[House Hearing, 110 Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION: TEACHING
OUR CHILDREN TO PRESERVE OUR FUTURE
=======================================================================
FIELD HEARING
before the
SUBCOMMITTEE ON EARLY CHILDHOOD,
ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION
COMMITTEE ON
EDUCATION AND LABOR
U.S. House of Representatives
ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS
SECOND SESSION
__________
HEARING HELD IN LAUREL, MD, APRIL 22, 2008
__________
Serial No. 110-87
__________
Printed for the use of the Committee on Education and Labor
Available on the Internet:
http://www.gpoaccess.gov/congress/house/education/index.html
----------
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
41-810 PDF WASHINGTON : 2008
For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing
Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800;
DC area (202) 512-1800 Fax: (202) 512-2104 Mail: Stop IDCC,
Washington, DC 20402-0001
COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION AND LABOR
GEORGE MILLER, California, Chairman
Dale E. Kildee, Michigan, Vice Howard P. ``Buck'' McKeon,
Chairman California,
Donald M. Payne, New Jersey Senior Republican Member
Robert E. Andrews, New Jersey Thomas E. Petri, Wisconsin
Robert C. ``Bobby'' Scott, Virginia Peter Hoekstra, Michigan
Lynn C. Woolsey, California Michael N. Castle, Delaware
Ruben Hinojosa, Texas Mark E. Souder, Indiana
Carolyn McCarthy, New York Vernon J. Ehlers, Michigan
John F. Tierney, Massachusetts Judy Biggert, Illinois
Dennis J. Kucinich, Ohio Todd Russell Platts, Pennsylvania
David Wu, Oregon Ric Keller, Florida
Rush D. Holt, New Jersey Joe Wilson, South Carolina
Susan A. Davis, California John Kline, Minnesota
Danny K. Davis, Illinois Cathy McMorris Rodgers, Washington
Raul M. Grijalva, Arizona Kenny Marchant, Texas
Timothy H. Bishop, New York Tom Price, Georgia
Linda T. Sanchez, California Luis G. Fortuno, Puerto Rico
John P. Sarbanes, Maryland Charles W. Boustany, Jr.,
Joe Sestak, Pennsylvania Louisiana
David Loebsack, Iowa Virginia Foxx, North Carolina
Mazie Hirono, Hawaii John R. ``Randy'' Kuhl, Jr., New
Jason Altmire, Pennsylvania York
John A. Yarmuth, Kentucky Rob Bishop, Utah
Phil Hare, Illinois David Davis, Tennessee
Yvette D. Clarke, New York Timothy Walberg, Michigan
Joe Courtney, Connecticut [Vacancy]
Carol Shea-Porter, New Hampshire
Mark Zuckerman, Staff Director
Sally Stroup, Republican Staff Director
------
SUBCOMMITTEE ON EARLY CHILDHOOD,
ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION
DALE E. KILDEE, Michigan, Chairman
Robert C. ``Bobby'' Scott, Virginia Michael N. Castle, Delaware,
Dennis J. Kucinich, Ohio Ranking Minority Member
Susan A. Davis, California Peter Hoekstra, Michigan
Danny K. Davis, Illinois Mark E. Souder, Indiana
Raul M. Grijalva, Arizona Vernon J. Ehlers, Michigan
Donald M. Payne, New Jersey Judy Biggert, Illinois
Rush D. Holt, New Jersey Luis G. Fortuno, Puerto Rico
Linda T. Sanchez, California Rob Bishop, Utah
John P. Sarbanes, Maryland Todd Russell Platts, Pennsylvania
Joe Sestak, Pennsylvania Ric Keller, Florida
David Loebsack, Iowa Joe Wilson, South Carolina
Mazie Hirono, Hawaii Charles W. Boustany, Jr.,
Phil Hare, Illinois Louisiana
Lynn C. Woolsey, California John R. ``Randy'' Kuhl, Jr., New
Ruben Hinojosa, Texas York
[Vacancy]
C O N T E N T S
----------
Page
Hearing held on April 22, 2008................................... 1
Statement of Members:
Kildee, Hon. Dale E., Chairman, Subcommittee on Early
Childhood, Elementary and Secondary Education.............. 1
Prepared statement of.................................... 2
Submissions for the record:
Statement of Zenobia Barlow, cofounder and executive
director, the Center for Ecoliteracy............... 49
Statement of William C. Baker, the Chesapeake Bay
Foundation......................................... 50
Miller, Hon. George, Chairman, Committee on Education and
Labor, prepared statement of............................... 51
Sarbanes, Hon. John P., a Representative in Congress from the
State of Maryland:
Prepared statement of.................................... 52
Additional submissions:
Statement of Joe Harber, director, education program,
National Aquarium.................................. 53
Statement of Larry Schweiger, president and CEO,
National Wildlife Federation....................... 54
Woolsey, Hon. Lynn C., a Representative in Congress from the
State of California, prepared statement of................. 57
Statement of Witnesses:
Davidson, Sean, co-founder, Greenlight Biofuels.............. 35
Prepared statement of.................................... 37
Grasmick, Dr. Nancy S., Maryland State superintendent of
schools.................................................... 13
Prepared statement of.................................... 15
Harris, Karen, principal, Pot Spring Elementary School....... 18
Prepared statement of.................................... 21
Lawrence, Robert S., M.D., director, Center for a Livable
Future, and professor of environmental health sciences,
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health............ 28
Prepared statement of.................................... 29
O'Malley, Hon. Martin, Governor, State of Maryland........... 2
Prepared statement of.................................... 4
Executive Order (01.01.2008.06), ``Maryland Partnership
for Children in Nature''............................... 58
Pergams, Dr. Oliver R. W., director, Red Rock Institute,
Inc.; conservation biologist, University of Illinois at
Chicago.................................................... 23
Prepared statement of.................................... 25
ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION: TEACHING OUR CHILDREN TO PRESERVE OUR FUTURE
----------
Tuesday, April 22, 2008
U.S. House of Representatives
Subcommittee on Early Childhood,
Elementary and Secondary Education
Committee on Education and Labor
Washington, DC
----------
The Subcommittee met, pursuant to call, at 11:00 a.m., at
the National Wildlife Visitor Center of the Patuxent Wildlife
Research Refuge, 10901 Scarlet Tanager Loop, Laurel, Maryland,
Hon. Dale E. Kildee [chairman of the Subcommittee] presiding.
Present: Representatives Kildee, Grijalva, and Sarbanes.
Also Present: Representative Bordallo.
Staff Present: Tylease Alli, Hearing Clerk; and Lloyd
Horwich, Policy Advisor, Subcommittee on Early Childhood,
Elementary and Secondary Education.
Chairman Kildee. I know every governor is very busy. And
Governor O'Malley I know is especially busy. I read what is
going on in Maryland all the time. Two of my children have
chosen Maryland as their home. So, Governor, I want to get to
you right away.
I am pleased, first of all, to welcome my fellow
Subcommittee members, as well as the Chairman of the
Subcommittee that has a deep interest in this in the Resources
Committee, Madeleine Bordallo from Guam. My son has flown there
many times. And he says it is the longest flight in the world.
So, Ms. Bordallo, we very much appreciate you being here also.
And we want to thank the teachers and the students. I tell
people in real life, I was a school teacher. I was not teacher
of the year. I didn't quite make that. I was teacher of the
month. So I still have that plaque for that.
This is a very important topic, a topic that Mr. Sarbanes
has brought to us and which we hope we can integrate into our
bill, No Child Left Behind, teaching our children to preserve
our future. I specifically want to recognize him and Raul
Grijalva. Raul fights for water out in Arizona. He sees the
water here and knows how important that is. And the others who
are here today, I also appreciate that.
I thank all the audience, people who have come here because
of their deep interest. Because the Governor's time is
extremely busy, I will go immediately to Governor O'Malley.
And, Governor, thank you for all that you are doing.
Prepared Statement of Hon. Dale E. Kildee, Chairman, Subcommittee on
Early Childhood, Elementary and Secondary Education
I'm pleased to welcome my fellow Subcommittee Members,
Congresswoman Bordallo, the many students and teachers who are with us
today, and our witnesses, to this hearing on ``Environmental Education:
Teaching Our Children To Preserve Our Future.''
I specifically want to recognize Representative Sarbanes for his
leadership on environmental education--a number of our witnesses will
testify in support of his No Child Left Inside Act--and also for having
suggested this beautiful location for today's hearing.
And, I want to thank all the people here at the Patuxent Wildlife
Research Refuge for their hard work in hosting us, today. It is
especially appropriate that we are discussing environmental education
on the 38th annual Earth Day. The purpose of Earth Day is to raise
awareness of the environment and promote ways to protect it. And as is
the case with so many of the challenges that our country faces, the
best answer is education.
Our witnesses will testify about environmental education from a
wide range of perspectives and experiences--we have a governor, state
superintendent, school principal, two professors, and a recent college
graduate who co-founded a biofuel company.
But I believe that in the end, they all will testify in support of
the same principles:
first, that for environmental education to be effective,
we must not treat it as separate from other areas of our studies or our
lives, but as an integral part of each of them--environmental education
can be integrated into math, reading, science, art and virtually any
other subject.
and, second, that if we do not support environmental
education, we will--quite literally--jeopardize our children's health
and our country's future.
As we will hear, environmental education can be an ideal way to
engage even the most difficult to teach students, because it makes
learning fun and relevant.
And, I would add, environmentally sound school buildings contribute
not only to students' and teachers' ability to learn and to teach, but
also to the health of everyone who spends time in schools and to
teachers' and principals' and other school workers' job satisfaction.
We will hear that environmental education can get children back
into the outdoors where they can get physically fit and learn about
healthy eating and the importance of our natural resources.
And, we will hear that good business practices and good
environmental practices can be one and the same.
I know that many of you have spent the morning so far engaging in
hands-on environmental learning, and I hope that you find this hearing
equally interesting and rewarding.
Again, thank you all for being here.
______
STATEMENT OF MARTIN O'MALLEY, GOVERNOR, STATE OF MARYLAND
Governor O'Malley. Mr. Chairman, thank you very, very much
and the members of the Subcommittee. Welcome to the great State
of Maryland. And to Congressman Sarbanes, thank you very much
for your leadership and for your partnership and for really
being at the forefront of ushering in a new generation of
renewed commitment to the environment.
Mr. Chairman, Dr. Martin Luther King said that the mark of
a true education is ``intelligence plus character.'' And for
those reasons, I think most of the people that look at the
well-rounded education will have to acknowledge that kids do
better or children do better in reading and math when they also
have the ability to study music and to study art and to become
not only students but engaged in science and, in particular,
environmental science.
At its core, true education is about teaching our children
to be responsible citizens of the world. And what better than
Earth Day to discuss ways to impress upon our children the
virtue of service to the common good. It is a time that we set
aside to remind ourselves that all of us must ``think globally
and act locally.''
The No Child Left Behind legislation is designed to help
those of us at the state level who embrace the vision of
education which believes that connecting students with nature
is really an essential part of their development as fully
engaged citizens. It is rooted in the hope and belief that
today's young people will do a better job caring for our
environment and this increasingly smaller planet than, quite
frankly, generations before them have.
When it comes to our children's attention, nature has a lot
of competition these days between the television and the video
games and the other attractions of the so-called modern world.
And in these difficult economic times, as parents are working
two and sometimes three jobs in a single household trying to
make ends meet, it is hard to carve out the time to share the
outdoors with their children. But schools do play and can play
an even greater role in bringing our young people closer to
nature.
As we work at the state level to implement more
environmental education opportunities in our schools, the No
Child Left Inside bill will provide significant assistance by
providing grants to support and counterbalance portions of
modern education that often emphasize too much the testing day
aspects of education without emphasizing the other aspects of a
full education.
Yesterday I signed an executive order, Mr. Chairman, which
directed our state agencies to work in concert with local,
private and nonprofit partners on expanding environmental
education in Maryland.
We hope to be the first state in the union to have an
environmental literacy plan. And the goal is to create what we
call the Partnership for Maryland Children in Nature and charge
it with three main tasks: number one, to develop an
environmental literacy plan that will create a statewide
strategy for implementing environmental education opportunities
in our schools; number two, to connect existing camps and other
outdoor programs to state learning standards and to increase
participation of particularly underprivileged and under-served,
historically under-served students.
We already have some promising initiatives underway.
Beginning this summer, participants will earn an hourly wage
while conducting conservation projects engaging in nature
immersion experiences, developing marketable job skills for our
increasingly greener economy; and, number three, to increase
opportunities for learning and recreation in natural settings.
We are working to connect communities with parks via
walkable trails, working with private and local entities to
create and improve natural play zones in undeveloped pockets of
local parks and neighborhood, and converting asphalt and empty
lawns into nature landscapes.
In conclusion, Mr. Chairman, as we recognize Earth Day, we
must also recognize that the discussions we make in the here
and now will determine what sort of Earth we leave to our
children. We will create a generation of environmental stewards
who realize humankind sacred responsibility to our land, our
air, our water. We have to make the choices now that enable us
to do that.
If we invest in environmental education today, it is our
belief that there will come a time when our young people
graduate high school not only with intellectual abilities but
also with a greater connection that creates greater action for
a much better Earth to leave to our grandchildren and to
theirs.
Thank you very, very much.
[The testimony of Governor O'Malley follows:]
Prepared Statement of Hon. Martin O'Malley, Governor, State of Maryland
Mr. Chairman, Ranking Member Castle, Members of the Subcommittee,
thank you for holding this hearing and welcome to the great State of
Maryland--we are honored to have you here. Before I offer some words in
support of the legislation you are considering today, I wanted to take
a brief moment to recognize Congressman Sarbanes, whose leadership and
partnership have been so critical to our efforts to return Maryland to
progress.
Mr. Chairman, Martin Luther King said that the mark of a true
education is ``intelligence plus character.'' That's really what this
legislation is about. If we truly wish to prepare our children for the
challenges of tomorrow, we must recognize that education can be about
so much more than reading, writing and arithmetic.
At its core, true education is about teaching our children to be
responsible citizens of the world--about instilling them with the ideal
that each individual can make a difference, and that all of us must
try.
There is no better time than Earth Day to discuss ways to impress
upon our children the virtue of service to the common good. Earth Day
is a time we set aside each year to remind one another that all of us
must ``think globally and act locally''--that each of our individual
actions have global consequences, and that there is a unity to spirit
and matter, and the things we do in this life do matter.
Why this legislation matters
Here in Maryland, we recognize the importance of providing
opportunities for citizens to recreate outdoors and we are committed to
getting kids re-connected to nature. There is no better way to
demonstrate the paramount importance of this issue, than to make sure
that all students, regardless of socio-economic status, have the
opportunity to experience our great outdoors.
When students are taught environmental education in schools, we
know that their learning is enhanced, and that they have better problem
solving skills than students who don't use the environment as an
integrated learning context.
Research has shown us that spending time outside of the classroom
for learning during the school day is important to the intellectual,
emotional, and physical health of our children. Moreover, exposing
students to the natural world can improve their overall academic
success, self-esteem, sense of community, personal health and
understanding of the environment.
This issue goes even beyond the scope of environmental education by
considering how children grow and learn, and by looking holistically at
their development. We must provide for their physical, emotional, and
intellectual aptitude.
I believe we must pursue every avenue to reconnect our children
with their natural world before it is too late. Environmental education
increases student engagement in science, improves student achievement
in core subject areas such as reading and math, and increases student
awareness about individual actions they can take to restore the health
of the natural environment. It is incumbent upon us to make a
commitment that will ensure that our children grow to become informed
and responsible stewards of the environment. It is our responsibility
to make sure they are prepared to address future environmental
challenges and opportunities as individual citizens, as members of the
workforce, and as parents who will prepare their own children to live
responsibly in our world.
Our schools must play a special role in bringing our young people
closer to nature because there are increasingly less opportunities for
children to enjoy nature outside of the school setting. In these
difficult economic times, when parents are working harder and
struggling to pay bills, it can be difficult to find the extra time--or
for those who do not live in proximity to open space, the extra money--
to share the outdoors with their children.
Additionally, when it comes to our kids' attention, nature has a
lot of competition these days. Between television, the internet, video
games and other distractions, it is fair to say that going for a hike
or enjoying the outdoors is not always on the top of every child's
wish-list.
As we work at the state level to implement more environmental
education opportunities in our schools, the No Child Left Inside bill
would provide significant assistance through grants and support, and
counterbalancing portions of the No Child Left Behind law which scaled
back hands-on learning opportunities and environmental education.
Maryland's response
Maryland intends to be a national leader in assuring that school-
aged children have opportunities to learn from nature. As a major step
toward this goal, on April 18, 2008, I signed an Executive Order
directing Maryland state agencies to work together, along with local,
private and non-profit partners, to help our kids reconnect with nature
through every avenue available to us. The Executive Order has four key
components that will help us ensure no Maryland child is left inside:
1. Partnership for Children in Nature
The Executive Order establishes a Maryland Partnership for Children
in Nature that again, includes government agencies and NGOs, to oversee
a multitude of state initiatives that will be implemented through
public and private partnerships. This Partnership has been tasked with
ensuring the development and implementation of a number of key new
initiatives; the Partnership will also be responsible for identifying
new funding for these initiatives and for evaluating our progress and
the progress of our children.
2. State-wide Environmental Literacy Plan
The Partnership has been tasked with developing a state-wide
Environmental Literacy Plan to ensure students are exposed to the
natural environment at school.
This plan will examine model outdoor programs, model curriculum and
professional development opportunities for teachers. It will also look
at graduation standards to make sure we are producing environmentally
literate graduates. To accomplish this, we will need to identify
current resources, existing standards, and current model programs that
provide students with meaningful outdoor experiences. As such, we must
make sure that our teachers are prepared to provide these types of
experiences for students by providing them with exemplary professional
development opportunities.
Maryland is fortunate to have some important tools already in
place: We have an Environmental Education By-law, we have the
Chesapeake 2000 Commitment to provide every student with a Meaningful
Watershed or Outdoor Experience, and we have environmental issues
integrated into our learning standards. But, we can and must go
farther. We will track whether or not our students are graduating as
environmentally literate citizens, and we will measure our successes
and improve in areas that need improvement.
3. Increase Opportunities for Outdoor Learning
The Partnership is also tasked with increasing opportunities for
outdoor learning by connecting our Department of Natural Resources
camps and other outdoor programs to state learning standards, and by
engaging at-risk youth in outdoor restoration and recreation
activities.
By offering more opportunities for structured outdoor learning, it
will be easier for teachers to justify attending outdoor programs
during the school day by aligning them with the Voluntary State
Curriculum learning standards. In this way, students are still learning
required content material while being exposed to the outdoors.
Research has shown that exposure to natural areas thorough mentors
dramatically increases stewardship and the willingness to make positive
environmental choices. That is why we aim to increase the availability
of park naturalists and train staff specifically to work with school
groups.
We also aim to increase minority visitation to state public lands.
All too often, minorities don't see themselves as being an important
contributor to environmental issues. However, the decisions that all of
us make on a collective basis have a dramatic impact on the
environment. That is why it is important to make the extra effort to
reach out to those communities that feel disenfranchised or may not
have the resources or background to make informed decisions about the
environment.
Additionally, we are particularly excited about our new Civic
Justice Corps through which we are recruiting court-involved youth to
participate in a summer service program at our State Parks and other
conservation lands. On a parallel track we are also recruiting
disadvantaged youth from our underserved urban communities--beginning
this summer in Baltimore City--to participate in a similar program.
Participants in both programs will earn an hourly wage while they
conduct conservation projects, engage in nature immersion experiences
and develop marketable job skills for our increasingly green economy.
4. Provide Opportunities for Structured and Unstructured
Play
At the state level, we are also looking at ways to provide
opportunities for youth to have structured and unstructured time in
natural settings for both play and learning. As a result of abundant
time spent playing outdoors young people form deep and personal bonds
with nature. This connection inspires and motivates children to become
stewards of the environment, and enriches their physical and mental
well-being.
We want to connect communities with local and state parks through
the development of walkable trails that will encourage visitation to
these areas. By connecting schools to these public lands, we can
encourage outdoor education, environmental clubs, and awareness of the
importance of these open spaces.
By expanding schoolyard habitat programs, we will be converting
asphalt and empty lawns into natural landscapes that serve as dynamic
learning tools for students. Teachers from all subject areas can
utilize these spaces, demonstrating to students that math, science,
language arts, and physical education are not disconnected and discreet
subject areas, but rather integrated topics that enhance their
learning.
We will work with private and local entities to develop policies
and plans that promote natural play areas. This incentive-based program
will provide for the improvement of natural play zones in the
undeveloped pockets of local parks and urban and suburban
neighborhoods.
Conclusion
We must take actions to ensure that young people develop this
stewardship ethic. These actions should manifest themselves through
federal, state, local and private initiatives. The No Child Left Inside
Act of 2007 will make the United States a world leader in developing
this stewardship ethic on a national scale; it will serve as an example
for state jurisdictions to do the same on a localized scale; it will
set the stage for a sustainable future; and most importantly, it will
put the physical, intellectual and spiritual needs of our children
first.
As we recognize Earth Day, we must also recognize that the
decisions we make in the here and now will determine what type of
planet we leave our children. Will we create a generation of
environmental stewards who realize humankind's sacred responsibility to
our land, our water, and our air? Will they treat our planet better
than we did? Will they allow the circumstances they inherit to change
them, or will they feel that desire in their hearts to change their
circumstances?
If we invest in environmental education today, it is our belief
that there will come a time when our young people graduate high school
not only with the intellectual ability to tackle complex environmental
challenges--but also with the will and desire to care for and save our
planet.
Thank you.
______
Chairman Kildee. Thank you very much, Governor. Thank you.
[Applause.]
If I could ask just one question, Governor?
Governor O'Malley. Yes, sir?
Chairman Kildee. In your testimony, you described a
partnership of state and local agencies, businesses, and
nonprofit organizations, many of which I see here today. Can
you discuss the importance of making sure that multiple
stakeholders are involved in these programs?
Governor O'Malley. Yes, sir. You know, we are blessed in
Maryland with the tremendous awareness of our proximity to the
water and how human activities impact the Chesapeake Bay
region. We have a number of great organizations. Many of them
are represented here today, all of whom collectively have a
tremendous awareness of what assets there are in our state that
can be connected to the classroom and to our kids.
For that reason, we want to create a broad-based coalition
of people that we can bring into this effort, whether they are
the river-keeper organizations, whether it is the Chesapeake
Bay Foundation, and our state park networks and friends, like
Parks and People. They are all very important because it is in
the overlaying and overlapping of these organizations and their
experiences that we really create the opportunities and the
multiple opportunities, frankly, for our students not only to
engage in the course of the curriculum offered in school, but,
as importantly, to engage in after-school hours with the
resources that are out there and available to them.
Chairman Kildee. Thank you, Governor.
Mr. Sarbanes, you have a question of your Governor.
Mr. Sarbanes. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. And, again, I
appreciate very much your willingness to conduct this field
hearing. The whole idea here was we wanted to emphasize the
point of bringing children from indoors to the outdoors by
doing it ourselves. And we got incredibly lucky with the
weather. And so whatever you did to pull those strings, I thank
you for that as well.
Governor, your leadership with respect to the environment
is well-known to Marylanders and becoming well-known across the
country. And I thank you for it.
There is a real synergy between what we are trying to do
with No Child Left Inside and what you propose with your
executive order because No Child Left Inside is encouraging
states to develop these environmental literacy plans and
encouraging them by offering funding that can help support
activities behind those. And Maryland is clearly positioning
itself to be at the forefront and to have that kind of
environmental literacy plan when it comes to the federal
government and says ``We need the resources to support it.'' So
it is I think a great example of the partnership between the
federal government and the state government.
My question is with respect to the economic opportunities
that can come from getting the next generation on the cutting
edge with environmental education, science, STEM, as you
mentioned before. But I'm sure as you have attended these
conferences of governors across the country, you are hearing
about the whole green job movement, which is something that
environmental education obviously sets up in a very
constructive way.
So I thought you could maybe just speak to the green job
movement, how you see the economic linkages with environmental
education in the State of Maryland.
Governor O'Malley. Sure. I will do my best. We have the
urgent necessity to find a much more sustainable way to fuel
our economy in the literal sense. And, to that end, there have
been a number of initiatives that have taken place over the
last 14 months in Annapolis. They have put together sort of the
strands of an energy policy that is cleaner and that is greener
and that is also much more broad-minded than simply looking at
what is coming out the nozzle that goes into the gas tank. What
do I mean by that?
We have created a much broader renewable portfolio standard
in our own energy consumption in our state, I believe a goal
now of 20 percent. We have increased the tax incentives for
solar and also geothermal.
We just passed--and I think I am signing tomorrow--is it
tomorrow?--two days, Thursday, our green buildings legislation.
And we are requiring our state buildings that are going to be
built in the future, that they will have, especially our
schools, that they will be built green and that we will strive
for those LEED certifications. So these are all efforts that
dovetail nicely with environmental awareness and environmental
literacy.
In order to create the sort of support and public support
for those initiatives, which, yes, may cost a little more today
but save us over the long term. It is critically important that
our children not only be aware of the civics and that we are a
representative democracy but also aware that the most important
responsibility we have in securing the blessings of liberty is
to be responsible for securing them for future generations. And
it is only in the intersection of those two that you create the
public will I believe to make this transformation to the green
economy.
So they both have to go together. Otherwise our efforts
will be short-lived and will pass and fade as leaders pass and
fade, but if it can become something that is truly inculcated
into every successive generation, then we have the makings for
a transformation that is truly revolutionary and in keeping
with our American traditions.
Mr. Sarbanes. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Chairman Kildee. Thank you. [Applause.]
You have half past. Do you want to yield to Mr. Grijalva?
Mr. Sarbanes. Yes, sir.
Mr. Grijalva. No. Just to thank you, Governor, I appreciate
your leadership very much.
This issue is a tremendously important issue because it is
about the future. And I am happy to join with my colleague Mr.
Sarbanes in pushing that legislation and very appreciative of
your leadership.
Chairman Kildee. Congressman, thank you.
And the gentlelady from Guam, Mrs. Bordallo?
Ms. Bordallo. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. And I,
too, would like to go on record to thank the Governor.
It is so appropriate. It is Earth Day today and for your
state to take this first step and, of course, to my colleague
for introducing this very important piece of legislation.
I have already spoken to him because in reading the
legislation, I noticed it emphasized the states. And I told him
to be sure and add the territories. [Laughter.]
But I think there is so much talk right now about the
global warming, the environment. And it all starts with our
children. They must receive this education to protect our
environment. And what a great way to start.
I want to congratulate you, Governor and all of the
residents of Maryland and, of course, your congressman here,
for having the foresight to get this piece of legislation out.
And I support it.
Governor O'Malley. Thank you.
Chairman Kildee. Governor, thank you very, very much.
Governor O'Malley. Thank you.
Chairman Kildee. And you go with our good thoughts and our
prayers. Thank you very much.
Governor O'Malley. Thanks so much. Thank you, Congressman.
Mr. Sarbanes. Thank you. [Applause.]
Chairman Kildee. The Chair will note the presence of a
quorum for the record. This record will become part of the
permanent record of the Congress of the United States. And 100
years from now, people will be able to read this record in the
Library of Congress. So these words are very important.
Pursuant to Committee rule 12A, any member may submit an
opening statement in writing, which will also be made a part of
the permanent record.
Just a statement of my own. It is especially appropriate
that we are discussing environmental education on the 38th
annual Earth Day. I can recall in 1965 my first year serving in
the state legislature in Michigan coming to Washington to see
how to clean up Lake Erie. And we were actually told by most of
the people that ``It is probably too late to clean up Lake
Erie.''
They were wrong. Once we quit dumping the gunk and all of
the stuff into Lake Erie, it began to clean itself up, not as
clean as we would like it but far cleaner than what it was in
1965. And we learned something from that. We have to be great
custodians of our waters and of our land.
The purpose of Earth Day, then, is to raise awareness to
the environment and to promote ways to protect it. And, as is
the case with so many challenges, the best answer is education.
If you know, you can do.
Our witnesses today will testify about environmental
education from a wide range of perspectives and experiences.
You heard the Governor. We will hear the state superintendent,
a school principal, two professors, and a recent college
graduate who co-founded a biofuel company.
I believe that in the end, they all will testify in support
of the same principles, first that for environmental education
to be effective, we must not treat it as separate from other
areas of our studies or our lives but as an integral part of
each of them.
You know, in the math class, when you go out and take
specimens, you can count how many per square foot or whatever
it may be. You can integrate that into a math class.
In literature, I was a Latin and English teacher. When you
talk about Walden Pond, it might be good to find a pond to go
out and talk about that. It can be integrated into the system.
And I think that should be an important aspect of the bill. And
Mr. Sarbanes' bill lends itself to that type of integration.
If we do not support environmental education, we will quite
literally jeopardize our children's health and our country's
future. We have the opportunity in our generation.
I am 78 years old. What we do will affect me for a few more
years. But those children who were here and are here, it will
affect them for many, many years. We have a responsibility to
them. And they have a great task that we are going to pass on
to them.
I would add environmentally sound school buildings
contribute not only to students' and teachers' ability to learn
and to teach but also to the health of everyone who spends time
in schools and to teachers and principals and other workers'
job satisfaction.
We will hear that environmental education will get children
back into the outdoors, where they can get physically fit and
learn about healthy eating and importance of our natural
resources.
When I was young, we used to have what was called for the
children who were not that healthy fresh air schools. I think
every school can provide a real fresh air element. And just
look at the opportunities you have here in Maryland. Take
students out of the classroom at times. Let them see the assets
we have here in our environment.
And we will hear about good business practices and good
environmental practices. They can be one and the same. There is
no real conflict.
So, again, thank you for being here. Chairman Miller had
hoped to be here today, but he is unable. With that, we will
call up our panel.
At this point before we call up the second panel, I know
you had a question for the Governor, Mr. Sarbanes, but if you
have an opening statement, you may do that at this time.
Mr. Sarbanes. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I will keep it brief
because I know we want to get started on this excellent panel
of witnesses that is coming forward.
I just want to emphasize a couple of things. First of all,
I want to thank the staff here at Patuxent Wildlife Refuge for
all of the logistical support to make this happen. [Applause.]
I have been here a number of times to various events. And
every time it goes off without a hitch. I will knock on wood
since I know we are not quite finished, but I think it will go
off. And the weather, of course, is beautiful today.
I want to thank the Committee staff for working to help
make this possible. Delicia Reynolds on my own staff, who was
the point person, I want to thank her for her efforts.
[Applause.]
And I just wanted to make a point for the students who are
here. And, really, they are what it is all about. And I am
going to be very brief because, Mr. Chairman, I might ask one
student to come up and for 30 seconds say what he did today
just to kind of set the tone for the witnesses that are coming
forward.
To me the most important thing is the mutuality dimension
of caring for our environment. And I particularly think of that
with respect to the Chesapeake Bay. The Chesapeake Bay
Watershed, of course, includes six states and the District of
Columbia.
And I have gone to members of Congress who represent places
in New York and talked to them about how much I care about a
stream or river that is in their district. And they have looked
a little bit perplexed and wondered why. And then I explain
because the watershed begins in your district, as far north, in
fact, as Cooperstown, New York.
So the notion that we can escape the obligation to our
environment by being a little bit more removed is delusional,
really. And the way we are going to save this Bay, the
Chesapeake Bay, the way you are going to save it, the way the
students who are here are going to save it, is by tending to
the needs of our environment, again, right there in their own
backyard.
Somebody handed me this Family Circus cartoon from today. I
didn't see it. But if any of you have not seen it, you should.
It is a picture of these two boys. I don't know their names,
actually, the Family Circus boys. They are sitting under a
tree, chewing on a blade of grass. And one says to the other,
``This is my favorite learning place: Schoolhouse Earth.'' And
so that is the point that we are trying to make here today.
Mr. Chairman, if for one minute we could just have Jonathan
Baker, who is with Edgewood High School, if I could yield 60
seconds of my time? If you want to just come right up here to
the mike and just tell us very briefly--Jonathan is from
Edgewood High School in Harford County--what they were doing
today?
Chairman Kildee. Without objection, Jonathan is recognized.
Mr. Sarbanes. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.
Mr. Baker. Thank you, everybody. I would just like to say
what a great day to be outdoors we have here. I mean, it is
Earth Day. It was a nice day out here.
Today what we were doing in the rivers, we were checking
for the biodiversity that all the animals and plants that we
had out here were. And we were just checking the water quality
of this lake here in an ultimate effort to check the watershed
area of the Chesapeake Bay. And we found tons of different
species of fish and plants and macroinvertebrates, shows that
the water quality is good.
But things can always get better, you know. And
environmental education, really, for me has taken it to the
next level because it provides an authentic experience, where
you are outside and you are actually doing things and getting
the interest that you need and the commitment that you want.
Mr. Sarbanes. Thank you very much. That says it all, Mr.
Chairman. [Applause.]
Chairman Kildee. Thank you very much, Jonathan. Thank you
very much.
I am pleased now to introduce our very distinguished second
panel of witnesses. Dr. Nancy S. Grasmick is Maryland's
Superintendent of the Schools, where she has served since 1991.
Prior to that, she was appointed by then Governor Schaefer as a
Special Secretary for Children, Youth, and Families. Dr.
Grasmick is widely known for her strong commitment to student
achievement, teacher quality, and parent involvement. She has
received numerous awards for her service, including in 2005
having the State Education Department Building renamed in her
honor.
Dr. Oliver Pergams is Conservation Biologist at the
University of Illinois at Chicago, and Director of the Red Rock
Institute. Previously he was a Conservation Associate for the
Chicago Zoological Society. The Red Rock Institute conducts
life science and social science research concerning people's
relationships with nature.
I now yield to Representative Sarbanes to introduce Ms.
Harris, Dr. Lawrence, and Mr. Davidson. And I know you will
also want to add to my introduction of Dr. Grasmick.
Mr. Sarbanes. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Yes, we have introduced Dr. Grasmick. If we were to try to
go through all of the different accomplishments of Dr.
Grasmick, we would have to change this hearing to this
afternoon.
I had the distinct pleasure of working with Dr. Grasmick
for almost eight years at the State Department of Education as
a liaison to the Baltimore City school system. I know of her
many achievements and her leadership.
She is one of the longest, I think the longest now,
appointed superintendents in the country. And her dedication to
children is well-known. On this particular issue with respect
to environmental education, she is at the forefront. I think we
will hear about that in her testimony. So it is a real pleasure
to welcome her here today.
Karen Harris is the principal at Pot Spring Elementary
School, which is not quite in my district but I think draws
students from my district. So I am very pleased to have you
with us today.
She serves on the Board of the Maryland Association of
Environmental and Outdoor Educators. She has been in education
for 37, almost 40 years now, beginning her career as a
kindergarten teacher for Baltimore County in 1971.
In 1990 she was appointed principal of Perry Hall
Elementary. And Perry Hall was one of nine Bay schools in the
Chesapeake Bay Foundation Bay School Project during her tenure
there.
And for the past four years, she has been serving as the
principal at Pot Spring Elementary School. And she has served
as Chair of the Baltimore County Public Schools Principals'
Academy and served in the superintendent's cabinet. We are
looking forward to hearing from you today.
Dr. Lawrence is a very distinguished I would say educator,
environmentalist, physician, and researcher who has taken on
the task of bringing all of these kind of disparate elements
when it comes to the benefits of environmental education and
sensitivity together, particularly as it relates to public
health.
He has founded the Center for a Livable Future at Johns
Hopkins. And he has reached out in many, many directions to
make the point about how good it is for us from a public health
standpoint to be connected to the environment. We are looking
forward to his testimony today.
And the last witness is Sean Davidson, Co-founder of
Maryland Biofuels. We have asked Sean to be here today to
demonstrate the economic opportunities that lie behind
environmental sensitivity. And his awareness, as we will hear,
was raised in high school. And he took that interest, and he
ran with it from a business standpoint and has now founded this
company: Maryland Biofuels. You can tell when you listen to his
testimony and read it that he is somebody who is going to be
part of a larger engine of economic growth that is based in
environmental sensitivity and awareness.
So we are thrilled to have all of the witnesses here today
and look forward to their testimony, Mr. Chairman.
Chairman Kildee. Thank you very much.
I want to welcome all of our witnesses today. For those who
have not testified before this Subcommittee before, let me
explain our lighting system and five-minute rule. The five-
minute rule, by the way, applies to the members up here also.
Everyone, including members, is limited to five minutes of
presentation or questioning. The green light will be
illuminated when you begin to speak. When you see the yellow
light, it means that you have one minute remaining. When you
see the red light, it means that your time has expired and you
need to conclude your testimony. There is no ejection chair,
however. So we will be a little discrete up here.
Please be certain as you testify to turn on and speak into
the microphone in front of you and turn it off when you are
finished.
We will now hear from our first witness, Dr. Nancy S.
Grasmick, Superintendent.
STATEMENT OF NANCY S. GRASMICK, SUPERINTENDENT, MARYLAND STATE
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Ms. Grasmick. Well, good morning and welcome to you, Mr.
Chairman. A very special welcome to Congressman Sarbanes and
certainly all the members of the Committee. I am delighted to
be here today to share information about Maryland's
environmental education program. I know that you know that it
is very vibrant as you have interacted with our teachers and
our outstanding students this morning.
Environmental Education has been required in Maryland since
1990. And it is a major part of the curriculum, and it is a
part of the regulations of the State Board of Education.
We have strongly encouraged our systems to provide every
child with a meaningful watershed experience each year. And the
environmental education program is certainly fuller than that.
Our school systems have been enthusiastic about embracing
this requirement in terms of experiential learning. Today we
have over 390,000 students in the State of Maryland who
participate in environmental outdoor experiences each year.
As was mentioned, we are a part of the Chesapeake Bay 2000
agreement. And the stewardship of that provision called for a
meaningful watershed experience for all students before they
would graduate from high school.
But we decided that that goal was not rigorous enough. And
so we set a more rigorous goal in being a part of that
agreement, and we said that every student had to have a
meaningful outdoor watershed experience in elementary, in
middle, and in high school. And so we have again ratcheted that
up to say every child every single year.
We are fortunate to have in Maryland an outstanding
environmental educator, who oversees the implementation of the
curriculum in each school system. And that is Rebecca Bell, who
was with us this morning.
Maryland has integrated the environmental education program
in our state curriculum. They are integrated. Those concepts
are integrated throughout the curriculum. And we are evaluating
students in the environmental education part of this as part of
our science evaluation in the elementary school, in the middle
school, and in the high school, to ensure those concepts have
been taught and mastered by our students.
We are fortunate in Maryland to have only 24 school
systems. Nine of those school systems have outdoor
environmental programs associated with the school system, with
the jurisdiction. I would like to provide one example. It is
the North Bay experience.
This is a program that was developed by an outstanding
philanthropist in Maryland. We consider it to be so beneficial
to our student that the state provides $1.5 million per year
for students to have a week-long environmental experience in
this facility. It is residential. And its focus is certainly
for children who are economically disadvantaged to have that
opportunity.
The students are prepared for the opportunity to visit this
residential site with their science and their environmental
curriculum prior to going to the facility. And it becomes a
seamless part of the instructional program. There is a deep
focus on scientific skills and processes.
When the students leave that week-long experience, there is
considerable follow-up for them within their classrooms. They
design and implement an environmental project. And then an
outside evaluator, independent evaluator, provides data on how
beneficial this experience has been for the students and what
are the adjustments and improvements necessary.
During their residential week, they also use the
environmental experience to integrate with sort of analogies of
life situations. So as they learn about things like invasive
species during the day, in the evening they identify and
discuss invasive things that might be occurring in their own
lives. And so they use the environment to expand their
repertoire of how this impacts their lives and what are the
knowledges and skills they need to deal with those situations.
I was very fortunate to be selected by the National Academy
of Sciences to serve on Rising Above the Gathering Storm. And
so I am deeply concerned about America's competitiveness in the
stem areas: the science, technology, engineering, and
mathematics. Our environmental education programs are
motivating and engaging for our students at a very early age to
consider and nurture students' interests in these STEM areas.
Recently in conjunction with a conference held with Johns
Hopkins University, we had a panel of students, high school
students, who are choosing as a career path STEM areas. When
asked what motivated them, it was precisely these environmental
experiences that they had as early as elementary school that
they built on as they matriculated through their school
experiences.
I think it is time to take environmental education to a
whole new level, to move beyond just awareness and knowledge to
really action and synthesis. So our slogan is ``Every Child,
Every Year and, Actually, Every Day.''
Thank you very much.
I have a handout for you.
Chairman Kildee. Very good.
Ms. Grasmick. We have just published a book called ``Feet
Wet, Hands Dirty.'' And I would like to provide this for the
Committee.
[The information offered by Ms. Grasmick may be accessed at
the following Internet address:]
http://www.marylandpublicschools.org/MSDE/programs/environment/
______
Ms. Grasmick. Thank you so much.
[The testimony of Ms. Grasmick follows:]
Prepared Statement of Dr. Nancy S. Grasmick, Maryland State
Superintendent of Schools
Good Morning Chairman Kildee, Congressman Sarbanes and members of
the Subcommittee. Welcome to Maryland! I am delighted to share with you
today information regarding the vibrant and robust Environmental
Education program we have in Maryland. You have observed a small piece
of that this morning with some of our wonderful students.
Background
In 1990, the Maryland State Board of Education adopted a State
Regulation (COMAR13A.04.17) requiring the teaching of Environmental
Education in Maryland schools. The Regulation outlines the major
concepts that are to be included in the curriculum and it promotes a
focus on investigating environmental issues. The Regulation does not
mandate an outdoor experience because, in Maryland, and I am sure in
most of your states, decisions relating to specific instructional
activities fall within the purview of local Boards of Education.
However, in our role as the state education agency, we strongly
encourage our school systems to provide every child with a meaningful
watershed experience each year. Our school systems have responded and
they enthusiastically embrace the incorporation of outdoor experiential
learning as an integral part of the curriculum. Students benefit from
learning about their local environment as well as environmental issues
at the state, regional, national and global levels.
Voluntary State Curriculum
The Maryland State Department of Education (MSDE) has developed a
Voluntary State Curriculum that defines what students should know and
be able to do at each grade level. The science curriculum was developed
by professional science educators, is based on national science
standards and was evaluated by Achieve, Inc. Environmental concepts are
integrated throughout the Maryland Voluntary State Curriculum in
environmental science, life and earth systems science, economics,
geography, and public policy and government. The language in the
Environmental Science learning indicators and objectives are adopted
from the North American Environmental Education Association. Our 24
school systems have adopted the Maryland Voluntary State Curriculum.
Additionally, as required by No Child Left Behind, on a statewide
basis, science is assessed once in elementary school, once in middle
school and once in high school.
Further, MSDE provides curriculum review and support for many
environmental organizations from all over the state in order to help
them align their activities with the appropriate curriculum topic at
the appropriate grade level. More importantly, the school systems have
engaged these environmental organizations to provide their professional
expertise to enhance the existing school system curriculum. This
approach has fostered thriving partnerships between school systems and
their environmental education partners and organizations.
Outdoor Environmental Experiential Learning
Currently, 390,000 Maryland students (45% of our public school
population) participate in outdoor environmental learning experiences
each year. Some Maryland school systems have been offering outdoor
environmental education experiences for almost 40 years.
The Stewardship provision of the Chesapeake Bay 2000 Agreement
calls for a ``meaningful watershed experience for all students before
they graduate from high school.'' State Education Agencies in the Bay
watershed are required to report student participation numbers to the
Chesapeake Bay Program as a measure of their progress towards the
fulfillment of the Stewardship Provision. The Chesapeake Bay Program
calculated a participation rate for Maryland of 96%. A separate
independent poll of the student body conducted by a student at the
University of Maryland College Park campus, also found that 96% of the
graduates from Maryland schools reported participating in such an
experience.
Because Maryland schools were already close to the Bay 2000 goal
when the Agreement was signed, lacking only a full experience in
Baltimore City at the time, we set a more rigorous goal for our school
systems--that they provide a meaningful watershed experience at least
once during the elementary school years, once during the middle school
years, and once during the high school years. With Baltimore City's
implementation of an experience for all students in 2006, we are once
again approaching our goal. Therefore, we have recently ratcheted up
our goal once again--to ``Every Child, Every Year''. While ambitious,
this goal has become the rallying cry for Maryland's environmental
education coordinators, teachers and providers.
Maryland students currently participate in outdoor environmental
learning experiences in a variety of ways. :
as part of the regular science curriculum
as part of Maryland's Student Service Learning Program.
Maryland has received a 3-year federal Learn and Serve grant, which
funds community-based environmental experiences for our students. This
program has provided additional grade level experiences in 17 school
systems.
Providers of Outdoor Environmental Experiential Learning
Nine (9) of Maryland's 24 school systems fund and operate
their own outdoor environmental education centers, sponsoring day trips
and residential experiences. School systems that do not have such a
facility, partner with state and federal parks, local community groups
and non-profit providers to use their sites for similar activities.
Maryland is fortunate in that we have a large number of
informal education institutions that provide opportunities for
environmental education, including outdoor experiences. The State
provides funding to many of these institutions through the State-Aided
Educational Institution Program, so that they may offer free services
and/or reduced-price entrance/participation fees to Maryland students.
This program provides funding for 50,000 students to participate in
programs at organizations such as the Maryland Science Center, the
National Aquarium in Baltimore, the Maryland Zoo, and the Chesapeake
Bay Foundation.
The Maryland General Assembly generously appropriated
$1.55 million to fund experiences for sixth graders from across the
state at the acclaimed NorthBay program. This nationally recognized
program provides a week long residential environmental experience for
sixth graders in high need areas. The program is followed by a
stewardship project at the school. The NorthBay program has been
recognized as the first program to model proper implementation of the
issues-based instructional model.
The North Bay Experience
As an example of the many programs we have across the state, I
would like to tell you about the NorthBay program. NorthBay is an
environmental education center located in Cecil County in northeastern
Maryland. The program provides a week long residential experience for
high need students. For many students, it is the first time they travel
away from home.
The NorthBay curriculum, developed with professional educators,
provides a systematic, meaningful watershed experience for sixth
graders from high need school districts. All sixth graders from
Baltimore City, Somerset, Allegany, Caroline, Garrett, and Cecil
counties attend the week long residential program. Title I students
from other school systems attend as well.
The curriculum the students experience is the Grade 6 Voluntary
State Curriculum in Science, so teachers do not have to worry about
time away from their classroom. NorthBay is the classroom. Life science
and environmental science goals are the major focus, however the
experience also integrates earth sciences, chemistry, reading, writing,
and health objectives where appropriate. Scientific skills and
processes form the framework of the experience, and the content pieces
can be changed to address the issues, interests, and needs of the
particular student group. The visit to NorthBay is a seamless part of
the instructional year.
Students begin their experience in school by identifying and
listing school and community issues. They take their issues list to
NorthBay.
At NorthBay, daily instruction is based on a particular skill. For
example, on Day 1, students, no matter what activity they are engaged
in, discuss the qualities of a good scientific question. On subsequent
days, they discuss data collection methods, hypothesizing, using
technology to collect data, data analysis and interpretation, decision-
problem-solving, and communication of results.
Back at school, students review the issues they identified before
their experience, and then choose a problem to address. They apply the
scientific skills learned at NorthBay to design and implement a school
or community project. Technical support for community and school
projects will come from partners within the schools' district.
Students can monitor the data collection throughout the year from
their home school to provide follow-up experiences throughout the year.
Students learn that they can influence the quality, health, and safety
of their own home environment, have the confidence to act, and have the
knowledge and skills to do so.
A major focus of the program is on character development and
leadership, using the students' environmental experiences as analogies
of their life situations. For example, students may learn about
invasive species in their environment, but also reflect on the
``invasives'' in their own lives.
Research on Student Achievement
A longitudinal study being conducted by Dr. Marc Stern, Assistant
Professor, College of Natural Resources, Virginia Tech uses the
NorthBay site to research long-term effects of environmental education
experiences on student achievement, preliminary. The study evaluates
program effectiveness in three major areas: character development and
leadership, environmental responsibility, and academic performance. Dr.
Stern submitted the following summary of the findings to date.
``At the outset of our program, NorthBay contracted with an
experienced external evaluation team from Yale, Virginia Tech, and
Clemson to measure how well we would achieve our goals and to help us
continually improve our programs to maximize the positive impacts we
could have on visiting students and teachers. The first year's
evaluation report (NorthBay Evaluation: Results from 2006-2007 School
Year; Robert B. Powell, Marc J. Stern, and Nicole M. Ardoin; October
2007) investigates our 3 primary goals: Character Development &
Leadership, Environmental Responsibility, and Academic Performance &
School Culture. The evaluation system looks at short-term and longer-
term impacts of our non-formal residential educational programs, which
take place during the school year, upon these goals.
The evaluation of the first year of the program clearly indicates
statistically significant short-term achievements within all three
categories of outcomes. Students exhibited significantly higher scores
on survey elements associated with enhanced character development and
leadership, environmental responsibility, and academic performance
immediately following their NorthBay experiences. Surveys and
interviews with teachers confirmed these gains and revealed additional
positive impacts upon the educators that attend our programs, including
better relationships with their students and the acquisition of new
techniques for better motivating their students.
Follow-up surveys conducted with students three months after their
visits to NorthBay indicated that statistically significant gains in
character development and leadership remained, while most gains related
to environmental responsibility and academic performance faded over
time. Thus, the evaluation revealed the importance of implementing
effective follow-on programs to enhance the positive impacts of our
program. We've used the evaluation results to develop our follow on
program, which we have been actively implementing in over 25 schools
throughout the 2007-2008 year. We've also used the survey and interview
results to improve specific aspects of our program on-site, ranging
from specific educational lessons to the logistical execution of our
programs.
The evaluation system is an ongoing program designed to continually
improve our performance. We regularly use the results to adapt our
programs. We'll also be systematically evaluating the quality of our
follow on programs in an effort to ensure that it, along with all of
our programming, is the best that it can be''.
This research indicates that students need to engage in multiple
experiences in order to develop a stewardship ethic. The study is also
significant in that it uses data to improve, not merely justify,
environmental education program
A second study indicates that students not only need multiple
experiences; they also need a variety of experiences.
Dr. Tom Marcinkowski, Associate Professor of Science and Math
Education, Florida Institute of Technology, a nationally recognized
researcher in environmental literacy and behavior, states that ``We
must talk about the different kinds of curriculum content and
organization, program organization, and modes of teaching * * * because
different kinds of environmental education programs have different
kinds of effects on learning. A 1997 review of research pertaining to
environmental literacy by Volk and McBeth for EPA clearly indicates
that different kinds of programming resulted in effects on different
environmental literacy outcomes. For example, Hungerford et al.'s
issue-and-action instruction and action research affect problem-
solving/issues skills, but not ecological knowledge or environmental
sensitivity. Field instruction at schools sites, nature centers, and
camps can influence ecological knowledge and environmental sensitivity
but have little effect on issue and action skills''.
In light of these studies and others, it is clear that students
need to engage in a variety of activities over a period of many years.
Global Competitiveness
There are larger issues facing us in science education as reflected
in the report Rising Above the Gathering Storm. There is concern that
the United States is not preparing a sufficient number of teachers and
students in science, technology, engineering and mathematics, and this
shortage will affect the United State's ability to compete in an
increasingly competitive global economy. Environmental education
programs are motivating and engaging for both teachers and students and
can be an important part of guiding students to these careers.
In January 2007, Governor Martin O'Malley convened the Base
Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Subcabinet, with Lt. Governor Anthony
Brown as chair, to coordinate planning for the 25,000 new households
and 60,000 new employment opportunities that will accompany the
transformation and realignment of federal military bases in Maryland.
The Maryland State Department of Education is working diligently to
ensure our students are prepared for these challenging jobs.
In light of these significant initiatives, it is time to take
Environmental Education to a new level. Now is the time for us to move
beyond awareness and knowledge to action and synthesis.
Today, our focus has been on Outdoor Experiential Learning. But,
there is much more happening in our local school systems related to
Environmental Education. Environmental education can contribute to
addressing the challenges we face both culturally and academically.
We have an extremely effective program in our State. We have more
work to do.
Every Child, Every Year!
______
Chairman Kildee. Thank you very much, Doctor, for your
testimony.
Ms. Harris?
STATEMENT OF KAREN HARRIS, PRINCIPAL, POT SPRING ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
Ms. Harris. Thank you, Chairman Kildee and Representative
Sarbanes, for holding this hearing about environmental
education.
For the last four years, I have had the privilege of
serving as the principal of Pot Spring Elementary School in
Baltimore County. What I do there wouldn't be possible without
the support of my superintendent and his vision for
environmental education and his inclusion of environmental
education units in our curriculum and his constant support of
what I try to do with my children.
Four years ago I did begin serving as the principal at Pot
Spring. It was my second appointment as a principal in
Baltimore County. And when I arrived at the school--it is a
school of great diversity. We have 580 students in pre-K to 5.
They come from 28 countries and speak 32 languages. We have
children who come from homes of great affluence, and we also
have a large majority of our students who come from government-
subsidized housing and everything in between.
We have very supportive parents. We also have families
because they work several jobs who don't have the opportunity
to be as supportive at home as we would wish that they are, but
they still send us great children.
Our diversity is what makes our school such a rich school,
but it also can lead to some issues as helping all children be
as successful as we would want them to be.
When I took over Pot Spring, our MSA scores had been
relatively flat. The instruction in the school was very
traditional in the fact that most children just sat and did
worksheets, read from books. The teachers are wonderful. They
are still wonderful. But the instruction was very unengaging to
children.
The children who had been taught to understand school were
very successful. Our students that didn't have that support
were not as successful. So our boys underachieved all of our
girls in most of our subtests on MSA, our Maryland State
Assessment and as well our minority populations also were
under-performing.
I knew I had to make some changes when I took over the
school. And I began by changing the culture in the building. I
believe strongly that if you want to change teaching and you
want to change learning, you have to help your teachers and you
have to support your teachers. So I began by looking at how I
could bring some very rich and very powerful professional
development to my staff.
We began integrating the use of the environment as a
context for learning all subjects. It is not a stand-alone. It
needed to be integrated into all subjects.
One of the ways I did that was by bringing in very good
staff development to help improve the teaching, improve the
quality of the work that the students are doing, the learning,
and also improve student achievement. And that is the results.
I knew I had to integrate all three of those things as well as
what we were doing in the school.
All of the staff received extensive training in how to
integrate the use of the environment in everything that they
were doing. That means all of the staff from the school nurse
all the way through the phys. ed. teacher and all the classroom
teachers, the guidance counselor. It has to be a whole school
focus in order for it to be successful.
They are encouraged to expand their teaching and learning
by what we call learning outside the walls. It is not unusual
for me to sit in my office and see students doing math,
measuring the circumference of a tree outside of my office, or
to have children doing perimeters by taking a measuring tool to
actually identify the perimeter of a garden that they are
planning to do.
Children are encouraged to be writing descriptive phrases
by going outside into one of our outside learning areas and
sitting in those environments and actually writing, much more
engaging than putting an apple on a table and say, ``Describe
the apple.''
The students apply their skills of writing to persuade by
writing letters to me, asking permission for them to be able to
plant trees outside of their classroom so that they have shade
and it will cut down on some of the use of the energy in the
building. What an authentic purpose for learning.
The students also write the grants to the Chesapeake Bay
Trust, asking for funding for the projects that they have
identified themselves as issues on our school grounds. The
children have done schoolyard report cards to find out, are
there areas of our school grounds that need improvement, are
there areas inside our school? And children as young as first
graders, kindergartners are working with their teachers to
write grants to the Chesapeake Bay Trust, asking for funding,
another authentic application of their learning where they have
to write anyway. Why not write a grant to important people? It
raises the level of what that writing is going to look like.
During lunchtime you can find children in the back of our
building creating reef balls. They are artificial oyster reef
balls. They are made out of concrete. They work with teachers
to create these. In the spring, they are lowered into the
Chesapeake Bay on the Memorial Stadium Oyster Reef in order to
help improve the Bay, but it is an engaging math activity. It
is team building. Again, it is applying. They are teaching and
learning in authentic ways.
Our first graders, you can go down there. They are learning
to count by tens by counting bottle caps that have been
recycled in our building. They are putting them in bunches of
tens. How many tens make 100? How many hundreds make 1,000?
They could easily be counting with just chips, but we are
recycling. So why not use what we are doing to teach their math
lessons?
The teachers purposely involve the students in exploring
animals and their habitats, both in and outside of their
classroom. There was a natural extension for one of our
Baltimore County STEM units in second grade. It is a unit on
animals. And so one of our groups of teachers became very
passionate about bluebirds and the plight of bluebirds when
they attended the MAEOE conference.
They came back with their enthusiasm about what they had
learned and tried to encourage some children to also learn
about this. The students decided to create a bluebird trial,
with some encouragement from those teachers, to attract
bluebirds to our school grounds.
Last spring, we had a whole day outside, 580 children
outside, for the entire day doing environmental activities. One
of the activities was building bluebird houses. In the fall,
those bluebird houses were put up around our school grounds.
Each class has been assigned to a bluebird house. They
monitor what is going on inside there. They collect the data.
They write about it. They write announcements for our school to
hear what is happening with their bluebirds. We do have some
bluebirds who have landed at Pot Spring.
The teachers have been impressed by the quality of the work
that the students are doing, partially because they are writing
for authentic purposes. They are learning for authentic
purposes. They see reasons for what they need to know.
Why do you need to know perimeter? Well, if you are
planting a garden and you need to know how many board feet of
wood to put around it, you need to know perimeter. Why do you
need to know cubic feet? Well, if you have to find out how much
mulch you need for this garden, you need to know cubic feet. It
makes their leaning meaningful.
Two years ago we began as a school exploring the
qualifications to become a Maryland Green School. It was a
natural outgrowth for what we were already doing. And the
program was chosen for several reasons. It seemed like it would
be actively engaging for the teachers and the students. There
were opportunities for intensive staff development. The project
could be integrated into the curriculum we were already doing
at all grade levels. There wasn't a cost. That was a good
thing. And the program would help our students become stewards
of the environment.
We really liked the idea. The teachers embraced it. The
students embraced it. Yesterday we found out we were going to
be named a Maryland Green School. Woo-hoo! [Applause.]
So we were very excited.
Over the past four years at Pot Spring, I have witnessed
the school's climate and culture change. In addition, there has
been improvement in academic performance. And that is the
reason we are in school to begin with.
Throughout the building, students are collaborating with
their classmates. They are applying teacher feedback to the
work that they are doing. They are investigating real-life
problems in order to make our school and our community and our
school environment a healthier place. Students are learning for
a purpose, and they know what that purpose is.
Our boys have made great improvements by having the
opportunity to learn with hands-on activities. School is not
traditionally made for boys. In addition, we have seen a steady
improvement on our MSA scores for all of our subgroups. In
fact, we have received recognition by the state for continued
and sustained improvement on MSA.
My office referrals have also decreased. And so have our
out-of-school suspensions. My theory is that the children would
much rather be in the outdoors or in their classrooms than
sitting in my office.
Our integration of environmental education has been
successful for a lot of reasons. I have involved all the
stakeholders in the decision-making process along the way. In
addition, I have encouraged the staff to teach differently, and
I have supported their efforts in teaching this way.
The staff have participated in intensive and ongoing
professional development on how to create integrated lessons.
Our master schedule provides many opportunities for them to
work together. Not only do the teachers need time to work
together and learn from each other, but they also need time to
learn and work with experts. So that is provided for them as
well.
Integrating the use of the environment into all subjects
has helped both our students and our teachers make meaningful
connections to what they are doing.
My favorite quote comes from a little third grade boy
sitting in the middle of a garden writing descriptive phrases.
He had not always been an excited learner. And he turned to me,
and he said, ``Mrs. Harris, this is like recess with
learning.'' I think that wraps it up.
Thank you. [Applause.]
[The testimony of Ms. Harris follows:]
Prepared Statement of Karen Harris, Principal, Pot Spring Elementary
School
Thank you, Chairman Kildee and Representative Sarbanes for holding
this hearing about environmental education. I am Karen Harris and I am
the principal of Pot Spring Elementary School in Baltimore County.
It's been four years since I began my tenure as the principal at
Pot Spring Elementary. Pot Spring is a diverse school in the central
area of Baltimore County Maryland. We have over 570 students in grades
Pre-K-5 who come from over 28 countries speaking 32 different
languages. We have children from a wide range of economic backgrounds
as well. Many of our students come from affluent families, however we
also have a large population that come from government subsidized
housing. The diversity of our school is one of the qualities that make
it a great school but it is also one of the challenges in creating a
high performing school for all students.
When I took over the school Pot Spring's Maryland School Assessment
(MSA) scores had been relatively flat for the three preceding years.
The boys underperformed the girls on all subtests of MSA. The minority
population also underperformed the non-minority students. Four years
ago the instruction was very traditional. When I talk about traditional
teaching, I mean, the majority of work was done through reading
textbooks and completing worksheets with teacher directed lessons.
There was very little engaging, authentic or differentiated
instruction. I knew I had to make some changes so I began by changing
the culture. I also knew from experience at a previous school that we
would be most successful with a school-wide instructional focus.
We began integrating the use of the environment as a context for
learning all subjects several years ago as a way to create more
engaging, rigorous and authentic lessons for our students, especially
our most reluctant learners. My goal was to improve staff development
(the teaching), improve the quality of work we ask the students to do
(the learning), and improve student achievement (the results). All of
the staff have received extensive training on how to incorporate the
use of the outdoors to teach math, reading, science, art, language
arts, etc. over the last three years. They are encouraged to expand
their classroom by engaging the students in learning ``Outside the
Walls''. It is not unusual to see students applying their measurement
skills to determine the area needed for a garden. Students can be seen
writing descriptive essays at our outdoor learning classroom. Students
apply their skills of writing to persuade by writing Baltimore County
officials for permission to plant trees outside their classroom in
order to have some shade on a sunny day. The students also write grants
to the Chesapeake Bay Trust asking for funding for their environmental
projects. During lunch time our fifth grade ``Bay Ambassadors'' can be
found behind the school creating Reef Balls that will be lowered into
the Chesapeake Bay to provide an artificial oyster reef. Some of our
youngest students learn to count by tens as they group recycled bottle
caps into packs of 100 for our family environmental night. Another
example of how integrating environmental education into all subjects
has changed our teaching and learning was through a second grade study
of animals and their habitats. The teachers purposely involved the
students in exploring animals and their habitats both in and outside of
their classroom. This was a natural extension to the BCPS STEM unit for
second grade. One group of teachers became passionate about the plight
of the Bluebird after attending the MAEOE conference and began to
inspire the students to discover that our schoolyard was not attracting
many native Maryland birds. The students decided to create a bluebird
trail to attract bluebirds, which are native to the area. During
science they studied bluebird habitats and in social studies they
studied neighborhoods and communities. As part of language arts
students wrote announcements that were read to the entire school about
their project. Last spring at our Earth Day, Every Day celebration, our
entire school worked to build Bluebird nesting boxes among other
environmental activities. The boxes were installed around our school
grounds this year. Each grade has been assigned a nesting box to
monitor, collect the data and write about their findings. The teachers
have been impressed with the quality of the work the students are
producing. The students are motivated and see meaning to their
learning--characteristics of high quality work. They are applying
reading, writing and math skills to an authentic, real life project
that they feel will improve our local environment. We are fortunate in
Baltimore County to have curriculum already in place that makes
integrating environmental education a natural fit. At Pot Spring we
view it as how we do what we do, not an addition to our already full
instructional plate.
Two years ago our school began exploring the qualifications
necessary to become a Maryland Green School as a natural outgrowth of
our integration of environmental education. This program was chosen for
several reasons: it seemed like it would actively engage the teachers
and the students in the learning process; there were opportunities for
staff development that would benefit all teachers no matter what grade
or subject they taught; the project could be integrated into the BCPS
curriculum at all grade levels; a variety of other schools were
involved around the state creating a network for the teachers; there
wasn't a cost to the school; the program would help our students become
stewards for the environment; and we liked the idea of focusing on
environmental science and thought most students would as well. We have
documented all of the environmental projects our students have done for
the past two years. Our hope is that we will be awarded Green School
status this year.
Over the past four years at Pot Spring I have witnessed the
school's climate and culture change. In addition there have been
improvements in academic performance, behavior, and student
achievement. Throughout the building students are collaborating with
their classmates, applying teacher feedback to their writing and
investigating real life problems in order to make our school and
community environment a healthier place. Students are learning with a
purpose and they know what that purpose is.
Our boys have made improvements by having the opportunity to learn
through hands-on engaging work. In addition we have seen steady
improvement in MSA scores for all of our sub groups. Pot Spring has
received recognition from both the county and the state for continued
and sustained improvement on MSA in 3rd-5th grade. Our office referrals
have decreased and so have our out of school suspensions. It appears
that students would much rather be in their classrooms than sitting in
the office. Classroom instruction is so much more engaging and
rigorous.
Our integration of environmental education has been successful for
a variety of reasons. I have involved all stakeholders in the decision
making process along the way. In addition, I have encouraged my staff
to teach differently and supported their efforts to change. The staff
have participated in intensive and ongoing professional development on
how to create integrated lessons. Teams of teachers have been
encouraged to work together to plan integrated lessons. Our master
schedule provides daily opportunities for each grade level to
collaborate. Not only do teachers need time to work together and learn
from each other, but they also need time to work with and learn from
``experts'' so opportunities have been provided for experienced experts
in environmental education to help them on their journey.
Integrating the use of environmental science into all subjects has
helped both our students and teachers make meaningful connections to
their learning. When students understand a real life purpose and
application for their learning, they tend to put more effort into their
work.
______
Chairman Kildee. I have served in the Congress for 32 years
now. And I have traveled throughout the country, visited
hundreds of schools. And when I find a truly excellent school,
the one constant I find in those truly excellent schools is a
strong creative, capable, and caring principal. And you
illustrate that very well. [Applause.]
Dr. Pergams?
STATEMENT OF OLIVER PERGAMS, CONSERVATION BIOLOGIST, DEPARTMENT
OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO
Dr. Pergams. Chairman Kildee, Congressman Sarbanes,
honorable members of the Subcommittee, it is an honor for me to
appear before you today to share our research on the declining
percentage of Americans visiting nature.
I will share my thoughts on what this trend means for our
children's health and for their environmental attitude as
adults. I will emphasize research, showing the most effective
way to instill an appreciation for nature is through hands-on
nature experiences, incorporated into elementary environmental
education. Lastly, I will speak briefly on resulting economic
benefits. First I will speak on the declining percentage of
nature-based recreation.
Our research published February 2008 shows that people in
the U.S. and other developed nations are spending far less time
in nature than ever before. With colleague Dr. Patricia
Zaradic, I tested 16 measures of nature participation related
to visitation of various types of public lands in the U.S. and
other countries; number of various types of game licenses
issued; and amount of time spent camping, backpacking, or
hiking.
The U.S. activities with the greatest participation were
visits to U.S. state parks, U.S. national parks, and U.S.
national forests. All three visitation rates are in downtrends
and are declining on average between 1 percent and 3 percent
per year.
Now, during this testimony, I am going to give you three
take-home messages. And this is the first. The longest and most
complete of the 14 U.S. nature recreation data sets show that
ongoing declines in nature participation, typically began
between 1981 and 1991, are losing on average over one percent
per year and so far have lost between 18 and 25 percent to the
present date. There is no longer any real doubt that the
percentage of people involved in nature-based recreation is in
long-term decline.
Next I would like to talk about the benefits of nature-
based environmental education. The first benefit I would like
to talk about is environmental attitude. Our 2007 review of
related research suggests that direct contact with nature,
especially as children, is the most critical influence on later
attitude toward the environment.
Family vacations and time with family and other mentors
outdoors are a major influence on later environmental attitude.
Environmental education is also important but actually to a
lesser degree than direct actual experiences of natural areas.
It is ideal when exposure to nature occurs in the presence
of a knowledgeable mentor or teacher. Such a teacher answers
questions and helps to convert the rich experience of nature to
knowledge and increased curiosity in the student. Direct
contact with wild nature, such as hiking, playing in the woods,
camping, hunting, or fishing, and, to a lesser extent,
domesticated nature, by which I mean things such as gardening
or pet care, before age 11 has been shown to be particularly
important in shaping environmental attitudes and behaviors in
adulthood.
This research is also very important to today's
proceedings. It means that--and this is the second take-home
message--while classroom environmental education of children is
important and absolutely necessary, incorporating as many
hands-on nature experiences as possible is what is really
crucial. These experiences should be with wild nature if at all
possible and with domestic nature as a distant second choice.
Next I would like to talk about the effects of nature, or
lack of nature on children's development. Three ways of
experiencing nature have been described. Direct experience is
undirected play in nature; for example, in a forest,
neighborhood park, backyard, or even a vacant lot. Indirect
experience includes thing like zoos, nature centers, aquariums,
and museums. Vicarious experience is without any physical
contact with nature; for example, art, photographs, movies,
videos, and webcams.
Direct experience with nature plays the most significant
role in children's cognitive and evaluative development. Direct
experience of nature offers a multitude of continuously
changing sights, sounds, smells, and touches that promote a
wide range of adaptive and problem-solving responses,
alertness, and attention.
The more structured indirect experiences of nature do not
require the same level of spontaneous engagement and do not
have the same developmental benefits. The least engaging and
least spontaneous type of nature contact is vicarious
experience through electronic media.
This research is also very important to today's
proceedings. It means that--and here is the last take-home
message--the nature experiences incorporated should be direct
experiences if at all possible; with indirect experiences
second choice; and vicarious experiences, ``electronic
experiences,'' a very distant third choice indeed. The presence
of a teacher or mentor in any case is still necessary.
Just as exposure to nature has positive effects, lack of
exposure has negative effects. Children under 13 living in the
United States spend on average only about half an hour of
unstructured time outdoors each week.
Research suggests that this lack of nature exposure is
leading to many developmental problems. For example, five-year-
olds limited in playing outdoors exhibited poorer social,
behavioral, and motor skills and had fewer playmates than
children who played more outdoors.
Children attending a day care center surrounded by
orchards, pastures, and woodlands and where the children went
outdoors every day, regardless of the weather, had better motor
coordination and greater attention capacity than did children
who attended an urban day care center surrounded by tall
buildings.
Children who moved to housing with more nature nearby
tended to have higher levels of cognitive functioning and focus
than children who moved to housing with less nature. Activities
conducted in natural green settings tend to lower the symptoms
of children with ADD, ADHD, and raise self-esteem.
Lastly, I would like to touch upon the economic benefits of
nature-based environmental education. I should probably mention
that science is a second career for me. My first career was in
the financial markets and beginning as a bank foreign exchange
trader and ending as owner of a commodities trading firm.
We have seen that elementary environmental education and
hands-on nature experiences for children will increase interest
in nature and affirm environmental attitudes. This, in turn,
will have enormous and beneficial impacts on our use of non-
renewable resources and on our economy.
The reduction in health costs relating to increased outdoor
exercise will be substantial. Increased interest in nature
would raise attendance at our great public lands and reverse
the negative trend in U.S. nature-based tourism in general.
In addition, we must consider that a downward trend in the
quality of science education has emerged as a national crisis.
The percentage of graduate students in science and engineering
has declined steadily since 1993. Meanwhile, imports of science
and engineering brain power are up almost 40 percent. We must
reverse this trend in order to remain competitive in a global
economy.
In closing, I recognize that implementing nature-based
environmental education will not be easy and will take strong
political will and courageous leadership, but I firmly believe
that our efforts if we succeed will pay rich dividends for our
nation's future generations.
Thank you again for this opportunity to testify. I welcome
your questions later on.
[The testimony of Dr. Pergams follows:]
Prepared Statement of Dr. Oliver R. W. Pergams, Director, Red Rock
Institute, Inc.; Conservation Biologist, University of Illinois at
Chicago
Chairman Kildee, Congressman Sarbanes, honorable members of the
Subcommittee, and Governor O Malley: my name is Dr. Oliver Pergams. I
am a Director of Red Rock Institute, a scientific research foundation,
and am a conservation biologist at the University of Illinois at
Chicago. Science is a second career for me: my first career was in the
financial markets, beginning as a bank foreign exchange trader and
ending as owner of a commodities trading company. I hope therefore to
bring a little broader perspective.
It is an honor for me to appear before you today to share our
research on the declining percentage of Americans visiting nature. I
will share my thoughts on what this trend means for our children's
health, and for their environmental attitude as adults. I will
emphasize research showing the most effective way to instill an
appreciation for nature is through hands-on nature experiences,
incorporated into elementary environmental education. Lastly, I will
speak briefly on resulting economic benefits.
I. Declining Percentage of Nature-Based Recreation
Our research published Feb. 2008 shows that people in the US and
other developed nations are spending far less time in nature than ever
before.\1\ This research is included as an attachment to my written
testimony. With colleague Dr. Patricia Zaradic, I tested 16 measures of
nature participation related to visitation of various types of public
lands in the US and other countries; number of various types of game
licenses issued; and amount of time spent camping, backpacking, or
hiking. The US activities with the greatest participation were visits
to US State Parks, US National Parks, and US National Forests. All
three visitation rates are in downtrends and are declining on average
between 1% and 3% per year.
The longest and most complete of the 14 US nature recreation
datasets show that ongoing declines in nature participation typically
began between 1981 and 1991, are losing on average over 1% per year,
and have lost between 18% and 25% to date. There is no longer any real
doubt that the percentage of people involved in most nature-based
recreation is in long-term decline.
II. Benefits of Nature-Based Environmental Education
The first benefit I'd like to talk about is environmental attitude.
Our 2007 review of related research\2\ suggests that direct contact
with nature, especially as children, is the most critical influence on
later attitude toward the environment.\3,4\ Our article is included as
a second attachment. Family vacations and time with family and other
mentors outdoors are a major influence on later environmental attitude.
Environmental education is also important, but to a lesser degree than
direct actual experience of natural areas.\4,5\ It is ideal is when
exposure to nature occurs in the presence of a knowledgeable mentor or
teacher. Such a teacher answers questions and helps to convert the rich
experience of nature to knowledge and increased curiosity in the
student. Direct contact with wild nature (such as hiking, playing in
the woods, camping, hunting, or fishing), and (to a lesser extent)
domesticated nature (such as gardening or pet care), before age 11, has
been shown to be particularly important in shaping environmental
attitudes and behaviors in adulthood.\4\ This research is very
important to today's proceedings: it means that:
While classroom environmental education of children is important
and absolutely necessary, incorporating as many hands-on nature
experiences as possible is crucial. These experiences should be with
wild nature if at all possible, and with domestic nature as second
choice.
Next I'd like to talk about the effects of nature, or lack of
nature, on children's development. Three ways of experiencing nature
have been described.\6\ Direct experience is undirected play in nature,
for example in a forest, neighborhood park, backyard, or even a vacant
lot. Indirect experience includes zoos, nature centers, aquariums, and
museums. Vicarious experience is without actual physical contact with
nature; for example art, photographs, videos, and webcams.
Direct experience with nature plays the most significant role in
children's cognitive and evaluative development. Direct experience of
nature offers a multitude of continuously changing sights, sounds,
smells, and touches that promote a wide range of adaptive and problem
solving responses, alertness, and attention. The more structured,
indirect experiences of nature do not require the same level of
spontaneous engagement and do not have the same developmental benefits.
The least engaging and spontaneous type of nature contact is vicarious
experience through electronic media. This research is also very
important to today's proceedings: it means that:
The nature experiences incorporated should be direct experiences if
at all possible, with indirect experiences second choice, and vicarious
experiences a very distant third choice. The presence of a teacher or
mentor is still necessary.
Just as exposure to nature has positive effects, lack of exposure
has negative effects. Children under 13 living in the United States
spend on average only about half an hour of unstructured time outdoors
each week.\7\ Research suggests that this lack of nature exposure is
leading to many developmental problems. For example, 5-year-olds
limited in playing outdoors exhibited poorer social, behavioral, and
motor skills and had fewer playmates than children who played more
outdoors.\8\ Children attending a day care center surrounded by
orchards, pastures, and woodlands (and where the children went outdoors
every day regardless of weather) had better motor coordination and
greater attention capacity than did children who attended an urban day
care center surrounded by tall buildings.\9\ Children who moved to
housing with more nature nearby tended to have higher levels of
cognitive functioning and focus than children who moved to housing with
less nature.\10\ Activities conducted in natural green settings tended
to lower the symptoms of children with ADD/ADHD and raised self-
esteem.\11\
III. Economic Benefits of Nature-Based Environmental Education
We have seen that elementary environmental education and hands-on
nature experiences for children will increase interest in nature and
affirm environmental attitudes. This in turn will have enormous and
beneficial impacts on our use of nonrenewable resources and on our
economy. The reduction in health costs relating to increased outdoor
exercise will be substantial. Increased interest in nature would raise
attendance at our great public lands, and reverse the negative trend in
US nature-based tourism in general.
In addition, we must consider that a downward trend in the quality
of science education has emerged as a national crisis. The percentage
of graduate students in science and engineering has declined steadily
since 1993. Meanwhile, imports of science and engineering brainpower
are up almost 40 percent. We must reverse this trend in order to remain
competitive in the global economy.
IV. Closing
In closing, I recognize that implementing nature-based
environmental education will not be easy and will take strong political
will and courageous leadership. But I firmly believe that our efforts,
if we succeed, will pay rich dividends for our nation's future
generations.
Thank you again for this opportunity to testify. I welcome your
questions on these topics.
attachments
1. Pergams, O. R. W. and P. A. Zaradic. 2008. Evidence for a
fundamental and pervasive shift away from nature-based
recreation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA
105:2295-2300.
http://www.pnas.org/content/105/7/2295
2. Zaradic, P. A. and O. R. W. Pergams. 2007. Videophilia: Implications
for childhood development and conservation. Journal of
Developmental Processes 2:130-144. http://
www.redrockinstitute.org/uploads/videophilia2.pdf
endnotes
\1\ Pergams, O. R. W. and P. A. Zaradic. 2008. Evidence for a
fundamental and pervasive shift away from nature-based recreation.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 105:2295-2300.
\2\ Zaradic, P. A. and O. R. W. Pergams. 2007. Videophilia:
Implications for childhood development and conservation. Journal of
Developmental Processes 2:130-144.
\3\ Bogeholz, S. 2006. Nature experience and its importance for
environmental knowledge, values and action: Recent German empirical
contributions. Environmental Education Research, 12, 65 84.
\4\ Wells, N. M., & Lekies, K. S.(2006. Nature and the life course:
Pathways from childhood nature experiences to adult environmentalism.
Children, Youth and Environments, 16, 1 24.
\5\ Chawla, L. 1999. Life paths into effective environmental
action. Journal of Environmental Education, 31, 15 26.
\6\ Kellert, S. R. 2002. Experiencing nature: Affective, cognitive,
and evaluative development in children. In P. H. Kahn, Jr. & S. R.
Keller (Eds.), Children and nature: Psychological, sociocultural, and
evolutionary investigations. (pp. 117 152). Cambridge, MA: The MIT
Press.
\7\ Hofferth, S., & Sandberg, J. 2001. Changes in American
children's time, 1981 1997. In S. L. Hofferth & T. J. Owens (Eds.),
Children at the millennium: Where have we come from, where are we
going? Oxford, England: Elsevier Science.
\8\ Huttenmoser, M. 1995. Children and their living surroundings:
Empirical investigations into the significance of living surroundings
for the everyday life and development of children. Children's
Environments, 12, 403 413.
\9\ Grahn, P., Martensson, F., Lindblad, B., Nilsson, P., & Ekman,
A. 1997. Ute pa dagis. Stad and Land, Nr. 145 [Outdoor daycare. City
and country]. Hassleholm, Sverige: Norra Skane Offset.
\10\ Wells, N. M. 2000. At home with nature: The effects of nearby
nature on children's cognitive functioning. Environment & Behavior, 32,
775 795.
\11\ Taylor, A. F., Kuo, F. E., & Sullivan, W. C. 2001. Coping with
ADD: The surprising connection to green play settings. Environment and
Behavior, 33, 54 77.
______
Chairman Kildee. Thank you, Dr. Pergams. [Applause.]
Dr. Lawrence?
STATEMENT OF ROBERT LAWRENCE, DIRECTOR, CENTER FOR A LIVABLE
FUTURE, JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Mr. Lawrence. Chairman Kildee, Congressman Sarbanes, and
members of the Subcommittee, I am pleased to be in this
beautiful setting on Earth Day to speak about the promise of
the No Child Left Inside Act.
As Congress Sarbanes graciously said in his introduction, I
am a professor of environmental health sciences at the Johns
Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and direct the Center
for a Livable Future, whose mission is ``to advance an
ecological perspective in reducing threats to the health of the
public and to promote policies that protect health, the global
environment, and the ability to sustain life for future
generations.''
Critical to this mission is the education of our children
to become stewards of the environment, to develop a healthy
relationship with the natural world, and to stimulate their
minds and bodies through physical activity, exposure to the
wonders of nature, and creative and spontaneous play in safe,
natural outdoor settings.
The No Child Left Inside Act will provide the resources
necessary to support programs of environmental education. We
are in the midst of an epidemic of childhood obesity that puts
our children at risk for the first time in our nation's history
to have a shorter life expectancy than their parents.
Many factors contribute to this epidemic. The normal
balance of energy consumed in food and drink and energy
expended in physical activity has been upset by sharp decreases
in physical education and outdoor play, concerns about the
safety of children walking or biking to school, increased time
watching television or playing computer games, and the
consumption of processed foods high in fats and sugars.
Increasing opportunities for regular exercise is crucial to
preventing childhood obesity. One of the benefits of No Child
Left Inside will be the physical activity associated with
nature walks, outdoor play, and field trips to learn
environmental stewardships, such as those we have seen today.
The dramatic increase in childhood obesity started soon
after the first Earth Day in 1970 and shows no signs of
leveling off. Obesity among 2 to 19-year-olds has increased
from 5 percent to more than 15 percent in the past 30 years.
About two-thirds of our children no longer participate in any
organized physical activity. And about one-quarter have no free
time physical activity.
Many suburban developments lack open green spaces for free
time play. And the very nature of the street design with
curving roads and no sidewalks compels parents to drive their
children for play dates and other events. Gone are the acres of
woodlot at the end of the road where children once explored the
natural environment and engaged in hours of spontaneous play.
This year for the first time in human history, half of the
world's population, 3.3 billion people, will live in urban
environments. And it is the rare cityscape that has adequate
parkland and natural settings for children to explore.
Environmental education linked to exploration of nature
stimulates increased physical activity. Playground activity and
active exploration of nature on field trips will increase the
energy expenditure while providing other physical and mental
benefits.
Time spent in natural settings also provides emotional,
social, and cognitive gains for children. Access to green
spaces for play and even having views of green settings
enhances peace, self-control, and self-discipline among inner-
city youth. For rural children, exposure to nature reduces
stress, increases their ability to focus, and improves
cognitive abilities.
Nature is important to healthy development in children in
every major area of growth: intellectual, social, spiritual,
and physical. Play and learning in nature is especially
important for developing capacities for creativity, problem-
solving, and intellectual development.
Finally, our children will inherit a world facing grave
environmental challenges, those of global climate change,
enough fresh water to meet the needs of people, agriculture,
and industry, and adequate food supply, and preservation of
biodiversity. We must educate a new generation of
environmentally literate citizens to maintain the fragile web
of life.
The Paleolithic record shows an average species loss over
eons of three to four per year. We are now losing about 1,000
species per year, a number that is likely to rise with
continued destruction of natural habitats and global climate
change.
The need is urgent for our children to benefit from No
Child Left Inside not just for the immediate health benefits
described above but for the long-term benefits of raising a new
group of intelligent, curious, and committed stewards of the
natural world.
Thank you very much.
[The testimony of Dr. Lawrence follows:]
Prepared Statement of Robert S. Lawrence, M.D., Director, Center for a
Livable Future, and Professor of Environmental Health Sciences, Johns
Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
``Nature-deficit disorder is not an official diagnosis but a
way of viewing the problem, and describes the human costs of
alienation from nature, among them: diminished use of the
senses, attention difficulties, and higher rates of physical
and emotional illnesses. The disorder can be detected in
individuals, families, and communities.''
--Richard Louv, Last Child in the Woods:
Saving Our Children from Nature-Deficit Disorder
The key messages for policy makers in supporting the Sarbanes-Reed
No Child Left Inside Act are:
1. Support programs for environmental education and teacher
training;
2. Provide additional funding to states that develop environmental
literacy plans for grades K-12;
3. Re-establish the Office of Environmental Education within the
U.S. Department of Education to provide leadership and oversight of
environmental education activities; and
4. Authorize the Secretary of Education to award competitive
matching grants to nonprofit organizations, states, and local education
agencies for activities to improve and support environmental education
that include: 1) advancing content and achievement standards, 2)
developing or disseminating innovations or model programs, 3) research,
and 4) creating new funding sources.
Introduction
I am very pleased to be here today in this beautiful setting and on
the 38th anniversary of the first Earth Day to speak about the promise
of the No Child Left Inside Act. My name is Robert Lawrence, and I am a
professor of Environmental Health Sciences at the Johns Hopkins
Bloomberg School of Public Health. I also serve as the director of the
Center for a Livable Future, an interdisciplinary center devoted to
research, education, advocacy, and community engagement to address the
interactions among the environment, food production, diet, and human
health that are all elements of a single complex ecosystem. Our mission
is ``* * * to advance an ecological perspective in reducing threats to
the health of the public and to promote policies that protect health,
the global environment and the ability to sustain life for future
generations.''
Nothing is more critical to achieving this mission than the
education of our children to become stewards of the environment, to
develop a healthy relationship with the natural world, to stimulate
their minds and bodies through physical activity, exposure to the
wonders of nature, and opportunities for creative and spontaneous play
in safe, natural outdoor settings, and for some to be inspired to seek
careers related to protecting and preserving our natural world for
future generations. The No Child Left Inside Act will provide the
resources necessary to develop and support programs of environmental
education and help reconnect our children with nature.
Public Health Aspects of Environmental Education
Childhood obesity epidemic:
We are in the midst of an epidemic of childhood obesity that
threatens to produce a generation of Americans who will, for the first
time in our history, have a shorter life expectancy than their parents.
There are many factors contributing to this epidemic of overweight and
obesity among our children and youth and in the adult population. The
normal healthy balance of energy consumed in food and drink and energy
expended in physical activity has been interrupted by sharp decreases
in physical education and outdoor play in our education system,
alterations in the built environment, the increasing reliance on labor-
saving devices, concerns about safety for children walking or biking to
school that places them in buses and cars, increase in time spent
watching television or playing computer games, increased consumption of
processed foods high in fats and sugars, and the dramatic increase in
high fructose corn syrup in soft drinks and juices.
Measures directed at increasing caloric expenditure through regular
exercise are crucial elements to preventing childhood obesity and
helping children who are currently overweight or obese achieve a
healthy weight as measured by age-adjusted body mass index (BMI). One
of the benefits of No Child Left Inside will be the additional physical
activity associated with nature walks, outdoor play, and participation
in environmental stewardship learning exercises such as those sponsored
by the Chesapeake Bay Foundation and other environmental groups.
The dramatic and alarming increase in the rate of childhood obesity
started soon after the first Earth Day and shows no signs of leveling
off. As illustrated in Figure 1 and summarized in Table 1, the
percentage of obese 2- to 19-year-olds has more than doubled in the
past 30 years (as defined by the 95th percentile for body mass index or
BMI by age).
TABLE 1: WHAT PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN IN THE U.S. ARE OBESE?
[CDC, Overweight Prevalence, 2007]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Age 1972-1974 2003-2004 Percent Change
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2-5 years.................................................... 5.0% 13.9% +8.9%
6-11 years................................................... 4.0% 18.8% +14.8%
12-19 years.................................................. 6.1% 17.4% +11.3%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]
A number of factors contribute to the energy imbalance responsible
for these dramatic increases in childhood obesity. About 62 percent of
children do not participate in any organized physical activity and 23
percent do not participate in any free-time physical activity. (CDC,
2003) The percentage of children who live within a mile of school and
who walk or bike to school has declined nearly 25 percent in the past
30 years. Barely 21 percent of children today live within one mile of
their school. (Ogden, 2006) While 71 percent of adults report that they
walked or rode a bike to school when they were young, only 22 percent
of children do so today. (Beldon 2003)
Suburban sprawl has been accompanied by the design of developments
that frequently lack sidewalks or open green spaces for free-time play,
and the very nature of the street design with curving roads, lollypop
cul-de-sacs, and no sidewalks makes parents feel compelled to transport
their children by car for play dates and other social interactions.
Gone are the acres of woodlot at the end of the road where children
once explored the natural environment, built tree-houses, and engaged
in hours of spontaneous play. This year for the first time in human
history half of the world's population will live in urban environments,
and it is the rare cityscape that has adequate parkland and natural
settings for children to explore. (UNFPA, 2007) Over 90 percent of
parents say that safety is their biggest concern when making decisions
about whether to allow their children to engage in free play outside.
(Bagley, 2006) The result of these changes in the built environment and
parental concerns about safety is that children now play predominantly
at home where their activities are monitored and controlled by adults
in contrast to the play of children a generation ago. Only 3 percent of
children today have a high degree of mobility and freedom in deciding
how and where to play. (Tandy, 1999)
More and more of the time children once spent playing outdoors is
now spent in front of a television set or a computer game. In 2003 the
Kaiser Family Foundation found that 65 percent of children ages 8 and
older had a television set in their bedroom, and 42 percent of children
lived in a home where ``the TV set is on * * * most of the time, even
when no one is watching.'' (Kaiser Family Foundation, 2003) In 58
percent of U.S. homes, the TV is usually on during mealtimes.
Integrating environmental education linked to subject matter in the
classroom to exploration of the natural environment can serve as an
important stimulus to increase physical activity. A combination of
playground or gymnasium physical activity with expanded opportunities
for active exploration of nature on field trips and in the school
environment will increase energy expenditure while providing other
benefits discussed later. A recent review of childhood obesity
prevention co-sponsored by the Center for a Livable Future and the
Department of Health, Behavior and Society at the Bloomberg School of
Public Health lead to the following recommendations about the school
environment:
Engage students in at least 30 minutes of moderate to
vigorous physical activity each day.
Encourage the consumption of healthy foods by increasing
the number of healthy options, pricing those options competitively, and
reducing the number of unhealthy foods offered.
Provide high-quality health education in areas such as
nutrition and physical fitness.
Changes are needed for the built environment and for neighborhoods
as well. Again, environmental education is an essential component of
helping children appreciate nature and find pleasure and stimulation in
active play and exploration of the outdoors. The following
recommendations address changes needed at the neighborhood level:
Make communities more walk-able and bike-able.
Increase access to healthy foods. (Center for a Livable
Future, 2007)
The Meatless Monday and Eat Healthy Monday campaigns of the Center
for a Livable Future are part of a broader Healthy Monday campaign to
use the first day of the week as a motivator to change behavior and
lower risk by eating healthier foods, exercising more, quitting the use
of tobacco, and adopting other health promoting behaviors. School lunch
(and in a growing number of schools, breakfast programs) are ideal
venues for introducing Eat Healthy Monday menus and linking these to
respect for the land and the environment. The rise of industrial
agriculture since World War II has had a profound impact on the number
of animals raised in factory settings with devastating impact on the
environment, discharge of excess nutrients into watersheds, and the
emergence of antibiotic resistant bacteria. These aspects of
environmental education can help reinforce the value of eating a
healthy diet composed of foods produced in a sustainable way.
The linkage to access to healthy foods includes learning how our
food is produced. Now that less than 2 percent of the U.S. population
works in the agricultural sector, most children are ignorant of the
sources of the food they eat. Environmental education can include
learning about the natural cycle of plants and animals, including those
that we consume in our diet. The role of community gardens, school
gardens, and kitchen gardens should be integrated in environmental
education to help children understand the source of healthy foods in
contrast to processed foods and snacks while they expand their
knowledge of the living world.
Other public health benefits of environmental education:
As important as the benefits of physical activity associated with
environmental education and increasing time spent in natural settings
are the emotional, social, and cognitive benefits for children. Many
studies conducted in recent years show a range of benefits for children
when they spend more time outdoors. Taylor and her colleagues found
that children with attention-deficit disorder (ADD) benefited from more
exposure to nature--the greener a child's everyday environment, the
more manageable are the symptoms of ADD. (Taylor, 2001) Taylor also
observed that access to green spaces for play, and even having views of
green settings, enhances peace, self-control, and self-discipline among
inner-city youth, especially among girls.
For children living in rural areas Wells and Evans observed that
exposure to green plants and natural vistas reduces stress. The
reduction in stress was greatest in the settings where there are the
greatest number of plants, green views, and access to natural play
areas. (Wells, 2003) In an earlier study Wells observed that proximity
to nature, access to views of nature, and daily exposure to natural
settings increases the ability of children to focus and improves
cognitive abilities. (Wells, 2000) In other words, by expanding
environmental education and increasing exposure to natural settings, No
Child Left Inside has the promise of improving learning in all subject
areas such as those emphasized by current provisions of the No Child
Left Behind legislation.
Nature is important to healthy development in children in every
major area of growth--intellectual, social, spiritual, and physical.
Play and learning in nature is especially important for developing
capacities for creativity, problem-solving, and intellectual
development. We need, therefore, to alter our modern built environment
to maximize opportunities for children to have contact with nature.
(Kellert, 2005) Other investigators describe the benefits of free and
un-structured play in the out-of-doors, noting that children will be
smarter, better able to get along with others, healthier, and happier.
(Burdette, 2005)
Environmental education provided by schools can and should be
supplemented by the child experiencing nature in the company of a
family member or trusted adult. Chawla states that a positive, direct
experience with nature and sharing that experience with a parent,
grandparent or trusted adult are the two factors that most contribute
to individuals choosing to take action to benefit the environment as
adults. (Chawla, 2006)
At the school environment level Bell and Dyment observed that
children who experience school grounds or play areas with diverse
natural settings are more physically active, more aware of good
nutrition, more creative, and more civil to one another. (Bell, 2006)
Outdoor experiences for teens result in enhanced self-esteem, self-
confidence, independence, autonomy, and initiative with persistence of
these traits through many years. (Kellert, 1998) After excluding other
variables, a study of students in California and nationwide
demonstrated that schools that use outdoor classrooms and other forms
of nature-based experiential education produce significant student
gains in social studies, science, language arts, and math. One recent
study found that students in outdoor science programs improved their
science testing scores by 27 percent. (American Institutes for
Research, 2005)
Bell and Dyment observed that children in schoolyards with both
green areas and manufactured play areas engaged in more creative forms
of play in the green areas and also played more cooperatively. (Bell,
2006) They also show more advanced motor fitness, including
coordination, balance, and agility. (Fjortoft, 2001) Play is more
diverse in natural environments with imaginative and creative play that
fosters language and collaborative skills. (Moore, 1997; Fjortoft,
2000) Play in diverse natural environments reduces or eliminates anti-
social behavior such as violence, bullying, vandalism, and littering
and reduces school absenteeism. (Coffey, 2001; Malone, 2003; Moore,
2000) A number of other studies confirm these benefits of having
children spend more time out-of-doors. These benefits of better
psychological well being, superior cognitive functioning, fewer
physical illnesses, and more rapid recovery from illness apply to
adults as well. But the benefits of experience in nature for children
are more profound because of the greater plasticity and vulnerability
of the young. (Wells, 2003)
Fostering Environmental Stewardship
The world that our children will inherit contains enormous
environmental challenges. Among the most important ones are global
climate change; sufficient supplies of water to meet the needs of
people, agriculture, and industry; adequate food supply; and
preservation of biodiversity. Our children must learn the knowledge and
skills and develop the proper attitudes to be good stewards of our
endangered natural world. Without raising a new generation of
environmentally literate citizens it is hard to imagine that we will be
able to maintain the fragile web of life, as we have known it. The
Paleolithic record shows an average species loss of 3-4 per year. The
distinguished socio-biologist, E.O. Wilson, estimates that we are now
losing about 1000 species per year, a number that is likely to rise
with continued destruction of natural habitats and global climate
change. The need is urgent for our children to benefit from No Child
Left Inside--not just for the immediate health benefits described above
but for the long term benefits of raising a new group of intelligent,
curious, and committed stewards of the natural world.
references
American Institutes for Research, ``Effects of Outdoor Education
Programs for Children in California.'' AIR: Palo Alto, CA;
submitted to The California Department of Education, 2005.
Balmford, A., Clegg, L., Coulson, T., & Taylor, J. ``Why
Conservationists Should Heed Pokemon.'' Science, 295(5564),
2367-2367, 2002.
Bartlett, Sheridan. Access to Outdoor Play and Its Implications for
Healthy Attachments. Unpublished article, Putney, VT. 2006.
Bell, Anne C.; and Janet E. Dyment. ``Grounds for Action: Promoting
Physical Activity through School Ground Greening in Canada.''
Evergreen. 2006.
Beldon Russonello and Stewart Research and Communications. ``Americans'
Attitudes toward Walking and Creating Better Walking
Communities.'' Surface Transportation Policy Project Report.
Washington: Beldon Russonello & Stewart Research and
Communications, 2003.
Bixler, Robert D., Floyd, Myron E. & Hammutt, William E.
``Environmental Socialization: Qualitative Tests of the
Childhood Play Hypothesis,'' Environment and Behavior, 34(6),
795-818. 2006.
Burdette, Hillary L., M.D., M.S.; and Robert C. Whitaker, M.D, M.P.H.
``Resurrecting Free Play in Young Children: Looking Beyond
Fitness and Fatness to Attention, Affiliation and Affect.''
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 159:46-50. 2005.
Center for a Livable Future. Perspectives on Childhood Obesity
Prevention: Recommendations from Public Health Research and
Practice. Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health,
Baltimore MD, 2007.
Clements, R. (2004) ``An Investigation of the State of Outdoor Play.''
Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, Vol. 5(1):68-80. Pg 74.
2004.
Chawla, Louise. ``Learning to Love the Natural World Enough to Protect
It.'' Barn. Vol. 2, 2006
Cobb, E. The Ecology of Imagination in Childhood, New York, Columbia
University Press. : 57-58. 1977.
Coffey, Ann. Transforming School Grounds, in Greening School Grounds:
Creating Habitats for Learning, (eds) Grant, Tim and
Littlejohn, Gail., Toronto: Green Teacher and Gabriola Island,
BC: New Society Publishers. 2001.
Crain, William. ``Now Nature Helps Children Develop.'' Montessori Life,
Summer 2001.
Faber Taylor, A., Kuo, F.E. & Sullivan, W.C. ``Coping with ADD: The
surprising connection to green play settings.'' Environment &
Behavior, 33(1), 54-77. 2001.
Faber Taylor, A., Kuo, F.E. & Sullivan, W.C. ``Views of Nature and
Self-Discipline: Evidence from Inner City Children,'' Journal
of Environmental Psychology, 22, 49-63. 2002.
Faber Taylor, A., Wiley, A., Kuo, F.E., & Sullivan, W.C. ``Growing up
in the inner city: Green spaces as places to grow.''
Environment and Behavior, 30(1), 3-27 1988.
Fjortoft, Ingunn. ``The Natural Environment as a Playground for
Children: The Impact of Outdoor Play Activities in Pre-Primary
School Children.'' Early Childhood Education Journal, 29(2):
111-117. 2001.
Fjortoft, I. And J. Sageie. ``The Natural Environment as a Playground
for Children: Landscape Description and Analysis of a Natural
Landscape.'' Landscape and Urban Planning, 48(\1/2\) 83-97.
2000.
Grahn, P., Martensson, F., Llindblad, B., Nilsson, P., & Ekman, A. UTE
pa DAGIS, Stad & Land nr. 93/1991 Sveriges
lantbruksuniversitet, Alnarp. 1997.
Hofferth, S.L. & J.F. Sandberg. ``Changes in American Children's Time,
1981-1997.'' In S.L. Hofferth & T.J. Owens (Eds.), Children at
the Millennium: Where Have We Come From, Where Are We Going?
(pp. 1-7). New York: JAI, 2001.
Hofferth, S.L. & S.C. Curtin. ``Changes in Children's Time'', 1997-
2002/3: An Update, 2006.
Kaiser Family Foundation. New Study Finds Children Age Zero to Six
Spend As Much Time With TV, Computers and Video Games As
Playing Outside Available at: http://www.kff.org/entmedia/
entmedia102803nr.cfm (accessed April 14, 2008).
Karsten, L. ``It All Used to be Better? Different Generations on
Continuity and Change in Urban Children's Daily Use of Space.''
Children's Geographies, Vol.3 (3), pp275-290, 2005.
Kellert, Stephen R. ``Nature and Childhood Development.'' In Building
for Life: Designing and Understanding the Human-Nature
Connection. Washington, D.C.: Island Press. Pg 83. 2005.
Kellert, Stephen R., Derr, Victoria. A National Study of Outdoor
Wilderness Experience. New Haven: Yale University. 1998.
Kids Walk-to-school: Then and Now--Barriers and Solutions. Center for
Disease Control and Prevention, 2006. http://www.cdc.gov/
nccdphp/dnpa/kidswalk/then--and--now.htm
Kuo, Frances E.; and Andrea Faber Taylor. ``A Potential Natural
Treatment for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder:
Evidence from a National Study.'' In American Journal of Public
Health, Vol 94, No. 9, September 2004.
Louv, Richard. Childhood's Future, New York, Doubleday. 1991.
Louv, Richard. Last Child in the Woods: Saving our Children from Nature
Deficit Disorder. Algonquin Books. 2005.
Malone, Karen & Tranter, Paul. ``Children's Environmental Learning and
the Use, Design and Management of Schoolgrounds,'' Youth and
Environments, 13(2), Accessed June 9, 2004 from
cye.colorado.edu. 2003.
Moore, Robin & Cosco, Nilda. ``Developing an Earth-Bound Culture
Through Design of Childhood Habitats, Natural Learning
Initiative.'' paper presented at Conference on People, Land,
and Sustainability: A Global View of Community Gardening,
University of Nottingham, UK, September 2000.
Moore, Robin. ``Impact Nature: The Role of Playing and Learning Gardens
on Children's Lives,'' Journal of Therapeutic Horticulture, 8,
72-82. 1996.
Moore, R. & Wong, H. ``Natural Learning: Rediscovering Nature's Way of
Teaching.'' Berkeley, CA MIG Communications. 1997.
Moore, Robin C. ``The Power of Nature Orientations of Girls and Boys
Toward Biotic and Abiotic Play Settings on a Reconstructed
Schoolyard.'' Children's Environments Quarterly, 3(3). 1986.
Nowak, R. ``Blame lifestyle for myopia, not genes.'' NewScientist, July
10, 2004, 12. 2004.
Ogden, C. L., Carroll, M. D., Curtin, L. R., McDowell, M. A., Tabak, C.
J., & Flegal, K. M. ``Prevalence of Overweight and Obesity in
the United States, 1999-2004.'' Journal of the American Medical
Association, 295(13), 1549-1555, 2006.
Pyle, Robert. ``Eden in a Vacant Lot: Special Places, Species and Kids
in Community of Life.'' In: Children and Nature: Psychological,
Sociocultural and Evolutionary Investigations. Kahn, P.H. and
Kellert, S.R. (eds) Cambridge: MIT Press. 2002.
U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). ``Phsyical
Activity Levels Among Children Aged 9-13 Years--United States,
2002.'' MMWR Weekly; 52(33):785-88, 2003.
Rideout, V. and E. Hamel. ``The Media Family: Electronic Media in the
Lives of Infants, Toddlers, Preschoolers, and Their Parents.''
Kaiser Family Foundation, 2006.
Rideout, Victoria J., Vandewater, Elizabeth A., Wartella, Ellen A.
``Zero to Six: Electronic Media in the Lives of Infants,
Preschoolers, and Toddlers.'' A Kaiser Family Foundation
Report. Pg 4. 2003.
Roberts, Donald F., Foehr, Ulla G., Rideout, Victoria A. ``Generation
M: Media in the Lives of 8-18 Year-olds.'' A Kaiser Family
Foundation Study. Pg 3. 2005.
Tandy, C. ``Children's Diminishing Play Space: A Study of
Intergenerational Change in Children's Use of Their
Neighborhoods.'' Australian Geographical Studies, 37(2), 154-
164, 1999.
Taylor, Andrea Faber; Frances E. Kuo; and William C. Sullivan. ``Coping
with ADD: The Surprising Connection to Green Play Settings.''
In Environment and Behavior, Vol. 33, No. 1, January 2001.
Taylor, Andrea Faber; Frances E. Kuo; and William C. Sullivan. ``Views
of Nature and Self-Discipline: Evidence from Inner City
Children.'' Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 2001.
United Nations Population Fund. UNFPA State of World Population 2007.
Available at: http://www.unfpa.org/swp/2007/english/
introduction.html (accessed April 14, 2008).
Veitch, J., Bagley, S., Ball, K., & Salmon, J. ``Where Do Children
Usually Play? A Qualitative Study of Parents' Perceptions of
Influences on Children's Active Free Play.'' Health & Place,
12(4), 383-393, 2006
Wells, N.M. ``At Home with Nature: Effects of `Greenness' on Children's
Cognitive Functioning.'' Environment and Behavior. Vol. 32, No.
6, 775-795. 2000.
Wells, Nancy M. & Evans, Gary W. ``Nearby Nature: A Buffer of Life
Stress Among Rural Children.'' Environment and Behavior, 35(3),
311-330. 2003.
Wilson, Ruth A. The Wonders of Nature--Honoring Children's Ways of
Knowing, Early Childhood News, 6(19). 1997.
______
Chairman Kildee. Thank you very much, Dr. Lawrence.
[Applause.]
Chairman Kildee. Mr. Davidson?
STATEMENT OF SEAN DAVIDSON, CO-FOUNDER, GREENLIGHT BIOFUELS
Mr. Davidson. Thank you, Chairman, Representative Sarbanes,
and members of the Subcommittee, for allowing me to attend this
hearing to tell my story of how environmental education
impacted what I have done to date.
I would briefly like to introduce myself. My name is Sean
Davidson. I am 22 years old. I grew up in suburban Columbia,
Maryland, where I currently live.
I work for a company called Greenlight Biofuels, which
operates a four million-gallon per year biodiesel production
facility in Princess Anne, Maryland. I and a team of two other
people co-founded the $6 million facility.
Biodiesel,--I have some here--which is an alternative fuel
for diesel engines, is clean-burning, locally produced, and
made from alternative sources, such as used vegetable oils and
animal fats.
Compared to regular diesel, burned biodiesel has as much as
78 percent less carbon dioxide and other emissions. It is part
of a sustainable environmentally sound solution to our nation's
energy needs. I am here to tell the story of how I reached this
accomplishment and the role that my environmental education
experiences played in it.
Up until middle school, I had very little exposure to
environmental education. In late middle school, I and 19 other
students won the opportunity to go on a school-sponsored trip
to a farm, where we camped and learned about the outdoors.
I thoroughly enjoyed this experience. I looked for more
like it and came across Chesapeake Bay Foundation's two-week
trip for gifted and talented students, a camping trip that took
me in and around the Bay via foot, skipjack, canoe, and van.
I learned the roots of what I would later categorize as the
three pillars of environmental education: one, the appreciation
and respect for outdoor beauty and its enjoyment; two, the
understanding of ecology and the interaction of people with it;
and, three, the utility and value of the resources around us.
At the end of the course, they gave us the challenge to do
an environmental project in our community. I went on to
organize friends to raise for release into the Bay oyster spat
and underwater grasses, which are two keystone species in the
Bay ecosystem. I also did several trash cleanups.
The lesson I learned was that a person can make a
difference in their own sphere of influence, even if it is
small. However, I was frustrated with the limitations of not
enough money and the difficulty of motivating others to get
involved and make a significant impact.
Continuing through high school, I never forgot the
importance of the environment and the idea that I can make a
change within my sphere of influence. Often this meant simply
relating a paper to or doing a research project in school on
environmental topics.
After not long, though, I began thinking about what careers
would allow me to spend my time making positive environmental
impacts. My best ideas were to become an educator or a
scientist as the means to have the largest impact within this
area of influence. Then when considering these options and how
their work is implemented, I began to realize I had a knack for
understanding business.
When college rolled around, I began studying business. It
wasn't long before this led me to see I could have a profitable
business that practiced environmental stewardship. Even better
would be a business that made money specifically doing that was
something environmentally friendly. In this way I could have
the largest possible positive impact.
When I and a partner discovered the market trend that
allowed a biodiesel manufacturing business to be economical, we
tackled it with conviction and perseverance. It was a marriage
of business and the environment that just made sense. So I am
here today.
I sit before you, having learned a great deal more about
those three pillars of environmental education: appreciation
and respect, ecology and interaction with it, and resources and
our dependence on them. And I am astounded at how many people
around me and the people going through school knew so little in
those areas.
Not only have I seen firsthand the lack of environmental
education around me, I've read reports and articles speaking to
how our culture and educational system is moving away from
these things.
Video games, iPods, laptops, and the internet are often
cited as contributing culprits but are no excuse for the lack
of a system that gives opportunity for outdoor learning to take
place. These outdoor learning experiences were very influential
in my own life and prepared me to later develop and build the
biodiesel project with the environment in mind.
It may be my opinion, but my experiences have taught me
that not only is environmental education needed in our schools
today but that it can be successful in its desired goals.
Please consider this insight when you consider your support for
the No Child Left Inside Act.
Thanks. [Applause.]
[The testimony of Mr. Davidson follows:]
Prepared Statement of Sean Davidson, Co-Founder, Greenlight Biofuels
Thank you Chairman for allowing me to attend this hearing to tell
my story of how environmental education impacted what I have done to
date.
I'd like to briefly introduce myself. My name is Sean Davidson and
I am 22 years old. I grew up in suburban Columbia, MD where I currently
live. I work for a company called Greenlight Biofuels who operates a 4
million gallon per year biodiesel production facility in Princess Anne,
Maryland. I and a team of two other people co-founded the $6 million
facility.
Biodiesel which is an alternative fuel for diesel engines is clean
burning, locally produced, and made from alternative sources such as
vegetable oils and animal fats. Compared to regular diesel when burned
biodiesel has as much as 78% less carbon and other emissions. It is
part of a sustainable environmentally sound solution to our nations
energy needs. I am here to tell the story of how I reached this
accomplishment and the role that my environmental education experiences
played in it.
Up until middle school I had very little exposure to environmental
education. In late middle school I and 19 other students won the
opportunity to go on a school sponsored trip to a farm where we camped
and learned about the outdoors. I thoroughly enjoyed the experience. I
looked for more like it and came across the Chesapeake Bay Foundation's
two week trip for gifted and talented students. A camping trip that
took me in and around the bay via foot, skipjack, canoe, and van. I
learned the roots of what I would later categorize as three pillars of
environmental education.
1. Appreciation and respect for outdoor beauty and enjoyment
2. An understanding of ecology and the interaction of people with
it
3. The utility and value of the resources around us
At the end of the course they gave us the challenge to do an
environmental project in our community. I went on to organize friends
to raise for release into the bay oyster spat and under water grasses
which are two keystone species in the bay ecosystem. I also did several
trash cleanups. The lesson I learned was that a person can make a
difference in their own sphere of influence even if it is small.
However, I was frustrated with the limitations of not enough money and
the difficulty of motivating others to get involved to make a
significant impact.
Continuing through high school I never forgot the importance of the
environment and the idea that I can make change in my sphere of
influence. I began thinking about what careers would allow me to spend
my time making positive environmental impacts. My best ideas were to
become an educator or a scientist as the ways to have the largest
impact within my sphere of influence. While considering my career
options and their impact I began to realize I had a knack for
understanding business.
When college rolled around I began studying business. It wasn't
long before this led me to see I could have a profitable business that
practiced environmental stewardship. Even better would be a business
that made money specifically doing something environmentally friendly.
In this way I could have the largest possible positive impact. When I
and a partner discovered the market trend that allowed a biodiesel
manufacturing business to be economical we tackled it with conviction
and perseverance. It was a marriage of business and environment that
just made sense and so here I am today.
So I sit before you having learned a great deal more about those
three pillars of an environmental education. Appreciation and respect,
ecology and our interaction with it, and resources and our dependence
on them. And I am astounded at how many people around me and people
going through school know so little in those areas.
Not only have I seen first hand the lack of environmental education
around me I've read reports and articles speaking to how our culture
and educational system is moving away from teaching these things. Video
games, iPods, laptops, and the internet often are cited as contributing
culprits but, are no excuse for the lack of a system that gives
opportunity for outdoor learning to take place.
It may be my opinion, but my opinion through experience that not
only is environmental education needed in our schools today but, that
it can be successful in its desired goals. Please consider this insight
when you consider your support for the No Child Left Inside Act.
Thank You.
______
Chairman Kildee. Thank you very much. Thank you very much.
I will recognize myself for my five minutes of questions.
Superintendent Grasmick, can you expand on some of the ways
that environmental concepts are included in Maryland's
voluntary state curriculum?
Ms. Grasmick. Absolutely. It begins in elementary school.
It is a specific area where students are not only taught the
concepts, there is an expectation of students having outdoor
experiences, and that is expanded into middle school and high
school. And it goes across our science curriculum, specifically
identified as environmental education curriculum. It certainly
is integrated into our math curriculum, et cetera.
So every aspect of the curriculum has some contact with
environmental education. And, as I indicated, we are requiring
that students have an outdoor environmental experience every
single year to stimulate this interest.
And in schools such as Pot Spring you heard today from Ms.
Harris, students are using environmental education as a part of
learning for every subject area within those schools.
And so we do have in reality an unevenness based on often
the commitment of the principal, but every school must be
teaching these concepts. And we are evaluating that. But to the
extent that you heard from Pot Spring Elementary School, I
could not say that all 1,600 schools in the State of Maryland
have that kind of robust program. However, we are seeing an
accelerating interest in this.
Of the 24 jurisdictions, 9 have outdoor educational,
environmental educational, settings where students go for
residential opportunities to really pursue the preparation they
have received in the classroom in those environmental settings
and take that back and continue to do projects which will
expand their knowledge.
And so we feel very excited about this aspect of No Child
Left Inside because we agree with it. And we are saying it is a
mandatory part of our teaching in the State of Maryland.
And so Ms. Harris actually has a folder from the
Principals' Academy which the State Department of Education
supports and initiates. And I do agree with your comment that I
have never seen a great school that didn't have a great
principal. And so we have organized our State Department of
Education to have a special division devoted exclusively to
leadership.
And I must say Congressman Sarbanes was a wonderful
addition to our department in accelerating the importance of
that and some of the creative ideas, but I am mentioning this
because we have this opportunity to influence principals in
terms of the creativity of integrating this in all aspects of
learning for our students through our principal academies.
Chairman Kildee. Thank you very much. You know, you draw to
mind when I was teaching, pay for teachers is always low. It
was low then, too. So I taught summer school. And I taught a
class in English literature. This was not acceleration. Mostly
all boys who had failed English literature for the regular
school year. So they were a pretty strong group of young men.
I came to the poetry section. I figured I'm going to have
problems here. They were totally bored. So I went to my
principal, Bob Rodda. May he rest in peace. And I said, ``Bob,
we have behind the school what is called Sleepy Hollow, kind of
a wooded area. Could I take my students out there, especially
during this poetry section?''
He said, ``Dale, you are a professional teacher. Use your
professional judgment.'' And I tell you that was one of the
best experiences I had and they had.
And occasionally I would still run into someone in Flint
who would say, ``My name is'' so and so. ``You taught me out in
Sleepy Hollow.'' And he remembered that. And it really made a
difference in the teaching, that setting there.
Ms. Grasmick. Absolutely.
Chairman Kildee. So thank you very much.
And my principal was smart enough to realize that you do
work with your teachers, too, right, if they come up with an
idea? If it is a good idea, give them some----
Ms. Harris. Hire good people and stay out of their way.
[Laughter.]
Chairman Kildee. That is very good. Very good.
Mr. Grijalva?
Mr. Grijalva. Thank you very much. Just a couple of quick
questions, but I want to thank the panel, informative and very,
very important testimony.
I am on this Committee under the able leadership of Mr.
Kildee, and I happen to chair a Subcommittee on Natural
Resources, National Forests, Parks, and Public Lands. When we
had a hearing on the similar subject, I think Mr. Sarbanes made
a really good point then, and I think the follow-up is this,
that key to this environmental education and No Child Left
Behind will be the focus of the school, this, as the departure
point for this activity. And I agree it is critical.
You know, we are going through a time right now where the
environment at some levels is treated with benign neglect if
not disdain. I think environmental education for a lot of
reasons is important. I will probably come back to you, Doctor,
with a question about that.
As we look at our public parks and our public lands,
visitation in some areas continues to go down. And so we need
to build not only environmental literacy and sense of
stewardship and sensitivity and awareness about the
environment, but we need to build a constituency to protect
these public places of ours that are so important. And I see
this as a very positive outcome of environmental education as
well.
The new visitors to our parks in the next decade or two are
going to be more urban, more diverse, more family-oriented kind
of activities. I think those are all important gains for our
public lands because that public support is critical to their
existence.
If I may, Ms. Harris, you mentioned something in your
testimony about changing the culture of the school. You know,
we are faced with this culture that you have to teach to the
test. And so as you talk to other educators, they make it an
either/or proposition. Either I prepare and teach for the test
or I do those other extracurricular things: music, art,
environmental education.
Tell me why in changing the culture you don't think it is
an either/or proposition or should function that way.
Ms. Harris. It is a dilemma because we do a lot of
assessment. And we are held accountable. At our school system,
we are held accountable for the Maryland voluntary state
curriculum. And I truly believe in it. And I know that we are
holding our children to a very high standard.
That doesn't mean that you have to teach to a test. Good
teaching is good teaching. They need to understand what it is
that the children are going to be responsible for learning. You
can teach that through a variety of contexts.
I believe strongly that if you show children the purpose
and the reason for learning something, then they understand why
to learn and they are invested in learning it. If they are
applying that knowledge and those skills in authentic ways,
then they have a purpose for their learning. That will equate
to better test results.
If we teach children, they have to learn how to read. They
have to learn how to write. But if they have a purpose for
their reading and they understand ``I need to be able to learn
more about what is happening with erosion on my school grounds
so that I can create a project that is going to overcome those
issues,'' then I have a deeper understanding of why I am
reading about this, I am going to invest more time. It is also
more engaging.
One of the things that I noticed when I was at Pot Spring--
I don't think my staff knows this, and I have several of them
here. So I am going out on a limb here, but when I first walked
through my building, we had a lot of children who had been
taught how to play school. And they did it very well. The
teacher would be in the front of the classroom teaching their
little heart out, and the children are building airplanes in
their desk. And that is a true story. They weren't engaged.
They looked like they were learning. But they weren't engaged
in the learning process.
Now you go into classrooms in my school. And children are
working in groups. They are working together. They are creating
very meaningful work at a very high level because that work is
going to be read by important people. They understand that they
just can't write garbage.
I think that all of that has equated to our students
learning at a higher level. And that equates to higher test
scores.
Mr. Grijalva. Thank you.
Ms. Harris. We don't teach to the test.
Mr. Grijalva. Dr. Lawrence, one of the cornerstones of the
legislation is to reestablish the Office of Environmental
Education within the Department of Education. Do you have
comments on that?
Mr. Lawrence. Well, I think the mixture of environmental
education to provide the knowledge base for becoming
responsible stewards of the environment is a big part of it,
but, as the previous comments have been focused on the ability
of children to learn, Dr. Pergams and I cited much of the same
literature in our testimony because it is a relatively new
phenomenon for people to be concerned about what is happening
to our children with regard to their physical inactivity, with
regard to how little time they spend out in nature.
And study after study is showing that, indeed, something
really good happens to the way our minds work when we are
stimulated, as we all are today, by the variety of colors, the
sounds, the bird song, the spring flowers. All of that is doing
things in our complex nerve net that makes us then absorb other
cognitive information more readily.
We don't know how that happens yet. And we may never know
it is such a complicated way in which our brain processes
information, but I think the knowledge base of what is
happening to our environment and then the experience in the
environment to allow us to function more effectively and for
children to become better problem solvers is absolutely
essential. It is a hand in glove phenomenon.
And it is very easy to get quite pessimistic about the
outlook for the Earth's planet. You know, we are adding two to
three parts per million of carbon to the atmosphere every year.
We are already about 100 parts per million above historic
highs. All of this is going to impact the current generation of
children in a profound way, as Chairman Kildee said in his
opening remarks.
Those of us in the later years of our life, we're not going
to benefit much from dramatic change, but our legacy, what we
leave our children and our grandchildren, is absolutely at the
center of a moral relationship with the natural world. And
somehow the only way that children can acquire that is to
experience it directly and then have that stimulate other
curiosity, as we have heard from Mr. Davidson.
Mr. Grijalva. Thank you very much.
Chairman Kildee. Will you yield?
Mr. Grijalva. Absolutely.
Chairman Kildee. I just was very happy to hear you use the
word ``moral'' because we do have a moral responsibility, not
just for my own--I have seven grandchildren, but for all the
children around the world. We have a tall responsibility to
them.
And I would like to think that we could leave the world a
better place in every way than it was when we entered it. But
we know that environmentally we have not done that, but we have
the opportunity and we have the obligation and we have the
moral obligation to do that.
And I am very happy that is a part of your----
Mr. Lawrence. Thank you.
Chairman Kildee. Thank you.
Mr. Grijalva. Thank you.
And, just in closing, I was watching one of my favorite
philosophers on TV the other day, George Carlin. [Laughter.]
And he said a very profound thing. He said, ``Whatever
happened to that kid playing outside with the stick?''
With that, thank you very much. [Applause.]
Chairman Kildee. The gentleman from the great State of
Maryland, Mr. Sarbanes?
Mr. Sarbanes. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I want you to know I
am restraining the impulse to ask you that all of our hearings
going forward be outside. [Applause.]
Chairman Kildee. He is the one who insisted they be
outside.
Mr. Sarbanes. That is right.
Chairman Kildee. I have to wonder how----
Mr. Sarbanes. We rolled the dice.
Chairman Kildee. Thanks for insisting.
Mr. Sarbanes. Thank you. And I wanted to also thank
Chairman Grijalva for his leadership on the Subcommittee of
Natural Resources that I have the privilege of serving on.
Ms. Harris, I was intrigued when you were talking about the
bluebird nesting box project that engaged some of your students
because my son, who I mentioned before, is a very avid birder
and bird photographer now. In fact, tonight or Friday he is
going down to be a guide at the Delmarva Birding Weekend on the
Eastern Shore.
He first got interested in birds because he went to a
Maryland State Department-sponsored, State Department of
Education-sponsored, bluebird camp in western Maryland, in
Washington County. And he came back from that experience just
completely converted.
In May, he is going to Texas to participate in a four-day
Texas birding classic competition, which I don't think the
Superintendent here knows. So I can say this is going to mean
he is going to miss a day and a half of school. [Laughter.]
Mr. Sarbanes. And when I confronted him with that problem,
he said, ``Well, you are the one who says we have to get out of
school and into nature.'' [Laughter.]
I said, ``I meant out into a class outside, not away from
school.'' But, in any event, it just shows how these early
experiences can grab hold of a child and steer them in these
wonderful directions.
I was wondering if you, Dr. Grasmick and you, Ms. Harris,
could speak. We talked a lot about the benefits of the children
of environmental education. But I have to imagine that the
effect, the positive effect, it is having on teachers in terms
of them feeling renewed and engaged and excited about their
ability to reach and teach their students is also something to
behold.
And I wonder if you could speak about that in terms of the
experience in your own school and then, Dr. Grasmick, across
the state what you are seeing with that.
Ms. Harris. I do have a wonderful staff. And I am very
blessed to be their leader. One of the things that they have
said to me over time since we have been doing this kind of
teaching and learning is that it has brought the fun back into
teaching.
Because the state mandates and the federal mandates for
success for all children truly is what drives what we do, there
are occasions where that becomes more teaching to the test or
can become more teaching to the test and you become so enmeshed
in just teaching, in book learning, and making sure that they
are writing and it is all just so intense that it has taken
some of the fun out of teaching.
And my staff, I encourage them. I am out there with them.
But I say, ``Get them outside.'' The video that you could pick
up, actually, is part of my children and my staff outside at
the stream near our school.
They have to teach what is required. They have to learn
what is required. But can't we do it in a fun way? And I
thinking learning and teaching should be fun.
It is a very difficult job. They have an enormous stress,
an enormous amount of responsibility to make sure that their
children are ready for the next year and ready for the world.
But they can do it in a different way and still get great
results.
So I really cheer them on. I feel my job is to hire great
people, to support what they are doing, to give them the staff
development that they need to be successful, to join them in
the joy of teaching and learning, and then really to get out of
their way and say, ``It is okay. You are doing good things.''
Mr. Sarbanes. Thank you.
Ms. Harris. So I have several of them here, and they are
very enthusiastic people. But, again, I am very lucky to have
them.
Ms. Grasmick. I would say from the perspective of the
entire state--and I do want to acknowledge her. She is right
behind me, Rebecca Bell, who does an amazing job in working
with our teachers, in setting up the summer centers, as you
alluded to with your son.
What I have seen that is so profound as I travel around the
state is the retention factor of teachers in schools where they
can integrate this experience and knowledge of the environment
with the teaching across subject areas.
I was just in one of the most heavily impacted urban
schools in terms of circumstances of poverty. And when I walked
through the door, it was like an oasis. And we have identified
that as one of our six blue ribbon schools in the State of
Maryland.
And by all circumstances and what stereotypically would be
expressed is teachers would not want to be there. And, yet,
year after year there's 100 percent retention of teachers
because of the creativity, because of this integration of the
opportunities for students through the environmental
experiences that they have beyond that narrow community and the
creativity of the teachers that have been described in a
suburban school.
And so I see it as both motivational for teachers,
contributing greatly to teacher retention, teachers feeling
creative, and I also see it as fostering a new cohort of
teachers.
When I spoke about the students who were high school
students who were at this conference I had with Johns Hopkins
and they were talking about the STEM areas and talking about
what they want to do as a career path, they weren't necessarily
talking about being engineers. They were interested in
engineering, but they were talking about becoming teachers. And
that stimulation began in elementary school for these students
with the experiential learning that they had.
And so we are fostering perhaps a whole new cohort of
teachers. They see teaching through different eyes, not as
regimented but as a creative profession that does this kind of
integration on the environment with the subject material.
Mr. Sarbanes. I guess what I am hearing is in a sense, it
is a disservice to our teachers if we don't give them this
environmental education resource to use with their students.
Dr. Pergams and Dr. Lawrence, thank you for being here. I
heard in I think, Dr. Pergams, your testimony a suggestion--or
maybe it was Dr. Lawrence, but I would like to have both of you
react to this--the notion that you can't teach about the
environment if you are not in the environment.
And maybe you could just sort of build on that concept or
flesh it out a little bit more because I think it relates to
this notion that we can somehow turn environmental stewardship
over to experts when, in fact, the only way we are going to
save the environment and combat global warming and save the
Chesapeake Bay is if all of us begin to have the habits that
will do that.
So we need guidance and leadership from the experts, but we
have to own it ourselves. And in the same way, you just can't
teach in a classroom inside four walls that environment is
important if you are not actually outside in the environment.
Maybe you could speak to that.
Dr. Pergams. I think the research backs this up, and it is
also my own personal experience from taking kids into nature
and for my own children that learning about nature without
going there is just like learning any other subject.
But if you go into nature and if you--it can range from
just simply playing outside in a forest or a vacant lot or
going on a field trip with a teacher or going, you know, Boy
Scout camp with a leader that knows something about nature.
What is important I think is the great variety of input
that children get in the huge, beautiful, chaotic world of
stimulus that the children get and the vast demands it makes on
their neural net and their developmental progress.
So I think you re-create this kind of complex, chaotic
world in a movie or a webcam or a book. And that is I think
really the difference here. You don't know. When you go out
into nature, you don't know what is going to happen, actually.
You don't know what you are going to see when you turn over
that log. You know, you don't know what you are going to get
when you sweep that net into the pond.
It is unpredictable. And, therefore, it is wonderful. And,
therefore, it has an incredible influence on their children's
developmental and cognitive progress.
Dr. Lawrence. I would just supplement that a little bit by
saying that recent understanding of neural development in the
child reinforces everything that Dr. Pergams said. We now
understand that, in fact, an infant has many more synaptic
connections among cells in the brain than we do as adults. And
those synaptic connections are in great redundancy. When they
are not used, they start getting pruned.
And so if you don't begin learning a second language by a
certain age, if you don't take up a musical instrument by a
certain age, if you don't begin to understand how complex the
web of life is by a certain age, those potential synaptic
connections are going to get pruned.
And that is why early exposure to children, to the wonders
of nature has an explanation that we are beginning to be able
to connect the dots and say, ``This is stimulating a certain
part of the cortex. This is keeping some of those synapses
together and, in fact, stimulating the creation of additional
ones.''
So pattern recognition, hands-on, scooping the net, as the
children and young people did today, in the ponds, and counting
the variety of natural organisms, that is stimulating their
brains in a way that sitting in front of a video or reading a
book just doesn't do it.
It doesn't mean that we shouldn't complement and supplement
and integrate standard methods of educational approach with
hands-on, but the more we learn about the way the brain matures
and develops, the more powerful is the idea that we need to
have these kinds of hands-on experience.
I would also say that there is this whole interesting
phenomenon of trying to begin to integrate concepts of natural
capital with social capital as well as financial capital for
development and so on.
And it is the opportunity to work together as they were
working together that creates social capital. And the social
capital is what was described by our colleagues that they are
beginning to see in positive ways in the schoolroom and among
teachers. And all of that then begins to really reinforce.
So it is very powerful. And it fits in with what is
evolving in our understanding of the way the human mind works.
Mr. Sarbanes. Thank you.
Mr. Chairman, I am sure I am out of time. I had a real
quick question for Mr. Davidson.
Chairman Kildee. Go ahead.
Mr. Sarbanes. I was just curious. You are now moving in an
arena where there are others that are in these places where, as
you put it, business marries the environment. And I am
wondering if you have encountered others who got into their
business because they had their sort of environmental awareness
raised at some point along the way.
Mr. Davidson. I have, actually. For example, in my
experiences that I went through, not only is it awareness that
is created, but it is appreciation, love, respect, which kind
of breeds a passion in a person that is required when you go to
start a business.
I think I briefly mentioned that we tackled it with
conviction and perseverance. You know, that is borne from the
passion that we got, you know, for me partly from my
experiences and my desires to do something significant with the
environment. In the other business leaders I meet I could see
that passion reflected, especially strong when it is in what
they are doing, when their business matches their environmental
agenda.
And I have met some people in Maryland and elsewhere that
have gone that route.
Mr. Sarbanes. So the drive that is needed to succeed in
business can come from having had this environmental passion.
Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I appreciate it.
Chairman Kildee. Dr. Lawrence, before I call upon the
gentlelady from Guam, you mentioned the synaptic connections.
We just rewrote the Head Start bill. And I was a key sponsor of
that bill. That was written in 1965 originally, before they
even knew about this physical structure, laying down the
structure of the brain. But we incorporated all of that
knowledge in Head Start because we know that I was rocking my
week-old granddaughter the other night and talking to her,
using her name even, talking to her. And that is part of the
development of the brain right there. Thank you for bringing it
up.
The gentlelady from Guam, Mrs. Bordallo.
Ms. Bordallo. Thank you. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.
First let me say what an ideal setting this is, although I
am a little warm. [Laughter.]
I shouldn't be. I am from an island. But the sounds of
nature and all around us, I mean, it is beautiful. And we had
such outstanding speakers, everything from the educators all
the way down to the entrepreneurs.
I am the Chairman of the subcommittee in Natural Resources
on fisheries, wildlife, and oceans. So I feel that I am in the
right place this morning.
I have the distinction of having the veteran Mr. Kildee on
my committee. And I am very pleased. He has had so many years
in Congress; and, of course, my colleague who came into
Congress at the same time as I did, Mr. Grijalva. The one that
isn't a member is Mr. Sarbanes, but I think he will probably
sign up next time around. [Laughter.]
Ms. Bordallo. I have some questions, a couple of questions,
for Dr. Grasmick and Ms. Harris, but I want to talk to the
entrepreneur. I was real impressed with how you are so young
and you have this company in which you have invested millions
of dollars.
Would you say, Mr. Davidson, that--do you talk to other
students now that you are in this company and you are
developing this company? Do you talk to students of different
ages to encourage them about the environment, like you are
doing today? I mean, are there other instances where you may
talk to them at schools?
Mr. Davidson. I have, actually. I spoke at the Business
Club at University of Maryland-College Park, talking about my
experience and relating the environmental aspects of it as
well. And to the people that I meet and do get to interact, I
always----
Ms. Bordallo. Do you think that we are making progress? Mr.
Davidson, do you think students are more interested today than
they were when you went to school? However, you are very young.
So you just went a few years ago. Do you find the interest
picking up?
Mr. Davidson. It is. It is something talked about in the
media all the time. And I think students--I have a younger
brother that just graduated high school last year. And I think
they are grappling with trying to make some of those
connections because they hear about it all the time. So I have
heard inquiries.
Ms. Bordallo. The other question is the governor mentioned
about the need to include a range of stakeholders in
environmental education partnerships. Can you discuss the
importance of including businesses, particularly
environmentally aware businesses, in such partnerships? Would
you encourage that?
Mr. Davidson. I would, absolutely. You know, the businesses
are part of the lifeblood of our economy. And nonprofit
stakeholders have a lot of resources and experience in what
they do. And so do businesses. And I think there is a strong
interest in the business community that they can get involved
in some way where they can lend their expertise or some
resources.
Ms. Bordallo. Was your education in environment all
obtained here in the State of Maryland?
Mr. Davidson. It was.
Ms. Bordallo. Well, then we can congratulate all of the
educators here. [Laughter.]
My last question, is your business profitable? It is
getting there?
Mr. Davidson. We have been producing biodiesel since
November 2007.
Ms. Bordallo. Good. I have a question now for Dr. Grasmick
and Ms. Harris. You know, at this level it is very important to
have parents involved. I was reading this book, not that I
wasn't listening to the testimony, but I did read it about the
oyster program and so forth and how the families are very much
involved, the parents.
So what feedback have you received from parents on the
impact of these environmental programs?
Ms. Grasmick. I would say from a state perspective, it has
been outstanding. We want to accelerate our efforts and get
more parents engaged, but we also see our students through
their exposure as being incredible ambassadors.
And I would just draw the analogy to the stop smoking
campaign we had with our young people and all the dangers of
smoking. And honestly there was nothing that engaged parents in
a more profound way. Children would say, ``I don't want to ride
in the car with you if you are smoking. I am not going to ride
in the car with you if you are smoking.''
We are now doing the same things relative to those
activities and energy conservation. And so children are saying
to their parents, ``We have to have energy conservation in our
house. We have to recycle.'' Parents who would not necessarily
pursue that, the children are really the ambassadors.
And so we do see this having a positive effect on the
engagement. And that is a good thing because it is not only
helping the parents to also appreciate all of the potential of
the environment, but it is also ensuring that we have more
interaction between children and parents. And that is an effort
that we are continuing to make in the State of Maryland.
Ms. Bordallo. And I feel it would be very embarrassing to
parents to be told what to do and what not to do by their
children.
Ms. Grasmick. Absolutely.
Ms. Bordallo. So certainly they should listen.
Ms. Harris?
Ms. Harris. We have several different goals in our school,
but one of our goals is to involve not just our parent
community but our business community as well. And so we have
business partners that help us with our environmental projects.
I have a group of parents that work with the students to do our
recycling program after school.
Any time we have children outside we have parents involved.
They are there to help. They are there to teach. They are there
to just supervise.
Just recently we had a school-wide environmental night. And
the children and the parents both work through environmental
projects together. Again it is how do you make that parent-
child connection because that really will make the difference.
The children go home and talk about what they are learning.
It is in our parent bulletin. It is on our announcements. And
then they share that information with the parents. And it
encourages the parents to do the same kind of thing.
Again, we are very blessed at Pot Spring that we have an
enormous supportive parent population. And so they come for
everything that we ask them for. And they come when we don't
ask them just because they are involved and they want to be
involved.
But I think that partnership, the partnership, with the
local community is equally as important with businesses that
are in the community, getting them to donate, either time or
goods, to help with our projects that we are doing around the
school.
And then they know what they are doing and they get
involved. Our kids teach them as well.
Ms. Bordallo. Yes.
Ms. Harris. So it has to be a whole effort. It really does.
Ms. Bordallo. Well, we have gone a long time without
speaking about the environment like we are doing in the last
five to ten years. And it is just swelling as we go on.
And I commend the author of this legislation. I am excited
about it. And I am very excited to initiate some of the
programs in the territories, Mr. Sarbanes. So we must include
states and territories in this legislation. [Laughter.]
Mr. Sarbanes. That is my take-away.
Ms. Bordallo. Thank you.
Thank you very much, an outstanding panel of witnesses
today. Thank you very much. [Applause.]
Chairman Kildee. I thank the gentlelady. I have no plans
for a second round of questions. However, Mr. Sarbanes has a--
--
Mr. Sarbanes. I have no questions, Mr. Chairman. I just
wanted to make a couple of comments. One is to thank the panel,
what a tremendous panel, to again salute Patuxent for making
this available to us and all the others that help bring this
together just on a logistical basis.
What I am taking away is that our children need to be
outside for them, but they need to be outside for us. If we
don't make that connection to the environment for the next
generation, then we are all going to suffer for it. And I think
we have been able today to shine a light on that.
The coalition that is supporting this legislation I want to
thank them again. And then, finally, I want to thank the
students who have been sitting here listening to this
testimony, who showed us this morning all the exciting things
that they are doing and, as Dr. Grasmick said, really are the
ambassadors in so many ways. So we are here doing this hearing
for you, and I appreciate your attending it today.
Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Chairman Kildee. Thank you very much, John. I really
appreciate, John, you putting together such a great panel. I
mentioned I have been in Congress 32 years, and this is in the
top one percent of panels that I have listened to, very, very
good. [Applause.]
You know, we refer to any hearing we have outside of
Washington, D.C. as a field hearing. What a field. [Laughter.]
And what a hearing, right? It is wonderful. And a hearing
like this is a major step in advancing legislation like this.
So, John, you have taken that first major step on that, which
is a very, very important introduction. And this hearing has
been very, very helpful.
So I want to thank all of you. Each one of you has made
your contributions. You have overlapped, and you have
coordinated. You reinforced individual ideas, all of these
things. Again, I just want to thank you personally, thank the
students particularly. You have been great. If you were my
students, I would take you out to Sleepy Hollow also.
[Laughter.]
I have to wrap up some of the legal things here now. As
previously ordered, members will have seven calendar days to
submit additional materials for the hearing record. Any member
who wishes to submit follow-up questions in writing to the
witnesses should coordinate with majority staff within the
requisite time.
And, without objection, this hearing is adjourned.
[Additional submissions by Mr. Kildee follow:]
Prepared Statement of Zenobia Barlow, Cofounder and Executive Director,
the Center for Ecoliteracy
My name is Zenobia Barlow. I am cofounder and executive director of
the Center for Ecoliteracy, a national nonprofit foundation based in
Berkeley, California that is dedicated to education for sustainable
living.
I am pleased to submit written testimony before the House Education
and Labor Committee, subcommittee on Early Childhood, Elementary and
Secondary Education, on ``Environmental Education: Teaching Our
Children To Preserve Our Future.''
I want to thank Chairman Miller and Reps. McKeon, Kildee, and
Castle for including much of the No Child Left Inside Act (H.R.3036) in
the Education and Labor Committee's staff draft of the NCLB
reauthorization bill and respectfully urge them to help achieve passage
of the NCLI Act in this Congress. I also applaud them for their
leadership in helping to close the achievement gap.
I have been engaged in education for sustainability for more than
17 years, and cofounded the Center for Ecoliteracy in 1995 with systems
theorist and author Fritjof Capra (Tao of Physics, The Turning Point,
Web of Life) and philanthropist and former CEO Peter Buckley.
Since then, the Center has provided financial, intellectual, and
practical support to hundreds of schools committed to organizing their
curriculum and community around environmental project-based learning,
and reached thousands of educators through our active web and
publishing programs. We have developed and offer seminars and
professional development institutes attended by educators from across
the United States and countries from every continent in the world. With
support from the California Endowment, the W.K. Kellogg Foundation and
other funders, we also developed the Rethinking School Lunch program,
which has been widely adopted to assist schools in improving school
lunches and making learning connections between food, heath, and the
environment in the curriculum.
Through our work, we have repeatedly seen how important it is that
young people understand the web of life upon which we are dependent for
our well-being. Making connections between what we do as individuals,
families, communities, and nations--and the impact on the Earth--is the
highest goal of education for the environment. It is also critical to
all education that will prepare students for the world in which they
will live.
As you know, the No Child Left Behind Act has done just the
opposite--significantly narrowing the curriculum and diminishing the
role of environmental education. This is a most untimely development
with potentially devastating consequences for the future economic and
environmental well-being of our nation.
With the rise of environmental problems such as global warming and
worldwide food and water shortages, there is today an urgent need to
prepare young people to meet the challenges that have already begun to
destabilize our society and societies around the globe. There is also a
vital need to help them learn what they need to know to create more
sustainable societies in the future, societies that better harmonize
human needs with those of the natural world upon which we depend.
This essential work can only be accomplished by advancing
environmental education in K-12 schools nationwide--education in which
experiences in nature are linked to classroom experiences that help
students develop the knowledge, values, and skills to understand what
they observe in nature. This kind of education also enables students to
develop the ability to deal with downstream consequences of individual
and community actions and the capacity to care about those who are
affected.
The good news is that many school communities are integrating such
indoor learning with outdoor experiences while promoting an
understanding of the natural world as one interconnected system or
biosphere, the web of life that holds all humanity and everything we
value.
Now we must put the financial and institutional supports in place
that will encourage and enable more educators to do the critical work
of preparing America's young people for the environmental challenges
and opportunities that lie ahead.
______
[Statement of Mr. Baker follows:]
Prepared Statement of William C. Baker, President, Chesapeake Bay
Foundation
Thank you, Mr. Chairman and members of the Committee, for
scheduling this field hearing here in the heart of the Chesapeake Bay
watershed and for this opportunity to submit this statement for the
record.
The Chesapeake Bay Foundation is the largest regional field-based
environmental education program in the country. We work closely with
schools and school systems throughout the watershed to provide teacher
training and one and multi-day field experiences for students. Our
programs are designed to engage students, deepen their understanding of
their environment and support student achievement.
After nearly two decades of steady growth, our environmental
education programs began to experience a noticeable drop in enrollment
in the past few years. Other environmental education providers in the
watershed and around the country told us they were experiencing similar
declines. When we asked teachers and school administrators the reasons,
they pointed to two things: pressure to improve test scores in reading
and math and budgetary constraints.
This was happening at the same time that every report and indicator
was suggesting that more, not less, time and effort should be devoted
to environmental and outdoor education. For example:
An annual report card on environmental attitudes,
knowledge and behavior conducted by Roper Reports finds that two-thirds
of all Americans fail an even basic environmental quiz.
Two reports by the National Science Foundation published
in 2000 and 2003 called for a systemic approach to environmental
education.
A nationwide study conducted by the State Education and
Environment Roundtable found that environmental education has a
measurably positive impact not only on student achievement in science,
but also in reading, math, and social studies, when integrated into K-
12 curricula or used as an integrating theme across the curriculum.
Two reports to Congress by the National Environmental
Education Advisory Council released in 1996 and 2005 called for raising
the level of environmental literacy of Americans.
And it was happening at a time of growing recognition that people--
and particularly our youth--are increasingly disconnected from nature,
spending more time inside and not outside playing, exploring and
learning. This trend was highlighted by Richard Louv in his book Last
Child in the Woods and by one of today's witnesses, Oliver Pergams in a
recent study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences entitled ``Evidence of a fundamental and pervasive shift away
from nature-based recreation.''
In an effort to address what we believe is a national crisis in
environmental education, the Chesapeake Bay Foundation became a
founding member of the No Child Left Inside Coalition--a diverse group
of environmental, education, health and business organizations who care
about environmental education. We came together just over a year ago
with the goal of restoring and enhancing environmental and outdoor
education in our nation's schools and school systems. From a handful of
organizations, we now comprise 200 members, representing some 20
million people. In my judgment, this rapid growth reflects the deep
concerns about this issue and the strong public support, across the
spectrum, for restoring environmental education to our nation's indoor
and outdoor classrooms. Polling data confirms this support, finding
that 95% of Americans surveyed support environmental education in our
schools.
The No Child Left Inside coalition enthusiastically supports the
bipartisan legislation introduced by Representative John Sarbanes and
Senator Jack Reed known as the No Child Left Inside Act. This
legislation would amend the No Child Left Behind Act to provide
incentives for states to develop and implement plans to ensure that
students graduate from high school environmentally literate. It
authorizes $100 million a year in federal funding to states to train
teachers in environmental education, to operate model environmental
education programs, including outdoor learning, to support research and
strategic initiatives to advance the field and to encourage states to
develop and implement environmental literacy plans. These plans are
critical to ensure that environmental education programs are fully
integrated with NCLB and state goals to improve student performance and
effectively reach the most students and teachers possible. We want to
commend Governor O'Malley for his Executive Order establishing a
partnership to develop and implement what we hope will be the first of
many state environmental literacy plans. This Executive Order is an
important step forward in ensuring that all of Maryland's students will
receive a basic grounding in the environment.
Mr. Chairman, we have a tremendous opportunity with the No Child
Left Inside Act to make a difference--for education, for the
environment, and for our future. If NCLI is enacted, we will implement
the recommendations of the studies I cited earlier and have a systemic
approach to environmental education which will raise the level of
environmental literacy of Americans. We will help meet the student
achievement goals of the No Child Left Behind Act. We can help address
the disturbing trends and health impacts of nature deficit disorder.
And we will graduate a generation of students who are fundamentally
prepared with the skills and knowledge to deal with the challenges they
face on an individual, national and global basis--whether that's
reducing their carbon footprint, or cleaning up Chesapeake Bay. I want
to commend the Committee for holding this hearing and urge you to move
swiftly to approve this critical legislation.
______
[The statement of Mr. Miller follows:]
Prepared Statement of Hon. George Miller, Chairman, Committee on
Education and Labor
Good morning. I regret that I can not be here with Representative
Sarbanes, Governor O'Malley, and our distinguished witnesses and guests
today.
I'm looking forward to learning about helping students to connect
with the environment.
When we teach students to face critical environmental issues like
climate change, energy conservation, air pollution, habitat
conservation, or the importance of protecting Chesapeake Bay, we are
not only preparing them to be better stewards of the environment and
all that that brings with it, but we are also preparing them to play an
important role in strengthening our economy.
Environmental education has been with us for a long time, but it
may be facing a change. Outdoor education, such as field trips to bays
or local ponds, are fun and important. Those trips can be the first
exposure a child may have to the splendor and fragility of nature, and
the impact people have on it.
Now, we need to take environmental education to the next level. In
addition to getting kids outdoors, which is so important, we must
ensure that students learn about the environment as if our society and
our local communities depended on it--because the fact is, they do
depend on it.
The future health of our planet and the future success of our
economy depend on students integrating environmental education into
their overall education.
That is what is exciting about the Sarbanes bill and the overall
issue of environmental education.
As more and more businesses `go green,' we will need new crops of
students who are capable of and excited about being environmental
innovators--developing products and processes that are environmentally
sound and economically important.
America's success in the world came from being innovative--in
science and technology, in politics, and in education. We can continue
to be a leader in the world for positive solutions to our world's
problems by continuing to push forward with environmental technology,
environmental science and environmental problem solving.
The schoolchildren of today are those future engineers,
environmental scientists, and problem solvers.
I'm proud to say that California has been a leader in environmental
education. There have been great statewide and local efforts to involve
students with the environment. California is in the process of
developing an Environmental Education Initiative to help integrate the
subject into the classroom.
We can assist teachers and principals in addressing environmental
education inside and outside the classroom. Environmental education is
a powerful tool to help motivate students to take care of the
environment and help improve the academic achievement of students.
I have been working with Representative Sarbanes on his legislation
and in fact last year we included language from his bill, No Child Left
Inside, into the discussion draft to reform No Child Left Behind that
was the basis for discussions in the Education and Labor Committee and
the larger education community.
The Sarbanes language would provide funding for environmental
education professional development for teachers and also funding to
help expand environmental education and disseminate information on
proven environmental education programs. We will work with Rep.
Sarbanes this year and next year as we find a way to move the k-12
reform agenda forward.
I'd like to thank Rep. Sarbanes for pushing this issue forward and
I look forward to learning more about how Maryland is working to make
environmental education a priority in its schools.
Thank you.
______
[The statement of Mr. Sarbanes follows:]
Prepared Statement of Hon. John P. Sarbanes, a Representative in
Congress From the State of Maryland
Thank you Mr. Chairman. Again, I appreciate very much your
willingness to conduct this field hearing. The whole idea here for
today's hearing outdoors was to emphasize the point of bringing
children from indoors to the outdoors by doing it ourselves. And, we
were incredibly lucky with the weather, so thank you for allowing us to
have this hearing outdoors as well.
Governor, your leadership with respect to the environment is well-
known to Marylanders and is becoming well-known across the country. I
thank you for your leadership. There is real synergy between what we're
trying to do with No Child Left Inside (NCLI) and what you proposed
with your executive order because NCLI is encouraging states to develop
these environmental literacy plans and encouraging them by offering
funding that can help support activities behind those.
Maryland is clearly positioning itself to be at the forefront of
this important issue and to have that kind of environmental literacy
plan. When it comes to the federal government Maryland, among other
states, says we need the resources to support it. I think it's a great
example of the partnership between the federal government and the state
government. I am sure as you have attended these conferences of
governors across the country you are hearing about the whole green job
movement which is something that environmental education obviously sets
up in a very constructive way.
Thank you Mr. Chairman. I also just wanted to emphasize a couple of
things. First, I wanted to thank the staff here at the Patuxent
Wildlife refuge for all the logistical support to make this hearing
happen. I have been here numerous times to various events and every
time it goes off without a hitch (I'll knock on wood since I know we're
not finished but I think it will go on). I also want to thank the
Education and Labor Committee staff for helping to make this day
possible; Delicia Reynolds on my own staff is the point person--I want
to thank her for her efforts. Most important, I wanted to make a point
to thank the students that are here--really they are what it's all
about.
The most important thing about Environmental Education and today's
hearing is the mutuality dimension of caring for our environment,
particularly with respect to the Chesapeake Bay. The Chesapeake Bay
watershed of course includes 6 states and DC. While soliciting support
for the No Child Left Inside Act, I have gone to members of Congress
who represent many different places across the Watershed and Bay area.
I have talked to them about how much I care about a stream or river in
their district. They have looked a little bit perplexed and wondered
why, and then I explain because the watershed begins in your district--
as far north in fact as Cooperstown, NY. The notion that we can escape
the obligation for our environment by being a little bit more removed
is delusional. The way we are going to save this bay, the Chesapeake
Bay, the way you're going to save it, the way these students are going
to save it is by tending to the needs of our environment again right
there in your own backyard.
Somebody handed me this family circus cartoon from today. I didn't
see it, but if any of you have not seen it, you should. It is a picture
of these two boys (I don't know their names) but they are sitting under
a tree, chewing a blade of grass, and one says to the other ``this is
my favorite learning place--Schoolhouse earth.'' And that's the point
that we're trying to make here today.
______
[Additional submissions of Mr. Sarbanes follow:]
501 East Pratt Street,
Baltimore, MD.
Hon. John M. Sarbanes,
U.S. House of Representatives, Washington, DC.
Dear Rep. Sarbanes: Thank you for the opportunity to submit written
testimony in support of the field hearing on Environmental Education:
Teaching Our Children To Preserve Our Future held April 22, 2008 at the
Patuxent National Wildlife Refuge.
We request the testimony be submitted for the hearing record.
Again, thank you fro supporting environmental education through the
No Child Left Inside Act.
Sincerely,
Joe Harber, Director,
Education Programs, National Aquarium in Baltimore.
On behalf of the National Aquarium Institute, we are pleased to
submit written testimony before the House Education and Labor
Committee, subcommittee on Early Childhood, Elementary and Secondary
Education, on Environmental Education: Teaching Our Children To
Preserve Our Future.
We wish to thank Chairman Miller and Reps. McKeon, Kildee, and
Castle for including much of the No Child Left Inside Act (H.R.3036) in
the Education and Labor Committee's staff draft of the NCLB
reauthorization bill and urge them to help achieve passage of the NCLI
Act in this Congress. We applaud them for their leadership in helping
to close the achievement gap.
We also wish to thank Rep. John P. Sarbanes for extending an
invitation to attend the Congressional Field hearing on April 22, at
the Patuxent Wildlife Research Center.
The National Aquarium Institute representing the National Aquarium
in Baltimore, the National Aquarium in DC, the future Center for
Aquatic Life and Conservation, and the National Aquarium Foundation is
committed to providing environmental education programs to youth,
adults and families. Our education and conservation programs contain
many elements of import to this legislation.
The Aquarium's AquaPartners program uses the Chesapeake Bay
watershed as a topic that is both engaging for students and teachers
and critical to science and environmental education in Maryland.
Further, it helps schools meet the 2010 Chesapeake Bay Agreement to
provide all students with a ``meaningful Bay experience.'' The program
is designed to bring the science curriculum to life while offering
young people, who do not have many occasions to see the world beyond
their own urban environment, an opportunity to experience the wonders
of the natural world. The program includes a Summer Workshop for
teachers, classroom outreach during the year, and field study trips to
the Chesapeake Bay at the Ft. McHenry Field Station and Sandy Point
State Park.
Conservation is at the heart of the Institute's mission and
programs. The Chesapeake Bay Initiative includes a volunteer corps that
restores wetlands by planting beneficial marsh grasses, monitoring the
health of created wetlands, and conducting outreach restoration events
for local community groups.
In 2002 the Aquarium enhanced its existing community partnerships
by providing area students with opportunities to grow wetland plants at
their schools and participate in habitat restoration projects through
the Wetland Nursery Program. Through this program, students contribute
to restoration of Chesapeake Bay tidal wetlands, investigate the life
cycle of plants and their importance to the estuarine ecosystem, help
maintain wetland plant nurseries, test water quality, and gain problem-
solving skills.
Since the 2002 inaugural year, the systems at several participating
Wetland Nursery Schools have been upgraded to the AquaEcosystem, a
system that also includes native Chesapeake Bay fish. In this
integrated, closed-loop system, fish wastes fertilize the marsh grass,
which in turn filters the water before it is returned to the fish.
Students are responsible for regularly testing water quality and
monitoring the growth of their fish. Aquarium staffers visit the
schools and engage the students in activities that teach them about the
Chesapeake Bay and the importance of wetland habitats.
These activities are supplemented by Aquarium-led field trips to
restoration sites throughout the Chesapeake Bay, where students gain
additional hands-on experience. After the plants and fish have grown
for a few months, the students, accompanied by program staff,
transplant the plants and release the fish at an Aquarium-sponsored
restoration site.
Both the AquaPartners and AquaEcosystem Wetland Nursery programs
incorporate outdoor educational experiences with classroom instruction.
The classroom and field components are integrated into the school's
curriculum, and aligned with State and national education standards.
Results of program evaluations show these programs significantly
increases students' positive attitudes towards the Chesapeake Bay, and
in addition, provide students with the knowledge and tools to make
positive changes to the health of the Bay. Improving students'
attitudes towards science is an important precursor to increasing
student achievement.
The challenges facing the Chesapeake Bay and our world's oceans are
immense. Depleted fish stocks, coastal development, and climate change
are just a few of the challenges facing the citizens of this country
and the world.
We need to equip the young people of today with the experiences,
skills, and abilities to solve these growing problems. Environmental
education experiences with direct contact with the natural world are
critical to achieving that goal.
Again, we wish to thank Chairman Miller and Reps. Sarbanes, McKeon,
Kildee, and Castle for their support and urge them to help achieve
passage of the NCLI Act in this Congress.
______
Prepared Statement of Larry Schweiger, President and CEO, National
Wildlife Federation
Thank you Chairman Kildee, Ranking Member Castle, Congressman
Sarbanes and members of the Subcommittee for hosting this field hearing
on environmental education and connecting children to nature. I
appreciate the opportunity to submit testimony for the hearing record
this Earth Day about importance of environmental education and the
National Wildlife Federation's commitment to connecting people,
especially children, with nature.
About the National Wildlife Federation
The National Wildlife Federation is the largest non-profit
conservation, education, and advocacy organization with more than four
million members and supporters throughout the United States. The
National Wildlife Federation's family also includes forty-seven states
and territorial affiliate organizations. Founded in 1936, the National
Wildlife Federation works for the protection of wildlife species and
their habitat, and for the conservation of our natural resources.
Overview
Looking out of my home-office window, I can see down a long
forested valley across North Park to a far-away place appropriately
called ``wildwood'' where nine decades ago, Rachel Carson and her
mother Maria roamed the Pine Creek bottoms, explored rock outcrops and
woodlands, listened to birds, and discovered spring wildflowers and
insects. These hours in the fields of western Pennsylvania profoundly
influenced one of the 20th century's greatest women by fostering a rich
sense of wonder and profound love of nature.
Perhaps reflecting on her wildwood walks with her mother Rachel
wrote later in life, ``If a child is to keep alive his inborn sense of
wonder without any such gift from the fairies, he needs the
companionship of at least one adult who can share it, rediscovering
with him the joy, excitement and mystery of the world we live in.''
Rachel would be deeply saddened by what has happened to the
traditional connection between Americans and the outdoors, something
that is markedly different than anything in our past. The evidence is
everywhere. The average child today spends more than 6 hours daily
watching TV, playing video games or operating a computer. Meanwhile,
the amount of time U.S. children now spend outdoors has declined by 50
percent in the past 20 years.
An important connection between being outdoors and caring for
nature is being broken, and it greatly concerns me. Children who fish,
camp and spend time in the wild before age 11 are much more likely to
grow up to be environmentally committed as adults, report Cornell
University researchers. It was for me.
As a child, I spent many hours outdoors with my father, who was a
dog trainer and hunter. He died more than 30 years ago, yet when I go
to the woods and smell a familiar plant or hear a distant crow on a
crisp fall day, my memories of being with Dad come flooding back in
rich detail, as if it were yesterday. In those moments I can hear his
voice clearly and I can see his ruddy face in the golden light of an
early morning sun. I cherish those memories.
Although many environmental advocates speak of early experiences in
nature that formed their connection, people of all professions often
talk fondly of childhood experiences outdoors. Most adult Americans had
a childhood were they could ``go outside and play,'' four little words
rarely heard today.
What will become of wild places, if children know little of the
mystery, the grace, the interconnectedness of all living things? How
will we address global warming and other environmental threats if we do
not engage and prepare the next generation for these monumental
challenges? We only save what we love and we only love what we know.
It's time to take action. As one of the largest conservation
organizations in the country, the National Wildlife Federation is
committed to helping children ``rediscover the joy, the excitement, and
the mystery'' of our world.
National Wildlife Federation, with over 70 years of experience
inspiring and fostering a connection with nature and wildlife continues
to lead the way. Our award-winning Ranger Rick magazine for children
has sparked curiosity about nature and wildlife in generations of
children. Every month it delivers engaging stories, wildlife images and
ideas for fun outdoor activities. In response to increasing demand for
age appropriate magazines about animals for younger children, National
Wildlife Federation also offers Your Big Backyard and Wild Animal Baby
magazines for families with children 3-8.
With tens of thousands of certified Backyard Wildlife and
Schoolyard Habitats, our wildlife gardening programs help individuals
and families attract birds, butterflies and other local wildlife to
backyards across the country. A more recent addition to the suite of
fun family outdoor activities is the National Wildlife Federation's
Great American Backyard Campout, which is reconnecting families,
neighborhoods and entire communities through camping, by sharing
campfire stories and eating s'mores.
To encourage parents and caregivers to make time for children to
``go outside and play,'' National Wildlife Federation launched Green
Hour, www.greenhour.org, a source of information and inspiration to
create daily free time outside for children.
What Is at Stake?
Children are no longer spending time playing outside. Today's kids
spend six and a half hours a day ``plugged into'' electronic media.
Research shows that children are spending half as much time outside as
they did 20 years ago. In his 2005 book, Last Child in the Woods,
Richard Louv described this American trend. He gave this alarming
problem a powerful name. Today's kids suffer from a ``nature deficit.''
The Health of Our Children. Nature deficit has had profound impacts
on our children's mental and physical health. Over the past 20 years,
time spent playing outdoors has been cut in half, but the childhood
obesity rate has more than doubled and the adolescent obesity rate has
tripled. Doctors warn that, for the first time in American history,
life expectancy may actually decrease because of the health impacts of
the current childhood obesity epidemic.
Research has linked childhood obesity to a lack of playtime
outdoors. Although physical activity through organized sports can help
address childhood obesity, the medical community recognizes that
unstructured free time outdoors has unique health benefits to children.
Children who play outside are more active and more physically fit. Time
in nature improves children's academic performance, concentration,
balance, coordination, and self-esteem. Recent studies indicate that
playing outside even reduces the severity of symptoms of Attention
Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), which affects millions of
American children.
The Economy. The economic impacts of nature deficit are
significant. The costs of the childhood obesity epidemic to our public
health systems could reach $100 billion annually. Hunting and fishing
licenses sales have stagnated, resulting in severe cuts to state
resource agencies' budgets. A decline in outdoor retail sales, a $730
billion a year industry sector, may soon follow.
The Future of American Conservation. From the redwood forests to
the Gulf Stream waters, exploring the diverse landscapes of America has
shaped who we are as Americans. Children who spend time in nature are
more likely to have pro-environmental attitudes as adults. Time spent
in nature with an important adult often shapes a child's long-term
environmental ethic. If this nature deficit continues unabated, we may
face a dearth of environmental leaders, professionals, and advocates as
we try to conquer future environmental challenges like global warming.
We may also lose a unique aspect of our national culture and identity.
Solutions
We need to protect our children's future. To reverse nature
deficit, National Wildlife Federation is working to reconnect children
to nature through advocating for environmental education, educating our
public health community about nature deficit, increasing opportunities
for outdoor recreation experiences for children through better design
and access, and embarking on a national public outreach campaign to
encourage parents to build in regular time for outdoor play.
Several policy actions at the federal, state, local, and personal
level can make a difference, although I will focus the remainder of my
testimony on environmental education which would be strongly bolstered
by passage of the No Child Left Inside Act (H.R.3036).
Hands-on, experience-based environmental education can reconnect
kids to the natural world. The National Wildlife Federation supports
policies that invest in and increase opportunities for environmental
education to help reverse nature deficit. Environmental education
programs use the environment as an integrating context (EIC) across
disciplines, which often results in interdisciplinary, hands-on,
community-based projects that affect the local environment. There is
widespread public support for environmental education, with 95 percent
of adults and 96 percent of parents supporting environmental education
in public schools. Unfortunately, because of federal education
legislation, known as the ``No Child Left Behind'' Act, many schools
have reduced their environmental education budgets to meet these new
testing and curriculum requirements.
There are four major types of outdoor education programs that serve
to reconnect children to nature:
(1) investigational approaches;
(2) outdoor learning;
(3) place-based learning; and
(4) community service.
Traditional environmental problem solving in a community or
``investigational approaches'' have shown to increase test scores on
environmental knowledge, reading, and writing skills. Outdoor learning
programs like Outward Bound or the National Outdoor Leaderships Schools
have become ``meaningful lifetime experiences'' and often promote
environmental stewardship. Place-based education connects the school to
its immediate environment. Community service approaches advance
responsible environmental behaviors and give children an opportunity to
support local green spaces. Furthermore, experts note that if
environmental education is done right it can be worth up to $75 billion
a year in measurable environmental benefits.
In addition to connecting kids to nature, integrating environmental
education into school programs has proven academic benefits:
Sparks Interest in Science and Math as Future Career Pathways.
According to the National Environmental Education Foundation, 80
percent of all students decide to opt out of science and math careers
before entering high school. Environmental education is a ``heuristic
tool for making science more relevant and appealing,'' and ``provides
an appealing entry point for students thinking about future careers.''
In one study, educators observed thousands of students in environmental
education programs and found that test scores improved across the
board. Science was on the only subject where 100 percent of the
students' scores improved.
Results in Better Math Scores. In a Houston schools study, fourth
grade students who participated in the National Wildlife Federation's
Schoolyard Habitat Program increased math scores significantly more
than peers with a traditional curriculum. Overall, minority children
showed more improvement.
Increases Academic Motivation and Attendance. A Washington state
study concluded that students enrolled in environmental education
programs showed better overall GPA improvements and increased
attendance and motivation. Another study showed that programs using the
environment as an integrating context (EIC) had better student
attendance rates 77 percent of the time and fewer discipline problems.
Closes the Gap in Underserved Communities and Serves as an
Educational Equalizer. A 2004 study evaluated a place-based
environmental education project in an under-resourced, predominantly
African-American Louisiana school district. The performance gap between
the district's performance and the state average on state educational
tests improved across all subject areas. The National Environmental
Education Foundation found that ``environment-based education appears
to be a kind of educational equalizer, improving reading, science
achievement, and critical thinking across ethnic and racial groups and
across socioeconomic levels.''
Improves Critical Thinking Skills. A recent study examined over 400
high school students in eleven Florida high schools and contrasted
students' critical thinking skills in environmental education programs
and traditional classes. The environmental education classes
significantly raised students' scores on two nationally recognized
critical thinking skills tests. Teachers concluded that students'
critical think-environmental programs involved interdisciplinary
problem-solving approaches, empowered students by allowing them to
choose their projects, and allowed students to connect their projects
to their communities.
Higher Standardized Test Scores in Reading, Math, Science, and
Social Studies. Numerous studies, including, an evaluation of student
performance in 40 schools in 12 states implementing environment as an
integrating context (EIC), show that students in EIC programs have
higher scores in reading, writing, math, science, and social studies.
Increases Self-Esteem and Science Scores. In California, a
comparison of at-risk sixth-grade students showed that students in
hands-on environmental education significantly raised their science
scores by 27 percent, and they showed better self-esteem, motivation,
and behavior.
Thank you once again for hosting this field hearing on
environmental education, a topic that is critical to the health of our
planet and to the health and educational achievement of our nation's
students. Thank you also to Education and Labor Committee Chairman
George Miller and Ranking Member Buck McKeon for including much of the
No Child Left Inside Act (H.R.3036) in the Education and Labor
Committee's staff draft of the No Child Left Behind reauthorization
bill. I urge you to pass the No Child Left Inside Act this year and I
look forward to working with you.
______
[The statement of Ms. Woolsey follows:]
Prepared Statement of Hon. Lynn C. Woolsey, a Representative in
Congress From the State of California
Thank you, Chairman Kildee, for holding this hearing on such an
important hearing: teaching our children about the environment and how
children can play key roles in preserving our world's future. This is a
topic that deserves more discussion and focus as we move towards
reauthorizing No Child Left Behind and as we continue discussions on
how to turn back the tide of global warming.
These environmental education programs, especially those that allow
students to get out of school and into nature for more hands-on
learning, provide invaluable lessons to our nation's children. The
programs can also teach students to be good stewards of the earth and
to become more active members in strengthening and preserving their
community. If taught early, these students can go on to play important
roles in protecting our environment.
Indeed, many students are being given the opportunity to make a
difference now. One program has provided students in my District with
the opportunity to participate in hands-on learning while also helping
to bring back an endangered species. The Students and Teachers
Restoring A Watershed (STRAW) Project in Marin County has provided
teachers and students with the opportunity to learn about science and
the importance of preserving our environment at the same time. STRAW
grew out of the Shrimp Project, which was started in 1993 when a group
of students and teachers worked together to try to find a way to bring
back the endangered California freshwater shrimp, which was once
prevalent but, by 1993, were only found in some areas of the Bay area
creeks. These students worked together with their teachers, scientists,
restoration specialists, environmental organizations, public land
agencies, private landowners, and the community to take steps to
determine what this species needed to survive and how they could
provide this. These students participated in bird and aquatic insect
studies, water quality monitoring, planting of native plants, nature
writing, and other activities. Due, at least in part, to their
activities, within 2 years of the start of their project, the
California freshwater shrimp began to make a comeback in the creek in
which the students were working.
The STRAW project now reaches 1,200 K-12 students each year. They
plant an average of 2,200 native plants a year at 25 different
restoration sites, restoring about four acres of creek bank each year.
These students also work on erosion control projects and removal of
non-native and invasive vegetation. This project is a great example of
how hands-on environmental learning can both compliment what students
are learning in school while giving students the opportunities to learn
how to be protect the environment. These students have been able to
learn about and practice scientific and mathematic principles and
methods, as well as working on their writing and artwork. This kind of
project teaches students how their subject areas can be tied together
and how the students themselves can be connected to the community.
The Edible Schoolyard is another great example of how students can
learn about protecting the environment while applying what they learn
in the classroom to more real world concepts. In the 1990s, chef Alice
Waters worked with the principal and teachers at the King Middle School
in Berkeley, California, and members of the community to turn an
abandoned lot adjacent to the school into a garden. Students and
teachers participated in everything from removing asphalt and putting
down soil to designing the garden. Today, the program is a key part of
the middle school where students garden and learn about cooking
nutritional meals out of what they've grown. Students are learning
about nutrition, ecology, and how they can be connected to and thus
good stewards of land. Since the creation of the Edible School Garden
at King Middle School, similar models have sprung up all over
California and across the nation. Many of these great programs are in
my District.
These programs are just two examples of the potential of offering
environmental education programs to our schoolchildren. As we look
towards ensuring that every student has the best possible education, we
cannot forget that the best education educates the whole child.
Children must continue to have access to all subjects, not just those
that are tested. Environmental education is one great way to tie
together so many of these important subjects and lessons while also
teaching students about their environment and how to play an integral
role in preserving it for their future and the future of their children
and grandchildren. I look forward to working together to find ways to
promote and encourage environmental education and continuing to create
these future stewards of the environment.
______
[Additional material submitted by Governor O'Malley
follows:]
Executive Order (01.01.2008.06)
Maryland Partnership for Children in Nature
WHEREAS, The natural world is a successful model for many values that
human communities seek: continuity, stability and sustenance,
adaptation, sustained productivity, renewal without exhaustion
of resources, and thriving in an environment of diversity;
WHEREAS, To sustain the natural world in Maryland-including the
Chesapeake Bay and hundreds of thousands of acres of diverse
land and habitat-requires the stewardship of future generations
and business leaders;
WHEREAS, Stewardship is not possible without a strong sense of
connection to the natural world;
WHEREAS, Maryland's children are losing their connection with our
natural world, an alienation that threatens the future of
Maryland's great natural resources and the quality of life for
future citizens, diminishes use of the senses, creates
attention difficulties and causes higher rates of physical and
emotional illness and obesity;
WHEREAS, Spending frequent time outdoors in unstructured and structured
experiences is the best way to develop a connection to nature
and the foundation on which to build an environmental
stewardship ethic;
WHEREAS, There is a need to continue and expand outreach that will
engage individuals and organizations in the minority community
in partnerships with State government in promoting a high
standard of life through the conservation, restoration and
preservation of natural resources;
WHEREAS, Environmental education increases student engagement in
science, improves student achievement in core subject areas,
and increases student awareness about individual actions they
can take to restore the health of the natural environment; and
WHEREAS, Maryland must renew its efforts to ensure that its children
grow to become informed and responsible stewards of the
environment and prepared for future environmental challenges
and opportunities as individual citizens and as members of the
workforce.
NOW, THEREFORE, I MARTIN O'MALLEY GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND
BY VIRTUE OF THE AUTHORITY VESTED IN ME BY THE CONSTITUTION AND THE
LAWS OF MARYLAND, HEREBY PROCLAIM THE FOLLOWING EXECUTIVE ORDER,
EFFECTIVELY IMMEDIATELY:
A. Established. There is a Maryland Partnership for Children in
Nature (The Partnership) to promote outdoor experiential activities and
environmental education for Maryland's young people and to build a
coalition of ongoing support for these endeavors.
B. Membership. The Partnership shall include the following members:
(1) The Secretary of Natural Resources, or the Secretary's
designee;
(2) The Superintendent of the State Department of Education, or the
Superintendent's designee;
(3) One representative of the Chesapeake Bay Trust;
(4) Two representatives of non-profit organizations dedicated to
environmental education;
(5) One representative of the Maryland Association for
Environmental and Outdoor Education;
(6) One representative of a Parent Teacher Organization
(7) Two representatives of local governments that have demonstrated
leadership in sustainable development practices;
(8) One representative (teacher or principal) from a Maryland Green
School that has completed a Schoolyard Habitat project;
(9) Two representatives of urban youth-based organizations;
(10) One representative of the Maryland Recreation and Parks
Association;
(11) One representative of the pediatric medical field;
(12) A former member of the Task Force on Minority Participation in
the Environmental Community;
(13) Two representatives of the business community with
demonstrated leadership in supporting children in nature; and
(14) One representative of the National Wildlife Federation.
C. Appointment and Terms. The members identified in B(3) through
B(14) of this Executive Order shall be appointed by the Governor, with
the advice of the Secretary of Natural Resources and the Superintendent
of Education. Such members shall serve at the pleasure of the Governor
for 2-year terms.
D. Meetings. The Partnership shall meet at the call of the Chairs.
E. Procedures. A majority of the Partnership constitutes a quorum
for the transaction of any business. The Partnership may adopt any
other procedures and by-laws necessary to ensure the orderly
transaction of business.
F. Expenses. Members of the Partnership shall serve without
compensation for their services, but they may receive reimbursement for
reasonable expenses incurred in the performance of their duties in
accordance with the Standard State Travel Regulations and as provided
in the State budget.
G. Consultation. The Partnership shall consult with and engage
leadership and staff from all other Maryland Executive Departments and
independent agencies, federal and local government representatives.
H. Chair. The Partnership shall be co-chaired by the Secretary of
Natural Resources, or the Secretary's designee, and the Superintendent
of Education, or the Superintendent's designee.
I. Staff Coordination. The Department of Natural Resources shall
provide staff support for the Partnership in coordination with the
State Department of Education and other State agencies and other
partners as directed by the Chairs.
J. Working Groups. The Partnership shall be supported by working
groups, to be established by the Chairs, to lead the major tasks
identified under this Executive Order.
K. Responsibilities. The Partnership shall promote the well-being
of youth by providing opportunities for increased time spent outdoors
and environmental literacy through outdoor experiential activities and
formal and non-formal environmental education. The Partnership shall:
(1) Develop and implement a plan to provide youth with structured
and unstructured opportunities for play, outdoor recreation, learning
and scientific study to include:
(a) Strategies that provide increased support for Schoolyard
Habitat Programs, which support the conversion of schoolyards to
natural habitats for play and outdoor classrooms;
(b) Creation of trails to connect communities, parks and schools
via trail systems that encourage walking, biking and increased time
outdoors by youth and families;
(c) Greening initiatives that create nature play areas within
communities to provide outdoor experiences for children close to home;
(d) A statewide Civic Justice Corps to provide at-risk youth with
opportunities to serve in conservation crews in State Parks and other
public lands in partnership with the Maryland Department of Juvenile
Services and community non-profit organizations;
(e) An outdoor classroom program that provides voluntary
curriculum-aligned programming and service learning opportunities on
public lands in cooperation with local county school systems, local
parks and non-profit organizations;
(f) Increased access to naturalists on State Parks and public lands
to provide interpretive activities for children and families to enhance
their discovery and enjoyment of Maryland's natural resources; and
(g) Increased opportunities for under-served communities to access
Maryland State Parks and public lands through partnerships with
organizations that serve minority students;
(2) Develop and implement a State Environmental Literacy Plan to
include:
(a) A review of current environmental education efforts in Maryland
schools, including the environmental education bylaw, the Chesapeake
2000 commitments, and student environmental literacy levels;
(b) Identification of curriculum necessary to develop
environmentally literate students;
(c) Identification of model outdoor field and service learning
experiences that can be integrated into the regular school curriculum;
(d) Professional development opportunities for in-service teachers,
pre-service teachers, and non-formal environmental educators;
(e) Methods to annually measure and report at the State and local
level, progress of public school students toward becoming
environmentally literate graduates; and
(f) A process for revising or updating the environmental literacy
plan every five years, or as needed;
(3) Devise a method of measuring baseline data and increased time
spent in nature by children;
(4) Identify opportunities and barriers to support implementation
of programs in local school systems and on public lands; and
(5) Present these plans and a status report on their implementation
to the Governor by January 1, 2009.
GIVEN Under My Hand and the Great Seal of the State of
Maryland, in the City of Annapolis, this 21st Day of April
2008.
Martin O'Malley,
Governor.
ATTEST:
Dennis Schnepfe,
Interim Secretary of State.
______
[Whereupon, at 1:00 p.m., the Subcommittee was adjourned.]