement by Ms. Carrie Ricci
    Thank you, Chairman Reed, Ranking Member Inhofe, and distinguished 
Members of the Committee. It is an absolute honor to come before you 
today as President Biden's nominee for General Counsel of our great 
Army.
    I am joined here today by my brother, Dr. John Ricci of New Jersey, 
and my daughter Maria Smith, a 10th grader with straight A's who took 
delight in informing her Government teacher that she would be missing 
class today, but that he should not worry, as she will be watching our 
government in action first-hand! My 21-year-old son and college 
student, Joseph Smith, could not be here today, as he was needed to 
work a shift at our local grocery store, where at times he worked for 
21 days straight at the height of the pandemic, demonstrating a 
dedication to duty that is endemic in our family. For that I must thank 
my parents, Hector and Maria Ricci, who proudly hail from Puerto Rico 
and are watching today. It is they who instilled in me a great sense of 
duty and selflessness, personal discipline, and goodwill, for which I 
am deeply grateful.
    I am also grateful to President Biden, Secretary Austin, and 
Secretary Wormuth for the confidence they have shown in me by 
nominating me for this position. If confirmed, I would be incredibly 
excited to return home to the Army and resume my service to its 
soldiers and civilians. I served as an Army officer for just shy of 22 
years, first as a personnel officer, then as a Judge Advocate, retiring 
at the rank of Lieutenant Colonel. Every day, I had the immense 
privilege of watching soldiers put their team, mission, and country 
first, taking great risks and making personal sacrifices to achieve our 
shared goals. I remain grateful to my family and those of all our 
servicemembers and civilians who make this service possible.
    Should I be confirmed, my experiences in the Army have prepared me 
well to assume the duties of General Counsel and do right by our 
soldiers, civilians, and family members. As a Judge Advocate, I worked 
on a broad spectrum of legal issues including military justice, equal 
opportunity, fiscal law, and operational and administrative law. I 
deployed to the Middle East twice, first to DESERT STORM in 1992 and 
then in support of IRAQI FREEDOM and ENDURING FREEDOM in 2004. I have 
served in operational and intelligence units, service and combatant 
command staffs, and in the Office of the Judge Advocate General and the 
office of the General Counsel. I understand the importance of the 
collaborative relationship that must exist between these offices and 
have been fortunate to work with many of the lawyers presently serving 
in both offices, including the current Judge Advocate General of the 
Army, an extraordinary leader with whom I served at Fort Hood.
    Since retiring from the Army, I have worked as a federal civilian 
lawyer, currently leading a dynamic team of attorneys in the Office of 
the General Counsel at the Department of Agriculture. Last year, I was 
privileged to serve the Army as a civilian member of the Fort Hood 
Independent Review Committee, where our five-member team completed a 
comprehensive review of the Fort Hood command climate and culture that 
has been the impetus for great change at Fort Hood and across the Army 
and DOD.
    If confirmed, I commit to serve our soldiers and civilians 
selflessly in ensuring the Office of the General Counsel provides the 
highest quality legal services to Secretary Wormuth and the Department, 
and to further the cooperative relationship enjoyed by the Department 
and this Committee. This is a momentous time; a time where our Army is 
embarking on a complete cultural transformation for the benefit of its 
soldiers. At Fort Hood I witnessed the damage inflicted on soldiers and 
their units by the prevalence of sexual assault and sexual harassment. 
If confirmed, I will ensure that current initiatives respect the rule 
of law and due process and assist Army leaders in bringing about real 
change for the brave men and women that serve our country. The current 
momentum must not fade; success is a must.
    I am also committed to helping the Department tackle a range of 
challenges such as the quality of housing on and near Army 
installations, beating the COVID pandemic, and ensuring we have the 
appropriate acquisition authorities to get our warfighters the 
equipment they need.
    Senators, thank you for your consideration of my nomination, I look 
forward to answering your questions.

    Chairman Reed. Thank you very much, Ms. Ricci.
    Now for all of the witnesses, I will ask a series of 
questions that are required for all civilian nominees. You may 
answer together.
    Have you adhered to applicable laws and regulations 
governing conflicts of interest?
    [All three witnesses answered in the affirmative.]
    Chairman Reed. Have you assumed any duties or taken any 
actions that would appear to presume the outcome of the 
confirmation process?
    [All three witnesses answered in the negative.]
    Chairman Reed. Exercising our legislative and oversight 
responsibility makes it important that this committee, its 
subcommittees and other appropriate committees of Congress 
receive testimony, briefings, reports, records, and other 
information from the Executive Branch on a timely basis.
    Do you agree, if confirmed, to appear and testify before 
this committee, when requested?
    [All three witnesses answered in the affirmative.]
    Chairman Reed. Do you agree to provide records, documents, 
and electronic communications in a timely manner when requested 
by this committee, its subcommittees, or other appropriate 
committees of Congress and to consult with the requestor 
regarding the basis of any good faith delay or denial in 
providing such records?
    [All three witnesses answered in the affirmative.]
    Chairman Reed. Will you ensure that your staff complies 
with deadlines by this committee for the production of reports, 
records, and other information, including timely responding to 
hearing questions for the record?
    [All three witnesses answered in the affirmative.]
    Chairman Reed. Will you cooperate in providing witnesses 
and briefers in response to congressional request?
    [All three witnesses answered in the affirmative.]
    Chairman Reed. Will those witnesses and briefers be 
protected from reprisal for their testimony or briefings?
    [All three witnesses answered in the affirmative.]
    Chairman Reed. Thank you very much.
    Now, Mr. Sherman, DOD has been filling a critical role in 
developing 5G technologies and the dual-use applications that 
will ride on top of the next generation of wireless networks. 
5G and the applications that 5G makes possible, will drive 
future economic prosperity and, critically, national security.
    Do we need to sustain or even increase our level of 
investment and commitment to ensure that Chinese 
telecommunications companies do not dominate this critical 
infrastructure?
    Mr. Sherman. Senator, 5G is critical to our warfighting 
capability both, training here in the continental United States 
and then capabilities, potentially, overseas.
    In terms of development within the Department of Defense, 
our continued focus on this going forward, between research and 
engineering, the CIO, the services, and other components to 
develop 5G and, indeed, lean forward to 6G capabilities are 
going to be critical in that space. Strategy will drive our 
budget on this, and, if confirmed, this would be a priority for 
me to work, to look at what is the proper investment to ensure 
if CIO, or when CIO takes us over from R&E, that the pilot 
projects that are implemented fully flourish and that we are 
postured to provide that warfighting capability.
    Chairman Reed. Thank you.
    Do you continue to still believe that DOD and EOS Telecom 
companies can successfully share the spectrum that is vital to 
both, is that possible?
    Mr. Sherman. Yes, Senator. Spectrum sharing must be our 
watch-word going forward. The DOD has vacated a good bit of the 
spectrum over the years, but now with where things are, the 
spectrum needs to be shared, particularly in the 3100 to 
3450MHz. Working with industry, the Executive Branch, and this 
Committee and otherwise, figuring out how we do that 
successfully to both, enable DOD capabilities, as well as U.S. 
economic development would be critical.
    Chairman Reed. Thank you very much.
    Mr. Vazirani, you have a record as a naval veteran, 
yourself. Your son is a Marine serving. As the former director 
to the National Military Family Association, you have an 
extraordinary personal connection to the issues you will be 
dealing with.
    So, can I ask what your priorities would be with respect to 
family readiness when you, if confirmed, take over.
    Mr. Vazirani. Senator, thank you.
    Addressing family readiness is critical to force readiness 
and making sure that we take care of families is critical. 
There are several things that I looked at when I was an 
advocate for military families, and, if confirmed, I will look 
at a broader set of issues, as well.
    But things that are of critical importance to military 
families today are military spouse unemployment, the degree to 
which we can help military spouses achieve fulfilling careers 
and contribute to the financial success of their family will 
also contribute to the readiness of that family and the ability 
of that servicemember to continue in their service. So, that 
becomes a retention issue, and to enable that, we need to look 
at innovative options for childcare. So, those are some of the 
things that would be specific for military families, Senator.
    Chairman Reed. Thank you very much.
    Ms. Ricci, you have had an extraordinary career in the Army 
as a lawyer and now you are positioned to be the General 
Counsel of the Army. Again, my comments could be directed to 
any one of the nominees today: extraordinary experience in the 
field you have been nominated to direct.
    One aspect has been your participation at the Fort Hood 
Independent Review Committee and one of their conclusions was 
that, at Fort Hood, it appeared to be compliant on the surface, 
but was hollow and lacking leadership retention, day-to-day 
implementation, broad acceptance by enlisted soldiers, and the 
full inculcation into the culture and character of the Fort 
Hood community. Senator Inhofe and I traveled down there and I 
think that was our impression, also.
    This is as much a leadership problem as it is a legal 
problem, but you will be right at the crossroads of both, 
leadership and the law. So, could you give us some insights 
from your participation on the committee?
    Ms. Ricci. Yes, Chairman.
    I saw, personally, at Fort Hood, the devastation that 
sexual assault can wreak on its victims and, as well as the way 
it erodes unit cohesion, and, if confirmed, it would be a 
priority of mine to assist in the implementation of the 
recommendations of the DOD IRC, as well as the Fort Hood IRC.
    It is my understanding that the recommendations have been 
accepted, but now it is time for implementation. The details 
are still being worked out, and it would be my job as the Chief 
Legal Officer for the Army to assist in ensuring there is 
accurate and timely legal advice to allow for swift 
implementation.
    Chairman Reed. Thank you very much, again, to all the 
witnesses. You bring forward impressive, detailed backgrounds 
in the areas that you have been nominated to serve in and I 
wish you well. I think we can try to rapidly get you confirmed 
with cooperation of the Committee.
    Senator Inhofe, please.
    Senator Inhofe. Yeah, I regretfully have to outdo the 
chairman. You know, I have been critical of this President and 
a lot of the things that have been going on, but I have to say 
that I have never seen three nominees more qualified and in a 
better position to do a better job for America than we are 
looking at right now. I don't know what came over him, but --
    Chairman Reed. You may do that every time.
    [Laughter.]
    Senator Inhofe. But, anyway, I am so impressed with each of 
you for different reasons. Certainly, starting with Mr. 
Sherman, you have the background and experience from when Dana 
Deasy was in this position and there were things that had to be 
done. I know it became pretty controversial back when Legato 
received the position that he was in, contrary to virtually 
everyone, every federal agency that was out there and on record 
at the time, along with the general public.
    I have not seen so much disregard for one individual or one 
group taking over, in this case, something significant as the 
group handling the LBAN for GPS and the threats that that poses 
on our entire segment.
    So, I did ask you if you saw the hearing that we had back 
at the beginning of this and I think you told me, Mr. Sherman, 
that you did, and so you know my feeling and the feeling of 
everyone who testified that day as to the problems that exist. 
So, I would only ask if you are, just keep in mind you have got 
the background. You know the issue. You actually worked with 
Dana Deasy and so I hope you will draw on that background to 
try to correct a problem that has got to be corrected.
    Are there any comments that you want to make about that 
issue?
    Mr. Sherman. Sir, assured positioning, navigation, and 
timing, particularly with global positioning system, is so 
critical to our warfighting ability both, here in the Homeland 
and overseas.
    As you noted, sir, I am very familiar with the Legato issue 
and where that license is so close to the GPS spectrum, in my 
view, represents an unacceptable threat to bleed over into that 
spectrum. Despite our efforts to share other parts of the 
spectrum where Legato is, is not acceptable.
    If confirmed, Senator, I would want to work with the 
Executive Branch, this Committee, and others to ensure that we 
rectify that issue to assure our PNT capabilities for our 
forces, sir.
    Senator Inhofe. Well, Mr. Sherman, let me just tell you how 
much I appreciate the very strong position that you have taken.
    Mr. Vazirani, you have a background, as the chairman 
pointed out that you really know, you have a hands-on 
background, and one of the problems I am having and have been 
having now that comes out of this administration is the problem 
of the COVID problems with the idea that, as I read this, and 
hopefully this is not going to happen, but there is a 
punishment, a punitive position that someone who is not 
complying, and we are talking about military people, as well as 
contractors, those individuals could find themselves to be 
fired.
    Well, right now, certainly you realize, as do most people, 
our biggest problem right now is retention and recruitment. We 
did inherent a very good and positive economy; consequently, it 
is hard to find people to work because everyone is working, and 
so that does create a problem.
    But right now, if they were to--I can't think of anything 
that would be worse than if we were to find ourselves in a 
situation where we were letting people go, where we are firing 
people. It is something that is going to have to be corrected.
    I would like any comment that you might make as to what 
effect this could have on the morale and our recruitment and 
retention problem that exists today.
    Mr. Vazirani. Senator, I believe that COVID, and I said in 
my statement, that COVID is one of the readiness challenges 
that we face. One of the things that we have learned over the 
past 2 years is that COVID is deadly and it detracts from 
readiness, and that the vaccines are safe and effective.
    So, Senator, I am fully supportive of the President's order 
and the Secretary's mandate to vaccinate the force to ensure 
our readiness. It is my understanding that there is an 
administrative process that allows for exemptions, whether it 
is medically necessary or due it religious belief. Then 
progressing administrative actions to address a servicemember 
who may decline a vaccine.
    So, Senator, if I am confirmed, I would certainly look 
towards making sure that those processes are administered with 
care and compassion so that we understand the specific needs of 
each servicemember.
    Senator Inhofe. Yeah, but the problem that I see is that 
the damage is already done. Now, I am talking about two marines 
walking across the street just happened to recognize me and 
tell me that they were going to resign and just the idea--I was 
enlisted personnel back in my military days--and we don't go 
into a lot of the details as to what the motives are and all of 
that, but all they read is you better do this or you are going 
to be fired.
    Well, that is just not acceptable. So, frankly, I think the 
damage is already done and we are going to have to do our best 
to remedy it.
    Now, I know my time is expired, but I do want to comment to 
Ms. Ricci that one of the problems I have addressing, and a 
very serious problem that is out there, is that we seem to be 
wanting to, all the efforts seem to be, what are we going to do 
now, as opposed to a prevention, in terms of sexual assault; in 
other words, preventing it before it takes place, not 
afterwards.
    So, I know my time is expired, but --
    Chairman Reed. Senator, go ahead, please.
    Senator Inhofe.--if you just have a short answer for that?
    Ms. Ricci. Yes, Senator.
    I agree with you, prevention is critical and that this 
where the majority of our effort needs to be focused, and I 
believe that the IRC recommendations and the Fort Hood 
recommendations will lead us to that prevention strategy.
    Senator Inhofe. I agree with that.
    Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
    Chairman Reed. Thank you, Senator.
    Now, Senator Shaheen, please?
    Senator Shaheen. Thank you.
    Congratulations to each of you on your nominations and 
thank you for your long, public service to the country.
    I would like to begin with you, Mr. Sherman, because this 
summer, a DOD IG report identified shortfalls in DOD's 
recruiting and retention of cybersecurity-related positions.
    I had the benefit of being in New Hampshire this summer 
with General Van Ovost, who came up to look at the KC-46s that 
our National Guard has, and she talked passionately about the 
need for all kinds of IT positions within our military and how 
we were going to get there.
    As you think about your challenges in taking over this 
role, how do you see your role in recruiting and retention, 
because it seems to me without that workforce, we can't do 
anything else we need to do.
    Mr. Sherman. Senator, while cybersecurity is certainly 
about technology, I feel so strongly that the people factor is 
what makes it go. If confirmed, I would move out on a new 
strategy to look at our cyber and digital talent, so we can 
think differently about how we recruit, re-skill, and retain 
our individuals. This is a whole-of-nation effort and we must 
come at it much differently; thinking about diversity, about 
different sort of career paths, maybe not a 30-year career 
path, but folks coming in and out of the organization, looking 
at the security protocols therein, and also building upon the 
progress the DOD has made in terms of how they already 
understand the work roles and the cyber-accepted service, but 
also thinking differently about how we implement it, Senator.
    Senator Shaheen. Well, thank you. I would urge you to look 
at the National Guard, as well, because we have a lot of talent 
in National Guard units around the country on this issue and we 
should take advantage of them wherever possible.
    Mr. Vazirani, I am very concerned about the potential for 
Havana Syndrome attacks, also known as anomalous health 
incidents. Obviously, in your role, you are going to be in a 
position to consider how DOD responds to those issues.
    I very much appreciate Secretary Austin's issuing a 
guidance, but I think what is going to be very important is to 
have particular protocols that everyone understands and knows 
what to do if they are the victim of such an attack.
    So, will you commit that this is something that you will 
take a look at and work on, if confirmed?
    Mr. Vazirani. Senator, I do know that this is a serious 
issue and that it has become a priority for the administration, 
and, if confirmed, I would certainly commit to ensuring that 
the resources of the Department, particularly the health 
system, were available to address this.
    Senator Shaheen. Good. Thank you.
    Another issue that has surfaced, sadly, onto many of our 
military installations is the prevalence of PFAS. It has shown 
up in the blood of a lot of folks in New Hampshire who were 
stationed at the former Pease Air Force Base and who now live 
in the community. Obviously, these chemicals, the PFAS 
chemicals are linked to a variety of health concerns. One of 
the things we need to do is to start thinking about how to 
track those.
    Are you aware of any efforts by DOD to offer blood testing 
for military servicemembers and their families, who have been 
stationed at those contaminated bases and do you think we 
should be looking at some sort of a tracking effort to address 
this?
    Mr. Vazirani. Senator, certainly, the health and well- 
being of servicemembers and their families is critical for the 
readiness of the force and while I am not aware of any specific 
actions that the Department is taking, if confirmed, I would 
certainly look at how can we understand the prevalence and 
impact of these toxic chemicals and what they could mean for 
families and for readiness. Senator, I do commit that, if 
confirmed, that I would work with this Committee and with 
colleagues in the Department to ensure we understand the 
complexity of that particular issue.
    Senator Shaheen. Well, thank you.
    I think there are some provisions in the House-passed 
Defense Authorization bill that would look at testing, blood 
testing for members of our military.
    Ms. Ricci, you talked eloquently about what happened at 
Fort Hood and the need for cultural change. Again, I appreciate 
Secretary Austin's announcing his support for moving sexual 
assault cases outside of the military chain of command. This 
Committee voted to support that.
    If confirmed, how do you see your role in making sure that 
that gets done in a way that people in the military can buy 
into and that better addresses the issue of sexual assault?
    Ms. Ricci. Senator, it is important to support the 
Secretary's decision and, if confirmed, as the Chief Legal 
Officer of the Army, it would be my duty to assist the Army in 
understanding the nuances, the legal nuances involved and 
making sure that we have the appropriate implementation so that 
we do support the Secretary's decision in removing that 
decision from the chain of command.
    Senator Shaheen. Do I have your commitment that you will 
come back and report to this committee on the progress of how 
those changes are going?
    Ms. Ricci. Yes, Senator, you absolutely do.
    Senator Shaheen. Thank you.
    Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
    Chairman Reed. Thank you, Senator Shaheen.
    Senator Tuberville, please?
    Senator Tuberville. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
    Thanks for being here today. Mr. Sherman, back in July, 
this Committee marked up the fiscal year 2022 NDAA and 
increased Defense top line spending, which included $116.1 
billion for DOD RDT&E. A significant portion of this money will 
go to contractors. Many of them will be small businesses. For 
some, it will be their first DOD contract. Unfortunately, these 
contractors' cyberattacks against the Homeland are growing, 
making their small businesses the target in the eyes of our 
adversaries. In Alabama, alone, we have 5,000 Defense 
contractors.
    It is self-defeating to spend billions a year on cutting-
edge technologies and critical research, but then let China and 
Russia sneak through the backdoor. We cannot expect our DOD 
contractors, especially our small businesses, to fend for 
themselves against cyberattacks from nations, states, and 
malign actors.
    If confirmed, what will you do to assist all contractors 
with the collective, defensive capabilities needed to 
adequately safeguard, you know, our technology?
    Mr. Sherman. Senator, cybersecurity is certainly the 
paramount activity of Chief Information Officer and as you 
note, small- and medium-sized businesses are the backbone of 
this economy. If confirmed, there are a number of things that I 
would want to do to include with the Cyber Maturity Model 
Certification, or CMMC, program, making that updated and not 
onerous to those small and medium companies in Alabama and 
everywhere else, sir; also, working with General Paul Nakasone 
at NSA and USCYBERCOM, doing things like providing, as we would 
call it, cybersecurity, as a service for that small- or medium-
sized company, giving them templates and guides on how to do 
this, so they are not having to reinvent the wheel themselves 
on this. With always thinking not just about the very large 
corporations, but those small and medium companies that are so 
important, and also where the Chinese and Russians and others 
try to go after, to get into our network, sir.
    Senator Tuberville. Yeah, thank you.
    Mr. Vazirani, if confirmed, you would have supervision over 
the Department of Defense education activity; 160 schools in 
seven states, 11 foreign countries, and two territories. Two of 
these schools are in my home state Alabama, Fort Rucker and 
Maxwell Air Force Base.
    I am a proud military brat. I was an educator for 40 years. 
I have seen, firsthand, the importance of a stable environment 
for kids inside the classroom and at home.
    Students who are in their third year, impacted by COVID-19 
mask mandates, virtual learning, now school boards across the 
country are pushing critical rates. They are even trying to 
restrict parents' involvement in the classroom.
    Would you agree that some of the best solutions to the 
challenges facing our schools come from the local level, where 
parents, students, teachers, and administrators can collaborate 
and work towards success together, and can you elaborate on 
that?
    Mr. Vazirani. Senator, I appreciate the question and I 
think what you are pointing out is that the education of 
military children is critical and particularly when we look at 
the future force, 80 percent of those who serve today are 
military-connected, and so we have to think about the 
appropriate education of those children and make sure that 
there are appropriate education options for the families so 
that their children can advance, particularly as they move from 
one location to another.
    Senator, if confirmed, I would want to look at the 
education activities and make sure that the appropriate level 
of education is being provided. I think that parents do provide 
a great resource and are our partner in the education of their 
child. If confirmed, I would want to work with the colleagues 
at the Defense Department education authority to make sure that 
the education and the curriculum is being involved in a way 
that will appropriately educate those children.
    Senator Tuberville. Thank you.
    Ms. Ricci, it was good to hear you say something about the 
living quarters in a lot of our military bases. A lot of them 
are atrocious. I have been to some of them and it was good to 
hear you say that, you know, you support upgrading some of 
those facilities.
    Could you elaborate on that. Have you had firsthand 
knowledge of that?
    Ms. Ricci. Yes, Senator, I have.
    At Fort Hood, I did learn about the abominable living 
conditions that some of our servicemembers have lived in and it 
was a small mention in the Fort Hood report that was part of 
the overall command climate. I would be supportive of the 
Army's continuing efforts to reform how privatized housing 
works, to ensure that contracts are in other words and that the 
partners are held accountable.
    Senator Tuberville. Thank you. You know, the attitude of 
our military is very important and a lot of it, you know, 
starts at home, obviously, with kids and living quarters, and 
they don't make a lot of money. You know, a lot of them could 
go and do other things, and we have got to make sure that we 
can do anything possible to keep, you know, our best in the 
military because with all this technology now, a lot can leave. 
They can go to other places, have a better life with a lot more 
money, but a lot of them want to support this country, and we 
appreciate that.
    So, thanks for being here today. Thank you for your 
testimony.
    Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
    Chairman Reed. Thank you, Senator Tuberville.
    Senator Kaine, please?
    Senator Kaine. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
    Congratulations to the nominees. You are all well- 
qualified for your positions.
    Mr. Sherman, I want to pick up, just commenting on 
something that Senator Tuberville was asking about, that I am 
also really focused on, and that is the ability of small, 
innovative tech companies to participate in work across the DOD 
but including in cybersecurity. So, this question of having a 
process to get CMMC compliance that can work for small 
technology companies is also something that I am really 
interested in and I appreciate Senator Tuberville asking about 
that, and your commitment, that you would work on that. I would 
look forward to working with you on it.
    Here is one that is kind of related in dealing with 
technology companies' interaction with DOD. The DOD has a 
process for certification. It is called--technology companies 
have a process within DOD that is called Impact Level to get 
certified to do work with the DOD. There is a similar process 
in the GSA called FedRamp to get approval through the GSA to be 
a government IT vendor. I often wonder whether we can create 
reciprocity between some of these programs so that a company 
that gets, you know, certified through the GSA process could 
get certified through the DOD or vice-versa without requiring 
duplication of work.
    We run into the same issue with security clearances, where 
different agencies use different practices on security 
clearances and it makes it very difficult.
    Do you think there should be reciprocity between the GSA 
certification system and the DOD certification system?
    Mr. Sherman. Senator, given how critical our private sector 
is to our tech innovation, particularly from small and medium 
companies, as well as large ones, if confirmed, I would always 
try to seek symmetry and, I don't want to say simplification, 
but making it being cognizant of how it affects the companies, 
and if confirmed, would take a look at the GSA parity to 
FedRamp and also recognizing that we at Department of Defense 
will often layer above and extra certifications on top of that, 
given our security considerations, but, at the front end, 
making this as smooth and symmetrical as possible, sir.
    Senator Kaine. That would be great. I take that as a 
commitment to work together with GSA to see what symmetries can 
be created, and you are right, if there are additional security 
requirements at the DOD side, but you could build on the base 
of what GSA has done with FedRamp, rather than having a 
completely separate certification process, that would be very 
much appreciated.
    Mr. Vazirani, I want to ask you about our workforce needs. 
The commandant in the Marine Corps released planning guidance 
in 2019 and I am going to read you a quote from it, quote, our 
manpower system was designed in the Industrial Era to produce 
mass, not quality. We assume that quantity of personnel was the 
most important element of the system and that marines are all 
essentially interchangeable.
    My son is Marine, too. I know you have a boy in the 
Marines.
    As the complexity of the world is increased, the spread 
between physical jobs and thinking jobs is increased 
dramatically. War still has a physical component and all 
marines need to be screened and ready to fight; however, we 
have not adapted to the needs of the current battlefield. The 
only way to attract and retain marines capable of winning on 
the new battlefield is to compete with the tools and incentives 
available to them in the marketplace.
    What are some of the areas of the military's recruitment, 
training, promotion, and retention system that could benefit 
from incentives found, quote, in the marketplace?
    Mr. Vazirani. Senator, I appreciate that question.
    I think that point about making sure that we have the right 
talent, and it is not just a question of quantity; it is a 
question of quality, as well. I think as we think about the 
emerging warfare domains and the way that war will be waged 
into the future, we have to think about that as, in order to 
compete on that battlefield, to have the right talent.
    So, if confirmed, one of the things that I would want to do 
is to work with the services and the team within Personnel and 
Readiness to see what mechanisms are available to ensure that 
we get a diverse and qualified total workforce. I think that is 
a question of, and how do you achieve that through the military 
service, as well as the civilian component of the military. So, 
as we go through this process of recruiting people, we have to 
think about, are we reaching the right people who have those 
skills, and then, two, what are the mechanisms we have 
available to retain them?
    Because as we compete, we are also competing with 
corporations and institutions, and so we have to look at what 
are the tools available to us to retain the talent.
    Senator Kaine. One mechanism that I will just put on the 
radar screen that I will ask you about, should you be 
confirmed, is one that we included in the NDAA in 2020. There 
was a provision, or Section 860, to this that would establish 
the Defense Civilian Training Corps and this corps was sort of 
like an ROTC corps that we could use to attract people into 
particular fields: engineering, acquisition, and others, where 
we are going to need a strong workforce going forward. I would 
like to talk further about the success of that model, it is 
still very new, and what the DOD plans to do to really exploit 
the value of a program like that.
    But thanks to all the witnesses and congratulations to you.
    Mr. Chair, I yield back.
    Chairman Reed. Thank you, Senator Kaine.
    Senator Hawley, please?
    Senator Hawley. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
    Thanks to all the witnesses for being here.
    Mr. Sherman, let me start with you. The use of Chinese-made 
hardware like printed circuit boards poses a major 
cybersecurity concern for the United States. I spoke about this 
with Microsoft's president, Brad Smith, when he was here 
earlier this year. He agreed with this assessment.
    Let me ask if you agree that it is time for DOD to stop 
using Chinese-printed circuit boards and the information 
systems that our warfighters depend on to defend their country?
    Mr. Sherman. Senator, I see China as a paramount threat to 
our systems, to everything that we are doing at DOD, and if 
confirmed, that would absolutely be something that I would look 
at. We do not want the Chinese in or near our systems, sir.
    Senator Hawley. Let me ask you China, with regard to 
Taiwan. If China invades Taiwan, I will likely try to do so by 
surprise, of course, and as quickly as possible, as the fait 
accompli scenario. One of the ways in which it will likely try 
to achieve its objectives is to overwhelm our cyber defense 
systems and try to degrade or neutralize as many of our 
critical defense systems as possible.
    So, in your assessment, is DOD currently prepared to 
withstand and fight through a barrage of cyberattacks in the 
event of a Chinese attempted fait accompli?
    Mr. Sherman. Senator, I believe DOD is well-postured, based 
on what I know right now, that is, with any sort of defensive 
mechanisms, we can always improve it. If confirmed, 
cybersecurity, working with General Nakasone at CYBERCOM, 
informed by NSA threat intelligence, to keep the Chinese back 
on their heels would be a top priority.
    Senator Hawley. Very good.
    Can I just come back to the printed circuit boards for just 
a second. You said that China was a concern. I appreciate that. 
But would you agree that it is time for DOD to stop using 
Chinese-printed circuit boards?
    Mr. Sherman. Senator, if confirmed, I would have to look at 
that, but in principle, any sort of Chinese hardware or 
software should not be on or near our systems would be my 
belief.
    Senator Hawley. Okay. I look forward to hearing from you 
further on that.
    On the Taiwan question, again, talk to us about how the 
requirements for defending against a surge of cyberattacks like 
we were just talking about, how do those differ from the 
requirements from defending or for defending against Chinese 
cyberattacks on American systems during peacetime; in other 
words, what do we need to be prepared for in, effectively, a 
kinetic scenario that we otherwise wouldn't be?
    Mr. Sherman. I think the principle of Zero Trust, Senator 
will be for both scenarios. Assuming they are already on our 
networks right now, and not just defending at the perimeter in 
a wall-and-moat scenario or even a defense in-depth but 
segmenting our networks and everything we are doing in a way 
that we have not done before, making it about the data and also 
tagging people and tagging data in a way that we have not done 
before. Zero Trust will be the key both, for defending here in 
the Homeland, as well as out at the edge, where they could 
attack us.
    Senator Hawley. Let me ask you, if you are confirmed, what 
you will do to ensure that we are able to not only defend 
against Chinese cyberattacks in peacetime, but also to be able 
to withstand and fight through them in a potential future 
conflict.
    Mr. Sherman. Senator, if confirmed, my role as CIO would be 
to ensure we have the most robust defensive capabilities 
possible and providing the infrastructure for General Nakasone 
and CYBERCOM to use for offensive capabilities.
    Senator Hawley. Are there any specific steps that you can 
think of now that you would take, that you think need to be 
taken in that regard?
    Mr. Sherman. The most immediate step, if confirmed, would 
be what we call enterprise Identity, Credential, and Access 
Management, or ICAM; somewhat of a techy term, but something 
that has to be there to be able to tag the people and tag the 
data on that Zero Trust scenario, sir.
    Senator Hawley. Good. Let me ask you a little bit about the 
consolidation of our industrial base. This is something that I 
have raised with other nominees before the committee.
    DOD has long struggled with this, this increase in 
consolidation. We are seeing problems now with emerging 
technologies, with just a few large companies in this country 
can own a lot of technology or can buy it up.
    Do you agree that concentrating market power in just a 
handful of companies, and I am thinking specifically of Google, 
Facebook, Microsoft, Amazon, makes it harder for competition to 
occur and to spur innovation, and that is especially true as it 
relates to information technologies.
    Mr. Sherman. Senator, I see our technology Defense 
Industrial Base as a national advantage for us. In terms of 
their consolidation, all I can say, if confirmed, as CIO, I 
will be a very tough customer to all of them, without 
favoritism or bias and making sure that our warfighters get the 
very best technology for their warfighting needs.
    Senator Hawley. You are anticipating my next question, 
which is how can we ensure a robust and competitive marketplace 
for these emerging technologies that isn't dominated by a few 
firms and, ultimately, is getting us the best innovation that 
is possible and that we need in order to succeed.
    Mr. Sherman. Senator, if confirmed, I would see that done 
by rigorous requirements, but also casting a wide net, not to 
exclude small and medium businesses with geographic diversity, 
different capabilities, and working with acquisition 
sustainment, and research and engineering, and others to make 
sure we hear multiple voices for our requirements.
    Senator Hawley. Very good. If the Chairman will let me 
slide one more question in here very quickly, Mr. Vazirani, I 
want to ask you about the needs in the Pacific theater.
    Secretary Austin told me earlier this year, and to quote 
him now, the combat-credible, forward-deterrent posture is 
instrumental to the U.S. military's ability to deter, and if 
necessary, deny a fait accompli scenario. We are talking about 
Taiwan there. Forward-deployed units are only part of the 
solution, of course. These organizations have to be filled with 
servicemembers who understand the Pacific theater of 
operations.
    If nominated, your office will oversee the recruitment and 
retention of all DOD personnel. Here is my question: How can 
DOD Berman and equip PACOM units with specially trained 
individuals who are ready to compete and within in the Pacific 
theater, given the unique needs and requirements there?
    Mr. Vazirani. Senator, I think, there, again, it is a 
question of how do we get to the right talent; the people who 
can fight those wars who have the skills, the knowledge, the 
language skills, the cultural skills to know how we might 
engage an enemy in that region.
    So, if confirmed, that is something I would work with the 
people within the Personnel and Readiness with the Under 
Secretary, and with the Service Secretaries to make sure that 
we understand what the requirements are for each of those 
forces who may engage and ensure that we have the right 
standards, and so that the standards and requirements meet that 
and that we can meet our recruiting goals.
    Senator Hawley. Thank you.
    Chairman Reed. Thank you, Senator Hawley.
    Senator Blumenthal, please?
    Senator Blumenthal. Thanks, Mr. Chairman.
    I thank each of you for your service and for your 
willingness to serve in these new capacities.
    Mr. Sherman, I am not sure what your role will be, if 
confirmed, in the procedures and standards used in classifying 
documents, but I have raised repeatedly in our classified 
sessions, the fact that a lot of what we are hearing, the 
American people deserve to hear and there is no real reason 
that the material should be classified.
    In a lot of the instances where I raise this issue, the 
military or intelligence officials there, without disclosing 
any classified information that may have taken place there, 
tend to agree, and in fact, the American people deserve to 
though more. It would be useful for the Department of Defense 
that they should know more and, in fact, for our democracy.
    So, will you undertake a review of our current 
classification standards and procedures with a view to opening 
more of it to the public?
    Mr. Sherman. Senator, I certainly see the absolute value in 
our way of government for transparency, but also keeping our 
secrets safe. If confirmed, I would work with the stakeholders 
in the Department of Defense to include Intelligence and 
Security, I&S, and other parts of the Department to look at 
this topic.
    Senator Blumenthal. Will you commit to give us a plan for 
that review, a specific plan as to who will be involved and 
what the timetable is?
    Mr. Sherman. Senator, I would commit to work with the 
stakeholders who have that appropriate policy under them, but, 
yes, I would, if confirmed, take this as a priority.
    Senator Blumenthal. Well, with all due respect, will
    you present the Committee on Armed Services of the United 
States Senate with a plan, a specific plan for whom you will 
consult and what your timetable will be?
    Mr. Sherman. I will commit to that, Senator.
    Senator Blumenthal. Thank you.
    Who do you think should be involved? Who are the 
stakeholders that you would involve?
    Mr. Sherman. Senator, based on what I know about the job, 
it would be Intelligence & Security and other folks who look at 
the counterintelligence equities. I know CIO has a role in 
this, but other parts of the Department do, as well. As well as 
protecting secrets and safeguarding that area, they would 
absolutely need to be involved, sir.
    Senator Blumenthal. Thank you.
    Mr. Vazirani, I am sure you are aware of the increasing 
rate of suicide, an alarming increasing rate of suicide among 
our veterans and servicemembers. Since September 11, 2001, 
apparently, that number is more than quadrupled number who died 
in the wars previously. I may have some of the details wrong.
    There is a study that estimates that 7,057 servicemembers 
have been killed in post-9/11 war operations, while 30,177 
active-duty servicemembers and veterans have died by suicide. 
The average suicide rate for post-9/11 veterans is between 18 
to 34 was 32.3, per 100,000 between 2005 and 2017, but it rose 
to 45.9, per 100,000 in 2018. That is about 2.5 times the 
suicide rate in the general population.
    Are you familiar with the study that provided these numbers 
from Brown University's Costs of War Project?
    Mr. Vazirani. Senator, first of all, any suicide, any 
number of suicides in the military or veteran community are 
alarming and we should be concerned about that.
    Senator, I am not familiar with that specific study. I am 
familiar with the studies that the Department has done 
regarding suicide.
    If confirmed, if this an area that would be a particular 
concern for me and a priority to look at what are we doing. As 
the Secretary said, the first thing we need to do is to make 
sure that we reduce stigma and we encourage help-seeking so 
that servicemembers, their families, and they understand that 
we can overcome that stigma, so that as they proceed through 
their military life cycle, and even into the veteran community, 
they know how to ask for help.
    The other side of that, Senator, that I focus on is 
ensuring that leaders know how to recognize the signs of 
suicide and when to offer help and make sure that there is a 
trusted relationship where a servicemember can ask for help.
    Senator Blumenthal. I appreciate that answer.
    My time has expired.
    This topic is a big, complex and an important one, and I 
look forward to following up with you.
    Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
    Chairman Reed. Thank you, Senator Blumenthal.
    Senator Tillis, please?
    Senator Tillis. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
    Congratulations to all three of you for your nominations.
    Mr. Sherman, you get a pass on this question, because I 
think there are families and friends watching. I would like to 
pronounce your last names right.
    Could you please pronounce your name? Is it Vazirani?
    Mr. Vazirani. Vazirani.
    Senator Tillis. Vazirani.
    Ms. Ricci?
    Ms. Ricci. Ricci.
    Senator Tillis. Okay. Thank you.
    I asked my staff. She said it had been pronounced a couple 
of different ways, so I just wanted to make sure I got it 
right.
    Ms. Ricci, I am very focused on military housing. I made 
several visits to Fort Bragg and Camp Lejeune. I have done town 
halls, and we still have a problem there. We made some progress 
with the Bill of Rights, but I think that there is a lot more 
work to do.
    So, can you give me an idea of whether or not this will be 
a priority for you and some vision as to how we can get to an 
improved state of military housing. It is a real problem. I 
think it has a number of effects on readiness, health, a number 
of other issues.
    Do you share that concern? Can you give me an idea of some 
of the things that you may make a priority?
    Ms. Ricci. Yes, Senator.
    I absolutely share your concern. Soldiers should have safe 
housing, safe and healthy housing, and during my time at Fort 
Hood, I did, indeed, listen to some of the concerns of the 
servicemembers living there and some of the conditions that 
they faced. I understand that the Army is going through a 
revised, so to speak, way of looking at their partnerships with 
privatized housing and ensuring that contractors are held 
accountable.
    If confirmed, that would be a priority of mine. That would 
be one of the priorities, is to make sure that our procurement 
processes are being enforced appropriately and that our 
partners are being held accountable.
    Senator Tillis. I also think that we have to have a focus 
on what has occurred as a result of some of this unacceptable 
housing. I went into a house at Fort Bragg that had a 
dehumidifier that in the hallway that was collecting so much 
water that the tank, they couldn't use the tank. They literally 
had to run a hose to the bathtub in the hallway bathroom just 
to be able to keep it running nonstop, 24/7.
    So, another area that I think we have to look at is, how 
are we proactively helping the families that have documented 
medical conditions?
    I met with a number of military spouses who had doctors' 
advice to get out of these homes because the conditions in the 
homes were clearly causing health problems for them and their 
children. So, that is another area that I look forward to 
working with you, after you are confirmed.
    I guess one other question I have for you has to do with 
military justice. What do you perceive would be an appropriate 
role for the Army General Counsel, if Congress enacts Secretary 
Austin's proposal to establish the office of special victims' 
prosecutions in the secretariat of the military department?
    Ms. Ricci. Senator, if confirmed, the Army General Counsel, 
as the Chief Legal Officer, would have the obligation to ensure 
swift implementation to provide accurate and timely legal 
advice, and to assist in working out the legal nuances 
attendant to that change.
    Senator Tillis. Mr. Sherman, I have got more in common with 
you than I do with most of the people in the Senate with my 29 
years in information technology. I also want to echo what 
Senator Blumenthal said on suicide prevention; removing the 
stigma, that is very important. I also think we have to act in 
the way that we talk.
    We all talk about removing the stigma and then we will go 
behind closed doors and whisper about a problem that we may 
have with a family member or friends. It really begins with our 
behavior, too, to help remove the stigma.
    But Mr. Sherman, I feel like the Department of Defense is 
replete with opportunities to consolidate, to collapse some 
silos, and to really go through an enterprise transformation 
for the use of information technology, duplicative systems 
across service lines. I think that there is an opportunity to 
build cross-functional platforms and then only have, on an 
exception basis, the silos that we have today.
    Do you agree with that?
    Mr. Sherman. I do, Senator.
    Senator Tillis. Do you think that the culture of the DOD 
can be changed to actually accept that?
    It is the same sort of problem I saw in large, diverse 
corporations. But what would you do to actually change the 
culture so that we could make meaningful progress and take a 
lot of costs out of our IT operations in the DOD?
    Mr. Sherman. Senator, I would build upon, if confirmed, 
successes that have been underway; for example, with the 26 
defense agencies and field activities, what is called the 
Fourth Estate Network Optimization, to reduce all of those 
inefficiencies there, scale that to the Department level, build 
on what the military departments are doing; for example, the 
Department of Navy's project Cattle Drive, they call it, to get 
rid of duplicative systems and drive greater efficiencies.
    I would, if confirmed, build on those successes, sir, and a 
lot of this would be built on data, to make sure we know what 
is out there and to make that implemented, sir.
    Senator Tillis. Well, this is something that is personally 
very important to me. It is very interesting to me. It keeps my 
skills up to date.
    So, I would like to get your commitment that I received 
from your counterpart in Veterans Affairs, to get together, 
take a look at your program office, the sort of structure that 
is going to be necessary to actually execute that. It is also 
very important to me because I think there is a lot of 
integration opportunities, particularly with respect to the 
Cerner platform for the electronic health record, so that we 
can actually get to a point to where we may be able to predict 
a transitioning servicemember being at risk before they even 
know they are. I do believe that that is within our reach if we 
integrate and capture the right kind of data through the like 
cycle of a soldier.
    Thank you, Mr. Chair.
    Chairman Reed. Thank you, Senator Tillis.
    Senator King, please?
    Senator King. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
    Mr. Sherman, there has been a lot of discussion about cyber 
on a lot of levels. I don't think there is any doubt that if 
there is a conflict that we are engaged in, cyber will be the 
first part of it. The first effort of our adversaries will be 
to try to blind us in terms of our ability to communicate. They 
are also using cyber to compromise our networks to steal 
intellectual property.
    My question is, you use the word ``ensure"; I think that 
may be an optimistic word. But how do we ensure?
    Do you anticipate pen testing, red teaming, bug bounties, 
hackers for hire?
    It seems to me the best way to be sure or to get toward 
assurance is testing the network by friendly hackers or 
friendly, those who are enabled to attack the networks and tell 
us where our vulnerabilities are. Is that in your agenda?
    Mr. Sherman. Yes, sir. Absolutely.
    Not just trust but verify and reverify. Working with, for 
example, the Defense Digital Service, which does a lot of that 
bug bounty-type activity at DOD. Also working with the Director 
of Operational Testing and Evaluation, DOT&E, so we can do that 
up front testing, as we buy technology, such as commercial-clad 
capabilities to really see where vulnerabilities are. As we 
have done, for example, on Office 365 being employed across the 
enterprise, finding vulnerabilities that even the vendor didn't 
know about.
    Senator King. I would hope that you would work with NSA and 
CYBERCOM, they are the best in the world, to test your own 
networks. You used ``trust, but verify"; that is one of my 
favorite mottos, but another is, ``Does it work and how do you 
know?'' So, CYBERCOM, it seems to me, and NSA, with Paul 
Nakasone, would be a tremendous resource.
    Secondly, on cyber, we are engaged in a very large-scale 
modernization of our nuclear triad. As far as I am concerned, 
we ought to scrap the word ``triad'' and talk about nuclear 
quad, because command and control is as important as any leg of 
the triad; if we don't have command and control, we can't 
communicate with the triad, it isn't going to work.
    So, I hope that modernization, when we are talking about 
modernization of the submarine fleet or the missiles or the 
bombers, we are also talking about a very intense modernization 
of command and control in the nuclear area.
    Mr. Sherman. Sir, NC3, and I like where you are heading 
with this, it is not just a triad; it is the fourth leg of a 
triad, to ensure that the triad will be effective. Having 
resilient, modern, strengthened NC3 on that, and that is an 
area, too, and I should have included this, with General 
Nakasone, both from CYBERCOM and NSA, to ensure that NC3 
network is there when we need it.
    Senator King. It has to be redundant, and redundant, and 
redundant.
    Mr. Sherman. Yes, sir.
    Senator King. You talked about workforce, so I won't dwell 
on that. But as you know, that is a huge problem nationwide, 
and not only in the defense field, but in every field, in terms 
of network security, cybersecurity, network administration. So, 
workforce is something that I think has to be attended to.
    Mr. Vazirani, two issues in your area. One that concerns 
me, and that is the geographic diversity of our Armed Forces. I 
was surprised to find in 1975, the division between the 
Northeast, the Midwest, and the South, and the Southwest, among 
our military personnel was about 50/50. I think it was 47/47.
    Today, it is 67/30; in other words, the Midwest and 
Northeast have fallen to 30 percent of our active-duty 
military. The South and Southwest are now almost two- thirds. I 
think that is unhealthy for the country to have our 
professional military service be geographically defined.
    Do you appreciate that concern and what do we do about it?
    Mr. Vazirani. Senator, I certainly share that concern. I 
think that in order for us to have the most ready force that 
force also has to look like America and come from the breadth 
of America. I think, Senator, if I am confirmed, one of the 
things we would want to look at is, how can we improve the 
value proposition to reach young people; people who are 
eligible and qualified to serve in those areas and ensure that 
we are accessing the talent.
    Senator King. It has to be a conscious strategy. The 
current strategy, obviously, isn't working. There has to be a 
conscious saying, we are going to recruit more in Cleveland or 
in Boston than we are today. We are going to put more 
advertising, and whatever it is, and I hope you will pursue 
that.
    Second, I just have a few seconds left, so I just want to 
touch on these. I want to associate myself with all the others 
who have talked about suicide. In the Vietnam War, we lost 
58,000 people. In the decade from 2008 to 2017, we lost 60,000 
people to suicide. The figures Senator Blumenthal mentioned are 
just shocking. We have lost four times as many military people 
and veterans to suicide since 9/11, than to operations. That is 
a stalker of our military personnel. I hope you will really put 
some focus on that. If it were a military event killing 30,000 
people over that period of time, we would have all kinds of 
resources on it, so I hope you will pursue that.
    Finally, Ms. Ricci, I looked into this whole housing issue. 
I think a lot of it is contracts, contract administration, and 
following up and enforcing the contracts that we have and 
renegotiating and improving those contracts with the private 
vendors. If you have an obligation under contract but nobody 
ever enforces it or pays any attention to it, then you are 
going to backslide, and I think that is exactly what happened.
    So, I hope in your position you will be very contract 
lawyerly and follow those obligations to be sure that they are 
enforced. That is one way to quickly bring those contractors 
back up to the standard that they agreed to.
    Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.
    Chairman Reed. Thank you, Senator King.
    Now, let me recognize, via Webex, Senator Duckworth, 
please.
    Senator Duckworth. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
    I want to associate myself also with the comments from my 
colleagues who came before me on both sides of the aisle on 
suicides, among our military men and women.
    Just to remind everyone the Veterans Crisis hotline is: 1-
800-273-TALK, t-a-l-k, 1-800-273-TALK. You can call that if you 
are on the brink of homelessness or any kind of crisis, 
including needing just to talk to someone.
    Now, I want to start by congratulating all three of you who 
are here today on your nominations. I do want to begin with a 
problem that has existed far too long that has become more 
urgent during this pandemic, and that is military hunger. Far 
too many of our military families experience food insecurity.
    That is why I introduced the Military Hunger Prevention 
Act, to create a basics, needs allowance to help struggling 
military families put food on the table. My bill currently has 
25 bipartisan co-sponsors in the Senate; an indicator of the 
broad support for solving this shameful problem.
    Mr. Vazirani, please, I apologize for mispronouncing your 
name, if confirmed, how will you address food insecurity among 
our servicemembers?
    Mr. Vazirani. Senator, thank you for raising that concern. 
Food insecurity, obviously, it affects the readiness of the 
family today. It detracts from the readiness of the 
servicemember when they are in the field if they are thinking 
that their family is hungry. It detracts from our future 
readiness because the children of many of those who serve today 
are going to serve in the future.
    Senator, if confirmed, I want to work with this Committee 
and with people within the Department to certainly meet up to 
the Secretary's priority of people first. I think we have to 
look at a range of options on how we solve for this and part of 
that is ensuring that those families have financial security.
    So, when I was an advocate, I looked at a range of options 
for the basic needs allowance, which I think is one of those 
options and a qualification for other programs that would allow 
for families to have the resources to ensure the well-being of 
their family.
    Senator Duckworth. Thank you. I look forward to working 
with you, once you are confirmed, on this.
    In January, you wrote, and I quote, military families are 
counting on Washington to ensure that services adequately fund 
childcare fee-assistance programs and partner with the 
community outside the gates to increase accessibility when on-
installation waitlists are too long, end quote.
    You also noted in your advanced policy questions that 
ensuring affordable, quality care is accessible to our military 
families will be one of my priorities, your priorities.
    I agree that this is an issue of huge importance to our 
military families, as well as to our readiness. That is why I 
introduced the Military Child Care Expansion Act that would 
authorize a number of programs to improve access to a range of 
childcare options for military families.
    Mr. Vazirani, can you expand on the importance of 
affordable and accessible childcare for our military families.
    Mr. Vazirani. Senator, enabling military spouse employment 
and for military spouses to have fulfilling careers is critical 
to their families, but also to the readiness of the force, 
which will allow the servicemember to continue to serve in the 
way they are.
    Senator, to enable that requires childcare and accessible 
childcare that the family can get to and affordable childcare. 
So, if confirmed, Senator, I would want to look at a range of 
options; particularly, around how do we innovate in providing 
childcare to military families, whether it is on the 
installation or off the installation, as well as the 
opportunity to military spouses to earn their credentials and 
either provide childcare in their homes and be reimbursed 
through a fee-assistance program, or to become providers with 
portability within the military childcare system.
    Senator Duckworth. Wonderful.
    Well, the fiscal year 2022 NDAA has report language 
directing the DOD to seek out creative solutions to solve the 
childcare availability crisis, and I hope that you will keep me 
updated on your progress.
    Mr. Vazirani. Senator, certainly.
    Senator Duckworth. Thank you.
    Finally, according to numerous studies, paid family leave 
offers clear advantages to both, employers and families, yet, 
depending on their branch of service and family situation, many 
servicemembers currently only receive 2 or 3 weeks of parental 
leave.
    To recruit and retain the best and brightest, we must 
modernize the DOD's parental leave policy for members of the 
military. That is why I introduced the Servicemember Parental 
Leave Equity Act, to make sure that all primary and secondary 
caregivers in the military can access 12 weeks of paid parental 
leave.
    Mr. Vazirani, if confirmed, will you commit to prioritizing 
initiatives such as Parental Leave Expansion that would help 
strengthen military readiness and better support military 
families?
    Mr. Vazirani. Senator, if confirmed, I certainly commit to 
looking at any solution that would help military families and 
military family readiness.
    Senator Duckworth. Thank you.
    Thank you for your testimony today, and I look forward to 
your confirmation.
    I yield back, Mr. Chairman.
    Chairman Reed. Thank you, Senator Duckworth.
    Now, let me recognize Senator Kelly, please.
    Senator Kelly. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
    Thank you for being here today, folks.
    Mr. Vazirani, the uptick in military suicides is alarming, 
I think, to all of us, and the Department's own figures show 
that 580 servicemembers died by suicide in 2020. This means 
that the number of suicides increased by 15 percent from the 
prior year.
    Every single suicide, even one, is too many. We need to do 
more to support our men and women in uniform.
    It was this concern that led me to introduce the Brandon 
Act, named to one of Arizona's fallen. We did this, along with 
Senator Cramer and the support of other members of this 
committee. The bill is designed to ensure that a servicemember 
in crisis is never denied timely access to live-saving care. I 
also joined with Senator Ernst in introducing the Save Our 
Servicemembers Act to further improve the Defense Department's 
internal coordination on suicide prevention.
    It is clear that we need to do better. If confirmed, will 
you commit to work with us on these proposals?
    Mr. Vazirani. Senator, I absolutely confirm to work with 
you on those proposals and I would look for options to reduce 
suicides and eliminate suicides to the degree that we can.
    Senator Kelly. What other strategies do you have for 
addressing, like, what are the strategies?
    So, I would like to listen to, maybe, some of your ideas on 
how we address this rising rate of suicides in the military.
    Mr. Vazirani. Senator, I haven't formed a complete strategy 
on that. I certainly have some thoughts on this, primarily from 
the fact that I have a family that experienced two suicides. I 
think that as the Secretary said, we have to reduce stigma. We 
have to make it okay for people to ask for help.
    In order to ask for help, we have to have a command 
structure, whether it is a squad level, the division level, the 
platoon level, the company level, where there is a connection 
between the servicemember and their leader so that they know 
how to ask for help. So, that is one of the things that we have 
to do.
    So, in order to address this issue, which is so personal, 
we have to think about the system, as well. So, we have to 
develop a system that enables help-seeking. We also have to 
acknowledge that part of that is to ensure that there are the 
same resources at home for the military family, because that 
stress source may be at home, as well.
    So, we can't just look at it as just a military issue; it 
is a military-family issue, as well.
    Senator Kelly. Well, the piece of that about, you know, 
helping members ask for help and a process to do that, is what 
the Brandon Act was all about, so thank you for your response.
    In my remaining time, I want to switch to Mr. Sherman here 
and talk a little bit about cybersecurity and AI. With the 
SolarWinds and Colonial Pipeline ransomware attacks, Americans 
have had a front-row seat on the havoc that cyberattacks can 
wreak on our country.
    We have also had a wake-up call to the vulnerabilities 
inherent in our infrastructure. Now, the Defense Department is 
not immune to these risks; in fact, the Defense Department 
identifies cybersecurity among its top priorities in its 
Digital Modernization Strategy. This work is increasingly 
important as more and more of the equipment and technology that 
we use to defend our Nation comes to rely on the network and 
its security.
    If confirmed, what are your priorities to securing our 
Defense networks against cyberattacks?
    Mr. Sherman. Senator, I absolutely agree that cybersecurity 
is of paramount concern and, if confirmed, to strengthen our 
cybersecurity, I would oversee the implementation of what is 
called Zero Trust; a strategy that assumes that the enemy is 
already on the network, not protecting at just the perimeter or 
Defense in-depth, but assuming they are already on our network 
and through a strategy of what is called microsegmentation. Not 
only on our enterprise IT server, but also on things like 
industrial control systems. You referenced the Colonial 
Pipeline. Things like HVAC, elevators, you name it; other 
things that make the enterprise run. So, if confirmed, Zero 
Trust would be the approach that I would oversee, sir.
    Senator Kelly. That approach is not used today?
    Mr. Sherman. Elements of Zero Trust are being implemented; 
building blocks for it. For example, the Defense Information 
System Agency is implementing it on the secret side. We need to 
scale it out much larger and also build on industry best 
practices.
    Senator Kelly. Thank you, Mr. Sherman.
    Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
    Chairman Reed. Thank you, Senator Kelly.
    Let me now recognize Senator Kaine, who has additional 
questions.
    Senator Kaine. Thank you, Mr. Chair.
    Mr. Vazirani, this is just an observation that is directed 
at you because of your forthcoming role on personnel matters. 
We had a hearing about Afghanistan the other day and it was an 
important hearing and the administration witnesses talked 
about, in a somber way, the American troops lost in 
Afghanistan, 2,324 military personnel, as well as the 4,598 who 
died in Iraq, and we were talking about the toll that our 
Nation suffered in the war on terror.
    One thing that I noticed in this testimony, and we have 
heard it before, is that the death of U.S. contractors is 
almost never mentioned, and it truly is a unique war, this war 
on terror, in American history, where the U.S. contractor 
deaths were higher than troop deaths. Total troop deaths in the 
war on terror were 7,052, but U.S. contractors, their deaths 
were 8,189.
    I haven't yet kind of wrapped my mind around what that says 
about the notion of modern warfare, that there would be more 
casualties of contractors, many of whom were veterans, they had 
previously served in the military, than there were of active-
duty troops. I think it is something that we need to think 
about and contemplate.
    But one thing that I would urge on the Pentagon going 
forward, as we talk about U.S. lives lost in the war on terror, 
that we don't omit the U.S. contractors whose lives were lost. 
They may not have gotten some of the recognition that others 
did, and yet they lost their lives on a similar mission, 
usually under contract with the Pentagon. We would be wise not 
to forget them, but to highlight their sacrifices, as well. So, 
in your forthcoming role in personnel, I just wanted to urge 
you to have the Pentagon think about that. Thank you.
    Chairman Reed. Thank you, Senator Kaine.
    Senator King, if you have no questions, thank you all for 
you, not only service, which has been extraordinary, but your 
commitment to serve again. Your responses were compelling.
    I can't outdo the ranking member in his praise, so I will 
stop right there, and we look forward to bringing your 
confirmation before us as quickly as possible and getting you 
to work. Thank you all very much.
    With that, the hearing is adjourned.
    [Whereupon, at 10:58 a.m., the Committee adjourned.]
                                ------                                

    [Prepared questions submitted to Mr. John B. Sherman by 
Chairman Reed prior to the hearing with answers supplied 
follow:]

                        Questions and Responses
                       duties and qualifications
    Question. Titles 10, 40, and 44 U.S. Code, establish a diversity of 
duties and responsibilities for the Chief Information Officer (CIO) of 
the Department of Defense.
    What is your understanding of the duties and functions of the CIO?
    Answer. It is my understanding that the DOD CIO serves as the 
primary advisor to the Secretary of Defense for information technology, 
management, and assurance; as well as non-intelligence space systems, 
critical satellite communications, navigation and timing programs; 
spectrum, and telecommunications. Additionally, I understand that the 
DOD CIO drives technology and cyber transformation to ensure 
warfighters maintain a decisive advantage over adversaries, works with 
industry to identify new solutions, advocates for IT and cyber talent, 
and leads CIOs and other stakeholders from across the Department toward 
modernization goals.
    Question. If confirmed, what if any additional duties and functions 
do you expect that the Secretary of Defense would prescribe for you?
    Answer. If confirmed, I expect that oversight of the Cyber Maturity 
Model Certification (CMMC) activities might be transferred from 
USD(A&S) to the DOD CIO portfolio, under the DOD Chief Information 
Security Officer (CISO). In this scenario, DOD CIO/CISO would provide 
the centralized cybersecurity oversight of the CMMC activities, with 
USD(A&S) maintaining the Department's lead role for overall engagement 
with the Defense Industrial Base.
    Question. What background, experience, and expertise do you possess 
that qualifies you to serve as Chief Information Officer? Please 
include specific examples of insights from your private sector 
experience as a Chief Information Officer or in similar roles, as well 
as your service to date as the Principal Deputy DOD Chief Information 
Officer, that you would apply to your service as CIO, if confirmed.
    Answer. My foundation for the DOD CIO role includes serving as the 
Intelligence Community (IC) CIO, the DOD Principal Deputy CIO (PDCIO), 
and the Acting DOD CIO. All involved experiences with strategic 
leadership of large-scale technology modernizations, which I would 
apply to the DOD CIO role if confirmed. As the IC CIO, I oversaw the 
flagship IC Information Technology Enterprise initiative, where I led 
major updates to cloud computing, cybersecurity, and interoperability 
during my nearly 3 years in the job. At DOD, I oversaw the shift to the 
enduring DOD365 collaboration and productivity suite, accelerated the 
focus on Zero Trust for cybersecurity, moved to meet urgent cloud-
computing needs with the Joint Warfighting Cloud Capability (JWCC) 
multi-cloud approach, increased emphasis on resilient Positioning, 
Navigation, and Timing (PNT), and launched a new strategy to diversify 
and strengthen our cyber talent. All of this is undergirded by my 
nearly 25 years in the IC as a consumer and user of cutting-edge 
technology.
    Question. Given your observations and experience to date as the 
Principal Deputy DOD Chief Information Officer, if confirmed, what 
innovative ideas would you consider implementing with regard to the 
structure and operations of the information enterprise of the 
Department of Defense?
    Answer. If confirmed, one of my main priorities would be to 
implement Zero Trust across the Department, changing the cybersecurity 
paradigm from one of protecting perimeters to one that assumes 
adversary penetration of the network and employs principles of micro-
segmentation. Additionally, I would focus on deployment of an 
enterprise multi-cloud solution with JWCC, which is critical to enable 
Joint All-Domain Command and Control (JADC2). I would also work with 
Department stakeholders to identify and deploy increasingly innovative 
and complementary types of PNT to ensure resiliency against growing 
threats. Finally, I would work with DOD components, executive branch 
departments, Congress, and industry on ways to ensure warfighter access 
to critical electromagnetic spectrum capabilities while also 
identifying opportunities to help strengthen US 5G advantage.
                   major challenges and opportunities
    Question. What do you consider to be the most significant 
challenges that you would face if confirmed as the Chief Information 
Officer?
    Answer. Ensuring cybersecurity of the Department of Defense 
Information Network (DODIN) in the face of increasingly capable threats 
would be among my top challenges if confirmed. Additionally, providing 
edge-node capabilities in support of JADC2, such as in the Western 
Pacific and in a highly contested battlespace, would also represent a 
major task to be addressed. Finally, DOD's ability to recruit, retain, 
and reskill IT and cyber talent, especially in an environment of 
increasing competition for key skillsets, represents both a challenge 
and an opportunity to reimagine how DOD manages its civilian and 
uniformed technology professionals.
    Question. What steps, if any, have you already taken to address 
each of these challenges, and, if confirmed what additional steps will 
you take, and on what timeline?
    Answer. I began strengthening the Department's cybersecurity 
posture as Acting CIO by moving the enterprise toward a Zero Trust 
footing, overseeing the Defense Information Systems Agency's (DISA's) 
launch of the ``Thunder Dome'' Zero Trust initiative, the publication 
of a Zero Trust reference architecture, and the preparations for the 
standup of a Zero Trust portfolio management office within DOD CIO. If 
confirmed, I would move out quickly on implementing the key elements of 
Zero Trust, starting with deployment of enterprise Identity, 
Credential, and Access Management (ICAM) in early 2022. Also, I would 
immediately buildupon the partnership between CIO organization and the 
Director, Operational Test and Evaluation (DOT&E), which was 
instrumental in the testing of DOD365 earlier this year and will be 
vital as we ensure the cyber bona fides of commercial cloud 
capabilities. On support to JADC2, in July 2021 I launched the pivot to 
the JWCC multi-cloud approach, which will provide enterprise cloud 
computing capabilities, at all three security levels, from the 
Continental United States to tactical edge environments. While fully 
recused from developments on this procurement since my nomination in 
September 2021, I established the 3Q FY22 award date while still 
serving as the Acting CIO. Finally, I launched the drafting of a cyber-
talent strategy earlier this year, with a projected publication date of 
early to-mid 2022.
    Question. Describe significant opportunities in the domain of the 
DOD CIO that, in your view, and informed by your service as Principal 
Deputy CIO, DOD has not fully leveraged.
    Answer. Based on my time here in the Department since June 2020, I 
believe that DOD is fully leveraging all facets of the DOD Digital 
Modernization Strategy (DMS) with regards to cloud, cybersecurity, 
data, AI, and command, control, and communications. Deployment of 
modernized capabilities and enhancements, ranging from strengthened 
weapons system cybersecurity to deployments of resilient PNT across the 
force to implementation of the Electromagnetic Superiority Spectrum 
Strategy (EMS3), at the speed and scale necessary to stay ahead of the 
China pacing threat, remains an opportunity for continued progress in 
the CIO domain.
    Question. If confirmed, what specific actions would you take to 
ensure that DOD leverages these opportunities in a suitable and timely 
way?
    Answer. If confirmed, I would leverage established governance 
venues at the enterprise and CIO levels to drive component action on 
areas needing acceleration (remediation of cybersecurity threats, etc.) 
and provide strong, active oversight of Military Department investments 
through planning guidance and budget certification processes. I would 
also work through less formal channels, such as by day-to-day 
engagements with CIOs and other leaders, to sustain unrelenting focus 
on developing and deploying critical capabilities, at speed and scale.
    Question. If confirmed, what follow-on actions (e.g., sustainment, 
enhancement, modification, termination) would you take with regard to 
initiatives established by your predecessor, specifically digital 
modernization, composed of cybersecurity, data management, enterprise 
cloud, artificial intelligence, and joint all-domain command and 
control? Please explain your answers.
    Answer. If confirmed, I would continue efforts against all facets 
of the DOD DMS launched by my predecessor, with appropriate updates in 
areas such as Zero Trust for cybersecurity, an enterprise multi-cloud 
approach, oversight of EMS3 implementation, and other developments and 
opportunities that arise in the constantly evolving technology and 
cybersecurity space. A ``North Star'' for modernization efforts would 
be toward enabling joint warfighting and JADC2, especially in support 
of combat operations in highly contested, edge environments.
    Question. Your predecessor concluded that these initiatives 
required additional personnel with engineering and other technical 
expertise, but was unable to gain approval for these additional 
billets.
    Based on your experience to date as the Principal Deputy and Acting 
CIO, what is your view as to whether the CIO's office requires 
additional manpower and expertise to properly implement these 
initiatives?
    Answer. Based on my experience in DOD CIO, both as Principal Deputy 
and Acting CIO, I believe that the CIO's office is properly staffed for 
its mission. I would reassess this if confirmed, and on an ongoing 
basis, especially in light of additional responsibilities for CIO in 
areas such as Zero Trust, EMS3, and 5G.
    Question. Historically, the DOD CIO, as well as the CIOs of the 
military departments, have been perceived as lacking operational 
expertise and have been more or less confined to non-warfighting and 
non-operational roles. Today, however, the lines between protecting and 
managing administrative information technology networks and operational 
warfighting networks have blurred and integrated enterprise networks 
face common cyber and information warfare threats. CIO's are also 
increasingly called upon to manage information technology initiatives 
that directly impact operational capabilities.
    Should DOD CIOs be, and be seen as, more involved in military 
operational matters, in your view?
    Answer. Yes, at the strategic level. The Department's ability to 
counter advanced adversaries like China and Russia is heavily reliant 
on the digital modernization capabilities that the CIO oversees.
    Question. In your view, should CIOs across the DOD Components 
acquire more operational expertise to be effective in their jobs?
    Answer. Based on my experience, the CIOs in the components are 
highly knowledgeable of their respective organization's operational 
needs, and they adapt and deploy technology accordingly.
    Question. If so, how would such capabilities be acquired and 
documented?
    Answer. A Component CIO's ability to understand and address 
operational needs should be documented in artifacts such as position 
descriptions and vacancies. Also, familiarity with military operations 
and technology requirements to support current doctrine and strategies 
should be a key consideration in hiring.
    Question. The DOD CIO is responsible for a plethora topics that 
affect DOD business and military operations. Is the office 
organizationally aligned correctly? Does it have sufficient staff to 
meet its responsibilities and obligations?
    Answer. Based on my experience, the DOD CIO organization is 
properly aligned and has sufficient staff to meet its responsibilities 
and obligations. As Acting CIO, I elevated the Special Access Program 
(SAP) IT portfolio to a Deputy CIO level in order to ensure the topic 
received appropriate effort and leadership attention. If confirmed, I 
would continually assess all areas of CIO, similar to what I did for 
the SAP IT function, and make necessary adjustments and/or advocate for 
additional resources.
                    civilian control of the military
    Question. If confirmed, specifically what would you do to ensure 
that your tenure as CIO epitomizes the fundamental requirement for 
civilian control of the Armed Forces embedded in the U.S. Constitution 
and other laws?
    Answer. Civilian control of the Armed Forces is a fundamental 
principle of the Constitution, which I would firmly uphold and protect 
if confirmed. If confirmed, I would provide proper and adequate 
direction and meaningful civilian oversight in the course of my duties, 
and advocate to ensure that the office of the DOD CIO has appropriate 
staffing to perform the required civilian oversight.
                     2018 national defense strategy
    Question. The 2018 National Defense Strategy (NDS) outlined three 
lines of effort by which the U.S. would generate decisive and sustained 
military advantage in great power competition and conflict: rebuilding 
military readiness to form a more lethal force, strengthening alliances 
and creating new partnerships, and reforming the Department's business 
practices and culture. At the core of each of these efforts, the NDS 
describes a need for innovation, flexibility, and adaptability, and the 
streamlining of personnel, technology, and infrastructure.
    Do you believe DOD has been successful in implementing the 2018 
NDS? Why or why not? In which lines of effort and nested tasks do you 
perceive a need for continued improvement or additional focus or 
resources? Please explain your answers.
    Answer. I believe DOD has been successful in large part with 
implementing major aspects of the 2018 NDS, especially with regards to 
refocusing efforts from counterinsurgency to greater lethality against 
Nation-State adversaries. Additionally, a continued focus on 
strengthening key partnerships across many regions and nations has 
bolstered DOD, and reforms have resulted in new achievements like the 
Fourth EState Network Optimization (4ENO) initiative. In terms of 
additional focus going forward, especially in a CIO context, a 
continued and robust effort to ensure US weapon systems and networks 
are hardened against near-peer adversary threats must be a priority, 
along with development of new capabilities in areas such artificial 
intelligence (AI), compute and transport in edge/contested 
environments, agile software development (DevSecOps), the future shift 
to 6G, even more resilient PNT, and enabling full dominance of the 
electromagnetic spectrum (EMS).
              relationships with other department offices
    Question. What is your understanding of the respective 
responsibilities of the Principal Cyber Advisor and the CIO regarding 
the Department's cyber activities and cybersecurity programs and 
architecture?
    Answer. The DOD CIO is responsible for establishing policies, 
standards, and architectures to ensure networks and systems are capable 
of operating in any environment. The DOD CIO also provides budgetary 
and programmatic oversight of Military Departments, Defense Agencies 
and Field Activities (DAFAs), to include the National Security Agency's 
(NSA's) Cybersecurity Directorate. In addition to its oversight of U.S. 
Cyber Command (USCYBERCOM), the Principal Cyber Advisor (PCA) monitors 
the execution of the DOD Cyber Strategy and integrates cyber operations 
policy, programs, and processes across the Department, to include 
cybersecurity objectives under DOD CIO responsibility.
    Question. Does this allocation of responsibilities need to be 
changed or clarified, in your view? Please explain your answer.
    Answer. If confirmed, I would work with USD(P) and other 
stakeholders to review the allocation of responsibilities to ensure the 
Department's cyber mission is being carried out efficiently and 
effectively, and then make recommendations as needed to Department 
leadership.
    Question. What is your understanding of the respective 
responsibilities of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and 
Sustainment (USD(A&S)) and the CIO for the acquisition of 
cybersecurity, information technology, and command, control, and 
communications systems, including contracting and software development? 
For securing the Defense Industrial Base against cyber attacks? For 
supervising the Strategic Cybersecurity Program?
    Answer. USD(A&S) has oversight of the acquisition process and 
promulgation of acquisition policy to ensure that acquisition programs 
implement DOD cyber security policy throughout the entire acquisition 
lifecycle. The DOD CIO works with USD(A&S) to ensure that system 
acquisitions are compliant with DOD cybersecurity architectures, 
policies, and standards. These responsibilities also apply to the 
Strategic Cybersecurity Program (SCP) where DOD CIO works in 
conjunction with USD(A&S) and other SCP stakeholders to assure the 
cybersecurity of weapon systems and critical infrastructure across the 
acquisition lifecycle.
    Question. Do any of these allocations of responsibilities need to 
be changed or clarified, in your view? Please explain your answer.
    Answer. At this time, I do not believe the overall allocations of 
responsibilities need to be changed or clarified. As the Department's 
senior acquisition official, USD(A&S) is able to leverage its 
authorities and oversight to ensure the incorporation of cybersecurity, 
and adherence to DOD CIO promulgated cybersecurity policies, 
architectures, and standards, in the acquisition of goods and services. 
Also, I believe there might be a transfer of responsibilities for the 
cybersecurity oversight of the CMMC program from USD(A&S) to CIO, with 
USD(A&S) maintaining overall lead for DIB engagement and related 
issues. If confirmed, I will continue to work with USD(A&S) to align 
acquisition and cybersecurity policy while identifying any gaps that 
may arise in our joint cyber assurance responsibilities.
    Question. What is your understanding of the respective general 
responsibilities of the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and 
Engineering (USD(R&E)), the (USD(A&S)), other components of the 
Department of Defense, and the CIO, for the development, procurement, 
and use of artificial intelligence and other emerging technologies?
    Answer. The USD(R&E) is responsible for fundamental AI research and 
developmental prototyping of AI capabilities, and collaborates closely 
with DOD Components to improve the capacity to transition such 
capabilities to production, integration, and operational use. In short, 
USD(R&E) is responsible for advancing the state-of-the-art in AI.
    The USD(A&S) plays a critical role in updating policies on software 
acquisition, including systems that are enabled by AI software. 
USD(A&S) is also responsible for training the DOD acquisition 
workforce, and the JAIC has been a close partner in training this 
community on best practices in AI acquisition.
    The Military Departments continue their mission of ``man, train, 
and equip,'' and the JAIC seeks to provide enabling services to, for 
example, program offices to accelerate their incorporation of AI 
capability.
    In a 2019 memorandum, the then-Deputy Secretary of Defense 
designated the Director of the JAIC as the senior designated official 
for AI, as required by Sec. 238 of the fiscal year 2019 NDAA. The 
Senior Official role includes principal responsibility for the 
coordination of activities relating to the development and 
demonstration of AI and machine learning for the Department. As the 
JAIC is now a direct report to the Deputy Secretary of Defense, the 
JAIC Director meets regularly with the DOD CIO to ensure 
synchronization across the information enterprise, especially on 
enterprise priorities such as the AI and Data Accelerator (ADA) 
Initiative.
    Question. More specifically, what is your understanding of the 
CIO's continued responsibilities for artificial intelligence once the 
Director of the Joint Artificial Intelligence Center is realigned to 
report directly to the Deputy Secretary of Defense?
    Answer. The DOD CIO will continue to play an important enabling 
function in DOD AI transformation through its management of the 
foundational networks, platforms, IT infrastructure, and policies that 
facilitate AI capability development. The DOD CIO and the JAIC are 
close partners in executing the ADA Initiative, and the DOD CIO serves 
as a member of the ADA Implementation Management Executive Steering 
Group, which oversees the ADA Initiative.
    Question. Does this allocation of responsibilities need to be 
changed or clarified, in your view? Please explain your answer.
    Answer. In my view, this allocation of responsibilities is 
appropriate to ensure the necessary implementation and integration of 
AI within the Department, while also ensuring the DOD CIO and JAIC 
continue to collaborate seamlessly on key issues and projects.
    Question. What is your understanding of the respective roles and 
responsibilities of the CIO and the DOD Chief Data Officer, who will 
now report directly to the Deputy Secretary of Defense, with respect to 
data policy, standards, and architectures?
    Answer. Currently, the DOD Chief Data Officer (CDO) reports to the 
DOD CIO. Both DOD CIO and CDO have complementary roles with respect to 
policy, standards, and architectures. The DOD CDO governs the 
development of data-related policies, standards, and architectures 
which ensure data is visible and accessible in an open, non-proprietary 
format. The DOD CIO leads the development and implementation of the IT 
and transport architecture that move data to the point of need, as well 
as the cybersecurity that protects the data. My experience in the IC 
has shown the benefit of having these as distinct roles working in 
peer-level partnership.
    Question. What is your understanding of the respective 
responsibilities of the USD(R&E), USD(A&S), and the CIO in prioritizing 
research and development activities that will provide enhanced 
information enterprise capabilities for the future of the DOD?
    Answer. My understanding is that emerging technology is typically 
first identified by USD(R&E) professionals. As the technology begins to 
mature, either organically or in the commercial space, DOD CIO partners 
with USD(R&E) to ensure relevant IT capabilities, policy, and guidance 
are in place. Collectively, our collaboration ensures USD(A&S) has both 
the relevant acquisition pathway identified and baseline level of 
technological understanding to complete a system's journey from 
research to pilot to operational deployment. I believe that all three 
organizations--CIO, USD(R&E), and USD(A&S)--are critical to achieving 
digital modernization and, if confirmed, I am committed to working with 
both organizations to provide enhanced information enterprise 
capabilities to the DOD.
    Question. What is your understanding of the respective 
responsibilities of the Executive Committee on Electronic Warfare, the 
Designated Senior Official established under section 1053 of the 
National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2019, the 
CIO, and the Principal Information Operations Advisor to the Secretary 
of Defense, for the management of electronic warfare; electromagnetic 
operations, standards, and policy; and information operations?
    Answer. The Executive Committee on Electronic Warfare (EWEXCOM) 
functions as an advisory body to key senior level DOD decision bodies 
on investment, development, acquisition, sustainment, and intelligence 
integration on Electronic Warfare (EW) investments.
    The Senior Designated Official (SDO) of the EMSO Cross-Functional 
Team (CFT) has two primary areas of responsibility: (1) provide 
recommendations on resource allocation and investments in the EMSO 
mission areas; and (2) propose EMSO governance, and operational reforms 
to the Secretary of Defense through the EWEXCOM. The SDO is in the 
process of transferring EMS3 execution and oversight responsibilities 
to the CIO.
    Pursuant to Department of Defense Directive 3610.01, the DOD CIO, 
as the Principal Staff Assistant (PSA) for EMS: (1) advises the 
Secretary of Defense on matters related to the EMS and EMS regulatory 
activities globally, including national and international fora; (2) 
develops and provides guidance on DOD strategies and policies in 
support of operations in the EMS; (3) informs DOD strategies on EMS 
command, control, and coordination system investments; (4) develops 
instructions to clarify EMS roles and responsibilities in greater 
detail; (5) advises the DOD Component heads on DOD investment 
strategies for EMS-dependent systems; (6) establishes a review and 
evaluation process that considers all EMS requirements; (7) ensures all 
DOD EMS users are involved in all DOD spectrum-related decisionmaking 
processes; and (8) in coordination with the USD(R&E), USD(A&S), and the 
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, provides oversight of EMS-
related capability development to the EWEXCOM as the governance 
structure.
    Pursuant to 10 US Code 397, the USD(P) serves as the Principal 
Information Operations Advisor to the Secretary of Defense, and 
provides advice on all aspects of information operations conducted by 
the Department, including support operations, electromagnetic warfare, 
special technical operations, operations security, cyberspace 
operations, and military deception.
    Question. Do these allocations of responsibilities need to be 
changed or clarified, in your view? Please explain your answer.
    Answer. It is my understanding that revisions to DOD Directive 
5144.02 are in progress and that these will clarify the CIO's EMS 
governance responsibilities. Multiple studies have revealed governance 
as a major challenge for DOD spectrum operations, including dispersed 
responsibilities across the Department at various organizational 
levels. The entire Department is embracing an enterprise approach to 
create unity of effort across the organizations and is aligning EMS 
efforts.
    Question. What do you perceive to be the appropriate relationship 
between the DOD CIO, the CIOs of the Military Departments and Defense 
Agencies, and the Joint Staff J6?
    Answer. I believe the DOD CIO must set the strategy and direction 
for digital modernization priorities and lead the DOD technology 
enterprise. There should be close collaboration with the other CIOs and 
the Joint Staff (JS) J6, with the DOD CIO facilitating partnership, 
sharing of best practices, a willingness to hear suggestions, and an 
environment to make changes when better solutions or approaches arise. 
The DOD CIO must also be attuned to the operational needs conveyed by 
the other CIOs and JS J6, and ensure that Department initiatives don't 
occur at the expense of user experience and mission effectiveness. All 
the while, the DOD CIO must ensure adherence to standards, strategic 
guidance, and policies--holding a hard line where necessary, while also 
maintaining flexibility to capitalize on emerging opportunities. 
Success relies on close communication, trust, and transparency between 
the DOD CIO and the other IT and cyber leaders.
    Question. If confirmed, how would you ensure consistency of 
approach and unity of effort to strategy development, planning, 
policymaking, and oversight, in the information enterprise across the 
Department of Defense?
    Answer. If confirmed, I would partner and meet frequently with the 
CIOs of the Military Departments, including the US Coast Guard, 
National Guard Bureau, Commander USCYBERCOM, and Director of DISA, to 
establish the right strategy to collaboratively develop and maintain a 
modern and dynamic information enterprise that is cyber-secure and 
responsive to the Department's needs. I would also consider 
establishing and/or strengthening joint governance forums to vet issues 
and ensure consistent implementation of infrastructure enhancements, 
with a special focus on leveraging commercial solutions to get the best 
capabilities to our users in the shortest period of time while 
enhancing security and minimizing cost.
    Question. If confirmed, how would you avoid unnecessary duplication 
between your efforts as the Department's CIO and the CIOs for each of 
the Military Departments?
    Answer. If confirmed, I would avoid duplication of efforts with the 
Military Departments through governance, communications, and oversight 
empowered by data-driven analytics via the Advana platform. If we 
identified a redundant or duplicative activity, I would direct that we 
quickly review its rationale and determine whether it should proceed, 
and, if not, how the requirement could be met using a current or 
forthcoming enterprise capability.
    Question. In your role as the Principal Deputy CIO, have you 
observed or experienced circumstances in which critical information 
enterprise responsibilities have been ``dropped'' or otherwise left 
undone? If so, please explain your answer and describe how you have or 
will rectify the situation. If confirmed, what systemic changes would 
you introduce to avoid this same circumstance going forward?
    Answer. Defending our Nation and ideals of freedom is no longer 
confined to traditional battlefields, with adversaries now targeting 
not just our military facilities, defensive assets, and soldiers, but 
also the networks, critical infrastructure, and individual citizens 
that support our way of life. Their weapon and target of choice is 
information and data.
    Improving the Department's technological agility and speed while 
enhancing our cyber posture remains a critical challenge, one that 
requires a comprehensive approach driven as a collaborative effort by 
the Department's leadership. If confirmed, I would continue to work 
along with the USD(A&S), USD(R&E), and other stakeholders to push rapid 
technical improvement, agility, and resiliency through the Department's 
Software Modernization initiative and other priorities in the DOD DMS.
    Question. What is the role of the DOD CIO vis-`-vis the Defense 
Digital Service and the United States Digital Service in developing and 
deploying software expertise and capabilities for the Department of 
Defense, and in assessing and correcting information technology-related 
problems across the Department?
    Answer. It is my understanding that DOD CIO and the Defense Digital 
Service (DDS) are well-aligned. There is a shared desire to improve the 
way software is designed, developed, deployed, and secured across the 
Department. DDS is a proven source of innovation inside the Department 
and provides perspectives that have led to cultural changes with how 
DOD approaches software development. The Department is working to 
adopt, adapt, and scale both their methodology and its tools. In 
addition, DDS has been a strong partner to CIO in designing and 
implementing next-generation network security solutions, such as Zero 
Trust and cloud computing.
    Question. What do you perceive to be the appropriate relationship 
between the DOD CIO and the Principal Cyber Advisor to the Secretary of 
Defense?
    Answer. The PCA provides the DOD CIO insight into cyber policy and 
broader perspectives on areas dealing with oversight of USCYBERCOM, 
while the CIO provides the PCA with an understanding of enterprise-
level IT modernization and defensive cyber activities. There should 
always be a close partnership between the PCA and CIO, especially on 
areas such as the SCP, the nexus between offensive cyber strategy and 
the CIO's defense cybersecurity portfolio, cyber investment strategy, 
and advocacy for cyber talent and education within the Department.
    Question. How do you assess the current division of labor in 
cybersecurity between the DOD CIO, the USD(A&S), the Under Secretary of 
Defense for Intelligence and Security (USD(I&S)), and the Under 
Secretary of Defense for Policy (USD(P)) in securing the Defense 
Industrial Base and Defense Critical Infrastructure?
    Answer. Securing the DIB and Defense Critical Infrastructure 
against a determined and well-resourced adversary requires a 
coordinated team effort. DOD CIO, USD(A&S), USD(I&S), and USD(P) work 
in coordination with one another to accomplish this objective. The 
Department must understand the intent and ability of our adversaries 
through intelligence programs administered by USD(I&S), develop and 
oversee execution of cybersecurity policies, standards, and 
architectures through the efforts of DOD CIO, ensure that programs and 
acquisitions adhere to cybersecurity best practices through the 
oversight of USD(A&S) and ensure effective cross-functional 
coordination and mission assurance through the efforts of USD(P).
    Question. How do you envision the coordination and integration of 
cybersecurity architectures and capabilities under the oversight of the 
CIO with those under the direct supervision of Commander, U.S. Cyber 
Command, such that they complement and support each other, as directed 
by Congress in law?
    Answer. The Department maintains the DOD Cybersecurity Reference 
Architecture (CSRA), which is the foundational guidance for the 
implementation of cybersecurity capabilities. DOD CIO works closely 
with USCYBERCOM and the Services to maintain the CSRA and develop 
capability-specific architectures such as the ICAM Reference Design and 
the Zero Trust Reference Architecture. If confirmed, as the need for 
new capabilities or modernization is identified, I would ensure 
USCYBERCOM and DOD CIO would work together to determine the best 
approach to address gaps and ensure DOD networks and information are 
properly protected. USCYBERCOM is a key participant in DOD governance 
bodies and in developing cybersecurity capability requirements and 
implementation guidance with DOD CIO.
    Question. Please explain how, if confirmed, you would plan to 
improve coordination with Joint Force Headquarters-DODIN (and CYBERCOM) 
with its operational responsibilities to protect DOD information 
networks.
    Answer. If confirmed, I would look for ways to better leverage 
JFHQ-DODIN's operational chain of command to publish and enforce cyber 
tasking orders on high-priority cybersecurity issues. When cyber 
threats are discovered and a tasking order has been issued, it is 
critical the threats are remediated quickly.
    Question. In your view, where do DOD CIO and Joint Force 
Headquarters-DODIN (and CYBERCOM) have shared responsibilities and 
separate responsibilities in protecting the DOD information network?
    Answer. The DOD CIO is the PSA and senior advisor to the Secretary 
of Defense for IT, and in that capacity develops DOD strategy and 
policy on the operation and protection of all DOD IT and information 
systems, including development and promulgation of enterprise-wide 
architecture requirements and technical standards, and enforcement, 
operation, and maintenance of systems, interoperability, collaboration, 
and interface between DOD and non-DOD systems. Through the DOD CISO, 
the office of the DOD CIO establishes the DOD Cybersecurity Program, 
and is the Chief DOD Cybersecurity Risk Manager. The Commander of 
USCYBERCOM directs the security, operations, and defense of the DODIN, 
in accordance with the Unified Command Plan. The Commander of 
USCYBERCOM has delegated authority to the JFHQ-DODIN to command and 
control, plan, direct, coordinate, integrate, and synchronize DODIN 
operations and defensive cyberspace operations--internal defense 
measures in order to secure, operate, and defend the DODIN. Thus, there 
is a significant shared responsibility in the securing and defending of 
the networks. The DOD CIO develops the strategy and policy, and 
strategic risk acceptance tolerance in partnership with USCYBERCOM, 
which USCYBERCOM and JFHQ-DODIN implement in day-to-day cyber defensive 
operations.
    Question. What do you view as the appropriate role of, and 
relationship between, the DOD CIO and the Director of the National 
Security Agency with respect to securing National Security Systems 
across the government?
    Answer. The Director of NSA is also the National Security Systems 
(NSS) National Manager and in that role is responsible to the Secretary 
of Defense for the security of NSS and to the Director of National 
Intelligence for those NSS that also qualify as intelligence systems. 
The DOD CIO ensures compliance with the requirements of National 
Security Directive (NSD) 42, which is the policy for the security of 
National Security Telecommunications and Information Systems, and 
collaborates with the National Manager on the performance of the 
National Manager's duties, per Executive Order 12333, as to all systems 
within the DOD. Outside of DOD, the DOD CIO chairs the Committee on 
National Security Systems (CNSS), which sets policy for NSS across the 
government.
    Question. What do you view as the appropriate role for the DOD CIO 
Officer vis-`-vis the USD(A&S), the USD(I&S), and the USD(R&E) in 
securing the Defense Industrial Base and other national security 
research and technology organizations from adversary cyber threats so 
as to ensure the integrity and security of DOD's classified 
information, controlled unclassified information, and other key data?
    Answer. In my view, the current role is appropriate as the DOD CIO, 
in coordination with the Defense Cyber Crime Center (DC3) and NSA's 
Cybersecurity Directorate, maintains an active program of sharing cyber 
threat information and responds to adversary activity. This partnership 
extends to USD(A&S), which is responsible for planning, coordinating, 
and synchronizing cybersecurity throughout the DIB; USD(I&S), which is 
responsible for developing guidance for and overseeing the DOD 
industrial security program; and USD(R&E), which is responsible for 
working closely with the DIB on new technologies, to include in the 
cybersecurity realm.
  acquisition of information technology and cyber infrastructure and 
                              capabilities
    Question. How can the DOD CIO encourage the appropriate use of 
rapid acquisition approaches and the ``agile'' method in regard to 
software development?
    Answer. Many software-intensive systems would benefit by 
transitioning to a software acquisition pathway that demands adoption 
of modern software development techniques, including agile practices. 
To drive this change in approach, I understand that DOD CIO partnered 
with USD(A&S) to release the DOD Enterprise DevSecOps Strategy 
Guidance. In addition, DOD CIO is driving the adoption of enterprise 
services that are specifically aligned to software development tooling 
and expressly linked to acquisition pathways that are agile by design.
    Question. What are your views on the role of data and data science 
in supporting information system acquisitions and the ``agile'' 
lifecycle?
    Answer. I believe that increased use of data is critical to 
informing and managing all of our acquisition processes, particularly 
information systems and modern software. As DOD modernizes its approach 
to make use of ``agile'' approaches, data engineers and data scientists 
will increasingly be integral members of the Department's software 
development teams. They are critical enablers of modernized software 
Development, Security and Operations (DevSecOps), which will result in 
increased delivery speed, security, and performance.
    Question. In your view, does the existing Department of Defense 
budgeting, programming, and acquisition process suffice for information 
technology acquisition, particularly software-intensive work, or do you 
plan to review such processes?
    Answer. In my view, existing Department of Defense budgeting, 
programming, and acquisition processes are aligned to meet the 
Department's mission. In addition to the Department's overarching 
Planning, Programming, Budget and Execution (PPBE) and acquisition 
processes, I understand that the Department recently issued updated 
software acquisition policy that provides an adaptive acquisition 
framework to enable delivery of effective, resilient, supportable, and 
affordable solutions to end users in a timely manner.
    Question. In your view, how should the DOD information enterprise 
balance the acquisition and adaptation of commercially available, off-
the-shelf cybersecurity, information technology, and business systems 
with the development and acquisition of government-unique solutions?
    Answer. I believe that adapting the Department's routine day-to-day 
business processes in order to realize the cost savings found in 
adopting commercial information technology systems must become the 
norm. NSS, however, bring additional complexity, with mission execution 
parameters being highly rigid for very specific reasons. In this space, 
successful mission execution justifies the Department's investment for 
specific mission needs into government-unique solutions. I believe that 
the balance of commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) and government-off-the-
shelf (GOTS) products is justified within the Department, but care must 
be given to ensure balance based on mission need.
    Question. How should DOD balance the procurement of information 
technology-and cybersecurity-as-a-service and the requirement to use 
the government workforce to perform enduring missions and inherently 
governmental functions?
    Answer. I understand that the Department takes a risk-based 
approach to the procurement of IT and cybersecurity-as-a-service, 
seeking maximum effectiveness for the warfighter with an eye toward 
overall affordability and placement of inherently governmental 
functions. The Department also weighs risk when making decisions 
regarding its workforce mix, and the DOD CIO has implemented an 
adaptable the DOD Cyber Workforce Framework (DCWF) to enhance the 
development and preparedness of its total force as the scope continues 
to evolve.
    Question. In your view, what role should the Defense Information 
Systems Agency (DISA) play in facilitating the development, 
acquisition, and sustainment of information technology and 
cybersecurity capabilities across the Department of Defense?
    Answer. DISA provides a unique and enterprise-wide mission set of 
applications and services used by every Combatant Command (CCMD), 
Military Service, and DAFA, currently leading the development and 
acquisition of capabilities and services across the Department 
including for use across the DOD Information Network. It delivers 
critical warfighter IT capabilities quickly and efficiently across the 
Department including provision of foundational worldwide IT transport 
infrastructure for the DOD and mission partners. I believe that DISA is 
in a key position to gather, coordinate and understand the pressing 
needs of DOD in all phases of the acquisition lifecycle and will 
continue to lead the department in the development and delivery of 
cutting-edge technology.
    Question. Congress enacted legislation directing that the National 
Security Agency's Cybersecurity Directorate conduct and support 
cybersecurity market research, testing, and acquisition across the 
Department of Defense. If confirmed, what actions would you take to 
ensure that this legislation is properly implemented?
    Answer. If confirmed, I would ensure the roles and responsibilities 
are assigned to NSA and promulgated in Department policies. I would 
also ensure that DOD maintains a program to improve acquisition of 
cybersecurity products and services consisting of market research, 
testing, and expertise transmission, or augments to existing programs, 
to improve the its evaluation of cybersecurity products and services.
    Question. What do you view as the appropriate role of the DOD CIO 
in working to ensure that software code developed by and for the 
Department of Defense is vulnerability-free and produced using secure 
development processes?
    Answer. Software systems are incredibly complex ``systems of 
systems.'' Understanding the composition of software through a software 
bill of materials is a mandatory first step in understanding and either 
mitigating or consciously accepting a degree of cybersecurity risk. It 
also is a prerequisite for responding to newly discovered 
vulnerabilities to determine what software in our inventory are 
affected and need immediate attention. If confirmed, I will drive 
Department-wide policy and establish timely guidance for generating, 
ingesting, and analyzing these software bills of materials.
    Question. As a co-chair of the Defense Business Council, what are 
your plans for using the annual Title 10 Section 2222 certification 
requirements to limit funds available to programs that, for example, 
don't comply with the Business Enterprise Architecture or with the 
Department's auditability requirements?
    Answer. The Department plans to utilize an IT portfolio management 
process to optimize business systems and meet performance requirements, 
maintain pace with technological advancement, and eliminate unnecessary 
costs and vulnerabilities. The Defense Business Council will rely on 
the annual certification process to enforce portfolio management 
decisions and ensure that business systems and their associated budgets 
align with DOD modernization objectives. If confirmed, I would provide 
active oversight of and involvement in these processes.
    Question. If confirmed, how would you plan to continue DOD's 
efforts to update its Business Enterprise Architecture while also 
working to better integrate the business architecture with the 
department's IT Architecture?
    Answer. If confirmed, I would ensure that the Business Enterprise 
Architecture and the IT Enterprise Architecture are integrated into the 
DOD IT Portfolio Management process in order to provide the functional 
descriptions of the business and information enterprise necessary to 
achieve modernization and efficiency objectives. This will enable the 
DOD to assess current business systems and IT infrastructure and 
services, identify gaps, overlaps, and vulnerabilities, thereby 
informing investment decisions.
    Question. There have been a number of recent and sometimes public 
disagreements on how DOD components approach technology modernization, 
of which culture transformation is a critical element. What is an 
actionable strategy toward working with entrenched interests and 
practices to accelerate modernization? What does success look like in 
one, three, 5 year horizons?
    Answer. If confirmed, ensuring that the Department modernizes the 
way it delivers software would be among my top priorities. Transforming 
from an environment where software deliveries are measured in years to 
one where deliveries are measured in minutes requires significant, 
deliberate change to our business processes, policies, workforce, and 
technology. This transformation demands a coordinated effort to 
reimagine today's environment and to rapidly address the challenges 
inherent in our current ways of acquiring, testing, securing, and 
deploying software. To that end, I understand that a DOD Software 
Modernization Strategy, developed by the DOD CIO, the USD(A&S), and the 
USD(R&E)--and built upon the already released DevSecOps Strategy 
Guide--will be published soon. This strategy defines the approach to 
accelerating the DOD enterprise cloud environment, establishing a 
Department-wide software factory ecosystem, and transforming DOD 
processes to enable technology resilience and agility.
    Question. The Department only recently migrated to Microsoft 365, 
with a mandatory shutdown of the Commercial Virtual Remote capability 
in June 2020. As a result of this transition, DOD has lost a 
significant amount of collaboration capability with external 
organizations, including the congressional oversight committees. What 
is your plan to rectify these technical challenges such that 
interoperability with external organizations improves?
    Answer. The DOD CIO office spearheaded the deployment of 
capabilities that have maximized DOD365 offerings with more 
enhancements from Microsoft being implemented in the environment. Today 
DOD can conduct meetings and have individual chats via Teams with any 
organization, to include communication within and external to the 
Department. The DOD CIO office authored and delivered a guide to assist 
our partners in enabling these capabilities. If confirmed, I will 
ensure DOD CIO continues to work with Microsoft to prioritize 
capabilities in order to maintain commercial parity in the more secure 
environment offered by DOD365, all the while remaining in close 
coordination with other stakeholders across the enterprise.
                  science, technology, and innovation
    Question. What are the key technologies that DOD should be 
supporting through research and development funding and procurement 
activities that will contribute to the effective execution of 
information systems modernization?
    Answer. I believe that AI remains a cornerstone technology in our 
competition with China. Effective information system modernization will 
certainly benefit from advances in AI and machine learning. Adoption 
requires an ecosystem where cutting-edge commercial innovations and 
models can be installed, explored, and evaluated without fear of 
operational impact. Synthetic representational data must be supported 
in order to sit side-by-side with industry and work unencumbered from 
controlled unclassified information (CUI) and classification concerns. 
If confirmed, I would work closely with the Director of the JAIC, 
USD(R&E), and others to ensure DOD pursues a leadership position in the 
research and development of enabling AI-empowered and validated Zero 
Trust architectures. I would also advocate for technologies that 
advance and increase network bandwidth, such as through the integration 
of additional low-earth orbit (LEO) satellite communications to further 
compliment terrestrial capabilities. As network traffic continues to 
increase, I believe that more research into improving data compression 
algorithms would greatly benefit the information enterprise.
    Question. What do you see as the most significant challenges (e.g., 
technical, organizational, or cultural) to successful development of 
the key technologies for which the CIO bears significant 
responsibility?
    Answer. The DOD CIO is responsible for information technology (IT), 
including NSS and defense business systems (DBS), information resources 
management (IRM), and efficiencies. Just by virtue of its size and 
complexity, the Department faces challenges in making large-scale 
changes at the enterprise level in areas such as adapting current 
systems, workflows, and data to work with modern technology frameworks 
such as Zero Trust and development, security, and operations 
(DevSecOps) frameworks. If confirmed, ensuring success against these 
challenges would be among my top priorities.
    Question. Are the Department's investments in these technologies 
appropriately focused, integrated, and synchronized across all Military 
Departments and the Defense Agencies?
    Answer. With the DOD DMS, I believe the Department is committed to 
properly focusing, integrating, and synchronizing key technology areas 
in cybersecurity, AI, cloud, and command, control, and communications. 
This strategy remains highly relevant, complementing the Department's 
long-term investments in AI that will enhance the foundation of US 
defense capabilities relative to China and others. In my view, we 
already have seen the impact of the DOD DMS in the digital 
transformation strategies published by the Military Departments and 
DAFAs. If confirmed, I would use the DOD CIO's budget certification 
authorities to ensure the Department's IT and cyberspace activities 
budgets are sufficient to improve business platforms and improve joint 
warfighting.
    Question. If confirmed, what efforts would you undertake to 
identify new technologies developed commercially by the private sector 
and apply them to national security and warfighter purposes?
    Answer. I believe that industry outreach is critical in this area. 
The Department has seen success, for example, in the Air Force's 
curated ``Ask Me Anything'' sessions with industry, and a desire from 
industry to directly offer feedback on DOD DevSecOps reference designs. 
If confirmed, and in close coordination with other stakeholders such a 
USD(A&S), USD(R&E), and the Military Departments, I would foster forums 
where industry can directly engage with the DOD and offer feedback to 
highlight areas where innovation is occurring. Strengthening 
relationships with the venture capital industry to create communication 
channels is another mechanism the Department could consider for more 
rapid identification of new technologies under development.
    Question. What responsibilities does the CIO have within the Office 
of the Secretary of Defense with respect to planning and directing the 
research and development of new, advanced information technologies?
    Answer. The DOD CIO is the senior advisor to the Secretary of 
Defense for IT, including NSS and DBS, information resources management 
(IRM), and efficiencies. The DOD CIO advises the Defense Acquisition 
Board, Defense Space Council, Cyber Investment Management Board, Cyber 
Council, Defense Innovation Board and serves as the chair of the 
Committee on National Security Systems. I believe that addressing the 
Department's needs for research and development of new technologies 
requires ongoing collaboration. If confirmed, I will establish close 
working relationships and collaborative engagements with my peers to 
more effectively address the Department's research and development 
priorities. Additionally, the CIO should maintain a close relationship 
with USD(R&E) leadership to provide inputs on enterprise technology 
requirements and receive feedback on cutting-edge opportunities for 
further exploration.
    Question. Given the leading role of commercial industry in 
developing cutting edge information technology, what is the CIO's role 
in identifying and adapting key commercially developed technology for 
the Department?
    Answer. The DOD CIO should ensure open lines of communication with 
commercial engagement and open up new opportunities for industry 
partners to deliver new innovations and technologies to address DOD 
mission needs. The Department continues to make significant strides in 
its ability to leverage nontraditional partners and commercial 
solutions.
    Question. What are the major emerging technologies and software 
development practices that you believe will have the greatest effect on 
the success of the Department's information enterprise into the future?
    Answer. I believe that the speed that emerging technologies appear, 
mature, and impact operational environments is accelerating, and 
ubiquitous adoption of both cloud and DevSecOps enables success in 
tomorrow's information environment. Its greatest effect could come from 
unleashing the creativity of our civilian and military workforce, 
moving beyond the pockets of innovation that exist today to a widely 
accessible ecosystem. This is fundamentally important because it 
enables junior officers and civilians, who are digitally savvy and 
extremely innovative, easy access to virtual enclaves with appropriate 
cybersecurity guardrails.
             budget review and standards-setting authority
    Question. Section 909 of the NDAA for fiscal year 2018 empowered 
the DOD CIO to exercise budget review and certification authority to 
ensure that the budgets of Department of Defense components with 
responsibilities associated with any activity specified in section 
142(b)(1) of title 10, U.S. Code, are adequate for such activities.
    In your experience, how has this budget review and certification 
authority been used to shape the modernization and prioritization of 
cybersecurity and information technology infrastructure? If confirmed, 
to what investments and objectives would you envision this authority 
being best put to use?
    Answer. The DOD CIO budget review and certification authority has 
been invaluable in helping shape and influence proper investment in IT 
and cybersecurity capabilities that are critical to supporting the NDS 
and the DOD DMS.
    If confirmed, I will use this authority to ensure that the 
Department resources critical IT and cybersecurity investments that 
support the NDS, DOD DMS, and emerging requirements such as Zero Trust 
architecture, 5G technologies, cloud computing, and enterprise 
solutions.
    Question. What actions would you propose to take, if confirmed, to 
ensure that directives, policies, and standards originating from the 
Office of the DOD CIO are adopted and implemented consistently and 
rapidly throughout the Department? If confirmed, by what specific means 
and methods would you exercise your oversight responsibilities to 
assess other DOD Components' adherence to your directives?
    Answer. If confirmed, I will work closely with the Military 
Department and DAFA CIOs to ensure they understand and are consistently 
implementing DOD CIO policies and directives. I will also use existing 
DOD governance forums, such as the Council on the Oversight of the 
National Leadership Command, Control, and Communications System; PNT 
Oversight Council; Command, Control, and Communications Leadership 
Board; CIO Resources Board; and Digital Modernization Infrastructure 
Executive Committee to support my oversight responsibilities. Finally, 
I will also continue to leverage the budget review and certification 
authority that Congress has provided to ensure compliance with DOD CIO 
policies and directives.
                       cybersecurity architecture
    Question. In your view, what are the major challenges facing the 
Department of Defense as regards its cybersecurity programs and 
capabilities?
    Answer. DOD is a large organization that executes the budget in a 
decentralized fashion to achieve DOD-wide objectives in support of the 
warfighter. I believe that synchronization of those decentralized 
activities remains a key challenge. The Cybersecurity Reference 
Architecture enables organizations to align cybersecurity needs, goals, 
objectives to better integrate policies and acquisitions. Additionally, 
consistent application of the Cybersecurity Reference Architecture 
promotes adherence to common approaches and reuse of known, secured 
design patterns to repeatedly instantiate standardized, interoperable, 
and consistent solutions.
    Question. In your view, how effective are the Department's 
cybersecurity programs, capabilities, and common infrastructure--at the 
perimeter, at the network layer, and across endpoints--in detecting and 
defeating advanced persistent threats in real-time?
    Answer. In my view, the perimeter, network lawyer, and endpoint 
capabilities and DOD in-depth approach to cybersecurity has protected 
Department resources against the relatively unsophisticated tradecraft 
of the past. However, against well-resourced adversaries of increasing 
sophistication and insider threats, I believe DOD needs to do better. 
If confirmed, I would ensure the Department moves to a data-centric, 
Zero Trust concept based on micro-segmentation to better protect 
critical networks and information that will allow cyber defenders to 
detect and defeat advanced persistent threats (APTs).
    Question. In the wake of multiple severe cybersecurity breaches 
across industry and government organizations, DOD's stated goal is to 
accelerate adoption of ``Zero Trust'' architectures and capabilities.
    How should the transition to a ``Zero Trust'' architecture affect 
the Joint Regional Security Stack program for both unclassified and 
classified networks, and the Department's Internet Access Points?
    Answer. I believe that the transition to Zero Trust will evolve the 
Department's approach with the Joint Regional Security Stack (JRSS) 
deployments. The JRSS Program Management Office is planning to phaseout 
JRSS, but will continue to maintain the 15 NIPRnet Joint Regional 
Security Stacks that supports approximately 1.5 million users until 
phase-out activities are complete. I understand there will be no 
deployment of JRSS on the SIPRnet due to DISA's implementation of its 
new ``Thunder Dome'' Zero Trust initiative.
    Question. What are the most important features of the ``Zero 
Trust'' Architecture that should be fielded over the next several 
years? Does the Department have approved plans and resources to achieve 
this objective?
    Answer. The DOD Zero Trust Reference Architecture was publicly 
released in May 2021 and is being incorporated into the Department's 
Cybersecurity Reference Architecture. In response to the Executive 
Order 14028 on Improving the Nation's Cybersecurity, the Department 
released the initial Zero Trust Plan in July 2021. This plan will be 
continually edited and updated. I believe the most important features 
of the Zero Trust Architecture that will be fielded are end-point 
security technologies and an enterprise ICAM solution.
    Question. The Military Departments, the Defense Agencies, and the 
combatant commands are migrating to standardized cloud-based 
capabilities provided by Office 365. However, only the Navy is 
acquiring the set of comprehensive cybersecurity applications and 
capabilities available as options under this program. These 
cybersecurity capabilities are integrated and interoperable, and enable 
automated orchestration of security operations. These capabilities are 
supported by artificial intelligence, and meet ``Zero Trust'' 
Architecture goals.
    As DOD has been unable to achieve an integrated, interoperable, and 
automated security enterprise through decentralized acquisition of 
commercial products, do you intend to consider mandating that all DOD 
Components acquire and implement a standardized set of capabilities 
through the M365 program that would enable that goal?
    Answer. The Department is steadfast in its commitment to advance 
Zero Trust capabilities across all facets of its Information 
Enterprise. While the Navy's decisions to pursue a holistic solution 
from a single vendor meets their individual requirements, the DOD CIO, 
in partnership with USCYBERCOM, established a process for a 
cybersecurity baseline for DOD365 and minimum viable products to be 
tested by red teams, under the direction of DOT&E, to inform decision-
based outcomes on both cybersecurity and affordability for the DOD365 
cloud environment. Additionally, the DOD CIO office is in the process 
of establishing a Zero Trust Portfolio Management Office that will 
provide strategic guidance and oversight to ensure the Department 
adopts Zero Trust principals appropriately and in a timely fashion. 
This portfolio management office is a first major step to bring synergy 
and strategic oversight to a new and sophisticated cybersecurity 
architecture for the entire Department at scale.
    Question. Does the DOD CIO have the authority to issue such a 
mandate, in your view?
    Answer. In my view, DOD CIO indeed maintains the authorities for 
such a mandate. Current statutes (Title 44, Sec 3544) grant the DOD CIO 
authority to establish and enforce standards across all of DOD, to 
include the Military Departments and DAFAs for capabilities to operate 
on defense networks. Similarly, DOD CIO responsibilities codified in 
Section 142 of Title 10 provide the DOD CIO with statutory authority 
over Military Department and DAFA procurements of information 
technology-based capabilities to ensure compliance with Department-wide 
standards established by the DOD CIO. Those authorities provide the 
basis for any mandates the DOD CIO may establish.
    Question. Are Joint Force Headquarters-Department of Defense 
Information Networks and Defense Information Systems Agency Global 
Operations Command sufficiently resourced, manned, and equipped to 
serve as operational command and control hubs for the Department of 
Defense's cybersecurity? In your assessment, to what extent do they 
link together the Department of Defense's cybersecurity operators and 
capabilities at the perimeter, at the network layer, and across 
endpoints? In your assessment, to what extent do they provide real-time 
direction and orchestration of cybersecurity operations? If confirmed, 
what would you see as the next logical steps going forward in this 
regard?
    Answer. JFHQ-DODIN serves to integrate, synchronize and direct the 
cyber activities of different DODIN areas of operation--across the 
Services and DISA. The scope and scale of the information cyber 
operations and security organizations need to perform their duties is 
vast and requires automation, big data analytics, and visualization to 
reach their full potential. The Department has been making significant 
investments to accelerate digital modernization, and are working toward 
real-time direction and orchestration in all areas. If confirmed, I 
would work with General Nakasone at USCYBERCOM to conduct a holistic 
assessment of our DODIN cyber command and control capabilities to 
ensure our ability to accurately and continuously assess the 
Department's cyber readiness posture while improving the ability to 
respond in near real-time.
    Question. How is the Department planning to implement and employ 
microsegmentation and software defined networking technologies to 
improve networking performance and cybersecurity? What prototyping and 
acquisition efforts are underway to incorporate microsegmentation and 
software defined networking into the Department's computing and network 
architecture?
    Answer. DISA is leading the efforts for the Department in actively 
developing and fielding Software Defined Networking (SDN) capabilities 
within its backbone, including efforts for automation of service 
delivery, and configuration normalization across backbone, data centers 
and managed local area networks. DISA is engaged in the development of 
Software Defined-Wide Area Networking (SD-WAN)-enabled service delivery 
nodes to leverage modern technologies and delivery mechanisms. Project 
Thunder Dome will incorporate SD-WAN enabled application aware routing 
on existing, fielded Defense Information System Network (DISN) core 
infrastructure. DISA is actively working with DOD components to enable 
SD-WAN mission platforms to seamlessly integrate into larger DOD 
communications capabilities.
    Question. The Military Departments, the Defense Agencies, and the 
combatant commands are migrating to standardized cloud-based 
capabilities provided by Office 365. However, only the Navy is 
acquiring the set of comprehensive cybersecurity applications and 
capabilities available as options under this program. These 
cybersecurity capabilities are integrated and interoperable, and enable 
automated orchestration of security operations. These capabilities are 
supported by artificial intelligence, and meet ``Zero Trust'' 
Architecture goals.
    If confirmed, what policies would you plan to enact to help limit 
DOD's attack surface and vulnerabilities--especially to persistent 
threat agents?
    Answer. I believe that implementing Zero Trust requires rethinking 
how the Department utilizes existing infrastructure to implement 
security in a simpler and more efficient way while enabling unimpeded 
operations. If confirmed, I will adapt lessons-learned from pilot 
efforts across the Department to move DOD toward the rapid adoption of 
Zero Trust and SDN. It is my understanding that the Navy's efforts have 
been coordinated with the office of the DOD CIO and are being used as a 
pathfinder to directly influence the Department's cybersecurity 
requirements, policy, and architecture.
    Question. Please share your thoughts on how DOD is addressing (or 
planning to address) the requirements for cybersecurity set forth in 
Executive Order 14028, Improving the Nation's Cybersecurity? For 
example, among other things, DOD in collaboration with other agencies, 
including the Department of Homeland Security, is to jointly develop 
procedures for ensuring that cyber incident reports are appropriately 
shared among agencies. Can you provide us with the status of the 
procedures or any of DOD's activities related to the cyber EO?
    Answer. On July 7, 2021, the DOD and DHS signed a memorandum of 
agreement (MOA) to establish formal procedures to immediately share DOD 
Incident Response Orders or DHS Emergency Directives and Binding 
Operational Directives. I believe that sharing this information will 
raise the enterprise baseline cybersecurity posture across the entire 
Federal Government. DOD has also assisted with providing procedures for 
ensuring cyber incident reports are promptly and appropriately shared 
among agencies, drafted a national security memorandum (NSM) to improve 
the protection of NSS across the Federal Government, and holds a chair 
on the Cyber Safety Review Board.
    Question. Please identify the report(s) and frequency of reports 
you receive on DOD's cybersecurity posture. Do you believe that these 
report(s) you are sufficient? Overall, what grade would you give DOD's 
cybersecurity posture?
    Answer. The Department has used three scorecards to assess the 
DOD's cybersecurity posture, which include the monthly Cybersecurity 
Hygiene Scorecard (CHS); quarterly Top 10 Scorecard; and monthly 
Network Cybersecurity Accountability Scorecard (NCAS). I believe these 
reports are sufficient and, if confirmed, would ensure the Department 
continues a laser focus on maintaining a proactive cybersecurity 
posture.
    Question. Is it possible for DOD controlled unclassified 
information (CUI) information systems to have more than 50 percent of 
applicable security controls found to be ``non compliant'' and still 
allowed to operate on the DODIN? Is it possible for DOD CUI information 
systems to have less applicable security controls found to be 
``compliant'' than a system that does not have CUI? If the answer to 
either of these questions is affirmative, and if CUI is supposed to be 
more important to protect than publically reliable information, why has 
DOD CIO not established minimum security controls for CUI systems?
    Answer. Yes, it is possible. The Federal Information Security 
Modernization Act (FISMA) mandated the Risk Management Framework (RMF) 
process and does not establish compliance requirements for 
cybersecurity, but focuses efforts on managing cybersecurity risk in 
systems. I understand that the Department has a number of non-
traditional systems that process CUI that, when compared to the 
security control baseline of a traditional IT system, have a high rate 
of non-compliant controls. The DOD is working with the National 
Archives and Records Administration (NARA) on ensuring all systems 
manage the cybersecurity risk to CUI data while meeting all 
requirements through a policy memo titled, ``Requirement for Applying 
Baseline Controls for Controlled Unclassified Information Systems.''
    Question. What is your perspective on harmonizing DOD CUI standards 
to support a whole-of-government approach with NIST 800-53, the recent 
Executive Order on Zero Trust, and other standards?
    Answer. The DOD follows the security standards for CUI as 
established by the Executive Order. DOD CIO is ensuring systems 
processing CUI data meet these standards through a policy memo titled, 
``Requirement for Applying Baseline Controls for Controlled 
Unclassified Information Systems.'' DOD requires all systems processing 
CUI data meet the moderate-moderate threshold. If confirmed, I would 
support continued efforts to reinforce the whole of government 
approaches to harmonizing CUI standards. However, DOD has a number of 
non-traditional systems that process CUI (weapons systems, control 
systems, etc.) and the cybersecurity risk to CUI in these types of 
systems is fundamentally different. I believe that flexibility to 
manage cybersecurity risk is needed for these unique use cases.
    Question. There are currently legislative proposals to require 
industry to report cyber incidents to Federal Government. DOD has had a 
cyber incident reporting requirement for years (DFARS 252.204-7012). To 
what extent has this cyber incident reporting requirement provided DOD 
any benefits? What does DOD do with this information? What challenges 
has it had in ensuring this acquisition requirement is complied with?
    Answer. The DOD DIB Collaborative Information Sharing Environment 
(DCISE) serves as the single DOD focal point for receiving all cyber 
incident reporting affecting unclassified external networks (i.e., 
contractor or other government agency). Information shared between DOD 
and DIB Cybersecurity (CS) Program participants increases the Nation's 
knowledge of growing cyber threats, resulting in a greater capability 
to respond to and mitigate these risks. Reporting information is then 
used to identify and respond to adversary activity, identify 
vulnerabilities, provide mitigation and remediation strategies, and 
help improve overall network defenses of USG entities and DIB CS 
Program participants.
              defense industrial base (dib) cybersecurity
    Question. DOD CIO is supposed to be chairing the DIB Cybersecurity 
Executive Committee. How active is this committee? How often does it 
meet? What specific accomplishments has it achieved in the last 2 
years?
    Answer. As cybersecurity has matured within the Department and 
across US Government, the DIB Cybersecurity Executive Committee's 
mission has been addressed through the Government Coordinating Council 
(GCC). The GCC brings key leaders in cybersecurity across multiple USG 
components together, to collaborate and discuss all threats facing the 
DIB and USG, in addition to strategies to protect the warfighter. The 
GCC has a complimentary Industry council, called the Sector 
Coordinating Council (SCC), which discusses the same challenges from 
the prospective of Industry, and then convenes with the GCC to discuss 
areas of mutual concern and strategize on a way forward. Both councils 
meet monthly and additional meetings are scheduled as necessary. Two 
specific accomplishments include driving the mitigation and remediation 
strategies for SolarWinds and Microsoft Exchange vulnerabilities.
    Question. The CMMC framework does not allow contractors to use 
corrective action plans (a.k.a. POA&Ms) for security controls that are 
applicable to the system but are found to be non-compliant. However, 
DOD relies extensively on POA&Ms.
    In your opinion, should DOD establish a requirement for industry 
that it does not practice itself?
    Answer. The DOD often has requirements in place that exceed 
industry practices, and industry often mirrors DOD requirements. I 
understand that DOD is reviewing CMMC, including its exclusion of 
POA&Ms, for the barriers to doing business with DOD that it may 
establish. If confirmed, I will quickly learn about the results of this 
review and help assess whether there should be areas for greater 
symmetry for POA&Ms and similar practices between DOD and industry.
                 adoption of commercial cloud services
    Question. The single-award acquisition strategy pursued in the 
first phase of the Joint Enterprise Defense Infrastructure (JEDI) 
initiative was intended to enable the Department to rapidly move 
workloads and data to an enterprise cloud without delays stemming from 
the need to compete each specific migration in task order-type multi-
award contracts. This strategy was upended by continuous litigation, 
preventing DOD from making any significant progress on cloud migration. 
Now, years later, DOD plans to make multiple awards for general purpose 
enterprise clouds.
    How does the Department now plan to allocate cloud migration 
workloads across multiple vendors rapidly? Will each discrete 
transition be competed among the multiple vendors receiving awards in 
the Joint Warfighter Cloud Capability program? Has the Department taken 
any steps to ensure that vendors fully understand the JWCC 
requirements?
    Answer. The Department plans to have multiple cloud service 
providers compete for mission owner cloud requirements at the task 
order level by using streamlined, fair opportunity ordering procedures. 
I understand that a JWCC Ordering Guide is in development and will 
detail how to order cloud services from the JWCC Indefinite Delivery/
Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract. With this, the Department will be 
able to leverage an automated provisioning tool to expedite cloud 
resource allocation and allow mission owners to provision cloud 
resources within days of the task order award. Each mission owner will 
be able to acquire cloud services to meet their specific mission needs 
in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR). The 
Department has taken measured steps to ensure that the U.S.-based 
hyper-scale cloud service providers (CSPs) fully understand JWCC's 
requirements. Initially, a Pre-Solicitation Notice that outlined high-
level JWCC requirements was posted on SAM.gov. Next, the Department 
held multiple meetings with major U.S.-based hyper-scale CSPs to 
discuss their services and capabilities and determine how they aligned 
with JWCC requirements and timelines. Finally, following receipt of the 
solicitation, the vendors will be able to ask any clarifying questions 
about the requirements before final proposals are due to the 
Department. I further understand that the Department is confident these 
measured steps will help vendors fully understand the requirements.
    Question. Commercial enterprise cloud providers have balked at 
requests from DOD officials to evaluate, including through Red Team 
testing, the security of their cloud provisioning, control plane, and 
hypervisor. The Office of the Director of Operational Test and 
Evaluation, in particular, has regularly voiced concerns that DOD has 
not generally been permitted to evaluate for itself whether these 
clouds are sufficiently secure.
    What are your views on the need for DOD to be able to assess the 
foundational security of the commercial clouds on which DOD will 
increasingly depend?
    Answer. I believe that it is critical that the DOD assesses the 
security of commercial cloud environments. Penetration testing is an 
existing requirement of the Cloud Computing Security Requirements 
Guide, which all cloud contracts are required to follow, per DFARS 
clause 252.239-7070. If confirmed, I welcome the opportunity to work 
with the DOT&E to strengthen and enhance our existing cloud 
cybersecurity policies to explicitly allow increased testing. DOD CIO 
recently collaborated with the testing and evaluation community to 
ensure their requested language for enabling DOD testing of cloud 
vendors is included in JWCC requirements. As the DOD transitions more 
workloads to the commercial cloud, it must ensure that it maintains the 
right level of assurance that DOD data is protected properly through 
the ability to perform cybersecurity assessments of commercial cloud 
infrastructure.
    Question. When DOD initiated the JEDI program, DOD officials stated 
that a single initial award was sensible because: (1) the DOD workforce 
would have great difficulty in handling the technical integration 
challenges involved with multiple cloud vendors; and (2) 
interoperability and data portability across clouds was not mature in 
the commercial cloud industry.
    Are you concerned that DOD personnel lack sufficient capacity and 
expertise to transition workloads to multiple clouds simultaneously?
    Answer. Since the inception of the JEDI program several years ago, 
both the cloud ecosystem and the expertise of DOD personnel have 
evolved. Even so, it is my understanding that JWCC provides mission 
owners a great deal of flexibility--while they can transition their 
workloads to multiple cloud environments, they may also choose to 
pursue a single-cloud environment. Mission owners will make this 
decision based on their workforce expertise, mission, and operational 
requirements.
    Question. Has industry made significant progress on cross-cloud 
interoperability since JEDI was initiated?
    Answer. The Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF) is developing 
a broad range of open technologies and standards that enable 
organizations to build and run modern applications across public, 
private, and hybrid clouds. These technologies, such as Kubernetes, 
micro-services, and service mesh form the backbone of the Department's 
DevSecOps environments, as seen in the US Air Force's Platform One and 
Kessel Run.
    Question. In your view, what are the benefits and downsides 
associated with expediting the movement of DOD Components' data and 
networking functions to enterprise clouds?
    Answer. As I learned firsthand in my experience leading the IC's IT 
ecosystem, cloud computing is a core component of a modern IT 
environment. It is critical to delivering enhanced DOD mission 
capabilities, expanding the use of AI and machine learning, and 
maintaining the Department's technical advantage. I agree that ``Cloud 
Smart'' rather than ``Cloud First'' is the correct strategy, which 
means that mission owners should rethink their approach to cloud by 
conducting inventories of their systems to determine which systems can 
move to the cloud and which systems should be decommissioned. This 
methodical, upfront work is necessary to build both the strategic 
implementation plan and associated resourcing strategy to re-architect 
their systems when migrating to the cloud, rather than preforming a 
pure ``lift and shift'' operation. Clouds provide a powerful foundation 
for modern applications but can be expensive and cumbersome when 
supporting older IT systems that have not been tailored to fully 
harness the power of the cloud environment.
    Question. Given the lessons from JEDI, a variety of cloud instances 
are proliferating across DOD. What is your perspective on harmonizing 
various implementations of cloud instances from different cloud service 
providers to standardize deployment, information security posture, and 
cost management?
    Answer. DOD continues to see consolidation of cloud contracts 
across its enterprise. Each of the Military Departments has created 
preferred contract vehicles, along with corresponding managed service 
provider organizations, to drive cloud migration and adoption. I 
believe that JWCC will provide a much-needed enterprise cloud solution 
through a multi-vendor, multi-cloud IDIQ contract. Moreover, JWCC will 
address the urgent, unmet cloud capability gaps needed to support JADC2 
and the ADA Initiative. Regardless of cloud contract or cloud service 
provider, the DOD's overall goal in the move to cloud computing should 
be to make it as simple as possible for a mission owner to purchase, 
secure, deploy, and maintain their cloud workloads.
                        artificial intelligence
    Question. In your view, what are the major challenges facing the 
Department of Defense relative to its efforts to leverage artificial 
intelligence capabilities to support defense missions?
    Answer. The DOD continues to face significant difficulty in 
recruiting, training, and retaining a skilled AI technical workforce 
that is familiar with how to develop, manage, and utilize AI-enabled 
systems. Beyond core technical expert staff, many communities within 
the existing DOD workforce require additional training to execute their 
existing functions in AI contexts. In addition to workforce expertise, 
the primary barriers to DOD AI adoption include technical debt across 
the IT ecosystem and challenges associated with data quality and 
availability.
    Question. The Joint Artificial Intelligence Center (JAIC) initiated 
the Joint Common Foundation (JCF) program. The price of entry for AI is 
large-scale computing infrastructure. Thus, it makes no sense for all 
the DOD Components seeking to develop AI applications to build such 
complex and expensive computing platforms. The JCF objective, 
therefore, is to provide common large-scale computing infrastructure, 
services, and applications to DOD Components so that they can rapidly 
apply their domain expertise to build AI solutions. There are multiple 
companies providing mature commercial platforms for this purpose. 
However, the JAIC appears to be pursuing a government-developed 
solution that could prove technically challenging, expensive, and time-
consuming. Section 215 of S. 2792, the Senate Armed Services Committee 
enacted version of the NDAA for fiscal year 2022 would require DOD to 
acquire access to commercial platforms and services under part 12 of 
the Federal Acquisition Regulation for these purposes.
    What are your views on the best approach to providing the 
infrastructure and services required to enable DOD Components to 
rapidly apply their domain expertise to develop AI solutions for their 
missions?
    Answer. The Department must develop an enterprise approach in order 
to deliver AI solutions across multiple and diverse mission sets. To do 
this, it must use commercial, open source tools, and cloud computing 
environments.
    Question. At this point in the maturity of AI, there is not a 
single-set of infrastructure services that will meet DOD needs. DOD 
requires a combination of commercial cloud, on premise, commercial 
tools, and open-source tools that each target unique requirements 
across the functional communities. This is the set of needs the DOD's 
Joint Common Foundation (JCF) is filling. First, JCF integrates 
infrastructure and services from leading commercial providers. JCF is 
built on commercial infrastructure. This is available now to the 
Services, promulgating best practices and a centralized architecture 
that distributes capability throughout the enterprise. Second, the JCF 
effort is building a fabric between these commercial services and other 
DOD platforms to create a development environment that can support 
DevSecOps. This broad enterprise-wide approach will then support 
portability and integration of data and AI models to achieve true 
interoperability of data and insights at scale and ensures economies of 
scale and interoperability across the enterprise. If confirmed, I would 
work closely with the JAIC Director to continually evaluate the JCF 
approach, especially in light of new capabilities such as with JWCC.
    Question. The National Security Commission on Artificial 
Intelligence recently completed its work and published its findings and 
recommendations.
    What specific Commission recommendations do you believe the 
Secretary of Defense and the CIO should implement?
    Answer. While there are many outstanding recommendations in the 
National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence (NSCAI) final 
report, there are 11 that I believe would do the most to transform DOD 
into an AI-ready institution, if implemented.
      Build the technical backbone
      Define a joint warfighting network architecture
      Train and educate warfighters for AI
      Establish AI and digital readiness performance goals
      Accelerate adoption of existing technologies
      Tailor and develop Test, Evaluation, Verification, and 
Validation policies and capabilities
      Strengthen the Responsible AI (RAI) ecosystem
      Develop and deploy AI-enabled defenses against cyber 
attacks
      Invest in priority research and development areas to 
support future military capabilities
      Promote AI interoperability and adoption of critical 
emerging technologies among allies and partners
      Improve AI coordination and interoperability between DOD 
and the IC
    These NSCAI recommendations offer the greatest return on Department 
investment in broad-scale AI readiness.
    Question. If confirmed, what do you envision as the next steps in 
the process for Department use of machine learning and advanced 
statistical methods to improve its business, maintenance, and 
management practices? What improvements could result from these 
efforts, in your view?
    Answer. The wholesale integration of business, maintenance, and 
management practices is an important mission. I believe that Advana and 
its integration of AI-enabled capabilities is an early example of what 
is possible when AI is integrated into enterprise platforms. The DOD 
CIO is both a user of Advana and an advocate and enabler for enhanced 
enterprise use of this powerful capability through the incorporation of 
additional data sources spanning the enterprise.
    Question. In your view, should the Department fund academic, small 
business, and government lab research in artificial intelligence to 
support defense missions and the development of new AI-enabled systems 
and technologies?
    Answer. Yes. The JAIC continues to implement methodologies for 
smaller and non-traditional innovation sources to leverage Department 
acquisition processes. Through consortium-based models like the Other 
Transaction Authority (OTA) called ``Tradewind,'' and Blanket Purchase 
Agreement models for Responsible AI and AI Test & Evaluation, 
procurement barriers can be reduced. The Department maintains mature 
relationships with multiple universities and their laboratories today, 
and these partnerships should continue. Advancing technologies to meet 
critical national security needs through innovative academic and 
commercial partnerships is a key component of DOD's strategy.
    Question. How can the Department of Defense use procurement and 
research activities to shape the direction of commercial sector 
artificial intelligence efforts and create incentivizes for the 
production of technologies that can support defense missions?
    Answer. The DOD is consistently collaborating with industry to 
leverage best practices and technological innovations. The JAIC is 
utilizing the OTA called ``Tradewind'' to drive AI innovation at scale 
and foster collaboration with small business and non-traditional 
companies. I believe that the integration of mature commercial 
technology into growing Defense systems is a critical pipeline that 
must be maintained. The Department continues to steer commercial 
efforts into use-cases through broad partnerships and sharing of 
Defense challenges in a variety of forums, and I understand these 
relationships are vibrant. New AI companies are proliferating rapidly, 
many of them specifically in response to DOD demand signals.
    Question. Where and how is the Department of Defense developing the 
operating concepts, plans, and capabilities relevant to future 
artificial intelligence battlefield systems?
    Answer. The DOD needs to adopt, scale, and deliver AI solutions to 
warfighters. These concepts, plans, and capabilities come from a 
variety of sources. Service AI efforts are integrated through Joint 
warfighting concepts, exercises, and requirements developed by the 
Joint Staff and CCMDs. A key component of this effort is the ADA 
Initiative, directed by the Deputy Secretary of Defense and led by a 
partnership including the JAIC, CDO, CIO, USD(R&E), JS J6, DDS, and 
others. Through ADA, the DOD will incentivize and accelerate a set of 
global, open architecture data and process solutions that embed modern 
data management and analytics capabilities to automate business and 
warfighting workflows.
    Question. What structures, processes, and policies are needed, in 
your view, to ensure the ethical and safe application of AI technology 
to the warfighting missions of the Defense Department?
    Answer. The governance of AI is a critical enabler of the ethical 
and safe application of AI technology to DOD's warfighting missions. 
The AI Executive Steering Group ensures accountability throughout the 
Department. In addition, the Deputy Secretary of Defense has directed 
the implementation of a RAI ecosystem throughout the Department. This 
guidance reaffirmed the five DOD AI Ethical Principles and outlined the 
contours of RAI governance. Through this effort DOD will cement a 
culture of ethical and safe application of AI in the Department.
    Question. What steps should the Department of Defense be taking 
with international partners and the commercial sector to develop 
standards and norms for the ethical and safe application of AI 
technologies?
    Answer. DOD has deep and ongoing engagements with our allies and 
partners on AI, including in the area of standards and norms for the 
ethical and safe application of AI. For example, the JAIC has conducted 
bilateral and multilateral engagements with approximately 40 allies and 
partners. Nearly all of these engagements included substantive 
discussions of RAI, ethics, and sharing of good practices to enable AI 
readiness and interoperability among allies and partners. The 
Department's ``AI Partnership for Defense'' brings together 16 nations 
based on a common ethical framework and responsible outcomes. This is a 
dynamic and effective environment for shaping global understanding of 
responsible and ethical AI application. Similarly, the development of 
the DOD AI ethical principles involved deep collaboration with leading 
commercial technology organizations and public policy non-profits. The 
DOD continues to solicit the advice and expertise of both groups as it 
implements its RAI Strategy.
    Question. How are you integrating AI/ML capabilities into DOD's 
data architecture, and what investments do you think need to be made in 
order to ensure that decisionmakers have the right information at the 
right time?
    Answer. Maturing the unique, Service-specific infrastructures and 
architectures into an integrated enterprise is an essential element of 
DOD's warfighting effectiveness and global competitiveness. Current 
efforts span a scaled data environment, an integrated AI development 
fabric, AI Test & Evaluation, and AI applications at the CCMDs and at 
the tactical edge. Commanders and decisionmakers across DOD require 
access to data and insights generated across components, domains, and 
network boundaries. Department AI/ML capabilities, and the investments 
made in them, only achieve their full potential through integration. 
This creates conditions necessary for implementing AI/ML capabilities 
at-scale. In my view, the Department needs to quickly and effortlessly 
discover, access, and utilize data, compute, and services so that 
individual components can leverage these Department-wide resources to 
build AI capabilities.
             electromagnetic spectrum policy and operations
    Question. Based on information gleaned from internal DOD 
assessments and Committee oversight activities, it would appear that 
the Department's electronic warfare posture is dangerously inadequate.
    Under the electronic warfare implementation plan announced in 
August 2021 the DOD CIO will assume the roles and responsibilities of 
the level 2 senior designated official under section 1053 of the fiscal 
year 2019 NDAA, and will now be responsible for overseeing the 
implementation plan of a cohesive electronic warfare strategy DOD wide. 
What makes you qualified to assume these roles and responsibilities?
    Answer. Achieving spectrum superiority in all domains is critical 
to U.S. national security. The 2020 EMS3 provides the strategic 
direction and oversight to address identified gaps in U.S. posture and 
generate results. DOD CIO is at the nexus of Department's EMS policies, 
strategies, and international and national engagement. As the PSA for 
EMS to the Secretary and the newly assumed roles and responsibilities, 
the DOD CIO will ensure enduring enterprise focus on EMS strategy. If 
confirmed, I will work closely with the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) and 
other stakeholders to ensure that the implementation plan supports the 
operational needs of our military forces.
    Question. In a brief to congressional staff on August 5, 2021, five 
goals were outlined for the strategy and objectives of a cohesive DOD 
wide electronic warfare strategy. Please discuss each goal, what you 
envision to be the major hurdles associated with accomplishing each 
goal, and what you would do, if confirmed to overcome each such hurdle.
    Answer. The EMS3's goals have a common hurdle. Historically, the 
Department has approached Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations (EMSO) in 
isolation. The Department has now focused on an enterprise-wide 
strategy to overcome the challenges caused by unique, isolated 
approaches. In my view, the Department now has the policy, governance, 
and people in place to address such challenges. The EMS3 sets DOD on a 
course to view EMSO in a more strategic and integrated manner. If 
confirmed, I will continue to drive this paradigm change.
    Question. The DOD CIO's selection as the senior designated official 
in the DOD for electronic warfare renders the CIO responsible for 
``establish[ing] process and procedures to develop, integrate, and 
enhance the electronic warfare mission area and joint electronic 
spectrum operations in all domains across the Department of Defense.'' 
If confirmed as the DOD CIO, you would be responsible for certifying 
that the overall budget for electronic warfare is adequate and 
integrated as follows----
    ``(A) The development of an electromagnetic battle management 
capability for joint electromagnetic spectrum operations.
    (B) The establishment and operation of associated joint 
electromagnetic spectrum operations cells.''
    Do you believe the DOD is making adequate progress in a joint 
battle management capability for spectrum operations? If not, how can 
these efforts be improved, in your view?
    Answer. In my view, the DOD CIO will rely heavily on the best 
military advice of the Vice Chairman of the JCS and Commander, US 
Strategic Command, who remain responsible for Electronic Warfare (EW) 
matters.
    The Department continues to make strong progress in a joint battle 
management capability for spectrum operations. As the Department 
continues the Electromagnetic Battle Management (EMBM) development 
effort, it is balancing lethality and joint interoperability with 
fiscal responsibility. Additionally, to ensure the appropriate data 
gets to the tactical edge requires the DOD to establish an EMSO 
architecture that connects with all relevant stakeholders. If 
confirmed, I will ensure that these efforts continue.
    Question. Do you believe the DOD has successfully implemented joint 
electromagnetic spectrum operation cells? How can DOD's efforts in this 
regard be improved, in your view?
    Answer. I believe that the DOD has successfully started to 
implement Joint EMSO Cells (JEMSOCs). Properly incorporating EMSO into 
operational plans and accounting for real-time activities requires the 
appropriate staffing of JEMSOCs in each CCMD. DOD is also evaluating 
the long-term home for EMSO responsibilities in the Department in 
accordance with FY21 NDAA Section 152 requirements.
    To enable continued success, I believe DOD must ensure appropriate 
resource allocation, and that training requirements and that EMSO 
capabilities, such as EMBM, are developed and employed.
    Question. If confirmed, how do you plan to integrate with the 
combatant commands who will be responsible for executing the cohesive 
electronic warfare strategy you are responsible for?
    Answer. If confirmed, the DOD CIO will continue to work directly 
with the Joint Staff as a co-chair of existing governance bodies. Many 
of the Department governance forums also include direct engagement with 
CCMDs as well, ensuring awareness of and advocacy for CCMD 
requirements.
    Question. On page 6 of the July 15, 2021, report entitled ``Summary 
of Implementation Plan for 202 DOD EMS Superiority Strategy and 
Attached Roadmap,'' submitted to Congress pursuant to section 
1053(d)(3)(E), DOD stated: ``[a]dditionally, the Implementation Plan 
requires the Office of Undersecretary of Defense for Policy (OUSD(P)) 
to designate one of its Deputy Assistant Secretaries of Defense to 
advocate for and represent EMSO interests in OUSD(P).''
    What assistance would you expect the USD(P) to provide you, if you 
are confirmed as the DOD CIO and vested with the authorities and 
responsibilities of the section 1953 senior designated official?
    Answer. If confirmed, I would expect continued support from and 
close partnership with USD(P) in ensuring the EMS equities are captured 
in the Department's policy decisionmaking process.
    Question. If confirmed, how would you expect to influence the 
Defense Planning Guidance?
    Answer. If confirmed, I would look forward to influencing the 
Defense Planning Guidance (DPG) to elevate investment in capabilities 
that would digitally modernize the Department's EMS Enterprise; 
leverage more agile, adaptable, and survivable EMS capabilities; 
establish secure, responsive and integrated EMS infrastructure; and 
further advance live, virtual, and constructive (LVC) capabilities. 
Altogether, these initiatives will enable enhanced testing and training 
in representative EMS environments against realistic threats.
    Question. DOD conducts an annual Northern Edge exercise to assess 
the Joint Force capabilities in an electromagnetically contested 
spectrum environment.
    In your view, how will this exercise influence your actions and 
decisions as the senior designated official? If confirmed what actions 
would you take to improve capabilities to provide realistic threat 
capabilities to the joint force?
    Answer. If confirmed, in coordination with the JCS, I would 
leverage the Joint Pacific Alaskan Range Complex for exercises that 
include training, testing, and developing advanced electronic warfare 
capabilities in a realistic environment.
    Question. In your view, what are the major challenges facing the 
Department of Defense as pertains to its electromagnetic spectrum 
operations (EMSO) programs?
    Answer. The DOD has reorganized, improved governance structures, 
and implemented new policies to best ensure the Department can compete 
with near peer adversaries in an increasingly congested, contested, and 
constrained environment.
    The DOD faces two main challenges, the first is outdated 
regulations and policies that have not evolved with the current 
environment. Second is the drive to share or vacate EMS to enable 
commercial mobile broadband technologies. While I absolutely support 
enabling commercial access to spectrum, the increasingly congested 
spectrum ecosystem is a challenge that, if confirmed, I would need to 
address.
    Question. What is your assessment of DOD electromagnetic spectrum 
operations capabilities, as compared to the offensive and defensive 
capabilities of our adversaries?
    Answer. All warfare domains, to include the EMS, are challenged by 
peer and near-peer adversaries. Recognizing US reliance on the EMS, our 
adversaries have spent decades studying, investing, and implementing 
policies, capabilities, and procedures with the absolute focus of 
gaining military advantage over US forces. These adversaries are 
developing and fielding advanced technology that targets US 
capabilities across the spectrum.
    Through implementing the DOD EMS3, the Department is working to 
develop a spectrum enterprise that is fully integrated, operationally 
focused, and designed for great power competition.
    Question. Please define your view of the appropriate sharing of 
spectrum between the DOD and non-Federal users.
    Answer. I believe that DOD has been a national leader in thinking 
broadly about new solutions and has already participated in several 
spectrum-sharing initiatives. These have contributed to US leadership 
in enabling the use of mid-band spectrum for commercial 5G. 
Acknowledging that progress, I also believe that spectrum sharing (vice 
spectrum vacating) now needs to be the new normal. Such an approach 
offers Federal and non-Federal users a new paradigm by allowing 
simultaneous usage of a specific frequency band in a specific 
geographical area and time by a number of independent entities where 
harmful electromagnetic interference is mitigated.
    To date, Federal policymakers have made unprecedented amounts of 
spectrum available for commercial use across large, contiguous spectrum 
ranges. Now, I believe the DOD must also develop spectrum sharing 
policies that enable the most efficient use of spectrum while still 
protecting and prioritizing mission critical functions.
    Question. What are your views regarding the potential sharing of 
spectrum for both Federal and non-Federal bands? Do you believe the 
Department can adequately share spectrum in the band of 3.0-3.45 MHz 
and what actions must be taken, and by whom, before such sharing can 
occur? Please explain your answer.
    Answer. I believe that sharing of spectrum for both Federal and 
non-Federal bands is the new normal. DOD is pursuing a range of 
possible solutions that improve access for military missions and 
enhance US economic competitiveness for 5G and other advanced 
technologies.
    As such, I believe the Department can share the 3.1-3.45 GHz band. 
Technical and operational feasibility assessments are required to 
identify the best sharing framework for this band. These feasibility 
assessments will identify the amount of spectrum that could be made 
available, regulatory requirements needed to protect incumbent military 
operations, and the associated costs and timelines for implementation.
    Upon completion of the assessments, I believe a whole-of-government 
approach is required to determine which sharing framework best meets 
the Nation's needs.
    Question. Is the Department investigating and investing in 
technologies to enable: (1) simultaneous use of commercial wireless 
networks and DOD military systems in the same spectrum; (2) 
simultaneous transmit and receive capabilities; and (3) continuous 
operations through very high levels of interference and jamming? Could 
such technologies resolve competing demands for spectrum and help to 
meet the Department's EMSO warfighting objectives, in your view?
    Answer. Yes, the Department is investing in and investigating these 
types of cutting-edge technologies for inclusion in future military 
capabilities. I believe they hold great promise for both addressing 
competing demands for spectrum, which are increasing across all users, 
and helping to meet the Department's EMSO warfighting objectives.
    The vision of the EMS3 is the ability of our forces to enjoy 
freedom of action in the electromagnetic spectrum, at the time, place, 
and parameters of our choosing. To facilitate this outcome, I would, if 
confirmed, ensure that DOD CIO continues to partner with OUSD(R&E) and 
OUSD(A&S) to develop and integrate these types of capabilities to meet 
the warfighter's current and future requirements.
    Question. How will you help ensure that DOD's execution of the 
spectrum IT modernization requirements in the FY21 NDAA are 
successfully implemented? In particular, how will you ensure that DOD's 
IT systems collect the necessary information to facilitate spectrum 
sharing where possible and are designed in such a way to enable rapid 
or real-time processing of spectrum assignment adjustments?
    Answer. If confirmed, I will ensure that DOD CIO continues with 
development and implementation of a plan to successfully modernize and 
automate the spectrum IT infrastructure, per the requirements in 
Section 9203 of the NDAA for FY21. This modernization effort will be 
key to advancing agile spectrum management operations. I understand the 
intent is to develop a common spectrum IT architecture; improve data 
collection and aggregation; standardize analytical tools and 
methodologies; increase spectrum situational awareness, spectrum access 
and sharing; and establish integrated and standardized automation 
interfaces.
               positioning, navigation, and timing (pnt)
    Question. In your view, what are the major threats and 
technological challenges facing the Department of Defense as pertains 
to its positioning, navigation, and timing (PNT) programs and 
capabilities?
    Answer. In my view, the Department relies heavily on the Global 
Positioning System (GPS) and our adversaries are well aware of this 
dependence and have developed extensive capabilities to deny our access 
to GPS. Additionally, while GPS has been critically beneficial over the 
last several decades, the PNT Enterprise is complex and the DOD should 
develop and field alternates and complements to GPS to address known 
threats.
    Question. The Committee is concerned about the dependence of the 
Department, and indeed the country as a whole, on the Global 
Positioning System (GPS) given the very serious existing and 
anticipated threats to the system. Upgrades to GPS and user equipment 
are being acquired, but significant vulnerabilities remain and the 
expected implementation time is significant. Congress has mandated 
near-term measures to field more resilient alternative PNT solutions to 
complement and augment GPS.
    What are your views on the need for reliable additional near-term 
and far-term augmentations to GPS? Is the Department adequately 
resourcing these needs?
    Answer. In my view, the Department is aware of the vulnerabilities 
of GPS. I am a strong advocate for the Department to identify, invest 
in, and field alternate and complementary sources of PNT to enhance PNT 
now and in the future. In June 2021, the Department submitted a report 
on progress on alternative PNT capabilities in response to a tasking in 
Section 1611 of the fiscal year 2021 NDAA. While a ``one-size-fits-
all'' solution is not feasible, the Department has made significant 
strides in fielding alternate and complementary capabilities in 
programs such as the GPS-Based Positioning Navigation and Timing 
Service (GPNTS), the Mounted Assured Positioning, Navigation and Timing 
System (MAPS), and the Dismounted Assured Positioning, Navigation and 
Timing System (DAPS). While progress is slower in the air domain, the 
Air Force is pursuing an open architecture-based Resilient-Embedded 
GPS/Inertial (R-EGI) that will enable the integration of existing 
capabilities and new PNT alternatives. If confirmed, I would continue 
to champion development of modernized receivers and fielding of the 
alternate PNT sources they will process to provide PNT resilience to 
the Joint Force.
    Question. What is your assessment of DOD's ability to implement a 
timely strategy to provide Military Grade User Equipment (MGUE) 
navigation cards to the wide array of platforms and weapons the 
Department uses and how can DOD efforts in this regard be improved?
    Answer. It my understanding that DOD CIO is working closely with 
the Joint Staff, Services, and USD(A&S) to monitor program progress and 
ensure that MGUE development and fielding have required priority and 
associated resources. Longer-term, I believe that implementing a 
Modular Open System Approach (MOSA) will enable faster and more agile 
integration of additional GPS and alternative and complimentary PNT 
sources.
    Question. What is your assessment of DOD's progress in providing 
alternate means for PNT to DOD platforms and weapons? If confirmed, 
what actions would you recommend be taken to accelerate DOD efforts in 
this regard?
    Answer. I believe that the Department is making significant strides 
in testing and implementing effective alternate PNT capabilities. I 
support these efforts and, if confirmed, I will continue to push these 
efforts forward.
    Question. What is your assessment of the effectiveness of the PNT 
Oversight Council authorized under section 2281 of title 10 U.S. Code? 
If confirmed, what actions would you take to improve the Council's 
effectiveness?
    Answer. In my view, the PNT Oversight Council is effective in 
executing governance and providing oversight of the DOD PNT Enterprise. 
The Council has driven development and fielding of more resilient GPS 
and is now also focused on the delivery of alternative and 
complimentary PNT solutions. If confirmed, I would support continuation 
of these efforts as well as the incorporation of GPS and PNT data into 
the Advana platform, enabling enhanced tracking and oversight of the 
full scope of efforts across the Department.
               fifth generation wireless networking (5g)
    Question. 5G wireless networks are the foundation for future 
industrial transformations that will power the world economy via 
applications such as vehicle autonomy; the Internet of Things; 
telemedicine; smart factories, ports, and warehouses; and smart cities. 
It is widely recognized that U.S. national security and economic well-
being would be jeopardized if Chinese companies such as Huawei dominate 
5G global wireless infrastructure. DOD has robustly funded research and 
development in 5G technology and in the applications that will be 
enabled by the speed, low-latency, and capacity of 5G networks. 
Although the Office of the USD(R&E) is currently managing DOD's 5G 
program, Congress directed the Department to begin preparations to 
transfer that responsibility to the CIO as projects and technologies 
mature. The Committee is concerned that budget reductions would prevent 
the achievement of these objectives. Accordingly, the Committee has 
recommended authorization of an additional $100 million for 5G-related 
technology in fiscal year 2022.
    In your view, how would significant reductions in funding for DOD's 
5G program affect U.S. industry's ability to compete with Huawei in the 
global 5G market?
    Answer. In my view, significant reductions in funding for DOD's 5G 
programs would curtail the progress the Department has made in reducing 
Huawei's influence in establishing the technical specifications for 
commercial 5G user devices, network components, and cellular services, 
as well as significantly slow the development of verified and secure 
applications of 5G Technology in the transport layer of the 
department's mission-critical voice and data communications.
    Question. In your view, how would budget reductions in the near 
term affect the ability of the DOD CIO and the Military Departments to 
transition successful 5G technology development projects?
    Answer. In my view, budget reductions in the near term would 
significantly hamper the activities of the CFT legislated in the FY21 
NDAA to oversee the implementation of the strategy developed under 
section 254 of FY20 NDAA. This strategy was coordinated across all 
relevant elements of the Department and will drive the adoption of 
commercially available, next-generation wireless communication 
technologies, capabilities, security, and applications by the 
Department and the DIB. If confirmed, I will continue to work with my 
counterparts in USD(R&E) to ensure a successful transition of these 
responsibilities.
    Question. What are your views on the importance of rapidly maturing 
technologies to create modular 5G network architectures based on open 
standards, and to virtualize network functions through software, in 
enabling U.S. companies to compete with Huawei globally? Does DOD have 
a role to play in achieving that objective?
    Answer. I believe that modular 5G network architectures, based on 
open standards and software-enabled virtualized network functions, are 
critical to promote the development and deployment of user devices and 
network components manufactured by US and allied nations' industrial 
bases, in lieu of Huawei. I understand that DOD is promoting these 
modular 5G network architectures through participation in international 
Standards Development Organizations, inclusion of modular 5G network 
architectures in the DOD's 5G pilot experimentation efforts, and the 
development of supply chain standards and acquisition tools for the 
deployment of 5G technology across the Department. If confirmed, I 
would sustain focus and momentum on these activities.
                  command, control, and communications
    Question. In your view, what are the major challenges facing the 
Department of Defense as pertains to its command, control, and 
communications (C3) programs and capabilities?
    Answer. In my view, modernization of our existing C3 systems is 
critical to maintaining our military advantage in multi-domain 
operations, given that adversaries have developed tactics and 
techniques to degrade, deny, and spoof our C3 systems.
    Question. What is your assessment of the Department's C3 
capabilities and resiliency in the face of near peer adversaries' 
capabilities?
    Answer. I understand that the Department is addressing investment 
shortfalls as part of its digital modernization efforts, and I believe 
that DOD must ensure it continues to prioritize the C3 capabilities and 
resiliency needed for high-end conflict.
    Question. What is your assessment of the effectiveness of the 
Council on Oversight of the National Leadership Command, Control, and 
Communications System (NLC3S) as authorized under section 1052(f)(3) of 
the fiscal year 2014 NDAA? How can the Council's effectiveness be 
improved?
    Answer. The DOD CIO is a member and secretariat of the NLC3S co-
chaired by the Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the 
USD(A&S). I believe the Council has been effective in ensuring that 
National Leadership Command Capability (NLCC) is able to meet the needs 
of the President and other senior leaders and raising critical issues 
to the Department's senior leadership. If confirmed, I will review how 
the effectiveness of how the Council might be improved.
    Question. There has been much discussion about the importance of 
networking and connecting warfighting capabilities across air, land, 
and sea platforms through the Joint All-Domain Command and Control 
(JADC2) initiative.
    What is the role of the CIO in developing and implementing 
solutions to JADC2 objectives?
    Answer. The DOD CIO has been an integral member of the JADC2 effort 
and CFT since its inception. DOD CIO has collaborated with Department 
stakeholders on the conceptual design and development of the JADC2 
Strategy and Implementation Plan, but the main DOD CIO role is as an 
enabler. Each JADC2 initiative relies on existing DOD CIO-led IT 
modernization efforts for success, such as JWCC, cybersecurity based on 
Zero Trust, and transport resiliency.
    Question. What is being done to ensure that airborne data links are 
both resilient against peer competitors and interoperable--across all 
Military Services' platforms?
    Answer. Tactical data links (TDLs) are foundational to the command 
and control (C2) of the Joint Force, our allies, and coalition 
partners. It is my understanding that the Department has three lines of 
effort to ensure that airborne data links are resilient: (1) advocating 
that Services expeditiously close identified gaps by rapidly fielding 
the Multifunctional Information Distribution System (MIDS) Program of 
Record for Link 16, (2) identifying legacy TDLs that are vulnerable or 
require replacement, and (3) accelerating the implementation of 
advanced capabilities to increase the resiliency, robustness, and 
capacity of tactical networks.
    Question. If confirmed, specifically what would you do to 
facilitate development and implementation of JADC2 concepts?
    Answer. If confirmed, I would leverage the DOD CIO statutory 
authorities to use the Budget Certification process, to include 
providing annual Capability Planning Guidance, to ensure the successful 
implementation of the JADC2 Strategy, ensuring the optimal delivery of 
capabilities to the Joint Forces. In addition, I would continue to 
drive JADC2 enablers including access to cloud compute and storage; 
resilient transport; and robust cybersecurity.
    Question. How do you differentiate the role of the CIO with regard 
to warfighting networks that provide command and control of our armed 
forces at their platforms in an operational context, from the CIO's 
role with regard to infrastructure and networks that traditionally 
would be regarded as administrative or otherwise non-warfighting in 
nature? Does the CIO's authority extend to warfighting networks and 
systems in the Department? Is the CIO qualified and resourced to serve 
as the official with a fundamental role in the warfighting 
infrastructure of the Department?
    Answer. In my view, networks are converging as we start focusing on 
data-centric architectures. Business and warfighting infrastructure are 
leveraging and implementing the same technologies and formats at the 
network transport, compute/store and cybersecurity layers, with the 
primary difference at the tactical edge in providing increased 
survivability. I believe the DOD CIO is sufficiently resourced to drive 
the modernization of warfighting infrastructure across the Department.
    Question. Please describe your view of the CIO's role with respect 
to overseeing the cryptographic accounts at the National Security 
Agency and recent efforts to build new facilities or upgrade existing 
facilities and infrastructure at the NSA for cryptographic key and 
management infrastructure across the DOD?
    Answer. DOD CIO is the PSA responsible for DOD cybersecurity and 
protection of NSS. In this capacity, DOD CIO collaborates with NSA, as 
the NSS National Manager, to modernize the key management 
infrastructure across DOD. NSA's tenets call for a Key Management 
Enterprise (KME) that permits a ``person-out-of-the-loop'' electronic 
crypto key distribution from the generation of the key through the key 
processor to the End Crypto Unit (ECU). Additionally, they require an 
inventory of cryptographic devices that are more robust, modular, 
scalable, capable, net-centric, and durable. These tenets enable more 
effective and efficient performance including reduced inventory, 
expanded data rates, simplified upgrades, lower life cycle costs, and 
ensured global information grid-compatibility in addition to 
eliminating current key vulnerabilities. Modernization of the KME is 
required to ensure cryptographic keying material and supporting data is 
protected at the highest level throughout the enterprise.
    Question. How should these same efforts be applied to the 
development and distribution of nuclear command and control products, 
in your view?
    Answer. I believe that modernization of nuclear command and control 
products is critical to ensure the highest levels of security. The same 
tool sets used to upgrade cryptographic key and management 
infrastructure should be used to modernize nuclear command and control 
products across the DOD. However, it must remain a separate and 
isolated activity from the overall enterprise modernization processes 
given its sensitivity.
    information technology workforce and the cyber excepted service
    Question. The Chief Information Officer serves as the functional 
community manager for 18 civilian occupational specialties, accounting 
for approximately 52,000 civilian employees. Additionally, the CIO is 
one of the chairs of the Cyber Workforce Management Board, which 
oversees the management of the entire Department of Defense military 
and civilian cyber workforce. The CIO's diligent performance of these 
functions is critically important to the Department's ability to evolve 
its employment practices to attract and retain personnel with highly 
valuable information technology and cyber-related skillsets.
    As you shape and guide the Department's cyber workforce, what 
factors would you apply to a determination as to whether a certain 
position should be filled by military, civilian, or contractor 
personnel?
    Answer. I believe that USD(P&R) has established an effective policy 
and structure for the determination of workforce mix across the 
Department. This policy dictates that risk mitigation be given 
precedent over cost savings or other efficiencies. The ability to 
continually evaluate these decisions based on risk as the domain 
evolves is crucial to the Department's agility in this domain. To 
enhance and complement the USD(P&R) process of workforce determination, 
the Defense Cyber Workforce Framework and the DOD 8140 policy series 
provide a management framework and governance structure for the 
cyberspace workforce that can be leveraged to manage military, 
civilian, and those contracted to augment the force.
    Question. What is your view of the appropriate mix between the 
uniformed cyber workforce and civilian employees?
    Answer. I believe the current mix is appropriate. Current 
projections have this mix at approximately 45 percent military, 30 
percent civilian, and 25 percent contractor across the full spectrum of 
the DOD cyber workforce. Overall, the current mix brings diversity of 
thought and experience, which I view as a strength of the Department.
    Question. Each Military Department and DOD Component is competing 
for the same set of skilled and experienced employees--those who are 
highly skilled and experienced in cyber and information technology.
    How does the Cyber Workforce Management Board de-conflict and 
prioritize personnel requirements across the Department to ensure the 
strategic allocation of manpower to the highest priority needs?
    Answer. The Cyber Workforce Management Board provides the tools to 
successfully recruit, retain and develop members of the cyber 
workforce. The DOD Cyber Workforce Framework provides a more detailed 
focus than traditional civilian occupational series, and, based on its 
alignment with the National Initiative for Cybersecurity Education 
(NICE), it also provides a tool for Components to communicate with 
partners across government, industry and academia. In addition, it 
enables very targeted recruitment and retention by location and 
specialty. The largest percentage of the DOD cyber workforce are 
military members, who are developed through established training 
pipelines, including best practice programs for some operational roles.
    Question. Of the approximate 52,000 civilian employees under the 
DOD CIO's purview, how many should be included in the Cyber Excepted 
Service, in your view?
    Answer. In my view, I believe most, if not all, of the DOD civilian 
cyber workforce should be eligible for Cyber Excepted Service (CES). 
Expanded eligibility would maximize the benefits of the enhanced 
recruitment, retention, and development flexibilities authorized under 
CES.
    Question. In your view, how effective is the Cyber Excepted Service 
Workforce in meeting the requirements for a highly qualified and 
competent cyber workforce?
    Answer. In my view, the Cyber Excepted Service is highly effective 
in meeting the requirements for a qualified and competent workforce. 
Further, effectiveness will continue to grow as the number of 
organizations leveraging CES is expanded. Even so, competition for this 
workforce is fierce and, if confirmed, training of the current 
workforce and enhanced recruitment and retention will be one of my 
priorities.
    Question. What actions would you take, if confirmed, to mitigate 
any gaps between cyber workforce capacity and capability?
    Answer. If confirmed, I would continue the current path of the DOD 
Cyber Workforce Framework (DCWF), DOD 8140 policy series and CES 
utilization. The foundation of these efforts, supported in cooperation 
with partners in USD(P&R), USCYBERCOM, and the Military Departments, 
are providing significant benefits. As implementation activities 
continue, the analytics capabilities of the Advana business 
intelligence platform will be used to better analyze overall workforce 
numbers against readiness. I will also pursue re-skilling of our 
current workforce, and ensure publication of a new Cyber Workforce 
Strategy.
    Question. In your judgment, what additional authority does the 
Department needs to recruit and retain talent for the Cyber Excepted 
Service?
    Answer. If confirmed, I will review the current authorities and 
make the appropriate recommendations to Congress.
    Question. Should management of the Cyber Excepted Service be 
transferred to the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and 
Readiness, in your view?
    Answer. In my view, no. The DOD CIO works closely with USD(P&R) on 
program implementation. I understand that both organizations have 
agreed that the DOD CIO is the right functional lead for this area and, 
if confirmed, I will continue the strong partnership between CIO and 
USD(P&R).
    Question. What quantitative and qualitative metrics should be 
established and tracked to determine the effectiveness of the Cyber 
Excepted Service, and to support decisions as to whether adjustments to 
existing authorities are required?
    Answer. I understand that the DOD CIO currently tracks 
implementation metrics such as recruitment and retention data, combined 
with qualification and development information garnered from DOD 8140 
policy implementation. I further understand that the DOD CIO is also 
developing and implementing an advanced analytics tool to enhance 
predictive analysis. As this capability continues to mature, I foresee 
this data being integrated with operational metrics such as readiness 
to provide a broader picture of force capabilities and gaps.
                         command climate survey
    Question. In the context of your service as Principal Deputy CIO, 
did you administer a command climate survey to the workforce under your 
leadership and management? If so, what were the results of that survey 
and what actions did you take or direct to address the survey results?
    Answer. No, I did not administer a command climate survey during my 
tenure as PDCIO.
    Question. If you have not administered such a survey, would you 
plan to do so, if confirmed? Please explain your answer.
    Answer. Yes. In addition to encouraging my organization's 
participation in the annual Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey, if 
confirmed I would also work to develop and administer a DOD CIO-
specific command climate survey at the earliest opportunity. I believe 
climate surveys are critical in identifying needs and concerns of the 
workforce, and help leaders identify areas that need improvement or 
adjustment to ensure an inclusive workplace environment that 
contributes to the organizational mission.
                           sexual harassment
    Question. In responding to the 2018 DOD Civilian Employee Workplace 
and Gender Relations survey, 17.7 percent of female and 5.8 percent of 
male DOD employees indicated that they had experienced sexual 
harassment and/or gender discrimination by ``someone at work'' in the 
12 months prior to completing the survey.
    What is your assessment of the current climate regarding sexual 
harassment, gender discrimination, and other harassment in the Office 
of the CIO?
    Answer. I assess that the status on these areas is positive 
overall, but always meriting close supervision, as with any 
organization.
    Question. If confirmed, what actions would you take were you to 
receive or become aware of a complaint of sexual harassment, 
discrimination, or other harassment from an employee of the Office of 
the CIO, or an employee of an organization over which the CIO exercises 
authority, direction, and control?
    Answer. If confirmed, I would act quickly and thoroughly to address 
any complaints of sexual harassment, discrimination, or other forms of 
harassment. I would ensure that the individual's chain of command is 
taking the complaint with the utmost seriousness, and will work closely 
with appropriate DOD authorities (Office of General Counsel, Washington 
Headquarters Service, etc.) to get advice and guidance. Additionally, I 
would ensure a positive, inclusive, and fair leadership climate, making 
clear that any sort of discriminatory or harassing behavior has no 
place in CIO or the DOD writ large.
                         cyber readiness review
    Question. In March 2019, the Secretary of the Navy's Cyber 
Readiness Review presented a scathing assessment of the Department of 
the Navy's approach to cybersecurity and hi-lighted the urgent need for 
the Navy to modify its business and data hygiene processes to protect 
data as a resource.
    In your view, would DOD writ large benefit from a ``Cyber Readiness 
Review'' similar to that of the Navy? Please explain your answer.
    Answer. In my view, the Department is keenly aware of the cyber 
readiness issues identified in the Navy review as well as those problem 
areas highlighted in other studies such as the Cyberspace Solarium 
Commission's report. As I understand it, the Department is now 
appropriately focused on the remediation and modernization efforts 
required to address these short-falls.
    Question. If confirmed, specifically what measures would you take 
or direct to improve the cybersecurity culture across the DOD 
workforce--military, civilian, and contractor? How would you empower 
and hold key leaders accountable for improvements in DOD cybersecurity?
    Answer. In my view, shaping and molding an effective cybersecurity 
culture among DOD members is an institutional process that must occur 
across all Components, from the forward-deployed servicemember to the 
civilian at a CONUS installation. Over the past decade, I understand 
that DOD has moved away from the idea that cybersecurity is just a DOD 
CIO responsibility, but the responsibility of every DOD member. To 
improve this trend, I expect that DOD will continue to educate and hold 
its entire workforce responsible for the proper employment of 
cybersecurity practices in the performance of their jobs, and where 
practical, the use of technology to enforce proper cybersecurity 
practices. In September 2020, the Department initiated an effort to 
empower and hold key leaders accountable for improvements in DOD 
Cybersecurity through a revision of its cybersecurity policy for the 
deployment of a cyber-systems and applications. No longer is it just 
the system's operator, the component authorization official, or a 
program manager, but it is now the responsibility of all three to 
consult with each other to ensure any risks are appropriately 
mitigated. If confirmed, I would continue with this emphasis on 
ensuring that cybersecurity is a Department-wide responsibility, and 
not just for those in CIO or other IT organizations.
                        relations with congress
    Question. What are your views on the State of the relationship 
between the Office of the CIO and the Senate Armed Services Committee 
in particular and with Congress in general?
    Answer. In my view, it is critical that the DOD CIO maintain close 
coordination and consultation with Congress. If confirmed, I would 
commit to establishing and maintaining a close working relationship 
with the Members and their staffs.
    Question. If confirmed, what actions would you take to sustain a 
productive and mutually beneficial relationship between Congress and 
the Office of the CIO?
    Answer. If confirmed, I commit to working collaboratively with 
Congress and Department of Defense oversight committees and responding 
to congressional requests in a timely manner. This includes informing 
Members and their staffs of critical updates in a timely and 
transparent manner. I assure the Committee that I will serve as a 
partner with Congress.
                        congressional oversight
    Question. In order to exercise legislative and oversight 
responsibilities, it is important that this committee, its 
subcommittees, and other appropriate committees of Congress receive 
timely testimony, briefings, reports, records--including documents and 
electronic communications, and other information from the executive 
branch.
    Do you agree, without qualification, if confirmed, and on request, 
to appear and testify before this committee, its subcommittees, and 
other appropriate committees of Congress? Please answer yes or no.
    Answer. Yes.
    Question. Do you agree, without qualification, if confirmed, to 
provide this committee, its subcommittees, other appropriate committees 
of Congress, and their respective staffs such witnesses and briefers, 
briefings, reports, records--including documents and electronic 
communications, and other information, as may be requested of you, and 
to do so in a timely manner? Please answer yes or no.
    Answer. Yes.
    Question. Do you agree, without qualification, if confirmed, to 
consult with this committee, its subcommittees, other appropriate 
committees of Congress, and their respective staffs, regarding your 
basis for any delay or denial in providing testimony, briefings, 
reports, records--including documents and electronic communications, 
and other information requested of you? Please answer yes or no.
    Answer. Yes.
    Question. Do you agree, without qualification, if confirmed, to 
keep this committee, its subcommittees, other appropriate committees of 
Congress, and their respective staffs apprised of new information that 
materially impacts the accuracy of testimony, briefings, reports, 
records--including documents and electronic communications, and other 
information you or your organization previously provided? Please answer 
yes or no.
    Answer. Yes.
    Question. Do you agree, without qualification, if confirmed, and on 
request, to provide this committee and its subcommittees with records 
and other information within their oversight jurisdiction, even absent 
a formal Committee request? Please answer yes or no.
    Answer. Yes.
    Question. Do you agree, without qualification, if confirmed, to 
respond timely to letters to, and/or inquiries and other requests of 
you or your organization from individual Senators who are members of 
this committee? Please answer yes or no.
    Answer. Yes.
    Question. Do you agree, without qualification, if confirmed, to 
ensure that you and other members of your organization protect from 
retaliation any military member, Federal employee, or contractor 
employee who testifies before, or communicates with this committee, its 
subcommittees, and any other appropriate committee of Congress? Please 
answer yes or no.
    Answer. Yes.
                                 ______
                                 
    [Questions for the record with answers supplied follow:]

                Questions Submitted by Senator Jack Reed
        cybersecurity of department of defense commercial clouds
    1. Senator Reed. Mr. Sherman, in your answers to the Committee's 
advance policy questions, you stated, ``I believe that it is critical 
that the DOD [Department of Defense] assesses the security of 
commercial cloud environments. Penetration testing is an existing 
requirement of the Cloud Computing Security Requirements Guide, which 
all cloud contracts are required to follow, per DFARS [Defense Federal 
Acquisition Regulation Supplement] clause 252.239-7070. If confirmed, I 
welcome the opportunity to work with the DOT&E [Director, Operational 
Test and Evaluation] to strengthen and enhance our existing cloud 
cybersecurity policies to explicitly allow increased testing. DOD CIO 
[Chief Information Officer] recently collaborated with the testing and 
evaluation community to ensure their requested language for enabling 
DOD testing of cloud vendors is included in JWCC [Joint Warfighting 
Cloud Capability] requirements.''
    Will these JWCC requirements include assessments of the control 
plane and hypervisor?
    Mr. Sherman. Yes. I understand that the Department has developed a 
cybersecurity plan for JWCC that supplements the Cloud Computing 
Security Requirements Guide and will enable DOD to conduct independent 
testing and evaluation of commercial cloud services and capabilities, 
from the application to the data layer, to include control planes and 
hypervisors. If confirmed, I would ensure that the Department works 
closely with its industry partners to address potential vulnerabilities 
and ensure that defensive capabilities are effective.
    operational expertise of chief information officers of military 
                              departments
    2. Senator Reed. Mr. Sherman, in your answers to the Committee's 
advance policy questions, you expressed your opinion that it is 
advisable for the CIOs of the military departments and combat support 
agencies to have operational expertise, and provided two examples of 
methods for achieving that objective. One is to include such 
capabilities in position descriptions and vacancy notices; another is 
to make familiarity with military operations and technology 
requirements to support current operational doctrine and strategies a 
key consideration in hiring. If confirmed, will you make such 
recommendations to the Secretary of Defense?
    Mr. Sherman. Yes, if confirmed, I would work with Departmental 
leadership to ensure that both operational and technical expertise are 
considerations in hiring decisions for Military Department and Combat 
Support Agency CIOs.

    3. Senator Reed. Mr. Sherman, do you think this issue is important 
enough for Congress to mandate such qualifications?
    Mr. Sherman. No. I believe these are important characteristics that 
must be considered, but a mandate is unnecessary and might unduly 
restrict otherwise highly-qualified individuals from applying for such 
positions.
                  electromagnetic spectrum operations
    4. Senator Reed. Mr. Sherman, in your answers to the Committee's 
advance policy questions, you stated that ``multiple studies have 
revealed governance as a major challenge for DOD spectrum operations, 
including dispersed responsibilities across the Department at various 
organizational levels.'' The Fiscal Year 2020 National Defense 
Authorization Act (NDAA) required the Secretary of Defense to designate 
a Principal Information Operations Adviser (PIOA) and to conduct a 
posture review and designate a joint force provider and joint force 
trainer. Two years later, the Secretary of Defense has designated the 
Under Secretary of Defense for Policy as the PIOA and has just kicked 
off the posture review. The Fiscal Year 2019 NDAA established the Vice 
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs as the ``Senior Designated Official'' in 
charge of the Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Cross Functional Team 
(EMSO CFT). Congress also had previously created the position of 
Principal Cyber Adviser (PCA) to the Secretary of Defense to bring 
greater coherence and integration to the cyber mission in the 
Department. Congress recognizes that electronic warfare, cyberspace 
operations, military deception and psychological operations, military 
information support operations, as well as other disciplines are all 
part of information warfare, and must be well integrated. How do you 
think that the Department could best achieve an integrated information 
warfare enterprise able to compete with peer nation states at the 
strategic level?
    Mr. Sherman. I believe the Department can best achieve an 
integrated information warfare enterprise by teaming across key 
organizations, leveraging the relationships codified in law, and 
ensuring leaders place appropriate high-level emphasis on successful 
EMSO modernization. If confirmed, I would be committed to all of these 
goals, and will work across the Office of the Secretary of Defense 
(OSD), the Joint Staff, and the Military Services to ensure the 
development and delivery of enhanced information enterprise 
capabilities to the force. Also, as the Joint Staff completes the Joint 
Warfighting Concept, I would work closely with USD(P) in its PIOA role 
and the other stakeholders to ensure EMSO is aligned and supports this 
foundational warfighting initiative.
                       software bill of materials
    5. Senator Reed. Mr. Sherman, in your answers to the Committee's 
advance policy questions, you wrote that ``understanding the 
composition of software through a software bill of materials is a 
mandatory first step in understanding and either mitigating or 
consciously accepting a degree of cybersecurity risk. It is also a 
prerequisite for responding to newly-discovered vulnerabilities to 
determine what software in our inventory are affected and need 
immediate attention. If confirmed, I will drive Department-wide policy 
and establish timely guidance for generating, ingesting, and analyzing 
these software bills of materials.''
    What are the impediments or obstacles to achieving a broad mandate 
for a software bill of materials for custom software?
    Mr. Sherman. While I believe there is broad support in concept in 
both government and industry for implementing mandates for a software 
bill of material (SBOM) for custom software, I also think there is not 
yet consensus on specific standards--and therein lies the first 
challenge that I would seek to overcome if confirmed. Implementing SBOM 
at scale would certainly strengthen cybersecurity in the Department, 
but it will require extensive engagement with many stakeholders--from 
USD(A&S) to USD(R&E) to the Services and many others--to gain buy-in 
and endorsement. While challenging, it's a task worth undertaking, and 
I'm committed to doing so if confirmed.

    6. Senator Reed. Mr. Sherman, how difficult do you think it will be 
to work through these impediments and obstacles?
    Mr. Sherman. As with any sort of standards development, this is an 
area that will take extensive and detailed work among experts and 
stakeholders. I estimate that it will require many months of ongoing 
focus within DOD CIO and through various governance forums, 
specifically in those dealing with software as well as cybersecurity. 
If confirmed, I would give my personal attention to progress on this 
area, with an eye to ensuring that the standards are attainable and not 
so burdensome as to hinder agility among the DOD components. Balance on 
that front will be key.
               resilient position, navigation, and timing
    7. Senator Reed. Mr. Sherman, in your answers to the Committee's 
advance policy questions, in multiple places you cite your concern 
about the vulnerabilities of the Global Positioning System (GPS) and 
the need for DOD to develop and deploy alternative position, 
navigation, and timing (PNT) solutions that are robust and resilient. 
Will the modernization of GPS to the M-Code satellites and M-Code-
enabled receivers resolve all the issues you see with GPS?
    Mr. Sherman. I believe that modernizing the GPS enterprise to M-
Code standards is a critical step towards ensuring PNT resiliency for 
the force. M-code replaces the legacy P(Y)-Code that DOD has used since 
GPS' inception over 40 years ago, and M-Code will provide greater 
security and signal robustness to military GPS users in all mission 
areas and increased resistance to Navigation Warfare threats targeting 
the GPS signals in the near-term. However, I see the transition to M-
Code as a necessary, but not sufficient, step to bolstering DOD's PNT 
capabilities against peer and near-peer adversaries. In addition to 
keeping up the focus on the force-wide transition to M-Code, if 
confirmed I would also be a strong advocate for the continued 
development and deployment of alternative and complementary PNT 
sources. The threats are multi-faceted and the Department's approaches 
to ensuring PNT must be as well.

    8. Senator Reed. Mr. Sherman, while the Military Services are 
developing modular systems to receive and process multiple PNT data 
sources, there are few actual alternative PNT data sources that are 
mature and in the process of being acquired or deployed by the 
Services, and yet near-term solutions need to be identified. What are 
your views about how to resolve this dilemma?
    Mr. Sherman. I believe the Department is taking very seriously the 
need to identify, test, and deploy alternative and complementary 
sources of PNT. Strong partnerships within DOD's PNT enterprise and the 
use of the modular open architecture approach (MOSA) are resulting in 
real capabilities that can help warfighters maintain mission even if 
GPS is jammed or spoofed. There is still much more to do on this front, 
however, and, if confirmed, I would work closely with the other 
stakeholders--to include USD(R&E), USD(A&S), the National Geospatial-
Intelligence Agency, the Military Services, and others--to ensure that 
warfighters have diversity and resilience in their PNT suite of 
capabilities.
                             dod365 program
    9. Senator Reed. Mr. Sherman, as you noted in your answers to the 
Committee's advance policy questions, the Department has chosen an 
enterprise-wide standard solution for cloud-based office functions 
through the Defense Enterprise Office Solution and Enterprise Software 
Agreement program (also known as the M365 program). However, when it 
comes to the security of these functions, and the security of the 
overall network, the Department decided to economize, declining to 
procure the cybersecurity capabilities built into the M365 offering. 
The Navy is the only component in the Department that elected to buy 
most of the suite of capabilities offered as options on the contract. 
As a result, the other Services and the defense agencies will remain 
more vulnerable and will prolong DOD's efforts to implement a zero 
trust architecture and achieve an integrated, automated, and 
orchestrated cybersecurity posture. DOD will continue to be plagued by 
interoperability problems. Section 1612 of S.2792, the Committee's 
reported National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2022, would 
require the Department to conduct a comparative analysis of the Defense 
Enterprise Office Solution and Enterprise Software Agreement with the 
current cybersecurity tools and capabilities across the enterprise. In 
your answers to the Committee's advance policy questions, there is the 
implication that the Navy's plan would serve as a sort of pilot or test 
of the relative benefits of each approach. Is that your intention, if 
confirmed?
    Mr. Sherman. During the deployment of M365 in the Department, all 
tenant owners adhered to an effective cybersecurity baseline 
established by DOD CIO and US Cyber Command (USCYBERCOM). As part of 
this process, the Department of the Navy (DoN) chose to employ a 
higher-end option that they determined to be the best fit for their 
requirements and budget. If confirmed, I would ensure that the DoN's 
experiences, along with those of the other components, would all inform 
the work of moving the Department to a Zero Trust posture as well as 
any analyses directed in the Fiscal Year 2022 NDAA.
                               5g funding
    10. Senator Reed. Mr. Sherman, in your answers to the Committee's 
advance policy questions, you indicated that substantial reductions to 
the Department's planned budget for 5G wireless network technology and 
applications would be detrimental across the range of DOD and national-
level economic and security interests, including the transition of 
mature 5G and ``next-G'' technologies and applications developed under 
Research and Engineering auspices to CIO management. The Committee is 
concerned that DOD is not going to sustain previously planned 
investments. If confirmed, would you intend to promote robust 5G 
funding as a top priority?
    Mr. Sherman. Yes. If confirmed, I would advocate for robust 5G 
funding to ensure DOD's capabilities in this area. I support the 
Department's research and development on secure applications of 5G that 
are crucial to mission-critical voice and data communication. In 
addition, I would coordinate smooth transitions of 5G technology 
developments from USD(R&E) to enterprise-wide adoptions overseen by DOD 
CIO as specified in Section 224 of the Fiscal Year 2021 NDAA.
                               __________
             Questions Submitted by Senator Mazie K. Hirono
oversight of senior dod officials--sexual assault and sexual harassment
    11. Senator Hirono. Mr. Sherman, as part of my responsibility as a 
member of the Senate Armed Services Committee and to ensure the fitness 
of nominees for appointment to senior positions within the Department 
of Defense (DOD), I ask the same two questions that I ask nominees to 
all of the committees on which I serve. Since you became a legal adult, 
have you ever made unwanted requests for sexual favors, or committed 
any verbal or physical harassment or assault of a sexual nature?
    Mr. Sherman. No.

    12. Senator Hirono. Mr. Sherman, have you ever faced discipline, or 
entered into a settlement related to this kind of conduct?
    Mr. Sherman. No.
                cyber security priorities and challenges
    13. Senator Hirono. Mr. Sherman, since you have had some experience 
in the position in an acting capacity, if confirmed what would be your 
top priorities as the Chief Information Officer?
    Mr. Sherman. If confirmed, I would take steps to ensure the 
Department is postured to fight and win in a highly-contested, 
degraded, and high-threat environment against a sophisticated state 
adversary like China or Russia. One of my top priorities would be to 
implement Zero Trust, changing the cybersecurity paradigm from one of 
protecting perimeters to one that assumes adversary penetration of the 
network and employs principles of micro-segmentation. Additionally, I 
would work with USD(A&S), the National Security Agency (NSA), the 
Military Services, the Joint Staff, and others to accelerate 
remediation efforts of cybersecurity vulnerabilities on key weapon 
systems--both fielded and those still in development--while also 
collaborating closely with USD(P&R) to recruit, train, and retain an 
increasingly diverse, agile, and capable workforce to meet the growing 
cybersecurity demands of the Department.
    Additionally, I would prioritize the stand-up of JWCC, which is a 
priority requirement for Joint All-Domain Command and Control (JADC2), 
to provide a modern multi-cloud capability at all three security 
levels, from the Continental United States to the tactical edge. I 
would also accelerate the modernization and resiliency of critical PNT 
capabilities, to include GPS M-Code transition and development and 
deployment of alternate/complementary PNT sources. Finally, I would 
work with DOD components, Executive Branch departments, Congress, and 
industry to ensure warfighter access to critical electromagnetic 
spectrum capabilities, while also identifying opportunities to help 
strengthen US 5G advantage in ways that do not degrade or interfere 
with GPS and other vital means of PNT.

    14. Senator Hirono. Mr. Sherman, what are some challenges you see 
the Department facing as cyber security threats continue to arise from 
Russia, China, and other adversaries?
    Mr. Sherman. In my view, one of the major issues that the 
Department must address immediately involves the remediation of known 
cyber vulnerabilities in key weapon systems that would be critical in 
operations against Russia, China, or other adversaries. Additionally, 
ensuring achievable cybersecurity in the Defense Industrial Base, 
particularly with small and medium-size companies--which are vital to 
DOD's success but often the first target for an adversary--must be a 
priority. This ``whole of enterprise'' approach must also extend to 
other parts of the DOD, especially in areas like industrial control/
supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) systems, which can 
represent a vulnerable ``back door'' to an enterprise if not secured 
with the same thoroughness as other parts of the network. Finally, 
DOD's necessary move towards more managed services and the adversaries' 
resulting focus on commercial capabilities will require the Department 
to be even more diligent in pushing for holistic testing and evaluation 
of these technologies, both prior to deployment and during sustainment 
activities.

    15. Senator Hirono. Mr. Sherman, a senior Air Force information 
security official publicly resigned in September, citing what he 
described as the Pentagon's reluctance to make cybersecurity and 
artificial intelligence a priority--he described the Department's cyber 
defense ability as ``kindergarten level'' and no match for China's 
capabilities. How would you respond to that allegation?
    Mr. Sherman. I respect the contributions and views of this former 
official, but strongly disagree with his assertion on this point. 
Although there will always be opportunities to bolster the Department's 
cybersecurity capabilities--such as through the implementation of Zero 
Trust, prompt remediation of weapon system cyber vulnerabilities, and 
rigorous testing of new technologies and services--DOD is a leader in 
the Federal government in terms of protecting its enterprise against 
cyber threats. If confirmed, I would move with alacrity in leading the 
push to even stronger cybersecurity through constant improvements, and 
by building upon the already robust partnerships between DOD CIO and 
USCYBERCOM/Joint Force Headquarters-Department of Defense Information 
Networks (JFHQ-DODIN), NSA, the Military Departments, the Director of 
Operational Testing and Evaluation (DOT&E), and many others.
    In later comments, this official has also noted that the US must 
move with the utmost speed to stay ahead of the China pacing threat. I 
completely agree with that point and, if confirmed, plan to instill a 
sense of urgency in preparing the Department's IT and cyber 
capabilities to stand up to even the most sophisticated adversaries.
                               __________
                Questions Submitted by Senator Tim Kaine
                         spectrum interference
    16. Senator Kaine. Mr. Sherman, the Fiscal Year 2021 National 
Defense Authorization Act included a provision, section 1664, requiring 
DOD provide an estimate of damages associated with harmful interference 
resulting from Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Order 20-48 to 
the Global Positioning System of the Department. Additionally, the 
Department--according to section 1661 of the Fiscal Year 2021 NDAA--was 
also expected to exchange technical information with Ligado Networks in 
an effort to identify specific receivers potentially requiring 
upgrading or replacement. If confirmed, could you provide an update on 
the status regarding the fiscal year 2021 provisions and ensure that 
the Department satisfies these Congressional mandates?
    Mr. Sherman. Yes. If confirmed, I will ensure the Department is 
responsive and fulfills Congressional requirements. I understand that 
the Department is currently working towards ensuring these provisions 
are fulfilled.

    17. Senator Kaine. Mr. Sherman, both Congress and the FCC 
envisioned and expected that the Department of Defense and Reston, 
Virginia-based Ligado Networks would engage toward efforts to resolve 
any technical issues regarding the Federal Communications Commission's 
Ligado approval. Have you or anyone within your office responded to 
Ligado requests to meet following the FCC's April 2020 Order?
    Mr. Sherman. I have not met with Ligado and I understand that the 
Department has informed Ligado that the DOD and Ligado are unable to 
communicate on this topic while the National Telecommunications and 
Information Administration's (NTIA's) petition for reconsideration 
regarding FCC's Order 20-48 is pending. Of note, per Section 1662 of 
the Fiscal Year 2021 NDAA, DOD has funded a study by the National 
Academy of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to provide an 
independent technical assessment of FCC's Order 20-48.
                               __________
           Questions Submitted by Senator Angus S. King, Jr.
                                spectrum
    18. Senator King. Mr. Sherman, there is considerable concern 
amongst some of my colleagues and I about the auction of the 3.10 to 
3.45 megahertz band given the sheer number of critical Department of 
Defense systems currently utilizing it. I have been told the cost 
estimate is $60 to 80 billion to either vacate or share within the band 
itself. But the main issue really is not the money, but the readiness 
impacts that it would cause across the Armed Forces. Even if it is 
possible, it would take many years to reconfigure the large radar 
systems currently in service at the depots for aircraft or dockyards 
for ships. Can you please tell us how serious this is and what actions 
you might do if confirmed to mitigate these concerns?
    Mr. Sherman. I believe that ensuring spectrum availability for DOD 
needs in the mid-band, especially between 3.1 to 3.45 megahertz (MHz), 
is a critical priority and will require attention by all stakeholders 
to ensure both warfighting capabilities as well as advantages for US 5G 
dominance. With DOD's recent efforts to vacate other parts of the 
spectrum, such as with the activities of last year's America's Mid-Band 
Initiative Team (AMBIT), the criticality of the 3.1 to 3.45 MHz band 
has only increased given the number of DOD capabilities operating in 
that range. Accordingly, advocating for a spectrum sharing paradigm--
vice one based on outright vacating--would be a priority of mine if 
confirmed, and I would look forward to working with Congress, Executive 
Branch stakeholders, other parts of DOD, and industry to enable this 
outcome.
                               __________
             Questions Submitted by Senator Gary C. Peters
                          federal contracting
    19. Senator Peters. Mr. Sherman, I have heard from constituents 
that contracting with the Department is rather difficult for startups 
or companies that don't traditionally fit into the defense industrial 
base. How will you ensure that our war fighters receive the best 
technology and products in the market whether they are developed from 
the defense industrial base or two PhD computer scientists in a garage 
in Tulsa?
    Mr. Sherman. I believe that small and medium-sized businesses are 
the backbone of our economy. If confirmed, I would work with my 
colleagues across the Department, especially in USD(A&S), to do 
whatever we can to reduce burdensome requirements that cause barriers 
of entry for small businesses. Innovation at every level is critical to 
ensuring that our warfighters receive the best technology possible, 
whether it's from a 25-person company in the Midwest or a corporation 
with thousands of employees elsewhere in the nation.

    20. Senator Peters. Mr. Sherman, for technology procurement in 
particular, I am told that requirements such as Cybersecurity Maturity 
Model Certification (CMMC), or Impact Level 4 or 5 are real barriers to 
small companies--how would you respond?
    Mr. Sherman. The Department recently completed an internal review 
of CMMC that included the identification of opportunities to lower the 
cost of implementation for small businesses. Based on the conclusions 
of that review, the Department announced ``CMMC 2.0,'' which will 
streamline and simplify the CMMC framework, thereby significantly 
reducing costs for small businesses. If confirmed, I look forward to 
working with USD(A&S) and other stakeholders in implementing this 
updated CMMC approach, with an ongoing focus on how its requirements 
are impacting small and mid-size companies.

    21. Senator Peters. Mr. Sherman, many technology companies have to 
go through the General Services Administration's (GSA) FedRAMP [Federal 
Risk and Authorization Management Program] process to be approved as a 
government information technology (IT) vendor, and then have to go 
through the DOD's Impact Level process. Do you believe these processes 
should have reciprocity? Why or why not?
    Mr. Sherman. I believe there should be reciprocity and symmetry 
wherever possible, to include between FedRAMP and the DOD Impact Level 
process. Put simply, I would always seek to streamline the Department's 
ability to acquire cutting-edge technology--which will be so necessary 
for our warfigthers to stay ahead of China and others--and would also 
work to ensure that cybersecurity standards are met. I'm confident the 
Department can do both, and, if confirmed, would press to ensure these 
processes both make sense for industry partners and preserve necessary 
cybersecurity for DOD systems and data.
                     pathology digitization efforts
    22. Senator Peters. Mr. Sherman, on March 4, 2020, the Defense 
Innovation Board issued a report entitled, ``Defense Innovation Board 
Joint Pathology Center (JPC) Repository Enhancement.'' The report 
states that if the JPC's repository is ``leveraged to its fullest 
potential, it would advance diagnosis and treatment for thousands of 
illnesses, saving lives across the Department and the global population 
. . . '' What is your plan to leverage the repository?
    Mr. Sherman. From a data management and availability perspective, 
the JPC data repository represents an exciting opportunity for DOD to 
share this resource with US institutions and the world. If confirmed, I 
would engage with the Director of the JPC to determine how DOD CIO can 
help to ensure this repository is appropriately leveraged.

    23. Senator Peters. Mr. Sherman, in the DOD's Joint Pathology 
Center, there are tens of millions of slides that could be digitized, 
and used to build an artificial intelligence (AI) model to more easily 
and accurately detect cancer. This would vastly improve the lives of 
our men and women in uniform, and in fact all of our citizens. This 
treasure trove of data would allow our country to take an important 
biotechnology leadership position on the world stage. Other than two 
small contracts that the Department has let that seem to be 
accomplishing nothing at any rapid rate, this vision is completely 
unfulfilled. What will you do to accelerate this, to rapidly realize 
the vision outlined in this report?
    Mr. Sherman. If confirmed, I would work to ensure that the promise 
of JPC's data to help detect cancer and other address other priorities 
would be fully realized. In this effort, I would build upon the work 
that I understand is already underway involving several components to 
field data management fundamentals critical for the implementation of 
AI capabilities. For example, the Joint AI Center (JAIC) and Defense 
Innovation Unit (DIU) have worked together to develop an augmented 
reality microscope for cancer detection on pathology slides, while the 
Defense Digital Service (DDS) has also been engaged with JPC on 
digitization of pathology samples. As CIO, if confirmed, I would bring 
all the entities together to ensure unity of effort and availability of 
the Department's IT resources for projects involving JPC's data.
                               __________
               Questions Submitted by Senator Jacky Rosen
                             cybersecurity
    24. Senator Rosen. Mr. Sherman, if confirmed, what are the 
proactive steps you will take to enhance the cybersecurity posture of 
the Department of Defense's most critical systems, including through 
workforce investments?
    Mr. Sherman. If confirmed, I would seek to strengthen and 
accelerate efforts with USD(A&S), NSA, the Services, Joint Staff, and 
USD(P)/PCA to ensure that weapon systems and defense critical 
infrastructure are capable of operating in a cyber-contested 
environment across the acquisition lifecycle. Further, I would drive 
the enterprise towards a Zero Trust footing by continued deployment of 
enterprise Identity, Credential, and Access Management (ICAM), and 
standing up a Zero Trust Portfolio Management office within DOD CIO.
    To enhance the posture of the cyber workforce, including those 
responsible for cybersecurity activities, I would continue development 
and implementation of the DOD Cyber Workforce Framework (DCWF). The 
DCWF allows the Department to track and develop its cyber workforce 
based on skill requirements. This process, coupled with the Cyber 
Excepted Service (CES), allows for targeted recruitment and retention 
across the total force (civilian, military and contractors). I would 
also oversee the drafting and publication of a new Cyber Workforce 
Strategy that would focus on ways that the Department could better 
compete for and develop diverse and capable talent in an increasingly 
competitive environment.

    25. Senator Rosen. Mr. Sherman, if confirmed, how will you ensure 
DOD has access to the cyber personnel needed to defend its networks 
from attacks and launch offensive operations?
    Mr. Sherman. The Department must focus on ensuring it has the right 
capabilities to achieve superiority when conducting defensive and 
offensive missions in the cyberspace domain. If confirmed, I would work 
with our OSD (especially USD(P&R)), USCYBERCOM, and Military Service 
partners to implement the DCWF. This, in conjunction with the DOD 8140 
policy series and the CES, provides the policies and mechanisms needed 
to meet current missions along with the agility to adapt to future 
missions.

    26. Senator Rosen. Mr. Sherman, can you speak to the positive 
impact of a capable and nimble cyber workforce on readiness, and thus 
national security?
    Mr. Sherman. I believe that traditional workforce models, where 
those in high-demand skillsets stay to work at DOD for a decades-long 
career, will be increasingly less applicable. Indeed, there might be 
instances in fields such as a data science where careers that include 
government service and private sector employment are not only 
desirable, but actually an imperative in order for specialists to keep 
their skills honed. If confirmed, I would ensure these considerations 
feature prominently in a new Cyber Workforce Strategy, which would be 
based on an overriding theme that successful cybersecurity will require 
different approaches on talent, recruitment sources, degree 
requirements, and other factors.

    27. Senator Rosen. Mr. Sherman, how might supplementing existing 
DOD personnel with additional cyber capacity be of value to the 
national security enterprise, especially when responding to a 
significant cyber incident?
    Mr. Sherman. Additional capacity, such as from the National Guard 
and Reserves, has contributed and will continue to add to DOD's ability 
to respond to cyber incidents. If confirmed, I would work closely with 
GEN Paul Nakasone in his role as Commander, USCYBERCOM, to provide 
inputs to his oversight of the broad array of Cyber Operations Forces 
that are critical to proactive defense against cyber threats. Also, I 
would work closely with interagency partners, such as at the Department 
of Homeland Security, Intelligence Community, and elsewhere, to ensure 
effective teaming against national security cyber threats.
                         emerging technologies
    28. Senator Rosen. Mr. Sherman, a recent report from the National 
Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence (AI) highlights the 
risks of the United States failing to compete in the AI era and 
presents a strategy to defend against AI threats, responsibly employ AI 
for national security, and win the broader technology competition. How 
can the Department leverage AI using this report's recommendations to 
support DOD's information enterprise?
    Mr. Sherman. I commend the National Security Commission on 
Artificial Intelligence for their excellent report. One of the most 
important contributions in the report is its focus on the enterprise 
infrastructure and foundational IT required to integrate AI across the 
Department and help secure competitive military advantage. Developing, 
testing, and fielding AI at scale is not possible without that 
technical backbone in place, and the Commission has provided a number 
of recommendations to help us achieve this goal. Ideas such as a secure 
data architecture, packaged AI environments, a marketplace of shared AI 
resources, and modern governance structures and procedures will form 
the digital ecosystem that the Commission describes. I understand that 
DOD CIO has already taken a number of steps to provide the foundation 
upon which this ecosystem will be built, by pursuing the JWCC and by 
scaling network infrastructure across the enterprise. If confirmed, I 
would continue to be a leading voice in bringing the Commission's 
recommendations to fruition.

    29. Senator Rosen. Mr. Sherman, if confirmed, what other emerging 
technologies will you encourage DOD to prioritize in its research and 
development (R&D) and procurement activities?
    Mr. Sherman. In addition to AI-empowered technologies, if 
confirmed, I would work closely with USD(R&E) and others to ensure DOD 
pursues a leadership position in the research and development of 
technologies that enable Zero Trust. I would also advocate for 
technologies that advance and increase network bandwidth, such as the 
integration of additional low-earth orbit (LEO) satellite 
communications to further compliment terrestrial capabilities. As 
network traffic continues to increase, I believe that more research 
into improving data compression algorithms would also greatly benefit 
the information enterprise. Finally, I would advocate strongly for 
additional progress on capabilities to provide alternative and 
complementary PNT sources.

    30. Senator Rosen. Mr. Sherman, if confirmed, how would you work to 
identify commercial, off-the-shelf innovations that have potential 
national security applications, and how could you bring them to scale?
    Mr. Sherman. If confirmed, I would leverage established processes 
and governance, such as the Software Modernization Senior Steering 
Group (SSG), to identify and scale commercial, off-the-shelf (COTS) 
technology. The Software Modernization SSG is a cross-functional team 
chaired by senior leaders in DOD CIO, USD(A&S), and USD(R&E) charged 
with establishing technical and non-technical guidelines to accelerate 
adoption of modern software development technologies and cloud 
capabilities. The SSG is well-positioned to identify emerging 
technologies and identify roadblocks to adoption across the enterprise, 
and I believe it is an effective fulcrum for finding and deploying COTS 
software capabilities.

    31. Senator Rosen. Mr. Sherman, as part of the Department's Digital 
Modernization Strategy, how should DOD work to quickly replace 
vulnerable, outdated equipment with modern alternatives?
    Mr. Sherman. In order to replace vulnerable and outdated equipment 
with modern alternatives, I believe that the Department should continue 
with its efforts to transition capabilities to the cloud, embrace a 
software-as-a-service (SaaS) model, and implement software-defined 
networking. DOD should also continue to update acquisition strategies 
with a revised software acquisition pathway to enable acceleration of 
modernization efforts.

    32. Senator Rosen. Mr. Sherman, what would funding information 
technology modernization do to reduce vulnerabilities and improve our 
response to cyber-attacks?
    Mr. Sherman. I believe that funding IT modernization would allow 
the Department to accelerate adoption of a Zero Trust architecture and 
provide a quick reaction capability to respond to cybersecurity 
vulnerabilities and attacks. IT modernization also allows the 
Department to transition from historic software development models to a 
development, security, and operations (DevSecOps) model, which allows 
for agile system iterations.

    33. Senator Rosen. Mr. Sherman, in your view, how can DOD reform 
its budgeting, programming, and acquisition process to accelerate IT 
acquisition?
    Mr. Sherman. I believe that the Department's budgeting, 
programming, and acquisition processes are well-aligned overall to meet 
the Department's mission. One I area that I think merits consideration 
involves greater latitude to utilize the current Research, Development, 
Test and Evaluation (RDT&E) Budget Activity (BA) 8 Software and Digital 
Technology Pilot to provide enhanced financial flexibility for digital 
modernization activities.
                               __________
             Questions Submitted by Senator James M. Inhofe
             cloud and information technology capabilities
    34. Senator Inhofe. Mr. Sherman, how will the Department quickly 
stand up a secure, classified outside of the Continental United States 
(OCONUS) cloud capability, which is critical to meeting the 
Department's Joint All-Domain Command and Control (JADC2) objectives?
    Mr. Sherman. I believe the Department will be able to quickly stand 
up secure, classified cloud capabilities in overseas settings by 
implementing the objectives outlined in the recent DOD OCONUS Cloud 
Strategy, which puts the strategic focus of the DOD's cloud computing 
on supporting forward-deployed units in tactical settings. This 
strategy recognizes the challenges of operating at the tactical edge, 
which has been a challenge for traditional cloud ecosystem. It includes 
three major tenets: (1) the modernization of in-theater communication 
networks; (2) the deployment of cloud compute at the edge; and, (3) the 
recruitment, retention, and training of talent to employ these 
technologies. If confirmed, I would ensure implementation of these 
objectives so that our warfighters have the technological capabilities, 
especially modern cloud computing, required to fulfill their OCONUS 
missions.

    35. Senator Inhofe. Mr. Sherman, how will the Department address 
data sovereignty issues surrounding OCONUS cloud?
    Mr. Sherman. Data sovereignty remains a challenging issue with 
regards to the OCONUS cloud way-ahead, given that DOD data must remain 
under US legal jurisdiction. Other countries have laws in place that 
allow their governments to require cloud service providers (CSPs) to 
disclose customer data, and, in some cases, CSPs are legally barred 
from notifying the customer that their information has been provided to 
an outside entity. I believe the best course of action is to ensure 
that OCONUS cloud data is hosted within the boundaries of the United 
States, US territories, or geographic locations where there is US 
jurisdiction, and this data hosting requirement will need to be squared 
with cloud computing capabilities at the tactical edge. A tall order to 
be sure, but one that I'm committed to addressing with the DOD Chief 
Data Officer (CDO) and others.

    36. Senator Inhofe. Mr. Sherman, how will DOD drive Department-wide 
adoption of Identity Credentialing and Access Management (ICAM)?
    Mr. Sherman. Implementation and adoption of enterprise ICAM 
services is critical for the Department to achieve modernization and 
security goals, especially Zero Trust. If confirmed, I would ensure 
that enterprise ICAM is affordable and available across the DOD to all 
components. Further, I would ensure any federated ICAM architectures, 
which will likely be required while an enterprise capability is being 
tested and rolled out, will be effectively integrated and 
interoperable. This is a topic on which I spent much time during my 
three years as the Intelligence Community CIO, with extensive 
engagement on standards and buy-in due to ICAM's criticality for 
security in the broader enterprise. If confirmed, I plan to leverage 
this experience to ensure that DOD is able to implement ICAM 
successfully and at scale.

    37. Senator Inhofe. Mr. Sherman, how will the Department leverage 
ICAM to drive to a Zero Trust Architecture?
    Mr. Sherman. Identity management, multifactor authentication, and 
dynamic access are foundational ICAM capabilities needed to implement a 
Zero Trust architecture. ICAM is the first line of defense to confirm 
identity, verify need, and authorize access to data. Zero Trust will 
actively incorporate and employ DOD ICAM services. For example, if an 
enterprise credential is stolen or compromised, revocation of the 
credential will prevent its use, minimizing or eliminating loss or 
degradation of our systems and networks. Continuous authentication, one 
of the key elements of a Zero Trust architecture, relies on the ability 
to link an authenticated user to that individual's identity attributes 
to support real-time access decisions, enabling secure information 
sharing.

    38. Senator Inhofe. Mr. Sherman, in the context of initiatives to 
consolidate information technology (IT) contracts, which are critical 
to lower costs, what other DOD IT consolidation efforts are planned to 
realize similar savings?
    Mr. Sherman. I understand that DOD CIO is leading two major IT 
consolidation efforts. These include the Fourth Estate Network 
Optimization (``4ENO''), which is targeted to Defense Agencies and 
Field Activities, and the Data Center Optimization Initiative, which is 
being implemented across the full DOD enterprise. While 4ENO 
consolidates service desks and networks, driving efficiencies and 
increased performance, the Data Center Optimization is intended to 
drive efficiency, performance, security, and affordability in the 
domain of data storage and compute. In addition to these DOD CIO-led 
activities, I'm aware of Military Department-led initiatives, such as 
the DoN's ``Operation Cattle Drive,'' which also aims to increase 
efficiency by eliminating older and/or redundant systems. If confirmed, 
I would not only keep up the focus on the successful DOD CIO-led 
projects, but also seek to capitalize and build upon worthy initiatives 
being undertaken in the Military Departments and elsewhere.
                               __________
               Questions Submitted by Senator Thom Tillis
                           end point security
    39. Senator Tillis. Mr. Sherman, what is the overall strategy and 
timeline for delivering next-generation endpoint security across the 
.mil domain?
    Mr. Sherman. It is my understanding that the Department is 
finalizing the DOD Endpoint Security Strategy, which outlines a new 
approach for endpoint security, leverages industry advancements, and 
protects endpoints from evolving threats. The overall goal of the 
strategy is to provide operational flexibility to enable agile, 
interoperable and resilient cyber endpoint defenses via a data-centric 
approach for endpoint security solutions. The Strategy describes the 
goals and high-level architecture of the desired endpoint security end 
state to be achieved by fiscal year 2025.
 security operations centers and cybersecurity service providers pilot 
                                program
    40. Senator Tillis. Mr. Sherman, recall section 1733 of the Fiscal 
Year 2021 NDAA, which tasks the Office of the Chief Information Officer 
(CIO) to ``conduct a pilot program to assess the feasibility and 
advisability of developing and using speed-based metrics to measure the 
performance and effectiveness of security operations centers and cyber 
security service providers in the Department of Defense.'' Do you 
commit to meeting obligations and reporting deadlines outlined in that 
requirement?
    Mr. Sherman. Yes. If confirmed, I will ensure the Department is 
responsive and fulfills Congressional requirements. I understand that 
the Department is currently working towards ensuring these provisions 
are fulfilled.
                               __________
            Questions Submitted by Senator Marsha Blackburn
                         cyber vulnerabilities
    41. Senator Blackburn. Mr. Sherman, some of our development of 
next-generation weapons systems vehicles involve an interconnectedness 
between two or more platforms that is truly unprecedented. How are we 
going to ever harden them, defend them, and even instrument them, from 
a cyber-standpoint?
    Mr. Sherman. In my judgement, every military capability must 
include within its requirements a cyber-survivability performance 
parameter, which will be addressed during research, design, 
development, test, and in all subsequent modernization, upgrades, and 
sustainment activities. Cybersecurity of the systems is a key focus for 
both developmental and operational testing, which includes adversarial-
level penetration testing, or red-teaming. If confirmed, I would work 
with USD(A&S), the Military Services, DOT&E, and others to ensure these 
considerations remain front and center with regards to weapon systems 
cybersecurity.

    42. Senator Blackburn. Mr. Sherman, are we adequately assessing 
weapons platforms and relevant systems holistically (i.e. from an enemy 
or red-cell perspective)?
    Mr. Sherman. Yes, I believe that DOD is adequately assessing weapon 
platforms and relevant systems. Both the -Defense Intelligence 
Enterprise and Military Services conduct assessments, and the Services 
are currently implementing mitigations for cyber vulnerabilities on 
critical weapon platforms and systems. Moreover, it is my understanding 
that the Department prioritized mitigation for critical warfighting 
systems to ensure that cyber-hardening efforts meet the needs of 
Combatant Commanders.

    43. Senator Blackburn. Mr. Sherman, do you believe there is 
legitimacy along the procurement path to task qualified individuals to 
``disrupt, ``exploit,'' or ``sabotage'' any joint force or service 
procured weapons systems to fully understand the vulnerabilities of the 
networks that underpin these assets?
    Mr. Sherman. Yes. I believe there are benefits to be gained during 
the procurement of a DOD system to have a red team actively seek cyber 
vulnerabilities. If confirmed, I would support DOT&E's use of cyber red 
teams to discover vulnerabilities both through operational testing of 
acquisition programs and in assessments conducted during training 
exercises.
                   joint warfighter cloud capability
    44. Senator Blackburn. Mr. Sherman, do you have a plan to solve the 
Disconnected, Disrupted, Intermittent and Delayed (DDIL) environments?
    Mr. Sherman. If confirmed, addressing DDIL challenges would be 
among my top priorities given how important it will be for US military 
operations in distant, highly-contested combat environments. Given 
DDIL's complexity, I believe that solving it should involve a mix of 
capabilities and approaches, to include mitigation, redundancy, 
architectural resiliency, and the adoption of advancements in 
technology. Evaluation of CSP global network fabrics with advanced 
tactical edge cloud capabilities will also be critical. I'm aware of 
the work that the DoN (especially the Marine Corps) has done in this 
area to push vendors to think more holistically about solutions for 
DDIL. If confirmed, I would seek to build on these engagements, and 
further press CSPs and others to come up with solutions--many of which 
might have applicability in several industry sectors as well--to answer 
DOD's needs in this critical space. Finally, I'm confident that 
USD(R&E)/DARPA, DIU, and other DOD research and engineering centers can 
help solve this challenge, and I plan to enlist their help accordingly.

    45. Senator Blackburn. Mr. Sherman, can you identify potential 
pitfalls created by these DDIL environments?
    Mr. Sherman. I believe that DDIL environments will create 
significant challenges that DOD must solve to ensure effective Joint 
Warfighting operations. The outgoing Vice Chairman and others have 
noted that US and Coalition warfighters must be prepared to fight 
``disconnected'' at times in areas like the Indo-Pacific, and then 
``reconnect'' to the network when possible. If confirmed as CIO, I see 
my job as providing solutions to significantly reduce (or even 
eliminate) the amount of time that units must fight disconnected. New 
solutions, to include modern mesh networks, LEO constellations, 5G/
Next-G, resilient terrestrial transport, and cybersecurity based on 
Zero Trust, all must be priorities to provide redundancy and 
resilience. Put another way, data-informed decision advantage will be 
critical in operations against a peer or near-peer adversary. Our 
adversaries know this and will do whatever they can to disrupt this 
information flow, and hindering their ability to do so must be a top 
priority for CIO and partners in the rest of the DOD digital 
enterprise.
                               __________
               Questions Submitted by Senator Josh Hawley
     concern with concentrating market power in the industrial base
    46. Senator Hawley. Mr. Sherman, the Department of Defense has long 
struggled with consolidation in the industrial base, and we're seeing 
this problem now with emerging technologies, where just a few large 
companies own a lot of the technology or can buy it up. Do you agree 
that concentrating market power in just a handful of companies like 
Google, Microsoft, Facebook, and Amazon makes it harder for competition 
to occur and spur innovation, especially as it relates to information 
technologies?
    Mr. Sherman. I believe that the US technology sector, from the 
largest companies to some of the smallest, represent a national 
advantage vis-`-vis China and other nations. Having said that, too much 
consolidation in any one sector can be a cause for concern. If 
confirmed, I would work with USD(A&S), USD(R&E), and others to ensure 
that we hear from the broadest range of voices and ideas, especially to 
include small and medium-size business, which I believe are the 
ultimate backbone of the US economy. There are certain capabilities 
that only larger companies can bring to bear at the scale needed by 
DOD, but I strongly believe there is impressive innovation occurring 
all across US industry that the Department must leverage.

    47. Senator Hawley. Mr. Sherman, how can we ensure a robust and 
competitive market for emerging technologies--especially in the 
information space--that isn't dominated by a few big firms?
    Mr. Sherman. I believe that maximizing DOD's investment and 
engagement with small business must remain a top priority to inspire 
innovation. Intentional support of innovative small businesses and 
cutting-edge academic research drives a robust market for emerging 
technologies. The DOD must prioritize access to emerging innovations, 
with a constant focus on ideas emerging across the entire spectrum of 
sources--from the 25-person company to the well-established CSP. If 
confirmed, I would work to ensure we keep the door open to all.
                                 ______
                                 
    [The nomination reference of Mr. John B. Sherman, follows:]
      
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]
    
      
                                 ______
                                 
    [The biographical sketch of Mr. John B. Sherman, which was 
transmitted to the Committee at the time the nomination was 
referred, follows:]
      
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]
    
      
                                 ______
                                 
    [The Committee on Armed Services requires all individuals 
nominated from civilian life by the President to positions 
requiring the advice and consent of the Senate to complete a 
form that details the biographical, financial, and other 
information of the nominee. The form executed by Mr. John B. 
Sherman in connection with his nomination follows:]
      
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]
    
      
                                 ______
                                 
    [The nominee responded to Parts B-F of the committee 
questionnaire. The text of the questionnaire is set forth in 
the Appendix to this volume. The nominee's answers to Parts B-F 
are contained in the committee's executive files.]
      
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]
    
      
                                 ______
                                 
    [The nomination of Mr. John B. Sherman was reported to the 
Senate by Chairman Reed on December 8, 2021, with the 
recommendation that the nomination be confirmed. The nomination 
was confirmed by the Senate on December 14, 2021.]
                                ------                                

    [Prepared questions submitted to Mr. Ashish S. Vazirani by 
Chairman Reed prior to the hearing with answers supplied 
follow:]

                        Questions and Responses
                       duties and qualifications
    Question. Section 137a of title 10, U.S. Code, establishes the 
position of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and 
Readiness (DUSD(P&R)) and provides broad guidance as to the DUSD's 
duties and powers.
    If confirmed as DUSD(P&R), what do you believe would be your most 
critical duties and responsibilities?
    Answer. I believe the most critical duties and responsibilities are 
to ensure that we are meeting our obligations with respect to 
servicemembers, their families, and the civilian workforce of the 
Department. In particular, the Department must be focused on Secretary 
Austin's commitments to build a ready, diverse, and resilient force 
reflective of the Nation it serves. As Under Secretary Cisneros said 
when he appeared before the committee in July, ``Caring for the people 
who make up the Department of Defense's total force is a sacred 
responsibility.'' I agree wholeheartedly and if confirmed, I plan to 
fully support the leadership in taking care of the people, which is the 
most critical factor to our readiness and national security.
    Question. What is your understanding of the role of the DUSD(P&R) 
as ``first assistant'' to the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel 
and Readiness (USD(P&R))?
    Answer. If confirmed, as the first assistant to the Under Secretary 
for Personnel and Readiness, I believe my roles is to support and 
discharge the statutory and policy responsibilities of the office, 
promote and advance the Administration's values, the Secretary of 
Defense's priorities, and the Under Secretary's focus on recruiting and 
retaining a diverse force; cultivating an inclusive environment free of 
sexual assault, sexual harassment, prohibited discrimination, and other 
problematic behaviors; and promote through policy, oversight, and 
resource advocacy a ready and resilient force prepared to answer the 
national security challenges of today and the future. If confirmed, I 
commit to providing the Under Secretary and other Department leaders 
informed, candid, and pragmatic perspectives, recommendations, and 
advice as the first assistant, and be prepared to assume the duties of 
the USD(P&R) should I be called upon to do so.
    Question. What leadership and management experience do you possess 
that you would apply to your service as DUSD(P&R), if confirmed?
    Answer. I bring 35 years of leadership, management, progressive 
learning and increasing responsibility in the military, the private and 
non-profit sectors.
    Foundational to my career are the seven years of Active military 
service I spent in the United States Navy, where I gained valuable 
leadership and management experience as a submarine officer, community 
manager and detailer.
    Following graduate education in management and industrial design, I 
further developed management capabilities while leading organizations 
through significant transformations. I assisted global technology and 
pharmaceutical companies improve commercial (marketing and sales) 
planning and execution. I have significant expertise in strategic 
planning, having helped organizations identify their growth priorities 
and levers for growth, and then facilitating the prioritization of the 
most critical levers to drive impact. Driving change requires 
perspective to craft a vision, a willingness and capacity to make 
decisions informed by data and rigorous analysis, and the ability to 
form and motivate teams that can drive change; capabilities that I have 
developed. I have significant experience in organization design 
(structure and operations) developed through supporting my clients and 
through building consulting teams and organizations where I had 
responsibility for the people as well as profit and loss.
    I translated my experience in the private sector to drive change 
and impact in the non-profit sector with a focus on supporting military 
families, a commitment I would maintain if confirmed. At the Armed 
Services YMCA I developed programs and partnerships to improve the 
well-being of junior enlisted military families. As the Executive 
Director and CEO of the National Military Family Association I led an 
organization focused on standing up for, supporting, and enhancing the 
quality of life for every military family through bold advocacy, 
innovative programming, and dynamic and responsive solutions. These 
experiences provided me with perspective regarding the opportunities 
and challenges of military life and the collaboration required to 
develop more complete solutions. I also served as a member of the 
National Academy of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine's Committee on 
the Well-Being of Military Families.
    Question. Please provide an example of a situation in which you led 
and brought to conclusion a management improvement/change initiative in 
a large, complex organization.
    Answer. An example of the application of these skills was an 
engagement with the world's leading software company. During the 
engagement, I led a client and consulting team that collaborated to 
craft the strategy and implement a global agency model to transform the 
company's direct marketing efforts. My team was responsible for the 
development of the 5-year relationship marketing strategy and 
supporting agency model, management of the agency selection process, 
and design and implementation of the operating model. The global agency 
model created more than $100 million in savings in the first year, and 
the relationship marketing strategy improved marketing effectiveness as 
measured by campaign metrics and customer satisfaction.
    Question. Specifically, what background and experience do you have 
that qualify you to provide advice and assistance to the USD(P&R) on 
military and civilian personnel matters in the DOD?
    Answer. During my Active Duty service, I served as a personnel 
manager (detailer) for the Submarine and Nuclear Power community of the 
United States Navy. I would bring a warfighter's and community 
manager's mindset to the areas of military personnel matters. Following 
my career in the Navy, I worked in the professional services sector 
building teams of motivated, educated, and driven individuals to solve 
complex problems through use of data and analytics. As DOD works to 
build and sustain a Total Force that is ready to address threats in 
emerging warfare domains, I will be able to support the USD(P&R) on 
issues related to recruiting, training, education, health care, 
professional development, and retention.
    Question. Specifically, what background and experience do you have 
that qualify you to provide advice and assistance to the USD(P&R) on 
matters of military readiness?
    Answer. Military readiness has several critical components--
defining readiness based on the requirements of the national defense 
strategy, developing force readiness, readiness evaluation, and 
readiness reporting.
    I have worked with global organizations to assist them with 
definitions of readiness for their commercial organizations (sales and 
marketing) based on growth and profitability objectives, organization 
design, professional development programs, and the measurement of 
commercial readiness and productivity. If confirmed, I would translate 
this capability with a focus on military readiness to support the 
USD(P&R).
    Question. Specifically, what background and experience do you have 
that qualify you to provide advice and assistance to the USD(P&R) on 
matters of health services?
    Answer. During the early portion of my consulting career, I advised 
companies in the health care market. Providing impactful and actionable 
advice required me to understand the dynamics of the healthcare market 
place--prevalence of disease (acute and chronic), providers, payors, 
and patient populations. That experience will help me to advise the 
USD(P&R) and the ASD(HA) on issues related to health services for the 
military community (Active and Reserve components, retirees, and their 
families).
    During the time I spent working with military service organizations 
(MSOs), I represented those organizations to the Defense Health Agency 
to provide the perspective of the military families.
    Question. Specifically, what background and experience do you have 
that qualify you to provide advice and assistance to the USD(P&R) on 
Reserve component matters in the DOD?
    Answer. My background and experience on Reserve component matters 
is limited to issues related to Reserve component military families and 
access to benefits based on Title 32 and Title 10 order status. If 
confirmed, this is an area that would require study to assist the 
USD(P&R).
    Question. Are there are any actions you would take to enhance your 
ability to perform the duties and exercise the powers of the DUSD(P&R)?
    Answer. Education, learning and curiosity have been enablers of my 
success. An engineering background helped me develop a structured 
problem-solving approach and advanced analytic skills. Naval Nuclear 
Power and submarine training required that I develop a disciplined 
approach to learning to comprehend volumes of information at a rapid 
pace, and an ability to quickly diagnose complex operational issues. 
While the engineering background has equipped me with technical 
capabilities and skills, a graduate education in business and 
industrial design enabled me to apply my analytical expertise to a 
broader set of problems, thus allowing me to address strategic and 
management issues with a rigorous and disciplined approach.
    If confirmed, to enhance my ability to perform the duties and 
exercise the powers of the DUSD(P&R) I would start by learning from 
experts within the Department, as well as experts outside the 
Department, including this Committee and other Committees, in both 
chambers of Congress. Based on those learnings, I would work with the 
USD(P&R) to prioritize areas for action and those for greater study.
    Question. If confirmed, what specific duties might you expect the 
USD(P&R) to prescribe for you, particularly in light of the lines of 
effort set forth in the 2018 National Defense Strategy (NDS)?
    Answer. I understand that the next National Defense Strategy is 
currently being developed, but the common thread in our nation's 
defense strategy and posture is our people--the soldiers, sailors, 
airmen, marines, guardians, their families, and the civilians that 
support them--who have committed to upholding the values and principles 
of our country. If confirmed, I look forward to helping the Under 
Secretary in his capacity as the principal advisor to the Secretary on 
all matters related to the health, welfare, and resiliency, of our 
personnel, and the readiness of our forces to fight not only today's 
wars, but also to be best positioned to respond to the threats of the 
future.
    Question. If confirmed, are there any specific duties and powers 
you would recommend that the Under Secretary delegate to you, as his/
her deputy?
    Answer. Currently, I do not have enough familiarity with the 
distribution of duties and resources within the Office of the Under 
Secretary for Personnel and Readiness to speculate on the delegation of 
any specific duties. If confirmed, I look forward to garnering an 
appreciation of resource allocation and workload distribution in the 
organization, and will offer the Under Secretary candid advice and 
recommendations on the delegation of duties based on my professional 
expertise and management experiences.
                    major challenges and priorities
    Question. What do you consider to be the most significant 
challenges you would face if confirmed as the DUSD(P&R), and how would 
you address each of those challenges?
    Answer. The contemporary challenges to readiness are significant--
sexual assault, harassment, suicide, military spouse unemployment, 
COVID, and military family financial and food insecurity. We face 
challenges in recruitment and retention--shaping a defense community 
that reflects America and is comprised of diverse, effective teams with 
a range of skills in emerging domains, prepared for tomorrow's fight.
    To meet these challenges and support the Total Force will require 
innovation: a willingness to ask and answer tough questions, rapidly 
test and learn, and scale solutions. If confirmed, I will work closely 
with the USD(P&R), Service Secretaries and Secretary, and Congress, to 
care for the Total Force and our military families, to meet readiness 
requirements and achieve the President's national security objectives.
    Question. What plans do you have for addressing each of these 
challenges, if confirmed?
    Answer. As stated above, if confirmed I would work with experts and 
leaders within the Department, Congress, and external stakeholders to 
define a set of priorities--areas for further evaluation and areas for 
action. Developing plans at this point would be presumptive and I have 
not developed specific plans for addressing these challenges.
                    civilian control of the military
    Question. If confirmed, how would you adhere to and further the 
fundamental principle of civilian control of the armed forces?
    Answer. I have a strong conviction that civilian control of the 
armed forces is a necessity and understand the role and responsibility 
of the Under Secretary and his office as the principal civilian advisor 
to the Secretary of Defense for all matters related to the readiness of 
our forces, and the health and resiliency of the personnel that make up 
the Department's Total Force. As such, if confirmed, I will always 
provide the best possible, candid and informed advice I can to the 
Under Secretary, the Deputy Secretary, and the Secretary of Defense in 
order ensure civilian control of the armed forces.
    Question. If confirmed, specifically how would you ensure your 
inclusion in the discussion, debate, and resolution of U.S. defense and 
national security issues?
    Answer. Our personnel are our most important and critical asset and 
are inextricably tied to our national security and defense posture. As 
such, if confirmed, I will strive to make sure that personnel 
considerations, readiness matters, and other workforce considerations 
are an integral part of the decision making and governance of the 
Department. I will endeavor to work with my counterparts across the 
Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff and Combatant 
Commands, and the Military Departments and Services to inform 
deliberative process and decision making, particularly when it comes to 
strategic posture and policy and resource allocation.
                    personnel policy implementation
    Question. If confirmed, what specific changes to personnel policies 
and processes would you recommend to improve the efficiency and 
effectiveness of human resources management--both military and 
civilian--across the Department?
    Answer. People are the greatest asset to any organization, and the 
personnel policies and processes established to manage the workforce 
must be efficient and effective. While I am not aware of specific 
changes that should be made, if confirmed, I will work with senior 
leaders across the Department to identify policy and process 
deficiencies and lead necessary changes to improve or enhance human 
resources management programs.
    Question. What is your understanding of your responsibility, if 
confirmed, to inform and consult with this Committee and other 
appropriate committees of Congress, on the implementation of personnel 
policies directed by law?
    Answer. I understand Congress' critical and Constitutionally 
prescribed roles in providing oversight of the Executive Branch, and in 
enacting legislation and appropriating funds. If confirmed, I 
understand that as the Department implements policies and procedures 
related to the personnel of the Department it has an obligation to 
inform and consult with this and other Committees, in both chambers, to 
ensure we are meeting the spirit and intent of the laws the Congress 
enacts.
    Question. What is your understanding of the timeframe in which 
personnel policies directed by law must be implemented by the 
Department?
    Answer. I understand the obligation to implement statutory 
requirements pursuant to the law. However, I am also aware that 
resource constraints and bureaucratic process delays are a fact of life 
for the Department, just like any other organization. If confirmed, I 
commit to promoting timely action and implementation, and as noted 
above, informing and consulting with this and other Committees as 
appropriate if there are delays.
                               oversight
    Question. The USD(P&R) prescribes policies and establishes programs 
across the domains of personnel and readiness. Responsibility for 
executing these policies and programs vests primarily in the Military 
Departments and Services, elements of the Office of the Secretary of 
Defense, and the Defense Agencies and Activities, subject to oversight 
by the USD(P&R).
    What is your view of the scope and importance of the USD(P&R)'s 
oversight duties and powers?
    Answer. I believe that the USD P&R's oversight duties and 
responsibilities are extremely significant and broad, impacting all 
aspects of the Department's personnel and readiness requirements. While 
I recognize that the Military Departments have the authority to 
organize, train, and equip, I believe that P&R has an obligation and 
responsibility to ensure the Military Department's actions are in 
compliance with both the spirit and letter of the law and the policies 
of the Department.
    Question. If confirmed, specifically what would you do to assist 
the USD(P&R) in the exercise of his/her oversight duties and powers?
    Answer. If confirmed I will always provide the USD(P&R) with 
candid, pragmatic, and informed recommendations and advice, and assist 
him in executing the Administration's, the Secretary's, and the USD's 
priorities.
    Question. If confirmed, how would you recommend that OUSD(P&R) 
resources be allocated to ensure rigorous oversight of the 
implementation and execution of personnel and readiness policies and 
programs across the DOD?
    Answer. If confirmed, I believe stewardship of P&R resources will 
be a critical responsibility for me as the DUSD(P&R). I will work to 
enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of P&R's policy and oversight 
role by assessing the allocation and balance of human capital and 
resources across the P&R portfolio and providing the USD with 
recommendations that will best align those resources with his 
priorities and the workload of the office. I will do so in alignment 
with intent and guidance from the Under Secretary and leveraging the 
institutional knowledge and background of the P&R Senior Career 
Official and other leaders across P&R.
                 overall readiness of the armed forces
    Question. How would you assess the overall readiness of the armed 
forces, specifically their readiness to execute the National Defense 
Strategy (NDS) and associated operational plans?
    Answer. I believe our armed forces are manned, trained, and 
equipped to execute the strategic objectives in the President's Interim 
National Security Strategic Guidance and the National Defense Strategy. 
While our Military Services are prepared to meet today's operational 
missions, ensure U.S. competitive advantage, and mitigate undue risks 
to our warfighters, their readiness to meet future challenges, 
particularly with regard to
    China and Russia, must remain a priority. If confirmed, I will work 
closely with my colleagues in the Office of the Secretary of Defense, 
the Military Departments and Military Services, and the Joint Staff to 
ensure readiness policies, processes, methodologies, and systems are 
effectively implemented and tailored so that we can keep pace with 
evolving threats. Our readiness policies underpin our goal to provide 
our senior leaders with the best information to assess the way our 
forces generate and sustain readiness to meet both immediate and future 
demands.
    Question. If confirmed, what specific actions would you recommend 
to improve personnel readiness, including with regard to the health of 
the force?
    Answer. If confirmed, I will focus efforts on growing, developing, 
managing, and caring for the talent in our force that underpins the 
U.S. competitive advantage. This includes building a resilient and 
ready force, and fostering an environment that holds DOD leaders at 
every level appropriately accountable for building a safe and 
collaborative workplace. I will also support the Military Departments 
in these areas in order to reduce any potential impacts to readiness, 
because our people are the foundation of our readiness to confront the 
challenges of today and tomorrow. As Secretary of Defense Austin made 
clear in his March 4, 2021, Message to the Force, ``Our most critical 
asset as a Department is our people and we remain the preeminent 
fighting force in the world because of our personnel.''
    Question. If confirmed, what actions would you take to oversee 
compliance by the Military Services with such timelines to ensure that 
personnel and training readiness goals are met?
    Answer. As the lead office for readiness policy and oversight, it 
is USD(P&R)'s responsibility to set the conditions that enable the 
Services to meet readiness requirements. To do so, OSD must work 
closely with Service counterparts not only to ensure their 
understanding and compliance with requirements, but also to advocate 
for the removal of barriers that may inhibit the Service's ability to 
meet their personnel and training readiness goals. If confirmed, I will 
also ensure that there is awareness of specific readiness risk areas, 
and timely solutions to address them across the Services.
    Question. In your view, is the OUSD(P&R) the most appropriate 
organization under which to align the Office of the Assistant Secretary 
of Defense for Readiness? If so, why do you believe this alignment best 
serves the DOD? If not, under which Principal Staff Assistant to the 
Secretary of Defense should the Assistant Secretary of Defense for 
Readiness be aligned for greatest efficacy, and why?
    Answer. Based on my understanding of the responsibilities of the 
ASD(Readiness), I do believe that they are properly aligned under the 
OUSD(P&R). People are the foundational building block of readiness, and 
the more I look at and understand readiness, the clearer it is that the 
recruiting, retention, development, education, training, and management 
of people and their knowledge, skills, and abilities to execute the 
mission are the principal generator of ready forces.
    Question. How do the functions of the Office of the Assistant 
Secretary of Defense for Readiness integrate with the readiness 
functions of the Military Departments, the Joint Staff, and the Under 
Secretary of Defense for Policy?
    Answer. ASD(Readiness) must work seamlessly with the Military 
Departments, the Joint Staff, and the Under Secretaries of Defense, 
including Policy, to set the conditions for readiness across the force. 
As members of the Secretary's staff, the Office of the USD(P&R) must 
ensure that DOD is generating the trained and educated force we need, 
that those forces and civilians across the Department are properly 
protected, and that the force is prepared to meet the nation's 
challenges today and in the future. OSD must work together to provide 
guidance to the Joint Staff, Military Departments, and Military 
Services to ensure they have the tools and strategic direction to build 
and sustain readiness to meet national defense objectives.
    ASD(Readiness) is then responsible for the oversight of these 
activities to ensure the right policies, processes, and authorities are 
in place to sustain readiness under current and future conditions, as 
well as to develop, refine, and track readiness metrics in order to 
inform leadership decision-making.
                          measuring readiness
    Question. What is your understanding of how the Department of 
Defense and the Military Services measure and track readiness? Do you 
believe the current metrics used to measure and track ``readiness'' are 
appropriate, particularly in light of the 2018 NDS?
    Answer. The Defense Readiness Reporting System--Strategic (DRRS-S), 
the Department's authoritative operational readiness database, provides 
a means to manage and report the readiness of DOD and its subordinate 
Components to meet immediate national requirements. It does so by 
providing a comprehensive assessment of a unit's operational readiness 
at a specific point in time. This is important but insufficient to 
understand the Department's long term ability to meet national 
strategic objectives. If confirmed, I will focus on the need to capture 
comprehensive readiness data with the goal of ensuring the DOD has an 
informed view of how decisions made today may impact the readiness of 
the future force.
    Question. If confirmed, what changes would you recommend to engage 
the OUSD(P&R) more directly in tracking readiness across the force? In 
prescribing efforts to remediate or mitigate identified deficiencies in 
readiness?
    Answer. I believe the Department is at a critical technological 
inflection point, where data-driven modeling and predictive analytics 
can provide a fuller understanding of how decisions made today may 
impact the readiness of the current and future force. In order to 
harness this data, the Department also requires a comprehensive 
framework for assessing forces across a broader strategic readiness 
spectrum. If confirmed, I will work with my partners across the 
Department to realize this shift so we can deliver actionable insights 
that provide senior leaders with timely and more objective analysis of 
readiness risks and tradeoffs.
    Question. Does OUSD(P&R) have the analytic tools and expertise to 
assist you, if confirmed, in evaluating DOD personnel and training 
readiness across the spectrum of challenges presented by the strategic 
environment--from low intensity, gray-zone conflicts to protracted, 
high-intensity fights with major-power rivals? Please explain your 
answer.
    Answer. I believe the OUSD(P&R) has both the highly skilled 
workforce as well as the analytical underpinnings to guide the decision 
of the USD(P&R) and my decisions if I am confirmed. I understand that 
the Department-wide focus on enhanced data analytics driven by the 
Deputy Secretary of Defense has created an environment where the 
innovative application of best-in-class analysis techniques are 
partnered with expertise of the military, civilians, and contracted 
workforces to provide decision support to leaders across the 
Department. I believe this ongoing effort will improve the Department's 
performance in evaluating the readiness of our force.
                     non-deployable servicemembers
    Question. In your view, should servicemembers who are non-
deployable for more than 12 consecutive months be subject either to 
separation from the service or referral to the Disability Evaluation 
System, as is current Department policy?
    Answer. My current understanding is that all servicemembers are 
expected to be deployable and if a servicemember is non-deployable for 
more than 12 consecutive months, the Military Department concerned is 
required to make a retention determination. If confirmed, in order to 
maintain force readiness and prevent impediments to fulfilling 
deployment requirement, I will review current policies to ensure they 
are geared towards maintaining a mission-ready force while still 
providing for individualized review of cases to determine if their 
continued service is appropriate.
    Question. Under what circumstances would the retention of a 
servicemember who has been non-deployable for more than 12 months be 
``in the best interest of the service''?
    Answer. I would expect these evaluations by the Secretaries of the 
Military Departments to be highly individualized. Secretaries of the 
Military Departments should consider the probability the 
servicemember's condition or reason for the non-deployable status will 
be resolved as well as their ability to execute necessary military 
duties consistent with the member's grade and responsibilities.
    Question. In your view, how should this policy be applied to 
servicemembers with HIV? To servicemembers who identify as transgender?
    Answer. In my view, servicemembers should receive fair and 
equitable treatment, irrespective of the medical condition involved.
    Question. In your view, should a servicemember's readiness to 
perform the required specific missions, functions, and tasks in the 
context of a particular deployment also be considered in determining 
whether that servicemember is deployable?
    Answer. Yes. I am aware that the Military Departments and Services 
consider specific deployment criteria as they assign individuals to 
fulfill these requirements in order to maximize the readiness, 
lethality, and capability of the deployed force.
    Question. What are your recommendations for addressing the 
challenges of medical non-deployability in the Reserve components?
    Answer. Although I do not currently have enough information to 
assess the challenges faced by the Reserve Component related to medical 
non-deployability, if confirmed, I will work with the Military 
Departments on this issue.
 collaboration between the departments of defense and veterans affairs
    Question. In your view, how effective has DOD/VA collaboration been 
to date, and what would you do to enhance it?
    Answer. The DOD and VA serve an overlapping population, and it's 
critical that these two Departments partner and constantly seek 
improvements to support our servicemembers. If confirmed, I will 
support continued efforts to strengthen the Joint Executive Committee 
and its activities to facilitate collaboration between the two 
Departments. We must continue to frequently work with one another, 
maintain constant communication, address any obstacles, and ensure our 
efforts show positive outcomes.
    Question. If confirmed, how would you improve the seamless 
transition of each servicemember as they move from servicemember to 
veteran status?
    Answer. Military to civilian transition is an ever-evolving, 
complex, and multi-faceted process. The Transition Assistance Program 
(TAP) must remain innovative, responsive, transparent and collaborative 
as we work with our servicemembers, Military Departments and Services, 
interagency partners, and non-governmental organizations to 
continuously improve transition services and support. If confirmed, I 
will champion transition programs and collaborate with private and 
public supporters to build upon current successes, achieve ever-
improving outcomes, and provide our transitioning servicemembers with 
the resources they need both before and after transition to empower and 
enable them to become successful, visible, Active Veterans equipped to 
reach their full potential and strengthen their communities.
    Question. What is your view of the effectiveness of the Transition 
Assistance Program (TAP), and how might it be improved?
    Answer. I believe TAP works, and like any program needs to evolve 
and continuously improve to meet the dynamic and varied requirements of 
transitioning servicemembers. TAP provides comprehensive, holistic, 
timely and personalized transition support. It is my understanding that 
the support TAP currently provides reflects work over the past 10 years 
of continuous assessment, evaluation, collaboration, and improvements 
to the program. If confirmed, I will work with the Services to build 
upon current successes and achieve ever-improving outcomes for TAP 
eligible servicemembers by addressing barriers that could prevent 
successful transition to civilian life and by increasing interagency 
data-sharing to improve TAP evaluation and assessment.
    Question. Should military spouse transition preparation be better 
inculcated in the TAP? Please explain your answer.
    Answer. I absolutely agree that spouse participation and spouse-
focused transition support and services are critical to successful 
transition. I understand that currently military spouses are invited 
and encouraged to attend all TAP modules. If confirmed, I will review 
how we can better incorporate support to spouses in the program.
    Question. What is your assessment of the efficacy of TAP services 
and support to members of the Reserve components as they transition 
from federalized/mobilized status back to civilian life and 
participation in their assigned reserve and guard units or positions?
    Answer. It is my understanding that the Department integrated TAP 
and Yellow Ribbon Reintegration Program (YRRP) curriculum, evaluation, 
and assessment to ensure transition and reintegration resources are 
available to all servicemembers, spouses, and caregivers all the time. 
If confirmed, I will ensure TAP and the YRRP work in tandem to provide 
support and services to all our servicemembers, to include TAP eligible 
members of the Reserve components, and their spouses and eligible 
caregivers.
    Question. In your view, how can TAP be improved to provide better 
support to members of the Reserve components?
    Answer. While TAP is a valuable program that works for all 
components, we must continue to evolve TAP to best meet all 
transitioning servicemembers needs and requirements. If confirmed, I 
will continue building and expanding the transition and reintegration 
suite of resources and services to achieve ever-improving outcomes for 
TAP eligible servicemembers, spouses and caregivers by addressing 
barriers that could prevent successful transition to civilian life and 
increasing interagency data-sharing to improve TAP evaluation and 
assessment.
    Question. If confirmed, what problems would you recommend be 
submitted to the Joint Executive Committee for review and resolution?
    Answer. If confirmed, my first step would be to listen to our 
subject matter experts and collect as much data and information to 
understand where we are, where gaps may be, and how we can most 
efficiently and appropriately move forward. It is my understanding that 
DOD and VA recently signed their most recent Joint Strategic Plan, to 
include several goals in the areas of health care collaboration, 
benefits, transition, business operations, and strengthening 
interoperability and benefits. If confirmed, I would look to ensure 
that the Department is moving forward as quickly and effectively in 
these areas to drive needed improvements.
    Question. What progress have the DOD and VA made in implementing 
their respective Electronic Health Records? Is each agency's EHR system 
fully interoperable with the system of the other? How would any delays 
in the VA's EHR implementation impact DOD's progress towards full 
implementation of its EHR? Please explain your answers.
    Answer. It is my understanding that the Departments of Defense 
(DOD) and Veterans Affairs (VA) purchased a common Electronic Health 
Record (EHR) system, a Commercial-off-the-Shelf product delivered by 
Cerner, which is interoperable between the two organizations. Even 
though they are using the same EHR system, the DOD's progress toward 
full implementation is independent of the VA's implementation. If 
confirmed, I will work with the DOD and VA to ensure both agencies 
continue on a successful path toward full implementation of the system 
and that the selected contractor meets their obligations.
                               extremism
    Question. What is your view of the prevalence and effect of 
extremism within the armed forces?
    Answer. It is my understanding that extremist activities in the 
ranks are limited. Unfortunately, extremist activities have an outsized 
effect and thus must be addressed appropriately to ensure the long-term 
safety and security of the Force.
    Question. If confirmed, what recommendations would you have to 
eliminate extremism within the ranks?
    Answer. I understand Secretary Austin directed a review of this 
issue this past summer and may be considering additional 
recommendations and actions. If confirmed, I will work with my 
colleagues to put any recommendations approved into action to further 
increase the stability and security of our servicemembers, civilian 
workforce, contractors and their families.
                        diversity and inclusion
    Question. In general, what is your assessment of the diversity of 
each of the Department of Defense military and civilian workforces?
    Answer. It is my understanding that while the Department has made 
progress in some areas, there remains work to be done. We need to 
ensure that the DOD, the Services, and our civilian workforce 
appropriately reflect the Nation we serve. Our diversity and inclusion 
efforts must help us drive real progress and change. Ensuring 
opportunity is not only about who we are as people, but it also ensures 
that we are doing more to fully leverage the varied strengths of all 
our people.
    I understand that the Deputy's Workforce Council is working to 
address many of the most critical people-related efforts, including 
improvements for diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility. More 
must be done in these areas, and if confirmed I will closely engage 
with the Department's subject matter experts to support strong 
progress.
    Question. If confirmed, how would you increase diversity and 
inclusion in the armed forces, and work toward the goal of ensuring 
that the nation's military, at all levels, especially within the senior 
officer ranks, reflects the broad diversity of the nation eligible for 
service in the armed forces?
    Answer. If confirmed, my first steps would be to collect 
information, identify specific areas of concern, work with subject 
matter experts to increase our understanding of these areas of concern, 
and ensure that our oversight and governance frameworks are set up to 
support comprehensive, long-term and sustained progress on these 
issues.
    Question. If confirmed, how would you increase diversity and 
inclusion within the Department's civilian workforce, especially at the 
senior General Schedule and Senior Executive Service levels?
    Answer. I support the Administration's focus on strengthening 
diversity and inclusion in the Federal workforce, and I believe efforts 
should include a focus on the senior levels, including the Senior 
Executive Service. If confirmed, I will work closely with other DOD 
leaders to promote diversity of talent and remove barriers to equal 
opportunity in the Department's senior ranks.
    Question. How would you increase geographical diversity in the 
armed forces, especially from areas of the country and local 
communities that are currently underrepresented in the force?
    Answer. I believe geographic diversity is important and if 
confirmed I will work with the Military Departments and Services to 
help ensure they have fully leveraged technology in an effort to 
improve recruiting in these local and underrepresented communities. I 
believe sustained investment in developing a value proposition that 
resonates with underrepresented communities, virtual recruiting and 
digital marketing will be critical to improving diversity and expanding 
outreach in all communities across the Nation.
                 sexual assault prevention and response
    Question. In your view, how adequate and effective have the 
policies, programs, and training been that DOD and the Military 
Services have put in place to prevent and respond to sexual assault?
    Answer. In a zero tolerance environment, if even one sexual assault 
occurs that means current policies, programs and training are falling 
short. I am aware that over the past several years, DOD has 
substantially updated and issued new policies, established new 
programs, and generally expanded the infrastructure in place to prevent 
and respond to sexual assault. While there are, to my understanding, 
numerous reporting options and support services for victims, we 
absolutely must also prevent these crimes from occurring in the first 
place. I understand that the Department is working through an 
implementation roadmap for the recommendations related to the 
Independent Review Commission on Sexual Assault in the Military (IRC). 
If confirmed, I will work to support Secretary Austin's vision in this 
area and ensure we do everything possible to appropriately address 
sexual assault. These behaviors cannot be tolerated.
    Question. If confirmed, specifically what would you do to increase 
DOD-wide focus on the prevention of sexual assaults?
    Answer. If confirmed, I will support implementation of the approved 
IRC recommendations in support of Secretary Austin's vision. The 
Department must hold itself to the highest standard. The Military 
Departments and Services in particular have the tools and ability to 
shape behaviors, and they must do all they can to prevent sexual 
assaults, as must we all. We need increased focus on this issue and 
identification of the most promising practices, tools, and efforts that 
can help reduce--and eliminate--sexual assaults.
    Question. What is your assessment of the Department's 
implementation of protections against retaliation--most notably social 
ostracism and reputation damage--for reporting sexual assault?
    Answer. Retaliation is completely unacceptable and must be 
eliminated. If confirmed, I will work to evaluate our policies and 
efforts to prevent retaliation and, in particular, social ostracism and 
reputational damage. It is my understanding that the Department's goal 
of eliminating retaliatory behaviors will help lead to an environment 
where victims feel comfortable coming forward to report allegations of 
sexual assault, which will, in turn, lead to increased reporting and 
greater accountability of alleged offenders.
                 sexual harassment in the armed forces
    Question. What is your assessment of the effectiveness of the 
sexual harassment programs of the Department, including those of the 
Military Departments?
    Answer. This is a critical area. My understanding is that the 
Department published new or updated policies in recent years to prevent 
sexual harassment. Nonetheless, sexual harassment remains a challenge 
and I know DOD can do better to prevent this unacceptable behavior that 
undermines unit cohesion, degrades victims, and can be a precursor to 
sexual assault.
    If confirmed, I will prioritize review of the Department's recent 
and ongoing efforts in the prevention area. This is not only an issue 
that must be addressed to ensure our people are treated with dignity 
and respect, but it is also critical for our military's readiness.
    Question. In your view, do methods for tracking the submission and 
monitoring the resolution of informal complaints of harassment or 
discrimination provide DOD leaders, supervisors, and managers with an 
accurate picture of the systemic prevalence of these adverse behaviors 
in the military force?
    Answer. My understanding is that the Department leverages surveys 
and data to measure the prevalence of harassment and discrimination. 
This approach assesses data on experiences to measure rates rather than 
depending only on reports received about these adverse behaviors.
    Data from surveys helps leaders and organizations understand the 
total scope of an issue--its prevalence--and better ensure specific 
actions to address areas that need to be addressed.
    Informal reports are another option, and at the same time it is 
absolutely critical that all leaders throughout DOD take immediate and 
appropriate action when they receive an informal report. They also must 
track them to understand prevalence.
    Question. If confirmed, what actions will you take to improve the 
quality of investigations into allegations of sexual harassment in the 
force?
    Answer. The Department's leaders must always be held appropriately 
responsible for addressing sexual harassment complaints. To improve the 
quality of investigations, if confirmed I will fully support efforts to 
improve leadership engagement in this area, including the 
implementation roadmap for IRC recommendations, including investigation 
of all sexual harassment cases by an independent, well-trained body 
that is outside the chain of command. Addressing issues of sexual 
harassment is critical to put a stop to this readiness-detracting 
behavior.
    Question. Does the Department's method for recording the outcomes 
of informal complaints of harassment or discrimination provide DOD 
leaders, supervisors, and managers with a means of identifying repeat 
perpetrators in the military?
    Answer. If confirmed, I will closely examine this issue. I would 
closely examine anti-harassment and equal opportunity policies to 
ensure they are robust and support efforts in this space. We must 
ensure that any repeat offenders are identified.
         domestic violence and child abuse in military families
    Question. What is your understanding of the extent of domestic 
violence and child abuse and neglect in the armed forces, and, if 
confirmed, what actions would you take to address these issues?
    Answer. Domestic abuse, and child abuse and neglect are 
fundamentally incompatible with military values and negatively impact 
mission readiness. However, these issues do exist in our military, and 
if confirmed, I commit to prioritizing solutions and resources to 
support productive prevention and appropriate response efforts.
    Question. In your view, what more can the Department do to prevent 
child abuse and neglect and domestic and intimate partner violence?
    Answer. It is my understanding that the Department is attacking 
this serious issue by focusing on an integrated primary prevention 
approach. If confirmed, I will ensure that the collaborative efforts in 
this area remain a priority.
    Question. Do you believe that the Department's Family Advocacy 
Program strikes the right balance between healing families and holding 
individuals accountable for acts of domestic violence and child abuse 
and neglect?
    Answer. If confirmed, I commit to thoroughly review the program and 
evaluate how well it addresses prevention, support of those impacted, 
and appropriate accountability for those engaged in these actions. It 
is my understanding that these are all essential components of the 
Department's approach to this issue.
 department of defense education activity, dod schools, and dependent 
                               education
    Question. What is your assessment of the overall quality of 
education provided by DOD schools?
    Answer. It is my understanding that overall satisfaction with DODEA 
schools is extremely high and standardized test scores are on par with 
the finest public school systems in the country. If confirmed, I will 
continue to support excellence in our schools for military families.
    Question. What lasting impacts, if any, do you believe the COVID-19 
pandemic will have on the way DOD schools are run and how DOD 
dependents who attend those schools learn?
    Answer. It is my understanding that DODEA operated very effectively 
during the COVID-19 pandemic, especially when compared with other 
public school systems. If confirmed, I will support the continued 
incorporation of adaptive curriculum and technology to not only to 
prepare for future pandemics, but also to provide individualized 
instruction to meet students' learning needs no matter their location.
    Question. Do you believe DODEA should further expand its 
capabilities to deliver online education going forward? Please explain 
your answer.
    Answer. Although I do not know all of the details, I recently read 
that DODEA is conducting a pilot program to expand access to its 
virtual school. If confirmed, I will be sure to assess the results of 
that pilot and work with DODEA to continue focusing resources and 
education tools to reach its students whether in the classroom or in a 
remote setting.
    Question. What is your assessment of the preparedness of DOD 
schools to respond and react appropriately to active shooter 
emergencies?
    Answer. In today's world, all schools must prepare for active 
shooter situations and the DOD schools are no different, even though 
they are on military installations. Keeping awareness of procedures 
through regular training and drills is vital to ensure preparedness. I 
am aware that DODEA partners with installation commands to evaluate its 
drills, and if confirmed I will continue any and all support to ensure 
student safety.
    Question. How do you assess current class sizes (student to teacher 
ratios) throughout DODEA schools, and do you recommend they be 
adjusted? If so, why?
    Answer. Because I am not an educator, if confirmed, this is an 
issue I want to learn more about from the Department's subject matter 
experts at DODEA. We must continue to invest in our military families 
through our schools and this includes suitably staffing teaching 
requirements.
    Question. In your view, how, if at all, should the quality and 
availability of local public education factor into Departmental and 
Military Service basing decisions?
    Answer. As an advocate who worked closely with military families, I 
know how much our military readiness is dependent upon family readiness 
and I have spent my time in the non-profit sector supporting military 
families--particularly young military families with children. I 
understand that the Military Services are beginning to include the 
quality and availability of local education in basing decisions, and if 
confirmed I will support this effort as well as implement and advocate 
for improvements that may be needed.
    Question. Are you confident that DODEA has in place the policies 
and processes to ensure that:
    Allegations of sexual assault or sexual harassment by a student in 
locations under the jurisdiction of DODEA are properly investigated?
    Answer. If confirmed, I will work to ensure the policies and 
procedures are in place to respond to allegations of sexual assault or 
sexual harassment. As with all Executive Branch agencies, DODEA must 
take reasonable steps to eliminate unlawful discrimination in its 
schools, programs, activities, and workplaces, as required under 
Executive Order 13160, ``Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Race, Sex, 
Color, National Origin, Disability, Religion, Age, Sexual Orientation, 
and Status as a Parent in Federally Conducted Education and Training 
Programs,'' June 30, 2000. If confirmed, I will ensure that requirement 
is followed.
    Question. Information documenting such misconduct, if 
substantiated, is recorded in the permanent record of the offending 
student and that any school to which that student subsequently 
transfers is made aware of that information, as appropriate?
    Answer. I believe information on substantiated misconduct should be 
included in a student's record and transferred if and when that student 
enrolls in a new school and, if confirmed, I will review DODEA's 
policies and take appropriate action as necessary.
    Question. If confirmed, what actions would you direct to ensure 
that DODEA takes all appropriate actions to hold its teachers, other 
employees, and students accountable for acts of sexual assault, sexual 
harassment, and unlawful discrimination?
    Answer. We must continually work to end discrimination, harassment, 
and assault of any kind everywhere in the Department, including its 
schools. If confirmed, I will review the training and resources 
available to DODEA teachers, staff, and students and ensure that the 
systems in place are being properly used to address inappropriate 
behaviors and take appropriate action as warranted.
                  juvenile problematic sexual behavior
    Question. What is your assessment of DOD and Military Service 
programs to respond to, investigate, adjudicate, and document 
allegations of juvenile problematic sexual behavior?
    Answer. I am aware that the Department has no jurisdiction to 
adjudicate such cases. Therefore, it is important for DOD to work with 
partners in the Department of Justice, State and local governments to 
ensure the behaviors that reach a criminal threshold are appropriately 
adjudicated. If confirmed, I will commit to providing the focus on this 
issue and will make sure the team has the resources and support 
necessary.
    Question. How can these programs be improved, in your view?
    Answer. I believe that the Department has taken a multi-
disciplinary approach to respond to these behaviors that ensures this 
issue is appropriately addressed. If confirmed, I will focus on 
continued improvements to processes and policies for this program.
                       military service academies
    Question. Over the last year, each of the Military Service 
Academies experienced significant violations of their respective honor 
codes, which prohibit lying, cheating, or stealing.
    In your view, how should the Military Service Academies handle 
honor code violations?
    Answer. As I understand, the Service Academies' academic standards 
are designed to prepare cadets and midshipmen in part for the 
responsibilities they will take on as commissioned officers. These high 
standards are important to developing the integrity and character 
required of our military leaders. If confirmed, I will how the honor 
system contributes to leader development and ensure it is implemented 
in a manner that meets the desired intent.
    Question. What is your assessment of the diversity of cadets and 
midshipmen enrolled in each of the Military Service Academies? What 
measures can be taken to increase diversity in the Academies?
    Answer. Diversity within our services is critical. The Military 
Service Academies produce future leaders of our military; therefore, it 
is essential the cadets and midshipmen represent the diversity of our 
great country. If confirmed, I will work with the Military Departments 
and Services to improve communication of the value proposition, explore 
new marketing, recruiting, and community partnering methods to increase 
the diversity of Military Service Academy applicants.
    Question. What is your assessment of the efficacy of the policies 
and processes in place across the Military Service Academies to prevent 
sexual assault and sexual harassment, and to ensure that cadets and 
midshipmen who do report assault or harassment are not subject to 
retaliation--social ostracism and reputation damage--in particular?
    Answer. Any form of sexual assault or harassment is unacceptable, 
particularly at the Military Service Academies, institutions among the 
top colleges and universities in the country. If confirmed, I will work 
with Military Department and Service leadership to make sure that they 
monitor such behavior to ensure the Military Service Academies properly 
address all forms of problematic behaviors, to include any retaliation, 
ostracism, or reputational damage.
    Question. What is your assessment of the efficacy of the policies 
and processes in place at each Military Service Academy to ensure 
cadets' and midshipmen's free exercise of religion--to include no 
religion at all--and the accommodation of religious practices?
    Answer. I am confident in the policies and process in place to 
protect and enable the free exercise of religion, or no religion at 
all, at the Academies. If confirmed, I will work to ensure the 
Department continues to protect and provide for the free exercise of 
religion, or no religion at all, as well as the spiritual readiness of 
all our cadets, midshipmen, and servicemembers.
    Question. What is your assessment of the efficacy of suicide 
prevention programs at each Military Service Academy?
    Answer. I am aware of recent media reports and understand the 
Department and Services take this tragic issue very seriously. If I am 
confirmed, I will assess the efficacy of efforts taken to date, and 
engage with the Military Departments and Services to seek ways to 
advance suicide prevention programs.
    Question. Do you believe the current five-year minimum Active Duty 
service commitment for Military Service Academy graduates is sufficient 
return on investment for the U.S. military and the American taxpayer?
    Answer. I do not currently have enough information to provide an 
informed assessment. However, if confirmed, I will examine the costs 
and benefits if the Military Service Academies and work to ensure our 
Nation is receiving a high return on its investment.
    Question. In your view, do the Military Service Academies 
contribute to the pool of military officer accessions commensurate with 
their attendant costs? Why or why not?
    Answer. Although I am unfamiliar with costs of the Military Service 
Academies, especially in comparison to other accession programs, I am 
familiar with the excellent reputation of the Military Service 
Academies and the high caliber officers and citizens they produce. If 
confirmed, I look forward to assessing the educational costs relative 
to the contributions of this particular pool of officers.
    Question. Given the provisions of title 10, U.S. Code, applicable 
to each of the Military Service Academies, under what conditions would 
you deem it appropriate, if confirmed, to permit a military officer to 
play professional sports prior to completing at least two consecutive 
years of commissioned service following graduation from an Academy?
    Answer. From recent news reports, I am generally aware of a few 
Military Service Academy cadets and midshipmen approved to play 
professional sports prior to serving at least two consecutive years as 
a commissioned officer. If confirmed, I look forward to examining this 
issue in detail.
            senior reserve officers' training corps (srotc)
    Question. In your view, does the Senior Reserve Officers' Training 
Corps (SROTC) program remain a viable source of officer accessions?
    Answer. SROTC units are geographically spread across the nation. 
Not only do they provide a diverse source of officers, but also, as I 
understand it, are the largest source of commissioned officers. If I am 
confirmed, I will assess the Department's current programs to ensure 
efficiencies are maximized.
    Question. What is your assessment of the diversity in our ROTC 
programs? What measures can be taken to increase diversity in the ROTC?
    Answer. I am not currently well-versed in the diversity of ROTC 
programs. If confirmed, I will review the ROTC programs and ensure the 
Department continues to focus on increasing the diversity of the 
officer corps.
    Question. In your view, should the Military Services continue to 
operate SROTC units at colleges and universities that fail to meet 
their minimum annual commissioning requirements? If not, please explain 
the factors you believe should be used to determine which units should 
be terminated.
    I am interested in reviewing the circumstances surrounding those 
SROTC units facing viability and commissioning challenges. If 
confirmed, I will work alongside the Military Departments and Services 
and Congress to ensure maximum efficiency without the loss of cultural 
and geographical representation.
    Question. How would you modify the SROTC scholarship program to 
attract the top talent that our armed forces need?
    Answer. SROTC scholarship programs should be designed and located 
at the best colleges and universities to allow the Services to recruit 
and commission the top talent they require. If confirmed, I look 
forward to working with the Military Departments and Services and 
Congress to review current efforts and to leverage technology to 
attract the skills and talent the armed forces need.
                     health care quality and access
    Question. If confirmed, what specific actions would you take with 
respect to each of the following:
    Eliminating performance variability throughout the Military Health 
System (MHS).
    Answer. If confirmed, I will ensure the MHS uses performance 
measures to monitor key performance goals for medical readiness, 
quality, clinical outcomes, safety, access, patient experience and 
satisfaction and other vital indicators. I will ensure the MHS 
determines why that variability may exist, whether due to circumstances 
unique to geography, size of medical facility, resourcing decisions, or 
leadership challenges and also to identify leading practices for 
implementation across the enterprise.
    If confirmed, I will ask that MHS leaders implement performance 
improvement plans and milestones for areas where variability is high, 
and performance is poor. I also will ensure the Defense Health Agency 
codifies validated standard processes in official guidance and 
establishes accountability processes to eliminate unwarranted 
performance variability across the MHS. I understand that reducing 
variability requires continuous assessment and probing questions. If 
confirmed, I will hold regular management reviews of MHS performance as 
part of my oversight responsibilities.
    Question. Improving health outcomes and the experience of care for 
all of the Department's beneficiaries--in both the direct and purchased 
care components of the MHS.
    Answer. If confirmed, I will ensure the MHS continues its plans to 
enhance clinical outcomes and patient experience. It is my 
understanding that, in the direct care system, the MHS is prioritizing 
implementation of patient-friendly, patient-facing processes in 
military medical treatment facilities (MTFs) and markets to reduce 
administrative burdens on patients and enhance customer service. In 
support of great clinical outcomes, if confirmed, I will ensure the MHS 
remains focused on accountability for patient safety and quality and 
also leverages the expertise of our MHS clinical communities to 
establish evidence-based care pathways and practice guidelines to 
improve health outcomes. Finally, if confirmed, I will ensure the MHS 
establishes standard processes to enhance patient experience including 
centralized appointing, integration with the TRICARE network, and 
implementation of industry-standard virtual health and patient 
engagement capabilities.
    Question. Creating a value-based MHS--ensuring the delivery of 
accessible, high-quality health care at a reasonable cost to both the 
Department and its beneficiaries.
    Answer. It is my understanding that the MHS is implementing 
standard processes in the direct care system to improve resource 
utilization, eliminate waste, reduce unnecessary variation and enhance 
clinical outcomes and improve readiness of the force. If confirmed, I 
will ensure the MHS moves toward a value-based care model based on 
quality of care rather than quantity in both the direct care and 
private sector care components of the MHS. I will ensure the health 
care teams are accountable for delivering high-quality care supportive 
of the overall DOD mission while ensuring effective use of taxpayer 
resources.
    In the private sector care component, if confirmed, I will support 
on-going work to reduce the provision of low-value care and to enhance 
the use of high-value health care services. I will ensure incorporation 
of alternative payment models and value-based benefit and insurance 
design where supported by evidence. These efforts should directly 
contribute to patient outcomes, readiness, access to care, and 
represent good stewardship of taxpayer dollars.
                     military health system reform
    Question. Do you support the implementation of the Military Health 
System (MHS) reforms mandated by the NDAAs for FYs 2017, 2019, 2020, 
and 2021?
    Answer. Yes, I support implementation of the MHS reforms and, if 
confirmed, will work with the various stakeholders within the 
Department and Congress to implement the reforms. As I understand the 
reforms, they will focus the MHS on readiness and provide opportunities 
to enhance the quality of health care while improving overall mission 
effectiveness and efficiency. I recognize challenges come with 
significant change, however, with the reform goals as stated, if 
confirmed, I will work closely with all stakeholders, internal and 
external, to understand the issues and move forward on implementing the 
reforms to enhance future MHS capabilities and mission support.
    Question. If confirmed, specifically what would you do to change 
the culture within the Military Services to prompt them to embrace 
fully the changes necessary to improve the readiness of the medical 
force?
    Answer. If confirmed, I will work closely with the Military 
Departments and Services to understand their requirements and listen to 
their concerns. Recognizing the importance of our mutually reinforcing 
mission to maintain a Medically Ready Force and a Ready Medical Force, 
I am confident we can move forward together to enhance this critical 
mission for the Department of Defense.
    Question. In your view, are the Military Departments' medical 
forces properly sized to meet the joint medical requirements set forth 
in operational plans implementing the 2018 NDS and in the recent Joint 
Medical Estimate?
    Answer. If confirmed, I will work with the Joint Staff and Military 
Departments to understand their medical requirements and advocate for 
those needs while helping them balance and prioritize those needs 
within the Department's budget guidance and resourcing processes.
    Question. In your view, is DOD's current education, training, and 
career development approach sufficient to ensure a military trauma care 
workforce that is ready to deliver expert health care (including combat 
casualty care) in support of the full range of military operations, 
domestically and abroad?
    Answer. If confirmed, I will work with the MHS leadership to fully 
understand the requirements and any issues inhibiting our ability to 
provide world class military trauma care. It is my understanding that 
it is a very challenging area, but obviously essential to our 
continued, future mission success. I plan to advocate where needed for 
adequate resourcing and leverage career development opportunities to 
address any limitations in fielding a ready highly capable medical 
force across the range of military operations.
                   mental and behavioral health care
    Question. If confirmed, what actions would you take to ensure that 
sufficient mental and behavioral health resources are available to 
servicemembers in theater and to servicemembers and families at home 
station locations, including members and families of the Reserve 
components?
    Answer. If confirmed, I will ensure DOD continues to provide 
accessible, high quality mental and behavioral health resources to our 
military servicemembers and their families. This includes inpatient, 
outpatient, deployment embedded health care services, child and family 
behavioral health care, and tele-behavioral health, non-medical 
counseling, supplemented by family programs such as the Military Crisis 
Line, providing confidential, immediate help 24/7 at no cost to Active 
Duty, Guard and Reserve members, and their families.
    Question. In your view, how could the Department better integrate 
the provision of mental and behavioral health care services and non-
medical counseling?
    Answer. If confirmed, I will seek to support mental health 
professionals that are positioned to provide the best possible care 
based on evidence-based best practices, and improve whole health of 
patients through compliance with current standard of care clinical 
practice guidelines, including recommendations for non-medical 
counseling and social context support systems.
    Question. If confirmed, what would you do to improve the delivery 
of behavioral health services in the MHS through telehealth? How would 
you expand such capabilities in both the direct and purchased care 
components of the MHS?
    Answer. If confirmed, I will work with MHS leaders to enable tele-
behavioral health services that are leveraged for mental health 
assessments, ongoing behavioral health treatment, and surge support for 
pre-deployment evaluations, and work to expand services to include 
continued beneficiary care through consistent and stable patient/
provider relationships. Further, if confirmed, I will seek to promote 
collaborative efforts across the direct and purchased care components, 
addressing IT, network, system, and patient/provider challenges to 
expand capabilities and enable a patient-centric approach to promote 
tele-behavioral health.
                           suicide prevention
    Question. If confirmed, how would you strengthen the Department's 
suicide prevention programs to reduce the number of suicides among 
servicemembers, including in the Reserve components, and their 
families?
    Answer. We must do everything possible to prevent suicides. 
Preventing these tragedies must remain a top priority for the 
Department of Defense. If confirmed, I will work to ensure that 
prevention efforts leverage the most promising evidence-informed 
strategies and best practices. Science and research are key. It is my 
understanding that the Department has focused its prevention efforts on 
reducing risk factors and enhancing protective factors. This includes 
addressing relationship, financial, or mental health challenges, 
encouraging help-seeking, reducing stigma, and helping with the 
resources and skill building that can enhance an individual's ability 
to more effectively work through challenging events or stressful times.
    I also recognize the need to ensure collaboration--both with the 
Department of Veterans Affairs and other stakeholders.
    Question. If confirmed, what specific steps would you take to 
provide additional suicide prevention programs in rural and isolated 
locations, such as Fort Wainwright, Alaska and on naval ships underway?
    Answer. Suicide prevention is personal to all of us, particularly 
for me since my family has experienced suicide; I take this issue very 
seriously. It is my understanding that the Department is employing a 
public health approach to address these tragedies. This broad approach 
recognizes that suicide can be a result of factors that exist at the 
individual as well as the community/societal levels.
    If confirmed, I will support the broadest possible approaches that 
the evidence and research indicate hold promise to prevent suicide. We 
must ensure we are constantly learning about underlying factors that 
contribute to suicide. That means we also take actions to understand 
why there could be an increase or concentration of suicides in a given 
area and what circumstances might be occurring in remote areas that we 
can better address.
                  officer personnel management system
    Question. In your view, what actions can be taken to improve 
permeability between the Active and Reserve components?
    Answer. As I understand it, permeability between the Active and 
Reserve components will allow the Military Departments flexibility in 
personnel management and allow them to make quicker talent management-
based decisions. If confirmed, I pledge to learn more about this issue 
and will work with the Military Departments to improve permeability 
between the Active and Reserve components.
    Question. Do you believe current DOD and Military Service 
procedures and practices for reviewing the records of officers pending 
the President's nomination for promotion or assignment, especially 
those with adverse or reportable information, are sufficient to enable 
fully-informed decisions by the Secretaries of the Military 
Departments, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Secretary 
of Defense, and the President?
    Answer. Yes. As I understand it, there are extremely thorough 
processes in place to properly evaluate officer qualifications, to 
include any available adverse or reportable information, to ensure the 
decisions made by senior leaders are well informed. If confirmed, I 
will work to make sure the necessary information to make fully informed 
decisions is available.
    Question. Recent NDAAs provided significant flexibility to the 
constraints imposed by the Defense Officer Personnel Management Act 
(DOPMA). In your judgment could the Military Departments benefit from 
additional authorities or flexibilities, better to achieve the talent 
management objectives associated with implementing the NDS?
    Answer. First off, I must offer my appreciation to this Committee 
specifically for providing the Department with modernized laws in this 
space that contribute to enhancing the readiness of the Services. If 
confirmed, I look forward to working with the Congress in order to 
identify other potential authorities or flexibilities as the Department 
looks to recruit and retain the talent it needs to implement the 
National Defense Strategy.
                        joint officer management
    Question. In your view, do the requirements associated with 
becoming a Joint Qualified Officer (JQO), and the link between 
attaining joint qualification and eligibility for promotion to General/
Flag Officer rank, continue to be consistent with the operational and 
professional demands of military service line officers?
    Answer. It is my understanding that the requirements associated 
with becoming a Joint Qualified Officer (JQO) and the link between 
attaining eligibility for promotion to General/Flag Officer are 
consistent with operational and professional demands. If confirmed, I 
will review the joint qualification requirements to confirm they are 
aligned with the Department's needs.
    Question. What additional modifications, if any, would you 
recommend to JQO prerequisites to ensure that military officers are 
able to attain both meaningful joint and Service-specific leadership 
experience, as well as adequate professional development?
    Answer. If confirmed, I am committed to partnering with Department 
leadership to evaluate JQO prerequisites in order to maintain our 
competitive advantage by developing strategically minded joint 
warfighters with critical thinking skills and innovative approaches to 
applying military power to the national strategy that will allow for 
adaptability to fight under changing conditions and execute worldwide 
operations.
    Question. What are your ideas for improving the JQO system better 
to meet the needs of Reserve component officers?
    Answer. I am aware that the current Joint Qualification System 
(JQS) is a Total Force system allowing the Department to have a common 
standard that ensures all joint qualified officers are qualified to 
work in the joint environment. If confirmed, I commit to evaluating 
and, as necessary, transforming the system for the Total Force, 
including those critical Reserve component officers.
    Question. In your view, should the requirement to be a JQO be 
eliminated as a consideration in selecting officers for promotion and 
assignment?
    Answer. No, I strongly believe we need officers across the Total 
Force to be JQO and, if confirmed, I will work with the Joint Staff and 
the military leaders to ensure that the JQO requirements continue to 
meet the Department's needs and objectives. The requirement to be a JQO 
recognizes that the Department needs leaders who are critical thinkers 
and can execute worldwide unified operations, and are able to fight 
during fluctuating circumstances.
                    professional military education
    Question. What changes or reform would you recommend to the 
professional military education system to ensure that tomorrow's 
leaders have the tools necessary to ensure the Department is able to 
meet the national defense objectives of the future?
    Answer. My understanding is that the Department's professional 
military education has been achieving its core functions of developing 
our servicemembers. If confirmed, I intend to evaluate how the 
professional military education system is educating servicemembers to 
meet not just today's threats but tomorrow's as well. I would also 
ensure that opportunities for professional military education are 
accessible to all those who meet the educational requirements.
                             nuclear forces
    Question. If confirmed, what would be your role in ensuring that 
the military services sustain efforts to improve the training, 
readiness, morale, welfare, and quality of life of servicemembers 
charged to execute and support the Department's nuclear mission?
    Answer. DOD must support the servicemembers carrying out one of our 
highest priority mission--nuclear deterrence. If confirmed, I will work 
with the Military Departments to better understand the specific 
challenges their nuclear forces face and ensure their servicemembers 
have the training, readiness, and support required to execute our 
Nation's most critical national defense mission.
                              space force
    Question. In your view, how should the Reserve components be 
structured to support to the U.S. Space Force?
    Answer. In my view, Space is critical to national security, and 
like all other warfighting domains, the Reserve component plays an 
essential role in the ability to surge to meet emerging threats. If 
confirmed, I will work with other DOD leaders to ensure the seamless 
integration of the Reserve component as part of the Total Force.
                         military compensation
    Question. Do you agree that the primary purpose of a competitive 
military pay and benefits package is to recruit and retain a military 
of sufficient size and quality to meet national defense objectives?
    Answer. Yes. The pay and benefits provided to servicemembers and 
their families must be as competitive as possible with the private 
sector for DOD to be able recruit and retain top-quality individuals 
for military service.
    Question. What is your assessment of the adequacy of the current 
military pay package in achieving this goal?
    Answer. From my time as CEO of NMFA, I am aware that military 
members are paid well and that the current military compensation 
package is very competitive with the private sector. However, I also 
believe the Department's leaders must remain vigilant to ensure the 
full range of pay and benefits remains effective, particularly since 
most American families require dual incomes.
    Question. What changes, if any, would you recommend to the current 
military pay and benefits package, if confirmed?
    Answer. While I don't have specific recommendations to offer at 
this time, if I am confirmed, I would be open to considering changes to 
military compensation. I believe that Secretary Austin was absolutely 
right when he made ``taking care of our people'' his top DOD priority. 
Therefore, in my view, any significant change to current military pay 
and benefits must be carefully considered to ensure we do not 
jeopardize readiness while we enhance our recruitment and retention 
efforts..
    Question. What specific recommendations do you have for controlling 
rising military personnel costs, including entitlement spending?
    Answer. I understand there are concerns regarding growth in 
military personnel costs over time. I believe we need to control those 
costs and should search for improved processes and greater efficiencies 
that will do so. If confirmed, I will work with the USD(P&R) and DOD's 
leaders, as well as the Armed Services Committees in both chambers of 
Congress, to ensure any future military compensation and benefits 
changes are cost-efficient, and contribute to maintaining a Total Force 
composed of the highest quality individuals that are properly trained 
and equipped to meet our national defense goals.
                end strength and personnel requirements
    Question. In your judgment, what role should the USD(P&R) play in 
ensuring responsible management of military manpower across both the 
Active and Reserve components?
    Answer. If confirmed, I commit to prioritizing compliance with all 
applicable laws in this area. I will review actions taken so far, and 
ensure an action plan is in place to address any outstanding issues.
    Question. Is the current military end strength sufficient to meet 
national defense objectives? If not, what end strength is necessary?
    Answer. I confirmed, I commit to fully understanding the 
Department's operational plans and requirements in order to conduct a 
review of current military end-strength policies. Under the leadership 
of Secretary Austin and Under Secretary Cisneros, I will work with the 
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and other uniform and civilian 
leadership to address personnel and readiness matters that would inform 
future deliberations on the size and composition of our military force 
levels to meet the National Defense Strategy and other objectives.
                        recruiting and retention
    Question. In your view, what are the main reasons that less than 30 
percent of 17 to 24-year-olds are eligible for military service, and 
how would you propose to increase the size of that pool?
    Answer. It is my understanding that the low-eligibility rate for 
military service of today's youth candidates is primarily due to 
obesity and other medical conditions. To improve the recruiting pool, I 
believe the Department must work to expand messaging and outreach to 
overcome the limited interest (low propensity rate) for military 
service and to highlight the value and opportunities offered by 
military service to those that meet the standards but are not 
interested in military service.
    Question. The propensity of youth to serve in the armed forces 
continues to drop and is at its lowest level (about 10 percent of all 
youth, according to DOD data) in years. What do you believe to be the 
root cause of this disturbing phenomenon?
    Answer. I believe a variety of factors, such as lack of knowledge 
regarding service options, the shrinking military footprint in many 
parts of our country, the declining Veteran presence, recent social 
unrest, and the influence of military-related messaging by external 
organizations contribute to the low propensity of today's youth, as 
well as society's misperception and understanding of military service.
    Question. Do you believe that non-native English speakers are 
disadvantaged by the current testing process in qualifying for military 
service? Please explain your answer.
    Answer. I believe that all military operations are conducted in 
English; therefore, the ability to communicate and understand English, 
in oral and written form, especially in stressful situations, is 
necessary for mission success. Recruiting efforts are targeted to 
identify and access the widest possible eligible population. If 
confirmed, I will continue the efforts to modernize the Department's 
assessment tools, ensuring today's youth are provided with the widest 
opportunities for Military service.
    Question. How would you address any such disadvantages to increase 
the pool of youth eligible for and interested in military service?
    Answer. If confirmed, I will work to ensure the Department uses 
best practices in marketing, advertising, and assessment approaches to 
maximize its ability to reach and access an inclusive, and qualified 
pool of eligible prospects. I believe our eligibility standards should 
optimize the match between expanding needs of the Services and member 
abilities.
    Question. In your view, should existing medical and other 
qualification standards be reconsidered to accommodate youth willing to 
enlist for service in certain high-demand specialties, such as remotely 
piloted aircraft pilots or the cyber workforce?
    Answer. Although I am not familiar with the specific qualification 
standards for military service, if confirmed, I will work with my 
colleagues in OSD and the Military Departments and Services to ensure 
qualification standards are sufficiently broad enough to ensure 
servicemembers can complete their required training, achieve the 
standards commensurate for each role, and are able to deploy world-wide 
so that we maintain a ready, agile, and lethal military force.
    Question. The recently revised DOD Instruction 6130.03 Volume 1, 
Medical Standards for Military Service: Appointment, Enlistment, or 
Induction, provides that a ``history of cross-sex hormone therapy 
associated with gender transition is disqualifying unless the 
individual has been stable on such hormones for 18 months . . ..''
    What recognized independent medical authority recommends 18 months 
as an appropriate timeframe to assess a patient's ``stability'' on 
cross-sex hormones?
    Answer. I understand that the Department released updated standards 
in April 2021 that reestablished the stability period at 18 months for 
cross-sex hormone therapy. If confirmed, I will work with the OUSD(P&R) 
staff to understand the recommendations of the different recognized 
medical authorities regarding the appropriate timeframe required to 
determine if a patient can be considered stable when treated with 
cross-sex hormones.
    Question. What criteria would a licensed medical provider use to 
make a determination that a potential servicemember is ``stable'' on 
cross-sex hormones?
    Answer. If confirmed, I will work with the OUSD(P&R) staff to 
review and understand the criteria that a medical provider uses to 
determine stability regarding the use of cross-sex hormone therapy.
                           reserve components
    Question. In your judgment, what has been the effect of increased 
operational tempo on Reserve component recruiting and retention?
    Answer. I am aware that the Reserve component continues to 
contribute to the Total Force across a spectrum of categories to 
include domestic emergencies and in support of operational requirements 
across the globe. If confirmed, I will work with the Military 
Departments to understand the impact of this operational tempo on 
Reserve component recruiting and retention to ensure they have the 
needed tools to reach end strength objectives.
    Question. In your view, do the Reserve components serve as an 
operational reserve, a strategic reserve, or both? In light of your 
answer, should the Reserve components be supported by increased 
training, improved equipment, and higher levels of overall resourcing 
for readiness?
    Answer. The Reserve component has evolved beyond just a strategic 
force and is now routinely used as an operational reserve that is 
regularly employed. If confirmed, I will work with the Military 
Departments to ensure the Reserve component is supported with the 
training, equipment, facilities, and resources needed to maintain an 
appropriate level of readiness.
       military lending act and servicemembers' civil relief act
    Question. What is your view of the efficacy of the Military Lending 
Act (MLA)? If confirmed, what specific steps would you take to ensure 
the act is fully implemented and enforced?
    Answer. It is my understanding that the MLA is working as intended. 
If confirmed, I intend to monitor the MLA, in coordination or 
consultation with the financial regulators, to ensure protections 
currently afforded to servicemembers and their families remain in 
place. During the seven years that I was an Active Duty Naval Officer, 
I saw first-hand the negative impacts financial issues could have on 
the well-being of servicemembers, their families, and ultimately 
mission readiness.
    Question. What is your view of the value and efficacy of the 
servicemembers' Civil Relief Act (SCRA)? In your judgement, does the 
SCRA require any updates to improve protections for military personnel 
and their families?
    Answer. The Servicemembers' Civil Relief Act (SCRA) is an extremely 
valuable set of statutory protections. Without the SCRA our military 
personnel and their families would suffer extreme financial hardships 
associated with their military service commitments. The SCRA protects 
our personnel from issues with rental agreements, security deposits, 
prepaid rent, evictions, installment contracts, credit card interest 
rates, mortgage interest rates, mortgage foreclosures, civil judicial 
proceedings, automobile leases, life insurance, health insurance, and 
income tax payments. If confirmed, I will review the SCRA for any 
potential deficiencies or shortcomings, and, if necessary, collaborate 
with Congress to amend the SCRA to improve protections for military 
personnel and their families.
                        military quality of life
    Question. If confirmed, what qualify of life and morale, welfare, 
and recreation (MWR) programs would you consider to be a priority?
    Answer. I fully support a robust portfolio of quality of life 
programs. I believe these programs are integral to mission readiness 
and contribute to the well-being and resilience of servicemembers and 
their families. Programs that directly support resilient families, 
including military family life counseling, fitness opportunities, MWR 
and resale, spouse education and employment support, and access to 
quality and affordable child care will be prioritized. These programs 
are key contributors to both military family and mission readiness, and 
as such must be sustained.
    Question. What metric would you apply in determining which MWR and 
quality of life programs should be sustained or enriched and which 
should be eliminated or reduced in scope as ineffective or outmoded?
    Answer. If confirmed, I will review MWR and quality of life 
programs to sustain those programs that have the greatest impact on 
readiness, retention, and resiliency, while ensuring good stewardship 
of public funds and appropriate return on investment. I will review key 
metrics and measurements for existing programs to validate success in 
these areas.
                 military family readiness and support
    Question. What do you consider to be the most important family 
readiness issues for servicemembers and their families?
    Answer. I firmly believe that military family readiness ultimately 
impacts the success of the mission. Child care and spouse employment 
are two of the main issues that I hear about regularly that have direct 
impacts on family readiness. In the current climate, these issues can 
be major stressors on the family. If confirmed, I commit to supporting 
the Department's efforts in these areas, and others that impact the 
military family.
    Question. If confirmed, what specific actions would you take to 
ensure that military families are provided with accessible, high-
quality childcare, at an appropriate cost?
    Answer. Without quality child care, military families are unable to 
work, not to mention its effects of family readiness and retention of 
our servicemembers. If confirmed, I would support ongoing efforts to 
improve recruitment and retention of child care staff, evaluate child 
care fee assistance, and collaborate with the Military Departments and 
Services to maximize child care capacity. Ensuring affordable, quality 
care is accessible to our military families will be one of my 
priorities.
    Question. If confirmed, what specific actions would you take to 
support military spouse employment?
    Answer. Supporting military spouse education and employment is a 
personal priority of mine. It is my understanding that the Department 
of Defense supports military spouse employment by providing robust 
resources and advocating for military spouse licensure portability. If 
confirmed, I would review current resources to ensure military spouses 
receive the individualized support and robust tools they require to 
plan and finance their education, define and pursue a job or career and 
grow their professional and personal networks to suit their needs.
    Question. Military spouses that work in licensed or credentialed 
career fields, like teachers or medical professionals, often face 
challenges becoming re-licensed or re-credentialed after a Permanent 
Change of Station.
    If confirmed, specifically what steps would you take to support the 
work of the Council of State Governments to create of interstate 
compacts to enhance for military spouse license and credential 
portability?
    Answer. I am aware that States continue to make improvements to 
their licensing laws to support military spouses, and that many States 
have approved licensure compacts to create reciprocity for military 
spouses. If confirmed, I will support the Department's existing efforts 
with the Council of State Governments in this area.
            support for military families with special needs
    Question. What is your view of the overall effectiveness of the 
exceptional family member program (EFMP)?
    Answer. If confirmed, I will evaluate how the Department is meeting 
the needs of these important members of our military community. I will 
be committed to providing the resources and support to meet the unique 
needs of military families who have family members with special needs.
    Question. If confirmed, how would you incentivize servicemember 
enrollment in EFMP?
    Answer. If confirmed, I will assess the effectiveness of current 
incentives as well as address any obstacles to enrollment in EFMP. I 
will also encourage the team to explore innovative incentives to 
further encourage enrollment for those servicemembers and their 
families who need this support, no matter where they are serving.
    Question. If confirmed, how would you enhance support to a 
servicemember in navigating the TRICARE system to obtain the medical 
services and support required by a family member with special needs, 
regardless of where that family member is located?
    Answer. If confirmed, I will work with Department stakeholders to 
improve communication, collaboration, and coordination between 
families, the direct care system and the TRICARE system customer 
services representatives to assist in obtaining and understanding 
medical services and support needed. In recognition of the transient 
nature of our military community, if confirmed, I will work with the 
Military Services to improve communication, collaboration, and 
coordination between the losing and gaining locations prior to the 
beneficiaries' arrival at the new duty station.
    I believe early notification of movement will allow for better 
coordination of both primary and specialty care for beneficiaries in 
the Exceptional Family Member Program (EFMP), who have special needs. 
If confirmed, I will ensure the MHS implements established standard 
processes for all MTFs, which include enhanced care coordination with 
the TRICARE regional contractors and MTFs to support our EFMP families, 
wherever they may be located and to facilitate the transition when they 
move to a new location to ensure continuity of care.
    Question. If confirmed, how would you work with Military Housing 
Privatization Initiative partners and military commanders to ensure 
that the needs of servicemembers with an exceptional family member are 
considered in the military housing assignment process?
    Answer. Collaborating with the Military Services and Military 
Housing Privatization Initiative partners to ensure families with 
special needs have access to housing that supports their specialized 
requirements is crucial. If confirmed, I commit to working with 
appropriate DOD officials to review existing procedures and policies to 
make sure they are meeting the mark, and explore methods to strengthen 
procedures, if needed.
    Question. If confirmed, what specific steps would you take to 
prioritize the implementation of section 582 of the NDAA for FY 2021, 
which mandates improvements and standardization of the EFMP across the 
Department?
    Answer. If confirmed, I commit to prioritizing compliance with all 
applicable laws in this area. I will review actions taken so far, and 
ensure an action plan is in place to address any outstanding issues.
            department of defense civilian workforce matters
    Question. How would you describe the current state of the 
Department's civilian workforce, including its morale and the 
Department's ability to successfully recruit and retain top civilian 
talent?
    Answer. Although I do not have access to the Department's data 
regarding the current state of the civilian workforce's morale, or the 
Department's ability to successfully recruit top talent, I recognize 
that the civilian workforce is a critical element of the DOD total 
force. If confirmed, the recruitment, retention, and sustainment of a 
high quality civilian workforce will be one of my top priorities.
    Question. In your judgment, what are the biggest challenges facing 
the DOD in effectively and efficiently managing its civilian workforce?
    Answer. I cannot speak to the specific challenges facing the DOD in 
managing its civilian workforce; however, for many complex 
organizations, the fight for high quality talent, particularly 
technical talent, is an issue. If confirmed, I will work closely with 
other Department leaders to identify recruitment, retention, and other 
workforce challenges, and develop strategies to address each, as 
appropriate.
                            cyber workforce
    Question. What is your view of the appropriate mix between the 
uniformed and civilian components of the cyber workforce?
    Answer. I believe that rather than a specific workforce mix, we 
must look at the nature of work and the mission requirements, as well 
as the broader market conditions to include labor supply and cost 
considerations. If confirmed, I will commit to reviewing and if 
necessary, changing, the Department polices to allow leaders the 
ability to achieve appropriate total force mix and meet the mission.
    Question. In your view, how effective is the Cyber Excepted Service 
Workforce authority under section 1599f of title 10, U.S. Code, in 
meeting and sustaining the Department's requirements for a highly 
qualified and competent cyber workforce?
    Answer. The authority provided by Congress to build a cyber 
capability to meet emerging threats in this warfare domain are critical 
and I applaud the Committees leadership in this area. I understand 
that, if confirmed, I will collaborate with the DOD Chief Information 
Officer (CIO) on cyber workforce matters. At this time, I cannot speak 
to the effectiveness of this alternative personnel system in meeting 
the Department's current and emerging cyber workforce needs but, if 
confirmed, I commit to working with the DOD CIO to ensure the 
Department is making best use of the authorities provided by Congress 
and has a highly qualified and competent cyber workforce.
    Question. What actions would you take, if confirmed, to mitigate 
any gaps between cyber workforce capacity and capability?
    Answer. If confirmed, I will work with my colleagues in the Office 
of the DOD CIO to mitigate cyber workforce capacity and capability 
gaps. Based on my understanding of the report from the Cyberspace 
Solarium Commission, I anticipate actions may include identifying 
staffing requirements and talent gaps, and developing strategies and 
policies to increase workforce capacity and ensure the skillsets 
necessary to meet cyber workforce mission needs.
                          technical workforce
    Question. In your view, what are the pros and cons of having Active 
Duty military personnel--as opposed to civilian employees--trained and 
working as scientists, engineers, software coders, and in other 
technical positions across the DOD research, development, and 
acquisition enterprise?
    Answer. In an era of emerging threats and warfare domains that have 
become increasingly technical, I believe it is crucially important that 
the Department seeks to recruit and retain the best technical and 
digital workforce across the total force, including Active military 
duty personnel. This includes looking at how we train and assign our 
servicemembers to support them in their ability to maintain currency in 
constantly changing fields. In addition to balancing the Active Duty 
and civilian workforce, I believe we need to assess how we best utilize 
the talent of our Reserve component personnel.
    Question. If confirmed, how would you ensure that the directors of 
national labs under the purview of DOD have the civilian workforce 
management tools they need to shape their science, technology, and 
engineering workforces?
    Answer. If confirmed, I will work with my colleagues in the Office 
of the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering and the 
Military Departments to ensure the directors of the national labs have, 
to the greatest extent possible, the tools necessary to recruit, 
retain, and shape their science, technology, and engineering 
workforces.
                        senior executive service
    Question. Given that competent and caring leadership is one of the 
most significant factors in shaping a high-performing DOD civilian 
workforce, if confirmed, what factors and characteristics would be most 
important to you in selecting candidates for appointment to the Senior 
Executive Service?
    Answer. If confirmed, I will focus on selecting members of the 
Senior Executive Service who are capable of managing complex systems 
and organizations, who are exceptional collaborators and team builders, 
and who can be innovative in their leadership of a high-performing and 
globally relevant DOD civilian workforce.
    Question. If confirmed, how would you ensure that SES under your 
authority are held accountable for both organizational performance and 
the rigorous performance management of their subordinate employees?
    Answer. If confirmed, I will ensure SES members under my authority 
have clear and measurable performance expectations that include 
standards for organizational performance as well as leadership of a 
high performing subordinate workforce.
    Question. Are you satisfied with the subject matter and rigor of 
SES professional development programs currently available across DOD? 
If not, what changes would you make to these programs, if confirmed?
    Answer. I am aware that SES professionals participate in 
development programs but do not have specific details to speak to the 
subject matter and rigor. If confirmed, I will assess these programs to 
identify changes that may be needed and develop strategies to achieve 
these changes, as appropriate.
                                 safety
    Question. What is your understanding of the role of the OUSD(P&R) 
in matters of operational safety and occupational health?
    Answer. It is my understanding that the USD(P&R) chairs the Defense 
Safety Oversight Council (DSOC), the Department's senior leader safety 
forum, and serves as the Principal Enterprise Safety Official (PESO). 
The PESO is the senior policy advisor to the Secretary of Defense and 
lead for integrated safety assessment, reporting, trend analysis, and 
mishap and accident reduction and mitigation activities related to 
aviation, ground, motor vehicle, afloat, space, and risk management in 
the workplace. I am also aware that the ASD(Readiness) is the 
Department's Designated Agency Safety and Occupational Health Official. 
If confirmed, operational and occupational safety and health will be 
among my top priorities for me. For leaders of the Department, no 
responsibility is more important than to protecting the people, 
military and civilian, who serve our country.
    Question. If confirmed, specifically what more would you do to 
establish OUSD(P&R) leadership in the domains of operational safety and 
operational health?
    Answer. Leaders at the highest levels must set the tone for the 
Department's safety culture.
    Our people are our most important asset. If confirmed, I will 
commit to promoting a culture of safety for our personnel while 
simultaneously preserving operational capabilities. I will support the 
OUSD(P&R) in managing the Defense Safety Oversight Council (DSOC) and 
ensure we use this forum, and other available resources, to instill a 
culture where safety is paramount in both high-risk situations and 
daily operations and activities. Safety must be an ever-present 
standard in all we do.
                         drug demand reduction
    Question. What role does the OUSD(P&R) play in ensuring that each 
of the Military Services--including their respective Reserve 
components--maintains an effective military personnel drug abuse 
testing program?
    Answer. This is a critical area, as impairment can impact not only 
and individual's performance but endanger lives of others while 
performing military duties. The OUSD(P&R) role in this area must be to 
ensure oversight and thorough policy for drug testing, identifying 
emerging threats through surveillance; and working with the Military 
Departments and Services on new testing procedures as well as 
prevention.
    If confirmed, I will work with experts throughout DOD to continue 
deterrence of prohibited and impairing substances.
    Question. In your view, how could the DOD drug demand reduction 
program be modernized while maintaining or enhancing the program's role 
in deterring the unlawful use of controlled substances?
    Answer. If confirmed, this is an area that I will closely evaluate. 
It is my understanding that a comprehensive, yet agile drug testing 
program helps deter and detect drug abuse. If confirmed, I will work to 
ensure that the program is robust and can quickly adjust to identify, 
test for, and deter emerging drug threats that can negatively impact 
our people and our military missions.
                      voluntary education programs
    Question. Do you believe DOD's Voluntary Education Programs 
contribute to military recruiting and retention, and to military 
readiness? By what metrics does DOD assess and evaluate the 
contribution of such programs to recruiting, retention, and readiness? 
Do you believe such metrics are adequate to discern a causal 
relationship between these programs and desired recruiting and 
retention outcomes?
    Answer. Yes, I believe that educational opportunities contribute to 
readiness as well as recruiting and retention. It is my understanding 
that this causation is hard to determine. Therefore, if confirmed, I 
will review the metrics used to evaluate the contributions to voluntary 
education programs to ensure the Department is achieving the desired 
outcomes.
    Question. Does DOD receive adequate return on its investment in 
Tuition Assistance?
    Answer. It is my understanding that the opportunity to receive 
additional educational opportunities while in the military is cited as 
a key reason for enlistment, and also plays a role in retention 
decisions. If confirmed, I will ensure that DOD has the information 
necessary to assess and evaluate the return on investment for these 
programs.
    Question. What is your view of the adequacy of the Department's 
mechanisms and processes for protecting servicemembers seeking to make 
use of Tuition Assistance Program funding from marketing by educational 
institutions that offer academic programs of dubious rigor and 
applicability?
    Answer. It is my understanding that the Department has procedures 
and mechanisms to help to mitigate these risks. If confirmed, I am 
committed to ensuring that servicemembers continue to be protected from 
predatory practices.
    Question. What is your assessment of the Department's policies and 
procedures for reviewing and adjudicating servicemember complaints 
against educational institutions that have allegedly failed to comply 
with the obligations on which their eligibility for receipt of Tuition 
Assistance funding is contingent?
    Answer. It is my understanding that the Department takes such 
complaints seriously and uses the procedures and policies at its 
disposal to address aggressive or misleading marketing. If confirmed, I 
will ensure that the Department continues to take servicemember 
complaints seriously and protect servicemembers from noncompliant 
educational institutions.
                        congressional oversight
    Question. In order to exercise legislative and oversight 
responsibilities, it is important that this committee, its 
subcommittees, and other appropriate committees of Congress receive 
timely testimony, briefings, reports, records--including documents and 
electronic communications, and other information from the executive 
branch.
    Do you agree, without qualification, if confirmed, and on request, 
to appear and testify before this committee, its subcommittees, and 
other appropriate committees of Congress? Please answer with a simple 
yes or no.
    Answer. Yes.
    Question. Do you agree, without qualification, if confirmed, to 
provide this committee, its subcommittees, other appropriate committees 
of Congress, and their respective staffs such witnesses and briefers, 
briefings, reports, records--including documents and electronic 
communications, and other information, as may be requested of you, and 
to do so in a timely manner? Please answer with a simple yes or no.
    Answer. Yes.
    Question. Do you agree, without qualification, if confirmed, to 
consult with this committee, its subcommittees, other appropriate 
committees of Congress, and their respective staffs, regarding your 
basis for any delay or denial in providing testimony, briefings, 
reports, records--including documents and electronic communications, 
and other information requested of you? Please answer with a simple yes 
or no.
    Answer. Yes.
    Question. Do you agree, without qualification, if confirmed, to 
keep this committee, its subcommittees, other appropriate committees of 
Congress, and their respective staffs apprised of new information that 
materially impacts the accuracy of testimony, briefings, reports, 
records--including documents and electronic communications, and other 
information you or your organization previously provided? Please answer 
with a simple yes or no.
    Answer. Yes.
    Question. Do you agree, without qualification, if confirmed, and on 
request, to provide this committee and its subcommittees with records 
and other information within their oversight jurisdiction, even absent 
a formal Committee request? Please answer with a simple yes or no.
    Answer. Yes.
    Question. Do you agree, without qualification, if confirmed, to 
respond timely to letters to, and/or inquiries and other requests of 
you or your organization from individual Senators who are members of 
this committee? Please answer with a simple yes or no.
    Answer. Yes.
    Question. Do you agree, without qualification, if confirmed, to 
ensure that you and other members of your organization protect from 
retaliation any military member, federal employee, or contractor 
employee who testifies before, or communicates with this committee, its 
subcommittees, and any other appropriate committee of Congress? Please 
answer with a simple yes or no.
    Answer. Yes.
                                 ______
                                 
    [Questions for the record with answers supplied follow:]

             Questions Submitted by Senator Mazie K. Hirono
     oversight of senior dod officials - sexual assault and sexual 
                               harassment
    1. Senator Hirono. Mr. Vazirani, as part of my responsibility as a 
member of the Senate Armed Services Committee and to ensure the fitness 
of nominees for appointment to senior positions within the Department 
of Defense (DOD), I ask the same two questions that I ask nominees to 
all of the committees on which I serve. Since you became a legal adult, 
have you ever made unwanted requests for sexual favors, or committed 
any verbal or physical harassment or assault of a sexual nature?
    Mr. Vazirani. No.

    2. Senator Hirono. Mr. Vazirani, have you ever faced discipline, or 
entered into a settlement related to this kind of conduct?
    Mr. Vazirani. No.
implementing sexual assault and harassment independent review committee 
                            recommendations
    3. Senator Hirono. Mr. Vazirani, if confirmed, you both will have 
important roles in the implementation of the Sexual Assault and 
Harassment Independent Review Committee (IRC) Report recommendations. I 
am concerned about Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin's tentative 
timeline for implementation, which in some cases goes out to 2028 or 
later. If confirmed, how do each of you plan to support the 
Department's efforts to implement the IRC recommendations?
    Mr. Vazirani. I share your concerns about achieving progress as 
soon as possible. We owe this to our servicemembers. If confirmed, I 
will work as expeditiously as possible to ensure implementation of 
these recommendations. It is my understanding that timelines in the 
roadmap are a conservative estimate, and in many cases account for the 
time to fully implement the recommendations across the Reserve 
Components. If confirmed, I will fully engage with all stakeholders 
within the Department, as appropriate, to support implementation while 
ensuring that we are thorough in our planning to set a durable 
foundation for efforts to stop sexual assault and harassment.

    4. Senator Hirono. Mr. Vazirani, do you have any ideas that might 
help to speed up the implementation process?
    Mr. Vazirani. Leadership engagement will be critical. If confirmed, 
I will work with all appropriate DOD entities, and push forward the 
implementation within the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for 
Personnel and Readiness. I believe the approach in the Secretary's 
roadmap allows for continuous evaluation, which may enable the 
Department to make potential modifications that could facilitate faster 
progress. The Department needs to get this right. I am committed to 
moving as quickly as possible to achieve real change and I understand 
that Tier 1 focuses on building a foundation for other efforts; we must 
be thorough as we build this foundation to get this right from the 
start since we are not only creating process, but we are also changing 
culture. If confirmed, I am committed to assessing implementation 
efforts and supporting faster progress whenever possible.
                         extremism in the ranks
    5. Senator Hirono. Mr. Vazirani, in April, Secretary of Defense 
Lloyd Austin directed several immediate actions to counter extremism in 
the ranks--one tasks Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and 
Readiness Gilbert Cisneros with reviewing and updating the definition 
of ``prohibited extremist activities'' for uniformed personnel. If 
confirmed, how would you approach this matter given the sensitive First 
Amendment freedom of association issues involved and the need to 
maintain good order and discipline in the ranks?
    Mr. Vazirani. As a former servicemember, I understand that good 
order and discipline within the military is critical to readiness. At 
the same time, the freedom of speech and association rights of all 
Americans are liberties that our servicemembers and our great military 
fight to protect. However, by focusing on defining prohibited 
activities, I do not believe the approach outlined by Secretary Austin 
inhibits First Amendment rights; rather this will focus attention to 
harmful actions that threaten our common values of respect, duty, and 
honor. If confirmed, I will continue to commit to ensuring that we 
maintain a united and ready force that will continue to stand for and 
protect the Constitutional rights of all individuals.
                        diversity and inclusion
    6. Senator Hirono. Mr. Vazirani, I am interested in making sure the 
Services are providing a level playing field to ensure women and 
minorities have the same opportunities to assume senior positions 
within the officer and enlisted ranks. If confirmed, will this be one 
of your priorities?
    Mr. Vazirani. Yes. If confirmed, I will work with all stakeholders 
across the Department to ensure that all servicemembers have the same 
opportunities to assume senior positions with the enlisted and officer 
grades. I understand that this is one of the highest priorities of the 
Administration, and particularly for Secretary Austin and Under 
Secretary Cisneros, and if confirmed, I will fully and enthusiastically 
support and lead any efforts that allow our military to better reflect 
the diversity of this great nation.

    7. Senator Hirono. Mr. Vazirani, creating opportunities for 
underrepresented groups in our civilian DOD workforce is also important 
to me. How would you recommend DOD grow diversity in areas like STEM 
[science, technology, engineering, and math], intelligence, and 
national security?
    Mr. Vazirani. The Department of Defense must continue to increase 
diversity in its STEM, intelligence, and national security workforces 
by taking advantage of technology and social media platforms to expand 
recruitment outreach and using all available hiring authorities to 
target a diversity of groups, as appropriate. While technology will be 
an enabler, we must also have active, personal engagement in 
communities that are underrepresented. I am aware that DOD has been 
successful in using internship and fellowship programs to bring in new 
technical and specialized talent, including in partnership with 
Historically Black Colleges and Universities and Minority Serving 
Institutions and professional organizations for minorities and women to 
diversify the future talent pipeline. If confirmed, I will work with 
USD Cisneros to continue these programs, actively engage in these 
programs, and work with the Department leadership to look for more 
opportunities to recruit and retain this critical talent.
                               __________
               Questions Submitted by Senator Jacky Rosen
                             housing issues
    8. Senator Rosen. Mr. Vazirani, our lowest paid servicemembers with 
the least amount of time in the service are being ordered to move off 
base to private housing in an accelerated manner. While DOD recommends 
that servicemembers reside in unaccompanied housing for their first 3 
years, airmen living at Nevada's Nellis Air Force Base--among other 
bases across the country--are averaging only 12 months in on-base 
unaccompanied housing due to insufficient capacity. Some of the 
affected individuals are too young and financially unprepared at the 
time they are ordered to move out, particularly given rising rents and 
home prices, which is why I have worked with the Committee to address 
this issue through the National Defense Authorization Act. If 
confirmed, how to do you plan on tackling this issue and ensure that 
our youngest servicemembers have an adequate amount of development and 
time on base before they are ordered to move out?
    Mr. Vazirani. The housing and financial readiness issues are 
personally important to me, and I have expressed my concerns in various 
forums in my previous roles. We owe it to our servicemembers and their 
families to ensure they are supported and empowered with the necessary 
resources to have appropriate housing and financial means, as well as 
educated as to how to make the best use of those resource. I believe 
this is a readiness and retention issue because we cannot ask these 
servicemembers to remain mission-ready when they are financially 
struggling. If confirmed, I will closely review and identify root 
causes of these issues, which may include resources or other 
challenges, and work with my counterparts to take appropriate actions 
to resolve these types of situations.
                               __________
            Questions Submitted by Senator Marsha Blackburn
                       military family readiness
    9. Senator Blackburn. Mr. Vazirani, if confirmed, how will you work 
with the services to ensure that the Fiscal Year 2021 NDAA required 
standardization of the Exceptional Family Member Program (EFMP) is 
completed in a timely fashion?
    Mr. Vazirani. I believe standardization of the EFMP Program is 
necessary to provide support to military families with special needs. 
If confirmed, I will work in coordination with the Military Departments 
and Services, through the established EFMP working group, to develop 
policies and procedures that support the standardization of the EFMP. 
My understanding is that the Department is committed to performing the 
necessary actions to complete the standardization by implementing 
program improvements, policy development, and oversight. If confirmed, 
I will ensure that the support and services provided to military 
families with special needs minimizes the challenges they experience 
and improves the EFMP across DOD.

    10. Senator Blackburn. Mr. Vazirani, if confirmed, specifically 
what role would you assign to yourself in expanding services essential 
to military family readiness?
    Mr. Vazirani. If confirmed, I see my role as a staunch advocate and 
defender of programs that enhance the well-being and resilience of 
servicemembers and their families. I will make data informed decisions 
to ensure that policy, strategy, and planning for programs and services 
supporting military servicemembers and families are adequately funded, 
resourced, and that programs are properly delivered and thoroughly 
measured. Family readiness is an essential part of maintaining mission 
readiness and Total Force fitness, because these programs and policies 
impact the readiness, recruitment, and retention of personnel and lead 
to increased military family health and well-being.

    11. Senator Blackburn. Mr. Vazirani, if confirmed, how will you 
improve continuity of care for families enrolled in the EFMP?
    Mr. Vazirani. I understand that the EFMP Family Support working 
group is refining processes to improve the continuity of family support 
services, and the Defense Health Agency is working diligently to 
implement measures to improve the continuity of medical care for 
families enrolled in the EFMP when they move to a new location. If 
confirmed, I will ensure that that Department has fully implemented the 
standardized processes and policies across the DOD to improve access to 
care and continuity of services for military families with special 
needs during a move. If confirmed, I will also ensure that the 
Department examines the impact of frequent moves on military families, 
particularly those with special needs, and explores alternatives that 
promote family stability and military readiness.
                       military fitness standards
    12. Senator Blackburn. Mr. Vazirani, do you believe that gender-
neutral military physical fitness standards benefit our force and 
quantifiably increase the lethality of our military?
    Mr. Vazirani. I understand that gender-neutral military 
occupational fitness standards specific to each military occupation is 
current practice, and that the intent of this practice is to ensure all 
military professions are prepared for combat. If confirmed, I look 
forward to working with health and fitness experts within DOD, 
including the Service Departments, to make certain these standards 
achieve their stated aims.

    13. Senator Blackburn. Mr. Vazirani, what impact do you assess non-
binary standards implemented across DOD would have on female 
recruitment, retention, and promotion?
    Mr. Vazirani. The health and well-being of servicemembers is 
paramount to readiness. A key contributor to the health and readiness 
of the force is physical fitness, which is one of many important 
measures to determine if recruits meet the entry standards for the 
military and qualification for military occupations. I am not familiar 
with the impact these standards have had on female recruitment, 
retention and promotion.
                               __________
               Questions Submitted by Senator Josh Hawley
                   sexual assault prevention programs
    14. Senator Hawley. Mr. Vazirani, I am a strong advocate for 
improving the Sexual Assault Prevention programs within DOD. If 
confirmed, you will have oversight over military service sexual assault 
prevention and response programs. How do you believe the Department 
should improve in this area?
    Mr. Vazirani. The Department must constantly evolve its efforts if 
we're going to reduce sexual assault in the military with an ultimate 
objective to eliminate sexual assaults and harassment from Department. 
This includes coordinated and effective programs to prevent these 
crimes from occurring in the first place. More importantly we must 
change culture and improve command climates to create a positive 
environment in which we regain the trust and confidence of those who 
serve, and servicemembers meet our expectations to treat all with 
dignity and respect. If confirmed, I will support the Department in 
advancing these efforts.
                                 ______
                                 
    [The nomination reference of Mr. Ashish S. Vazirani, 
follows:]
      
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]
    
      
                                 ______
                                 
    [The biographical sketch of Mr. Ashish S. Vazirani, which 
was transmitted to the Committee at the time the nomination was 
referred, follows:]
      
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]
    
      
                                 ______
                                 
    [The Committee on Armed Services requires all individuals 
nominated from civilian life by the President to positions 
requiring the advice and consent of the Senate to complete a 
form that details the biographical, financial, and other 
information of the nominee. The form executed by Mr. Ashish S. 
Vazirani in connection with his nomination follows:]
      
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]
    
      
                                 ______
                                 
    [The nominee responded to Parts B-F of the committee 
questionnaire. The text of the questionnaire is set forth in 
the Appendix to this volume. The nominee's answers to Parts B-F 
are contained in the committee's executive files.]
      
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]
    
      
                                 ______
                                 
    [The nomination of Mr. Ashish S. Vazirani was reported to 
the Senate by Chairman Reed on December 8, 2021, with the 
recommendation that the nomination be confirmed. The nomination 
was confirmed by the Senate on July 12, 2022.]
                                ------                                

    [Prepared questions submitted to Ms. Carrie F. Ricci by 
Chairman Reed prior to the hearing with answers supplied 
follow:]

                        Questions and Responses
                      duties and responsibilities
    Question. Section 7019 of title 10, U.S. Code, establishes the 
position of the Army General Counsel and provides that the General 
Counsel shall perform such functions as the Secretary of the Army may 
prescribe.
    What is your understanding of the current duties and functions of 
the Army General Counsel?
    Answer. Section 7019 of Title 10 provides that the General Counsel 
of the Army shall perform such functions as the Secretary of the Army 
may prescribe. Pursuant to this section of Title 10, the Secretary has 
prescribed the General Counsel's duties through various general orders, 
regulations, and memoranda. Under these authorities, the General 
Counsel serves as legal adviser to the Secretary of the Army and is the 
chief legal officer of the Department of the Army. As such, the General 
Counsel provides legal advice to the Secretary of the Army, the Under 
Secretary, the Assistant Secretaries, and other officials within the 
Army Secretariat; coordinates legal and policy advice for all other 
members of Army headquarters; and determines the controlling legal 
position of the Department. The General Counsel's responsibilities 
extend to any matter of law, and to other matters as directed by the 
Secretary, including: (1) providing professional guidance to the Army's 
legal community; (2) overseeing matters in which the Army is involved 
in litigation; (3) serving as the Designated Agency Ethics Official for 
the Department; (4) exercising the Secretary's oversight of 
intelligence and counterintelligence activities; (5) monitoring 
sensitive activities and investigations for legality and propriety; (6) 
taking final action on certain claims filed against the Army; and (7) 
working with The Judge Advocate General to oversee criminal and 
administrative investigations.
    Question. If confirmed, what additional duties and functions would 
you expect the Secretary of the Army to prescribe for you, particularly 
in light of the lines of effort comprising the 2018 National Defense 
Strategy (NDS)?
    Answer. If confirmed, I anticipate that the Secretary of the Army 
will expect me to lead and manage the Office of General Counsel 
efficiently and effectively to ensure that the office provides timely 
and accurate legal advice that assists the Army to comply with both the 
spirit and letter of the law while it executes the National Defense 
Strategy. I am prepared to advise Army leadership and assist in their 
efforts to modernize the force to ensure a resilient and rapidly 
innovating force that will compete, deter, and win in the current 
operating environment. I anticipate that the Secretary will expect me 
to build strong, collaborative relationships with The Judge Advocate 
General and members of the Secretariat and Army staff, as well as the 
General Counsels of the Department of Defense, the service branches, 
and other Federal agencies.
    Question. If confirmed, specifically what would you do to ensure 
that your tenure as Army General Counsel epitomizes the fundamental 
requirement for civilian control of the
    Armed Forces embedded in the U.S. Constitution and other laws?
    Answer. If confirmed, I would ensure that the final decision on all 
questions of law and policy are made by members of the civilian 
Secretariat after close cooperation and consultation with the uniformed 
Department of the Army staff. Also, I would work to ensure that 
Headquarters, Army Senior Leaders know that Office of General Counsel 
advises the Secretary of the Army and the Secretariat. I would likewise 
ensure that no confusion exists regarding the chains of command between 
the attorneys working for the Office of the General Counsel versus 
those working for The Judge Advocate General of the Army.
    Question. In your opinion, who is the ``client'' of the Army 
General Counsel?
    Answer. The General Counsel's client is the Department of the Army, 
acting through its authorized officials, including, but not limited to, 
the Secretary, the Under Secretary, the Assistant Secretaries, and 
other principal officials within the Army Secretariat and the Army 
Staff.
    Question. What is your view of the responsibility and authority 
associated with the Army General Counsel's designation as the Chief 
Legal Officer of the Department of the Army?
    Answer. In my view, the General Counsel and Office of General 
Counsel attorneys serve as legal counsel for the Department of the 
Army, the Secretary, and other Secretariat officials. As a team, the 
Office of General Counsel coordinates legal and policy advice for 
Headquarters, Department of the Army; determines the Army's position on 
all legal questions and procedures; provides legal advice on Army 
acquisition, logistics, and technology programs; gives final Army legal 
clearance on all legislative proposals and comments thereon of interest 
to the Department; establishes and administers the Army's policies 
concerning legal services; exercises technical supervision over, and 
professional guidance to, all Department of the Army attorneys and 
legal offices; oversees compliance with the Freedom of Information Act 
and the Privacy Act within the Department; oversees the Army Ethics 
Program and exercise final authority within the Army for all ethics 
matters; exercises the Secretary of the Army's oversight of 
intelligence activities and monitor those activities for legality and 
propriety; serves as the point of contact for legal matters between the 
Department of the Army and other departments and agencies; and takes 
final action on claims filed against the Army.
    Question. If confirmed, how would you view your role as the Army 
General Counsel with respect to the General Counsel of the Department 
of Defense (DOD) in her role as the DOD Chief Legal Officer?
    Answer. The General Counsel of the Department of Defense is the 
chief legal officer and final legal authority for all legal issues 
facing the Department of Defense, to include the Department of the 
Army. If confirmed, I look forward to continuing to cultivate the 
strong working relationships that I am accustomed to from my time as a 
Judge Advocate in the Army, in DODEA, and the Department of 
Agriculture. I am committed to working collaboratively on matters of 
mutual interest to the Department of the Army and the Department of 
Defense.
                             qualifications
    Question. What background and experience do you possess that 
qualify you to serve as the General Counsel of the Department of the 
Army?
    Answer. I served as an Army officer for just short of 22 years, 
first as a personnel officer, then as a Judge Advocate, retiring at the 
rank of Lieutenant Colonel. Every day, I had the immense privilege of 
watching soldiers put their team, mission, and country first, taking 
great risks and making personal sacrifices to achieve our shared goals. 
Should I be confirmed, my experiences in the Army have prepared me well 
to assume the duties of General Counsel and to do right by our 
soldiers, civilians, and family members. As a Judge Advocate, I worked 
on a broad spectrum of legal issues including military justice, equal 
opportunity, fiscal law, and operational and administrative law. I 
deployed to the Middle East twice, first to OPERATION DESERT STORM in 
1992 and then in support of OPERATIONS IRAQI FREEDOM and ENDURING 
FREEDOM in 2004. I have served in operational and intelligence units, 
service and combatant command staffs, and in the Office of the Judge 
Advocate General and the Office of the General Counsel. I understand 
the importance of the collaborative relationship that must exist 
between these offices and have been fortunate to work with many of the 
lawyers presently serving in both offices, including the current Judge 
Advocate General of the Army, an extraordinary leader with whom I 
served at Fort Hood. Since retiring from the Army, I have worked as a 
Federal civilian lawyer, and I am currently leading a dynamic team of 
attorneys in the Office of the General Counsel at the Department of 
Agriculture. In this role I have further honed the leadership skills 
instilled in me daily during my Army service, and I am committed more 
than ever to exceed expectations as a servant leader for our country. 
Last year, I was privileged to serve the Army as a civilian member of 
the Fort Hood Independent Review Committee, where our five-member team 
completed a comprehensive review of the Fort Hood command climate and 
culture that has been the impetus for great change at Fort Hood and 
across the Army and DOD. I am well qualified and honored to be 
considered for this position.
    Question. Do you believe that there are any actions you need to 
take to enhance your ability to perform the duties of the Army General 
Counsel?
    Answer. Based on my background and experience, I am confident I 
have the requisite knowledge, skills, abilities, and temperament to 
serve as the Army General Counsel. If confirmed, I will work closely 
with the talented attorneys in the Office of the General Counsel, as 
well as in the Office of the Judge Advocate General to further my 
understanding of the legal challenges facing the Army. I will work with 
Army leadership to assess and prioritize their legal needs and quickly 
calibrate how I can be most effective in the position.
                    major challenges and priorities
    Question. If confirmed, what would be your vision for the OGC of 
today? For the OGC of the future?
    Answer. If confirmed, my current vision for OGC is to continue to 
provide well-coordinated, timely, and accurate legal and policy advice 
within the HQDA and to clearly articulate the Army's position on all 
legal matters. OGC lawyers will continue to carry out the 
responsibilities of OGC as enumerated in HQDA General Orders No. 2020-
01, as well as play a key role in supporting Secretary Wormuth's 
culture of innovation and experimentation, particularly in implementing 
acquisition reforms to streamline processes and promote efficiency 
within the parameters of the law. Finally, Army lawyers will be 
instrumental in the implementation of both the DOD and the Fort Hood 
Independent Review Committee's recommendations, particularly those 
regarding the prevention of and response to sexual assault and sexual 
harassment within the Army.
    For the OGC of the future, I envision that Army lawyers will add to 
their already diverse portfolios with well-developed expertise in 
cybersecurity, intellectual property, artificial intelligence, public-
private partnerships, and the law of modern warfare that reflects the 
transformation on which the Army is embarking today.
    Question. In your view, what are the most significant legal issues 
facing the Army today?
    Answer. The Secretary of the Army has established the Army's 
significant priorities, with the focus on People, Readiness, and 
Modernization. If confirmed, I look forward to supporting these Army 
priorities by addressing the legal issues that currently exist, and may 
arise, as those national security priorities are achieved. I have 
shared nine of the most significant legal issues that I am aware of in 
the answer that follows.
    Question. What do you consider to be the most significant 
challenges you will face if confirmed as Army General Counsel?
    Answer. To confront the significant challenges ahead, the Office of 
General Counsel must have the training and expertise required to 
provide timely and expert legal advice regarding modernization and 
acquisition reforms, while ensuring the vital focus on its people and 
military readiness. The Army will require attorneys knowledgeable in 
cybersecurity, intellectual property, and the challenges posed by 
artificial intelligence. If confirmed, the legal and policy issues and 
challenges that I expect to confront, at a minimum, are: (1) the Army's 
ongoing efforts to ensure diversity and promote fairness for all who 
serve the Nation in the United States Army; (2) prevent and respond 
appropriately to incidents of domestic violence, sexual harassment, and 
sexual assault; (3) suicide prevention; (4) the continuing integration 
of women into previously closed combat positions and occupations; (5) 
the implementation of recent legislative reforms in military justice 
and health care; (6) compliance with environmental laws; (7) continued 
focus on senior leader accountability; (8) oversight of Army 
intelligence activities; and (9) acquisition and modernization efforts.
    Question. What plans do you have for addressing each of these 
challenges, if confirmed?
    Answer. If confirmed, I intend to work closely with the Secretary 
of the Army, the Army Secretariat, the Chief of Staff of the Army, the 
Army Staff, and the Office of The Judge Advocate General to provide 
legal support and advice to confront the challenges facing our Army. I 
will ensure the attorneys in the Office of General Counsel (OGC) have 
access to training and development opportunities necessary to gain any 
additional expertise required to confront these challenges. I will also 
work with The Judge Advocate General and other Army attorney qualifying 
authorities to identify resources as well as training and development 
opportunities for attorneys throughout the Army to develop the skills 
necessary to confront these challenges. Regarding the legal and policy 
challenges I have identified, I will ensure OGC attorneys--always 
standing point--are fully engaged with our clients, ready to provide 
legal advice and find the legal solutions necessary to facilitate 
mission success.
    Question. If confirmed, what broad parameters would you establish 
as to the types of legal and policy issues on which you and the OGC 
must be consulted?
    Answer. If confirmed, I intend to support the Secretary, Under 
Secretary, and the Assistant Secretaries on all material and 
substantive matters being worked by the Army Secretariat. I believe 
that attorneys who are problem solvers are essential to shaping the 
legal and policy landscape. As an organization, I believe that the 
attorneys who comprise OGC must be participants in all stages of 
decisionmaking. It would be my duty to ensure that OGC attorneys have 
the training and professional skills necessary to provide sound legal 
advice and are fully integrated into the Army's decisionmaking process.
    Question. If confirmed, are there specific matters on which your 
predecessor Army General Counsels have issued legal opinions that you 
would expect to reconsider and possibly revise? If so, which opinions, 
in which practice areas, do you believe might merit reconsideration?
    Answer. There are no legal opinions that I am aware of at this time 
that need to be reconsidered or revised.
    Question. If confirmed, what innovative ideas would you consider 
providing to the Secretary of the Army to improve the organization and 
operations of Army OGC? To improve the delivery of legal services Army-
wide?
    Answer. If confirmed, I would undertake a review of the legal 
support to Army modernization efforts. In particular, I would review 
legal support related to cyber security, information law, and 
intellectual property. If confirmed, I would also evaluate the 
applicability of the Defense Legal Services Agency structure at the 
Military Department level, and consider the opportunities that could be 
realized with a new Department of Army Legal Services Organization.
    Question. If confirmed, how would you use organizational climate 
surveys to enhance your leadership and management of the OGC?
    Answer. I would read every word of the organizational climate 
surveys and take note of any recommendations for improvements, as well 
as positive feedback, to inform my decisions and ensure continued 
success. Should there be any negative feedback, I would seek to 
immediately analyze and identify the root cause and work to address the 
issue immediately and transparently.
    Question. If confirmed, what actions would you take to sustain a 
productive and mutually beneficial relationship between Congress and 
the Department of the Army?
    Answer. The Army cannot expect to succeed without the support of 
Congress, and particularly this Committee. It would be my goal to 
maintain transparent and continuing communication with the Congress to 
facilitate oversight. If confirmed, I will maintain a productive 
relationship through my words and actions, proceeding with complete 
integrity and positive collaboration.
relationship with the judge advocate general of the army and other army 
                            senior counsels
    Question. How are the responsibilities and authorities for 
providing legal services to the Department of the Army allocated 
between the General Counsel of the Army; The Judge Advocate General of 
the Army; the Command Counsel, U.S. Army Materiel Command; and the 
Chief Counsel, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers?
    Answer. It is my understanding that the Judge Advocate General of 
the Army (TJAG), the Command Counsel for U.S. Material Command, and the 
Chief Counsel for the U.S Army Corps of Engineers provide legal counsel 
to the Commanding General of their organization, or in the case of the 
TJAG, to the Chief of Staff of the Army and the members of the 
Department of the Army Staff. The General Counsel (GC) of the Army is 
the final legal authority for the Department of the Army and has 
overall responsibility for providing legal counsel to the Secretary of 
the Army, the Under Secretary of the Army, the Assistant Secretaries of 
the Army, and all other members of the Army Secretariat. The GC's legal 
opinions are controlling within the Department of the Army. The GC also 
serves as the overall qualifying authority for all lawyers in the 
Department of the Army, although I understand that qualifying authority 
has been delegated to the TJAG, Command Counsel for AMC and the Chief 
Counsel for the COE. However, I also understand that under Title 10 
section 7037, the TJAG is also a legal advisor to the Secretary on 
issues where his or her expertise is crucial to the success of the 
mission--such as military justice, international or operational law, 
and other uniquely ``military'' areas of the law.
    Question. What is the role of the Army General Counsel and other 
Army Senior Counsels in ensuring that attorneys under their supervision 
adhere to the Attorney Rules of Professional Conduct? If confirmed, how 
would you approach this critical supervisory duty with regard to Army 
OGC?
    Answer. The Army General Counsel is the senior qualifying authority 
for all attorneys in the Department of the Army. While The Judge 
Advocate General, the Army Materiel Command Chief Counsel, and the U.S. 
Army Corps of Engineers Chief Counsel are all qualifying authorities 
for the attorneys that practice under their supervision, the Army GC 
has overall responsibility for the ethical practice of law and the 
adherence to the Attorney Rules of Professional Conduct for all 
attorneys in the Department of the Army. If confirmed, I would review 
current Professional Conduct training for all Army attorneys, as well 
as current oversight protocols within the Army to ensure the Army 
attorneys are employing sound ethical practices.
    Question. If confirmed, how would you employ the forum provided by 
the Department of the Army Professional Conduct Council?
    Answer. If confirmed, I would use the forum to ensure that my 
responsibilities as the Qualifying Authority for all attorneys in the 
Department of the Army are thoroughly and professionally executed. As I 
understand, along with the Standards of Conduct Office at OSD OGC, the 
Professional Conduct Council is another resource to ensure that the 
Department of the Army legal community maintains the highest 
professional standards for the practice of law. I am completely 
committed to not only the ethical practice of law, but to the education 
of counsel on the necessity of always choosing the harder right instead 
of the easier wrong.
    Question. What role, if any, does the Army General Counsel play in 
evaluating the performance of other Army Senior Counsel?
    Answer. I believe the Army General Counsel provides input to the 
rater of every Army Senior Counsel on their annual performance 
evaluation.
    Question. What is your understanding of the unique role and 
authority of The Judge Advocate General of the Army vis-a-vis the 
General Counsel of the Army?
    Answer. The Judge Advocate General (TJAG) and the General Counsel 
of the Army are partners, both dedicated to the advancement of the Army 
mission and to the legal support of their respective clients--the Chief 
of Staff of the Army for TJAG and the Secretary of the Army for the 
General Counsel. I also understand that under Title 10 section 7037, 
the TJAG is authorized to give independent legal advice to the 
Secretary or the Chief of Staff of the Army.
    Question. What is your view of the authority of The Judge Advocate 
General of the Army, particularly as regards the provision of 
independent legal advice to the Secretary of the Army and the Chief of 
Staff, Army?
    Answer. Under Title 10 section 7037, the TJAG is authorized to give 
independent legal advice to the Secretary and the Chief of Staff. This 
is particularly important where his or her expertise is crucial to the 
success of the mission--such as military justice, international or 
operational law, and other uniquely ``military'' areas of the law.
    Question. What is your view of the responsibility of Army judge 
advocates to provide independent legal advice to military commanders 
and other Army officials and employees?
    Answer. Under Title 10 section 7037, Army Judge Advocates are 
entitled to give independent legal advice to military commanders. The 
statute prohibits any officer or employee of the Department of Defense 
from interfering with these duties. In my view, Judge Advocates must be 
empowered to provide independent legal advice to commanders and their 
staff, supported by appropriate guidance from their supervising 
attorneys. It is critical that commanders have access to timely, 
accurate, and candid legal advice and counsel as they execute their 
missions.
    Question. How do you view the role and responsibility of the Army 
General Counsel in the supervision and oversight of military justice 
matters vis-`-vis The Judge Advocate General of the Army?
    Answer. I view the Army General Counsel's role as complementary to 
that of The Judge Advocate General, who is charged statutorily with 
supervision and oversight of military justice. While providing 
independent views and advice to the Secretary of the Army and Army 
Senior Leaders, the Army General Counsel and The Judge Advocate General 
must work together to ensure appropriate policies are in place; those 
working within the military justice system have the requisite training, 
experience, and resources; victims receive the support they deserve; 
and the military justice system is fair and properly holds military 
personnel accountable for their actions.
    Question. If confirmed, would you propose any changes in the 
current relationships between the Army General Counsel and The Judge 
Advocate General of the Army?
    Answer. I am not aware of any changes that are currently needed. It 
is my understanding, that the Army General Counsel and The Judge 
Advocate General have a close and collaborative relationship. If 
confirmed, I would seek to buildupon and strengthen that relationship 
to ensure that the civilian and military lawyers leverage their 
expertise and perspectives to provide informed and comprehensive legal 
and policy advice to Army Senior Leaders.
    Question. If confirmed, would you propose any changes to the 
current relationships and/or allocation of responsibilities between 
attorneys in the OGC and uniformed Army judge advocates?
    Answer. I am not aware that any changes are currently needed. I 
understand that the Army Office of the General Counsel and the Office 
of The Judge Advocate General have a close and collaborative 
relationship. If confirmed, however, I will take a careful look at this 
relationship and assess if any adjustments are necessary.
    Question. Are the legal opinions of the Army General Counsel 
binding on all Army attorneys?
    Answer. Yes. It is my understanding that the Army General Counsel 
is the chief legal officer for the Department of the Army and is 
empowered to determine the Department's position on any legal question 
or procedure. Legal opinions issued by the Army General Counsel are, 
therefore, controlling throughout the Department of the Army. It is my 
understanding, partially informed by my experience as an active duty 
judge advocate in Office of the Army General Counsel, that there is a 
close and collaborative relationship with the Office of the Judge 
Advocate General in formulating those opinions. If confirmed, I will 
continue to ensure that legal opinions are informed by the expertise of 
both the civilian and uniformed members of the Army's legal community.
    Question. If confirmed, how would you ensure that controlling legal 
opinions of your office are available to all Army attorneys, including 
judge advocates?
    Answer. It is my understanding that written opinions authored by or 
coordinated with the Office of the General Counsel for the Department 
of the Army are generally distributed in the ordinary course of 
business, using normal departmental distribution processes. If 
confirmed, this practice will continue and I will be sure to evaluate 
its effectiveness. In addition, I will ensure that the Office of the 
Army General Counsel makes its legal opinions appropriately available 
upon request to other Army attorneys, including judge advocates.
    Question. Section 548 of the National Defense Authorization Act 
required the Secretary of Defense shall carry out a program to provide 
legal counsel to victims of domestic violence offenses who are 
otherwise eligible for military legal assistance.
    In your view, how do the needs of victims of domestic violence 
offenses differ from the needs of victims of sexual assault? How should 
any such differences affect the parameters of a legal counsel program 
established for domestic violence victims?
    Answer. In my view, due to the nature of the relationship a victim 
of domestic violence has with the offender, victims may need legal 
support to help them leave an unsafe domestic situation. A primary goal 
of any legal program intended to support these victims should focus 
first on providing the victim with the legal tools necessary to safely 
leave a dangerous relationship. This assistance likely requires a legal 
subject matter expert in family law--a case area covered by the Army's 
Legal Assistance program. In addition to family law advocacy, victims 
of domestic violence deserve the victim advocacy that Army Special 
Victims' Counsel (SVC) attorneys can provide. Because these victims 
have these two unique legal needs, my view is that any program that 
seeks to support and protect victims of domestic violence must provide 
both types of support--victim advocacy and family law advocacy.
    Question. If confirmed, what role would you establish for yourself 
in assisting the Secretary of Army conducting the program required by 
section 548?
    Answer. If confirmed, I would assist in evaluating the 
effectiveness of the Army's recent efforts to meet this challenge. As 
this is a new program, training, resourcing, or focus may require 
adjustments as the program matures.
    Question. In your view, how do the needs of military child victims 
of sexual abuse differ from the needs of adult victims of sexual 
assault and from those of domestic violence victims? How would any such 
differences affect the parameters of a legal counsel of guardian ad 
litem program established for military child victims of sexual abuse?
    Answer. I am aware that Special Victims' Counsel, Special Victim 
Prosecutors, and Trial Defense Services attorneys all receive training 
on how different traumas and different stages of development impact the 
support needed by victims. I understand that Special Victims' Counsel 
can only represent those victims capable of understanding the process 
and of making independent decisions. In cases where victims, due to 
their young age, are not competent to make those legal decisions, I 
understand that a guardian ad litem may be assigned. In these 
instances, the guardian ad litem makes decisions on behalf of the 
victim that are in the victim's best interests.
                      information law and practice
    Question. The Army General Counsel serves as the Army's appellate 
authority for appeals of denials of the release of information 
requested under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).
    What is the current backlog of FOIA appeals in Army OGC?
    Answer. I am informed that, as of October 1, 2021, when the Army 
Office of General Counsel compiled its annual report, the appeal 
backlog was 57.
    Question. If confirmed, what actions would you take to address this 
backlog?
    Answer. If confirmed, I would devote an appropriate number of 
personnel to addressing and reducing the backlog, including the use of 
Army Reserve Judge Advocates assigned to Army OGC.
    Question. If confirmed, what factors would you consider in 
determining whether or not to recommend the invocation of Executive 
Privilege in regard to a request from the Senate Armed Services 
Committee for information under the cognizance of the Department of the 
Army?
    Answer. If confirmed, my recommendation about whether to invoke 
Executive Privilege would be made in close coordination with the 
Department of Defense Office of the General Counsel and would be based 
on applicable law and established executive branch policy regarding 
accommodation of congressional oversight requests.
    Question. How does the Army address or mitigate privacy concerns 
associated with the Commander's Risk Reduction Dashboard? Given the 
sensitivity of the personal information aggregated in the Dashboard, 
should the Army's approach to compliance with privacy laws and 
regulations be adjusted in any way, in your view?
    Answer. I am informed the Army mitigates privacy concerns by 
imposing extensive administrative and technical safeguards to protect 
the information on the Commander's Risk Reduction Dashboard. In 
addition, Dashboard users receive privacy training to ensure they are 
good stewards of the information and understand applicable law and 
policy. I do not know, at this time, if adjustments are necessary.
    Question. How does the Army navigate the requirements of the Health 
Information Portability and Accountability Act and a soldier's desire 
for confidentiality in determining what information about a soldier's 
mental or behavioral health--including treatment for a mental or 
behavioral health condition--can and should be provided to the chain of 
command? Should the Army's approach to this matter be revised in any 
way, in your view?
    Answer. In my judgment, the Army must ensure the safety and 
confidentiality of all soldiers' medical conditions and treatment in 
accordance with the Health Information Portability and Accountability 
Act. It is important that soldiers continue to seek care and, as such, 
it is appropriate to limit the amount of information conveyed to the 
chain of command to only that necessary to convey the risk to the 
soldier and to the mission. If confirmed, I will provide the Secretary 
my best advice, in coordination with the Surgeon General, on the right 
balance between confidentiality and ensuring the command is informed in 
order to effectively assess risk, maintaining full compliance with the 
law and Department of Defense policy.
 criminal and administrative investigations and intelligence oversight
    Question. Per Army General Order 2020-01, Assignment of Functions 
and Responsibilities Within Headquarters, Department of the Army, the 
Army General Counsel is responsible for overseeing criminal and 
administrative investigations, in coordination with The Judge Advocate 
General.
    If confirmed, what role would you establish for yourself in 
providing advice to the U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command (CID), 
including acting on requests for consensual or nonconsensual 
interceptions of wire, electronic, and oral communications, and pen 
register operations?
    Answer. My understanding is the Army General Counsel (GC) 
coordinates with the Judge Advocate General to provide advice to CID on 
the development and execution of criminal investigation policy and has 
delegated approval authority to the Director of CID for consensual 
interceptions of wire, electronic, and oral communications and pen 
register operations. The GC oversees the use of these sensitive 
investigative techniques and is the approval authority for any 
exceptions to the policy for conducting them. The GC also approves or 
denies CID requests to seek Attorney General or judicial authorization 
for nonconsensual interception of wire, electronic, oral 
communications, and pen register operations. If confirmed, I would 
ensure that the use of consensual or nonconsensual communications 
intercepts are not only consistent with the law, but also necessary to 
the conduct of law enforcement activities.
    Question. In light of the holding in U.S. v. Dreyer, what legal 
standard does Army CID apply in determining whether to authorize its 
special agents to participate in investigations of Internet Crimes 
Against Children (ICAC) in which the suspected perpetrator's military 
affiliation has not yet been established with certainty? If confirmed, 
would you recommend any changes to this standard?
    Answer. I understand that the Army applies a reasonable basis 
standard, considering information related to the military location, the 
military persona, or the connection to the individual's DOD duties, 
when determining the investigative authority of the Army's criminal 
investigators. If confirmed, I will work with the new CID Director to 
ensure Army investigators continue to be involved in ICAC 
investigations and work closely with their civilian counterparts to 
ensure these crimes are thoroughly investigated while not running afoul 
of U.S. v. Dreyer.
    Question. In your view, do Army CID special agents have adequate 
authority and resourcing to participate in multi-jurisdictional law 
enforcement task forces related to the investigation of ICAC offenses?
    Answer. My general understanding is that CID agents currently have 
the appropriate authorities, and with the transformation of CID, will 
have the proper resourcing to participate more effectively in multi-
jurisdictional task forces. If confirmed, however, I will assist the 
Department in assessing CID's resourcing and authorities.
    Question. Recent reports by the Government Accountability Office 
and by private organizations have raised significant questions about 
racial disparity in the military justice system--most notably at the 
investigation stage.
    If confirmed, what steps would you take to address potential racial 
disparity in in the context of Army investigations--whether such 
investigations are criminal or administrative in nature?
    Answer. If confirmed, I am committed to assisting Army leadership 
in addressing racial disparities identified by the GAO in military 
investigations. I understand that, in June 2020, the Secretary of the 
Army directed The Judge Advocate General and The Provost Marshal 
General to conduct a holistic evaluation of racial disparities in the 
military justice system. If confirmed, I will look forward to working 
with these two Army leaders to evaluate, identify and advise the 
Secretary as to how best to address, the causes of racial disparities 
throughout our system, from the accessions process, to investigations, 
prosecutions, sentencing, and clemency and parole.
    Question. What progress have DOD and the Army made in developing 
and implementing the process and policy required by section 545 of the 
NDAA for fiscal year 2021?
    Answer. Personally, I am unaware of the progress DOD or the Army 
has made in developing and implementing a policy and process through 
which any covered person may request that the person's name, personally 
identifying information, and other information pertaining to the person 
be expunged from law enforcement records. If confirmed, I will 
ascertain DOD and the Army's progress in developing and implementing 
these policies and processes and ensure the Office of General Counsel 
is supporting this effort.
    Question. When can the Committees on Armed Services expect to 
receive the report required by section 545(e) of the NDAA for fiscal 
year 2021?
    Answer. Personally, I am unaware of the status of the Secretary of 
the Army's report on the actions taken to carry out the requirements of 
section 545 of the NDAA for fiscal year 2021. However, if confirmed, I 
would ascertain the status of the report and work to ensure its 
submission to the Committees on Armed Services as rapidly as possible.
    Army General Order 2020-01 further provides that in coordination 
with The Judge Advocate General and the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-2, the 
Army General Counsel is responsible for developing and overseeing 
policies and programs for Army intelligence and counterintelligence. 
Further, together with The Judge Advocate General, the General Counsel 
is charged to oversee sensitive activities and counterintelligence 
investigations.
    Question. What is the role of the Army General Counsel in ensuring 
that Army sensitive activities--at all levels of classification--are 
consistently conducted in accordance with standards of legality and 
propriety?
    Answer. I understand the Army General Counsel, together with the 
Judge Advocate General and the Director of the Army Special Programs 
Directorate, identifies sensitive Army intelligence and other 
activities based on the potential for limited organizational oversight, 
and negative impacts to public confidence should the activities not be 
conducted consistent with law and policy. The Secretary of the Army has 
established specific enhanced oversight requirements for these 
activities, especially those that are highly classified. I also 
understand the Army General Counsel is provided unfettered access to 
all sensitive activities and conducts in-depth reviews of them either 
prior to approval, or after approval and then quarterly or annually to 
ensure they are conducted consistent with law and policy. The Army 
General Counsel is also directed by the Secretary of the Army to bring 
any sensitive activity to her attention if there is any doubt about the 
propriety of conducting it.
    Question. In your view, what limiting practices should guide Army 
intelligence organizations in determining the types and amount of 
information that can be collected about U.S. citizens?
    Answer. Army intelligence organizations may only collect U.S. 
person information (USPI) if the information sought is reasonably 
believed to be necessary for the performance of an authorized 
intelligence mission or function assigned to the component. I am 
informed that Executive Order 12333, DOD Manual 5240.01, and Army 
Regulation 381-10 place limits on USPI that Army intelligence 
organizations may collect. These policies forbid the collection of USPI 
solely for the purpose of monitoring activities protected by the First 
Amendment or the lawful exercise of other rights guaranteed by the 
Constitution and laws of the United States. These policies balance 
civil liberties and privacy interests with the need to conduct lawfully 
authorized intelligence missions. If confirmed, I would expect that 
attorneys at all levels of Army intelligence organizations review the 
collection of USPI to ensure it is consistent with law and policy.
    Question. If confirmed, what would be your approach to ensuring 
that senior Army leaders, including the Secretary of the Army, are 
fully informed of, and personally engaged in critical decisions 
associated with Army sensitive activities?
    Answer. If confirmed, it is my intention to continue to promote the 
Army's long-standing policy of having the Secretary of the Army review 
and approve the most sensitive activities and to withhold approval of 
other sensitive activities to the Under Secretary of the Army, or 
Deputy Chief of Staff for Intelligence. I also will continue to 
collaborate with The Judge Advocate General to exercise broad 
discretion in elevating the review or approval of any sensitive 
activity that I believe should have the attention of the Secretary of 
the Army to ensure that she and other Army senior leaders remain 
engaged in the command and control of these activities.
    Question. How does OGC fit into the established Army Intelligence 
Oversight structure, and how does OGC engage with the President's 
Intelligence Oversight Board?
    Answer. I understand that the Secretary of the Army has directed 
that the Army General Counsel exercise day-to-day oversight of Army 
intelligence activities on her behalf. A senior-level attorney in Army 
OGC office performs this mission in coordination with The Judge 
Advocate General and the Army Inspector General. One level of 
intelligence oversight at HQDA involves the requirement to report 
Questionable Intelligence Activities and Significant or Highly 
Sensitive Matters through the chain of command to the Army Inspector 
General. I believe the Army General Counsel provides the final review 
of these reports prior to them being forwarded to the DOD Senior 
Intelligence Oversight Officer (SIOO). I am informed the DOD SIOO is 
responsible for reporting relevant Questionable Intelligence Activities 
and Significant or Highly Sensitive Matters through the Secretary of 
Defense to the President's Intelligence Oversight Board (PIOB). Army 
OGC engages with the PIOB through the DOD General Counsel and the DOD 
SIOO.
    Question. What is the role of Army OGC in reviewing requests for 
the provision of DOD physical protection and personal security services 
to retired DOD officials and the family members of certain DOD 
personnel, as contemplated by section 1074(b) of the NDAA for fiscal 
year 2008? If confirmed, would you concur in the provision of DOD 
protective services to such persons in the absence of an imminent and 
credible threat to their safety?
    Answer. Army OGC conducts a legal review of nominations involving 
current or former DOD officials or their family members for the 
provision of physical protection and personal security services to 
ensure the requests address the criteria in law and policy required to 
justify providing such support. If confirmed, I would continue to 
oversee the conduct of these legal reviews to provide the Secretary of 
the Army the legal input she needs to determine whether to forward a 
nomination to the Deputy Secretary of Defense for approval.
    Question. If confirmed, what would be your approach to ensuring 
that Army counterintelligence investigations--including investigations 
of cyber intrusions--properly take into account both law enforcement 
and national security interests?
    Answer. I understand that all Army Counterintelligence (CI) 
investigations are conducted jointly with the FBI. The Army CI 
organizations and the FBI work together to balance law enforcement and 
national security interests. Army CI investigations seek relevant 
information to develop national security criminal cases including 
potential cyber intrusions by foreign actors that could be prosecuted 
by the Army under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, or the 
Department of Justice in Federal court. In CI investigations, I believe 
the Army develops national security cases to protect DOD personnel, 
resources, and critical information as well as to protect individual 
constitutional, privacy, and civil rights. There may be times when a CI 
investigation does not result in a judicial prosecution due to 
insufficient evidence or to protect CI sources and methods. In these 
and all other cases, Army CI provides intelligence obtained from the 
investigations to appropriate DOD Components to address national 
security threats to DOD personnel, facilities, and information 
technology networks.
comprehensive review of department of the navy uniformed military legal 
                              communities
    Question. On January 10, 2020, the Department of the Navy released 
its Comprehensive Review of the Navy and Marine Corps Uniformed Legal 
Communities. In commenting on the importance of the review, the Vice 
Chief of Naval Operations stated, ``[i]t is precisely because our legal 
communities provide vital services [that] are necessary to promote the 
readiness of the force and successful mission accomplishment, that a 
review of this nature was warranted. . . . This comprehensive review 
was an opportunity for us . . . to reflect on how we conduct ourselves 
and do business, in terms of military justice and legal support to our 
sailors, marines, and their families.''
    Have you reviewed the report of the Navy's Comprehensive Review?
    Answer. Yes. I am familiar with it.
    Question. Did the Navy's Comprehensive Review yield any findings or 
recommendations that you believe may be applicable and/or useful to the 
Army legal community? Please explain your answer.
    Answer. The review found that the Navy JAG Corps' organizational 
structure and processes did not foster a culture of continuous self-
assessment focused on professional performance and accountability. The 
review recommended the Navy JAG Corps implement changes to refocus its 
culture and put in places self-assessment mechanisms, rapid feedback of 
lessons learned, and accountability. These recommendations are a good 
reminder for the Army legal community to ensure it emphasizes the 
importance of maintaining a learning culture throughout the Army legal 
community. If confirmed, I will work with The Judge Advocate General to 
ensure we do so.
                           covid-19 response
    Question. What is your view of the legality of the Secretary of 
Defense's directive that requires all servicemembers, including members 
of the National Guard and Reserves, to be vaccinated for the 
coronavirus?
    Answer. Commanders at all levels are responsible and accountable 
for the health of their commands, which includes maintaining medical 
readiness. As part of this responsibility, commanders ensure the 
immunization of their personnel as required by Army Regulation 40-562 
or other legal directives. With full FDA approval of the vaccine, I 
support the Secretary of Defense's actions in this matter, which ensure 
military readiness.
    Question. What guidance has the Army given to commanders regarding 
precautions to limit the spread of COVID-19, and what role has the 
Office of the Army General Counsel played in generating and reviewing 
such guidance?
    Answer. My understanding is that the Army has provided commanders 
with extensive guidance throughout the COVID-19 pandemic to promote the 
safety, health, and welfare of their commands. Since the beginning of 
the pandemic response, I believe the Army has fully implemented all DOD 
directives and guidance for mitigating the risk posed by COVID-19, 
while empowering Army commanders to implement additional safeguards 
based on mission requirements, community transmission data, or other 
unique factors. I am informed that these measures have included the use 
of personal protective equipment, social distancing, and increased 
telework flexibility. The Office of the Army General Counsel has 
reviewed all such guidance and will continue to play an important role 
in advising the Department on COVID-19 related matters.
               civilian attorney recruiting and retention
    Question. In your view, does the Department of the Army have a 
sufficient number of military and civilian attorneys to perform its 
many missions?
    Answer. I am not currently in a position to judge the adequacy of 
attorney manning levels. If confirmed, in coordination with The Judge 
Advocate General, I will evaluate and make any appropriate 
recommendation on what manning levels need to be adjusted for the Army 
to perform its many missions with proper legal review. I believe the 
increased complexity and pace of multi-domain operations has expanded 
the role of both civilian and uniformed attorneys in areas such as 
cyber law, intelligence law, space law, international law, and 
acquisitions. Furthermore, recent legislation requiring additional 
legal services for domestic violence victims and expected legislation 
reforming military justice requires additional military attorneys to 
ensure the fair and expeditious adjudication of misconduct critical to 
maintaining good order and discipline, readiness levels that supports 
the warfighting mission, and soldier and family well-being. I am also 
informed that civilian attorneys have, on occasion, been forced to 
surge expertise to address emerging needs. When those requirements 
become enduring, I believe an assessment must be made on whether 
current civilian end strength is appropriate.
    Question. Army judge advocates benefit from an established career 
progression format, substantial mentoring and training opportunities, 
and exposure to a broad spectrum of legal practice areas and leadership 
responsibilities. By contrast, Army civilian attorneys normally do not 
have established career programs and may do the same type of legal work 
for many years, with promotions based solely upon longevity and 
vacancies that may arise.
    If confirmed, what specific actions would you take to recruit, 
hire, and retain high quality civilian attorneys, and provide 
sufficient opportunities for their development and advancement through 
positions of increasing responsibility and leadership in the career 
civilian component of the Army legal community?
    Answer. If confirmed, I would make recruitment, hiring, and 
retention of highly qualified attorneys a top priority. In order to 
remain competitive in the legal labor market, it is crucial that the 
Army renew its commitment to funding current recruiting and retention 
incentive programs. It is also important to encourage innovative 
recruiting and retention strategies to develop tools to compete with 
the private sector and other Federal employers. If confirmed, I will 
study the viability of additional incentives to attract and retain the 
highest quality attorneys, as I am convinced these efforts and programs 
are needed to maintain the tradition of superior legal services within 
the Department of the Army. In addition, I will seek to establish a 
formal professional development program in the Office of General 
Counsel and consider reestablishing the Army General Counsel Honors 
Program intended to recruit a rich demographic of young legal talent.
    Question. Do you foresee that in the coming years, the Department 
of the Army's demand for civilian attorneys with certain technical-
legal expertise (e.g., cyber, space, and intellectual property law) 
will increase, commensurate with the Department's evolving missions and 
the 2018 NDS? If so, in what technical-legal specialties would you 
expect the Army's requirements to increase, and why?
    Answer. Yes, I think it is highly likely that demands for 
technical-legal expertise will increase in the coming years. If 
confirmed, I intend to become more fully informed of potential 
deficiencies in these legal practice areas and would work diligently to 
ensure the Army's legal capabilities match the Department's mission 
requirements.
    Question. Do you believe the Army, including Army OGC, needs 
additional incentives and talent management tools to recruit, develop, 
sustain, and retain a 21st century career civilian attorney workforce? 
If so, what sort of incentives and tools do you perceive would be 
helpful?
    Answer. If confirmed, sustaining the career civilian attorney 
workforce would be one of my highest priorities. It is my current 
understanding there are several options already in place that the Army 
can leverage for recruiting and retention of the career civilian 
attorney workforce, such as telework/remote work, the ability to hire 
using excepted service authorities, and the student loan repayment 
program. If confirmed, I would look for additional ways to improve the 
Army's ability to recruit, develop, sustain, and retain talent such as 
developing a Scholarship-for-Service program similar to the Cyber Corps 
Scholarship-for-Service and considering whether to reestablish the Army 
General Counsel Honors Program.
    Question. How is ``Qualifying Authority'' allocated among Army 
Senior Counsels?
    Answer. The Army General Counsel has the authority to approve the 
qualifications of all civilian Army attorneys but has delegated the 
qualifying authority for GS-15 level civilian attorneys and below to 
the Chief Counsel of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; the Command 
Counsel for Army Material Command, and The Judge Advocate General. The 
General Counsel retains qualifying authority for all SES and SL 
attorney positions Army-wide. While the authority is delegated to these 
senior attorney officials, the General Counsel maintains oversight 
responsibility.
    Question. If confirmed, would you make any adjustments to Army 
legal community Qualifying Authority designations or processes? Please 
explain your answer.
    Answer. No. I am not aware of any need for changes or adjustments 
to qualifying authorities at this time, but if confirmed, I would 
remain receptive and listen to reasons that might suggest otherwise.
    The Army General Counsel serves as the qualifying authority for all 
Army civilian Senior Executive Service (SES) attorney positions.
    Question. What factors would you consider in determining whether to 
qualify a candidate for appointment to an attorney's position in the 
career SES?
    Answer. I understand that when the Army seeks to hire an attorney 
for a career SES position, the Executive Resources Board (ERB) appoints 
a panel to review qualifications and interview qualified candidates. 
Important factors in this process include professional education, 
training, and work experience. If confirmed, I would also look at 
temperament and character for these top legal leadership positions.
    Question. What do you view as the most important executive 
competencies of an SES attorney and how would you assess these in 
deciding whether to recommend a particular candidate for selection and 
appointment to an attorney's position in the career SES?
    Answer. I understand that the General Counsel, as the principal 
legal advisor to the Executive Resources Board (ERB), is not a voting 
member, and therefore, I am informed, is not in a position to recommend 
particular candidates for selection or appointment. I understand, 
however, the Office of General Counsel ensures that ERB members 
recommend candidates who are best qualified for the civilian senior 
executive position because: 1) they have demonstrated the ability to 
lead change; 2) they have demonstrated the ability to lead people; 3) 
they have demonstrated an ability to deliver results; 4) they have a 
history of sound business acumen; and 5) they have successfully built 
coalitions.
    Question. If confirmed, how would you hold Army SES attorneys 
accountable for both organizational performance and the rigorous 
performance management of their subordinates?
    Answer. Every year, Army senior leadership convenes a performance 
review board (PRB) focused on holding each SES, to include attorneys, 
accountable for their work. Instructed by the Secretary of the Army, 
the PRB ensures each SES meets performance objectives. If confirmed, I 
would take appropriate corrective action in cases where individual SES 
attorneys fail to meet performance objectives and standards.
    Question. What role does the Army General Counsel play in the 
Department of the Army Executive Resources Board (ERB)? Would you 
recommend any changes to the Charter of the ERB, if confirmed?
    Answer. The Army GC provides independent legal advice and support 
to the ERB as a non-voting member. At this time, and based on my 
current understanding of the ERB, I am unaware of any changes that need 
to be made to the ERB Charter.
    Question. What role does the Army General Counsel play in the 
Department of the Army SES Talent and Succession Management process? 
Would you recommend any changes to the process, if confirmed?
    Answer. The Office of the Army General Counsel serves as an advisor 
to the ERB and the Talent and Succession Management Boards (TSMB). 
Based on my current understanding of the ERB, I am unaware of any 
changes that need to be made to the SES Talent and Succession 
Management process.
    Question. What role do mobility and the objective of joint 
experience play in the Army SES program, including with regard to SES 
attorneys?
    Answer. I believe the Senior Executive Service is a national asset. 
Mobility is typically required of all SES employees. Mobility involves 
using a full range of assignment authorities to leverage the skills of 
executives to enable greater mission accomplishment and to prepare them 
for higher levels of service, whether within the agency, or elsewhere 
in Government. I believe our Nation is best served when agencies and 
executives work together strategically to field the strongest and most 
agile executive corps possible. Mobility encompasses both temporary and 
permanent job assignments involving changes from previous assignment 
patterns (for example, to different business lines, disciplines, 
program areas, components, regions, headquarters, or other divergent 
environments). I understand that joint experience is also a component 
of the Army SES program, as the Army participates inside the DOD 
Enterprise allowing SES employees to maneuver into different 
environments within DOD, enabling SES employees to gain broader 
experience and perspective within the Department of Defense.
    Question. The American Bar Association's Standing Committee on Pro 
Bono and Public Service asserts that ``[w]hen society confers the 
privilege to practice law on an individual, he or she accepts the 
responsibility to promote justice and to make justice equally 
accessible to all people. Thus, all lawyers should aspire to render 
some legal services without fee or expectation of fee for the good of 
the public.''
    If confirmed, would you favor the creation of a program to permit 
civilian attorneys in Army OGC to engage in pro bono work? If not, why 
not? If so, what would be the parameters of such a program?
    Answer. Yes. I fully support the principles articulated by the ABA 
regarding pro bono services and, if confirmed, I will explore the 
feasibility of such a program within the Army Office of General 
Counsel. However, I think caution is advisable because many attorneys' 
State bars have guidelines regarding pro bono work, as well as rules 
governing the practice of law outside of the jurisdiction in which an 
attorney may be licensed.
    Question. Former Secretary of Defense Esper and Army Chief of 
Staff, General McConville, prioritized initiatives to employ military 
spouses in Army civilian jobs. In 2014, the Army Judge Advocate 
General's Corps created the Military Spouse Attorney Hiring Program.
    What role can the Army General Counsel play in expanding the 
Military Spouse Attorney Hiring Program across the Army legal 
community?
    Answer. I understand that the Army Judge Advocate General's Corps' 
Military Spouse Attorney Hiring Program has been very successful, with 
well over 200 appointments of spouse attorneys since its inception in 
2014--with most appointments being within the Judge Advocate General's 
Corps. Since that time, the Air Force has implemented its own program, 
patterned after the Army's. If confirmed as General Counsel, I would 
intend to broadcast the quality of the attorneys recruited thought this 
program and emphasize the overall value of the program amongst each of 
the Qualifying Authorities and the rest of the Army and DOD legal 
community leaders.
    Question. In your view, can the tenets of the Military Spouse 
Attorney Hiring Program be expanded to military spouses in other 
professions?
    Answer. Yes. In my assessment, many of the tenets that make the 
Army's Military Spouse Attorney Hiring Program so successful would 
apply to any profession. While I understand this particular program 
benefits from excepted service hiring flexibilities, the success of the 
program is fundamentally based on the ready, able, and extremely 
motivated pool of high quality talent that exist in the Services' 
military spouses.
                      detention and interrogation
    Question. Do you support the standards for detainee treatment 
specified in the revised Army Field Manual on Interrogations, FM 2-
22.3, issued in September 2006, and in DOD Directive 2310.01E, The 
Department of Defense Detainee Program?
    Answer. Yes. I firmly believe that all detainees must be treated 
humanely.
    Question. If confirmed, what role will Army OGC play in the ongoing 
triennial review and revision of FM 2-22.3 mandated by the NDAA for 
fiscal year 2016?
    Answer. I understand that Section 1045 places primary 
responsibility for reviewing FM 2-22.3 with the Secretary of Defense, 
in consultation with the Attorney General, the Director of the Federal 
Bureau of Investigation, and the Director of National Intelligence. To 
ensure the field manual complies with U.S. legal obligations, however, 
the Army General Counsel should provide an independent voice regarding 
any proposed revision to the interrogation standards contained in FM 2-
22.3 and the interpretation of those specified in Section 1045 of the 
FY2016 NDAA. If confirmed, I would provide that independent voice, and 
would work with the DOD General Counsel, and The Judge Advocate General 
of the Army to ensure that the standards of treatment in the manual are 
in accordance with applicable law and policy.
    Question. Section 2441 of title 18, U.S. Code, defines grave 
breaches of common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions, including 
torture and cruel and inhuman treatment.
    In your view, does section 2441 define these terms in a way that 
provides U.S. detainees in the custody of other nations, as well as 
foreign detainees in U.S. custody, appropriate protections from abusive 
treatment?
    Answer. In my view, the definitions of ``torture'' and ``cruel and 
inhuman treatment'' as contained in United State Code, Title 18, 
Section 2441, provide clear and appropriate guidance regarding the 
treatment of U.S. detainees in foreign custody and foreign detainees in 
U.S. custody. The articulated standards criminalize specific ``war 
crimes,'' regardless of whether the offense is committed by or against 
a member of the Armed Forces or a national of the United States, and 
serve as safeguards to ensure appropriate protection from abusive 
treatment.
                        military commissions act
    Question. In your view, have military commissions constituted 
pursuant to the Military Commissions Act of 2009 provided an effective 
forum for trying violations of the law of armed conflict in the context 
of the global war on terrorism? Please explain your answer.
    Answer. In my view, yes. The military commissions constituted 
pursuant to the Military Commissions Act of 2009 have provided an 
effective forum designed to address the unique nature of offenses 
committed in violation of the law of armed conflict.
    Question. Does the extensive duration of pretrial procedures in 
ongoing commission cases give you any cause for concern that the 
commission system may not be effective? Please explain your answer.
    Answer. Based on my present understanding, no they do not. Pretrial 
procedures are a critical part of the commissions--or any criminal 
judicial--process, and are required by the Military Commissions Act of 
2009, the Rules for Military Commission, the Regulation for Trial by 
Military Commission, and the Military Commissions Rules of Court. I 
understand that the length of time that the pretrial process takes is 
specific to the factual issues of each case, many of which bear 
directly on due process and national security considerations.
    Question. What changes to the Military Commissions Act of 2009 
would you propose, if confirmed, to improve the efficiency and 
effectiveness of the military commission system and process?
    Answer. At this time, I do not have any recommended changes to the 
military commission system and process. However, if confirmed, I will 
continue to assess the efficiency and effectiveness of this system and 
its processes.
    Question. In your view, could the Article III court system serve as 
a suitable, if not preferable alternative for the trial of persons 
charged with violations of the law of armed conflict in the context of 
the global war on terrorism? Please explain your answer.
    Answer. Although the Federal court system has successfully tried 
many terrorists, my current view is that some cases are more 
appropriate for trial by military commission. Military commissions, as 
established by the Military Commissions Act of 2009 and governed by the 
associated rules and regulations, provide a just process for trying 
offenses against the law of war and other offenses triable by a 
military commission consistent with U.S. and international law.
                                 ethics
    Question. If confirmed, what actions would you take to effectuate 
your duties as the Designated Agency Ethics Official for the Department 
of the Army?
    Answer. If confirmed, as the Army's Designated Agency Ethics 
Official (DAEO), I would have the primary responsibility for developing 
and overseeing the policies and programs for the Army's ethics program, 
and for ensuring effective and open communication with the Office of 
Government Ethics. I would coordinate with subject matter experts in 
the Office of the General Counsel and with officials in relevant agency 
components to ensure the Army had established effective communication 
relationships regarding matters related to the agency's ethics program. 
I would also perform all duties required of me under Federal and DOD 
regulations, which include providing accurate and timely ethics advice 
and counseling and ensuring the appropriate resolution of conflicts of 
interest and the appearance of conflicts of interest.
    Question. What do you see as the role of the Army General Counsel 
in setting an ``ethical tone'' for all Army personnel, military and 
civilian?
    Answer. In my view, the strength of the Army's ethical culture 
should come from leadership at every level. I share President Biden's, 
Secretary Austin's, and Secretary Wormuth's commitment to restoring and 
maintaining public trust in government, and in the Army in particular. 
If confirmed as the senior legal official in the Army, I would play an 
important role in not only advising the Army's most senior leaders, but 
also in providing training and legal practice resources to all Army 
legal professionals. By ensuring all Army leaders get prompt and 
accurate legal advice as well as continual ethics training, I would 
provide them the skills and tools to be ethical leaders and ensure they 
are able to personally set the highest ethical standards. I will also 
take steps to ensure the Army's financial and operational processes, 
reporting, systems, and data are accurate, reliable, and secure, 
further enhancing public trust in the Army.
    Question. How is responsibility for providing ethics advice to 
senior officials allocated among Army Senior Counsel?
    Answer. If confirmed, I would personally provide ethics advice, and 
also delegate responsibility for providing certain advice to an 
Alternate Designated Agency Ethics Official, to several Deputy 
Designated Agency Ethics Officials, and to Ethics Counselors throughout 
the Army.
    Question. What actions has the Army taken over time to ensure that 
its military officers and other Army personnel are trained--throughout 
their careers--on objective ethics and the Army's core values?
    Answer. I am informed that all new Army members--soldier and 
civilian alike--must receive ethics training within 3 months of 
appointment. Interactive or in-person annual ethics training is 
mandatory for all senior Army officials and members whose duties 
involve the exercise of significant independent judgment over matters 
that will have a substantial impact on the integrity of Army operations 
and relationships with non-Federal parties. Army members also receive 
ethics training at their command preparation courses and their 
professional advancement courses, and many commands offer ethics 
training aimed specifically at post-government employment restrictions 
to departing officials. Additionally, The Judge Advocate General Legal 
Center and School (TJAGLCS) provides government ethics training to both 
legal and non-legal personnel. The Army also provides government ethics 
training materials that are used throughout the Army for initial entry 
training, command courses, and other training courses throughout 
soldiers' careers in the Army.
    Question. What role does the Army General Counsel play in ensuring 
that Department of the Army personnel--military and civilian--timely 
identify and disclose potential personal and organizational conflicts 
of interest and take all appropriate steps to avoid or mitigate them?
    Answer. The General Counsel, as the Designated Agency Ethics 
Official, is responsible for the Army's ethics program to prevent 
conflicts of interest in order to maintain the public trust. Timely 
submission of the appropriate financial disclosure report for both new 
and annual filers is the first step toward minimizing these conflicts. 
It is my understanding that the Army General Counsel and subordinate 
ethics offices work closely with human resource officials so that when 
new employees in-process, they are provided with notices of filing 
requirements. The cognizant ethics official provides advice and counsel 
to both the employee and his/her supervisor to navigate and/or remedy 
any actual or potential conflicts of interest. If confirmed, I will 
also ensure that the Department's business practices are designed to 
prevent personal and organizational conflicts of interest and that this 
effort is one of the Army's highest priorities. If confirmed, I will 
work closely with senior Departmental officials to promote an 
organizational climate that is vigilant about preventing conflicts of 
interest and reacts appropriately when specific issues arise.
    Question. What training do Army lawyers receive to ensure they are 
competent to provide effective, accurate, and timely guidance to Army 
personnel in need of such counsel?
    Answer. All Army uniformed lawyers receive specific instruction on 
government ethics throughout their career progression, starting with 
the basic Judge Advocate Officer Basic Course, and progression to 
refresher ethics training, including at the Judge Advocate Graduate 
Course and the Reserve Component Judge Advocate Officer Advanced 
Course. Those lawyers designated, in writing, as ethics counselors 
receive an additional multi-day comprehensive course on ethics and 
standards of conduct. My understanding is that the Office of the 
General Counsel provides in-person and web-based presentations on 
recent developments in ethics and legal practice to the Army legal 
community. Furthermore, Army uniformed and civilian attorneys regularly 
participate in multi-day ethics courses and conferences offered by the 
Army, other services, and the Department of Defense Office of General 
Counsel. If confirmed, I will work closely and collaboratively with The 
Judge Advocate General of the Army and other senior legal officials to 
address training needs for all uniformed and civilian attorneys and 
legal support personnel within the Department and continue to 
strengthen the Army's ethical climate and culture.
    Question. What resources has the Army made available to provide its 
GOs and SESs the legal advice, and assistance they need to adhere to 
ethical and legal standards in complying with travel regulations, and 
ensuring that government resources, including the official time of 
their military and civilian subordinates--are used only for official 
purposes? Please explain your answer.
    Answer. It is my understanding that the Army provides multiple 
resources to GOs and SESs to ensure they have access to legal advice 
regarding government ethics issues. I am informed that The Judge 
Advocate General's Legal Center and School (TJAGLCS) provides training 
directly to GOs, and that new Army GOs are required to attend Army 
Strategic Education Program (ASEP) courses that include ethics 
training. Additionally, the TJAGLCS has a General Officer Legal 
Orientation Course (GOLO) that is optional for GOs (O-7 and O-8s), 
which includes a mandatory 1-hour block of instruction on government 
ethics issues to include conflicts of interest, use of resources (e.g., 
the use of subordinates' time), gifts, travel regulations, post-
government employment restrictions, and relations with non-Federal 
entities. In addition to these training requirements, I understand that 
GOs and SESs have access to trained ethics counselors who have been 
delegated the authority to advise on ethics issues from the General 
Counsel of the Army, the Army Designated Agency Ethics Official, 
through The Judge Advocate General of the Army. These ethics counselors 
provide direct support to GOs and SESs to assist them with identifying 
ethics issues and addressing them in accordance with all statutory and 
regulatory requirements. Finally, because all Army GOs and SESs are 
mandatory filers of Public Financial Disclosure reports as required by 
the Office of Government Ethics, these individuals are required by 
Federal regulations to receive annual ethics training. Topics covered 
in the annual training include financial conflicts of interest, 
impartiality, misuse of position, gifts, and any other agency 
regulations determined to be relevant by the Designated Agency Ethics 
Official. I understand that the agency regulations included in this 
training are the Joint Travel Regulation and the use of government 
resources in accordance with the Joint Ethics Regulation.
    Question. What is your understanding of the actions required of a 
Department of the Army civilian attorney or Judge Advocate who becomes 
aware of improper activities by a Department of the Army officer or 
official who has sought, but failed to follow that attorney's legal 
advice?
    Answer. My understanding is that, except when representing an 
individual client, an Army lawyer represents the Department of the 
Army. If a lawyer for the Army knows that any person associated with 
the Army is engaged in action that is a violation of a legal obligation 
they owe to the Army that is adverse to the legal interests or 
obligations of the Army, or that is a violation of law that reasonably 
might be imputed to the Army, then that lawyer must take appropriate 
action for the best interests of the Army. This would include asking 
that person to reconsider or elevating the matter to a higher 
authority. If, despite the lawyer's efforts, the highest authority that 
can act concerning the matter insists upon or fails to address, in a 
timely and appropriate manner, the violation, the lawyer, in my view 
should consult with senior Army lawyers at the same or higher levels of 
command, advise them of the lawyer's concerns, and discuss available 
alternatives to address the situation.
    Question. In your view, is Army OGC adequately resourced--in 
people, money, technology, and expertise--to execute its FDM-related 
duties on behalf of the Secretary of the Army?
    Answer. I have no knowledge at this time if the Army Office of 
General Counsel is appropriately resourced to execute its Financial 
Disclosure Management responsibilities, but will look into the Army 
Office of the General Counsel's resourcing, if confirmed, to ensure the 
Army can meet this key requirement.
    Question. In March 2016, the DOD Inspector General issued its 
report, Section 847 Requirements for Senior Defense Officials Seeking 
Employment with Defense Contractors. The report concluded that the 
After Government Employment Advice Repository (AGEAR), administered by 
Army OGC, was ``unreliable.''
    Have all of the AGEAR-related deficiencies identified in the DOD 
Inspector General's report--including deficiencies under the purview of 
Army OGC, and those for which other DOD Components were responsible--
been corrected? Please explain your answer.
    Answer. My understanding is that all AGEAR-related deficiencies 
have been corrected, as evidenced by the DOD Inspector General's 2019 
report conclusions. The DOD Inspector General found no deficiencies and 
made no recommendations in the 2019 report.
                       environmental contaminants
    Question. GAO advises that as of August 2017, the Army had 
identified known or suspected releases of perfluorooctane sulfonate 
(PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) in drinking water at or near 
61 of its installations.
    What ``lessons learned'' will OGC incorporate--going forward--in 
its practice relating to environmental remediation in support of the 
redevelopment of military bases closed under BRAC--including as regards 
the remediation of PFOS and PFOA?
    Answer. I believe, the Defense Environmental Restoration Program is 
a mature effort throughout the Army for both active and BRAC sites, and 
most installations closed under BRAC have been remediated. However, I 
think the Office of General Counsel needs to be proactive and 
responsive to Army leaders regarding the potential for emerging 
contaminants to impact property disposal of BRAC sites due to the risk 
to redevelopment by local communities. If confirmed, I will ensure the 
Office of General Counsel educates Army leaders and stakeholders about 
existing or proposed legal requirements for PFOS/PFOA, and other 
emerging contaminants, and will ensure that the Army remains cognizant 
and flexible as both the law and science related to contaminants 
continue to develop.
    Question. To date, what has been the role of OGC in the Army's 
efforts to address environmental and soldier and family health concerns 
associated with PFOS, PFOA, and other potentially harmful contaminants 
at active Army installations? If confirmed, what role would you 
establish for yourself in ongoing efforts in this regard?
    Answer. If confirmed, I will work closely with the DOD Office of 
General Counsel in supporting the DOD's per-and poly fluoroalkyl 
substances (PFAS) Task Force. I will also assist the Army Secretariat 
in their efforts to address novel issues that are raised through the 
Army's PFAS Working Group to ensure the protection of human and 
environmental health. The Army is fully engaged with the other services 
to proactively and conscientiously address PFAS concerns and develop a 
coordinated and holistic DOD approach.
    Question. What factors would you consider in providing legal advice 
to Army officials regarding the role the Army should take in funding 
and overseeing PFOS and PFOA-related environmental cleanup and 
restoration activities at Reserve locations and in communities adjacent 
to or near military bases, installations, and operational platforms?
    Answer. If confirmed, I would consider recent NDAA provisions that 
have focused on PFAS-containing materials at DOD installations and 
operational platforms as well as considering existing law including the 
Defense Environmental Restoration Program to provide accurate and 
proactive legal advice to Army officials regarding the Army's role with 
respect to PFOS and PFOA-related environmental cleanup and restoration 
activities. I am aware of the challenges posed in conducting 
investigations and remediation related to PFOS and PFOA releases. If 
confirmed, I am committed to working transparently with all 
stakeholders to develop mutually acceptable solutions.
                     energy security and resilience
    Question. The range of threats against which Army installations 
must maintain resiliency is ever-growing.
    In your view, how can OGC assist the Army in better integrating 
energy security and resilience as standard components of its Military 
Construction (MILCON) programs?
    Answer. If I am confirmed, I would ensure the Office of the General 
Counsel assists the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Installations, 
Energy and Environment in determining how best to integrate recently 
enacted and amended energy resilience authorities--to include the 
Energy Resilience and Conservation Investment Program (ERCIP)--with 
existing MILCON authorities as the Army builds its Future Year 
Development Plans (FYDPs). The Office of the General Counsel can also 
help identify gaps in statutory authority that may benefit from 
additional legislation to enable the Army's MILCON program to 
appropriately prioritize energy resilience measures in the construction 
design and project authorization process. Further, as General Counsel, 
I would advocate for additional MILCON funding in the budget process to 
fully support Army priorities, Army facilities investment strategies, 
and the National Defense Strategy, to include those aspects dealing 
with energy security and resilience.
    Question. A number of unique authorities enable the Army's pursuit 
of distributed energy projects that improve installation resilience, 
increase readiness and mission assurance, and offer long-term cost 
savings. These authorities include: Inter Governmental Support 
Agreements, Other Transaction Authority, Utility Privatization, Energy 
Savings Performance Contracts, Utility Energy Service Contracts, 
Enhanced Use Leases, and the Defense Community Infrastructure Program.
    What is the role of the OGC in advising on the use of these 
authorities? Has the Army's use of one or more of these authorities 
yielded outcomes of particular promise?
    Answer. I believe the Office of General Counsel advises the Army 
Secretariat on legal issues associated with policy formulation and 
implementation, including those related to distributed energy projects 
to improve installation resilience. With regard to the use of 10 U.S.C. 
2679 to enter into Inter-Governmental Support Agreements (IGSAs), for 
example, I am informed that Army Installation Management Command 
(IMCOM) reported the Army saved approximately $25.3M by obtaining 
installation support services through IGSAs compared to obtaining those 
same services through Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)-based 
contracts.
                 encroachment on military installations
    Question. Encroachment on military installations by commercial and 
residential development can negatively impact ongoing operations and 
significantly delay or halt the construction of new testing and 
training facilities vital to generating readiness.
    What would be your role, if confirmed, in engaging with communities 
surrounding Active Army and Reserve Component training ranges, to 
address and resolve community concerns, while ensuring the resilience 
of range capabilities?
    Answer. It is my understanding the Army, in conjunction with the 
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation, conducts compatible use 
studies at installations. These studies are co-sponsored by the 
community and include input from surrounding county and State officials 
to ensure all future plans are known and incorporated into the study. 
If confirmed, I will ensure the Office of the General Counsel is fully 
engaged in the process of obtaining compatible use buffers to protect 
Army training missions.
               environmental stewardship and conservation
    If confirmed to be the Army General Counsel, how would you educate 
Army leaders and the force at large about the imperative of complying 
with environmental protection laws and regulations, as well as with 
guidance from the Environmental Protection Agency
    Answer. I am aware of some of the environmental challenges that DOD 
and the Army face. If confirmed, I will work with the Army's subject 
matter experts to address these challenges in order to protect human 
health and the environment, and to ensure support of the Army's 
warfighters.
    Question. If confirmed, how would you work with the Department of 
the Interior and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to promote 
environmental stewardship and conservation on and around Army 
installations, while ensuring military readiness?
    Answer. If confirmed, I will ensure the Army continues to work 
closely and cooperatively with the Department of the Interior and the 
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to remain good stewards of our Nation's 
most valuable natural resources, while maintaining sufficient land to 
train for the Army's warfighting mission.
    Question. What are your ideas as to how the process associated with 
generating an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) could be 
streamlined, with a view to completing any future EIS in 2 years or 
less, from start to finish?
    Answer. If confirmed, I will work with the Army's subject matter 
experts and with other stakeholder Federal agencies to explore ways to 
update and refine the Army's National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) 
regulation and procedures in an effort to streamline NEPA requirements 
Army-wide.
            military housing privatization initiative (mhpi)
    Question. If confirmed as Army General Counsel, what would be your 
role in establishing accountability inside the Army for sustaining the 
high quality housing that soldiers and their families deserve?
    Answer. If confirmed, I would ensure Army leadership is kept fully 
aware of all legal mechanisms available to hold the Army's housing 
privatization partners to their legal obligation to provide high-
quality housing to soldiers and their families. If Army leadership 
deems it appropriate to take action to hold a partner accountable, I 
will ensure the Office of the General Counsel provides the necessary 
legal advice and support to effectively implement the available 
accountability measures.
    Question. If confirmed, specifically what would you do to improve 
business operation constructs and vest accountability in MHPI 
``contractors'' for strict compliance with the terms of their public-
private partnership agreements with the Army?
    Answer. Ensuring that soldiers and their families have high quality 
housing is exceptionally important. I believe it is critical that the 
Army set defined metrics and enforce performance standards with the 
MHPI partners. I understand the Army established common performance 
metrics for MHPI project company incentive fees. If confirmed, I will 
support the refinement of existing tools to allow leaders to assess 
project company performance and hold them accountable by enforcing 
contractual obligations, including any penalty provisions when 
appropriate. As stated above, if confirmed and if Army leadership deems 
it appropriate to take action to hold a partner accountable, I will 
ensure the Office of the General Counsel provides the necessary legal 
advice and support to effectively implement the available 
accountability measures.
    Question. What progress has the Army made in creating a ``Tenant 
Bill of Rights'' and enumerating ``Tenant Responsibilities'' applicable 
to soldier and military families who reside in privatized housing?
    Answer. I understand the Army recently implemented all 18 tenant 
rights at all 44 privatized housing locations and issued a 
complementary document of tenant responsibilities. If confirmed, I will 
provide Army leadership the necessary legal support to protect soldiers 
and their families across a wide range of privatization initiatives, 
including implementation of the Tenant Bill of Rights.
    Question. The installation or regional commander in charge of the 
oversight of privatized housing units will serve as the ``deciding 
authority'' in the dispute resolution and payment-withholding processes 
established pursuant to section 2894 of the NDAA for fiscal year 2020.
    What role will OGC play in training commanders, their legal 
counsel, and other participants in the dispute resolution and payment 
withholding processes?
    Answer. My understanding is the dispute resolution and payment 
withholding process is being implemented by Army Installation 
Management Command (IMCOM). If I am confirmed, the Office of the 
General Counsel will continue to advise the Army Secretariat on policy 
and legal issues resulting from implementation of the Army's dispute 
resolution and payment withholding processes, including issues 
indicating a need for additional training of process participants.
    Question. Recently, the Air Force Inspector General undertook an 
assessment of actual progress in implementing MHPI reforms at a 
sampling of installations across the Department of the Air Force.
    Has the Department of the Army implemented any like objective 
assessment? If so, what did that assessment find? If not, would you 
recommend that the Secretary of the Army direct such an assessment? In 
your view, are there other ways in which the Secretary can assess 
effectively whether the reports of progress he receives from Army 
officials responsible for MHPI are congruent with improvements on the 
ground?
    Answer. I have been told that the Department of the Army Inspector 
General is in the process of conducting a similar assessment, as is the 
Department of Defense Inspector General and the Government 
Accountability Office. If confirmed, I will review the assessments, 
once they are completed, and make recommendations to Army leadership as 
to how best to correct any outstanding deficiencies. I will also ensure 
that the Office of the General Counsel provides legal support to aid 
the MHPI program in making improvements in compliance with all 
applicable laws and policies.
                              acquisition
    Question. In successive NDAAs beginning in fiscal year 2013, 
Congress enacted sweeping reforms of the defense acquisition system and 
organizational structure. These reforms expanded the acquisition-
related functions of the Service Chiefs and incorporated measures 
designed to reduce the cost and development timelines of major systems.
    What is your understanding of the role of the Army General Counsel 
in ensuring that Army acquisition programs are executed in accordance 
with the law and DOD and Army acquisition policy?
    Answer. The Army General Counsel is responsible for advising both 
the Secretary of the Army and the Assistant Secretary of the Army for 
Acquisition, Logistics and Technology (ASA(ALT)) to ensure Army 
acquisition programs are executed in accordance with law and policy. If 
confirmed, I would stay directly involved in this area and would ensure 
the Office of the General Counsel continues to provide sound legal and 
business advice to help Army acquisition programs achieve their cost, 
schedule, and performance objectives consistent with the principles of 
acquisition reform.
    Question. How does the Army General Counsel ensure that the 
acquisition-related responsibilities of the Chief of Staff of the Army 
are synchronized with those of the Secretary of the Army and the 
Assistant Secretary of the Army for Acquisition, Logistics and 
Technology (ASA(ALT))?
    Answer. The Secretary of the Army and the Chief of Staff of the 
Army are the customers of the Army acquisition system, which is 
responsible for balancing resources against priorities on acquisition 
programs. The Army's acquisition system must ensure that appropriate 
tradeoffs are made among cost, schedule, technical feasibility, and 
performance objectives on a continuing basis throughout the life-cycle 
of the program. The Army General Counsel advises Army leaders on the 
legal aspects of acquisition matters to help ensure their involvement 
with individual programs remains synchronized and fully support the 
Secretary's responsibility to equip the Army.
    Question. What are your views on the overall effects on the Army of 
defense acquisition reform to date?
    Answer. The objective of the defense acquisition system is to 
deliver decisive capabilities to soldiers in a timely manner while 
ensuring that taxpayer resources are utilized appropriately and 
efficiently. My understanding is that the Army has implemented a series 
of acquisition reforms directed by Congress in recent years, which 
provide greater flexibility in the development of new capabilities and 
that reduce timelines to field them to soldiers. These reforms appear 
to be benefiting the Army's efforts to modernize its weapon systems. If 
confirmed, I would support the Secretary of the Army and the Assistant 
Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics, and Technology) in 
ensuring the Army continues to implement recent reforms expeditiously, 
in accordance with law and policy, and in a manner consistent with 
congressional intent.
    Question. If confirmed, how would you ensure that Army acquisition 
officials understand and leverage the flexibilities provided by 
Congress in the context of acquisition reform?
    Answer. Given the rapid pace of technological change and evolving 
threats in an increasingly complex security environment, it is critical 
that the Army leverages all of the flexibility and authority provided 
in law. If confirmed, I would work to ensure that Army acquisition 
officials understand the full range of these authorities and how they 
can be implemented in specific acquisition programs. I would also work 
closely with Army acquisition leaders to ensure that these authorities 
are exercised in a manner consistent with congressional intent and 
promote public confidence and trust in the acquisition process.
    Question. Do you perceive benefit to the Army in establishing major 
acquisition programs under Section 804 authority? What are the risks of 
doing so? Please explain your answer.
    Answer. My understanding is that Section 804 authority enables the 
Army to rapidly prototype and field new capabilities to respond to 
rapidly changing technology and evolving threats outside of the formal 
defense acquisition system. These authorities enable the Army to inform 
requirements and incorporate soldier feedback throughout the process, 
thereby increasing successful program outcomes. As I understand it, 
there are potential risks associated with the use of this authority, 
particularly when transitioning new technologies and prototypes into 
production. If confirmed, I would work with the Assistant Secretary of 
the Army (Acquisition, Logistics and Technology) to ensure that Section 
804 programs appropriately address these considerations while 
effectuating congressional intent in this area within applicable law 
and policy.
    Question. Do you believe the Army should exploit non-developmental 
or commercial off-the-shelf solutions to meet Army requirements? Would 
this put capabilities into the hands of soldiers more quickly, in your 
view?
    Answer. Yes, my view is that the Army should leverage existing 
commercial and non-developmental technologies where appropriate. In 
doing so, the Army can more effectively invest resources in developing 
unique capabilities and encourage investment by a broader cross-section 
of the industrial base. If confirmed, I commit to working with the 
Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics and Technology) 
to support such efforts.
    Question. What is your assessment of the legal issues attendant on 
the identification, evaluation, and management of risk in the Army's 
organic and commercial defense industrial base, including the munitions 
industrial base?
    Answer. I understand that the organic and commercial defense 
industrial base, including the munitions industrial base, is vital to 
the Army's success, however, I am not currently aware of specific legal 
issues related to the industrial base. If confirmed, I would become 
fully informed in this area and would advise the Secretary the Army and 
the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Acquisition, Logistics and 
Technology on the associated legal and business considerations.
                          army futures command
    Question. The Secretary of the Army indicated to the committee that 
a holistic review of Army Directive 2020-15, relating to Army Futures 
Command authorities and relationships, would be conducted.
    What is the status of the holistic review and what are the findings 
and outcomes of the review to date?
    Answer. I am not familiar with the details of the Army's internal 
discussions on this matter. If confirmed, however, I will make it a 
priority to ensure that any deliberations are fully informed by 
thorough legal analysis of related statutes and policy.
    Question. Will you commit that, if confirmed, you would ensure that 
any way forward on this Directive comports with the principles of 
civilian control and with governing laws?
    Answer. Yes. If confirmed, I commit to ensuring that any actions 
taken following the authorities derived from Army Directive 2020-15 
comport with the principles of civilian control of the military and 
with governing law.
                          security assistance
    Question. The U.S. Army Security Assistance Command is the one-stop 
focal point for Army Foreign Military Sales, providing materiel, 
training, education, and other services to more than 140 allies and 
friendly countries and multinational organizations--all designed to 
improve security cooperation and foster interoperability and 
preparedness.
    In your view, is the current structure for the provision of legal 
services to U.S. Army Security Assistance Command, sufficiently expert, 
efficient, and effective? Please explain your answer.
    Answer. I am informed that the U.S. Army Security Assistance 
Command legal services are sufficiently expert, efficient, and 
effective. I understand that the attorneys whose practice involves 
Foreign Military Sales (FMS) possess significant experience in 
procurement law and litigation, are appropriately resourced, and are 
exceeding the standard for delivery of routine opinions. If confirmed, 
however, I commit to evaluating the provision of legal services to this 
command, and all commands for that matter, and I will make 
recommendations for improvement where necessary.
    Question. What progress has the Army made in standardizing security 
assistance reporting so as to leverage comparisons of security 
cooperation spending across countries, regions, and programs to enable 
informed future prioritization and resourcing decisions?
    Answer. I understand that the Army has developed a data base that 
tracks and measures statistics for all Army FMS cases, which allows for 
the sorting of data by country, region, status, and type of case. I 
also understand that this data base, combined with other existing Army 
financial management tools, provides the Army with a holistic overview 
of all FMS cases and is transferable into systems developed for the 
Secretary of Defense. These improvements ensure that Army FMS cases are 
properly prioritized and aligned with U.S. strategic interests.
    Question. What progress has the Army made in developing an expert 
and effective security cooperation workforce? What skill and competency 
gaps remain, in your view?
    Answer. I understand that the Army implemented the DOD Security 
Cooperation Workforce Certification Program into all training, 
personnel, and force management policies and procedures, and this 
program ensures that the security cooperation workforce has the 
necessary knowledge and skills to be effective in executing security 
missions and functions. I also understand that the Army Security 
Assistance Enterprise Training Initiative is being implemented to 
address skill and competency gaps in Army FMS development, 
implementation, and closure actions. If confirmed, I commit to 
assessing the expertise and effectiveness of the security cooperation 
workforce, to include identification of any skill or competency gaps, 
and seeking improvements where necessary
      role in the army officer promotion and confirmation process
    Question. What is your understanding of the role of the Army 
General Counsel in ensuring the integrity and propriety of the 
statutory officer promotion selection board process?
    Answer. My understanding is that the Office of General Counsel, in 
conjunction with the Office of The Judge Advocate General, reviews all 
promotion board memoranda of instruction, promotion board results, and 
documentation for officer promotions to ensure that they are properly 
convened and conducted, any potentially adverse or reportable 
information is properly considered, and the Secretary is able to 
certify the exemplary conduct required for promotion.
    Question. Do you perceive any need for change in this role? Please 
explain your answer.
    Answer. I am unaware of any specific changes needed at this time, 
but if confirmed I will take a careful look at the Army's policies and 
procedures and make any necessary adjustments.
    Question. In your view, are the current policies and procedures 
governing review of the records of Army officers whose selection for 
promotion or assignment requires Presidential or Secretary of Defense 
approval or Senate confirmation sufficient to enable informed decisions 
by the Secretary of the Army, the Secretary of Defense, the President, 
and the Senate? Please explain your answer.
    Answer. Yes. In my view, it is essential that the Army promote only 
the most qualified and exemplary officers. I understand current 
statutes and policy require a thorough review of each officer's record, 
including an examination of any potential adverse or reportable 
information that might make their promotion inappropriate.
    Question. In your view, are these policies and procedures fair to 
the individual Army officers proceeding through the promotion or 
assignment processes?
    Answer. Yes. My understanding is that officers with potentially 
adverse information or reportable information are given an opportunity 
to rebut that information and have that rebuttal fully considered so 
that the information can be explained or put into proper context.
    Question. What is the role, if any, of the General Counsel of the 
Department of the Army in advising senior Army and DOD officials on the 
implications of adverse or reportable information pertaining to a 
military officer nominated for promotion to General Officer grades or 
for appointment to a position of ``importance and responsibility.''
    Answer. My understanding is the Army General Counsel, in 
conjunction with The Judge Advocate General, provides advice to the 
Secretary of the Army and other senior Army leaders on nominations with 
potentially adverse or reportable information to ensure that the 
information is properly evaluated, considered, and reported to the 
Office of the Secretary of Defense and the Senate Armed Services 
Committee.
    Question. If confirmed, what will be your role in ensuring the 
Army's strict compliance with section 502 of the NDAA for fiscal year 
2020 and section 505 of the NDAA for fiscal year 2021, as regards the 
conduct of boards for the selection of officers for promotion to 
General Officer grades?
    Answer. If confirmed, I would work with The Judge Advocate General 
to ensure strict compliance with these statutory requirements. As 
discussed above, I would also ensure that the Office of General 
Counsel, in conjunction with the Office of The Judge Advocate General, 
reviews all memoranda of instruction, promotion and advisory board 
results, and documentation to ensure that they are properly convened 
and conducted, and any potentially adverse or reportable information is 
properly considered.
    Question. What is your level of confidence that adverse information 
derived from Army administrative investigations, including those 
conducted pursuant to Army Regulation 15-6, Procedures for 
Administrative Investigations and Boards of Officers, is recorded and 
tracked across an individual soldier's career, and properly considered 
by promotion selection boards?
    Answer. Based on my current understanding, adverse information 
derived from Army administrative investigations is recorded in 
accordance with Army Regulation 15-6, tracked across an individual 
officer's career, and properly considered by promotion selection 
boards, as required by 10 U.S.C. 615 and 14107. I understand that the 
Army Adverse Information Program (AAIP) data base was created to record 
adverse findings against Regular Army field grade officers and higher 
ranks to comply with the general officer screening requirements in 10 
U.S.C. 615. Understanding statutory changes and Congress' intent to 
provide adverse information to all Senate confirmed promotion boards, I 
am aware that the Army is in the process of updating and expanding AIPP 
to record adverse administrative investigation findings on all 
commissioned officers, regardless of rank or component, in the data 
base. If confirmed, I would review this matter carefully in 
coordination with The Judge Advocate General.
              officer personnel management system reforms
    Question. The John S. McCain NDAA for fiscal year 2019 contained 
several provisions to modernize the officer personnel management 
system. These reforms were designed to align officer career management 
with the priorities outlined in the 2018 NDS.
    How is the Army implementing these authorities today and to what 
effect?
    Answer. The modernization of the Army's personnel system is a 
necessary priority in order to recruit and retain the best talent in 
the Army. I understand that the Army People Strategy communicates this 
emphasis, and the Army Talent Management Task Force is implementing 
needed reforms in officer commissioning, promotion, and retention. If 
confirmed, I commit to reviewing the efforts underway to ensure they 
are fully informed by thorough legal analysis of related statutes and 
policy.
    Question. If confirmed, what would be your role in advising and 
assisting the Army in further leveraging these new authorities?
    Answer. If confirmed, I will advise the Department's leadership 
regarding any issues related to these authorities provided in the 
FY2019 NDAA and ensure that application of the authorities is 
consistent with Title 10, United States Code, and relevant Department 
of Defense and Department of Army Regulations.
    Question. Are there other authorities that the Army needs in order 
to modernize the management of its officer personnel?
    Answer. If confirmed, I commit to reviewing the authorities 
concerning officer management and providing my legal assessment to the 
Secretary of the Army. My view is that modernization of the officer 
personnel system is an important component of readiness, and, if 
confirmed, I commit to working closely with Army leaders and this 
Committee to ensure that authorities are in place to maximize talent-
based promotions throughout all components--Active, National Guard, and 
the Army Reserve.
                     non-deployable servicemembers
    Question. In July 2018, DOD published Department of Defense 
Instruction (DODI) 1332.45, Retention Determinations for Non-Deployable 
Servicemembers. DODI 1332.45 provides that the Secretaries of the 
Military Departments may ``retain . . . those servicemembers whose 
period of non-deployability exceeds the 12 consecutive month limit . . 
. if determined to be in the best interest of the Military Service.''
    What factors would you consider in advising the Secretary of the 
Army that the retention of a soldier who has been non-deployable for 
more than 12 months is ``in the best interest of the Service''?
    Answer. If confirmed, I will ensure that each soldier's case is 
evaluated based on its individual merits, while remaining mindful of 
the Army's vital mission and the service's demanding requirements. 
Unique skill sets, the ability to perform critical duties in a non-
deployed environment, medical recovery timelines, and personal 
circumstances are all factors that I would consider in advising the 
Secretary. I understand that this case-by-case approach ensures that 
the best interests of the soldier and the Army are appropriately 
considered in the waiver determination process.
    Question. In your view, what legal and legal policy parameters 
govern how this policy should be applied to soldiers with HIV and to 
soldiers who identify as transgender?
    Answer. As a standards-based organization, I believe that all 
soldiers must be treated with dignity and respect. If confirmed, I 
commit to following all law and DOD policy concerning the deployability 
of HIV-positive and transgender soldiers. I further commit to 
evaluating such cases according to the same factors pertinent to any 
other soldier. If confirmed, I will always provide the Secretary a 
legal analysis informed by a soldier's individual circumstances and 
guided by Army equities.
                           suicide prevention
    Question. Mindful of the U.S. Constitution, Amendment II, and 
related statutes, what ideas would you offer to the Secretary of the 
Army for preventing suicides by curtailing the misuse of lethal means 
by soldiers and their families?
    Answer. I believe that in many cases suicide is a preventable 
tragedy that harms not only the soldier, but also families, 
communities, and teams. If confirmed, I would fully support the 
Secretary's initiatives concerning suicide awareness and intervention, 
to include training on the importance of limiting access to lethal 
means. Above all, if confirmed, I would support efforts that increase 
leader involvement, community engagement, and enable rapid access to 
critical services.
      sexual assault and sexual harassment prevention and response
    Question. You recently served as a member of the Fort Hood 
Independent Review Committee that found that the Army's Sexual 
Harassment/Assault Response and Prevention (SHARP) program at Fort Hood 
``appeared to be compliant on the surface, but was hollow and lacking 
in leadership attention, day-to-day implementation, broad acceptance by 
the enlisted soldiers, and full inculcation into the culture and 
character of the Fort Hood Community.''
    What is your view of the adequacy of Department of Army-level 
oversight of the implementation of policies for the prevention of and 
response to sexual assaults and sexual harassment in the Army?
    Answer. It is my understanding that there are adequate oversight 
procedures established for the Army's Sexual Harassment/Assault 
Response and Prevention (SHARP) program. However, I understand and 
appreciate that the Army continues working to enhance its programs and 
policies. For example, I am aware that the Army recently conducted an 
assessment of organizational compliance with sexual harassment, sexual 
assault, and integrated violence prevention policies. If confirmed, I 
commit to assisting the Secretary and the Army leadership in assessing 
the adequacy of HQDA-level oversight of the implementation of the law 
and policy governing the prevention of, and response to, sexual assault 
and sexual harassment.
    Question. In your view, what can the Army General Counsel do ensure 
improvements in such oversight?
    Answer. It is my understanding that the Army is undertaking a 
transformational change in its approach on prevention of and response 
to sexual assault and sexual harassment. The Army's redesigned SHARP 
program will look out for the best interest of our soldiers and 
civilians by focusing on prevention, survivor support, and holding 
leaders at all echelons accountable. If confirmed, I will work with the 
Army's leadership to ensure appropriate oversight of these new programs 
by emphasizing that sexual assault/harassment prevention and response 
is a high priority and by monitoring the implementation of prevention 
and cultural reforms proposed by the Independent Review Commission and 
accepted by Secretary Austin. Sexual harassment and assault do not have 
any place in the Army.
    Question. The Army has recently made changes to the structure and 
operations of the Army Criminal Investigation Command. In light of 
these changes, what is your view of the adequacy of the human resources 
the Army has in place to investigate and prosecute allegations of 
sexual assault and of the training provided to such investigators and 
prosecutors?
    Answer. As I understand the ongoing transformation of CID, the Army 
is working to ensure that it has the appropriate level of trained and 
experienced agents to investigate and support the prosecution of 
reports of sexual assault and other serious crimes. If confirmed, I 
would assist in the Army's efforts to transform CID.
    Question. What is your view of the value of the Army's Special 
Victims' Counsel program? In your view, has this programs had any 
effect on the reporting and prosecution of allegations of sexual 
assault in the armed forces?
    Answer. In my view, the greatest value of the Army's Special 
Victims' Counsel Program is that it has helped numerous victims over 
the last 5 years to be heard. When victims understand the justice 
process, they are empowered to describe what justice looks like for 
them and their case. The SVC program helps ensure this critical 
information is known by prosecutors and commanders before they make 
important decisions about each case. While I am not in a position to 
assess directly the effect on reporting and prosecutions, I understand 
that the overwhelming feedback from victims is that the SVC program 
increased their confidence in the military justice system.
    Question. DOD reports on sexual assault and sexual harassment in 
the military generally, and at the Military Service Academies more 
specifically, consistently document the correlation of incidents of 
sexual harassment and incidents of sexual assault.
    What is your view of the Army's program to prevent and respond to 
sexual harassment in the force?
    Answer. In my view, sexual harassment, sexual assault, and 
associated retaliation have no place in the Army. I believe, these 
harmful behaviors are contrary to the Army values, harm soldiers, 
destroy teams, and negatively impact the readiness of the force. I 
understand that the Army is continually working to enhance its programs 
and policies in this critical area. If confirmed, I will support the 
Secretary and the Chief of Staff of the Army as they implement the 
approved recommendations from the Fort Hood Independent Review 
Committee and the DOD Independent Review Commission
    Question. If confirmed, what role would you establish for yourself, 
in addressing the problem of sexual assault and sexual harassment in 
the force?
    Answer. Having served on the Fort Hood Independent Review Committee 
(FHIRC), I am intimately familiar with its recommendations to improve 
sexual assault/harassment prevention and response, and I will utilize 
this insight to provide my best legal advice in support of Secretary 
Wormuth's efforts to implement the FHIRC recommendations, as well as 
Secretary Austin's efforts to effectuate the DOD-level Independent 
Review Commission recommendations across the Department of the Army.
    Question. In your view, does the Army's method for tracking the 
submission and monitoring the resolution of informal Equal Employment 
Opportunity complaints of harassment or discrimination provide Army 
leaders, supervisors, and managers, with an accurate picture of the 
systemic prevalence of these adverse behaviors in the civilian 
workforce?
    Answer. It is my understanding that the Army's methods for tracking 
these complaints provides an accurate picture, which is necessary for 
understanding adverse behavioral trends. I am informed that EEO 
Officials are responsible for reviewing, monitoring, and assessing EEO 
complaint activity and informing supervisors of trends. The Army 
Complaints Tracking System, I am told, has the capability to query by a 
variety of data fields and specific information. If confirmed, I will 
review the Army's tracking of harassment and discrimination complaints 
to see if any gaps exist.
    Question. Does the Army's method for recording the outcomes of 
informal Equal Employment Opportunity complaints of harassment or 
discrimination provide Army leaders, supervisors, and managers with a 
means of identifying repeat perpetrators in the civilian workforce?
    Answer. Yes, I understand that the Army's method for recording 
outcomes of informal EEO complaints provides a means of identifying 
repeat offenders and to track the disposition of any discrimination 
complaints against them. Further, I understand the Army is establishing 
a separate anti-harassment program for civilians, which similarly will 
identify repeat perpetrators. If confirmed, I would support the 
establishment of the separate Anti-Harassment Program for Civilians and 
the exploration of additional ways to prevent harmful behaviors in the 
workplace.
    Question. Does the Army's method for responding to complaints of 
harassment or discrimination in the civilian workforce provide 
appropriate care and services for victims?
    Answer. Counseling, advice, and referrals are an essential part of 
any complaint process including within the Army workforce. As I 
understand, the Army has a history of compliance with law, regulation, 
and policy that ensures commitment to providing care and full due 
process for victims alleging EEO harassment and/or discrimination. If 
confirmed, I would work to ensure continued accountability for 
offenders, compliance with law and policy, and that reports of 
harassment are kept confidential to the fullest extent possible without 
impeding fact-finding into such allegations. I would ensure that Army 
management officials investigate allegations and take appropriate 
corrective or disciplinary action, if warranted.
    Question. If confirmed, what role would you play in shaping 
policies and processes for the prevention of harassment and 
discrimination in the Army's civilian workforce?
    Answer. I am familiar with the Government-wide equal employment 
opportunity processes available to the civilian workforce as well as 
the existence of civilian employee assistance programs. I also 
understand that the Department of the Army recently implemented a new 
SHARP policy that grants additional SHARP victim services to Army 
civilian employees. If confirmed, I will assist Army leadership in 
supporting these EEO processes and victim services, and will emphasize 
the high priority to ensure support of all victims, including those 
within our civilian workforce.
              identification of potential extremist views
    Question. Press reports document the involvement of a small number 
of active duty military personnel, retired military officers, members 
of the National Guard, and military veterans in events at the U.S. 
Capitol on January 6.
    In your view, are the Department's policies adequate to address, 
document, and track extremism in the Army, including in the Army 
civilian workforce?
    Answer. In my view, the Department's policies are adequate to 
address, document, and track extremist activities in the Army, but they 
can always be refined, particularly with respect to Civilian and 
Contractor employees. In my experience, the Army takes reports and 
indicators of extremism very seriously and has been proactive in 
reviewing its policies to counter extremism. I understand the Army 
takes an enterprise approach to counter extremism and other unwanted 
behaviors, including accessions screening, insider threat monitoring, 
suitability screening, and law enforcement programs. I am told that the 
Army also benefits from Department of Defense security clearance 
background investigations, expedited screening, and continuous 
evaluation process to detect and counter extremism in its ranks. If 
confirmed, I would review the current policies to identify any 
potential mechanisms to better enable the tracking of extremism 
activity within the Department.
    Question. What is your understanding of how the Army balances the 
need to identify and respond to potentially harmful extremist views 
held by soldiers and civilian employees against individual privacy and 
respect for the rights of soldiers and civilians to hold and express 
personal beliefs?
    Answer. In my view, public service as a uniformed or civilian 
member of the Army is a privilege. It begins by taking an Oath of 
Office, and comes with the responsibility to maintain public trust, 
safeguard sensitive information, and maintain good order and discipline 
within the ranks. While soldiers and civilian employees have a right to 
express personal beliefs and maintain individual privacy, these rights 
must be balanced against the special trust that public service demands. 
Extremist or dissident behaviors within the ranks are an existential 
threat to that trust and pose an unacceptable risk to military 
readiness. I believe the Army must balance individual rights against 
the need to maintain readiness and discipline by ensuring diligence and 
due process in investigations, conducting disciplinary processes that 
consider the unique facts of each case and focus on activities and 
behavior, and maintaining workplaces free of harassment, retaliation 
and reprisal.
    Question. Do you see a need for a change in this balance?
    Answer. No. My understanding is that the Army focuses on 
participation in extremist activities and not on beliefs. As such, I 
think the Army is properly striking the balance between soldier's and 
civilian's First Amendment rights, and the need to protect the morale, 
good order, and discipline of the force.
    Question. In your view, do current DOD and Army policies limit the 
ability to include information about an individual's extremist views in 
official records that may assist in the identification of potential 
insider threats? Please explain your answer.
    Answer. I am not aware of any specific DOD and Army policies that 
limit the documentation of information related to extremist views in 
official records when obtained in the conduct of a criminal 
investigation related to extremist activity, or in an administrative 
investigation for a violation of Army policy or regulations. However, 
if confirmed, I will determine if there are any such limitations and 
seek to address them as appropriate.
    Question. In your view, do current DOD and Army procedures hinder 
the ability to share this same type of information with other Federal 
and State agencies charged with identifying and monitoring potential 
extremist activities? Please explain your answer.
    Answer. I am not aware that any current DOD or Army procedures 
hinder the Army's ability to share information about criminal 
investigations of extremist activities with outside law enforcement 
agencies. The Army Criminal Investigation Division has assigned 
personnel to the National Joint Terrorism Task Force, the FBI Domestic 
Terrorism Operations Unit and the National Gang Intelligence Center to 
ensure information is rapidly shared among these law enforcement 
organizations. I understand that this system reinforces and enables the 
information sharing that occurs locally through the conduct of joint 
investigations between Army law enforcement and civilian law 
enforcement partners. However, if confirmed, I would assess whether 
there are barriers to information sharing related to extremist activity 
and if so, address how those might be overcome.
                       medical malpractice claims
    Question. Section 731 of the NDAA for fiscal year 2020 authorizes 
the Secretary of Defense to consider, settle, and pay claims against 
the United States for personal injury or death incident to the service 
of a member of the uniformed services that was the result of medical 
malpractice caused by a DOD health care provider.
    In your view, what should be the role of the Army General Counsel 
in adjudicating and approving claims under section 731?
    Answer. If confirmed, I will ensure that Army attorneys, both 
uniformed and civilian, are properly resourced and trained to support 
the implementation of the rules promulgated by the DOD. In my view, the 
Army General Counsel's role in adjudicating claims under section 731 
should be to ensure that Army attorneys making the initial 
determinations are trained and resourced to apply uniform standards of 
law and render sound decisions.
               district of columbia national guard (dcng)
    Question. What is the role of the Secretary of the Army with 
respect to the DCNG?
    Answer. I understand that, since 1969, the President, through the 
Secretary of Defense, has delegated to the Secretary of the Army the 
authority to ``supervise, administer, and control'' the DCNG. The 
Secretary of the Army exercises command, through the Commanding General 
of the DCNG, over DCNG operations when it is operating in a militia 
status to aid civil authorities. When in a militia status (under Title 
32, U.S. Code), the Secretary of the Army is third in the chain of 
command of the DCNG after the President and the Secretary of Defense.
    The Secretary of the Army has broad authorities under Title 32, 
U.S. Code, over the DCNG including organization (32 U.S.C. Sec.  104b), 
inspections (32 U.S.C. Sec.  105), Federal recognition (32 U.S.C. Sec.  
301 and Sec.  307), enlistments (32 U.S.C. Sec.  302), and training (32 
U.S.C. Sec.  501).
    Question. How does the Army General Counsel assist the Secretary of 
the Army in executing this role, particularly as regards activating 
members of the DCNG in response to severe weather events, in support of 
National Security Special Events, and to address civil disturbances?
    Answer. It is my understanding that a request from the civil 
authorities of the District of Columbia, normally from the District of 
Columbia Homeland Security Emergency Management Agency (DCHSEMA), is 
transmitted directly to the DOD Executive Secretary who then transmits 
that request to the Army and the DC National Guard (DCNG). The DCNG is 
responsible for conducting a mission analysis to determine whether it 
can provide the requested support. If DCNG determines they can support 
the request, the Commanding General of the DCNG asks the Secretary of 
the Army to approve the support. I understand that attorneys in the 
Army's Office of the General Counsel work closely with DCNG legal 
advisors to determine the legality and parameters of the support 
requested. Army Office of General Counsel attorneys also coordinate 
with DOD General Counsel attorneys and the office of the Deputy 
Attorney General (DAG) in the Department of Justice for the support 
requested, because the DAG must concur with any request for civil 
support. For National Special Security Events or other Federal requests 
for support, it is my understanding that these are treated differently 
and typically are communicated from the Federal agency requesting 
support directly to the Department of Defense and not the Secretary of 
the Army and there is also no DAG coordination requirement for Federal 
requests for support.
    Question. What is the role of the Secretary of the Army with 
respect to National Guard from other States in a Title 32 status who 
are called in to augment the DCNG?
    Answer. I understand that the Secretary of the Army does not have 
direct authority with respect to out-of-State National Guard forces who 
are mobilized to augment the DCNG, however, she may exercise tasking 
authority through the DCNG Commanding General. I further understand 
that the Secretary of Defense may designate the Secretary of the Army 
to oversee and coordinate the mission performed by these augmenting 
National Guard forces.
    Question. How does the Army General Counsel assist the Secretary of 
the Army in executing this role?
    Answer. The Army General Counsel provides legal advice to the 
Secretary of the Army, working closely with attorneys from the Joint 
Chiefs of Staff, the DOD Office of the General Counsel, the National 
Guard Bureau Office of the General Counsel and the Department of 
Justice.
                  juvenile problematic sexual behavior
    Question. A 2018 media expose asserted that the U.S. military 
frequently fails to ``protect or provide justice to'' the children of 
servicemembers who are sexually assaulted by other children on a 
military installation.
    What actions has the Army taken to regularize policies and programs 
for responding to, investigating, adjudicating, and documenting 
allegations of juvenile problematic sexual behavior on Army 
installations?
    Answer. I am generally aware that the Army recently published an 
Army directive that requires Installation Commanders to ensure the 
investigation of major juvenile misconduct. I understand the directive 
also requires the referral of allegations of problematic sexual 
behavior of children and youth to Family Advocacy for assessment, 
treatment, and victim assistance. The most serious cases may be 
referred to civilian authorities for further investigation or 
appropriate disposition. I am also aware that CID has updated its 
policy to require that all investigative personnel properly document 
CID's notifications to installation commanders and civilian legal 
authorities. If confirmed, I intend to gain a more thorough 
understanding of the Army's policies and programs in this important 
area.
    Question. How does the Army ensure that the victims of juvenile 
problematic sexual behavior receive the care, treatment, support, and 
advocacy services they need?
    Answer. I understand that the Army has recently published a new 
policy on problematic sexual behavior in children and youth. The policy 
requires Army installations to respond to each report of such behavior 
and establish multi-disciplinary teams to address safety, medical, and 
behavioral health of the children, youth, and families involved. I 
understand that the policy also requires the Army to provide trauma-
informed assessment, care, support, rehabilitation, and treatment to 
eligible beneficiaries impacted by this behavior. The policy also 
requires the Army to provide appropriate resource and referral 
information to persons who are not eligible beneficiaries, but who are 
affected by these incidents reported to the Army.
    Question. In your view, does the Army have a mechanism to hold 
accountable, as appropriate, and provide treatment to juveniles who 
engage in problematic sexual behavior?
    Answer. Yes. My understanding is that Army policy requires the 
investigation of each case of major juvenile misconduct and provides 
mechanisms to hold those juveniles who engage in problematic sexual 
behavior accountable. The most serious cases may warrant referral to 
the appropriate civilian authority for further investigation or 
appropriate disposition.
    Regarding treatment, I understand that Army policy requires that 
the Army provide trauma-informed assessment, care, support, 
rehabilitation, and treatment to eligible beneficiaries who are 
affected by this behavior. I also understand the policy requires the 
Army to provide appropriate resource and referral information to 
persons who are not eligible beneficiaries, but who are affected by 
these incidents. If confirmed, I intend to review these mechanisms for 
accountability and treatment.
    Question. In your view, is retrocession of jurisdiction over 
juvenile offenses committed on Army installations, to the State or 
territory in which that installation is located, the most effective way 
to ensure the accountability of juveniles who engage in acts of 
delinquency, including problematic sexual behavior? Please explain your 
answer.
    Answer. I understand that retrocession is a lengthy process and a 
State may decline it or, after obtaining jurisdiction, decline to 
accept a referral. In my view, the most effective way to ensure the 
accountability of juveniles who engage in acts of delinquency, which 
may include problematic sexual behavior, is to ensure that each 
allegation of misconduct is investigated, reviewed by the command for 
appropriate action, and if appropriate, referred to the controlling 
civilian authority to determine disposition.
    Question. Does the Army require any additional authorities to 
establish and maintain the centralized data base on child and youth 
problematic sexual behavior required by section 1089 of the John S. 
McCain NDAA for fiscal year 2019?
    Answer. At this time, I am not aware that additional authorities 
are required and I understand that the Army is working closely with the 
Department of Defense to implement this data system, which will aid in 
tracking this important information. If confirmed, I would want to 
ensure that the Office of General Counsel assists key stakeholders in 
the implementation of this legal requirement.
                        whistleblower protection
    Question. Section 1034 of title 10, U.S. Code, prohibits taking or 
threatening to take an unfavorable personnel action against a member of 
the armed forces in retaliation for making a protected communication. 
Section 2302 of title 5, U.S. Code, provides similar protections to 
Federal civilian employees.
    If confirmed, what role would you perform in ensuring that soldiers 
and civilian employees of the Department of the Army who report fraud, 
waste, and abuse, or gross mismanagement are protected from reprisal 
and retaliation, including from the very highest levels of the Army, 
DOD, and the executive branch?
    Answer. The law prohibits taking or threatening to take an 
unfavorable personnel action against an individual in retaliation for 
making a protected disclosure. I understand that for reprisal 
allegations from military personnel, the Department of Defense (DoD) 
Inspector General investigates or oversees such investigations 
undertaken by DOD Component IG offices, and forwards to the Service 
Secretary investigation outcomes for appropriate action. If confirmed, 
I would be responsible for advising the Secretary of the Army on such 
investigations.
    Regarding civilian employee allegations of whistleblower reprisal, 
if confirmed, I would monitor the Army's program and investigation 
processes. These processes include referrals from the Office of Special 
Counsel and the Office of the Inspector General, as well as non-
referral allegations such as an employee raising the matter within his 
or her management chain. If confirmed, I would ensure that the Army has 
in place effective programs and processes to protect our military and 
civilian personnel from reprisal and provides for avenues of relief. I 
would support taking appropriate corrective action in substantiated 
cases.
    Question. What role does the Army General Counsel play in ensuring 
compliance with Office of Special Counsel requests to the Army for 
investigations, and in ensuring the legal sufficiency of any such 
investigation the Army conducts?
    Answer. It is my understanding that the Army General Counsel is 
responsible for providing overall guidance on all issues concerning the 
Army's cooperation with the Office of Special Counsel (OSC). This 
primarily relates to investigation of alleged prohibited personnel 
practices and allegations of improper or illegal conduct. If confirmed, 
I would ensure that the Office of the General Counsel has a robust 
program in place to facilitate this mission. This includes: rapid relay 
of referrals to commanders in the field and their servicing legal 
advisors; informal Office of the General Counsel coordination with both 
servicing legal advisors and OSC attorneys throughout the process of a 
given investigation; and prioritized Office of the General Counsel 
review of such investigations prior to final action.
                 support to the army inspector general
    Question. What is the relationship between the Army General Counsel 
and the Army Inspector General?
    Answer. I believe that as members of the Army Secretariat, the 
General Counsel and the Inspector General should have a strong working 
relationship to help the Secretary of the Army identify, investigate, 
and resolve important matters impacting the service. These include 
individual misconduct by senior officials, systemic non-compliance with 
law and regulation, or any other matter of sufficient magnitude. The 
Inspector General furthers this mission by being the eyes, ears, and 
voice of the Secretary through inspections, assistance, investigations, 
and teaching and training functions. I believe the Army General Counsel 
facilitates this mission by ensuring that the Office of the General 
Counsel stands ready to provide legal advice regarding these processes.
    Question. In your view, what role, if any, should the Army General 
Counsel have in reviewing and rendering opinions on the legal 
sufficiency of the investigations and recommendations of the Army 
Inspector General?
    Answer. In my view, the role of the Office of the General Counsel 
in reviewing and rendering opinions on the legal sufficiency of 
investigations and recommendations of the Army Inspector General is 
appropriately limited to cases with substantiated findings regarding 
senior officials or otherwise brought to the attention of the General 
Counsel. I am told attorneys assigned to the Office of the Army 
Inspector General provide legal sufficiency reviews for all 
investigations that the Inspector General conducts involving senior 
officials, both military and civilian. As these investigations can have 
significant impacts on senior members of the Army, the Army General 
Counsel has an interest, on behalf of the Secretary, to ensure the 
sufficiency of the investigations.
            litigation involving the department of the army
    Question. What is your understanding of the relationship between 
the Department of the Army and the Department of Justice with respect 
to litigation involving the Army?
    Answer. I understand that the Department of Justice (DOJ), under 
the direction of the Attorney General, has the responsibility to 
represent the Department of the Army and its officers in civil 
litigation. However, I understand that DOJ requires the assistance of 
Army attorneys to defend litigation involving the Army, and throughout 
the course of the litigation Army attorneys work with DOJ attorneys to 
ensure the Army's interests are represented by collaborating on 
litigation strategy and defenses. If confirmed, I would continue to 
work collaboratively with The Judge Advocate General and the Department 
of Justice to protect the Army's interests in litigation.
    Question. In your view, should the Department of the Army have the 
independence and resources to conduct its own litigation?
    Answer. I understand that the Judge Advocate General's Litigation 
Division has a strong, longstanding, and collaborative relationship 
with the Department of Justice. If confirmed, I will work with The 
Judge Advocate General to ensure this working relationship endures, and 
that the Army has the litigation resources necessary to properly 
protect the Army's equities and interests.
    Question. If confirmed, what factors would you consider in 
determining whether official Department of the Army information should 
be released in litigation? How would your analysis of Touhy requests 
differ in cases in which the United States or the Army is a party as 
compared to cases in which the United States or the Army is not a 
party?
    Answer. I understand that when the Department of the Army is a 
party to litigation, it complies with the Federal Rules of Civil 
Procedure and provides information in discovery, as would any other 
party. I further understand that the Department of the Army regulation 
that implements Touhy applies only to litigation in which the Army is 
not a party and where official information is requested. When the Army 
is not a party and does have an interest in the litigation, I 
understand that the Army's policy is to make official information 
reasonably available in litigation in an impartial manner by providing 
equal access to official information and fact witnesses (but not expert 
or opinion witnesses) to litigants. If confirmed, I would collaborate 
with The Judge Advocate General, in coordination with the Department of 
Defense General Counsel and the Department of Justice, to ensure the 
Army's approach is consistent with other agencies' approaches to this 
issue.
    Question. How is the authority to waive attorney/client privilege 
allocated within the Department of the Army? If confirmed, would you 
make any changes to this allocation of authority or to policies 
governing the release of information potentially subject to the 
privilege?
    Answer. I understand that by Army regulation, the authority to 
waive attorney/client privilege belongs to the responsible official 
acting for the Army on a given matter. For example, when the Office of 
General Counsel provides legal advice to an Assistant Secretary of the 
Army on a matter within his or her purview, waiver of the privilege on 
this matter belongs to that Assistant Secretary. A more senior 
authority may overrule a subordinate official's decision on waiving or 
invoking the privilege. The Secretary of the Army is the ultimate 
responsible official for invoking and waiving the privilege.
    If confirmed, I do not anticipate changing the current allocation 
of authority for this privilege. Army regulations currently scope the 
privilege authority properly so that decisionmaking occurs at a 
reasonable level. I would, however, keep an open mind if circumstances 
warrant a potential modification to the current structure.
    Question. If confirmed, what factors would you consider in 
approving a request for the representation of an Army official or 
employee by Department of Justice attorneys or by private counsel 
furnished by the Department, in civil, criminal, or congressional 
proceedings in which an Army employee is sued, subpoenaed, or charged 
in their individual capacity?
    Answer. I am aware that the Attorney General has the authority to 
approve representation by the Department of Justice, or by private 
counsel furnished by the Department of Justice. It is my understanding 
that Army attorneys use the factors outlined in applicable implementing 
regulation as the framework to analyze whether individual 
representation is appropriate and warranted when making a 
recommendation to the Department of Justice. Specifically, those 
factors are: (1) whether the official or employee was acting within the 
scope of employment at the time of the incident, and (2) whether 
representation is in the best interest of the Army. If confirmed, I 
intend to follow the current policy in coordination with the Department 
of Defense and the Department of Justice.
                      the army civilian workforce
    Question. In your judgment, what is the biggest challenge facing 
the Army in effectively and efficiently managing its civilian 
workforce?
    Answer. I am informed, the biggest challenge facing the Army in 
managing its civilian workforce is ensuring sustained access to high-
demand talent such as engineers, scientists, software coders, 
cybersecurity analysts, data scientists, and other technical positions. 
I believe the Army, now more than ever, has a significant demand for 
these skills to meet current and future mission and readiness 
requirements. If confirmed, I would support policies that allow the 
Department to quickly and efficiently acquire, develop, employ, and 
retain a sustainable bench of top talent possessing current and 
emerging high demand skill sets.
    Question. Would there be value, in your view, to establishing a 
unified DOD civilian workforce, as opposed to separate civilian 
workforces segregated by DOD Component? Please explain your answer.
    Answer. It is my understanding the DOD civilian workforce is 
diverse across a number of mission sets that are specific to each DOD 
Component. In my view, there is value in recognizing both the unique 
mission of the Army and how Army civilians support that mission and 
Army readiness.
    However, it is also my understanding that there are multiple 
civilian personnel systems and authorities that are applied across the 
DOD civilian workforce, which create complexities in each Component 
being managed. If confirmed, I would support further review and 
analysis of the benefits of establishing a unified civilian personnel 
system, with streamlined authorities.
    Question. It is not uncommon for contractor employees--particularly 
those contracted to provide knowledge-based or administrative 
services--to work in the same offices, serve on the same projects and 
task forces, and perform many of the same functions as Department of 
the Army military personnel and civilian employees.
    In your view, does the Department of the Army have in place 
adequate processes to ensure that contractor employees do not perform 
inherently governmental functions and that contractor performance of 
``closely associated'' and critical government functions is minimized? 
Please explain your answer.
    Answer. Yes, my understanding is that there is an adequate process 
in place for ensuring that the Army does not contract for inherently 
governmental functions. I understand that functions currently performed 
by contractors are reviewed at every iteration or logical inflection 
point of a contract to ensure that requiring activities are not 
entering into inappropriate or unauthorized personal services contracts 
or those involving inherently governmental functions.
                        congressional oversight
    Question. In order to exercise legislative and oversight 
responsibilities, it is important that this committee, its 
subcommittees, and other appropriate committees of Congress receive 
timely testimony, briefings, reports, records--including documents and 
electronic communications, and other information from the executive 
branch.
    Do you agree, without qualification, if confirmed, and on request, 
to appear and testify before this committee, its subcommittees, and 
other appropriate committees of Congress? Please answer yes or no.
    Answer. Yes.
    Question. Do you agree, without qualification, if confirmed, to 
provide this committee, its subcommittees, other appropriate committees 
of Congress, and their respective staffs such witnesses and briefers, 
briefings, reports, records--including documents and electronic 
communications, and other information, as may be requested of you, and 
to do so in a timely manner? Please answer yes or no.
    Answer. Yes.
    Question. Do you agree, without qualification, if confirmed, to 
consult with this committee, its subcommittees, other appropriate 
committees of Congress, and their respective staffs, regarding your 
basis for any delay or denial in providing testimony, briefings, 
reports, records--including documents and electronic communications, 
and other information requested of you? Please answer yes or no.
    Answer. Yes.
    Question. Do you agree, without qualification, if confirmed, to 
keep this committee, its subcommittees, other appropriate committees of 
Congress, and their respective staffs apprised of new information that 
materially impacts the accuracy of testimony, briefings, reports, 
records--including documents and electronic communications, and other 
information you or your organization previously provided? Please answer 
yes or no.
    Answer. Yes.
    Question. Do you agree, without qualification, if confirmed, and on 
request, to provide this committee and its subcommittees with records 
and other information within their oversight jurisdiction, even absent 
a formal Committee request? Please answer yes or no.
    Answer. Yes.
    Question. Do you agree, without qualification, if confirmed, to 
respond timely to letters to, and/or inquiries and other requests of 
you or your organization from individual Senators who are members of 
this committee? Please answer yes or no.
    Answer. Yes.
    Question. Do you agree, without qualification, if confirmed, to 
ensure that you and other members of your organization protect from 
retaliation any military member, Federal employee, or contractor 
employee who testifies before, or communicates with this committee, its 
subcommittees, and any other appropriate committee of Congress? Please 
answer yes or no.
    Answer. Yes.
                                 ______
                                 
    [Questions for the record with answers supplied follow:]

             Questions Submitted by Senator Mazie K. Hirono
     oversight of senior dod officials - sexual assault and sexual 
                               harassment
    1. Senator Hirono. Ms. Ricci, as part of my responsibility as a 
member of the Senate Armed Services Committee and to ensure the fitness 
of nominees for appointment to senior positions within the Department 
of Defense (DOD), I ask the same two questions that I ask nominees to 
all of the committees on which I serve. Since you became a legal adult, 
have you ever made unwanted requests for sexual favors, or committed 
any verbal or physical harassment or assault of a sexual nature?
    Ms. Ricci. No.

    2. Senator Hirono. Ms. Ricci, have you ever faced discipline, or 
entered into a settlement related to this kind of conduct?
    Ms. Ricci. No.
                renewal of hawaii's training land leases
    3. Senator Hirono. Ms. Ricci, the Army is negotiating renewals for 
several training area land leases in Hawaii that are set to expire in 
2029, including the Pohakuloa Training Area (PTA), which is critical to 
joint and partner nation military readiness. It's important for the 
Army to conduct respectful engagement with local community leaders, 
especially the Native Hawaiian population. If confirmed, how would you 
go about ensuring these leases are negotiated fairly and respectfully 
with leaders in Hawaii?
    Ms. Ricci. I understand that the Army continues to engage with 
State leaders, the Native Hawaiian population, and other local leaders 
as it seeks to retain the leased military training areas in Hawaii. In 
my experience, this dialog is vital, as it promotes a relationship of 
trust and credibility and clarifies misunderstandings. If confirmed, I 
will work to ensure that the Army continues such efforts throughout the 
process, that the Army remains committed to negotiating openly and 
honestly to reach fair and equitable terms with the State of Hawaii, 
and that my team provides the Department timely legal advice throughout 
the process.
implementing sexual assault and harassment independent review committee 
       recommendations-strongly supporting sec austins leg prop.
    4. Senator Hirono. Ms. Ricci, if confirmed, you both will have 
important roles in the implementation of the Sexual Assault and 
Harassment Independent Review Committee (IRC) Report recommendations. I 
am concerned about Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin's tentative 
timeline for implementation, which in some cases goes out to 2028 or 
later. If confirmed, how do each of you plan to support the 
Department's efforts to implement the IRC recommendations?
    Ms. Ricci. In my view, the Secretary of Defense has appropriately 
prioritized the prevention of sexual assault, sexual harassment, gender 
discrimination, and associated retaliation within the Department of 
Defense (DoD), and I strongly support DOD's legislative proposal on 
military justice reform. I understand that the majority of Independent 
Review Commission (IRC) recommendations will be implemented within the 
next one to 4 years. The DOD IRC implementation timeline is scheduled 
in tiers because some recommendations must build on the work done in 
prior tiers. If confirmed, I will actively support Army leadership in 
executing the DOD implementation of the IRC's recommendations in a 
thoughtful, deliberate, and timely manner designed to ensure a focus on 
prevention while providing victims with compassionate care and support.

    5. Senator Hirono. Ms. Ricci, do you have any ideas that might help 
to speed up the implementation process?
    Ms. Ricci. Based on my understanding, the Secretary of Defense is 
acting expeditiously. Some of the recommendations prescribe 
considerable changes to existing policies and organizational 
constructs, requiring significant time to implement across the 
Department of Defense and the Army. If confirmed, I intend to support 
the Secretary of the Army and the Army's leadership in executing the 
recommendations of the Independent Review Commission and the decisions 
of the Secretary of Defense as quickly as possible while ensuring 
victims of sexual assault, sexual harassment, gender discrimination, 
and associated retaliation receive prompt, professional, and 
compassionate care.
                               __________
             Questions Submitted by Senator Gary C. Peters
          high mobility multipurpose wheeled vehicle rollovers
    6. Senator Peters. Ms. Ricci, the Government Accountability Office 
(GAO) released a report in July detailing actions the Army should take 
to prevent and mitigate training accidents in tactical vehicles. The 
Army can do more to prevent High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicle 
(HMMWV) rollover fatalities, as these were involved in more reported 
accidents than any other type of tactical vehicle. I am concerned that 
this vital issue is not being taken seriously. I have asked the Army to 
ensure it fully funds the HMMWV rollover mitigation program and was 
able to secure language in this year's NDAA calling on the Army develop 
a plan to retrofit all of its HMMWVs with rollover prevention kits.
    As General Counsel, would you advise the Army to install proven 
rollover mitigation safety measures on legacy vehicles that they will 
continue to use in the fleet for the next 20 years?
    Ms. Ricci. Generally speaking, if confirmed, I would support 
acquisitions that enhance Soldier safety. While I am not familiar with 
the details of the Army's installation of rollover mitigation measures 
on legacy vehicles, including the HMMWV, it is my understanding that 
the Army is committed to equipping all HMMWVs with Anti-lock Brake 
System/Electronic Stability Control (ABS/ESC) kits as quickly as 
fiscally possible. If confirmed, I would become familiar with the 
details of the HMMWV rollover mitigation program and appropriately 
advise the Secretary of the Army and the Assistant Secretary of the 
Army for Acquisition, Logistics, and Technology on this matter.

    7. Senator Peters. Ms. Ricci, in your legal opinion, is it a 
liability to the Army if it does not take action to prevent accidents 
when a proven and fielded HMMWV rollover solution exists?
    Ms. Ricci. I am not presently familiar with the GAO report 
referenced in the previous question or the details of the HMMWV 
mitigation program. As such, it would be inappropriate to offer a 
definitive legal view at this time. As a general matter, it is 
important, from both a liability and Soldier safety standpoint, for 
Army leaders to implement all reasonable safety measures. If confirmed, 
I would become familiar with the details of the HMMWV rollover 
mitigation program and appropriately advise the Secretary of the Army 
and the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Acquisition, Logistics, and 
Technology on this matter.
                               __________
            Questions Submitted by Senator Marsha Blackburn
                       sexual assault in the army
    8. Senator Blackburn. Ms. Ricci, if confirmed, how specifically 
would you address prevention of sexual assault and harassment in the 
Army?
    Ms. Ricci. Based on my experience, I believe the prevention of 
sexual assault, sexual harassment, gender discrimination and associated 
retaliation in the Army starts with commanders. These leaders are 
responsible and accountable for setting the conditions and enforcing 
the standards that lead to healthy organizational climates. If 
confirmed, I will advise the Army's leadership to continue their 
efforts to prevent these harmful behaviors through the implementation 
of the recommendations from both the Fort Hood Independent Review 
Committee and 90-Day Independent Review Commission. In addition, if 
confirmed, I will ensure that the Office of General Counsel provides 
sound and timely legal advice regarding efforts to prevent sexual 
assault and harassment in the Army. Finally, if confirmed, I will 
support, and provide advice regarding continued Army investments in 
research on culture, climate, and unit cohesion to advance a holistic 
prevention approach.

    9. Senator Blackburn. Ms. Ricci, do you believe that giving 
prosecutorial decisions on sexual assault, domestic violence, most 
crimes against children, and other special victim related offenses to 
independent military prosecutors will address the prevention of sexual 
assault and harassment in the Army?
    Ms. Ricci. I understand the Department of Defense continues to 
provide technical assistance to Congress on proposed legislation to 
remove commanders from making prosecution decisions on cases involving 
special victims, and other offenses as defined by the proposed 
legislation. I strongly support the legislative proposal submitted by 
the Department to enact military justice reform that will enable 
specialized, independent special victim prosecutors who report to the 
Secretary of each Service, to make decisions on these complex cases. In 
my view, while accountability is essential, it is not the whole 
solution. The Army must continue its prevention efforts through the 
implementation of the recommendations of both the Fort Hood Independent 
Review Committee and the Department of Defense Independent Review 
Commission, and through the Army's People First Task Force, to build a 
stronger culture and ensure a safe environment that decreases the 
prevalence of sexual assault, sexual harassment, and other corrosive 
behaviors. If confirmed, I look forward to assisting the Secretary and 
the Army's leadership in striving to prevent sexual assault and sexual 
harassment in the Army.
                  department of the army covid policy
    10. Senator Blackburn. Ms. Ricci, based on the guidance outlined in 
Army Regulation 600-20, 40-562 as well as the new Army Directive 2021-
33, what is your understanding of least favorable discharge and 
characterization of service a soldier can receive for refusing the 
COVID-19 vaccine?
    Ms. Ricci. I understand the Army is currently in the initial 
implementation phase of the COVID-19 vaccine policy. In this initial 
phase, commanders are not authorized to initiate separation proceedings 
based solely on a Soldier's refusal to receive the vaccine. I am 
informed that, upon transition to the next phase, commanders, at a 
minimum, will initiate an administrative separation action against 
Soldiers who, without a pending or approved exemption, refuse 
vaccination. I understand that the Army's regulatory due processes 
would apply to these administrative separation proceedings, and 
initiation of separation proceedings does not necessitate actual 
separation. Based on my experience with Army administrative 
separations, Soldiers can be discharged with uncharacterized service 
(for entry-level separations), or be assigned a characterization of 
service of honorable, general, or other than honorable. If confirmed, I 
will ensure that the Office of General Counsel provides robust legal 
advice regarding the Army's implementation of the Department of Defense 
vaccine policy.

    11. Senator Blackburn. Ms. Ricci, what is the Army's authoritative 
document regarding the vaccination requirements, timelines, and 
exemption procedures for civilian personnel? Please include references 
for both contractors and GS [general schedule] employees.
    Ms. Ricci. I am aware that Executive Order (EO) 14043, ``Requiring 
Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccination for Federal Employees,'' applies 
to all Federal employees, and Executive Order 14042, ``Ensuring 
Adequate COVID Safety Protocols for Federal Contractors,'' applies to 
all Federal contractors. These are the authoritative documents 
regarding the vaccination of Federal civilian employees and contractors 
of the Department of Defense (DoD) and the Army. Subsequent to the 
issuance of EOs 14042 and 14043, the Department of Defense issued 
``Force Health Protection Guidance (Supplement 23) Revision 2--
Department of Defense Guidance for Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccination 
Attestation, Screening Testing, and Vaccination Verification,'' which 
provides guidance regarding COVID-19 vaccine attestation and screening 
testing for unvaccinated personnel. It also provides updated guidance 
for implementing force health protection and workplace safety measures 
directed by the White House Safer Federal Workforce Task Force to 
reduce transmission of the virus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 
(COVID-19). Additionally, I anticipate that the Secretary of the Army 
will issue guidance that implements the EOs and applicable DOD 
guidance. These documents, taken together, would provide the authority, 
timelines, and exemption procedures for civilian personnel. If 
confirmed as General Counsel, my role would be to ensure that the Army 
guidance complies with the applicable law, Executive Orders, and DOD 
policy.

    12. Senator Blackburn. Ms. Ricci, what is the protocol for 
personnel, originating from the other military branches, who are 
assigned to Army commands and refuse the vaccine?
    Ms. Ricci. I am informed that the Army's current policies 
implementing the COVID-19 mandate do not address this specific issue. 
In my experience, in situations like this, commands ordinarily follow 
any applicable agreements between the Services and, if no agreement is 
in place, coordinate directly with the parent Service.

    13. Senator Blackburn. Ms. Ricci, how will the Army address foreign 
military personnel--such as those studying U.S. professional military 
education courses--if they refuse the vaccine for religious reasons?
    Ms. Ricci. Whether vaccination requirements should apply to foreign 
military personnel is an issue that I would need to examine further. In 
my view, religious exemptions should be considered on a case-by-case 
basis and initiated by an appropriate request from the foreign military 
service member through their partner nation military service.
                                 ______
                                 
    [The nomination reference of Ms. Carrie F. Ricci, follows:]
      
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]
    
      
                                 ______
                                 
    [The biographical sketch of Ms. Carrie F. Ricci, which was 
transmitted to the Committee at the time the nomination was 
referred, follows:]
      
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]
    
                                 ______
                                 
    [The Committee on Armed Services requires all individuals 
nominated from civilian life by the President to positions 
requiring the advice and consent of the Senate to complete a 
form that details the biographical, financial, and other 
information of the nominee. The form executed by Ms. Carrie F. 
Ricci in connection with her nomination follows:]
      
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]
    
                                 ______
                                 
    [The nominee responded to Parts B-F of the committee 
questionnaire. The text of the questionnaire is set forth in 
the Appendix to this volume. The nominee's answers to Parts B-F 
are contained in the committee's executive files.]
      
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]
    
      
                                 ______
                                 
    [The nomination of Ms. Carrie F. Ricci was reported to the 
Senate by Chairman Reed on December 8, 2021, with the 
recommendation that the nomination be confirmed. The nomination 
was confirmed by the Senate on December 14, 2021.]

                                 [all]