[Senate Hearing 117-866]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]


                                                        S. Hrg. 117-866

                     LANDSAT AT 50 AND THE FUTURE OF U.S. 
                       SATELLITE-BASED EARTH OBSERVATION

=======================================================================

                                 HEARING

                               BEFORE THE

                   SUBCOMMITTEE ON SPACE AND SCIENCE

                                 OF THE

                         COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE,
                      SCIENCE, AND TRANSPORTATION
                          UNITED STATES SENATE

                    ONE HUNDRED SEVENTEENTH CONGRESS

                             SECOND SESSION

                               __________

                            DECEMBER 1, 2022

                               __________

    Printed for the use of the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 
                             Transportation
                             
[GRAPHIC NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]                             


                Available online: http://www.govinfo.gov
                
                               __________

                   U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE                    
55-823 PDF                  WASHINGTON : 2024                    
          
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------                  
               
       SENATE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND TRANSPORTATION

                    ONE HUNDRED SEVENTEENTH CONGRESS

                             SECOND SESSION

                   MARIA CANTWELL, Washington, Chair
AMY KLOBUCHAR, Minnesota             ROGER WICKER, Mississippi, Ranking
RICHARD BLUMENTHAL, Connecticut      JOHN THUNE, South Dakota
BRIAN SCHATZ, Hawaii                 ROY BLUNT, Missouri
EDWARD MARKEY, Massachusetts         TED CRUZ, Texas
GARY PETERS, Michigan                DEB FISCHER, Nebraska
TAMMY BALDWIN, Wisconsin             JERRY MORAN, Kansas
TAMMY DUCKWORTH, Illinois            DAN SULLIVAN, Alaska
JON TESTER, Montana                  MARSHA BLACKBURN, Tennessee
KYRSTEN SINEMA, Arizona              TODD YOUNG, Indiana
JACKY ROSEN, Nevada                  MIKE LEE, Utah
BEN RAY LUJAN, New Mexico            RON JOHNSON, Wisconsin
JOHN HICKENLOOPER, Colorado          SHELLEY MOORE CAPITO, West 
RAPHAEL WARNOCK, Georgia                 Virginia
                                     RICK SCOTT, Florida
                                     CYNTHIA LUMMIS, Wyoming
                       Lila Helms, Staff Director
                 Melissa Porter, Deputy Staff Director
       George Greenwell, Policy Coordinator and Security Manager
                 John Keast, Republican Staff Director
            Crystal Tully, Republican Deputy Staff Director
                      Steven Wall, General Counsel
                                 
                                 ------                                

                   SUBCOMMITTEE ON SPACE AND SCIENCE

JOHN HICKENLOOPER, Colorado, Chair   CYNTHIA LUMMIS, Wyoming, Ranking
RICHARD BLUMENTHAL, Connecticut      TED CRUZ, Texas
GARY PETERS, Michigan                DEB FISCHER, Nebraska
KYRSTEN SINEMA, Arizona,             TODD YOUNG, Indiana
BEN RAY LUJAN, New Mexico            MIKE LEE, Utah
RAPHAEL WARNOCK, Georgia             RICK SCOTT, Florida
EDWARD MARKEY, Massachusetts         JERRY MORAN, Kansas
                            
                            C O N T E N T S

                              ----------                              
                                                                   Page
Hearing held on December 1, 2022.................................     1
Statement of Senator Hickenlooper................................     1
Statement of Senator Lummis......................................     2
Statement of Senator Cantwell....................................    46
Statement of Senator Blumenthal..................................    54

                               Witnesses

Stephen M. Volz, Assistant Administrator, National Environmental 
  Satellite, Data, and Information Service, National Oceanic and 
  Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce........     3
    Prepared statement...........................................     5
Dr. Kate Calvin, Chief Scientist, National Aeronautics and Space 
  Administration.................................................    14
    Prepared statement...........................................    16
Daniel Jablonsky, President and Chief Executive Officer, Maxar 
  Technologies...................................................    19
    Prepared statement...........................................    20
Kevin Gallagher, Associate Director for Core Science Systems, 
  U.S. Geological Survey, Department of the Interior.............    23
    Prepared statement...........................................    25
Waleed Abdalati, Director, Cooperative Institute for Research in 
  Environmental Sciences; Professor, Department of Geography, 
  University of Colorado, Boulder................................    31
    Prepared statement...........................................    33

                                Appendix

Response to written questions submitted to Dr. Kate Calvin by:
    Hon. Maria Cantwell..........................................    61
    Hon. Kyrsten Sinema..........................................    62
Response to written questions submitted to Daniel Jablonsky by:
    Hon. Maria Cantwell..........................................    63
    Hon. Kyrsten Sinema..........................................    64
    Hon. John Hickenlooper.......................................    64
Response to written questions submitted to Kevin Gallagher by:
    Hon. Maria Cantwell..........................................    65
    Hon. Kyrsten Sinema..........................................    66
    Hon. John Hickenlooper.......................................    68
    Hon. Raphael Warnock.........................................    69
Response to written questions submitted to Dr. Waleed Abdalati 
  by:
    Hon. Maria Cantwell..........................................    70
    Hon. John Hickenlooper.......................................    71
    Hon. Raphael Warnock.........................................    75

 
 LANDSAT AT 50 AND THE FUTURE OF U.S. SATELLITE-BASED EARTH OBSERVATION

                              ----------                              


                       THURSDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2022

                               U.S. Senate,
                 Subcommittee on Space and Science,
        Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
                                                    Washington, DC.
    The Subcommittee met, pursuant to notice, at 10:33 a.m., in 
room SR-253, Russell Senate Office Building, Hon. John 
Hickenlooper, Chairman of the Subcommittee, presiding.
    Present: Senators Hickenlooper [presiding], Cantwell, 
Blumenthal, Lummis, and Fischer.

         OPENING STATEMENT OF HON. JOHN HICKENLOOPER, 
                   U.S. SENATOR FROM COLORADO

    Senator Hickenlooper. Great. Terrific. Welcome to the last 
Space and Science Subcommittee hearing of the 117th Congress, 
``Landsat at 50 and the Future of U.S. Satellite-Based Earth 
Observation.''
    I know I almost never mention on this committee--well, I 
try to mention it fairly frequently, but I am a former 
geologist and I have seen firsthand how the dynamic 
circumstances around our country, our world, how our world is 
constantly changing and the ecosystems across the globe in many 
ways support each other, oceans affect forests, and plains.
    And we should understand what the phrase ``surf turf'' and 
what is above the Earth are all crucially interconnected. 
Observations from space allow us to better--get to a better 
understanding of changes in our planet over time. The CHIPS and 
Science Act reaffirms our Nation's commitment to science and to 
research.
    Today, we are going to examine important scientific 
missions carried out by important partners in Government and 
academia, the commercial sector, all playing a role and all 
interconnected. Earth observation provides key data that serve 
many purposes. Farmers can serve or can measure soil moisture 
to make sure they can improve crop yields.
    Weather, the National Weather Service forecast to alert 
residents of hurricanes and tornadoes. In the case of 
emissions, we can detect and increasingly measure fugitive 
emissions, such as methane, from oil and gas wells. In terms of 
Colorado, the two key issues that we have seen where Earth 
observation has become increasingly important, wildfire 
mitigation and drought management.
    Some would go so far as to describe our droughts in the 
West now as so prolonged that they don't qualify to be 
considered droughts. They are aridification or desertification. 
They are more permanent than generally what we think of a 
drought.
    We have an image here of the East Troublesome Fire over my 
right shoulder here. It burned over 190,000 acres, destroyed 
over 350 homes, caused over a half a billion dollars of damage 
in Colorado.
    And instruments built by Ball Aerospace, Colorado based 
company, were on the Landsat 8 satellite, captured images of 
the fire, the one on this far from my right. It is a natural 
color showing a smoke plume. But the second uses infrared light 
to show details of where you have the active fires, bright red, 
the burn scars are dark red, and the vegetation is green.
    The second image I put up here as part of the show and tell 
is Lake Powell, the second largest reservoir in the entire 
country and part of the Colorado River Basin system. This 
ongoing drought, this aridification, is making water management 
a top conservation policy. Last fall's emergency release of 
water helped Lake Powell's hydroelectric power generation, but 
it was really a stopgap measure.
    Lake Powell is currently filled to only 26 percent of its 
full capacity, the lowest level since 1967. And you see that in 
frightening clarity in that image. These images from Landsat 
showed the changing water levels between 1999 and 2021. And by 
any measure, these are drastic reductions in water levels over 
a relatively short period of time.
    With today's hearing, we look forward to better 
understanding how our Federal, academic, and commercial earth 
observation activities can better complement each other, can be 
better orchestrated. How can we use this data to improve 
ecosystem conservation or adaptation? And what benefits can 
emerging technologies like artificial intelligence or cloud 
computing provide for future earth observation?
    Today's witnesses include--while our array is a reminds me 
of the 1927 New York Yankees, you know, the--one of the 
greatest batting orders in the history of baseball. Today's 
witness panel brings immense expertise.
    Dr. Steve Volz, Assistant Administrator for Satellite 
Information Services, and leads NESDIS--N-E-S-D-I-S, I should 
spell it out, at NOAA. Dr. Kate Calvin, Chief Scientist of 
NASA. Mr. Daniel Jablonsky is the CEO of Maxar Technologies, 
also based in Colorado. Mr. Kevin Gallagher leads the Landsat 
Program at the U.S. Geological Survey.
    And Dr. Waleed Abdalati is the Director of C.U. Boulder's 
Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, 
CIRES, and served as co-chair of the recent Earth Science 
Decadal Survey.
    With that, I will turn it over to Ranking Member Lummis for 
her opening statements, and then recognize Chair Cantwell and 
Ranking Member Wicker when they get here.

               STATEMENT OF HON. CYNTHIA LUMMIS, 
                   U.S. SENATOR FROM WYOMING

    Senator Lummis. Thank you, Chairman Hickenlooper. And thank 
you witnesses for joining us today. In the West, our land is a 
key part of our very lives, our every activity, and certainly 
part of our culture.
    Whether it is agriculture, energy production, or our parks, 
Wyoming's land shapes our people, our economy, and both in 
nearly every way imaginable. Having detailed data on how that 
land changes over time, how it responds to the changing of the 
seasons, or how it is impacted by severe weather is extremely 
valuable and necessary to make informed decisions.
    That is why I am glad we are holding this hearing today, so 
that we can highlight the importance of the Landsat Program by 
showing how it interacts with each of these issues. Through 
these images, we can better understand how seasonal changes 
affect crop yields, better insights into previously unknown 
locations for mineral deposits, and a deeper knowledge of how 
to prepare for snowmelt across the region.
    The Landsat Program has provided significant resources to 
individuals and businesses operating in Wyoming, especially 
since the program moved toward open data for the public. It is 
my hope that we are able to emphasize the work already underway 
in the Landsat Program and prepare the program as we move into 
the future.
    So, thank you all for being here, and I am really looking 
forward to your testimony and our discussion.
    Senator Hickenlooper. Great. And I don't see--I think this 
is one of those moments where we have a lot of--there is a lot 
of stuff. There are a lot of balls in the air, so I think our 
Chair and our Ranking Member might be a little late or might 
become conflicted out.
    Anyway, I think we can go to--begin to the--go to our 
expert witnesses. And Dr. Volz, why don't you begin? You are 
here by video. Since you are on video, you should get special 
consideration.

            STATEMENT OF STEPHEN M. VOLZ, ASSISTANT

        ADMINISTRATOR, NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL SATELLITE,

        DATA, AND INFORMATION SERVICE, NATIONAL OCEANIC

                AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION,

                  U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

    Dr. Volz. So, thank you, sir. And I wish I could be there 
in person, but I am happy to participate remotely and the 
opportunity to do so. Good morning, sir, Chair Hickenlooper, 
Ranking Member Lummis, and members of the Subcommittee.
    As noted, I am Dr. Stephen Volz, the Assistant 
Administrator of NOAA's National Environmental Satellite, Data 
and Information Service. It really is an honor to speak to you, 
along with so many of my close partners at the anniversary of 
the Landsat Program, of NASA's creation, and of the launch of 
the TIROS-1 satellite and our own beginnings. We can trace our 
agency start in space to the collaborative scientific project 
known as the International Geophysical Year.
    That effort in 1957 and 1958 spurred satellite development 
and highlighted the importance of global Earth observations. 
NOAA was established with a broad mission, to study, 
understand, and support the health of our oceans and 
atmosphere, and a unique charge, to predict how our environment 
changes and to predict the events of that environment for our 
people from hour to hour and from year to year.
    We save lives, protect property, and enhance the American 
economy by monitoring and forecasting weather, water and the 
climate, and by informing our citizens every day. In that job, 
we deploy ships and planes, buoys, balloons, drones, and 
satellites. Satellite observations from NOAA and from our 
national and international partners account for around 90 
percent by volume of all data used by NOAA's forecast models.
    And satellites are essential to develop and extend critical 
planetary climate data records, which allow us to understand 
the changing planet. But we don't just use satellite data. NOAA 
defines and designs our Nation's environmental satellite 
system.
    NASA manages their launch and their construction, and we 
operate the fleet of satellites over decades. Our three 
agency's missions are complementary. NASA develops the space 
technology and the fundamental understanding of how Earth 
systems operate.
    USGS and NOAA track and investigate the causes and 
consequences of climate change, and NOAA exploits technologies 
and delivers observations and information that the Nation needs 
every hour of every day.
    And together, we all develop science driven models of the 
Earth and climate system environment to advance our individual 
missions. And the need for better understanding of those 
systems is great and growing greater.
    Our experience with hurricane observations and research has 
taught us lessons over the years, that better observations, 
research, and modeling lead to better forecasts and outcomes 
for our communities in the paths of storms. Improved 
observations from satellites, aircraft, and other data sources, 
and better research and data assimilation have led to improved 
forecasts.
    Since Hurricane Andrew hit Florida in 1992, we have reduced 
hurricane tracking error by 75 percent and improved intensity 
forecast by 50 percent. We are facing hurricanes now that are 
stronger and more frequent than in the past, and we are dealing 
with more damaging extreme events, including wildfires, as you 
mentioned, and flooding occurring year round and nationwide.
    We need to be able to precisely forecast fire and flooding 
events, as well as derechos and ice storms, not hours but days 
in advance in order to inform emergency managers and 
communities more effectively. We can do that, but we need 
better observations and better models to do it.
    NOAA's next generation space architecture is benefiting 
from the successes of NOAA's geostationary low-Earth orbit 
satellite programs over the years, including different ways of 
block buying instruments and satellites, better ground systems, 
and the use of commercial data.
    Our next generation geostationary satellites currently 
provide--[technical problems]--supporting severe weather and 
hazardous environmental condition watches and warnings, and the 
next-gen geostationary extended observations for GeoXO mission 
will continue and expand on the current GOES-R series, with 
planned observations through 2055. One of the GeoXO's advanced 
capabilities is something--it is called a hyperspectral 
infrared sounder.
    This sounder will provide improved real time information 
about the vertical distribution of atmospheric temperature and 
water vapor and will significantly enhance observations of wind 
speed and direction. And with these better data, we will be 
able to better track storms, predicting the behavior of fire 
and smoke around wildfires.
    NOAA's current fleet of low-Earth orbit satellites, known 
as the JPSS series, and including the just launched JPSS-2, 
provide critical weather data and continuous climate data 
records. NOAA's future LEO satellites, low-Earth orbit, will 
supplement and eventually replace our current JPSS satellites, 
providing improved modeling, higher resolution, short and long 
term weather forecasts, and better preparing the Nation for 
extreme weather and events.
    Defining our third leg is our Nation's current space 
weather system, and now includes NOAA's observations, and NASA, 
and other research missions and extended service life. NOAA's 
next--Space Weather Next will extend these observations and 
provide operational forecast, helping safeguard our power 
grids, civil aviation, and spacecraft and astronauts.
    Finally, I would note, we know our citizens need weather 
and environmental information to thrive, and not just to 
survive in a changing world. NOAA and NESDIS are not just ready 
to do this, we were actually created for this mission.
    So I thank you for your strong and continued support of our 
programs, and I am happy to answer your questions. Thank you.
    [The prepared statement of Dr. Volz follows:]

    Prepared Statement of Stephen M. Volz, Assistant Administrator, 
   National Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information Service, 
                               National 
  Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce
    Chairman Hickenlooper, Ranking Member Lummis, and Members of the 
Subcommittee, I am Dr. Stephen Volz, the Assistant Administrator of the 
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA) National 
Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information Service (NESDIS). Thank 
you for the opportunity to participate in today's hearing. I am pleased 
to join the other witnesses, Kate Calvin of NASA, Kevin Gallagher of 
the U.S. Department of the Interior, Waleed Abladati of the Cooperative 
Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, and Daniel Jablonsky 
of Maxar Technologies, to discuss the 50th anniversary of the Landsat 
Program, the 62nd anniversary of the launch of TIROS-1 and the 
beginning of NOAA's environmental satellite program, and the 64th 
anniversary of the creation of NASA.
    All three of our agencies provide important and complementary 
support to the wellbeing and economic vitality of our Nation and can 
trace our roots back in part to the International Geophysical Year 
(IGY), 1957-1958.\1\ The scope of the IGY included global collaboration 
in 11 different Earth sciences: aurora and airglow, cosmic rays, 
geomagnetism, glaciology, gravity, ionospheric physics, precision 
mapping, meteorology and radiation, oceanography, seismology, and solar 
activity. The IGY also sparked the monitoring of several key 
atmospheric variables including the atmospheric carbon dioxide 
concentration at Mauna Loa in Hawaii and the total amount of ozone 
above Halley Bay in Antarctica. These activities spurred the 
development of rockets and satellites, highlighted the importance of 
regular and synchronized global observations, and established 
collective activities to provide access to and archive of the 
tremendous data and information through the establishment of World Data 
Centers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    \1\ www.nasa.gov/feature/70-years-ago-scientists-establish-the-
international-geophysical-year
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    In 1960, NASA and the Department of Defense launched the TIROS-1 
satellite, the world's first dedicated weather satellite and the 
predecessor for our Polar Operational Environmental Satellites and 
Joint Polar Satellite System (JPSS). This was followed by the 
development and launch of our early Geostationary Operational 
Environmental Satellites (GOES). The Department of the Interior's U.S. 
Geological Survey (USGS) and NASA developed the Landsat series, which 
is the longest continuous, space-based record of Earth's land in 
existence. With respect to the immense amount of data our agencies have 
gathered, we each operate globally recognized world data centers that 
the international community relies upon and provides U.S. leadership in 
these areas. At NOAA, the National Centers for Environmental 
Information continues to be a national and international repository of 
space-based and in situ weather and climate, space physics, and 
geomagnetic data and the World Magnetic Model, and also houses the 
World Ocean Database. USGS is a leader in land use/land change data, 
and NASA is a leader in a wide range of space-based data and research.
    Partnerships among the agencies remain strong with interdependence 
at the operations level, co-dependence in the maintenance of long-term 
environmental data records, regular consultations through the National 
Academy of Sciences Decadal Surveys, and U.S. leadership in 
multilateral organizations. The participation of Dr. Waleed Abdalati 
highlights the essential value of the research and academic community 
in the continuing efforts to improve our understanding of the complex 
earth environmental systems which in turn lead to improved information 
products and services.
    The participation of Mr. Jablonsky demonstrates that the aerospace 
industry plays an important role in maintaining U.S. leadership in 
space-based Earth observation. With successes over the past 10 years, 
the U.S. Government will increasingly seek ways to incorporate the 
commercial sector in our long-term plans and activities.
NOAA Builds on the Legacy of the International Geophysical Year
    NOAA has a unique mission to understand, predict, and support the 
health of our oceans and atmosphere. From daily weather forecasts and 
severe storm warnings to fisheries management, coastal restoration, and 
data to enhance marine commerce, NOAA's products and services promote 
economic vitality, affecting more than one-third of America's gross 
domestic product. We work to save lives, protect property, and enhance 
the American economy through the timely delivery of trusted weather, 
water, and climate forecasts, analyses, and information.
    For decades, NOAA has been at the forefront of the world's weather 
and climate enterprise. We are the global leader in observing the Earth 
to understand its interconnected physical and biological systems, and 
in disseminating knowledge from that understanding to people, 
communities, and industry every day and into the future. Our 
observation and information systems drive NOAA's weather, water, and 
climate products and services, which afford vital industries--shipping, 
fishing, agriculture, construction, energy and water resources, and 
more--the ability to predict and plan for the future. As a leading 
Federal source for operational weather, water, and space weather 
forecasts, and warnings, and climate assessments, we provide critical 
predictions and decision support tools by developing unique products 
that merge a variety of satellite and in situ data to address complex 
societal needs. In many cases our partner agencies (NASA, USGS, DoD) 
provide complementary and supplementary roles.
    Satellite datasets, collected by NOAA, and our research and 
international partner agencies, are essential for NOAA predictions and 
monitoring across all scales and times, and account for around 90 
percent of all data that is used by NOAA's operational forecast models. 
NOAA has the distinct and important role of planning for, jointly 
acquiring, and operating the Nation's operational environmental 
satellites, and working with our global partners to ensure our systems 
work together. Our satellites are relied upon 24 hours a day, seven 
days a week for weather, ocean, climate, and space weather data by 
NOAA, as well as individuals, businesses, and all levels of government 
to protect lives and property within the U.S. and around the world.
    NOAA accomplishes this environmental satellite and data mission 
through strategic partnerships and operational cooperation with a 
number of federal, private, and international space organizations and 
academia. Our longest-standing and closest strategic partner in Earth 
observations from space is NASA. NOAA's Mission is ``science, service, 
and stewardship to understand and predict changes in climate, weather, 
ocean and coasts; to share that knowledge and information with others; 
and to conserve and manage coastal and marine ecosystems and 
resources.'' \2\ NASA seeks ``new knowledge and understanding of our 
planet Earth, our Sun and solar system,'' and ``to understand how 
biological and physical systems work at a fundamental level,'' with the 
intent to understand ``how and why Earth's climate and environment 
(are) changing.'' \3\ These complementary missions enable NOAA to 
address the observation and information needs to meet the operational 
service delivery demands of the Nation, including, among other 
services, environmental and climate predictions and analysis, and 
weather and water forecasts, warnings, and information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    \2\ NOAA's Mission and Vision: https://www.noaa.gov/our-mission-
and-vision
    \3\ https://science.nasa.gov/about-us/smd-vision
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOAA and USGS Collaboration
    NOAA has a long history of collaboration as well with the USGS, as 
both agencies share unique but complementary responsibilities to 
protect lives and property. One of the areas of longstanding 
collaboration is USGS's use of the NOAA GOES-Data Collection System 
(GOES DCS). USGS has deployed over 12,200 ground-based Data Collection 
Platforms (DCPs) to support its Water Resources Mission to collect and 
disseminate reliable, impartial, and timely data that are needed to 
understand the Nation's water resources. The majority of USGS water 
data is sent from remote DCPs to the NOAA GOES spacecraft, and is then 
received directly by USGS as a direct broadcast from the GOES 
spacecraft. This GOES DCS system is relied upon by USGS, the U.S. Army 
Corps of Engineers to monitor and transmit information on rivers, 
reservoir levels, and snowpacks in the American West. Much of this work 
is overlaid on Landsat images to depict the extent of floods.
    Similarly, scientists at NOAA's Great Lakes Environmental Research 
Laboratory use satellites, remote sensing, buoys, and autonomous 
platforms to gather information on the Great Lakes to monitor and 
forecast the extent of harmful algal blooms. This includes the use of 
images from USGS's Landsat-8 to evaluate bloom location at a resolution 
of about 30 meters.\4\ The Minnesota Sea Grant Program has developed 
remote sensing methods that can use both Landsat and Sentinel satellite 
imagery to provide census-level colored dissolved organic matter 
measurements across the state of Minnesota, providing essential 
information for the understanding and management of lakes.\5\ 
Researchers with the Maine Sea Grant Program have also used USGS 
Landsat data to analyze the suitability of satellite data for use in 
site selection for oyster aquaculture.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    \4\ How NOAA tracks harmful algal blooms. research.noaa.gov/
article/ArtMID/587/ArticleID/2469/A-Look-Inside-How-NOAA-Tracks-
Harmful-Algal-Blooms
    \5\ Regional measurements of Minnesota's lakes using Landsat 8 
imagery. 2020. repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/34252
    \6\ Oyster aquaculture site selection using Landsat 8 derived seas 
surface temperature, turbidity, and chlorophyll-a 
repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/40053
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    In addition to its work with NASA and USGS, NOAA also has strategic 
partnerships with the Department of Defense, the U.S. aerospace 
industry, and the international satellite Earth observation community. 
NOAA benefits from and leverages its partnerships with Cooperative 
Institutes and Minority Serving Institute Cooperative Science Centers 
for research to operations to research (R2O2R) and algorithm 
development to increase the value of NOAA's satellite data in 
addressing societal challenges, such as air quality in urban areas, 
monitoring change in the urbanized coastal environment (land and 
water), and weather forecasting in complex urban areas.
    NOAA has provided essential environmental satellite data since the 
1960s and we plan to do indefinitely. We are currently actively 
planning for the next generation of satellite constellations that will 
extend into the 2050s, equipping the Nation with a high-performing and 
reliable baseline of environmental satellite information. NOAA has 
benefited from the longstanding support of the U.S. Congress to provide 
oversight and appropriations for our satellite programs. I am pleased 
to join you to discuss the importance of our next-generation satellites 
and future environmental data for our Nation.
Meeting Shared and Complementary User Needs
    At NOAA, we are continuously improving our satellite data and 
information to create products and services that meet evolving national 
and local needs and requirements. Over the past five years, even 
through the COVID-19 pandemic, NOAA has sustained meaningful 
interactions with numerous stakeholders to ensure that we understand 
the requirements of our primary users of our data services. We have 
also met with the customers of those users to understand their working 
conditions and to ensure that we provide the data in ways that address 
their downstream current and future needs.
    Every day, we see communities grappling with environmental 
challenges due to unusual or extreme events that affect their health, 
security, and economic well being. Below are some examples of regions 
and populations that benefit from observations from NOAA satellites, as 
well as severe events that are characterized by NOAA satellite 
observations. These data and information additionally benefit USGS in 
meeting its user needs. Our partnership with the academic community 
provides critical support to address emerging areas that require 
targeted and dedicated research.
    Coastal Populations. In 2020, the marine economy accounted for 
$361.4 billion, or 1.7 percent of current-dollar U.S. gross domestic 
product.\7\ The concentration of people and economic activity at the 
coasts places pressures on ecologically sensitive coastal ecosystems 
and leaves residents and visitors vulnerable to coastal hazards such as 
hurricanes, erosion, sea level rise, and harmful algal blooms. To 
better understand these threats, the NOAA Ocean Service, NESDIS, USGS, 
NASA, and other Federal and state partners are involved in joint 
projects that use digital elevation models to better protect coastal 
communities from coastal inundation and coastal flooding.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    \7\ Marine Economy Satellite Account, 2014-2020. Bureau of Economic 
Analysis. 2022
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Underserved Communities. The most severe harm from climate change 
falls disproportionately upon underserved communities--those who are 
least able to prepare for and recover from heat waves, poor air 
quality, flooding, coastal erosion, and other impacts. For example, 
through mapping of climate changes using satellite and in situ data, we 
know that African American individuals are more likely to live in areas 
with the largest projected increases in childhood asthma diagnoses and 
extreme temperature-related deaths \8\. NOAA, USGS, NASA, the 
Environmental Protection Agency, and others work collaboratively to 
ensure that forecasts and warnings reach and are understood by the most 
vulnerable citizens and communities, protecting human health. As a 
specific response to this need, we are committed to ensuring our 
websites are compliant with Section 508 of the 1973 Rehabilitation Act, 
including ensuring our information is accessible to visually and 
hearing impaired individuals.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    \8\ Climate Change and Social Vulnerability in the United States: A 
Focus on Six Impact Sectors. Environmental Protection Agency.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Farmers. Key production regions for food grains in central 
California and the central U.S. are experiencing severe drought this 
year. According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, as of August 2, 
2022, drought affected at least 45 percent of the production acreage 
for barley, cotton, rice, sorghum, winter wheat, and hay.\9\ NOAA and 
USGS, through programs such as the National Integrated Drought 
Information System, play important roles in ensuring that the 
agricultural communities have access to its Earth observed and in situ 
data to mitigate or minimize the effects of drought and aridification 
that is ongoing across the Western U.S.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    \9\ USDA summary of agricultural products affected by drought. 
USDA. August 2022.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Arctic. The warming in the Arctic is occurring at two to three 
times the global average rate and is projected to continue. Older, 
thicker sea ice that once covered the central Arctic ocean is now 
almost entirely gone.\10\ Extreme events and increasing variability 
throughout the Arctic impact the safety and wellbeing of communities 
within and far away from the Arctic and carry implications for U.S. 
national security interests.\11\ Using Landsat data, NOAA, NASA, and 
USGS scientists actively collaborate in Alaska and the Arctic region to 
better understand the climate processes that are underway and how those 
relate to changes in global weather patterns, the existence of a 
persistent ice-free Arctic, and to national security. The National 
Weather Service (NWS) uses Landsat imagery to supplement other 
satellite sources to map river ice hazards which can be responsible for 
severe flooding.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    \10\ Arctic Report Card: Update for 2021. NOAA. 2021.
    \11\ Department of Defense Arctic Strategy. DOD. 2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Wildfires. Drought and persistent heat set the stage for 
extraordinary wildfire seasons from 2020 to 2022 across many western 
states.\12\ Such a rapid increase in the number and intensity of 
wildfires has become a major threat to lives, property, public health, 
electricity supply, water resource quality, and local and regional 
economies in the western U.S. and beyond. NOAA, NASA, USGS, and other 
Federal agencies are important partners in supplying actionable 
information from our space-based assets to the wildland community to 
support the time-critical detection and active management of wildfires.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    \12\ Wildfire Climate Connection. Noaa.gov. August 2022.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Floods. Floods are the most common and widespread of all weather-
related natural disasters.\13\ In just the three months of June through 
August 2022, major flooding or flash floods occurred in six states, 
including in Death Valley National Park and Yellowstone National Park. 
Before, during, and after flooding events, NOAA, USGS, NASA, and the 
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers work in close partnership with vulnerable 
communities to address flooding and make use of digital elevation 
models to better protect communities, informing vulnerable populations 
about potential inundation. NOAA's NWS also routinely uses Landsat 
imagery to map the extent of flooding.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    \13\ Severe Weather 101. NOAA National Severe Storms Laboratory.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Heat. Heat is the leading cause of all weather-related deaths in 
the United States.\14\ In the summer of 2022, more than 150 million 
people were placed under heat warnings and advisories. As part of the 
National Integrated Heat Health Information System, NOAA launched 
Heat.gov in July 2022 to provide decision-makers and the public with 
clear, timely, and science-based information to reduce the health risks 
of extreme heat. NOAA, NASA, and USGS work closely together with 
partners at Federal, State, and local levels to support affected 
populations prepare for, endure, and recover from extreme heat events.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    \14\ Weather Related Fatality and Injury Statistics. National 
Weather Service.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Harmful Algal Blooms. Harmful algal blooms (HABs) occur when algae 
grow out of control in marine, Great Lakes, and freshwater 
environments. These HABs may produce toxic or harmful effects on 
people, infrastructure, fish, shellfish, marine mammals, and birds, and 
threaten access safe drinking water supplies. HABs have been reported 
in every U.S. coastal state, and their occurrences are on the rise, 
increasingly affecting the health of marine ecosystems and people. 
Resource managers at Federal, State, local, and Tribal levels share 
responsibilities to protect these resources and people from HAB 
hazards; data from EO satellites provides foundational data to detect 
and monitor HAB outbreaks.
    Space Weather. According to the National Research Council, disabled 
electric power grids and collateral impacts from geomagnetic storms 
could result in economic and societal costs of up to $2 trillion per 
large storm, and it could take four to ten years for full recovery of 
grids.\15\ By monitoring space weather from space using NOAA and NASA 
satellites, and USGS and National Science Foundation (NSF) ground 
assets the NWS Space Weather Prediction Center is able to warn users 
and commercial partners to safeguard these national assets from space 
weather events.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    \15\ National Research Council 2009. Severe Space Weather Events 
Understanding Societal and Economic Impacts: A Workshop Report: 
Extended Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https:/
/doi.org/10.17226/12643.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Orbital Debris. A hazard that all members of this panel face is the 
exponential rise in the amount of orbital debris that pose threats to 
orbiting spacecraft. The NOAA Office of Space Commerce is working with 
the Department of Defense, NASA, and commercial companies to stand up a 
cloud-based Open Architecture Data Repository where debris can be 
tracked and shared with all space operators.
    NOAA is helping to meet these challenges through the provision of 
trusted and validated data and information as well as user-ready 
products and services. The scope of the challenge is enormous, and NOAA 
must innovate to meet the need, leverage new technological solutions, 
develop broader business models and partnerships with public and 
private sectors, and demonstrate organizational agility to adjust to 
changing needs, opportunities, and risks. We must do this all while 
meeting our critical mission to deliver environmental observations 
without interruption.
    The increasing number of extreme events and increasing risks of 
harm to communities from those events necessitates enhanced information 
to meet this challenge. We need to monitor fire events with better 
resolution and more rapid response, to observe and forecast water 
quality and HABs with better resolution and forecasting, and to monitor 
and predict the intensification and trajectory of hurricanes, 
tornadoes, and derechos better and faster. Our communities need better 
information that is designed and scaled to meet their local and 
specific needs in light of increased extreme weather events and 
environmental changes. New technologies, developed by the commercial 
sector and often demonstrated by NASA research satellites through 
direct cooperation with NOAA, must be integrated into NOAA's next-
generation satellite architecture to enable us to more completely 
deliver to users the most impactful observations and data.
NOAA's Next-Generation Satellite Architecture
    NOAA's next-generation satellite programs will provide enhanced 
observations into the 2050s to meet increasing and evolving needs, 
contributing both continuous and innovative environmental information 
to diverse end users. NOAA will also modernize its information systems 
architecture by including seamless integration of NOAA and partner 
satellite data and in situ, ship, plane, and drone observations from 
our internal NOAA partners, and from a growing community of commercial 
providers. Developing these next-generation satellites takes a decade 
or longer from concept to launch and full deployment, but we are 
committed to and excited about this work.
    In recognition of societal needs to adapt to and mitigate the 
effects of extreme weather and various hazards, NOAA's next-generation 
satellites will include advanced imagers that are relied upon to detect 
a wide range of hazards such as hurricanes, floods, and wildland fires. 
Harnessing the advances in high performance computing, artificial 
intelligence/machine learning, and the cloud, NOAA will provide 
additional capabilities to process and deliver data and information to 
users such as communities, emergency managers, and city planners to 
inform their activities and actions.
    The requirement to sense the atmosphere for temperature, pressure, 
and water vapor input for weather and environmental numerical models 
remains one of NOAA's top priorities for its next-generation systems. 
To provide needed protections to coastal communities, NOAA plans to add 
an ocean color imager in geostationary orbit that will complement and 
vastly augment capabilities in the polar orbit to detect harmful algal 
blooms. The capabilities from NOAA's satellites are relied upon by 
NASA, USGS, many other Federal and state agencies, and the commercial 
sector.
    Definition of the next-generation satellite programs is underway, 
and definitive life cycle costs have not been finalized. Arriving at 
approved program scopes and final life cycle costs, along with the 
relevant technological review assessments, will be done in close 
coordination and consultation with NASA and the Department of 
Commerce's Office of Acquisition Management.
    NOAA's 2014-2017 Satellite Observing System Architecture study 
evaluated alternative architectures for its next-generation missions. 
The study indicated key takeaways for consideration in NOAA's next-
generation satellite constellation plans including an integrated system 
of observations from NOAA and international and commercial partners. 
NOAA is using this comprehensive assessment to guide the design and 
development framework for the future architecture, and continues to 
develop NOAA's next-generation plans based on new information and 
resource constraints.
    Our next-generation plans are also informed by our space 
engineering experience over past decades, such as the successes of the 
GOES-R Series and JPSS programs, the experiences of our domestic and 
international partners, and the U.S. commercial space sector. These 
lessons learned and coordination activities are focused on delivering 
reliable and continuous data and information for users.
    NOAA relies on the U.S. aerospace industry for support throughout 
the lifecycle of satellite acquisition-from instrument and spacecraft 
bus development to launch vehicle and services to development and 
deployment of the antennas and ground systems. As NOAA works with 
industry, it is increasingly assessing the ability of commercially 
provided data to fill specific mission requirements. Through the 
Commercial Data Program, NOAA has purchased radio occultation data that 
are currently being integrated into its weather forecast models. As the 
commercial sector demonstrates the ability to deliver data that meet 
NOAA mission requirements, we will continue to engage and acquire these 
commercially-based data as part of our overall next generation 
satellite architecture plans.
Implementing NOAA's Next-Generation Satellite Architecture
    To best facilitate user needs across orbits and observations, 
NOAA's next-generation satellite architecture includes three 
portfolios: geostationary observations, low Earth orbit, and space 
weather observations (see Figure 1).
    The next-generation architecture also includes an evolved support 
system to operate the satellites and use the data. This includes 
supporting our satellite operators while integrating more and varied 
observing system elements. It also involves evolving the ground 
infrastructure into a system that supports all satellites and ensures 
the data are reliable and shareable. We will transform the ``bits and 
bytes'' received from around the world into timely, actionable, and 
reliable environmental information and create new data products and 
services. NOAA's future architecture will also ensure the quality, 
accuracy, and preservation of the Nation's historical environmental 
data archives while augmenting this vast repository with new datasets, 
merged products, and integrated observations from NOAA, U.S., and 
global observing systems.
[GRAPHIC NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]

    Figure 1: Notional Flyout of NOAA's Next-Generation Satellites

    Geostationary Observations. NOAA's geostationary Earth orbiting 
(GEO) satellites provide the only continuous observations of weather 
and hazardous environmental conditions over the Western Hemisphere--
from the eastern Atlantic to the western Pacific and from the Arctic 
Circle to the southern tip of South America. Information generated from 
our GOES system helps protect the lives and property of the one billion 
people who live and work in the Western Hemisphere with continuous, 
near-real-time observations and warnings.
    NOAA's Geostationary Extended Observations (GeoXO) program is the 
next generation of GEO capabilities that will enable the continuous 
improvement of terrestrial weather prediction and warning, and will 
provide information enabling better climate adaptation and mitigation, 
healthy oceans, and resilient coastal communities and economies. As the 
follow-on program to the current GOES-R Series, GeoXO will provide 
continuity of critical geostationary data with its first launch in 2032 
and planned observations through 2055. Due to the significant 
capabilities proposed, GeoXO is our largest investment through the 
2030s, and due to the criticality of providing continuous observations, 
GeoXO has an aggressive 11-year development schedule.
    The GeoXO pre-formulation phase included extensive, direct outreach 
to thousands of end users in many dozens of organizations as well as 
observation value assessments. It also included Observational System 
Simulation Experiments, an analysis of observations relative to the 
NOAA mission service areas, and consultation with the NOAA Observing 
System Council to define future observational needs and select the 
recommended payload instruments for GeoXO. End users require continuity 
of existing observations for short-term forecasting, severe weather 
watches and warnings, and monitoring of a range of hazardous 
environmental conditions such as tropical storms, lightning and winds, 
flooding, snow, wildfires, volcanic ash, and others. Current and future 
instruments in NOAA's GEO support NOAA's weather mission with essential 
information to notify and protect people and property across the 
country. These observations, together with the 50-year record of GOES 
observations, also provide an essential climatological data record 
supporting NOAA and national climate analyses and a range of climate 
products and services.
    Following outreach to users on their satellite data needs, NOAA is 
now conducting industry studies to evaluate the technology readiness 
and costs of potential new instruments.

   A hyperspectral infrared sounder promises to improve 
        localized forecasts and nowcasting by enhancing weather 
        forecasting models,\16\ which is critical as extreme weather 
        events including storms, tornados, and hurricanes become more 
        frequent and more severe.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    \16\ Geostationary Extended Observations (GeoXO) Hyperspectral 
InfraRed Sounder Value Assessment Report. 2021. 
repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/32921

   An atmospheric composition instrument could provide a new 
        platform to monitor air quality, track transport and dispersion 
        of hazardous emissions (volcanic, smoke, chemical, and 
        radioactive), and monitor greenhouse gasses.\17\ Air pollution 
        results in at least 100,000 premature deaths and nearly $1 
        Trillion in damages each year in our Nation.\18\ GeoXO's 
        atmospheric composition capabilities could improve the guidance 
        that NOAA provides every day to national, state, and local 
        environmental authorities who issue pollution alerts.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    \17\ A Value Assessment of an Atmospheric Composition Capability on 
the NOAA Next-Generation Geostationary and Extended Orbits (GEO-XO) 
Missions. 2020. repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/27224
    \18\ Goodkind, A. L., Tessum, C. W., Coggins, J. S., Hill, J. D., 
Marshall, J. D. (2019) Fine-scale damage estimates of particulate 
matter air pollution reveal opportunities for location-specific 
mitigation of emissions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 116(18), 8775-8780.

   A geostationary ocean color instrument could complement 
        instruments in low Earth orbit to expand NOAA's ocean observing 
        system to support the blue economy, increase coastal 
        resilience, and help enable NOAA's oceans, coastal, and 
        fisheries services. This information is also valuable to other 
        non-federal users to better assess ocean productivity and 
        health, ecosystem change, aquaculture and fisheries management, 
        coastal and inland water quality, seafood safety, and hazards 
        such as harmful algal blooms. Economic analyses estimate the 
        health effects of HABs at over $1 billion per year and that 
        more timely and precise forecasts have potential to reduce the 
        duration fisheries must be closed to avoid seafood 
        poisoning.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    \19\ The Value of Geostationary Ocean Color. 2021. 
repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/33278

    GEO satellites allow near real time data sharing partnerships that 
provide global benefit for weather forecasting and environmental 
monitoring activities. GEO data will be leveraged in innovative global 
inputs that supplement low Earth orbiting (LEO) observations. NOAA 
observations will be matched with similar satellite missions deployed 
in the same period by the European Organisation for the Exploitation of 
Meteorological Satellites (EUMETSAT) over Europe and by the Japanese 
Meteorological Agency and Korean Meteorological Agency over the western 
Pacific and Asia, to create a GEO ring of observations. These combined 
observations will provide global data sets for use by NOAA and our 
international partners to meet global modeling system and mission 
service needs. NOAA has previously benefited from acquisition 
efficiencies, just as other partners have utilized U.S. instrument 
vendors to meet their own mission needs.
    Low Earth Orbit. LEO satellites from NOAA, NASA, and international 
partners provide a half century of unbroken climate data records and 
are the backbone of global weather forecasting models. These satellites 
detect and monitor hazards such as fires, droughts, floods, poor air 
quality, coral bleaching events, unhealthy coastal waters, and others. 
NOAA itself collects about half of the LEO data we use every day to 
meet our ongoing mission needs with the balance provided by our 
interagency and international partners. NOAA satellites in the LEO 
portfolio will supplement, and eventually replace, the current JPSS 
satellites.
    The next generation of NOAA LEO satellites will leverage commercial 
space capabilities for increased flexibility. Together with NOAA's 
fleet and aircraft observations, NOAA's LEO satellite data will support 
the missions of all NOAA services including weather forecasting, 
fisheries management, ocean and coastal monitoring, and the research 
that supports these activities.
    For accurate forecasts, weather models integrate measurements from 
microwave (MW), infrared (IR), and radio occultation (RO) sounders on 
polar satellites. These observations are especially important in polar 
regions where geostationary and in situ observational data are sparse. 
For example, JPSS provides critical data for nearly all weather 
forecasting in Alaska, and this is critical for aviation and the 
maritime industry. Ozone measurements also track the contours of the 
ozone layer and the extent of stratospheric ozone. Improved MW, IR, and 
RO soundings with more frequent observations and better spatial and 
vertical resolution have the potential to improve modeling and allow 
for higher-resolution short-and long-term weather forecasts.
    A distributed constellation of satellites will provide greater 
diversity in data needed by the weather forecast models to cover all 
facets of the event under investigation, a resilient system less 
susceptible to individual satellite failures, and a higher refresh rate 
for measurements, which enables higher-accuracy weather forecasts and 
improvements in other key applications.
    NOAA's next-generation LEO satellites would also provide vital data 
for wind speed, sea surface temperature, and ocean color. Hyperspectral 
ocean color imagery at improved spatial resolution would improve our 
understanding of harmful algal blooms and phytoplankton dynamics to 
give managers tools to mitigate economic impacts. The LEO observations 
would complement similar ocean color observations from geostationary 
orbit. NOAA is working with NASA to assess and integrate the upcoming 
Plankton, Aerosol, Cloud, ocean Ecosystem (PACE) mission observations 
into our mission services, an example of research for operational use. 
Enhanced atmospheric composition sensors for methane, carbon dioxide, 
sulfur dioxide, ozone, nitrogen dioxide, carbon monoxide, and other 
pollutants will enable more timely and accurate forecasts of air 
quality hazards and allow NOAA to assess climate change both granularly 
and holistically. It is important to note that this increased amount 
and diversity of data going into forecast models may also require the 
models using the data to adapt and increase their computing power.
    NOAA's next-generation satellite architecture for the LEO program 
serves users by collecting and delivering the following global 
observations: MW soundings and imagery, hyperspectral IR soundings, RO 
soundings, visible-IR imaging including day-night band imagery, 
measurements of atmospheric composition including ozone, ocean surface 
winds, ocean color, radio detection and ranging imagery, 3D winds, and 
ocean surface height. NOAA will continue to evaluate and prioritize 
these data demands as we scope the program.
    Space Weather Observations. Space weather observations aid in 
safeguarding fundamental power grid infrastructure, civil aviation, and 
on-orbit assets and astronauts. Building on the Space Weather Follow-On 
program, the Space Weather Next (SW Next) program will reliably provide 
critical space weather products and services to observe and identify 
this hazard and support the needs of diverse users across the U.S. and 
around the globe. These users will include the electric power and 
airline industries, utility and telecommunications companies, 
commercial and government satellite operators, U.S. and foreign 
governments, and the space weather research and academic communities.
    Observations from NOAA's SW Next program will be combined with 
complementary data collected by Federal and international partners and 
will be processed through NOAA's Office of Satellite Ground Services to 
provide the necessary information flow for space weather forecasts. 
This data and information flow will enable NOAA's Space Weather 
Prediction Center (SWPC), the Office of Space Commerce, and other 
operational users to deliver actionable information that protects 
critical power grid infrastructure and civil aviation, and provides 
essential space situational awareness.
    SW Next will maintain and extend space weather observations from a 
range of different observing points, selected to most efficiently 
provide the comprehensive knowledge of the sun and the near-earth space 
environment. These observation points could include LEO, GEO, highly 
elliptical orbit, and Lagrange Point 1 (L1) and Lagrange Point 5 (L5) 
orbits. As an initial step, NOAA has signed an agreement with the 
European Space Agency (ESA) to collaborate on a space weather mission 
flying at L5. NOAA will provide a coronagraph, ESA will provide the 
spacecraft, other instruments, and operations, and both Agencies will 
exploit the observations for science and operations. These observations 
will provide near-real-time coronal mass ejection imagery, solar wind, 
solar imaging, coronal imagery, solar wind parameters, magnetospheric 
particles, and ionosphere parameters, and other relevant observations 
required to support space weather forecasts provided by SWPC.
    This work supports space weather forecasts as authorized by the 
Promoting Research and Observations of Space Weather to Improve the 
Forecasting of Tomorrow (PROSWIFT) Act (P.L. 116-181), with the 
leadership and support of this Committee, and as driven by the National 
Space Weather Strategy and Action Plan (March 2019). Several 
complementary projects within SW Next will provide continuity and 
resiliency of space weather observations from multiple orbits with 
launches in the 2020s, early 2030s, and onward. Just as with our LEO 
portfolio, it is important to note that this increase in the amount and 
diversity of the data must be accompanied by improvements in our space 
environment and weather models, requiring the models to adapt and 
increase their resolution and available computing power.
    Space weather observations are needed from a multitude of orbit 
views, so NOAA is pursuing partnerships to augment the SW Next 
architecture. This year for the first time, NOAA is working with NASA 
and the NSF to engage the National Academy of Science, Engineering and 
Medicine (NASEM) to complete the Decadal Survey for Solar and Space 
Physics 2024-2033. NOAA will use the NASEM recommendations to inform 
its observing system decisions, and to improve coordination with NASA 
and the NSF while addressing combined observational objectives. In 
addition, SW Next is developing a methodology to understand the impacts 
of observational capabilities on user needs such as alerts, watches, 
and warnings. We are engaging with users to better understand how our 
products and services support end-user decision-making. This process 
will aid in prioritizing NOAA program requirements and in assessing 
potential economic and societal benefits. The SW Next program is 
evaluating its alternatives to determine the most cost-effective 
architecture to meet user needs and will continue to leverage user 
engagement to identify and prioritize user needs across the enterprise.
Conclusion
    NOAA's next-generation satellite architecture provides the 
environmental space-based observations needed for critical weather 
forecasts and to meet the growing needs of the Nation in a changing 
environment. NOAA's integrated next-generation observing system will 
leverage new and existing technologies and partnerships at all levels, 
and will combine data from various sources, allowing us to deliver 
significantly improved products and services to our users. The urgency 
of our changing environment requires action now to better fulfill 
NOAA's essential mission to protect lives, property, critical 
infrastructure, and our economy.
    The challenges our Nation and planet face demand the continued 
partnership of Federal agencies, each of which brings longstanding 
expertise in our respective areas. Alongside and in cooperation with 
the commercial sector's activities, academia, international partners, 
and investments in NASA, USGS, and NOAA's next-generation satellites 
will allow us all to better serve the Nation.

    Senator Hickenlooper. Great, great. Thank you, Dr. Volz. 
Now we will move over to Dr. Calvin.

    STATEMENT OF DR. KATE CALVIN, CHIEF SCIENTIST, NATIONAL 
              AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

    Dr. Calvin. Thank you. When we look down at earth from 
space, we see this amazing, indescribable, beautiful planet. It 
looks like a living, breathing organism. These are the words of 
Astronaut Ron Garan, who spent 6 months looking down at Earth 
from the International Space Station in 2011. They capture how 
inspiring it is to observe the Earth from space.
    In the years ahead, we will need Earth observations more 
than ever for science and for inspiration. Earth observations 
are key to helping society understand and effectively respond 
to changes in climate and are increasingly used in a range of 
societal applications.
    NASA's launch of the first Landsat satellite in 1972 marked 
the start of a continuous record of land measurements from 
space that continues unbroken to this day.
    Today, NASA operates a fleet of over two dozen satellites 
and instruments on the International Space Station. Earth 
observations from space are the foundation of much of what we 
know about our planet as a system.
    Earth observing satellites, like NASA's long running Terra, 
Aqua, and Aura satellites, and the more recent GRACE follow on, 
ICESat-2 and Sentinel 6-Michael Freilich have measured changes 
in vegetation, carbon dioxide, the mass of ice sheets, sea 
level, and much more.
    Earth observations are also a foundation for a range of 
applications, including weather prediction, disaster response 
and recovery, wildfire response, land use planning, water 
resource monitoring, agricultural support, food security, air 
quality monitoring, and aviation safety.
    For example, OpenET is an application that uses publicly 
available NASA, USGS Landsat data to provide information to 
farmers and ranchers can use to estimate the amount of water 
being taken up on their fields or used by their crops. And this 
information gives them--this water will usually need to be 
replaced through irrigation or rainfall, so this enables them 
to use water more efficiently and better plan irrigation.
    NASA continues to lead by innovating the state-of-the-art 
in remote sensing technologies and following scientific needs 
to bring new types of Earth observations into existence. We 
will soon launch the surface water and ocean topography, or 
SWOT mission, which will improve our understanding of oceans 
and terrestrial surface waters, including providing the first 
global survey of water running through rivers and lakes.
    We are also formulating the Earth System Observatory, a set 
of satellites, instruments, and missions that when complete 
will provide a more comprehensive view of the planet. When 
combined with SWOT and PACE missions, the Earth System 
Observatory will measure all major components of the Earth 
system, including the human Earth interface.
    NASA continues to innovate in measuring and monitoring of 
greenhouse gases from space. With the carbon dioxide 
monitoring, OCO-2 and OCO-3 satellites, NASA's EMIT mission has 
demonstrated the capability of detecting the presence of 
methane, a potent greenhouse gas. In the data that EMIT has 
collected since being installed on the International Space 
Station this July, we have identified more than 50 super 
emitters globally.
    NASA also announced earlier this year a new contract for 
commercial data acquisition with GHGSat, that which uses 
satellites to identify methane emissions. Following in the 
footsteps of NASA's other commercial data vendors, including 
Planet, Maxar, and Spire, GHGSat will provide their data to 
NASA for evaluation to determine the utility for advancing 
NASA's science and application goals.
    NASA plays an essential role in supporting the continuity 
of Earth observations through its expertise in flight programs 
and integrating innovation into new satellite architectures, 
partnering with NOAA and USGS. We launched GOES-T and JPSS-2 
this year and look forward to GeoXO and the low earth orbit 
architectures.
    Landsat Next is just entering formulation. We also merge 
interagency and international data to allow the 
characterization of short term variability and long term trends 
in things like radiation, ozone, and aerosols.
    As part of a growing emphasis on providing actionable data 
and information to a broad range of users, NASA is planning to 
launch an Earth Information Center. This Earth Information 
Center will provide a wide range of Earth data and information 
to the public and stakeholders.
    But the initial focus will be on prototyping capabilities 
for greenhouse gas monitoring and information system that will 
integrate data from a variety of sources with a goal of making 
greenhouse gas data more accessible and usable to policymakers, 
researchers, and even students.
    And as always, we thank you, Congress, for your support of 
NASA's Earth Science. We thank you for the opportunity to share 
this exciting work we are doing to advance Earth observation 
and maximize its impact, and we look forward to your questions.
    [The prepared statement of Dr. Calvin follows:]

        Prepared Statement of Dr. Kate Calvin, Chief Scientist, 
             National Aeronautics and Space Administration
INTRODUCTION
    ``When we look down at Earth from space, we see this amazing, 
indescribable, beautiful planet. It looks like a living, breathing 
organism.'' These are the words of astronaut Ron Garan, who spent six 
months looking down at Earth from the International Space Station in 
2011. They capture how inspiring it is to observe Earth from space. 
Garan is one of many NASA astronauts whose relationship with our home 
planet has been transformed by his time in space. When people see our 
Earth as a blue marble from space, they see it is finite, fragile, and 
interconnected.
    Space is the best vantage point we have for both seeing and 
studying our changing planet. Earth observations gathered from space 
are the basis for so much of the scientific data and information that 
tells us what we know about Earth and how it is changing. In the years 
ahead, we will need Earth observations more than ever, for science and 
for inspiration, as we grapple with the growing impacts of climate 
change on our planet. Earth observations are key to helping society 
understand and effectively respond to changes in climate and are 
increasingly used in a range of societal applications.
Earth Observations as the Foundation
    NASA has been observing and measuring Earth from space for over 60 
years, beginning with the launch of the world's first dedicated Earth 
Science mission in 1960. The TIROS-1 weather satellite only lasted 78 
days, but it was a precursor mission to today's Earth observing 
satellites. Twelve years later, NASA's launch of the first Landsat 
satellite in 1972 marked the start of a continuous record of land 
measurements from space that continues unbroken to this day. Fast-
forward to 2022 and there are over 1,000 Earth observing satellites in 
orbit today, with more being launched each month. These satellites have 
different capabilities, sizes, and architectures, and are hosted and 
operated by a range of entities, including other U.S. government 
agencies, other governments, and a growing private sector.
    Through decades of Earth observing missions and innovation, NASA 
started a revolution and laid the groundwork for the golden age of 
Earth observations we see ourselves in today. Today, NASA operates a 
fleet of over two dozen Earth observing satellites and instruments 
hosted on the International Space Station (ISS). We continue to push 
the state-of-the-art in Earth remote sensing from space and take 
critical measurements of nearly every component and constituent of the 
changing Earth. We also build and launch environmental satellites for 
our Federal agency partner NOAA, and we work in close partnership with 
USGS through the interagency Sustainable Land Imaging program to 
design, develop, and launch USGS' Landsat series of land imaging 
satellites. And NASA is pleased to see the success of an industry we 
have supported emerging as a robust partner across a number of areas 
related to earth observation. .
    Earth observations from space are the foundation of much of what we 
know about our Earth systems. Datasets from Earth observing satellites 
like NASA's long-running Terra, Aqua, and Aura satellites and the more 
recently launched Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE-FO), 
ICESat-2, and Sentinel 6-Michael Freilich, underpin climate research, 
and they are key to developing and testing and verifying Earth system 
models.
    We also work with people on the ground around the world to solve 
problems as they unfold. Earth observations are the foundation for a 
range of applications, including weather prediction, disaster response 
and recovery, wildfire response, land use planning, water resource 
monitoring, agricultural support, food security, air quality 
monitoring, and aviation safety. For example, OpenET is a program that 
uses publicly available NASA-USGS Landsat data to provide information 
to farmers and ranchers on evapotranspiration, so they can estimate the 
amount of water being taken up or used by their fields and crops and 
that will usually need to be replaced through irrigation or rainfall. 
This enables them to use water more efficiently and better plan 
irrigation.
    Together with our other government partners, we are measuring, 
studying, and informing the world about our changing Earth. We are 
disseminating the data and knowledge collected for the benefit of 
humankind. And we are researching the new technologies and paving the 
way for the next generation of Earth observation missions. Our latest 
endeavor is NASA's Earth System Observatory (ESO), a series of missions 
in development that will launch later this decade that will give us a 
3D holistic view of the changing globe.
Innovating the Next Generation of Earth Observations
    The ESO responds to the top recommendations from the National 
Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine's 2017 Earth Science 
and Applications from Space Decadal Survey, including missions 
targeting the Academies' priorities for observation: aerosols, clouds, 
convection and precipitation; mass change, surface biology and geology, 
and surface deformation and change. Formulation activities are underway 
for the first four major ESO missions targeting these designated 
observables. NASA just received recommendations from an ESO Independent 
Review Board (IRB), which took a close look at ESO's science goals, 
management and programmatic structures, and preliminary mission 
architectures. The IRB reviewed technical concepts formulated by NASA 
for the ESO to ensure their robustness, considered the ESO's ability to 
achieve NASA's plans, and checked to ensure lessons learned regarding 
large missions were incorporated into this effort.
    In October, NASA announced the first mission opportunity within the 
new Earth System Explorer Program, another priority from the 2017 
Decadal Survey. For the Earth Explorer missions, NASA is seeking 
submissions of proposals for a medium-sized PI-led mission that will 
investigate one or more targeted observables identified by the Decadal 
Survey. With a focused programmatic scope, Explorer missions can be 
developed relatively quickly and complement the science goals of the 
larger Earth System Observatory. They will allow investigators to 
propose gathering high priority observations, including, for example, 
greenhouse gases, that are not part of the ESO suite of missions.
    NASA continues to innovate in the measuring and monitoring of 
greenhouse gases from space, building on the legacy of our Orbiting 
Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) and OCO-3 missions, which are able to 
measure vertical columns of carbon dioxide concentrations in Earth's 
atmosphere and track how CO2 concentrations vary globally 
and how they are changing over time. NASA's new Earth Surface Mineral 
Dust Source Investigation (EMIT) mission, which launched successfully 
in July, has demonstrated the crucial capability of detecting the 
presence of methane, a potent greenhouse gas. Since July, the EMIT 
science team has identified more than 50 methane super-emitters 
globally.
    NASA also announced earlier this year a new contract for commercial 
data acquisition with GHGSat, Inc., of Canada, which uses satellites to 
collect methane and carbon dioxide measurements that can help identify 
greenhouse gas sinks and sources. Following in the footsteps of NASA's 
other commercial data vendors, including Planet, Maxar, and Spire, 
GHGSat will provide their data to NASA for evaluation to determine the 
utility for advancing NASA's science and application goals.
    The data and information provided by EMIT, commercial missions like 
GHGSat, and future missions like these, can help decision-makers better 
identify, understand, and address methane emissions.
Ensuring Continuity of the Global Climate Record
    With a number of NASA's flagship Earth research satellite missions, 
including Terra, Aqua, and Aura, reaching end-of-life over the next few 
years, an important ongoing conversation has emerged across the Earth 
observations community about how to ensure the continuity of the data 
provided by missions on which the research and applications communities 
have relied for decades. These conversations include questions about 
the roles that other Federal agencies, as well as our international 
partners, and private sector, can play.
    With a new budget line in the FY 2023 Budget, NASA is pursuing key 
climate continuity measurements and advancing open science by 
leveraging cutting edge data science techniques. In addition, the first 
Earth Venture Continuity (EVC) mission, Libera, was selected in 
February 2020 and will maintain the 40-year data record of the balance 
between the solar radiation entering Earth's atmosphere and the amount 
absorbed, reflected, and emitted. NASA plans to announce an opportunity 
and solicit proposals for a second EVC mission in 2023.
    NASA plays an essential role in supporting continuity of data 
records provided by our interagency partners' satellites, including in 
building and launching NOAA's environmental satellites, on a 
reimbursable basis for NOAA, and helping develop future satellite 
architectures for both NOAA and USGS. NASA develops and maintains 
critical continuity data records using reprocessed NOAA operational 
satellite measurements merged with those of NASA and other agency and 
international partners, allowing detection and characterization of both 
short-term variability and long-term trends in essential quantities, 
such as Earth radiation, ozone, and aerosol concentrations. NASA 
provides flight program management expertise and a focus on innovation 
to partnered missions, driving Federal science through new approaches 
and observation technologies.
    For example, NASA has been working closely with USGS to finalize 
the next-generation system architecture for the Landsat Next satellite 
and will begin formulation activities for the mission activities 
shortly. NASA's goal has been striking a balance between incorporating 
the latest land imaging technologies with ensuring Landsat's continuous 
long-term record of land imagery and data within the budget that the 
Administration and Congress can provide. Landsat Next, now expected to 
launch as a ``triplet'' configuration of three platforms, will join 
Landsat 8 and Landsat 9 on orbit in adding to the continuous long-term 
record of land imaging that began with the first Landsat in 1972.
    We also expect to expand our commercial interaction working with 
the private sector to add their capabilities to our own to benefit 
American citizens. NASA's pioneering data purchases have allowed us to 
see what small commercial satellite operators can provide now and what 
they might in the future, as well as better set the terms of future 
procurements and licensing of data for science. We hope our work in 
this area will support this industry as it grows.
Earth Observations for Earth Action
    As part of a growing emphasis on providing actionable data and 
information to a broad range of users, NASA is planning to launch an 
Earth Information Center (EIC) next year. The EIC will provide a wide 
range of Earth and climate data and information to the public and 
stakeholders, but the initial focus will be on prototyping capabilities 
for a greenhouse gas monitoring and information system that will 
integrate data from a variety of sources with a goal of making GHG data 
more accessible and usable to Federal, State, and local governments, 
researchers, the public, and other users.
    To implement this effort NASA is collaborating with other agencies 
including the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to enhance 
greenhouse gas monitoring and make greenhouse gas data more accessible 
to a broad range of users. NASA will work jointly with other agencies 
to develop the greenhouse gas monitoring and information system. The 
greenhouse gas monitoring and information system will support regular 
updates to national gridded greenhouse gas anthropogenic activity-based 
data. The system will also combine EPA's anthropogenic emission data 
with atmospheric-based data on natural emissions and fluxes, and enable 
the identification and quantification of emissions from large anomalous 
events, leveraging aircraft and satellite data.
    Through open-source science, NASA provides knowledge, resources, 
tools, and technologies to benefit humanity. This provides 
opportunities for those outside of NASA to create new applications 
using NASA observations, as well as leverage existing applications. For 
instance, it can help other government agencies or NGOs as they address 
societal or environmental challenges and make decisions in a range of 
sectors. NASA is also continuing to improve our engagement with the 
public on Earth Science and share information about our planet that can 
only be fully unlocked by observing it. NASA is also innovating its 
partnerships, with the goal of exploring new paths to applications and 
impact. NASA capabilities mean opportunities for engagement with a wide 
range of sectors, from agriculture to oil and gas. We are looking at 
ways to engage with philanthropies, state agencies, and to connect with 
citizens broadly through open science as well as targeting our outreach 
through the lens of environmental justice.
CONCLUSION
    Increasingly, we see our work in Earth observations through the 
lens of its importance to global climate change. Each climate tipping 
point presents its own multi-faceted ecological or societal challenge. 
For each, we ask how science and Earth observations can inform 
responses, by individuals, nations, and the world. The global climate 
observing system from space is critical because only from space can we 
track the status over time of each of these climate tipping points and 
other Earth system changes holistically all around the world. Our 
monitoring could provide the first and most clear warning signs that a 
climate tipping point is near or has been reached.
    And as always, we look to Congress for guidance on priorities and 
partnerships, noting congressional interest in science relating to 
everything we do. We thank you for this opportunity to share something 
of our approach to Earth observation and look forward to your 
questions.

    Senator Hickenlooper. Thank you, Dr. Calvin. Mr. Jablonsky.

 STATEMENT OF DANIEL JABLONSKY, PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE 
                  OFFICER, MAXAR TECHNOLOGIES

    Mr. Jablonsky. Chairman Hickenlooper, Ranking Member 
Lummis, Chair Cantwell, Ranking Member Wicker, and esteemed 
members of the Subcommittee on Space and Science, thank you for 
holding this hearing to discuss the important topic of Earth 
observation in honor of 50 years of Landsat.
    My name is Dan Jablonsky, and I am the President and CEO of 
Maxar Technologies. I have been a part of the Earth observation 
industry for just over a decade, and before joining the private 
sector, I was a surface warfare officer and nuclear engineer in 
the U.S. Navy. I am honored to be here today.
    Maxar, based in Westminster, Colorado, is a leader in 
commercial earth intelligence and space technology, solutions, 
and a proud long standing partner to the U.S. Government and 
the commercial industry.
    Maxar owns and operates a fleet of very high resolution 
earth observation satellites and soon will be launching 
WorldView Legion, our next generation Earth observation 
satellites and the first to be built in-house.
    After the passage of the Land Remote Sensing Policy Act of 
1992, we were granted the first commercial Earth Observation 
License, opening the door to the Earth observation industry. 
Since then, satellite imagery has become integral to everyday 
life.
    Earth observation capabilities identify, monitor, and 
address problems that impact the security and economic well-
being of every American. For example, Earth observation data 
helps with natural disaster relief and recovery.
    Using imagery from satellites and analytical techniques, we 
can help forecast potential damage and point on the ground 
response teams to locations efficiently, identifying areas that 
have been damaged by hurricanes, provide precision 3D mapping 
to optimize relief efforts, and across vast stretches of public 
and private lands help responders identify and fight wildfires. 
Earth observation applications also unlock commerce and 
mobility.
    Geospatial data is the bedrock for many businesses and 
applications that generate significant value for the economy. 
For example, Google Maps uses Maxar satellite images to not 
only help users navigate the world, but also to locate and find 
their way to local businesses, offices, schools, and all other 
types of locations.
    In more recent years, the commercial, remote sensing 
industry has been exploring ways to go beyond the pixel. 
Machine learning, autonomous change detection, and object 
identification are helping decisionmakers get to answers 
quicker.
    At Maxar, we are pushing the edge on 3D mapping, taking our 
images and making them three dimensional, ushering in a new era 
of insight, augmented reality, and immersive experiences. 
Critically, the commercial sector is advancing U.S. leadership 
in space. Commercial satellite support crucial civil and 
national security missions. As we look to the future of our 
industry, we must also look to space sustainability.
    I thank Senators Hickenlooper, Lummis, Cantwell, and Wicker 
for introducing the ORBITS Act, a great step in protecting and 
maintaining a sustainable space environment for the future. I 
support this effort and look forward to working with you to 
find new commercial solutions to solve today's most challenging 
problems.
    Maxar stands ready to do its part to help build a 
sustainable space environment and usher in the next 50 years of 
Earth observation advancements. Thank you to the Subcommittee 
for holding this hearing, and the opportunity to speak to you 
on this important topic.
    I am happy to answer any questions you have at this time.
    [The prepared statement of Mr. Jablonsky follows:]

 Prepared Statement of Daniel Jablonsky, President and Chief Executive 
                      Officer, Maxar Technologies
    Chairman Hickenlooper, Ranking Member Lummis, full Committee Chair 
Cantwell and Ranking Member Wicker, and esteemed Members of the 
Subcommittee on Space and Science:

    Thank you for holding this hearing to discuss the important topic 
of Earth observation in honor of 50 years of Landsat. My name is Dan 
Jablonsky, and I am the President and CEO of Maxar Technologies, a role 
in which I have served in since January 2019. I have been a part of the 
remote sensing industry for the past decade and before joining the 
private sector, I was a surface warfare officer and nuclear engineer in 
the U.S. Navy. I am honored to be a part of this hearing today.
About Maxar
    Maxar is a leader in commercial Earth intelligence and space 
technology solutions and a trusted, end-to-end partner to the U.S. 
government and the commercial industry. As a U.S. company with 
locations across the country, Maxar designs, manufactures, and operates 
communications and Earth observation satellites; space exploration 
spacecraft; solar electric propulsion systems; on-orbit satellite 
servicing vehicles; and robotics for ongoing space operations and 
exploration.
    In 1993, the U.S. Department of Commerce granted WorldView Imaging 
Company, later known as DigitalGlobe, a legacy Maxar company, the first 
license for commercial Earth observation from space. Maxar's Earth 
observation satellites have provided imagery to support critical 
national security and disaster response missions ever since. Most 
recent examples include intelligence related to the war in Ukraine and 
damage assessments to support recovery efforts related to Hurricanes 
Fiona, Ian, and Nicole. We are proud to serve as a trusted partner to 
the U.S. government--providing data-driven insights, analysis, and 
recommendations, delivering current, high-resolution satellite imagery, 
and enabling 3D data for analysts and decision makers to better 
monitor, understand, and respond to current events, deter threats, and 
ensure national and global security.
    For more than 60 years, Maxar has supported U.S. leadership in 
space, manufacturing more than 280 spacecraft, supporting numerous 
civil space missions including the National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration's (NASA) upcoming Tropospheric Emissions: Monitoring of 
Pollution (TEMPO) mission.
    Additionally, we operate, and for the past 20 years have operated, 
the most advanced constellation of commercial Earth imaging satellites 
in the world. We are headquartered in Westminster, Colorado, and have a 
dedicated workforce of over 4,000 across the country including at our 
facilities in California, Florida, Michigan, Missouri, Virginia, and 
Puerto Rico.
Landsat at 50
    We are here today to mark the 50th anniversary of the launch of the 
first satellite in the Landsat series by the U.S. Geological Survey 
(USGS) and NASA in 1972. The fifty-year archive of Landsat observations 
has supplied invaluable, empirical evidence that has helped build 
confidence in Earth observation technology and created a shared 
understanding of how the Earth is changing. Since that time, Earth 
observation technology and the U.S. space industrial base have advanced 
rapidly.
    As we celebrate this important milestone and look to the future of 
U.S. satellite-based Earth observation, I would like to discuss three 
important topics today:

   The value Earth observation technology provides to society 
        and how Earth observation technology can be harnessed to solve 
        some of the biggest problems facing humanity.

   The important role the commercial space sector plays 
        advancing U.S. leadership in space.

   The steps industry and Congress should take to help ensure 
        America continues to lead on Earth observation technology.
Earth Observation Technology Helps Solve Complex Problems
    Earth observation technology is key to solving some of the biggest 
problems facing humanity and enables a better understanding of the 
world around us. Earth observation capabilities help identify, monitor, 
and address problems that threaten the security and economic well-being 
of every American, and aid in the improvement of the lives of people 
across the globe.
    In order to most effectively use Earth observation data to address 
today's issues, and issues that will arise in the future, Maxar uses 
innovative artificial intelligence, machine learning, and algorithm 
techniques to extract answers quickly in order to assist decision 
makers. The amount of information coming from space is best used by 
applying these techniques to get actionable information. We all know 
the danger of overgrown trees near powerlines and the impacts a downed 
line can have. However, we have applied unique algorithms which can 
tell the height of vegetation based off data we obtain from our Earth 
observations which can then be used for utility corridor monitoring--
helping customers understand when vegetation near powerlines needs to 
be trimmed.
Extreme Weather and Disaster Response
    Each year, thunderstorms, floods, tornadoes, hurricanes, and other 
weather-related events, cause an average of approximately 650 deaths 
and $15 billion in damage in the U.S. About one-third of the U.S. 
economy--some $3 trillion--is sensitive to weather and climate.\1\ 
Earth observation provides decision makers and first responders with 
essential information to help them protect lives and property when 
extreme weather events occur. Not only is imagery essential, but 
technologies like Shortwave Infrared (SWIR) on Maxar's WorldView-3 
satellite help first responders identify where wildfires are most 
active.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    \1\ https://www.noaa.gov/weather
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Other applications like our Open Data Program provide critical and 
actionable information to assist response efforts. Associated imagery 
and crowdsourcing layers can provide information to the front lines at 
high speed. Using machine learning and satellite imagery, the 
government has been able to help forecast potential damage and point 
on-the-ground response teams to areas that have been damaged by 
hurricanes.
    Maxar's 20+ year imagery archive provides a digital history of our 
planet that allows change assessment over time. With our extensive 
archive and our ability to detect change over time, our data is 
regularly used to track droughts, glacial melt, and as with response 
efforts, the damage caused by wildfires, floods, hurricanes, and other 
natural disasters. For example, our imagery and automated algorithms 
were used to map new standing bodies of water after the Hunga Tonga 
Hunga Ha'apai volcano eruption and subsequent tsunami.
    Maxar's WeatherDesk helps anticipate and mitigate the changing 
weather conditions by accessing global weather forecasts and 
observations that support better business, mission, and operations 
decision-making. Recently, Maxar developed an award-winning high 
performance computing solution using NOAA's weather forecasting model 
in the cloud and our WeatherDesk team collaborated with Amazon Web 
Services, Inc. to optimize this solution and deliver a detailed global 
weather forecast 58 percent faster, reducing a 100-minute process to 
roughly 42 minutes.
Agriculture and Food Security
    Agriculture is a multibillion-dollar industry that contributes a 
total of $1.053 trillion of national Gross Domestic Product and 11 
percent of employment when derivative industries (e.g., food services, 
textile production) are considered.\2\ Earth observation technology 
plays a critical role in supporting the agriculture industry by 
supplying farmers with information about when to plant crops and their 
estimated yields. It also plays an important role in food security, 
providing an early warning when food supply may be at risk. For 
example, earlier this year, Maxar's WeatherDesk was used to predict a 
significant decline in Ukrainian crop harvest, which typically helps to 
feed parts of the world facing food scarcity, due to the war.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    \2\ https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/ag-and-food-statistics-
charting-the-essentials/ag-and-food-sectors-and-the-economy/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Critical Infrastructure
    Earth observation technology supports critical infrastructure. 
Maxar's Precision3D Telco Suite enables 5G radio network providers to 
plan telecommunications networks by accurately mapping terrain to avoid 
signal disruptions. This is possible due to Maxar's use of imagery 
data, artificial intelligence, and automation. Maxar also provides 
insight to analysts on critical energy infrastructure projects in the 
oil and gas sectors, helping to preserve finite resources. Our 
satellite images also provide critical data for mobility and logistics 
operations across the U.S.
National Security
    Over the last two decades, Maxar has been a trusted partner to the 
U.S. government, providing commercial Earth observation capabilities in 
support of national security, including the response to the ongoing war 
in Ukraine--ensuring that policymakers have uninterrupted access to 
time sensitive, actionable satellite imagery. The transparency provided 
by satellites showed the world the buildup of Russian troops along the 
border of Ukraine, tracked the early days of the invasion, and have 
been used to document atrocities carried out by the Russian military.
    Maxar is also helping the U.S. government to harness commercial 
capability in support of warfighters with its ability to transform 2D 
satellite imagery into 3D models and precision point clouds, a set of 
data points in space which create a 3D model. This allows us to provide 
more information to intelligence analysts, as well as highly accurate 
and sophisticated geolocation data to warfighters. As a result, Maxar's 
3D data and capabilities are helping to usher in a new era of insight, 
simulation, and modeling.
Advancing U.S. Leadership in Space
    Maintaining a robust domestic commercial space industrial base and 
ensuring the U.S. government is harnessing the full breadth of 
commercial capability--including advanced Earth observation 
capabilities--is fundamental to advancing American strategic interests 
in space. Commercial satellites increase America's overall resiliency 
in space, providing the U.S. government with greater capacity and 
capability for civil space and national security space missions.
    The National Space Policy recognizes this strategic imperative, 
stating in part that ``a robust, innovative, and competitive commercial 
space sector is the source of continued progress and sustained U.S. 
leadership in space.'' \3\ Leaders in the intelligence community (IC) 
have called the commercial sector not ``just a priority, [it's] a 
must,'' and, ``part of [the IC's] infrastructure,'' and affirmed the 
importance of making sure the U.S. industrial base is and remains 
competitive.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    \3\ https://www.space.commerce.gov/policy/national-space-policy/
    \4\ https://www.nro.gov/Portals/65/documents/news/speeches/2021/
7Oct21_GEOINT_Sympo
sium.pdf
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Fortunately, the partnership between domestic commercial providers 
and the U.S. government is only getting stronger. Recently, the U.S. 
government increased its acquisition of commercial imagery across 
several U.S. industry providers to meet the growing demand for imagery 
and data across the U.S government. The commercial sector has also made 
big investments of its own and is working to harness its new and 
developing capabilities for the benefit of U.S. government customers. 
Programs like NOAA's GeoXO satellite system and NASA's TEMPO satellite 
instrument stand to benefit from these leading-edge technologies, 
including the use of artificial intelligence and machine learning, 
which reveal useful patterns in massive amounts of data-helping 
customers reduce resources while increasing scale and speed.
    At Maxar, we're looking forward to the enhanced capacity coming 
online soon from our next-generation WorldView Legion satellites, which 
will more than triple Maxar's capability to collect 30 cm-class 
resolution imagery and enable up to 15 revisits per day--providing 
unrivaled commercial capability, including even greater persistent 
monitoring of priority areas of interest, accelerated change detection, 
and timely analysis at scale.
    These are just some examples of how the U.S. industrial space base 
is helping to provide America with a technological edge in space.
Overcoming Challenges to Sustained U.S. Leadership in Space
    Today, there are more than 4,500 active satellites and millions of 
other space objects orbiting Earth.\5\ Despite the growth of commercial 
capabilities, commercial Earth observation providers face a space 
environment that is increasingly complex, making the challenge of 
preserving the space environment through responsible space traffic and 
debris management all the more urgent. Human-made objects traveling in 
Earth's orbit--including the debris caused by recent Chinese and 
Russian anti-satellite tests--pose a serious risk to satellites, 
spacecraft, and the people on board.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    \5\ https://sia.org/commercial-satellite-industry-growing-as-it-
continues-to-dominate-expanding-global-space-business-sia-releases-
25th-annual-state-of-the-satellite-industry-report/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    In 2016, Maxar's own WorldView-2 satellite was hit by a small piece 
of untracked debris. Fortunately, this had no impact on WorldView-2's 
ability to operate, but it provides a stark example of the dangers 
posed by space junk zipping around the world at 17,000 miles per hour: 
any collision could impact our ability to access the technological 
advancements we take for granted today, including GPS, weather 
monitoring and prediction, satellite imaging, satellite communications, 
and more. All these technologies rely on safe access to low Earth 
orbit.
    Maxar has long been a proponent of limiting space debris and 
harnessing commercial technologies, such as propulsion, to support 
responsible space traffic management. To do our part, Maxar joined a 
group of global commercial space companies in signing on to the World 
Economic Forum's Space Industry Debris Statement, which encourages 
companies to ``work together to inform and help governments create a 
practical set of regulations for the sustainable use of space.'' \6\ We 
are also testing a new commercial solution from LeoLabs to help monitor 
and track space debris.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    \6\ https://www3.weforum.org/docs/
WEF_Space_Industry_Debris_Statement_2021.pdf
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    However, the U.S. government is best positioned to set an example 
for the rest of the world to follow. Just as it did thirty years ago 
when Congress passed the Land Remote Sensing Policy Act to establish 
rules of the road for the then-nascent commercial satellite-based Earth 
observation industry, America can help build a global framework for 
responsible operations in space. The Administration has been an 
important leader in this work, bringing key government and industry 
leaders together to understand how we can collaborate to create 
enforceable policies. And, I want to recognize and thank Subcommittee 
Chairman Hickenlooper (D-CO), Ranking Member Lummis (R-WY), and full 
Committee Chair Cantwell (D-WA) and Ranking Member Wicker (R-MS), and 
the rest of the Subcommittee and full Committee for their leadership on 
the importance of protecting and maintaining a sustainable space 
environment through the introduction of the Orbital Sustainability 
(ORBITS) Act. We support the ORBITS Act and we look forward to 
continuing to work with the Committee and Congress to develop solutions 
that will make space sustainable and maintain American leadership. 
There's still much work to do, but U.S. leadership is critical in 
bringing the rest of the world along.
Conclusion
    Despite these challenges--as the Landsat program demonstrates--
America can achieve great feats in space when we work together toward a 
common goal. The Landsat program has provided observations for 50 
years, changing how we see and understand our planet. Thanks to the 
ingenuity of the commercial sector, and our strong partnership with the 
U.S. government, I am excited and optimistic for what the next 50 years 
will bring.
    But that future will not be realized unless stakeholders across 
government, industry, and the research community work together to 
preserve the space environment by developing clear rules that govern 
space debris and space traffic management.
    Maxar stands ready to do its part to help build a sustainable space 
environment and usher in the next 50 years of Earth observation 
advancements. Thank you to the Subcommittee for holding this hearing 
and the opportunity to speak on this important topic. I'm happy to 
answer any questions you may have at this time.

    Senator Hickenlooper. Thank you, Mr. Jablonsky. And with 
the proviso that for part of my professional life I wanted to 
be on the U.S.--in the U.S. Geological Survey, Mr. Gallagher.

   STATEMENT OF KEVIN GALLAGHER, ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR FOR CORE 
  SCIENCE SYSTEMS, U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, DEPARTMENT OF THE 
                            INTERIOR

    Mr. Gallagher. And we would certainly welcome you.
    [Laughter.]
    Mr. Gallagher. Chairman Hickenlooper, Ranking Member 
Lummis, members of the Subcommittee and Committee, I am pleased 
to testify before you today during such a dynamic and 
innovative time in Earth observation science.
    On behalf of the U.S. Geological Survey, I would like to 
recognize and express our appreciation for the support we have 
received from Congress over many years for our role in Earth 
observation and mapping, and in particular, Senate Resolution 
721, celebrating the 50th anniversary of Landsat and its unique 
contributions to the Nation. Thank you
    The Department of the Interior and the USGS have a long 
history of providing observations of the Earth, including its 
topography, biology, geological and water resources, and 
natural hazards such as earthquakes, volcanoes, wildfires, and 
coastal change.
    The USGS has been involved in the Landsat program since the 
late 1960s, when the Department of the Interior charted a bold 
vision for the use of space technology to sustainably manage 
the Earth's natural resources.
    The unique data from Landsat enables scientists and 
analysts around the globe to detect, measure, map, and monitor 
critical changes on Earth. Local, tribal, State, and Federal 
agencies all rely upon Landsat data and products to help them 
understand ongoing changes to their lands, surface waters, 
coastlines, ecosystems, and natural resources.
    In fact, Landsat is the most widely used land remote 
sensing data within Federal agencies, and it is the most 
frequently cited land dataset in peer reviewed science 
literature. Landsat data provide enormous economic benefits in 
the U.S. and around the world, far surpassing the Government's 
investment in the Landsat satellites.
    In the U.S. alone, Landsat is estimated to provide over $2 
billion in annual economic benefits and has been a vital 
component of the training curriculum for generations of 
American scientists. Two unique attributes make Landsat the 
gold standard for all civil and commercial land imaging, the 
accuracy and precision of the data, and the long and unbroken 
record of the data.
    Landsat data is incredibly versatile, supporting 
applications across the Nation for agriculture monitoring and 
forecasting, water resource management, forest health and 
productivity, and wildfire mapping and remediation. In fact, 
the Office of Science and Technology Policy led Earth 
observation assessments done in 2012 and 2016.
    Ranked Landsat's impact across societal benefit areas as 
second only to the global positioning system. Much like GPS, 
weather data--and weather data, Landsat data is a public 
utility used daily to help us better understand and sustainably 
manage our dynamic planet.
    In recognition of the significant cross-Government impact 
of Landsat, the DOI and NASA established the Joint Sustainable 
Land Imaging Program in 2016 to provide a long term commitment 
to historically compatible Landsat observations. This has been, 
by all accounts, a highly successful partnership.
    Within the SLI Program, NASA is responsible for satellite 
development and launch, and the USGS provides ground system 
development and flight data operations, which are conducted at 
the USGS Earth Resources Observation and Science Center in 
Sioux Falls, South Dakota. In September 2021, NASA launched 
Landsat-9, the first mission in the SLI partnership.
    Landsat-9 has been amazingly successful, working in tandem 
with Landsat-8 to deliver highly calibrated multispectral 
imagery greater than the landmass of North America and South 
America combined, every day.
    The follow on SLI mission called Landsat Next will be far 
more capable than Landsat-9, meeting users' evolving needs for 
improved spectral, spatial, and temporal resolution critical to 
identifying and characterizing land surface in areas like urban 
areas, agricultural, coastal, the cryosphere, and lands 
increasingly impacted by drought and wildfire.
    Landsat has experienced a remarkable surge in popularity 
and continued relevance. In 2022, the USGS fulfilled more 
Landsat data access requests, at last count more than 4 
billion, than in the entire previous 49 year history of the 
program.
    That demand for Landsat data is linked to its global 
utility, free and open access in the cloud, and most 
importantly, the program's unrelenting commitment to 
maintaining the accuracy and precision of the data.
    The SLI Landsat Next mission will ensure that future 
generations will continue to reap the benefits of the Landsat 
series of measurements. I am excited about the future of 
Landsat and appreciate the opportunity to speak with you today.
    [The prepared statement of Mr. Gallagher follows:]

  Prepared Statement of Kevin Gallagher, Associate Director for Core 
  Science Systems, U.S. Geological Survey, Department of the Interior
    Chairman Hickenlooper, Ranking Member Lummis, Members of the 
Subcommittee and Committee, I am pleased to testify before you today 
during such a dynamic and innovative time in Earth observation science. 
The Department of the Interior (DOI) and the U.S. Geological Survey 
(USGS) have a long history of providing observations of the Earth, 
including its topography; biological, geological and water resources; 
and natural hazards such as earthquakes, volcanoes, wildfires, and 
coastal change. True to its mission, the USGS is providing science for 
a changing world.
History of Landsat
    The USGS has been involved in the Landsat program since the late 
1960s, when the DOI charted a bold vision for the use of space 
technology to sustainably manage the Earth's natural resources.
    The first Landsat satellite was launched on July 23, 1972. It has 
been succeeded by a series of Landsat satellites that, over 50 years, 
have drawn a comprehensive portrait of our planet from 400 miles in 
space. The unique data from Landsat enable scientists and analysts 
around the globe to detect and monitor critical changes on Earth. 
Local, Tribal, state, and Federal agencies all rely upon Landsat data 
to understand ongoing changes to their lands, surface waters, 
coastlines, ecosystems, and natural resources. Landsat is the most 
widely used land remote sensing data source within Federal agencies to 
carry out their missions every day.
    Landsat data provides enormous economic benefits in the U.S. and 
around the world, surpassing the investments in the Landsat technology. 
In the U.S. alone, Landsat is estimated to provide over $2 billion in 
annual economic benefits. When including benefits to other nations, 
Landsat's total annual economic benefits is estimated to be nearly $3.5 
billion. Two unique attributes make Landsat the ``gold standard'' for 
all civil and commercial land imaging: 1) the accuracy and precision of 
the data, and 2) the long and unbroken record of this data.
    The U.S. Group on Earth Observation-led Earth Observation 
Assessments have ranked Landsat's space system impact as second only to 
the Global Positioning System (GPS). Much like GPS and weather data, 
Landsat data is used daily to help us better understand and sustainably 
manage our dynamic planet--and to improve our ability to combat climate 
change. In 2019, the U.S. Global Change Research Program identified 
Landsat as a ``critical observatory for climate and environmental 
change research due to the unbroken length of the Landsat record and 
its ability to monitor remote regions with surface features such as 
glaciers, rainforests, permafrost, and coral reefs.''
    In recognition of the significant cross-government impact of 
Landsat, the DOI and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration 
(NASA) established the joint Sustainable Land Imaging (SLI) program in 
2016 to provide continued, historically compatible, and operational 
land-surface observations for public science and services. The 2014 and 
2019 National Plans for Civil Earth Observations both endorsed the SLI 
Program. In September 2021, NASA launched Landsat 9, the first mission 
in the SLI partnership. The next SLI Mission, known as Landsat Next, is 
in its planning phase and is intended to replace Landsat 8, which has 
been in orbit since 2013. The USGS has rigorously documented 
requirements for the next mission to meet users' ever-increasing need 
to monitor, understand, and predict complex changes to our Nation's 
land and water surfaces. Landsat Next will also ensure that projected 
climate-change impacts on our landscapes can be rigorously measured, 
assessed, and sustainably managed.
Applications of Landsat Data
    Landsat is incredibly versatile for a wide range of applications. 
In addition to the widely recognized benefits for the Federal 
government and the commercial sector, Landsat is also used 
internationally. International space agencies use Landsat data and work 
with the USGS and NASA to align with our systems' data and products to 
be more interoperable for all users. International non-governmental 
organizations make use of Landsat data to provide local assistance for 
developing nations.
    Landsat data is used for a wide variety of domestic applications. 
In Colorado, for example, Landsat has important applications for 
agriculture, water, forests, and development of natural resources. In 
Wyoming, Landsat's thermal infrared sensor collects data on Yellowstone 
National Park's thermal areas, including those previously unknown. As 
seen with the recent hurricane in Florida, Landsat supports research 
and response efforts on hurricane and storm surge impacts including 
assessing tree loss and vegetation damage, structure damage, flooding, 
water quality, storm surge debris, coastline shift, and long-term 
vegetation recovery in urban and natural ecosystems. (See Appendix A 
for graphics/images of these applications.)
Partnership with the Commercial Sector
    The commercial sector is a vital part of the Landsat program. Under 
government contracts and Federal supervision, commercial firms build 
the satellites; build and launch the rockets that carry them into 
space; construct the ground systems that collect, archive, process, and 
distribute these data to users; perform the flight operations of the 
satellites in space; and host the data in the commercial cloud for 
users to gain better access.
    Recently, there has been an exciting rise of commercially developed 
and commercially operated satellites. Today, the commercial industry 
has successfully built and deployed constellations of small, low-cost, 
low-orbiting satellites that provide high-resolution, high-revisit 
optical imagery. This data is useful for a wide variety of 
applications, some of which are available to Federal agencies through 
existing commercial data contracts. This data can augment and 
complement the coarser-resolution, broader area coverage baseline 
measurements made by Landsat and other government-sponsored 
observatories.
    However, commercially owned global satellite systems currently lack 
the complicated and expensive calibration capabilities to provide the 
long-term science-quality imagery required to fully meet government 
objectives. In 2020, the NASA/USGS SLI Architecture Study Team (AST) 
provided recommendations for an SLI architecture beyond Landsat 9. The 
AST found that Landsat's moderate-resolution shortwave infrared and 
thermal infrared imagery--crucial for meeting Landsat global survey 
applications--are not projected to be commercially viable in the next 
ten years, requiring a government-led solution to ensure data 
continuity. The AST also found that commercial data in the visible and 
near-infrared spectrum could augment Landsat data to satisfy additional 
user needs. Through multiple AST listening sessions, the commercial 
sector clearly conveyed its desire for the government to maintain its 
gold standard systems like Landsat for use in their commercial imagery 
calibration and new product development.
    The AST's findings related to the value of Landsat's unique 
radiometric and geometric calibration standard to the commercial sector 
were echoed by the Landsat Advisory Group (LAG), a subcommittee of the 
Federal Geographic Data Committee National Geospatial Advisory 
Committee, which provides advice to the Federal government on the 
Landsat Program and includes representatives of commercial Earth 
observation companies like Maxar and Planet. Multiple white papers 
published by the LAG in recent years have articulated the value of 
Landsat to the commercial sector, particularly as a trusted reference 
source to help calibrate their own sensors.
The Role of Federal agencies
    The U.S. government has a vital role to play in prioritizing and 
applying science-quality Earth observations to support local, Tribal, 
state, and national decisions on sustainable land, water, and resource 
usage; especially in the face of extreme weather events and 
accelerating climate-change impacts. This role includes making this 
data freely and openly available in the public domain to serve as 
authoritative datasets for science conducted at the global, regional, 
and local levels. Landsat offers consistent, global, full-spectrum 
coverage, with observations calibrated consistently over many decades. 
Landsat notably includes spectral bands that may not be profitable in 
the commercial sector but that meet governmental and societal needs for 
global applications like monitoring consumptive water use, climate 
change, agriculture, and deforestation.
    Another essential role for Federal agencies is to continue to 
support development of standards and specifications that support the 
interoperability of Earth observations. The DOI and the USGS work 
closely with national and international organizations to improve the 
interoperability among governmental and commercial Earth observation 
data sources. This improved interoperability will benefit all users and 
commercial providers by improving the ability to access multiple 
datasets to meet their science and operational needs.
    Landsat participates and is well represented in numerous 
international forums including the Group on Earth Observations (GEO), 
the Committee on Earth Observation Satellites (CEOS), the International 
Charter: Space and Major Disasters, and has numerous bilateral 
partnerships around the world. In fact, Landsat has led the world 
through the development of its Analysis-Ready Data products being 
distributed in the commercial cloud. Landsat's Collection 2 data--a 
complete reprocessing of the entire data archive--was the very first to 
be certified as CEOS-Analysis Ready Data compliant. Analysis-Ready Data 
is the key to future interoperability of all Earth observation 
satellite data sets, greatly increasing their value for all 
applications.
Opportunities for Collaboration between the Federal Government and the 
        Commercial Sector
    The USGS is excited about emerging commercial data sources. Current 
commercial imagers cannot provide global, full-spectrum coverage with 
the science quality necessary to meet the needs of government users. As 
stated earlier, some commercial firms rely on the calibrated Landsat 
data as a trusted reference source to evaluate and improve their own 
systems' performance. There are ways for the government to work with 
the commercial Earth observation industry to benefit both sectors. 
Federal agencies continue to perform extensive evaluations of federal, 
state, local, and Tribal user needs, as well as the needs of 
international users and the public. These studies consistently identify 
an increasing potential for commercial data to provide imagery at 
higher resolutions and greater frequency than Landsat to address urgent 
and short-term environmental events such fires, floods, and other 
disasters. In addition, the USGS, NASA, NOAA, and other agencies work 
together with commercial data providers in an activity called the Joint 
Agency Commercial Imagery Evaluation (JACIE), which provides an 
independent characterization of commercial imagery and products and 
shares those results across the remote sensing community. This helps 
facilitate the use of commercial products while helping providers 
better understand how their products are used across the Federal 
government.
    The technologies for imagery collection, transmission, storage, 
processing, and dissemination continue to improve. In the future, the 
Federal government will need to determine the optimal roles for 
commercial and government capabilities in these areas, taking into 
consideration the growing capabilities, potential lower costs, 
licensing approaches of commercial systems, and the broad range of 
requirements across the user community, to include data accessibility 
and redistribution. In addition to satellite systems, there is a 
growing potential for the commercial sector to provide ground stations 
and mission operations as services, potentially reducing or eliminating 
the need and associated costs for government-owned satellite operations 
centers and ground-station infrastructure. The Federal government will 
also need to determine how commercial advancements best support data 
processing, long-term management, and distribution, with the Federal 
government continuing to certify data authenticity and maintain the 
official, long-term public data archive.
The Future
    Federal agencies continue to develop science-quality Earth-
observing systems to provide the foundational data of a multi-source 
``data ecosystem'' of U.S. government, U.S. commercial, and 
international sources. Commercial Earth observation systems will 
increasingly be licensed to provide new and improved data for all. 
Through these combined efforts, the U.S. continues to strengthen our 
global leadership position in the development, launch, and operations 
of Earth observation systems. Further, our ongoing efforts to develop 
standards and infrastructure support the goal of interoperability and 
widespread access to optimize the exploitation of all Earth observation 
data.
    Landsat will remain the indispensable ``tool in the toolbox'' for 
decision support to government authorities and private sector decision-
makers. Its precision will calibrate other government, commercial, and 
international observations. Its spectral and spatial characteristics 
will complement the data generated by others and support new 
information products and support services.
    Landsat provides a domestic baseline capability that complements, 
rather than competes with, other international systems. While other 
systems may offer individual improvements in terms of spatial 
resolution, temporal revisit, or spectral performance, Landsat, with 
its five-decade record of robust collection, calibration and archiving, 
and its longstanding service as a global reference to cross-calibrate 
other missions, improves not only the quality of those systems but the 
overall quality of the global ``system of systems''.
Conclusion
    Landsat has experienced a remarkable surge in popularity and 
continued relevance. In 2022, the USGS has fulfilled more requests for 
Landsat data--at last count, more than 4 billion requests--than in the 
entire previous 49-year history of the program. That demand for Landsat 
data is linked to its global utility, free and open access in the 
cloud, and most importantly, the program's unrelenting commitment to 
maintaining the accuracy and precision of these data into the future. 
It is that commitment to data quality that will perpetuate Landsat's 
reputation as the gold standard for all civil and commercial land 
imaging in the foreseeable future. I am excited about the future of 
Landsat and appreciate the opportunity to speak with you all today. 
Thank you.
             [Appendix A: Example Images of Landsat scenes]
[GRAPHIC NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]

    WYOMING: This Landsat 8 image from the night of April 20, 2017, 
shows a newly emerged thermal area, labeled New Feature (white pixels 
indicate warmth), between the Tern Lake Thermal Area and West Tern Lake 
in Yellowstone National Park in Wyoming. Red triangles indicate 
individual mapped thermal features, such as geysers or springs. Image 
credit: U.S. Geological Survey.
[GRAPHIC NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]

    COLORADO: These images, using data acquired by Landsat 8 on the 
morning of July 31, 2018, near Sterling in northeastern Colorado, show 
natural color surface reflectance of agricultural fields on the left 
and the actual evapotranspiration (ET) on the right. Evapotranspiration 
is the quantity of water removed from surfaces by evaporation and plant 
transpiration. The circles indicate center-pivot irrigation systems, 
and evapotranspiration measurements can help land and water managers 
make informed decisions about water use. Hay and corn are produced in 
the area, among other crops.
[GRAPHIC NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]

    FLORIDA: Landsat 7 captured this image of the aftermath of 
Hurricane Ian in southwestern Florida, including floodwater and 
sediment in the ocean, on the morning of October 2, 2022. Sanibel 
Island is shown at the center with Fort Myers Beach and Cape Coral to 
the right. Naples is the gray urban area in the lower right.
[GRAPHIC NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]

    FLORIDA: Landsat 9 captured this image of the aftermath of 
Hurricane Ian in southwestern Florida on the morning of October 6, 
2022. Sanibel Island is shown in the center, with breaches in the 
Sanibel Causeway that connects the island with the mainland. (White 
clouds also appear in this image.)
[GRAPHIC NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]

    FLORIDA: Landsat 9 captured this image of the aftermath of 
Hurricane Ian in eastern Florida on the morning of October 6, 2022. It 
shows the coast and New Smyrna Beach, which experienced extensive 
flooding.
[GRAPHIC NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]

    GEORGIA: Landsat 9 captured this image of the aftermath of 
Hurricane Ian on the Georgia coast on the morning of October 6, 2022. 
It shows the area of Brunswick, Georgia (top left), and sediment 
spreading out from the shoreline.

    Senator Hickenlooper. Right. Thank you. Dr. Abdalati.

            STATEMENT OF WALEED ABDALATI, DIRECTOR,

             COOPERATIVE INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH IN

        ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; PROFESSOR, DEPARTMENT OF

           GEOGRAPHY, UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO, BOULDER

    Dr. Abdalati. Chair Hickenlooper, Ranking Member Lummis, 
and Chair Cantwell, Ranking Member Wicker, and other members of 
the Committee, thank you for the opportunity to testify today 
on the very important matter of the future of U.S. satellite-
based Earth observations.
    I greatly appreciate the work of this committee, and it is 
also a privilege to be here with representatives from civilian 
agencies and the private sector who develop and operate and 
analyze the data for the good of the American people and for 
the good of the world.
    Observations from space serve us in many ways, from day to 
day planning, to national security, to public health, to 
resource management, to disaster management and recovery, 
feeding our people and understanding--and understanding the 
threats and challenges and opportunities associated with our 
changing climate.
    Some of the benefits are directly derived from the 
observations themselves. You can just look and see, and but 
many are derived from their integration with models and 
complementary data. It is that ecosystem of information. That 
is critical and satellites are a fundamental component of that.
    Ultimately, however, these observations play a key role in 
enabling and empowering us to understand what tomorrow will 
bring, and whether that tomorrow is literally tomorrow or the 
coming week, the next day or week, as the case is with weather 
forecast, or whether it is the next growing or dry season, as 
in the case of seasonal forecast, or years and decades down the 
road, as is the case with climate projections.
    This knowledge and information equip our Nation and society 
as a whole for success in managing environmental challenges and 
capitalizing on environmental opportunities. We have made 
remarkable strides in Earth observation since the launch of the 
first TIROS satellite more than 60 years ago, when it 
transmitted its blurry images of Earth for two and a half 
months.
    These observations have become integral to our lives, and 
there is still much to learn and tremendously important 
benefits to be realized. The work of the agencies represented 
here today has been indispensable in enabling us to understand 
our environment, how it is changing, and what those changes 
mean for life on earth.
    They have done so by developing new observing technologies 
and capabilities, as well as pioneering and supporting the use 
of these capabilities for science and application purposes. And 
the work of the private--the work the private sector has 
brought forth has been innovative in developing ways of cost 
effectively carrying those observations forward, providing data 
and information that deliver great benefit to society.
    This combined approach is important for continuing to 
develop new technological and scientific innovations, and for 
providing situational awareness needed to serve society, and 
innovative and cost effective ways.
    And finally, the engineering and science communities that 
develop these capabilities and ensure their value is realized 
need to be recognized and sustained, as this committee 
certainly has and does.
    Some of that community exists at universities like my own, 
some at Federal and federally supported facilities, and others 
in the private sector and elsewhere. But regardless of where 
these talents reside, most share the simple fact that they were 
initially cultivated at the Nation's colleges and universities.
    So while investments in the development and use of these 
capabilities are absolutely critical, investments in the 
education and training of those who transform these visions and 
aspirations into society serving realities is crucial as well.
    Environmental intelligence, as former NOAA Administrator 
Dr. Kathy Sullivan used to refer to it, positions our Nation 
and society for success in the face of whatever lies ahead. The 
space based observations ultimately deliver that intelligence 
and associated insights in ways that greatly serve the citizens 
of this country and the citizens of the world.
    I thank you for your time and your attention on this very 
important matter, and I apologize for reading from a computer, 
but my written remarks are actually sitting in a taxi somewhere 
that brought me here, so----
    [Laughter.]
    Dr. Abdalati. I am going to close this now and we can talk. 
But I wanted to get it right, so thank you.
    [The prepared statement of Dr. Abdalati follows:]

Prepared Statement of Waleed Abdalati, Director, Cooperative Institute 
   for Research in Environmental Sciences; Professor, Department of 
               Geography, University of Colorado, Boulder

 Space-Based Earth Observations: Fundamental to Prosperity, Security, 
                 and Resilience on Our Changing Planet

    Chairwoman Cantwell, Ranking Member Wicker, and members of the 
Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, thank you 
for the opportunity to testify on the very important matter of the 
future of U.S. satellite-based Earth observation. I greatly appreciate 
the work of this committee and its bipartisan efforts to examine the 
importance, state, and prospects for Earth observations from space. In 
addition, it is a privilege to be here with representatives from 
civilian agencies and the private sector who develop, operate, and 
analyze these capabilities for the good of the American people, and for 
the good of the world.
    As we continue to live in a world in which our relationship with 
the environment is critical to our success and prosperity, the value of 
knowledge about our environment has never been more consequential. We 
live on a changing planet, and space-based observations of Earth not 
only provide us situational awareness that allows us to watch the story 
of that change unfold, but they provide us the information needed to 
understand the underlying causes, the evolution of their behaviors, and 
the implications for the future. They provide essential situational 
awareness and are a critical element of our national informational 
infrastructure that allow us to thrive in the face of environmental 
changes and challenges.
    Satellite observations are a fundamental component of our everyday 
lives (Figure 1), often in ways that many people don't realize, 
strengthening our national security, supporting effective resource 
management, advancing global health, and supporting our national 
prosperity. These benefits directly result from the fact that satellite 
observations provide the context, scale, and perspective needed to 
understand our Earth environment in ways that can inform our actions to 
optimize our relationship with the planet on which we live, by 
understanding how it functions, adapting to and managing changes, and 
capitalizing on opportunities.
[GRAPHIC NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]

    Figure 1: Many aspects of our individual and collective lives are 
positively impacted by data from space-based resources, often in ways 
that we do not recognize. SOURCES: Data available as follows: Helping 
Plan Our Day--Lazo et al., 2009; comScore, 2014. Protecting Our 
Health--WHO, 2016, 2017. Keeping Us Secure--Titley, 2016. Mitigating 
Natural Disasters--GAO Highlights, 2017. Ensuring Resource 
Availability--UN-Water, 2007; McKinsey Global Institute, 2017. Figure 
from National Academy of Sciences Earth Science and Applications from 
Space 2017 (NAS, 2018).

    These capabilities are applicable to many domains of societal 
interest that directly affect our economic and social well-being and 
our strength as a nation. Here I will speak to just a few.
Water Resources
    Water access and availability is perhaps the element that is most 
impactful to our societal well-being. With implications in the United 
States that go beyond simply access, into the domains of health, food 
production, recreation, and so much more. Globally, the access to water 
has further implications for migration and geopolitical stability 
(National Intelligence Council, 2021). Domestically, in recent decades, 
the western United States has been experiencing the worst drought in 
1200 years (Williams et al., 2022). Comprehensive observations of the 
elements that contribute to water transport and storage are required in 
order to (a) fully appreciate the nature of this drought, (b) 
understand the driving factors, (c) recognize the implications of the 
stresses on our water resources, and (d) manage these resources most 
effectively. Such observations are needed on a scale that is only 
available from space.
    I recently had the opportunity to join Senators Michael Bennett and 
Mitt Romney on a short rafting trip down the Colorado River (Figure 2). 
The purpose of that bi-partisan trip was to provide a shared first-hand 
and up-close look at the water stresses in the Colorado river basin. 
Also on the trip were a rancher, a water manager, a native tribal 
leader, and others whose lives and livelihoods are tied to the water. 
What was most striking about that trip was how low the water level was 
and how slowly the water flowed. Our tour guides talked about how it 
``used to be,'' with the relatively still water in the picture standing 
in stark contrast to what used to be whitewater rapids. While those 
anecdotes are accurate, to truly understand the situation requires a 
broader view. One in which Landsat, along with other observing 
capabilities, has played an important role. Figure 3 shows a time 
sequence of the Colorado River near Lake Powell (a highly-stressed and 
depleting reservoir). The sequence shows a reduction in water flowing 
through the river over time, part of a longer trend. Our ability to 
monitor the river width and flow, not just in this drought-stricken 
region, help us understand the scope and scale of the reduced water and 
put them into a broader context--the kind of context needed to manage 
water effectively. The importance of this ability is underscored by the 
fact that the Colorado River System alone provides essential water 
resources to seven western states: Colorado, Wyoming, Utah, New Mexico, 
Arizona, Nevada and California.
[GRAPHIC NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]

    Figure 2. Senators Romney (left) and Bennet (right) rafting on the 
Colorado River on September 27, 2021. Photo: Spenser Heaps, Deseret 
News

    A key reason for the decreasing river flows is the fact that 
typical mountain snows that feed and recharge the rivers in the spring 
have been diminishing (Milly and Dunne, 2020). We know this too from 
satellite observations, combined with a sampling of ground-based 
measurements and hydrological models (informed by these observations) 
that make clear that the spatial extent of the snow cover and the 
associated water content are decreasing (Figure 4), and melt is 
occurring earlier and more rapidly (Musselman et al., 2021). The result 
is lower river levels, reduced soil moisture (Figure 5), fewer water 
resources, and significant threats to agriculture, ranching, and 
tourism.
    Moving further below the surface still, there is a space-based 
capability that allows us to go beyond the images of the surface (snow, 
timing of melt, river flow, and lake extent), and examine what 
subsurface storage. The Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) 
satellite, and its successor (GRACE-Follow-on), have measured actual 
changes in sub-surface mass to provide an integrated assessment of 
overall water storage and how it is changing with time. It does so by 
measuring changes in the gravity field, which are directly tied to the 
mass that lies beneath the satellites, which fluctuates with water 
availability (Rodell et al., 2016). As shown in Figure 6, there has 
been a drying trend in the Colorado River Basin
[GRAPHIC NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]

    Figure 3: Colorado River upstream of Lake Powell. The natural-color 
images above were acquired in March 1999, April 2005, May 2011, and 
April 2021 by the Landsat 5, 7, and 8 satellites. Springtime typically 
marks the lowest water levels before mountaintop snow starts to melt 
and run down into the watershed. The images capture years with the two 
highest and lowest levels over the past 22 years.
    (https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/148861/lake-powell-
reaches-new-low)
[GRAPHIC NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]

    Figure 4: Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) Image 
of Rocky Mountain snow cover on April 7, 2022 (left) and map of snow 
water equivalent (water stored as snow) in the Rocky Mountains on April 
1, 2022, as compared to the 2000-2020 average.
    https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/149779/taking-stock-of-
rocky-mountain-snowpack
[GRAPHIC NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]

    Figure 5: Soil moisture anomalies in the top meter of soil based in 
part on measurements NASA's Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) 
satellite and vegetation indices from the Moderate Resolution Imaging 
Spectroradiometer (MODIS) instruments on NASA's Terra and Aqua 
satellites.
    https://scitechdaily.com/long-term-drought-grips-the-western-u-s-
soils-and-plants-are-parched/
[GRAPHIC NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]

    Figure 6: Changing Freshwater Availability from GRACE, 2002-2015, 
(Rodell et al., 2016)

    In the immediate term, these observations and how they are used 
enable us to manage challenges associated with water access as our 
environment continues to change. In the longer term, their value is 
further amplified through their ability to inform practices related to 
farming, ranching, land use and more. As we observe and understand 
trends in our environment, we are better positioned to anticipate what 
the future holds in terms of water stresses and water availability. 
This advanced knowledge is critical to successfully positioning 
ourselves as a nation to manage the emerging challenges and capitalize 
on emerging opportunities.
Fires and other Hazards and Extreme Events
    The costs associated with natural hazards and extreme events has 
been increasing significantly over the last 40 years (Figure 7). All of 
these types of events listed below are those that can be observed, 
predicted, understood, and most importantly, prepared for and managed 
with the aid of space-based observations.
[GRAPHIC NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]

    Figure 7: Number of billion-dollar disasters in the United States 
from 1980 to 2021. Each bar is colored to show the different types of 
billion-dollar disasters with the number of events (left vertical axis) 
and the associated costs (right vertical axis.). During the first nine 
months of 2022 there have been fifteen separate billion-dollar weather 
and climate disaster events. Figure is from NOAA National Centers for 
Environmental Information (NCEI) at https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/
billions/time-series)

    The parameters that drive or contribute to each of these disasters 
is derivable from space, and their prediction depends critically on 
space-based observations, integrated with ground-based measurements and 
modeling capabilities. Perhaps the most familiar example is the 
weather-related events, which are managed through weather forecasts 
that integrate satellite observations with sophisticated weather 
forecasting models.
    Closely coupled to the above discussion on drought and water trends 
is the prevalence and impact of fires in the United States. This is a 
matter that literally hits close to home for me, as my town was 
devastated by the loss of 1100 homes in Colorado's Marshall Fire in 
December 2021. My family and I were forced to evacuate, and we returned 
the next day to neighborhoods that was destroyed and devastated.
    As with water resources, satellite observations allow us to go 
beyond the local impacts to directly assess the presence and extent of 
fires, the nature of their burn scars, the time of recovery, and the 
trends in fires and their severity over the years. Moreover, 
topographic maps, as well as population and residential distribution 
maps, also supported by satellite images, complemented by weather and 
wind forecasting, help us understand the vulnerability of communities 
associated with fires. When coupled with drought information (such as 
the soil moisture and vegetation information described above), the 
susceptibility to fire can be assessed, both in real-time and in terms 
of longer-term vulnerability.
    An analysis of the Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity data set 
(data set described in Eidenshink et al., 2007), which integrates 
Landsat observations with Federal and state fire reports, have revealed 
a significant increase in wildfires, particularly in the western U.S. 
(Figures 8 and 9). When combined with population and development data, 
the human and economic vulnerability of these regions can be 
determined. With this increasing risk of fires and other natural 
hazards, understanding the vulnerability is critical to informing 
development and management strategies to limit the damage, and manage 
its threats to lives and property. The satellite observations are 
critical tools in doing so.
    In the case of fires, an added capability, informed by space-based 
observations of fire location and intensity, to support health and 
disaster management is the modeling of smoke movement in the 
atmosphere. The High Resolution Rapid Refresh Smoke (HRRR smoke) model 
integrated satellite observations of atmospheric composition, and 
meteorological conditions, to predict, with great accuracy, the 
propagation of smoke during and after the Marshall Fire, enabling an 
understanding of where health-risks were high, as was done for the Camp 
Fire, California's most destructive fire in its history (Chow et al., 
2022). On a larger scale, it is possible to see not just smoke's 
migration and impact on air quality, but also the movement of pollution 
and its implications for visibility, temperature, air quality, and 
wind.
[GRAPHIC NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]

    Figure 8: U.S. fires during the period 1984-1999 (Panel A) and 
2005-2018 (Panel B). Small dots indicate nonextreme fires while extreme 
fires are represented with larger orange (area burned >99th percentile 
in 1984-1999) or red bubbles (area burned >99th percentile in 2005-
2018).'' The history of the aggregate fires and burned land, and their 
associated trends, are shown in Figure 9 below.
    https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abc0020
[GRAPHIC NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]

    Figure 9: Number of wildfires in the U.S. (left) and area burned 
(right) from 1985 to 2015. The graphs are from https://www.ucsusa.org/
resources/infographic-wildfires-and-climate-change, and the underlying 
data are from https://www.mtbs.gov.

    While I have focused on drought and fires here, the same type of 
utility applies to other types of disasters. In the case of flooding, 
for example, the satellite observations (along with models) inform 
precipitation amounts, location of precipitation, storm trajectories, 
vulnerability to storm surges in coastal areas, river stage, landslide 
potential, and threats to people.
    The fundamental role of satellites goes beyond understanding the 
level of risk and how it evolves over time (with Figure 8 providing a 
clear example of information to inform such an assessment). They also 
contribute to understanding the vulnerability to such risks in part 
through observations of infrastructure and population distribution, 
providing important information on how many people are in harm's way 
and what the potential impacts of such disasters may be. And finally, 
satellites play a key role in managing the aftermath of such disasters 
to inform recovery responses and priorities, by providing observations 
of the nature, location, and amount of damage, as well as the state of 
access routes to enable effective response. (Le Cozannet et al., 2020).
Sea Level Rise
    In a more global sense, but with direct ties to our Nation's 
shores, oceans have been rising since the late 1800s (Church and White, 
2011). While the rise in seas prior to the satellite era was observed 
with tide gauges, it was difficult to accurately determine overall rate 
of global sea level rise and impossible to determine its regional 
character. It was not until the satellites provided global coverage 
that it was possible to observe such information. Since the first 
routine observations, beginning with the Topex mission in 1993, the 
data have shown the global trends in sea level rise of 3.3 mm/yr (which 
is higher than that of the previous century), as well as an increase in 
the rate of sea level rise over the nearly 30-year record (Figure 10).
    More important than the global sea level rise, however is its 
spatial distribution, as some areas are rising more rapidly than the 
global mean, and some are rising more slowly, even lowering in some 
places (Figure 11). The nature of this distribution has to do with 
where heat is stored in the oceans, the sources of sea level rise, and 
the movement of the land in relation to forces acting on it--mainly 
isostatic adjustment in response to land ice changes. Satellite 
observations allow us to monitor the surface temperature and water 
movement, which combined with models allows us to understand the heat 
distribution and transport throughout the world's oceans. They also 
provide information on the behavior of the Earth's glaciers and ice 
sheets, the shrinking of which has been adding water to high-latitude 
regions of the Earth, while at the same time resulting in an upward 
movement of high-latitude land masses, and a lowering of land masses at 
low latitudes, as the solid earth responds to the lightening of the 
load near its polar regions.
[GRAPHIC NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]

    Figure 10: Global mean sea level rise from 1993-2022 derived from a 
sequence of satellite altimeters.
    (https://sealevel.colorado.edu)
[GRAPHIC NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]

    Figure 11: Regional trends in sea level rise for the 1993-2021 
period.
    (https://sealevel.colorado.edu)

    All of these factors, observable and quantifiable from space, 
provide a picture of the rate of sea level rise, its causes, its 
regional distribution, and coastal vulnerability to storm surges. These 
storm-surge events are also observable from space, predicted by 
operational satellites, and the damage assessed by commercial and other 
satellite observations.
    Quantifying sea level rise, understanding its spatial variability, 
assessing vulnerability, predicting coastal flooding, assessing the 
damage, and informing recovery are critical to our national interests, 
particularly considering that the effects of sea level rise on the 
order of 1 meter by 2100 is conservatively predicted to result in costs 
of hundreds of billions of dollars to the U.S. alone (Neuman et al., 
2015). Our understanding of vulnerability in this area and the likely 
implications is all made possible by satellite observations, not just 
of sea level rise itself, but of the factors that contribute to it, and 
the factors that ultimately result in the water from these rising seas 
invading our shorelines.
Sea ice
    While much of what I have addressed to this point is tied to 
phenomena that we see or feel directly in our country and on its 
shores, there is another area, seemingly far removed from our everyday 
lives, in which satellites have been absolutely critical in observing 
change that has direct environmental, economic, and strategic impact. 
That is the disappearance of Arctic sea ice. The layer of ice that 
blankets the Arctic ocean is a driver in the weather and climate of 
this nation, and has direct ties to economic and strategic interests. 
Since 1978, we have been able to track the extent and concentration of 
sea ice cover (Figure 12), using both civilian satellites and non-
classified data from defense satellites, and since 2003, we have also 
been able to track its thickness (Figure 13). Both the extent and 
thickness are changing in ways that will have a profound impact on how 
we live and function.
[GRAPHIC NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]

    Figure 12: Annual extent of Arctic sea ice, at its minimum extent 
each year (late September) for the period 1978-2022. Minimum extent is 
indicative of the overall state, since it includes the ice that 
survives the summer melt season
    https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/5036
[GRAPHIC NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]

    Figure 13: Arctic sea ice volume calculated from ICESat, CryoSat-2 
and ICESat-2 ice thickness fields, for February-March (in red) and 
October-November (in blue). The Linear trends are calculated using 
estimates from longer time series of ICESat and CryoSat-2. (Kacimi and 
Kwok, 2022)

    From a weather and climate perspective, modern civilization has 
never known an ice-free Arctic in the summertime, yet we are likely 
headed to such a state in the coming decades (Liu et al., 2022). The 
implications range from a disruption in the Earth's radiation balance, 
as the darker ice-free water absorbs more sunlight than is the case in 
its ice-covered state, to changes in ocean circulation and associated 
weather and climate phenomena, as the melting ice freshens the Arctic 
waters. The impacts for North America of these changes could be felt on 
time scales of days (weather), to months (seasonal climate), to years 
and decades. Successfully managing these changes requires information 
on where and how they are occurring, as well as information on the 
associated changes in the atmosphere and ocean--all of which are 
supported by space-based observations.
    From an economic standpoint, an ice-free Arctic can offer 
tremendous commercial and trade opportunities, as the Arctic ocean 
becomes seasonally navigable, greatly reducing the transport costs 
between North America and Asia. Understanding the navigability, and 
planning out the most cost-effective routes, however, requires 
situational awareness, which requires observations that only satellites 
can provide. One of the challenges in observing the Arctic is that it 
is frequently cloud-covered. Many of our Arctic-observing satellites 
operate in the microwave portion of the electromagnetic spectrum, which 
allows them to see through clouds, enabling the tracking of sea ice, 
and assessment of its thickness, and navigability. As the shrinking 
trend of Arctic sea ice continues, an understanding of that trend can 
inform investments into Arctic navigation capabilities that could 
ultimately have tremendous economic payoff.
    From a strategic sense, an ice-free Arctic and increased economic 
activity, creates an exposed marine border and vulnerable operations in 
the Arctic that will require the kind of security considerations and 
management that has not been necessary in the past. Such management 
will require situational awareness on scales that are best achieved 
through satellite coverage.
    It is important to recognize that the behavior of sea ice, as is 
the case with sea level rise, occurs on scales that require 
observations that span hundreds, even thousands, of kilometers. Such 
observations are far beyond the capability of any sea-faring vessel. 
The satellites provide the scale of observation, and the context and 
perspective of change against a broader Earth system backdrop, to truly 
understand the nature, causes, and implications of such changes. It is 
also worth noting, with regard to the monitoring of Arctic sea ice and 
the shrinking high-latitude ice, the orbits of polar-orbiting or near-
polar-orbiting satellites converge in the polar regions, offering far 
more frequent coverage then they do at lower latitudes, thus from a 
sampling perspective, polar regions are well-suited to satellite 
monitoring.
National Security
    Finally, another extremely important dimension of U.S. interests, 
in which satellite observations are essential is in the national 
security space. Understanding threats to military infrastructure 
requires knowledge of the kind described above. As one example, the 
Norfolk Naval Station is the largest in the world, and because of its 
situation in coastal Virginia, the risks associated with sea level rise 
are of great importance. The assets that observe sea level rise and 
inform predictions, as well as observations that enable weather 
forecasting and climate projections have direct implications for this 
base and its operations. Other facilities are similarly subject to a 
range of environmental exposure for which knowledge of risks is 
essential for effective operations. Another domain in which satellite 
observations are very important is with respect to the theater of 
operations in conflicts involving U.S. forces. Knowledge in this domain 
requires intelligence on conditions on the ground and in the air, and 
how they will evolve throughout the operations period. In addition, the 
risks of conflict, which are driven by such matters as drought, 
resources, food access, etc., are informed by the access and 
information provided by satellite observations. Understanding 
population migration, strategic actions of parties of interest, all 
benefit from space-based observations. Many of these are acquired in 
the domain of the intelligence community and Department of Defense, but 
there are capabilities, such as weather forecasts, that are enabled by 
observations in the civil space domain that either fill gaps in or 
complement those in the classified domain.
    This year the Office of the Director of National Intelligence 
(ODNI) released The Annual Threat Assessment of the U.S. Intelligence 
Committee (ODNI, 2022) in which it categorizes threats to National 
Security interests into eight topic areas:

   China,

   Russia,

   Iran,

   North Korea,

   Health Security,

   Climate Change and Environmental Degradation,

   Additional Transnational Issues, and

   Conflicts and Instability.

    While the management of each of these threats benefit to some 
degree from space-based observations, Health Security and Climate 
Change and Environmental Degradation stand out as relying heavily on 
civilian satellite observations to enable their understanding and 
support predictions of future conditions and future threats. Similarly, 
as described above, assessing and anticipating conflicts and 
instability are supported by such observations as well. With regard to 
climate change specifically, the 2021 National Intelligence Estimate 
(National Intelligence Council, 2021) further supports the importance 
of understanding climate change in a national security context.
Sustaining Important Observations
    The capabilities in space-based Earth observations have advanced 
tremendously over the last two decades, with companies such as Maxar, 
Tomorrow.io, IceEye, Planet, Capella, and others developing 
capabilities with direct applications for commercial and government 
markets. These capabilities do--or will--provide robust and timely 
monitoring of fundamental Earth system parameters that include visible 
and thermal imaging, precipitation monitoring, all-weather surface 
conditions, surface deformation, etc. These efforts are quite 
impressive and represent a significant advance in the Nation's 
capabilities to make cost-effective, economically valuable observations 
of the state of the Earth for various applications. There remain 
challenges however for securing important Earth observations for which 
there is great societal need, but no viable commercial business model. 
While the economic value of imagery, for example is intuitive, there 
are some variables needed to advance science, and that have a less 
direct benefit to specific applications of the sort that would generate 
paying customers.
    While it may seem that such observations could be sustained by 
operational agencies, this is often not the case. Once NASA-sponsored 
efforts have demonstrated success in such observations, the resource-
limited operational agency investments are, appropriately, targeted at 
fulfilling their operational function, such as weather forecasting, in 
the case of NOAA, or land surface change and land-resource management 
in the case of USGS. There are variables that are vitally important to 
our success as a nation and society in planning for an evolving future 
state, but that don't have an operational benefit that directly aligns 
with these agencies' core mission and that don't lend themselves to 
commercial viability. Some examples of the most critical include:

   carbon monitoring to understand the evolution of carbon, its 
        sources and sinks and its implications for atmospheric warming,

   precipitation amount and type, to better understand 
        precipitation processes, which are critical for assessing 
        drought, flooding, and water availability,

   mass change to track the movement of water throughout the 
        Earth, including aquifer depletion and replenishment, as well 
        as ice sheet and glacier changes and their impacts on sea level 
        rise,

   the monitoring of incoming and outgoing radiation to assess 
        the Earth's energy balance, and the degree of warming and 
        cooling and how it varies with time and space,

   stratospheric ozone, to assess exposure potential to harmful 
        ultraviolet radiation,

   tropospheric ozone, to understand the health risks 
        associated with increases,

   soil moisture to assess water availability (and its 
        evolution) for plant growth and drought conditions, and

   ocean salinity, to improve understanding of ocean 
        circulation characteristics and the movement of heat by and 
        through the ocean, in particular between the equator and the 
        poles.

    There are other variables of interest, and in some cases, the 
military satellite observations provide data for civilian purposes 
(such as ocean winds). In other cases, private foundations provide 
support for very specific applications (e.g., methane and carbon 
dioxide monitoring). We also rely on international partners for some 
measurements that are not part of the U.S. portfolio, as has 
historically been the case for synthetic aperture radar for example and 
will be the case for upcoming atmospheric composition observations.
U.S. Leadership
    The United States has pioneered many space-based Earth observations 
and has also effectively partnered with international agencies to 
advance Earth observation and understanding. NASA has invested in and 
developed various technologies and capabilities that have pushed 
technological and scientific boundaries. Some of these sensors have 
transitioned to the operational communities; some have been taken on by 
the private sector, and some have been carried forward by international 
organizations. In this way, U.S. leadership in space-based observations 
has produced tremendous benefits for our Nation and humankind. Success 
in the future requires a continued innovation on the technical and 
scientific fronts, as well as on the programmatic front. This is where 
the broader space-based Earth observing enterprise requires investments 
in the research and development (primarily NASA), development and 
operational use (agencies such as NOAA and the USGS), and the 
innovation of the private sector, bringing low-cost approaches to 
critical observational needs. The challenge is that, while each of 
these entities does its part and does it well, there are significant 
gaps in the broader Earth observing enterprise that will impair our 
ability to anticipate and prepare for environmental challenges and 
opportunities that lie ahead.
    In addition, U.S. leadership is challenged by the limited degree of 
domestic talent to work on such capabilities. There is currently a 
great deal of competition for the appropriate skilled workforce across 
all related disciplines in science and engineering, with some of the 
various smaller start-up companies providing significant competition 
for the larger more established entities (such as NASA centers or the 
larger contractors). On the one hand, this is very good, as these 
start-ups introduce novelty and ingenuity into the pursuits, but at the 
same time, a robust workforce that supports a diverse set of 
capabilities is essential for U.S. leadership in this arena.
    The needs are primarily in basic engineering--aerospace, 
mechanical, electrical, computer, etc., which includes robotics and 
autonomy, and the universities remain the key source for entry-level 
engineers. The limiting factor, however, is at the mid-career level 
engineers who, in addition to their domain expertise and capabilities 
in systems engineering. In other words, people who are able to put all 
the components together to deliver a successful project. In addition, 
it is important that these systems engineers have a basic understanding 
of the science and applications for which these systems are being 
developed, so trade-offs can be assessed. Talent in this area is in 
high demand and of limited supply. They are aggressively sought by all 
types of organizations (small start-ups, large contractors, NASA 
centers, etc.), and competition is high. In some cases, the domestic 
labor workforce is not sufficient to meet these needs, and 
international talent needs to be brought in. For the U.S. space-based 
Earth observation enterprise, the challenges are not so much at the 
entry level, but in the availability of seasoned mentors, to help these 
entry-level engineers evolve into project leadership roles.
Conclusion
    These are just a few examples of the critical importance that 
space-based observations play in our lives and how they contribute to 
our livelihoods, safety, and prosperity. There are too many to 
comprehensively address for this hearing, but these examples make the 
point that such observations can positively impact how we live in a 
day-to-day sense, how we thrive as a nation, and how we succeed as a 
society on a changing planet. The benefits from such observations are 
realized in many sectors. Among them are:

   everyday citizens, who rely on forecasts in such areas as 
        weather and air quality to plan their days and even week's 
        activities and make health risk exposure choices,

   the insurance industry, who relies on observations of risk, 
        damage, and vulnerability to effectively insure the properties 
        of people subject to potential environmental threats,

   land resource managers, who require intelligence on resource 
        availability, risks and trends,

   water managers, who require information on current and 
        predicted water availability, drought, usage, and related 
        resources,

   coastal managers, who require information on sea level rise, 
        land subsidence or uplift, coastal erosion, and storm 
        forecasts,

   urban planners, who need to understand vulnerability of 
        populations and structures to weather and climate related 
        events, so they can plan accordingly,

   the transportation sector such as aviation and shipping (on 
        land, sea, and via rivers), who need to understand and manage 
        the navigability of rivers, the skies, and the oceans, all of 
        which have tremendous impacts on supplies and costs of goods,

   farmers, who need to know the degree to which factors 
        affecting crop health, crop yield and optimum times for 
        planting and harvesting,

   ranchers, who similarly need to know the health of lands for 
        grazing,

   the recreation industry (e.g., skiing, rafting, etc.), who 
        rely on information about snowpack, river flow, vegetation 
        health, etc. to plan their operations,

   those managing disaster response, who need to know avenues 
        for evacuation and access;

   the military and national security community, who need to 
        understand threats to their resources, potential areas of 
        resource-driven environmental conflict, conditions in theaters 
        of operations, and potential vulnerability of U.S. assets, and

   elected officials and other policymakers who rely on 
        credible information for policies such as resource management, 
        Federal flood insurance, rebuild vs. relocate decisions.

    It is clear that space-based observations of Earth improve lives, 
enable us to manage environmental challenges, and provide great 
economic benefit. They do so by providing the context, scale, and 
perspective needed to characterize, understand, anticipate, manage, and 
respond to change. In so doing, they enable--and empower--individual, 
national, and societal success.
    Thank you for the opportunity to testify and for your commitment to 
this important topic.
References
    Chow, F. K., Yu, K. A., Young, A., James, E., Grell, G. A., 
Csiszar, I., Tsidulko, M., Freitas, S., Pereira, G., Giglio, L., 
Friberg, M., and Ahmadov, R., (2022). High-Resolution, Smoke 
Forecasting for the 2018 Camp Fire in California, Bulletin of the 
American Meteorological Society 103, 6; 10.1175/BAMS-D-20-0329.1

    Church, J.A., White, (2011). N.J. Sea-Level Rise from the Late 19th 
to the Early 21st Century. Surv Geophys 32, 585-602. https://doi.org/
10.1007/s10712-011-9119-1

    Eidenshink, J., Schwind, B., Brewer, K. et al. (2007). A Project 
for Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity. fire ecol 3, 3-21. https://
doi.org/10.4996/fireecology.0301003

    comScore, Inc. (2014). ``The U.S. Mobile App Report.'' August 14. 
https://www.comscore.com/Insights/Presentations-and-Whitepapers/2014/
The-US-Mobile-App-Report.

    Kacimi, S. and R. Kwok, (2022). Arctic Snow Depth, Ice Thickness, 
and Volume From ICESat-2 and CryoSat-2: 2018-2021, Geophysical Research 
Letters, DOI 10.1029/2021GL097448.

    Lazo, J.K., R.E. Morss, and J.L. Demuth. (2009). 300 billion 
served--Sources, perceptions, uses, and values of weather forecasts. 
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 90(6):785-798.

    Le Cozannet, G., Kervyn, M., Russo, S. et al. (2020) Space-Based 
Earth Observations for Disaster Risk Management. Surv Geophys 41, 1209-
1235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-020-09586-5

    Liu, J., Song, M., Zhu, Z. et al. (2022). Arctic sea-ice loss is 
projected to lead to more frequent strong El Nino events. Nat Commun 
13, 4952. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-32705-2

    McKinsey Global Institute. (2017). How Technology Is Reshaping 
Supply and Demand for Natural Resources. February. https://
www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/sustainability-and-resource-
productivity/our-insights/how-technology-is-reshaping-supply-anddemand-
for-natural-resources.

    Milly, P. C. D. and Dunne, K. A., (2020), Colorado River flow 
dwindles as warming-driven loss of reflective snow energizes 
evaporation, Science, Vol. 367, No. 6483, pp. 1252-1255, DOI: 10.1126/
science.aay9187

    Musselman, K.N., Addor, N., Vano, J.A. et al. (2021) Winter melt 
trends portend widespread declines in snow water resources. Nat. Clim. 
Chang. 11, 418-424. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01014-9

    National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, (2018). 
Thriving on Our Changing Planet: A Decadal Strategy for Earth 
Observation from Space. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. 
https://doi.org/10.17226/24938.

    National Intelligence Council (2021). Global Trends 2040: A More 
Contested World. ISBN 978-1-929667-33-8. NIC 2021-02339.

    Neumann, J.E., Emanuel, K., Ravela, S. et al. (2015). Joint effects 
of storm surge and sea-level rise on U.S. Coasts: new economic 
estimates of impacts, adaptation, and benefits of mitigation policy. 
Climatic Change 129, 337-349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1304-z

    NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information (2021). U.S. 
Billion-Dollar Weather and Climate Disasters. https://www.doi.org/
10.25921/stkw-7w73

    NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, Climate at a 
Glance: Global Time Series, published March 2021, retrieved in April 
2021 from https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cag/

    Office of the Director of National Intelligence (2022), Annual 
Threat Assessment of the U.S. Intelligence Community. 31 pages.

    Rodell, M., Famiglietti, J.S., Wiese, D.N. et al., (2018). Emerging 
trends in global freshwater availability. Nature (557)651 https://
doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0123-1

    Titley, D. (2016). ``Cutting NASA Earth Observations Would Be a 
Costly Mistake,'' Defense One. December 2. http://www.defenseone.com/
technology/2016/12/cutting-nasa-earth-observations-would-be-costly-
mistake/133586/.

    UN-Water. (2007). Coping with Water Scarcity: Challenge of the 
Twenty-First Century. http://www.fao.org/3/a-aq444e.pdf.

    WHO (World Health Organization). (2016). Burden of Disease from the 
Joint Effects of Household and Ambient Air Pollution for 2012. http://
www.who.int/airpollution/data/AP_jointeffect_BoD_results_Nov2016.pdf.

    WHO. (2017). ``Malaria Fact Sheet,'' http://www.who.int/
mediacentre/factsheets/fs094/en/.

    Williams, A.P., Cook, B.I. & Smerdon, J.E. (2022). Rapid 
intensification of the emerging southwestern North American megadrought 
in 2020-2021. Nat. Clim. Chang. 12, 232-234. https://doi.org/10.1038/
s41558-022-01290-z

    Senator Hickenlooper. Thank you. Dr. Abdalati. And I was 
impressed that you were using--you know, not killing trees like 
the rest of us. I appreciate that. I now turn it over to our 
Chair Cantwell, who is an expert in her own right in not just 
technology, but in aerospace.

               STATEMENT OF HON. MARIA CANTWELL, 
                  U.S. SENATOR FROM WASHINGTON

    The Chair. Well, thank you, Mr. Chairman. And thank you, 
and to Senator Lummis, for holding this important hearing, and 
to our witnesses adding a lot of insight and valuable 
information about the success and opportunities for us in this 
area.
    We know that the unmatched scientific legacy of the U.S. 
Geological Survey's Landsat program and the key partnerships 
that they have had with NASA have been successful. And of 
course, NASA being in the news now with the landmark Artemis I 
mission, which just reached a point at almost 270,000 miles 
from Earth, farther than any other human related spacecraft. I 
would like to start by congratulating them, NASA, and their 
Artemis program, as well as the workforce in my state and 
across the Nation who participated in this.
    With 42 Washington companies contributing components for 
Artemis, our State remains an aerospace leader and NASA is 
keeping the United States in a world leadership position here 
as well. NASA, of course, does a lot more than explore space, 
and since its founding, it has had a mission to help us 
understand Earth, a mission shared by the USGS and the National 
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
    And for over 50 years, these agencies have been working 
with their academic and commercial partners and giving the U.S. 
a leadership role in developing and deploying satellite based 
remote sensing systems for monitoring the Earth. Now, I can't 
tell you how important we feel this is today.
    In the case of Landsat, publicly available data yielded 
over $2 billion in annual benefits to U.S. users, and over $1 
billion in annual benefits to users outside the United States. 
The total global Earth observation commercial market is 
projected to be almost $8 billion by 2030. You may have gone 
over all this data, OK.
    But this data, these services, this market represents 
sustained growth and opportunities, particularly in areas like 
agriculture, to crop insurance, to urban planning, and a very 
important subject for us in the Northwest and my colleagues 
here on this committee, wildfires.
    In Washington, the data and processes of information by 
NOAA Western Regional Center in Seattle, which houses offices 
for the National Weather Service and National Environmental 
Satellite Data and Information Services, data from these 
offices are invaluable in helping us cope with these increasing 
wildfires.
    During the season, and my colleagues I know in Western 
States saw this, an unbelievable increase in these instances. 
For example, the Bolt Creek Fire burned approximately 15,000 
acres on the East of Seattle in King County.
    We are used to having these fires on the other side of the 
Cascades, on the East side of the Cascades. We are not so used 
to having them on the West side of the Cascades. And Earth 
observation data were essential for real time fire mapping 
measurements, part of suppression in assessing post-hazard 
burns.
    This is incredibly important because in this particular 
area it is very steep and it is one of our two highway passes 
across the Cascades, and without that data and information, nor 
that highway, it becomes very precarious.
    So looking forward, we know that there is going to be a 
growing need around wildland fire prediction and long term 
adaptation. We must be vigilant about these fires. And 
residents who just suffered through the Bolt Creek fires have 
to worry now about landslides, which is why this--all of this 
information, as those of you who are involved in this already 
know, that that kind of fire damage leaves you very, very 
vulnerable.
    So the United States must continue to sustain its growth in 
Earth observation capabilities in alignment with our community 
needs and scientific consensus, and the symbolic development of 
research and operational capabilities managed by NASA, NOAA, 
and USGS will, I believe, remain very critical to how the 
partners in the private sector also develop.
    So I look forward to having an opportunity, Mr. Chairman--
you know, I don't want to get ahead of you and Senator Lummis 
on questions, but thank you to the witnesses, and thank you for 
holding the hearing.
    Senator Hickenlooper. Madam Chair, I think you are 
probably--your schedule, I can only imagine it. So if you would 
like to go first with questions, I think that is alright with 
me.
    Senator Lummis. Absolutely.
    Senator Hickenlooper. Ranking Member Lummis concurs.
    The Chair. OK. So to our--Dr. Volz, thank you for being 
here, virtually I guess. I wanted to--could you speak how 
infrastructure funding that was part of the bipartisan 
infrastructure law, Fire Ready Nation Act of 2020 to strengthen 
NOAA's fire weather service capabilities, are helping us with 
the fire and keeping residents safe? And what else do you think 
we need to do to help expand this capacity within NOAA?
    Dr. Volz. Thank you, ma'am, for the question. It is an 
excellent question, and we definitely appreciate the disaster 
supplemental funds, which provided the resources to us.
    So with those particular funds in the supplemental, we have 
been able to accelerate the delivery--the development and 
delivery of some fire products which take the information we 
get from our geostationary satellite GOES-R, and modeling--and 
working with our National Weather Service with modeling to make 
a better use of those products to our fire emergency managers, 
but also into such services as our high resolution rapid 
refresh model, which allows us to forecast the propagation of 
smoke and other effects that are coincident with the fire.
    These are products that were in the pipeline that we know 
we are ready to do, but we were resource limited, and we were 
able to accelerate them, for example, with the inclusion of 
these disaster supplemental funds.
    Looking forward, we definitely have seen the increase in 
the fire events and our next generation--we have a number of 
other products which we are continuing to improve, but in the 
next generation geostationary satellite, for example, the 
GeoXO, we have particularly targeted bands which are better 
focused on fire initiation and have increased the resolution on 
those so that we will be able to spot smaller fires faster and 
then give fire emergency managers a quicker response time to 
those fires.
    And one of the amazing facts in my mind was that we are 
able to contain roughly 97 percent of the fires that occur, but 
those 3 percent we don't contain in the first hours are the 
ones that lead to the bulk of the damage around the country.
    So if we can even improve that by 1 percent, we can 
significantly reduce the impact of major fires around--in the 
West and elsewhere in the U.S.
    The Chair. So what do we need to do to execute on that from 
a satellite point--?
    Dr. Volz. Well, we are continuing the development of the 
products and services. We are using the supplemental funds. But 
also GeoXO is now--it is in our program and is not confirmed 
yet. It is ready for the next step.
    And we are actually taking it to the Department of Commerce 
in the next two weeks for the next step in initiation, and we 
hope to be able to--it will require funding for the first 
launch, will be in 2032.
    And we will take the time between now and then to develop 
those satellites and to prepare the weather service and all of 
the whole ecosystem, as Dr. Abdalati said, of managers and 
responders to deal with the increased data when we get it. It 
is important that we get the investments to supplement and to 
deliver the next generation of enhanced observations that will 
meet the growing need.
    The Chair. Well, this doesn't--I mean, I mean, I know look, 
there is a lot of satellite use and a lot of interest that 
people have. But in this case, we get from the Weather Service 
every, usually by May and then maybe an update later in the 
summer, this is where the hot spots are going to be.
    They already have their projections. Here is who is really 
going to be at the brunt of this, you know, with weather 
forecast. So sometimes it might be Wyoming and it might be 
Colorado, and sometimes it is Washington and Oregon.
    And even, you know, you can get a map that is very red in 
Alaska, and you are thinking, how can this be? But I know that 
my colleagues from Alaska can tell you it is real. They have 
had fires up there they never predicted.
    So at that time, we would then dedicate satellite 
monitoring to say whatever those hot spots would be for a 
period of, what, a month, 2 months? So we literally would be 
calling out, you know, calling out these fires. What--describe 
what it is that we would do? I stumped our witness. I think 
they--I think they got----
    Senator Hickenlooper. He might have gotten frozen.
    The Chair. Yes. There you go. Can you hear us, Mr.--Dr. 
Volz?
    Dr. Volz. I can hear you now. I am sorry. You froze for 
just a second. So, yes, I hear you.
    The Chair. OK. My question was, are we targeting--we need 
satellite capability to target certain areas for, like, months 
at a time, I guess is the question?
    Dr. Volz. No, I would say that is a misrepresentation that 
the GOES--the geostationary satellites are observing all the 
time, 24/7 with no interruption.
    You mentioned the forecasting for a seasonal and the like, 
and that, we don't change our satellite assets to observe those 
differently based on high vulnerability versus low 
vulnerability, but it allows the communities to preposition to 
prepare emergency responses to those areas that may be listed 
as higher vulnerability.
    What we can do, improve forecasting, ecosystem forecasting, 
understanding the health, the vegetation health, the soil 
moisture content, the general ecosystem, environmental factors 
to give even more higher resolution and higher?
    [Technical problems.]
    The Chair. Better broadband.
    [Laughter.]
    The Chair. Well, Mr. Chairman, I will--I think the point 
here I would make if Dr. Volz was back with us is just, so 
there is no reason why we shouldn't do this. So this is going 
to save us money. The three of us know how much fire damage is 
costing us.
    And if you can prevent some of it by what we say are 
activities of hasty response, and if we can use our geo-system 
to do that, let's do it. So thank you, Mr. Chairman.
    Senator Hickenlooper. Thank you. And I think that is, that 
sense of when you get to a fire soon enough, you dramatically 
transform the damage done.
    The one thing you learn, every Governor in the West learns 
is that if you can get there in that first few hours when it is 
smoldering before it breaks into a blaze, you have got a very 
good chance of controlling it. Let me switch a little bit.
    Dr. Calvin, how will NASA and the Earth Information Center, 
this is the news Senator Bill Nelson talked about in 2021, 
coordinate with other Federal agencies to address priorities, 
wildfires, but methane emissions, land use?
    So much of this, and I think you all could speak on this in 
terms of the great challenges to orchestrate and to integrate 
all the different sources of data. So, speak to that, if you 
can start.
    Dr. Calvin. Yes. Thank you. And thank you for the question. 
I think what we all recognize is that there is increasing 
challenges. We have just been talking about wildfire and there 
is other agriculture and droughts, and we have a lot of 
information both at NASA and other Federal agencies.
    And the idea behind the Earth Information Center is to 
bring that together and make that information accessible to 
people so that they can respond to the challenges they are 
seeing in their communities. And there are a lot of 
complementary sets of information or all around the Federal 
Government.
    One of the prototypes that we are thinking of for the Earth 
Information Center is around greenhouse gas in monitoring and 
measurement. And here there is an interagency working group 
that has been actively working together on how you can bring 
that data together.
    So how can you take the activity based inventories produced 
by EPA and combine it with satellite based observations from 
NASA, and other ground and surface space observations from 
other agencies and bring that all together to provide more 
complete information.
    And so we look forward to working with our Federal partners 
to make that a reality.
    Senator Hickenlooper. You know, and I am old enough, I 
think I am the only person here that is old enough to remember 
when Landsat first delivered images, real images. Before we had 
seen it in movies.
    We had various art directors' perspective, what they 
thought it would look like, but it was so different when we saw 
it. And, you know, it really is to this day one of the most--to 
remember back to how amazingly transformational it was in our 
consciousness. It is hard to imagine today.
    Mr. Jablonsky obviously there has been a rise in the 
commercial small sats, these constellations of small 
satellites, and a number of companies such as Maxar have 
demonstrated the ability to produce high resolution, very high 
resolution earth observation data.
    What can small sats, if that is a word, it must be the word 
because it is written here--what can small sats with higher 
resolution imagers, how can they provide targeted observations 
over specific areas of interest? And what are some of the--what 
is an example of that?
    Mr. Jablonsky. Well, thanks, Senator. I think probably the 
best way to tee that up would be to describe the vast amount of 
data coming in from the commercial, as well as Government 
satellites, and how that is being, you know, dealt with to 
make--to help decisionmakers take action on it in a fairly 
rapid fashion.
    So, for example, Maxar's satellites have 30 centimeter 
pixel size, so that anything with a, you know, larger than 30 
centimeters in a frame becomes visible. That means we can not 
only see, but using artificial intelligence algorithms, count 
all the cars in a city in a single satellite pass and do that 
in seconds because of the revolutions that we have had in cloud 
computing, as well as machine learning algorithms and 
artificial intelligence in recent years.
    It has been demonstrably, I think, very effective in 
matching that type of data with weather patterns, for example, 
to then help fight wildfires in the West. So not only 
understanding where the fires are, but when you overlay weather 
patterns and terrain and elevation and difficulty and road 
networks and where resources are, figure out the best way to 
rapidly minimize the damages and impacts that might be 
happening while keeping life safe.
    Because when people go out into the field, if they are on 
the wrong upslope and the wind changes, you know, that is when 
you can have a loss of emergency responders' lives. So, Maxar 
and other commercial providers collect massive amounts of the 
planet every day--millions and millions of square kilometers 
and terabytes and petabytes of data.
    And it is too much for any one human to get through, so 
getting that data into the right places, making it accessible 
through cloud enabled environments and Internet enabled 
environments, so that the first responders in a command center 
in Wyoming or Colorado can get to that information quickly, and 
then overlay their decisions on to it, is what we are working 
on.
    Senator Hickenlooper. Perfect. Dr. Abdalati, you have a 
great deal of experience working with NASA and NOAA. C.U. 
Boulder now has a research partnership with NOAA. Can you 
discuss the importance of interagency coordination to federally 
funded Earth observation missions, and maybe a concise 
suggestion or two for improvement?
    Dr. Abdalati. Well, certainly the coordination is 
absolutely critical because we have on, you know, upstream of 
the effort is the development of the technology, testing of the 
technologies, then deployment of the technologies to learn how 
to observe the parameters we need to observe.
    And then further downstream, as you see in the case of 
Landsat, for example, are the satellites that support weather 
forecasting. We have the use of those capabilities to advance 
science, to advance applications, to provide information that 
inform our day to day planning.
    So the spectrum of activities from discovery, and 
discovering how to discover, is at one end to the other end of 
using the information, turning that into something of direct 
value to people. So that doesn't happen with just NASA doing 
its part and then kicking it over to USGS or kicking it over to 
NOAA.
    There needs to be this reach across agencies, and it does 
exist, where at the user end of things, more operational end of 
that continuum, the needs are articulated so that NASA further 
upstream can be working toward delivering something that can be 
of use.
    And at the same time, as new capabilities emerge and are 
being developed, the operational agencies need to be aware of 
what the potential is. So that integration is absolutely 
critical. And as far as improving it, I will say this, it works 
well in an interaction sense.
    Where I would suggest improvements is there are still 
things that fall through the cracks because NOAA, USGS has its 
mission--have their missions. NASA has its capabilities that it 
develops. And when the mission centric perspective, as is 
appropriate, is exercised by the agencies, they are looking at, 
OK, what do I have to fulfill my mission?
    There are observations that need to be done, that need to 
be continued, that don't quite fit into the operational space, 
but have been developed and continue to be developed by NASA. 
And finding a way to keep those going, even though they support 
knowledge, they support understanding our planet and how it 
operates, don't necessarily map to the operational function of 
the agency.
    So some overarching entity that says, this is what the 
enterprise needs to carry out and I think that will improve it.
    Senator Hickenlooper. I appreciate that. Thank you. Ms. 
Lummis.
    Senator Lummis. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Dr. Calvin, one of 
the things that our committee has been focused on is the 
growing concern about orbital debris. Is there a threat posed 
to the Landsat Program by growing amounts of orbital debris? Is 
this something you are focused on?
    Dr. Calvin. So at NASA, people think about this, and we 
agree that it is important to ensure that space is usable for 
years to come. Space debris and mega constellations are an 
issue that need to be addressed by U.S. leadership. And I think 
I can refer other colleagues within my agency for more 
information on that.
    Senator Lummis. Thank you very much. Dr. Abdalati, being 
from the West, you know well the dangers of not only drought, 
but also some surprise flooding from snowpack melt in Wyoming.
    We saw a lot of damage this spring around Yellowstone 
National Park, where we had a surprisingly rapid snow melt due 
to some unseasonably warm weather, and rain simultaneously. And 
so are there ways that Landsat can help mitigate these sorts of 
disasters?
    Dr. Abdalati. Well, the mitigation--what we can do is 
observe as they unfold. So we can mitigate the management of 
those kinds of disasters and preparation.
    And it is not just Landsat, it is other observations 
because it requires understanding the potential for rain. You 
know, how much water is in the atmosphere? How much is going to 
fall out? How much snow, we call it snow water equivalent, is 
stored in the mountain. So, you mentioned rain.
    Rain makes melt happen much faster. It is a much more 
efficient energy delivery system for melt. So it really 
requires the monitoring and forecasting of rainfall, 
temperature, the rate at which it will occur, the topography, 
because the runoff of the water dictates or is a big driver and 
flooding as well.
    So all of those elements combined. Certainly Landsat is a 
component of it, but there is much more to be observed.
    Senator Lummis. Thank you. Mr. Gallagher, as you know, 
Wyoming is rich in oil, gas, coal, uranium. It is my 
understanding that using images from Landsat, we were able to 
determine the subsurface composition of minerals and other 
deposits based on above ground particles.
    Certainly it is true with uranium. We see that in Fremont 
County, Wyoming, as well as some other counties. How is the 
data collected by Landsat Program making our natural resource 
location and extraction more efficient, pinpointing it a little 
better?
    Mr. Gallagher. Good. Thank you for the question. So, yes, 
it is true that the superficial geology, if you know the 
superficial geology, then it can tell you whether or not it is 
complimentary for minerals and oil and gas.
    Landsat has some spectral bands that provide some--certain 
information about the surface. More broadly at USGS, we have 
other sensors that can do that as well. So in my mission area, 
I partner with the Energy and Minerals Mission Area on a 
project we call Earth MRI.
    So we are flying airborne instrumentation that is 
electromagnetic data that lets us see into the subsurface for 
the identification of critical minerals. So I just cite that as 
an example.
    As my colleague said, they are really multiple sensors that 
give you that kind of information, both on the surface and 
subsurface, and Landsat has a role.
    Senator Lummis. Thank you. Dr. Volz, are you still there? 
Can you hear me?
    Dr. Volz. Yes, I can hear you fine. Go ahead.
    Senator Lummis. Thanks. I want to expand on a question that 
was asked earlier. Are there data sets that can be used to help 
us combat wildfires in real time? As Chairman Hickenlooper 
stated, you know, if we can catch them early enough, we can 
really contain the damage. And I am curious about whether data 
sets can be used in that way?
    Dr. Volz. What Dr. Abdalati just said a few minutes ago--
Yes, we are getting--we are getting a lot of feedback.
    Dr. Volz. All right, OK. But yes.
    Senator Lummis. OK. Good, good. You answered my question. 
And--Yes. And then you reference up Dr. Abdalati's name, so I 
wonder if I might turn to elucidate a little bit.
    Dr. Abdalati. Yes, I am sorry, can you restate? You are 
asking if there are data sets that can be used?
    Senator Lummis. Yes, that can help us identify in real time 
wildfire potential or----
    Dr. Abdalati. Oh, certainly. You know, and in fact, I 
personally, my neighborhood was destroyed by the Marshall Fire 
in Colorado. We lost 1,100 homes. Mine was not one of them. 
There was a lot of smoke damage.
    But personally, as we were evacuating, I with my daughter 
and my coughing dog, I just looked around at how dry the land 
was and felt the wind, you know. And so it is information on 
wind speeds. It is information on drought.
    Soil moisture is key because while it was likely human 
ignited fire, as most wildfires are, the conditions for the 
fuel for it were in the dryness of the soil and the vegetation, 
the winds that just caused it to rip through the neighborhood, 
the area.
    So data sets are soil moisture, information on vegetation 
so we understand its health, how dry it is, is it kindling or 
is it, you know, green. Winds, precipitation, and all of these 
can be derived from not solely or exclusively, but from 
satellite observations, as some of which were mentioned here.
    Landsat is a great element of that system. But there are 
also things like forecasting winds and understanding soil 
moisture and other data sets. So, yes, it is an integration of 
capability.
    Senator Lummis. Thank you. And can I ask one more quick 
question? Do I have time for that?
    Senator Hickenlooper. Sure.
    Senator Lummis. Mr. Jablonsky, is there a way the private 
sector can work with the public sector's data sets and 
information to provide even more information?
    Mr. Jablonsky. Thank you, Senator. Absolutely. For example, 
on a private sector satellite, WorldView 3, we have over 20 
multispectral bands, including shortwave infrared sensors.
    And those shortwave infrared sensors can actually see 
through the smoke to determine the boundaries of a wildfire, 
where the hotspots are and help the teams on the ground as 
determined. It can also tell you when you think you have got a 
fire out, where you still have localized hotspots that you 
might need to take care of or work on.
    And then Maxar and other commercial companies have weather 
desk type abilities. So, for example, our weather prediction 
capabilities are used commercially, but can also be used by 
Governments to determine crop health, to figure out economic 
indicators, and in areas like this, think about what a 
propagation pattern might look like in a localized area.
    Senator Lummis. Thank you, panel. Really appreciate your 
testimony.
    Senator Hickenlooper. Great. Senator Blumenthal.

             STATEMENT OF HON. RICHARD BLUMENTHAL, 
                 U.S. SENATOR FROM CONNECTICUT

    Senator Blumenthal. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Appreciate all 
of you on the panel being with us today. My guess is that not a 
lot of Americans understand or appreciate the immense value of 
the work that Landsat and similar kinds of systems do for our 
country, not to mention the vast potential value that they can 
add in terms of our understanding of the planet and our efforts 
to save it.
    Connecticut's coastline, as you probably know, has a number 
of expansive estuaries like Long Island Sound that are teeming 
with flora and fauna, with other kinds of ecosystems that are 
threatened by global warming and human development, and natural 
disasters, and more. Landsat has been instrumental in better 
understanding Connecticut's waterways.
    In 2018, the Interstate Environmental Commission studied 
hypoxia, as you know, there are zones lacking oxygen, 
indicating poor water quality in Long Island Sound, using 
Landsat data to help determine the contributing factors to that 
problem. And Landsat data has also been used to examine ocean 
conditions and so forth.
    My question has to do with how accessible this data is to 
ordinary Americans, to environmental groups, to the public in 
general. I think you may have touched on this, Dr. Calvin, in 
one of your answers to Senator Hickenlooper, but perhaps you 
could elaborate on how this data can be made more publicly 
available and accessible to people who are interested in it, 
like citizens groups, environmental advocates, and others.
    And I would be interested in views that others may have on 
that same question.
    Dr. Calvin. Yes. Thank you for the question. So all of 
NASA's satellite observations are publicly available, but one 
of the things we are working on at NASA is making them more 
accessible. They are often large datasets. You need a lot of 
technical expertise.
    So some of the things we are doing is moving some of these 
to the cloud so that you don't need a supercomputer, and 
providing more trainings on the data, including some in Spanish 
language.
    And then when I was answering Senator Hickenlooper's 
question earlier about the Earth Information Center, so part of 
what we are doing is trying to make it more accessible to the 
public.
    And just one example of a tool we have now, we have a sea 
level rise tool, so you can look at coastal cities around the 
U.S. or around the world and see how much sea level has risen 
till now and how much it might rise in the future.
    And we are continually working to make sure our data sets 
are usable to people and accessible.
    Senator Blumenthal. Others have comments? If not, Dr. 
Calvin, I am interested in the work that you have done on food 
and water. Can you talk generally about what we are seeing and 
learning about water quality in the United States, quantity and 
quality of water?
    Dr. Calvin. So we are seeing changes in the water cycle in 
general, more heavy precipitation events, more droughts. And a 
lot of what we can see with NASA's satellite observations, we 
can monitor and observe those changes.
    And so we have talked a little bit earlier today about how 
we can see things like soil moisture and better understand 
that. We have a satellite launching 2 weeks from today called 
the Surface Water and Ocean Topography Mission, and this will 
provide us the first global survey of water running through 
rivers and lakes.
    So any river larger than 100 meters in width, we will be 
able to see that. And then for oceans, we will get a better 
understanding of ocean circulation. And all of those things 
impact food.
    So a lot of, you know, water scarcity work is looking at 
how much water do we have available, which the Surface Water 
and Ocean Topography Mission will tell us. And then we also 
need to know how much water we need.
    And so some of the other satellites that NASA has that can 
give us information about irrigation needs and soil moisture 
would be important for that as well.
    Senator Blumenthal. You expect that that kind of analysis 
and factual collection will indicate some solutions, some steps 
we ought to take?
    Dr. Calvin. You know, the goal with NASA is to provide the 
information in an actionable ways that people can use that as 
their own to inform their decisionmaking. And so we will be 
working with stakeholders and users to understand what their 
questions are and provide information that is relevant to 
those.
    Senator Blumenthal. Thank you. Thanks very much, Mr. 
Chairman.
    Senator Hickenlooper. Thank you. Now I have a question, a 
couple of questions more. I don't know--I suspect a Ranking 
Member Lummis might have a question extra.
    Senator Lummis. You know, I do, but I know that they just 
scheduled a call to vote.
    Senator Hickenlooper. I know, but I think we can be like 10 
minutes late.
    Senator Lummis. Good. OK.
    Senator Hickenlooper. I think--this is a unique set. We 
have votes being scheduled against our will. I shouldn't say 
that. Why don't you go ahead and ask the question, and I will 
ask a question.
    Senator Lummis. Well, I would like to explore, I thought it 
was fascinating to hear about the abilities of both Government, 
Landsat and satellite data, and private sector satellite data 
being used almost simultaneously and in a complementary way on 
some significant weather events or fire events.
    And so I would just like to explore just a little more, Mr. 
Gallagher and Mr. Jablonsky, with how--who analyzes it? Let's 
say you have a significant hurricane off the coast, or you are 
watching it develop or some such observable event.
    How do you coordinate between private sector information 
and Department of Interior information specifically?
    Mr. Gallagher. Thank you for the question, Senator. So I 
will speak quickly about the Landsat data itself. We refer to 
Landsat data as medium resolution. So a little more on that. It 
is a pixel is 30 meters by 30 meters.
    That is about the size of a baseball diamond. And so a 
Landsat seeing one image is actually about 13,000 square miles. 
So it is medium resolution. It is--you are seeing things at a 
scale of regional scale. So a lot of the commercial sources of 
data are much higher resolution. You heard our colleague here 
talking about submeter resolution through their imagery data.
    So when an event like that occurs, the data is very 
complementary because the Landsat data is looking at the 
regional patterns, denuding of the landscape, loss of shoreline 
erosion, or high wind that takes out green infrastructure and 
human built infrastructure.
    The lower--the higher resolution data is fed to emergency 
responders who are responding on the scene for what is needed 
in terms of immediate responses. Landsat data is usually used 
for longer term recovery.
    How people access the data in real time? We have done in 
recent months and years efforts to put all the Landsat data in 
the cloud and make it immediately accessible in that way. And 
we also serve it, of course, through the USGS through a tool 
called Earth Explorer.
    Senator Lummis. Thank you.
    Mr. Jablonsky. Just as an overlay on that, Senator. The 
Government has been far reaching in its efforts to get access 
to commercial resources and make them broadly accessible.
    The largest program is the electro-optical commercial layer 
program with the National Reconnaissance Office, by which they 
spend significant amounts on commercial data and license that 
data in such a way that it is then broadly accessible to all 
U.S. Government personnel and for U.S. Government type 
programs.
    It is a very taxpayer friendly way to buy something once 
and then propagate it throughout the entire ecosystem. Beyond 
that, then the National Geospatial Intelligence Agency has a 
program called Global EGD, or Enhanced Geospatial Delivery, 
which started as a small program over a decade ago in 
Afghanistan, about how do you get satellite data to people very 
quickly, that has now expanded to include worldwide reach.
    So from the time the satellites go overhead until that 
imagery, very high resolution imagery is available to over 
hundreds of thousands of users across the Federal Government, 
it might be a matter of 10 to 30 minutes.
    So, and it is broadly accessible. With a CAC Card in the 
U.S. military, you can just log in and get access. NASA has 
access. NOAA has access. One estimate was that the Federal 
Government saved over $1 billion by making that data accessible 
to the Census Bureau as they were doing their work.
    So I think it is a very, you know, far reaching, expansive 
way to make that information available and strong support for 
those programs.
    Senator Lummis. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Great 
hearing.
    Dr. Volz. Senator Lummis, this is Steve Volz.
    Senator Lummis. OK.
    Dr. Volz. If I can make a comment on that. You brought the 
example up of hurricanes. I think that there is definitely 
complementarity between a very high resolution commercial 
sector and moderate resolution, as Kevin Gallagher mentioned.
    But what is necessary is the pre-prep, is the preparation 
so that the information sources are planned in advance, the 
integration is done, the systems are compatible.
    And it goes back to the point I think that Dr. Abdalati was 
saying is that we have a whole systems of observations, 
including commercial and Federal, and making them interoperable 
in the right environment so that when the event does occur, a 
hurricane or a fire, you are not arguing about whose data.
    You are using an integrated system where the data are then 
seamlessly used. So it is not a question of getting--going 
through the CAC, as we just heard, and getting the data. But 
knowing the data are available and it is seamless in terms of 
time and in scale.
    And that is where the operational system side works with 
the planning, and the dry runs, and we do this on a regular 
basis months in advance on an annual basis so that we have all 
of the players in the loop for utilizing the best data for the 
most--for every application as they come forward.
    And that is what the collaboration really is key between 
the Federal, the commercial, and the local partners.
    Senator Lummis. Impressive. Thanks.
    Senator Hickenlooper. Yes. And there are companies, a 
number of companies, Palantir comes to mind, but companies that 
can help pull all those datasets from disparate sources 
together and make them help facilitate that interoperability 
that I think we all agree is a necessity.
    My last question is just--and again, I still have at home 
my Landsat, the first book of imagery, I think was 1974 it came 
out and I just couldn't believe it. And I was, you know, as I--
when I got my Masters in Earth Environmental Science, it became 
kind of my handbook in a funny way of how we could think about 
the Earth.
    Back then, we didn't call it climate change. We called it 
the greenhouse effect, but everyone knew it. And many of those 
early predictions back from the 1970s and 1980s and even the 
1990s are being borne out in a frighteningly accurate way.
    I just thought we could run down and let each of you just 
say a minute about the ability, and if you have a suggestion I 
am always looking for action items, but the ability to see 
methane is something that is a hot topic right now.
    And, but it is not just methane, but the ability to really 
begin looking at this Earth as an organism that breathes and 
inhales and exhales, and what we need to do to be able to--part 
of this is communicate to the American public that this 
pollution is going to have real effects, but part of it is 
actually measuring it in such a way that we can respond to it.
    So I will give you each 30 seconds or 40 seconds, because I 
think otherwise I am going to get shouted down by the powers 
that--the powers that be. Anyways, so let's start with--I guess 
we will start, Dr. Volz, now that we have you back and then we 
will go to Dr. Calvin and down the line. Be concise.
    Dr. Volz. Thank you. In my 30 seconds, I would say it is 
really the integration of all of these. To understand how the 
earth is breathing, you need to look at it in a multispectral, 
multi-factors way, and that is bringing the data together and 
having them interoperable.
    And we are doing that in moving all of our data systems, 
those records and the current observations, into a cloud based 
format so that we can bring these observations together, public 
and private, high resolution and low resolution, global, so 
that we can have that holistic understanding of the Earth.
    And that allows us to do that forecast modeling and to 
explain the environmental systems better. Thank you.
    Senator Hickenlooper. Great. Dr. Calvin.
    Dr. Calvin. Yes. So we are also working toward bringing 
together multiple observations of different satellites and 
instruments. They have different spatial resolution, different 
revisit rates, different gases that they can observe. And so 
bringing all that together and then continuing to innovate.
    So IMET is an instrument installed on the International 
Space Station. Its primary science is around mineral dust, but 
the science team realized they could observe methane with it, 
and so they are now using it for that as well.
    And so thinking about how can we be innovative about how we 
measure and monitor.
    Mr. Jablonsky. Several times we have spoken about cloud 
based activities, and Maxar moved approximately 120 petabytes 
of data fully into the Amazon cloud. So it is completely 
accessible and searchable, and algorithms can run over those 
entire datasets, which are a 20 year record of the planet.
    The next big change now is to take all of the other 
datasets and position them geographically in an area so that 
they can all be--run with algorithms across the same dataset. 
So taking 3D precision data registration techniques, taking 
multiple sources of data, all getting them into that cloud 
infrastructure so that the data structures can be useful to do 
things like predict methane detection, to do all the things you 
want to do with it.
    So that is the next big revolution.
    Senator Hickenlooper. Great.
    Mr. Gallagher. So Landsat has been this independent, 
unbiased witness for the last 50 years to all the changes that 
have taken place on Earth from 4 billion people to almost 8 
billion people, and all the changes associated with that. It is 
a marvelous time series data.
    And the next big revolution is to be able to mine data sets 
like that. First of all, maintain those data sets.
    So 50 years from now, we have 100 years of observation 
data, but also to mine that time series using artificial 
intelligence and machine learning to do--to understand what 
happened before and how that brought us to today and make 
projections about where that is going to take us in the future.
    Senator Hickenlooper. Right.
    Dr. Abdalati. And I would say it requires that we 
continually look at all the relevant parameters of the Earth's 
system. It isn't just watching it rain. It isn't just watching 
it flood. It is all the pieces of it and integrate them. And 
doing so requires looking in parts of the electromagnetic 
spectrum that our eyes can't see.
    So it may not be something visible, but it is there. Water 
vapor is not something we really see, but understanding its 
content and, you know, quantity and movement is critical. So 
integrating all the parameters within the Earth system and 
observing it in a sustained and continued way.
    And as far as communicating goes, you know, I would just 
say make what is not visible to people visible. You know, it is 
hard, as I said, to see water vapor. But there are animations. 
There are ways of depicting the moisture in the air that can 
really speak to people. And the agencies, I think, do a good 
job of that. We just need to continue to get it out there.
    Senator Hickenlooper. Great. Well, thank you all. And I 
apologize. I could sit here, obviously an hour and go. Nothing 
I like more than getting a little more granular on some of 
these issues and having you all in one place. It is 
exhilarating.
    So I have a number of other questions I want to put--you 
will get them. Well, they will get collected into the record. 
Thank you all for making the effort to come here.
    And Dr. Volz as well. I think that we are, and I feel this, 
that we are on the edge of actually getting to the ways that we 
can demonstrate what the reality is and what the rate of change 
is, which is what the, you know, looking at these long-term 
data sets is so powerful.
    We can see changes in the rate of change. I think we can 
get to a point where we can mobilize not just our country but 
the world and really address some of these issues much more 
successfully than we have in the last few decades.
    So thank you for all your public service, private service 
and public service, and look forward to working with you all 
together.
    Senators who wish to submit questions for the record, 
questions will be due December 15, and look forward to seeing 
you all again, sooner than later.
    We are adjourned.
    [Whereupon, at 11:52 a.m., the hearing was adjourned.]

                            A P P E N D I X

   Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Maria Cantwell to 
                            Dr. Kate Calvin
    Intergovernmental Personnel Act (IPA): You are an employee of the 
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) on detail to NASA. Of 
course, PNNL's main campus is in Richland, WA with over 4000 employees, 
though you work at one of PNNL's satellite campuses in College Park in 
Maryland. These campuses conduct ground-breaking research on the 
environment, sustainable energy, and coastal/national security. 
Therefore, it is not surprising that NASA would want to tap into the 
talent at PNNL and hire you as their Chief Scientist and Senior Climate 
Advisor.

    Question 1. Given the highly competitive market for technical 
talent in the space industry, what additional hiring authorities and/or 
programs would be helpful to NASA to attract individuals with the 
rights skills into the Agency?
    Answer. NASA has existing special authorities, such as critical pay 
authority and hiring and pay flexibilities for STEM positions, that 
help us to attract specialized and highly skilled candidates. These 
authorities support our multi-year, overarching strategy to provide 
more agility across our entire workforce, including increased talent 
mobility and investment in non-permanent civil service appointments to 
support shorter duration projects and projects where required skills 
and knowledge change rapidly.
    NASA has also implemented several new tools to create a workforce 
that is efficiently shaped and sized to meet the needs of the future. 
These tools include:

   Enhanced hiring flexibilities including direct hire 
        authority which provides greater reach to external talent and 
        faster time to hire;

   Talent Marketplace--an internal application where detail and 
        lateral opportunities are shared with the workforce; and

   Increased use of rotations, temporary assignments and 
        promotions, and just-in-time training to upskill, reskill or 
        broaden capabilities of the existing workforce.

    Wildland Fires: Washington State had the second-and third-worst 
fire seasons on record in 2020 and 2021. This year, warmer weather is 
extending the fire season in the Northwest by 2 months compared to the 
1970s. NASA satellites and services play a critical role in the 
detection of fires as well as the tracking of fire and smoke.
    That is why I fought for additional fire weather infrastructure in 
the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and why Senator Sullivan and I 
introduced the Fire Ready Nation Act of 2022.

    Question 2. What new capabilities or satellite monitoring 
strategies might NASA be able to employ with additional investments in 
the near-term to (1) identify regions that are prone to fires and (2) 
to monitor new ``hot spot'' areas as they develop with the goal of 
identifying and containing fires early in their life cycle. 
Specifically, which priority items (pre-, active-, and post-fire) could 
be accelerated to reduce the most damaging and costly impacts of fires?
    Answer. Emerging approaches to airborne and satellite fire risk and 
vulnerability sensors include vegetation LIDAR and hyperspectral 
imaging to quantify fuel loading while passive microwave and synthetic 
aperture radar could monitor soil moisture. NASA is also exploring 
products such as OpenET (evapotranspiration data products derived from 
optical data and weather station data) to estimate live fuel moisture, 
which is likely more important than soil moisture for understanding 
fire risk.
    NASA's pre-fire focus is on using existing and new sensors for soil 
moisture and fuels. The active-fire priority is developing new sensors 
for airborne or satellite platforms for eventual full-time, day and 
night observations of fire location and intensity. Post-fire efforts 
are focused on better monitoring burn scars and forecasting 
precipitation to understand debris flow and landslide potential.

    Question 3. Could you highlight some of the next-generation Earth 
Observing instruments that NASA is working on now that will 
revolutionize our understanding of the Earth system in the future?
    Answer. Within the FY 2024 budget request for Earth Science, NASA 
requests funding to initiate four Earth System Observatory missions: 
Surface Biology & Geology, Atmospheric Observing System--Sky, 
Atmospheric Observing System--Storm, and Mass Change. These missions 
will provide key information to guide efforts related to climate 
change, natural hazard mitigation, fighting forest fires, and improving 
real-time agricultural processes. In addition, the Budget request 
supports the initiation of the Landsat Next mission, which will ensure 
continuity of the longest space-based record of Earth's land surface 
and will provide new capabilities for the next generation of Landsat 
users.
    The fifth ESO mission, Surface Deformation & Change, will remain in 
the pre-formulation study phase until FY 2026. This observable can be 
met by the NISAR mission when it launches in FY 2024.
    NASA is also looking toward future selections that will advance our 
understanding of the Earth system. During FY 2024, NASA intends to make 
selections from the Earth Venture Instrument-6 Announcement of 
Opportunity (AO) and will release the fourth Earth Venture Suborbital 
AO. NASA will also release the first Earth Explorers AO in FY 2023, to 
provide competitive opportunities for medium-sized instruments and 
missions that address specific science and applications needs as 
identified in the most recent Earth Science and Applications Decadal 
Survey.
                                 ______
                                 
   Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Kyrsten Sinema to 
                            Dr. Kate Calvin
    Drought and Fire Monitoring: Fire season begins in late April in 
Arizona, as the Southwest experiences the most severe drought in twelve 
hundred years. This is one month earlier than the average start of peak 
fire season between May and June. Earlier this year, the Tunnel Fire 
north of Flagstaff burned over twenty thousand acres while the Crooks 
Fire consumed over six thousand acres south of Prescott. After the 
fires were extinguished, burn scars have led to significant flooding 
issues in Flagstaff and other areas in northern Arizona.

    Question 1. How can researchers utilize Landsat data to examine the 
effects of drought and wildfire and help predict where future fire and 
flooding events may occur?
    Answer. Landsat satellites have been collecting information about 
water supplies, forest fires, and land use since the 1970s. Landsat 
data is used to locate and allocate water resources, assess water 
pollution, and manage watersheds--all vital to understanding the 
effects of drought. Landsat also plays an important role in assessing 
the impact of fires on forest ecosystems and human society. Landsat 
satellites document the location and extent of burned areas, how 
severely fires burn, and the subsequent regrowth of the land after a 
forest fire. All this information helps land managers better manage our 
forests and other natural resources in the context of fire. When 
combined with soil moisture data, Landsat can also improve drought and 
deluge monitoring to better understand where fire and flood events may 
occur.

    Question 2. How does your agency share this information with 
Federal and local emergency officials, Federal land management 
agencies, and water managers to inform their response to drought, 
wildfire, and flood risks?
    Answer. NASA's Applied Sciences Disasters Program works with 
partners across Federal and State government, including Federal and 
local emergency services, with private sector organizations, and 
scientific and academic institutions, to leverage Earth observation 
(EO) data, products, and models to provide actionable data to relevant 
decisionmakers across communities in the United States and the world. 
For example, Landsat and other EO data is used to populate the NASA 
Disasters Mapping Portal, which provides near real-time information and 
specific products to respond to disasters, such as floods and 
wildfires. These products are open and accessible to all and empower a 
range of stakeholders to make more informed decisions, including those 
with limited GIS knowledge.

    Question 3. Can your agency utilize Landsat data to predict or 
track urban areas that will experience the worst heat on a summer day, 
as well as the features of certain urbanized areas that contribute to 
or mitigate extreme heat areas? If so, can you describe the process for 
making those predictions?
    Answer. Landsat data, together with other EO data, including NASA's 
Ecosystem Spaceborne Thermal Radiometer Experiment on Space Station 
(ECOSTRESS), can be used to identify extreme heat areas and understand 
the impact to surrounding communities. Landsat uses observations in the 
near-infrared part of the electromagnetic spectrum to determine which 
parts of a city are warmer or colder over time. This can be connected 
to other factors including Nitrogen Dioxide and other pollutants from 
automobiles to reconstruct the cause and effect of urban heat. Recent 
NASA research on urban heat, using sources like ECOSTRESS, has been 
able to identify particularly heat-vulnerable areas and allow local 
governments and their partners to consider mitigation approaches, like 
thermal resistant paint, as reflected in NASA work in Los Angeles.

    Question 4. What steps have you taken to minimize the threats posed 
by space debris? Are there any actions Congress can take to help 
address this issue?
    Answer. NASA's budget request for its debris-related activities is 
almost $40 million. Supporting the funds requested in the President's 
Budget is needed to continue the essential work on this issue. NASA's 
activities to address the challenge of space debris have four 
components: debris mitigation, debris tracking and characterization, 
debris remediation, and crosscutting policy research and analysis.

   Mitigation. Office of Chief Engineer (OCE) and Office of 
        Safety and Mission Assurance (OSMA) are the Agency's orbital 
        debris technical authorities. The Orbital Debris Program Office 
        (ODPO) within OSMA is a leader in developing research and 
        technologies to both accurately measure the debris environment 
        and reduce the creation of debris during spacecraft operations. 
        The Science Mission Directorate's (SMD) Heliophysics Division 
        supports the development of on-orbit debris sensors and other 
        space environment measurement tools.

   Tracking and characterization. NASA's Conjunction Assessment 
        and Risk Analysis (CARA) Program is focused on better 
        understanding the risks posed by space debris so that 
        spacecraft can operate more safely. The Trajectory Operations 
        Officer (TOPO) and Flight Dynamics Officer (FDO) at the Johnson 
        Space Center provide conjunction risk analysis support to NASA 
        human space flight missions, including ISS and vehicles 
        visiting the ISS.

   Remediation. The Space Technology Mission Directorate (STMD) 
        supports the development of low TRL debris remediation 
        technologies that may one day be utilized to reduce the threat 
        of existing space debris. NASA's Office of Technology, Policy 
        and Strategy (OTPS) is studying costs and benefits of cleaning 
        up space debris, with insights for NASA, industry, and 
        policymakers.

   Crosscutting Policy Research and Analysis. OTPS conducts and 
        sponsors economic, policy and social research and analysis 
        related to solving the challenge of orbital debris.
                                 ______
                                 
   Response to Written Question Submitted by Hon. Maria Cantwell to 
                            Daniel Jablonsky
    Future of Computing and EO Data: Commercial companies such as Maxar 
have been critical in identifying flooding from Nooksack River and 
wildland fires in my state of Washington. In addition, commercial 
companies can augment Federal government datasets with advancements in 
artificial intelligence and cloud computing.
    Maxar has partnered with companies in my state, including Microsoft 
and Amazon Web Services, to advance the use of cloud storage and 
computing in Earth Intelligence.

    Question. Given these advancements, what is Maxar's vision for data 
processing, storage, and distribution over the next decade? How will 
this change access and decision making for U.S. citizens?
    Answer. Maxar is focused on continuing to deliver the best data and 
analytics it can. With world-leading resolution for commercial imagery, 
we are continually advancing how our data can be used. Our Precision3D 
technology is creating a digital twin of the globe which will continue 
to make significant advancements in the use of Earth observations for 
logistics, mapping, and even in gaming. We are also focused on 
delivering actionable intelligence to our government partners with 
constantly improving timelines.
    All of this is done with better processing and better storage. As 
Maxar continues to push forward and continues to lead the commercial 
sector with these products, the ability to process our data will be 
more important than ever. Data security and storage is of great 
importance, and we take our security measures seriously. Maxar's data 
is stored in the United States, and we take every effort to ensure that 
both our data and our satellites are secure through a variety of 
encryption techniques. Our partnerships with data companies are 
invaluable and we look to continue to grow these opportunities.
    As our technology continues to advance it will lead to better, more 
accurate, and more timely access for our decision makers. Specifically, 
we work closely with the private sector to provide solutions that make 
their businesses more effective. As mentioned, Maxar's data can provide 
better logistics to increase the efficiency of delivery routes. The 3D 
maps derived from Maxar's satellite imagery are also improving the 
rollout of 5G networks by showing obstructions that can impact signal. 
These are just a few examples of many on how commercial Earth 
observation data is playing a key role for decision makers in both 
government and the private sector.
                                 ______
                                 
   Response to Written Question Submitted by Hon. Kyrsten Sinema to 
                            Daniel Jablonsky
    Space Debris: One potential threat to our Landsat network is space 
debris that can damage or even destroy our satellites while they are in 
orbit. The Department of Defense's global Space Surveillance Network 
tracks over 27,000 objects of space debris, but thousands of other 
objects that are too small to observe can still represent a hazard.

    Question. What steps have you taken to minimize the threats posed 
by space debris? Are there any actions Congress can take to help 
address this issue?
    Answer. I thank Congress for understanding the immediate need to 
address space debris and look forward to finding ways Congress and the 
commercial sector can partner for solutions. Maxar's satellites are 
fully maneuverable which ensures that we have the ability to move out 
of the way of not only debris, but also other active satellites without 
maneuverability. Additionally, we deorbit our satellites long before 
current regulations require. Maxar is an active participant in the 
Commercial Integration Cell which is used to share information and best 
practices to maximize space situational awareness. Looking forward, in 
order to contribute to the growing need for space situational 
awareness, Maxar has invested in a technology called non-Earth imaging, 
which allows Maxar to image objects in space. This technology helped 
Maxar identify that our own satellite was hit by an untracked piece of 
space debris. It will be able to help diagnose the health of other 
satellites in the future as well.
    I support the ORBITS Act and think that is a good first step in 
helping address orbital debris. Additionally, I think a better system 
for rules of the road will help because while we are focused rightfully 
so on current debris, we must also ensure that active spacecraft are 
not creating debris or the potential for collisions that would create 
debris fields. Congress having an active engagement with the commercial 
space sector and spacecraft operators will also help create policies 
that can begin to tackle the dangers posed by space debris.
                                 ______
                                 
 Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. John Hickenlooper to 
                            Daniel Jablonsky
    Commercial Capabilities I: Maxar is an ongoing participant in 
NASA's Commercial Smallsat Data Acquisition Program. A NASA evaluation 
report on the CSDA pilot highlighted the utility of commercial datasets 
accessed through the program and the benefits provided to commercial 
partners. End User License Agreements (EULAs) between NASA and CSDA 
partners are structured to promote data use and sharing while also not 
obstructing commercial growth. It is cost prohibitive for NASA to make 
these datasets fully public, and the evaluation report underscored that 
restrictive EULAs were making it more challenging for researchers to 
share and publish data.

     Question 1. How has the CSDA program supported the growth of 
Maxar's EO capabilities? How could it be improved to promote greater 
use and access to commercial datasets while still promoting commercial 
growth?
    Answer. I want to thank Congress for its leadership and support of 
the commercial remote sensing industry. Congress continues to ensure 
that commercial capabilities are leveraged for key programs and that 
they are adequately funded. NASA's Commercial Smallsat Data Acquisition 
(CSDA) program looks to procure commercial data for a variety of uses 
and to help tell the story of what is happening on Earth. Maxar has not 
been a major provider of data for the CSDA program, largely because 
NASA can receive much of the same data through the National 
Reconnaissance Office's (NRO) Electro Optical Commercial Layer (EOCL) 
contract. There may be opportunity in the future to provide increased 
access to data and products, but those conversations are still ongoing. 
I'd encourage NASA to look at the licensing agreements of the EOCL 
contract, as they strike a good balance in maximizing use and 
publication of data, while still protecting commercial growth.

    Commercial Capabilities II: There has been a rise in the launch of 
commercial ``smallsats'' and constellations. Companies such as Maxar 
have demonstrated the capabilities of these smallsats to produce high-
resolution images of the Earth.

    Question 2. What are the unique capabilities that commercial 
satellites provide that might supplement or complement Federal systems? 
How can commercial datasets with higher spatial and temporal 
resolutions be used to support the broader Earth Observation mission?
    Answer. First, I'd like to clarify that Maxar's Earth observation 
satellites are not smallsats. Our current Earth observation satellites 
are 2800 kg in weight and 5.7 meters tall and our next gen Legion 
constellation are around 800 kg in weight and 3 meters tall--this size 
is necessary in order to carry optics that provide for very high-
resolution imagery. That said, commercial satellites provide an 
opportunity for the Federal government to leverage the pace of 
innovation in the private space sector. The government can license 
images and analytics through contracts with companies like Maxar and 
use this to augment government missions. Commercial Earth observation 
data is unclassified and quickly sharable between agencies and even 
with allies during times of need. This shareability is a cost savings 
to the taxpayer as the government is only paying for the data once, and 
it can be used for national security missions, humanitarian missions, 
or even during natural disasters. For example, with our planned Legion 
constellation and worldview satellites that are in-orbit today, we will 
be able to aid Federal governments with disaster response and recovery 
with up to 15 times a day revisit, providing near real time information 
of the events unfolding on the ground to the first responders. Another 
example of our unique capabilities is Maxar's ability to build and 
maintain 3D models with very high detail and accuracy that can 
complement Federal programs such as 3DEP (3D Elevation Program from 
USGS). These 3D models are critical to understand the impacts of 
climate change and increasing intensity of disasters and how to develop 
resiliency plans to support our homeland security.
                                 ______
                                 
   Response to Written Question Submitted by Hon. Maria Cantwell to 
                            Kevin Gallagher
    Landsat Data: Landsat has provided a virtually unbroken record of 
Earth Observation data for the last 50 years. As you said in your 
testimony, the U.S. Geological Survey has been intimately involved 
since the beginning of the program and has since 2008 provided free and 
open access to Landsat data. These data have become an invaluable 
resource for our Nation's infrastructure, informing urban planning, 
precision agriculture, and disaster response.

    Question. Could you describe the importance of Landsat's historical 
dataset? What new data will the Landsat Next satellite bring, and how 
do you see the program evolving from there?
    Answer. Both today's Landsat observations and the long-term data 
record to which they contribute provide unique value and impact 
Scientific and technology advancements in data storage, data 
processing, and algorithms have enabled Landsat's data record to give 
us new insights into changes occurring on our Nation's land surfaces, 
surface waters, and coastal regions.
    Following the first Landsat mission, launched in July of 1972, we 
have had at least one satellite in the series collecting data and often 
two satellites, which is our current operational baseline. This 
baseline allows us to image the entire Earth's land surfaces every 
eight days. Landsat's multi-decadal, global data record is unique--no 
other Earth-observing satellite mission comes close to its timespan, 
its consistency, and its scientific accuracy. Two U.S. Group on Earth 
Observations-led interagency Earth Observation Assessment reports 
ranked Landsat as the most impactful Earth-observing satellite system 
used by Federal agencies. In short, Landsat is a unique ``witness'' to 
changes that have occurred across the globe over the last 50 years.
    While Landsat senses phenomena visible to the human eye, it also 
can ``see'' in the near infrared (NIR), shortwave IR (SWIR), and 
thermal IR (TIR) regions of the electromagnetic spectrum.
    Landsat's capabilities enable users to perform land use and urban 
development planning, observe soil moisture, accurately estimate 
agricultural water use, assess crop health, understand wildfire risk 
and forest recovery processes, and respond to natural disasters, 
including flooding, drought, and wildfire, while also supporting many 
other societal applications.
    The Landsat archive is open and accessible to all users. Utilizing 
cloud processing and storage, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) has 
reprocessed and re-released the entire dataset as Landsat ``Collection 
2''. The dataset provides every Landsat measurement taken over the life 
of the Landsat program as a time-series of observations, thus enabling 
in-depth analysis of land cover changes over the past 50 years. In a 
little less than two years, the USGS has recorded over 4 billion user 
accesses to this data.
    Throughout Landsat's history, the National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration (NASA) and the USGS have continually advanced its 
technology to better address users' growing needs for high-quality 
data. The earliest Landsat missions sensed the Earth in four spectral 
bands, and in the 1980s, Landsat utilized eight bands, including a 
thermal band. Today, Landsat 8 and 9 operate in 11 bands. The USGS has 
also advanced the mission's spatial resolution-the ability to resolve 
small or adjacent details in an image. The earliest Landsat satellites 
imaged at about 75-meter resolution, whereas Landsat 8 and 9 operate at 
30-meter resolution--about the size of a baseball infield. Landsat Next 
will image in 26 spectral bands at resolutions as fine as 10 meters, 
more than doubling Landsat spectral and spatial resolution 
capabilities. Landsat Next will also improve revisit rates so that 
every location on Earth will be imaged every six days.
    Landsat Next's spectral, spatial, and timeliness requirements are 
driven by the most detailed land imaging user needs ever available for 
Landsat formulation. We conduct our peer-reviewed user needs process 
across the USGS, the Department of the Interior (DOI), and other 
Federal agencies. This process connects our users' continually growing 
science and public service needs to specific Landsat Next spectral 
bands while maintaining Landsat Next's continuity with the historical 
data record.
    Under the NASA-USGS Sustainable Land Imaging partnership, Landsat 
Next will provide the core, operational U.S. Government land-imaging 
capability for the Nation. The USGS will augment this core capability 
through partnerships with commercial and international satellite data 
providers, to serve an even broader array of user needs than can be 
served by a single system.
    The Landsat Program is evolving on the ground as well as in space. 
We are improving the interoperability among Federal, commercial, and 
international land-imaging datasets. While Landsat already provides 
essential calibration utilized by the commercial satellite providers, 
which enhances interoperability, we intend to optimize user tools for 
discovering and accessing data across disparate archives-enabling a 
multi-source ``data ecosystem''--so that users may apply multiple 
datasets (commercial and government) for improved land cover/land use 
analysis, monitoring, and forecasting. These capabilities and tools 
will help U.S. scientists answer some of the Nation's most pressing 
questions about resource management, disaster preparation, response, 
and mitigation, ecosystem health, and climate change resiliency.
    Prior to launching Landsat Next, NASA and the USGS expect to 
determine Landsat Next's successor mission and analyze future 
commercial and international remote sensing capabilities to determine 
the best approach to address our users' future needs. We plan to work 
closely and collaboratively with NASA and other organizations as we 
chart our future course.
                                 ______
                                 
   Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Kyrsten Sinema to 
                            Kevin Gallagher
    Drought and Fire Monitoring: Fire season begins in late April in 
Arizona, as the Southwest experiences the most severe drought in twelve 
hundred years. This is one month earlier than the average start of peak 
fire season between May and June. Earlier this year, the Tunnel Fire 
north of Flagstaff burned over twenty thousand acres while the Crooks 
Fire consumed over six thousand acres south of Prescott. After the 
fires were extinguished, burn scars have led to significant flooding 
issues in Flagstaff and other areas in northern Arizona.

    Question 1. How can researchers utilize Landsat data to examine the 
effects of drought and wildfire and help predict where future fire and 
flooding events may occur?
    Answer. Arizona is in a region where forest fires and drought are 
occurring more often and with increasing intensity. Landsat plays a 
critical role in wildfire science and in helping to prevent damage to 
life, property, and natural resources. Land managers and scientists use 
Landsat to predict wildfire, assess wildfire risks, and to understand 
their immediate and long term impacts. They also use Landsat to map the 
rapidly growing wildland-urban interface, which is highly susceptible 
to wildfire damage.
    Scientists use Landsat to characterize vegetation and fire fuel 
load. This characterization enables them to model different fire 
regimes and to support proactive vegetation and fire management to 
reduce fire risks and mitigate fire impacts, such as erosion and 
flooding. Land managers and scientists also use Landsat to assess the 
severity and extent of large fires as they plan recovery efforts, to 
estimate how much pollution burning releases into the air, and to 
monitor the post-fire recovery of burned areas.
    Landsat can capture active fires and smoke plumes as they occur, 
showing images of large, rapidly developing fires in the West. Because 
Landsat instruments can detect surface temperature differences over 
broad areas, they can also help detect wildfires burning in remote 
regions.

    Question 2. How does your agency share this information with 
Federal and local emergency officials, Federal land management 
agencies, and water managers to inform their response to drought, 
wildfire, and flood risks?
    Answer. The USGS shares Landsat data and information products with 
partner agencies working to address these risks. Landsat enables 
natural resource managers to assess the severity and extent of large 
fires for planning recovery efforts. For example, the U.S. Department 
of Agriculture (USDA) U.S. Forest Service (USFS) Burned Area Emergency 
Response (BAER) team uses Landsat data to map vegetation, water, and 
soil changes immediately after a fire. With these maps, the USFS can 
identify the most severely burned areas and treat them to mitigate 
increased water runoff and erosion. BAER has been estimated to yield 
cost savings ofup to $35 million over a five-year period. By using 
Landsat data to map vegetation, water, and soil changes after a fire, 
response staff can identify the patchwork of burned areas left in the 
wake of the flames.
    Landsat also enables fire fuel mapping through the joint USFS--DOI 
LANDFIRE program. This program supports a range of land management 
analysis and modeling for fire behaviors and informs strategic land 
management.
    Worldwide, droughts can have disastrous impacts on lives and 
livelihoods. Landsat data show the impact of drought on vegetation at a 
scale that enables water managers to better allocate limited water 
resources. Landsat's unique thermal infrared data can map 
evapotranspiration (ET)--water evaporating from the ground or 
transpiring from the plants--to estimate water use, soil moisture, and 
drought impacts on vegetation and ecosystems. As climate change 
exacerbates drought conditions, Landsat can help improve water 
allocation to support more effective adaptation.
    Landsat captures before and after images of flooding across the 
Nation and around the world, illustrating flood extent, vegetation 
loss, and structural damage. Landsat can also help monitor post-
flooding impacts on water quality and long-term vegetation recovery. By 
using Landsat to map historic flooding patterns, USGS hydrologists can 
better predict future flood hazards.

    Question 3. In particular, can you describe how the U.S. Geological 
Survey's Arizona Water Science Center in Flagstaff employs Landsat data 
when making forecasts regarding the Colorado River and Arizona 
watersheds?
    Answer. While the Arizona Water Science Center's activities focus 
primarily on field work and in-situ observation, Landsat has 
complemented this work in the Colorado River Basin and Arizona 
watersheds. Irrigation accounts for over 40 percent of freshwater 
withdrawals in the United States. Increased demand for scarce water 
supplies has shifted water management strategies from increasing water 
supply to innovatively managing water use at sustainable levels. 
Landsat's unique thermal infrared data enables field-scale measurements 
of ET to accurately estimate consumptive water use. With the warming 
climate and increasing drought conditions, Landsat-based analyses 
provide a reliable, consistent, impartial, and non-proprietary data 
source to inform water rights negotiations and resolve water rights 
disputes. Landsat-based water use information is also combined with 
climate models to forecast future water use across the Colorado River 
Basin.
    Prolonged drought has changed Arizona's watersheds, water quality 
and availability, riparian vegetation, and ecosystems. Scientists and 
land managers use Landsat to monitor vegetation type conversions, 
native and invasive species along the watersheds, inform watershed 
restoration efforts, and monitor restoration progress over time. One 
example involves their use of Landsat to monitor vegetation 
establishment and growth after installing rock detention structures--
low-cost, low-tech, natural systems in dryland streams. Landsat data 
recorded 30 years of sustained or increased vegetation cover where 
these natural structures were installed, despite prevailing long-term 
drought conditions. Landsat observations demonstrated that these 
nature-based solutions can help improve watershed condition and boost 
local climate change resilience.
    Additionally, Flagstaff Science Center scientists have used Landsat 
data collaboratively with the San Carlos Apache Nation in Arizona, to 
support the Tribe's management of its natural resources. They have used 
Landsat to assist the National Park Service with understanding 
potential effects of climate change on wildlife habitat in park lands. 
The Center's staff has used Landsat data to derive global cropland 
extent maps to support food security and sustainable agricultural 
practices.

    Heat Health: Large portions of central and southern Arizona 
experience extreme heat events, particularly during the summer months. 
Extreme heat can contribute to negative outcomes for individuals who 
lack access to air-conditioned residences or suffer from ailments that 
affect the ability of their bodies to regulate heat. 552 people died in 
Arizona from heat-related causes in 2021, and nearly 2,800 passed away 
over the past 10 years from heat-related causes.

    Question 4. Can your agency utilize Landsat data to predict or 
track urban areas that will experience the worst heat on a summer day, 
as well as the features of certain urbanized areas that contribute to 
or mitigate extreme heat areas? If so, can you describe the process for 
making those predictions?
    Answer. Yes, Landsat has informed municipal authorities' urban 
heat-island and green infrastructure efforts in various U.S. cities, 
including metropolitan New York City, Chicago, Illinois, and Boston, 
Massachusetts. Landsat collects surface temperature and vegetative 
change information that pinpoints urban heat islands. This information 
supports urban authorities' actions to mitigate heat stresses for 
residents. This work is growing in scope and urgency as urban and 
exurban landscapes throughout the world are growing at a rapid pace, 
with the total area of urban land cover estimated to triple between 
2000 and 2030 and as global average temperatures continue to rise.
    Continuing urbanization has numerous impacts on social and 
ecological systems. These impacts include expansion into critical 
protected areas, loss of croplands, changes in local hydrology, and 
changes to local climate. All these factors can contribute to 
residents' increased heat-borne mortality rates. Monitoring these 
landscape changes is critical for urban planners, resource managers, 
and decision makers seeking sustainable and equitable growth. Landsat 
is well-suited to this task, due to its multi-decade imagery archive, 
landscape-scale spatial resolution, and range of spectral imaging 
capabilities.
    Descartes Labs, a New Mexico-based startup, has mapped urban growth 
and heating by using Landsat data combined with machine learning 
algorithms and Geographic Information Systems. The company produced a 
map of urban heat islands in the greater Boston area by generating a 
mosaic of Landsat's thermal bands over several months. Its results show 
the stark difference between urban green spaces, major transportation 
corridors, and built-up areas. The team was also able to detect local 
patterns on the landscape resulting from large climate-controlled 
warehouses or brick buildings. Through Descartes Labs' platform, it is 
possible to model seasonal changes in urban land-surface temperature 
over the course of more than thirty years, with significant 
implications for the study of climate and its effects on cities.
    A September 2019 report featured on National Public Radio also used 
Landsat thermal-imaging capabilities to determine whether urban areas 
of lower income are correlated with higher daytime temperatures. The 
report found a strong, negative correlation between heat and income in 
many cities, indicating that the urban poor are often more susceptible 
to heat-related illnesses than their wealthier counterparts.
                                 ______
                                 
  Response to Written Question Submitted by Hon. John Hickenlooper to 
                            Kevin Gallagher
    Earth Observation Mission Architectures: The USGS and NASA 
collaborated on the Sustainable Land Imaging Architecture Study to 
examine novel concepts for next generation Earth observing missions, 
including the use of satellite constellations. They also gathered user 
feedback to establish data requirements and maximize scientific impact 
of future Landsat missions.

    Question. Can you discuss how the findings of this study will 
impact the Landsat Next mission?
    Answer. The USGS participated in two separate efforts to quantify 
the requirements and determine the architecture of the Landsat Next 
mission. First, the USGS National Land Imaging Program sought to 
understand and document user needs associated with Earth observation in 
general, and moderate-resolution space-based Earth observation in 
particular. The Program utilized a peer-reviewed process consisting of 
hundreds of expert interviews to understand user applications and 
observation needs. These findings were compared to existing and future 
observing systems to identify gaps in planned Earth observation 
capabilities.
    These findings were a direct input into our second effort, a 
mission architecture study. Along with NASA, our Sustainable Land 
Imaging partner, the USGS commissioned an Architecture Study Team to 
examine candidate architectures which would maintain the 
Congressionally mandated Landsat data continuity record while also 
addressing the gaps identified by our user needs analysis. The Team 
developed scores of architecture options and evaluated them against 
mission capabilities, required technologies, and relative costs. It 
presented its methodology, driving requirements, leading candidate 
architectures, and its recommended architecture to NASA and DO1/USGS 
leadership. Recommendations were guided by the need to execute a cost 
effective solution that would meet the user needs within the schedule 
and risk constraints of an operational Landsat mission. The 
architecture proposed by the study team, and eventually accepted by the 
agency partners and administration, is known as ``hybrid triplets''. 
The triplets are a simultaneously operating constellation of three 
observatories in a repeating ground track Sun-synchronous orbit. The 
selected architecture achieves an aggregate six-day revisit over the 
Earth's land surface and more than doubles Landsat's spectral and 
spatial resolution.
    For Landsat Next, NASA and the USGS determined that this hybrid 
triplets architecture will be the most cost-effective option to meet 
user needs for emerging science and applications while assuring 
continuity--an enduring connection--to the historical land record 
started by Landsat back in 1972.
    The new architecture will enhance users' ability to perform land 
use and urban development planning, observe soil moisture, accurately 
estimate agricultural water use, assess crop health, understand 
wildfire risk and forest recovery processes, and respond to natural 
disasters including flooding, drought, and wildfire, while also 
supporting many other societal applications.
                                 ______
                                 
  Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Raphael Warnock to 
                            Kevin Gallagher
    Coastal Erosion: Georgia's coast is home to numerous barrier 
islands that support thousands of residents and significant 
biodiversity. These islands play a crucial role in not only tourism and 
shipping, but also protecting the mainland from powerful winds, tides, 
currents, storms and hurricanes.

    Question 1. Your testimony references Landsat images showing the 
effects of Hurricane Ian on the coastlines of Georgia and Florida. How 
does the United States Geological Survey (USGS) use Landsat data such 
as this to work with local governments to address coastal erosion?
    Answer. Landsat's consistent, reliable, repeated observations of 
Earth's landscapes keep an objective record of their conditions before 
and after disasters. This information serves as an essential tool for 
inventorying land resources, assessing the risks of hurricanes, mapping 
the extent of hurricane damage, and planning post-disaster recovery in 
states such as Georgia.
    Landsat images are among the remote sensing images that feed into 
the USGS's Hazards Data Distribution System. This system is used by 
local responders across the Nation to support citizens affected by 
hurricanes, typhoons, volcanoes, earthquakes, widespread flooding, and 
other hazards.
    During the recent Hurricane Ian, Landsat 8 passed directly over the 
storm's eye on Sept 28 as the hurricane approached southwest Florida, 
enabling scientists to scrutinize the images and analyze the forces 
that made it so catastrophic. In the hours after the storm passed, 
millions lost power.
    Landsat helped capture the extent of the power outage, as well as 
post-storm sediment runoff from rivers and streams on Florida's 
southwest coast. Authorities used Landsat to generate the first high-
resolution, broad scale land disturbance map detailing damage wrought 
by the hurricane's wind and storm surge. This map was released just 
days after the storm to aid teams on the ground in their search and 
recovery work.
    Landsat measures coastal change not only after storms but 
continuously through time. This capability enables scientists and 
coastal managers to calculate erosion trends, evaluate processes that 
shape coastal landscapes, and predict how coastlines will respond to 
future storms.

    Agriculture: As you may know, Georgia is a proud agricultural 
state. However, changes in weather patterns and climate can threaten 
the success of Georgia's agricultural sector.

    Question 2. Your testimony discusses the importance of Landsat in 
agriculture. Please elaborate on how USGS partners with the 
agricultural sector to identify challenges and implement solutions 
based on Landsat data. How can an agricultural state such as Georgia 
strengthen its partnership with the USGS to better support farmers?
    Answer. Freely and easily accessible Landsat data has long 
benefited the agricultural sector. The USGS would be glad to work with 
the USDA and your staff to discuss how Landsat can further benefit 
Georgia's farmers.
    Millions of farmers and consumers already benefit from Landsat data 
that improve crop and water management decisions. Food and farming 
organizations rely on Landsat's unbiased, accurate, and timely 
information. It enables Federal and state agencies, local authorities, 
businesses, and farmers to analyze the health and vigor of crops they 
mature over the growing season; to understand needs of specific fields 
for fertilizer, irrigation, and rotation; to monitor planted acreage to 
forecast crop production and fight crop insurance fraud; to decide how 
much water is used in irrigation; and to forecast the impacts of 
drought on particular crops.
    Farmers once had to walk their entire farm, which could be hundreds 
of acres, on a regular basis to witness the same crop conditions that 
can now be readily detected by Landsat. The USDA uses Landsat data as a 
key input into several reports during the growing season that forecast 
crop production. In turn, the multimillion-dollar U.S. agricultural 
commodities market relies on these forecasts when conducting futures 
trading.
    Nearly two-thirds of U.S. surface-freshwater withdrawals are for 
crop irrigation. Keeping track of just how much water gets used--and 
making sure it gets used efficiently and legally, where and when it's 
needed across millions of acres of crop land--is no easy task. Landsat 
images can map evapotranspiration--water evaporating from the ground or 
transpiring from the plants--to estimate how much water crops are 
using.
    As rising temperatures, more widespread droughts, and intensifying 
weather events threaten food security and farmers livelihoods, farmers 
can use Landsat as a tool for effective action before, during, and 
after the growing season.
                                 ______
                                 
   Response to Written Question Submitted by Hon. Maria Cantwell to 
                          Dr. Waleed Abdalati
    Observation Gaps: As one of the co-chairs of the 2017 Earth Science 
Decadal Survey, Director of NOAA's Cooperative Institute for Research 
in Environmental Science (CIRES) and a former NASA Chief Scientist, you 
are uniquely positioned to talk about the Nation's current Earth 
observations, continuity of those observations, and what may be missing 
from the portfolio.

    Question. On January 5, 2023, it will be 5 years since the release 
of the last Earth Science Decadal Survey. Given that you are 
approaching the mid-term assessment, which measurements do you believe 
are critical to be sustained and which new measurements should be added 
to the portfolio to improve our understanding of Earth's changing 
climate? What are the tangible benefits of these measurements (or the 
consequences of not obtaining these measurements)?
    Answer. The Earth Science and Applications from Space 2017 (ESAS) 
Decadal Survey was a two-year effort that drew on the input from many 
hundreds of scientists. The panels and committee that wrote the report 
numbered approximately 100. The priorities that have been put forward 
were robustly developed, and they still remain priorities today. As 
such, my interest is in seeing the recommendations of the Decadal 
Survey implemented as soon as is practical. There have been some 
delays, and little has changed in terms of scientific and applications 
needs, so what were priorities at the time of release remain priorities 
today. As such, NASA's Earth System Observatory (ESO), which seeks to 
implement the recommendations of the Decadal Survey in the ``Designated 
Observable'' category, should remain the primary focus of NASA's 
mission development efforts. The ESAS committee also recommended 
several Earth Explorer mission (missions on the order of $350M each) 
opportunities to explore several areas among a list identified in the 
Decadal Survey that spanned atmosphere, ice, ecosystems, ocean and 
atmospheric winds, snow depth, and trace gases. The discriminator among 
these would be the feasibility/likelihood of successfully achieving 
their science objectives within the $350M cost caps. These priorities 
remain.
    Where there is an additional need, however, which was referred to 
in the Decadal Survey, but for which a path has yet to emerge, is in 
continuity of some critical measurements that do not quite fit into the 
NASA Earth process and discovery domains or the NOAA operational 
domain. These are sustained routine monitoring observations of 
important environmental parameters that are necessary for us to 
understand the evolution of our planet, particularly in the face of 
climate change. We addressed this to some extent in the Decadal Survey, 
by calling for an Earth Venture Continuity opportunity, which seeks to 
develop low-cost capabilities for conducting some critical Earth 
observations in a sustained way to provide this important information. 
To date, the continuity of observations that don't fall into the NASA 
or NOAA buckets remains a challenge, and they remain an important need.
    The benefits of executing the Decadal Survey recommended missions 
have been articulated in the Decadal Survey. In short they are an 
improved understanding of environmental processes that affect the way 
we live, such that we can be in a position to thrive on our changing 
planet. The benefits of identifying ways to conduct sustained 
observations in critical areas are that we will gain a better 
understanding of the rate of change on our planet and the underlying 
consequences, which will empower us to meet the associated challenges. 
Acquiring that understanding--beyond the research and operational 
domains--is also fundamental to our success as a nation and society in 
the face of our changing environment. The consequences of not doing 
both the missions outlined in the Decadal Survey and the additional 
continuity missions will be a compromised ability to manage 
environmental changes (natural and human-induced). This compromised 
ability will be a result of (a) not fully understanding the processes 
driving those changes and their likely behavior in the future and (b) 
not understanding the rate at which those changes are occurring and the 
magnitude and implications of those changes. The absence of such 
knowledge and information will significantly impede our ability to 
manage and navigate those changes, resulting in sub-optimal, and in 
some cases very costly and harmful, responses to those changes.
    We as a nation have been very fortunate in the fact that many of 
our Earth observing instruments (such as those on the Terra, Aqua, and 
Aura satellites) have surpassed their design lives by decades, and in 
the fact that many of our international partners have taken on the 
task, in a number of cases, of sustained observations. However, 
understanding these variables and processes are too important to leave 
to good fortune. A well-considered strategy is needed for prioritizing 
the range of variables needing continuity of measurements and 
subsequently prioritizing those needs against those associated with 
operational and discovery capabilities that are the subject of NOAA and 
NASA investments.
                                 ______
                                 
 Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. John Hickenlooper to 
                          Dr. Waleed Abdalati
    Drought Forecasting: Droughts threaten the livelihood and security 
of communities across the country. Water resource research is one of 
the primary focus areas at the Cooperative Institute for Research in 
Environmental Science (CIRES). CIRES researchers monitor changes in 
water supply and demand in order to inform policies for adaptation, 
resilience, and protection of this critical natural resource.

    Question 1. What data could next-generation satellites collect to 
improve our ability to forecast, mitigate, and recover from droughts? 
Could ground-penetrating radar data aid our research on-and response 
to-droughts? Are there any current or planned missions flying radar 
instruments?
    Answer. The ability to forecast, mitigate, and recover from 
droughts has several elements, some of which satellite observations can 
contribute to through the understanding of drought conditions, their 
evolution, and the associated processes. Our ability to understand and 
forecast droughts depends on our ability to assess the state of and 
changes in: subsurface water storage, near surface wetness of land/
soil, rainfall rates, water stored as snow in the snowpack, and the 
rate at which this rain and snowfall runoff at the surface vs. 
penetrate into the ground and/or replenish aquifers.
    For comprehensive subsurface water mass, the key space-based 
observational tool we have at the moment is the GRACE Follow-on (GRACE-
FO) mission, which determines changes in large scale water storage by 
measuring perturbations in the Earth's gravity field. An assessment of 
changes in the water storage from such measurements is shown in Figure 
1 for the period 2002-2016. NASA plans to fly a follow-on to the GRACE-
FO mission known as the Mass Change (MC) mission, currently planned for 
launch later this decade. It is expected to have the same capabilities 
as GRACE-FO. The resolution of this capability is on the order of 100 
km, but technological advances can allow for improvement in the future. 
Such advances include increased precision and accuracy of the ranging 
between satellites (the gravity measurements of GRACE and GRACE-FO rely 
on accurately measuring distance between two satellites in orbit) and 
flying multiple satellite pairs, with the latter providing the greatest 
opportunity for improvement and more detailed analyses. Currently there 
is no plan in place for extended gravity measurements after the Mass 
Change mission (beyond the early 2030s), leaving a critical measurement 
capability for drought assessment in question.
    For near surface wetness (soil moisture), long wavelength microwave 
sensors, both active (radar) and passive (radiometers), provide the 
ability observe soil water content. This is made possible by the fact 
that soil moisture affects both the emission of microwave energy from 
within the surface, and the penetration of radar into the soil and 
associated backscatter. While each provides some capability of 
assessing soil moisture, when combined (as was the case with the design 
of the Soil Moisture Active and Passive (SMAP) Mission), the 
complementary capabilities make for a more robust set of measurements. 
Currently, our ability to resolve soil moisture is on the order of 10 
km, which is useful for homogeneous terrain (such as expansive 
farmland) but poses challenges on heterogeneous terrain that varies 
within the footprint. Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) has been shown to 
provide insight into variability of soil moisture on small scales, but 
its accuracy is limited by surface roughness and structure. None-the-
less, it has the potential to provide information on relative 
variations in soil moisture. There is a range of synthetic aperture 
radar missions in operation and planned by international partners, but 
the U.S. has no current mission on orbit. The U.S. does have one in 
development, however, NISAR, which is a joint mission with the Indian 
Space Research Organisation (ISRO).
    Another key measure of drought in the form of river and reservoir 
storage can be ascertained from visible and infra-red imagery, as in 
the case of the historic Landsat records, showing the drying out of 
lakes and reservoirs throughout the world. An example is shown in 
Figure 2 which provides a multi-decadal history of the health and 
stages of the Colorado River. In addition, surface dryness and its 
implications for vegetation and health can be inferred from visible and 
near-infrared imagery, a capability that has existed for decades in a 
number of forms, and is expected to continue into the foreseeable on 
commercial, operational, and research instruments.
    Finally, the ability to measure and quantify rain and snowfall are 
key to understanding the sustainment and replenishment of water 
supplies. Precipitation can be measured using active radar and passive 
radiometers as is the case for the Global Precipitation Measurement 
(GPM) Mission, led by NASA and the Japanese Space Agency, JAXA. The 
resolution of such measurements is about 10 km x 10 km. The spatial 
character of snowfall deposited on the ground can be measured with 
visible imagery, since the reflectivity of snow is far greater than the 
reflectivity of background land surfaces, but the more important 
parameter is the snow water equivalent (SWE), which is a function of 
snow depth and density. One tool for measuring snow depth is the laser 
instrument on NASA's Ice Cloud and Land Elevation Satellite-2 (ICESat-
2), since laser scattering characteristics vary as a function of snow 
depth (Lu et al., 2022). Such measurements provide some insight into 
snow water equivalent stored in the pack, but without knowledge of the 
snow density, the information is not complete. One of the missions 
called for in the Decadal Survey in the Earth Explorer category is a 
mission to measure snow water equivalent, which would likely be a 
microwave sensor that ``sees'' into the snow and can provide 
information not just on snow depth, but the associated snow water 
equivalent.


    While the visible imagery, such as Landsat has a robust history, 
and the outlook is good for sustained observations, the other 
capabilities are limited going forward. The GRACE and GRACE Follow-on 
missions will be succeeded by NASA's Mass Change mission, extending 
gravity measurements into the next decade, however the SMAP mission 
suffered a failure of its active sensor, and there is no successor 
planned. Therefore the benefits of radar subsurface measurements will 
likely not be realized, except through some of the international and 
U.S. SAR missions, which have their own challenges in retrieving snow 
water equivalent. The passive microwave sensors are expected to 
continue through the coming decade, but their future beyond that is 
uncertain. The likelihood of a mission to directly measure snow water 
equivalent is not known, because it will depend on how successfully 
such a mission competes in NASA's Earth Explorer budget line. Our 
vision on the decadal survey was for there to be three Earth Explorer 
missions in the 2017-2027 decade to address three of the seven priority 
areas identified in the Decadal Survey:

   Greenhouse gases

   Ice elevation

   Ocean surface winds and currents

   Ozone and trace gases

   Snow depth and snow water equivalent

   Terrestrial Ecosystem Structure

   Atmospheric Winds

    Unfortunately, there will likely be only one or two, rather than 
three. The future of snow depth and snow water equivalent measurements 
will depend on the success of such a proposal in the limited Earth 
Explorer competition(s).
    All of these on-orbit or planned sensors provide the capability to 
observe the movement and evolution of water on and within the Earth's 
surface and in the atmosphere, however, predicting water resource 
availability and the associated implications, requires the integration 
of these observations with meteorological and hydrological models. 
Moreover, managing the challenges associated with changes in water 
resource availability requires policies that are targeted toward 
ensuring that whatever the effects of natural and human-caused climate 
change are, society can adapt. The satellite observations are a 
fundamental tool for informing those choices, but in the end, managing 
the challenges depends on a combination of observations, modeling, 
policies adopted, and choices made.
References:
Lu X, Hu Y, Zeng X, Stamnes SA, Neuman TA, Kurtz NT, Yang Y, Zhai P-W, 
    Gao M, Sun W, Xu K, Liu Z, Omar AH, Baize RR, Rogers LJ, Mitchell 
    BO, Stamnes K, Huang Y, Chen N, Weimer C, Lee J and Fair Z (2022) 
    Deriving Snow Depth From ICESat-2 Lidar Multiple Scattering 
    Measurements: Uncertainty Analyses. Front. Remote Sens. 3:891481. 
    doi: 10.3389/frsen.2022.891481
Rodell, M., Famiglietti, J.S., Wiese, D.N. et al., (2018). Emerging 
    trends in global freshwater availability. Nature (557)651 https://
    doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0123-1

    Decadal Survey Recommendations on Commercial Data Use: NASA's 
Decadal survey provides a forum for members of the scientific community 
to help guide the agency's objectives and future missions. You recently 
served as the Co-Chair of the Earth Decadal Survey, which discussed the 
utility of commercial Earth Observing datasets.

    Question 2. Can you share more about why the Earth Science Decadal 
Survey focused on the importance of commercial data sources in its 
recommendations?
    Answer. The Earth Science Decadal Survey explicitly pointed to the 
importance of commercial data sources primarily because the need for 
space-based observations in meeting critical societal goals is such 
that NASA's budget cannot accommodate them all. It was also done 
because commercial capabilities have evolved considerably in the last 
decade to the point where they can be a more cost-effective tool for 
some Earth observations. Because of limits in Federal resources, and 
because NASA does not have the budget to carry out all the work that is 
needed, the adoption of more cost-effective ways of observing the Earth 
is a necessary part of the space-based Earth observation portfolio. 
There are some cases in which the commercial sector can provide Earth 
observing capabilities of sufficient quality at a significantly lower 
cost than Federal agencies can develop them. These tend to be in areas 
in which a commercial business model can be profitable, such as with 
visible and infrared sensors. As a result, the science community sent a 
clear message that when these cost-effective methods can be used to 
provide sufficient critical Earth observations of high priority 
parameters, they should be used so that more could be done with the 
resources available. The commercial sector is by no means a substitute 
for the science capabilities that NASA missions enable or many of the 
operational capabilities that NOAA missions provide, but they are an 
important complement for providing cost-effective measurements that 
have become more routine and don't require significant technology 
development in order to provide useful data for scientific and societal 
purposes.

    NASA & NOAA: Roles and Missions: You have a great deal of 
experience working with both NASA and NOAA. CU-Boulder now has a 
research partnership with NOAA through the Cooperative Institute for 
Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES).

    Question 3. Can you discuss the importance of interagency 
coordination to federally-funded Earth Observation missions? Do you 
have any suggestions for improvements to prevent unnecessary 
duplication or uncertainty over responsibilities?
    Answer. Interagency coordination is absolutely critical for an 
effective Earth observing program. Were there to be overlap in 
observing capabilities, there would be an inefficient use of resources. 
Where there are gaps between the agencies' combined portfolios, there 
is an absence of knowledge and information fundamental to societal 
success. Both agency missions are clear, and I don't see significant 
overlap in capabilities, but there are important gaps, and going 
forward it is crucial that all of the needs for space-based Earth 
observation be articulated, and an agreed-upon framework that involves 
all relevant agencies be adopted for meeting those needs.
    These gaps arise from observations that are needed to understand 
and prepare for the Earth's changes and their implications for local, 
regional, national, and global populations but do not fit either into 
NOAA's operational mission or NASA's mission of discovery and process 
understanding. Examples include monitoring the evolution of Arctic sea 
ice, monitoring sea surface heights and sea level rise, assessing the 
changes in ice sheet mass balance and their implications for sea level 
rise, monitoring the Earth's radiation budget, etc. In each of these 
cases, I refer to monitoring. This is because climate variations and 
associated implications require observing for sustained periods of time 
for the purpose of understanding the evolution of the state of certain 
geophysical variables (such as sea surface height). Such observation 
strategies are not geared toward immediate operational (e.g., weather 
forecasting) needs, and at the same time they do not fit well into the 
category of exploring and understanding Earth environmental processes.
    Addressing the need to fill these gaps requires a well-considered 
strategy for prioritizing the range of variables in need of continuity 
of measurements and establishing a framework for implementing these 
observations. Doing so means that NASA's or NOAA's (or both) agency 
responsibilities would need to be expanded to address the need for this 
kind of monitoring, and resources would need to be allocated for this 
purpose. If additional resources were not to be allocated for this 
expansion of agency mission, then they would come at the expense of 
current agency priorities, which both agencies are having difficulty 
meeting in the current budget environment.
    In such a scenario, judgements would need to be made on the 
relative value of these monitoring missions against the exploration and 
operational value of the missions currently in the portfolio. In the 
end, our success as a nation depends on robust capabilities in all 
three areas--research, operations, and monitoring.
                                 ______
                                 
  Response to Written Questions Submitted by Hon. Raphael Warnock to 
                          Dr. Waleed Abdalati
    Natural Disasters: Your testimony discusses how space-based 
observations can be used to track storm trajectories, vulnerability to 
storm surges, and other weather threats to people.

    Question 1. How can these observations better help communities in 
states such as Georgia, which may be vulnerable to natural disasters 
such as tornadoes and storms, prepare and respond to natural disasters?
    Answer. These observations are already used to help communities 
prepare for natural disasters in that they inform prediction and allow 
for short-term preparation for impending disasters such as tropical 
storms and coastal flooding. However, this is under conditions in which 
disasters are imminent, and the data and associated forecasts can 
inform evacuations, rescue, and other quick-response strategies. 
Ideally, preparation for natural disasters should occur long before 
they strike. As a result, in addition to forecasts, there is a need for 
assessments of disaster likelihood and vulnerability, so communities 
can prepare in advance. If we just consider one example, such as 
coastal flooding in Georgia, such assessments would include 
understanding coastal topography, an assessment of vulnerability to 
storm surge, the determination of coastal sea level rise, etc. In 
western states, such assessments would likely be along the lines of 
vulnerability to fire or drought. For the Georgia coastal flooding 
example, observations and data that support such assessments include:

   the history of meteorologic observations that show the 
        evolution of tornadoes, hurricanes, and other severe weather,

   the time series of regional sea level rise,

   local topography,

   integrity and vulnerability of structures and infrastructure 
        in coastal regions,

   rain rates to assess flooding risks.

    NASA has made a concerted effort to work with the applications 
communities, the kind that would be doing these types of assessments, 
to better understand their needs and to produce data in usable formats. 
At the same time, NOAA produces coastal topography maps, and forecasts 
that allow for the risk assessment in the near term. What is needed, 
however, involves a more integrated strategy of multiple agencies 
(NASA, NOAA, USGS, NSF, FEMA, etc.) to quantify risks that would inform 
building strategies and management approaches. A simple example is the 
reassessment of flood zones. What was a 100-year flood zone as little 
as 30 years ago, is often now subject to the recurrence of those ``100-
year-floods'' in just a few decades, or in some cases, just a few years 
(Marsooli et al., 2019). Space-based observations, provide the 
foundational data to inform such reassessments, by providing 
fundamental insights into the processes that produce such disasters and 
by tracking the history and evolution of change, thus informing 
assessments of the rate, magnitude, and likelihood of future change. 
Similar assessments should be made for the other types of risks, such 
as fires in the drying west, landslides in mountainous regions, and 
flooding near rivers, to name a few.

    Question 2. What challenges, if any, have you observed in the 
ability of communities to effectively use these space-based 
observations to prepare for natural disasters?
    Answer. In some ways this depends on the types of disasters. For 
those related to weather (which can include fires and flooding), the 
challenges have been limited, as a result of our Federal agencies being 
good at examining the data and model results and predicting the 
likelihood of natural disasters and where they will occur. The 
forecasts have improved significantly over the last two decades, and 
the location and magnitude of weather-and climate-related disasters are 
much better understood than they were even ten years ago. NOAA, as an 
agency with an operational focus has always had a history of delivering 
products (whether derived from observations or models) that are usable 
by the community.
    The products primarily developed by NASA have been more in the 
domain of advancing research and advancing knowledge, and thus have 
been developed more for use by a particularly data savvy research 
community. More recently, however, it has become clear that NASA's 
Applied Sciences Program has made a robust and concerted effort to 
broaden the base of users of space-based observations for applications, 
including disaster preparedness and response, and ensure that their 
products are of such a nature that these communities can make effective 
use of them. NASA deserves great credit for their efforts to work from 
a user-needs perspective (which includes data formats, volumes, and 
other usability considerations) as a complement to its efforts to 
advance scientific knowledge and understanding. There are still some 
hurdles to overcome, as community management entities tend to stick 
with familiar types of data and systems, but the conversations between 
the expanding base of potential users and NASA will improve this aspect 
of disaster preparation. NASA's continuing efforts in this area should 
be supported and commended.
    To summarize, the challenges have not been in the domain of 
forecasting and use of forecasts, which is familiar to many and has 
been very successful. The challenges are more in the domain of direct 
data use from observations, as not all potential users are familiar 
with or comfortable with these data products. The situation is 
improving, as NASA continues to strive to understand user needs and 
works to present data in forms that are most valuable to user 
communities, and as these user communities continue to become more 
comfortable and familiar with how to use these types of data sets.
Reference:
Marsooli, R., Lin, N., Emanuel, K. et al. Climate change exacerbates 
    hurricane flood hazards along U.S. Atlantic and Gulf Coasts in 
    spatially varying patterns. Nat Commun 10, 3785 (2019). https://
    doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11755-z

                                  [all]