[Senate Hearing 109-199]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
S. Hrg. 109-199
NOMINATIONS OF RICHARD L. SKINNER AND BRIAN D. MILLER
=======================================================================
HEARING
before the
COMMITTEE ON
HOMELAND SECURITY AND GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS
UNITED STATES SENATE
ONE HUNDRED NINTH CONGRESS
FIRST SESSION
ON THE
NOMINATIONS OF RICHARD L. SKINNER TO BE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF THE
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, AND BRIAN D. MILLER TO BE THE
INSPECTOR GENERAL OF THE GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
__________
JULY 18, 2005
__________
Printed for the use of the
Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
23-161 WASHINGTON : 2006
_____________________________________________________________________________
For Sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office
Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800; (202) 512�091800
Fax: (202) 512�092250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402�090001
COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY AND GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS
SUSAN M. COLLINS, Maine, Chairman
TED STEVENS, Alaska JOSEPH I. LIEBERMAN, Connecticut
GEORGE V. VOINOVICH, Ohio CARL LEVIN, Michigan
NORM COLEMAN, Minnesota DANIEL K. AKAKA, Hawaii
TOM COBURN, Oklahoma THOMAS R. CARPER, Delaware
LINCOLN D. CHAFEE, Rhode Island MARK DAYTON, Minnesota
ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah FRANK LAUTENBERG, New Jersey
PETE V. DOMENICI, New Mexico MARK PRYOR, Arkansas
JOHN W. WARNER, Virginia
Michael D. Bopp, Staff Director and Chief Counsel
Jennifer A. Hemingway, Professional Staff Member
Joyce A. Rechtschaffen, Minority Staff Director and Counsel
Adam R. Sedgewick, Minority Professional Staff Member
Trina D. Tyrer, Chief Clerk
C O N T E N T S
------
Opening statements:
Page
Senator Collins.............................................. 1
Senator Akaka................................................ 3
Senator Warner............................................... 3
WITNESSES
Monday, July 18, 2005
Hon. George Allen, a U.S. Senator from the State of Virginia..... 5
Richard L. Skinner to be Inspector General, U.S. Department of
Homeland Security.............................................. 7
Brian D. Miller to be Inspector General, General Services
Administration................................................. 9
Alphabetical List of Witnesses
Allen, Hon. George:
Testimony.................................................... 5
Miller, Brian D.:
Testimony.................................................... 9
Prepared statement........................................... 71
Biographical and professional information.................... 73
Responses to pre-hearing questions........................... 78
Responses to post-hearing questions.......................... 97
Skinner, Richard L:
Testimony.................................................... 7
Prepared statement........................................... 17
Biographical and professional information.................... 21
Responses to pre-hearing questions........................... 25
Responses to post-hearing questions.......................... 63
NOMINATIONS OF RICHARD L. SKINNER AND BRIAN D. MILLER
----------
MONDAY, JULY 18, 2005
U.S. Senate,
Committee on Homeland Security
and Governmental Affairs,
Washington, DC.
The Committee met, pursuant to notice, at 2 p.m., in room
562, Dirksen Senate Office Building, Hon. Susan M. Collins,
Chairman of the Committee, presiding.
Present: Senators Collins, Warner, and Akaka.
OPENING STATEMENT OF CHAIRMAN COLLINS
Chairman Collins. The Committee will come to order.
Good afternoon. Today, the Committee will consider the
nominations of Richard Skinner to be Inspector General of the
Department of Homeland Security and Brian Miller to be
Inspector General of the General Services Administration.
Congress enacted the Inspector General Act of 1978 in
response to growing concerns that Federal agencies did not have
sufficient internal protections against waste, fraud, and
abuse. The Act has been amended several times to add new IGs
and to clarify reporting requirements, but its basic tenets
have remained constant: To provide independent voices in
promoting the ``economy, efficiency, and effectiveness'' of
programs and operations. Billions of dollars have been
recovered or saved based upon IG recommendations, and thousands
of prosecutions have resulted from those investigations.
In recent years, the responsibilities of IGs have expanded
in response to new challenges. IGs today play increasingly
vital role within their agencies by conducting financial
audits, reporting on Results Act compliance and accountability,
and assessing information security efforts.
Nowhere is the role of the Inspector General more important
than at the Department of Homeland Security. This relatively
new and extraordinarily large Department poses management and
other challenges that demand oversight like few others. The
execution of the DHS mission is crucial to our Nation, and
effective, ongoing internal oversight is essential.
As the Department begins to adopt the restructuring
proposed in Secretary Chertoff's just-completed Second Stage
Review, this oversight will be even more important.
Our nominees' willingness to work closely with the
Committee will be critical to our continued oversight of both
Departments.
Richard Skinner became the first Deputy Inspector General
at the Department of Homeland Security on March 1, 2003, the
date that office was established. He assumed the role of Acting
Inspector General on December 8, 2004.
Prior to joining DHS, Mr. Skinner was with the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), where he served as both
Deputy and Acting Inspector General. And prior to that, he
served in the Office of Inspector General at the Departments of
State, Commerce, Justice, and Agriculture.
In all, he has dedicated more than 36 years to good
government as a member of the audit and Inspector General
community.
Mr. Skinner is no stranger to this Committee. He has
provided valuable testimony at two hearings so far this year--
in January on DHS management challenges, and in May, on FEMA's
disaster relief efforts last year in Florida. So we welcome you
back, Mr. Skinner.
Another Federal agency at which effective, ongoing internal
oversight is paramount is the General Services Administration.
As the provider of office space, equipment, supplies,
telecommunications, and information technology throughout the
Federal Government, GSA is the gateway for nearly $66 billion
in Federal spending. The agency also has a central role in the
management of some $500 billion in Federal assets, including
more than 8,300 government-owned or leased buildings, a fleet
of more than 170,000 vehicles, and computer systems worth
hundreds of millions of dollars.
With the financial stakes so high, it is imperative that
GSA provide taxpayers with the best possible return on
investment in terms of value, efficiency, and integrity. As
this Committee knows all too well, this has not always been the
case. From our investigations of Federal real estate, purchase
cards, and agency vehicle fleets, we have seen that GSA has not
kept sufficient track of these valuable taxpayer-owned assets.
GSA faces significant challenges. From his responses to our
pre-hearing questions, it appears that this Inspector General
nominee, Mr. Miller, knows full well how serious these
challenges are. He recognizes that much of what GSA does has a
tremendous impact across every agency of government, and thus a
great impact upon the American people. He has stated his
commitment to strengthening GSA performance by conducting
independent and objective audits and investigations, and by
seeking legislative and regulatory remedies when needed.
Mr. Miller currently is Cousnel to the U.S. Attorney for
the Eastern District of Virginia. Prior to that, he served as
Senior Counsel to the Deputy Attorney General, an Assistant
U.S. Attorney, and a Senior Attorney-Advisor at the Department
of Justice. During that time, he has supervised audits and
investigations of procurement, grant, and healthcare fraud. He
has worked with Inspector Generals in prosecuting criminal and
civil cases, and, in fact, has provided training to the
Inspector General community on conducting effective
investigations.
Mr. Miller has a very impressive background, he has the two
distinguished Senators from the Commonwealth of Virginia here
to comment on his background, I am going to allow those who
know him better than I to speak to his qualifications.
I welcome Mr. Miller to the Committee. I know we will be
working closely with both of our nominees today. I look forward
to the testimony of both of these nominees.
I would now like to call upon Senator Akaka for his opening
comments.
OPENING STATEMENT OF SENATOR AKAKA
Senator Akaka. Thank you, Madam Chairman. Senator Allen,
good to have you with us. Mr. Skinner and Mr. Miller, I welcome
you to this Committee, and I welcome your families, who are
seated back of you, to this Committee. I want to congratulate
each of you on your nominations.
In 2003, we celebrated the 25th anniversary of the
Inspector General Act. Through amendments to the Act and the
hard work and the dedication of the IG community, IGs have
established themselves as independent voices for economy,
efficiency, and effectiveness within the Federal Government.
IGs are also responsible for protecting employees from
retaliation for blowing the whistle on waste, fraud, and abuse.
We all agree that Federal employees should be at liberty to
report such matters without fear of losing their jobs.
As you know, this Committee and the Congress depend on the
integrity and frequency of your reports for assisting in our
oversight role of the Executive Branch.
Mr. Skinner, under your predecessor, the DHS IG office
established a reputation for thorough and insightful analysis.
If confirmed, I hope you will continue that practice.
You both face significant challenges. DHS and GSA have
programs on the Government Accountability Office high-risk
list, which are identified as having the greatest risk of
waste, fraud, abuse, and mismanagement. Solutions to these
problems have the potential to save billions of dollars. Mr.
Miller, you will have your work cut out for you, particularly
in the areas of interagency contracting, technology
procurement, and Federal real property management. And, Mr.
Skinner, as you know from your present position, there are many
challenges at DHS, including management transformation, human
capital management, procurement, and information security, to
name a few.
And with that, I welcome you to this Committee. Thank you.
Chairman Collins. Thank you, Senator.
I would now like to recognize the distinguished Chairman of
the Armed Services Committee and a very valuable Member of this
Committee, Senator Warner.
OPENING STATEMENT OF SENATOR WARNER
Senator Warner. Thank you very much, Madam Chairman, and I
join with you in welcoming these distinguished individuals. As
I look back over my experience here in the Senate of quite a
few years, this is a very important hearing because each of you
have been carefully selected by the President, and I commend
you for that first step. And I am confident of confirmation.
But you will undertake a challenge unlike others in public
service in that you want to express a loyalty to the Cabinet
Officer, under whom you serve, and/or the head of the agency.
And at the same time, you must, in order to fulfill your
statutory mandate, find within yourself the courage to speak
absolutely to the accuracy of the facts and your own opinion.
It is not easy. The system has worked, I think, reasonably
effectively in the years I have been here, and I was here when
this statute was first passed, so I can speak from some modest
observation. But it is going to be a challenge, and the
distinguished Chairman has completely outlined the essential
facts that are necessary for this hearing. I would ask to put
mine into the record.
But I would ask each of you now, particularly, Mr. Skinner,
you are almost, I think you would say, a professional Inspector
General. Would you kindly introduce the family that has
accompanied you today because this is a very important hearing
for them, too.
Mr. Skinner. Well, thank you, Senator. I would be glad to.
Seated right behind me is my wife, Barbara, and my youngest
daughter, Heidi, right here.
Senator Warner. We welcome you.
Mr. Skinner. My oldest daughter, Tasha, lives and works in
San Francisco, and was unable to make the trip today to be
here. But I would like to say, if I may, they have been and are
my bedrock, and just for the record I would like to express my
sincere thanks to them for their sustained support of me over
the years as I pursued my Federal career.
Senator Warner. Well, this Committee welcomes that
representation, and we thank you very much.
Now, Mr. Miller, your family?
Mr. Miller. Thank you, Senator. Behind me is my daughter,
Rosemary.
Senator Warner. Rosemary, we welcome you.
Mr. Miller. My wife, Mary Frances, and my son, Andrew.
Senator Warner. Andrew, nice to see you.
Mr. Miller. And, I, too, thank my family for their
sacrifice. Often public service can be hard on a family, and I
would like to thank them for their sacrifice and their support.
Senator Warner. Well, each of you is going to be entrusted
with one of the more complicated portfolios of decisions
because homeland security is rapidly expanding, if I may say
under the distinguished oversight of this distinguished
Chairman and Ranking Member of this Committee, and others on
the Committee. And your agency has been around a long time. I
see that from the perspective of this Committee on which I
serve and also the Environment and Public Works Committee. And
I have had a long affiliation with your agency, and I wish you
well because it, too, has had a record of some problems in the
past and my very best good luck to you as you address the
complicated matrix of decisions that will come before you.
With that, Madam Chairman, I yield the floor to my
distinguished colleague, if I may.
[The prepared statement of Senator Warner follows:]
PREPARED STATEMENT OF SENATOR WARNER
Chairman Collins, Senator Lieberman, and my other distinguished
colleagues on the Senate's Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
Committee, I thank you for holding this confirmation hearing.
Today, I am pleased to introduce to you, Mr. Skinner, who has been
nominated to serve as the Inspector General of the Department of
Homeland Security. Mr. Skinner is supported here today by his wife
Barbara and his youngest daughter Heidi.
Subsequent to earning his B.S. degree in business administration
from Fairmont State College in 1968, Mr. Skinner has served as a
dedicated public servant for over 35 years. Mr. Skinner began his
Federal career in the Office of Inspector General at the U.S.
Department of Agriculture (USDA) as an auditor.
Since working at USDA, Mr. Skinner has worked in five other Federal
agencies' Offices of Inspector General. Most recently, he has served as
the Acting Inspector General of Homeland Security.
Having worked exclusively within the Inspector General community,
Mr. Skinner has had the opportunity to rise through the ranks in a
variety of management and executive positions. Consequently, he has
participated in and directed all operational functions associated with
an Office of Inspector General.
Madam Chairwoman, obviously, Mr. Skinner is highly qualified to
serve as Inspector General of the Department of Homeland Security. I
urge my colleagues to support his nomination, and I look forward to the
Committee reporting out his nomination favorably.
Also, today, I am pleased to introduce to you, Mr. Miller, who has
been nominated to serve as the Inspector General of the General
Services Administration. Mr. Miller is supported here today by his wife
Mary Frances, his son Andrew, and his daughter Rosemary.
The job of Inspector General is a critical one, tasked with the
responsibility of detecting and deterring waste, fraud, and abuse
within the agency. Mr. Miller has a strong legal background and
extensive work experience in the Federal Government, which makes him
highly qualified to serve in this position.
Subsequent to earning his B.A. at Temple University and J.D. at the
University of Texas, Mr. Miller has served as a public servant for
nearly two decades. For over a decade now, Mr. Miller has served as an
Assistant U.S. Attorney in a diverse number of roles and has handled
many cases. In one such role, he assisted in some of the most important
terrorism cases the Federal Government has pursued since the September
11 attacks, including United States v. Moussaoui.
In addition, Mr. Miller served as the Special Counsel on Health
Care Fraud. In that position, Mr. Miller was charged with overseeing
the U.S. Department of Justice's health care fraud litigation,
prosecution, and policy development within the Department.
Madam Chairman, obviously, Mr. Miller is highly qualified to serve
as Inspector General of the General Services Administration. I urge my
colleagues to support his nomination, and I look forward to the
Committee reporting out his nomination favorably.
Chairman Collins. Thank you. Senator Allen, we are
delighted to have you with us today to introduce the nominee.
STATEMENT OF HON. GEORGE ALLEN, A U.S. SENATOR FROM THE STATE
OF VIRGINIA
Senator Allen. Thank you, Madam Chairman, Senator Akaka,
and my good colleague, Senator Warner. Thank you all for
allowing me to have this opportunity to present to you Mr.
Miller, who the President has nominated to be Inspector General
of the General Services Administration.
I consider Mr. Miller to be a trusted friend. His family
has been introduced here, they are proud residents of
Fredericksburg, Virginia. I heard you all talking about
economy, value, and efficiency. I asked his son, Andrew, what
were the gas prices at the Wawa Station in Fredericksburg; he
knew it was $2.19. As my colleague Senator Warner knows, I look
for efficiency, value, and economy in fuel prices, and so that
is a good sign that young Andrew here doesn't want to squander
money on paying unnecessarily high prices for gasoline.
At any rate, I, Madam Chairman and Members of the
Committee, highly recommend Mr. Miller for confirmation as an
Inspector General for the General Services Administration. For
nearly 20 years, Mr. Miller has dedicated his professional life
to public service. Whether as a leader in the community in
Fredericksburg, Alexandria, or in Washington, DC, he has worked
closely with some of the most effective leaders of our time.
Mr. Miller has provided wise counsel to FBI Director, Robert
Mueller, when he was Acting Deputy Attorney General. He also
gave counsel to Deputy Attorney General Larry Thompson and our
outstanding U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia
presently, Paul McNulty.
Mr. Miller's skills are well respected and have been
utilized in a variety of different ways by different agencies
and prosecutions. In fact, even when there was a prosecution in
the Southern District of West Virginia that was in jeopardy
because of misconduct by the lead investigator, the Department
of Justice asked Mr. Miller to go down there to investigate the
investigation, to make sure that moved forward.
Now, as Inspector General, Mr. Miller is going to be
charged with the very important responsibility of preventing
waste, fraud, and abuse in an agency that, as you stated, has
one of the largest, if not the largest procurement budgets in
our whole government. It is a task that Mr. Miller is well
suited for. He has been a principal architect for U.S. Attorney
Paul McNulty's Federal Procurement Fraud Initiative. Mr.
Miller, therefore, is no stranger to this sort of prevention
and prosecution of procurement fraud. He has over 12 years of
experience as an assistant U.S. Attorney, and has handled
numerous procurement, health care, and grant fraud cases. He
has the legal courtroom experience to not just investigate, but
also prosecute, which I think will give his scrutiny and
eyeballing of what is going on added credibility, and hopefully
giving those who would be making these decisions the
understanding that there is someone watching who understands
what is going on.
And so, I believe for us in Congress, Mr. Miller is the
type of person we would want as we all care so much, regardless
of party, we don't want our taxpayers' dollars being wasted or
squandered or being misused, and Mr. Miller will be our eyes
and ears, not just ours, but also the taxpayers.
So I thank you Madam Chairman and Members of the Committee
for the courtesy provided to me here. I hope you will move
swiftly on Mr. Miller's nomination. I strongly endorse his
nomination and look forward to working for his confirmation on
the Senate floor. I thank you, all.
Chairman Collins. Thank you very much, Senator.
Your strong endorsement carries great weight with this
Committee, and we look forward to working with you.
I am aware that you have other scheduled appointments this
afternoon, and so we are pleased to excuse you at this time.
Senator Warner. Madam Chairman, he made reference to the
young Mr. Miller about the price of gas. [Laughter.]
I remember the night very well. The two of us had been on a
long trip, as most Senators, traveling in a small plane,
bouncing through the skies, finally arriving back at around 11
o'clock, having called our respective wives to join each other
and have a drink who had been waiting 2 hours late for us.
We then get into his beat up old SUV, and he finds it has
no gas in it. So now the problem is at this hour of the night
trying to find a gas station. And the first one was closed. The
second--when we started pumping, he would only have 90-cent
regular. That was all he was going to pay.
So they had five gallons. So we pumped that. We went to the
next gas station, and the fellow was all out of regular, but he
had some high test. And George said no, I am moving on. I said,
George, I am buying all the high test this guy has or I will
buy the gas station and give it to you. [Laughter.]
We finally got home. [Laughter.]
Chairman Collins. Well, I would have you know, Mr.
Chairman, that when I heard the price of gas in Virginia, I was
envious, since it was 15 cents lower than that in the State of
Maine this past weekend.
Senator Warner. I am out of here.
Chairman Collins. So thank you, Senator.
Senator Allen. Bring Senator Warner with you. He will pay
for that high test.
Chairman Collins. Yes. [Laughter.]
And that was just regular.
Senator Allen. Thank you.
Chairman Collins. I want to thank both of the Senators from
Virginia for being here in support of the nominees. Both
nominees have filed responses to biographical and financial
questionnaires, answered pre-hearing questions submitted by the
Committee, and had their financial statements reviewed by the
Office of Government Ethics. Without objection, this
information will be made part of the hearing record, with the
exception of the financial data, which are on file and
available for public inspection in the Committee offices.
Our Committee rules require that all witnesses at
nomination hearings give their testimony under oath. So I would
ask that you both stand at this time and raise your right hand.
[Witnesses sworn.]
Chairman Collins. You may be seated.
Mr. Skinner, I would ask that you proceed first with your
statement.
TESTIMONY OF RICHARD L. SKINNER,\1\ TO BE INSPECTOR GENERAL,
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Mr. Skinner. Thank you, Chairman Collins.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The prepared statement of Mr. Skinner appears in the Appendix
on page 17.
The biographical information and questionnaire appears in the
Appendix on page 21.
The pre-hearing questionnaire appears in the Appendix on page 25.
The post-hearing questions appears in the Appendix on page 63.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Senator Akaka, I would like to thank you for having this
hearing today on my nomination, and I'd also like to thank
Senator Warner for taking time out of his busy schedule to be
here today as well.
Again, I express my sincere thanks to President Bush for
the confidence that he has shown by nominating me for such a
high Federal position.
The importance of the Department's mission cannot be
overstated. And by conducting independent and objective audits,
investigations, and inspections, the Inspector General can play
a very critical or very important role in aiding the Department
to accomplish its mission.
Since their arrival in the Department several months ago,
I've had the opportunity to meet with Secretary Chertoff and
Deputy Secretary Jackson on several occasions. They both
underscored their appreciation of the Inspector General's
oversight role and dual reporting responsibilities. I thank
them for their support.
Based upon my experience today, I am confident that, if
confirmed, I will have a very close working relationship with
them both.
Furthermore, since March 2003, I've had the privilege to
serve with some of the most dedicated employees in the Federal
Government. I cannot begin to tell you how rewarding it has
been over the past 28 plus months to work side by side with the
men and women employed within both the Department and the OIG.
I would like to take a moment now to provide you a brief
summary of my work experience and what I would bring to the
Inspector General job, if confirmed.
I feel as though I've been training for this job for the
past 36 plus years. I spent my entire Federal career in
Inspector General organizations dedicated solely to the
implementation of the principles specified in the Inspector
General Act. My background has afforded me the opportunity to
be involved in all operational functions associated with an
Office of Inspector General. I believe this experience has
prepared me to perform the duties of an Inspector General with
confidence and integrity.
If confirmed, I would bring that experience, knowledge,
dedication, and independence to the job as the Inspector
General of the Department of Homeland Security.
There are several lessons I've learned over the years. One
is the importance of teamwork. Notwithstanding the independent
role of the OIG, the Inspector General must work to build
relationships within the Department and the Congress,
relationships that are based on trust and mutual respect, and a
shared commitment to improving the Department's operations and
programs.
If confirmed, I pledge to keep both the Secretary and the
Congress currently informed and to promote the open exchange of
information and ideas.
Second, it is imperative that the Inspector General has the
flexibility to respond to unanticipated requirements or
conditions and to do so in a timely manner.
If confirmed, I would stand ready to initiate special
reviews responsive to the needs of the Secretary and the
Congress on short notice.
The third and possibly most important lesson is never to
rest on your laurels. The Inspector General must continually
strive to do better, to anticipate ways in which operations can
be improved, both within the Department and within the OIG
itself.
If confirmed, I would very much look forward to working
closely and routinely with this Committee, as well as the many
other congressional committees with homeland security oversight
responsibilities, and I pledge to carry out my responsibilities
as Inspector General to the very best of my ability, with
enthusiasm and dedication, and in an objective, independent,
and apolitical manner.
Madam Chairman, that concludes my statement. I'd be pleased
to answer any questions.
Chairman Collins. Thank you. Mr. Miller.
TESTIMONY OF BRIAN D. MILLER\1\, TO BE INSPECTOR GENERAL,
SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
Mr. Miller. Chairman Collins, Senator Akaka, and Members of
the Committee, thank you for the opportunity to appear before
you today.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The prepared statement of Mr. Miller appears in the Appendix on
page 71.
The biographical information and questionnaire appears in the
Appendix on page 73.
The pre-hearing questionnaire of appears in the Appendix on page
78.
The post-hearing questions appears in the Appendix on page 97.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I've also submitted a written statement that I would ask be
included in the record.
Chairman Collins. Without objection.
Mr. Miller. Thank you. It is an extraordinary honor and
privilege to be the President's nominee to serve as the
Inspector General of the General Services Administration.
I'd also like to thank Senators Warner and Allen from my
home state of Virginia for their kind introduction. I really
appreciate their support throughout this nomination process.
I'd also like to thank the members of my family, again, and
I'm also encouraged by so many of my friends and colleagues who
have come here to this hearing.
If confirmed, I welcome the challenges of this position at
this historic time, and I will work hard every day to carry out
my responsibilities. I also look forward to working with you
and the other Senators and Members of Congress to achieve our
mutual goals for the operations of the General Services
Administration.
Chairman Collins, thank you for allowing me to testify here
this afternoon. I would be happy to answer any questions that
you or other Members of the Committee may have. Thank you.
Chairman Collins. Thank you very much. I will start my
questioning with standard questions that we ask of all nominees
who come before this Committee.
First, is there anything that you are aware of in your
background which might present a conflict of interest with the
duties of the office to which you have been nominated? Mr.
Skinner.
Mr. Skinner. No, Madam Chairman.
Chairman Collins. Mr. Miller.
Mr. Miller. No, Madam Chairman.
Chairman Collins. Two, do you know of anything, personal or
otherwise, that would in any way prevent you from fully and
honorably discharging the responsibilities of the office to
which you have been nominated? Mr. Skinner.
Mr. Skinner. No.
Chairman Collins. Mr. Miller.
Mr. Miller. No.
Chairman Collins. And finally, on this segment, do you
agree without reservation to respond to any reasonable summons
to appear and testify before any duly constituted Committee of
Congress if you are confirmed? Mr. Skinner.
Mr. Skinner. Absolutely.
Chairman Collins. Mr. Miller.
Mr. Miller. I will.
Chairman Collins. Well, you both passed that section very
well.
I will now do a round of questions limited to 8 minutes
each.
Mr. Miller, I have long been concerned about whether the
Federal Government is doing enough to protect the integrity of
the procurement process. One essential area is determining
whether or not government contractors are responsible under the
law as the Federal Acquisition Regulations require.
For some time, I have questioned whether GSA has done
everything that it could in the area of debarring or suspending
contractors who fail to meet ethical standards or in some cases
may have been convicted of a crime. This Committee pursued at
great length the WorldCom situation, where GSA was very slow to
make a responsibility determination to determine whether this
major telecommunications contractor should continue to do
business with the Federal Government. I wasn't prejudging the
outcome of that process, but I was concerned that but for this
Committee's prompting GSA to begin its analysis and review it
might never have reached a determination.
Similarly, this Committee's Permanent Subcommittee on
Investigations has held hearings over the past 2 years that
have revealed that numerous Federal contractors have
deliberately failed to pay taxes that they owe, payroll taxes,
for example. One problem is that the Federal contracting
officials often delay in taking action against the contractor
until an investigative agency brings charges against them or
even in some cases until a conviction is secured.
Do you see any opportunity for the GSA IG to take a more
active role in probing Federal contractors, since GSA is the
largest procurement agency and maintains the debarment and
suspension list upon which other agencies rely?
Mr. Miller. Thank you for the question, Chairman Collins. I
share your concern regarding contractors who have defrauded the
Federal Government or have not paid taxes, and I, too, would
like to see them debarred. And that is an issue that when I did
meet with the former Inspector General, Dan Levinson, I brought
that up with him, and we had a discussion about debarment
practices and bringing action against those individuals.
In fact, we talked about WorldCom. So I share your concern.
If confirmed, I would do everything in my power to pursue
debarment and administrative remedies against contractors who
are engaged in defrauding the government or misusing government
funds, and I would like to see our office move in a direction
where it is much easier for contracting officers to recognize
the potential for debarment proceedings earlier on in the
investigation or if they see an irregularity. I would strive to
work closer with contracting officers so that we can move more
quickly against Federal contractors who are engaged in fraud or
abuse of the contract.
So I would do all in my power, if confirmed.
Chairman Collins. Thank you. Mr. Skinner, you made a very
important point in your opening statement when you talked about
the necessity for the IG not only to be the independent
watchdog, but to build relationships with managers in the
Department so that you can help them avoid problems that
improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the delivery of
Federal programs.
In that regard, could you tell us whether you had any role
in the second stage review recently undertaken by the Secretary
of Homeland Security, which has led to significant
reorganization proposals for the Department?
Mr. Skinner. Madam Chairman, we were involved in this since
March 2003. We've had the opportunity to issue several reports
in which we questioned organizational structure and as well as
delivery of different services within the Department. What we
did, working with the Deputy Secretary, is to analyze all of
our recommendations and all of our outstanding recommendations
and to overlay those with the recommendations that were coming
in from the other 17 working groups--I believe there were 18
working groups under the 2SR--to see if there were any
contradictions or if there was anything that the Secretary
could use from an Inspector General report to support any
recommendations he may have. If there were differences, then
the Secretary was at least made aware of what those differences
are. That way, he can make an informed decision on which way he
would choose to go.
So in that sense, we were.
Also, we participated in the law enforcement working group.
That was one of the 18 working groups. We provided input to
that group relative to the internal affairs operations that are
scattered throughout the Department and the different bureaus
and directorates and how those interact with the OIG.
Chairman Collins. I am glad to hear that, and the Secretary
also told me that he had sought you out for your advice, which
I think is so important. The Secretary ought to view the
Inspector General as an ally, not an adversary, but that is not
always the case.
At a January hearing before this Committee, Mr. Skinner,
you kindly agreed to my request to conduct a review of whether
it made sense to merge two agencies in the Department, the CBP
and ICE.
As part of his second stage review, Secretary Chertoff
proposes to actually move the two agencies out from under the
control of a common directorate. I have told the Secretary that
this concerns me because it further separates them potentially.
He also told me, however, that he has not ruled out if some
management reforms he puts into place are not effective
eventually taking another look at combining the two agencies.
We have had experts recommend the merger of CBP and ICE to us.
It is not something that I have reached a decision on, but it
is something I am interested in hearing views on.
Could you tell us where you are in the review process and
whether you have reached any preliminary conclusions?
Mr. Skinner. Chairman Collins, I'm pleased to report that
if not today, tomorrow morning I will be signing a draft
report.
It's been an arduous journey in doing a task like this. We
have interviewed somewhere between 400 to 500 individuals
across the country, in all parts of the BTS, Bureau of
Transportation and Security, as well as those that the
Department services, interacts with, and that would be U.S.
Attorneys Offices, State, and local governments.
We have just over the weekend started pulling together all
of our conclusions. I have not seen the final draft. We keep
making adjustments to it. But I hope to have that signed
tomorrow, obtain comments from the Secretary himself, and have
a report up to you very shortly, hopefully within the next 30
days.
Chairman Collins. Excellent. Thank you. Senator Akaka.
Senator Akaka. Thank you, Madam Chairman.
Mr. Skinner, as I noted in my opening statement, I take the
issue of whistleblower protection very seriously. Good
government demands protection of employees who report waste,
fraud, and abuse.
Federal Inspectors General are key partners in
investigating whistleblower reprisal allegations. The number of
referrals of reprisal allegations from the Office of Special
Counsel to IGs is increasing.
Some OIGs have dedicated training units to handle such
cases, such as the Defense Department OIG, which has two
separate directorates for reprisal investigations, one for
military and one for civilian employees.
My questions are how does DHS OIG currently handle reprisal
investigations? And, in light of increases in referrals, how
will your office act to ensure that whistleblower reprisal
investigations are investigated properly?
Mr. Skinner. Senator Akaka, I share your concerns with
regard to the protections offered under the Whistleblower
Protection Act.
In order to be successful, the Whistleblower Protection Act
is something that we rely on very heavily. People have to be
secure in the knowledge that they can come to the OIG without
fear of reprisal. We work very closely with the Office of
Special Counsel when we receive allegations under the
Whistleblower Protection Act.
First of all, anytime we do get such an allegation, we
counsel those individuals on how far we can go with those
investigations. We contact the Office of Special Counsel to
seek their advice, their input as to how we should proceed with
these issues. If it's something that we can't handle or an
investigation that we can't pursue; that is, we would have to
share the identity of the allegator, then we would refer that
individual to Office of Special Counsel for further
investigation.
More often than not, those cases are referred back to us.
We have, in the past 2 years or in 2004, set up an Office of
Special Investigations within headquarters here in Washington
that handles all allegations that involve whistleblower
allegations. They pursue any of these special type cases where
people feel like they have been reprised against as a result of
coming to the OIG, or for that matter to OSC or to management
itself.
It is something we do take very seriously. Our success
depends on the ability of these people to come forward and be
truthful and forthright.
Senator Akaka. Thank you for your response. Mr. Miller,
would you care to comment on the role of the GSA Inspector
General in protecting whistleblowers and explain your view of
the responsibilities of the OIG and the Office of Special
Counsel in handling whistleblower retaliation cases?
Mr. Miller. OK. Thank you, Senator. I, too, share your
concern about whistleblowers. Whistleblowers are a very
important part of oversight of government operations. When I
was Special Counsel on Health Care Fraud for the Department of
Justice, I learned that it was very important to get--obtain
information from all sources, including whistleblowers. In
fact, some of our most significant cases started with
whistleblowers. We settled a case with TAP Pharmaceutical
Company. It ended up paying $875 million in criminal fines and
civil penalties and that began with a whistleblower.
So I do recognize the importance of whistleblowers, and I
believe they should be protected to the fullest extent
possible, and I see the role of the OIG as very important in
protecting them from retaliation.
Senator Akaka. Thank you. Mr. Skinner, TSA is the only
entity within DHS that is not required to follow the Federal
Acquisition Regulation. As you know, the DHS OIG and the
Government Accountability Office have audited TSA procurement
practices, and have questioned the cost and effectiveness of
many TSA contracts.
Your office attributed these problems to a lack of contract
oversight personnel, poor management by the contractors, and
weak financial controls at the agency.
Based on your investigations, do you believe TSA should
still be exempt from the FAR?
Mr. Skinner. That's an excellent question. The reports that
we issued with regard to TSA and the problems that they're
having with their procurement operations are somewhat dated.
Those procurements occurred generally in 2002 and in early
2003, keeping in mind in 2002 and early 2003, TSA only had 12
employees and only one contracting officer. Things have changed
considerably since then.
Today, they have over 70, close to 80, people dedicated to
a procurement. They have established an entire division for
procurement operations. They have an investment review board
now for anything that's procured over $50 million. They have a
review process for anything over $5 million. So things have
improved considerably since the early days of TSA in 2002 and
2003.
With regard to using the FAR versus the other acquisition
mechanisms, I think it's going to require a little closer study
on our behalf before we can offer an opinion on that. I have
been working with our Chief Procurement Executive within the
Department of Homeland Security to make a determination whether
it is still needed. At the time that they were stood up in
2002, the acquisition regulations under which they were
operating may have been necessary because of the imminent
requirement or the requirement to stand up so quickly, and they
required exemptions to enable them to do that.
Today, the dust has settled, and now we're moving at a more
steady pace. The question is could they operate under the FAR?
My initial reaction to that is yes, they could. But before we
draw that conclusion categorically, we have to study to see
what impact that would have on some of the procurements that
are currently underway and what their future plans are.
Senator Akaka. Chairman, I will wait for a second round.
Chairman Collins. Thank you.
Senator Akaka. Thank you.
Chairman Collins. Mr. Skinner, in response to the
Committee's written questions, you stated that at times the IG
office has had difficulty in obtaining information from within
the Department that it needed to conduct its investigations.
You specifically cited significant problems involving a case of
your review of a rendition of an individual to Syria. Are you
satisfied that you will have the cooperation of high-ranking
officials and the Secretary as far as getting timely access to
all the information you need to conduct your duties?
Mr. Skinner. Today, I'm very satisfied, Chairman Collins.
That particular case you're referring to is a very frustrating
process. It wasn't a matter of denial of access to records or
individuals. There were extenuating circumstances. There was an
outstanding civil suit. There was the question of whether the
Department was going to waive certain privileges through the
court proceedings.
That had to be resolved. There was also the issue of
classified material that was under what they call an
organizational control classification; that is, it was
classified by other departments, and to have access, approval
was required.
We had to work through that. It was the first time for
them. It was the first time for us. We have worked through
that. That particular case now is--we're moved very rapidly on
that now. We have resolved all those issues. And it was a good
lesson for us all because it taught us, a lot of people within
the Department, what our authority really is; that is, we have
unfettered access to individuals and records, and they
understand that now.
I've talked and met with Secretary Chertoff, Deputy
Secretary Jackson, General Counsel Phil Perry, and they've all
assured me that if we do not receive the information that we're
asking for, to report it to them immediately, and they will see
to it that we get it.
Chairman Collins. I am glad to hear that. I would also
encourage you to contact this Committee if ever you do run into
those difficulties and let us know.
Mr. Skinner. Rest assured, I will.
Chairman Collins. And, Mr. Miller, I would ask the same
commitment from you. If you run into difficulties in securing
documents or access to individuals within GSA that you believe
are necessary to carry out your responsibilities, I would ask
that you notify this Committee.
Mr. Miller. I certainly will.
Chairman Collins. Mr. Miller, I have one final question for
you. In January, the Government Accountability Office, GAO,
once again placed Federal real property management on its high-
risk list. This is at least the second time that the management
of real property has been on GAO's high-risk list. In doing so,
GAO noted that the area was designated as high-risk due to
``longstanding problems with excess and underutilized property,
deteriorating facilities, unreliable real property data, and
costly space challenges.'' GAO further stated, and this is even
more troubling, that the underlying conditions that led to the
high-risk designation continue, and more remains to be done to
address these problems and the obstacles that prevent agencies
from solving them.
This Committee did an in-depth investigation of this very
issue. We found countless cases of valuable Federal property
left to deteriorate. It is a real problem, and, as the landlord
for the Federal Government, this should be a matter of great
concern for the General Services Administration. What role do
you think that the IG could play in assisting GSA in getting a
handle on its real property and ensuring that the taxpayers'
investment is protected?
Mr. Miller. Thank you, Chairman Collins. I, too, share your
concern. It is imperative that GSA maintains proper management
of Federal real property and gets the best deal for the
taxpayers. All improper management should be remedied and
improvements made. Our Nation's building resources should not
remain unproductive.
If confirmed as Inspector General, I will attempt to ensure
that GSA makes better use of Federal property through audits,
through investigations, and through any other means. I consider
this a very important issue and will give it my full attention
if confirmed as Inspector General.
Chairman Collins. I hope that you will make this as a
personal priority a goal of getting the Federal property
management off the high-risk list so that we don't have exactly
this same conversation in 2007, when the GAO's list will come
out again.
Mr. Miller. Yes, Senator, I'll do my best.
Chairman Collins. Thank you. Senator Akaka.
Senator Akaka. Thank you very much, Madam Chairman. I have
further questions I would like to submit because I was just
informed that I have to leave to attend another meeting. So I
thank you very much, and I thank our witnesses very much for
their responses.
Chairman Collins. Thank you, Senator. I am very sympathetic
because I, too, have a BRAC meeting that is scheduled for this
afternoon. Mine is about a half hour from now. That is probably
good news for our next panel. But I do thank you for being here
today.
I want to thank both of our nominees for appearing before
the Committee. Without objection, the record will be kept open
until 10 a.m. tomorrow for the submission of any written
questions, statements, or other materials for the record.
In closing, let me just say that I feel we are very
fortunate that both of you have been tapped for your respective
posts. We need people like you who are willing to serve in such
an important position, and I thank you and your families for
your dedication to public service.
Mr. Miller. Thank you, Senator.
Mr. Skinner. Thank you.
Mr. Miller. Thank you, Madam Chairman.
Chairman Collins. We look forward to working very closely
with you. This hearing is now adjourned.
[Whereupon, at 2:49 p.m., the Committee was adjourned.]
A P P E N D I X
----------
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.001
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.002
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.005
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.006
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.007
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.008
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.009
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.010
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.011
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.012
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.013
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.014
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.015
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.016
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.017
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.018
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.019
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.020
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.021
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.022
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.023
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.024
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.025
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.026
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.027
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.028
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.029
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.030
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.031
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.032
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.033
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.034
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.035
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.036
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.037
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.038
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.039
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.040
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.041
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.042
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.043
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.044
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.045
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.046
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.047
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.048
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.073
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.074
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.075
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.076
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.077
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.078
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.079
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.080
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.003
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.004
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.049
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.050
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.051
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.052
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.053
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.054
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.055
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.056
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.057
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.058
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.059
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.060
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.061
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.062
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.063
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.064
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.065
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.066
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.067
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.068
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.069
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.070
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.071
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.072
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.081
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.082
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3161.083