[Senate Hearing 111-1153] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] S. Hrg. 111-1153 THE DEEPWATER DRILLING MORATORIUM: AN ECONOMIC DISASTER FOR LOUISIANA'S SMALL BUSINESSES ======================================================================= FIELD HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION __________ AUGUST 17, 2010 __________ Printed for the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.fdsys.gov ---------- U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 74-311 PDF WASHINGTON : 2012 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800; DC area (202) 512-1800 Fax: (202) 512-2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402-0001 COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS ---------- MARY L. LANDRIEU, Louisiana, Chair OLYMPIA J. SNOWE, Maine, Ranking Member JOHN F. KERRY, Massachusetts CHRISTOPHER S. BOND, Missouri CARL LEVIN, Michigan DAVID VITTER, Louisiana TOM HARKIN, Iowa JOHN THUNE, South Dakota JOSEPH I. LIEBERMAN, Connecticut MICHAEL B. ENZI, Wyoming MARIA CANTWELL, Washington JOHNNY ISAKSON, Georgia EVAN BAYH, Indiana ROGER WICKER, Mississippi MARK L. PRYOR, Arkansas JAMES E. RISCH, Idaho BENJAMIN L. CARDIN, Maryland JEANNE SHAHEEN, New Hampshire KAY HAGAN, North Carolina Donald R. Cravins, Jr., Democratic Staff Director Wallace K. Hsueh, Republican Staff Director C O N T E N T S ---------- Opening Statements Page Landrieu, Hon. Mary L., Chair, and a U.S. Senator from Louisiana. 1 Vitter, Hon. David, a U.S. Senator from Louisiana................ 9 Witnesses Davis, Lori, Owner, Rig-Chem, Houma, LA.......................... 11 Goodson, Charles, Owner, Charley G's Restaurant, Lafayette, LA... 17 David, Dewitt, Commercial Real Estate Broker, Van Eaton and Romero......................................................... 21 Cloutier, Troy, Regional President, Midsouth Bank................ 28 Angelle, Hon. Scott, Lieutenant Governor, State of Louisiana..... 32 Chabert, Hon. Norbert N., Louisiana State Senate, District 20.... 52 Champagne, Hon. Simone B., Louisiana House of Representatives, District 49.................................................... 57 Williams, Hon. Arlanda, Council Chairwoman, Terrebonne Parish Consolidated Government........................................ 58 Matte, Hon. Timothy, Mayor, Morgan City, LA...................... 65 Alphabetical Listing and Appendix Material Submitted Angelle, Hon. Scott Testimony.................................................... 32 Prepared statement........................................... 35 Response to post-hearing questions from Chair Landrieu....... 125 Chabert, Hon. Norbert N. Testimony.................................................... 52 Prepared statement........................................... 54 Champagne, Hon. Simone B. Testimony.................................................... 57 American Energy Alliance Report: ``The Economic Cost of a Moratorium on Offshore Oil and Gas Exploration to the Gulf Region''................................................... 80 E-mail from Heidi Martin..................................... 108 Cloutier, Troy Testimony.................................................... 28 Prepared statement........................................... 30 Response to post-hearing questions from Chair Landrieu....... 122 David, Dewitt Testimony.................................................... 21 Prepared statement........................................... 23 Davis, Lori Testimony.................................................... 11 Prepared statement........................................... 14 Response to post-hearing questions from Chair Landrieu....... 116 Deep Water Activity.......................................... 132 Shelf Activity............................................... 133 Deep Water Work History...................................... 134 Revenues..................................................... 135 Moratorium Effect on Rig-Chem, Inc........................... 136 Graph of Moratorium Effect on Rig-Chem, Inc.................. 137 Freyou, Ernest Letter....................................................... 138 Goodson, Charles Testimony.................................................... 17 Prepared statement........................................... 19 Response to post-hearing questions from Chair Landrieu....... 120 IHS Global Insight Special study................................................ 110 Landrieu, Hon. Mary L. Opening statement............................................ 1 Prepared statement........................................... 5 Fax letter from experts and attachment....................... 73 Mason, Joseph R. Report....................................................... 90 Prepared statement........................................... 40 Matte, Hon. Timothy Testimony.................................................... 65 Prepared statement........................................... 69 Miller, Mark K. Prepared statement........................................... 140 Randolph, Charlotte Response to post-hearing questions from Chair Landrieu....... 130 Report Potential Economic Impacts of Proposed Increases in Regulation and Taxes on Deepwater Drilling in the Gulf of Mexica..................................................... 111 Tea Party of Lafayette Press release................................................ 144 Vitter, Hon. David Opening statement............................................ 9 Williams, Hon. Arlanda Testimony.................................................... 58 Prepared statement........................................... 61 THE DEEPWATER DRILLING MORATORIUM: AN ECONOMIC DISASTER FOR LOUISIANA'S SMALL BUSINESSES ---------- TUESDAY, AUGUST 17, 2010 United States Senate, Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship, Lafayette, LA. The committee met, pursuant to notice, at 10:02 a.m., in Suite 209, Louisiana Immersive Technologies Enterprise (LITE), 537 Cajundome Boulevard, Lafayette, Louisiana, Hon. Mary L. Landrieu (Chair of the committee) presiding. Present: Senators Landrieu and Vitter. OPENING STATEMENT OF THE HON. MARY L. LANDRIEU, CHAIR, AND A U.S. SENATOR FROM LOUISIANA Chair Landrieu. If everyone would take their seats, I would like to thank you for coming. I am pleased to be here, and I have been particularly pleased to chair the committee the last year and a half. I will start with opening statements, as is our custom, and then we will go to our panelists and have five minutes of questions with a second round, if necessary. I want to begin by saying, first of all, thanks to the LITE Center for having us and also for Mark Miller and Brian Hanks, who helped, with the help of the Chamber and many other organizations, to put out the notice for this hearing. We are very, very grateful. A hundred-and-twenty-one days ago, the Deepwater Horizon explosion 50 miles off the coast of Louisiana took place. It took the lives of 11 men and sent an estimated five million barrels of oil spewing into the Gulf of Mexico, onto our shores and into our marshes. This accident has threatened our environment, our economy, and our way of life. The Macondo well may be capped, but the crippling economic impacts caused by this disaster and the ensuing moratorium continue to impact our communities in substantial negative ways. Louisiana's families and businesses are getting hit on two fronts. First, our seafood industry, which accounts for roughly 40 percent of the lower 48's production, is suffering from both actual impacts from the spill and no less damaging the perception that our seafood is no longer safe. Shrimping season opened today. We are going to do everything we can to talk about how fresh and flavorful our Gulf shrimp are. Secondly, our offshore energy exploration industry and hundreds of businesses that support it have been put in jeopardy by the heavy hand of the Federal Government. Regrettably, the Administration reacted to the Deepwater Horizon tragedy by halting all deepwater exploration activities in the Gulf and canceling the scheduled Western Gulf lease sale which would have occurred this month. While some very limited shallow water drilling is underway in the Gulf, only two permits have been granted since April 20, and all deepwater drilling has been brought to a complete standstill as a result of this ill-conceived action. The decision to stop virtually all new energy exploration in the Gulf was uninformed, in my view, and it borders on reckless. Today, thousands of Gulf Coast businesses are fighting their way out of this government-imposed economic disaster that not only threatens our jobs and businesses, including the oil and gas field, transportation, fabrication companies, hospitality, and restaurants, but it also threatens our way of life just as surely as the massive oil spill did and perhaps even more. This Administration's decision to halt drilling activity did more than threaten the livelihoods of rig workers and oil service crews. It substantially reduced general economic activity throughout the Gulf region. We will hear testimony today that will highlight the hardships and challenges that this moratorium has imposed on Gulf Coast small businesses. While we are here today to discuss the moratorium's economic impact on local and regional economy, we cannot ignore the consequences to our environment and our national security, and I would like to address both just briefly. The Administration's stated goal of this moratorium is to protect the environment. I believe the action to impose this moratorium has actually increased environmental risk to our oceans and coastal wetlands, and this is why. The United States continues to consume 20 million barrels of oil every day. It did so the day before the Deep Horizon explosion and it is doing so today as we meet here at the LITE Center. Therefore, by stopping all new drilling here at home, offshore drilling in the Gulf, which is virtually shut down, the U.S. will necessarily increase oil imports from other countries with far weaker environmental standards than our own and regulatory regimes that do not function as well as ours. In countries like Niger, Angola, and Venezuela, the record shows that these countries suffer significantly more spills at a much more frequent rate, causing more harm to the world's oceans, not less. In addition, all of that oil must be tankered into U.S. ports. While tankers are much safer today than they were before the Exxon Valdez spill, the fact is that prior to the Deepwater Horizon, the record will show that spills from tankers were four times more volume and frequency than spills from the drilling rigs themselves. The negative impacts of the moratorium on national security should also not be overlooked. The U.S. demand for oil will not decline simply because Gulf Coast exploration has been shut down. This means that less oil used by Americans going forward will have been produced by Americans and more will have been produced offshore and imported to our shores. As we all know, some of these imports will invariably come from hostile nations, or nations hostile to U.S. interests. In 2008 alone, Americans transferred nearly $700 billion overseas to pay for oil imports. That number, in addition, will increase as future Gulf Coast production lags due to the long-term effects of this ill-conceived moratorium. This is a blow also to our national security, and one that we could do without. At a hearing I chaired in Washington, DC, last month through the Small Business Committee, we heard testimony from Louisiana State University Professor Joe Mason who said that under the current moratorium, the Gulf Coast region will lose more than 8,000 jobs, nearly $500 million in wages, over $2.1 billion in economic activity, as well as nearly $100 million in State and local revenue. The moratoria's spillover effect could mean 12,000 jobs and nearly three billion nationwide, including almost $200 million in Federal tax revenues just in the first six months. This is a very serious issue, not only related here in Lafayette Parish and in this region, not only to the State of Louisiana, but to the nation as a whole. According to Dr. Mason, if the moratorium lasts longer, some 25,000 jobs could be in jeopardy, and we will hear from our panelists along those lines today. Another expert from a research firm, from Dun and Bradstreet, estimated that in Lafayette Parish alone, 780 businesses employing close to 10,500 people could be negatively affected. Businesses here in Lafayette are some of the hardest hit, which is why I chose this site and this venue for this important field hearing today. Consider what we know. Idling deepwater rigs that were permitted to drill in the Gulf will immediately impact crew members, as many as 46,000 directly. According to the Gulf Economic Survival Team, which is represented here today by Lieutenant Governor Scott Angelle, and, I might add, has been ably represented by him, it says that the long-term job loss could reach 120,000 by 2014. While Gulf waters may be clouded by oil in some spots, the data that we are accumulating against this moratorium is crystal clear. We cannot close down the Gulf offshore oil and gas sector without devastating economic impacts to our region, increased environmental risk to our ocean, and weakening our national security. I think it is noteworthy that the Administration was forced to revise its stand in July after a Federal court decision ruled that its action was without solid legal basis. As one of the first Senators to call for a full investigation into the accident and request more effective safeguards against future spills, I share the Administration's goal of a safer oil and gas industry. We all do, but this blanket moratorium will not help us achieve or advance that goal. The fact is that Louisiana's coastline is a working coast that brings the country an abundance of energy, seafood, and provides navigation assets for commerce for the world. The Mississippi Delta is our home, and there is no one who wants drilling to be safer than we do, no one who wants the water to be cleaner than we do, and no one that wants the seafood to be fresher than those of us that serve it and consume it in our restaurants daily. I am confident that we can strengthen the safety record of Gulf drilling as we move forward while promoting a balanced and diversified economic future. But we also know that any hope for a prosperous future will be challenged by a prolonged suspension of deepwater drilling. We will hear today from grocery store owners, restaurants, real estate companies, and local banks and other small businesses that have been directly and negatively impacted by this moratorium. Our Federal Government has a responsibility, particularly in these difficult times, to make sure that these paychecks do not turn into pink slips. In this hearing today, we will build a strong case for lifting this moratorium now, and that is the purpose of this hearing, to hear directly from small businesses that are being adversely affected about this ill-conceived and heavy-handed action by the Federal Government that does not, as I have said already, and it is worth repeating, does not meet our environmental needs, our national security needs, and it most certainly does not meet our economic needs. It fails on every test. I believe this Congress needs to hear these stories of these small businesses, and I am very proud that my committee will be able to supply this for the record, and this record will stay open for two weeks. We invite all those in attendance to submit any written comments they feel perhaps were not given on the record today. I also want to take a moment to introduce a person that is here at my request, and I want you all to be polite. Mark Doms is the Chief Economist at the Department of Commerce. Mark, would you stand up just so people can recognize you? He is here to listen to this testimony. He is one of the lead officials that will be making the report to the President in September, and we hope that the report will lead to a lifting of the moratorium. I am committed, along with members of the Gulf Coast and our delegations, both Republican and Democrat are united across the board, from Texas to Louisiana to Mississippi to Alabama, to get this message out so this moratorium can be lifted. I was proud to introduce legislation in the Senate this month that will lift the moratorium and build on the work of others, most notably Representative Melancon in the House that has gotten the House on the record, both Democrats and Republicans, against this moratorium. If the Gulf Coast is going to recover from this nightmare, it will be because of the health and production of coastal Main Street small businesses that support the production of energy that fuels our nation. We cannot continue to support a policy that will close the doors on small businesses in Acadiana, in Louisiana, in Texas, or for that matter, throughout the United States. So I thank you all very much for being here. I now turn the opening statement over to Senator Vitter, a very strong member of our committee. Thank you, Senator. [The prepared statement of Senator Landrieu follows:] [GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] OPENING STATEMENT OF THE HON. DAVID VITTER, A U.S. SENATOR FROM LOUISIANA Senator Vitter. Thank you. Thank you very much, Mary, and thanks for all your work chairing this committee, particularly on this topic. And as you mentioned, this is really a continuation of a hearing we had in Washington and it is a very, very important discussion. I also want to thank our hosts here at LITE and ULL and certainly our panelists and everyone for being here. As Mary said, the bottom line is real simple, and unfortunately, very stark. It is great news that the oil flow has stopped and the ongoing environmental damage is beginning to lessen. But the economic threat continues worse than ever because of this moratorium. And the bottom line is simple. If this moratorium continues even a few more months, we will lose more jobs because of it than we will lose from the oil itself and it will be devastating economically in the midst of the most serious recession since World War II. Also, as Mary suggested, it is not just the formal moratorium in deepwater. It is really somewhat of a broader discussion. Obviously, the formal moratorium in deepwater is perhaps the most serious and offensive thing we are here talking about. It is very serious. It is costing us a lot of jobs. Those major platforms, major investments are moving to other parts of the world as we speak. At the same time, there is a de facto moratorium in shallow water, as Mary noted. The Administration says there is no moratorium in shallow or ``open for business'' or ``open to issue'' permits. Great. Then you ask the obvious follow-up question, how many new drilling permits have been issued in shallow water since the Deepwater Horizon explosion, and the answer as of three weeks ago was zero, and the answer as of today is two. That means there is a de facto moratorium in shallow. That means because of the complicated, cumbersome, uncertain nature of the new rulebook even in shallow, even shallow is pretty much shut down. And then there is a third component to the threat, which is the new regulatory environment we are going to be going into which could continue this virtual shutdown even after formal moratoria are lifted. Just yesterday, the Interior Department issued a new policy moving away from the so-called categorical exclusion for Gulf drilling under NEPA that has been in place for decades. What this means is that every new project, every new well, will have to go through many more hoops of environmental review, even though the basic issues are the same throughout the Gulf, which is what led to the so-called categorical exclusion before. There is already an environmental review for every new project. For the Deepwater Horizon incident, there were five levels of NEPA work. There were nine comprehensive supporting environmental studies. Many of those were inadequate. I am not arguing that. But to add layers upon layers upon layers to that five-plus-nine is not protecting the environment any more. It is making many drilling projects completely unsustainable economically, and I think that is what the environmental left has in mind, quite frankly, pushing this ending of the categorical exclusion. So that is a big threat. What is at issue, as I said, as Mary said, is an enormous number of jobs and enormous amounts of economic activity. A recent study by IHS Global Insight, for instance, put some concrete, verified numbers on that. Independent oil and gas companies in the Gulf account for about half of the nearly 400,000 jobs, $70 billion of economic value, $20 billion in Federal, State, and local revenue generated by the industry just in 2009. That same study says that if this policy or something like it continues into the future, by 2012, we could lose hundreds of thousands of jobs in the Gulf. It would also cost government major revenue, over ten years, $147 billion in Federal, State, and local revenue from the Gulf region. So there is a lot at stake for the country and for Louisiana. Again, I am eager to hear from our witnesses. In closing, let me say that, again, just like in our Washington, DC, hearing, I am very disappointed that our witnesses don't include any representative of the Obama Administration. In that Washington, DC, hearing, Mary and I both invited the Administration to send a representative to lay out the case and the economic analysis for the moratorium. They sent no one, complete, utter silence. For today, I again specifically invited the Administration to send a representative as a witness to testify, to lay out the case for the moratorium and their economic analysis. Again, they sent no one as a witness. I am happy Mark is here from the Commerce Department. What I, at least, requested--Mary probably did the same thing--is a witness to testify, to lay out the case, to lay out the reasoning that led to this draconian action, and they sent no witness. We are still waiting to hear the justification. The people of Louisiana are still waiting to hear the justification. But with that, I very much look forward to hearing from our witnesses. Thank you, Mary. Chair Landrieu. Thank you, Senator Vitter. We are going to begin with a terrific panel of witnesses that both of us have asked to testify. They represent, I think, a broad swath of business owners in this region. Of course, we could have filled up this room ten times over with businesses that are affected, but we are really very grateful to those of you that have prepared testimony in such a comprehensive way to help us build a Congressional record to get this moratorium lifted. We would like to begin with Ms. Lori Davis, who is President and co-owner of Rig-Chemical, Inc., a small family- owned company located in Houma. Rig-Chem was founded in 1980 as a specialty chemical manufacturer distributor servicing the oil and gas industry. Lori is an active member of Petroleum Engineers and a member of American Association of Drilling Engineers. Thank you, Ms. Davis, for being here. Next, we will hear from Charlie Goodson, a very famous Lafayette leader. He has owned Charley G's for now, I think, celebrated, what, 25 years, Charlie? All of us have eaten at this wonderful restaurant. He also has a great deal of experience with other restaurants in the area, from Cafe Vermilion to Hub City Diner, and he is really an outstanding member of this community and we thank you, Charlie, for being here. Our next witness is Dewitt David, Commercial Sales Manager for Van Eaton and Romero Realtors here in Lafayette. He is very, very active in the community. He is Chairman of the Commercial Real Estate Committee and Realtors Association of Acadiana. We want people to understand this goes well beyond oil field service companies and the negative impacts that are being felt. Mr. Troy Cloutier serves as Senior Vice President, Regional President for MidSouth Bank. As a Regional President, his area includes Houma, Thibodaux, Morgan City, and Lafayette. Bankers like Mr. Cloutier are in a particularly front-row seat to see what is happening in this region and we are very grateful for you to be here, Mr. Cloutier. Because Scott Angelle's presence is required in North Louisiana--work never ends for our Lieutenant Governor--we have pushed him up to our first panel, and he will be the last panelist. Lieutenant Governor Scott Angelle from Breaux Bridge has been serving as Lieutenant Governor since May. Prior to that, he served as the Secretary for the Department of Natural Resources that has the jurisdiction over, of course, drilling here in our state. He is extremely knowledgeable and he leads our state's efforts right now to overturn the moratorium with the Gulf Economic Survival Team. Many organizations are a part of that effort, and he has been the leader of that. He is a graduate right here of Lafayette and a former President of St. Martin Parish. Lori, why don't we start with you? We are going to limit opening statements to five minutes. If you can shorten them to four or five, we will go through each and then have a series of questions for you. Ms. Davis. STATEMENT OF LORI DAVIS, OWNER, RIG-CHEM, HOUMA, LA Ms. Davis. First of all, I would like to say thank you to Senator Landrieu and Senator Vitter and for everyone here today. Today, I would like to paint for you a picture, a picture of a real American dream. During the oil crisis in 1984, when over 50,000 people left the industry---- Chair Landrieu. Lori, pull the microphone closer to you, down, if you could. There you go. Ms. Davis. When my father, who had worked for an oil field service company for 21 years, was forced into early retirement at the young age of 50, with no formal education and a $25,000 severance package that was given to him for his 20-plus years of experience, he took a chance, with my mother's support, to live a dream and buy into a small business. What he didn't realize at the time was that it would become a family business and would support his daughters, grandson, niece, and later a daughter-in-law, all as employees of the company now known as Rig-Chem. Picture today, 26 years later, we are in a very similar place. I, Lori Davis, co-owner of Rig-Chem, and my sister, Penny Molina, have no formal education. We are both close to the age my father was in the early 1980s and now being forced not into early retirement, but possibly out of business, and not by market demand, but by a Federal Government who is taking control of our industry and offering no help but to possibly force us all into unemployment, which is not the severance package I had hoped for and worked so hard to build. All of this because the government feels that one company's mistake should be borne by an entire industry that has operated safely and never had anything like this happen before in the Gulf of Mexico. We have been a company that was debt free, never had to borrow money to operate, never had to lay anyone off, always had paid a good income to our 17 employees, 14 that live in Louisiana, two in Texas, and one that lives in Maine. We offer our employees 401(k) matching of four percent. We have given profit sharing of 11 percent yearly per employee. And we pay 100 percent employee health benefit, dental, disability, and life insurance, along with two weeks of paid vacation. We are now facing the worst year in the company's history, with six-figure losses and the reality that we can only hold on until December without having to take drastic measures, such as layoffs and pay cuts. This is hard to believe, but this is what the moratorium has done to Rig-Chem, an American dream. The only people that will profit from this tragedy will be big business. They are the only ones that can survive during this type of crisis. They have huge resources, established international divisions, bank support, government connections, and deep pockets with no real loyalty to employees, only to stockholders. Once this is all done and the moratorium lifted, they will emerge that much better, and they now have reduced competition due to this arrest in our industry forcing small business closures and access to our best employees. Small business is usually quick to react to change. That is why we have a niche in most markets. Small business can make things happen because we are the decision makers. We keep markets competitive. We employ and train talent that allow them to focus on their job, not corporate culture. Unfortunately, small businesses, the moms and pops of the industry, will not survive this moratorium if it is not lifted soon. To add insult to injury, we are receiving daily news of price increases on our core materials with concerns of shortages due to production changes, all of which are being driven by the fear of what will happen as the price of oil continues to rise, our demand for foreign oil increase, and the uncertainty of U.S. oil production and its future. Another blow to our industry is that our insurance company is not sure what will happen. As a business, we have to be profitable, which means we have to operate on budgets. But with all the uncertainty caused by the moratorium, it makes it very hard to project the budget. We are being asked to review MSA agreements with many clients and now being offered new agreements that have language included which there is no insurance coverage available, at least not to small business. The next hurdle we will have to endure is directly related to safety. We already work in an environment that adheres to high standards when it comes to safety and performance. We will be asked to comply and should to the new requirements that will be placed as a result of this incident, which will add yet another financial burden. Our picture is not unique. Most small business owners are in the same situation and may be some without the fortunate reserves to continue to battle through this lockdown and have nowhere to turn but to bankruptcy or foreclosure. We need help. We need to go back to work and be assured that we will have the support and commitment from our industry and legislators to help keep the American dream alive. This is not what my parents planned for our future, nor is it the one I planned for my son. Thank you very much. [The prepared statement of Ms. Davis follows:] [GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] Chair Landrieu. Thank you. [Applause.] Mr. Goodson. STATEMENT OF CHARLES GOODSON, OWNER, CHARLEY G'S RESTAURANT, LAFAYETTE, LA Mr. Goodson. Senator Landrieu, Senator Vitter, and members of the Senate committee, thank you for allowing me to testify before you today and thank you for holding this hearing. I appreciate the opportunity to tell my story of the possible and very probable effects of the continued deepwater drilling moratorium. My name is Charlie Goodson, owner with my wife, Del, of Charley G's Restaurant. We have been in the restaurant business for over 30 years and I have operated Charley G's concept for the last 25 years. The Louisiana restaurant industry is the largest private sector employer in the State, 145,000 people directly and another 70,000 people indirectly. The restaurant industry in Louisiana has had to overcome some significant challenges in the last five years, Hurricanes Katrina and Rita in 2005, Ike and Gustav in 2008, and five years and a national recession later, things are finally looking up for Louisiana restaurants. Along comes the BP oil crisis. The deepwater drilling moratorium will cripple Louisiana's economy and force many restaurants to lay off workers or even close their doors. Traditionally, summer is a slow season, and combined with another hurricane season, times could not be more desperate. Owning a restaurant in Louisiana has been a roller coaster ride, with some terrific highs and some soul-searching lows. With only what I can describe as a stubborn will to stay in business, we have survived. In the mid-1980s during the oil bust, it was particularly hard for Louisiana restaurants and our city. We pulled out all the stops, any marketing strategy we could think of. For a time, we ran a promotion, lunch for two for the price of a barrel of oil. I served lunch for two for $5.40, definitely not a profitable situation. With the deepwater drilling moratorium of six months, I believe we are headed back to those struggles, those economic times. As small business owners, we hang on economic decisions made by others that can take us down in a matter of months. We work hard at our business and we budget our sales every year on a day-to-day basis. This year, I budgeted a seven percent net income before taxes. We probably will do somewhere between four and five if we don't have any major problems. This moratorium could be that major problem and put us into negative for the year. Our management team, my daughters and my wife have started to prepare our company for a major slowdown if there are jobs lost in the oil industry in our area. Our first line of defense would be a hiring freeze, then a salary freeze, then a halt on all leasehold improvement. Our second tier of defense would be to discontinue our lunch service. By discontinuing lunch, we will be able to eliminate six kitchen positions, four service staff positions, and one manager. That represents 25 percent of my entire staff, 11 jobs in one small local restaurant. Our daughters are now at the age where they will be getting involved in the management of our family business. We hope to pass this healthy and growing business on to them. The moratorium casts big doubts over the future of this small business. Each and every one of us understands the importance of safe offshore drilling to prevent another spill such as the April 20 explosion of BP's well, not to mention the devastating loss of life. However, reckless shutting down of the industry will result in a tsunami sized wave of economic impact on the other industries in Louisiana. Thank you, Senator Landrieu, Senator Vitter, for allowing me to speak today. [The prepared statement of Mr. Goodson follows:] [GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] Chair Landrieu. Thank you, Mr. Goodson. [Applause.] Mr. David. STATEMENT OF DEWITT DAVID, COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE BROKER, VAN EATON AND ROMERO Mr. David. Well, good morning, and also, thank you for allowing me to be here to share my thoughts on the impact of the moratorium on the local real estate market. After receiving the invitation to speak with you this morning, I spoke with dozens of real estate agents, investors, developers, and others involved in our real estate community and all agree that this moratorium is having a devastating effect on their business. I would like to share a few quotes with you from some of the individuals that I spoke with. First, a couple of residential agents. ``I had a ready, willing, and able buyer under contract to purchase. Given the moratorium and rumblings at his job about cutbacks, he walked from the contract.'' Another said, ``My phone quite literally quit ringing when the moratorium was announced. Three clients who were on the verge of buying decided to sit tight. They were concerned about whether or not they would have jobs in a year, and if they did, whether the job would be based in Acadiana.'' The vast majority of residential sales are reported to our local MLS and there are some disturbing numbers which may illustrate the impact that the moratorium has had on our residential market. If you compare the residential pending sales, which some people call ``under contracts,'' for the period June 1 to August 13 of this year, which I call the basic moratorium period, with last year, we find, I think, some startling numbers. Last year during that period, 565 families made a decision to buy a residential property. Through that same period this year, what I call the moratorium period, that 565 dropped to 437. That is a 22 percent drop in the number of people who made a decision to buy a residential property, and there is no doubt since the moratorium went into effect, buyers are taking a waiting and see attitude before they purchase a home. What is interesting, this is in spite of the fact that interest rates are near all-time lows and home prices in the past several months have gotten to be pretty competitive. And, of course, our local commercial market is also showing some signs of slowdown. Since much of our commercial market is not reported to a central database, it is difficult sometimes to quantify exactly what effect the moratorium is having on the market. But I spoke to dozens of commercial agents in our area and all agree that since the moratorium has been in effect, we have seen a drastic drop in our business and it also seems that it is close to being at a standstill. Now, our industry, the commercial real estate market, is heavily dependent on the oil industry. These folks lease and buy hundreds and hundreds of industrial facilities from here to New Iberia to Houma and they occupy thousands and thousands of square feet of our office space. I would like to share with you a few comments from a couple of our commercial brokers. ``I was working with an investor from a major city to buy a very large apartment complex here in Lafayette. He states, `No go until the moratorium is over and the economy back in check.''' Another said, ``I lost a sale to an oil field service company for a tract of land. The contract was signed. They were in their due diligence period. Then the moratorium was announced. They canceled the agreement and said because of the moratorium, they no longer had a need to expand.'' A study that was just completed by the Louisiana Realtors Association projects that the Deepwater Horizon catastrophe will result in an initial loss of commission income to South Louisiana Realtors of over $6 million from May to April of next year. It also cautions that the effects could possibly spread over many years and impact our real estate market for years to come. And note this includes only the projected lost commission income for the spill. This does not include what we assume is surely coming, a loss of revenue from the moratorium. So both in the areas in our local market of residential and commercial, the phones just aren't ringing and we hear clients saying they are cautious, they are afraid, they are uncertain. The perception is that the worst is yet to come, and there are very few people out there in a position to make a commitment on a long-term real estate deal not knowing what our economy will bring. Many of us here remember the oil bust in the mid-1980s. The reality was, we were all in the oil business, but we didn't realize it until that bust hit us right in the face. Home builders, electricians, plumbers, grocers, beauticians, restaurant owners, dance instructors, you name it, we all depended then and we still do on the jobs that are generated by this great industry. We have all heard the numbers, that for every one job on a deepwater drilling rig there are eight conciliary jobs. But I contend there is a much greater impact than those numbers indicate. The rig workers, their eight supporting workers and the companies they work for are now carefully analyzing their spending habits. The bottom line is this. The moratorium is not just on the drilling and the jobs supporting that drilling. The moratorium is a strain on everyone in our area. It is critical to our economy that the ban on deepwater drilling be lifted immediately so the air of uncertainty and fear that is hanging over our heads be removed. Senators, I urge you to bring back to Washington our message loud and clear. Lift the moratorium. Thank you. [The prepared statement of Mr. David follows:] [GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] Chair Landrieu. Thank you. [Applause.] Thank you, Mr. David. Mr. Cloutier. STATEMENT OF TROY CLOUTIER, REGIONAL PRESIDENT, MIDSOUTH BANK Mr. Cloutier. Good morning, Senators Vitter and Landrieu. Thank you for this opportunity, and also, Mark from the Commerce Department, thank you for taking time out of your schedule to come here. My name is Troy Cloutier. I have worked at MidSouth Bank for over 18 years. MidSouth Bank is a $950 million bank headquartered in Lafayette, Louisiana. MidSouth is one of the biggest users of SBA programs in the State, so we thank you for your work with SBA that you have done over the past few months. MidSouth is an oil and gas bank with numerous lines of credit extended to companies to pay their daily expenses during payroll, insurance, payables, and other expenses that arise during a business cycle. We also do boat loans, equipment loans. Currently, 32 percent of our portfolio is in the oil and gas industry or commercial and industrial, so we are the people who lend to the oil and gas people. Right now, we have $80 million in loans in the South Region, which consists of Terrebonne, Lafourche, and St. Mary Parishes. Over the past few months, we have seen an increase in companies using their lines of credit for oil field cleanup. We have seen boats that we couldn't get to work go to work because of the cleanup. Because of these issues, we have increased in loans $11 million since March of this year. So you can see that oil companies are currently--the service companies are currently working, or have been working because of the clean- up. Going forward, though, we see businesses being very nervous about what is going to happen in the oil industry. Because of the moratorium on deepwater drilling, some of the big companies are going overseas because they have the financial resources to do so. The smaller companies, however, like the seven that I put in business over the past five years with SBA loans, are very fearful that work will dry up when bigger companies move overseas and hire other providers. They are holding on to their money and making sure that they do not buy any new equipment or have any additional expenses that might compound their problem once a slowdown occurs. During the moratorium, they have already--before the moratorium, they have already scaled back where they could just because of the slowdown in the economy today. They have laid off people and do not plan on hiring them back anytime soon. I have talked to a machine shop owner the other day and he told me that him and his wife will work the machine for the next six months and not hire any new people. He has let five people go since the beginning of the year and does not have any plans to hire any of them back. Because businesses are trying to prepare for new regulations when the moratorium is lifted, some of the business owners fear that the cost of doing business in the Gulf will skyrocket, and not just the deepwater operations. So they are holding on to their cash now. They are worried about the profits of their business going forward, so they are taking care of their families first. Many of them just recovered from Hurricanes--not Hurricane Katrina, but Gustav and Ike, which hit the area very hard, and now are faced with this. We hear so much about Hurricane Katrina, but we do not hear anything about the other hurricanes that devastated the areas below New Orleans. I have talked to oil field executives the other day who pointed out the irony of the fact that businesses moved to the Gulf the last few years because of the political landscape here. Now they are moving out of the Gulf because of the political landscape here. Those who will be hurt the most are the employees, who are already leveraged as much as they can be financially. Many of the employees were working 50 to 60 hours a week a year ago and now they are being laid off today. They have seen a decrease in salaries just because of the overtime not there, and today, they face the layoff ahead of them. They cannot get home loans today because of the regulations. I personally just moved into a house and the mortgage process was a nightmare, and I have great credit. So that is why they are not buying as many houses. Consumers have a lot of credit card debt. Most consumers today have a very high debt-to-income ratio, so it is very hard for them to get credit today. It is easy to say that they should have done a better job managing their finances, but the fact of the matter is, they live paycheck to paycheck and they do not have any money in reserve to pay for being laid off in the next 30 to 90 days. The only way they can make it is to get credit cards from the big banks. Many of them do not have the skill to go get another job. They come out of college and they see that they can make $60,000 to $70,000 a year in the oil field and that is what they go to do. This is what they want to do, and we ask you to put them back to work. On behalf of community banks, I would like to urge both of you to get with BP, ask them to put their money, their $20 billion in local community banks because that will be the banks that will help the communities and the businesses go forward. So I ask you to get with them to put the money in community banks. And I also urge you to continue your work on the jobs bill, Bill 5297. I know you all have worked very hard on that. That is key for community banks to start lending again to companies like Lori Davis's and others out there. The community banks will be the ones to come in and help these companies in the future. So thank you for what you all have done today and I will answer any questions. [The prepared statement of Mr. Cloutier follows:] [GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] Chair Landrieu. Thank you very much. I have already sent a letter to the Administration and BP asking them to put those deposits into local banks along the Gulf Coast, which would make a lot of sense, and I hope that that is exactly what will happen. Now we will hear from Scott Angelle. STATEMENT OF HON. SCOTT ANGELLE, LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR, STATE OF LOUISIANA Mr. Angelle. Good morning, Madam Chairlady and Ranking Member Vitter. I bring greetings to you from Governor Bobby Jindal and the men and women of Louisiana who have been working for the past 120 days to restore our way of life. I thank you for bringing this hearing of the Senate Committee on Small Business to Louisiana, which proudly holds America's most prominent oil and gas economy. Since oral testimony is limited to five minutes, I will offer brief comments and introduce a few faces of the moratorium to make certain the public record reflects that this policy is a burden imposed mostly on the middle class of America. I thank each of you for your public service and your continued interest in a strong, safe domestic oil and gas industry. I say strong and safe because that is what we have been about and are about in the Gulf of Mexico, with a proven track record of nearly 50,000 wells drilled over the last 60 years. The issuance of a six-month moratorium on deepwater drilling is an overreach, not necessary, and has been deemed arbitrary and capricious by the Federal courts. Not only did five of seven of Secretary Salazar's experts chosen to review his safety study publicly oppose the moratorium, saying, quote, ``it will not measurably reduce risk further and it will have a lasting impact on the nation's economy,'' but in addition, at least five independently conducted studies, referenced in my written comments previously submitted, forecast a huge negative impact on the small businesses of America. I am not speaking of the stockholders of BP, Conoco, Shell, Exxon, or Chevron. I am speaking of the middle-class American men and women who work on the drilling rigs, the ones who put on their hardhats and steeltoed boots, kiss their families goodbye for weeks at a time, and do the tough work of exploring the energy to fuel America. But that is not all. The companies that employ welders, fabricators, diesel mechanics, pipefitters, boat captains, and forklift operators are seeing a decrease in business. And that is not all. The companies that employ hotel workers, retail clerks, auto mechanics, restaurant workers, and caterers are impacted. And that is not all. The banks, auto dealers, and real estate folks are feeling the pressure, I might add, probably the three industries that have most been discussed on Capitol Hill, the banks, auto dealers, and real estate folks, and we are at a time having a disconnected policy in South Louisiana relative to those industries. I have said before, this moratorium is not about big oil. It is rather about the Calais, the Sheramies, Depueys, the Roberts, the Boudreauxes, and the Thibodauxes [ph.], just a few of the South Louisiana middle-class families that have taken the risk, borrowed the money, created the jobs, paid the taxes, found the energy, built our economy, and have done nothing wrong, and yet find themselves in the bullseye of this poor public policy to shutdown deepwater drilling. [Applause.] But don't just take my word for it. Todd Citron of Hub City Ford reports a 20 percent drop in sales of both new and used cars since the moratorium. Flo Meadows, a Lafayette realtor, reports that she has had more commercial contracts dropped before closing in the last five months than in the the last five years combined. Ken Veron, who employs 38 workers in his family-owned Cafe Vermilionville restaurant, reports his holiday event schedule is normally booked at this time by oil field service companies with deposits in hand. Today, he does not have a single oil field service company booked for a holiday event, and two other energy companies have recently canceled events. Layoffs are happening all around us for all the wrong reasons. This comes at a time when our nation has invested nearly $800 billion in stimulus funding to boost the economy and create jobs, yet we still have an unacceptable unemployment rate. There is not one shred of evidence of systemic failure for operations in the Gulf of Mexico, yet we are being treated with a one-size-fits-all approach. We certainly have the wherewithal in America to immediately institute enhanced safety practices if we are serious and have a sense of urgency about a strong and safe domestic oil and gas industry. So the rest of the country can be clear that there are real people impacted by this moratorium, allow me quickly to introduce you to a few great Americans, to Dustin and Gwen Guy [ph.], a family from Broussard. Neither are employed in the oil and gas business, but because Dustin's employer, a flooring contractor, has experienced a slowdown in work from oil and gas companies, they have been forced to cancel their home building plans, an example of a cascading impact on the economy. Bayou Country Harley-Davidson--since the moratorium, owner Mike Bruno's stores in Slidell and Houma have seen a 38 percent decrease in sales revenue and a reduction in net operating profit in excess of $400,000. He has eliminated all advertising, reduced inventory, and laid off 14 of the employees pictured here. From Cut Off, Kirk and Sheila Rouse and their six children, ages six to 17, Kirk is the owner/operator/truck driver and terminal manager hauling offshore equipment and earning commission for the loads he transports. The dramatic increase in work since the moratorium has the Rouse family unsure of how they will send their oldest son, a heart patient, to college this fall because now they can't afford to pay health insurance premiums. Dwayne Webstock invested $3 million in a Port Fourchon multi-service dock facility that opened less than three months before the moratorium. Since then, he has laid off 30 of his employees and made other cutbacks, and he has attempted to find work not related to the oil and gas industry just to keep his doors open. Again, thank you Senators Landrieu and Vitter for having me here today, for your extreme leadership and your courage in continuing to fight, and with your help, Louisiana will not give up on this fight, not today, not tomorrow, not ever. Thank you very much. [Applause.] [The prepared statement of Mr. Angelle follows:] [GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] Chair Landrieu. Thank you, Lieutenant Governor. We appreciate your leadership on the coalition. I understand you may have to leave, and just excuse yourself when you do--we were happy to accommodate your schedule--we are going to ask the panel a few questions and then move to our second panel. Lieutenant Governor, let me start with you. We have gotten a terrific response throughout Louisiana for overturning this moratorium, and I think because of the work that we have all done, that message clearly is getting out to our state. The issue is how to get it out around the nation. You have traveled to Washington. You have been meeting with other delegations. Could you give us some insight into how the committees have been receiving the testimony that you have given here and if you feel like we are making some progress or not in getting this message out around the country, and not just to other delegations, but to other cities and elected officials around the country? Mr. Angelle. Certainly, my concern is that we are talking to only our friends. Certainly, our folks in Texas and Mississippi certainly understand what it is that we are doing here and we have attempted to reach out to as many folks across the nation. I would tell you that my observation is that many folks across the nation do not have a full understanding of the value of what happens in the Gulf of Mexico, and we will only know that value when they begin to see energy prices rise because of the lack of production that will come from this moratorium and the cascading impact of the regulations that we believe are coming as the other shoe drops. Certainly, we have worked with the National Association of Counties. You have perhaps received a resolution. The National Association of Counties, representing counties across America, has adopted a resolution opposing the moratorium. We have seen manufacturers across the nation opposing this. However, I am concerned that America does not yet understand that what happens in the Gulf of Mexico is so important to the daily lives of the families of America. Fully a third of the oil and gas production comes from the Gulf of Mexico and 90 percent of it comes from deepwater wells. We will do everything we can to continue to get that message across. Again, I think there are some biases. Somewhere along the way, the oil and gas industry helped to create a strong America and somebody hijacked that message and began to convince people that what we were doing was somehow dirty and not American and nothing could be further from the truth. Chair Landrieu. Thank you very much. Could you also comment--I am going to move to others for questions--the meeting that I was able to help establish with you and Michael Bromwich about three weeks ago in Washington. The meeting went on for eight hours, I understand. Was any progress made in terms of the shallow water regulations, because you all were getting down into some real detail about how to move that forward? Is there anything you would like to report here on that? Mr. Angelle. I would like to say, to borrow a phrase, I think the spirit is willing, but the flesh is weak, and what I mean by that is I get into meetings and we hear about the things that we are trying to get done from a shallow water perspective, but the proof is really in the numbers and there have only been two wells, in fact, two new permit for gas wells, relatively low-risk wells, that have been issued. We continue to grind, and in ways that I have never seen before. We hosted a meeting here last week at the LITE Center with operators doing everything we can, sharing best management practices, trying to put the kind of things that we can in front of the regulators. There is a strong disconnect between the home office and the regional office. There is a culture of fear within the Bureau of Ocean Energy. There is a feeling that to do the work that both the President and the Secretary have said is legal in America, to drill for shallow water--to issue shallow water permits, we believe that there is a fear in that agency. There is a culture of better to not issue a permit than to issue a legal permit and have someone question your job performance. And, look, it is tough. I served in a position in a regulatory environment. It is tough to do this work, but that is what the folks signed up for. The work that you--the meeting that I think that you hosted did help us identify the issues. I thank you for that. And I think we are moving in a direction to get shallow water permits. I think we are in the red zone, if you will allow me to borrow a sports analogy, but we need to push it over the end zone, over the goal line, in a relatively soon manner. Chair Landrieu. And finally, I just want to be clear that while the official moratorium is for deepwater drilling and there were about 33 rigs with, I think I understand, four additional that were on the way when this happened, into the Gulf, that what we are hearing, the testimony is that for all practical purposes, drilling in the entire Gulf, including the shallow, is shut down. So I hope the members that are representing the Administration here put that into their calculations. It is not just the deepwater drilling. Let me ask one final question to the panel and I will turn it over to Senator Vitter. For all of you, it is important, and I think, Charlie, you hit the nail on the head when you said we didn't know we were all in the oil business, but when the crash happened in 1980, we figured that out. I mean, I can remember what a ghost town not only Lafayette, the West Bank of Orleans and Jefferson felt like, Iberia, Vermilion, Lafourche, Terrebonne. I mean, it was like the movies with the sagebrush. You got that feeling going through a lot of our neighborhoods. It doesn't quite feel like that yet, but we are getting sort of the first ripples of it. Can you describe--you described for your restaurant, but if each of you would just take 30 seconds and talk about one of your suppliers or one of your neighbors or someone that is related that is being negatively affected so we can get as many stories on the record as possible, if something comes to mind. I don't know, Charlie, do you want to start? Mr. Goodson. Right off the top of my head, speaking with Gerald Breaux over the last few days with the Lafayette Visitors and Convention Bureau---- Chair Landrieu. Speak a little louder, if you could. Mr. Goodson. The motel industry in town locally is really suffering. The vacationer dollars seem to be there. The tourist dollars are still there. But the traveler, the business traveler is way, way down, and Gerald told me somewhere around 25 percent, that the hotel-motel--and that is so directly related to us. A business person comes into town to do business, entertains their guests, so if they are not coming, it also affects my business, as well. Chair Landrieu. Mr. David. Mr. David. Yes, Senator. We think that it appears that somewhere between 16 and 17 agents that we are aware of have left our industry since the first of June to find employment elsewhere. I mean, you saw the Louisiana Realtors' projections that we are going to lose considerable commission dollars in the next 12 months. My fear is that we are going to lose good people, experienced people that just can't make it unless homes and buildings are selling and leasing. So we are beginning to see some of the agents seek employment elsewhere. Chair Landrieu. Mr. Cloutier. Mr. Cloutier. I have customers all the time who say that they are laying off and going to continue to lay off, but I also deal with mergers and acquisitions and there is a ton of banks in the Florida-Alabama area that are failing, and this summer was supposed to be their resurrection year. They are going down much further than they ever thought they would. But I would like to offer a solution, because I don't like people coming to my office and throwing a lot of problems on the desk---- Chair Landrieu. Please. Mr. Cloutier [continuing]. Without solutions. Chair Landrieu. We are looking for them. Mr. Cloutier. I was with a retired engineer this weekend and he said that he is working harder now than he ever did because of all the new regulations. He is having to find ways to get the rigs out there. He says he is working six days a week and he only wants to work two to three days a week, at most, and spend time with his grandchildren after that. So I would offer that there are 33 rigs that you said, which he said the same number, 33 rigs on the deepwater. If MMS would look at hiring two retired engineers to go through the processes of these rigs and make sure they are meeting the regulations as for the deepwater, and I am sure there are at least 66 retired engineers out there that would be interested in doing it on a part-time or full-time basis---- Chair Landrieu. That is excellent, and we have generally suggested along those lines a SWAT team concept that Lieutenant Governor Angelle and the coalition have pressed the Administration to try to put into place and use the experience here. Ms. Davis, and then I will turn it over to you, Senator Vitter. Just another story or two about a supplier or a neighbor or---- Ms. Davis. Well, I mean, we represent--we do business quite a bit with companies in Louisiana, but because of the nature of our industry, we do have to reach out into other States. I mean, 30 percent of revenues for one of the suppliers that we do business with that is in Atlanta, Georgia, is being affected by the downturn in our purchases. We have another supplier in Howell, Michigan, that is feeling the same effects. And it is not just Louisiana. So when we think about this, it is going to reach further and further because that person that is 30 percent down in Atlanta, Georgia, is going to have to cut back somewhere in his business and some of the things that he is doing. So it is more than just a Louisiana problem. Chair Landrieu. Thank you for bringing that up, and I think that is one of our strategies moving forward, to get these small business owners that are outside the Gulf to start calling their Congressmen and their Senators and saying how they are being directly affected, and I think that is a good strategy. Senator Vitter. Senator Vitter. Thank you, Mary. Mr. Lieutenant Governor, I want to go back to the broader issue of not just the formal moratorium in deepwater, but the de facto moratorium in shallow water and the threat of unreasonable regulation. You have been working with us and others on this shallow water problem, as you alluded to. Secretary Salazar told me that is going to get solved six weeks ago. Is that solved today? Mr. Angelle. No, sir. The problem is not solved. There is a strong disconnect between what home office in Washington, DC, is trying to implement and their ability to communicate that to regional offices throughout America. There is no question that the shallow water fleet is getting stacked by the day. We will have fewer shallow water rigs working this week than we had two weeks ago, and that continues to be the forecast with the uncertainty of these regulations. Senator Vitter. Is it fair to say, because shallow water rigs and projects are smaller and the lead-in time is much shorter--it is something like 30 days in terms of getting a rig operating--that the negative economic impact is going to be felt even more quickly in shallow? Mr. Angelle. That is absolutely right. I think some of the issues that you are hearing about, real estate folks and banking folks and car dealers and those kind of things, are all just tied to some of the poor public policy of not being able to communicate what it is that we want in this country from a shallow water standpoint. Again, the President and the Secretary have both indicated publicly that shallow water permitting is a legal business enterprise in this country, yet the numbers don't indicate that the government is issuing the license to do that. Senator Vitter. Right. And just to be clear for the record, as of three weeks ago, the number of those new drilling permits in shallow since the Deepwater Horizon explosion was zero. As of today, it is two. The month before the explosion, for a one- month period, that number would have been what, I think in the 40s or 30s? Mr. Angelle. That is correct. I think it was upwards in the high 30s. So clearly, a significant drop-off, even in spite of the fact that it is legal to permit and to prosecute those drilling plans. Senator Vitter. Now, in this context, it just happened yesterday, but do you have any comments or reaction to this move by the administration, at least in deepwater, possibly broader, to get rid of this NEPA categorical exclusion, to have the NEPA process a whole lot more complicated for projects? Mr. Angelle. I think it is terrible public policy. It has been longstanding public policy in this country between Presidents of different parties for a long time to recognize the categorical exclusions, that when the Federal Government produces its five-year plan for leasing, it takes into consideration the activity that goes on in these areas, and as a result, companies are then able to use the environmental reports the government, in fact, provides to indicate that the prosecution of drilling plans is, in fact, synonymous with what the Federal Government looks to avoid from an environmental standpoint. To now have a situation that we are going to roll back longstanding policy, at least in the deepwater situation--I am not certain yet what kind of impact it has on shallow water, I am continuing to follow that--but in the deepwater, this is going to be a significant, significant slowdown, even if we lift the moratorium early. If we lift it today, we still, as a result of this announcement yesterday, are going to have significant issues getting permits issued in a shorter period of time. Again, the fact that five out of seven disagree, the fact that there is not one shred of systemic evidence here, the fact that we have gone to court and the courts have said it is arbitrary and capricious, the fact that the day after we issued--the day after the courts issued their order, the Secretary testified to a question by Senator Alexander, if the fact--was he aware of the fact that the day before the Federal courts had issued and vacated and called it arbitrary and capricious, would he simply issue another moratorium, he said yes. So it is clear to me that there is a ``damn you'' attitude towards the science and to the analysis. It is clear to me that there is an effort at play to move this country artificially or to accelerate a move away from the use of hydrocarbons to fuel this country. And there are some folks who are going to look at this opportunity, and shame on them for using the loss of life of 11 Americans to try to bring about a change in the use of where we get our energy. If we are going to have an energy debate in this country, we ought to have it---- [Applause.] If we are going to have an energy debate in this country, we ought to have it, but we ought to not use this event as the reason. Seven percent of America today gets its energy from alternatives and renewables and I think that this was about--we all believe that this can't be business as usual. You have testified, both of you have testified, it can't be business as usual. Death by a thousand cuts is what is happening. It is a moratorium today. We beat it. We get another one issued the following day. We go to court on that on August 25. There will be another one. Then we get regulations that are rolled out. Then we can't understand the regulations because the people who wrote them have the duty to explain them can't explain them fully to us. You just begin to get the sense there is something at play a lot more than just moratorium and deepwater drilling. I think you get the play that this is about an effort to move this country off of hydrocarbons premature. Senator Vitter. Thanks. Just one---- [Applause.] Thank you. One closing comment to the other panelists who are talking about the investment business environment. You know, for a lot of businesses, particularly worldwide businesses, one factor they look to in terms of investing in different places is political risk. What I am scared to death about is that for energy companies and related industries, all of a sudden, the political risk in the United States of America is higher, is worse, is more threatening than it is in West Africa or a lot of other places in the world, and that is quite a comment. Would any of you all like to expand on what you think this is doing to that business investment environment, including for small business here in Louisiana? Mr. Cloutier. I would say that what we are seeing is that there are people who can go overseas that are moving overseas because they are just as worried as we are about what it is going to be going forward. I mean, we don't know what it is going to be going forward. We don't know when they are going to open up the permits to the shallow water or the deepwater and what is that price going to be going forward. How much is the insurance going to be? What are you going to have to do to get that permit? So those people who have the financial wherewithal to go overseas, and a lot of them already have had offices overseas, so it is very easy for them to bring their rigs, their boats, their equipment overseas, they are gone overseas. And I know Anandarko just moved three rigs, I think three months ago. So we are seeing the movement to overseas and that is going to hurt the small businesses here because they are not going to be able to move overseas with them. So, yes, that is a big concern of ours, is the political landscape and the price of doing business in the Gulf is going to go through the roof to us. Chair Landrieu. Would you all go quickly so--I wanted to get this in---- Mr. David. Senator Vitter, I am so glad you asked that question, because I had a little blip here, but I didn't have enough time. This is from an investor developer. ``Over the past decade, my partners and I have invested more than $3 million per year in the real estate in this area. In 2009 through early 2010, we invested close to $20 million. Since the moratorium, we had four build-to-suit projects canceled. The prospective tenants were all multi-million-dollar companies. We lost our option monies and all our pre-development costs. At this time, we are no longer looking at this area for investment and strongly considering investing in Brazil.'' Chair Landrieu. Charlie? Mr. Goodson. Quickly, I think as a community, we are where we eat and we are where we shop. Local restaurants, local stores are who we are--Charley G's, Cafe Vermilionville, Judy's--and there is only one of those in the whole world, right here in Lafayette. So as a small businessman, I would like to do another project in Lafayette with my daughters, but that is not going to be the case. I cannot take that risk. I cannot venture out until there is some kind of final solution to this problem. So I think more small business, like myself, to open up individual local restaurants is going to be very, very hard. Chair Landrieu. Ms. Davis. Ms. Davis. I would like to say, the oil and gas industry is a very global industry, and even as a small business owner, we have had to position ourselves, even before the moratorium, to be able to compete in a global market because many of our clients are overseas. What I am seeing as a result of the moratorium, companies and agents that I had been working with and working through in Saudi Arabia, Nigeria, other parts of the world, are very pleased with what is happening here because they are now going to capitalize on the fact that we need to do business there. We will be able to send our technology there. We will be able to send our people there. We will be able to focus more time and energy to developing those business relationships and making them stronger. And it is going to be a real pain for us. Chair Landrieu. Well, that is a perfect place to end, a perfect place as a challenge to end this first panel. We have a second panel. You all were excellent. I want the Administration to take note that even Secretary Chu, the President's hand- chosen person for Secretary of Energy, said that this country is going to be needing a tremendous amount of oil and gas for the next 50 years. I would strongly suggest we get as much of that oil and gas here, right here at home on American soil, right here along the Gulf Coast. The Administration's policies are in a direct conflict even with the statements of the Secretary of Energy. Thank you. While this panel is moving and the other panel comes forward, I am sorry I cannot recognize people in the audience at an official field hearing. If you want to submit anything for the record, you may, and I am going to remain afterwards for a few minutes for anyone who wants to talk to me personally. I thank you all very, very much for coming. Would the second panel come forward, please? To save time, I am going to introduce them as they come forward. First, we have State Senator Norby Chabert. Senator Chabert was born and raised in Petit Caillou. He represents District 20, which covers the southernmost sections of Terrebonne and Lafourche Parish. He is one of the rising stars in our legislature, a dynamic leader in the state, and will speak from a perspective--his family, of course, has been in and around the business for many years. Representative Simone Champagne is a lifelong resident of Jeanerette, who worked for First National Bank of Jeanerette for 23 years. She served as Chief Administrative Officer of Iberia Parish Government. She is currently a member of the legislature and an excellent leader. We are very pleased to have Representative Champagne with us today. Honorable Arlanda Williams is the Parish Chairwoman of Terrebonne Parish, the first female to hold this position. She currently serves her first full-time term of District 2 on the Council. She was Immediate Past President of Louisiana Police Jury Association, of the Black Caucus, and current President of the National Association of Black County Officials, and she has testified in Washington and we thank you very much for your leadership. And, of course, Mayor Tim Matte from Morgan City, which is the gateway to the Gulf of Mexico for shrimp and oil field industries. Because of the importance of these industries to the local economy, Morgan City has the Annual Labor Day Louisiana Shrimp and Petroleum Festival, and that has been getting a lot of attention around the country as people start to really understand how we can shrimp and drill in the same waters on the same day and have done so successfully and safely for many decades, and we thank you for being the spokesperson of that community. Let us begin, if we can, Senator Chabert, with you, and if you will limit your testimony to four to five minutes and then we will have a round of questions. STATEMENT OF HON. NORBERT N. CHABERT, LOUISIANA STATE SENATE, DISTRICT 20 Mr. Chabert. Thank you. Madam Chairwoman, distinguished members of the United States Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship, my name is Norbert Nolty Chabert, but everybody down in the bayou calls me Norby. I am a Louisiana State Senator for District 20, and I want to first thank Senator Landrieu and Senator Vitter for their service on the committee and for giving this serious matter the attention that it deserves. Louisiana's 20th Senatorial District is a very unique and special place. Geographically, it is comprised of the southernmost portions of Terrebonne and Lafourche Parishes. It is home to some of South Louisiana's most famous bayous, Bayou Terrebonne, my home of Bayou Lil Caillou, and the most dominant and legendary bayou of them all, Bayou Lafourche. The names of the towns there are synonymous with Louisiana living--Houma, Cut Off, Cocodrie, Dulac, and Golden Meadow. District 20 is a microcosm of our State. It is flush with shrimp boats, vast sugar cane fields, huge mills, fertile hunting and fishing grounds, thousands of camps and boat launches, and miles and miles of America's wetlands. It is also the hub of offshore support and supply for oil and gas exploration in the Gulf of Mexico. And no disrespect to our dear friends and colleagues here in Lafayette, St. Mary, and Iberia Parishes, but it is now the epicenter of the economic impact of the Department of Interior's moratorium on offshore drilling. You see, members, District 20 is not only the home of the Louisiana Offshore Oil Port, commonly referred to as LOOP, where over 13 percent of our nation's oil is piped through over 50 pipelines in the Marsh Pipeline System, but it is also home to Port Fourchon, Louisiana's offshore supply super-port. Currently, each and every one of the 33 rigs that have had their drilling suspended by this moratorium are based, supplied, and serviced out of Fourchon, every single one, members. Much has been made of the consequences of the job loss on those 33 rigs. It is estimated that there are between 6,500 and 7,000 workers combined on the moratorium rigs. However, it must be noted that were are over 5,000 workers on the docks of Port Fourchon alone, Fourchon, to say nothing of the 8,500 direct jobs of men and women who drive in and out of that port every single day to provide the goods and services needed to make that port and our oil and gas industry operate. But neither the port nor the large companies that lease space there are why I come before you today. Those companies are directly feeling the pain, the financial burden of this moratorium, as much as anyone. But they have lawyers and lobbyists to fight their fights for them. I come before you as a representative of the thousands of mom and pop operations in my district, small businesses like Tom's Gas Station in Golden Meadow, Pat's Dress Shop and Paul's Drive-Through, both of Chauvin, the Galliano Twist, Marcel's Supermarket in Bayou Blue, Blackie's in Lockport. These are places where the workers of the oil field buy their tires, they get their groceries, they purchase their children's school uniforms, and they pick up a hamburger or a six-pack after a long day of work. But there aren't a whole lot of extra burgers being bought, not a whole lot of dresses being sold. Everyone in my district is feeling the effects of the economic depression that has been wrought upon us through no fault of our own. Every conversation that I have with my constituents, whether it is at a coffee shop on a Monday or after church on a Sunday, is filled with the concern of the impact it is having on their businesses and the worry about whether or not they are going to keep their job. Just this past weekend at my local Rouse's Market, I was stopped seven times by people telling me of the hard times that they were facing. Now, Senators, this is not a scene that is unfamiliar to us. Public service is the life we have chosen. However, the testimony of these constituents was very much the same, yet drastically different. A teacher was worried about the progress of her classroom, where three of her kids' parents had lost their jobs and were going to move. A woman working in a print shop had seen a 50 percent downturn of orders just in the last three days--excuse me, last 30 days. A man who owns a tool rental company has had to lay off two of his ten workers in his shop just because their services are no longer needed. Every one of their testimonies is because of this moratorium on drilling. Over the last half-century, the hard-working people of South Louisiana have built the energy infrastructure that powers this country. The people of the Tenth Ward in South Lafourche practically invented the international boat business. Oil and gas is the lifeblood of our economy, from top to bottom, and that blood has stopped pumping due to nothing more than political posturing. In the coming weeks and days, more and more companies will lay off employees. Shops will shut their doors for good. Car payments will not be made. Mortgages will not be paid. In Terrebonne and Lafourche Parish, the welcome sign will once again read, ``Last one out, turn out the lights.'' Once again, I would like to thank the Chairwoman for her leadership and Senator Vitter for his leadership, as well, as well as the attention that the committee is paying on this very important issue. Thank you. [The prepared statement of Mr. Chabert follows:] [GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] Chair Landrieu. Thank you, Senator. [Applause.] Representative Champagne. STATEMENT OF HON. SIMONE B. CHAMPAGNE, LOUISIANA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, DISTRICT 49 Ms. Champagne. Thank you. First of all, I would like to thank Senator Landrieu and Senator Vitter for being here today and listening to us. We really appreciate all the hard work that you all are doing in our capital to make the rest of the nation understand how important Louisiana is in the oil and gas industry. I also, and in your package you will receive, I included a survey from an independent oil and gas industry people that did a survey on the economics and gives you a little more stats than what I will provide. To start off, I represent District 49, which is Coastal Iberia and one-third of Coastal Vermilion Parish. I am very proud of the fact that we don't compete necessarily with Port Fourchon, but we try to complement Port Fourchon on our industry. What we have in District 49 are two waterports that do topside as well as fabrication, as well as an airport that is home to the Helicopter Training Center that utilizes a lot of the oil and gas industry air providers. I also am proud that we are the home of the Henry Hub, which provides 25 to 30 percent of the electricity throughout the nation. This, I believe, is what we need to make Washington understand, how much we provide the rest of the nation, what we do for them on a daily basis. In my testimony, I also have written from Ms. Heidi Martin, who owns Prologue, another woman-based industry, and she is located on Highway 90 in Iberia Parish. She does rental and lease for offshore oil storage facilities and drilling. She has received 80 to 85 percent reduction in her sales and lease since the moratorium has taken effect. On the bottom of her statement, which I did provide for you all, she gave me a wonderful quote. ``Courage is not denying a situation, but denying its power over you.'' Today, my testimony is going to be about not denying the power that the moratorium has put on the good people of Louisiana. I, like Norby, visit those supermarkets on a daily basis. We have families. We have to go home and cook their meals and take them to the ballpark and everything else that moms and dads and grandparents do on a daily basis. So my testimony today will be about the small businesses that I visited in the last several months about the moratorium. First was Prologue, a woman-owned business that is getting 80 to 85 percent decrease. The others are our mud cleaning businesses. We all talk about how the drilling rig, how they are pumping mud into the Deepwater Horizon. Well, all of that has to be cleaned out at some point in time, and that is what drilling does. So we have a lot of that industry in District 49 and across the coastal parishes. So they are hurting, because if they are not working, if they are not drilling, they are not cleaning. I also visited with supply companies. We have very many. Now, we look at supply companies sometimes as giving those fittings and the piping, which they do, but we also have supply companies that will daily ship to our businesses supplies such as groceries, air conditioners, and heating, linen supplies, our galley hands. If they are not drilling and we are not producing oil and gas, they are not working. So these people are out of work. They run the risk of not having a job in the next six to nine months or as long as this will last, and for eternity. I also visited our uniform companies that have had a decrease of about 50 percent in their sales for uniform companies and printing. So all of this, along with I had an interesting conversation on Friday with a caterer, and what she said was--another woman-owned business that employs about 35 people--she said, people think of caterers as being the wedding people or the special planners, which they are. But I know in the district I represent, they also go out to our ports. They furnish daily meals for the industry that they sell to workers. And all of these specialty items, they can no longer furnish because these are some of the things that are being cut back in our economy because of this moratorium. They also buy from our local restaurants and our local grocery stores. So it is not about the trickle-down effect. It is about the trickle-up effect, how it is climbing the ladder. And this will reach Washington very shortly. When this and many others don't work, local sales taxes are down. That affects the services that we provide as public servants when it comes to our schools and our drainage issues that we have along the coastline. We need the rest of the nation to understand how hard Louisianans work to provide the many products that are derived from this industry. We are the energy corridor. We don't have to be dependent on foreign oil. As a wife, mother, and sister of oil field employees, I understand the hazards of the industry. I also understand the dilemma that families face firsthand about the layoffs that they soon will see. My husband and I went through the 1980s, the oil bust of the 1980s, with two small children to feed. The uncertain future for these families will cause great stress amongst them. We have hard working, resilient people in Louisiana. Allow us to continue to provide the quality of life our constituents deserve and have worked for for years to accomplish. Katrina and Rita issued a huge blow to the Louisiana economy. Gustav and Ike kicked us in the gut. The oil spill brought us to our knees. But this moratorium and the cease of drilling permits will sign our death sentence. I ask the Administration to please lift the moratorium, not in October or November or September, but today. Let us get back to work. Thank you. Chair Landrieu. Thank you. [Applause.] Ms. Williams. STATEMENT OF HON. ARLANDA WILLIAMS, COUNCIL CHAIRWOMAN, TERREBONNE PARISH CONSOLIDATED GOVERNMENT Ms. Williams. Thank you. Good morning, Senator Landrieu and Senator Vitter. Thank you guys for inviting us here. I bring you greetings from the good earth, Terrebonne Parish, where I currently chair the Parish Council. The French words ``terra bonne,'' meaning good earth, good soil, and good land, are more than fitting, as the citizens of our parish have supported themselves and their families with the blessings of nature, our unique geography that creates abundant fisheries, our beautiful landscapes, and a warm culture that draws many every year. Our parish symbols, the oil rig and the fishing vessel, represent the importance of the oil and gas industry and the seafood industry to the economy of our great parish, with approximately 60 percent of our workforce directly or indirectly related to the oil field and approximately 20 percent directly or indirectly related to the seafood industry. The explosion of the Deepwater Horizon caused devastation to 11 families who lost fathers, sons, brothers, or friends, something that many of us have probably never experienced, a death with no proper closure. Moreover, the events after the explosion have caused detriment to thousands along the Gulf Coast, a reality that some of us never thought we would be faced with. Although we understand the position of safety, a six-month moratorium would destroy parishes and counties along the Gulf Coast that rely heavily on oil and gas as a way of revenue. In our case, six months is the equivalent of two to four years. When a company that installs and dismantles offshore platforms in the Gulf of Mexico ties up a derrick barge, that act ripples through the region and States' economies. It results in employee layoffs, approximately a crew and staff of 100 people, and the subsequent reduction of their income, the impact on their ability to pay mortgages, household bills, tuition, fewer dinners out, shopping trips, and other dollars that can be spent in our local economy. My parish depends more or less on services related to the oil field industry, so when one company reduces its spending with numerous other companies who supply that operation-- groceries, welding suppliers, pipe, sheet metal, safety supplies, chemicals and cleaning fluids, field, truck transportation, water, driving companies, and even the scrapyard that would be used to buy those scrap materials--and those suppliers lose their business, when this happens, they lose their ability to spend dollars on those supplies and services and can be forced to lay off employees. This is just from one derrick barge that services shallow waters, where permits are still not really being issued. In Terrebonne Parish, all of this reduced disposable income has hurt a local restaurant. Big Al's, known to many when they come and visit our parish, is a long-established seafood restaurant that had to close one of its locations. The closure was the result of a decrease of income of $15,000 to $20,000 a month for the last 90 days and the difficulty in buying seafood to prepare and sell. He was affected by both the loss in seafood and the lack of employees coming in because the oil field services always came in and did lunch meetings or dinner meetings with Big Al's. While this means no purchases are being made from seafood suppliers, neither are purchases being made from suppliers of other ingredients, supplies, or utilities. These workers have lost their jobs and no longer have the ability to spend money as freely as they previously did. The effect of the moratorium will have more of a lasting effect than anyone can conceive. With a Master's in criminal justice, I understand social strain, and this is a theory used in criminal justice to describe increased criminal activity and certain offenders. It is the inability to live the quality of life you are accustomed to, thus resulting in increased criminal activity which happens when that father or that mother cannot bring home the food and the money that they are used to and their children cannot live the lives that they have been accustomed to living. They result in doing things that are unseen and unknown to many because they want their family to continue to go and live the life that they have lived for so many years. But the most important thing are our children. The Terrebonne Parish School District went into Reduction in Force for the 2010-2011 school year, highly related to a $9 million sales tax decrease, a drop in child enrollment causing their MFP to decline because of migration out of the parish. The school system receives 46.22 percent of sales tax revenue and will begin this school year in need of $11.3 million to balance the general fund, and that is before the true effects of this moratorium begins. These numbers are expected to almost double, and to put a burden on an already financially burdened school system. The basis for which this country's future lies is in our children and they are now becoming the sacrificial lambs at the end of the situation. Because the public school system will have to prepare for an increased amount of students that will transfer in from the parochial system, thus causing overcrowded classrooms mixed with all types of behavioral problems, yet there will be no increase in the sales tax, to increase the teaching staff will be unattainable, thus making ``No Child Left Behind'' to be changed to ``No Generation Left Behind.'' Am I my brother's keeper? Am I my sister's keeper? E. pluribus unum, out of many, one. It is this fundamental belief, I am my brother's keeper, I am my sister's keeper, that this country works off of. But if you live in a little area called Pointe-Aux-Chenes, a community built on the seafood industry, a community rich in faith and hope, a community strong enough to weather every catastrophic storm that has touched the Louisiana Gulf Coast, and yet not another disaster has taken away the very industry that they need to survive, and now many is taking away the only backup plan that they ever had. I beg upon you to take back these fundamental beliefs to the administration to let them know that we are a people that can stand and we can weather anything. But when you take food out of our mouths, when you stop educating our children, then we begin to fight, and our fight is not one, but it is all standing together. I thank you guys for your support and I thank you guys for having this meeting today. [The prepared statement of Ms. Williams follows:] [GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] Chair Landrieu. Thank you. [Applause.] Thank you, Madam President, very much for that moving testimony. Mayor Matte. STATEMENT OF HON. TIMOTHY MATTE, MAYOR, MORGAN CITY, LOUISIANA Mr. Matte. Good morning, Chairwoman Landrieu and Senator Vitter. Welcome to South Louisiana and the Cajun Coast. My name is Tim Matte and I am presently serving my 14th year as Mayor of the City of Morgan City. Morgan City is a community located 70 miles south of here at the bottom of the Atachafalaya Basin, the largest overflow river swamp in the United States. We are very proud of the fact that we are the birthplace of the offshore oil and gas exploration business. In 1947, Kerr McGee drilled the first successful oil well outside of land just south of Morgan City and brought about this vital industry. At the same time, our community was known as the Jumbo Shrimp Capitol of the world in recognition of the huge fleet of shrimp boats ported out of Morgan City, harvesting the jumbo shrimp from the waters of the Central Gulf of Mexico. Today, both of these industries are prominent contributors to our local economy, although the support of offshore oil and gas exploration and production make up the majority of our economic base. The businesses that call our community home include small marine fabricators, shipyards for both new construction and repair, diesel repair shops, equipment rental companies providing equipment utilized by drilling companies for all phases of exploration and production of oil and gas, vessel operators, food supplying catering companies, and diving contractors and remote operating vehicle manufacturer and operators, as well as companies providing support for all of these businesses. Our resident companies are primarily small businesses, but we also are home to some of the larger names in this vital business, such as the fabricator of many of the offshore structures and production facilities, J. Ray McDermott, Transocean, Halliburton, Cameron, the manufacturer of sub-sea equipment, such as blowout preventers, and Oceaneering International, the manufacturer and operator of those ROVs, or underwater robots that we all watch working on the plugging of the Deepwater Horizon well. We are also home to the companies that developed and constructed the Big Gulp, the barge skimmer that successfully worked in removing large quantities of oil from the Gulf, and the sealing plug was fabricated here in our parish. We are also home to a variety of small retailers that rely on the employment provided those that work offshore and for those service companies. I would like to make a few initial comments as an overview of our feelings towards the moratorium, offer some examples from my community of the impacts we are seeing and anticipate seeing as a result of the moratorium, and wrap up with a few comments about the need for safety in the industry. It is my understanding that there are 33 rigs seeking permits to drill in deepwater in the Gulf of Mexico. I also understand that two rigs have already left the Gulf for other projects in foreign waters. And I understand that up to six rigs have already sent notification that they will be leaving the Gulf of Mexico. My view of the moratorium is that it is punitive to small business in Coastal Louisiana. I believe that this is not the intention of the effort, but without a doubt, that is the result. The larger oil companies will not be adversely affected by the withholding of drilling permits as they will simply exploit a resource in some other part of the world. The drilling contractors may only suffer minimal impacts as they compete on a worldwide basis and have opportunities to drill elsewhere. But our small business community primarily serves the Gulf of Mexico activity. The movement of these rigs will cause a loss of jobs and economic opportunity for our resident companies as they will not be in a position to follow the activity to foreign areas. In some cases, they would even be prohibited from doing so. Let me offer a few examples from my community. Morgan City is the home of an offshore caterer, a family-owned business that has been operating here since the 1960s, serving companies with their food and related product needs out of a downtown Morgan City location. They employ 70 to 90 people, depending on workload, and of the 33 rigs in question, they have contracts with six. When operating, those six rigs represent 30 percent of their gross revenue. The loss of these rigs would lead to a reduction of the staff by as many as 30 people. Since he would not have the workload, he would also have to return a number of trucks that he has presently under lease, and, of course, the fuel purchases and all of the other costs associated with that would have to be reduced. One of our small fabricators, another example, builds flow line jumpers for these offshore wells once the well is drilled and moved to development. He has reported that he has had orders postponed for nine jumpers from one oil company and from six from another company delayed. He expects this to impact his revenues by over $1 million. He does market to companies that do work in foreign areas. However, he has not been very successful in doing that in that he finds that fabrication is one area where some foreign governments have put a requirement of local content in their projects, therefore putting him at a competitive disadvantage. Each of these 33 drilling rigs will have one to two ROVs for its drilling operation. One of our resident companies had committed 29 ROVs to those 33 drilling rigs. From a company perspective, he hopes to continue to serve those rigs if they move. However, they will be crewed by employees from those foreign offices that he has. That is going to result in the loss of United States employment, without a doubt. Our area is also the home to a helicopter company which happens to probably have locations in every one of our locations. They have contracts with 22 of those 33 rigs. That is going to have an impact all across the Gulf Coast. These are just a few examples that we have seen thus far with the moratorium. This burden is falling on small business, and consequently it is going to fall on a community like mine as we are forced to adjust our budget by reducing the number of people we have working for us, thus exacerbating this problem. St. Mary Parish was in the disaster area for each one of the hurricanes, Katrina, Rita, Gustav, and Ike. We have come through some pretty tough times. These tough times, one of the results of that is that it causes a depletion of our reserves. We just don't have reserves to fall back on to wait around. We don't have the luxury of waiting out better times when a drilling moratorium might be lifted and when these rigs might come back to the Gulf of Mexico. In my conversation with some of the business community, I was told that the economic downturn and the effect the moratorium has had in some cases has been softened by the opportunities derived by responding to the spill or providing services to BP and their contractors, and this has had the result of putting some offshore supply vessels and towboats back to work and barges to work. I had one crewboat operator tell me that he has had four jobs canceled in deepwater, but he has got five boats working on the spill. I believe he has already got notification on one, and the notification on those other four are coming shortly. Those boats are going to be laid off. So in addition to losing these four from the deepwater projects, he is going to have another five vessels sitting at his dock, not spending money, not employing people, and so forth. Two vessel crews have already been let go. That is 24 people. You know, you operate those vessels around the clock. It takes a lot of people to operate them. Another contractor, another offshore supply vessel operator told me that he has fully one-half of his fleet today committed to BP and has already received a notification about those contracts. So while we have talked about some very bad things that will happen as a result of this, I think the worst is yet to come with the moratorium because this BP work will and has to end. We all see that this work is now coming to an end, and our parish right now has an unemployment rate of ten percent. That is as of June 2010. That is up from 8.7 percent last year. Once again, I think that clearly demonstrates that this moratorium is punishing the wrong people. A common theme I am hearing from my business community is that the new office replacing MMS, namely the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, is contributing to a reduction in economic activity in the Gulf of Mexico causing the de facto moratorium that we have referred to. One local businessman referred to the office as chaotic in processing a permit request, and delays are resulting in the processing of permit requests for activities that have absolutely nothing to do with deepwater drilling activities other than the fact that they both occur in the Gulf of Mexico. And I will add to that, not only is it shallow water drilling permits, but it is permits for activities in shallow waters that have nothing to do with drilling. This is having an impact on many of the service providers in our community that have traditionally served shallow water and the shelf areas going back to the early days of the Gulf of Mexico. And lastly, let me finish up with one point that I would like you all to leave here regarding--my comments regarding safety of offshore oil and gas production and exploration. I think the Macondo Well incident, most of you would agree that prior to that incident, the industry had a pretty good safety record. While there is and will be much debate about the cause of this very tragic incident and what should be done about it to prevent a future incident, I want to offer this observation. I think it is very significant that the loudest voices protesting the institution of this moratorium is coming from mayors and parish presidents and workers and their families from Coastal Louisiana. Those are our sons and daughters on those rigs. Those are our brothers and sisters on those rigs. None of us take their health and safety for granted. We demand a safe workplace. We have proudly served our nation by putting ourselves at risk by undertaking this important task because it is noble work, it is important work, and it is work that this country needs done. I think our willingness to continue this work deserves some recognition. Our citizens want to go back to work. And I thank you for this opportunity to share these thoughts with you. [The prepared statement of Mr. Matte follows:] [GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] Chair Landrieu. Thank you. [Applause.] Well, ladies and gentlemen, we have had two excellent panels this morning and I think the testimony has been some of the best that I have heard, either chairing a meeting or participating, in the hundreds that I have participated in since becoming a Senator. So I really appreciate it. I want to submit for the record, following up Scott Angelle's testimony, the letter from the five experts, the Administration's own experts, who have testified and advocated against the moratorium. I want to make sure that that gets in the record. [The information follows:] [GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] Chair Landrieu. I also want to submit for you, Representative Champagne, the document, the survey of small businesses that you referred to in the record. [The information follows:] [GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] Chair Landrieu. I have one question for the whole panel, and we will then turn it over to Senator Vitter so we can wrap up at the appropriate, expected time. Part of the feedback that we have gotten when we have been discussing the ending of this moratorium with people is, well, the situation isn't as bad, Senator, as you describe because there are so many people being employed or hired by the clean- up. We try to explain that that in no way substitutes for the loss of the permanent jobs and the anxiety that is out there because of just the unknown. So I would like to ask you all to respond to this. This hasn't been officially on the record, but we get these comments in private meetings that we have. Would you try to take a minute, each of you, to explain to the public the difference between the jobs for the clean-up, which might be temporary and sometimes are hiring workers that aren't even from our area, as versus the jobs being lost from the moratorium? I don't know, Mayor, if you want to start---- Mr. Matte. I would be happy to. I think what we have seen in our community, primarily, those jobs have involved the hiring of vessels. And in some cases, these boats were not working, so they were able to put those back on. The best example I have, the two marine operators that I mentioned earlier, both of them have crew boats and supply boats, and the crew boats are the--that is the low cost per day rentals. They are very thankful for the fact that they were able to put those vessels to work because what is happening is the larger offshore supply vessels, those in the 260 even up to over 300- foot-long vessels that leave Port Fourchon for the deepwater areas, those are the much higher day rates, require much more employment to staff those vessels. Those are the ones that are laid off. They are kind of supplementing it with these crew boats and some of the smaller boats that are serving the spill. But they have already gotten notification, that is it. That is over. That is gone. Will it be another week, another month? That is probably the outside time frame we are talking about. Over the next month, those jobs will go away. Chair Landrieu. So it was an inadequate and temporary substitute for the jobs lost, and now that is even coming to an end. President Williams. Ms. Williams. Yes, Senator. In Terrebonne Parish, as you know, BP has one of their stations is right, unfortunately, right in my district, as well. But we had a serious problem with them even hiring our local vessels of opportunity. So to say that people are working, people are making money, that is true, but it will not last past 90, maybe 180 days at most. But these people that have been placed out of these other jobs, it is going to take them, just like I said earlier, two to four years before they can make the living that they used to make. So you are going from $2,500 a week, example, to $235 a week. So that is the false that they are being sold that they are making money, but you are not making money every day. You are not guaranteed to go out every day. I have been stopped several times. ``Ms. Williams, we go down there and they sent us back home.'' So that is not a job. A job is you know that you have to go from eight to five or eight to six, not if I go and they feel like bringing me, then I am going to work that day. So that is a false that everybody needs to understand. You may see people working today, but tomorrow, you may not. Chair Landrieu. Representative. Ms. Champagne. Thank you, Senator. Yes, I agree, and I think where we get this false sense is people are confusing the oil spill with the moratorium, and every day when we go out in our districts, I know in District 49, my fishermen, my shrimpers and my fishermen have been put to work by BP and they are working their boats. What the moratorium is doing is it is affecting the stable industry that we have with oil and gas throughout Iberia and Vermilion Parish as well as the whole coastline. We have oil field service companies and fabrication companies at the Port of Iberia that are already setting up shop in Brazil. These will not come back. If they leave totally and the economy base in Brazil helps them and the climate in Louisiana and the United States is not good enough, they are not going to come back. But they can't take all of our people with them when they do this. So the false sense that people are actually working is exactly that, a false sense of people actually working. The moratorium is longstanding, and when I say longstanding, not today or tomorrow, a month from now. This is years. It will take years for our economy to come back, if it will at all. Chair Landrieu. Senator. Mr. Chabert. One point that has not been touched upon that I know both of you have a tremendous amount of experience in, in terms of those jobs that are out there relative to the oil spill, what you have during a time of emergency and tragedies like this is the influx of profiteers. Unfortunately, we have seen that up and down all of our parishes, where you get folks who are not even from the State, much less from the area affected, coming in and capitalizing on some of the opportunities that were there, be they vessels of opportunity or catering contracts or any of the number of things that have been discussed thus far today. You know, secondly are those jobs that have absolutely nothing to do with the oil spill that we have talked about repeatedly today. How do you equate a teacher who is going to lose their job due to a reduction in MFP and a decrease in the workforce, how do you say, well, that person can go to work for an oil spill clean-up job? It is unfortunate that there is that misconception out there, but completely understandable that it does exist. Chair Landrieu. Thank you all for clearing that up. Senator Vitter. Senator Vitter. Thanks. I just have two questions. First, for the Senator and Representative. You mentioned you both represent significant ports, Port Fourchon, Port of Iberia. What percentage of those ports' activity is directly related to offshore oil and gas? And if the formal or de facto moratoria continue for six months or more, what will those ports look like? Ms. Champagne. Thank you. The Port of Iberia is 100 percent oil and gas related, and if we see a decrease, what will happen is, like we are seeing right now, some of our port facilities are looking at overseas employment. So they will decrease and these yards will be substantially decreased in furnished product here in the United States as well as overseas, but I can see if this continues, a reduction of at least 75 to 80 percent. Mr. Chabert. And as we have stated before, 33 of those rigs that are affected by this moratorium are based out of Port Fourchon, so that would speak directly to them, but 100 percent of what Fourchon does. More importantly, I want to speak to something that we have all worked on, and I see my good friend, former Senator Cravens, Chief of Staff of the committee, you know, the hard work that we put in paying for long-term projects to get money down to things like Port Fourchon that we all agree are a State asset but they are a national asset, we are all familiar with the Leeville Bridge and the money that we have all worked so hard to allocate to that. We have tied directly the payment of bonds to pay for that bridge on the amount of traffic that is going to go to service Port Fourchon via the way of tolls. Well, no one has been able to calculate the loss of revenue that has been generated due to the number of trucks and heavy- load vehicles, which we all know those tolls vary depending on what type of vehicle passes over that bridge. So, again, the true impact of this moratorium on things like that, that folks possibly in DC aren't seeing, has yet to be measured. Senator Vitter. Right. And Ms. Williams and Mayor Matte, again, if the formal and de facto moratoria continue for six months or more, what revenue impact will your jurisdiction and your local school systems see, and what service cuts will that lead to? Ms. Williams. In Terrebonne Parish, you are looking at a possible 40 percent reduction in sales taxes, which would affect not only our school system, which receives 46 percent of it, but it would also affect our levee board, who receives about $5 million a year through our sales tax revenues, thus prohibiting them from continuing with projects that they have already started. Definitely, we have already started with a cut in our school system, so we would definitely not be able to increase the staff. On the parish side, we have already started looking at different measures as far as cutting back. We are only hiring now those positions that are absolutely detrimental to the parish. So with a 40 percent decrease in our sales tax, you would definitely see lots of layoffs on the parish side, and then probably even more layoffs on the school systems side. Mr. Matte. Well, Senator, in my parish--first off, I am fairly conservative in my budgeting. I budgeted a five percent reduction in sales tax for this year and am keeping my fingers crossed that that is going to be a sufficient number. We are getting ready to go through the budget process for this upcoming year, and, of course, this is a big question mark. Secondly, you heard me say earlier, my unemployment rate is already ten percent. One of the things that I think you probably agree with, unemployment has a tendency to create more unemployment as those dollars--there are fewer and fewer dollars turning over, it broadens its impact and we are going to feel it very dramatically. I am already not buying equipment and not buying supplies and not buying things to avoid having to lay people off, but there is no question that that is the only other place that, from a community like Morgan City, the only other place we can go is to begin to lay off employees. A moratorium that would continue on from here would cause--ultimately would cause the layoff of city employees. That would be the only response I would have. Mr. Chabert. And Senators, if I may, on the Mayor's point, it needs to be noted for the record that the lowest unemployment in the country prior to this moratorium and the oil spill was right here in South Louisiana, with Terrebonne, Lafourche, Lafayette, and St. Mary. Chair Landrieu. And now it is headed to one of the highest. All right. This hearing is going to come to a close. I just want to say again how much we appreciate the testimony, heartfelt, specific, very detailed, that is going to help us build the Congressional record necessary to get this moratorium lifted immediately and permits issued expeditiously. So we thank you all very much. The record of this hearing will stay open for another two weeks. We encourage other testimony to be presented. And I can commit to you all, as the Chair of this committee and as a Senator from Louisiana, I am going to put the full weight of this committee behind the lifting of this moratorium as soon as possible. Thank you. The meeting is adjourned. [Whereupon, at 11:58 a.m., the committee was adjourned.] APPENDIX MATERIAL SUBMITTED [GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]