[Joint House and Senate Hearing, 112 Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
BUILDING BRIDGES_OR BURNING THEM?
THE ESCALATION OF VIOLENCE AGAINST
ROMA IN EUROPE
=======================================================================
HEARING
before the
COMMISSION ON SECURITY AND COOPERATION IN EUROPE
ONE HUNDRED TWELFTH CONGRESS
SECOND SESSION
__________
FEBRUARY 15, 2012
__________
Printed for the use of the
Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe
[CSCE 112-2-4]
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]
Available via http://www.csce.gov
_______________
U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE
93-734 PDF WASHINGTON : 2015
_________________________________________________________________________________
For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office,
Internet:bookstore.gpo.gov. Phone:toll free (866)512-1800;DC area (202)512-1800
Fax:(202) 512-2104 Mail:Stop IDCC,Washington,DC 20402-001
COMMISSION ON SECURITY AND COOPERATION IN EUROPE
LEGISLATIVE BRANCH COMMISSIONERS
HOUSE
SENATE
CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey, BENJAMIN L. CARDIN, Maryland,
Chairman Co-Chairman
JOSEPH R. PITTS, Pennsylvania SHELDON WHITEHOUSE, Rhode Island
ROBERT B. ADERHOLT, Alabama TOM UDALL, New Mexico
PHIL GINGREY, Georgia JEANNE SHAHEEN, New Hampshire
MICHAEL C. BURGESS, Texas RICHARD BLUMENTHAL, Connecticut
ALCEE L. HASTINGS, Florida ROGER F. WICKER, Mississippi
LOUISE McINTOSH SLAUGHTER, SAXBY CHAMBLISS, Georgia
New York MARCO RUBIO, Florida
MIKE McINTYRE, North Carolina KELLY AYOTTE, New Hampshire
STEVE COHEN, Tennessee
EXECUTIVE BRANCH COMMISSIONERS
MICHAEL H. POSNER, Department of State
MICHAEL C. CAMUNEZ, Department of Commerce
ALEXANDER VERSHBOW, Department of Defense
[ii]
BUILDING BRIDGES--OR BURNING THEM?
THE ESCALATION OF VIOLENCE AGAINST
ROMA IN EUROPE
----------
February 15, 2012
COMMISSIONERS
Page
Hon. Christopher H. Smith, Chairman, Commission on Security and
Cooperation in Europe.......................................... 1
Hon. Robert B. Aderholt, Commissioner, Commission on Security and
Cooperation in Europe.......................................... 13
WITNESSES
Andrzej Mirga, Senior Adviser on Roma and Sinti Issues, OSCE..... 3
Dezideriu Gergely, Executive Director, European Roma Rights
Center......................................................... 6
APPENDICES
Prepared statement of Hon. Christopher H. Smith.................. 30
Prepared statement of Hon. Benjamin L. Cardin.................... 32
Prepared statement of Andrzej Mirga.............................. 33
Materials for the Record......................................... 39
[iii]
BUILDING BRIDGES--OR BURNING THEM?
THE ESCALATION OF VIOLENCE AGAINST
ROMA IN EUROPE
----------
February 15, 2012
Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe
Washington, DC
The hearing was held at 2 p.m. in room B-318, Rayburn House
Office Building, Washington, DC, Hon. Christopher H. Smith,
Chairman, Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe,
presiding.
Commissioners present: Hon. Christopher H. Smith, Chairman,
Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe; and Hon.
Robert B. Aderholt, Commissioner, Commission on Security and
Cooperation in Europe.
Witnesses present: Andrzej Mirga, Senior Adviser on Roma
and Sinti Issues, OSCE; and Dezideriu Gergely, Executive
Director, European Roma Rights Center.
HON. CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, CHAIRMAN, COMMISSION ON SECURITY AND
COOPERATION IN EUROPE
Mr. Smith. The Commission will come to order. And let me
begin by expressing my apology for being so late. It's 45
minutes after we were supposed to start. We did have a series
of votes--five votes--on the floor. And so I do apologize for
that.
I'd like to welcome everyone for joining us this afternoon,
particularly our witnesses who have traveled here from Europe
to be able to testify today before the Helsinki Commission. We
appreciate your dedication to the human rights and dignity of
the Romani people, probably the most discriminated against and
disadvantaged people in Europe today.
Roma, Europe's largest ethnic minority, has faced
discrimination and worse for hundreds of years. In parts of
Europe, they were even literally enslaved as late as the 19th
century, when our own country was battling this evil, and in
the 20th century were the victims of German genocide during
World War II. An estimated 500,000 Roma were exterminated by
Nazi Germany and its accomplices.
In 1990, hopes for the democratic transitions under way
were enormous. And the OSCE was likewise optimistic that it
would play its part in ensuring that Roma would be equal
sharers in the benefits of freedom, democracy and the free
economy that it would bring. But the 1990s were difficult years
for Roma, who were faced with murderers and other acts of
violence and police brutality.
With a view to that violence, I wrote then-secretary--
Assistant Secretary for Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor,
Harold Koh, regarding Romani human rights and religious
freedom, and urged the State Department to be sure that these
issues were fully covered in the State Department's annual
country reports on human rights practices. The Commission
became increasingly active on Roma human rights issues. In
2002, we held a Helsinki hearing on the situation of Roma. In
that same year, my resolution on improving equal opportunities
for Roma in education was adopted by the OSCE parliamentary
assembly.
Although about 10 years ago many countries began to
implement measures to stem the violence, resulting in fewer
attacks and more accountability when attacks occurred, the sad
fact is that these positive developments have not--I repeat--
have not been sustained.
To make matters worse, in recent years, there has been a
terrifying escalation of violence against Roma, prompting the
Helsinki Commission to hold a briefing on this issue in 2009.
The current wave of violence has resulted in horrible
fatalities like the murder of the 5-year-old, Robert Csorba, in
Hungary, who along with his father was killed by sniper fire
when they tried to flee their burning house, which had been set
afire by a Molotov cocktail.
There are many cases of horrifying violence against Roma,
people who have been maimed or disfigured for life, like the
13-year-old girl in Hungary shot in the face by the extremists
who also killed her mother, or the toddler known as Baby
Natalka in the Czech Republic who was burned over 80 percent of
her body in a Molotov cocktail attack.
As we discuss today the anti-Roma mob attacks and
demonstrations that continue to occur in several countries, we
should ask what is the impact on families and children who
huddle in their homes while a mob outside yells: ``Gypsies, to
the gas''? Exactly this sort of thing is really going on in
2012. The Roma still have to face such open savagery. It's
beyond imagination.
Yet, at the same time, many governments are voicing serious
concerns about this situation. One of the purposes of this
hearing is to ask how well the solutions respond to the
problem. Every EU country is now working up a national strategy
for Roma integration. Do these strategies respond to the real
gravity of the danger threatening the Roma?
Likewise our own State Department has prioritized the
rights of the Romani people. And this has been implemented with
real commitment by many ambassadors and human rights officers.
Yet the country reports on human rights practices has been
uneven. And so we will all have to continue to watch them
carefully. They should be a touchstone of our government's
commitment to the human rights of the Romani people.
Finally, we should also talk about humanitarian concerns.
In the post-communist countries, Roma have been the absolute
losers in the transition to market economies. Last year, the
Hungarian minister for social inclusion, Zoltan Balog, said
that their situation is worse today than it was under
communism. Over the past 20 years, Roma have been caught in a
downward spiral, accelerating at exponential rates. While they
were at the bottom of the social ladder during the communist
period, they are often off the grid, living in shantytowns,
urban ghettos, or segregated settlements that I and members of
this Commission have visited. I remember one visit to a Romani
ghetto that was right next to a dump, and the smell of garbage
was overwhelming. And yet these individuals had to live there
and raise their children there.
A UNDP report concluded that Roma in five Central European
countries live in conditions more typically found in sub-
Saharan Africa than in Europe. And I would note
parenthetically, as chairman of the Africa subcommittee of the
House of Representatives, I've been to many very, very poor
places in Africa. And what I saw at some of these Romani houses
or townships has clearly approximated what I've seen in some of
the most destitute places in Africa.
But can governments really expect to make improvements with
regard to other problems Roma face in housing, in employment,
education and so on, if shocking acts of violence continue
unabated? That is the open question and part of what we hope to
at least to begin to address today.
We will begin by receiving testimony from our two
distinguished witnesses, Andrzej Mirga, who is well-known in
Washington. Mr. Mirga is the senior adviser on Romani issues to
the OSCE's Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights
or ODIHR. He first testified in Washington in 1994 and has
brought his considerable experience and insights to the
Helsinki Commission and to all the other governments of the
OSCE. And we thank you for doing it for our Commission as well.
We're grateful for his leadership he brings to the OSCE on
these issues. Mr. Mirga, welcome back to Washington.
Our second witness will be Dezi Gergely, the Executive
Director of the European Roma Rights Center. The ERRC was
established in 1996 and has spearheaded some of the most
important litigation to protect the human rights of Roma. Mr.
Gergely, thank you again for being here today--and my fellow
Commissioners--and you have to know and I know you know this,
but this record will be very widely disseminated to many
opinion makers, but especially to members of Congress--House
and Senate--and to our Commissioners. So this record becomes
information that very often is actionable and gives us a
blueprint as to what we should do, as well as the lay of the
land as of today as you present it. So I thank you again for
being here.
Mr. Mirga.
ANDRZEJ MIRGA, SENIOR ADVISER ON ROMA AND SINTI ISSUES, OSCE
Thank you. Mr. Chairman, I would like my full statement to
be included into the record.
Mr. Smith. Without objection, so ordered.
Mr. Mirga. Honorable chairperson, distinguished members of
Helsinki Commission, ladies and gentlemen, I would like first
to express my gratitude to the chairperson of the Helsinki
Commission for organizing this hearing on Roma and Sinti today.
I am grateful for the long dedication of Chairman Smith and Co-
Chairman Cardin to the protection of human rights of Roma. I
also appreciate the statement made by Secretary of State
Clinton about Roma human rights most recently in Sofia on
February 5th.
It's a great opportunity to share with you our views and
concerns regarding Roma and Sinti in the OSCE area with this
important commission. It's the right time to address these
issues as some developments in recent years are highly
disturbing and we need to speak up about them.
I testified here with several Roma friends last time in
mid-2009. It was a time when the financial and economic crisis
has erupted. And we signaled the worrying developments that
were evolving with regard to the Roma and Sinti. Today, with
fiscal difficulties in a number of European countries and a
second economic crisis looming, I have to report to you that
some of these concerns unfortunately have become reality. No
doubt the ongoing economic difficulties have intensified and
exacerbated some of the negative trends I elaborated upon in
the briefing in 2009.
On a general note, let me underline that most problems
facing Roma and Sinti population have by no means been
resolved. And for the most part, this minority has not yet
benefited from lasting improvements in human rights and social
inclusion. This is unfinished business in Europe that requires
much stronger and long-term interventions at national--at
European level. That was one of the conclusions in my 2009
briefing here, based on the finding of the so-called status
report of 2008. This conclusion is more valid than ever today.
Currently, it seems the requirement for much stronger and
long-term interventions is widely recognized. As all major
international organizations and EU institutions are calling
upon governments to step up their efforts to realize objectives
regarding Roma and Sinti social inclusion, this is done partly
as a response to a serious and dangerous rise in violence and
intolerance against members of this minority in number of
countries. It comes, however, at a time when European
governments face real fiscal and economic difficulties, making
it a bad time to approach them on other issues. Governments are
facing tough decisions from the introduction of austerity
programs to reduce public spending and keep national debt under
their control.
In the past two years, in the context of deepening economic
hardship, we have witnessed a number of disturbing
developments. There was the crisis related to Roma migrants in
France. We have seen the rise of tensions in extreme right or
neo-Nazi groups in North Bohemia of Czech Republic. We have
seen mass protests against Roma in number of cities in
Bulgaria, following with the incidents in Katunitsa near
Plovdiv.
In most of these situations, we have seen populist,
extremist--extreme right or neo-Nazi groups--actively
exploiting anti-Roma prejudice, sometimes generating hostility
or instigating violence against the Roma and Sinti communities.
We are concerned about current public discourse of Roma and
Sinti that revives past anti-Roma rhetoric centered on the
image of them as a nomad, viewing them as a burden to social
system, or as a danger for public security and order based on
alleged gypsy criminality.
Roma and Sinti migration has become a key challenge. And it
will likely remain so for some time. The social stigma
associated with Roma and their visibility as migrants will
continue to heighten the risk of discriminatory practices and
social exclusion in countries of destination. The rise in open
and often radical anti-Roma politics and policies at local
level is another challenging and new phenomenon.
We witnessed local authorities and mayors actively pursuing
policies aimed at forcing Roma and Sinti from their
communities. Exclusion or separation is openly advocated in
some municipalities, including in the segregation of children
in the educational system. There are also cases of refusal by
local authorities to accept or request state aid aimed at
supporting Roma communities. In the past have been focused on
providing assistance to newer democracies and states in crisis
or post-crisis situation. Today and likely over the near
future, such assistance will be provided to consolidate it in
young democracies in instances of hate crime targeting Roma and
Sinti--as instances of hate crimes targeting Roma and Sinti may
become a recurrent issue there.
Parallel to this worrying development, we are witnessing
more promising efforts and initiatives aimed at ensuring Roma
human rights and social inclusion. The most important are the
new agenda of the European Union of Roma. The EU has both the
political and financial tools to enforce some measures on its
members some think the other organizations don't have. Most
recently on April 5th 2011, the Commission issued a
communication on EU framework for national Roma integration
strategy, which was endorsed by the council in June. The
framework commits all 27 member states to develop of targeted
policies that systematically tackle the socio-economic
exclusion and of discrimination against the Roma people in the
EU.
This complex EU agenda on the Roma and Sinti has been
overshadowed, however, by the euro crisis itself. Much of the
response to the question of how this new effort of the EU
regarding Roma can be successful and lasting will depend on the
response to other question, how will the EU resolve the present
crisis and how long it will take to recover from it?
Surprisingly little has, however, appears to have been paid to
its possible negative impact on the most socially and
economically disadvantaged group in societies, like Roma and
Sinti.
There seems to be a somehow parallel discourse of Roma
disconnected from ongoing debates and concerns. The report
recently commissioned by the EU on use of its financial and
policy instruments with regard to Roma are in most parts
critical. Minimal progress has been achieved. Disproportional
funds were used to produce short-living outcomes. The effective
use of this has been also questioned.
To conclude this part, prospects in short terms appear poor
in fields where there has been some constant, if minor,
improvement in the past, such as in education, housing,
political participation, or Roma representation in public
media. A number of participating states that appear to have
been set-backed into area mentioned as the gaps between
standards for Roma and Sinti and the majority population have
been in fact widening. With few social and economic indicators
showing improvement in situation of Roma, the evidence of
increasing hostility toward the communities among Roma in some
states, these disturbing trends might not just continue, but
could very well worsen.
The last part of recommendation I may leave for later. And
in discussion, I may elaborate more on this. Thank you.
Mr. Smith. Mr. Mirga, thank you very much for your
testimony and the comprehensiveness of it and the longstanding
nature of your commitment on this and other issues, but
specially the Roma. Thank you so much.
Mr. Gergely?
DEZIDERIU GERGELY, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, EUROPEAN ROMA RIGHTS
CENTER
Mr. Chairman, I would like to take this opportunity to
extend my gratitude on behalf of the European Roma Rights
Center to be invited to this prestigious event in order to
testify about the human rights situation of Roma in Europe. And
with your approval, I would like my full statement to be
included in the record.
Mr. Smith. Without objection, so ordered.
Mr. Gergely. Distinguished representatives of the
Commission, ladies and gentlemen, a recent European Union
survey on minorities and discrimination highlights that on
average, one in five from our respondents were victims of
racially motivated personal crime at least once in previous 12
months. Eighty-one percent of Roma who indicated that they were
victims of assault, threat or serious harassment considered
that their victimization was racially motivated. Between 65
percent and 100 percent of Roma in the surveyed European
countries did not report their experiences of personal
victimization to the police.
The main reason given by the Roma was that they were not
confident that the police would be able to do anything. This
lack of confidence is not surprising to someone familiar with
Roma in Europe, and I will explain why. Two weeks ago, the
Council of Europe's Committee of Ministers adopted an official
declaration to express deep concern about the rise of anti-
Gypsyism and violent attacks against Roma, which constitute a
major obstacle to the successful social inclusion of Roma and a
full respect of their human rights.
The fact is that the racist or stigmatizing anti-Roma
rhetoric has been on the rise in public and political
discourse, including accusations that Roma, as an ethnic group,
are engaged in criminal behavior. There are well-documented
examples from France, from Italy, Hungary, Slovakia, Bulgaria,
or Czech Republic. And in some cases, these words were
understood as--as encouraging violent action against the Roma,
such as mob riots or violence. Extremist groups, political
parties, and politicians have sharpened their anti-Romani
rhetoric and actions, galvanizing segments of the public
against Roma in Hungary, Czech Republic, Lithuania in
particular, or Bulgaria. Anti-Gypsy stereotypes also continue
to be spread and perpetrated in the media across Europe, which
reports primarily on Roma in the context of only social
problems and crime.
Violence against Roma remains a serious problem not only
because it harms Roma directly affected by the attacks, but
because Roma as an ethnic group are impacted by the lack of
effective response by state authorities. In 2011, the European
Roma Rights Center published a report examining the state
response to 44 selected attacks against Roma in Czech Republic,
in Hungary and Slovakia.
And a number of shortcomings in the state response to
violence against Roma are apparent. Many Roma victims of
violent crimes do not secure justice. A limited number of the
perpetrators of violent attacks against Roma are successfully
identified, investigated, and prosecuted. Even fewer are
eventually imprisoned for the crimes they have committed
against Roma.
At the time of publications, judgments finding the
perpetrators guilty have been reached in nine out of the 44
selected cases. Of those nine cases, only six resulted in
imprisonment; several are under appeal. And three resulted in
suspended sentences or fines, including persons with known
affiliations to neo-Nazi groups in the Czech Republic, for
example.
Police investigations were suspended with no perpetrator
identified in 27 percent of all the cases. Racial motivation
was confirmed in only three out of 44 selected cases of
violence against Roma. In 11 other cases, racial motivation is
included in the indictment of impending cases, and in 50
percent of all the selected cases racial motivation of the
crimes committed against Roma was ruled out or not confirmed.
The failure of law enforcement authorities to identify the
perpetrators of crimes against Roma in a considerable number of
investigations creates a climate of impunity and may encourage
further acts of violence against Roma. The issuance by courts
of only suspended prison sentences to persons found guilty of
serious crimes against Roma reinforces the message that it is
OK to attack Roma.
Recognition of racial motivation in such a small number of
cases may indicate a low level of importance placed on
aggravating circumstances of the crimes committed and may fail
to account for the full nature of the attacks. These findings
may have a serious negative impact of the will on the Romani
individuals to report crimes committed against them to law
enforcement authorities, and explains the results of the
European Union survey on minorities and discrimination.
How can governments put an end to impunity and restore the
confidence of Roma in law enforcement and reduce the level of
violence? First, governments must adopt a zero-tolerance policy
against racist speech uttered by public officials. All such
racist speech should be immediately denounced and the
responsible official removed from his or her job. Racist speech
by private actors should be also vigorously condemned by
government at the highest level.
It is important that the government distinguish between
free expression, which must be protected in a democratic
society, and acts of intimidation, which must be strongly
suppressed through acts of law enforcement. The spectacle of
neo-Nazis carrying flaming torches through Roma settlements,
shouting anti-Romani epithets, preventing people from going to
their jobs or to schools, as occurred in several countries--
Hungary or Bulgaria, for example--must not be allowed to recur.
Most important of all, governments must take a firm stance
against racially motivated violence. They should guarantee
speedy and effective investigations and prosecutions of all
crimes committed against Roma, and identify any racist motives
for such acts, so that the perpetrators do not go unpunished
and escalation of ethnic tension is avoided. Governments should
ensure full assistance, protection, and compensation for the
victims of violence. Last year, the EU launched an important
process to promote Roma integration, focusing on education, on
health, employment, and housing. Member states of the EU are
obliged to develop and implement strategies for such
integration, but it is crucial that the states recognize the
interdependence of inclusion and anti-discrimination. Any
strategy developed to improve the social and economic
integration of Roma must include measures combating
discrimination and addressing anti-Gypsyism.
The United States has long been a leading global example in
ensuring the inclusion of minorities in society. Last week, the
U.S. announced its intention to become an official observer of
the decade of Roma inclusion, another important European
initiative designed to encourage Roma advancement. Here is how
the U.S., from our point of view, can assist Europe as it tries
to achieve true integration of Roma at all levels of society.
Offer assistance of U.S. law enforcement in addressing bias
crimes against Roma. Offer good practices as examples of
promoting minority inclusion in education, in housing, health
care, or employment. Offer financial assistance to civil
society organizations in Europe addressing anti-Roma
discrimination and rights violation.
Thank you very much for your attention.
Mr. Smith. Thank you very much for your testimony and your
extraordinary leadership on this very, very important human
rights issue. Let me ask you a couple of questions, starting
off with the anti-Roma riots, which are increasing. The fact
that they're occurring throughout EU countries is shocking in
and of itself.
And then some have the gall to call it demonstrations--
which is a misnaming to a huge extent. What proactive steps are
the governments taking to mitigate this incitement that's
occurring, and much of the violence that ensues from these
demonstrations, these riots? Mr. Mirga?
Mr. Mirga. The question you pose brings some challenges
because we, in fact, do not have much to report as positive
steps to counter such phenomena like extreme right and what
they do campaigning against the Roma. We know about some steps
taken, for example, into the public to imprison some of the
leaders of the extreme right, but they are finding ways to get
out, of course. And we know about some steps in Hungary to--for
example, but they are reappearing under new name, so they are
still able to organize marches.
I think that the main objective of these kind of groups is
to benefit during the election time, because they are trying to
get public support by staying up, at that time especially,
anti-Roma slogans, rhetorics, because they believe this can
give them votes. And as we warned in 2009 when I was here, I
said that one test case will be and just after we landed it
became the--in the country. So that is a telling story.
We also know about some cases which were very positively
handled, like in the case of Natalka in Czech Republic, and the
court sentence of the perpetrators. But after we had some
statement of the state of issues which a little bit
undermined--or trying to undermine the court sentence which,
again, is something which should probably not happen in this
situation.
So we receive something like ambiguous messages. On the one
hand we see some reaction which is proper--as I said for
example, court cases are highly appreciated, but again from the
politicians we are receiving mixed messages, which as I said,
should be here--the line should be kept and the message should
be one: condemning such situations.
Mr. Smith. Thank you.
Mr. Gergely. I would only like to add the fact that even
though we cannot name these proactive measures, what is
extremely crucial is speed and effective response. Unless the
government does not react to violent riots or mob riots
attempting to attack communities, which happened in several
countries--as long as there is no reaction in defending these
communities, of course it would spread out. And this is the
case of Bulgaria, where last year we could see in more than 15
cities mass protests against the Roma communities.
The state response was initially slow. When the law
enforcement officials reacted, they could manage the mobs. In
Czech Republic it was the same. It is even interesting that
when the mobs were stopped by the police, the mobs were
shouting: You are defending Gypsies. So law enforcement
officials haven't defended Gypsies. This is what they have to
do, to act and to ensure protection.
Mr. Smith. Mr. Mirga, let me ask you, as you know, OSCE-
participating States are charged with collecting hate crime
data and providing that to ODHIR. Have the countries provided
information on these hate crimes to ODIHR as it relates to
Roma?
Mr. Mirga. We--with TND and other departments--we are
preparing such reports every year. There is a standard question
of central governments who--to get some response to. In fact,
we are receiving very few information from countries about the
cases of irrational hate crimes
Mr. Smith. Did they give an explanation? And could you
provide to our Commission those countries that have responded
and those that have not? And do you find the quality of that
information is--are you encouraged that those that do respond
are actually doing their due diligence?
Mr. Mirga. Well, we are trying to encourage--
Mr. Smith. I know you are, but I'm talking about the
countries, in terms of their response.
Mr. Mirga. Oh. Yeah. I think that governments who provide
us information--there are few, yes; I don't want to name them
here. But----
Mr. Smith. Could you? It would be helpful if you would.
Mr. Mirga. ----they are few--yes? I'll be--
Mr. Smith. Put you on the spot.
Mr. Mirga. I----
Mr. Smith. OK.
Mr. Mirga. ----at the moment, yes? But there are really
few, yes? And they're--in general, we do not have much
information. So we have to rely on other sources coming from
the civil society mostly, yes? And this has to be checked.
Mr. Smith. Exactly.
Mr. Mirga. Yes. We have, for example, I am from Poland,
yes? And I am closely monitoring the situation because I am
Roma from Poland. And I have a good relationship with the
minister of interior, and they are providing us in a letter if
we wish to have, and they are providing. In some countries,
it's more difficult to get such information.
Mr. Smith. As the European Roma Rights Center has pointed
out in a report on human trafficking, that research in
Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Hungary and Romania and Slovakia
during early 2010 indicated that Roma represent 50 [percent] to
80 percent of victims in Bulgaria, at least 40 percent in
Hungary, 70 percent in Slovakia, and up to 70 percent in parts
of the Czech Republic.
Our own U.S. government TIP report, trafficking in persons
report--and I would note parenthetically, I wrote the law, it's
called the Trafficking Victims Protection Act that created our
response, includes that TIP report--well, in the annual report
country-by-country, it makes for very disturbing reading.
Country after country, with regards to Roma--for example, in
Hungary Roma victims are over-represented in trafficking
victims from Hungary. Roma women and girls who grew up in
Hungarian orphanages are highly vulnerable to internal sex
trafficking.
With regards to Romania, that there are reports that ethnic
Roma criminal groups in Romania throughout Europe. There is a
very disturbing statement--and this runs through these--that
some did not approach police out of fear of traffickers'
reprisals. There's others who said they didn't want to go to
the police because they're not sure which side the police were
on.
In the Slovak Republic the comment is made that the
government's poor relations with the Roma community resulted in
significant problems in victim identification and prosecutions,
including a government estimate that only one-third of all
trafficking cases involving Roma are investigated. In other
words, two-thirds are not. And it goes on and on, you know--you
read country after country trafficking is modern-day slavery,
whether it be labor or sex trafficking.
And as both of you know so well, the ODIHR and the OSCE is
certainly absolutely committed, as are you are, Mr. Gergely.
Could you speak to the issue of trafficking of Roma, and
elaborate on some of those numbers if you would? And the fact
that law enforcement ought to be absolutely, proactively and
aggressively--as well as the governments that support law
enforcement--on the side of these victims--please speak to.
Mr. Mirga. As regards trafficking, ODIHR is involved in
supporting some of the programs or projects on antitrafficking.
And the focus is on the victims, We are trying to obtain some
more concrete data from some countries. Recently we were very
much focused provide some support to Albania, for example, and
for some activities there on Roma who were trafficked and
brought. It seems to be one of the key issues for number of
countries in Western Balkans, this ongoing process.
To obtain, however, data is one of the challenging things.
We in fact are missing concrete numbers. In this regard that
there is a number of agencies dealing with these issues and
NGOs who are involved. I was recently visiting Italy, where we
were supporting some civil organizations dealing with
trafficked Roma families--children, mostly. And we visited a
center for children trafficked in Rome where NGOs are taking
care and taking them from the street there. We visited families
who were victims of trafficking as well, and they were placed
in some camps.
We are trying to obtain more information: What is the
extent of the issue? How numerous are this population, for
example, in Rome, and whether these countries from--aware they
were trafficked? Most of them were from Western Balkan
countries, and some of them especially from Romania. So that
was what our findings was. But again, to obtain concrete data
about numbers, it was quite difficult. When we are working with
trying to talk to those agencies--state agencies, police--we do
not, again, get something concrete. That is a main concern,
that it's difficult to get something real.
The other issue which emerged also in Italy and France and
other countries is about the expulsion policy of--or the
treatment of women and children who are sometimes on the street
begging or doing other things. We're trying to talk to some of
the governments that--the effort to get rid of these people,
from the streets, and to deport them may--should be maybe
rethought because some of the women with children may be
victims of trafficking. And for the second time you are just
punishing them by deporting back in a very straightforward way;
whereas those people may be a subject for care, because we have
to recognize who is a real victim and who is not a real victim
of the trafficking.
And here I think still there is very little understanding
of the part of the enforcement bodies who would like to see
these women, children as a--simply organized by mafia, and
disregard that they consider that they are victims. They are
expelling the women without due consideration for their
situation. And it is something concerning.
Mr. Gergely. I think that there are a couple of issues
which we have to underline when we speak about trafficking, as
well as when we speak about hate crimes or other similar,
related areas. And on the first place, we have to be aware of
the fact that the Roma minority--it is placing a major
discrepancy situation in comparison with the majority of the
populations in the European countries. In terms of social,
economic, educational situation, this low level puts them in
extremely high risks, in terms of being victims of trafficking
or being victims of other sort of crimes.
There are two things which we have to underline here. First
of all, there is a lack of disaggregated data on the basis of
ethnicity, when we are speaking about minorities which are
victims of trafficking. We do not have the information to what
extent--and when I say information, I am saying official
information coming from the governments--on to what extent this
phenomenon is affecting the Roma minority.
And secondly, due to this fact that we are lacking official
data, we lack also policies targeting these particular groups
which are affected by the trafficking, for example. So
basically we do have policies which are targeting trafficking,
but we do not have targeted policy to the victims of
traffickings--in our case, the Roma women or children. So this
is something which needs to be addressed.
Mr. Smith. Are groups like IOM and others at least
attempting working with governments?
Mr. Gergely. There are several examples of cooperation----
Mr. Smith. Yeah.
Mr. Gergely. ----of course. But the problem is that--when
you have a state policy which is not targeting by its policy a
vulnerable group, and seeing exactly the extent of the
situation and trying to really tackle in a particular way that
phenomenon--it's really hard to see improvement. And
unfortunately we can see the same situation in other areas of
concern. We are lacking data on health situation; we are
lacking data on the unemployment situation; we are lacking data
on several areas. And because of this lack of information, we
don't know, first of all, to what extent we have the problems;
and secondly, to what extent the governments are addressing the
problems fully or not.
Mr. Smith. Let me ask you with--the recent European court
case which concluded that sterilization of a Romani woman from
Slovakia violated the European Convention on Human Rights--
called it cruel and inhumane. And I understand there are at
least five more similar cases pending against Slovakia.
Obviously forced sterilization is an egregious form of
violence. Is it continuing? Is it systematic? Your view on
that? And then I'll yield to my colleague, and then I'll come
back to some additional questions.
Mr. Gergely. First of all, of course, this is a major
decision from the European Court of Human Rights. And it has a
major impact on this topic. I have to say that there are
several similar cases pending before courts in other countries
as well. And I would only name the Czech Republic, for example,
where there are a couple of cases pending before the national
courts. Last year there was a successful case before the
supreme court which acknowledged this. And a victim had
received compensation. There is a similar situation in Hungary
as well. There are cases before national courts pending until
now. And also, as you mentioned, there are several cases
pending before the European court.
Now it is quite difficult to state whether this phenomenon
is systematic still. But what is clear is that, in several
member states, there is a lack of ensuring a process of
compensation for victims of sterilization. We have to say that
many of these victims were sterilized during the communist
regime, so before '89. And they could not raise those cases at
the time.
Mr. Smith. Like in China, where women are routinely
forcibly sterilized.
Mr. Gergely. So--yeah. We have to take into account and--
that in several countries, there are time bars. So for a
victim, it's really difficult to raise a case now after 20
years. So I think that what we need here is from the
governments to take a positive step in--to ensure, on the first
place, a compensation procedure for the victims; and secondly,
to ensure that such acts will not be repeated anymore--meaning
that you have to have a full and informed consent when you deal
with such a situation. Without any consent, we cannot speak
about--right.
Mr. Smith. Well, you know, and just for the record, in
places even like in Mexico, there are hospitals--they call them
social security hospitals--where women, particularly indigenous
women, give birth. Unknown to them, they--in some cases they've
gotten tubal ligations. In other words, they've been
sterilized. And I'll never forget--in work that I was involved
in in Peru and still am--upwards of 100,000 women were
sterilized, many of them at health fairs, when President
Fujimori erroneously thought that one way to combat poverty was
to eliminate the possibility of poor people giving birth to
children who might be poor as well--a bit of a presumptuous
thought to begin with.
And I actually held a series of hearings on it, and it was
amazing: He took his impetus for that from the population
conference in Cairo, that you need to adopt a sterilization
mentality, and quickly crossed the line from voluntary
sterilization to forced. And it was--it was awful. And so I'm
glad you're very much on the forefront of trying to prevent and
to provide compensation for those who have been so harmed by
the government.
Oh yes, Mr. Mirga.
Mr. Mirga. I will just say that we do not see that there is
something like a systemic continuation of sterilization. I
think that the cases which were brought up very much
contributed to raise awareness, which is important. We still
need to get to the compensation issue. This is another step to
be made. There are some cases of the national courts which
recognize also that sterilization against Roma women. And that
is also very important, that it's not only from the European
level court, but also from the national.
So I believe there is a step forward, but we have to push a
little bit farther to fully have--those who are doing this
responsible for these acts. And compensation should follow.
Mr. Smith. Robert? Great. I yield to Commissioner Aderholt.
HON. ROBERT B. ADERHOLT, COMMISSIONER, COMMISSION ON SECURITY
AND COOPERATION IN EUROPE
Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Thank you for your testimony here
today and for your presence. One thing that we hear concerning
this issue that was [inaudible] hearing is, we hear from a lot
of extremist parties anti-Roma sentiment. But many examples of
anti-Roma statements come from public figures associated with
what we'd call normal parties or mainline parties across
political spectrum. My question would be, has extremism against
the Roma gone mainstream? And can you give us a more nuanced
understanding of this phenomenon.
Mr. Mirga. Thank you. Well, we see a danger that rhetoric--
anti-Roma rhetoric which pays can be adopted also by mainstream
parties. And this is kind of approach to pre-empt, maybe, the
support for the extremists, so you are bringing in some kind of
rhetoric to attract more voters during the elections. we
observe that some of the mainstream parties or leaders or
member of the mainstream parties using the same, sometimes,
language as it was in case of extreme-right parties.
So it becomes more tolerable to speak the language which
usually we associate with extreme. And this is something really
worrying. Whether this is a pre-empting something or new
strategy to get more votes, or simply people feel more free to
speak racist language because they do not meet a strong
reaction from the public or condemnation--this is something to
discuss. But we see this kind of phenomenon present.
The second thing is that we see in Europe a tendency or
trend that extreme parties are winning. They are getting more
votes. Finland, for example--
Mr. Aderholt. Did you say Finland?
Mr. Mirga. Finland, yes; and nationalist extreme-right
party made some winning. U.K., for the first time, extreme
right get into Parliament. we already talked about. So in the
number of countries, you can notice this trend that those who
are playing with anti-immigrant, anti-minority, anti-Jew, anti-
Roma, anti-Muslim--they are getting votes. This pays. And this
may be attractive strategy for mainstream parties, because they
may become losers. They will--if extreme will win, they will
lose. So they have to think how to eventually--what kind of
strategy they have to develop. The easiest seems sometimes for
some of them to be a little bit radical and play for these
voters who are in the crisis trying--maybe because of the
crisis they are getting a little bit more sensitive to extreme
rhetorics.
And this is worrying. And we saw first kind of test case in
Hungary in 2000 during the last local--parliamentary election,
when they get like 15 percent of votes. We are now approaching
Slovakia's elections. SNS already is playing with anti-Roma
rhetoric openly. But we are also hearing mainstream politicians
who are talking similar language.
And this is really concerning. This is something which is a
danger, because it's like a disease. You can maybe think that
this virus--you are strong, you can overcome it. But maybe this
virus will cause a damage to you. So we have to warn a little
bit mainstream politicians about the way they think they can
play at politics in future. This is a danger.
Mr. Aderholt. OK. Yes, could you?
Mr. Gergely. If we would go back in time for 10 years or a
bit more, we would see that what was different from today is
exactly the political discourse or politics in general. If you
are looking now into what is happening in several European
countries, we would very clearly see that politics has been
deteriorating a lot. Now, there are many things which we have
to consider. Anti-Romani sentiment or anti-Romani prejudice was
all there. Twenty years ago it was the same high level of anti-
Romani sentiment.
But now we see a gap which has been widened between the
situation of the Roma and the majority of the population. We
have the economic crisis. The economic crisis in Europe has
affected the majority of the population, but had a much greater
impact on the vulnerable groups and in particular on the Roma
communities. This widening of the situations, this big
difference is fueling prejudice, rejection, exclusion of this
minority--the Roma minority in particular.
Now, the economic crisis is playing an important role in
terms of the feeling insecure as a mainstream citizen. You
cannot feel but insecure about what is happening. Having this
situation, there is an erosion of trust in governments, there
is a lack of trust in the political environment. So the parties
have to find something in order to counterbalance this erosion.
So what is that? It is exactly on minorities, immigrants,
criminality, Roma.
Playing--putting this issue on the table in terms of
political debate and mixing up with the insecurity of the
majority of the people, it seems that it works, it pays votes.
So we have the case of France, when mainstream government
representatives have been involved in anti-Romani rhetoric. We
have the case in Italy where the same--mainstream government
representatives have been involved in anti-Romani rhetoric. And
then we go to Central and Eastern European countries--Czech
Republic, Hungary. In Slovakia now, for example, in the
political debate--in the political campaigns we can find
banners on the streets: ``How long do we have to pay for the
Gypsies?'' This should stop. So it is an issue for political
campaign. And if 15 years ago only extreme right parties or
extreme right movements were playing this card, now it is
played by the mainstream as well because, at the end of the
day, it pays votes.
Mr. Aderholt. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Mr. Smith. Commissioner Aderholt, thank you so very much.
Let me just ask a couple of final questions and then ask you if
you have any final comments you'd like to make.
Mr. Mirga, you mention that there is a need for more Roma
in police forces. I would just note, parenthetically, there may
be a model that needs to be replicated throughout all of
Europe, and that's Northern Ireland. I actually chaired 11
congressional hearings, including--in the Subcommittee on Human
Rights, which I chair, and our Commission here, on the need for
integration of Catholics into Northern Irish police force.
It used to be called the RUC, the Royal Ulster
Constabulary. And Mr. Patten, the foreign minister for the EU,
former--very distinguished career--authored what was known as
the Patten Report that made sweeping recommendations to London
as to what they needed to do to make that police force more
responsive. And I always argued that I felt that was the
Achilles' heel. You don't get peace if you don't have a police
force that's fair and unbiased, professionally trained, has a
human rights focus to it.
And I'm wondering if there's any attempt to try to take the
Northern Irish model and replicate it elsewhere, because they
have recruited very fine officers in the Catholic community.
And now that force is working very cohesively. If you ring up a
policeman you're not going to get somebody who might commit a
human rights abuse--although there are bad apples or bad
policemen in any police force--but not based on sectarian
issues, or at least it's less likely now. And I'm wondering,
has there been a look at the experience in Northern Ireland?
And secondly, what countries are getting that right and
bringing Roma into the police force?
Mr. Mirga. Two years ago, together with SPMU from Vienna,
we published a booklet on police and Roma--building trust
between police and Roma. It contains a lot of good practices
collected from various countries about what police can do in
multiethnic society, how they can increase representation of
minorities in the police forces. So a higher end example
probably is also included there.
What we are trying now to do is to promote this booklet and
to launch in national languages. We had already two such
launches--one in Romania, one in Hungary. When we were on the
field visit in Hungary we were paying attention to the issue of
representation of Roma in police forces, especially because we
had this number of killings there. And we were meeting with
Roma as well who are police officers. At the time when we were
in the field--on the field visit, the spokesperson for Roma--
for national police was a Roma himself--a young, Roma police
officer.
In Vienna where we were launching the book we had three
Roma officers--one, and this spokesperson of the police from
Hungary--policewoman from Hungary, and Roma officer from U.K.,
from metropolitan police. And he was a Czech Roma who migrated
to U.K. And there he became a police officer--the first ever
Roma officer in the police force in U.K. So we have some of
their examples.
In Hungary, for example, there is around 300 Roma in the
police force. It's a significant number. However, and
paradoxically, in this country we had this series of attacks.
During the elections, in this country, a trade union--the
police trade union--has agreement with Jobbik to support
Jobbik. So this is kind of a confusing messages, coming from
police forces--kind of exceptional situation.
In some other countries--in Romania, there is number of
Roma in the police forces as well, but less than in Hungary.
Some Roma are in police forces in Bulgaria, but not much. So
this is something which should be encouraged and bring in more
and more--and to have Roma and career--open career for them to
be done. And this can contribute, of course, to the improvement
of the integration of Roma into society. So this is something
still ahead.
Mr. Smith. Let me just ask you, with regards to countries
like Germany that continue to deport Roma to Kosovo 13 years
later, where the prospects of reintegration--unless it's very
carefully done could be a very, very painful experience, and
especially when you have forced repatriation being a part of
it--what is the status of that? Is Germany and others still
doing that? And what happens when that person who was forcibly
repatriated arrives in Kosovo?
Mr. Mirga. Two years ago there was a briefing in the
Bundestag. I was part of this briefing on the situation of Roma
of Kosovo and about the policy of Germany vis-a-vis those who
are in Germany and supposedly should be going back. Our
official position was that while Germany has a right to do what
they do, because there was agreement--temporary protection was
provided after the conflict there--to victims of the conflict
including Roma and when they considered that there are already
safe conditions in Kosovo, so they should be going back.
We were saying that maybe it's a premature action. It's
maybe not right timing. There are still tensions there,
economic opportunities for those who return are very minor. So
in fact, the decision to send them back, puts them in very bad
situation after return there; the second--those who are
returned may not be going to Kosovo itself, because some of
them were asked where they want to go--to Belgrade or to
Pristina? Most of them are choosing to go not to Pristina, to
Belgrade.
When we were trying, for example, to identify Roma who were
returned in Kosovo, it was very difficult to find people
because they were already not there. So maybe the policy of so-
called voluntary or forced return is not effective at all,
because people stay 10, 12, 13 years in Germany, living there,
have their networks there, being with families, suddenly
deported. They will try to find a way to go back.
We were visiting also Roma communities in Mitrovica--
southern Mitrovica, which is rebuilt now. U.S. also leave some
funding for rebuilding and closing in the--And again, we are
trying to find the people there from Germany, whether they are
there. We found one person, a young 20-years-old man who spent
half of his life in Germany, spoke perfect German, and who
suddenly was taken, put on the airplane and send back. And he
was completely lost in this environment. All his family and
friends are there. So what he is doing here.
So my conviction--my point--my view is that Germany should
rethink its policy, disregard that there are some agreements
they are entitled to do this. It might be not effective. On the
other hand, in Germany there is a movement among the Roma and
supporters to argue to have them stay in Germany. Romani Rose
is one of the leading Roma activists in Germany who is
advocating for this also with the government. So there is a
hope maybe that some of them may stay.
Mr. Smith. Commissioner Aderholt.
Mr. Aderholt. Yeah, Mr. Chairman, if I could interject for
just a minute. I am between meetings, this is--I've been at a
hearing all morning. It's really been a crazy day for hearings
on the Hill today. But before I do slip out I did want to ask
about two countries in particular, the next likely candidates
for NATO membership: Montenegro and Macedonia. What is your
assessment of the situation of the Roma in those two countries
just briefly?
Mr. Mirga. As regards Macedonia, there is a significant
Roma population, contrary to Montenegro--there is very tiny
Roma community, though in Montenegro you have a large number of
Roma from Kosovo who left around--over 4,000. And they are
still living in camp where are very bad conditions.
In Macedonia, you have, as I said, significant Roma
population which benefited, paradoxically, from the crisis
which was in beginning of 2000 with Albanians. There was the
agreement, and agreement requires minority communities to
benefit for equitable representation in public office, in
employment. And that pays also to Roma, not only to Albanian
minority have--I should not say minority.
So because of that, you may see Roma represented in many
offices of the government and authorities. So in Macedonia
there is actually a minister, a Roma, in the government; there
is a deputy minister, another Roma; there are several directors
in various departments. So in this sense, Roma benefited
because of the agreement, because it goes to all the
communities in the country.
Another thing is what is the situation of Roma in terms of
social, economic, human rights and so on? This is a little bit
different. We have a big municipality--Roma municipality in
Skopje. It's over 30,000 people with a mayor, council, built up
by the Roma themselves. So Roma, visible in the country. They
are represented in some offices--not yet to the level they
should because there's a percentage which it was not reached
yet. But this is something progressing.
Comparing this with Montenegro, well, they started just now
to have a Roma council. And there is a consultation process
with the Roma. There was a new census which included Roma and
we know a little bit more now how many Roma are there. This is
important because of the representation eventually in the
parliament. If you reach some threshold, you can have
representation in the parliament. So this is something evolving
also with regard to representation.
There are few educated people, though, in the country--
around 20. They're educated and they are not working sometimes.
So one of the issues which we raised with them--with the
government is that as an example of positive, perhaps to act as
a role model for others to follow in education, they should
give some jobs to educated in the country. So we see some Roma
who will be selected probably by the government to take some
positions.
So as I said, main problem now for the Montenegro Roma
population is Roma in the camp which is a big one in
Podgorica--Konik camp, over 4,000 people living on the dump.
You mention sometimes the dump; it is live at the dump and they
are there of course surrounded by other people as well, but the
conditions are dire. So there is an effort a little bit now to
improve the living conditions there. A commission is ready to
put some money for rehabilitation, but we have to see how it
will evolve in next years.
Mr. Aderholt. That's very helpful, thank you. Would you
like to add something?
Mr. Gergely. Yeah, I would--just a few things about
Macedonia. In terms of positive developments, we might mention
that the government has acknowledged the situation, has adopted
a policy for improving the situation of Roma. And another thing
is that, as positive practice--is that Macedonia adopted a law
for legalization of property rights, which might be of high
importance for Roma, because that means legalizing informal
settlements or providing recognition of property--land property
for Roma. So from this point of view, Macedonia is a good
example to be mentioned.
It would be very interesting to follow up on the process of
the implementation of this law, to see exactly if the Roma
would benefit from this law in terms of recognition of
properties, because you may know that housing is an outstanding
issue for Roma communities. They live in informal settlements.
Most of the times local authorities, they do not recognize the
properties, the land--in particular land properties. So this
law could be of high importance for Roma.
On the other hand, in terms of the human rights situation,
there are as well a couple of areas where Macedonia has to
improve. It's not only the employment, education, health; but
in terms of law reforms--for example, the legal framework for
protecting against discrimination still has to be improved. In
education there are a couple of cases where the Roma children
are enrolled in special schools for children with intellectual
disability, even though they are not disabled. So there are a
couple of issues where Macedonia has to still improve.
Mr. Aderholt. Thank you very much. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Mr. Smith. Thank you. Mr. Gergely, can I just ask you--I
chair the Autism Caucus here in the United States, and actually
wrote the law in '98 and just did it again last year to put
considerable money into autism best practices. And early
intervention--beyond anything else that we might do,
particularly in age two or three or four, and the earlier the
better--can have a tremendous impact on whether or not that
child has a better life as he or she grows into adulthood.
I'm working closely with some Europeans and the European
Parliament on autism. It's a big problem there. I just chaired
a hearing last year on global autism, and the estimates are
that there are some 67 million people worldwide who have--are
somewhere on the Asperger--either severely autistic or
moderately. And it's just an emerging problem that we're not
sure what the trigger is, and there may be multiple triggers.
But it seems to me that autism--especially as it is all
over Europe, all over the United States, has to be a problem.
And many kids, children in--who happen to be Roma, might be
further disadvantaged because the early intervention
initiatives are not available to them. And I'm wondering if
there's been an effort to include them.
Education per se for Roma children is substandard because
of inadequate response by governments anyway. But this is above
and beyond because it--testing needs to be done. You know, just
a general sense of, why is my child not behaving the way he or
she ought to, may not trigger the response. And if those social
services are not there--and if the educational establishment is
not working to help those kids--they are further disadvantaged.
Your thoughts on that?
Mr. Gergely. Well, this is an outstanding issue for Roma
children as well. European Roma Rights Center was involved in
lodging several complaints on behalf of Roma children before
the European Court of Human Rights. And we have some--a couple
of decisions, one against the Czech Republic, one against
Croatia. There is another decision against Greece. And there
are several examples of cases before national courts--Romania,
Hungary.
It seems that it is a practice to enroll Romani children in
separate classes, separate schools or special schools for
mental disabled children, in the absence of any medical record
that this children would need a special education, a special
attention, paid for. What we are advocating a lot is that
Romani children have to be enrolled in mainstream schools. The
practice of segregating Romani children--either in segregated
classes, segregated annexes to the schools or special schools--
has to be ended. And the decisions from the European court are
in this regard.
The problem is that, in a lot of member states, there is a
lack of reform in the educational systems. The governments are
a bit reluctant in reforming systems. Czech Republic is maybe
one of the cases where we had a decision from 2007, and the
government--it's still struggling in reforming the educational
system after five years from the decision,when the government
had to reform its system on the basis of the court's decision.
And still that is not the case. So we have several situations
in other countries as well. Unfortunately it is a practice in
Europe to put Romani children in segregated spaces, I would
say.
Mr. Smith. Could I ask you, with regards to autism, whether
or not there has ever been a surveillance? And again, going
back to 1998, I introduced a bill that was signed into law in
2000 that required the Centers for Disease Control to set up
centers of excellence, as we call them. And it really came out
of case work in my own district, where we thought we had a
prevalent spike in Bricktown, New Jersey. And when we started,
or they started, doing their data calls, they found out that
other municipalities had a similar rise, inexplicable. And we
went from believing that the prevalence rate in the United
States was three out of every 10,000 children to one out of
every 110.
And I'm not sure--if they're not part of the surveillance,
large numbers of Romani children could be left further behind
because their autism has not been discovered and early
intervention and other--I mean, segregation for a severely
autistic child is required, as long as they're getting service
that is commensurate with the problems that they face, so that
they can become better-functioning. But if it's done just to--
as you are clearly saying--to separate in the way that African-
Americans were separated in this country years ago, through
laws that were just to set apart--that's prejudicial and
discriminatory and certainly totally unethical. But I wonder if
that's been even looked into the way it ought to be.
Mr. Gergely. It was not substantially looked upon, but the
other problem is also the lack of proper testing procedure when
they are applied through Romani children, because this is where
the problem starts. They are enrolled in special schools
without being properly tested. So basically they are tested--
they are enrolled on the basis of a social-economic
disadvantage, not on the basis of a medical ground. This is
what is happening.
Mr. Smith. You know, just to--point for pondering: We're
pushing more police understanding of what a severely or even
moderately autistic child might be experiencing, because that
child--as he or she becomes an adult--might fly off the handle,
and a cop will respond in a way that then leads to an
altercation.
The child gets--young adult--incarcerated, and they're
dealing with a disability that made them prone or almost
predetermined--given the right trigger--to respond negatively
and then go to jail. So we have children--young adults, I
should say--in our own jails who shouldn't be there, who are
really--medical issues that went unaddressed. And I'm sure
they've got to be occurring within the Romani community.
Let me just ask one final question, and then yield to Erika
Schlager, our expert. You know, one thing about the--and you
know this, I think--about this Commission is that we are
blessed with very, very talented and effective staff who make
it their business, 24/7, year in and year out, to know,
understand and work the issues, including the Romani issue--
human rights issues. So I will yield to her.
I just want to ask one final question on trafficking. In
your report, Mr. Gergely, you make it very clear that--and this
is just one fact that you have in there--24 percent of the
Romani trafficked persons interviewed in this study, the
``break into silence'' study, had been in contact with the
police, and only one case resulted in the imprisonment of the
perpetrator.
You point out in the study, the overwhelming lack of
support available to Romani trafficked persons negatively
impacts the ability of many to re-integrate, leaving them
highly vulnerable to re-trafficking. And of course that is true
anywhere; it's true here. When they don't get the kind of
services that they need, soon as they're back out on the
street, if you will--even if rescued, the traffickers are
waiting there to re-enslave them.
And you also in your recommendations say that there needs--
and this would be to you, Mr. Mirga--to promote networking
between Romani NGOs, Romani mediators and Romani community
representatives to law enforcement and anti-trafficking
authorities, to combat trafficking in Romani communities.
And I'm wondering, since all of our countries now have
plans of actions--or at least almost all, including the OSCE
space--are they looking to put that piece in, so that the
Romani--who are disproportionately trafficked--have those re-
integration services available to them, so they're not enslaved
a second and a third and a fourth time?
Mr. Gergely. Well, as I said before, the problem is that,
in several countries, this is not acknowledged as an issue. So
therefore you do not have a policy which addresses this. That's
why we recommended in the report that there should be a
networking in place--meaning cooperation between the
communities and the law enforcement. This unfortunately is
lacking because the law enforcement doesn't see it as an issue
which has to be tackled in a particular way. But this is apply-
able to other areas, unfortunately.
Mr. Mirga. Yeah. I think that one of the issues which
should be raised here is neglect. Neglect, yes. And this goes
in many other areas. Not only in the issue of law enforcement
and care about something like victims of trafficking. Because
if they identify something like a Roma, well, this is kind of
less an issue. Similarly with education why Roma children are
not in the school, and there is obligation for having them in
the school. Sometimes school authorities just neglect their
obligation to control and that they should be in school, not
outside of the school.
So in this way, we can see that Roma are sometimes a
second-class citizen whether in the situation of victims or in
the situation of children who should be in school. And we see
this in many places. And so something like--if we expect Roma
to be included into the society, we should--and be treated
equally or sometimes even positive discrimination applied--we
have to of this kind of negligence--of neglect, closing eyes on
the issues.
And we should apply strongly the existing law. If there is
a convention of child protection--if there is a law which says,
until secondary education a child has to be in school--
authorities should enforce this, not just neglect--because you
are Roma, we don't care what you do. So this is one of the
source of being left out completely in many situations,
including, trafficking.
The second about--thinking about trafficking, I think we
already pointed out that there is a real lack or a little bit
of real commitments to fight against. I know the situation in
some of the countries where--because of the pressure from
outside, and providing funding--there were many agencies
created to deal with anti-trafficking. But when you try to push
to get some data, what has been--how this was effective to
prevent trafficking, you cannot get positive results. It's
simply--the procedure is continued, and you do not see positive
results. So that is what is concerning: multiplying agencies
and institutions which absorb funding, various funding from
donors, let's say--but you do not see a real progress in
stopping the process.
Mr. Smith. I'd like to yield to Erika Schlager.
Ms. Schlager. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Two years ago, at
the time of the murders in Tatarszentgyorgy, in Hungary, there
was I think quite a lot of shock at the brutality of the murder
of the father and son there. And two prominent Romani Hungarian
public officials spoke to this. Florian Farkas warned that
Hungary could be headed towards civil war, and Viktoria Mohacsi
said Roma would have no choice but to arm themselves or flee.
Without limiting yourself to Hungary--that is, speaking more
broadly to this phenomena in Bulgaria, the Czech Republic,
elsewhere--how do you view the prospect of interethnic
violence? Thank you.
Mr. Mirga. I think that, in the situation like we had in
Hungary, first reaction was to escape. You had a rise in people
who were migrating, Similarly, in Czech Republic, we had a
crisis where immigrants were going to Canada; Canada had to
introduce visas. Now we have again similar things in Western
Balkans, when you have significant number of Roma asking for
asylum, claiming the situation.
So I think first reaction is to avoid something like being
targeted by some groups, by extreme, and leave. The second--if
this is not a way out, and you have to stay--so the potential
for some--I would not say interethnic conflicts, but
victimizing the weaker, because Roma are not strong enough to
stand up. So more kind of a violence against the Roma may
happen. And we warn that--against that, especially in the
context of a continuing crisis, where you will see more
austerity programs which will impact welfare transfers to Roma,
who are mostly dependent on welfare.
So you may see this kind of situation where Roma can be
victimized by majority, because there is a growing resentment
against the Roma, built up by some elements in society. I
would--in my view, I would not see this like a real conflict
like we had with--let's say, between Albanians and Macedonians
in Macedonia, or like a real civil war. But more like something
which the weaker will be suffering more. So that's what I feel
may happen more often.
Mr. Gergely. What I would add is that the environment now
is very critical. The economic crisis in Europe on one hand,
the deterioration of the political environment, the gap in
terms of social and economic situation of the Roma--these
factors put the Roma community at a high risk. Of course that--
when we see all these manifestations against the Roma taking
place in several countries, when the political environment is
changing--unfortunately not in a very positive way, but rather
on negative way--you cannot but wonder where it would lead to.
So I think that the sentiment of the Roma communities is
not a safe and a secure sentiment. It's one of insecurity; it's
one of lacking the feeling of being protected. So it is
extremely important that when member states are addressing the
issues of the Roma communities, they are not focusing only on
economic or social perspective, but rather they see it as an
interdependent process with assuring human rights.
If human rights are not protected, if you do not have a
human rights-based perspective which is mixed with the social
and economic perspective, and without having an inclusive
approach, as long as we keep the Roma communities outside and
the majority of the societies on the other side, we will never
reach to a common ground, but we will be all the time parallel
without reaching anything.
So I think that the member states has to really see this
danger which is there. And they should really put together this
economic and social perspective, ensuring human rights
protection. That's the most outstanding issue now.
Mr. Mirga. Just to add something with--to the question. We
see something which is completely new--mass protests against
the Roma, It never happened before. We had eventually a
community of violence, local community was against Roma
community. That happened many times in many places since
transition. But to have somehow mobilized a large number of
majority and have them going outside on the streets to protest
against the Roma, this is something new. And this very
worrying.
Something new is also how extreme right is organizing
people. In North Bohemia, these groups are organizing protests
and they are joined by normal citizens, young people. And these
organizations are small, but they are mustering to have several
hundred or thousand people going against the community against
something--something new. And that never similar things were
happening in the past. And this shows the direction of how
things can evolve.
That, as I said, you may have this kind of victimization of
the weaker in this relationship, Roma-majority. And we have to
speak up about this. We have to raise awareness about this. We
have also to ask U.S. to react to this. Governments have to
realize that protection of the communities, the first, and to
diffuse this kind of action which are undertaken by some
elements of the--of the majority.
I would like to, for example, to appreciate steps made by
Bulgaria when the riots started and these mass protests were
organized in several cities, they arrested several hundred
people. And after, we do not hear any more about such organized
protests against the Roma. Also, what is positive thing--during
the local elections, Ataka--they didn't do well, they lost.
They had over 200-something councilors in the local elections
in the previous time. Now, they have much less, like one-third
of this.
So maybe either population or politician understood that
such an aggressive anti-Roma politics is not anymore right and
it's not so society didn't buy it in general. So I would like
to encourage this kind of freedom, unwavering opposition of the
leadership of the government, of the president, leaders of the
mainstream parties which stands on principles and they saying,
``This is not acceptable; we condemn this,'' in a uniform
voice. And that's also what we would like to see happening from
the U.S., that these strong messages about the principles are--
should be going straight forward to a number of countries.
Mr. Smith. Mr. Gergely, is the United States--from the
president to the vice president, secretary of state--speaking
boldly enough, with enough specificity to--on the Roma issues--
to our European friends?
Mr. Gergely. Yes, they are. I mean, the state secretary,
Hillary Clinton, has a history in taking firm standing on Roma
issues. Of course, having a similar message from the President
of the United States would be something which would very much
have a very clear and outreaching message to the European
countries--
Mr. Smith. Has he mentioned it? Has the President of the
United States mentioned it?
Mr. Gergely. Not yet. But it would be something----
Mr. Smith. Sure.
Mr. Gergely. ----which would give a strong message for
the--for Europe, I think----
Mr. Smith. Right.
Mr. Gergely. ----in terms of protecting human rights for
minorities. We are looking very much forward for U.S. to have a
similar standing and a position on Roma issues, as it was until
now.
Mr. Smith. Thank you. And I do have one final question. The
World Bank in a report suggested that if there was full
integration of the Roma community into the labor market, that
about a half a billion euros per year--annually, obviously--for
some countries would be the result, of positive consequences.
So it's not just a human rights issue, a humanitarian issue,
and a simple justice issue. It's also a very positive economic
issue if full integration were to occur. And I'm wondering is
that appreciated by governments, that they're missing out of a
positive economic benefit for the rest of the community if they
were to integrate?
Mr. Gergely. What I would say is if we look around in
Europe we would see that a lot of political commitments have
been in place in terms of improving the Roma situation, a lot
of governments have adopted policies for improving the Roma
situation. But unfortunately, the governmental commitments
which we're undertaking have been dissoluted at local level,
which shows that in practice having a commitment is not enough.
On the other hand, when the governments were adopting
policies for improving the Roma situation, what they were
missing to put there, beside the commitment, was the financial
resources for implementing those policies. So of course, in
order to ensure employment, you need resources for providing
trainings, for providing education, skills, and so on and so
forth--jobs, market, formal market. It's not--it's not easy at
all. It is a long process. It takes time. But unfortunately,
the governments are not committing their resources for
implementing such policies.
Now there is a lot of expectation from the European Union,
because the European Union has adopted the framework
communication on the policies. Now all the member states are
expected to develop and to have the policies for the next 10
years. There's a lot of emphasis on the financial resources,
because the union has the financial resources in place. The
only thing is that the member states have to apply for it. You
have to request, have to have the capacity.
The reports from the European Union shows that the European
funds absorption rates from the states are extremely low. With
other words, the states are not able to absorb the financial
resources which the European Union puts in place. So now the
question is if the member states are absorbing less than 30
percent of the available funds, how would they would be able to
absorb funds for Roma strategies? So the outstanding question
here is whether the states are able not to put their own money,
but to get the money from the union in order to implement the
policies for Roma.
Mr. Smith. Mr. Mirga.
Mr. Mirga. Just to comment on your question, I think it is
very valid argument, financial one, that governments is losing
and because of large work power which is not utilized at all,
to some extent of course because still if there is no will,
this argument will not work. Politicians, government may just
listen to, but they are not ready to, first, to invest to get
after what is the return. If you have a, let's say, sometimes
80 percent of people not working, so how to mobilize these
people if they have no skills, no education?
So what we are saying, you have to adopt a long-term
perspective. You have to start with early education of new
generations, because if you will not start early and prepare
the children to be equal with others in the school, they will
never finish high school, they will never finish universities.
And now education is a key to enter labor market. And there is
a competitive labor market. Some place people are young,
educated and they are without jobs. In some countries, it's
like 40 percent, 50 percent of young people without jobs. So
imagine now Roma, who have 1 percent educated and they are
discriminated, how they can enter the--such a competitive
field. So in order to really solve the issue, you have to have
a long-term start from the beginning, invest this money and
expect that maybe in 20 years there will be some return.
So the argument that now you can lose many money because
they are not involved in may not work with many politicians at
the moment. So our hope is that, especially in the time of
crisis where Roma even more are limited to take income and
jobs, what we can argue is do more with education, right,
starting from the beginning--
Mr. Smith. Are there countries that provide the proper
incentives--scholarships, for example--that do better than
other countries, particularly for higher education, so that
those marketable skills can be learned?
Mr. Mirga. Well, there are some countries who provide
scholarships, yes.
Mr. Smith. Who would you say is best? You may not want to
say, I understand.
Mr. Mirga. The best? Well, I can say some positive steps
are taken in Poland, for example. We have a scholarship system
since already for six or seven years. Each year we have like 50
students supported from the budget. They are receiving monthly,
like, 150 euros. So this is a significant help. This is a
significant support. We have in Hungary a scholarship system.
We have in Romania reserved seats at the universities.
So there are a number of good--but it's still small-scale
project. It should be more. But you have to do also not at the
only at the level of university, you have to take care that
there is more children going through the system and reaching
university. Now is very small percentage which is able to pass
through education and to reach university.
Mr. Smith. You know, one of the greatest trainer of skills
in the United States and I guess--I would suspect Europe as
well--are the U.S. military, our armed forces. How accessible
are the militaries of respective countries to Romani young
adults who want to enlist?
Mr. Mirga. I think--what I know about some countries is
like, for example, in Central, Eastern Europe in former
Czechoslovakia, yeah, army was a kind of a space where you can
make a career. Some of the leaders, present leaders, were rank
officers in the army. I don't know what is now at the moment,
whether it's still such openness, but I don't feel that it not.
At that time, it was much easier to be subscribed to army and
eventually some prospects was--
Mr. Smith. Is there any attempt on the militaries to
recruit among the--
Mr. Mirga. This I don't know. How it is--whether or they
are active, yeah, they are reaching out the community, here I
cannot say. It's similar probably like in police; you may have
some declarations, but openness of the forces are sometimes not
so. And there are also some inhibitions on the Roma side we
have to be clear about as well to be in police, for example.
Mr. Smith. I want to thank both of you. If you would like
to make any last comment but--I'll give you the last word--but
you certainly made many very important and incisive
recommendations. Your commentary will be very widely
disseminated. And it helps us to do a better job. And I am
deeply, on behalf of my fellow commissioners, grateful to you
for your leadership and for taking so much time out of your
day, and really couple days, to be here to provide us that. So
I thank you. If you would like to just make any final word or
we'll just conclude.
Mr. Gergely. I would just like to thank you for giving the
opportunity of my organization to have this statement here.
Mr. Mirga. I would like maybe to make some short statement
about the ODIHR and our cooperation with the EU.
Last year, we were working closely with the [inaudible].We
had a number of high level meetings with the government there
to raise awareness about the needs for concrete action
regarding Roma in Western Balkans who are in the pre-accession.
So the pre-accession has to be used differently how it was used
in the past. But this opportunity was somehow missed, because
this is at the right time to exert pressure on the governments
and to do more.
We were also awarded with the EC grant to do project in
Western Balkans. It's called Best Practices for Roma
Integration. And we aim to work with all the countries there,
including Kosovo, in identifying best practices in five areas
and will try to implement them.
In this context, I would like to thank also U.S. for
supporting financially this project, made some contribution.
Germany made also some contribution to this money. And we are
grateful for that. And at the end I would like to thank Erika
Schlager, a professional staff member of the Helsinki
Commission. I admire her as she is tireless in all her efforts,
whether it's in promote Roma rights here in Washington and the
OSCE area. This hearing is also thanks to her dedication. So
thank you very much, Erika. Thank you.
Mr. Smith. Thank you. On that last word, the hearing's
adjourned. Thank you.
Mr. Mirga. Thank you.
A P P E N D I X
=======================================================================
Prepared Statements
----------
Prepared Statement of Hon. Christopher H. Smith, Chairman, Commission
on Security and Cooperation in Europe
Good afternoon and welcome to everyone joining us this afternoon--
particularly to our witnesses, who have travelled here from Europe to
be able to testify today. We appreciate your dedication to the human
rights and dignity of the Romani people, probably the most
discriminated against and disadvantaged people in Europe today.
Roma, Europe's largest ethnic minority, have faced discrimination
and worse for hundreds of years. In parts of Europe they were even
literally enslaved, as late as the 19th century, when our own country
was battling this evil, and, in the 20th century, were the victims of
German genocide during WWII--an estimated 500,000 Roma were
exterminated by Nazi Germany and its accomplices.
In 1990 hopes for the democratic transitions underway were
enormous--and the OSCE was likewise optimistic that it would play its
part in ensuring that Roma would be equal sharers in the benefits
freedom, democracy, and the free economy would bring.
But the 1990s were difficult years for Roma, who were faced with
pogroms, murders and other acts of violence, and police brutality. With
a view to that violence, I wrote to then-Assistant Secretary for
Democracy, Human Rights, and Labour Harold Koh regarding Romani human
rights and religious freedom--and urged the State Department to be sure
that these issues were fully covered in the Department's annual Country
Reports on Human Rights Practices.
The commission became increasingly active on Roma human rights
issues. In 2002, we held a Helsinki commission hearing on the situation
of Roma. And that same year, my resolution on improving equal
opportunities for Roma in education was adopted by the OSCE
Parliamentary Assembly.
Although about ten years ago many countries began to implement
measures to stem the violence, resulting in fewer attacks and more
accountability when attacks occurred, the sad fact is that these
positive developments have not been sustained.
To make matters worse, in recent years there has been a terrifying
escalation of violence against Roma, prompting to a Helsinki Commission
to hold a briefing on this issue in 2009. The current wave of violence
has resulted in horrible fatalities--like the murder of five-year-old
Robert Csorba in Hungary, who, along with his father, was killed by
sniper fire when they tried to flee their burning house which had been
set on fire by Molotov cocktail. There are many cases of horrifying
violence against Roma: people have been maimed or disfigured for life,
like the 13-year-old girl in Hungary shot in the face by the extremists
who also killed her mother, or the toddler known as ``Baby Natalka'' in
the Czech Republic who was burned over 80% of her body in a Molotov
cocktail attack. And as we discuss today the anti-Roma mob attacks and
demonstrations that continue to occur in several countries, we should
ask: what is the impact on families and children who huddle in their
homes while a mob outside yells ``Gypsies to the gas!''? Exactly this
sort of thing is really going on-- in the year 2012 Roma still have to
face such open savagery.
Yet at the same time many governments are voicing serious concerns
about the situation --one of the purposes of this hearing is to ask how
well the solutions respond to the problem. Every EU country is now
working up a ``national strategy for Roma integration''--do these
strategies respond to the real gravity of the danger threatening Roma?
Likewise our own State Department has prioritized the rights of the
Romani people, and this has been implemented with real commitment by
many ambassadors and human rights officers. Yet the Country Reports on
Human Rights Practices have been uneven and so we will have to continue
to watch them carefully--they should be a touchstone of our
government's commitment to the human rights of the Romani people.
Finally, we should also talk about humanitarian concerns. In the
post- communist countries, Roma have been the absolute losers in the
transition to market economies. Last year Hungarian Minister for Social
Inclusion Zolton Balog said that their situation is worse today than it
was under communism. Over the past twenty years, Roma have been caught
in a downward spiral accelerating at exponential rates. While they were
at the bottom of the social ladder during the communist period, today
they are often ``off the grid,'' living in shantytowns, urban ghettos,
or segregated settlements. A UNDP report concluded that Roma in five
Central European countries live in conditions more typically found in
Sub-Saharan Africa than in Europe. But can governments really expect to
make improvements with regard to other problems Roma face--in housing,
employment, education and so on--if shocking acts of violence continue
unabated?
Prepared Statement of Hon. Benjamin J. Cardin, Co-Chairman, Commission
on Security and Cooperation in Europe
Mr. President, at the end of January, something remarkable
happened: Slovak Deputy Prime Minister Rudolf Chmel made a positive
statement about Roma. Saying something nice about Europe's largest
ethnic minority may not seem newsworthy, but it is and here is why.
The Deputy Prime Minister reacted to an escalation of anti-Roma
rhetoric in the runup to Slovakia's March 10 parliamentary elections by
calling on political parties not to play the ``Roma card.'' But more
than that, he welcomed a landmark decision of the European Court on
Human Rights holding that the sterilization of a Slovak Romani woman
without her consent had been cruel and inhuman. He welcomed the
findings of a Slovak court that concluded Romani children had been
placed in segregated schools in eastern Slovakia. And he commended the
human rights organization that had helped litigate both these cases.
To say that statements like these are few and far between is an
understatement. On the contrary, officials at the highest levels of
government frequently perpetuate the worst bigotry against Roma.
For example, after four perpetrators were convicted and sentenced
for a racially motivated firebombing that left a Romani toddler burned
over 80 percent of her body, Czech President Vaclav Klaus wondered if
their 20-plus-year sentences were too harsh. Romanian Foreign Minister
Teodor Baconschi suggested that Roma were ``physiologically'' disposed
to crime. Last year, President Silvio Berlusconi warned the electorate
of Milan to vote for his party lest their city become a
``Gypsyopolis.'' And French President Nicolas Sarkozy has explicitly
targeted Roma--from EU countries--for expulsion from France. The common
thread in most of this rhetoric is the portrayal of Roma as inherently
criminal.
Nearly 20 years ago in the New York Times--Dec. 10, 1993--Vaclav
Havel described the treatment of Roma as a litmus test for civil
society. Today, Europe is still failing that test miserably. As
Hungary's Minister for Social Inclusion Zolton Balog has argued, Roma
are worse off today than they were under communism. While a small
fraction of Roma have benefited from new opportunities, many more have
been the absolute losers in the transition from the commandto- a market
economy, and vast numbers live in a kind of poverty that the United
Nations Development Programme described as more typically found in sub-
Saharan Africa than Europe. Endemic discrimination has propelled
economic marginalization downward at an exponential pace, and the past
20 years have been marked by outbreaks of hate crimes and mob violence
against Roma that are on the rise again.
In the current environment, those who play with anti-Roma rhetoric
are playing with a combustible mix.
In the near term, there is the real prospect that fueling prejudice
against Roma will spark interethnic violence. Before Bulgaria's local
elections last October, the extremist Ataka party parlayed an incident
involving a Romani mafia boss into anti-Romani rioting in some 14 towns
and cities. In the Czech Republic, the government has had to mount
massive shows of law enforcement to keep anti-Roma mobs from
degenerating into all-out pogroms; its worked so far, but at a huge
cost.
Significantly, Roma are not always standing by while the likes of
the Hungarian Guard mass on their doorsteps; they have sometimes
gathered sticks, shovels, scythes, and anything else handy in an old-
school defense.
Even without the prospect of violence, there is a longer term
threat to many countries with larger Romani populations: if they fail
to undertake meaningful integration of Roma, they will find their
economies hollowed out from within. More than a decade ago, then-
Hungarian Minister of Education Zolton Pokorni said that one out of
every three children starting school that year would be Romani. Some
economic forecasts now suggest that by 2040, 40 percent of the labor
force in Hungary will be Romani. A number of other countries face
similar trajectories.
A desperately impoverished, uneducated, and marginalized population
will not serve as the backbone of a modern and thriving economy. But
several studies have shown that the cost of investing in the
integration of Roma--housing, education, and job training and the like-
-will be more than offset by gains in GNP and tax revenue. In order to
undertake those integration policies, somebody has to build popular
support for them. And that is where Mr. Chmel comes in.
Until now, most popular discourse about Roma seems predicated on
the ostrich-like belief that perhaps they can be made to go away. Few
politicians have shown the courage and foresight to reframe public
discourse in any way that acknowledges Europe's future will definitely
include Roma. Mr. Chmel has taken an important step in that direction.
I hope he will inspire others.
Prepared Statement of Andrzej Mirga, Senior Adviser on Roma and Sinti
Issues, OSCE
Honorable Chairperson, Distinguished Members of Helsinki
Commission, Ladies and Gentlemen,
I would like first to express my gratitude to the Chairperson of
the Helsinki Commission for organizing this hearing on Roma and Sinti
today. It's a great opportunity to share with you our views and
concerns regarding Roma and Sinti in the OSCE area with this important
Commission. It's the right time to address these issues, as some
developments in recent years are highly disturbing and we need to speak
up about them.
I testified here with several Roma friends in mid-2009. It was a
time when the financial and economic crisis had erupted and we
signalled the worrying developments that were evolving with regard to
Roma and Sinti. Today, with fiscal difficulties in a number of European
countries and a second economic crisis looming, I have to report to you
that some of these concerns, unfortunately, have become reality. No
doubt, the ongoing economic difficulties have intensified uncertainty
and exacerbated some of the negative trends I elaborated upon in the
briefing in 2009.
On a general note, let me underline that most problems facing Roma
and Sinti populations have by no means been resolved and, for the most
part, this minority has not yet benefited from lasting improvements in
human rights and social inclusion; this is unfinished business in
Europe that requires much stronger and longer-term interventions at
national and European levels. That was one of the conclusions in my
2009 briefing here, based upon the findings of ODIHR's 2008 Status
Report on Implementation of the Action Plan for Improving the Situation
of Roma and Sinti in the OSCE Area. This conclusion is more valid than
ever today.
Currently, it seems the requirement for much stronger and longer-
term intervention is widely recognized, as all major international
organizations and EU institutions are calling upon governments to step
up their efforts to realize objectives regarding Roma and Sinti social
inclusion. This is done partly as a response to a serious and dangerous
rise in violence and intolerance against members of this minority in a
number of countries. It comes, however, at a time when European
governments face real fiscal and economic difficulties, making it a bad
time to approach them on other issues. Governments are facing tough
decisions on the introduction of austerity programmes to reduce public
spending and keep national debt under control.
In the 2009 briefing I mentioned ODIHR plans to conduct a field-
assessment visit to Hungary. We spent nearly two weeks in the field
there, produced a report with a set of recommendations, and have since
organized follow-up activities with the Hungarian authorities. Our time
in the different localities we visited, including those where Roma had
been attacked, and some killed, provided us with a sense of what was
going on at the grass-roots level, what people, both Roma and non-Roma,
felt, and of developing trends. Clearly, the economic gap between the
majority population and the Roma was not diminishing, there were
underlying causes for tensions, and feelings of insecurity or being
threatened by radical groups were high among Roma.
I claimed also that the next elections in Hungary would be a test
case for the extreme right's quest for political power and for the
effectiveness of their anti-Roma campaign. Regrettably, those
campaigning using anti-Roma rhetoric attracted significant support. We
see this development as part of a dangerous trend in Europe, with more
such extreme-right, populist and nationalist groups entering into
mainstream politics; examples of this trend can be found in a number of
OSCE participating States. Another test case is approaching with
Slovakia's parliamentary elections, where one party is already openly
using anti-Roma rhetoric in its campaign.
Roma and Sinti migration has become a key challenge, and it will
likely remain so for some time. The social stigma associated with Roma
and their visibility as migrants will continue to heighten the risks of
discriminatory practices and of social exclusion in countries of
destination.
In the past two years, in the context of deepening economic
hardships, we have witnessed a number of disturbing developments. There
was the crisis related to Roma migrants in France, we have seen the
rise of tensions with extreme-right or neo-Nazi groups in North Bohemia
in the Czech Republic, we have seen mass protests against Roma in a
number of cities in Bulgaria, following the incidents in Katunitsa,
near Plovdiv.
In most of these situations we have seen populist, extreme-right or
neo-Nazi groups actively exploiting anti-Roma prejudice, sometimes
generating hostility or instigating violence against Roma and Sinti
communities. We are concerned about current public discourse on Roma
and Sinti that revives past anti-Roma rhetoric, centred on the image of
them as ``nomads'', viewing them as a burden to social system or as
dangers for public security and order based on alleged `Gypsy
criminality'.
The rise in open and often radical anti-Roma politics and policies
at local levels is another challenging and new phenomenon. We witness
local authorities and mayors actively pursuing policies aimed at
forcing Roma and Sinti from their communities. Exclusion or separation
is openly advocated in some municipalities, including in the
segregation of children in educational systems. There are also cases of
the refusal by local authorities to accept or request state aid aimed
at supporting Roma communities.
The Roma and Sinti, along with other disadvantaged minorities, are
right now passing through `hard times', facing `hardening attitudes'--
just to recall the title of last year's briefing. This sense of
hardship for Roma and Sinti is well illustrated in OSCE documents. The
Astana Declaration, the 2009 Ministerial Council Decision from Athens
the 2010 Review Conference in Warsaw, OSCE Parliamentary Assembly
Belgrade Declaration and the 2011 Human Dimension Implementation
Meeting Special Roma Day all addressed concerns regarding rising levels
of violence and intolerance against members of this minority. Most
recently, on 1 of February this year, the Declaration on the Rise of
anti-Gypsyism and Racist Violence against Roma in Europe was adopted by
the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe; the Committee
expressed its deep concern about this trend.
ODIHR in the past have been more focused on providing assistance to
newer democracies and States in crisis or post-crisis situations.
Today, and likely over the near future, such an assistance will be
provided to consolidated and young democracies as instances of hate
crime targeting Roma and Sinti may become a recurrent issue there.
ODIHR has followed all of these developments closely and will continue
to do so. The office managed to organize several field assessment
visits to participating States and is preparing next one: all were led
by the Senior Adviser on Roma and Sinti Issues.
Parallel to these worrying developments, we are witnessing more
promising efforts and initiatives aimed at ensuring human rights and
social inclusion of Roma and Sinti. The most important are the new
agenda of the European Union on Roma. With EU enlargements in 2004 and
2007 that brought in a majority of Europe's Roma population, the centre
of gravity for Roma and Sinti issues has, quite understandably, shifted
to the EU and its institutions. The EU has both the political and
financial tools to enforce some measures on its member States,
something that other organizations do not have.
Most recently, on 5 April 2011, the Commission issued a
communication on an EU Framework for National Roma Integration
Strategies, which was endorsed by the European Council in June. The
Framework commits all 27 Member States to the development of targeted
policies that systematically tackle the socio-economic exclusion of and
discrimination against Roma people throughout the EU.
This complex EU agenda on Roma and Sinti has been overshadowed by
the euro crisis itself. Much of the response to the question of how
this new effort of the EU regarding Roma can be successful and lasting
will depend on the responses to other questions: How will the EU
resolve the present crisis, and how long it will take to recover from
it? Surprisingly little attention however, appears to having been paid
to its possible negative impact on the most socially and economically
disadvantaged groups in societies, including the Roma and Sinti. There
seems to be a somehow parallel discourse on Roma disconnected from
ongoing debates and concerns.
The enlargement has been a matter of politics and not exclusively
of standards and benchmarks. Pre-accession support programmes for Roma
did not work to better integrate them; these programmes helped to
design activities and establish offices for Roma policy, but were mere
`window dressing'. Regrettably, expensive EU-funded projects have left
few traces of outputs in Roma communities or a sense that these
communities benefited. They remain socially excluded, with only a
minimal chance of increased integration and improving their lives.
The reports recently commissioned by the EU on use of its financial
and policy instruments with regards Roma are in most parts critical:
minimal progress has been achieved, disproportional funds were used to
produce short-lived outcomes; existing initiatives and programmes have
been confronted with a lack of political will at both the national and
local levels; the effective use of structural funds as, well as the
possibility of funds being misused, have both come into question. The
reports recommended setting benchmarks and improving monitoring and
evaluation, as well as focusing on attaining results and outcomes.
To conclude this part: prospects in the short term appear poor in
fields where there has been some constant, if minor, improvement in the
past, such as in education, housing, political participation or Roma
representation in public media. In a number of participating States
there appear to have been setbacks in the areas mentioned above, as the
gap between standards for Roma and Sinti and the majority populations
have been, in fact, widening. With few social or economic indicators
showing improvement in the situation of Roma, and evidence of
increasing hostility toward their communities among non-Roma in some
States, these disturbing trends might not just continue, but could very
well worsen.
In the crisis like this one the greatest challenge is raising the
level of employment and opportunities for income among members of Roma
and Sinti communities. Both the lack of education and skills and well
as discrimination in the labour market effectively hinder progress in
this area. The issue is even more challenging with the rising level of
unemployment among majority populations, including among graduates and
the young.
Roma civil society has undergone difficult times as well. First,
with accession concluded, donors and big private foundations tend to
move their activities out from new EU countries. Within the EU space,
Roma civil society, in particular, faces hardship in securing funding.
Currently, the main sources for funding have become the state and/or EU
financial instruments. Dependency on state funding brings limitations
and disadvantages; funding may depend on the good will of a particular
administration or other considerations. The weak development of human
resources on the part of Roma organizations also impacts negatively on
the securing of funding from EU sources; access to EU funding
opportunities are a matter of specialized skills, knowledge and
structures. As a result, Roma civil society may face difficulties in
securing funds.
What therefore would I urge states to do?
Rising racism and extreme right pose a real threat to minorities,
including immigrants and Roma and Sinti and, in consequence to social
cohesion. Renewing commitments to teaching tolerance and preventing
activities of neo-Nazi and extreme right groups is a most urgent need.
The media can play a crucial role in combating discrimination and
prejudices against minorities, immigrants and in particular Roma and
Sinti. This is definitely an area where more attention and energy has
to be invested in the future.
The best way to deal with the future consequences of today's
economic difficulties is to invest in education. This is particularly
the case for the Roma and Sinti, who suffer the most from a lack of
education and skills. The key here is both to work with parents,
particularly the mothers, of Roma and Sinti children to raise their
level of commitment and determination to push their children through
education.
I would recommend investing more in Roma and Sinti youth. The
number of Roma and Sinti students at universities is rising. They need
to be embraced and supported, as they can be the agents of change in
Roma communities.
There is a need to empower Roma and Sinti organizations, which will
increasingly face challenges in attracting funding right now. Such
grass-root organizations will be needed to win over the local
authorities that are key for Roma and Sinti inclusion. Municipal
associations, mayoral offices and local agencies are of central
importance.
Examples of good practices are tested by civil society,
demonstrating which projects need to be scaled-up, adopted by the
government, and introduced in a systemic way. I would stress, however,
that the most important actors are ultimately Roma and Sinti families
and individuals; they should play a key role in successfully overcoming
disadvantages and become self-reliant and successful in their lives.
The EU and national governments have to adopt a long-term approach.
Some of the problems are deeply entrenched, and there are no quick
fixes to attain goals like raising the level of education among Roma to
a level comparable to national averages, or reducing levels of Roma
unemployment or effectively countering discrimination faced by Roma in
all areas of life.
The implementation of various policies and measures has to be
assessed and monitored. This work will be increasingly important for
governments and the EU and other international stakeholders--there is a
need for evidence-based policy design and accurate evaluation of
outcomes.
Co-operation and co-ordination is required not only to limit
duplication, secure better outcomes, and ensure greater impact, but
also to ensure more effective use of available funding. Future EU Roma
policy should endeavour to maintain a balance between the
responsibilities of EU institutions and their instruments and policies,
and those of Member States. Such a policy shall not be an alibi on the
part of the states for inaction, neglect or the view that Brussels is
responsible. Stronger involvement on the part of the EU and the
financial resources it has to offer can provide a push in the right
direction.
ODIHR continues to foster its co-operation with the European
Commission. This year ODIHR has been one of the key partners for the
EC's Directorate General for Enlargement, which held a series of high-
level roundtables on Roma in the context of the EU accession process in
Serbia, Montenegro, Bosnia and Herzegovina, the former Yugoslav
Republic of Macedonia, and Albania. ODIHR has been awarded an EC grant
of over three million Euros for a regional project on ``Best Practices
for Roma Integration'' in the Western Balkans. The implementation of
the project started in January, and the project will be carried out
over 23 months in close co-operation with OSCE field operations.
This project demonstrates that the EU and the OSCE are increasingly
co-coordinating and co-operating on issues of concern with regard to
human rights and democratization.
I take the opportunity here to thank United States for its
substantial financial support for the project, and Germany, which has
also provided support.
Let me end by thanking Ms. Erika Schlager, a professional staff
member at the Helsinki Commission. I admire her, as she is tireless in
all her efforts to address and promote Roma rights here in Washington
and in the entire OSCE world. This hearing is thanks also to her
commitment and efforts.
Thank you.
M A T E R I A L F O R
T H E R E C O R D
=======================================================================
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]
This is an official publication of the
Commission on Security and
Cooperation in Europe.
< < <
This publication is intended to document
developments and trends in participating
States of the Organization for Security
and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE).
< < <
All Commission publications may be freely
reproduced, in any form, with appropriate
credit. The Commission encourages
the widest possible dissemination
of its publications.
< < <
http://www.csce.gov @HelsinkiComm
The Commission's Web site provides
access to the latest press releases
and reports, as well as hearings and
briefings. Using the Commission's electronic
subscription service, readers are able
to receive press releases, articles,
and other materials by topic or countries
of particular interest.
Please subscribe today.